HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-04-15; Planning Commission; ; PCD/GPC 09-01 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGETTfclty of Carlsbad Planning Department •
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 15, 2009
Item No. G)
Application complete date: NIA
Project Planner: Pam Drew
Project Engineer: Steve Jantz
SUBJECT: PCD/GPC 09-01 -CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
2009-2010 -Request for a Planning Commission Determination of General Plan
Consistency for the proposed Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Capital Improvement
Program Budget.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6554
APPROVING PCD/GPC 09-01 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
This project, the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Budget, is being presented to the Planning Commission for a determination of General Plan
consistency. The project consists of 9 new City CIP projects and 4 new CIP projects submitted
by Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) for a total of 13 new CIP projects (projects
which have not been included in previous years' CIP). Sections 65401 and 65402 of the State of
California Government Code require that new public works projects recommended for planning,
initiation, construction, or for property acquisition in the upcoming fiscal year be reviewed for
conformity with the adopted General Plan. Staff has reviewed all of the proposed new projects
included in this year's CIP and concludes that all are consistent with the General Plan.
Therefore, the General Plan consistency determination can be made.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The requested determination of General Plan consistency covers 13 new projects added to the
CIP for consideration as part of the proposed budget for fiscal year 2009-2010. Determinations
of General Plan consistency for the CIP are necessary when new projects are added to the build-
out CIP. This year's projects fall into the following project type categories: Drainage; Water and
Streets. A list of the projects by type is attached as Exhibit "A." Descriptions of the projects are
attached as Exhibit "B."
This CIP project list is subject to change during the fiscal year. Some projects not currently on
the list may need to be added as a result of City Manager recommendations and/or City Council
decisions. Any new projects which might be added to the CIP in this manner would first be
brought to the Planning Commission for consideration of a General Plan Consistency finding.
PCD/GPC 09-01 -2009-201 tAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA'
April 15, 2009
Pa e2
IV. ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the proposed FY 2009-2010 CIP for consistency with the City's General Plan.
Table 1, below ("General Plan Consistency"), identifies the elements, goals, objectives, and
policies of the General Plan which are relevant to the new projects being proposed this year. The
new projects' consistency with these goals, objectives, and policies are discussed on the
following page. (For discussion purposes, like projects have been grouped together.)
TABLE 1: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
GENERAL PLAN
REFERENCE TEXT
Land Use Element A City which ensures the timely provision of adequate public
Growth Mgmt. & Public facilities and services to preserve the quality of life of residents.
Facilities
Goal A.I
Land Use Element A City which maintains a system of public facilities adequate
Growth Mgmt. & Public for the projected population.
Facilities
Goal A.2
Land Use Element A City which protects and conserves natural resources, fragile
Environmental ecological areas, unique natural assets and historically
Goal A.I significant features of the community.
Circulation Element A City with an adequate circulation infrastructure to serve the
Streets & Traffic Control projected population.
Goal A.2
Circulation Element A City with properly maintained, smooth functioning and safe
Streets & Traffic Control traffic control systems.
GoalA.4
Circulation Element To provide an adequate circulation infrastructure concurrent
Streets & Traffic Control with or prior to the actual demand for such facilities.
Objective B.1
Circulation Element To design streets for the safe and efficient movement of people,
Streets & Traffic Control goods and services within and through the City in the most
Objective B.2 environmentally sound and aesthetically pleasing manner
possible.
Public Safety Element A City which minimizes injury, loss of life, and damage to
Flood Hazards property resulting from the occurrence of floods.
