The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008-07-16; Planning Commission; ; PUD 06-06A - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7T!ity of Carlsbad Planning Department • A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: July 16, 2008 ltemNo. 0 Application complete date: March 3, 2008 Project Planner: Shelley Esteybar Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle SUBJECT: PUD 06-06(A) -LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 43 single-family detached homes and one recreational lot within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.7, generally located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the terminus of Avenida Soledad in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6438 APROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 06-06(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 43 single-family dwelling units and the development of an open-space recreational lot located in the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.7. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 06-06) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 06-06), approved by the City Council on November 20, 2007. The approved project consists of 43 residential dwelling lots, 3 private driveway lots, 2 open space lots and one recreational lot all on 13.76 acres. A Planned Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 3'.7 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. Architecture and plotting for the units were not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 06-06 Conditions of Approval No. 7, the architecture and plotting could be processed at a later date through a Planned Development Permit Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject neighborhood. At less than 50 units the project does not require City Council approval. The proposed two-story homes consist of three separate and distinct floor plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 1,913 to 2463 square feet. The project incorporates three distinct architectural elevation styles and nine color schemes to provide variation throughout the proj,ect. The recreational lot is proposed to include a tot lot and play structures, turf area, landscaping, a sidewalk and park benches. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. --PUD 06-06(A)-LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 JULY 16, 2008 PAGE2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Background On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 06-06 and Planned Development Permit PUD 06-06 created the residential lots for Neighborhood 3.7. A final map has recorded for The Oaks; grading and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing. Project Description The project site, consisting of Neighborhood 3.7 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's Oaks Village, is generally located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the terminus of Avenida Soledad in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The subject neighborhood contains 43 single-family residential lots that are a minimum size of 3,500 square feet. Pursuant to the Master Plan, Planned Development Permits for neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet require a common recreation area, which was approved under CT 06-06. This project also includes proposed improvements for a 4,800 square foot common recreation lot which includes: one tot lot and play structures, turf area, landscaping, sidewalk and park benches. The recreational lot shall begin construction prior to the occupancy of the first unit and shall be approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the total units in this neighborhood. The Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans, elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, three different floor plans are being proposed with living areas ranging in size from approximately 1,913 to 2,463 square feet. Proposed are 43 two-story units, each having an attached garage providing parking spaces for a minimum of two cars. The project incorporates three distinct architectural elevation styles and nine different color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: PUD 06-06(A)-LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE3 TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS PLAN 1ST 2ND LIVING GARAGE TOTAL NO. FLOOR FLOOR AREA SQ.FT. BLDG. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. 1 974 939 1,913 424 2,337 2 car 2 964 1,154 2,118 512 2,630 2 car 3 1,151 1,312 2,463 488 2,951 2 car ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Spanish Colonial, Santa Barbara, Italian Tuscan Spanish Colonial, Santa Barbara, Italian Tuscan Spanish Colonial, Santa Barbara, Italian Tuscan To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment is required for the development of homes in neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes ofless than 7,500 square feet. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-0l(G)) The project is located within the Oaks North Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. The subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 06-06 and PUD 06-06, approved on November 20, 2007, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision were analyzed at that time. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan villages. The following Table 2 shows compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan. PUD 06-06(A)-LA COST,!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE4 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Front Yard All structures shall maintain a minimum 15-foot Please refer to the attached Setback habitable area setback from public or private 'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for (4.6.2.D.2.a & streets and a 20-foot setback for garages compliance with the front yard 4.6.2. D.2.c) fronting on public or private streets. setbacks from private driveways. !All units comply . . Garages shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet All garages comply with ·the required from motor courts, driveways, or iflocated at setbacks. the rear of a lot from private streets. Any habitable space must maintain a minimum 5- foot setback from private driveways unless located above the garage where a minimum 10- foot setback is required. Rear Yard Minimum rear yard setback is 1 O' Please refer to the attached Setback 'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for (4.6.2.D.2.c & compliance with the rear yard 7.7.3.7.i) setbacks. All units comply. Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15' All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. Side Yards Minimum of 5' for internal side yard setback Please refer to the attached (4.6.2.D.2.d & 'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for 4.6.2.B.2.c) side yard setbacks. All lots comply. At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood Plan types 2 & 3 incorporate side shall have one side elevation where there are yard courtyards and offsets. These sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard plan types are plotted on 31 lots or setback averages a minimum of 7'. 72.1 % of the total. Building The minimum distance between dwelling units All units are separated by a Separation shall be 1 O' excluding architectural feature minimum 10'. ( 4.6.2.D.2.b) projections and wrap around porch encroachments. Street Side 10' minimum setback. All units comply with the minimum Setback 10' street side setbacks. (4.6.2.D.2.d) PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGES TABLE 2-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Slope Edge All main and accessory buildings that are IA.ll proposed units meet the required Building Setback developed on hilltops and/or pads created on slope edge setbacks. Please refer to (4.3.4) downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in the Slope Edge Building Setback height shall be setback so that the building does exhibits on Page 3 of the enclosed not intrude into a . 