HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 2021-0001; GARFIELD HOMES; PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY; 2020-12-01-
•
-
-
-
•·
-
-
-
-------..
--
Executive Summary
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Proposed Project
Conclusions
References
Methodology
Introduction
TABLE OF CONTENTS
County of San Diego Criteria
Runoff Coefficient Determination
Hydrology & Hydraulic Model Output
Pre-Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100-Year Event)
Post-Developed Hydrologic Calculations ( l 00-Year Event)
Pre-Developed vs. Post-Developed Peak Flows ( 100-Year Event)
Appendix
lsopluvial Maps
Intensity Duration Design Charts
Runoff Coefficients
Hydrologic Soil Group -USDA Web Soil Sutv'ey
Pre-Development Hydrology Node Map
Post-Development Hydrology Node Map
SECTION
1.0
I.I
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
4.0
-----
-
---
• -
-
-
-
• -
• -
• -
-
---
--
PLSA 3391-01
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
This Preliminary Hydrology Study for the proposed development at 4008 Garfield Street,
known as the Garfield Homes, has been prepared to analyze the hydrologic and hydraulic
characteristics of the existing and proposed project site. This report intends to present
both the methodology and the calculations used for determining the runoff from the
project site in both the pre-developed (existing) conditions and the post-developed
(proposed) conditions produced by the l 00-ycar, 6-hour stonn.
1.2 Existing Conditions
The subject property is located along Garfield Street, southeast of the Garfield Street and
Chinquapin A venue intersection, in the City of Carlsbad. The site is bound by Garfield
Street to the west, Chinquapin A venue to the north, and residential development to the
south and east. The existing site consists of a single-family residential structure,
detached garage, and other hardscape and landscape improvements typical to the
surrounding residential sites. The project site is located in the Agua Hedionda
Hydrologic Area, and, more specifically, the Los Monos Hydrologic Sub-Area (904.3 l).
The subject property has an approximate area of 0.138 acres and is approximately 51 %
impervious in the existing condition. Per the Web Soil Survey application available
through the United States Department of Agriculture, the basin is generally categorized to
have type B hydrologic soils. Based on the existing impervious area and land use type, a
pre-development weighted runoff coefficient of 0.58 was calculated for the subject
property using the methodology described in section 3.1.2 of the San Diego County
Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein.
The existing site can be categorized into a single drainage basin designated as basin
EX-I, and comprises the entire property. Drainage basin EX-I primarily drains from
west to east, discharging onto Chinquapin Avenue by surface and sheet flow methods.
Once on Chinquapin Avenue, runoff leaving the site travels east along Chinquapin
Avenue and enters an existing storm drain inlet at the end of the public street. Storm
water collected in the drain at the end of Chinquapin Avenue continues to be conveyed
through public storm water facilities until ultimately reaching the Pacific Ocean .
Using the Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology
Manual, a peak flow rate and time of concentration were calculated for the 100-year, 6-
hour stonn event for the onsite drainage basins. Table 1 below summarizes the results of
the Rational Method calculations.
Page I of9
PLSA 3391-01
EXISTING DRAINAGE FLOWS
DRAINAGE Q,oo DRAINAGE 1100 AREA (CFS) (IN/HR) AREA (ACRES)
EX-1 0.138 0.51 6.42
Table 1. Existing Condition Peak Drainage Flow Rates
Refer to pre-development hydrology calculations included in Section 3.1 of this report for
a detailed analysis of the existing drainage basin, as well as a pre-development hydrology
node map included in the appendix of this report for pre-development drainage basin
delineation and discharge locations.
1.3 Proposed Project
The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing onsite improvements and the
construction of three (3) new single-family residential condominiums. Construction
activities such as grading and onsite hardscape improvements are also proposed.
Hardscape improvements include the construction of concrete driveways and walkways.
The development project also includes offsite improvement in the right-of-way such as
public concrete walkways, new curb and gutter, and driveway aprons. Miscellaneous
landscape improvements typical to residential development are also being proposed. As
in the existing condition, stonn water will flow from west to cast in the post-development
condition. Storm water collection from structures and other onsite hardscape features
will be dispensed into landscaped areas around proposed building and conveyed via
landscaped swales to brooks box catch basins. Catch basin will be connected to 3" PVC
underdrain pipes directing water onto Chinquapin A venue. As in the pre-development
condition, water will then continue east through public facilities until ultimately reaching
the Pacific Ocean.