Goal A
City Projects:
Drainage Projects
There are four new drainage projects being proposed this year. These projects are: I) the
preparation of a Preliminary Design Study for slope repairs to mitigate for drainage and erosion
issues between Park Drive and Bayshore Drive; 2) a geotechnical and engineering analysis to
determine remediation measures for subsurface drainage issues on Marca Place; 3) the
PCD/GPC 09-01 -2009-201 tAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA'
April 15, 2009
Pae 3
installation of a runoff collection and treatment system at Fire Stations 1 through 5; 4) and the
installation of a sub-drain system on the pedestrian bridge near Rancho Carrillo Park. These
projects are consistent with the Land Use Element, Growth Management & Public Facilities Goal
A. I, A City which ensures the timely pr9vision of adequate public facilities and services to
preserve the quality of life of residents; Goal A.2, A City which maintains a system of public
facilities adequate for the projected population; Land Use Element, Environmental Goal A.I, A
City which protects and conserves natural resources, fragile ecological areas, unique natural
assets and historically significant features of the community. In addition, Public Safety Element,
Flood Hazards, Goal A, to minimize injury, loss of life, and damage to property resulting from
the occurrence of floods.
Streets Projects
There are five new street projects being proposed this year. These projects are: 1) slope
stabilization on a landslide-prone site on Camino Hills Drive near the intersection of Jackspar
Drive; 2) an investigative study for future roadway realignment alternatives for Carlsbad
Boulevard between Manzano Drive and La Costa Avenue; 3) constructing an eastbound right
tum lane on eastbound Palomar Airport Road at the intersection to southbound Paseo del Norte;
4) constructing an eastbound left tum lane on Palomar Airport Road at the intersection to
northbound Paseo del Norte; and 5) constructing dedicated right tum lanes on the westbound,
southbound and northbound legs of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and College
Boulevard. These projects are consistent with Circulation Element, Streets and Traffic Control,
Goal A.2, A City with an adequate circulation infrastructure to serve the projected population;
Goal A.4, A City with properly maintained, smooth functioning and safe traffic control systems;
Objective B.1, To provide an adequate circulation infrastructure concurrent with or prior to the
actual demand for such facilities; and Objective B.2, which requires streets to be designed for
safe and efficient movement of people, goods and services within the city.
CMWD Projects:
Water Projects
There are four new water projects being proposed this year by the CMWD. These projects are: 1)
a study to establish priorities for a comprehensive reservoir repair and maintenance program; 2)
constructing a high pressure reducing station within the City right-of-way and closing certain
valves within Kelly Ranch Village "E" development, or installing a pipeline on Cannon Road
and El Camino Real in order to connect to the 25 5 water pressure zone to reduce the water
pressure below the 125 psi standard; 3) converting an existing 12-inch potable water pipeli_ne,
which crosses under I-5 between Avenida Encinas and Camino de las Ondas, to a recycled water
pipeline; and 4) constructing a recycled water transmission line from the Carlsbad Water
Recycling Facility (CWRF), located on A venida Encinas, to Chinquapin A venue to provide
recycled water to the Village area, parks, medians, and the Coastal Rail Trail. These projects are
consistent with Land Use Element, Growth Management, and Public Facilities Goal A.I, which
requires timely provision of adequate public facilities and services; and Goal A.2, which requires
maintenance of a system of public facilities adequate for the projected population.
• • PCD/GPC 09-01-2009-2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
April 15, 2009
Pa e4
Summary
Staff has concluded that all of this year's CIP projects are consistent with the City's General Plan.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
For purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the FY
2009-2010 CIP Budget's new projects have been analyzed for potential adverse impacts on the
environment. Environmental analysis of the CIP is complex in that adoption of the budget
occurs with a single action, but that action approves a lengthy list of activities which may vary
widely in terms of timing, magnitude, and potential impacts. The activities range from purely
administrative actions, such as studies, to major public works projects, such as constructing new
tum lanes and recycled water transmission lines. The new funding requests listed in the 2009-
2010 CIP Budget fall into general categories (discussed below) for purposes of CEQA analysis,
depending upon the nature of the activity being funded. (Exhibit "A," attached, lists each of the
CIP project activities and indicates the environmental status of the project under CEQA.).