7' horizontal to 1 ' vertical plans for further details. imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other. development application requirements. Lot Width Minimum lot width: 40' All lots were previously approved by (7.7.3.7.g) CT 06-06 and have a minimum lot width of 40'. Building I-story units: 50% of net pad area Please refer to the attached Coverage 'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for ( 4.6.3 .B.2) 2-story units: 40% of net pad area building coverage. Includes: All plan types are two-story • Garages and the perimeter area of a structures and do not exceed the basement. maximum 40% of net pad area as required. Excludes: • Exterior structures such as covered All units comply. porches • Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8' from the building • Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22' and a width of 8' • Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the face of any building • Awnings • Open parking areas • Structures under 30" in height • Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE6 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Building Height Maximum of 35' and 3 stories. (7.7.3.7.j) Plan 1 = 24'-1" max and 2 stories. Plan 2 = 24' -9" max and 2 stories. Plan 3 = 25 '-1" max and 2 stories. Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.e & 4.6.3.B.4.f) Rear Building Planes ( 4.6.3 .B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 Please refer to the architectural plans inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' for the building plane exhibits. between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 4 5 '. 33% of the above 50% building plane requirement may reduce the limit from 4 separate building planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Plan* 1 2 3 # of planes SC SB IT 2 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 trlans 2 (all elev.) & 3 (all elev.) tplotted on 31 lots or 72.1 % of the unit mix meet this requirement. k\ll units comply. 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 tr lease refer to the architectural plans inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' for the building plane exhibits. between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. Plan* 1 2 # of planes SC SB IT 3 3 3 3 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of 3 3 3 3 3 3 frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45 '. All units or 100% of units have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3 planes and a minimum 30 square feet for each plane. All units are located·on lots with 45' of frontage or less. k'\.11 units comply. * SC-Spanish Colonial, SB-Santa Barbara, IT -Italian Tuscan PUD 06-06(A)-LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE? TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Front Building Front building facades shall incorporate a Please refer to the attached Elevations minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to "Building Design Element Matrix" (4.6.3.B.6) create character and interest to the home. These Table 4 and the architectural plans elements vary depending on the architectural that detail the various design style used. elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Side & Rear Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced Please refer to the "Building Design Elevations architectural detailing incorporating good Element Matrix" Table 4 and the ( 4.6.3 .B. 7) design is required for side & rear elevations architectural plans that detail the adjacent to public/private roads. !Various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation ~ypes. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are !Please refer to the enclosed Fronting required to receive special attention to detailing architectural plans that detail the Circulation on the elevation fronting the roads. This will tvarious design elements incorporated Element Roads include window detailing equal to or better than for each of the proposed elevations. ( 4.6.3 .A. I .a) that of the front elevation. The introduction of [All plan types and elevation styles additional wall planes and balconies, where comply. noise standards allow, is encouraged. Floor Plans Minimum of 3 floor plans per neighborhood. lfhe proposed project includes three (4.6.3.B.5.c & floor plans with three distinctive 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be elevation types for each plan. Please provided for each floor plan. refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Single-Story For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that Not applicable within this Units are visible from a circulation element roadway, Neighborhood. All units are two- (4.4 & at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. story. 4.6.3.B.4.l) Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15' (10' preferred). Two Story Units Must include some single-story features. [Please refer to the enclosed (4.6.3.B.4.n & architectural plans that detail the 4.6.3.B.5.b) The second-story must not exceed 80% of the single story features provided. All first-story square footage, including all garage proposed plans comply. area. !Plan 1: 67.2% Plan 2: 78.2% Plan 3: 80.0% PUD 06-06(A)-LA COST.!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGES TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Where (3) Two One of the units must have a single-story Plan 1 incorporates a single story Story Units occur building edge at least 1 O' deep and shall run the building edge that is at least 1 O' in a row with less length of the building. wide and runs the length of the than 15 ft building. This plan type is plotted between homes-Single-story shall be defined as a plateline where there are three (3) 2-story (4.6.3.B.4.b) maximum of 15'. !Units with less than 15' between ~hem. Single-Story 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have [Plan type 3 incorporates a single Elements a single-story element, with a minimum depth story building element that is greater ( 4.6.3 .B.4.d) of 3 ', that is 40% or greater than the front ~han 40% of the front elevation elevation width. Porches and porte cochere twidth and a minimum of 3' deep. elements qualify. [Plan 1: 33.0% Plan 2: 18.6% [Plan 3: 75.8% [Plan type 3 is plotted on 15 lots, or 34.9% of the unit mix, meeting this tequirement. PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST !AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE9 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Entries, Front 25% of the units must have either a porch at 37.2% of the elevations incorporate a Porches, least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the front balcony (all elev. styles of the Courtyards, & dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever [Plan 2). Balconies is consistent with the architectural style. (4.6.3.B.9, [Please refer to the enclosed 4.6.2.B.2.f & Porches require a minimum front yard setback architecture and site plan for 4.6.2.B.3) of 10'. compliance. Porches shall have a minimum depth and length [All units with front balconies of5'. comply. A variety ofroof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. I Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. Octagonal or May encroach into the required side setbacks a None are proposed within the Round Entry maximum of 2'. The total length of the required side yard setback. Tower encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be ( 4.6.2.B.3 .a) located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. PUD 06-06(A)-LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGEl0 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Projections Fireplace structures not wider than 8 ', cornices, No projections extend into the side (4.6.2.B.3) eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other or front yard setback more than 2' similar architectural features projecting from inor are any projections greater than the building may intrude up to 2' into the 8' in length. All plans comply. required setbacks. Recreation Common recreation areas: lfhe parking proposed for the Parking common recreation area is located ( 4.6.2.B.4.b) • Less than 8,000 SF -Do not require off-on-street as approved with CT 06-06 street parking and PUD 06-06. • "Pocket Parks" -Not required to provide parking • Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include l space tor every 20 units. • More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) Resident Parking Minimum 2-car garage with interior All plan types include one 2-car (4.6.2.B.4.a) measurements of20' by 20'. garage with a minimum interior dimension measurement of 20' x 0 Two (2) 1-car garages each having interior 20'. measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE 11 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Garage Criteria 20' minimum setback from the property line !All units face a private street. A20' ( 4.6.2.B.2.b, where garage doors face a public or private street. or greater front yard setback is 4.6.3.B.4.h, maintained for all units. 