Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-01-15; Planning Commission; 01; Palomar and Aviara Office Project
This item was returned to staff to be placed on a future agenda at the request of the applicant. 1. PALOMAR AIRPORT AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT - SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 – Adoption of a resolution of the Planning Commission approving a site Development Plan, SDP 2023-0022 and Coastal Development Permit, CDP 2023-0034, to construct a 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building with a 52-foot-tall glass tower, a surface parking lot with 316 spaces and interior and exterior employee eating areas on a 6.07-acre property located on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway, in the southwest quadrant of the city, the office (O) and Open Space (OS) Zone, the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. (Staff Contact: Lauren Yzaguirre, Associate Planner) Meeting Date: Jan. 15, 2025 Item 1 To: Planning Commission Staff Contact: Lauren Yzaguirre, Associate Planner; 442-339-2634, Lauren.Yzaguirre@carlsbadca.gov Subject: Palomar and Aviara Office Project Location: Southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway, Carlsbad, CA 92008/212-040-64-00/District 2 Case Numbers: SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 Applicant/Representative: James McCann, 760-632-9400, jpmccann@jrmcre.com CEQA Determination: ☐Not a Project ☐ Exempt ☐ IS/ND or IS/MND ☐ EIR ☒Other: Consistent with a prior environmental document (i.e. Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH# 2004121003) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Kelly/JRM Office Project) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15162 through §15168 Permit Type(s): ☒SDP ☐ CUP ☒ CDP ☐ TM/TPM ☐ GPA ☐ REZ ☐ LCPA ☐Other: CEQA Status: ☒The environmental assessment IS on the Agenda for discussion ☐A CEQA determination was already issued. That decision is final and IS NOT on the Agenda Commission Action: ☒Decision ☐ Recommendation to City Council ☐ Informational (No Action) Recommended Actions That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 1), APPROVING Site Development Plan (SDP) 2023-0022 and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) 2023-0034 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Existing Conditions & Project Description Existing Setting The subject site is a vacant 6.07-acre (26,4409- square-foot) lot, located at the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. The 4.53- acre northern portion of the site was initially constructed in the 1980s using material from construction activities associated with Palomar Airport Road and further road, stormwater, and utility improvements were made in 2007 as part of the previous Laurel Tree Lane Public Improvement Project. The site is topographically level, except for Site Map This item is being continued to a date uncertain at the request of the applicant. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 1 of 117 0 the stormwater drainage basin near the southwest corner of the property associated with the road improvements. The northern area is periodically leased out for seasonal sales such as holiday trees and pumpkins. The 1.38-acre southern portion surrounding the Encinas Creek is included within the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve which is protected by a conservation easement and functions as a 70-foot-wide riparian buffer between the project site and the Encinas Creek to the south. An 8-foot-wide, decomposed granite-surfaced public hiking trail runs along the southern boundary of the project site and adjacent to the northern boundary of the preserved open space. The site is encumbered by an easement to SDG&E which contains overhead transmission lines and support structures, easements for public utilities, and easements for public roads. Easements for drainage and vehicular access also occur on the property. The lot contains an existing driveway connecting the parking lot to Laurel Tree Lane. The site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north and east, office uses to the west, and multi-family uses to the south. Table “A” below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the subject site and surrounding properties. TABLE A – SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE Location General Plan Designation Zoning Designation Current Land Use Site Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Temporary Seasonal Holiday Sales North Open Space (OS) Open Space (OS) Commercial Golf Course South R-30, Residential (26.5-30 du/ac)/Open Space (OS) Residential Density-Multiple Zone (RD-M) Open Space (OS) Multi-Family Residential Apartments East Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Gym West Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Office (O)/Open Space (OS) Offices General Plan Designation Zoning Designation Proposed Project The applicant proposes to construct a new medical office building. The project includes the following: • Proposed Medical Office Building A 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building will be constructed on the north portion of the site. The proposed building has a variety of wall angles and offsets to provide Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 2 of 117 ': 3:0120 )0340 11,g~o J:igoo 1DOII 0110 0:,00100 '"' ' AD,/.Q ' ., ,.,!~ _______ .. architectural relief. The building also incorporates vertical wall features and parapets which resemble a Modern architectural style, including a 52-foot-tall glass architectural tower. Materials consists of smooth fiber glass reinforced stucco, tinted glass, spandrel glass, ceramic tile and aluminum cladding. The project includes surface parking with 316 spaces, a trash enclosure, and a mechanical enclosure. The project also includes landscaping around the permitter of the building, the site perimeter and within the parking lot. The project provides both interior and exterior employee eating areas, including a 1,330-square-foot outdoor eating area on the south side of the proposed office building, a 1,372 square-foot outdoor eating area on the west side of the proposed office building and 2,703-square-feet of interior employee eating areas provided as staff lounge areas. • Grading & Improvements Grading for the proposed improvements and uses consist of 5,802 cubic yards of cut and fill to be balanced on site, as well as 13,060 cubic yards of remedial grading. The project also proposes to replace the curb, gutter and driveway approach on Laurel Tree Lane, extend the left turn pocket (from 95 feet to at least 170 feet) on northbound Aviara Parkway to Palomar Airport Road, and construct approximately 380 feet of ADA-compliant sidewalk on the south side of Palomar Airport Road. Project plans are attached to the staff report (Exhibit 8). The improvements and uses described above are hereinafter referred to as “Project.” Public Outreach & Comment The Developer has completed the Early Public Notice procedures pursuant to City Council Policy No. 84 (Development Project Public Involvement Policy). A notice of project application was mailed on Aug. 21, 2023, to all owners of property located within a 1000-foot radius of the project site and all occupants located within a 100-foot radius of the project site. A two-foot-tall by three-foot-wide yellow sign was also posted at the project site on Oct. 3, 2023, notifying all pass-by traffic of the project, which provides project name, application numbers, description, as well as both Developer and city staff contact information. A total of 28 property owners and one occupant were notified through the notice of project application. No comments were received as a result of the early public notice. Please note, the multi-family apartment building to the south of the project site had not received final occupancy until July 2024, and therefore the occupants were not provided early public notice by mail. However, the occupants of this building have been notified by mail in advance of Planning Commission hearing. In addition to the above, the Developer also completed the Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach Program pursuant to City Council Policy No. 84 (Development Project Public Involvement Policy). In this case, the Developer hosted a stakeholder outreach meeting on February 8, 2024 for those interested in learning more about the project and/or providing feedback. Two neighbors attended the meeting and asked questions about the proposed building size and potential occupants. The stakeholder outreach report is included as Exhibit 3. A California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis (Statement of Reasons and Determination that a Project is Consistent with a Prior Environmental Document and No Further Documentation is Required) was posted on the city’s website and an email was distributed to interested individuals on Dec. 3, 2024. One comment was received regarding the environmental analysis (Exhibit 5). Response to Public Comment & Project Issues One comment received regarding the posting of the environmental analysis included concerns regarding California Environmental Quality Act. The comment included concerns regarding the use of the previous environmental document due to the age of the document. Staff explained that Mitigated Negative Declarations do not expire and the approving agency can rely on a previous environmental document prepared for a prior project on the site provided the environmental document retains informational value to the analysis of the new project. Refer to the Environmental Review section below for additional details. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 3 of 117 Project Analysis General Plan Consistency The City of Carlsbad General Plan includes several goals and policies that guide development and land use within the city. A discussion of how the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan policies is summarized in Exhibit 4. Municipal Code Consistency The City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, most notably Tile 21 Zoning Code, includes requirements and provisions that guide development and land use within the city, consistent with the General Plan. Specific compliance with these relevant requirements is described in Exhibit 4. Local Coastal Program Consistency The project site is in the Coastal Zone and requires a Coastal Development Permit. The project complies with the Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment), including all goals and policies of the General Plan and all zoning code standards, as referenced above. Additional information on the Coastal Development Permit and Local Coastal Program findings is included in Exhibit 4. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Consistency The project site is within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) boundaries of the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The project complies with all requirements and provisions of the ALUCP. Specific compliance with these relevant requirements is described in Exhibit 4. Discretionary Actions & Findings In addition to the Coastal Development Permit required for development within the Coastal Zone, the following discretionary actions are requested. Additional information on the Coastal Development Permit and Local Coastal Program findings is included in Exhibit 4. Site Development Plan (SDP 2023-0022) Pursuant to Section 21.27.040, approval of a Minor Site Development Plan is required for any development in the Office zone, processed pursuant to Chapter 21.06 (Q-Overlay Zone). Staff finds that the required findings for this application can be met (Exhibit 4). Environmental Review In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), State Clearinghouse No. 2004121003, was certified as complete on Sept. 18, 2007 by the City Council for the Kelly/JRM Office Project. The Kelly/JRM Office Project was a request to approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Site Development Plan, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit to clarify, refine and adjust the generalized land use boundaries of the Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS) designations and eliminate the erroneous Unplanned Area (UA) designation on site. Zoning on the portion of the property designated Planned Industrial Zone (PM Zone) remained unchanged as Office (O). The land use development permit issued allows for the construction of a three-story, approximately 85,000 SF office building on the Project site which was never constructed. The portion of the property zoned Planned Industrial (P-M-Q Zone) was later rezoned to Office (O) Zone and the land use designation was changed to Office (O) during the 2015 Comprehensive General Plan Update (GPA 07-02/ZC 15-02/ LCPA 07-02). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164, and in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21166, the Palomar and Aviara Office Project (SDP 2023-0022 and CDP 2023-0034) is within the scope of the previously certified MND. The effects of the Project were examined in the MND, and all feasible mitigation Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 4 of 117 measures adequately address the anticipated adverse effects of the project. Staff has found that none of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, and therefore there is no need for the additional preparation of a subsequent, supplemental or addenda document. The full analysis is included as Exhibit 7. Refer to the attached resolution for additional support and justification (Exhibit 1). Conclusion Considering the information above and in the referenced attachments, staff has found that the proposed project is consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program, provisions of the Municipal Code and Local Facility Management Zone 5. All required public improvements and utilities are available to serve the proposed development. In addition, there are no environmental issues associated with the Project. The Project is conditioned to ensure the proposed Project’s compatibility with the surrounding properties and that the public health, safety, and welfare of the community are maintained. The Project would be required to comply with all applicable California Building Standards Codes and engineering standards through the standard building permit and civil improvement plan checking process. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the resolutions, approving the proposed Project described in this staff report. Exhibits 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Stakeholder Outreach Report 4. Project Analysis 5. Public Comments 6. Disclosure Form 7. CEQA Analysis (Statement of Reasons and Determination that a Project is Consistent with a Prior Environmental Document and No Further Documentation is Required) 8. Reduced Project Exhibits 9. Full Size Project Exhibits “A” – “W” dated Jan. 15, 2025 (on file in the Planning Division). 10. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 5 of 117 Exhibit 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SDP 2023-0022 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, CDP 2023- 0034, TO CONSTRUCT A 62,600-SQUARE-FOOT, THREE-STORY, 42- FOOT-TALL, MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING WITH A 52-FOOT-TALL GLASS TOWER, A SURFACE PARKING LOT WITH 316 SPACES AND INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR EMPLOYEE EATING AREAS ON A 6.07-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND AVIARA PARKWAY, IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, THE OFFICE (O) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ZONE, THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COSTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT CASE NO.: SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 WHEREAS, James McCann, “Developer,” and “Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as A PORTION OF PARCEL "C" AND ALL OF PARCEL "D" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 23, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74-230326, O.R., AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 15, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-085876 O.R., ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” – “W” dated Jan. 15, 2025, on file in the Planning Division, SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 (DEV2022-0094) – PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT as provided by Chapter 21.06 and Chapter 21.201 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on Jan. 15, 2025, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 6 of 117 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit. WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, State Clearinghouse No. 2004121003 (Planning Case Nos. GPA 04-20/ZC 04-15/LCPA 06-05/CDP 03-03/SDP 03-01), was prepared and the City Council certified it on Sept. 18, 2007, for the Kelly/JRM Office Project; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA, Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.), and its implementing regulations (the State CEQA Guidelines), Sections 15162 through 15168 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation, if any, to be completed when there is a previously certified negative declaration (ND) or mitigated negative declaration (MND) covering the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is required; and WHEREAS, there is no "new information of substantial importance" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 through 15168 and the potential ·environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously-certified MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM for the KELLY/JRM OFFICE PROJECT GPA 04-20/ZC 04-15/LCPA 06-05/CDP 03-03/SDP 03-01 (City Council Resolution No. 2007-199). Therefore, the previously-certified MND is adequate without modification and no additional environmental review is required; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 7 of 117 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission APPROVES SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 (DEV2022-0094) – PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: Site Development Plan (SDP2023-0022) 1. That the proposed development or use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable master plan or specific plan, complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and all other applicable provisions of this code, in that the project consists of a 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas on a lot located at the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. All improvements are proposed within the northern 118,396-square-foot portion of the property subject to the General Plan Land Use designation of O, Office and within the Office (O) Zone. The O land use designator allows for a wide range of general office, medical, and other professional uses as well as ancillary uses with a maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.6. The 62,600-square-foot building is below the 118,396-square-foot maximum square footage allowed with a 0.32 FAR. The remaining south portion of the lot which contains the Encinas Creek, is included within the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve, and is protected by a conservation easement. The preserve area has a General Plan Land Use Designation of OS, Open Space and is within the Open Space (OS) Zone, which allows for natural resource areas, areas for production of resources and recreation and aesthetic area. No development is proposed within the OS portion of the lot which contains riparian habitat and acts as a habitat buffer between the project site and the Encinas Creek to the south. The project is consistent with all remaining development and design standards applicable to the property as contained in Chapters 21.27 Office Zone of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. That the requested development or use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, will not be detrimental to existing development or uses or to development or uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed development or use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the proposed 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas is located on a portion of a 6.07-acre site zoned O. The project will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the use is located in that medical office uses are permitted by right in the O Zone. The property is surrounded on two sides by commercial uses, including a commercial golf course to the north, a gym to the east and office uses to the west. The existing open Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 8 of 117 space preserve located on the southern portion of the property provides a buffer between the proposed medical office and the Encinas Creek. This area also acts as a buffer between the proposed medical office and the existing multi-family residential apartment building to the south. A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Project was conducted and found that the medical office will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). The project trips were distributed to the local roadway network to evaluate the potential for traffic impacts. The TIA also took into account near-term traffic associated with approved and pending projects that will add traffic to the local study area by the time of project occupancy. One additional signal modification was also assumed since one of the near-term projects was conditioned to install the northbound right-turn overlap phase at Palomar Airport Road/Aviara Parkway. Based on the analyses conducted in the TIA, the proposed medical office would not result in a significant impact to the roadway network in the project area, including the Palomar Airport/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection adjacent to the site. 3. That the site for the intended development or use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that the proposed 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot- tall, medical office building with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas is located on a portion of a 6.07-acre site zoned O. All applicable code requirements have been met including parking and building coverage standards. The project’s proposed increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet with an addition 3-feet for a parapet is permitted pursuant to CMC 21.27.050(A)(3) as all required setbacks have been increased at a ratio of one horizontal foot for every one foot of vertical construction beyond 35 feet for a total setback increase of 7 feet on each side. The additional 3-foot parapet is a permitted height protrusion pursuant to CMC 21.27.050 as it does not exceed an overall height of 45-feet. The proposed 52-foot-tall architectural tower is a permitted protruding architectural feature as the extra height does not function to provide usable floor area, does not accommodate and/or screen building equipment, does not adversely impact adjacent properties due to the distance of the structure from property lines and provides architectural interest by providing interest and contrast in the building façade and roofline. 4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested development or use to existing or permitted future development or use in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that setback areas have been landscaped to screen the parking areas. Adequate on-site vehicular circulation has been provided to accommodate passenger and truck traffic. In addition, the existing open space preserve located on the south portion of the project site which provides a buffer between the project and the existing Encinas Creek and between the proposed project and the multi-family apartment building to the south will remain untouched as required by the recorded open space easement. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 9 of 117 5. That the street systems serving the proposed development or use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the proposed 62,600-square- foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Project was conducted and found that the medical office will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). The project trips were distributed to the local roadway network to evaluate the potential for traffic impacts. The TIA also took into account near-term traffic associated with approved and pending projects that will add traffic to the local study area by the time of project occupancy. One additional signal modification was also assumed since one of the near-term projects was conditioned to install the northbound right-turn overlap phase at Palomar Airport Road/Aviara Parkway. Based on the analyses conducted in the TIA, the proposed medical office would not result in a significant impact to the roadway network in the project area, including the Palomar Airport/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection adjacent to the site. 6. That the proposed development or use meets all other specific additional findings as required by Title 21, in that pursuant to CMC section 21.27.050, the proposed architectural tower is allowed to exceed the 45-foot height limit, up to a height of 52- feet because the protruding architectural features does not function to provide usable floor area, does not accommodate and/or screen building equipment, does not adversely impact adjacent properties and provides architectural interest. Coastal Development Permit (CDP 2023-0034) 7. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) and all applicable policies, in that the site is designated OS, Open Space which allows for natural resource areas, areas for production of resources and recreation and aesthetic areas, and O, Office allows for a wide range of general office, medical, and other professional development by the Mello II Segment of the LCP. The project consists of the construction of a 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas on a 6.07-acre site located on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. The medical office is proposed on the portion of the lot that is zoned and designated for office uses. The proposed three-story medical office will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses currently exist on the site. The project footprint is located entirely outside of the sensitive resources (Encinas Creek and associated habitat) located in the open space easement on the south portion of the lot and adequate buffers have been established to ensure this area will continue to be conserved. In addition, the proposed three-story medical office project is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazards. Since the site does not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access are Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 10 of 117 available from the subject site. Furthermore, the office designated site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. 8. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the property is not located adjacent to the shoreline. Therefore, the three-story medical office project will not interfere with the public’s right to physical access to the ocean and, furthermore, the office designated site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. 9. That the project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the three-story medical office project will adhere to the city's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil erosion. No undevelopable steep slopes and the previously graded site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction. A 70-foot buffer between the Encinas Creek and the development has been approved by the wildlife agencies. The riparian habitat within this buffer is protected by a conservation easement and will not be impacted by the development of the project. Therefore, there will be no impacts to native habitat. 10. The project complies with the requirements of the Coastal Agricultural Overlay 20 Zone as the project is conditioned to pay the agricultural conversion mitigation fee to develop with other than agricultural uses. 11. The project is not between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204 of the Zoning Ordinance). McClellan Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 12. The project is consistent with the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport (ALUCP), dated Dec. 1, 2011, in that: a. The proposed project is located within the 60-65 and 65-70 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contours. Medical offices are deemed a compatible use within the 60-65 CNEL noise contour in the ALUCP that will not be affected by aircraft noise and a conditionally compatible use in the 65-70 dB CNEL noise contour in the ALUCP. Buildings must be designed to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to California Code of Regulation (CCR) Title 24. Exterior noise levels associated with aircraft operations would be 70 dBA CNEL and noise modelling found in the Noise Evaluation (Ldn Consulting 2024) demonstrates the building could attenuate exterior noise to the indoor Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 11 of 117 standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24 by implementing recommendations in the Noise Evaluation. b. The proposed project is in compliance with the ALUCP airspace protection surfaces because the maximum height of the proposed medical office including the architectural tower is below the height that requires notification of construction to the FAA. Despite this, the project has been reviewed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with CFR Title 14, Part 77, in accordance with the Review Area 1 procedures (FAA 2024). Through the review process, it has been determined that the Project design would comply with the safety provisions of the ALUCP, would not exceed obstruction standards and would not result in hazard to air navigation. c. The proposed project is located within Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6. The ALUCP identifies office buildings (including medical offices) within Safety Zone 6 as compatible with airport uses, and conditionally compatible with airport uses in Safety Zones 2 and 4. Offices are allowed in Safety Zones 2 and 4 only if the development complies with either the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) or the maximum intensity and lot coverage limits as specified in Table III-2 (ALUCP Section 3.4.14). The project proposes 14,721 square feet of office space in Safety Zone 2, 3,058 square feet in Safety Zone 4 and 44,821 square feet in Safety Zone 6, all of which comply with the maximum square footages permitted within each safety zone per the respective FAR as outlined in the ALUCP. d. The proposed project is not located within the overflight notification area. California Environmental Quality Act 13. Record and Basis for Action. The Planning Commission has considered the full record before it, which includes the Record of Proceedings. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and material to this resolution; and are incorporated herein by reference. 14. Compliance with CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 through 15168, this project is covered by a previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, State Clearinghouse No. 2004121003 (Planning Case Nos. GPA 04-20/ZC 04-15/LCPA 06-05/CDP 03-03/SDP 03-01) that was prepared, and the City Council certified it on Sept. 18, 2007, for the Kelly/JRM Office Project. The effects of the project were examined in the previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and all feasible mitigation measures developed in the MND are incorporated into the appropriate entitlements to ensure that the mitigations measures will be implemented. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 12 of 117 a. There are no substantial changes proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the certified MND. b. There are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the certified MND. c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known at the time the MND was certified by the City Council on Sept. 18, 2007 pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2007-199. 15. The Planning Commission considered the MND and all significant impacts and mitigation measures in the certified MND, and considered all written and oral communications from the public regarding the environmental analysis, and found that (1) The project falls under the scope of the certified MND; (2) All significant impacts were adequately addressed in the certified MND; (3) The project would not make a considerable contribution to a new significant cumulative impact; and (4) None of the triggers for subsequent/supplemental NDs/MNDs in CEQA apply. The project is, therefore, determined to be within the scope of the certified MND and the certified MND satisfies all requirements of CEQA for this later activity. General 16. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated Jan. 15. 2024, including, but not limited to the following. a. Land Use & Community Design – The proposed project is adjacent to a commercial golf course to the north, a gym to the east, a multi-family residential apartment to the south and additional offices to the west. The proposed medical office will provide a convenient essential service to surrounding residences. The medical office will also provide employment opportunities for residents who live within proximity to the site, therefore enhancing the city’s position as a premier regional employment center. b. Mobility – The project includes the construction of approximately 380 feet of ADA-compliant sidewalk on the south side of Palomar Airport Road along with new street trees. The project also includes a new curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveway on Laurel Tree Lane. These upgrades will create an inviting streetscape and encourage walking. In addition, the applicant will be required to pay any applicable traffic impact fees, prior to issuance of a building permit, that will go toward future road improvements. c. Public Safety – The proposed structural improvements will be required to be designed in conformance with all seismic design standards. In addition, the Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 13 of 117 proposed project is consistent with all the applicable fire safety requirements including fire sprinklers. Furthermore, the project has been conditioned to develop and implement a program of “best management practices” for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities. d. Noise – Operational noise impacts due to new mechanical heating-ventilation (HVAC) systems, roadway noise, and aircraft operations were addressed in the Noise Evaluation (Ldn Consulting 2024). The evaluation concludes that the project’s HVAC would not expose nearby residential properties to noise levels in excess of the city standards. Nosie related to roadway traffic aircraft when combined with operations at McClelland-Palomar Airport would result in an on- site noise exterior noise level of 74.4 dBA CNEL. According to Table 5-1 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, the city considers office uses conditionally compatible with noise levels up to 77 dBA CNEL provided it can be demonstrated that interior noise standards can achieve the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL in accordance with CCR Title 24. Interior noise standards would be achieved for the project through the incorporation of noise attenuation design recommendations in the noise evaluation and shown on the project plans as design features. 17. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 and all city public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, a. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. b. The Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 5 is required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit. 18. That the project is consistent with the city’s Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50). 19. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 14 of 117 20. To offset the conversion of non-prime agricultural land to urban land uses per the requirements of the Mello II Local Coastal Program, the applicant shall provide payment of the agricultural mitigation fee, pursuant to the amount established by the City Council at the time of payment. The amount of the fee shall be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the grading permit and shall be consistent with the provisions of Carlsbad's Local Coastal Program. Conditions: NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading permit, building permit or recordation of final map, whichever comes first; or pursuant to an approved construction schedule at the discretion of the appropriate division manager or official. 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the city’s approval of this Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 15 of 117 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) city’s approval and issuance of this Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit, (b) city’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the city’s approval is not validated. 6. Prior to submittal of the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit to the City Planner, a 24" x 36" copy of the Site Plan, conceptual grading plan and preliminary utility plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. The copy shall be submitted to the City Planner, reviewed and, if found acceptable, signed by the city's project planner and project engineer. If no changes were required, the approved exhibits shall fulfill this condition. 7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the city that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 10. Developer shall pay the Citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 5, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 11. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, Developer shall submit to the city a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 16 of 117 issued a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 12. Prior to issuance of grading permit(s), developer shall make a separate formal landscape construction drawing plan check submittal to the Planning Division and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the city’s Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping and irrigation as shown on the approved Final Plans. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All irrigation systems shall be maintained to provide the optimum amount of water to the landscape for plant growth without causing soil erosion and runoff. 13. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the project’s building, improvement, and grading plans. 14. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, Developer shall list the following condition on all grading and building permit construction plans. Construction activities shall take place during the permitted time and day per Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 8.48. Developer shall ensure that construction activities for the proposed project are limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; no work shall be conducted on Sundays or on federal holidays. 15. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and Building Official. 16. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. When so required, the Developer shall submit and obtain approval of the Fire Chief and the City Planner of an Outdoor Storage Plan, and thereafter comply with the approved plan. 17. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of an exterior lighting plan including parking areas. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 17 of 117 18. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall submit a construction staging and operations plan to show vehicle and equipment areas which complies with the following requirements. a. All construction vehicles or equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of a dwelling shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. b. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as feasible from dwellings and other noise sensitive receptors. 19. Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy, field testing in accordance with Title 24 regulations may be required by the City to verify building compliance with STC and IIC design standards. 20. A minimum of 1,052.66-sqaure-feet of indoor employee eating areas must be provided prior to occupancy of the first tenant space. 21. The project shall to the maximum extent practicable avoid impacts during the vireo breeding season (generally March 15–September 15). If the project cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel adjacent to Encinas Creek prior to the initiation of the breeding season (generally before March 15), protocol surveys for vireo will be conducted in the adjacent habitat prior to the initiation of project construction for each breeding season as needed. If vireo are found, construction noise levels at the riparian canopy edge shall be kept below 60 dBA Leq or ambient level (whichever is greater) (Measured as Equivalent Sound Level) from 5 a.m. to 11 a.m. during the peak nesting period of March 15 to July 15. For the balance of the day/season, the noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels or ambient level, averaged over a 1-hour period on a weighted decibel (dBA) (i.e., 1 hour Leq/dBA). Noise levels shall be monitored, and monitoring reports shall be provided to the City and Wildlife Agencies. Noise levels in excess of this threshold shall require written concurrence from Wildlife Agencies and may require additional minimization/mitigation measures. 22. To help ensure the project does not create attractive conditions for brown-headed cowbirds, the office trash enclosure will be located in the eastern portion of the site, away from Encinas Creek, and trash cans in the outdoor eating areas abutting the office building will be fully enclosed (e.g., Rubbermaid Brute 55-gallon trash cans with dome lids). In addition, trash cans will be monitored and emptied regularly to ensure trash does not over-flow or become exposed in a way that attracts cowbirds. Upon project completion, the applicant will submit documentation to the Wildlife Agencies that the trash enclosure and cans are placed in the correct locations and are monitored and emptied regularly to ensure trash does not over-flow or become exposed in a way that attracts cowbirds. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 18 of 117 23. Lighting in or adjacent to the preserve will not be used, except where essential for roadway, facility use, and safety. If nighttime construction lights or permanent lights are necessary, all lighting adjacent to natural habitat will be limited to low pressure sodium sources and shielded and/or directed away from habitat. 24. Grading is permitted during the rainy season (from October 1st to April 1st of each year), however, no grading shall occur during a Qualified Precipitation Event (QPE), defined by the 2022 Construction General Permit (CGP) as a forecast of 50 percent or greater probability of precipitation of 0.5 inches rm ore within a 24-hour period. Engineering Conditions NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a (building or grading permit whichever occurs first). General 25. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed haul route. 26. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 27. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition. 28. Property owner shall maintain all landscaping (street trees, tree grates, shrubs, groundcover, etc.) and irrigation along the parkway frontage with Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway as shown on the Site Plan. Fees/Agreements 29. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation, the city’s standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 30. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 19 of 117 31. Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement. 32. Developer shall cause property owner to apply for, execute, and submit, to the city engineer for recordation, an Encroachment Agreement covering private retaining wall, paved parking, fire hydrant, reclaimed water and trash enclosure located over (existing) easements as shown on the site plan. developer shall pay processing fees per the city’s latest fee schedule. 33. Developer shall implement Transportation Demand Management strategies per the Carlsbad Municipal Code section 18.51. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall have a consultation with city staff regarding submittal of the final TDM Plan. Prior to occupancy, the Developer shall submit a final Tier 3 Transportation Demand Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 34. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall install transportation demand management infrastructure measures, in accordance with the project’s Transportation Demand Management Plan, as shown on the site plan, including but not limited to the following, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a.) Secured bike enclosure to accommodate a minimum of 14 bicycles. b.) Public bike parking and bicycle repair station. c.) Six dedicated car/vanpool spaces with proper signage and striping. d.) Two showers/changing rooms for employees. Grading 35. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports as required by city engineer, post security and pay all applicable grading plan review and permit fees per the city’s latest fee schedule. 36. This project may require off site grading. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the project unless developer obtains, records, and submits a recorded copy, to the city engineer, a temporary grading, construction or slope easement or agreement from the owners of the affected properties. If developer is unable to obtain the temporary grading or slope easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case developer must either apply for and obtain an amendment of this approval or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial conformance and/or consistency determination from both the city engineer and city planner. 37. Submit to San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) for review the final grading and improvement plans, including permission-to-grade language, and the project landscaping and irrigation plans. Plans should substantially conform to those reviewed Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 20 of 117 during the tentative map stage. The plans must be signed by SDG&E prior to issuance of any construction permits. Storm Water Quality 38. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 39. Developer shall submit for city approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall identify and incorporate measures to reduce storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city’s latest fee schedule. 