If funding requests in the CIP do not meet the definition of a "project" for purposes of CEQA,
these projects are noted as "not a project" in the Exhibit "A" table.
Other projects are exempt categorically or statutorily, or are exempt because it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the
environment. These types of projects or activities are not subject to any further CEQA review.
These projects are listed in Exhibit "A" as "exempt" with a notation as to the section of the
CEQA Guidelines which applies. The applicable sections of CEQA Guidelines are summarized
below:
a. Section 15301 categorically exempts projects or activities that consist of the operation,
repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, mechanical
equipment, or topographic features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond
that existing at the time of the lead agency's decision.
b. Section 15302 categorically exempts certain projects or activities which involve the
replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities and will have substantially the same
purpose and capacity of the facility or structure replaced or reconstructed.
c. Section 15303 categorically exempts certain projects which involve the construction and
location of a limited number of new, small, facilities or structures where only minor
modification is made to the exterior of the structure.
There is another, special class of statutorily exempt projects. Those in this category are being
proposed for preliminary design work and related studies or the preliminary work has already
begun. For the projects in this category, there is insufficient information at this time to determine
whether the project will result in any significant environmental impacts until some preliminary
design work has been completed. An essential part of the design process for these projects will
be collecting and analyzing the information needed to assess environmental impacts. It is
PCD/GPC 09-01 -2009-201 IAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA'
April 15, 2009
Pae 5
important to note that the projects in this group are not being approved for construction at this
time, and no discretionary permits are being approved, even though funds for future construction
may be shown in the budget. Adoption of the CIP will not have a legally binding effect on later
activities with respect to the projects in Category II because approval to construct a project in this
category cannot occur until environmental review has been completed and a document certified.
Certification of the environmental document for each project in this category will occur
concurrent with or prior to approval to construct the project. For purposes of adoption of the
CIP, the action to fund design work is, therefore, statutorily exempt from CEQA because
preliminary design for these projects constitutes a "feasibility or planning study" as provided in
Section 15262 of the CEQA Guidelines. However, that section also requires that feasibility and
planning studies must still include consideration of environmental factors. Given that these
activities currently involve feasibility or planning study only, the potential environmental impacts
have been considered to the extent possible. These project activities are not being approved
beyond the study phase at this time. Prior to final City Council action on these projects, CEQA
review must be completed. These projects are listed in Exhibit "A" as "exempt per 15262."
Finally, some CIP projects may require additional CEQA review. In any case, as discretionary
permits are requested, each of these projects will be required to comply with all appropriate
CEQA requirements. The table in Exhibit "A" identifies the status of these projects as
realistically as possible.
In conclusion, the proposed FY 2009-2010 CIP Budget as described in this report is fully in
compliance with CEQA for all three types of projects.
VI. SUMMARY
In summary, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65401 and 65402, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed FY 2009-2010 Capital
Improvements Program Budget is consistent with the City's General Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6554 (PCD/GPC)
2. Exhibit "A" (CIP Projects by Project Type with Environmental Status)
3. Exhibit "B" (CIP Project Descriptions)
• • Exhibit "A"
April 15, 2009
FY 2009-2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS
(BY PROJECT TYPE) WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
The following table contains all of the new capital projects included in the 2009-2010 Capital
Improvement Program Update. The projects are grouped by project type (left-hand column).
The second column identifies the project by name. The third column indicates the environmental
status of the project (as discussed in the "Environmental Review" section of the staff report).
Details of the project description (under the project name) are contained in Exhibit B "Technical
Appendix."
Projects which do not meet the definition of a "project" under CEQA are identified in the right-
hand column as "not a project." No future CEQA review will be required for those projects.