4.6.3.B.13 & Garages shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet rrhere are no garages proposed from 4.6.3.D.2.c) from motor courts, driveways. motor courts or driveways. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback rrhere are no side-loaded garages from property line. They also must be designed [)roposed. to appear as a livable portion of the home. Three-car garages in a row facing the street are There are no three-car garages permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a proposed. neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sf. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of Minimum lot size for Neighborhood 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units 3.7 is less than 5,000 square feet. may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street shall not exceed a total oJ 50% of the units. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of There are no three-car garages two door garages, three door garages, and offset proposed. two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used All garages are designed to fit the within each neighborhood to improve the street proposed elevations. There are three scene. different garage designs proposed to (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage provide variety from street scene. configurations) Roll-up garage doors are required. All units. have proposed roll-up garage doors. Architectural projections may encroach into the !All proposed architectural projections setback a maximum on 18" for garages. do not encroach into setbacks. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-ffor more specifics about garages) PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE 12 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Roofs Varied building roofheigl)ts and roof massing A variety of roof forms and massing (4.6.3.B.4.k & shall be incorporated into unit designs for each are proposed with changes in 4.6.3.B.8) master plan neighborhood. direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. Changes in roof direction shall be provided to Change in roof direction is provided. create diversity and interest. Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes Roof planes for units at the top of should attempt to parallel the slope. slopes are in compliance. A variety· of roof colors shall be used within There are a total of six (6) proposed each neighborhood. roofing tile colors, including: Los Padres Blend, Albuquerque, Sunset Blend, Carlsbad Blend, Santa Fe and Winslow. Minimum roof pitch of 3:12. Minimum roof pitch proposed is ~:12. Colors Colors should be consistent with the Each plan type plotted on the site ( 4.6.3 .B.12) architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones tplan includes a color scheme are preferred however other color combinations designation to show compliance. are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 o:>lease refer to the color and different exterior color schemes shall be used materials boards for details on each for each floor plan within the same architectural color scheme and to the site plan for styles. specific plotting. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Accessory Patio and accessory structures shall comply All plan types comply. Structures with development standards set forth in Section (4.6.3.B.3) 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE 13 TABLE 2 -RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Standard Comments Architectural Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more rrhe elevation types included are as Styles Permitted of the following Architectural Styles: follows: (4.6.3.C & 7.6) • Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Craftsmen Bungalow Spanish Colonial Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Spanish Colonial Italian/Tuscan • Monterey Ranch • Italian/Tuscan • European Country Design Standards 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in rrhe windows and doors on the front (4.6.3.B.4.i & the front of each unit shall be recessed or elevations are recessed a minimum 4.6.3.B.5.e) projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be of 2" and are trimmed with either trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored Kvood or raised stucco. Please refer aluminum window frames shall be used (no ~o the enclosed elevations on the mill finishes). architectural plans for compliance. "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, All plans comply. knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. Chimneys The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale Please refer to the enclosed (4.6.3.B.1 l) with the size of the structure. elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All chimneys and 2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less ~heir caps comply with proper scale than 7,500 SF. and proportion. Window The design of the windows shall include one or Please refer to the enclosed Detailing more of the following features: elevations on the architectural plans ( 4.6.3 .B.10) for compliance. All plans comply. • Deeply recessed windows • Paned windows • Decorative window ledges • Accent and varied shape windows • Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports • Exterior wood trim surrounds • Accent colors on shutters or other elements • Arched elements • Shutters • Raised stucco trim around windows • Window lintels PUD 06-06(A) -LA COST!AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, JULY 16, 2008 PAGE14 The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of four (4) enhanced architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of two (2) such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation and floor plan (see Table 4 -Attachment No. 8). The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 06-06. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed herein. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Oaks Neighborhood 3.7 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6438 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Table 1 -Individual Lot Data 7. Table 3 -Gross & Net Lot Acreage 8. Table 4 -Building Elevation Design Elements 9. Table 5 -Unit Summary Table 10. Reduced Exhibits 11. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"GG" dated July 16, 2008 • SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE • LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 PUD 06-06 (A) CITY OF CARLSBAD • GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood-3.7 CT 06-06(A) LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 11 GENERAL PLAN: =-=R=M=--------- ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY (P-C) (RD-Min MP 98-01) DEVELOPER'S NAME: ..;a;C...;:;,o=ln=· c=hc....=Dc...;e=-...cv-=-e=lo'"""p=m=e=nt"'--_______________ _ ADDRESS: 4747 Morena Boulevard Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92117 PHONE NO.: (858) 490-2300 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: _22~3--8~1~0-_1~3 ______ _ QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): _13~.8_a_c_re_s ____ _ A. B. C. D. E. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage= 149.49 sq. ft. Library: Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = 79.73 sq. ft. 43 EDU .29 acres 23 CFS Basin "D" F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 430 ADT ~------ G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 6 H. Open Space: Acreage provided = """pe=r...a:cH=C=P'------ 1. Schools (San Dieguito Unified High/ J. K. Encinitas Union Elementary School Districts): (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = Elementary: 17.6 Students Middle School: 14.19 Students High School: 14.19 Students 43EDU NIA 23,650 GPD L. The project is 2 units under the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. -• BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: PUD 06-06{A) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 APPLICANT: Jack Henthorn and Associates, PO Box 237 Carlsbad, CA 92018 REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEOA; and approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 43 single-family detached homes and one recreational lot within the Villages of La Costa, Oaks North Neighborhood 3. 7, generally located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the terminus of A venida Soledad in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 43 and lot 4 7 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 06- 06, Villages of La Costa -La Costa Oaks North -Neighborhood 3.7 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on December 3, 2007 as file no. 2007-0750674. APN: 223-810-13-00 -Acres: 13.8 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: ...:.;43=--=U=n=it=s _______ _ GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: =R=e=si=d=en=t=ia=l-=..:M-=..;e:;..::d=iu=m=:....{=R:::.;M-=-)'-------------- Proposed Land Use Designation: _S_am--'-e ___________________ _ Density Allowed: 4-6 Density Proposed: _3_.1_2.....,p_e_r_C_T_0_6_-_06 ____________ _ Existing Zone: Planned Community PC (RD-M) Proposed Zone: -=-P......;-C=.......:{R=D=-=c-M.=.,...) _____ _ Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Site P-C (RD-Min MP 98-RM 011) North P-C (OS/RD-Min MP OS/RMH 98-01) South P-C (OS in MP 98-01) OS/RL East P-C (OS in MP 98-01) OS West P-C (OS in MP 98-01) OS/RL LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Current Land Use Vacant mass graded pads and OS Multiple-family Res./Open Space Open Space Open Space Open Space Coastal Zone: D Yes [8] No Local Coastal Program Segment: -=-N""'/ A'-=------- Within Appeal Jurisdiction: D Yes [8] No Coastal Development Permit: D Yes [8] No Local Coastal Program Amendment: D Yes [8] No Revised O 1/06 • Existing LCP Land Use Designation: NIA Existing LCP Zone: NI A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: NIA Proposed LCP Zone: NI A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Dieguito Unified High School/ Encinitas Union Elementary School District. Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos -'--"'=-=-==---------------- Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): _43~E_D_U~-------------- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 0 Categorical Exemption, N~IA=---------------------- 0 Negative Declaration, issued _N_IA ___________________ _ 0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _ ~ Other, within the scope of EIR 98-07 dated October 23, 2001 Revised O I /06 Cit~ of Carlsbad ■ititiliihlf•l•M•idiil,€HII DISCLOSURE STATEMENT !Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, associat10n, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate,. in this and an other county, city and county, city municipali~, distrip~. ~r other politict}~ubdivi~t?~. orany othe~ gr?up or combination/c~!~g as a unit." •·· .... Agents may sign this document; however, th~ legal name and entity of ~he' applicant and property owner must be provided below. • l. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) 2. Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles. and addresses of the C<;)rporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) o,,.,.""1 C,~-tq Person,,.?;:::::::,, ~ =====--Corp/Part =LC~Oa=k~s =3.~7~L=LC~-______ _ Title i'\IL"':"::')e..-r Title ______________ _ Address i-j 1 '-\ 1 (~~-'i>W. 'S;b i oo 5;,,....,,..._\t).--..,o. U\ q?--\\1 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Address 4747 Morena Blvd Ste 100 San Diego, CA 92117 Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also. provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit. corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names. titles. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary_.)~ " 1 , ~ -----IV-."-"''1.C,...':>--v'L\ Person.~ 2 ~ Corp/Part =LC~O=a=ks~3=.7~L=LC~------ Title &k~ur- Address tj 141 1;,\r\.i. ,"e,.,..__ :b\,.J. ~ \-, LCD S"'-iO,..,.,.,.>.,, cA 4?-il7 Title ______________ _ Address 4747 Morena Blvd Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92117 1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (. 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust ________ _ Non Profit/Trust __________ _ Title ____________ _ Title--,--------------- Address ___________ _ Address _____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0Yes ~ No If yes, please indicate person(s): _____________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. z:s ;..? c-::::-------~ Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE The undersigned, being the President and Chief Operating Officer of ColRich Residential, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("CRR"), hereby certifies that: 1. CRR is the Managing Member of LC Oaks & Greens Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Holdings"). 2. Holdings is the Managing Member of LC Holdings L2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("L2"). 3. L2 is the Sole Member of LC Oaks 3.7, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("LC Oaks"). 4. LC Oaks is acquiring the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto by an Assignment from SARE Investments, LLC, a California limited liability company of its interest as Buyer under that certain Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions with Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a California corporation dated as of October 12, 2007. 5. The following individuals hold the offices in CRR set forth next to their respective names: Richard Gabriel Colin Seid Graeme Gabriel Danny Gabriel Barry Galgut Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer President and Chief Operating Officer President and Chief Investment Officer Executive Vice President 6. Pursuant to Sections 6.09 and 6.10 of the Limited Liability Agreement of CRR, each of the Officers of CCR are authorized to take any and all action on behalf of CRR and its subsidiary entities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate on December 6, 2007. Co-President and Chief Operating Officer P:00401460.4:13001.011 Lot# Plan Elevation 1 3 B 2 2 A 3 1 R B 4 2 C 5 3 A 6 1 C 7 2 B 8 2 C 9 3 A 10 3 B 11 1 A 12 3 C 13 2 C 14 3 A 15 1 C 16 3R B 17 1 R B 18 2R C 19 1 R A 20 2 B 21 3R C 22 2R B 23 1 R C 24 2R A 25 1 R B 26 2R C 27 3R A 28 3 B 29 1 C 30 2 B 31 3 B 32 2R A 33 1 B 34 2R C 35 3 A 36 2 B 37 2 A 38 3R C 39 1 R C 40 3R B 41 1 R A 42 2R C 43 3 R A ~. . • Livable Color Front 5 15.6 4 20.0 1 14.3 8 20.7 2 16.9 9 18.7 3 19.7 7 21.5 1 15.9 3 15.6 1 16.5 9 14.8 8 19.7 5 15.1 7 16.7 6 14.4 1 15.0 9 20.0 2 16.0 6 20.0 8 15.9 3 20.0 9 19.8 5 20.8 4 15.8 8 21.1 2 15.0 3 15.2 7 19.0 4 19.5 1 13.9 2 20.2 3 15.0 9 20.0 4 16.8 6 19.3 3 20.9 7 28.4 8 26.8 5 18.3 1 18.4 9 20.0 6 14.5 Individual Lot Data La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.7 Setbacks (ftl Side Yard Rear Left Right 15.5 5.3 7.4 22.1 5 7.6 28.3 5 7.7 23.2 5.5 7.4 19.5 5 6.9 28.9 5.4 6.4 24.5 5.7 8.1 44.7 19.6 12 35.2 8.4 31.6 11.6 27.6 7.2 20.5 10.3 7.9 10.4 8.1 6.6 17.4 8.4 6 13.8 10 6 20.6 10 5.8 10 5 14 18 6 12.8 12.9 6 5 18 6 5 12.7 6 5 36.9 10.7 6.3 36.7 5.9 6.7 27.8 5.8 5.6 23.3 5.8 5.7 28.9 5.8 5.2 23.8 6.2 7.6 18.4 6.8 20.6 10 60.3 7.2 30.5 10.1 7.8 52.5 7.9 8 32.8 6.8 7 16.5 5 6.8 18.5 5 6.8 12.9 5 5.5 15.3 10.2 5.8 22.9 5 5 30.8 5 5 21.7 5.8 5.1 17.7 7 5 11.8 6.4 5 23.5 6.7 5 17.8 7 5 10.3 8.4 18.3 ,,, i;•}>';\ :,i,:r :;, ·•f<t~ ('~,,•:h·, .. ..,,, ,• •✓e1.'"1· ''f 7:''.';}s\,;~:; , .. , .,;·, • T~b\-e.