40. This project is subject to ‘Priority Development Project’ requirements and trash capture requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP), subject to city engineer approval, to comply with the Carlsbad BMP Design Manual latest version. The final SWQMP required by this condition shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer with final grading plans. Developer shall pay all applicable SWQMP plan review and inspection fees per the city’s latest fee schedule. 41. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design, pollutant control BMP and applicable hydromodification measures. Dedications/Improvements 42. Developer shall cause owner to dedicate to the city an easement for public sewer purposes over the easterly 10 feet of the project site. The offer shall be made by a separate recorded document. All land so offered shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. Additional easements may be required at final design to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 43. Developer shall cause owner to quitclaim the existing public water easement as shown Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 21 of 117 on the site plan. The quitclaim shall be made by a separate recorded document. Developer shall pay processing fees per the city’s latest fee schedule. 44. Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems (12” diameter storm drain and larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees for private drainage systems. 45. Prior to any work in city right-of-way or public easements, Developer shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way permit to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 46. Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard Development Improvement Agreement to install and shall post security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 for public improvements shown on the (site plan). Said improvements shall be installed to city standards to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not limited to: a. Curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway and AC grind and overlay on Laurel Tree Lane. b. Extend left turn pocket (from 95 feet to at least 170 feet) on northbound Aviara Parkway to Palomar Airport Road. c. Upsize the existing sewer main (located on the adjacent property) and rehabilitate three existing manholes. d. Fire service. e. Sewer lateral. f. Construct approximately 380 feet of ADA-compliant sidewalk on the south side of Palomar Airport Road. Additional public improvements required in other conditions of this resolution are hereby included in the above list by reference. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees in accordance with the fee schedule. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. 47. Developer shall design, and obtain approval from the city engineer, the structural section for the access aisles with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with city standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. Prior to completion of grading, the final structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-value soil test information subject to the review and approval of the city engineer. 48. Developer is responsible to ensure utility transformers or raised water backflow preventers that serve this development are located outside the right-of-way as shown Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 22 of 117 on the Site Plan and to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These facilities shall be constructed within the property. Utilities 49. Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project 50. The developer shall agree to design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the district engineer. 51. Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at locations approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 52. The developer shall agree to install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 53. The developer shall design and agree to construct public water, sewer, and recycled water facilities substantially as shown on the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the district engineer and city engineer. 54. The developer shall submit a detailed sewer study, prepared by a registered engineer, that identifies the peak flows of the project, required pipe sizes, depth of flow in pipe, velocity in the main lines, and the capacity of the existing infrastructure. Said study shall be submitted concurrently with the improvement plans for the project and the study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the district engineer. 55. The developer shall submit a detailed potable water study, prepared by a registered engineer that identifies the peak demands of the project (including fire flow demands). The study shall identify velocity in the main lines, pressure zones, and the required pipe sizes. Said study shall be submitted concurrently with the improvement plans for the project and the study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the district engineer. 56. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit detailed design drawings and studies for the construction of private potable water, sewer, and fire service line required to serve the project. Said drawings and studies shall be prepared and submitted to the satisfaction of the building official. Code Reminders Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 23 of 117 The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 57. Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 58. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the (Site Plan) are for planning purposes only. NOTICE TO APPLICANT An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be filed with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission’s decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on the appeal prior to any judicial review. NOTICE TO APPLICANT The project site is within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. This Coastal Development Permit (CDP) shall not become effective until ten (10) working days have elapsed, without a valid appeal being filed with the Coastal Commission, following the Coastal Commission’s receipt of the city’s notice of the CDP issuance (“Notice of Final Action”). The filing of a valid appeal with the Coastal Commission within such time limit shall stay the effective date of this CDP until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached by the Coastal Commission. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 24 of 117 NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Special Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on ___________, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________________ WILLIAM KAMENJARIN, Chair ______________________________________ ERIC LARDY, City Planner Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 25 of 117 AV I A R A P Y PALOMAR A I R P O R T R D PRIVATE D Y CO L L E G E B L HIDDEN V A L L E Y R D SAPPHIREDR TO P M A S T D R C O B B L E STONERD T H E C R O S S I N G S D R LAURE L T R EE LN COBB L E S T O N E DR FLAME T R E E L N P R IV ATE DY PRIVATE D Y E L C AMINO R E A L LA COSTA AV A L G A R D C A R L S B A D B L SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 (DEV2022-0094) PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT SITE MAP J SITE Map generated on: 12/13/2024 Exhibit 2 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 26 of 117 Palomar Aviara Office Project SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach Report and Minutes February 8, 2024 City of Carlsbad Attn: Lauren Yzaguirre Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Project Outreach Report for Palomar/Aviara Office Project – SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 Dear Ms. Yzaguirre, HWL conducted an Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach meeting for the Palomar/Aviara Office Project, SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034, in conformance with Carlsbad Council Policy No. 84, and Guidance on Development Project Public Involvement Development Project Public Involvement Policy, Form P-21. Attachments to the letter includes: This transmittal, in compliance with Form P-21 Part B subsect no. 4, is the written public involvement meeting held on January 29, 2024. The meeting was based on the public notice letter that was sent out to the occupants within a 600-foot ownership-radius and 100-foot occupancy radius, in compliance with CMC Section 21.54.060. The notice detailed the date, time and location of the stakeholder meeting. At the meeting, physical plans of the proposed project were provided for reference and ADA compliance on accessibility for participants. A Community Outreach Meeting was held on Monday, January 29, 2024 at 6:00PM at 2888 Loker Avenue East, Carlsbad. Notices (see Exhibit 1) of the meeting were mailed 15 days prior to the property owners within 600 feet of the project site (see Stakeholder’s database – Exhibit 2.) Two neighbors and stakeholders attended the meeting and signed-in on the project sign-in sheet (see Exhibit 3.) After a brief introduction and explanation of the meeting’s purpose and format, the project manager, Stan Weiler, gave an overview of the project and reviewed the project site plan, landscape plan and renderings. Following the presentation there were several questions regarding the proposed project which were answered by the project team. The questions are outlined below. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:45PM at which time attendees were encouraged to sign in. Exhibit 3 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 27 of 117 Questions Received at the Outreach Meeting 1. How big is the proposed project? Answer: The proposed office building will be approximately 62,000 square feet on a 6.07-acre site and the remainder of the site would include a parking lot, and landscaping, and open space. 2. What businesses will occupy the building? Answer: The building tenants are not known at this time but are expected to be professional office uses consistent with the city land use regulatory code. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 28 of 117 NOTICE OF PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETING January 29, 2024 Date of Notification: January 18, 2024 Project Application: SDP 2023-0022/ CDP 2023-0034 (DEV2022-0094) – Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway Office Project Dear Property Owners, Neighbors and Interested Stakeholders: This letter is to invite you to an informational meeting on a proposed development project in your area. HWL Planning and Engineering (representative to JRMC Real Estate [applicant]) has submitted a development application to the City of Carlsbad for a Site Development Permit (SDP 2023-0022) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP2023-0034) for a proposed 62,600 square foot, 3-story office building with surface parking at a site located on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway in Carlsbad (APN: 212-040-64-00) (see map below and attached site plan and building elevations). The project is currently under review by the City of Carlsbad and will be subject to a future Planning Commission hearing where the Commission will vote to approve, deny or modify the project. As a property owner, neighbor or interested stakeholder, you will be notified of the future Planning Commission hearing on the project. The date of which is currently not known. Project Location Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 29 of 117 The informational meeting will be held at: 6:00 p.m. - Sharp Monday, January 29th, 2024 HWL Planning and Engineering 2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 217 Carlsbad, CA 92010 Please congregate at the HWL office Suite 217 and we will hold the meeting at one of the conference rooms. Plenty of free parking is available at our office. Please RSVP by Friday, 1/26/24 to sweiler@hwl-pe.com At the meeting, representatives will be available to describe the proposed project and discuss questions or concerns you may have. Maps and plans of the proposed project will also be available for review at the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 929.2288 Ext. 402 or sweiler@hwl-pe.com. Sincerely, L. Stan Weiler, AICP HWL Planning and Engineering Attachments: Site Plan and Building Elevation Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 30 of 117 WATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USE AVG. DAILY FLOW AVE. DAILYSUBTOTALS OFFICE 1,500 gpd/Acre TOTAL = PEAK FLOW 10,872 gpd 10,872 gpd 4.53 WASTEWATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USE AREA (SF) OFFICE 800 PER 10,000 SF 5,008 gpd TOTAL =5,008 gpd 62,600 AVG. DAILYFLOW (gpd)SUBTOTALS 6,795 gpd WĂůŽŵĂƌŝƌƉŽƌƚ>ĂŶĚhƐĞŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ^ƋƵĂƌĞ&ŽŽƚĂŐĞWĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌƐ ƌĞĂŽĨWƌŽƉĞƌƚLJtŝƚŚŝŶKĨĨŝĐĞĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶ ŝƌƉŽƌƚ>ĂŶĚhƐĞWůĂŶ&ZͲKĨĨŝĐĞ DĂdžŝŵƵŵ^ƋƵĂƌĞ&ŽŽƚĂŐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĚͲKĨĨŝĐĞ KĨĨŝĐĞ^ƉĂĐĞWƌŽǀŝĚĞĚͲ:ƵŶĞϳ͕ϮϬϮϯ^Ƌ͘&ƚ͘ĐƌĞƐ ^ĂĨĞƚLJŽŶĞϮ ϰϮ͕ϳϰϲ Ϭ͘ϵϴ Ϭ͘ϯϱϬϬϬϬϬϬ ϭϰ͕ϵϲϭ ϭϰ͕ϳϮϭ ^ĂĨĞƚLJŽŶĞϰ ϯϵ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϵϭ Ϭ͘ϲϰϬϬϬϬϬϬ Ϯϱ͕ϯϵϯ ϯ͕Ϭϱϴ ^ĂĨĞƚLJŽŶĞϲ ϭϭϰ͕ϵϬϱ Ϯ͘ϲϰ EŽ&Z>ŝŵŝƚ >ŽĐĂůŽŶŝŶŐ ϰϰ͕ϴϮϭ dŽƚĂůƐ ϭϵϳ͕ϯϮϳ ϰ͘ϱϯ ϲϮ͕ϲϬϬ Ja n . 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 I t e m # 1 3 1 o f 1 1 7 ' i Qm;__ NA~E: 1~:~:;J; =~=!,.~LC ADDRESs:JJOfNOHJrASIUD.Sl,m:201 PHONEN0.:760--5J2-94/JO /[GAi QfSCRIPDQN· A PQW/Wif PN?CR 'c" AN[)l,/.1_ if PM/CEJ.. 'D'if PARCELl,/Af'NO. 299JFllRJIN THf/HICE(F THfCOONrY RfC/1/0CRrFSAND/lGOCOOIITY,AUWST2J, 1974,ISFII.ENO. 74-2JOJ26,0.R.,ANDAPCl<IIC1/(TPARCEL2(T comno,rr ff CONPUJJ/CC FlCD JH rn£ /HICE (f Tl£ COONrY l?ro1IDfR (F SAN {)[GQ COONTY, rrBRUARY rs. 1990 AS fl£ NO. 90-085876 O.R., ill BElNG IN TH£ arr (F CARI.S8AD. CWNTY (F SAN {)/[(.;(), S1M£ CF CMO/?N/A SITE PLAN FOR CARLSBAD OFFICE VICINITY -----~~--71----:~X77p7;-7 -7~~-¼-- ~ --, -~ ~ -I~ -:/ ;:.z'-~~ ~ ,~~ ·c=p-B E --------r:~,i~:-·"-• 7. , _=_l _A I..~~~. --_. : : ; r ~. -. "'"" \ ... ~ a L• R/W '.:' -- =~· .. ~- ..,r Q..l 29·22·• ..: . R•4 ~ · L=2 ,-.: 9"22' L ;;:~-,s. ,-,, "lf:I .• 1 ..... .,,,,,._, l:.~ .EX ·S.T.LIGH .i!.. LlJJ. I w I✓~ .:s:' " ~ ·1G -_J ~f ~ -'!----.;! I ~~ I ~ ~--------_,,/" •• , \ -,-1,0 ~---p ~ N81·61·~••=/•-,~.lo· ;::c,:.....: 'I I .._, ~ J:PN· 212.-040 INDEX OF SHEETS SITE PLAN I ,':Z:-~-.7~~ PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DETAILS AND CROSS SECTIONS I GENERAL INFORMATION e-/ -~ ~-~~E:~~:•:G:.A.~CEL NUMBER.. :::;::o~:;STING) <"°'~JDEVELOPABLEACREAGE .... 4.SJAC(NET) "· rn~R~g %~frftLJ'Js~ DESIGNATION: 5. ~~g~g§rn %~fNR<fL J'/tr DESIGNATION: O 6 USAGE Of LOTS ................ OFFICE/OPEN SPACE C 1. NUMBER Of BUILDINGS .. . 8 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS ... . 9. PROPOSED PARKING SPACES.. SEE PARKING SUMMARY TABLE BELOW 10. BUILDIWVERAGE AREA : 2Uff~r ~-:j G] 11. PERCENTAGE OF SITE TO BE LANDSCAPED 2,717Sf 13. UNDEVELOPED AREA ...................... 1.54 AC d 15, SERVICE DISTRICTS SCHOOL DISTRICT -CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISlRICT WATER DISTRICT -CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SEWER DISTRICT -CITY Of CARLSBAD l 16. AVERAGE POTABLE WATER DEMAND.... . .... SEE BELOW PEAK POTABLE WATER DEMAND... . . SEE BELOW 17. PEAK IRRIGATION ...................... (PER L.S. PLANS) 18. AVERAGE SEWER GENERATION 19. DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN LOCATION ... PARK/NC SUM.MARY: 5SPACESPfR1000SF: PARl(/IICSl'ACESRfOO/RfD•JIJ PARl(IN(;SPACESPRO\IO£ll=JJJ DISABW)ACCESS181.fPNIKING: ... BASIN·c· .UNDETAINED: 14.63CFS DETAINED: 9.4 CFS PARK/1/GSPACESRfQU!REO• WTAl.(F8ACCfSS/81.£/NCl/JO/HGJ VAHACC£SSll:llf PMIK/IIC Sl'ACESPRO\IO£ll• ror1'1. (F !4 ACCESS&".Efl/QJ./0/NGJ VJ.NACCESSltlE £.VPARl<IIIG/OIARGNGSPACE: f0%(FlllfltJTAL(FJ1JSPACESRf/XIIRffl f.VPARK!IIC/alNIGlllGSPACf.SRfQUJREO •J2 E.V PARl(INGja/ARGNGSPACf.SPROWJED • 32 a/ARGINCCH.Y(IIGrPMIKING): FRCWMTOTALCF26T050£VPAf?KJHG/cHJ,RQNGSPACESPRO';ll}f!) SPACfSRfOOl({£0j1'RO';!DCD JVJ.NACCESS/ill,JSrAHDARO ACCES981.£,JAMBUU,TCWY ao,11 NR \O!KU PARKING SPACES (£ V PNll(!NG St'ACf.S NIE MSG COUHrED AS Cl£J.N NR PAfil<!NG St'ACES); 12:f(F 1H£ ltJTAL CF JJJSPACESRf/MRW ao,11 NR \O!KU PARKING SPACES Rf00/({£0 • 39 C1£4NNR,fH/QLPARK/NGSPACESPRO\IDfD•J9 <XJTDQ<E fA11NG ARFA· TOTALBU/l1JINGSQJARf.fOOTAG£·52.600.0SF JOOSFPfREAa/5COOSF•J,756SFRfOOIRUJ. OOIDOOl'[).T//./GNIEAA:1,027.0SF 001DOOl'EAT//./GNIEA8: 1,690.0SF rorAL CJ.Jrooct?[).nNGARf.k 2.717.0SF J,756.0SF-2,7!ZOSF •l,OJ9.DSF(ro8fPRO';ff)ff)\fASTNT LOONGEARfASINIIIEHSPACES) I ANQSCAPf 1RFf RfQUIROIFNTS; JJJPNIKINGSPACESPROW!fI) CW[IRfEPfREADi 4PAflK/NG9'ACESREOU/RfD: 78.25 •79TRE£5RfOUIRED. NfJSf CCWTOUR NOTE: THISPRO.CCT/$1.0CAIUlr.lTHII/Tflf 6S-70J./RF'tYiTIIOISECCWTOORUNES :~ l~ b I I i I I I I ~ ~-~-~~"., --~~ ... _ ~ !i!r~;~~~~E~:~:~~:ii~~:::,i:~t PR•m-, 4~ \ SCALE: 1"-40' REVISION DESCRIPTION CDP MINDRSDP EASfUFNT INFQ: PfRPREl.fMil/NIY 11Tl£RE1'(1,T8Ya//CAGO 111U:COMPJJ/Y OROCRII0.00/0/649-99J-SD2-r'IA DAIW: M'AY6, 2022 &rASEMENrFOR:PIJ8UCUTl!l1£S,/NaiESS,ECMSS,REC.:AUGIJST14,19571NBWi67C6. PM£.5140R. &. /flfPRtW.EGENIDRIQITTOE'KTUIDDRAINAGESIRUC1UR£SJ.ND£XCAVA11lWJ.ND EMBANl(Mfllr SLOPES BfYOND 7lfE uwrs (F ROAD SUR\£Y NO. 1534. 'ltfERf RfC(JIR(O r0R TIIECCWSIRUC11CWANDMAIN1DWICECFSAJDII/GHWAY.ASCCWTAJllf])fllll/EOCEJJ RfCOROEIJFF8RUNIYl6, /960ASfl/STRl}l,/fl/TIIO.J!596CFrHJaMRECORDS. & rHfPRtW.£GENIDRIQ/Tltl£XTUIDDRAINAG£.SIRUCTIJRESJ.N()fXCAVA11lWJ.ND £MBJ.NKMENTSLOPES8fYONO 11/ELJU/lSCFROAfJIIO. /5J-1. 'MJ[R[R£00/RfDrOR THE CCWSIRUCl!CtlJ.NDMAJN/fllJ,//C[(FSM)IIIQliWAY, ASCCWTAINEDIN 11/EDrnlREmlOCD AUWST 16, 1960ASINSTIMl£HTIIO. 165716 (FCfflC/1'1. Rfca?OS. & J.NEASil/EI/TrORROADWAYANDUT!LJTYANOIIIC/DEJIT1'1.PURPOSfSASDISQ.OSED8Y RECORDSVR~MAPII0.5n5. & :t~~;_rr:o_ ~~AiR"!'° Uf!LJTY AHO /IIODfNT1'1. PURPOSES REC.: FUJRUN/r 2, & ~~rt~~~~ :f: =:fr 7:::£;fi:J:;~-1::° ~~~t#r~ (F5UR\£YII0.5715TIIEIIIITTlfSlS(FllCORl1Tl£/IIS/JRANCECOMPJ.NY,ASSIJCCESSORTO mu:11/SURJ,//C[J.ND TRl}STCONPANYJ.NDASCEl/!Blllo/ORfCARt.SBAD,iLC,AOCU.WA.Rf UM/IWUMl/t.JTYCCIIPANYHA\£8££HEL/Mil/AT[f)8YQ!JTQ.\/MDEB)SRECOROEIJ MARO/ 6, 2006ASf/L£1/0. 2006-0!54736 J.NDMAROI 14, 2006ASF!l£NO. 2006-0176047, 80/H Cf"Cfl1CJALRf(XM)S. PNIT/£SS11ll.RETAIN/IIG/f/ITT/fSlSINSA/D£ASEl,/fl/TARfTIIEOltllfRSCFI..J.NDSCOMMCWLY KI/Oltll AS ASSESSOR'S PN/Cfl NUMBERS 212-00J-56 AND 212-00J-59. AN[).SfllfNTr0RPiPWNfORPffl.JN£SrORANYJ.NDAU.Pt.lRPOSESTOG£/H£RIIIIHIHE RIQIT(F1NG1/fSSIH£RfroANO£GR£SSTHEfl£Ff((MAHl)IHODfNrMPURPOSESREC. OECEMBEJ/ 28, 1961 AS INSTRUMEIITNO. 2232070.R. -TO 8f VACATm. £ A"/J'fUTURES11?ITT(ffl(INGS"AHIJ"42.flJTURESTRITT(ff)lfllG(KE/.lYDR.)'AS$0VIN WPN/CfL/,l,'/'110. 2991 -ltl8fVACA1rD. &J.N£ASillfl/TrORJIJ0PRfVArERW,0ANDUT!LJTY£A.SillfllTDfDICA11lWCWM,'/'NO. PARCUIIAPII0.299J[ASE1,1£1/T & ::1I~~f~-~~:'!;f ~QlilS AND /HC/Dfl/TM PURPOSES REC.: AUWST 2J, (IIOTPWTTITJ) In, :-~~l?' rRf.N St'ACf, Rfc«W): AUGUST 25, 1988 AS IHSTRl/lKNT 110, &J.NEASDIENTrORPU8UClf(}IWAYR£C.:AUGUST25,1988ASINSTR.II0.88-4265710.R. & J.NEASEl,/fl/TrORORAINAGEJ.NDINC/0£/ITMPURPOSES REC.:AUGIJST25,1988ASIIISIR,N0.88-4265740.R. & ~::~tR~f:~~ ~~a":5 fxiTJU~c:/(:~fx:;~1[ti£/}/~ SND STArEI.AW, J.NYCO\£NJ.NlSORR£SIRICl1CWS. £ ANY, 8ASWUP(IIRACE, ca.OR, REUG/Cli SEX SfXUAL ORJENrAn(IJ. FAIi/UN. STATUS. MARITAL srAIUS. DISABll.JTY. IIEDJCAL cwomcw. IIAl1CWN.OOG/ll,SOORCE.<X"INOOIE,ORANCf.SIRY"ASSETFORTHIHMDOCUli/£NT RfCOROEIJ:.JJI.YI0,/989ASINS7RIJUfNTII0.89-J62401CFcma41.RfCORDS (DEB)RfS1R/Cl1CWPR<HB/IINGM/fRATIOOCFLAHDfCflllS,Rfl/OV1'1.CFl.£GETA11CWCfl1H£ ER£C1!('1/ifSIRUCTUR[S IIIIHWT'MltTIDIAPPROV1'1. CF IHECMJF. COASTM caJUISS/CW). £.J.Nf).SfllfNTFORDRAINAGEJ.ND!NC/DENTALPURPOSfS,CONDDJIIEDBYf'IIIALDfCRf.£ CASEII0.:73929 RfC.:DfCfi/8ER9,J9!llJAS/f/S1R.N0./9!llJ-07985770.R.-T08fVACAIUl. & ADOCIJUfNTENnnID'fASfUfNTAGRffilf.llT",DATED,.MY28,2006,£Xfa.JTEDBY ASCEIIT-8il.1llORfCARt.SBA1),LLCAHO/(fJJ_Y/,R/J-PMOMARROADl.llC, SUB.£crroAU. II/ETERl,/S,PROWlWSJ.NDrumtl1CWSTH£Rf/NCQmJNEI),RECOROEDSEPITT/8£R6,2006 ASIIISTRUMlllTNQ2006-06J25840.R £.~~~rg-;/uBLJCORAII/AGEPIJRPOSES.REC.:MAR0/7,2007AS/f/S1R.IIO. &m EAS0/£1/TFORPUBLJCSTR££rANDPUBL/CUl11./TYPURPOS£S RfC.:M'ARO/l,2007ASINSIR.NQ2D07-Dl58005QR. £AN[).SfllfNTr0RPU8UCUTIUl1£S.fllGf/ESS.EGRfSSRfCORC!l);AUGIJST9,2007ASIIIS1R. N0.2007-05J2rJ10.R. &J.NfASEIIENTFORPIJBLJCDRAINAGC,REC.:AUGUSTI0,2007 AS/NSIR.110.2007-053$7580.R. &[).S£MfH/(S)fOR:CCW~VA1!('1/fASE11£1/T,R£C.:IIAY7,2010 REC.II0:2DID-D2J2H)IIO.R. BASIS Of BfARING f£AR/NGSS'IOIWH£RfOHN/fBASUICWGPSIIEAS/JREMENlSTJJ([NOH l/25/22ATQSB-064J.NDCI.S8-05JPfRC/TYCFCARL58)[)ROSJ7271 1.£ 11e1w·1rw -arr CF CAR!.S8AIJ SIJRl,£Y CW/Ra. P(J/JT CI.SB-053 PfR ROS 1727!. 2.5" DISC STAMPfD •a.se-053 1.5 6215" IN NOR/Hr.BT CORNfR CF VAlU OH rHf 11£ST 9/Jf OF HIDOCNVAU£YRD.0.1111.SOOIHCFPMCWNIAJRPORTRD. EL£V•84.9H(NA',f)8!j) HinlL HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING To,J.760.&292288 Fllll.7&).829.2287 2888LOKERAVENUEEA.STSUITE217 CARLSBAO,C.-.92010 ISH:r sl CARLSBAD OFFICE SITE PLAN (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 9 3 ' - 6 " Pa l o m a r A i r p o r t R o a d . Aviara Pkwy. La u r e l T r e e L n . PE D E S T R I A N A C C E S S CO M P A C T VE H I C U L A R A C C E S S E. V . / C. A .E. V . / C. A .E. V . / C. A . C.A . C. A .C.A . C.A . C. A . C. A . 4, 9 0 7 . 0 S F (M A X I M U M A L L O W E D 4, 9 4 5 . 0 S F ) VA N VA N VA N AM B U L A T O R Y CH A R G I N G ON L Y VA N A C C E S S I B L E CH A R G I N G ON L Y ST D A C C E S S I B L E CH A R G I N G ON L Y E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C. A . E.V . / C. A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C. A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E. V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C. A . E.V . / C. A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . E.V . / C.A . ZO N E 2 ZO N E 6 1, 0 1 9 . 2 S F (M A X I M U M A L L O W E D 8, 7 4 3 . 0 S F ) ZO N E 4 15 , 1 4 8 . 5 7 S F (M A X I M U M A L L O W E D NO L I M I T S F ) 3'-0" 110 0 4'-0 " 110 0 3'-0 " 110 0 3'-0"110 0 3'-0"110 0 3'-0"11 0 0 UP 06 05 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 10 0 9 0 8 0 7 11 1 2 15 1 6 1 7 1 8 14 1 3 FD FD IN CONTROL PANEL CLEARANCE OUT UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 UP 06 05 04 03 02 0110090807 EL E V . 1 EL E V . 2 110 0 3'-0"11 0 0 3'-0" 11 0 0 3'-0" 11 0 0 3'-0" 110 0 3'-0" 11 0 0 3'-0"11 0 0 3'-0"11 0 0 3'-0" 11 0 0 3'-0"11 0 0 3'-0" 110 0 OU T D O O R EA T I N G A R E A A 1. 0 2 7 . 0 S F OU T D O O R EA T I N G A R E A B 1, 6 9 0 . 0 S F (10 SPACES @ 8'-6") 85'-0" 7'-0"(10 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 85'-0" 7'-0" (11 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 93'-6" (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7' - 0 " (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 14 ' - 9 " 5'- 9 " 4'- 6 " 7'- 0 " (1 4 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 1 1 9 ' - 0 " (12 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 96'-0" 7'-0" (10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 80'-0" 7'-0" (10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 80'-0" (1 7 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 5 6 ' - 0 " 3 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 2 4 ' - 0 " 21 ' - 1 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 0 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 0 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 0 ' - 0 " (10 SPACES @ 8'-6") 85'-0" 7'-9"(10 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 85'-0" 7'-3"5 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 42'-6" 7'-3"5 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 42'-6" 5 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 51'-0"6'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 5 9 ' - 6 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 9 3 ' - 6 " 7'- 0 " 6'- 0 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 9 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 5 9 ' - 6 " 9'- 7 " 27 ' - 9 " 9'- 1 " 9'- 1 " 10 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 1 0 2 ' - 0 " 7'- 9 " MI N MA X 6'- 3 " MI N 10 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 7'- 6 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 32 ' - 7 " 50 ' - 9 " 9'- 1 " 9'- 1 " 9'- 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 8'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9'- 0 " (6 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 51'-0" 7'-7" (9 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 76'-6" 8'-2" 6'-10" 20'-0"24'-0" 20 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 15'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 24'-0" 20'-0"4'-1"25'-0" 20'-0"7'-1" 7'-0" 24'-10" 15 ' - 3 " 18 ' - 8 " 11'-9" 8'-7" 25'-7 " 15'-7 " 9'-3"57'-1"43'-2" 100'-3"13'-3" 36 ' - 2 " 21 7 ' - 9 " 11 0 ' - 1 " 13 ' - 1 0 " 7" 3'-1" 38'-9" PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND AVIARA PARKWAY CARLSBAD, CA 92010 WWW.RAYMONDFOX.COM 92108 CA DIEGO SAN 340 STE HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH 1660 (619) 296-4595 MEDICAL ARCHITECTURE & CONSULTING RAYMOND FOX & ASSOCIATES SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO. : PROJECT NAME : DA T E I S S U E D : SH E E T N U M B E R : DR A W N B Y : 1 2 3 4 5 S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA RAY M OND FO X No . C 2 4 5 8 3 RE N . 0 7 - 3 1 - 2 3 LICE N S E D ARCHI T E C T REVISIONS : PR O F E S S I O N A L ST A M P S : JU N E 0 7 / 2 0 2 3 6 7 CARLSBAD MOB 22.027 SP 1 0 0 SITE PLAN TO T A L B U I L D I N G S Q U A R E F O O T A G E : 6 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 S F 5 S P A C E S P E R 1 0 0 0 S F : PA R K I N G S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D = 3 1 3 PA R K I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D = 3 1 3 DI S A B L E D A C C E S S I B L E P A R K I N G : FR O M 3 0 1 T O 4 0 0 S P A C E S PA R K I N G S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D = T O T A L O F 8 A C C E S S I B L E I N C L U D I N G 1 V A N A C C E S S I B L E PA R K I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D = T O T A L O F 1 4 A C C E S S I B L E I N C L U D I N G 3 V A N A C C E S S I B L E E. V . P A R K I N G / C H A R G I N G S P A C E S : E. V . P A R K I N G / C H A R G I N G S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D = 3 2 E. V . P A R K I N G / C H A R G I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D = 3 2 CH A R G I N G O N L Y ( N O T P A R K I N G ) : FR O M T H E T O T A L O F 2 6 T O 5 0 E . V . P A R K I N G / C H A R G I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D SP A C E S R E Q U I R E D / P R O V I D E D 1 V A N A C C E S S I B L E 1 S T A N D A R D A C C E S S I B L E 1 A M B U L A T O R Y CL E A N A I R V E H I C L E P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( E . V . P A R K I N G S P A C E S A R E A L S O C O U N T E D A S C L E A N A I R P A R K I N G S P A C E S ) : 12 % O F T H E T O T A L O F 3 1 3 S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D CL E A N A I R V E H I C L E P A R K I N G S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D = 3 9 CL E A N A I R V E H I C L E P A R K I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D = 3 9 TO T A L B U I L D I N G SQ U A R E F O O T A G E : 62 , 6 0 0 . 0 S F ST A N D B Y EL E C T R I C A L GE N E R A T O R BU I L D I N G EL E C T R I C A L RO O M MA I L RO O M EL E V A T O R EQ U I P M E N T RO O M J. C . FL O O R EL E C T R I C A L RO O M ST O R A G E AR E A UT I L I T Y RO O M LO B B Y AR E A SC A L E : 1 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " PR O P O S E D SI T E P L A N TR A S H EN C L O S U R E OU T D O O R E A T I N G A R E A : TO T A L B U I L D I N G S Q U A R E F O O T A G E : 6 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 S F 30 0 S F P E R E A C H 5 0 0 0 S F = 3 , 7 5 6 S F R E Q U I R E D . OU T D O O R E A T I N G A R E A A : 1 , 0 2 7 . 0 S F OU T D O O R E A T I N G A R E A B : 1 , 6 9 0 . 0 S F TO T A L O U T D O O R E A T I N G A R E A : 2 , 7 1 7 . 0 S F 3, 7 5 6 . 0 S F - 2 , 7 1 7 . 0 S F = 1 , 0 3 9 . 0 S F ( T O B E P R O V I D E D V I A S T A F F LO U N G E A R E A S I N T H E T . I . S P A C E S ) LA N D S C A P E : T R E E R E Q U I R E M E N T S : 31 3 P A R K I N G S P A C E S P R O V I D E D ON E T R E E P E R E A C H 4 P A R K I N G S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D : 78 . 2 5 = 7 9 T R E E S R E Q U I R E D . Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 32 of 117 • • • / t---------------1 I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v ----v v v v v v I I I I I r-------- 1 ----------------------- I I I I I I 1 \,_ I 1 ------------~----------------------, ---------------------------------------\ , I I ------------T-~----------------~-------------------+ I I I I , .-1 I I I , ' ,-~ ~---"--~--"1 I ·71'--,-=-;== I ' T-~-cc----------r-----------C.-~//~~l(----,1i'-~-rr~,1-,, -1--r-:--:, i--, l-J l J, ( ,I -r -r-T---\ , , , 1,--r--+-r--1--1---r--1L --1--1-sc k-;-'.-,1·-1---r--7---t--1--1 --1 --11 -,--, -,-;---;--, --, ---, --, y-r--;~--,:--;---,--1 \ : i 1 C1 \ i : :i ,! 1 : :: :: :1 :1 :1 1 ill 1: 1: I :: I) :: 1 ill ii ill 1: ,I I ,I / ,, I ,, -" , ,, / ,, I I I ' ,I / ,, / ,, '·\ ' , , --,· • ' , , , , , , • ' , •• -, I ,, , , , I ,, 1 , / ,, I ,, ' ' ', \ , , ,, I ,, " , \ , , -1---,__--=---·-=---:.._1 1,-,,,·_-:----=----=c,\-=,_-_-_ll-----"--------, --,, , __ , '-----_,_ ' -,, I __ ,_ '·-' " -,_ --,,--,--•--,,_ , __ ,, '-i,· J,_ 0---J----J-__ \, --,,,#--7-7----\ __ I 1------------ 1 I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ', .) ' ' -•• ' ' ' \ ' -\ / \ I I I -{__ - ' ' -----------------,_} ---------------------------------------_\_ -,_ ---------'-':_ --'' ' ---- ,_ -' -----' ' ' ' " . ' ' • • • ' ' ' ' : :1-----; ,_________ ____ --' '------_ q ,_ \ 'x:,, ,-- ' ' , ' ' ',·-/k ', / 'vi I I ' ' ' ' . ' ' -r---,+---~~ccccc:::--::r:_ --------,--I • • ' ' ' ' ·, ' .',--, ., ' " \,-"','. ,-, __ -, -,_ --•----\" -, -\( ', -', \ I ' : : '' I : ,, I " ,I ,, ,\ ; I I I ' . l ' ' : ,,_ "' : " I -' "' ' '" ' ',, ' ' ' ' ' ' " ' ,, I I ,, ,, ' " " ' I I I " _, ' -:: ' ' " ,· --k -. -"" i J •, '< --' I I I J II II ii 1I II ii II i/1 11 II II i1 II / " • !,, / ff ,,/ ' -0 -' .. . ,, ',,,, I I 'I I 11 I I 11 I 1I II II I' II 1I r ·~<-0_ ,--/ -~~----•• ~--' Ii l1 / ----I : / ... , ----,_ ' I I -- 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ,I I I 1 I II I I I ' -\ ' " " ' ' ------i--"----7-, " ' ' ' '' ._ ' ' --' -[ 1------1: ~ -i) 1 : 1: / 1 1: ii :: I _j_i1 'i! __ _ill ,I : I ' I, , ! / !_,j/ / ;:,'-"If"-------\ f /. --~,_ , / , , --, -----I ----L l " -----j_ -----' --------• ' ----, ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' C -· l,?_,-_,_-}"-,._-,~_,-,._J:·-,--:,1/'""" __ -,-;;r __ ,c_-J,1----~I -,, 11-__JIJ', -I ----r' -• • ' ' ---------->------- ' ' --------, ---------' -------c ,-•-, _-_____ "'< ___ 71----L-~_ ' ,_ -' -' ' • ; -_:,, " -: : i ->'./-;,,, : ;: -:: ,--K_ •·· :: I : I I -J-' I i " ' I ' ' ' --" , ' ' c" o ' ' I ' I ' ' ., I o ' ' ' , "' -' ' _ ----1 1 1 I I " -' ----. _, ' : ' ;-, ' -" ,, ~ ---. -' ' ' ' ' -' "' ( / • ' ' ' -~• ' ---, ,,, ' ' ' I , " ' ' ' 1 1 -'. ·; -----I ' , • ._ ' ' ' 0 · . · . , _-''1') / o O • :: ' / I ' I ' ' ' ; ----· ---->--" I '· ' ,--, ' -, ·-,, ----. "' ' ' ' I 1· ' / ' ' ' • , ,, ' 0 ,,' " --. -, ' ' " ---. " - ' ' , , , _ ,_ , , , ,.,;, , , , , , ' -" , '1 1 1 ' 1 , ' ' ,-' "'' ' ' " ' -· ' I ' ,LI_ I\ I ] _____ --I Ii 1! • II I '-c----_ I '1-' : c---~-c ~-!I' ,-' / ' •-, o -ho.• o > c · , o --_ o , -/ __ J'i , 1 -1_/ I ,1 --~-;, / ./ 'i' , " " -" ---' ' ' ' ' _ 0 ' f , , ,er • -,. , , r,-, , ,, , , , • : Io, -• ,, .,_. • " , -, , .,,, ' , ,, , " I • , ' • , x"" •· ' • --{• '--• -/ ·-----. -, I / , , , r • --'1 ' , • , " ,, --,-----· ' ' ,, · · ' ,, ' " -' --• • , --• ' • ' , li'i , ", ' I ' , • / ' • , •, , -: : , -, ----i : , , -._ 1:, 11 ,,\-__ ;_ i ·---~""~~,_~;-c \"-,, ---==-~. i L-=---=---=----=....-=-=-=--=--~i 1 ~/r I : : j •"• , : ,Pi'/,0 ;-; X -) "i"f••-----.. , I -; :: /_// j I I ', II 1111 _:_·ri~/ :r I ::•.,'. .>,','if;! : ii • '11 II : •---c-___________ l,' __ ·.~_--. ___ ,,:1~_·_-_:-·,<, _____ c _________ ' II ,'I .., I I , , : , (/ ' : /"""''°'"' -{ rt , : -·-----r --. ---, -----, -1 ', : I ··, i i / , _, / / i'ii; )/! //, r \ -.. , ,i, / / ' ; i ;ff" /, 1 / ' : I I ' ' ' ; ' ' I/ // -' <' , ,, ' • ; ; ----+,, ' ' i i i ! 'i 'F ! t?:;:;-:i'.,r Z J'/F ! . , ! --_--! -<~'/ i I J I 1111,, .,-•'11 / -/ -./,] / ---/ ,S]]]i-_=-_J]j]''• ',, i c-=....--cc.._-=..._-=..._-,c=-=--=....--1c...::::_:_~~~-=....--cc.._--c.._-=..._-=.._-=.==-• i ,,,/' ii / i, / i , l I ' :J' ; i;J; ' 1/ /' --,,-----· / I ! ' / // 11 i 1 ' , : : ,-_ ---, ,_ i,---r ---,---. ! , ,I / ; , · · ; 1 _----c; · -,: , : I ' • • -, ' ---i -"·,,, --==---~ / l1 I I I ' • ,, -" ' " ' ' " ;, " --.. -' ---' -. ' 1 --1 1 __ / 0 i __ ', : , ,: , .,, , ::• , rr · : , 0 1 ·: •• J,. ""~----~:-1 ji' ' I ' , • -" ----,", -+ " -" , , •. , · , · -r -, ' ,-• ' • • I ' ' ' i,' // , ' ' ·------:· "''f ' --/; . I , ' " I I ' / I 1.,.,<,1 : : 0 ' : ' : i ------.. ,, --' --: -I -/;:' ----' ,, ' ; ' .'' -• • ' '; ,; '" '' ' . ---,, ,, ·. --,) ' ' 0 .I I Ii I 11 I I I "~~--~-,-~. __ .-_.· __ --'_ ,, -,i, I .,,.,, I L.__ ---/( j , / I -=r==a.., Ii , / l1 I I , /'L,~~~~-<cc, I Ii I I r ----iii:~f,';:"_7n, ,_-,-, -1--i : , ,-" ' -. : I 1 ' ,_-_l)o I " ' ' ' , ' , ' , ' ' • , ' ' ' " ' ' I -----r i I I I I i' I I ~-=....-=....-==----...... '----1-,,,, ,,,. I // , i I -I "· ,,,-__ I • I I I I -'I I , "/ ,, ---· __ -..11,1 I I (------,1----I ca_ I-_, / ' '' 'C"•••••--,.,_,, '",. ' ' '' ' -t-\ IF~-' ' ' ' " ,, ' ' " -V ' . : " ' ' I ---\\ ' \ I I I Ii l11 I -',I --,?c:"=========-~J,__.l ___ /1.____ I . -1 1 "1--/ 1 1 / ' --' " ,x------' -.. ---! I I !,.. -I I -.. C I II 1·1===------,:,c-=:=~---0_==;_ ___ ,1 ---: ' "'••------< ___ ,_~ ' ,. ' -} ' •. ' "· ' ' I ~ I t, .. __,c::;-, -~I _J_ I ' I, 'I I -\---c ~"o--_,___ , I 'I -/ I 0 I I I I I I I I I l J) I , : \ ' • • Y ' i I'/: /' "F -r---, ---, ": I : 1 , 1:1 ==""'irt==_I~-=-~-=,----,----, --,,. ; , , : r·, ----: .. / __ : 1 , : :: 1 : , I I /-' "" ' ' • ' ' ' ••• ----' -, " "" -' -' -c-, -"·· ' " I ' ' -7 • ' " ' ' ' ' " -,, ' ,, '" " , , , . ' ----_,, , I ' • C I ' ' !, -" ' ,<, ' ' ,--' , " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ••• , , " '" ' -' " o---•--.... ' " . . . ' ' o ' I ' ' ' ' ·-" ---" ' ---i ' ) -" ' ' i i \ • • ,/ / ' £;;1??!;Yf ' f // I / , • I · --:, i J / 11 : \ : : --: :r , : : -----1 , ::-\--------: ,--_ . 1 . : 11 • , • ,' \ II II l i1 0 1 1 1 1 '~1 I l 1 r1,1 ,I ,-, ____ ;ff 1 ____ -,-----=....-=....-=....-=...., 'I ._ /_/I , , , , , , i -· -, 1 . 1 1 ' ' ' • • ·., ' '' ' "·----' ' ' ' ' , : : -,-r---\,lt " i 11i~;~~~c;~;,;"il_r,I, -; , ~,·------· ,-: __ --"---: :: : : , : \ : :k l -'! / ' • /-•. -I / _-' I \ : : r -I , / ,.,,, / :, 1----_ / _ , f , : "' 1 ' , _. , , , , , -. i ,-' · · · • ---k -------J / / _, : ' ' : : -~-: : lt~~:~:,~?1_1 ,: 1 _-~----),'\,/-_ :; 1i1~:_,_1-:~""~~~, / ' : .----;r··----., __ / I ,, // I I II 1 1 1 1 / I ----1\-," - - - - - -I ' ,• " '' 11 I I ,. I • •. ' " ·-------' . • - ' ' 0 0 ' ' ' ' "11-:Jf I ' ----=....-=....~ I ;.;-:=.~ ''""1 =="1----•1-"/sl-/ ,-' ' ' ' -" ' " ,, ,, I ,. ' ' • : ' ' ' M, ' ,,,, -' -: I I '·-' , II ' \ : • J]" ' • c ' ,1 • • • _. •' • , • ,, -{ ' ' , ' ,, • .. , • • ' I ; ' / - -'c--4~-t- 1 1r~~~~-,\ ( \ i i : ":: r ,----\-j 1 _--; -r;-.. ---r-:. ,_ r 'J-' I I ' I \ I / I I, / I /I l,1 ·---~-, " I ', '11' ' J,-\, I ·---. ___ JILi _/ I II,. I i " ,, \ ! ! j'. j ! ' ---·cc-:,:,, t/-" !!-,,--'.c: ------" i · -"·• -" ,,, !--· f --. l ),-f / IL I I I /':::, I 7 I I I 'CJ 1 •1 I I I -+f, f--':-,--c:_~-r~'Z, ~-~"--,-_>< l['j, ,. \ : : , -J : 1 _ ' .• ;-0c ::1 " '.( :-' I ·-. _ _ ; ,-, , I '. I' I II II / Iii' ·----\I, II lt~,?',;7~)'"~>~-:-::--;;!f .. ~,11 --;,-y+I fli'!-, ---~ C "~~-"~~ct-I =---cc....-=....,'-=....-=....--cc.._-cc ==--=....--cc._-I ---;_1,,, I J - -+----'f~i--'f-7 ---::7::-:-:: __ i II II ' " '" ,, _, ./ ' 1 , 1 c,Jt-~c ~~~~-"~~~ " -" --/ I -----·1 ' ' ,., .-"° ',-' ., . ' ,, "' ' ' ' • • ' ' ' -------• • -• ' ' "" i ' ,, . --'" ' ' , , -' : : Jc: : : ,,,,, : ' :: " : . ," ---. ,, t,: ' . I : I -• \ : : • -: ,: I -_,, " l -r---------: rr · --: ;"--,, ------h -, ' _,-:, :-i ' I I :'c-l \ II 1111 \ I /i'I 'V./_J--::~?.;:--,,-°;11·~rl---1I-(t·,.;)1! II •,' ! ,, ,, II,,,.-_ c-,C~-~""~-~: I I I I /">\ I • • ' " --• • ' " -,-====I,;/ ______ =-=-=--+_,.;-·-1 I ~-/ -I I ' ' I • "C , 1 _. Cc '6 • • ' ' ,__ ,_, ' , . . . C oC , ' , " i , : \ : " : :-;---------, ,-. ::":,,, ----.. : ' ' •' i . ' / "' ' I I ', I I V;1 L , I -i ,: · _---/ , _-' • ',, -' ---,-. . . . -' ' / i -i_ II =~7 ~,-r "'."Tt =,"7 -;~1~--y1--:-i• ,r i'f'co·r,-,.,---+ 1:;------. --/ . I ,, / I ' ' - : " ; '-: .. .--s,r : r91 , -~ --_, x. --,!-~-----,.,.,.1 -----~-"-~! 1 ,1 ,.,.,.,. , > ~ 1 11 r ' ' , , " "--, -----' • ' , , " 1 , I .,, "i :~ I -,,,•=77•-::~·"····11 , , , !>, , " -, . ·· , . ' " ' ," , O , ' _j -' -" ' " " --" ' -! : --~~ ___ ,, f ➔t=CD=-===[ 6 =--..!b=~'========~r" 1 ----i : -L --~r, --i· ··-.·.·.--, r--;,",1 1 ; ,.,.,.,. I I -'c--.+---'-.---,--~77 ' ,· , ,,_, "&-""·' ' ' ' ' " '--.. \: , I ,- ' ' ' ' -,,, "' ' "''-' -' ' -' ' ' ' , ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' ,, _, --' ---' ''°" · V---' ' ' ' / I I L' ·- 1 - 1 ,'. //'", " <c F -}-"C " •---· ,, \ ) , I , I I I I I I I I , : - 7 , r : 'I ,,_ , " • ! f ~ , ., : • : ,', ,;:,,:,;,; _ ,_ ,!-c! < : , At ----: I : J-' II 1~~~~~~7-__ .:z_::-: ·; - -I •I ,;,, i \ " i : , i I,,, )j I I Ill l1 ' I "~~~-"-i-,~ ,K,; ,!',-~--~""~~" ·. II I ,,. / ! l '--~---\--/" r -X -" " Pr ! r r --! -1' ' ,----"":~--(~itc "17"~'r ! I )~----Tl ---'1s -r · ~ii ~ -' ~ f : : I ' I : I - i I----!1! : " ,,: C I / : I / " i ' . ; ,· I : I/ II I ' I ,,: " " ,, • ' A : -\ " -" ----/''" -----~- _ +--1'1?""('=-\-,,_--'11__,_1_:'\1-~ ( 'c---,;; ( 1IJ 11 11 •• V ') / I " I C I" ' "" " " " . {_ /••: -• ---:••: ,_ / ' / _,C., -!/ I / /I I I I I I I I '-,, ,,, ' • A -'' I -, ' ' , ' , ' .. I ' " , ' ·~· v ----+1 "'1 _-, --\ , / I / I . I / I , 1 / / /,I,' ! 1' - +--+,~ 1 ----;r---··1 / I ___ ---L -+--,v -----------, , , - , , , , , . ; , , _ _ _, . " _ , i· I '1--r-----'' ,, , , ' ·, '" , ", , " '"""-"" ' -' -; ' _-' ; : • : ' ,,-; ' : ,-,, --:r --~ . ,' i i I I I ,.-' ' ---" -----Li , ' -II I ,.,. I '/ I - - -,1'1 I I I I I I I ' ' ' • --,_, ' ' " ,, '' ' ' I I -' • ' -·, --t ---· -' -' , '' ' ' ' ,, " ' -' -' ---, / ---/ ,--'" ' " ' ' • -' ' / ' -_-. " ,, ' ' I I 7f---+ ---~,jl'--' , ' ,.-- ---, , -" ; ' ' ' I I I __ (I -__ --_-( --• ,.,.,. ( I --] [ / I ( 11 1I cf /1, / ' ''ii I I 1 : r--/ -1 ,11 ,,,, , -• 1 ,, 1 • "\ \ 1 1 1 1 r ,1 1 i ,, , 1, 1 ,--r 1 , :. 1 1 ,1 ::,-< :i _,--, :r, ·-e,;J; , : I T /_ = c-1 :;,';' h L7 11 II /lr7 -\) 1, I II I ii II 11 II I II C --11 },-I 11 II ii -f I ii 11 /( /--r / ,. ,r------Jc I ! I I I I '1 ' ,. I I I ' 111 ' I --_ 11 I I 11 I / I -I' 1' I , I -I ' I ' I 1 -I ,' ,v " I ' I 1 1 I I I : ,,,.:)/(----_:I 1 : Ii _ 1 1 1 -)_ JI \ 1l/_LJ~~-t i[--j -~I -( -). ,t -'-11f ~-IY': ) j l~\:r J __ I)\ _f'" ;< >?J !/ ! ! ! 1 1 n I • ' -:~t I II _Jll _ II II / LJL '; "· :ii_,_ ; ·.·• ,---__ ;},_ ~' :,~) \.--~t-~-..: 1. ,;~ !,;-~---J~ ,,,.,~~llll --=( -· ~•~,llL-, u )~tll-~'.i-' :;-cc_,11_-·,,i~//'" J' -II .,:_~I:: -, ------~-c-J: --1 : 1 : 1 ' -l -0L/ "-'i,1--,,-----'-,--r-~-p "-,---\:---11 " \ -'f y I ' --,I' -,('-\ --1 r --' -I j ,,. J: -F -r -,,, --,ej" ,f, , ' '; ,j I' : I ! i i ~---' r ;,I j I ,I / ;: :: I I\ I ! /r ' "! ( I ---/-:, ) ! t I r I I j, / ,, J,f ll "' !: i -l/ i ! ! 1 1 1 i_--/ 1 :; 1 1 I / ,I ' J ;: / ,I \ I / I / I J---·r tJ I I I I I J.-/ I J--· I i--.ii_/-· "~~--~-c-1 I ! I [ii-----:,,-,, J •~A \ / J ,, I,, 1 • / J \ I 1 \ 1 / I I / / _, _ /(I :: / : I I I ,.,. I ~ ---I i I -L/ ----,/'---J_ --------,.L_ ---;,,---,c::-, -I I "~~--~-"~;: I : / I I ,. I I ---J__ -----\----" .-, , -" ' ' ' '' ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. , ,. I I ,. I ,,_ __ / -I ' ' ' -" / , ' ' ' ' , ' • ' / -/ ' ", I " I • ' , " , ,. ' . -.. I " ' I ' ' " c' / / " ' " , " I ,.,.111_~~~~~-i I , ' \ ,-' " / _-.: ____ . S, 1 II ' ' , I -' , / / , I I -"" I• c y ' / • •• ' ' ·-\ I / ' ' ' ' I I ,I I /-.\ I ---I I I I I II ' : ' j I ' J 1 1 ,.---· ,, 1 1 ,-i' ,, 1 ,I ' ,, I I ,1 ' 1 I \ -, % ,, I \ ,, / \ 1 ,, _-\L --I, ' ,\" 1 I 1 1 • / 1 JI' ' , 1 1! , ----------------\ _,-i ' ' t i+~-~---4---t--~--+--+--i---1---1---~y-T,,;.-'70,--i---r--f--~, I ,I I ,J-__ L !>:J_ __ t---:---~--f-+--'.--ii---1--,, 1 ~ 'C --;--~,r---- 1 v-" ! • • \i i ii j I J "• L j j_:J:/r J \J ___ 1 _I_ J --;---,r _:,t--i >l;/l).L ' " - 1 ~ -L -L " I " :' 1 -J. "i t ,,>;~! ,~ 1 ______________________________ _ I,.,.) I • c·o4,~,l~~~---1-__ ~------------------,. T--1 ' ---, -' I --------C--------c .. _ y l, I ------------------" ' ', " , -------------' -, , ') '-----------t---/ I \ ', / ---L ______ j_ __ .j_ __ ~-=--=-_____ ------I ----1/1 / I ,. '----""'=-~--=---,,_ --F--!'--/ I / I I ,. -.l'--t-----L -----T ,. I ' ' ,. ' / I ---------------, ' ' , " L--. ./ ' " ' \ -,L ----" ' , " , " L L -L I I ,-I ,-,-/ ,,-' , , , -- \ , ' -, --' -' --/ ----, - - --,.--' , " , , '"--• ' -, -----------------------' -, ----------------. -' / , , / ------------- / ----------,...,.--........._ 'i;-,<-, ---------_____ ,___ -----~-. -----------" ''-'-~------- \ \_, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND AVIARA PARKWAY CARLSBAD, CA 92010 WWW.RAYMONDFOX.COM 92108 CA DIEGO SAN 340 STE HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH 1660 (619) 296-4595 MEDICAL ARCHITECTURE & CONSULTING RAYMOND FOX & ASSOCIATES SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO. : PROJECT NAME : DA T E I S S U E D : SH E E T N U M B E R : DR A W N B Y : 1 2 3 4 5 S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA RAY M OND FO X No . C 2 4 5 8 3 RE N . 0 7 - 3 1 - 2 3 LICE N S E D ARCHI T E C T REVISIONS : PR O F E S S I O N A L ST A M P S : JU N E 0 7 / 2 0 2 3 6 7 CARLSBAD MOB 22.027 A5 0 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 3 4 5 8 10 15 7 9 12 13 SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " PR O P O S E D EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S RO O F P L A N 1 1 2 A B C E F G H I J A B C F G ID 3 4 5 8 10 15 7 3 4 5 8 10 15 14 7 6 9 J 12 13 12 13 11 KE Y P L A N AC B D A B C D F G I J 13'-6"12'-3" 38'-0" 12'-3" 45'-0" 1R S T F L O O R ( F I N I S H F L O O R ) 2N D F L O O R ( F I N I S H F L O O R ) 3R D F L O O R ( F I N I S H F L O O R ) RO O F L I N E PA R A P E T TO P O F G L A S S T O W E R 7'-0" 7'-0" 52'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 8 10 15 14 7 6 9 12 13 11 A B C D F G I J Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 33 of 117 • • • ' ' 1--------+-----JC-l--+----lC--l I I----L +-JLJ-11 I I---,-L +-JLJ-11 j_ 1--------t - - ,-,-·..c,? - --'-,--<:. ·- -- ___ (..::,_ - ' I I I I -+- ' ' ---' I ► ► -+- -+- =t= = ' 1---- ,I I I I 1---- I I ' I I 1- 1 I I ' I I I I I 1---- ' I I I I ii I I I---- I ---,c_ - " ·-------' - -----l----1------11-- - -+-- -----~· -------·.J _,___ ' _[_ __ I I -1------+--- ("'>--------I-------- ( \----1-------- (\ __ _ _, -I-------- -1-------- -1------+--- - --,-- I I ---- I _____ v v _____ v v _____ v _____ v v n 0 11 r I -~ 11 I 0 11 I □► I - 11 I =J - - I I -_J I I -7 0 I I I 11 --+-+- --t--+- ---+- --+-+- L -,----j --t--+- _J - - - - - - ...... 0 0 0 I " - - - - - - Cl I - 0 0 1----- I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I ,1 I 0 00 i 0 0 t 0 0 ___L_,, 0 0 l ◄□ - I II II II ---r-···-----" '-'---~ ~ Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 34 of 117 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/AVIARA PARKWAY OFFICE PROJECT PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETING January 29, 2024-6:00 PM HWL-2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 217, Carlsbad, CA NAME ADDRESS PREFERRED CONTACT (email or phone) ~;,:;,1,./~r~~ £888 ~ t:L.7Z-/lvtF. c .t'&'S T Sa..>€'! t..€1'< €.. Ht.Jt.. -pc: ec.vr -# ~l"tl c~~-s/S/10 _ f?A 92010 S4flNtJ UtJP ueN Tl Sfic-_wft-&.,011e-r~ © wfr~p:-rc,HcGMNie/l c"IAL c.on, Jo~. freLIAw J~relf1w e) lUa sakt,cu)1.,flu;,; q al-Ct) m PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) PROJECT ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan Office (O) and Open Space (OS) Land Use Designation B. Office (O) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.24), Open Space (OS) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.33), and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.208) C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC 21.201) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC 21.203) D. Site Development Plan (CMC Chapter 21.06) E. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan F. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90) and Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5 The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail within the sections below. A. General Plan Office and Open Space Land Use Designation The project is proposed entirely within the northern portion of the property subject to the O General Plan Land Use designation which allows for a wide range of general office, medical, and other professional uses as well as ancillary uses. The remaining south portion of the lot which contains the Encinas Creek, is included within the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve, and is protected by a conservation easement. The preserve area has a General Plan Land Use Designation of OS, Open Space and is within the Open Space (OS) Zone, which allows for natural resource areas, areas for production of resources and recreation and aesthetic area. No development is proposed within the OS portion of the lot which contains riparian habitat and acts as a habitat buffer between the project site and the Encinas Creek to the south. Exhibit 4 Table A below identifies the permissible floor area ratio (FAR) for properties located within the O General Plan Land Use designation. TABLE A – PROPOSED FAR Gross Square Footage in O Designation Allowable FAR per O Designation; Allowed Maximum Square Footage Project FAR; Proposed Square Footage 0.18 0.6 FAR 118,396 Square Feet Maximum .03 FAR 62,600 Square Feet General Plan Compliance In addition to the above, the project also complies with the other Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table “B” below: TABLE B – GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 35 of 117 Exhibit 4 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Land Use & Community Design Goal 2-G.2 – Promote a diversity of compatible land uses throughout the city, to enable people to live close to job locations, adequate and convenient commercial services, and public support systems such as transit, parks, schools, and utilities. Goal 2-G.8 Provide opportunities for continued economic growth and vitality that enhance Carlsbad’s position as a premier regional employment center. The proposed project includes the construction of a 62,600 square foot medical office at the northeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. The site is adjacent to a commercial golf course to the north, a gym to the east, a multi- family residential apartment to the south and additional offices to the west. The proposed medical office will provide a convenient essential service to surrounding residences. The medical office will also provide employment opportunities for residents who live within proximity to the site, therefore enhancing the city’s position as a premier regional employment center. Yes Mobility Goal 3-G.3 – Provide inviting streetscapes that encourage walking and promote livable streets. Policy 3-P.5 – Require developers to construct or pay their fair share toward improvements for all travel modes consistent with the Mobility Element, the Growth Management The project includes the construction of approximately 380 feet of ADA-compliant sidewalk on the south side of Palomar Airport Road along with new street trees. The project also includes a new curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveway on Laurel Tree Lane. These upgrades will create an inviting streetscape and encourage walking. Furthermore, the project supports walkability and mobility by being located near other existing goods and services including a golf course to the north and a commercial gym to the east. In addition, the applicant will be required to pay any applicable traffic impact fees, prior to issuance of a building permit, that will go toward future road improvements. Yes Open Space, Conservation & Recreation Goal 4-G.3 – Protect environmentally sensitive lands, wildlife habitats, and rare, The southern portion of the site contains the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve which is protected by a conservation easement and Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 36 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY threatened, or endangered plant and animal communities. functions as a 70-foot-wide riparian buffer between the project site and the Encinas Creek to the south. The objective of the buffer is to protect water quality and associated biological resources by providing separation from human activities and to serve as a filtering mechanism for runoff before it enters the riparian zone. The buffer area was previously improved by the previous Biltmore/24-Hour Fitness project adjacent and to the east of the project site, as required by the resource agencies. No additional work is needed in the habitat buffer area or within the Encinas Creek. The 70-foot buffer zone is protected by an existing open space and conservation easement and a General Plan Open Space designation. No activity will occur within the buffer. Noise Goal 5-G.1 – Protect public health and welfare by eliminating existing noise problems where feasible, maintaining an acceptable indoor and outdoor acoustic environment, and preventing significant degradation of the acoustic environment. Goal 5-G.2 – Ensure that new development is compatible with the noise environment, by continuing to use potential noise exposure as a criterion in land use planning. The proposed project is located within the 60-65 and 65-70 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contours in the McClellan Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Medical offices are deemed a compatible use within the 60-65 CNEL contour in the ALUCP that will not be affected by aircraft noise and a conditionally compatible use in the 65-70 dB CNEL contour in the ALUCP. Buildings must be designed to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to California Code of Regulation (CCR) Title 24. Exterior noise levels associated with aircraft operations would be 70 dBA CNEL and noise modelling found in the Noise Evaluation (Ldn Consulting Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 37 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY 2024) demonstrates the building could attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24 by implementing recommendations in the Noise Evaluation. Operational noise impacts due to new mechanical heating-ventilation (HVAC) systems, roadway noise, and aircraft operations were also addressed in the noise evaluation. The evaluation concludes that the project’s HVAC would not expose nearby residential properties to noise levels in excess of the city standards. Nosie related to roadway traffic and aircraft when combined with operations at McClelland- Palomar Airport would result in an on-site noise exterior noise level of 74.4 dBA CNEL. According to Table 5-1 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, the city considers office uses conditionally compatible with noise levels up to 77 dBA CNEL provided it can be demonstrated that interior noise standards can achieve the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL in accordance with CCR Title 24. Interior noise standards would be achieved for the project through the incorporation of noise attenuation design recommendations in the noise evaluation and shown on the project plans as design features. Public Safety Goal 6-G.2 – Minimize safety hazards related to aircraft operations in areas around the McClellan-Palomar Airport. The proposed project is in compliance with the ALUCP airspace protection surfaces because the maximum height of the proposed medical office including the architectural tower is below the height that requires notification of Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 38 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY construction to the FAA. Despite this, the project has been reviewed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with CFR Title 14, Part 77, in accordance with the Review Area 1 procedures (FAA 2024). Through the review process, it has been determined that the Project design would comply with the safety provisions of the ALUCP, would not exceed obstruction standards and would not result in hazard to air navigation. In addition, the proposed project is located within Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6. The ALUCP identifies office buildings (including medical offices) within Safety Zone 6 as compatible with airport uses, and conditionally compatible with airport uses in Safety Zones 2 and 4 only if the development complies with either the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) or the maximum intensity and lot coverage limits as specified in Table III-2 (ALUCP Section 3.4.14). The office complies with the allowable FAR for each safety zone and is therefore compatible in Safety Zones 2 and 4. Public Safety Goal 6-G.1 Minimize injury, loss of life, and damage to property resulting from fire, flood, hazardous material release, or seismic disasters. Policy 6-P.6 – Enforce the requirements of Titles 18, 20, and 21 pertaining to drainage and flood control when reviewing applications for building permits and subdivisions. The proposed structural improvements will be required to be designed in conformance with all seismic design standards. In addition, the proposed project is consistent with all the applicable fire safety requirements including fire sprinklers. Furthermore, the project has been conditioned to develop and implement a program of “best Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 39 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Policy 6-P.34 Enforce the Uniform Building and Fire codes, adopted by the city, to provide fire protection standards for all existing and proposed structures. Policy 6-P.39 Ensure all new development complies with all applicable regulations regarding the provision of public utilities and facilities. management practices” for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities. Sustainability Policy 9-P.1 – Enforce the Climate Action Plan (CAP) as the city’s strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The project implements and is consistent with measures identified in the Climate Action Plan (CAP) through the provision of renewable energy generation (photovoltaic systems), energy conservation (Green Building Code), and by accommodating Zero-Emission vehicles and other greenhouse gas reduction measures and features. At building permit, the project will also be reviewed for compliance with the CAP ordinances. Yes B. Office (O) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.24), Open Space (OS) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.33), and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.208) The proposed project is required to comply with all applicable land use and development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) including the Office (O) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.24), the Open Space (OS) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.33) and the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.208). Office Zone Table “C” below shows how the project complies with the applicable requirements of the Office Zone. TABLE C- O ZONE COMPLIANCE STANDARDS REQUIRED PROPOSED COMPLY Building* Height 42 feet*; 55 feet for allowed architectural tower protrusions 42 feet/ 52 feet for allowed architectural tower protrusion Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 40 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) Setbacks* Primary Front Yard (Palomar Airport Road – Prime Arterial Road): Building – 50 feet/57 feet for additional height Parking Lot – 30 feet/37 feet for additional height Primary Front Yard (Palomar Airport Road – Prime Arterial Road): Building – 57 feet Parking Lot – 37 Feet Yes Front Yard (Laurel Tree Lane): Building – 20 feet/27 feet for additional height Parking Lot – 10 feet/17 feet for additional height Front Yard (Laurel Tree Lane): Building – 27 feet Parking Lot – 17 feet Yes Street Side Yard (Aviara Parkway - Arterial Road): Building – 30 feet/37 feet for additional height Parking Lot – 15 feet/22 feet for additional height Street Side Yard (Aviara Parkway - Arterial Road): Building – 37 feet Parking Lot – 22 feet Yes Interior Side Yard (Eastern Property Line): Building – 10 feet/17 feet for additional height Parking Lot – 5 feet/12 feet for additional height Interior Side Yard (Eastern Property Line): Building – 17 feet Parking Lot – 12 feet Rear Yard (South Property Line): Building – 10 feet/17 feet for additional height Parking Lot – 5 feet/12 feet for additional height Rear Yard (South Property Line): Building – 17 feet Parking Lot – 12 feet Yes* Lot Coverage 50% maximum 8% Yes Parking Required Pursuant to Chapter 21.44: 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area = 313 spaces 313 spaces Yes Parking Lot Landscaping 10% of the site devoted to uncovered parking/10,638.1 square feet 12.5%/13,174 square feet Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 41 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) Minimum of one 15-gallon tree per four parking stalls = 79 126 parking lot trees Employee Outdoor Eating Areas 300 square feet per 5,000 square feet of building area: 3,756 square feet Credit towards the required amount of square footage will be given for indoor eating facilities on a 1:1 basis Outdoor Eating Area A: 1,372.58 Outdoor Eating Area B: 1,330.76 Indoor Employee Lounge: 1,052.66 Total: 3,756 square feet Yes Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 42 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) * Section 21.27.050 allows an increase in building height over the 35-foot height limit when setbacks are increased by one foot for every foot of building height over 35 feet. The office is proposed at 42-feet-tall which is a 7-foot increase over the 35-foot height limit. Therefore, all setbacks are subject to an increase of 7-feet. This section also allows for an increase in height for architectural features such as architectural towers up to a maximum height of 55-feet. The architectural tower proposed at 52-feet meets the requirements pursuant to section 21.46.020(A)(3)(b) for allowed architectural protrusions. Open Space Zone No development is proposed within the portion of the lot zoned as OS which includes the Encinas Creek and associated riparian habitat. Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone The project site is located within the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone. Because the property is being developed as an Office building, which is a permitted use of the underlying Office zone, the project is not subject to the provisions of the Overlay Zone. C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC 21.201) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC 21.203) 1. Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies The proposed site is in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and is not located within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The project site has an LCP Land Use designation of Office (O) and Open Space (OS), which are consistent with the city’s General Plan and Zoning. The project’s consistency with the Office (O) and Open Space (OS General Plan Land Use designation is analyzed in Section “A,” Table “B” and “C” above. The project consists of the construction of a 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas on a 6.07-acre site located on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. The medical office is proposed on the portion of the lot that is zoned and designated for office uses. The proposed three-story medical office will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses currently exist on the site. The project footprint is located entirely outside of the sensitive resources (Encinas Creek and associated habitat) located in the open space easement on the south portion of the lot and adequate buffers have been established to ensure this area will continue to be conserved. In addition, the proposed three-story medical office project is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazards. Since the site does not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access are available from the subject site. Furthermore, the office designated site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 43 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) 2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the city’s Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban run-off, pollutants and soil erosion. No undevelopable steep slopes or native vegetation is located on the subject property and the previously graded site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction. D. Site Development Plan (CMC Chapter 21.06) According to CMC section 21.27.040, approval of a Minor Site Development Plan processed according to the provisions of Chapter 21.06 shall be required for any development in the O zone. Therefore, the project requires a Minor Site Development Plan. Six site development plan findings are required for the project. The required findings with justification for each are summarized below and contained in Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 1 to the Jan. 15, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report). 1. That the proposed development or use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable master plan or specific plan, complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and all other applicable provisions of this code. The project consists of a 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office with a 316- spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas on a lot located at the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway. All improvements are proposed within the northern 118,396-square-foot portion of the property subject to the General Plan Land Use designation of O, Office and within the Office (O) Zone. The O land use designator allows for a wide range of general office, medical, and other professional uses as well as ancillary uses with a maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.6. The 62,600-square-foot building is below the 118,396-square-foot maximum square footage allowed with a 0.32 FAR. The remaining south portion of the lot which contains the Encinas Creek, is included within the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve, and is protected by a conservation easement. The preserve area has a General Plan Land Use Designation of OS, Open Space and is within the Open Space (OS) Zone, which allows for natural resource areas, areas for production of resources and recreation and aesthetic area. No development is proposed within the OS portion of the lot which contains riparian habitat and acts as a habitat buffer between the project site and the Encinas Creek to the south. The project is consistent with all remaining development and design standards applicable to the property as contained in Chapters 21.27 Office Zone of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. That the requested development or use is properly related to the site, surroundings, and environmental settings, will not be detrimental to existing development or uses or to development or uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed development or use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation. The proposed 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas is located on a portion of a Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 44 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) 6.07-acre site zoned O. The project will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the use is located in that medical office uses are permitted by right in the O Zone. The property is surrounded on two sides by commercial uses, including a commercial golf course to the north, a gym to the east and office uses to the west. The existing open space preserve located on the southern portion of the property provides a buffer between the proposed medical office and the Encinas Creek. This area also acts as a buffer between the proposed medical office and the existing multi-family residential apartment building to the south. A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Project was conducted and found that the medical office will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). The project trips were distributed to the local roadway network to evaluate the potential for traffic impacts. The TIA also took into account near-term traffic associated with approved and pending projects that will add traffic to the local study area by the time of project occupancy. One additional signal modification was also assumed since one of the near-term projects was conditioned to install the northbound right-turn overlap phase at Palomar Airport Road/Aviara Parkway. Based on the analyses conducted in the TIA, the proposed medical office would not result in a significant impact to the roadway network in the project area, including the Palomar Airport/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection adjacent to the site. 3. That the site for the intended development or use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. The 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building with a 316-spaces surface parking lot and interior and exterior employee eating areas is located on a portion of a 6.07-acre site zoned O. All applicable code requirements have been met including parking and building coverage standards. The project’s proposed increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet with an addition 3-feet for a parapet is permitted pursuant to CMC 21.27.050(A)(3) as all required setbacks have been increased at a ratio of one horizontal foot for every one foot of vertical construction beyond 35 feet for a total setback increase of 7 feet on each side. The additional 3-foot parapet is a permitted height protrusion pursuant to CMC 21.27.050 as it does not exceed an overall height of 45-feet. The proposed 52-foot-tall architectural tower is a permitted protruding architectural feature as the extra height does not function to provide usable floor area, does not accommodate and/or screen building equipment, does not adversely impact adjacent properties due to the distance of the structure from property lines and is necessary to ensure the building design excellence by providing interest and contrast in the building façade and roofline. 4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested development or use to existing or permitted future development or use in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained. Setback areas have been landscaped to screen the parking areas. Adequate on-site vehicular circulation has been provided to accommodate passenger and truck traffic. In addition, the existing open space preserve located on the south portion of the project site which provides a buffer between the project and the existing Encinas Creek and between the proposed project and the multi-family apartment building to the south will remain untouched as required by the recorded open space easement. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 45 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) 5. That the street systems serving the proposed development or use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. The proposed 62,600-square-foot, three story, 42-foot-tall, medical office building will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Project was conducted and found that the medical office will generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT). The project trips were distributed to the local roadway network to evaluate the potential for traffic impacts. The TIA also took into account near-term traffic associated with approved and pending projects that will add traffic to the local study area by the time of project occupancy. One additional signal modification was also assumed since one of the near-term projects was conditioned to install the northbound right-turn overlap phase at Palomar Airport Road/Aviara Parkway. Based on the analyses conducted in the TIA, the proposed medical office would not result in a significant impact to the roadway network in the project area, including the Palomar Airport/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection adjacent to the site. 6. That the proposed development or use meets all other specific additional findings as required by Title 21. Pursuant to CMC section 21.27.050, the proposed architectural tower is allowed to exceed the 45-foot height limit, up to a height of 52-feet because the protruding architectural features does not function to provide usable floor area, does not accommodate and/or screen building equipment, does not adversely impact adjacent properties and is necessary to ensure the buildings design excellence. E. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan The proposed project falls within the boundaries of the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The ALUCP was amended on December 1, 2011, and all projects within its boundary are required to be reviewed for consistency with its goals and policies. The ALUCP identifies four types of airport impacts that must be considered for each development: Noise, Safety, Airspace Protection, and Overflight. Noise The proposed project is located within the 60-65 and 65-70 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contours. Medical offices are deemed a compatible use within the 60-65 CNEL noise contour in the ALUCP that will not be affected by aircraft noise and a conditionally compatible use in the 65-70 dB CNEL noise contour in the ALUCP. Buildings must be designed to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to California Code of Regulation (CCR) Title 24. Exterior noise levels associated with aircraft operations would be 70 dBA CNEL and noise modelling found in the Noise Evaluation (Ldn Consulting 2024) demonstrates the building could attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24 by implementing recommendations in the Noise Evaluation. Safety Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 46 of 117 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) The proposed project is located within Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6. The ALUCP identifies office buildings (including medical offices) within Safety Zone 6 as compatible with airport uses, and conditionally compatible with airport uses in Safety Zones 2 and 4. Offices are allowed in Safety Zones 2 and 4 only if the development complies with either the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) or the maximum intensity and lot coverage limits as specified in Table III-2 (ALUCP Section 3.4.14). The project proposes 14,721 square feet of office space in Safety Zone 2, 3,058 square feet in Safety Zone 4 and 44,821 square feet in Safety Zone 6, all of which comply with the maximum square footages permitted within each safety zone per the respective FAR as outlined in the ALUCP. Airspace Protection The proposed project is in compliance with the ALUCP airspace protection surfaces because the maximum height of the proposed medical office including the architectural tower is below the height that requires notification of construction to the FAA. Despite this, the project has been reviewed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with CFR Title 14, Part 77, in accordance with the Review Area 1 procedures (FAA 2024). Through the review process, it has been determined that the Project design would comply with the safety provisions of the ALUCP, would not exceed obstruction standards and would not result in hazard to air navigation. Overflight The proposed project is not located within the overflight notification area. F. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90) and Local Facilities Management Plan Zone The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the Northwest Quadrant of the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table “D” below. TABLE D – GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Standard Impacts/Demand City Administration No Impact; does not generate population Library No Impact; does not generate population Wastewater Treatment 34.8 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU)/26,535 GPD Parks No Impact; does not generate population Drainage 4.54 CFS, Drainage Basin C Circulation 3,130 ADT Fire Fire Station 4 Open Space No Impact Schools No Impact; does not generate population Sewer Collection System 34.8 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU)/26,535 GPD Water 26,535 GPD Average Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 47 of 117 From:Steve Linke To:Lauren Yzaguirre Subject:Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CEQA Determination Date:Tuesday, December 3, 2024 5:19:13 PM Ms. Yzaguirre: I noted the determination that the Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building project (formerly Kelly-JRM Office Building project) does not require any further CEQA documentationrelative to a previous MND approved by the City Council on 9/18/2007. Regarding the Transportation component: (a) The MND is over 17 years old. and the traffic study for that MND is probably a few years older than that. (b) The project will be adding vehicle traffic to an intersection of Palomar Airport Road thathas now been exempted from the Growth Management Program vehicle congestion performance standard due to degradation below LOS D. (c) I believe there is a substantial residential project being built directly adjacent, and whichwill also be adding its traffic to the same intersection. That project would not have been included in any 2007-era cumulative Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) cumulative impactstudy and may not have been included in a more recent analysis. (d) This project would be required to prepare a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan under existing rules based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Questions: A. Is there a method to appeal this determination? B. Please provide the following documentation, or let me know whether I need to file a publicrecords request: 2024 Transportation Impact Analysis (LLG)2007 Planning Commission Agenda Bill for the project (the 9/18/2007 City Council Agenda Bill refers to a date of 5/16/2007, but I was unable to locate the correspondingAgenda Bill on the records site) TIA conducted for the 2007 MND C. Is there no "expiration date" on old EIRs and MNDs that can trigger the need formeaningful updates? A lot of things change over 20 years. Best regards, Steve Linke CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Exhibit 5 Public Comment Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 48 of 117 • • • Exhibit 6 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 49 of 117 {_ City of Carlsbad DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) neveh~p;nen ~· 5ervjces Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (442) 339-2610 www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print Note: .< .• .·... . .•.. Person isoefined ~s ''Any inaividual, firm, .. co-partnership, Joint venture., associ1;1fion, social·club,Jr1;1ternal organizatkm, corp.orati9n, e§tate,. tr4st,. receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district orqther political subdivision or any other grpupor coml:lination.1;1cting asa qnit." . _-__ -----•<,·: .. :·.-:c'_c_-_.·-_·,_._ -----_.·.· :"':::,;.\·> _->:-:'.> . :--<-,·:_ .. ,:• • ·<:---_ . • \'_\'. >:· ',-.-·>'->\"·:" -.-<". .•.•.·.·•.• .. ·.·.:-_·.--:. .•. •• •. ::: .. ·.:.<·i; Agent~.!llpY .signfilisdocument;[hbwever,]he legatname and ... entity/of the ippH~ant~nd property owner must beprovided below. • -• .-•• • • • • • 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person James R. Mccann Corp/Part Kelly/JRM-Palomar Airport Road I, LLC Title __________ _ Title ____________ _ Address 330 Encinitas Blvd .• #201, Encinitas, CA 92024Address same ------------- 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) P-1(A) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person James R. Mccann Title ------------ Address 330 Encinitas Blvd. Ste 201 Encinitas, CA 92024 Corp/Part Kelly/JRM-Palomar Airport Road I, LLC Title ____________ _ same Address ____________ _ Page 1 of2 Revised 3/22 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 50 of 117 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust NIA Non Profit/Trust'----------- Title __________ _ Title _____________ _ Address __________ _ Address ____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes ~ No If yes, please indicate person(s): ___________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certif~th~t II the above information is true and correct to t~be ( ---------, ( Sig Signa r of applicant/date I/ A~n<es R. Mccann Ciii'rint or type name of owner JaM)e's R. Mccann // Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent P-1(A) Page 2 of2 Revised 3/22 Statement of Reasons and Determination that a Project is Consistent with a Prior Environmental Document and No Further Documentation is Required Pursuant to CEQA §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15164 Date: Dec. 03, 2024 Project Title: Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building Planning Case No.: CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 GP Designation: Office (O) and Open Space (OS) Zoning: Office Zone (O Zone) and Open Space Zone (OS Zone) in the Commercial Visitor Serving Overlay Zone Staff Contact: Lauren Yzaguirre - (442) 339-2634 Lauren.Yzaguirre@carlsbadca.gov 1. Introduction This California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis evaluates environmental impacts from the proposed three-story 62,600-SF Medical Office Building with two outdoor eating areas totaling 2,717-SF and a surface parking lot and ancillary improvements on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road at Aviara Parkway, Carlsbad, CA (APN 212-040-64-00; hereinafter referred to as the “Project”). Documentation herein has been prepared by the City of Carlsbad as Lead Agency in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of CEQA and CEQA Guidelines. Prior environmental documentation is conclusively presumed to comply with the provisions of CEQA and CEQA Guidelines for purposes of its use, unless the provisions of section 21166 and sections 15162 and 15164 are applicable. The City Planner has completed a CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164 consistency evaluation in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 for the Project. The provisions of CEQA Guidelines sections 15162, and 15164 apply when the project being analyzed is a change to, or further approval for, a project for which an EIR or negative declaration was previously certified or adopted. 2. Project Location and Description 2A. Project Location Southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road at Aviara Parkway, Carlsbad, CA (APN 212-040-64-00). 2B. Project Description The Project is a request to reduce the previously approved three-story, 85,000 SF general office building to a three-story, 62,600-SF medical office building. The proposed Project site plan reconfigures the placement of the smaller building and associated site improvements. Access to the Project site would continue to be provided via one unsignalized full-access driveway at the cul-de-sac on the eastern terminus of Laurel Tree Lane. Both the proposed Project and the previously approved project feature parking improvements up to the pedestrian trail along the southern portion of the parcel, abutting the Laurel Tree Lane Preserve with a narrow landscape strip between the parking stalls and trail fencing. The overall Project parking would meet the minimum 313 parking spaces required per the Carlsbad Municipal Code, including spaces for electric vehicle (EV), clean air vehicles and disabled access. A 150-foot-wide SDG&E easement traverses the site diagonally and would contain a total of 159 parking spaces Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 51 of 117 {city of Carlsbad Exhibit 7 Statement of Reasons Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 2 - 12/3/2024 along with associated drive aisles, landscaping, and site lighting. Other proposed site improvements would include utility infrastructure associated with providing storm drains, sewer, water, and electrical service. The existing recreation trail that traverses the site would be protected in place. Overall, the Project would require 5,802 cubic yards of earthwork, conducted in a balanced grading operation. The Project is consistent with density and lot size requirements of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The 6.07-acre Project site is currently vacant. The 4.53-acre northern portion of the site was initially constructed in the 1980s using material from construction activities associated with Palomar Airport Road and further road, stormwater, and utility improvements were made in 2007 as part of the Laurel Tree Lane Public Improvement Project. The Project site is topographically level, except for the stormwater drainage basin near the southwest corner of the property associated with the road improvements. The northern area is periodically leased out for seasonal sales (i.e., holiday trees and pumpkins). The 1.38-acre southern portion surrounding the Encinas Creek has a recorded conservation easement in favor of the City. An 8-foot wide, decomposed granite-surfaced trail traverses the southern portion of the site paralleling the fenced open space. The site is encumbered by an easement to SDG&E which contains 270 kV overhead transmission lines and support structures, easements for public utilities (i.e., sewer), and easements for public roads. Easements for drainage and vehicular access also occur on the property. The Project site is also within the 60 to 65, and 65 to 70 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contours and Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6 associated with McClellan-Palomar Airport operations, as defined in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). 3. Overview of Applicable CEQA Provisions and Findings The following discussion presents the relevant provisions of CEQA to which the proposed Project complies. This evaluation was performed to determine if conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 or 15164 would require preparation of a subsequent environmental document or addendum. In general, if changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent negative declaration if required under CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a). If there are some technical changes or additions necessary to reflect project changes or redesign, an addendum may be prepared (CEQA Guidelines section 15164). If, in examining future actions for development within the Project area, the city finds no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required other than those analyzed and/or required in the prior environmental document, and there is no new information of substantial importance, the city can approve the activity as being within the scope covered by this prior environmental document and no new environmental documentation would be required. The City Planner has determined that the update to the details of the request (requiring additional further discretionary approval) would not result in new significant impacts over and above those disclosed in the prior environmental document. This section concludes with the CEQA finding and determination that the Project is exempt from further environmental review. 3A. Prior Environmental Document A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND; SCH# 2004121003) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Kelly/JRM Office Project were adopted by City Council of the City of Carlsbad on September 18, 2007, by Resolution No. 2007-199. The Kelly/JRM Office Project was a request to approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Site Development Plan, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit to clarify, refine and adjust the generalized land use boundaries of the Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS) designations and eliminate the erroneous Unplanned Area (UA) designation on site. Zoning on the portion of the property designated Planned Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 52 of 117 Statement of Reasons Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 3 - 12/3/2024 Industrial Zone (PM Zone) remained unchanged as Office (O). The land use development permit issued allows for the construction of a three-story, approximately 85,000 SF office building on the Project site. The portion of the property zoned Planned Industrial (P-M-Q Zone) was later rezoned to Office Zone (O Zone) and the land use designation was changed to Office (O) during the 2015 Comprehensive General Plan Update (GPA 07-02/ZC 15-02/ LCPA 07-02). The previously approved MND is on file with the City of Carlsbad (Resolution No. 2007-199). 3B. Applicability of the Project to Sections 15162 and 15164 Once a project has been approved, the lead agency's role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approval on that project is required. Section 15160 of the CEQA Guidelines explains that there are several mechanisms, and variations in environmental documents, that can be tailored to different situations and intended uses of environmental review. Specifically, Section 15160 states that the “… variations listed [including subsequent EIRs, supplemental EIRs, and addendums] are not exclusive. Lead agencies may use other variations consistent with the CEQA Guidelines to meet the needs of other circumstances.” This provision allows lead agencies to tailor the use of CEQA mechanisms to fit the circumstances presented to the lead agency by a project. Here, the city has opted to assess the minor modifications to the details of the request (Project) that have transpired since the adoption of the prior environmental document. CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation, if any, to be completed when there is a previously adopted negative declaration (ND) or a previously certified environmental impact report (EIR) covering the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is required. CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), states that a subsequent document shall be prepared if substantial changes are proposed in the project or circumstances that will require major revisions of the prior CEQA document due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. A subsequent document may also be required when new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the prior environmental document was certified/adopted, shows that (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the prior document, (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the prior document, (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the prior document would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Thus, CEQA Guidelines section 15162 clarifies that a subsequent EIR or ND or supplemental EIR or ND is only required when "substantial changes" occur to a project or the circumstances surrounding a project, or "new information" about a project implicates "new significant environmental effects" or a "substantial increase in the severity of previously significant effects." In evaluating whether these thresholds are met, the key is to determine if any circumstances have changed enough to justify repeating a substantial portion of the environmental documentation process. Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines states if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary (and none of the conditions described in section 15162 have occurred), the lead agency may opt to prepare an addendum to assess the minor modifications of the project. 3C. Applicable Mitigation Measures Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 53 of 117 Statement of Reasons Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 4 - 12/3/2024 No applicable mitigation measures beyond those identified in Section 4, below, are required. Further, the MND adequately anticipated and described the impacts of the Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce project specific impacts. A comprehensive environmental evaluation has been completed for the Project (Section 4). 3D. Summary of Findings This CEQA Analysis demonstrates that the Project would not result in substantial changes or involve new information that would warrant preparation of a subsequent negative declaration because the level of development proposed is within the development assumptions analyzed in the prior environmental document. With uniformly applied development standards, mitigation measures imposed as environmental conditions of approval, and standard regulatory requirements, the Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts relative to what was identified the MND. Moreover, no technical changes are necessary and no addendum shall be prepared. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164, and in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21166, that the Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building project (CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22) is consistent with the MND for the Kelly/JRM Office project. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. The MND and other documents constituting the record of proceedings upon which the approval is based are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk. Signature Date Printed Name Title Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 54 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 5 - 12/3/2024 4. Overview of Applicable CEQA Provisions and Findings In general, CEQA Guidelines recommend using a written checklist or similar device to evaluate the criteria covered by sections 15162 and 15164 (consistency determinations) or to otherwise confirm whether the environmental effects of a subsequent activity are adequately covered in a prior environmental document. Accordingly, this section examines the Project’s potential environmental effects within the parameters outlined in CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15164. The evaluation builds from the Appendix G Environmental Checklist and has been modified to reflect the parameters outlined in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and 15164. The checkboxes in the evaluation below indicate whether the proposed Project would result in new or increased severity of environmental impacts or result in a substantial change to the prior analysis or be of equal or less severity of impacts relative to those identified in the prior MND. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 1. Aesthetics – Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously adopted Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to aesthetics and visual character due to the project site’s lack of scenic resources, previously disturbed agricultural nature, lack of trees or vegetation and the project’s compliance with the city’s Planned Industrial Zoning district development standards in place at the time of approval that would ensure high quality design and compatibility with adjacent office development. Therefore, the MND assessed that no impacts to aesthetics would result from the construction of the proposed office structure. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 55 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 6 - 12/3/2024 Proposed Project - As was the case in the MND, the Project site remains a vacant but disturbed property with no trees or vegetation present. Similar to the prior project, site grading would be minor and not substantially modify the property’s topography. Scenic vistas in Carlsbad generally consist of the scenic corridors and views towards the coastline, hillsides, and natural open spaces. The Project site is not listed as including any scenic vistas or corridors in the city’s General Plan (City of Carlsbad 2015). No other formally designated state or local scenic vistas are in the vicinity of the Project site. No impact is assessed to scenic vistas as a result of the proposed Project. Development of the medical office building, including the parking and other site improvements within the SDG&E easement, would be the same bulk and mass (or to a lesser degree) of the prior office building and would be consistent with the Project’s site’s planned use and zoning and comply with the Office development regulations in the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed Project is considered consistent with the Kelly/JRM Office Project MND and no minor or major technical changes to the analysis is required. The proposed Project would not damage scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings since none exist in the area. The proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources from a state highway since none occur in the Project area and no impact is assessed. Given the urban nature of the Project area and planned office use for the site, the proposed Project would not substantially change the character of the viewshed in the Project area. Therefore, a less than significant impact is assessed to existing visual character or quality of public view and surrounding sites. All of the Project’s lighting, including that proposed within the SDG&E easement, would comply with the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) and no substantial increase in lighting is proposed. No large expanses of glass or other reflective surfaces that could generate glare are proposed. All lighting would be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property, as required by city development regulations. No impact is assessed to light and glare as a result of the proposed Project. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to aesthetics; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 2. Agriculture/Forestry Resources – Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide or Local Importance as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 56 of 117 □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 7 - 12/3/2024 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code §12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code §51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Important Farmland or other agricultural resources, to non-agricultural use? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND found that the office building project did not have the potential for significant impacts to agricultural and forestry resources as no agricultural lands were affected by the project. Therefore, it was assessed that no impacts to agricultural and forestry resources would result from the construction of the proposed structure. Proposed Project - The Project site does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. The Project site is designated for Office use by the General Plan and identified as urban and built-up land according to the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder.1 Thus, the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use, and no impact would result. Per the City of Carlsbad Zoning Map, the Project site is zoned Office and Open Space. The site is not zoned for agricultural use nor is it identified as a site for agricultural use within the General Plan. The site is also not within a Williamson Act contract (City of Carlsbad 2015). Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning of agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract and no impact would occur in this regard. Carlsbad is devoid of any lands that meet the definition of forest land, timberland, or timberland production zone (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), or timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as 1 California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed July 1, 2024. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 57 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 8 - 12/3/2024 defined by Government Code section 51104(g)). The Project site is not occupied by or used for forest land or timberland purposes and is not zoned Timberland Production. Further, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the rezoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Therefore, no impacts to forest land or timberland and no impacts resulting from conversion of forestry lands would occur as a result of implementation of the proposed Project. The proposed medical office building would not result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use. Thus, no impact is assessed to changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to agricultural and forestry resources ; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 3. Air Quality – Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion An area is designated in attainment when it is in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (federal) and/or California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (state). These standards are set by the Environmental Protection Agency or the California Air Resources Board for the maximum level of a given air pollutant that can exist in the outdoor air without unacceptable effects on human health or the public welfare. The criteria pollutants of primary Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 58 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 9 - 12/3/2024 concern that are considered in an air quality assessment include ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10, and PM2.5), lead and toxic air contaminants. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are precursors to the formation of ground-level O3. The following table shows the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) designations for criteria pollutants: Criteria Pollutant Federal Designation (NAAQS) State Designation (CAAQS) Ozone (8-Hour) Nonattainment Nonattainment Ozone (1-Hour) Attainment2 Nonattainment Carbon Monoxide Attainment Attainment PM10 Unclassifiable3 Nonattainment PM2.5 Attainment Nonattainment Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment Attainment Sulfur Dioxide Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment Sulfates No Federal Standard Attainment Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal Standard Unclassified Visibility No Federal Standard Unclassified The SDAB is designated in attainment for all criteria pollutants under the NAAQS, with the exception of O3 (8-Hour) and PM10, which is listed as unclassifiable. The SDAB is currently designated nonattainment for O3 and particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5, under the CAAQS. It is designated as attainment under CAAQS for CO, NO2, SO2, lead and sulfates. The Project site is located within the SDAB. The periodic violations of (NAAQS) in the SDAB, particularly for O3 in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) with regional growth projections provided by San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). The RAQS outlines the APCD’s plans and regulatory control measures designed to attain state air quality standards for ozone. The RAQS, which was adopted by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board in 1992, is updated on a triennial basis with the most recent revision prepared in December 2022. The APCD has also developed the SDAB’s input into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) which is required under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) for pollutants that are designated as being in nonattainment of national air quality standards for the air basin. The SIP relies on the same information from SANDAG to develop emission inventories and emission control strategies that are included in the attainment plan for the air basin. Kelly/JRM Office Project – According to the previously approved MND, the Kelly/JRM Office Project was consistent with the growth assumptions in the General Plan and RAQS, thus would not conflict or obstruct the implementation of those regional air quality plans. The prior project involved minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction that would be 2 The federal 1-hour standard of 12 ppm was in effect from 1979 through June 15, 2005. The revoked standard is referenced here because it was employed for such a long period and because this benchmark is addressed in State Implementation Plans. 3 At the time of designation, if the available data does not support a designation of attainment or nonattainment, the area is designated as unclassifiable. SOURCE: SDAPCD, 2024 (https://www.sdapcd.org/content/sdapcd/planning /attainment-status.html). Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 59 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 10 - 12/3/2024 minimized through standard construction measures. Long-term air emissions due to travel to/from the project site would also be minimal and no impacts were identified. The MND concluded that the project would not result in the violation of air quality standards nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected violation, resulting in less than significant impacts being identified. With regard to sensitive receptors, the project would not result in substantial emissions or concentrations of emissions and at the time of the MND preparation there were no sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity. Therefore, the MND concluded that the prior project would not result in impacts to sensitive receptors caused by air pollutant emissions. Construction of the prior project would not generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment given that any exposure would be short-term and transient and the number of people exposed to such impacts would not be substantial. No impacts from odors were identified. Proposed Project - The proposed Project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into those air quality planning documents. These growth assumptions are based on each city’s and the county’s general plan. The Project is within the scope of development that was anticipated in Carlsbad’s General Plan used to develop the RAQS and SIP. Operation of the Project would result in emissions that were considered as a part of the RAQS growth projections. As such, the Project would not increase impacts or conflict with an air quality plan and is not anticipated to conflict with either the RAQS or the SIP similar to conclusions reached in the Kelly/JRM Office MND. A less than significant impact is assessed. The Project involves the construction and operation of a medical office building, which is expected to result in short-term emissions associated with grading and construction equipment. The Project would minimize air pollutant emissions through the application of standard construction measures, storm water pollution prevention plan requirements, Best Management Practices (BMPs), and when applicable, the California Green Building Code standards that would reduce fugitive dust debris, emissions and other criteria pollutant emissions during grading and construction. Therefore, emissions from the Project’s construction phase would be minimal, temporary and localized, resulting in pollutant emissions that are not anticipated to significantly contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. A less than significant impact is assessed. Vehicle trip emissions associated with travel to and from the site would be the primary source of the Project’s operational emissions, in addition to emissions from stationary and/or area sources associated with producing and transferring energy, providing potable water, disposing of solid waste and maintaining the site. The Project’s operational emissions would be slightly higher than anticipated with the prior project in terms of vehicles but lower with regard to stationary and area sources because of the reduced structure size. Vehicle trip emissions associated with the Project would be consistent with those anticipated in the General Plan and not anticipated to significantly contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Operational emissions associated with the Project would be consistent with the RAQS and SIP and not exceed APCD standards. A less than significant impact is assessed. The proposed Project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the proposed Project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed Project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed Project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3), the proposed Project’s incremental contribution would not be cumulatively considerable. A less than significant cumulative impact is assessed. Sensitive receptors include schools, hospitals, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes or other facilities that house individuals with health conditions that would be adversely impacted by Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 60 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 11 - 12/3/2024 changes in air quality. The closest sensitive receptors within 0.25-mile of the Project site are the Laurel Tree Center Head Strat Program just south of the property. As noted above, the proposed Project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations. The Project itself is not proposed in the vicinity of an existing pollution source that would expose sensitive receptors within the Project to pollutants. Thus, the Project does not propose any substantial changes, does not provide any new information of substantial importance regarding pollutant concentrations around sensitive receptors that was not considered in the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND. No impact is assessed. The proposed Project could generate emissions resulting in objectionable odors during construction, including vehicles and/or equipment exhaust from volatile organic compounds, ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, methane, alcohols, disulfides, dusts or other pollutants during the construction or operation of the Project. Such exposure would be in trace amounts, localized in the immediate area, temporary and would generally occur at magnitudes that would not affect substantial numbers of people. Also, the Project is required to comply with the applicable provision of the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure regarding idling limitations for diesel trucks. Thus, the Project does not propose any substantial changes, and does not provide any new information of substantial importance that was not considered in the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND. No impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to air quality; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 4. Biological Resources – Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 61 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 12 - 12/3/2024 c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND found that the prior project did have the potential for significant impacts to biological resources through habitat modifications, adverse effects on wetland habitats or other sensitive natural communities and potential effects on wetlands regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Direct impacts on 5.12 acres of non-sensitive vegetation were not considered significant. Impacts to wetlands associated with the extension of Laurel Tree Road improvements and crossing of Encinas Creek for vehicular access to the project site were analyzed in a July 5, 2001 MND for the adjacent Pacifica Palomar Office project and mitigation was identified in the MMRP and included onsite creation and enhancement of a total of 0.41 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 1:1 replacement of the existing pipe culverts onsite with a new triple box culvert. The impacts to wetlands were authorized through the issuance of a Section 404 Nationwide Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers, a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (File No. 02C-047) and Section 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game (Wildlife)(No. R5-2002-0128). The Kelly/JRM applicant was a co-permittee for the above-referenced permits and was, therefore, subject to the mitigation measures required by those permit. The Kelly/JRM Office MND concluded that mitigation to restore wetlands impacted by road improvements for Laurel Tree Lane would not interfere with the movement of wildlife through the Encinas Creek. The prior Kelly/JRM Office project was consistent with the preservation and mitigation requirements of the city’s Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP), which identified Encinas Creek and its northern slope as a Hardline Preserve. Potentially significant impacts without mitigation were identified in the prior MND. Proposed Project - A Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR) was prepared for the proposed Project (Merkel & Associates 2024). The entire Project is located on a vacant, disturbed property; the planned improvements to Laurel Tree Lane were implemented in 2007 as part of Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 62 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 13 - 12/3/2024 the Laurel Tree Lane Public Improvements Project. All impacts to wetland habitat have occurred and mitigation has been implemented in accordance with the agency permits cited above as part of the public road improvements. A conservation easement was recorded over the Encinas Creek portion of the property in 2010 and contains coastal and valley freshwater march, riparian flood scrub, southern willow scrub, Diegan coastal sage scrub and eucalyptus woodland. The portion of the site outside of the conservation easement was mapped in 2023 as urban/developed lands and disturbed habitat which is comprised of non-native herbaceous species with a small inclusion of non-native grasses and native species that are not dominant enough to function as a separate community. No sensitive flora or fauna were detected on site and no sensitive species have a moderate to high potential to occur because of the urban use of the site. Three sensitive floral species were detected within the Encinas Creek portion of the property. The Project site is not located within a designated critical habitat for any federally or state listed species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Although no special status plants or wildlife were observed on the urbanized and disturbed portion of the property, the potential for indirect impacts to sensitive species and nesting birds related to human intrusion, invasive species, erosion and lighting in the Encinas Creek open space could be considered potentially significant effects. Protocol survey for least Bell’s vireo and California gnatcatcher were conducted in 2024 and neither species was detected in the on-site conservation easement area. The proposed Project would honor the same development footprint and buffer agreements that were negotiated between the city, prior project applicant and Wildlife Agencies (i.e., California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) in 2008 as part of the prior project approvals. Upon Project construction, a 70-foot buffer would exist between the proposed medical office building and the nearby riparian habitat. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the adopted HMP’s Adjacency Standards for projects located adjacent to any HMP Hardline Preserve to avoid indirect effects to habitat and species in the open space. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Direct impacts to disturbed habitat and urban/developed lands would not be considered significant under CEQA due to their lack of sensitivity; however, to comply with the city’s HMP the Project would be required to pay on the HMP Mitigation Fee proportionate to the acreage impacted (City of Carlsbad 2004). The proposed Project would not impact or have an adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic, or wetland habitat. The Project would also not result in any adverse effects on state or federally protected wetlands or jurisdictional areas. Therefore, less than significant impacts are assessed. The majority of the Project site does not provide any value as a migration corridor for wildlife species, the exception is the Encinas Creek open space that provides habitat corridor value for wildlife. No direct impacts to the corridor are proposed and less than significant impacts to sensitive species in the corridor are assessed as less than significant upon compliance with the HMP Adjacency Standards. The city has no formal tree protection policy or ordinance that pertains to trees located on private property. The proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, including the City of Carlsbad HMP, as described in threshold f listed below. The City of Carlsbad HMP is a comprehensive, citywide program intended to identify how the city, in cooperation with the federal and state wildlife agencies, can preserve the diversity of habitat and protect sensitive biological resources within the city while allowing for development consistent Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 63 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 14 - 12/3/2024 with the city's General Plan. The HMP identifies the portion of the Project site crossed by Encinas Creek as Hardline Preserve. The HMP requires adherence to Adjacency Standards for projects located adjacent to any HMP Hardline Preserve. Compliance with those standards would ensure that the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Communities Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan and less than significant impacts are assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to biological resources; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 5. Cultural Resources – Would the Project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND found that the project did not have the potential for significant impacts to cultural resources because the area was previously disturbed and contains fill from agricultural activities and the construction of Palomar Airport Road. Therefore, no cultural resource impacts were assessed in the MND. Proposed Project - Based on information provided in a geotechnical investigation of the site (Geotechnical Exploration 2000), the site is underlain by 12 to 16 feet of artificial fill material. As such, there is no potential that excavation for the Project could encounter elements of the previously recorded archaeological sites or could uncover buried cultural deposits not previously detected because of the extent of prior disturbance. No archaeological resources impacts are assessed. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 64 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 15 - 12/3/2024 No on-site conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be found on the Project site. Due to the level of past disturbance on-site, it is not anticipated that human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, would be encountered during construction activities. However, if human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. California Public Resources Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 through 7055 describe the general provisions for human remains. Following compliance with existing state regulations, which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, and the requirements on the grading plans to provide monitoring of all ground-disturbing activities, it is concluded that the Project would result in no significant impacts concerning disturbance of human remains. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to cultural resources; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 6. Energy Resources – Would the Project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The Kelly/JRM MND did not explicitly address energy impacts of the prior project. Proposed Project - The City of Carlsbad General Plan (2015) contains policies and goals that address energy consumption in the city, including promoting energy efficiency and conservation, and the continued pursuit of sustainable energy sources. SDG&E provides electrical service for the city. Construction energy consumption would result from transportation fuels used for haul trucks, construction equipment and construction workers traveling to and from the Project site. Electricity would be used during construction to provide power for lighting and electronic equipment, and to power certain construction equipment. Construction of the Project would require the consumption of energy for necessary on-site activities and to transport materials, soil and debris to and from the Project site. The amount of energy used would not represent a substantial fraction of the available energy supply in terms of equipment and transportation fuels. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 65 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 16 - 12/3/2024 Further, compliance with the existing anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy. Construction power use would be temporary, occurring only during the construction period. Therefore, it is concluded that construction of the proposed Project, including the parking and other site improvements within the SDG&E easement, would not result in the wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy and would not increase the need for new energy infrastructures. The Project would be designed to comply with the CALGreen building code which would minimize its operational demands on energy systems. The proposed Project is not expected to substantially increase the amount of inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Therefore, a less than significant impact is assessed to energy resources due to wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during Project construction or operation. The City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan (CAP) sets a baseline for greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and establishes a long-term strategy to reduce such emissions. A CAP Consistency Checklist was prepared to outline the specific details of how the Project design would comply with the GHG reduction strategies outlined in the city’s CAP to ensure the specified emissions targets are achieved. The proposed Project would be designed in a manner that is consistent with relevant energy conservation plans designed to encourage development that results in the efficient use of energy resources, including the use on-site renewable energy systems, a heat pump for water heating, EV charging systems and spaces in the parking lot. The Project would also implement transportation demand management measures to minimize mobile emission associated with vehicular travel to and from the site. The proposed Project would be consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan and its CAP and does not propose any overall change in land use for the site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in conflicts with or obstructions of a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency and less than significant impacts are assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to energy; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 7. Geology and Soils Resources – Would the Project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 66 of 117 □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 17 - 12/3/2024 a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project would result in less than significant or no potential for significant impacts to geology or soils because no unusual soils or geologic existed onsite that would have prevented the typical construction proposed for the office development to proceed according to standard city processes. No site-specific conditions existed to conflict with standard grading and construction techniques. Therefore, it was determined that there would be less than significant or no impacts to geology and soils. Proposed Project - A Report of Soil Investigation and Geologic Reconnaissance of the Project site was prepared with subsequent updates of the investigation conducted using the Project site and grading plans (Geotechnical Exploration 2000; Construction Testing & Engineering 2023; UES 2024). The majority of the Project site is underlain by approximately 12 to 16 feet of fill underlain by alluvium and bedrock materials of the Eocene-age Del Mar/Friars Formation. The upper 2+ feet of the site contain compressible soils that would require removal and recompaction during Project construction. The remaining fill soils would be suitable for construction. No other site-specific conditions exist that would cause the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects. No impact is assessed. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 67 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 18 - 12/3/2024 Numerous active, potentially active, and inactive faults exist in southern California, and are defined in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Program. The site is not within a currently established Hazard Zone for surface fault rupture hazards. No active or potentially active faults with the potential for surface fault rupture are known to pass directly beneath the site. A local northeastern-trending local fault passes just east of the site; no fault traces were identified during investigations on the Project site. Therefore, the potential for surface rupture due to faulting occurring beneath the site is considered low. However, the site is located in the seismically active southern California region and could be subjected to moderate to strong ground shaking events. The nearest known active fault is the Rose Canyon Fault, located approximately 5 miles west of the site. It is the dominant source of potential ground motion at the site from earthquake. The potential magnitude of an earthquake from this fault would be 6.9 magnitude. Ground surface rupture occurs when movement along a fault is sufficient to cause a gap or rupture where the upper edge of the fault zone intersects the earth's surface. The potential for ground rupture is considered to be very low due to the absence of active or potentially active faults at the subject site and no impact is assessed. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which loose, saturated, relatively cohesion-less soil deposits lose shear strength during strong ground motions. Liquefaction is typified by a loss of shear strength in the liquefied layers due to rapid increases in pore water pressure generated by earthquake accelerations. On the Project site, the risk of liquefaction of foundational material due to seismic shaking is considered very low due to the stiff nature of the underlying alluvium and high clay content of the sediment. As indicated in the geotechnical reconnaissance, landslides and other adverse soil circumstances are not a design consideration for the Project. Thus, the Project would not cause exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, or landslides, and therefore no impact is assessed. Soils in the area are considered erosive and could potentially erode onto downstream areas; however proper erosion control, consistent with city Grading Ordinance regulations, would minimize the potential for any significant erosion. The Project would include appropriate BMPs consistent with the recommended geotechnical report measures. Temporary erosion and sediment control protections would be implemented so that all exposed soil in construction area would be protected from erosion. This would include the use of silt fences, sandbags and straw mulch rolls being placed around excavated trench spoils during the entire construction period. Also, all storm drains and natural drainages situated downstream from the construction would be protected by erosion control devices. Weather monitoring would take place in order to avoid exposed soils during times of heavy rainfall. As a result of these factors, a less than significant impact on soil erosion or the loss of topsoil is assessed. The proposed Project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems, and therefore no impact is assessed. Underlying alluvial soils appear to have a moderate to high expansion potential, but a low potential for deterioration of cement foundations. The on-site soils are capable of supporting the proposed structure based on their structure with regard to lateral spreading and weight-bearing functions. As a result of these factors, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on soil stability. The Project would be constructed primarily on areas that have been previously disturbed through agricultural activities and road construction. The site is underlain by 14 to 16 feet of artificial fill Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 68 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 19 - 12/3/2024 material and Project grading would not extend into formational materials. As such, based on the site location and as a result of the previous construction disturbances of the soils, the proposed Project is not expected to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic features. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to geology and soils; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Resources – Would the Project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discussion Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole, including temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global temperatures are moderated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases, including water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone, and certain hydrofluorocarbons. These gases, known as greenhouse gases (GHGs), allow solar radiation (sunlight) into the Earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the Earth’s atmosphere. GHGs are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. The accumulation of GHGs in the atmosphere regulates the Earth’s temperature. Emissions of GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are thought to be responsible for the enhancement of the greenhouse effect and contribute to what is termed “global warming,” the trend of warming of the Earth’s climate from anthropogenic activities. Global climate change impacts are by nature cumulative; direct impacts cannot be evaluated because the impacts themselves are global rather than localized impacts. California Health and Safety Code Section 38505(g) defines GHGs to include the following compounds: CO2, CH4, N2O, ozone, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 69 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 20 - 12/3/2024 perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). As individual GHGs have varying heat-trapping properties and atmospheric lifetimes, GHG emissions are converted to carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) units for comparison. The CO2e is a consistent methodology for comparing GHG emissions because it normalizes various GHG emissions to a consistent measure. The most common GHGs related to the project are those primarily related to energy usage: CO2, CH4, and N2O. Kelly/JRM Office Project - The Kelly/JRM Office Project MND did not explicitly address GHG impacts of the prior project. Proposed Project – In July 2015, the city adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that outlines actions that the city will undertake to achieve its proportional share of state greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The city’s Climate Action Plan meets the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5; therefore, a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative greenhouse gas emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of the CAP. The CAP is a plan for the reduction of GHG emissions in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of the CAP. An update to the CAP was approved in May 2020. In response to the update, the City Council adopted several ordinances aimed at reducing GHG in new construction and alterations to existing buildings. Projects requiring building permits will be subject to these ordinances, which address the following: • Energy efficiency (Ord. No. CS-347) • Solar photovoltaic systems (Ord. No. CS-347) • Water heating systems using renewable energy (Ord. Nos. CS-347 and CS-348) • Electric vehicle charging (Ord. No. CS-349) • Transportation demand management (Ord. No. CS-350) All projects in the city are, therefore, required to show compliance with the ordinances through submittal of a completed CAP Consistency Checklist and as shown on site plans and building plans. Step 1 of the CAP Consistency Checklist is determining the project’s consistency with the growth projections used in development of the CAP. As the Project is consistent with the existing General Plan land use and zoning designations, the proposed Project would be consistent with the growth projections used in the development of the CAP. Step 2 of the CAP Consistency Checklist outlines the proposed Project’s design features that are consistent with applicable Climate Action Plan ordinances. The proposed Project includes the use on-site renewable energy systems, a heat pump for water heating, EV charging systems and spaces in the parking lot. The Project would also implement transportation demand management measures to minimize mobile emission associated with vehicular travel to and from the site. The Project does not propose an intensification of the planned Office use of the site and is also consistent with General Plan policies that would help reduce GHG emissions. As a result, the Project would not contribute considerably to climate change impacts and is still in compliance and within the scope of this prior environmental document. Impacts to GHG emissions associated with the proposed is less than significant. As stated above, the City of Carlsbad adopted an update to its CAP in 2020 that outlines actions that the city will undertake to achieve its proportional share of state GHG emissions reductions. The CAP demonstrates that, with implementation of applicable General Plan goals and policies, coupled with state and federal actions, and execution of CAP measures and actions, the city will Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 70 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 21 - 12/3/2024 reduce GHG emissions in alignment with state goals established by Assembly Bill 32 and Senate Bill 32, and maintain a trajectory to meet its proportional share of the 2050 state target identified in Executive Order S-3-05. The proposed Project is consistent with applicable General Plan goals and policies, would not conflict with any applicable land use or zoning plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing the emissions of GHGs and less than significant impacts are assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to greenhouse gas emissions; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 9. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials Resources – Would the Project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 71 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 22 - 12/3/2024 the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials because the approval and implementation of the project did not invoke the use or transport of hazardous materials beyond typical construction and operationally practices. In addition, the project site is not listed on any hazardous materials databases. The prior MND stated that the project site is not within the safety hazard zones for McClellan-Palomar Airport influence area; thus, no impacts were assessed. The project would not interfere with the city’s emergency response or evacuation plans given that no improvements on adjacent roads are proposed and access would occur from the south via future improvements to Laurel Tree Lane. Given its location to urban development and major roads on three sides and the fact that it is an office building surrounded by a parking lot, no risk from or impacts involving wildland fires were identified. Therefore, it was assessed that there would be no impact to hazards or hazardous materials from the construction and operation of the prior project. Proposed Project - Construction of the proposed Project would include grading and building activities and other site improvements, including those within the SDG&E easement. These construction activities would likely require the use of limited quantities of hazardous materials such as fuels, oils and lubricants for construction equipment; paints and thinners; and solvents and cleaners. These hazardous materials are typically packaged in consumer quantities and used in accordance with manufacturer recommendations and would be transported to and from the Project site. The improper handling and transport of hazardous materials could result in adverse health effects to workers or the public. All hazardous materials used during construction operations would be typically handled and transported in small quantities and stored and handled in proper locations. The routine transportation, use, and disposal of these materials would be required to adhere to state and local standards and regulations for handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances. With adherence to existing state and local requirements that are intended to minimize potential health risks associated with the use or the accidental release of such substances, impacts related to the transport or use of hazardous materials would be considered less than significant. As indicated above, construction activities would require the use of limited quantities of hazardous materials, which would be transported to and from the Project site. The overall quantities of these materials on the site at any one time would not result in large bulk amounts that, if spilled, could cause significant soil or groundwater contamination issues. Spills of hazardous materials on Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 72 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 23 - 12/3/2024 construction sites are typically localized and would be cleaned up in a timely manner, in accordance with required BMPs and hydromodification BMPS (HBMPs). Refueling activities of heavy equipment would be conducted in a controlled dedicated area complete with secondary containment and protective barriers to minimize any potential hazards that might occur with an inadvertent release. As a result, the threat of exposure to the public or contamination from construction-related hazardous materials is minimal. Further, as a result of the fact that numerous laws and regulations govern the management of hazardous materials in order to reduce the potential hazards associated with accidental release and upset conditions, the impact from hazardous material accidents during operations constructing the Project would be considered less than significant. The closest school within 0.25-mile of the Project site is the Laurel Tree Center Head Start Program just south of the property. However, subject to compliance with state, federal and local laws regulating the handling of hazardous materials during construction and during ongoing operations, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions, materials, substances or waste that would result in a significant impact to the school. Therefore, it has been determined that impacts related to production of hazardous emissions or handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools would be less than significant. The subject Project, including the SDG&E easement, is not located on a site which is included on a list of a hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As a result, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment and no impact is assessed. According to the McClellan Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP; San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission [ALUC] 2011), the Project site is located within Review Area 1 of the Airport Influence Area (AIA), including Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6 which extend on site. Safety Zones 2 and 4 place safety compatibility criteria on square footage and floor area ratio (FAR) allowed for office uses within those zones. Local zoning regulations control the amount of square footage and FAR permitted within Safety Zone 6. The Project site plan has been designed to respect and comply with the limits contained with the ALUCP safety zone criteria and has been reviewed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with CFR Title 14, Part 77, in accordance with the Review Area 1 procedures (FAA 2024). Through the review process, it has been determined that the Project design would comply with the safety provisions of the ALUCP, would not exceed obstruction standards and would not result in hazard to air navigation. As such, the Project would not cause a safety hazard from for people residing or working within the Project area and no impact is assessed. The City of Carlsbad is a participant in the San Diego County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation (HAZMIT) Plan (City of Carlsbad 2023). This plan is intended to facilitate cooperation between agencies and encourages and rewards local and state pre-disaster planning. This enhanced planning network is intended to enable local and state governments to articulate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in expedient allocation of funding and effective risk reduction projects. The City of Carlsbad has implemented many of the recommended action items in the plan through existing programs and procedures and enforcement of policies and ordinances. The Project would be required to comply with all city code requirements and ordinances, and thus would not conflict with this plan and no impact is assessed. The subject property is situated in an urbanized environment and would be designed to comply with the city fire code standards. It would not produce any significant increase in exposure of Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 73 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 24 - 12/3/2024 people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires as a result of its implementation. No impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 10. Hydrology and Water Quality Resources – Would the Project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 74 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 25 - 12/3/2024 e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to hydrology and water quality because the project would rely on the existing storm drain system in the area and would comply with city standards regarding water quality, drainage and erosion control. The prior project was conditioned to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to manage the construction and development of the proposed building and site improvements. The prior project was required to comply with the city’s NPDES General Construction Permit and Municipal Stormwater Permit (MS4 Permit). No impacts to groundwater were assessed. Therefore, the prior project would not violate any water quality standards, deplete groundwater supplies or quality, substantially alter existing drainage patterns, cause substantial erosion or flooding or significantly impact the capacity of the stormwater drainage system. The prior office building and parking lot were not located within a 100-year flood hazard area and would not impede or redirect flows or expose people or structures to an inundation due to dam failure, seiche, tsunami or mudflows. The prior project was located along Encinas Creek; however, site drainage was required to comply with the city standards regarding water quality, drainage and erosion control by implementing storm water pollution controls and BMPs that would ensure pollutants would not reduce water quality; thus, less than significant water quality impacts were identified in the MND. Proposed Project - A drainage report has been prepared for the proposed Project (Howes Weiler Landy Planning and Engineering 2023). As was the case under the prior project, the majority of the site currently flows in a southwestern direction to a low point containing a standpipe that discharges to the south and into Encinas Creek. Other smaller portions of the site surface flow toward Laurel Tree Lane and enters Encinas Creek. A public storm drain system crosses the property from Palomar Airport Road to Aviara Parkway but does not collect on-site flows. All flows that enter Encinas Creek are ultimately discharged to the Pacific Ocean, approximately 1.5 miles to the west. The proposed Project, including the parking and site improvements within the SDG&E easement, would create new impervious surfaces that would produce more runoff, but the drainage patterns would mostly remain the same. According to the drainage report, the proposed Project is a Priority Development Project (PDP) and thus is required to implement structure BMPs for storm water pollutant control. Hydromodification management flow control structural BMPs are also required. The Project proposes to create four basin areas with flows being conveyed via gutters to three basins located along the property’s perimeter. The fourth basin would encompass a portion of the site located at the Project entrance from the Laurel Tree Lane cul-de-sac. Storm waters associated with the proposed impervious areas would be treated for storm water pollutant control, flow control and ad 100-year flood quantities (Q100) attenuation via hydromodification management flow BMPs. Treated flows would be discharged at the same pre-development points within Encinas Creek. The Project design plans and Storm Water Management Plan, and the follow-up SWPPP, incorporate the required BMPs. As such, the Project and related improvements within the SDG&E easement would not result in a substantial alteration of the existing drainage Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 75 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 26 - 12/3/2024 pattern of the site or area in a manner which would result in substantial erosion, siltation or flooding on- or off-site, create or contribute to runoff water exceeding the capacity of stormwater drainage systems or providing additional source of pollution runoff, or impeding or redirecting flood flow. Less than significant impacts are assessed. Construction of the Project would require earthwork activities, including grading and excavation of soil, potentially exposing the soil to erosion. During precipitation events, construction activities have the potential to result in erosion of sediments downstream. Before the beginning of construction, a SWPPP would be prepared, and a NOI filed with the San Diego RWQCB. These Project-specific documents would include all required BMPs. These requirements include low-impact development measures to address water quality of stormwater runoff as well as runoff volumes. Drainage control features included in the Project include biofiltration basins that would be designed to meet water quality control, hydromodification and 100-year flood quantities (Q100) attenuation requirements of the city. In consideration of the existing regulatory requirements and the proposed drainage control features included in the Project design, the potential impact related to water quality during both construction and operation of the proposed Project, the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality. Less than significant impacts are assessed. With the integration of BMPs and HBMPs, the subject Project would not result in any decrease in groundwater supplies or interfere with ground water recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin, and no impact to groundwater is assessed. The proposed medical office building and parking lot, including improvements within the SDG&E easement, would not be located within a 100-year flood hazard area and would not impede or redirect flows or expose people or structures to an inundation due to dam failure, seiche, tsunami or mudflows. Due to the lack of impounded water bodies nearby and the lack of significant topography on and surrounding the site, seiches are not a design consideration for the Project. No expectation of release of pollutants due to inundation from any of these hydrologic actions are anticipated. No impact is assessed. Since the Project would comply with all city ordinances relating to water quality control and BMPs, it is concluded that the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, and no impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to hydrology and water quality; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 11. Land Use and Planning – Would the Project: a) Physically divide an established community? Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 76 of 117 □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 27 - 12/3/2024 b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Discussion The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to land use and planning because the prior office use would be entirely consistent with the underlying PI general plan designation and P-M zoning. The office development would also be consistent with the office uses in the project vicinity. Although the previously approved MND also indicated that the prior project would be situated within the 65–75 dBA CNEL airport noise contours for McClelland-Palomar Airport, the office use was deemed not consistent with the airport’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (as contained in the ALUCP) due to exterior noise levels. The prior project was required by the ALUCP to demonstrate that interior spaces of the structure could be mitigated to 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24. An acoustical analysis performed for the prior project indicated that this required interior noise level could be achieved and, therefore, the City Council overruled the ALUCP’s inconsistency determination and adopted findings that the project would be consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act. Therefore, no potentially significant impacts related to conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation with jurisdiction over the project were identified, given that noise mitigation was applied to the prior project (refer to the Noise discussion herein for more information). The proposed Project involves the construction and operation of a medical office building and other site improvements where a general office building was previously approved. This Project does not propose any change in the land use or character of the surrounding established community. The Project is proposed on a vacant parcel adjacent to other office and residential developments. The Project is not anticipated to create any new barriers within the existing community or otherwise divide the established community and no impact is assessed. The medical office building Project is consistent with the Office (O) and Open Space (OS) General Plan land use designations and the development regulations in the O and OS zoning. The Project would be constructed on the portion of the property designated and zoned for office use, leaving the dedicated and conserved Encinas Creek open space intact. Pursuant to CMC section 21.208.030, the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone regulations are not applicable to an office use, as offices are not considered commercial/visitor-serving uses; therefore, no conflicts with this overlay zone would occur. The Project’s office use requires the approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.201 and a Minor Site Development Plan (SDP) pursuant to CMC section 21.27.040 and according to the provision of CMC Chapter 21.06. The Project site is within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The portion of the site designated as OS is within the appealable area of the coastal zone, while the portion of the site designated as O is within the non-appealable area of the coastal zone. As designed, the Project would comply with all applicable city development regulations, including CMC Title 21, LCP and HMP, and no impact is assessed. The Project is within Safety Zones 2, 4 and 6 and the 60-65 and 65–70 dBA CNEL airport noise contours for McClelland-Palomar Airport as defined in the 2011 amended ALUCP. Pursuant to the ALUCP, office buildings (including medical office buildings) are compatible in Safety Zone 6 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 77 of 117 □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 28 - 12/3/2024 and conditionally compatible in Safety Zones 2 and 4 and are allowed only if the development complies with either: (1) the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) or (2) the maximum intensity and lot coverage limits as specified in Table III-2 (ALUCP Section 3.4.14). Additionally, office uses are compatible in the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contours and conditionally compatible in the 70-75 dB CNEL noise contours. The Project proposes 14,721 SF of office space in Safety Zone 2, 3,058 SF in Safety Zone 4 and 44,821 SF in Safety Zone 6, all of which would respect with the maximum SF permitted on site as outlined in the ALUCP. As noted under Hazards, the Project site plan has been designed to respect and comply with the limits contained with the ALUCP safety zone criteria and has been reviewed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for compliance with CFR Title 14, Part 77, in accordance with the Review Area 1 procedures (FAA 2024). As described under Noise, the exterior noise levels associated with aircraft operations would be 70 dBA CNEL and noise modelling demonstrates the building could attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24 by implementing recommendations in the Noise Evaluation (Ldn Consulting 2024). The Project would be consistent with the safety and noise conditions specified in the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is assessed with regard to airport land use compatibility. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to land use and planning; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 12. Mineral Resources – Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to mineral resources because no mineral resources were associated with the property or proposed uses. Therefore, it was assessed that no impacts mineral resources related to the loss of availability of known mineral resources would occur from the approval and implementation of the office building project. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 78 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 29 - 12/3/2024 Proposed Project - The entire city is devoid of any non-renewable energy resources of economic value to the region and the residents of the state. Mineral resources within the city are no longer being utilized and extracted as exploitable natural resources. Therefore, no mineral resource impacts would occur as a result of the proposed Project. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to mineral resources; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Program Equal or Less Severity of Impact 13. Noise – Would the Project: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did have the potential for significant impacts due to noise from McClelland-Palomar Airport aircraft operations. The project site was located within the 65 to 75 dBA CNEL noise contours specified in the previous McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Plan adopted in April 1994 and amended in October 2004. Office uses were allowed in areas up to 70 dBA CNEL with the interior noise levels mitigated to 50 dBA pursuant to Title 24 of the CCR. An acoustical analysis was completed during the MND process and determined that the interior noise could be attenuated to 50 dBA CNEL by incorporating acoustic-specific structural building materials. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 79 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 30 - 12/3/2024 Implementation of the acoustical report recommendations and demonstration that that the project design would achieve the CCR Title 24 noise insultation standard would be required as part of the building permit review process. The MND concluded that potentially significant noise impacts would occur unless mitigation is incorporated into the prior project. Proposed Project - The proposed Project is located within the 60-65 and 65-70 dBA CNEL noise contours as specified in the current McClellan-Palomar ALUCP adopted January 2010 and last amended December 2011. A Noise Evaluation for the proposed Aviara Office Development was conducted for the Project (Ldn Consulting 2024). The evaluation addresses the noise impacts from the Project and on the proposed site plan and building, including from aircraft noise produced by McClelland-Palomar Airport operations. As noted in the evaluation, medical offices are conditionally compatible with the 65–70 dBA CNEL noise exposure, however buildings must be designed to attenuate exterior noise to the indoor standard of 50 dBA CNEL pursuant to CCR Title 24, as stated in the prior MND. Operational noise impacts were addressed in the noise evaluation due to new mechanical heating-ventilation (HVAC) systems, roadway noise, and aircraft operations. The evaluation concludes that the Project’s HVAC would not expose nearby residential properties to noise levels in excess of the city standards. Roadway traffic would produce cumulative noise levels of 72.4 dBA CNEL, while aircraft operations at McClelland-Palomar Airport would result in on-site noise levels of 70 dBA CNEL. When combined, these two transportation noise sources would produce an exterior noise level of 74.4 dBA CNEL which is a potentially significant noise impact on interior noise levels of the proposed medical office building. Noise modelling determined that these exterior noise levels could be reduced to achieve the 50 dBA CNEL interior noise standard, as required by CCR Title 24, provided the building incorporates the design recommendations in the Noise Evaluation. With those recommendations in place, the Project would achieve the interior noise standard and be compatible with the exterior noise environment of the Project site, and the potentially significant noise impacts would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The Project does not propose any substantive changes that would exceed the city Noise Ordinance or adopted exterior or interior standard levels. Thus, it is anticipated that the Project would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels from the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Construction noise effects, however, are anticipated to temporarily increase ambient noise levels in the Project area. As mentioned, construction activities would include the use of equipment for grading and other building and site improvement activities. Trucks would travel to, from, and within the site hauling building materials, sand, equipment, and landscaping materials. Smaller vehicles for workers and equipment, such as power saws, could also produce noise during the construction phase of the Project. All construction hours would be required to comply with the timeframe and other limitations identified in CMC Section 8.48.010. The City of Carlsbad does not have a numerical threshold for construction noise to determine whether an impact would be significant or not. However, the City's Noise Guidelines Manual, Table IV-2 indicates an impact could occur when construction occurs within 1,000 feet of a noise sensitive land use. Pursuant to the Noise Guidelines, noise sensitive lands include single family residential and multi-family residential land uses. Multi-family residential housing is under construction south of the site along Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Lane at a distance of approximately 250 feet from the Project site. Section VII of the Noise Guidelines recommends ensuring construction vehicles or equipment within 1,000 feet of a dwelling be equipped with Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 80 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 31 - 12/3/2024 properly operating and maintained mufflers and that stockpiling and or vehicle staging areas are located away from dwellings and other noise sensitive receptors. Compliance with these noise control recommendations would ensure that construction of the Project would result in a less than significant impact on ambient noise levels. The anticipated construction operations associated with the proposed Project would result in a temporary and minor increase in groundborne vibration and noise. Following the completion of grading and related construction efforts, ambient vibrations and noise are expected to return to pre-existing levels. Therefore, impacts associated with groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels are considered to be less than significant. As stated above, the Project site would be exposed to a cumulative noise level of 74.4 dBA CNEL as a result of roadway and aircraft noise operations. According to Table 5-1 of the Noise Element of the General Plan, the city considers office uses conditionally compatible with noise levels up to 77 dBA CNEL provided it can be demonstrated that interior noise standards can achieve the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL in accordance with CCR Title 24. Interior noise standards would be achieved for the Project through the incorporation of noise attenuation design recommendations in the noise evaluation and shown on the Project plans as design features. Therefore, the Project would not expose people working in the Project area to excessive noise levels emanating from aircraft or the airport. A less than significant impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to noise; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 14. Population and Housing – Would the Project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to population and housing Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 81 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 32 - 12/3/2024 because of its infill location on a site planned for office use that is served by existing or approved infrastructure. The prior project would not displace housing or people necessitating in the construction of replacement housing because it was vacant. The MND concluded that no impacts to population and housing would result from the approval and implementation of the prior project. Proposed Project - Similar to the prior project, the proposed medical office building Project does not propose any housing or result in unplanned population growth. It also does not propose the extension of roads, streets or utility trunk lines or other urban facilities which could encourage growth in the Project area. The required off-site sewer line upgrade discussed under Utilities would be upsized to carry the Project’s wastewater flows. Therefore, the Project would not induce any unplanned population growth in an area either or indirectly; no impacts on growth are assessed. The Project site is currently vacant and only used for temporary sales. No housing or population presently exist on-site. Therefore, the Project would not displace existing people or housing, and would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to population and housing; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 15. Public Services – Would the Project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to public services because the prior project was conditioned to comply with the city’s Growth Management Program, specifically for Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Compliance with this plan ensures the availability of Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 82 of 117 □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 33 - 12/3/2024 public services for all approvals ranging from sewer and water services to public safety. The office building would not affect planned or existing housing stock in the city or surrounding area. The MND concluded that no impacts to public services would result from the approval and implementation of the prior project. Proposed Project - The Carlsbad Fire Department currently maintains six stations through the city. Fire operations is the largest division within the CFD and is responsible for fire suppression, rescue, emergency medical service delivery and disaster mitigation. The locations of fire stations are dictated by Carlsbad's Growth Management Plan, which calls for additional fire stations whenever there are more than 1,500 dwelling units outside a 5-minute response time from a station. The Project site is located within Local Facility Management Zone 5, which includes much of the area in this southwestern section of Carlsbad. The nearest fire station is Carlsbad Fire Station No. 4, located on Batiquitos Drive approximately two miles southwest of the proposed Project. According to Chapter 6, Public Safety Element of the Carlsbad General Plan, the Project site is located within a Moderate to High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Further, the Project would not feature any highly flammable structures give the construction of stucco, glass and tile office structure with aluminum cladding, asphalt parking lots, and landscaping that would be regularly irrigated . The Project design would comply with the city’s fire code in terms of fire flows and hydrant connections. As discussed under Population and Housing, implementation of the proposed medical office building would not result in an increase in population. As a result, Project implementation would not require the construction of new or physically altered fire facilities and is not anticipated to result in an increase in service calls. Thus, no impact to fire protection facilities would result from implementation of the Project. Police protection for city residents is provided by the Carlsbad Police Department (CPD), which operates from the Carlsbad Safety Center, located at 2560 Orion Way. Police service is based upon actual workload measures including response times, travel times, type of service, number of calls for service, and the time of day that calls are received. Implementation of the proposed medical office building would not result in an increase in population. As a result, Project implementation would not require the construction of new or physically altered police protection facilities and is not anticipated to result in an increase in service calls. No impact is assessed to police protection. The subject Project is within the San Dieguito High School District and the Encinitas Unified School District. However, the proposed Project involves the construction and operation of a medical office building and would not result in an increase in population on-site or indirectly result in a substantial increase in the number of students within the Project area. No students would be generated by the proposed Project, and therefore no impact on school facilities would result from implementation of the Project. The city’s Growth Management performance standard for park facilities requires that 3 acres of community park or special use area per 1,000 residents within the Park District must be scheduled for construction within a 5-year period of first identification of the need. The proposed Project, however, would not result in an increase in population in the Project area as no residential units would be constructed. Since the Project does not propose any residents, the Project is not anticipated to result indirectly in a substantial increase in demands for use of park land. Thus, no impact on parks would result from implementation of the Project. In addition, the Project would comply with all other growth management categories (i.e., city administration, libraries, wastewater treatment, drainage, circulation, open space, sewer Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 83 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 34 - 12/3/2024 collection system, water systems). Therefore, the Project would result in no impacts to other public services. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to public services; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 16. Recreation – Would the Project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to recreation because the prior project was conditioned to comply with the city’s Growth Management Program, which has a performance standard for parks which was satisfied in Park District #1 where the site is located. Recreation facilities were determined to be adequate to accommodate the project. The MND concluded that no impacts to neighborhood or regional park and creation facilities would result from the approval and implementation of the prior project. Proposed Project - The current Project proposes improvements for a medical office building and related site improvements which would not place any new demand on parks and recreation facilities in the Project area. Because the Project would not increase population in the area and does not propose housing, it is determined that the proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. No impact is assessed. Conclusion Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 84 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 35 - 12/3/2024 As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to recreation; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 17. Transportation – Would the Project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND was studied under the pre-Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) change to vehicle miles travelled and found that the prior project had no potential for significant impacts to transportation based on the level of service (LOS) metric. The previously approval general office building project was predicted to generate 1,700 ADT with 238 AM peak hour and 221 PM peak hour trips. According to the MND analysis, the only intersection whose LOS would change as a result of project traffic was Palomar Airport Road/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway, which would drop from LOS B to C. This change in LOS did not result in a significant impact because LOS E was considered acceptable by SANDAG’s Congestion Management Program, which was the standard in place at the time the MND was prepared. The MND further indicated that the street system in the project area had been designed to accommodate the traffic from the prior project, as well as cumulative development in the city. Therefore, the MND concluded that the prior project would not cause traffic that was substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of local street system in the project vicinity. The MND further concluded that the project would not exceed a LOS standard established in a county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. Based on these analyses, less than significant impacts to traffic were identified in the MND. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 85 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 36 - 12/3/2024 No impact due to an increase in hazards related to design features were identified because of the prior project’s compliance with the city road standards and underlying land use designation and zoning. No impacts to emergency access were identified due to the prior project’s compliance with fire and police department requirements. No impact to parking capacity was identified because the prior project would comply with the city parking standards. Because the prior project would be located adjacent to two circulation arterial roadways that provide bike lanes and it was conditioned to have bike racks, no conflicts with alternative transportation policy were assessed in the MND. Proposed Project - Due to the prior project’s pre-SB 743 timing, the standard of review for the proposed Project’s transportation impacts uses the LOS metric included in the approved MND. Per the city’s Growth Management Plan, the performance standard for road segments and intersections is LOS D during peak hours (versus the Congestion Management Plan standard of LOS E). To establish consistency with the prior transportation analysis, a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Project was conducted using the LOS metric for CEQA (Linscott Law and Greenspan 2024). The medical office building Project would generate 3,130 average daily trips (ADT), with 188 AM pear hour trips and 344 PM peak hour trips, which would be a higher ADT and AM peak hour volume but lower PM peak hour volume than the approved office building. The Project trips were distributed to the local roadway network to evaluate the Project’s potential for significant traffic impacts. The TIA analysis also took into account near-term traffic associated with approved and pending projects that will add traffic to the local study area by the time of the Project’s opening day. One additional signal modification was also assumed since one of the near-term projects was conditioned to install the northbound right-turn overlap phase at Palomar Airport Road/Aviara Parkway. Based on the near-term and horizon year analyses conducted in the TIA, the proposed Project would not result in a significant impact to the roadway network in the Project area, including the Palomar Airport/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection adjacent to the site (i.e., LOS C and D in the near-term and horizon-year conditions). No impact is assessed. Further, the Project would not significantly increase the existing pedestrian, bicycle or transit facility demand. It is, therefore, determined to not result in a significant impact to these facilities also. Thus, the Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards. The proposed Project is consistent with the city’s General Plan and zoning. Thus, no impact is assessed. No change to existing circulation improvements would occur from implementation of the proposed Project. All circulation improvements in the area are presently constructed to city standards. Thus, the Project would not increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses. Other public safety design features are incorporated into the existing and proposed street and pedestrian design. Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed. The proposed Project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police Departments. No impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to transportation; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 86 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 37 - 12/3/2024 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 18. Tribal Cultural Resources – Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code § 5020.1(k), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to cultural resources because all areas proposed for development were heavily disturbed by agricultural resources and already converted from natural terrain. Therefore, it was assessed that there would be no significant cultural resource impacts from the approval or implementation of the master plan. Proposed Project - Per the records search and survey referenced above, the property has not been identified as a location containing a significant resource associated with the California Native American tribes. Because of the extent of past disturbance and presence of fill material on the Project site, there is no potential for tribal resources to be encountered on site during Project grading. Assuming the Project construction effort is in compliance with the proposed grading plans, no impact is assessed. Conclusion Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 87 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 38 - 12/3/2024 As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to tribal cultural resources; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 19. Utilities and Service Systems – Would the Project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, on in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND found that the prior project did not have the potential for significant impacts to utilities and service systems because the Encina wastewater treatment facility within the Local Facilities Management Zone #5 had adequate planned capacity to accommodate all of the growth in Zone #5 and the prior project would not exceed the growth projections anticipated in the Growth Management Plan. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 88 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 39 - 12/3/2024 Similarly, all water facilities and drainage facilities in the project area had been designed to accommodate the growth projections in the city at buildout. The project’s demand for water supplies or facilities, and wastewater treatment or facilities and storm drain facilities would not exceed the city’s growth projections. Because existing solid waste disposal services were adequate to serve the local population without exceeding landfill capacities, no impacts were assessed. Therefore, the project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or require the construction of new storm drain facilities resulting in new significant impacts; require new or expanded water supply entitlements; result in inadequate capacity for wastewater treatment capacity; be service by existing permitted landfill capacity and comply with application regulations related to solid waste. No impacts were assessed in the MND. Proposed Project - The proposed Project would require the construction of connections to local utilities to service the project. A Water System Analysis was prepared for the Project (Dexter Wilson Engineering 2023), which determined that there would be no need to make improvements to the off-site public water system in the Project area to provide potable water and fire protection services to the Project site. The Project would construct connections to the existing public water line in Laurel Tree Lane. Recycled water in the Project area would be used for irrigation. While the Project would create new demand for potable water within the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD), the Project would not increase population or the intensity of water demand above levels anticipated at buildout in the local Urban Water Management Plan (City of Carlsbad 2021). In addition, the CMWD has two district-wide ordinances in place to help manage demands during potential water shortages, which the Project would have to comply with: Ordinance No. 44 and Ordinance No. 46. Thus, the CMWD would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project under reasonably foreseeable conditions during normal, dry and multiple dry years and no impact to water supplies would result from implementation of the Project. Sewer collection and wastewater treatment for the site would be provided by the Encina Wastewater Authority. The proposed Project would result in an increase in sewer or wastewater generation by connecting the proposed medical office building to the local wastewater collection and treatment system. Due to its consistency with its designated office use, the Project would produce wastewater at a quantity that would have been anticipated in the long-term Encinas Wastewater Authority’s plans for the area. According to the Project’s Sewer Study, the Project would connect to the existing gravity sewer line in Laurel Tree Lane which leads to the Buena Interceptor Sewer main in Palomar Airport Road (Dexter Wilson Engineering 2024). With the addition of Project’s wastewater flows, an upsize of the existing 8-inch line to a 10-inch line for a distance of 385 feet within Laurel Tree Lane would be required to serve the Project and the project would be conditioned to implement the off-site sewer line improvements. No significant physical environmental effects would be attributable to the sewer line upsizing as it would be constructed entirely within the paved roadway and would be required to comply with the adopted HMP’s Adjacency Standards for projects located adjacent to any HMP Hardline Preserve to avoid indirect effects to habitat and species in the open space. As a medical office building, the proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. No impact to solid waste generation and landfill capacity is assessed. The subject Project would also comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Thus, the Project would not result in an environmental impact relative to solid waste disposal. No impact is assessed. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to utilities and service systems; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 89 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 40 - 12/3/2024 by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. Significant Project Impact Substantial Increase in Severity Substantial Change Relative to Project Equal or Less Severity of Impact 20. Wildfire If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zone – Would the Project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Discussion Kelly/JRM Office Project - The Kelly/JRM Office Project MND did not explicitly address wildfire impacts of the prior project. Proposed Project - City of Carlsbad participates in the County of San Diego’s Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (City of Carlsbad 2023). The City of Carlsbad has identified one high ranking hazard within its service area: Wildfire; the Project site is located within a moderate to high fire hazard severity zone, according to the Public Safety Element of the Carlsbad General Plan (City of Carlsbad 2015). Based on the capability assessment in the plan, however, the City of Carlsbad has existing regulatory, administrative/technical, and fiscal mechanisms in place to Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 90 of 117 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 41 - 12/3/2024 mitigate this hazard. Project construction and operations would not impact public roads or other vehicular accessways through lane closures used for evacuation routes. It would not propose any blocking of vehicular or other access, it would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan or the ability to coordinate and support existing efforts to mitigate wildfires in the area. Thus, no impact to emergency response is assessed. Per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map, the Project site is located within a moderate to high fire hazard severity zone. Further, the Project involves the construction of stucco, glass and tile office structure with aluminum cladding, asphalt parking lots, and landscaping would be regularly irrigated and would not contain any flammable structures. The Project design would comply with the city’s fire code in terms of fire flows and hydrant connections. As noted above under Hazards and Public Services, it has been determined that no impact to fire suppression infrastructure would result from implementation of the Project. The proposed Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. The Project would not result in an increase in wildfire potential because it would comply with applicable fire codes. The proposed Project would require shallow grading and excavation during construction, which would minimally alter the site’s generally level topography. As such, operation of the medical office building Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. It is concluded that the Project would result no to flooding or landslides due to high risk of wildfire. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not result in any significant impacts to wildfire; therefore, the Project would not result in an impact which was not adequately evaluated by the previously approved Kelly/JRM Office Project MND. None of the criteria listed in sections 15162 or 15164 have occurred, therefore there is no need to prepare subsequent, supplemental, or addenda documents for the Project. That is, this Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. 5. CEQA Project Environmental Conditions of Approval The Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts relative to what was identified the prior MND. The Project is subject to environmental conditions of approval pursuant to applicable mitigation identified in the MND as follows in this section. Two of the mitigation related to biology and land use, have either been satisfied or are no longer applicable. The third mitigation identified in the MND has been satisfied through preparation of the Noise Evaluation and incorporation of its recommendations into the building plans. The environmental conditions of approval shall not relieve a person from the responsibility of complying with all other applicable regulations of any other local, state, or federal agencies. No part of what follows should be deemed or construed to repeal, amend, modify, alter, or change any other applicable ordinance or any part thereof; and that in all particulars wherein these conditions are not more restrictive, each such other ordinance shall continue and shall be in full force and effect. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 91 of 117 15168 Exemption Checklist Palomar Aviara Medical Office Building CDP 2023-34 and Minor SDP 2023-22 - 42 - 12/3/2024 Any existing reference to an ordinance, title, chapter, article, or section heading which is renumbered or relabeled since MND adoption must be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contained within these conditions. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 92 of 117 S W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWWW W W W W W W W W WWWW W W W WM W W W WW WW 4,907.0 SF (MAXIMUM ALLOWED 4,945.0 SF) ZONE 2 ZONE 61,019.2 SF (MAXIMUM ALLOWED 8,743.0 SF) ZONE 4 15,148.57 SF (MAXIMUM ALLOWED NO LIMIT SF) Palomar Airport Road. Av i a r a P k w y . VAN VAN VAN COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGING ONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGING ONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGING ONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. COMPACT COMPACT DERO BIKE DEPOTDERO DUPLEX 14 BIKESSECURED ENCLOSURE DEROFIX-ITW/AIRKIT POWERBOX CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. (5) "U" BIKE RACKS (4) MICROMOBILITYPARKING STATIONS (4 ) " U " B I K E R A C K S PA S S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PROVIDE SIGNPASSENGER"DROP-OFF"ZONE PROVIDE SIGNPASSENGER"DROP-OFF"ZONE PA S S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E 3'-0" 3'-0"3'-0" UP UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1 2 3 7 10 1514658121311 FD IN CONTR O L P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 4 9 3'-0" UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 FD STAIR IS AN EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1019.4 & 713. 2-HOUR INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1023 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 11 12 15 16 17 18 14 13 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 3'-0" OUTDOOR EATING AREA (A) 1,372.58 SF OUTDOOR EATING AREA (B) 1,330.76 SF (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) 4 0 ' - 4 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 4 0 ' - 4 " 7'- 0 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 4 1 ' - 4 " 4'-4"4'-1"4'-4" 6 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 5 1 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " (9 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 7 6 ' - 6 " 7'- 0 " (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 11 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 8 8 ' - 0 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 8 0 ' - 0 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 8 0 ' - 0 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 8 0 ' - 0 " (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'- 9 " (1 0 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'- 3 " 5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 4 2 ' - 6 " 7'- 3 " 5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 4 2 ' - 6 " 6 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 5 1 ' - 0 " 6'-0" 7 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 5 9 ' - 6 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 8 5 ' - 0 " 7'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-0") = 9 3 ' - 6 " 7'-0" 6'-0" 10 SPACES @ 8'-10") = 8 8 ' - 4 " 6'-10" 7 SPACES @ 8'-10") = 6 1 ' - 1 0 " 9'-1"6'-1" 12 SPACES @ 8 ' - 1 0 " ) = 1 0 6 ' - 0 " 6'-9" MIN 6'-3" MIN 10'-0"12'-0"5'-0"9'-0"9'-0" 9'-0"5'-0"9'-0"5'-0"9'-0"5'-0"9'-0" 9'-0"7'-6" 5'-0"9'-0"5'-0"9'-0"5'-0" 22'-9" 9'-1" (6 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 5 1 ' - 0 " 6'- 8 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 6 " ) = 4 2 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 6 " 24 ' - 0 " 20'-0"24'-0"20'-0" 24'-0"20'-0"20'-0"25'-0"20'-0" 15'-0" 24 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 3 " 6'- 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 7'- 0 " 8'- 7 " 25 ' - 7 " 15 ' - 7 " 11 ' - 4 " 57 ' - 2 " 43 ' - 8 " 10 0 ' - 1 1 " 12 ' - 1 0 " 110'-1" 7"3' - 3 " 39 ' - 3 " 15 ' - 0 " 6'-1" 9'-1"9'-0"5'-0"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"8'-6"11'-6" 5'- 0 " 57 ' - 0 " 37 ' - 0 " 17'-0" 12'-0" F/A500 37'-0" 22'-0" E/A500 12'-5" 12'-0" 33' - 0 " 27' - 0 " 17'- 0 " REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K PA R K I N G / D R I V E W A Y S S E T B A C K PARKING/ DRIVEWAYS SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK FR O N T BU I L D I N G SE T B A C K 13 ' F U T U R E S T R E E T O P E N I N G EA S M E N T F O R U T I L I T Y A N D IN C I D E N T A L P U R P O S E S EASM E N T F O R P U B L I C U T I L I T I E S EASM E N T F O R P U B L I C U T I L I T I E S EASM E N T F O R PIPEL I N E 17 ' - 0 " 4'- 0 " 17 ' - 5 " 4'- 1 " 11'-9" tc tc tc tc tc PALOMAR A. RD. 30'-0" STANDARD PARKING SETBACK AV I A R A P A R K W A Y 1 5 ' - 0 " S T A N D A R D P A R K I N G S E T B A C K EA S T S I D E 5 ' - 0 " S T A N D A R D P A R K I N G S E T B A C K VANPOOL/CARPOOL VANPOOL/CARPOOL VANPOOL/CARPOOL VANPOOL/CARPOOL VANPOOL/CARPOOL VANPOOL/CARPOOL 218'-1"100'-11" 92 ' - 4 " 13'-9" 95'-10" 96 ' - 7 " 180'-5" 5'- 0 " 7'- 0 " 8'- 7 " 5'- 1 0 " 5'- 1 " 7' - 0 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) = 4 0 ' - 4 " 7'- 0 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) 4 0 ' - 4 " 7' - 0 " 7'- 0 " (5 S P A C E S @ 8 ' - 0 " ) 4 0 ' - 4 " 20 ' - 0 " BMP #1 BMP #2 BM P # 3 SP103 20'-10" 14 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 9 " 19'-1" (14 SPACES @ 8'-9") = 122'-6" 17 ' - 6 " (10 SPACES @ 8'-9") = 87'-6"(10 SPACES @ 8'-9") = 87'-6"(10 SPACES @ 8'-6") = 87'-6"7'-0" VANPOOL/CARPOOL 1/SP101 2/SP101 PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E SP100 SI T E P L A N TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 62,600.0 SF 5 SPACES PER 1000 SF: PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 313 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 320 DISABLED ACCESSIBLE PARKING: FROM 301 TO 400 SPACES PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = TOTAL OF 8 ACCESSIBLE INCLUDING 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = TOTAL OF 14 ACCESSIBLE INCLUDING 3 VAN ACCESSIBLE E.V. PARKING/CHARGING SPACES: E.V. PARKING/CHARGING SPACES REQUIRED = 32 E.V. PARKING/CHARGING SPACES PROVIDED = 32 CHARGING ONLY (NOT PARKING): FROM THE TOTAL OF 26 TO 50 E.V. PARKING/CHARGING SPACES PROVIDED SPACES REQUIRED/PROVIDED 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE 1 AMBULATORY CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES (E.V. PARKING SPACES ARE ALSO COUNTED AS CLEAN AIR PARKING SPACES): 12% OF THE TOTAL OF 313 SPACES REQUIRED CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 39 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 39 PROPOSED 3 STORY 62,600.0 S.F. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE : II-A STANDBY GENERATOR ENCLOSURE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM J.C. FLOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM STORAGE AREA UTILITY ROOM LOBBY AREA SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSEDSITE PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE OUTDOOR EATING AREA: TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 62,600.0 SF 300 SF PER EACH 5000 SF = 3,756 SF REQUIRED. OUTDOOR EATING AREA (A): 1,372.58 SF OUTDOOR EATING AREA (B): 1,330.76 SF TOTAL OUTDOOR EATING AREA: 2,703.34 SF 3,756.0 SF - 2,703.34 SF = 1,052.66SF (TO BE PROVIDED VIA STAFF LOUNGE AREAS IN THE T.I. SPACES) LANDSCAPE: TREE REQUIREMENTS: 313 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ONE TREE PER EACH 4 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 78.25 = 79 TREES REQUIRED. LONG TERM BICYCLE PARKING: DERO BIKE DEPOT_DERO DUPLEX 14 BIKE SECURED ENCLOSURE PUBLIC BICYCLE PARKING: "U" TYPE 9 BIKE LOOP RACK (2 PROVIDED FOR A TOTAL OF 18 BICYCLES) BIKE REPAIR STATION: DERO FIX IT_WITH MANUAL AIR PUMP KIT COMPACT SPACE PARKING: COMPACT SPACE ALLOWANCE 25% OF TOTAL SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 313 25% = 78.25 (79 SPACES ALLOWED) COMPACT SPACES PROVIDED 71 BUILDING ELECTRICAL ROOMWOMENS RESTROOM/ LOCKER/SHOWER MENS RESTROOM/ LOCKER/SHOWER MECHANICALEQUIPMENTENCLOSURE MECHANICALEQUIPMENTENCLOSURE DECORATIVE PAVING AREAS: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. LANDINGS/WALKWAYS: CONCRETE. PARKING/DRIVE WAY SURFACES: ASPHALT CONCRETE . TRASH CAN LOCATION: RUBBERMAID BRUTE 55 GAL TRASH CAN. RUBBERMAID BRUTE 55 GAL TRASH CAN DOME LID. TRUNCATED DOME AREA: PER CBC LANDSCAPED AREA: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR A COMPLETE SCOPE OF THE WORK NOTES: PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 42'-0". THE PROJECT IS REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 35-FEET PER CMC 21.27.050 WHICH ALLOWS ADDITIONAL HEIGHT UP TO 45-FEET THROUGH THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR SPD, PROVIDED THAT ALL THE SETBACKS SHALL BE INCREASED AT A RATIO OF ONE HORIZONTAL FOOT FOR EVERY ONE ONE FOOT. A) B) ALL SETBACKS HAVE BEEN INCREASED AT A RATIO OF ONE HORIZONTAL FOOT FOR EVERY ONE FOOT OF HEIGHT INCREASE OVER 35-FEET (42' - 35' = 7' MINIMUM SETBACK INCREASE). C) SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 MAXIMUM INTENSITY FLOOR AREA RATIO AREA OF PROPERTY WITHIN OFFICE DESIGNATION = 197,327SF. FAR ALLOWED (0.60) 118,396SF. FAR PROVIDED (0.32) 62,600SF. COOLING TOWER ENCLOSURE Exhibit 8 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 93 of 117 I I I I I I I 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I r-- 1 I I I I I I I I I •· 1 '1 I I -------------;:___ __ _ ' '- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I ·-·------. • • • I --·-·--. ·---, <]<]<]<]<] <]<] PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND AVIARA PARKWAY CARLSBAD, CA 92010 WWW.RAYMONDFOX.COM 92108 CA DIEGO SAN 340 STE HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH 1660 (619) 296-4595 MEDICAL ARCHITECTURE & CONSULTING RAYMOND FOX & ASSOCIATES SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO. : PROJECT NAME : DA T E I S S U E D : SH E E T N U M B E R : DR A W N B Y : 1 2 3 4 5 REVISIONS : MA Y 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 6 7 CARLSBAD MOB 22.027 PR O F E S S I O N A L ST A M P : S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O X No . C 2 4 5 8 3 RE N . 7 - 3 1 - 2 5 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E SP 1 0 1 ENLARGED COMMON AREA FLOOR PLAN DE R O B I K E D E P O T DE R O D U P L E X 1 4 B I K E S SE C U R E D E N C L O S U R E DE R O FI X - I T W/ A I R KI TPO W E R BO X (5 ) " U " B I K E R A C K S (4 ) M I C R O M O B I L I T Y PA R K I N G S T A T I O N S 3'-0 " UP 06 05 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 10 0 9 0 8 0 7 11 1 2 15 1 6 1 7 1 8 14 1 3 FD 1 A- 3 0 4 3'-0 "3'-0 " 3'-0 " UP 06 05 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 10 0 9 0 8 0 7 11 1 2 15 1 6 1 7 1 8 14 1 3 FD 1 A- 3 0 4 3'-0 "3'-0 " 6'- 7 " 13 ' - 9 " tc tc 16'-7"54'-5" 3'-0"30'-4"3'-0"10'-2" 5' - 0 " 9' - 8 " 7' - 8 " 2' - 9 " 3' - 4 " 5'-0" 6'-9" 4' - 1 0 " OU T D O O R E A T I N G AR E A ( A ) 1, 3 7 2 . 5 8 S F SC A L E : 1 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " PR O P O S E D SI T E P L A N DE C O R A T I V E P A V I N G A R E A S : RE F E R T O L A N D S C A P E D R A W I N G S . LA N D I N G S / W A L K W A Y S : CO N C R E T E . PA R K I N G / D R I V E W A Y S U R F A C E S : AS P H A L T C O N C R E T E . TR A S H C A N L O C A T I O N : RU B B E R M A I D B R U T E 5 5 G A L T R A S H C A N . RU B B E R M A I D B R U T E 5 5 G A L T R A S H C A N DO M E L I D . TR U N C A T E D D O M E A R E A : PE R C B C LA N D S C A P E D A R E A : RE F E R T O L A N D S C A P E D R A W I N G S F O R A CO M P L E T E S C O P E O F T H E W O R K OU T D O O R E A T I N G AR E A A 1 S W W W W W W W W W W W W VA N VA N VA N E. V . / C. A .E. V . / C. A .E. V . / C. A . C. A . C. A . C. A . (4) "U" BIKE RACKS 6'-0"7'-9" 6'- 7 1 / 2 " 32 ' - 2 " 7'- 9 1 / 2 " 26 ' - 1 1 " 5' - 8 " 9'- 1 " 22 ' - 9 " 9'- 1 " 9' - 0 " 5'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 8'- 0 " 9' - 1 " 8'- 0 " 9'- 0 " 9' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 3'-0"17'-0" 7'-0"12'-9" 4'-8" 6'-0" 42 ' - 7 " 14 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 20'-0" 3'-11" 10 ' - 1 3 / 8 " 4' - 4 " 5'- 1 1 " 4'- 7 " 4' - 1 " 2' - 9 " L A N D S C A P E L A N D S C A P E L A N D S C A P E 9'- 0 " 20 ' - 7 " 6'-7 1/2" 3'-10" OU T D O O R E A T I N G AR E A ( B ) 1 , 3 3 0 . 7 6 S F OU T D O O R E A T I N G AR E A B 2 SPD 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 Ja n . 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 I t e m # 1 9 4 o f 1 1 7 • • • • • ,f --- -·--+ I I I I I ' /\ I\ ----LL i; I, /1 i1 , I ------=----;_~-=------~----1 -~--- ----_k I ll_---~cc [-~------<· ·., ___ _ 1 1111 r ---,.----~-----Cc= I ,·[ I ';-I I ', -+---.j--'-;---I \\) I, I I ,, I I ;, I I ' "T "__:~-JL _. -1-_ J. • 1 '~.c; : I \ I -----+--t---1-,_ '-=-7 - I •'.-,,,'7 I L •_ I I -!- ··1 -· I I j --- I -- ~~ n " ·--.... .-. ...., .-,, . "\. c'J- ·7 ;:,::TT: 1,~1-- i::k ,ii,> 21,-J I I -'-'---l'----' --'--.-'---'----:1 •. I ,. . . . • l /;\: < I ~ • J ' ...• ·::)' □ _._.1,· .. ,, .• :-j'. ·.·J· ·-:i .,,· _,j, ·1 ·1 . : 1> . ,,· ,j," I 'I :,: .,,· ·i ·1 -·r :(· ·.,. ·). .'J' 'I :,: ·.,. ,j, .·r ·1 □ II : ,j," .·r I h l-.i I' 7 c·, I I ·,, ,/ -,--__ I I I I (~'; @ )"\ 7 @,_---- ( ________ ..... I, 7 '' -I ,_ \ ·, ------------- --@ ~ @ @] !~ ------- ----- ,.0 ~ ' Ir---:_-_:=:>=-::: ---:__-_-_.::-::::::::: --- I I : I I ·/ I // -I I 'I ·/ I 11 ·/' l1 •. ·1 I____--.,.-.::_ -I I ---~ -·:::::·~~~~::;:~~-;-;-~~-==------_} i' ,t -·r'.' 1-m11r-~--· :7-.--.-,-----" .. ~· •',_, ---.-1 , • \.'/ J • I • ' • . I I ·.1 .'./ 1 l I I ,, • • .-'. , . ' •. : I /' /'<:_: -~-~'.~.-~:":'_~-~:!: : ••• ': ... ; <, i'. • • • • , • r I-, '· · I· ·, . ' ,.· I . • I • ,. I . • I·· ' • 1·· r . • D -~--------;---,-____ ~ ·r~.f·~c.•:~~~,.,.~-c-~: ·cc~·:_, --~i • I!/ ! I I <Ii! ·~1 • • J /· I --~.--'--- "i / --, I, ', ,, ·1, 1 1/\ ·"11 ,, ·r·I! -------------. __ _ ' '--______________ __ ·-· ·-.·_,.j '•, :' I I @] I H • , -::·,,:u··· ti !W~ •• • , .... · 1 z.L/L/ ~ ~I ' •••• :::::::/ _\ ·- t le " I fl ~'. le f: I -~M/1,0• 'c>C' :00' ~ J ' -r- 1 r \_ I I -i-+ -.- .-, ' -. ·--·· -7 ----:,.- 11 ; \ I I I I I I I I .,o"<~'.>l• '·. ·-, ',j .. I I I I I -,- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "·\:,;//·•.:.> V/:.,./'. \,"::=§· ://\ • . '::§ii-·" : \ • :1 \ . ' -,- \ I I I \- 1 I I ' -. ',-,r " II II II II II II II II jj II II II II II II II tt II II II II II II frF / / .,,_. ·~ ... , \j " II II II II I\ I _J, I I C '\<( \.._ ....... -1---- -·-.• -I .• "\ :,._ ·. -· -• .,:. \,. .,~- ,. ~--·::\.1:·':-, "./. ~·,-·-· / l ·IR\ir'l'.o··. -~-V:t:!) ... ....... ,_- ·1· / / / 'I ,, l,j ./ / 7-, / / ---,- ·\ '' '. I I I I I ' I I I I I l ' I -, ,+-' ,_'./ I I I I / I / I I / I I / I ,( □ ; ..... , ..... ::::::::::: ·::::: ::::::::::: r I~ IL. ~ / / / / / / ·.;;a / I / I / I / I / I >YLl--1/iir'------ ·._;.,.;_-· :i' /- ·.;,·. I 1L ___ _ '>'~:';i,; .... : : I : : • ,.._, -~. 7,/L,'" . ·) ,cs,:~' l•<.!.1(-: •/· .... , 1 / I ' :: ),/?' ' : ·!~ ,:,, ;;z •. ,· • .X· ' I ••• ,··"':,n:;r·< •i •/·c·::c -, .-17 ·-:'.::,.~~:\;._?: "~-'-'--~ ~ -~ 7 ----"c- I I I I I I I I "-~ I I I I I I : I I 11:' ,i/,IW~-- I I I I ' : ' I I I I I 'I I I \ . ,1 i II I I ' I I '11 I( I I + ' , I ,,1_._.,, / / / / / / / )/ ---\ I r ---ir r : ..; ~:c-.-·' ·-/I I , I I ' -'· I ' I I I I I I I I I -.j. I -/ I I Jc ____ ,, I I I I I +·-----;, ' I / / [L v v v v v v v I 0 PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E A100 FI R S T F L O O R P L A N - N O T E D BUILDING ELECTRICAL ROOM 110 ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM 108 J.C. 105 FLOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM 103 STORAGE AREA 102 FIRE RAISER/ FIRE PUMP ROOM 111 LOBBY AREA 101 SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLANNOTED MALE TOILET/ SHOWER/ LOCKER 104 FEMALE TOILET/ SHOWER/ LOCKER 106 SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 HALLWAY 107 STAIR #2 109 INTERIOR PARTITION SCHEDULE NON-RATED PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 16" O.C.1A 1B 2A 3A 3B 3C NON-RATED PARTITION: SIMILAR TO TYPE 1A EXCEPT GYPSUM BOARD ON THE OUTSIDE ONLY. LOBBY SIDE ONLY 1-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT ( DESIGN #: U465) 2-HOUR PARTITION: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U411) 2-HOUR SHAFT: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) A-507 26 A-507 26 SIM. A-507 27 A-507 28 A-507 29 A-507 25 3D 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. W/ AIR SPACE OVER 6" x 20 GA. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A-507 25 2B 1-HOUR SHAFT: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A-507 9 Room name 101 ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER FLOOR CONTROL ASSEMBLY PER FIRE PROTECTION DWGS RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET PER DETAIL FCA G-004 8F.E. WALL MOUNTED ACCESS PANEL PER A-508 23A.P. D.S. DOWN SPOUT SURFACE MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.E. A-508 17 KEYNOTES 1 DUAL HEIGHT ADA ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN. SEE DETAIL 10/G-004 2 FLOOR DRAIN, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 3 KNOCK OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE STAIR. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO 4 WATER BOOSTER PUMP, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 5 FUTURE CORRIDOR, N.I.C. 6 ENTRY CANOPY 7 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS 8 MECHANICAL DUCT, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS 9 FIRE RISER, SEE FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS 10 ROOF ACCESS LADDER, SEE DETAIL 10/A-506 11 FIRE SPRAYED STEEL COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 12 FRP WALL FINISH AT JANITOR CLOSET ROOM #, SEE INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR FULL FINISHES. 13 ELEVATOR PIT LADDER, SEE EVELVATOR PIT PLAN 2/A-101 14 8" CONC. ELEVATOR PIT WALL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATOR PIT PLAN @ 4 FT. BELOW FIRST FLOOR 15 STEEL BEAM PER STRUCTURAL PLANS AND CENTER SCREEN WALL 8/A-513 16 1/4" THK. LAMINATED FROSTED GLASS 17 RECESSED KNOX BOX, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATION 18 TWO LAYERS OF 5/8" GYPSUM TO PROTECT STEEL POST LINEAR FLOOR DRAINS19 REMOTE CHILLER ABOVE ACOUSTICAL CEILING20 JL INDUSTRIES COSMOPOLITAN STAINLESS STEEL 1.5" SQUARE TRIM 1836-F10 & MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER CABINET. 21 SURFACE MOUNTED MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER.22 ADA PUSH BUTTON MOUNTED ON MULLION INSIDE, FOR DOOR 10123 ADA PUSH BUTTON MOUNTED ON COLUMN OUTSIDE, FOR DOOR 10124 SHAFT WALL ENCLOSURE FOR VRF REFRIGERANT LINES PER DETAIL: 29/A-507 25 FIRE RISER PUMP, SEE DEFERRED SPRINKLER DRAWINGS26 LOCATION OF BUILDING DIRECTORY, SEE ELEVATIONS27 GENERAL NOTES 24"X84" AMBULANCE GURNEY SIZED ELEVATOR PER SECTION 3002.4A28 # 1. WHERE COLUMNS REQUIRE A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING, THE ENTIRE COLUMN, INCLUDING ITS CONNECTIONS TO BEAMS OR GIRDERS,SHALL BE PROTECTED. WHERE THE COLUMN EXTENDS THROUGH A CEILING, FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE COLUMN SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE TOP OF THE FLOOR THROUGH THE CEILING SPACE TO THE TOP OF THE COLUMN. SECTION 704.2. 2. MEMBERS OF THE STRUCTURAL FRAME (OTHER THAN COLUMNS) SUPPORTING MORE THAN ONE FLOOR AND ROOF (OR MORE THAN 2 FLOORS), OR SUPPORTING A LOAD-BEARING WALL, OR A NONLOAD-BEARING WALL MORE THAN 2 STORIES HIGH) MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY ENCASEMENT FIRE PROTECTED. (SECTION 704.3) DETAIL THE REQUIRED PROTECTION ON THE PLANS. 3. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1. 4. STEEL ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOXES AT FIRE BARRIER WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIXTEEN SQUARE INCHES, SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 SQUARE INCHES PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF WALL, AND SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF TWENTY-FOUR INCHES WHEN ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF A WALL. SECTION 714.4.2. MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1 5. DUCTS PENETRATING FIRE BARRIERS AT OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS MUST HAVE FIRE DAMPERS. SECTION 717.5.2: A)IN CALIFORNIA, SECTION 717.5.2 WAS MODIFIED FOR GROUP I OCCUPANCY TO REQUIRE SMOKE DAMPERS IN ADDITION TO FIRE DAMPERS. 6. NOTE ON THE PLANS: "ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT.” SECTION 1010.1.9. IN LIEU OF THE ABOVE, IN A GROUP B OCCUPANCY, YOU MAY NOTE ON THE PLANS "PROVIDE A SIGN ON OR NEAR THE EXIT DOOR, READING THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THIS SPACE IS OCCUPIED." THIS SIGNAGE IS ONLY ALLOWED AT THE MAIN EXIT. SECTION 1010.1.9.4. 7. EACH DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE. SECTION 1010.1.10. 8. WHEN ADDITIONAL DOORS ARE PROVIDED FOR EGRESS PURPOSES, THEY ALSO SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1010 (WIDTH, SWING, HARDWARE, ETC.). SECTION 1010.1. 9. ALL DOORS WITHIN THE EXIT PATH TO A PUBLIC WAY FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH LATCHES OR LOCKS UNLESS THEY ARE EQUIPPED WITH PANIC HARDWARE. SECTIONS 1010.1.10 AND 1010.2. 10. A TACTILE SIGN STATING “EXIT” AND COMPLYING WITH ICC A117.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO EACH DOOR TO AN EXIT STAIRWAY, AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY, AND THE EXIT DISCHARGE. SEC. 1013.4. 11. SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THAT PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 906 12. WHERE COLUMNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF THE CODE, THE ENTIRE COLUMN SHALL BE PROVIDED INDIVIDUAL ENCASEMENT PROTECTION ON ALL SIDES FOR THE FULL COLUMN LENGTH. SECTION 704.2. 13. REFER TO SHEET G-003 FOR REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE CLEAR DIMENSIONS. 14. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BACKING FOR WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES PER DETAIL 9 & 10 /A-508. 15. SOUND ATTENUATING BATT INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL CORE PARTITIONS. 16. FOR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 2/A-502. 17. FOR PLUMBING PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 3/A-502. 18. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILING, SHAFT AND ROOF-CEILING SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTIONS 712, 713 & 714. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ROUGH OPENING REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS LOCKERS, RECESSED CABINETS, MAILBOXES & RECESSED FIXTURES PRIOR TO FRAMING. 20. MEANS OF EGRESS AT EACH STORY SHALL ALSO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED WHEN TENANT IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. 21. ALL DECK DRAINS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FLOOR FINISH. 22. SEE DECK EDGE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 23. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE-RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF-CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTION 716. 24. ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OF EFFORT. 25. DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY CBC SECTION 717. AREA = 21,073 S.F. 9'-8" 10'-8" 6'-11" 9' - 2 " 8' - 2 " 18 ' - 4 " 5'-8"1'-7"9" 1' - 1 0 " 8 3/4" -3'-6" E 6 STAIR #3 SCALE : AS NOTED 1 2 2 5 AMBULATORY CHARGING ONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGING ONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGING ONLY DERO BIKE DEPOT DERO DUPLEX 14 BIKES SECURED ENCLOSURE DERO FIX-IT W/AIR KIT POWER BOX E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. (5) "U" BIKE RACKS (4) MICROMOBILITY PARKING STATIONS (4 ) " U " B I K E R A C K S 3'-0 "102 3'-0" 107C 3'-0" 109B UP UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 3'-0"108 3'-0 "105 3'-0" 104 3'-0 "107A 3'-0" 107B 3'-0" 103 FD IN CON T R O L P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" 112B UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 FD A-401 7 1 A-304 2 A-402 3A 3A 3A 3A 1A 3B 3B 3A 3A 1A 1A 1A3A 3A 1A 1A 3A 3A 1A 1A 1A 3A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A STAIR IS AN EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1019.4 & 713. 2-HOUR INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1023 3B 1 A300 A202 D A200 D 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 11 12 15 16 17 18 14 13 101 2 A315 1 A312 1 A316 2 A312 4 A312 A312 SIM. SIM. 4 A313 3 A313 SIM. 1 A313 2 A313 4 A314 3'-0" 112A 3'-0" 107C 3'-0" 109A 4'-0" 107C 3'-0" 107C 3'-0 "102 3'-0" 107C 3'-0" 109B UP UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 3'-0"108 3'-0 "105 3'-0" 104 3'-0 "107A 3'-0" 107B 3'-0" 103 1 2 A B C E F G J A B C E G D 3 7 10 1514658 J 12 1311 FD IN CON T R O L P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 4 9 1 2 3 156121349 3'-0" 112B UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 FD A-401 7 1 A-304 2 A-402 3A 3A 3A 3A 1A 3B 3B 3A 3A 1A 1A 1A3A 3A 1A 1A 3A 3A 1A 1A 1A 3A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A STAIR IS AN EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1019.4 & 713. 2-HOUR INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY PER SECTION 1023 E3 3B A200 A 1 A300 2 A300 A200 B A202 C A202 D A201 A A201 B A200 C A200 D 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 11 12 15 16 17 18 14 13 101 2 A312 SIM. 2 A314SIM. 1 A314 3 A314 2 A315 1 A312 1 A316 2 A312 4 A312 3 A312 1 A312SIM. 1 A315 2 A315 3 A315 4 A315 3 A316 1 A313SIM. 4 A313 3 A313 SIM. 1 A313 2 A313 4 A314 3'-0" 112A 3'-0" 107C 3'-0" 109A 4'-0" 107C 3'-0" 107C +6" +6" +6" 0' - 0" +6" 0' - 0" - 3'-6" ELEVATOR PIT 5 A-503 3 A112 1 A112 +6" +4" 2 A112 5 6 7 8 9 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1111 11 11 1111 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 13 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 18 18 21 22 22 22 22 28 27 26 23 24 INSTALLATION SHAFT ABOVE 19 19 STAIR #1 112 4 PHONE ROOM 114 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 95 of 117 I I I I I -=-====-=--~ ~ I =c ====a--1 _ I' I I I /--===--_-cc_-cc_-cc_--/ ---c__---__ l ----7 I I I q I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----=---~,----- - - - - I I o-:-p ,; ,, ' 1,1--,, ,, ,, 'I ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, 'I ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, " ,, =t= I = = I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 I I I ! I I I : =~~=====~I=~==~~;;~~;;;:;~~~;:;~~~~;;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=:'.~"~· i,,~,~, ~, ~f -/--~~~ -_--, ~-1--11 -,, "' " , " "' " '" --- --- -----+.---+ --- ---tit------------, ~~~~~~~~~~~--;;,_ -:;,_-:;,_-:;,j~-:;,_-:;,_-;;, _-:;,_-:;,_-:;,;~§§~§,§_~~,§,§~,§,§~~~§~~,§~~,§,§~,I~§ _ _§_§_§_-:;,~~_§_§_§_~~,~I-:;, -~_§_§~--:;,~-:;,_~§_§_§_~~§~§§§,~~,§_§~~fi ~====,---0 ti---~ I I I I I I I I ' ~ I ', I ! ' I ', / I I I ' I -) I I, : Y--=-L=Y•:1 I -, 1! / I. I ~---',-._c,-4,_l_- I I I I , " -- ---t-- C i::::::r::::r::::' __ I I : ,-------=o,r-+-nC' ~ : I ,-----I I ~ I 11 ---/·~ f------ I I I I I jl 1 1! /' lj • I ~ I ~ i ccpii I I : I ---+ I\ -------;:::==;---=~~i==r== __ = __ = __ = __ =i --~~--'-.r,~------:-_!-1; .... 1-----------1-----I I I 1----~-------I O[l 11 1,I 11 I/ 11 l1 /, I/ I/ 'I ~ I/ 11 I/ l1 N i'I 11 II I, r~ :: :: ~ l ~ I'< ii NIM ii MM 8 i MMMIMFFMM 8 8 C 8 ------ C 8 8 l,e,eee+J L • 8 8 8 88 LJ ' ' I I I I I : ~+-----c-,/ ---+ttof--91, Q,-1i:- ~ - 11v , ( ' -:-:-:~-:- --+:: I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' j! j! J! i - - I ~ I [ __ _ I I I IV====== I I I I I I I I I 11'= ======= I I ~+o I I , I ' '.XX X/ ' " " r n,11 '" - _,.., ' ' ---. I • • • <]<]<]<]<] <]<] PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E SE C O N D F L O O R P L A N - N O T E D 2200 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 DN 19 20 21 22 23 24 15 16 17 18 14 13 12 11 SECOND FLOOR 3'-0" 2200 3'-0 "2200 3'-0" 2200 UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 11 12 15 16 17 18 14 13 3'-0" 2200 UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 1 A B C E F G J A B C E G D 3 7 1514658 J 12 1349 1 2 3 156121349 10 11 DN E3 2 DN 19 20 21 22 23 24 A200 A 1 A300 2 A300 2 A300 A200 B A202 C A202 D 1 A300 A201 A A201 B A200 C A200 D A312 1 A312 2 A312 3 A312 4 A313 1 A313 3 A314 1 A313 4 A312 2 A312 2 A312 2 A313 2 A314 4 13' - 0" 13' - 0" 13' - 0" SECOND FLOOR PLANNOTED FLOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM LOBBY AREA SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA = 20,590 S.F. INTERIOR PARTITION SCHEDULE NON-RATED PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 16" O.C.1A 1B 2A 3A 3B 3C NON-RATED PARTITION: SIMILAR TO TYPE 1A EXCEPT GYPSUM BOARD ON THE OUTSIDE ONLY. LOBBY SIDE ONLY 1-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT ( DESIGN #: U465) 2-HOUR PARTITION: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U411) 2-HOUR SHAFT: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) A507 26 A507 26 SIM. A507 27 A507 28 A507 29 A507 25 3D 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. W/ AIR SPACE OVER 6" x 20 GA. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A507 25 2B 1-HOUR SHAFT: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A507 9 Room name 101 ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER FLOOR CONTROL ASSEMBLY PER FIRE PROTECTION DWGS RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET PER DETAIL FCA G007 8F.E. WALL MOUNTED ACCESS PANEL PER A508 23A.P. D.S. DOWN SPOUT SURFACE MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.E. A508 17 KEYNOTES 1 DUAL HEIGHT ADA ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN. SEE DETAIL 10/G-004 2 FLOOR DRAIN, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 3 KNOCK OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE STAIR. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO 4 WATER BOOSTER PUMP, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 5 FUTURE CORRIDOR, N.I.C. 6 ENTRY CANOPY 7 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS 8 MECHANICAL DUCT, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS 9 FIRE RISER, SEE FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS 10 ROOF ACCESS LADDER, SEE DETAIL 10/A-506 11 FIRE SPRAYED STEEL COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 12 NO CERAMIC TILE FINISH AT JANITOR CLOSET ROOM #116 13 ELEVATOR PIT LADDER, SEE EVELVATOR PIT PLAN 2/A-101 14 8" CONC. ELEVATOR PIT WALL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 15 STEEL BEAM PER STRUCTURAL PLANS AND CENTER SCREEN WALL 8/A-513 16 1/4" THK. LAMINATED FROSTED GLASS 17 RECESSED KNOX BOX, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATION 18 TWO LAYERS OF 5/8" GYPSUM TO PROTECT STEEL POST LINEAR FLOOR DRAINS19 REMOTE CHILLER ABOVE ACOUSTICAL CEILING20 JL INDUSTRIES COSMOPOLITAN STAINLESS STEEL 1.5" SQUARE 1836-F10 & MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER 22 SURFACE MOUNTED MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER23 MULLION MOUNTED PUSH BUTTON INSIDE LOBBY, FOR DOOR 10124 PUSH BUTTON BOLLARD OUTSIDE, FOR DOOR 10125 SHAFT WALL ENCLOSURE FOR VRF REFRIGERANT LINES PER DETAIL: 29/A-507 26 FIRE RISER PUMP, SEE DEFERRED SPRINKLER DRAWINGS27 LOCATION OF BUILDING DIRECTORY, SEE ELEVATIONS28 GENERAL NOTES 24"X84" AMBULANCE GURNEY SIZED ELEVATOR PER SECTION 3002.4A29 # 1. WHERE COLUMNS REQUIRE A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING, THE ENTIRE COLUMN, INCLUDING ITS CONNECTIONS TO BEAMS OR GIRDERS,SHALL BE PROTECTED. WHERE THE COLUMN EXTENDS THROUGH A CEILING, FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE COLUMN SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE TOP OF THE FLOOR THROUGH THE CEILING SPACE TO THE TOP OF THE COLUMN. SECTION 704.2. 2. MEMBERS OF THE STRUCTURAL FRAME (OTHER THAN COLUMNS) SUPPORTING MORE THAN ONE FLOOR AND ROOF (OR MORE THAN 2 FLOORS), OR SUPPORTING A LOAD-BEARING WALL, OR A NONLOAD-BEARING WALL MORE THAN 2 STORIES HIGH) MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY ENCASEMENT FIRE PROTECTED. (SECTION 704.3) DETAIL THE REQUIRED PROTECTION ON THE PLANS. 3. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1. 4. STEEL ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOXES AT FIRE BARRIER WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIXTEEN SQUARE INCHES, SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 SQUARE INCHES PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF WALL, AND SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF TWENTY-FOUR INCHES WHEN ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF A WALL. SECTION 714.4.2. MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1 5. DUCTS PENETRATING FIRE BARRIERS AT OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS MUST HAVE FIRE DAMPERS. SECTION 717.5.2: A)IN CALIFORNIA, SECTION 717.5.2 WAS MODIFIED FOR GROUP I OCCUPANCY TO REQUIRE SMOKE DAMPERS IN ADDITION TO FIRE DAMPERS. 6. NOTE ON THE PLANS: "ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT.” SECTION 1010.1.9. IN LIEU OF THE ABOVE, IN A GROUP B OCCUPANCY, YOU MAY NOTE ON THE PLANS "PROVIDE A SIGN ON OR NEAR THE EXIT DOOR, READING THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THIS SPACE IS OCCUPIED." THIS SIGNAGE IS ONLY ALLOWED AT THE MAIN EXIT. SECTION 1010.1.9.4. 7. EACH DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE. SECTION 1010.1.10. 8. WHEN ADDITIONAL DOORS ARE PROVIDED FOR EGRESS PURPOSES, THEY ALSO SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1010 (WIDTH, SWING, HARDWARE, ETC.). SECTION 1010.1. 9. ALL DOORS WITHIN THE EXIT PATH TO A PUBLIC WAY FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH LATCHES OR LOCKS UNLESS THEY ARE EQUIPPED WITH PANIC HARDWARE. SECTIONS 1010.1.10 AND 1010.2. 10. A TACTILE SIGN STATING “EXIT” AND COMPLYING WITH ICC A117.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO EACH DOOR TO AN EXIT STAIRWAY, AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY, AND THE EXIT DISCHARGE. SEC. 1013.4. 11. SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THAT PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 906 12. WHERE COLUMNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF THE CODE, THE ENTIRE COLUMN SHALL BE PROVIDED INDIVIDUAL ENCASEMENT PROTECTION ON ALL SIDES FOR THE FULL COLUMN LENGTH. SECTION 704.2. 13. REFER TO SHEET G-003 FOR REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE CLEAR DIMENSIONS. 14. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BACKING FOR WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES PER DETAIL 9 & 10 /A-508. 15. SOUND ATTENUATING BATT INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL CORE PARTITIONS. 16. FOR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 2/A-502. 17. FOR PLUMBING PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 3/A-502. 18. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILING, SHAFT AND ROOF-CEILING SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTIONS 712, 713 & 714. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ROUGH OPENING REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS LOCKERS, RECESSED CABINETS, MAILBOXES & RECESSED FIXTURES PRIOR TO FRAMING. 20. MEANS OF EGRESS AT EACH STORY SHALL ALSO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED WHEN TENANT IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. 21. ALL DECK DRAINS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FLOOR FINISH. 22. SEE DECK EDGE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 23. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE-RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF-CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTION 716. 24. ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OF EFFORT. 25. DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY CBC SECTION 717. A200 STAIR #1 SHAFT SHAFT SCALE : 1/8"=1'0" FROM ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM 108 FLOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM 203 LOBBY AREA 201 HALLWAY 207 STAIR #3 209 STAIR #2 212 2 5 5 6 89 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1111 11 11 1111 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 18 18 21 22 22 22 22 28 27 FROM 1st FLOOR TO UPPER FLOORS AND ROOF OPEN TO BELOW SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 96 of 117 0-- 0-1 0--- 0- 0-- 0 0- =t= =t= I = = - - A \ ·-· • A ' ' \ ' - A ( ' ' ·-· • A - 0 0 0 - I j . ) '·--·· I - • I . \_. ' - " -- • --·~· I --------~-----------1++ ~ ---------;-----------~·- / / •·.. / --1----" r-+ • -0 -------\-0 ( ! \ / ¥ ---- • I I I I I I ---* ----------+-,,/ - -------~._ ----------++•-//-------------++'l/_ ---------J/ <>_ --------r -----------1++ ------0 I I \. •, ~ I . c--- ' -I ========r =============================i============ 1 r==============r =============================================================================================i ================== ,T========================= ~.-•. •••; ;,,... ===1= I ; • .. .. I < ·;> < I • ==============,=========/ ================================== i' I n~~i-~ ii -Fl~::;::.:::!'.~~\\~,_-::.::.::!:!: ::::::::;::!II__ ----~ ---------Ji ----- 1 __ //> ... r 7 I I .I - 111'1! I /'\.. I ' ' -------/ --- - I -0 -0 +------0 " I I I ! \ . -•, ' I ¥ I I 1 +r-<> --__.,.···"----- ,-_ ' ' •-r1 · ~ I I 1! !mi,111 I }--< 1 - -----CA'.=-_ r ----- I ' / \ \ "fr• ._ I I I -----7 --+----;;:" --= -=-=-= ~ ('. I I I ,r /'-- ~,• I ,-------,(~>~---"~====~~~•-==========,µ;·===k:t===:;;;;;:,===========:;;;,1 I I I -• . -\ ' ·.f I I ➔ ! I -~, I I 0 I I I ---I : I ----+----+--------___ 1 ___ ------~ ----~ -------~ : 0 ! , +c/• ot--t------------- 1 1 ___ _J II I --1--+--------0 I 6 6 6 6 0 o O /,A('Jo6 00 6 0 66 ; 0 ii Mil ii MM 8 i 8 MMMIMFFMM 8 C 8 ------ C 8 8 l,e,eee+J L 8 8 8 88 • • • * * <]<]<]<]<] <]<] PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E TH I R D F L O O R P L A N - N O T E D THIRD FLOOR 3'-0" 3300 3'-0 "3300 3'-0" 3300 DN 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 15 16 17 18 14 13 3'-0"3300 3'-0" 3300 DN 060504030201 090807 15161718 14 13 1 A B C E F G J A B C E G D 3 7 10 1514658 J 12 131149 1 2 3 156121349 2 192021 19 20 21 12 11 10 12 11 E3 A200 A 1 A300 2 A300 2 A300 A200 B A202 C A202 D 1 A300 A201 A A201 B A200 C A200 D THIRD FLOOR PLANNOTED SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA = 20,937 S.F. INTERIOR PARTITION SCHEDULE NON-RATED PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 16" O.C.1A 1B 2A 3A 3B 3C NON-RATED PARTITION: SIMILAR TO TYPE 1A EXCEPT GYPSUM BOARD ON THE OUTSIDE ONLY. LOBBY SIDE ONLY 1-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT ( DESIGN #: U465) 2-HOUR PARTITION: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE OF 3-5/8" X 25 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. MAX. STUDS TO BE CUT 3/4" LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U411) 2-HOUR SHAFT: TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415) A-507 26 A-507 26 SIM. A-507 27 A-507 28 A-507 29 A-507 25 3D 2-HOUR PARTITION: ONE LAYER WOOD VENEER ON 3-5/8" X 22 GA. STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. W/ AIR SPACE OVER 6" x 20 GA. OVER TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 4" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A-507 25 2B 1-HOUR SHAFT: ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD ON ONE SIDE AND 1" GYPSUM LINER INSERTED IN H-SHAPED SECTION TO 2-1/2" X 25 GA. C-H SHAPED STEEL STUDS @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL RESTRAINED WALLS REQUIRE STUDS TO BE CUT 3/8" LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT. (DESIGN #: U415)A-507 9 Room name 101 ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER FLOOR CONTROL ASSEMBLY PER FIRE PROTECTION DWGS RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET PER DETAIL FCA G-004 8F.E. WALL MOUNTED ACCESS PANEL PER A-508 23A.P. D.S. DOWN SPOUT SURFACE MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.E. A-508 17 KEYNOTES 1 DUAL HEIGHT ADA ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN. SEE DETAIL 10/G-004 2 FLOOR DRAIN, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 3 KNOCK OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE STAIR. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO 4 WATER BOOSTER PUMP, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS 5 FUTURE CORRIDOR, N.I.C. 6 ENTRY CANOPY BELOW 7 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS 8 MECHANICAL DUCT, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS 9 FIRE RISER, SEE FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS 10 ROOF ACCESS LADDER, SEE DETAIL 10/A-506 11 FIRE SPRAYED STEEL COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 12 NO CERAMIC TILE FINISH AT JANITOR CLOSET ROOM #116 13 ELEVATOR PIT LADDER, SEE EVELVATOR PIT PLAN 2/A-101 14 8" CONC. ELEVATOR PIT WALL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 15 STEEL BEAM PER STRUCTURAL PLANS AND CENTER SCREEN WALL 8/A-513 16 1/4" THK. LAMINATED FROSTED GLASS 17 RECESSED KNOX BOX, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATION 18 TWO LAYERS OF 5/8" GYPSUM TO PROTECT STEEL POST LINEAR FLOOR DRAINS19 REMOTE CHILLER ABOVE ACOUSTICAL CEILING20 JL INDUSTRIES COSMOPOLITAN STAINLESS STEEL 1.5" SQUARE 1836-F10 & MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER 22 SURFACE MOUNTED MECURY 5lb EXTINGUISHER23 MULLION MOUNTED PUSH BUTTON INSIDE LOBBY, FOR DOOR 10124 PUSH BUTTON BOLLARD OUTSIDE, FOR DOOR 10125 SHAFT WALL ENCLOSURE FOR VRF REFRIGERANT LINES PER DETAIL: 29/A-507 26 FIRE RISER PUMP, SEE DEFERRED SPRINKLER DRAWINGS27 LOCATION OF BUILDING DIRECTORY, SEE ELEVATIONS28 GENERAL NOTES 24"X84" AMBULANCE GURNEY SIZED ELEVATOR PER SECTION 3002.4A29 # 1. WHERE COLUMNS REQUIRE A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING, THE ENTIRE COLUMN, INCLUDING ITS CONNECTIONS TO BEAMS OR GIRDERS,SHALL BE PROTECTED. WHERE THE COLUMN EXTENDS THROUGH A CEILING, FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE COLUMN SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE TOP OF THE FLOOR THROUGH THE CEILING SPACE TO THE TOP OF THE COLUMN. SECTION 704.2. 2. MEMBERS OF THE STRUCTURAL FRAME (OTHER THAN COLUMNS) SUPPORTING MORE THAN ONE FLOOR AND ROOF (OR MORE THAN 2 FLOORS), OR SUPPORTING A LOAD-BEARING WALL, OR A NONLOAD-BEARING WALL MORE THAN 2 STORIES HIGH) MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY ENCASEMENT FIRE PROTECTED. (SECTION 704.3) DETAIL THE REQUIRED PROTECTION ON THE PLANS. 3. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1. 4. STEEL ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOXES AT FIRE BARRIER WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIXTEEN SQUARE INCHES, SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 SQUARE INCHES PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF WALL, AND SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF TWENTY-FOUR INCHES WHEN ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF A WALL. SECTION 714.4.2. MEMBERS SUPPORTING A HORIZONTAL FIRE BARRIER MUST HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING AS THE SEPARATION. SECTION 707.5.1 5. DUCTS PENETRATING FIRE BARRIERS AT OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS MUST HAVE FIRE DAMPERS. SECTION 717.5.2: A)IN CALIFORNIA, SECTION 717.5.2 WAS MODIFIED FOR GROUP I OCCUPANCY TO REQUIRE SMOKE DAMPERS IN ADDITION TO FIRE DAMPERS. 6. NOTE ON THE PLANS: "ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT.” SECTION 1010.1.9. IN LIEU OF THE ABOVE, IN A GROUP B OCCUPANCY, YOU MAY NOTE ON THE PLANS "PROVIDE A SIGN ON OR NEAR THE EXIT DOOR, READING THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THIS SPACE IS OCCUPIED." THIS SIGNAGE IS ONLY ALLOWED AT THE MAIN EXIT. SECTION 1010.1.9.4. 7. EACH DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE. SECTION 1010.1.10. 8. WHEN ADDITIONAL DOORS ARE PROVIDED FOR EGRESS PURPOSES, THEY ALSO SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1010 (WIDTH, SWING, HARDWARE, ETC.). SECTION 1010.1. 9. ALL DOORS WITHIN THE EXIT PATH TO A PUBLIC WAY FROM AN OCCUPANCY OF GROUP I-2.1 SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH LATCHES OR LOCKS UNLESS THEY ARE EQUIPPED WITH PANIC HARDWARE. SECTIONS 1010.1.10 AND 1010.2. 10. A TACTILE SIGN STATING “EXIT” AND COMPLYING WITH ICC A117.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO EACH DOOR TO AN EXIT STAIRWAY, AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY, AND THE EXIT DISCHARGE. SEC. 1013.4. 11. SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THAT PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 906 12. WHERE COLUMNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF THE CODE, THE ENTIRE COLUMN SHALL BE PROVIDED INDIVIDUAL ENCASEMENT PROTECTION ON ALL SIDES FOR THE FULL COLUMN LENGTH. SECTION 704.2. 13. REFER TO SHEET G-003 FOR REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE CLEAR DIMENSIONS. 14. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BACKING FOR WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES PER DETAIL 9 & 10 /A-508. 15. SOUND ATTENUATING BATT INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL CORE PARTITIONS. 16. FOR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 2/A-502. 17. FOR PLUMBING PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SE DETAIL 3/A-502. 18. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILING, SHAFT AND ROOF-CEILING SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTIONS 712, 713 & 714. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ROUGH OPENING REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS LOCKERS, RECESSED CABINETS, MAILBOXES & RECESSED FIXTURES PRIOR TO FRAMING. 20. MEANS OF EGRESS AT EACH STORY SHALL ALSO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED WHEN TENANT IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. 21. ALL DECK DRAINS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FLOOR FINISH. 22. SEE DECK EDGE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 23. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE-RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF-CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTION 716. 24. ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OF EFFORT. 25. DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY CBC SECTION 717. A300 STAIR #2 STAIR #3 SHAFT SHAFT SCALE : 1/8"=1'0" STAIR #2 STAIR #3 FROM 1st and 2nd FLOOR FLOOR ELECTRICAL ROOM 303 STAIR #2 309 STAIR #3 312 2 5 5 6 89 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1111 11 11 1111 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 18 18 21 22 22 22 22 28 FROM 1st and 2nd FLOOR to ROOF 11 SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 29 6 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 97 of 117 0 0 0 • • I I I j 0-----, 0-/ --H-- • • I -I I \_. \~· "------" --- • --- -~- I --------~ ------------+++ ~ . ---------------------~-- / / •·.. / -. /--' r I ----0 -----o • - • I I -----------++'l/_ ---------,I/ <>_ --------r ------------+++ ---• ----0 * * - I I I I I < ·;> -c---• '\ --_/ ----I < ·----I I I / I _,,, •' ,--7 I !, I I /'\. I I I \ / -t ---+ 0 \ - • ------------"' 1§: ------ : r 77 C 77 I II I II L _ _J I 1--_J I II IJ ,--'-, ~=7 7 -r ~- / I ~ 0 I I ~~ \ ___ ) 0 - I I I ( ;,--, I - I +------0 I I I L_ _______ _J I I I I I I I 0---1 --__.,----"----+r<> -----CA,'-_ r -1----~ -------<_ ~~> ---' -- -- ' / \ I 0 •-r1· "fr• IG l1i,11 0 ~ I 1' H I ±= I I I == 0- I I I I I I I -----+----+----------------+---1------,~c-tt I<--+---;,Il-Ht--,_ ~-J .--/) tt----l -t-------------1--+-------0 ~~~====~ I I I I I I I I I I 6 6 6 6 6 Q 6 / ,,A/'')QQ ' 6 Q 6 6 0 ; =t= ii Mil ii MM 8 i 8 =t= MMMIMFFMM 8 C 8 -- ---- C 8 8 l,e,eee+J L 8 8 <]<]<]<]<] <]<] 8 I = 88 = PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E A400 RO O F P L A N SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSEDROOF PLAN ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED 10' FROM EDGE OF THE ROOF. SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 ROOF PLAN 1 2 A B C E F G J A B C E G D 3 7 10 1514658 J 12 131149 1 2 3 156121349 69'-3" 32 ' - 0 " R I D G E R I D G E R I D G E 50 ' - 3 1 / 8 " 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12" SLOPE A200 A 1 A300X 2 A300 2 A300 A200 B A202 C A202 D 1 A300 1/4" to 12" SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"SLOPE 69'-3" 32 ' - 0 " 5'-0" R I D G E R I D G E 1/8" to 12"SLOPE1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/4" to 12"1/4" to 12" 1/8" to 12"SLOPE1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12"SLOPE1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12" SLOPE 1/8" to 12"SLOPE A201 A A201 B A200 C A200 D R I D G E R I D G E 1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12" SLOPE 1/8" to 12" SLOPE 1/8" to 12" SLOPER I D G E 1/8" to 12"SLOPE 1/8" to 12"SLOPE A506 18 10'-0" 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 10'-0" R.D. 41'-0" 48 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 27 ' - 6 1 / 2 " R.F. 41'-1 1/4"R.F. 41'-1 1/4" R.F. 41'-2 3/4"R.F. 41'-1 1/4"R.F. 41'-1 1/4" R.F. 41'-3" 27 ' - 1 0 7 / 8 " R.D. 41'-0"R.D. 41'-0"R.D. 41'-0" R.F. 41'-6 3/4" R.D. 41'-0"R.D. 41'-0"R.D. 41'-0"R.D. 41'-0" R.F. 41'- 3/4" R.F. 41'- 3/4" R.F. 41'- 3/4" R.F. 41'- 3/4" R.F. 41'-3" R.F. 41'-6 3/4" R.F. 41'- 2 3/4" R.F. 41'- 4 1/4" R.F. 41'- 2 3/4" R.F. 41'- 2 3/4" R.F. 41'- 2 1/2"R.F. 41'- 3 1/4" R.F. 41'- 3 3/4" R.F. 41'- 8 1/4" R.F. 41'- 9 1/8" R.F. 41'- 8 1/4" DOWN SPOUT SUSPENDED DRAIN PIPE BELOW SEE PLUMBING DWGS. DOWN SPOUT DOWN SPOUT DOWN SPOUT SUSPENDED DRAIN PIPE BELOW SEE PLUMBING DWGS. SUSPENDED DRAIN PIPE BELOW SEE PLUMBING DWGS. SUSPENDED DRAIN PIPE BELOW SEE PLUMBING DWGS. FUTURE AREA "B" FOR SOLAR ENERGY PANELS: MINIMUM 47.00 KW "DEFERRED APPROVAL" GENERAL NOTES 1. 2. SEE DECK EDGE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE-RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF-CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTION 716 .36" x 36" ROOF HATCH ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW ROOF PLAN LEGEND F14 - ROOF MOUNTED ACCENT LIGHTING, SEE A-104 AND ELECL. SHEETS. F14 R.F.= INDICATES ROOFTOP FINISH HEIGHT(SINGLE PLY MEMBRANE - TPO) KEYNOTES 1 AREA DESIGNATED FOR FUTURE SOLAR PV SYSTEMS, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SUPPORT PREPARATIONS AND PHOTO VOLTAIC DESIGN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 2 THERMALLY BROKEN ROOF HATCH DOOR. SEE DETAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. SEE 5/A506 3 RUBBER WALKWAY PAD TO PROTECT TPO SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF SYSTEM FROM TRAFFIC WHILE SERVICING PV PANEL UNITS AND PROTECT AGAINST SLIP/FALL. SEE 9/A506 4 BUILT-UP CRICKET TO DIVERT STANDING WATEXR IN NEEDED AREAS LIKE WALLS, CURBS, AND DRAINS. 5 EXHAUST FAN, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS EXHAUST AIR DUCT DN. THRU ROOF6 7 EXTERIOR ACCENT LIGHT FOR GLASS TOWER, ADJUST IN FIELD FOR LIGHTING UP TOWER, SEE ELEC. SHEETS. SCALE : 1/8"=1'0" 3. MAIN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON GROUND LEVEL, SEE SITE PLAN AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 11 # 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 8 PARAPET WITH EDGED METAL COPING CAP AND SUB PLATE. SEE DETAIL 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O. GLASSTOWER 52'-0" FUTURE AREA "B" FOR SOLAR ENERGY PANELS: MINIMUM 47.00 KW "DEFERRED APPROVAL" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O. GLASSTOWER 52'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" T.O.P. 45'-0" 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 ROOF OVERFLOW DRAIN. SEE 4/A506 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 98 of 117 110011 0--t--- 0--- 0--- 0- 0- 0 I I ~' ~ > ,u ■--+-- ~~-i /~ ~·;;%;~~ --+-+-¥o ! ··(> ; ~ - I I +---\~ j_ -- I I ~ ~~ i ~ 0 - - --+-- ~ §~•c~;~~~-~~---;iw ##/ ### /¾'m/~/1// ~Y# #~ffe/ ### m/4'. 1/ ,;;%,:'.~;;f 1/'m /##////[W jf;::ffe# ~ffi m# ,&;////2 I --+--- I 0 0 6 ~ ., I \ \_ I \ / I ~-> I / I ---+-- I 6 I 6 0 I I ----1. 1· I \ 0 0 0 0 •- ./ I I I I I I I I '-J.._~~ • • 4½½''!Y/7"'/7"M~S'½~·;1//•1/ 01//.1///•1/ ;C,///.1// /¥/.;1//// /2"/21// //;1/.1//j~~ - 0 0 0 00 0 • • • * * -0 0 -----0 -----0 <]<]<]<]<] <]<] PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 RE V I S I O N S : MAY 30/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 PROFESSIONAL STAMP: S T A TEOF CAL I F O RNIA RAYMO N D F O XNo. C24583 REN. 7-31-25 LICEN S E D ARCHIT E C T EUGEN E A500 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S 15 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 42 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 45 ' - 0 " 1RST FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 2ND FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 3RD FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) ROOF LINE PARAPET TOP OF GLASS TOWER 7'- 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 6 " 3'- 0 " 1'- 0 " ROOF RIDGE ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 35 ' - 0 " ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 123156121349 SCALE : AS NOTED 1 A B C E F G J A B C E G D 3 7 10 1514658 J 12 131149 1 2 3 156121349 2 E3 A-4017 1A-304 2A-402 46'-2 1 / 2 " 17'- 2 1 / 2 " 109'-11"106'-3" 35' - 9 " 20'- 0 " 15'- 1 0 " 27'-6 " 14'-1 1/2"69'-7"26'-9"20'-0"81'-6"5'-0" 15'- 1 0 " 3'-3 " 13' - 2 " 4'-9 1 / 2 " 2'-1 1/2" 5 1/2" 2'-5 " 7" 4" 33'-1 0 1 / 2 " 3'-0" 2'-7 " 3'-8" 1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " 3'-8"1'-8 " PROJECTION OF WALLS BELOW.ROOF HATCH DOOR OPENING. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. OVERFLOW AND ROOF DRAIN PAN OPENING. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. (TYP.) 3'-4 1/2"3'-7 1/2"10'-1 1/2" 2'-6 1/2" 12'-3 1/2" 2'-6 1/2" 5'-0 1/2" 10 1/2" 5'-0 1/2" 10 1/2" 17'-9 1/2" 10 1/2" 11'-9 1/2"3'-7 1/2" 10 1/2" 3" PROJECTION OF EDGE OF SLAB DECK BELOW.(TYP.) 3" PROJECTION OF EDGE OF SLAB DECK BELOW.(TYP.)3" PROJECTION OF EDGE OF SLAB, DECK BELOW.