Other projects are categorically or statutorily exempt for a variety of reasons. They may fall
under the General Rule exemption or they may be categorically or statutorily exempt. There are
several exemption categories that _may apply to the various projects ( e.g., maintenance and/or
repair of existing facilities, minor expansion of existing facilities, etc.). These projects are
indicated as "exempt per" the specific CEQA section that applies to that project. Some CIP new
funding requests may fall within a special exempt category: those projects which are at this time
statutorily exempt pursuant to Section 15262 of CEQA as preliminary design, planning, or
feasibility studies. These projects are still in the conceptual design or planning phase and will
ultimately: 1) return to either the Planning Commission or City Council for further discretionary
action where additional environmental documentation will be certified; or 2) undergo additional
environmental review and documentation if the results of the preliminary design/study indicates
it would be necessary. These projects are indicated as "exempt per 15262."
Other CIP projects may require CEQA review. Some of these projects are currently undergoing
review individually or as part of a larger project. Others have not yet undergone the necessary
review and will have to do so when the project has been better defined. Still others may have
already been reviewed pursuant to CEQA and have been included in previously certified/adopted
CEQA documents (prior compliance). In any case, as discretionary permits are requested, each
of these projects will be required to comply with all appropriate CEQA requirements.
1
NEW CAPITAL IMP,VEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT!Y TYPE WITH
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
PROJECT TYPE PROJECT NAME ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS
City Pro.iects:
Drainage Park Drive Drainage and Street Improvements Potential ND/MND
Marca Place Drainage Improvements Exempt per 15262
Fire Station 1-5 Drainage Systems Exempt per 15301
Rancho Carrillo Water Seepage Potential ND/MND
Streets Camino Hills Drive and Jackspar Drive Slope Exempt per 15262
Stabilization
Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Study, Phase 2 Exempt per 15262
Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte Right Exempt per 15301
Tum Lane
Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte Left Tum Exempt per 15301
Lane
Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard Right Potential ND/MND
Tum Lanes
CMWD Pro_jects:
Water Reservoir Repair/Maintenance Program Study Exempt per 15262
Kelly Ranch Domestic Water Pressure Reduction Exempt per 15302
I-5 Crossing: Avenida Encinas to Camino del las Exempt per 15301
Ondas
Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility (CWRF) to Exempt per 15262
Chinquapin A venue Recycled Water Transmission
Main
2
• •
FY 2009-2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Exhibit "B"
April 15, 2009
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE_pRQJECTS -PARK DRIVE DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION_MAP:
Park Drive Drainage And Street Improvements.Doc
PROJECT LOCATION:
Park Drive between Bayshore Drive and the residential driveway at 4650 Park
Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This phase of the project includes the preparation of a Preliminary Desig
Study. The Preliminary Design Study will include geotechnical investigation
and analysis, biological report, preliminary hydrology and hydraulic analysis,
and slope and existing utility analysis. Three alternatives will be developed to
mitigate the drainage and erosion issue. The results of the Preliminary Design
Analysis will determine the appropriate improvements to construct.
f_ROJ_EC_T_NEED:
The slope easterly of Park Drive has a history of erosion and drainage issues.
Several attempts to prevent the erosion and control the drainage have proven
successful for a limited time. The groundwater is seeping through the cracks in
the retaining wall causing extensive corrosion to the retaining wall. Complaints
have been received regarding the erosion, sedimentation, algae and safety
issues.
FINANCING:
Puraose
Study
Environmental
Design
Property Acquisition
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated. Cost
$55,500
$45,500
$35,500
$2,000
$17,000
$155,500
Funding Sol.If.Ce
GCC
GCC
GCC
GCC
GCC
PROJE_CT LOCATION MAP:
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE PROJECT_S -MARCA PLACE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION:
Marca Place
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT NO.
Subsurface conditions require an investigation of geotechnical conditions under
Marca Place and an engineering analysis to determine the appropriat,
remediation measures for the road surface. After the analysis and design o'
the recommended remediation measures, funds for construction will be
requested.
PROJECT NEED:
Residents have repeatedly contacted the Construction Management Division
and Streets Maintenance Division requesting maintenance of the street. Marca
Place has been repaired multiple times.