-j_ . Building Net Pad Coverage 11 Garage Porch Area (SF) Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 21.1 5,186 1,687 32.5% 20.7 16.5 4,227 1.476 34.9% 20 15.3 4,299 1.477 34.4% 20.8 16.7 4,571 1.476 32.3% 21.8 4,528 1,687 37.3% 22.9 18.8 4,246 1.477 34.8% 20.1 16.0 4,614 1.476 32.0% 20.8 16.6 5,330 1.476 27.7% 21.4 6,625 1,687 25.5% 21.1 4,668 1,687 36.1% 20.8 16.5 4,735 1.477 31.2% 20.2 4,784 1,687 35.3% 20.7 16.5 4,525 1,476 32.6% 20.6 4,421 1,687 38.2% 21.4 16.7 4,305 1.477 34.3% 20 4,344 1,687 38.8% 20.7 16.0 3,998 1.477 36.9% 20.7 16.5 3,689 1.476 40.0% 20.7 16.0 3,689 1,477 40.0% 20.7 16.5 3,705 1,476 39.8% 21.3 4,778 1,687 35.3% 20.7 16.5 4,218 1,476 35.0% 23.8 19.8 4,024 1,477 36.7% 20.7 16.6 3,824 1,476 38.6% 20.7 16.8 3,908 1.477 37.8% 20.7 16.6 4,044 1.476 36.5% 20.5 4,793 1,687 35.2% 20.7 7,265 1,687 23.2% 23.7 19.0 5,598 1,477 26.4% 21.2 17.2 6,589 1.476 22.4% 20 5,747 1,687 29.4% 20.9 16.7 4,232 1.476 34.9% 20.7 16.0 3,783 1.477 39.0% 20.7 16.5 3,795 1.476 38.9% 22.3 4,213 1,687 40.0% 20 15.8 4,519 1.476 32.7% 20.6 16.5 5,068 1,476 29.1% 32.9 5,618 1,687 30.0% 30.2 26.5 5,047 1,477 29.3% 22.6 4,410 1,687 38.3% 22.9 18.6 4,104 1,477 36.0% 20.7 16.5 4,022 1,476 36.7% 20 5,015 1,687 33.6% .h ' . •«<''"""'' ... ,, , . ·,.,"• .... ., .. ... 11 •auilding Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ff. from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending Jess than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parlcing arees, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls. 6/17/2008 Neighborhood 3. 7 Page 2 of 2 • La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3. 7 Table of Lot Sizes Lot No. Sq. Ft. Gross Net Pad* 1 5,186 5,186 2 4,227 4,227 3 4,299 4,299 4 4,571 4,571 5 4,819 4,528 6 4,601 4,246 7 4,614 4,614 8 8,621 5,330 9 8,907 6,625 10 6,186 4,668 11 4,735 4,735 12 4,784 4,784 13 4,526 4,525 14 4,421 4,421 15 4,305 4,305 16 4,344 4,344 17 4,311 3,998 18 3,690 3,689 19 3,690 3,689 20 4,031 3,705 21 6,189 4,778 22 5,008 4,218 23 4,851 4,024 24 4,552 3,824 25 4,586 3,908 26 4,649 4,044 27 6,182 4,793 28 7,755 7,265 29 5,585 5,585 30 6,589 6,589 31 5,743 5,743 32 4,232 4,232 33 3,783 3,783 34 3,795 3,795 35 4,478 4,213 36 4,519 4,519 37 5,585 5,068 38 5,618 5,618 39 5,047 5,047 40 4,411 4,410 41 4,104 4,104 42 4,021 4,021 43 5,015 5,015 • PLAN ONE DESIGN ELEMENTS Spanish Colonial Sant;i Barbara Front I Side i Rear Front Side Rear a. Variety of Roof Planes ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors ✓ ✓ ✓ c. Paned Windows and Doors ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ d. Exposed Root Beams or Rafter Tails ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ e. Decorative Window Ledges ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ f. Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood, Sidina and Stone ✓ ✓ g. Window and Door Lintels ✓ ✓ ✓ h. Dormers I. Accent and Varied Shape Windows ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ j. Window Boxes and Planters with Architecturallv Evident Suonorts ✓ ✓ k. Exterior Wood Elements ✓ I. Variations in Colors of Stucco and Other Elements ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or-Other m. Elements ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ n. Stucco Wainscoting o. Covered Balconies p. Arched Elements ✓ ✓ ✓ q. Shutters ✓ ✓ ✓ Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ r. noor~ 3/25/2008 La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.7 BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS PLAN TWO Tuscan Spanish Colonial Santa Barbara Front i Side I Rear Front Side Rear Front Side Rear ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ '✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ .. ,. __ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ PLAN THREE Tuscan Spanish Colonial Santa Barbara Tuscan Front Side Rear Front I Side I Rear Front I Side ; Rear Front Side I Rear ✓ ✓ ✓\✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ • ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ • ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ • Unit Summary Table Plan 1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage % of 2nd Floor Total Area Area Area vs. 1st Floor 11 Area 1 974 939 424 67.2% 2,337 2 964 1,154 512 78.2% 2,630 3 1,151 1,312 488 80.0% 2,951 1/ The 2nd story of any house does not exceed 80% of the 1st story square footage, including all garage area. 2I Building heights shown indicate the maximum building height for each proposed plan type. Tat>le 5 Building Building Height 21 Coverage 31 24'-1" 1,477 24'-9" 1,476 25'-1" 1,687 *31 Building Coverages for Plans 1 & 3 include additional square footage for the 2nd story overhang (P1;79 SF & P3=48 SF) 4/30/2008 Neighborhood 3. 7 Page 1 of 2 LA COSTA VICINITY MAP LEGEND PROPOSEDSUBO/VISIONBOCIHONlY PRO"OSRILOflMC DJSIIHG LOT MMJOI PRCPOSEDLOTIMIBER MrHPADEl.H'All(WNiO Ffi£.R!51S"lll£RfOURCJlfNr5(FR) Fl'l'CJ'OSEZl £NHHOf SWAt.C Pfla'OSED IDll'i'Aa ~ Pfl(p(JSEIJBROl/fDlfOI PfHJPOSED fASEllfJIT/.JN£ £»$l'ING lln.tffl'l'.llll'TITDINO PltCFOSED -MU SUF£ (2:1 IIAX) £J7SIJWGS(llf]lfllNH•l>IIINtHa.£ PNGPOSD} SC1IO /INN .IH IINIHO.I (8.PK'tNUSSOTHfRWSCNOfCO} .,._ --<G-----0 --+-----0 OISJWC .. IElf IINN •m nRE H'IDRANT ----tf-~-- Plta"CISl» ~!El llNII MIH F1RE HmtANT __ .,_T___ (~ IM.E'5S OH1'_.Sf NOTCO} OISIWG R£aMWED lfAIVi' ~li£QMl£01MIEl O:ISIWCSn:JIIWDRAMSl'SIDI ~_,,=====Cl Pl'lO"OSEZISrtllllfORNHSl'SIDI i =,CARJ4 ~SW =~====~O D RlffUP (EJE1'GY IJSSIPArcR) OJSIWG S11iffTCCNr£RtM£ElCV.MKWS (255 . .5) P'1CPOSl1J SIJICIT CCNTUUJNE UCVA1lCWS 2"5..5 O!SfWCCDNrrutS -;:..::~ PROPOS£DCDNrct,ff$ ~ CIIJSIWG SIREfTUGHT -¢- PROPOSlDFta.JC SITfUTUGHT -~o PROPOSlDPIIIIVA1fS111a1'UGHT 0---,0 Pffa>DSlD a.waor OHJSS Qln'lll ~. PROPOSlD PROECr, SOMO al lolE1t' t'AU ENWKEIJSIRHTPAIWG - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT NO. PUD 06-06(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3. 7 ~IIUJ&f18TA···· MAP~ _-•• . :j-:. ·· ... ·. ·'f:•:,.:; ,,.,: . :· ~;.,y.~:-,;:-._ . ' ;\>:· PROPOSEDPRcil' B~ '{,l~;t:,:·_. PRCPCSCDRETA!NfNGlfAU. £XIS71NC RETJHNC WALL BOUNOARY ANNOTATION CAU.OUT "'""""' EI.IVATKW AND CQ.M SOiD£ FJR!RAIEOSl1ft/CnM£ 0 [I] @) (FR) ''.--: PROJECT MAP PUBUC lmUTIES AND DISTRICTS mD'H:1£.,., .... , .......... SSC mllll.NICIITICN!I (ATJ,T) """- ~,~--. ,.''" ~~::~;' °'"" .....--....... ...•••.............. OC1N,TAS IM/Ool EILM. SOo:t. DIS1"/CT .... S"ANDIECIJITD I.J>IICYtl "IQfSOOl. 0/SrRICT CAill.£ •......•.........•.•.. NE..l'J1/A IIEQ.Alll(D l'AT£);o ............. CNl.SBAD YMICIPAL IMTm DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIFTION VI~ CT LA COSTA -LA COSTA OU.S M:RTH Vlu.AQ" .J.1 (CT OIHII$) LOTS /-I.JCT 11£CITYrTCMl.581'!) nlM:TCTIJMII, VII.LMZSrFt.A COSTA -LA Q!STA CMlt'.S JOf7H ~ IEICHDHD) .J.7 IN 11€ c,rr CT CW..SBW. CUNTt' (T SIN D1£00, STAI( rT CAI../FIJfNIA, JIXXRJl#l"i TOW NJ. f'649fll.£D '" n£(1T/a;(T 11£5'1#0/UXJCQNrrJl£0RVl'(W tEaJltEFI.J,20011.SfllC,cJ.2aJ1--tJl!ilJa14. ABBREVIATIONS PUD06-06 A GENERAL NOTES I. fOTM..Sl~A'EA.•~/11,U[[.Yl:J.BACRCS 2. EXIST/IC I.ND USE· VACANT -,in,Q-1 (RN£.() (P!R 0/fAl'IN: 451-.,.,,) .J. PRD"l'.1SED I.ND USE· Slf'Q.£ F"Mt/LY /£StOCNTIN.. ~ rF£N SPACE 4. TOTAL tulB£R (F a.£1.LINC tl'(lrs.· -U 5. TOTM.. MAE£R (F RESIOCNTIAL LOTS: -U 6. AS"SESSl'.W'S PARCEL M.A&:R: 22:1--810-1:1 7. DC/ST/NC CD£RAI... PL.AN L.ND tr:iE 0£SIG1-'TION: RI/ (/£510£NTIAI.. IEDII.M r£NSI TY {4-8 OJ/AC/) 8. PROPOSED CDERAI.. Pl.AN LAKJ USf DESIG1-'T/(1N: RI,/ (f£SIOD/TIN.. 1,£:CJU.M OCNSITY /.t-8 W/AC/) 11. o,sn1C zomc· PC 10. AMSTER Pl.AH INDI.YI/C Zt:,1/,C R0-N (R£StrENTIAL CXNS/TY -r.EDH.11') If. GR1:JSS (M"RAt.L ,C/CH!OlffXX) D£HS/TY::J.2 W/AC (-U CJ.J's/lJ.B AC) PfR 11,/ CT Ol!l-(115 12.LFWZ!X'E: m.£.11 l;J. A\IERAG£ £MILT TRIPS: 4.lO (-U lJll/r5" 10 TRIPS/DAY) 14. ll.JllDI/C CO\'ERACE: ~1111.H[LY 1.5 ACRr5 15. f£.RC£1'1TN;£ LANJSCAP/tc. APF'RCKIAMJil.Y 6..J.3 GENERAL DESIGN NOTEs-srrE Pl.AN I. Ml. QMD/l'C ~ PR0'0SED AKJ FlJTIM: Sl"REETS SI-ML{. ~ ro n£ c,rr (F CAll.5eAO OESIQJ STMCMRDS ND AS RE:r.1.J/Rrn BY n-c CITY FN;J/EDl. 2. ALL E'ASDEW"S SH4il.L 1£ PROV/CED, R£Mn£ll CR liROCA.TID AS RCOUIRED BY 11£ CITY D«;l#LER, FUI.IC UTILIT/£5 NC T~IR N'PRa'RIATE: DISrRICTS. :J. ALL PRCf'OSED VTIL/T/£5 .9W.L 1£ IHSTM.1.