The subject property is approximately 70% impervious in the proposed condition. Based
on the proposed impervious area and land use type, a post-development weighted runoff
coefficient of 0.71 was calculated for the subject property using the methodology
described in section 3.1.2 of the San Diego County Hydrology Manual and the formula
provided therein. The proposed site consists of a single drainage basin designated as
PR-I. Drainage basin PR-I consists of the entire project property, and as previously
discussed will all drain into the Chinquapin right-of-way.
Using the Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology
Manual, a peak flow rate and time of concentration were calculated for the I 00-year, 6-
hour storm event for the onsite drainage basins. Table 2 below summarizes the results of
the Rational Method calculations in the post-developed condition.
Page 2 of9
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ..
.. .. .. .. ..
..
~
..
~ .. ...
•
•
•
•
• -
-
•
►, ---------
►
PLSA 3391-01
PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOWS
DRAINAGE DRAINAGE Qwo 1,oo AREA AREA (ACRES) (CFS) (IN/HR)
PR-l 0.138 0.49 5.03
Table 2. Proposed Condition Peak Drainage Flow Rates
Refer to post-development hydrology calculations included in Section 3.2 of this report
for a detailed analysis of the proposed drainage basin, as well as a post-development
hydrology node map included in the appendix of this report for post-development
drainage basin delineation and discharge locations.
In an effort to comply with the City of Carlsbad storm water standards, the proposed site
has incorporated LID design techniques to optimize the site layout. Runoff from
proposed roofs and new or removed and replaced hardscapc areas will be directed to
landscaped areas in an effort to disperse drainage to pervious surfaces. The landscaped
areas will assist to remove sediment and particulate-bound pollutants from storm water .
1.4 Conclusions
Based upon the analysis included in this report, there is a difference of ~0.02 cfs in peak
runoff between the proposed development and the existing condition. Similar to the
existing condition, the project will discharge onto Chinquapin Avenue. Water will not be
diverted away from existing drainage patterns, and the difference in runoff will not have
any adverse effect on the downstream watershed and can be considered negligible. The
proposed project will be exempt from hydromodification compliance requirements as it
does not qualify as a Priority Development Project as defined in the Regional Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit and the San Diego County Model BMP
Design Manual. An additional detention analysis was not performed at this time as it was
determined that the project decreases runoff in the proposed condition from the pre-
project condition .
Page 3 of9
PLSA 3391-01
1.5 References
"San Diego County Hydrology Manual", revised June 2003, County of San Diego,
Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section.
"San Diego County Hydraulic Design Manual", revised September 2014, County of San
Diego, Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section
''City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards, Volume 5: Carlsbad BMP Design Manual
(Post Construction Treatment BMPs) '', revised February 2016
"Low Impact Development Handbook -Stonnwater Management Strategies", revised
July 2014, County of San Diego, Department of Public Works
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoi!survey.nrcs.usda.gov.
Accessed May 20, 2020
Page 4 of9
-
------..
.. .. .. .. .. -.. -..
... ..
... .. -.. .. .. -
---
... .. -
-
• --
• --
-------
•
-
• -
-
• -
-
-
-.. --
PLSA 3391-0l
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction
The hydrologic mode] used to perform the hydrologic analysis presented in this report
utilizes the Rational Method (RM) equation, Q=CIA. The RM formula estimates the
peak rate of runoff based on the variables of area, runoff coefficient, and rainfall
intensity. The rainfall intensity (J) is equal to:
I= 7.44 X P, X o-0 ""
Where:
I= Intensity (in/hr)
P6 = 6-hour precipitation (inches)
D = duration (minutes -use Tc)
Using the Time of Concentration (Tc), which is the time required for a given element of
water that originates at the most remote point of the basin being analyzed to reach the
point at which the runoff from the basin is being analyzed. The RM equation determines
the storm water runoff rate (Q) for a given basin in terms of flow (typically in cubic feet
per second (cfs) but sometimes as gallons per minute (gpm)). The RM equation is as
follows:
Where:
Q=CIA
Q = flow (in cfs)
C -=-runoff coefficient, ratio of rainfall that produces storm water
runoff (runoff vs. infiltration/evaporation/absorption/etc)
I= average rainfall intensity for a duration equal to the Tc for the
area, in inches per hour.
A= drainage area contributing to the basin in acres.