Fl_N_ANCING:
Pur.12.ose
Study
Design
Property Acquisition
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$15,500
$35,500
$2,000
$12,000
$65,000
Eundin.9. S0_urce
GCC
GCC
GCC
GCC
Marca Place Drainage Improvements.Doc
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE PROJECTS-FIRE STATIONS 1-5 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP: PROJECT LOCATION:
At Fire Stations 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Under the City's NPDES Permit, fire apparatus washing runoff is prohibited
from entering the City's storm drain system. In an effort to comply with this
requirement, Fire Stations 1 through 5 will be retrofit with the construction of
permanent Best Management Practices (BMP's) to treat the wash water and
control the runoff before entering the storm drain system.
PROJECT NEED:
Fire Station 6 is the only facility to have a permanent runoff collection and
treatment system. Fire Stations 1 through 5 currently use a vacuum system
which collects the wash water. The vacuum system is viewed as a temporary
solution to comply with the permit until a permanent BMP solution is installed.
FINANCING:
PurQOSe
Design
Construction
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$25,000
$145,000
$55,000
$225,000
Funding Source
GCC
GCC
GCC
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
Rancho Carrillo Seepage.Doc
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE PROJECTS -RANCHO CARRILLO WATER SEEPAGE
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATIO_N:
PROJECT NO.
Adjacent to the south abutment of the pedestrian bridge near Rancho Carrillo.
PROJECT DES_CRIPTION:
Water is seeping through the south abutment of the pedestrian bridge and
through the earth slope around the bridge abutment. A sub-drain syste
needs to be installed to convey water away from the bridge abutment an
adjacent sewer manhole at the south end of the bridge.
PROJECT NEED:
The project is needed to prevent erosion around the bridge abutment which
would undermine the structural support of the bridge. The sub-drain is also
needed to convey water away from the sewer manhole at the end of the bridge
to prevent water intrusion into the manhole.
FINANCING:
Pureose
Design
Construction
Ad min/Inspection
Total Cost=
Estirnated Cost
$8,000
$40,000
$5,000
$53,000
Funding Source
GCC
GCC
GCC
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CIRCULATION SYSTEM STREET PROJECTS -CAMINO HILLS DRIVE AND
JACKSPAR DRIVE SLOPE STABALIZATION
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
Camino Hills and Jackspar Slope Stabilization.doc
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION:
The project is located on Camino Hills Drive on the sloped area north of the
Camino Hills Mobile Home subdivision near the intersection of Jackspar Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project is located on a landslide prone site. A buttress system was·
constructed during the earthwork for the mobile home subdivision to help
stabilize the slope. However, there is gradual movement of the slope that is
damaging the adjacent street. The project will consist of geotechnical
investigations, development of alternative approaches to a solution, and the
preparation of design plans. The construction costs for the recommended
solution will be presented and considered in a future Capital Improvement
Program cycle. It is anticipated the slope stability improvement will consist of
installing vertical shear pins (steel I-beams) to prevent failure of the shear
plane. The shear pins will be spaced approximately 6 feet apart and will be
located below grade.
PROJECT NEED:
The project is needed to prevent a landslide that could potentially damage the
city's infrastructure.
FINANCING:
PurQose
Study
Design
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$25,000
$62,000
$87,000
Funding Source
GCC
GCC
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CIRCULATION SYSTEM STREET PROJECTS -CARLSBAD BLVD REALIGNMENT STUDY
PHASE 2
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
Carlsbad Blvd Realignment Phase 2.doc
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION:
Carlsbad Boulevard between Manzano Drive and La Costa Avenue.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Conduct an investigative study of future roadway realignment alternatives.
infrastructure needs, land uses, commercial land development options, publi
park and coastal access opportunities, and related long term coastal planning
issues, constraints, and processes will be analyzed. The second phase study
of a multi-year project such as this would not require permits or environmental
review at this time.