£0 ~. 4. SOt.A::£S or ~: SNH.O MRIAL ~ Fl.OIN 01-.J0-91 R.J. LIN; FlOIIH 05-rF-Df ~ A-ASSICIAITT ~ aYDIIC FUN 0.C. 429-'7C NO 11£ IUISN(Dl A-AsstCJAITT Ram <RADINC FUN (CRAl'INC IC. 451-M) 5. cam:uED IHmNM..S: ••~• FUT B. JIAN.FACTI.MD SI.CR" RAnos .9W.L 1£ VNl'IAII.£ (2: I ""). 7. FINISl£D alACCS N£ P£R RO.DI awJINC PLAHS 4.51-BA. e. SOILS l~T/CN l'AS CBTAJ1£D FRrN 1)£ t.Pl'.:MTED a:o~/CAL ltNESTICATICW PRCPN£D BY: rEOCffi I/IC., lMTm 08-Jl-01 a t.P!'.MTC L£TTrRS l:MIED 08-25--0tl 0. (;RJ(J£IJ Sll'AL£5 9'41..L. ,Ml£ A 11/NIIIUI tT f.f FLOI' LIi,£ CRAI£ ND AS 5HJIIIN CW QIJADINC PL.AN D#C 451-M. 10. AU STR£ET CES/crts, STR£1:T LICHT, IHJ FIR£ /-f11:RANTS TD ~a'ltl TO CITY a: CNl.!'BAO OCSlai STMCMRDS ND AS /£00/RUJ BY CITY [M;lfEER ND PROV/ta AS SlalN CW I~ Pt.ANS OM; 4!!1-B. It. LW'.ISCAPINC ND 1"1l£E: PLWTrn:; Sl-w...J. SE" PERM CAII..S84D UMJSCAP£. WiWML ANJ Tl£ VILLAGES or LA C!lSTA .MSrrR Pt.AN. (SU-1)£ ~r[R LMClSCAPE" PUN Fm Tl£ OAl(S) , ND P£R LNDSC4P£ PLAN l'REP«D BY CILUSPIC OCSIQJ. 12. CU.-l£-SAC CtM G'iAOCS 9IAL.L SE" A /11/NIIIUI CF F.f. ,,. 11£ StaJIVIODl/[Dtl.CF'Di' SH4LL PROVIOC NI] INSTALL M'FAO\'ED sma-r LICHT STNON,DS IIMJ FIJCTll£S IN n£ Tl'f'E" Mt) N.M8ER APPROVED BY 11£ CITY (F CW.5840, Tl£ A.a.IC lltA(S tv>ARTIENT • TRNTIC SECTICN AMJ F£R 11£ CITY'S SmffT LIGHT ccwsnax:rr<l¥ SrNDNi'DS. STREIT L/QfT"S AS 9«-i cw THIS WP Al£ 70 IE t.15ED AS A G.JIOC MY. STR£ET LICHTS AS 9t:JIN CN THIS IIAP N£ F£R a«;. 451-8 ND 429-70. 14. THIS PW ASSI.IES a:RTAIN 8AO(B0I£ l~TRI.X:Tlll£ IS Dr/STIN:; rR .4PF'Rl')\£I) ND BQ'ffV F"rR TO n£ SATISF"ACT/C11 or 11-£ CITY OC/r.£.f:R. Tl£Y IHCLI.C£ RNll'.HJ S,WTA F£ lftl40 AMJ A PrlrrlON CT .A\ICN/IM ~. 15. 9£RE 1£assARt IN <R:£11 TO IIE£T n£ 5· /11/NtlUI POSIT/¥( (RAI~ CW S/C£YARDS, t&1'E1£D FOOTlt«:S ,r1u.. 1£ UTILIZED AS AI..LOIED PER GE.OCCW, I/IC. L£rTCRDA1lD.JNol-.OB....OB. F6. Ml. I.IFR!»DEHTS ND awJ/IC ME DC/ST/IC F£R lll'ROVEJefl IN) (R.A/)INC Pl.ANS 443-.5 ND 4411-.5A R£9£C'T/~Y. 17. PRIM TO Tl£ /SSI.W,(£ tT A PR£CIS£ G1WJIM) F£RAIIT at ANY ll.JILD,M; P£JWHS. n£ DC/ST/NC /f#'flaVEJENT OR.A'1M;S ~ 1£ O::WSrRUCTICN 0-w.aD TO SIDI' n£ IE..OCATICW IT ANY lRl~tS. SE1IE1l NIJ IMT£R L.A7ERN.S --,,04 IMY <Drl..lCT ff/TH NIY CITY STNiWl"JS rR PRrPOSED 11£Sl!:£NTfAL !Ml~f~VS. 1B . .ANY R£S/C£NTIAL STRI.CTl.lES rR PCRT/"'5 rT Tl£ S11lLC1LR£ IIO...(.(£l) BJT .M:JT LIMITED TO aD'IS,/P.ATlaS",-91LlXW1£.S TIMT AR£ ,111-1JN FIRE PROTECTJfll .za.£S 9W.L 1£ FIR£ RA1lD NC .IMC{" IT IGNITION 1£$/STN« aN.ifRUCTION. 19. AU LOTS AR£ R£0/JIRfJ) fO H-4\1£" AUTOIMTIC F"Jli(" !PRlll<URS OWNER LC CM/I'S J.7, LJ..C 4747 olOEWI BCUEVARD SUITC 100 SNI D/£aJ, CA 92117 (~)490-2JCIO APPUCANT' LC CWl'S ;J.7, LLC 4147~8Dll.EVARD SU/TC 100 ~IJ'~2~92117 !UlfO A. HAWAII R.C.C. J,f1.51 DArr IIY Rm'STRAlll'.W DPWfS CW 9/Jt7/tw PREPARED BY, NO. REVISIONS DATE BY 2nd51./9AtlffAI.. -~~ :, JrdSIAM"rTA-1. ~ti! SIJ/JIIITTAL roR PC OCAR1Na D4/.Jl'.l/t)a .11A 06/11/08 .11A ....... ..... ... --= ..... a,_ ---PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 08-06(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA c· Of Carlsbad, Calttomia SHEET 1 OF 6 CORTElllNO TJ..,5.0 ~N:;/4"M{MN,J NOTTOSCM..E POfOIIG.4'4-1 a'PVl'~r l'U!l!CulllrrCASDill'tr ro·OIPIMIVl'(VIIO) J'CO\£/l(Tl'P) \_ ~1R11f,l)f1· ~rt' SASCD (SU SrRECTHOr£ '· SHr rJ PORTION OF smo MONTIUA ,-~~\ \_ ,, . t-,, IO"DIPIMlfR Vllll f'PrxSID!:lWK J'COIVl(TYf>) \_ &.'V1· ~IY' """ (S££SIR£ITll!Olll.91TI) smo ARAOO, smo CASTANO, &A POR110N OF smo ~ T,t•5.0 ""ACl""/IB(W,I.J NOTTOSC>.i.£ P(RDIC, ~-• PORTION OF AVENIDASOIB>AD BTA19tl4.IIITD 1z+aJIJ T.l•t.0 4"~A8[1,1f,l) f'fOTTOSCALE PERDIIC.458-1 PORllON OF AVENIDA S01£DAD STA 1!+a.PU017+o1.01 u .. e.o 4"/JC/frAB~) NCITTOSCAl.E P£RDIIC.4511-1 AVENIDA SOLEDAD AKJCREN11"·LOOU.S1REET'IWJHMEDMH RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD ,......,__.,,,..,. EXJSnNGSTREETSECnONS ''"" r.UlllTYLOCAIXWSNIC™"CAt. urc.tSS 01'0lf5[ SH09t (M PI.M Z. ACIUAI.Sllft,CMAI.SfCIJOlt1DflCPf1DIIIPOMEI CW IH£ "lil" VAU£ IUT, ~ BT M"ON'DfQ#EDf PUD 06-06 A DRAINAGE SWALE DETM. (F RETJII""'° WAt.l. 1£0UR'I:, 8 -- •.w.ollfD PfR GCOCD-1 INC. SOILS ffnrR DATfD JAN-08-08 SE.E SHEEf I GENERAL DE.SIGN-Sil[ PLAN NOTf I 15 TYPICAL DRAINAGE SWALE DETAILS NOT 10 SCAJ.£ DRl1£WAYS, SElt£R"' W,'rrR LAIFRAL lOCAncws AR( nPICAl AND SHALL BE Pl.Aa:D IN ACCORO,.,HCC wm CHY srAHOARDS ANO AS IV'PLICA/JlF', ffUCADIA WASlnrA1£R a,smicr STANDA/?OS, AS SHOWN PfR on-owe. 446-5. (SITND1£f1) •ALLOIIE"O P£H GEOCCIH INC. S00.S t£TrER DMW JAH-08-08 SEC SHEET 1 GENER.AL DESIGN-SITE PU.ti NOrE: I 15 SIOCWALK UNOCRDRAIN PCR RCCIDNAL STANDARD 0/iAIIINGS 111U. 8[ PROVIOCD ON ("\o[RY LOT Pr:R DHAIL D-27 l'l'l'IC4L. SECTION CCIINE1I WT SECllONIUI PREPARED BY: -~}rS ,..,..,,,.,,.,._..,YMIIJ PIANTABLE AREA DETAIL. Oill'AllfACCMffJ.218AO'S PnQT"l'(Tc.w.s&\O ST.w'.JMDIM'A-.MlGS-1., PLANNED DEVB.OPMENT PERMrr AMEND. 08-06(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA C Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 2 OF 6 0.1 I TOPOFSLCFE'v,r7 SETBACK V' LINE OF SIGH / H-• / / I I I / / m.mmm~ m mm TOP OF SlOPE SETBACK SECTION 'A' -lYPICAL SCAU:: 1"., 10' NOT£: AS LONG AS A 6.8' t.llN. CNSTMiCE IS MAINTAINED, TI-l[ TOP Of SLOPE SETBAO< RCOUIREWEN rs AA[ M[T I l(J'Of"SLOPE '""""' LINE OF SICHT ' ' 110.4' ACTIJJ LOT 12 SETBAO< I I TOP OF SI.OPE SETBACK SECTION 'B' • TYPICAL SCAL.£: 1"•10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' MIN. OISTmcE IS MAINTAINED, ll-lE TOP Of SLoPE SETBAO< Rf.QUIREMENTS ARE Mn. ,F/ TCl'Of"SUff'v )' SETBACK I LINEOFSIGHT I I I // H-7' I / I / I I TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "C" • TYPICAL SCALE: 1" • 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 5,8' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, THE TIF OF" SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE ME:T. I tl Ta:'OFSI.OPE'\1/ """°' I UNEOFSIGHT I 1 138 "CTUAL 1 LOT 14 SE78ACK I I I ill Ii i I D D lOP OF SLOPE 8ET8ACK SECTION 'll" • lYPICAL SCAL.E: 1" • 10' NOl'E: AS LONG AS A IU!I' M~. OIST-'NCE tS MAINTAINED, THE TOP OF SlOPE SEl8ACK R[OOIREMENfS ARE MET. m 10P OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "E' -lYPICAL SCALE: 1"•10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.1' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, THE TOP Of SLOPE SETB>,Ck REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 1100'A.CTUA( LOT 111 SETBACK C ·Ea rer IEIEIE EE lOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'P • TYPICAL SCALE: i--10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' MIN. OIST.t.NCE IS MAINTAINED, THE TCP OF SlOPE SETBACK REOUIRCMENTS AR£ MET. SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK ~-,•-,o· , )•,. ', '' : ! :· ~ , ; • ~~L SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX HUNSAKER &.ASSOCIATES MPNC.-.... ~ -.a .. aa.tamn --- PUD 06-06 A ARCHfT'ECTURE SUMMARY """ ,a.n. BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY ..... ""· ' ,.,~ " " FOOTl'l'INT TO"tlll.aDO. ICI. H." CO\llllAGI!' •~tr'Fl,~c.E'FH:UU:s:SV~Q/-,._,. lt'E.......,.,.vc,1V,>1,~•79SFl,~SF) PARKING SUMMARY REQUltEDPARKING iV'Sffi;lR PARKHO TOTALS ''" " 0 .l'SSPM:;ES)(SJ• tFORIIE-OUffl"lli SUBJOT,U M.L STMIDMD 11".tlCEI "PER lA COSTA Vl.lAGE MASTER PlAN CEV. STAM».RDS 4.1.2.C.4 ~ PROVIDED PARKNO S!Not.EFAMI.Y U.. 43 2 V A 3 2_.,.CE TOTALS '\/-•-•• -.. ~--UOW<,:UINS•"E-. 1 STREET SPACE ANO t DRNEW"' Y SP ... CE PER VNT. TOT""- at.DG.ICI. "· t.337 roor,,,.NT ICI.H. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMrr AMEND. O&-O&(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA C Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 3 OF 6 TilPOFSL<PE S(TB~OC LINE OF Sllltl 0.1 I I , , BUI Ill f!P:at llll TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'G" • TYPICAL SCALE: 1• • 10' NOTE. AS LONG AS A 6.8' t.llN OIST.t.NCE IS MAINTAINED, TI-I£ TOf' CF SlOPE SElBACK REOUIROIENTS ARE l,l£T. TCl'OFSLOPC~/ SE1BAOI' I ltil[ CJ" SIGH 07 , I I , , , , V 18.5 ACTUAL LOT JJ SETBACK I , , I mmmm Hll Ill ml TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'H' • TYPICAL SCAL£: f" -fO' NOTE: AS LONG -'SA 68' MIN DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REOUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP or SLtf'E """" UNEQ(Sl~T 0.7 ' ., ~ LOT 34 SETBACK I , , I EB mm H EB TOP OF SLOPE SETllACK SECTION T • TYPICAL SCALE: 1• "' 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' MIN DISTANCE tS MAINTAINED, THE ToP OF SLOP£ SET8ACl< REQIJIREMEHTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'J' -TYPICAL SC"1..E: 1• • 10' NOTE; AS LONG AS A 6.8" lrillN. DISTAHCE IS MAINTAINED, TI-£ TOP or SI.OPE SETBM)( REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. mmmmm m ' \ \ \ TOPOTSLCJ>E '"""" Ol UNE CF SICHT \ ' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SEC110N "K' -TYPICAL NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' WIN. DfSTN«:E IS MAJNT~. THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIRDCENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECT10N ,_, -TYPICAL SCAL.£: 1" • 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.8' MJN, DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, 1HE TOP OF SLOPE SEl'BACk REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK ~•·•ra' [mlEiliHinBS [ti m mm 17.8' ACTUAL LOT 42 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'M' -TYPICAL SCAL.t: 1"•10' NOTE: AS LONC AS A 6.8' MIN, DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, TttE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REOUIREll;ENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE 8EJBACK SECTION 'N' • TYPICAL SCALE: I" • 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 8 8' MIN. OISTANC£ IS UAINTAINED, THE TOP Of St.OPE SElliACK ffE0'.JIREMENTS ARE MET. PUD 06-06 A '/ :::::=-....=::_..,, __ _ r'~-----·~•-! r--:1-:··_~). SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX PREPARED BY: ■HUNSAKER ~~pis PLANNED 0EVELDPMENT PERMIT AMEN0. 0&06(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA c· Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 4 OF 6 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43) PLANl'IPE 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C El£VA110N STYLE SPANISH SANTA 11AR1W1A 1\JSCAN SPANISH SANTAIIARIIARA 1\J8CAN SANTA BARBARA 1\JSCAN ,:_..,:, _,_,-_.,~- • --·-.--::..::: -' ~ '. ' , .' PUDO ·;,:'".~---,\ \ -., ·,-,~ '.... I ~~&/~~~~i0;';,~\(sii~~~d•2c1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 0&-08(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA c· Of Carlsbad, Calttornia / SHEET 5 OF 6 A/'N, tz:t-at0-0I SC.lil..El"•60' EASEMENT NOTES £. ~~~ ~1~~~rrfili~o~[~N ill. t,::»:?' c%s:i:i ~"JZ.'::. ,~;rar PIJRPOS[S TO n1c &-. ruJ:fc~C~D w::t¼"'fkttt~~~r° W~~~s~O:: :}'f D:::J::ffrAJ.RCCORDITJ SfPTWCBCR 2J, 1980, AS rt£ NO. 80-J08501, AND RECORD£D AUGUST 20, 1981 AS nL£ NO. 81-2660JO, eon, or OF'FICIAt RCCOROS. £ :Sftif"J:'r%u~la:JfJ,'~5u,.Cf t"fi:EJ.s ~r~-%~i~~0~l~w. RECORDS. £ ~ u:t~s~~;~s ANO l,UJNT[N,WC[ fASOl(NT TO VALJ.!CJros WA1[R DIS1RICT GRANrro In. A PUB/..IC UTIIJTI' !.NO ACCfSS D,SDICNT GR/,Nft[) ON WP 15649. & :icf:i&/&cr~~G~i ~~;N ~~:7,~ ~ ~ ;,.fgf":cf:k~U&l[NT _&_~U:I" ~f.:cHc~~1r:;;_'!;w:f",:J5Z:;:'.106~i~f;~-•~•w omcit.t.R[COROS. 0 !NDJC.Af£S SICJff PISTANCE CONRJ(IOR t:.RAAT£D OH ~ NO. l56-t9. SIJBDIVISlON BOUNDARY MAP NO. 16:S'ltl LOT 1116 --- --------- ------------MASTER TENTATIVE -MAP BOUNDARY PREPARED BY: -~~ flMRCl ............ llllMl9IG lam.,Clltnn --- PUD 06-06 A SUBDMSION IIOUNDNIY MASTER TENTATIVE MAP BOUNDARY HH'MUlf'iOfQ;: EXISTING EASEMENT EXHIBIT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 08-06(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 (LOTS 1-43 OFC.T. ~) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA c· Of Carlsbad, Calttornia SHEET 6 OF 6 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 ELE/ATION STYLES (LOTS 1-43) PLAN 1A O SPANISH PLAN1B•SANTAIIAAIIARA PLAN 1 C • TUSCAN PLAN 2A • SPANISH PLAN 2B 0 8ANTAIIAAIIARA PLAN 2C • TUSCAN PLAN 3A • SPANISH PLAN 3B • SANTA IIARBAIIA PLAN IC • TUSCAN FENGE LE&END SPLIT F.AGE PILASTER SPLIT FAGE MASONRY Y"lALL TUBE STEEL FENGE Y'iOOD FENCE FIRE RE-SISTANT ~OD FENC.E SPLIT FAGE MASONRY Y'lALL (MASTER BUILDER) i"tOOD FENGE RETURN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONl.-'f) FIRE RESIST ANT ..-00D FENGE RETURN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY) NOTE, ALL SIDE Y.ARD FENCES SHALL NOT ENGROAGH ON F'RONT YARD SETBACK. _j_~_;,i.'1:el~L~~-•7 •-.·.• .. ,. ,· ~,,1~\F .Nc1 , . I , ., /' /: / " '•, ·, •• • • c •• , • , •• .-.,,~ ./ '--~----~--_·,._--._--:,·· '•. ____:.,,_ ••• • -·---~--. ~ -• =-r-"~-~~'~ SITE SUMMARY PLAN 1-12 PLAN2·16 PLAN 3-15 TOTAL-43 PREPARED BY: ■HUNSAKER ~~:1'-5 __ ..,._ -1a.-.aai .....-:..__. ___ LOT NUMBER AND PAD ELEVATION PLAN TYPE ELEVAllONS STYlE AND COLOR SCHEME SETBACK DIMENSION TO GARAGE SETBACK DIMEN8ION TO PORCH/PATIO OR DECK r··"'-1 SE111ACK DIMENSION TO UVAIIIE FENCING PLAN LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.7 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, camomia 6UEST el/lU,i=R ~"151 '!o.RM'r' '5REEN' Rl.eERJZED Re51LIENT SURFAC.IN6 ENHANGEt> G,ONCRETI: PAVINB pARl(J,!Ay PLANTIN6 SEA Tl'IAI.I. 6UEST el/11.C>ER PLANS (t>-"151-&W 1--~-:r1~:~1;:1~:~ .--IM.. . ~--. ---":_ SAADEH FOc-AL POINT BOX C,ITYOFC.~ C,Ol'tNERC,LEAR ZONE ~ "TREE • SHFiUB PLANTIN65 ARE PER --PLAN11N6 SAA'l'EC> eAc.K PER Af'l'1'0VEC> 6UEST el/lU,ER l..',Nc,SC,Al'E PLAl6 ...__-.C:.~--< ~ 61JE5T el/lLJ,ER PLANS ~~ ~~~~~~(t\~~~~~i?~~~~;·;~~i~~~~~~~~ -LIMIT OF YIORK. INC>ic.ATI:S PROPOSEC> AC>..LJ511'ENTS TO APPROVED 6UEST ~ '- el/11.C>ER LANC>5C,Al'E PLANS (t>-"1!11-&W. YIORK. INC,IJ.l>E5 TIE AC>C>ITION OF A e,+m.~ TOT LOT, SEATIN6 AREA IV ENHAc.ED PAYERS, ADA AC,C,E55 i"IAU<:, ENHANC,ED G,ONCl'ETI: z:>Ec.OlilATIVE BOULDERS, AC>C>ITIONAL PLANTIN6 ANO REVISEC> MOl'I CURB PAVIN6 LOc.ATION. ALL l'IORJc; OUTSIDE TIE LIMIT OF l'IORJc; 15 PER TIE APPROVED 6UEST el/lLJ,l=R LANC>5C,Al'E PLAN!!. TANICAI.. NAMe/CA~"l"/t:>!SC,. COMMON NAM!! size PLAY :=,JBUC]YRE DETAIL 21 ® GISll.&X-=~ 5eAL.IOOIII 5 eAL. IOOIII 58AL. IOOIII 5 eAL., IOOIII ,·or.. 6'0.(,. 3'0.(,. MUNITY FA~K SITE (D MEl..'UIJl,A teof'\iJLA PIN::1£1..,lUlJC;A €9 ~NJS 'COU.ltlStiaOD IIISRAM' ~-• HMVfArratJ.IITA'tltNA' El.LE: FOX TAIL MAVf 8 ~. 0 -~l"•IO' eE 'TAN' ARMY' 6REEN Fll.8elaRIZED Re51LIENT SURFAc.!N6 SLIDE, I.AC>C>ER, l'OC/F , PREPARED BY: -•- =~.~~ LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 PARK SITE, PUD 06--06 (A) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, CalHornia LA COSTA OAKS PLANNING AREA 3.7 COLRICH DEVELOPMENT Cl - --~-------7 I I I 0 I I 0 I I "-I -·-0 ..,, .. I I LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 PLAN ONE 1,913 SQ. Ff. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNE),200!1 t L - .-.. ........ ... ..,, ... l=IR6T l=LOOR !=I.AN 'A' P'NTPI..OCflL..-M•"· e;aGf"I.OOll, ...... f'T. '""" ........... ..,. . ....... 4ia4M.Pr. ~l.,ffllllll.t'T, ~PUICIII~""-"• ........,,.,.,.,,.. ~,.,.,. T'l'l'II .. I ! l ,--------,I I LEFT &lpli EiLf!YATlat,,.I 'A' RIGI-IT &Ip@ EILEiyATION 'A' PLAN ONE. SPANISH LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 C:OLRICH Df.VELOPMF.MT JUNE3,200R I I l --W•N? '""" FOR ELEVATION 'A' lJSE COLOII. sc_'IIEMES 1 • 6 PF.R COLOR R(l. ... Rns PROVTOf)) BY ANN MATTESON DATED 1-2+-08 REAR NYA'l'ION 'A' ...... IW■k, - 1 --~-------7 I I 0 I I I I 0 I """"' I -... 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _____ _j LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 PLAN ONE 1,913 SQ. IT. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNE),200!1 l' - ........ .... , ... ... _. ... , .. a. .... _,,_,,. ...... .. ~ .. - ------------ ...,.P\OCII', ~-l'T-~l"I.DOll..-!M.l"T. TI)TM..IJlll-.1"'1' . .....__,,Q,I, ... ,.,.. ~l,4Tf ....... . -=ac-l"l,C:ll:llt~"'M ... ..,.. ___. ...... .... ~,...,. ,....,. ... i l t I l ~II UFT -&10E! E!6EyATION •a• RIGMT -&10E! E!6E!yATION •a• PLAN ONE-SANT A BARBARA LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 COLRIClt DFVELOPMENT JUNEJ.20011 lr.MDlll•P-d NOTE: FOil ELEVATION'S' USI! COLOR SCtlF.MES I • t, PF.R COLOR BOARDS PROVlnFn BY ANN M,tTTESON DA7ED 1-l4-Jll RW M'(ATION 'a' ki,IU,IW■,_,, 0 "-......... .,, ... 0 I I I blm!m-r.i""""""'5lmmmr-----------~ :B02NP FL.OOR F'L.,Mj 'C' LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 PLAN ONE l,913 SQ. Ff. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNEJ,20011 ... .l•C:U.: ..... ---.,, ... --- ...... l'LDOlll,'"4M.P'I'. a:oo l"l,.Ota ... ,,.. 'TO\'-"a,\M'IA,.,.,. . ........ ,G4_"· CCMIIMlltl,tT'JM.P'I", ~fUIOR~""-"· _..,.._ ~ nN ,,,. .... I I l 6eEI e10a P61!'fATION ·c· RIGMT e10a liLF(ATION 'C' PLAN ONE -TUSCAN LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 C:OlRCCH OFVFWPMF.W JUNE3,200II Tl.leC.4N ~ONT ELF(ATION 'C' IGM6W'•""' NOTE: roll l'l f.VA.TI01'1 'I';" \JSf",{'OlOll. SC'!WMFS 7 • 9 PEil C'OLOR BOARDS PkOVIDED BY ANN MATTESON DATED 1-24-0I BJ=AR ELEyATION '0' ~ t,,n, M. "· Jtt>l"LOQt.,..MA""'2lfl'Olf',_,.f"LelCIIIU.,.,. ~e:QOP'I.OCl!t~ ..-rP'I.OClllo ..,,. ... ,,,., ~PUlellll, .. N,f'T, TDl'"H,. ....... ..,.. ~----P'I'. PLANE ONE ROOF F'L.AN 'S' ~""'"-"· alJP'LClCIIIU,MA""'"""Of'...,l'\.OClltU,,.,. INOll:A1ele::CICl'l'Locllt@ PLAN ONE LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 <:OLRICH DEVFLOPMF.NT JUNE],20011 ~~<l'M-Pr. a;QGPL.Cea, ... ..,._ 1"TM,.,UD•"· ~ 434-Pf'- PLANE ONE PLANE TWO . t------+-'-PLANE TWO L:.·.c:. • ........... f • c .. ·.: .. :· .: .. L)------>< 201'\.0C11tU.MAPl!lllc:IM'Ol'f'NTn,,OGIIIU'.,.,. ,_,.l'I.OC)lllo...,. ... ,,,._ --.citlJ l'L,DClllo .. 9G. "· nw....,....,...,,,,._ ......e,434M.,,,.. Bif8 pvATION 'C::' UJ/ .OE9$; OF!'ION .....,..,.,., Ri+8 BL.E'(A't'ION 'B-' UJ/ .OE9S OF!'ION .. ..,.,., PLAN ONE -llJSCAN LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 C.OLIUC.H OEVF.LOPMF.NT R.M,R. §6EVATION 'A' UJ/ .OE9S OPTION """61W•HI' ,------- / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L. ' ' ' □ □ □ LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 PLAN 1WO 2, 11 R SQ. FT. COLRJCH COMMUNillES JUNEJ,20011 PIR&T PLOOR PLAN 'A' ""-l'~<IM-". ~~l.a4-". 'fOTM..,2JII, ... ..,. . ............. "· ~1"9--". ---~Tl"N,Tl'N ... I II ■ 1111 L.Ef't e10a EIL.Ey.A.TION 'A' ■ I RIGHT el0a EL.El'(ATION 'A' PLAN TWO~ SPANISH LA COST A OAKS PLANNJNG AREA 3.7 COLRlCH DE\'ELOPMENT JUNEJ, 20011 IC'.H61,11'•f<I' NOT!'. FOR EllVATION 'A' USE COLOR SCJU:MES I -6PF.R C:OLOR ROA RDS f'JIOYmm nv ANN MATff.SON DATED 1-14--0I Ri.A.R EIL.EyATION 'A' IGMll,l,ll'•P"1' ,------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L. D D D ' ' ' -· ,,.,,,.,, ....... _J r LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 PLAN TWO 2,118 SQ. FT. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNEJ,20011 t t -.. .... , .... ....... l=l~T l=LOOi=t PL.AN 'S' ,..,.l"LOCll'I, ...... "· mcato~JM ... ". TOT' ..... 2,U ... "· ~11:1-". ~~-"-_,,,,_.,_ ... ~TIOM,.,,..~W t 'el ,_ ""LE!YATION RIGHT~ ..... ,"' -~--,.,, JlJNE3,200JI ,------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L_ □ □ □ ' ' ' "--·--... ffiONp P699R F'l,AN 'C' LA COSTA OAKS 3. 7 PLAN TWO 2,118 SQ. FT. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNE3,200R t t _ .. .......... -... f"NTP\..OCll"o~ ... "- ~f'I.Dal, ........ ". 'ltl'TAw ::uaM.PT . ......-.m•"· GOw'IIIMIJ, ........ "· ---~,,,.,,... .. t f j..pT-6L0E @6@YATION 'C' ~IGl-+T -eg El6SVATION 'C::' PLAN TWO -TUSCAN LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 C:OLRICH DF.VF.LOPMF.NT JUNE3,200R ~6SVATION 'C' IC#&Allt•P4' NITTE: FOJI. F.I.F.¥1' TION 'C" USE COLOR SCIIFMES 7-9 PER COLOR BOARDS PROVIDED BY ANN MATTESON DATED 1-2""411 PLANE FOUR t--f-''-:?'~+ir-;;6,,,,;;~'r;iEi:::;rc ... .:~;,;..\:,;;,.·,,;,,;.?'i;:-~:---PLANE THREE~ .-.-. .• -.-.._--_._ ... __ 's(,-::e:~--PLANE THREE -=~--:~=r""'"---"'-""=:-'"""'~""'"+-+---PLANE TWO l--L-'--L--+~~-'--~"-:-·"-c..r:"-c_;7' •"-'--/~ '<'< ",.-"'"-::"-""''-'-';::::::af===it=""'""'-1--..1....L--pLANE TWO "-----"-""-'-----"'-'--4' ' - +----------tz'.=:2::.22:.:bz2..'.':~~+---PLANE ONE ~ ...... -". aD"-"'°"".,..MA1'191131ft'Of',_,.l'I..QClltU.,._ ~aKICIIDl"LDIM.~ -=rr=-==~ TOrM.,..2,1 •• Pr. ........ It,! • ..,.. .aDl"LDIM.U.,.APIIIICatfOl"f"Nrl"l,OClll.111'.,._ ~ IIIISCQD ,i.oc:wt~ ,....1'1.Dca,4MM.Pr, -.GtCn..oi::... ..... 1112.PT, -n:,r ..... 2,ltt ... P"f . .,,.,.,.m•"· PLAN TWO LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 (.'OLRlrH DEVF.I.OPMF.NT JUNE),20011 .Ol'\Ol:lll,V.MAPIIIICiaft'Ol"f'Nl'l'\.Oelltat'.,._ IICIIGA--.c:itOft.OCR~ ,_,.PL,OcM, ... -.l"r. ~...,,.,.. ......... Pr. ,m'M.,2,119M.l"r. .,,.,,.,.112 .... ..,., l=t@ ELEYATION 'C:' W/ .ose; OPTION ~""·""' II II II R@Al=t EL.EEyATION 'B.' W/ .osgc:; OPTION ...,..llll!"•NP Jl,NE3,200ft l=tEA.l=t EI.EyATION 'A' WI .OEOC: O!=TION KMafllll'•kY' [ 1 ----=----.J. b r-~-------, I I I ? I --I I I I I ~--,,.--..... ---~ I I I I I I I ~ [] I I I I .. _ -·-...... 0 0 I ~-----------~ L ___ _J [] LA COSTA OAKS 3. 7 Plan 3 2,467 Sq. FL COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNEJ,2008 [:A" .,.:r .. ---...... -... -----... -.. -;;;;;.;;-~_,.,,.._-~-::',,....--'l"""'ll-11 I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I _, .. .... , .... ...... f1™ J.aa .... ...,,.,_ ...... --' l=IRe"I' 1=600R Pj.AN 'A' .....-""1ca ...... "· a:GIOl"LOCllltl.-,:N.l"r. ,orM..,2,4M ... "· ............. "· ~"""'-"· ~PI.OOIII:~•-"· ----~-rr,en,e.,. 6Ef'T' -6l0R EL.&VA'T'ION '.A.' PLAN TIIREE-SPANJSH LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 COLRICII nf\lF.LOPMP.NT JUNE 3,20011 -eP.ANiel-l COL.ONIAL. !=RON'T' EI.EVA'T'ION '.A.' IG,ld,r.lf'•F-o' NOTE FOR lcLGV ... TION 'A' Wm COLOR SCHtlMES I • 6 Pl'Jl COLOR BOARDS PROVIDED BY ANN"MATrnSONOATED r.u.a, Rl=4R ELEMA.'T'ION 'A' I DECORATIVE srucro RE("'f.SS WI WROUGHTlllON METAL ROU UP GAR.\GE lX>OR D~ORATIVE FOAM SHUUTF.ll WI \\'.I. CUP ll(RSOlnt.OOKF.RS ~ w 1 1...r-------1 [ ---------,~ I I I ? I --I I I I I r-...... -------~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I -· ........ ... u I 0 0 LJ l _______________ J :§ECONO !=LOO~ !='LAN 'B' LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 Plan 3 2,467 Sq. Ft. COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNE J,20011 -4 .... ...,. ... u J.aa ..... _,,..,... ... u l"MST"-Deat.BlllCLPr. a.QIDl'I..DC:llt.1,812M.Pr. TVTH.o~M.Pr . .......,._ .... .._PT. ~LM'TM.Pr. ac:atDft.C:lelfl~ ..... ..,. _ _ ,,_,.. ~ n'l'e, TT'l'e w 6EET 610EI ElbEIYATION 'B' RIGt:;tT -610EI EL.Ey.A.TION 'B' PLAN THREE -SANT A BARBARA LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 COi.RiCH DFVlil.OPMRNT JUNEJ,2008 I I t 6ANT A BA"6ARA PRONT E6EIY.A.TION 'B' ...,..W'•H" ~rtLEVATION '0' LISI: COLOR SCHEME.<; J -6 PER COLOk BOARDS PROVIDED BY ANN MATTESON DA TEO l-24,0I .. ~ -I r...r----------, [ ---------,~ I I I 1' I --I I I I I r-.,..--...,.--.i_ I I I I I ~ □ I I I I "--·-...... 0 0 I I I ~-----------~ L ___ _J n §EOONO l=l.99R Fl.AN 'C' LA COSTA OAKS 3.7 Plan 3 2,467 Sq. FL COLRICH COMMUNITIES JUNEJ,20011 ~IM"■l'-o" l•CIMI ...... ....,....., .., ... _ _, ....,."'"°°"' ...... ". ecOID"--oU112-". n:,r ...... a,,._ ... "· ~ ...... ..,._ ~\M1 ... ..,.. a::ctDP'l.aoll-~--"-_,,_ ... ~'ffll'llin'Pl:¥11 LEFT ate■ ■L■vATION ·e· lltlGMT atca EILEyA,TION 'C' PLAN TIIREE -TUSCAN LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 COlRlrH DF.Vf,l.OPMENT JUNE J,2008 I I t ~ELEVATION 'C' ..-.w•HI' NOTE: POR liUlVATION 'C' US!i COLOll SCUtMU 7 -9 PER COLOR B(MRDS PkOVIDtll BY ANN MATTESON DATI::D L-2+<11 lltEIA!lt ELEiYATION 'C' r PLANE ONE PLANE TWO PLANE THREE PLANE THREE PLANE TWO '-'le-+-------------PLANE ONE ~---~---~ ~OOIIPL..W 'C' ...,.l'LOl:ai.alN.Pr. e.OID l'l,OC& I.DD IA l"I". n,rH..,2,4191&rr. ~ ....... ..,.. ______ _, ------ ~OOP PL.A.N 'B! ...-..aW•l"O" PLAN THREE LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3. 7 COLIUCII DF.VFLOPMF.NT JUNEJ,200fl ,,,,,.,l'UIQII,._,_,.,._ e;QOf'I.OGllllol,mll&"· 'l'OT""'-'~liil.l"I", ~ ...... "· PLANE ONE +--------------,,------,-----.....-PLANE ONE PLANE THREE PLANETWO 1' PLANE ONE ~OOP PL.A.N 'A' ~...., ... ..,._ .3/IOf'I.OC:IIIU,MAPIIIICl!NrOf'l'NTl'\.OC:IIIU,,,- P'Nl'ft.ocAl.-iN.Pr. m:;QM:tl"L,0Cllt.(.a2 ... l"I". n:,T'M.,2,419M.l"I". .,,...... ....... Pl'. PLANE THREE PLANE THREE PLANET\V. FitlEAFit El.EYATION 'O' W/ PEOIS OPTION IC#la.lW•kl' §.A.Fit §1-eYATION 'B' W/ pEOIC: O!='TION tcW.61/11'•P"1 PLAN THREE -TUSCAN LA COST A OAKS PLANNING AREA 3.7 COLRIC"ll DFVF.I.OPMF.NT JUNEJ,2008 II ✓, / // /1// ,.,,.,/,p ,I,/• ; ~ ; M ' , / . ,, -' FitEA,Fit EbEYATION 'A' W/ .t>Ec:.lc:. OPTION 11:H&..,•P-d