The RM equation assumes that the stonn event being analyzed delivers precipitation to
the entire basin uniformly, and therefore the peak discharge rate will occur when a
raindrop that falls at the most remote portion of the basin arrives at the point of analysis.
The RM also assumes that the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff or the runoff
coefficient C is not affected by the storm intensity, I, or the precipitation zone number.
Page 5 of9
PLSA 3391-01
2.2 County of San Diego Criteria
As defined by the County Hydrology Manual dated June 2003, the rational method is the
preferred equation for determining the hydrologic characteristics of basins up to
approximately one square mile in size. The County of San Diego has developed its own
tables, nomographs, and methodologies for analyzing stonn water runoff for areas within
the county. The County has also developed precipitation isopluvial contour maps that
show even lines of rainfall anticipated from a given storm event (i.e. 100-year, 6-hour
storm).
One of the variables of the RM equation is the runoff coefficient, C. The runoff
coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil type and the County of San Diego
has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas to be applied to basin
located within the County of San Diego. The table categorizes the land use, the
associated development density (dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of
impervious area. Each of the categories listed has an associated runoff coefficient, C, for
each soil type class.
The County has also illustrated in detail the methodology for determining the time of
concentration, in particular the initial time of concentration. The County has adopted the
Federal Aviation Agency's (FAA) overland time of flow equation. This equation
essentially limits the flow path length for the initial time of concentration to lengths under
100 feet, and is dependent on land use and slope. The time of concentration minimum is
5 minutes for purposes of calculating rainfall intensity per the County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual requirements.
2.3 Runoff Coefficient Determination
As stated in section 2.2, the runoff coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil
type and the County of San Diego has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban
Areas to be applied to basin located within the County of San Diego. The table, included
in the Appendix of this report, categorizes the land use, the associated development
density (dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of impervious area.
For this study, a weighted runoff coefficient was used for both the pre-project and post~
developed site in accordance with the equation provided in Section 3.1.2 of the County of
San Diego Hydrology Manual. The weighted runoff coefficient is a function of the total
impervious and pervious surface areas in the existing and proposed conditions.
Page 6 of9
.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. --.. -.. --.. -.. .. .. -
-
-
• -
..
-
• -
.....
-
-
-
-
•
-
---
-
-
-----
--
PLSA 3391-0 I
3.0 HYDROLOGY MODEL OUTPUT
3.1 Pre-Developed Hydrologic Model Output (JOO-Year Event)
Pre-Development:
*Rational Method Equation Q=CIA
P100= 2.5 * 100-Year, 6-Hour Rainfall Precipitation
Total Site
Tota1Area=6,00I sf~ 0.138Acres
Impervious Area= 3,032 sf-+ 0.070 Acres
Pervious Area= 2,969 sf-+ 0.068 Acres
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
-0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual (SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
-0.9, C value for developed/ impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 3,032 sf+ 0.25 x 2,969 sf= 0.58
6,001 sf
Tc=ti+tt ti@ 100'=8.3% '=> 4.0 min from Table 3-2
tt => L=l56'-IOO'= 56' 6E=58.5-57.6=0.9'
tt= [ { 1 l.9(L/5,280)'3 }/6E]'0.385
11= [ { 11.9(56/5,280)'3 //0.9]'0.385 = 0.02
0.02 x 60 = 1.2 Min.
Tc = 4.0 + 1.2 = 5.2 Min
Tc= 5.2 Min
I= 7 .44 x P6 x o-M45 *Rainfall Intensity Equation
I= 7.44 x 2.5 x 5.2-"645 " 6.42 in/hr
Q,oo-0.58 x 6.42 in/hr x 0.138 Ac= 0.51 cfs
Page 7 of9
PLSA 3391-0l . '
4.0 APPENDIX
•
•
•
•
•
------.. ------Page 9 of9
--
-
-
-
-
•
•
• ----
--------
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Section:
Page:
)
12 of26
Note that the Initial Time of Concentration should be reflective of the general land-use at the
upstream end of a drainage basin. A single lot with an area of two or less acres does not have
a significant effect where the dramage basin area is 20 to 600 acres_
Table 3-2 provides limits of the length (Maximum Length (LM)) of sheet flow to be used in
hydrology studies. Initial T1 values based on average C values for the Land Use Element are
also included. These values can be used in planning and design applications as described
below. Exceptions may be approved by the "Regulating Agency" when submitted with a
detailed study.
Element*
Natural
LDR
LOR
LDR
MOR
MOR
MOR
MOR
HDR
HOR
N.Com
G.Com
O.P./Com
Limited l.