PROJECT NEED:
An initial feasibility/realignment study was completed in 2000. The next phase
of this project will prepare a study to analyze more detailed alternatives and
create options and cost estimates for the realignment of Carlsba"d Blvd from
Manzano Drive to La Costa Avenue.
FINANCING:
Pureose
Study
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$200,000
$50,000
$250,000
Funding Source
GCC
GCC
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CIRCULATION SYSTEM STREET PROJECTS -PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND
PASEO DEL NORTE RIGHT TURN LANE
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATIO_NMAP:
PAR and PON Right Tum Lane.doc
PROJECT NAME
, ~t ·.:. ·:~. ~ • ' ~~~?."' W • •J i ,,.,•.d,!l{ 1 t.;~ ~ 1~1" :~~ .. ,. l • • ' . l·~;'.S 1:\
;4:rf':'~ i, ~~I\\~
,,r-.Jl&...,41~ •11-1.";_, .. • • ' ;~: --,1f·;
PROJECT LOCATION:
Eastbound Palomar Airport Road to southbound Paseo Del Norte.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIQN:
Construct an eastbound right turn lane on eastbound Palomar Airport Road a
the intersection to southbound Paseo del Norte. The project would includ
construction of a 250 foot long lane in addition to a 90 foot long transition.
Traffic signal modifications will also be required.
PROJECT NEED:
The widening will . provide for the construction of a right turn lane which will
enable this leg of the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service in
the buildout condition. This project was identified as part of the environmental
review of the proposed Legoland Hotel project.
FINANCING:
Pur,eose
Design
Construction
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$43,312
$433,122
$60,637
$537,071
Funding Source
Developer/GCC
Developer/GCC
Developer/GCC
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CIRCULATION SYSTEM STREET PROJECTS -PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND
PASEO DEL NORTE LEFT TURN LANE
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
PAR and PON Left Tum Lane.doc
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION:
Eastbound Palomar Airport Road to northbound Paseo Del Norte.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construct an eastbound left turn lane on Palomar Airport Road at th
intersection of Paseo del Norte. The project would include construction of a 60'
foot long lane in addition to a 97 foot long transition.
PROJECT_NEE_ll:
The widening will accommodate a longer left turn lane which will enable this leg
of the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service in the buildout
condition. Project MS 07-02 is conditioned to pay a 13% fair share for the
construction of this project.
FJNANCING:
Pure,ose
Design
Construction
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$15,753
$157,530
$22,054
$195,337
Fundiaa.§s,urce
Developer/GCC
Developer/GCC
Developer/GCC
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NONE
CIRCULATION SYSTEM STREET PROJECTS -PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND COLLEGE BOULEVARD
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
PAR and College Intersection.doc
PROJECT LOCATION:
At the intersection of the Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construct dedicated right turn lanes on the WB, SB and NB legs of the
intersection. Project includes construction of storm drain improvements within
the southbound lane and an inlet on the northeast corner to collect runoff fro
hole #7 of the Crossings Golf Course. Project work may also require
.reconstruction of median improvements, striping and signal modifications, and
acquisition of necessary right-of-way.
PROJECT NEED:
Required to meet Growth Management Standards.
FINANCING:
Purpose Estimated Cost Funding Source
Design/Studies $165,000 TIF/GCC
Environmental $27,500 TIF/GCC
Construction $645,000 TIF/GCC
Total Cost= $837,500
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NONE
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM -RESERVOIR REPAIR/MAINTENANCE PROGRAM STUDY
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
Reservoir Repair-Maintenance Program Study.Doc
PROJECT_LOCATION:
Steel Reservoirs: Buena Vista, C, D-1, D-2, E, Elm, Ellery, La Cost~ and
Skyline.
PSC Reservoirs: Santa Fe 11, La Costa High and B (TAP)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Conduct a study to establish priorities for a comprehensive reservoir repair an
maintenance program. Evaluate existing available data from construction
drawings, diving and cleaning activities, and inspection reports. Recommend
to most cost effective program that meets all standards, requirements and
regulations.
PROJECT NEED:
Most of the steel reservoirs in the CMWD are approaching their estimated
operational lifespan. It is anticipated the recommended maintenance program
activities will promote tank longevity, enhance water quality, and satisfy
California Department of Public Health (CDPH) reservoir requirements.
FINANCIN_G:
Pur2ose
Study
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$100,000
$25,000
$125,000
Funding Source
Water Replacement
Water Replacement
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NONE
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM -KELLY RANCH DOMESTIC WATER PRESSURE REDUCTION
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATI_ON MAP:
Kelly Ranch High PR Station.Doc
PROJECT LOCATION::
Within Kelly Ranch Village "E" development.
PROJECT.DE.SCRIPTION:
Property owners in the Kelly Range Village "E" development are experiencing
water pressure beyond the 125 psi City of Carlsbad Engineering Standard. The.
project includes constructing a pressure reducing station within the city right-a~
way and closing certain valves to decrease the pressure below the 125 psi
standard. An alternative pressure reducing option would be to install a pipeline
on Cannon Road and El Camino Real in order to connect to the 255 water
pressure zone.
PROJECT NEED:
The City's Operation Department has received numerous complaints of high
water pressure in the area and has indicated the high pressure has caused
failures of the fittings and subsequent flooding of the homes experiencing high
water pressure.
FIN_ANCING:
Purg_ose
Design
Construction
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimat~d Cost
$40,000
$280,000
$35,000
$355,000
Funding Source
Water Replacement
Water Replacement
Water Replacement
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NONE
RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS -1-5 CROSSING AVENIDA ENCINAS TO CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION_M_AP:
1-5 Crossing Ave Encinas To Camino Del Las Ondas.Doc
PROJECT LOCATION:
Under 1-5 between Avenida Encinas and Camino de las Ondas.
PROJECT DES_CRIPTION:
Convert an existing 12-inch potable water pipeline crossing under 1-5 to,
recycled water. Two connection points would be required, west of 1-5 m
Avenida Encinas and east of 1-5 on Camino de las Ondas.
PROJECT NEE_D:
Converting the pipeline to recycled water would provide an increase in capacity
from the water reclamation plant to the service area east of 1-5. Currently the
only recycled water pipeline crossing 1-5 from the reclamation plant is along
Poinsettia Lane. This additional 1-5 crossing would increase reliability with a
second crossing.
FINANCING:
Puraose
Design
Construction
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$13,200
$110,000
$11,000
$134,200
Funding Source
Water Replacement
Water Replacement
Water Replacement
CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NONE
RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS -CARLSBAD WATER RECYCLING FACILITY (CWRF) TO
CHINQUAPIN AVENUE RECYCLED WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN
PROJECT NO.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
CWRF To Chinquapin Recycle Water Transmission Main.Doc
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION:
Located in Avenida Encinas from the Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility to
Cannon Road and continuing northerly to Chinquapin Avenue along a corridor
east and parallel to the NCTD right-of-way.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Prepare design plans for a recycled water transmission line in the existing
railroad right-of-way connecting the Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility to the
Recycle Water Phase Ill area. The purpose is to improve system hydraulics by
connecting to an existing transmission line in Cannon Road to the Village area.
The line will be installed with the Vista/Carlsbad Sewer Project to minimize
construction costs.
PROJECT NEED:
The project will improve the recycled water system hydraulics and water quality
with the interconnection to the current system. The project will provide
recycled water to the Village area, parks, medians and the Coastal Rail Trail.
FINANCING:
Pure.ose
Design
Administration
Total Cost=
Estimated Cost
$220,000
$30,000
$250,000
Funding Source
Water Replacement
Water Replacement