General I.
Table 3-2
MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH (LM)
& INITIAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (T1\
DU/ .5% 1% 2% 3% 5%
Acre LM T, LM T, LM T, LM T, LM T,
50 I 3.2 70 12.5 85 10.9 100 10.3 100 8.7
I 50 12.2 70 11.5 [ 85 10.0 100 9.5 100 8.0
2 50 11.3 70 10.5 ; 85 9.2 100 8.8 100' 7.4
2.9 50 10.7 70 10.0 85 8.8 95 8.1 100 7.0
4.3 50 10.2 70 9.6 80 8.1 95 7.8 l00 6.7
7.3 50 9.2 65 8.4 80 7.4 95 7.0 100 6.0
l0.9 50 8.7 65 7.9 80 6.9 90 6.4 l00 5.7
14.5 50 8.2 65 7.4 80 6.5 90 6.0 100 5.4
24 50 6.7 65 6.1 75 5.1 90 4.9 95 4.3
43 50 5.3 65 4.7 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4
50 5.3 60 4.5 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4
50 4.7 60 4.1 75 3.6 85 3.4 90 2.9
50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.6
50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.6
50 3.7 60 3.2 70 2.7 80 2.6 90 2.3
10%
LM T,
100 6.9
100 6.4
100 5.8
100 5.6
100 5.3
100 4.8
100 4.5
100 4.3
l00 3.5
JOO 2.7
100 2.7
100 2.4
100 2.2
100 2.2
100 1.9
*See Table 3-1 for more detailed description
3-12
D
CJ
Data used for
Pre-Developement hydrology
Data used for
Post-Developement hydrology
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Table 3-1
Section:
Page:
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
Land Use Runoff Coefficient "C"
Soil T e
NRCS Elements Count Elements %IMPER. A B
Undisturbed NaturaJ Terrain (Natural) Permanent Open Space o• 020 0.25
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 1.0 DU/A or less JO 027 0.32
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.0 DUI A or less 20 0.34 0.38
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.9 DU/A or less 25 0.38 0,41
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 4,3 DU/A or less 30 0.41 0.45
Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 7.3 DU/A or less 40 0.48 0.51
Medium Density RcsidentiaJ (MDR) Residential, 10.9 DU/A or Jess 45 0.52 0.54
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 14.5 DU/A or less 50 0.55 0,58
High Density Residential (HOR) Residential, 24.0 DUiA or less 65 0.66 0.67
High Density Residential (HOR) Residential. 43.0 DU/ A or less 80 0,76 0,77
Commcrcial/lndustrial (N. Com) Neighborhood Commercial 80 0.76 0.77
C'ommercial/IndustriaJ (G. Com) General C.ommercial 85 0.80 0,80
Commercial/Industrial (O.P. Com) Otlice Professional/Commercial 90 0,83 0,84
Commercial/Industrial (Limited I.) Limited Industrial 90 0,83 0,84
Commcrcialilndustrial General T. General Industrial 95 0.87 0.87
3
6 of26
C D
0.30 0.35
0.36 0.41
0.42 0.46
OAS 0,49
0.48 0.52
0.54 0.57
0.57 0,60
0.60 0.63
0.69 0,71
0.78 0.79
0.78 0,79
0.81 0.82
0,84 0.85
0.84 0,85
0.87 0.87
*The values associated with 0% impervious inay he used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3. J .2 (representing the pervious runoff
coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification mu»t be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area
is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU/A= dwelling units per acre
NRCS "'"National Resources Conservation Service
3-6
l I l I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I l I I I l I l I I I I I I I
~
Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI) D Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soll Rating Polygons
lli:} A
e] ND
ti:)B
(E! BID
{!:I C
e!J CID
~ D
D Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
,_.,,,;. A
.,,,..., AID
.,...,,,. B ,..,,. BID
~ C
""""' CID
,,,.; D
---··-Not rated or not available
Soll Rating Points
El A
■ AID
• 8
■ BID
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
El c
II CID
• 0
C Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
H-4 Rails
_,,, Interstate Highways
"""'11' US Routes
,,_.~ Major Roads
i"tJ# Local Roads
Background
• Aerial Photography
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required .
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: San Diego County Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 15, May 27, 2020
Soll map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1 :50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 23, 2020--Feb
13,2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result. some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
11/16/2020
Page 2 of4
Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/16/2020
Page4 of4