(TYP.) 2'-6 1/2"2'-6 1/2" 7'-7" 11'-11 1/2" KEY PLAN A C B D 15 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 42 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 45 ' - 0 " 1RST FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 2ND FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 3RD FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) ROOF LINE PARAPET TOP OF GLASS TOWER 7' - 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 6 " 1'- 0 " 3'- 0 "ROOF RIDGE ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 35 ' - 0 " ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) ABCEGDJ 15 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 42 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 45 ' - 0 " 1RST FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 2ND FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 3RD FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) ROOF LINE PARAPET TOP OF GLASS TOWER 7'- 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 6 " 1' - 0 " 3'- 0 "ROOF RIDGE ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 35 ' - 0 " ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) A B C E F G J PROPOSEDEXTERIOR ELEVATIONA SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" PROPOSEDEXTERIOR ELEVATIONB SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" PROPOSEDEXTERIOR ELEVATIONC SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" PROPOSEDEXTERIOR ELEVATIOND SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" 15 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 42 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 45 ' - 0 " 1RST FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 2ND FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) 3RD FLOOR (FINISH FLOOR) ROOF LINE PARAPET TOP OF GLASS TOWER 7'- 0 " 52 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 6 " 3' - 0 " 1'- 0 " ROOF RIDGE ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 35 ' - 0 " ( M A X I M U M B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ) 1 2 3 7 10 151465812131149 PROPOSED EMERGENCY GENERATORENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" PROPOSED TRASH/RECYCLE CONTAINERSENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" 7'- 6 " 7'- 6 " 1 2 3 4 8 5 6 6'- 7 " 6'- 7 " 5 6 7 8 E F WATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USEAVG. DAILY FLOWAVE. DAILY SUBTOTALS OFFICE1,500 gpd/Acre TOTAL = PEAK FLOW 26,535 gpd 26,535 gpd 6.1 WASTEWATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USEAREA (SF) OFFICE200 PER 1,800 SF6,956 gpd TOTAL =6,956 gpd 62,600 AVG. DAILY FLOW (gpd)SUBTOTALS 9,150 gpd Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Square Footage Parameters Area of Property Within Office DesignationAirport Land Use Plan FAR - Office Maximum Square Footage Permitted - Office Office Space Provided - June 7, 2023Sq.Ft.Acres Safety Zone 242,7460.98 0.35000000 14,961 14,721 Safety Zone 439,6760.91 0.64000000 25,393 3,058 Safety Zone 6114,9052.64No FAR Limit Local Zoning44,821 Totals197,3274.5362,600 2 1 4 3 36 " 12 " ROOF LINE PARAPET ROOF RIDGE SMOOTH FIBER GLASS REINFORCERED STUCCO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONMATERIALS LEGEND TINTED GLASS SPANDREL GLASS CERAMIC TILE ALPOLIC ALUMINUM CLADDING SYSTEM SMOOTH FIBER GLASS REINFORCERED STUCCO ROOF RIDGE PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE(FINAL SIZE T.B.D.) METAL DECORATIVE PANEL SMOOTH FIBER GLASS REINFORCERED STUCCO SMOOTH FIBER GLASS REINFORCERED STUCCO PAINTED METAL DOORS PAINTED METAL DOORS WATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USEAVG. DAILY FLOWAVE. DAILY SUBTOTALS OFFICE1,500 gpd/Acre TOTAL = PEAK FLOW 26,535 gpd 26,535 gpd 6.1 WASTEWATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USEAREA (SF) OFFICE200 PER 1,800 SF6,956 gpd TOTAL =6,956 gpd 62,600 AVG. DAILY FLOW (gpd)SUBTOTALS 9,150 gpd Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Square Footage Parameters Area of Property Within Office DesignationAirport Land Use Plan FAR - Office Maximum Square Footage Permitted - Office Office Space Provided - June 7, 2023Sq.Ft.Acres Safety Zone 242,7460.98 0.350 0 0 0 0 0 14,961 1 4 , 7 2 1 Safety Zone 439,6760.91 0.640 0 0 0 0 0 25,393 3 , 0 5 8 Safety Zone 6114,9052.64No FAR Limit Local Zoning 44,821 Totals197,3274.53 62,600 7 SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 99 of 117 I i i i I I I I I I I ---------------------------------------------------------r--------------------- .... I ' I n ,I);) ' I I ,; ,,1; ·: 0 /.\ I /,j i' 1,1 l :' L 0 00 0 ' ..... I ... ' -----... --------------------- -... --------------- I I l'. (: I I I ' ' ' I I(', ' i I -... -------- - I I I ' ii I I :'Iii Ii I ''cl,' _1 i \ .{,' ..... .,. I I I I -~ Fl J\ ,' b I I : 1;,, ;, I 11,,, 1 \ , I I -;•; L. ,, -~ n I 0 ... I I I ' ' ' ' ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------1-------------------1--------------------f-------I------1-f--------I---+---------------------1-----1 ------ ... I I I I n r: .. -r-,1 I C) i n L n ') I l 1/ l i I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------r ---------------------r - _L_J ___ LLJ _UU ___ L _L_J_J,L____L~----l I I I I " I I ' ' I )'\ ' ' 0 ' ..... -... - ..... ------------------..... ------ I I I I I II I ... I -- I I I ,_ - ,_ ' ..... I I I r lr, " I I ----I "I 1 \ I, i 11 k\ ,, - - ' ' ,, I 0 I I ' ' ----------------------------------------- ---I-------f-----------------+-- I I □ n 7 --( LJ • 11 ,,---------, I I L---------,.J ' ,-----7 I I ' ' ' ' - I I --· I I -.--.-· I --+ -,..SC --------------------- I , __ - I ~ - I I ,_ ' I -- - □► ~- 0 - ~ ,. !' .) ;, '., it\\ ,, \> ~ - I I I - I I I I I I I ~ =, ,~, .I ' /1 0 I I I I 0 0 ' 0 ' 0 -;;'-~ - ,. _/' ,-----------, ,-----------, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I M.--r',•--.•.•.••.•--. I I I I ~ p-· -•-•. .. -·-•-•. ·-•-•. ·•-•.•-•. ·-•-•. .,.,_._ . . •.•. •-•-•.v .•-• .•. ·-•-•.•.•.• . --_re -·, -...__ ' -il!i-I -•-: • i I -1-~= T I - -- i lj - ! - -,I, ,I, 1: 0 0 0 ...... n n ~Ei -~ . b I 11 '' 0 f I '' _J;,1 'i \' 0 U, \\.., ,I, _J . i I . -. I J~ ,----- , I L • • • * * - - - - - 0 0 ◄I 0 - 0 0 <]<]<]<]<] <]<] PA L O M A R A I R P O R T R O A D A N D A V I A R A P A R K W A Y CA R L S B A D , C A 9 2 0 1 0 WW W . R A Y M O N D F O X . C O M 92 1 0 8 CA DI E G O SA N 34 0 ST E HO T E L C I R C L E N O R T H 16 6 0 (6 1 9 ) 2 9 6 - 4 5 9 5 ME D I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R E & C O N S U L T I N G RA Y M O N D F O X & A S S O C I A T E S SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T N O . : PR O J E C T N A M E : DATE ISSUED : SHEET NUMBER: DRAWN BY : 1 2 3 4 5 S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA RAY M OND FO X No. C 24583REN. 07-31-23 LICE N S E D ARCHI T E C T RE V I S I O N S : PROFESSIONAL STAMPS : MARCH 20/2024 6 7 CA R L S B A D M O B 22 . 0 2 7 A600 EX T E R I O R R E N D E R I N G S SCALE : N/A PROPOSEDEXTERIOR RENDERING ROOF PLAN 1 1 2 A B C E F G H I J A B C F G I D 3 4 5 8 10 157 3 4 5 8 10 1514769 J 12 13 12 1311 KEY PLAN 1 4 5 3 1 EXTERIOR VIEW 2 2 EXTERIOR VIEW 3 EXTERIOR VIEW 4 EXTERIOR VIEW 6 5 EXTERIOR VIEW 6 EXTERIOR VIEW 7 CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT RD AND AVIARA PARKWAY/COLLEGE 7 EXTERIOR VIEW CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT RD AND AVIARA PARKWAY/COLLEGE SP D 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 2 2 / C D P 2 0 2 3 - 0 0 3 4 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 100 of 117 .... ,., ... , ........ . _. --- 7 r IF L llllllJt I □ ·' Y'' ,•' . ,;<~ ., '""""'~ • LJ • • ,. ~ .,.,_ ..-£ -"";: .. -- • ' .. , ' Ill Ill ' •. -t-1--------------------------------------------------------... L ..... • • • • • • <l<l<l<l<l <l<l I I I I I I • • LJ► l -• • □ -1-1-1 -t-' ' ---- • • • I LJW1 I • • I I I I I • l • • • • • • • • ! • • •• ' WATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USE AVG. DAILY FLOW AVE. DAILY SUBTOTALS OFFICE 1,500 gpd/Acre TOTAL = PEAK FLOW 26,535 gpd 26,535 gpd 6.1 WASTEWATER FLOW - GALLONS PER DAY USE AREA (SF) OFFICE 200 PER 1,800 SF 6,956 gpd TOTAL =6,956 gpd 62,600 AVG. DAILY FLOW (gpd)SUBTOTALS 9,150 gpd Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Square Footage Parameters Area of Property Within Office Designation Airport Land Use Plan FAR - Office Maximum Square Footage Permitted - Office Office Space Provided - June 7, 2023Sq.Ft.Acres Safety Zone 2 42,746 0.98 0.35000000 14,961 14,721 Safety Zone 4 39,676 0.91 0.64000000 25,393 3,058 Safety Zone 6 114,905 2.64 No FAR Limit Local Zoning 44,821 Totals 197,327 4.53 62,600 Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 101 of 117 Cl. " Cl. 0 N l!:J / z '.'i Cl. " z i5 ., "' c., >- "' ., z ,a ~ w "' :?' ti) z ., ~ Cl. >- "' ., z 0 c= w "' u "' w ;3-- " z ,. ., "' ;3-- c., z ii' i:J z B z w / " 0 .0 w ,: 0 u 0 C 0 ·s ., C C 0 u u "' • E 0 , Cl. ~ ., 0 f- '3 Cl. "' N 0 N "-N "- R/W OWNER: NAME: KELLY/JRM-PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD I, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ADDRESS: JJO ENCINITAS BL VD. SUIT£ 201 PHONE NO.: 760-632-9400 Total Area (AC) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF PARCEL "c" AND ALL OF PARCEL ·o· OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 FILED IN THE omcE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 23, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74-230326, O.R., AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICA T£ OF COMPLIANCE FILED IN THE omcE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 15, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-085876 O.R., ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STAT[ OF CALIFORNIA. -- SITE PLAN FOR PALOMAR AND AV/ARA OFFICE PROJECT VICINITY CITY OF OCEANSIDE 78 MAP 10. EASEMENT INFO: PER PRELIMINARY Till.£ REPORT BY CHICAGO 7171.£ COMPANY ORDER NO. 00101649-993-SD2-TVA DA TED: MARCH 8, 2024 CDP 2023-0034 MINOR SOP 2023-0022 10 • ------------ PACIFIC OCEAN PROJECT~~~ SITE INDEX OF SHEETS ii '.£)" ~ CJ ii/ NOT TO SCALE G' CITY OF VISTA Y OF SAN RCOS AVE & & & & 10. if1 111. & Lib. & ~ EASEMENT FOR: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS, EGRESS, RECORDED AUGUST 14, 1957 IN BOOK 6706, PAGE 514 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. THE PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT TO EXTEND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND EXCAVA T10N AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 1534, Wl!ERE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID HIGHWAY, AS CONTAINED IN THE DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 31696 OF DmCIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO THE PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT TO EXTEND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND EXCAVA T10N AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF ROAD NO. 1534, Wl!ERE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCT10N AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID HIGHWAY, AS CONTAINED IN THE DEED RECORDED AUGUST 16, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 165716 OF DmCIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DISCLOSED BY RECORD SURVEY MAP NO. 5715. AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES; RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 1961 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 18947 OF DmCIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND DESIGNATED AS "60 FOOT EASEMENT RESERVED FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES" AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 5715 THE INTERESTS OF TICOR 7171.E INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO 7171.E INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY AND ASCENIBILTMORE CARLSBAD, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED BY QUITCLAIM DEEDS RECORDED MARCH 6, 2006 AS FILE NO. 2006-0154736 AND MARCH 14, 2006 AS FILE NO. 2006-0176047, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARTIES STILL RETAINING INTERESTS IN SAID EASEMENT ARE THE OWNERS OF LANDS COMMONLY KNOW/'/ AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 212-040-56 AND 212-040-59. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS THERETO AND EGRESS THEREFROM AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC.: DECEMBER 28, 1961 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 223207 OF DmCIAL RECORDS. -TO BE VACA TED. AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES RECORDED: JULY 25, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74-200025 OF DmCIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF CITY OF CARLSBAD. A "/J'FUTURE STREET OPENINGS" AND "42'FUTURE STREET OPENING (KELLY DR.)" AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 2993. -TO BE VACA TED. THE RELINQUISHMENT OF RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE STREET, HIGHWAY, OR FREEWAY ABUmNG SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING BEEN RELINQUISHED BY THE MAP OF SAID TRACT. {NOT PLOTTABLE) AN EASEMENT FOR JO' PR/VAT[ ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT OED/CATION ON MAP NO.: PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED: AUGUST 23, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74-230327 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD (NOT PLOTTED) AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE, RECORDED: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-426570 OF DmCIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY REC.: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-426571 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC.: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-426574 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD COVENANTS, COND/710NS AND RESTRICTIONS ('BUT OMlmNG, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS CONTROLLED OR PERMITTED BY ANY APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STAT£ LAW. ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, MEDICAL COND/710N, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SOURCE OF INCOME, OR ANCESTRY" AS SET FORTH IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED: JULY 10, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-362401 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (0££0 RESTR!CnON PROHIB/71NG AL TERA TION OF LANDFORMS, REMOVAL OF VEGETATION OR THE ERECTION OF STRUCTURES WITHOUT WIIITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CALIF. COASTAL COMMISSION). AN EASEMENT FOR A, B, C, D AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECRff. CASE NO.: 73929 REC.: DECEMBER 9, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1998-0798577 OF OFFICIAL RECORD A. STREET B. DRAINAGE C. SLOPE D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT10N A DOCUMENT EN717l.ED "EASEMENT AGREEMEN1, DAT£D, JULY 28, 2006, EXECUTED BY ASCENT-BILTMORE CARLSBAD, LLC AND KELL Y/JRM-PALOMAR ROAD I, LLC, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROv1SIONS AND CONDIT10NS THEREIN CONTAINED, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006-0632584 OF DmCIAL RECORD. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE PURPOSES, REC.: MARCH 7, 2007 AS INSTR. NO. 2007-0158004 OF DmCIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES REC.: MARCH 7, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0158005 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UT1LIT1ES, INGRESS, EGRESS RECORDED: AUGUST 9, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0532131 OF DmCIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC. TO BE VACATED. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE, REC.: AUGUST 10, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0536758 OF DmCIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD EASEMENT(S) FOR: CONSERVAT10N EASEMENT, REC.: MAY 7, 2010 RECORDING NO: 2010-0232108 OF DmCAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD BASIS OF BEARING CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES (E. V. PARKING SPACES ARE ALSO COUNTED AS CLEAN AIR PARKING SPACES): 12% OF THE TOTAL OF 313 SPACES REQUIRED CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED = 39 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 39 OUTDOOR EAUNG AREA: TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 62,600.0 SF JOO SF PER EACH 5000 SF = 3,756 SF REQUIRED. OUTOOOR EA TING AREA A: 1,372.58 SF OUTOOOR EA TING AREA B: 1,330.76 SF TOTAL OU/DOOR EA TING AREA: 2,703.34 SF 3,756.0 SF -2,703.34 SF = 1,052.66 SF (TO BE PROVIDED VIA STAFF LOUNGE AREAS IN THE T.I. SPACES) SDG&E NOTf: LANDSCAPE TREE REQUIREMENTS: 313 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ONE TRff PER EACH 4 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 78. 25 = 79 TR££S REQUIRED. NOISE CONTOUR NOTf: THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 65-70 AND 60-65 AND 65-70 AIRPORT NOISE CONTOUR LINES CAUTION: EXISTING ENERGIZED 2JOKV OVERHEAD CONDUCTORS, ELEVATION VARIES, MUST MAINTAIN 20' RADIAL CLEARANCE, IF UNABLE TO MAINTAIN 20' RADIAL CLEARANCE, STANDBY LINEMAN IS REQUIRED FOR SAFETY WATCH. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POLES, GUY WIRES & ANCHORS, STANDBY LINEMAN & MECHANICAL BRACING MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS WITHIN 10' OF EXIST1NG POLES & ANCHORS, MEANS/METHODS FOR PROPOSED GRADING FOR CARLSBAD CITY NffD TO BE REVIE'IED/APPROVED & COORDINATED FOR POLE BRACING, CONTACT DIVERSIFIED UT1LITY SERVICES INC. (858-278-2880) JO DAYS IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE STANDBY & MECHANICAL BRACING. BEARINGS SHOW/'/ HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS MEASUREMENTS TAKEN ON 7 /25/22 AT CLSB-064 AND CLSB-053 PER CITY OF CARLSBAD ROS 17271 . I.E. N 8110'17" W BENCHMARK DESCRIPTION: MONUMENT CLSB-053 LOCATION: SET 2.5" DISK IN NW CORNER OF VAULT ON THE ~ST SIDE OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD, 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. RECORDED FROM: ELEVA T10N: DATUM: ROS 17271 82.744 NG\ID 29 L HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING Tel. 760.929.2288 Fax. 760.929.2287 2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST SUITE 217 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 l----+---+--------------+----+---+----+-----1 w CITXAN~Yc D~P±\~M~~BAD 1----+-----11------------------+---+---t----1-----1 PRELIMINARY GRADING FOR: PALOMAR OFFICE 1----+-----+-----------------+-----11----+----+------1 DRAWING NAME: AND AVIARA PROJECT SCALE: 1" = 40' 07.31.24 ML SITE PLAN 1--1 ---f~ 40 20 0 1--1 40 80 DATE INITIAL 120 ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL A B A B PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NOTES: EE D D DISCHARGE TO BMP 3 - TYPICAL DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1"=4' BMP DISCHARGE TO BMP'S 1 & 2 - TYPICAL DETAL 2 SCALE: 1"=4' C C BMP FF Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 102 of 117 CL '-' CL 0 N l!:J / z '.'i CL '-' z i5 ., "' '-' >- "' ., z ,a ~ w "' :?' ti) z ., ~ CL >- "' ., z 0 c= w "' u "' w ;3-- '-' z ,. ., "' ;3-- '-' z ii' i:J z B z w / " 0 .0 w -;: 0 u 0 C 0 ·s ., C C 0 u u "' • E 0 , CL "' N 0 N '---N '--- -R/w--- ' ' ' W- Y ' I ' ' C) ,o j\ . •. I I I I I I \ ' ' ' ' I I \ \ ed Area --"'""'") PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN FOR PALOMAR AND AV/ARA OFFICE PROJECT (J) PROPOSED 12" HOPE STORM DRAIN @ PROPOSED 24" HOPE STORM DRAIN (D PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT CDP 2023-0034 MINOR SOP 2023-0022 I I I 10 I I f-------f~ 20 0 • SCALE: 1" = 40' EVERSE OUTLET 1--1 40 80 LEGEND N42'18'59"W 40.00' EX CURB (FACE) CENTERLINE BOUNDARY DA TA RECORD LOT LINE PROJECT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY ----P/L--- EDGE OF ASPHALT WALL RETAINING WALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EDGE OF CONG. EDGE OF DIRT SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER VAULT DROP INLET VALVE CATCH BASIN FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE STANDPIPE SIGN POWER POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT STOP LIGHT TREES SINGLE TREE INDEX CONTOUR INTER CONTOUR DAYLIGHT NOTES: ---R/W- r J D □ 0 □ ,. o MH 0 --8- ~ ~ ~ c=:::::) 0 ----------//--- PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON JS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION AND FIELD DATA THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITH ADDITIONAL SURVEY DATA, AS REQUESlfD BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THEIR CONSULTANTS PER THEIR REVIEW AND COMMENTS. DASHED UNES MAY NOT MEET MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. FEATURES IN SHADOWS, VEGETATION AND SNOW MAY BE OBSCURED, FEATURES NEAR TALL OBJECTS MAY BE OBSCURED DUE TO PHOTOGRAPHIC ANGLE "LEAN". MAPPING OU/SIDE LIMITS OF SURVEY CONTROL PERIMffiR MAY NOT MEET MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. HORIZONTAL ACCURACY FOR 1 •= 40' AND VERTICAL ACCURACY FOR 1 FOOT CONTOUR INlfRVAL. MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED PHOTOGRAMMETRICALLY AND SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED ACCORDINGLY BY USER. SURVEY GROUND CONTROL PROVIDED BY: HWL PLANNING &: ENGINEERING THIS MAP AND ASSOCIATED DIGITAL DATA COMPILED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY DATED: 7 /26/22 SQG&E NOTES: 1. 2. OWNER TO OBTAIN LETlfR OF PERMISSION TO GRADE REQUIRED FOR ANY IMPROVEMENTS 'MTHIN SDG&:E EASEMENT CAUllON: EXISllNG ENERGIZED 2JOKV OVERHEAD CONDUCTORS, ELEVATION VARIES, MUST MAINTAIN 20' RADIAL CLEARANCE, IF UNABLE TO MAINTAIN 20' RADIAL CLEARANCE, STANDBY LINEMAN IS REQUIRED FOR SAFETY WATCH. PROlfCT IN PLACE EXISllNG POLES, GUY WIRES & ANCHORS, STANDBY LINEMAN & MECHANICAL BRACING MAY BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS 'MTHIN 10' OF EXISTING POLES & ANCHORS, MEANS/METHODS FOR PROPOSED GRADING FOR CARLSBAD CITY NEED TO BE REVIEWED/APPROVED & COORDINA lfD FOR POLE BRACING, CONTACT DIVERSIFIED UTILITY SERVICES INC. (858-278-2880) JO DAYS IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE STANDBY & MECHANICAL BRACING. GRADING ANAL YS/S CUT: 5802 CY FILL: 5,802 CY IMPORT: 0 CY REMEDIAL: 13,060 CY NOTE: EXCAVATED SOIL SHRINKAGE IS 8%-10%, NOT ACCOUNTED FOR ABOVE. (J) PROPOSED 36"X36" OUTLET STRUCTURE @ PROPOSED 6" PVC SEWER LATERAL@ 2% @ PROPOSED SEWER CLEAOUT 0 PROPOSED PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE LINE (SIZE TBD) @ PROPOSED DDCVA (SIZE TBD) @ PROPOSED PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANT @ PROPOSED PRIVATE DOMESTIC SERVICE LATERAL (SIZE TBD) @ PROPOSED WATER METER W/BACKFLOW PREVENTOR (SIZE TBD) @ PROPOSED COVERED TRASH ENCLOSURE @ PROPOSED STAND BY ELEC. GENERATOR @ PROPOSED 6" CURB @ PROPOSED 6" CURB AND GUTTER @ PROPOSED 3' WIDE RIBBON GUTTER @ PROPOSED RETAINING WALL @ PROPOSED 3' WIDE CURB OPENING, SEE TYPICAL DETAIL 2 BELOW. @ PROPOSED RIP RAP @ EXISTING STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT TO BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE @ EXISTING DG TRAIL TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, SHALL REMAIN ITS CURRENT WIDTH AND IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION, NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL IMPACT THE TRAIL, AND A CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE NORTH EDGE OF THE TRAIL @ PROPOSED 6' SIDEWALK @ PROPOSED 18"X18" BROOKS BOX WITH 12"HDPE OUTLET PIPE THROUGH RETAINING WALL, SEE TYPICAL DETAIL 1 BELOW @ PROPOSED 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ PROPOSED TRAFFIC RATED TRENCH DRAIN @ PROPOSED 1" RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE WITH 1" IRRIGATION METER. @ REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY @ PROPOSED 3' WIDE CONCRETE SPILLWAY @ PROPOSED LOCATION OF BICYCLE ENCLOSURE, PARKING AND REPAIR STATION. @ PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN TO SIDEWALK UINDERDRAIN OUTLET @ INST ALL TRASH CAPTURE DEV I CE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2. @ UPSIZE SEWER FROM MANHOLE 36A-64 TO 36A-4 TO A 10" PVC SEWER MAIN. @ TRENCH RESURFACING PER STD DWG GS-25 @ PROPOSED 6" ROLLED CURB PROP. SPLIT FACE CMU RET. WALL WITH SAFETY FENCE RIP RAP FG PER PLAN RIP RAP FG PER PLAN 1811X1811 BROOKS BOX TG PER PLAN . . .0% - II~~ 12" PVC @ 1.0% SEE PIPE THRU WALL 12" MIN. BELOW PEA GRAVEL L HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING Tel. 760.929.2288 Fax. 760.929.2287 2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST SUITE 217 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ISHESETS I 1----+------11-------------------+----+---1----1------< L___l__J PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1----+------11-------------------+----+---1----t------< 1----+-----11------------------+---+---t----1------1 PRELIMINARY GRADING FOR: PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1----+-----+-----------------+-----11------+----+------1 DRAWING NAME: 07.31.24 ML PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL 120 ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL TYPICAL STREET SECTION-LAUREL TREE LANETYPICAL STREET SECTION-AVIARA PARKWAY TYPICAL STREET SECTION-PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD SECTION "A-A" SECTION "B-B" SECTION "E-E"SECTION "D-D"SECTION "C-C" TYPICAL BIO-FILTRATION BASIN DETAIL PVC CAP / ORIFICE DETAIL PRECAST DRAIN INLET - BIO-FILTRATION OUTLET STRUCTURE LINER ATTACHEMENT DETAIL TYPICAL BIO-FILTRATION BASIN DETAIL SUMMARY OF DEVELOPED TRIPLE PURPOSE BMPs SECTION "F-F" StormTek™ ST3/ST3G Installation: Connector Pipe Screen Filter Deflector Plate only with ST3G Model Catch Basin Sump Stainless Steel Frame (2" flat bars, 3/16" thick) mounted to wallStormTek™ ST3/ST3G Device fastens on pinsOutflow Pipe Structural Support Bars (Bypass) Stainless Steel 1" flat bars 1/8" thickness Heavy-Gage Sheet Metal Screen S-304 Stainless Steel 5mm openingsa) StormTek™ ST3/ST3G b) StormTek™ is installed in front of the outflow pipe is supported by the frame mounted on the existing catch basin wall c) This device is designed to capture trash, sediment and debris from entering the storm water system. TRASH CAPTURE BMP DETAIL Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 103 of 117 "' • .,, .; I Q_ '-' Q_ 5 N "' _:::!- z :'.'i Q_ '-' z o "' 0: '-' >-0: "' z " :J w 0: _;!,, "' :,; ~ Q_ >-0: "' z 0 F w 0: u "' w ;3- c., z !< "' 0: ;3- c., z i'< w w z ci §, .,, C -" • -.: C u 0: "' Q_ sl C C C u u :, • -~ C , Q_ f! "' D f-g Q_ .. N D ~ "' ' "' 106- 104- 102- 100- 98 - 96 94 92 90 88 86 104- 102- 100- 98 96 94 92 90 88 PARKWAY AVIARA PARKWAY R/W 95.26TW c~~'\o _ - EX. SW~ BMP 2: 1 87.85BW P/L I PARKING 180.4' FINISH GRADE 24' DRIVE AISLE - PARKING - ___.. -~ EXISTING GROUND RETAINING WALL 133. 7' OPEN SPACE 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EX. 8.5' DG TRAIL PROTECT IN PLACE 25' DRIVE AISLE ----- PARKING I BUILDING / pf 94.4' ----------------;, - 24' DRIVE AISLE I 2: 1 I PARKING -106 --104 -102 PARKING -,------+L ~-'-_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ --=-= -~ -= -_ -_ -_ -=-== ~-=-~=:.c:=_-:_-:::_-:::_-:::_-~".'.:_-:=_-:=_-:=_~1----~ PARKING --100 326' 24' DRIVE AISLE -PARKING ----- 24' DRIVE AISLE PARKING ---- SCALE: 1"=30' HORIZ. 1"=6' VERT. 24' DRIVE AISLE PARKING - -I -:::::-::=--:=.J--= -- BUILDING ---- / -- 24' DRIVE AISLE 97.3' PARKING -98 -96 -94 -92 PVC END CAP R/W I I I I -90 PALOMAR AIRPORT 110'.' ROAD n -104 _J n 3 5• EXISTING"' '1 I • GROUND / _ --100 -102 BSM COMPOSITION VOLUME WEIGHT I I _I .,.,.- "'-/ :::r ---1----~~--\_;:----Fl-'-NI_S_H_G_R~ADE \....----------98 BMP 1 -96 FINISH GRADE \ / ENCINAS CREEK / \ --\J~ EXISTING 8.5' DG TRAIL (PROTECT IN PLACE) 5' BUFFER (LANDSCAPE) PARKING LOT 1' MIN. PROPOSE 6" CURB & GUTTER EXISTING. GROUND SCALE: 1"=30' HORIZ. 1"=6' VERT. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD / EXIST. CURB & t-----, GUTTER -'--"°'=:;::::=r I -- - p 1 o· 104.00TW 99.95BW EXISTING \ GROUND PROP. 6' S/W EXIST. CURB & GUTTER A VI ARA PARKWAY ~ -_, I -94 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERFORATED oumow PIPE / SAFETY FENCING PLANTING PER CITY APPROVED f PRECAST DRAIN INLET PER DETAIL THIS SHEET TG PER PLAN -OVER now --1WEIR __ _ FG w'mrlmrrr!lt" --~~~,I CJ ; CDP 2023-0034 MINOR SOP 2023-0022 , 6" OF 3/8" WASHED PEA GRAVEL DRILL LOWER ORIFICE DIAMETER AT FLOW LINE OF PERFORATED PIPE PER BMP TABLE 3/4"-2" WASHED GR. VEL, 5 INCH/ 1 HOUR INRL TRA TION RA lE 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN INSTALL IMPERMEABLE HOPE LINER (SIOE.S' ANO BOTTOM} W/ JOINTS WELDED TO PROV/OE WA !ER-TIGHT SEAL (30 MIL MIN} NTS DRAINS TO UNDERGROUND PIPE COLLECTOR SYSTEM 6" PVC CAP WITH LOWER OR/ACE @ PERFORATED PIPE FLOW LINE STRUCTURAL SOIL WIDTH VARIE.S' PER PLAN SANDY LOAM Q'i'A I/EL LA YER AREA EQUALS INRL TRA 1/0N AREA SAND SAND I SILT I CLAY COMPOST 65% 20% 15% NTS 75-80% I 10% MAX 3% MAX 9% MAX PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTIER DIMENSIONS A B (1) BMP ffi/BUTARY BMP AREA GRAVEL LOWER ORIF. WQ PONDING WEIR PERIMETER AREA (AC) (SQ FT) DEPTH DIA. (IN) DEPTH (IN) LENGTH (FT) BMP 1 1.060 2300 18 1.0 12 12 BMP 2 0.901 2100 18 0.8 12 12 BMP 3 0.773 6075 18 1.25 12 12 NOTE: (1) OVERFLOW LENGTH, THE INTERNAL PERIMETER OF THE RISER INTERNAL DIMENSIONS. (2) DEPTH OF PONDING BEN EA TH RISER STIRUCTURE'S SURFACE SPILLWAY. (3) TOTAL SURFACE DEPTH OF BMP FROM TOP CREST ELEVATION TO SURFACE INVERT. SAFETY FENCING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANTING PER CITY APPROVED --~R--- BMP 1 & 2 c(2) D (3) DEPTH RISER TOTAL SURFACE INVERT (IN) DEPTH (IN) 18 JO 16 28 20 26 f PRECAST DRAIN INLET PER DETAIL THIS SHEET TG PER PLAN -OVER now CL£ANOUT *WEIR WIDTH HEIGHT (FT) (FT) 2.83 0.25 2.83 0.09 2.83 0.52 n 12• MIN. FREEBOARD EXISTING \ GROUND ---------- ---------- /----------- EXISTING \~93-00TW GROUND ----------------2?r-------FG EL r,i,ma6Dmc,,---IP RAP ENCINAS CREEK FINISH GRADE f--...L.._-~ EXISTING. I I I PROP. 6' S/W ---✓ / / / PROPOSE 6" CURB r-----L I EXIST. 1 CURB & ,?. ·7 TO M. -/ R/W TEMP. CONSTRUCTION FENCE 6" NORTH OF EXISTING TRAIL EDGE NOT TO SCALE I 1 Q' 53' 126' BMP 1 -,.'- GROUND NOT TO SCALE R/W 53' 1 Q' I PROJECT SITE ()..__EX. 12" RECLAIM WATER MAIN °'-EX. 16" ACP WATER MAIN NOT TO SCALE R/W VARIES 110' -122' I 1 Q' 59' -62' I .0. I ~-., ... i-, --, .. '!i1r,, ... ~,. i',./ f EX. S/~~WALK J (\ EX. 42" RCP SD..,..,.V EX. 'Ex 8" SEWER MAIN NOT TO SCALE \ VEX. 12· SEWER MAIN EX. 16 • FAIL SAFE LINE 51' -60' R/W 1 Q' I PROJECT SfTE I :.,# ly ~~-... ~ ·,·.? ' \ ~-1- \EX. SIDEWALK \ ()....__EX. 18" WATER MAIN EX. 12" RECLAIM WATER MAIN ,.... ,.... ,....A ,.... I -- PROJECT SITE R/W 26' EX. FIRE HYDRANT (2%) ~ NOT TO SCALE 72' ,-x '/ I ,, ' ' ' NOT TO SCALE 26' EX. smEET LIGHT PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 10· R/W 0-......__ 0-......__EX. 8" WATER MAIN EX. 8" SEWER MAIN NOT TO SCALE GUTTER EXIST. 5' S/W 87.85BW INSTALL IMPERMEABLE HOPE LINER~- (_S/OES W/ JOINTS WELDED TO PROV/OE WA !ER-TIGHT SEAL (30 MIL MIN) 6" OF 3/8" WASHED PEA GRAm NOT TO SCALE 3/4"-2" WASHED GRAVEL,, 5 INCH/ 1 HOUR INRLTRATION RATE " Cl 91),.,,., ;(_•q :l!&. ~~~o'..,.__ _ _,, PARKWAY 27 LBS STEEL GRATE BIO FIL mA TION FACILITY INLET smucTURE PVC OUTLET PIPE, SIZE AND FLOW UN£ PER PLAN ·-:~J; ·_:'._,.?,• i\' -~ /;, PER PLAN /"· INSIDE HEIGHT OF BOX CATCH BASIN X y SIZE 12" X 12" 12" 19 1 /2" 18" X 18" 18" 28" 24" X 24" 24" 34• 36" X 36" 36" 44" *USE EXTENSIONS AS NEEDED NOTES: 1. OUTILET STRUCTURES PER OLDCASTLE PRECAST MODEL NUMBERS 1212CB, 1818CB, AND 2424CB OR EQUAL. 2. SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPLETE DIMENSIONS KNOCKOUTS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIF/CATIONS NOT TO SCALE z 15 1/2" 21 3/8" 27 1/2" 40 1 4" DRAINS TO UNDERGROUND PIPE COLLECTOR SYSTEM INRL TRA TION SEE STRUCTIJRAL SOIL TABLE, THIS SHEET HfOTH VARIE.S' PER PLAN •• Q'i'A m LA YER AREA EOUALS INRL TRA 1/0N AREA NTS BMP 3 ffi/M LINER TO TOP EDGE OF BATTEN, SILICONE SEAL TOP ~---" ~ BIO FIL mA TION EDGE OF BA TTEN / FA GILi TY INLET .o . <1 $ STRUCTURE 1/8" MIN. ALUMINUM FLAT BATTEN BAR, z 2" 'MDTH "' NUT WASHER WQELv __ 30 MIL HDPE LINER J/8"X3" WEDGE ·. ANCHOR, 18" O.C. =::::'.JR~U:JBBE; GAjKET NON-wokN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AGAINST WALL NOT TO SCALE L HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING Tel. 760.929.2288 Fax. 760.929.2287 2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST SUITE 217 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ISHESETS I 1----+----1t-------------------+----+---1----1-----< l__2_j PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1----+----lt-------------------+----+---1----t-----< 1----+----11------------------+---+---t----1-----1 PRELIMINARY GRADING FOR: PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1----+----+-----------------+----1t----+----+-----1 DRAWING NAME: 07.31.24 ML DETAILS DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 104 of 117 "' • " ,; I - Cl. '-' Cl. 0 N "' N / z 0: ..., Cl. '-' z i5 ., "' '-' >- "' ., z ,a ..., w "' Cl. / "' z 0: ..., Cl. >- "' 0: z 0 c= w "' u "' w 0 / '-' z ,. 0: "' 0 / '-' z ii' w w z B z w / " 0 .0 w -;: 0 u "" ., Cl. -,j 0 '\. C 0 ·s l ., C ) C 0 u / u ::, • E 0 , 0 N "' ;) :,! I / Cl. \ w ::, ., z w ..., C: "' N 0 ~ "" '--w f--., 0 f--0 ..., Cl. "' N 0 N '-N '--w f--., D 's' 0: "' \ " I I I : I : I \ \ : I I I MH I I o • \ \\ . . '• .. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN FOR PALOMAR AND AV/ARA OFFICE PROJECT 1□ --------------------------------------------------------- LEGEND EX CURB (FACE) CENTERLINE BOUNDARY DA TA RECORD LOT LINE PROJECT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY EDGE OF ASPHALT WALL CDP 2023-0034 MINOR SOP 2023-0022 N42'18'59"W 40.00' ---P/L------R/W---- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------- .. • ' ,, • • ' ¢, Q ------------------------------------------------------------------- • ··' : . • C O ••• • ••, . . . ' ·.: .. -- -~ >= • ;; :·-~ •. "·· ....... : '::' .• ..•.. .' ·. ;· -: • .. • ... Ji •, -;.· • • . . , ~ . ··. . •,•• .. ,. . -.... ~--· ;,. ... :: .,., •a.• : -------------------------------------- 2 ---------------------------------------MH ----------------------------------------------------~~----------- J • SCALE: 1" = 40' 1--1 ---f~ 1--1 RETAINING WALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EDGE OF CONG. l J PER CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS, VOLUME 1, GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS CHAPTER 4-, SEC110N 4.1.R: OFFICE, SMALL COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSIRIAL, PROJECTS SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION FOR A 42' /RUCK OR BUS PER CALIFORNIA DEPAR1MENT OF IRANSPORTA 110N HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL, FIGURE 404.5F. Bus Wheel Tracks -42-foot Radius 7ft. 25 ft. 8 ft. I I I ,, I 8.5 ff. _4 2.36JL + ...... O;) 0 0 D L HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING Tel. 760.929.2288 Fax. 760.929.2287 2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST SUITE 217 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ISHESETS I 1----+-------1t-------------------+-----+----1----1--------< l__±__J PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1----+-------lt-------------------+-----+----1----t--------< 1----+------11------------------+---+---t----1------1 PRELIMINARY GRADING FOR: PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1----+-----+-----------------+------1t----+-----+------1 DRAWING NAME: 07.31.24 ML DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL TRUCK RADIUS TURN EXHIBIT 40 20 0 40 80 120 ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 105 of 117 Q_ C, Q_ 0 ci "' N / z <( ~ Q_ l') z D <( O' l') >-0' <( z :, :::J w O' ? en z <( ~ Q_ >- °' <( z 0 F w °' u en w 9-" z " <( er 9-" z O' w w z [5 z w / TI 0 ~ C c D u er <( Q_ "3 0 C 0 > <( C C 0 u u :, ru E w :, <( z w ~ C: tj- N 0 N " ~ z::_ m 8 <( D f---0 ~ o_ io I I I I I •, [ "I , ~ I / I ! I I i 'I I • I • I I I ' ' ' ' I I ' I '. r • / I • I I ]• I I • ·1 I , I . I I • I ' I I I I I I I ' I I ' I I I I I ' I ' I I I I I ' I I ' I . I . I : \ I .· I ----~\· \ • \ . \ ' 1\ I I I . I "' I I~ I I S: I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I r j,\H : 1@ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,,1\ I .,.-------s~ I ,\ I I I \ I ' I I I I I I I es. .. • • ..,.. :, I ' I I I I ' ' ' I ' I I I ' ' ' I I I I I ' I I I I I ' I I I I I I I ,9 ' 5{ I I I I I I \ ' 1 ' ' -- ' I I I I CONSTRAINTS MAP FOR PALOMAR AND AV/ARA OFFICE PROJECT 10 V ------------------------------------------------- A.sph. ---------- ----------------------------------- 1 6 I' I I' I' I' I' / / / , V ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ I I I I oosc red 'Are ---i°i'c,i• ---------~ LEGEND EX CURB (FACE) CENTERLINE BOUNDARY DATA RECORD LOT LINE PROJECT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY N42"18'59"W 40.00' EDGE OF ASPHALT WALL RETAINING WALL GUARD RAIL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EDGE OF CONG. ---OHU--- EDGE OF DIRT SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER VAULT DROP INLET VALVE CATCH BASIN FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE STANDPIPE SIGN POWER POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE SJREET LIGHT SJREET LIGHT STOP LIGHT JREES SINGLE TREE INDEX CONTOUR INTER CONTOUR AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE 4 AIRPORT SAFTEY ZONE 6 AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE 2 OPEN SPACE EASEMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: D □ □ " o MH 0 -e- Q----$---D , " ~ 0 1·····1 . .. .. . . . . . . . • t T • T A PORllON OF PARCEL "c" AND ALL OF PARCEL "D' OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 FILED IN IH[ OFFICE OF IH[ COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. AUGUST 23, 1974 AS FIL[ NO. 74-230325, O.R., AND A PORllON OF PARCEL 2 OF CERllFICA T[ OF COMPLIANCE FILED IN IH[ OFFICE OF IH[ COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 15, 1990 AS FIL[ NO. 90-085875 O.R., ALL BEING IN IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STA TE OF CALIFORNIA. ASSESOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 212-040-54 BASIS OF BEARING LAND AREA 25422J±SQ.FT. 5.07±AC. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON AR[ BASED ON GPS M[ASUR[M[NTS TAKEN ON 7 /25/22 AT CLSB-054 AND CLSB-053 PER CITY OF CARLSBAD ROS 17271. IL N 8170'17" W UTILITY NOTE: UNDERGROUND UllLlll[S SHOWN H[R[ON AR[ INCOMPL[T[ AND IH[IR LOCA nONs SHOULD B[ VERIFIED BY CONTACllNG IH[ VARIOUS UllLITY COMPANIES. NOTES: PROPERTY LIN[ INFORMA noN SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMA nON AND Fl[LD DATA IH[ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO CHANG[ W11H ADDlnONAL SURVEY DATA. AS REQUESTED BY IH[ SCHOOL DIS1RICT AND IHf/R CONSULTANTS PER IHf/R REVIEW AND COMMENTS. DASHED LINES MAY NOT MffT MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. FEATURES IN SHADOWS, VEGETATION AND SNOW MAY BE OBSCURED, FEATURES NfAR TALL OBJECTS 1/AY 8[ OBSCURED DU[ TO PHOTOGRAPHIC ANGLE "LfAN". MAPPING OUTSIDE LIMITS OF SURVEY CONTROL PERIMETER MAY NOT MEIT MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS. HORIZONTAL ACCURACY FOR 1 "= 40' AND VERTICAL ACCURACY FOR 1 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL. MAP HAS BffN COMPILED PHOTOGRAMMITRICALLY AND SHOULD 8[ FIELD VERIFIED ACCORDINGLY BY USER. SURVEY GROUND CONTROL PROVIDED BY: HWL PLANNING cl: [NG/NffRING /HIS MAP AND ASSOCIATED DIGITAL DATA COMPILED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY DATED: 7 /25/22 ,.. I\ff ¥ti SJRIE ECTQ4 I Al NOT TO SCAlI CDP 2023-0034 MINOR SOP 2023-0022 EASEMENT INFO: PER PRELIMINARY nn_[ REPORT BY CHICAGO nn_[ COMPANY ORDER NO. 00101649-993-SD2-TVA DA TED: MA Y 5, 2022 £. [AS[MENT FOR: PUBLIC UllLlll[S, INGRESS, [GR[SS, RECORDED AUGUST 14, 1957 IN BOOK 5705, PAGE 514 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND [LEC7RIC COMPANY. & 10. & & & & & ~ A IH[ PRIVIL[G[ AND RIGHT TO [XT[ND ORA/NAG[ STRUCTURES AND [XCAVA noN AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND IH[ LIMITS OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 1534, WHERE REQUIRED FOR IH[ CONS7RUCllON AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID HIGHWAY. AS CONTAINED IN IH[ DffD RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1950 AS INS7RUM[NT NO. 31695 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF IH[ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO /HE PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT TO EXTEND ORA/NAG[ STRUCTURES AND [XCAVA noN AND [MBANKM[NT SLOPES BEYOND IH[ LIMITS OF ROAD NO. 1534, WHERE REQUIRED FOR IH[ CONS7RUCllON AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID HIGHWAY. AS CONTAINED IN IH[ DffD RECORDED AUGUST 15, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 155715 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWA y AND unuTY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DISCLOSED BY RECORD SURVEY MAP NO. 5715. AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY AND unuTY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES; RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 1951 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 18947 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS /HAT CERTAIN S7RIP OF LAND DESIGNATED AS '60 FOOT [ASEM[NT RESERVED FOR ROADWA y AND UllLITY PURPOSES" AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 5715 1H[ /NT[R[STS OF ncoR llTL[ INSURANCE COMPANY. AS SUCCESSOR TO nn_[ INSURANCE AND 7RUST COMPANY AND ASCENJBIL /MOR[ CARLSBAD, LLC, A D[LAWAR[ LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HA VE BffN [LIM/NA TED BY QUITCLAIM DEEDS RECORDED MARCH 5, 2005 AS FIL[ NO. 2006-0154735 AND MARCH 14, 2006 AS FILE NO. 2005-0176047, BOIH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARll[S snLL RETAINING /NT[R[STS IN SAID EASEMENT AR[ IH[ OWNERS OF LANDS COMMONLY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 212-040-55 AND 212-040-59. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TOGE/HER W11H IH[ RIGHT OF INGRESS /HERETO AND [GRESS IHERffROM AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES REC.: DECEMBER 28, 1961 AS INS7RUM[NT NO. 223207 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. -TO B[ VACA TED. AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF OED/CA llON FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES RECORDED: JULY 25, 1974 AS INS7RUM[NT NO. 74-200025 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF CITY OF CARLSBAD. A '1J' FUTURE STRffT OPENINGS' AND "42' FUTURE STRffT OPENING (KELLY DR.}" AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 2993. -TO BE VACA TED. IH[ R[LINOUISHM[NT OF RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO OR FROM IH[ S7RffT, HIGHWAY. OR FRffWA Y ABUmNG SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING BffN RELINQUISHED BY IH[ MAP OF SAID TRACT. (NOT PLOTTABLE) AN [ASEM[NT FOR JO' PRIVA T[ ROAD AND UllLITY EASEMENT DEDICA nDN ON MAP NO.: PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED: AUGUST 23, 1974 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 74-230327 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD (NOT PLOTTED) AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE, RECORDED: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INS7RUM[NT NO. 88-425570 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY R[C.: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 88-425571 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD AN EASEMENT FOR ORA/NAG[ AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES R[C.: AUGUST 25, 1988 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 88-426574 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD COVENANTS, CONDlnONS AND R[S7R/CllONS ('13UT OMlmNG, [XC[PT TO IH[ EXTENT /HAT SAID COVENANT OR R[S7R/CllON IS CON7ROLLED OR PERMITTED BY ANY APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE LAW, ANY COVENANTS OR R[STR/CllONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RAC[, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL OR/ENTAllON, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, MEDICAL CONDlnON, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SOURCE OF INCOME, OR ANCESTRY' AS S[T FORIH IN IH[ DOCUMENT RECORDED: JULY 10, 1989 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 89-362401 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (DffD R[S7R/CllON PROH/BlnNG AL TERA TION OF LANDFORMS, REMOVAL OF VEGETA noN OR IH[ ERECllON OF S7RUCTUR[S W11HOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF IH[ CALIF. COASTAL COMMISSION). AN EASEMENT FOR A, B, C, D AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECRff. CASE NO.: 73929 REC.: DECEMBER 9, 1998 AS INS7RUM[NT NO. 1998-0798577 OF OFFICIAL RECORD A. STRffT 8. ORA/NAG[ C. SLOP[ D. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCllON A DOCUMENT ENllTLED 'EASEMENT AGRffM[Ni, DA TED, JULY 28, 2006, EXECUTED BY ASCENT-BILTMORE CARLSBAD, LLC AND K[LLY/JRM-PALOMAR ROAD I, LLC, SUBJECT TO ALL IH[ TERMS, PROVISIONS AND CONDJnONS IHERf/N CONTAINED, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 2005 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 2006-0632584 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. A AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ORA/NAG[ PURPOSES, R[C.: MARCH 7, 2007 AS /NS7R. NO. 2007-0158004 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF 1H[ CITY OF CARLSBAD .b1. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC S7RffT AND PUBLIC UllLITY PURPOSES REC.: MARCH 7, 2007 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 2007-0158005 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD ~ AN [ASEM[NT FOR PUBLIC UllLlll[S, INGRESS, [GR[SS RECORDED: AUGUST 9, 2007 AS INS7RUMENT NO. 2007-0532131 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND MCTR/C. TO BE VACA TED. ~ AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE, REC.: AUGUST 10, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0535758 OF OFFICIAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD ~ [AS[MENT(S) FOR: CONSERVATION EASEMENT, R[C.: MAY 7, 2010 RECORDING NO: 2010-0232108 OF OFF/CAL RECORD. IN FAVOR OF IH[ CITY OF CARLSBAD BENCHMARK DESCRIPTION: MONUMENT CLSB-053 LOCA noN: SU 2.5" DISK IN NW CORNER OF VAULT ON IH[ K£ST SID[ OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD, 0.1 MILE SOUIH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. RECORDED FROM: ROS 17271 [LEVA llON: 82.744 DA TUM: NGVD 29 L HOWES I WEILER I LANDY PLANNING & ENGINEERING Tel. 760.929.2288 Fax. 760.929.2287 2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST SUITE 217 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ISHE5ETS I 1----+----+-----------------+----1----+----+------1 ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1----+----+-----------------+---1----+----+------1 1----+----+----------------+----l----+----+-----1 PRELIMINARY GRADING FOR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1----+----+-----------------+---1----+----+------1 DRAWING NAME: 07.31.24 ML CONSTRAINTS MAP DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM' QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA TREES WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA RHUS LANCEA BID ALTERNATE: SYAGRUS (ARECASTRUM) ROMANZOFFIANUM LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA' PINUS CANARIENSIS CASSIA LEPTOPHYLLA MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 'LITTLE GEM' DRACAENA DRACO PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'COLUMBIA' COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. COMPACT COMPACT DERO BIKE DEPOTDERO DUPLEX 14 BIKESSECURED ENCLOSURE DEROFIX-ITW/AIRKIT POWERBOX CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. (5) "U" BIKE RACKS (4) MICROMOBILITYPARKING STATIONS (4) " U " B I K E R A C K S PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PROVIDE SIGNPASSENGER"DROP-OFF"ZONE PROVIDE SIGNPASSENGER"DROP-OFF"ZONE PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E 3'-0" 3'-0" 107C 3'-0"109B UP UP 060504 03 0201 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0"108 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" IN CONTROL P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" UP 060504030201 1009080711 12 1516171814 13 060504 030201 10 09 0807 1112 1516 17 18 1413 101 3'-0"105 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 105 3'-0"105 T R TR LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATION PLANT SCHEDULE - ABBREVIATED (SEE SHEET L.4 FOR FULL SCHEDULE) SITE FURNISHINGSCITY OF CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE NOTES: PLANTING CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ENTITY: ADJACENT UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION OUTDOOR EATING AREA B 1,330.76 S.F. OUTDOOR EATING AREA A 1,372.58 S.F. ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING DECORATIVE PAVING, TYP. VEHICULAR SIGHT LINES. NO LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS OVER 30" HT. PERMITTED. CORNER VEHICULAR SIGHT LINE. NO LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS OVER 30" HT. PERMITTED. 8' MIN. BUFFER EXISTING D.G. TRAIL TO BE PROTECTED-IN-PLACE LINED WATER QUALITY BASIN BMP #1 PER CIVIL ENGINEER LINED WATER QUALITY BASIN BMP #3 PER CIVIL ENGINEER, TYP. STREET TREES SHALL BE LOCATED MIN. 7' FROM SEWER LINE. 7' LINED WATER QUALITY BASIN BMP #2 PER CIVIL ENGINEER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE PER OTHERS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE PER OTHERS TRASH ENCLOSURE PER OTHERS NEW TRAILHEAD SIGNAGE 5' M I N . SC R E E N Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 106 of 117 1. 2. 3. 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE (2% GRADE IN PLANTING AREAS) AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AND TERMINATING IN AN APPROVED DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE MANUAL REQUIRES THAT 50% OF THE SHRUBS (EXCEPT ON SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER) SHALL BE A MINIMUM 5-GALLON SIZE. ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE SCREENED. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW AND LABEL ALL UTILITIES AND PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SCREENING. STREET TREES SHALL BE LOCATED: A. A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) FEET FROM ANY SEWER LINE. B. IN AREAS THAT DO NOT CONFLICT WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. C. OUTSIDE OF SIGHT DISTANCE AREAS. D. WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. EXPOSITION ADA TABLE BY ANOVA SITE FURNISHINGS OR EQUAL I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS. I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS WHEN SUBMITTING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE ~-NTUSEOFWATER. ~ 09-17-2024 SIGNATURE DATE , ':r, , ~ / t ., ,-I ~--/ ii _--'<11 --'--'-\' I I I t~ I i ; I -I , I " ' I' -"--=-c/' I 11 I I f I 1~~ I 09.17,24 AK 5TH SUBMITTAL \ 07.31,24 AK 4TH SUBMITTAL 04.08.24 TJ 4TH SUBMITTAL 03.18.24 AK 3RD SUBMITTAL 08.D4.23 AK 2ND SUBMITTAL "X/',l I I" 40' 05.10.23 AK 1ST SUBMITTAL CONTOUR BENCH BY ANOVA SITE FURNISHINGS OR EQUAL ~ 1--1 LU ,'3.U I """:,Lr I\ Tl.~I 1 '.1 ;"' 1/1 "----•-' '; Cl I r,,S'_-;,; F'TIOII • • ! • PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: -LANDSCAPEAREA 55,954S.F. PARKING LOT AREA: 105,361 S.F. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE: 13,174 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPED PARKING LOT: 12.50% (EXCEEDS REQUIREMENT) {MINIMUM 10% REQUIRED) PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENTS: PARKING STALLS PROPOSED: TREES REQUIRED (1 PER 4 SPACES): 316TOTAL 79REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES PROVIDED: 126 TOTAL (REQUIREMENT MET) THE LANDSCAPE WILL BE PRIVATE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 .:.,.::..I=--11\111 .i'..L CARLSBAD L,cl /,~ I Iv l•I PRrTJMffARY GlHTJTNG f'OR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 0 """" i'I) 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl (/) COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLE CHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY COMPACT E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. 3'-0" 3'-0" 107C 3'-0" 109B UP UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0"108 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" IN CONTR O L P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" UP 060504030201 10090807 11 12 15161718 14 13 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 11 12 15 16 17 18 14 13 101 3'-0" 105 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 105 3'-0" 105 T R TR CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM' QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA TREES WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA RHUS LANCEA BID ALTERNATE: SYAGRUS (ARECASTRUM) ROMANZOFFIANUM LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA' PINUS CANARIENSIS CASSIA LEPTOPHYLLA MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 'LITTLE GEM' DRACAENA DRACO PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'COLUMBIA' SHRUBS AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME' ALOE STRIATA 'HYBRID' BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIEGON POINT' CAREX DIVULSA DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LITTLE REV' ENCELIA CALIFORNICA HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA SALVIA MELLIFERA SALVIA CLEVELANDII 'POZO BLUE' CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM DWARF CAPE RUSH 363 MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA CAREX PRAEGRACILIS SENECIO SERPENS GROUNDCOVERS IVA HAYESIANA SALVIA APIANA JUNCUS MEXICANUS CARISSA MACROCARPA 'TUTTLE' CRASSULA ARBORESCENS AGAVE ATTENUATA 'BOUTIN BLUE' SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' VINES FICUS PUMILA LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com PLANT SCHEDULE - ABBREVIATED (SEE SHEET L.4 FOR FULL SCHEDULE) MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L.3 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE SCREENED WITH VINES MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE SCREENED WITH FINES Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 107 of 117 dl... I 1-hc-'1"'' ' ·1 ,- I I 11 ' . ',~i\ --N : II l .-I r+',, -~-~--~---~ ~ =-=:;~~~:;:::~~~-'T-\J----• "---=1=1 ------,.=~~ I : 1 __ _ --, I ,':;----j f--- I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ----___ ./\-'\_:, ----">7., __ ' --~ ,_ r= ---~ - --.\ \ ;JI ,-• I L -• r::- ,, •. ,., '--~~ ~ "/• /" ·-·1' \ ~ ' ·-(.::_;•'// -\;)1 -'c,-- ' ,, ,,· \ ~~-c,;, · · · / · / / / ,-- I I - - - ' '- " - --s -- ,-1 '! - rl 0 \ ----------\------------ --__ '(, - ~. ~-!1 i::_ 1-{1•~ . • I __ , -s " H ! - - - 1 U ' / ( -, -·-~~--~~-J.=- ' I + I I ./ _),,=-==~~---. ·--=---=- ~~ ' !, le • 1, ' ' -!-T ~~-~,, ~~ 1-- 1 --S------S'c- ._ -\,,r ,,,.,_, __ --( ;'.',, :j' \/,----+--_t===/ '/--··-._" -,--~ ;, -::-\ 'v ---\ ·\ -1~ __;:_)--:-. ' 1 l::i□□=::i□=□ I " □ □ LJ " I - - - \ ';i\,l 1 1· ··_1 C)' ~ 1--1 I ~u LU r• r• ' -~' ~-,....,--- L '\.J ,--. I Ii 09.17.24 AK 5TH SUBMITTAL 07.31.24 AK 4TH SUBMITTAL 04.08.24 TJ 4TH SUBMITTAL 03.18.24 AK 3RD SUBMITTAL 08.D4.23 AK 2ND SUBMITTAL 05.10.23 AK 1ST SUBMITTAL """:,Lr Tl.~I 1'1 --, ·------b----· ' J ',, I __ , .:'f:c'~~-:/ ' \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .', Cl I rT'.',: '.Ti F'TIOII ' ' • / ' -• ' I, • ) -'1, ,-,~-,.,___r,,-; _r' -.; ,,.c )~ r ,.-, .. , r '-✓>--~~----"--a<.·'.~~~I (:~:-~~- I •j, ·-- \ __ ·:}:-{ ' I ' / \ ._) * * * a \.:.V © 15.. ~' 0 j _,A I l lf\ll IAL IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 11\111 i'..L CITY OF CARLSBAD PRrT.TMffAR'r GlHTJTNG f'OR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT PLANTING PLAN "'" i'I') 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N CL Cl u ---.... N N 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N CL Cl (/) 1 0 AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A. COMPACT COMPACT CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./ C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. PA S S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PA S S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E UP 06 05 04 03 02 01 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 101 R TR CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM' QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA TREES WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA RHUS LANCEA BID ALTERNATE: SYAGRUS (ARECASTRUM) ROMANZOFFIANUM LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA' PINUS CANARIENSIS CASSIA LEPTOPHYLLA MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 'LITTLE GEM' DRACAENA DRACO PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'COLUMBIA' SHRUBS AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME' ALOE STRIATA 'HYBRID' BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIEGON POINT' CAREX DIVULSA DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LITTLE REV' ENCELIA CALIFORNICA HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA SALVIA MELLIFERA SALVIA CLEVELANDII 'POZO BLUE' CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM DWARF CAPE RUSH 363 MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA CAREX PRAEGRACILIS SENECIO SERPENS GROUNDCOVERS IVA HAYESIANA SALVIA APIANA JUNCUS MEXICANUS CARISSA MACROCARPA 'TUTTLE' CRASSULA ARBORESCENS AGAVE ATTENUATA 'BOUTIN BLUE' SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' VINES FICUS PUMILA LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com PLANT SCHEDULE - ABBREVIATED (SEE SHEET L.4 FOR FULL SCHEDULE) MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L.2 TRASH ENCLOSURE SCREENED WITH VINES ADJACENT UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 108 of 117 I I i I ', I ----- - - - \ ·• \ I c,: . -'\ :ii ···• ........ -,.-,Ii----. .. ~. ,· ------ ' . ' - - I I I I I - - -- ~ 1 U - - VAN ~ /\ ' ; ' ~ -~ ~' ' ' I I ~/-----. \ ';IA,/ 1 /" --_1 C)' 1--1 ~u LU I. ; / / 09.17.24 07.31.24 04.08.24 03.18.24 08.D4.23 05.10.23 AK AK TJ AK AK AK Tl.~I -I~ ,-,\y, I I I I I I J I I I I I -- 5TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 3RD SUBMITTAL 2ND SUBMITTAL 1ST SUBMITTAL I t.µ I .. 11:Z.'. < I .l.J I I LiJ t.µ er I-i- I lJ w I ct I 3 I <( I ' ' ' 11-1\ /-\ II·1 t --i ' i;J' , ,. I / _,,,.,,,,, i i t./ I I, J I ( I I I I I I ',1 I I I I I, I' / / I • ) ' '1, ,-,~-,.,___r,,-; ,r' -.; ,,.c )~ r ,,·, ••I (!) * * * 0 © e 0 _,A I l j IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 11\111 i'..L CITY OF CARLSBAD l'L.> ./. /./C L:c/ .>~ 1/vl>i PRrT.TMffAR'r GlHTJTNG f'OR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT PLANTING PLAN 1 0 ""'" i'I') 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N a... Cl (/) PLANT SCHEDULE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE SPACING REMARKS WATER USE (WUCOLS-Z3) CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM'DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 49 24" BOX PER PLAN V LOW QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 29 24" BOX. PER PLAN MULTI-TRUNK V LOW TREES WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 13 15' B.T.H. PER PLAN SKINNED MED RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 40 24" BOX PER PLAN LOW BID ALTERNATE: SYAGRUS (ARECASTRUM) ROMANZOFFIANUM QUEEN PALM 10' B.T.H. PER PLAN SINGLE TRUNK, FULL CANOPY MED LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA'SWEET BAY 15 24" BOX PER PLAN SINGLE TRUNK, FULL CANOPY LOW PINUS CANARIENSIS CANARY ISLAND PINE 4 24" BOX PER PLAN V LOW CASSIA LEPTOPHYLLA GOLD MEDALLION TREE 14 24" BOX PER PLAN MULTI-TRUNK MED MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 'LITTLE GEM'LITTLE GEM MAGNOLIA 10 24" BOX PER PLAN SINGLE TRUNK MED DRACAENA DRACO DRAGON TREE 1 36" BOX PER PLAN SPECIMEN V LOW PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'COLUMBIA'LONDON PLANE TREE 3 24" BOX PER PLAN MULTI-TRUNK MED SHRUBS AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME' BLUE FLAME AGAVE 64 15 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW ALOE STRIATA 'HYBRID'CORAL ALOE HYBRID SPECIES 379 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 1'-2' 2'-3' BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIEGON POINT' DWARF COYOTE BRUSH 562 1 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 8"-24" 6' CAREX DIVULSA BERKELEY SEDGE 481 1 GAL. 18" O.C. LOW 18" 2' DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LITTLE REV' LITTLE REV FLAX LILY 125 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 1'-2' 2'-3' ENCELIA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA ENCELIA 246 1 GAL. 48" O.C. V LOW 3' 4' HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON, CHRISTMAS BERRY 118 5 GAL. PER PLAN V LOW 6'-10' 6'-10' JUNCUS PATENS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH 491 1 GAL. 24" O.C. LOW 2' 2' LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' BLUE LYME GRASS 203 1 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 2'-3' 2'-3' MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 358 1 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 4' 4' RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA LEMONADE BERRY 34 1 GAL. PER PLAN V LOW 3'-10' 3'-10' SALVIA MELLIFERA BLACK SAGE 124 1 GAL. 48" O.C. V LOW 3'-6' 3'-5' SALVIA CLEVELANDII 'POZO BLUE' CLEVELAND SAGE 45 1 GAL. 60" O.C. V LOW 3'-5' 5'-8' CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM DWARF CAPE RUSH 363 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 2'-3' 3'-4' MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA PINE MUHLY 620 1 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW CAREX PRAEGRACILIS CLUSTERED FIELD SEDGE 2,101 2" PLUGS 18" O.C.MED SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALK STICKS 1,721 1 GAL. 12" O.C.LOW GROUNDCOVERS IVA HAYESIANA SAN DIEGO POVERTYWEED 52 1 GAL. 72" O.C. LOW SALVIA APIANA WHITE SAGE 158 1 GAL. 48" O.C. V LOW 3' 3' JUNCUS MEXICANUS RUSH 159 1 GAL. 36" O.C. MED 2' 2' CARISSA MACROCARPA 'TUTTLE'DWARF NATAL PLUM 476 1 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 8' 5' CRASSULA ARBORESCENS SILVER DOLLAR 24 5 GAL. PER PLAN LOW 4' 4' AGAVE ATTENUATA 'BOUTIN BLUE' BOUTIN BLUE AGAVE 101 15 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 5' SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA MOTHER-N-LAW'S TONGUE 18 5 GAL. 24" O.C. LOW 4' 2' DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED FLAX LILY 166 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 1'-2' 2'-3' VINES FICUS PUMILA CREEPING FIG 26 5 GAL. PER PLAN ATTACH TO STRUCTURE MED LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com SLOPES 6:1 OR STEEPER REQUIRING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE TREATED WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANTING STANDARDS: A. STANDARD 1 – COVER CROP/AND EROSION CONTROL MATTING: COVER CROP SHALL BE A SEED MIX TYPICALLY MADE UP OF QUICK GERMINATING AND FAST COVERING GRASSES, CLOVERS, AND/OR WILDFLOWERS. SUBMIT THE SPECIFIC SEED MIX FOR CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION. THE COVER CROP SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 90% COVERAGE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS. THE TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND AFFIXED TO THE SLOPE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ON SLOPES 3 FEET OR LESS IN VERTICAL HEIGHT WHERE ADJACENT TO PUBLIC WALKS OR STREETS: WHEN PLANTING OCCURS BETWEEN AUGUST 15 AND APRIL 15, EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE REQUIRED. DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR, THE COVER CROP AND/OR EROSION CONTROL MATTING MAY BE USED. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 FEET IN HEIGHT, EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE REQUIRED, AND A COVER CROP SHALL NOT BE USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. B. STANDARD #2 – GROUND COVER ONE HUNDRED (100%) PERCENT OF THE AREA SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A GROUND COVER KNOWN TO HAVE EXCELLENT SOIL BINDING CHARACTERISTICS (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM SIZE OF FLATTED MATERIAL AND SPACED TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE WITHIN ONE YEAR). C. STANDARD #3 – LOW SHRUBS LOW SPREADING WOODY SHRUBS (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF 1-GALLON CONTAINERS) SHALL COVER A MINIMUM OF SEVENTY (70%) PERCENT OF THE SLOPE FACE (AT MATURE SIZE). D. STANDARD #4 – TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF 1-GALLON CONTAINERS) SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM RATE OF ONE (1) PLANT PER TWO HUNDRED (200) SQUARE FEET. SLOPES – 6:1 OR STEEPER AND: A. 3’ OR LESS IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND ADJACENT TO PUBLIC WALKS OR STREETS REQUIRE AT A MINIMUM STANDARD #1 (COVER CROP OR EROSION CONTROL MATTING). B. 3’ TO 8’ IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARDS #1 (EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF A COVER CROP), #2 AND #3. C. IN EXCESS OF 8’ IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARDS #1 (EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF A COVER CROP), #2, #3, AND #4. AREAS GRADED FLATTER THAN 6:1 REQUIRE A COVER CROP PER STANDARD #1 WITH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WHEN THEY HAVE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. SHEET GRADED PADS NOT SCHEDULED FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. B. A POTENTIAL EROSION PROBLEM AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY. C. IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY AS HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS TO THE PUBLIC OR HAVE SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT WARRANT IMMEDIATE TREATMENT. CITY OF CARLSBAD EROSION CONTROL NOTES:PLANTING NOTES 2.TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT ALL BRANCHES OVER PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ARE 7 FEET ABOVE THE WALKWAY GRADE AND SO THAT ALL BRANCHES OVER VEHICULAR TRAVEL WAYS ARE 14 FEET ABOVE THE GRADE OF THE TRAVEL WAY. 3. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR ALL TREES WITHIN 6' OF HARDSCAPE. MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE IMPROVEMENT DISTANCE TRAFFIC SIGNAL, STOP SIGN 20 FEET UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES (EXCEPT SEWER) 5 FEET SEWER LINES 10 FEET ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES 10 FEET (TRANSFORMERS, HYDRANTS, UTILITY POLES, ETC.) DRIVEWAYS 10 FEET INTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTING CURB 25 FEET LINES OF TWO STREETS) Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 109 of 117 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, AND ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE RELATED CITY AND REGIONAL STANDARDS. • ' • : • ' ' \ J " . ' 4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" ORGANIC COMPOSTED MULCH -I . ,,., . . . . . "EVERBLOOM MULCH" BY AGRI-SERVICE, INC. (FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS/ UNLESS ., ,, OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) ,/ ' "' \ ·/.~2i ! •:· . • " ? ,,, '' ' /'=-:,:. , 1,,,....,.,-r,) ~ I \?':: • i ', ,,;1( '" ' :\ * * @ • ® ~ 1~; ·'11:1· ~ /' • /~·\ 9 .. ' ct) * * ~ G ® ·ID·:·., '·' ' 0 ,I, @ r3:7;<:Ii .. t··0t·s .. (1 2'.,if,/3 ,,. :J;. 't' 09.17.24 07.31.24 04.08.24 03.18.24 08.04.23 05.10.23 -}f:..T=- AK 5TH SUBMITTAL AK 4TH SUBMITTAL TJ 4TH SUBMITTAL AK 3RD SUBMITTAL AK 2ND SUBMITTAL AK 1ST SUBMITTAL I\ Tl.t::..I _;. /\ I c_ 11\II I /\L _;.,/\ I=-- c,l ~; CII Lcl'.::~k PI IUII '.) 111 ' tf'Pl\l'\.' Cl I i ilWJ11i;i&#,d!I I/~ , j . 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 'I 4"" I CITY OF CARLSBAD Fl :: \I,. l•IC r:°F 1.~Tl:F•I" l 'lllLJMJJ\ Mi Y CJ:ii\l)JNC }'OK PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT DRAWING NAME: PLANTING LEGEND ll'·JI I i\L i\l' 'RC\i/\L ~ . :, l"1T:'i 1 0 """ i'I) 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl (/) COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. COMPACT COMPACT CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E 3'-0" 3'-0" 107C 3'-0"109B UP UP 060504 03 0201 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0"108 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" IN CONTROL P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" UP 060504030201 1009080711 12 1516171814 13 060504 030201 10 09 0807 1112 1516 17 18 1413 101 3'-0"105 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 105 3'-0"105 T R TR ADJACENT UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FUEL MODIFICATION LEGEND 7' FUEL MODIFICATION NOTES FUEL MODIFICATION MEMO FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE DIAGRAM Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 110 of 117 ----- ----t. --------y----,/ +- ,· ,'_, - II I ;' ,\ - I I >,s.:,,,-~ j /, __ s. __ __;,:;r:== / ----• ___ 1,1, __ ------- --" ------------ I ( .. / I •• • • . / 'ii ' \ \ :. I \ ~ '.l.0 NOTE: FOR THIS PROJECT, ALL 60' WILL BE CATEGORY C-1 WITHIN THE PARKING LOT ZONE C-1 • MEASURED HORIZONTALLY 20 FEET OUTWARD FROM THE OUTLYING EDGE OF THE FENCE LINE. • PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER OR LOW GROWING SHRUB SPECIES (LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT) KNOWN TO HAVE FIRE RESISTIVE QUALITIES. • TREES ARE ALLOWED. • IRRIGATION SHALL BE REQUIRED AND MAINTAINED. ZONE C-2 • MEASURED HORIZONTALLY 20 FEET OUTWARD FROM THE OUTLYING EDGE OF ZONE C-1. THIS CONDITION MAY EXIST IN EITHER A MANUFACTURED SLOPE OR A NATIVE SLOPE. • ZONE STANDARDS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FOR MANUFACTURED SLOPES REFER TO CONDITION A-ZONE A-2. FOR NATURAL SLOPES WITH NATIVE OR HAZARDOUS VEGETATION REFER TO CONDITION B -ZONE B-2. • IF THE CONFIGURATION IS CONDITION A (AN IRRIGATED MANUFACTURED SLOPE) THEN TREES ARE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT, AT MATURITY, A 20 FOOT SPACING CAN BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TREE CANOPIES. ZONE C-3 • MEASURED HORIZONTALLY 20 FEET OUTWARD FROM THE OUTLYING EDGE OF ZONE C-2. THIS CONDITION MAY EXIST IN EITHER A MANUFACTURED SLOPE OR A NATIVE SLOPE, AND EXTEND HORIZONTALLY TO A POINT AT LEAST 60 FEET FROM THE FENCE LINE. • ZONE STANDARDS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FOR MANUFACTURED SLOPES REFER TO CONDITION A-ZONE A-3. FOR NATIVE SLOPES REFER TO CONDITION B -ZONE B-3. • IF THE CONFIGURATION IS CONDITION A (AN IRRIGATED MANUFACTURED SLOPE) THEN TREES ARE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT, AT MATURITY, A 20 FOOT SPACING CAN BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TREE CANOPIES. Yard Landscaping No restrictions on: • Fire pits cu • Fi re places • Patio covers ,, ., ™ ZONEC-1 60' WIDTH NOTE: FOR THIS PROJECT, ALL 60' WILL BE CATEGORY C-1 WITHIN THE PARKING LOT 20' \'{IDTI I NOT APPLICABLE t-., .. ,-.,-.1 ZONE C-3 20' 'NIDTI I NOT APPLICABLE THE PROJECT IS IN AN AREA IDENTIFIED TO BE BOUNDED BY HAZARDOUS VEGETATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD FIRE INSPECTOR RE: Palomar and Aviara -Fire Suppression Zone Required for a New Development Project? Medi Maldonado <Medi.Matdonado@car1s:badca,gov.> Tue 9/19/20~3 4:5-8 PM fo: Alex Koutzoukis <alex@insitel,mdarch.com> Cc Tim Joehlewsk:i ..:;tim@insltd;mdarch.rnm >; Ron Moreno <:ron@lnsitelandarch.mm:> HE!ll o, Although the area is not in a Very High Hazard Severity Zone, it is in a fire zone. Please see the: following comments for Project SOP 2.021-002/CDP 2023-0034: 1. APN 212-040-64-00ls ill an -area identified to be bounded by hazardous vegetation. Due to this. information, a setback of not less than 60 feet shall be made in aa::ordance with the city's landscape manual :section five. It's worth noting that the state ts currelltly working on updated mapping to Identify high and very high hazard seventy zones. Depending on the official submission date of you, project, these cha~ges may impact the construction and setback requirements. Please don't hesttate to reach out with any questions or concerns. -Medi Maldonado Medi Maldonado Senior Fire lnsped or/tnvertigator City of Carlsbad Direct: (442) 339-2664 Main: (442 ) 339-2665 !fili,lgmm I Farebook I Tw~tter I YouTubE SECTION 5: FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS Fuel Modification Zones Zone C-1 • )( feet from edge of • B ?: ope: 1 f o: Fc::cc li::c • • Fire resistive plants • Trees and shrubs are allowed • Irrigated Zone C-2 Zone C-3 NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Native Vegetation • Undisturbed native vegetation • No irrigation ,---------,_ j 09.17.24 AK \ 07.31.24 AK 04,08.24 TJ 03,18,24 AK 08.D4.23 AK ';IA,\ 1 \' 4!1' 05.10,23 AK 1--1 I "":,Lr I\ Tl.~I LU ,'3.U 1 •1,n .:... ,_, Existing vegetation shall be trimmed to 18 inches high within 6 feet of fence (if fence is present) l Fuel modification zones for manmade or natural slopes which occur outside the fence line or property CONDITION C -GENERAL FUEL MODIFICATION Figure 5-C 45 5TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 3RD SUBMITTAL 2ND SUBMITTAL 1ST SUBMITTAL _,A I l 1'1 _:) Cl I rT'.''.Ti F'TIOII City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 11\111 i'..L CITY OF CARLSBAD l'L> -1-. \,IC L:c\ ,c~ \\il\l PRrTJMffAR'r GlHTJTNG f'OR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1 0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN """ i'I) 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a. Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a. Cl (/) COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. COMPACT COMPACT CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E 3'-0" 3'-0" 107C 3'-0"109B UP UP 060504 03 0201 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0"108 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" IN CONTROL P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" UP 060504030201 1009080711 12 1516171814 13 060504 030201 10 09 0807 1112 1516 17 18 1413 101 3'-0"105 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 105 3'-0"105 T R TR TREE SHADE CALCULATIONS ADJACENT UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 111 of 117 I' · 1 11 ,I , I,.;, "f'' -., i/j/ -,--- ,I~" ,' ~ \\ '" ',.._ -=V 1,~ n --,'.,:,C'c,;:._ -...:::+- t_ ""-1-t_ -----.- '•····... ·,} ~ -----:..:::::...~ --'---, , 1-~ ~ J~"f ' ., -=--1 -t-----I ---,, -·-', T H _J \ "X/',l I I" 40' ~ 1--1 I LU ,'3.U L:>" 09,17,24 AK 07,31,24 AK 04.08.24 TJ 03.18,24 AK 08.D4.23 AK 05.10.23 AK """:,Lr Tl.~I , I ' ! ' ' ' I 5TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 3RD SUBMITTAL 2ND SUBMITTAL 1ST SUBMITTAL 1/1 :; Cl I rT'.',: '.Ti F'T/011 TREE SHADE REQUIREMENTS: 0 PARKING LOT AREA: 50,460S.F. PARKING LOT TREE SHADE: 27,051 S.F. (50% SHADE REQUIRED) 53.6% SHADE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA: 55,769S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA TREE SHADE: 35,160S.F. (20% SHADE REQUIRED) 63.04% SHADE PROVIDED HARDSCAPE AREA: 105,384 S.F. HARDSCAPE AREA TREE SHADE: 39,969S.F. (20% SHADE REQUIRED) 37.93% SHADE PROVIDED TREE CANOPY AT 15 YEARS GROWTH IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 ,r6c I CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 0 PRrTJMffAR'r GlHTJTNG f'CIR 11\111 .i'..L PALOMAR OFFICE TREE SHADE AND AVIARA PROJECT CAL CU LAT IONS """" i'I) 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl u --....... N N 0 0 I i'I) N 0 N a... Cl (/) COMPACT AMBULATORYCHARGINGONLY VAN ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY STD ACCESSIBLECHARGINGONLY E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. COMPACT COMPACT CO M P A C T E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A.E.V./C.A. CO M P A C T CO M P A C T CO M P A C T E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. E.V./C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E PAS S E N G E R " D R O P - O F F " Z O N E 3'-0" 3'-0" 107C 3'-0"109B UP UP 060504 03 0201 10 09 08 07 ELEV. 1 ELEV. 2 3'-0"108 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" IN CONTROL P A N E L C L E A R A N C E OUT 3'-0" 106 3'-0" UP 060504030201 1009080711 12 1516171814 13 0605 04 030201 10 09 0807 1112 1516 17 18 1413 101 3'-0"105 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 105 3'-0"105 T R TR ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ADJACENT UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com WATER CONSERVATION IRRIGATION METHOD 1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE MANUAL WITH A LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY NECESSARY TO MEET THE MAWA. 2. A "SMART" IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH WATERING BUDGET FEATURE IN COMBINATION WITH A RAIN SENSOR, MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR WILL BE USED TO PREVENT WATER LOSS DUE TO MAINLINE BREAKS. 3. A DEDICATED WATER METER WITH A BACKFLOW DEVICE WILL BE USED FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SINCE THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS MORE THAN 1,000 SQUARE FEET. 4. INLINE DRIP TUBING WILL BE USED FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREA AS A HIGH EFFICIENCY IRRIGATION METHOD. 5. A MANUAL SHUFFOFF VALVE WILL BE INSTALLED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE WATER SUPPLY, AND ADDITIONAL SHUTOFF VALVES WILL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN EACH ZONE. 6. TREES WILL BE PLACED ON SEPARATE VALVES TO RECEIVE BUBBLERS (REFER TO IRRIGATION DETAILS) 7. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE HYDROZONES BASED ON THE PLANT MATERIAL WATER NEEDS, SUN EXPOSURE, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITION. 8. ONLY SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SHALL BE USED TO IRRIGATE ANY VEGETATION WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR INCHES OF AN IMPERMEABLE SURFACE UNLESS THE ADJACENT IMPERMEABLE SURFACES ARE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO CAUSE WATER TO DRAIN ENTIRELY INTO A LANDSCAPED AREA. HYDROZONES HYDROZONE 1: LOW WATER USE DRIP LANDSCAPE AREA: 40,463 S.F. % OF LANDSCAPE: 71.96% HYDROZONE 2: MEDWATER USE SPRAY (WQ BASIN) LANDSCAPE AREA: 15,210 S.F. % OF LANDSCAPE: 27.05% HYDROZONE 3: MED WATER USE BUBBLERS (PALMS) LANDSCAPE AREA: 562 S.F. % OF LANDSCAPE: 00.5% ON-SITE LANDSCAPE: 53,082 S.F. ROW LANDSCAPE:3,153 S.F. TOTAL LANDSCAPE: 56,236 S.F. TOTAL SITE AREA ONSITE ONLY:264,223 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA ONSITE ONLY:20.1% LANDSCAPE AREA WATER USE CALCULATIONS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY NOTE: ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE INCLUDING THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE PRIVATE MAINTAINED ITEM IRRIGATION WATER METER - RECYCLED WATER - 1" METER WITH 1" SERVICE LINE - REFER TO CIVIL PLANS IRRIGATION LEGEND (RECYCLED WATER) Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 112 of 117 Iii! --,--- t. ----.- ~--~\-----------~---•(1 ~ -----:..:::::...~ --·---, /' ----7-~~~~/,_.::_--· ~-J~•f' ., / , ' , / I , , , , , / -....-.c..:::..: -----r'- :. I ' -- '.l.0 09.17.24 AK 5TH SUBMITTAL \ 07.31.24 AK 4TH SUBMITTAL 04.08.24 TJ 4TH SUBMITTAL 03.18.24 AK 3RD SUBMITTAL O8.D4.23 AK 2ND SUBMITTAL ~-~CA.I I· ·1" 4!1' 05.10.23 AK 1ST SUBMITTAL 1--1 LU ,'3.U ~ I """:,Lr Tl.~I 1 '1 ,.., 1'1 .') Cl I rT'.', '.Ti F'TIOII .:._ ,_, I I Residential: MAWA = (ETo)(0.62)1(0.55 x LA) + (0.45 x SLA)I Non-Residential: MAWA = (ETo)(0.62)1(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)I Show Calculation: (44.0)(0.62)[(.45X56,236) + (.45X0)] Maxi1num Applied Water Allowance = 690,353.14 gallonspcrycar CITY OF CARLSBAD ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE TWU Tlydro~onc N umlwr ("I -5 with ST.A Zunc l-kk1\v -use as rn:rny tabk.s as necessary tu complete all hy<lrn,:;ones) Process Step 2 ' No. 1kki-'-v) l<.,';01p1m,111~pin1ti(Hl !C1tt-' 1 44.0 (Hl'o)* Conversion I ';JCtor 2 0.62 (Step I x Step 2) ' 27.28 Plant ractor (Pr)n (From .2 .5 .5 WU COLS) (VL W - I I\'1 4 (0.1 -IJ.8' ,\n:a of Hyclmzom: (sy_. ft.) ' 40,463 15,210 562 (l T:\'1 (Step 4 x Step .J) 6 8,092.6 7,605 281 T mg;tttm1 Effint',11cy (TE)*-~-* -.80 .72 .75 (Step 6 -:-Sl.cp 7) 8 10,115.75 10,562.5 374.67 (I otal ,-\11 Stc:p 8 + Total 0 21,052.92 SL\ sq. C1.. in S1cp S) (SLcp .J x SLcp 9) .b5Lunatcd Total \V'aler Use in gallons 10 574,323.66 pet· year (H' I '\V L) 1 ot:1I shall not exceed J'vL\ \Y'A ETo* lfl"est of I-5 = 40.0 Eastofl-5 and We.';f of El Camino Real= 44.0 East of'EI Camino Real= 47.0 Applicant may provide ii different ETo if suppoJted by docu111entatio11 subject to approval by the City Plannb1g Division ***JE Micro-!3pray = .80 Spray= .72 Rotor= .72 MP Rotator = . 75 Bubbler=. 75 Drip= .80 4 s ** Plant Factor & Water Use 0.1 = VL W -Very Low Water U.'>e Plant.,;, 0.3 = L W -Low Water Use Plants 0.5 = ~'-'IW -1lfoderate W.'lter Use Plants 0.8 = H1V -High Water Use Plants ETWU= 574,323.66 MAWA= 690,353.14 IN-srtE ~AR~~INC:: 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 SJ.A CITY OF CARLSBAD l'L> .I. I-IC Loci.>~ llvl'I PRrT.TMffAR'r GlHTJTNG f'OR PALOMAR OFFICE AND AVIARA PROJECT 1 0 _,A I l 11\111 i'..L CONCEPTUAL WATER CONSERVATION RESPONSIBILITY PLAN & MAINTENANCE ""'" i'I') 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I i'I') N 0 N a... Cl (/) LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com 1. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. INSTALL CONTROLLER, CABINET AND PEDESTAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. POWER SUPPLY WIRE 3. 1-INCH SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR POWER SUPPLY 4. GROUND WIRE AND CONDUIT, MIN. 1.5". GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES 5. CONCRETE PAD: 6-INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS 6. FINISH GRADE 7. COMPACTED SUBGRADE 8. 3-INCH SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR STATION WIRES 9. FLOW SENSOR WIRE TO FLOW SENSOR 10. MASTER VALVE AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WIRES CONTROLLER IN PEDESTAL SCALE: N.T.S. I-01 1. 5. 6. 7. 2. 3. 8. 9. 10. 4. NOTE: 1 WIRE CONNECTOR SHALL BE A 3M DBY DIRECT BURY SPLICE KIT. KIT SHALL INCLUDE A SCOTCHLOK SPRING CONNECTOR, A POLYPROPYLENE TUBE AND A WATERPROOF SEALING GEL. TUBE SHALL BE SUPPLIED PREFILLED WITH GEL. DIRECT BURY SPLICE KIT SHALL BE USED TO ELECTRICALLY CONNECT 2 - 3 #14 OR 2 #12 PRE-STRIPPED COPPER WIRES. LARGER WIRES OR GREATER QUANTITIES OF WIRES SHALL REQUIRE A LARGER APPROVED WIRE CONNECTION. 1. LOW VOLTAGE WIRES, 3 MAXIMUM 2. WIRES PASS THROUGH GROOVES IN TUBE LID TO ALLOW LID TO CLOSE 3. CLOSE TUBE LID AFTER WIRE IS INSERTED INTO TUBE 4. POLY TUBE PRE-FILLED WITH WATERPROOF GEL 5. LOCK TABS PREVENT WIRE REMOVAL ONCE CONNECTOR IS INSERTED 6. SCOTCHLOK ELECTRICAL SPRING CONNECTOR. WIRES SHALL BE PRE-STRIPPED OF 1/2" OF THE INSULATION PRIOR TO INSERTION INTO THE CONNECTOR. TWIST CONNECTOR ONTO WIRES TO SEAT FIRMLY. SCOTCHLOK CONNECTOR AND WIRES INSERTED INTO TUBE UNTIL THE CONNECTOR PASSES LOCK TABS WIRE SPLICE CONNECTION FOR LOW VOLTAGE CONTROLLER WIRES SCALE: N.T.S. I-03 2 3 4 5 6 ISOLATION BALL VALVE FOR PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE UP TO 2 1/2" SCALE: N.T.S. I-04 1. 10" ROUND PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID (DO NOT CUT) 2. TOP OF MULCH (OR SOIL WHEN TURF) 3. ISOLATION BALL VALVE WITH OVAL HANDLE 4. 8" DIAMETER CL 160 PVC SLEEVE (SET ON TOP OF VALVE) 5. SLIP X MIPT PVC SCH 80 ADAPTER (2 LOCATIONS) 6. SLIP X SLIP 45 DEGREE ELL (4 LOCATIONS) 7. 3/4" GRAVEL UNDER AND AROUND VALVE BOX - FILL TO TOP OF HOLES, WRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC 8. PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE - SEE PLANS FOR SIZE 9. BRICK SUPPORT (4) LOCATIONS 10. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 9. 1. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. INSTALL CONTROLLER, CABINET AND PEDESTAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. POWER SUPPLY WIRE 3. 1-INCH SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR POWER SUPPLY 4. GROUND WIRE AND CONDUIT, MIN. 1.5". GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES 5. CONCRETE PAD: 6-INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS 6. FINISH GRADE 7. COMPACTED SUBGRADE 8. 3-INCH SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT, FITTINGS AND SWEEP ELL FOR STATION WIRES 9. FLOW SENSOR WIRE TO FLOW SENSOR 10. MASTER VALVE AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WIRES NOTE: INSTALL A PURPLE (BILINGUAL) CONTROLLER RECLAIMED WATER MARKING STICKER TO INDICATE THE OPERATOR THAT THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTAINS RECYCLED WATER 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. BASKET STRAINER, REFER TO LEGEND 4. ID TAG. REFER TO IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL 5. PVC MAINLINE 6. PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTER 7. BRICK SUPPORT (4) LOCATIONS 8. BRASS UNION 9. BRASS NIPPLE TYP. 10. 3-INCH MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL 11. PCV MAINLINE FROM POC BASKET STRAINER SCALE: N.T.S. I-02 7. 6. 11. 10. 5. 3. 9. 2. 9. BBB 1. 4. 8. 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. SCH. 80 PVC THD. NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQ., 3" MIN. 4. MASTER CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR SPEC. 5. 30-INCH LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED - PROVIDE WATERPROOF CONNECTION AT SPLICE 6. SCH. 80 PVC UNION 7. TRANSITION TO CORRECT PIPE DEPTH USING TWO 45 DEGREE SCH. 80 PVC ELLS 8. SCH. 80 PVC T.O.E. NIPPLE 9. PVC MAINLINE TO RCV'S, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 10. BRICK SUPPORT (4) LOCATIONS 11. 3-INCH MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL 12. CONTROL WIRES IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONTINUOUS TO CONTROLLER. (AQUASEAL / VAPOR LOCK OPEN END OF CONDUIT) 13. BRASS MAINLINE PIPE AND FITTINGS FROM BACKFLOW PER SPECIFICATIONS 14. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL MASTER CONTROL VALVE SCALE: N.T.S. I-05 10. 6. 14. 4" 2" 12. 13. 11. 7. 4. 8. 2.1.5. 3. 9. 1. FLOW SENSOR - REFER TO LEGEND 2. 30-INCH LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED - PROVIDE WATERPROOF CONNECTION AT SPLICE, MAX WIRE DISTANCE RUN 1,000' 3. PURPLE PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX 4. TOP OF MULCH 5. MAINLINE PIPE 6. BRICK (4) LOCATIONS 7. 3-INCH MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL 8. CONTROL WIRES IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONTINUOUS TO CONTROLLER. (AQUASEAL / VAPOR LOCK OPEN END OF CONDUIT) 9. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL NOTE: INSTALL FLOW SENSOR AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, WIRE TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. USE 45 DEGREE ELLS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH ON THE DOWN-STREAM SIDE OF THE FLOW SENSOR. FLOW SENSOR SCALE: N.T.S. I-06 4. 4" MI N . 6. 7. 2" MI N . 1.2.3. 5. 9. 8. 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. 30-INCH LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED - PROVIDE WATERPROOF CONNECTION AT SPLICE 4. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE - (REFER TO LEGEND) 5. PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, CLOSE 6. PVC SCH 40 ELL 7. PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED 8. BRICK (4) LOCATIONS 9. PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND SCH 40 ELL AND SCH 40 ELL OR TEE 10. PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER/ LATERAL LINE CONNECTION 11. 3-INCH MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL 12. PVC PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE PIPE 13. CONTROL WIRES IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONTINUOUS TO CONTROLLER. (AQUASEAL / VAPOR LOCK OPEN END OF CONDUIT) 14. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SCALE: N.T.S. I-07 5. 6.3" MI N . 2. 3. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 14. 1. 13. 4. 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. 30-INCH LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED - PROVIDE WATERPROOF CONNECTION AT SPLICE 4. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ZONE KIT (REFER TO LEGEND) - WITH BASKET FILTER AND PRESSURE REGULATOR 5. PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, CLOSE 6. PVC SCH 80 UNION FOR SERVICING ASSEMBLY 7. PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER 8. PVC LATERAL 9. 3-INCH MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL 10. BRICK (4) LOCATIONS 11. PVC PRESSURE SUPPLY MAINLINE 12. PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE 13. CONTROL WIRES IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONTINUOUS TO CONTROLLER. (AQUASEAL / VAPOR LOCK OPEN END OF CONDUIT) 14. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL NOTE: DRIP CONTROL VALVE FLUSH CAP SHALL NOT USE HOSE THREADS ON RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS DRIP CONTROL VALVE WITH BASKET FILTER AND PRESSURE REGULATOR SCALE: N.T.S. I-08 5. 6. 7. 3" MI N . 2. 3. 8. 9. 10. 11. 13. 12. 12. 1. 4.14. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 113 of 117 ~-------------f=====t---------------------::--~-------------~~ CD CD ~=1~1 ii )r-------7 ,;;::;~; ll, ill 01-------01-------01------- 01---------01---------01--------- 09.17.24 AK 5TH SUBMITTAL 07.31.24 AK 4TH SUBMITTAL 04.08.24 TJ 4TH SUBMITTAL 03.18.24 AK 3RD SUBMITTAL 08.04.23 AK 2ND SUBMITTAL 05.10.23 AK 1ST SUBMITTAL -}f:..T=-I\ Tl.t::..I c,l ~; CII Lcl'.::~k PI IUII 01------- I 111 11 I I . -1- T 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 _;./\ll 11\III/\L _;.,/\I=-ll'·Jlli\L Cl I i\l' 'RC\i/\L PALOMAR OFFICE DRAWING NAME: AND AVIARA PROJECT CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION DETAILS 1 0 0 0 I t') N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I t') N 0 N a... Cl (/) VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG FOR RECYCLED WATER SCALE: N.T.S. I-15 1. ALL RECYCLED WATER SPRINKLER CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE TAGGED WITH IDENTIFICATION TAGS. 2. TAGS SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF PLASTIC 3” X 4”, PURPLE IN COLOR, WITH WORDS “WARNING RECYCLED WATER - DO NOT DRINK” IMPRINTED ON ONE SIDE, AND “AVISO - AGUA IMPURA - NO TOMAR” ON THE OTHER SIDE. IMPRINTING SHALL BE PERMANENT AND BLACK IN COLOR. 3. ONE TAG SHALL BE ATTACHED TO EACH VALVE AS FOLLOWS: ATTACH TO VALVE STEM DIRECTLY OR WITH PLASTIC TIE WRAP; OR ATTACH TO SOLENOID WIRE DIRECTLY OR WITH PLASTIC TIE WRAP. WARNING RECYCLED WATER - DO NOT DRINK AVISO - AQUA IMPURA - NO TOMAR FRONT BACK LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. QUICK COUPLING VALVE SCALE: N.T.S. I-09 1. 10" ROUND PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID (DO NOT CUT) 2. LOCKABLE QUICK COUPLING VALVE WITH PURPLE CAP 3. TOP OF MULCH (OR SOIL WHEN TURF) 4. PVC SCH 80 THREADED NIPPLE - PAINTED PURPLE 5. 1" MIP X FIP SCH 40 90 ELL (2 REQUIRED) 6. 3/4" GRAVEL UNDER AND AROUND VALVE BOX - FILL TO TOP OF HOLES, WRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC 7. PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE AND FITTINGS - SEE PLANS FOR SIZE 8. GALVANIZED (SCH 40) 36" STAKE WITH SPRINKLER TIES 9. 1" X 8" SCH 80 NIPPLE 10. 1" PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL 11. QUICK COUPLER VALVES SHALL BE OF A TYPE APPROVED FOR RECYCLED WATER USE 12. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL 9. 10. 12. 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. SEAL CONDUIT ENDS WITH AQUASEAL 4. WATERPROOF ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS FOR ALL WIRE SPLICES 5. AQUA SEAL / VAPOR LOCK OPEN END OF CONDUITS 6. LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRE COIL, 36" MINIMUM 7. BRICK SUPPORTS 4 REQUIRED PER BOX 8. 1.25" SCH. 40 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 9. LANDSCAPE FABRIC, WRAP UP AND OVER BOX HOLES 10. 3/4" GRAVEL IN, UNDER AND AROUND VALVE BOX - FILL TO TOP OF HOLES, WRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC CONTROL WIRE PULL BOX SCALE: N.T.S. I-10 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 1. 4. 2. WE ARE CONSERVING OUR MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE BYIRRIGATING OUR LANDSCAPE WITH RECYCLED WATER 42 " 12 " 3' 3" C L E A R 1' 1. RECYCLED WATER SIGN PER DISTRICT STANDARDS, 0.16 ALUMINUM, .060 ABS PLASTIC OR STICK-ON VINYL SIGNS. PURPLE BACKGROUND WITH BLACK LETTERS AND GRAPHIC. 2. ATTACH SIGN TO POST W/ (2) 1/4" SS CARRIAGE BOLTS 3. 3" GALVANZIED STEEL POST 4. CONCRETE FOOTING - SLOPE TOP TO DRAIN AWAY 5. FINISH GRADE RECYCLED WATER USE SIGN SCALE: N.T.S I-11 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 18" SIGN ENLARGMENT RECYCLED WATER AGUA RECICLADA DO NOT DRINK NO TOME EL AGUA WE ARE CONSERVING OUR MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE BY IRRIGATING OUR LANDSCAPE WITH RECYCLED WATER RECYCLED WATER AGUA RECICLADA DO NOT DRINK NO TOME EL AGUA A-3 A-2 A-1 BV BV QC 1. PVC SCH 40 MANIFOLD PIPE - SIZE PER PLANS (LOCATE UNDERNEATH VALVE BOXES) 2. ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 3. HEAT BRAND ALL VALVE BOXES PER SPECIFICATIONS 4. PRESSURE SUPPLY MAINLINE (SIZE PER PLANS) 5. CONTROL VALVE MANIFOLD (5 VALVES MAXIMUM) 6. BALL VALVE TO MANIFOLD 7. BALL VALVE TO QUICK COUPLER 8. QUICK COUPLER - PER PLANS MANIFOLD CONFIGURATION FOR CONTROL VALVES AND QUICK COUPLERS SCALE: N.T.S. I-12 4. 5. 1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6" 6. 7. 3. 2. 1. 8. TRENCH BELOW HARDSCAPE SCALE: N.T.S. I-13 1. HARDSCAPE PAVING 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL (FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS GREATER THAN 1") 3. NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE SLEEVE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 4. CONSTRUCTION GRADE SAND 5. DETECTOR TAPE (ABOVE EACH SLEEVE) 6. PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE SLEEVE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 7. 1.25" CONDUIT (FOR WIRE), SEE SPECIFICATIONS 2. 3. 4. 1. 5. 6. 7. 36 " 24 " 6" WIDTH PER SPECIFICATIONS 6" DETAIL FOR TWO WIRE SYSTEM TRENCH IN LANDSCAPE SCALE: N.T.S. I-14 1. MULCH 2. FINISH GRADE 3. NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 4. BACKFILL MATERIAL (FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS GREATER THAN 1") 5. DETECTOR TAPE (ABOVE EACH PIPE) 6. PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 7. 1.25" CONDUIT FOR WIRE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS 8. CONSTRUCTION GRADE SAND (6" ABOVE AND BELOW PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE) 2. 3. 4. 1. 5. 6. 7. 18 " F O R M A I N L I N E 1 . 5 A N D S M A L L E R 24 " F O R M A I N L I N E 1 . 5 A N D L A R G E R 12 " 6" WIDTH PER SPECIFICATIONS 8. 6" MIN. DETAIL FOR TWO WIRE SYSTEM Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 114 of 117 ~-------------------;::::==----------------------------------~~ of---------of--------- - -- 01---------01--------- ®------1'--I = =111-·, • 111 I I le-- ill I " ill-! -=111 • 111 L I I I I I ; • 111 11 l 1111 Ill f I . . • 11~1 ;,, ,~II 01--------- 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 1-------------------+----t--t--,----i l'lllLIMU,MtY Clli\l)JNC }'OK 09.17.24 AK 07.31.24 AK 04.08.24 TJ 03.18.24 AK 08.04.23 AK 05.10.23 AK -}f:..T=-I\ Tl.t::..I PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT 5TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 3RD SUBMITTAL ___:'_'.._------:'"'~----------+----t--t--1 -1 DRAWING NAME: 2ND SUBMITTAL 1ST SUBMITTAL c,l ~; CII Lcl'.::~k PI IUII _;./\ll 11\III/\L _;.,/\I=-ll'·Jlli\L '.) 111 -? LJ'PliO\',c,_ Cl I i\l' 'RC'/i\L CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION DETAILS 1 0 0 0 I t') N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I t') N 0 N a... Cl (/) LICENS E D L ANDSCAPEA R C H I T ECT S T A T EOF CAL I F O R NIA No. 4547TimJachlewsk i J r Signature Renewal Date Date 11-30-25 09-17-24 San Diego, CA 92106 619-795-7603 www.insitelandarch.com 1. PRESSURE COMPENSATING FULL-CIRCLE BUBBLER WITH PURPLE CAP. (2) PER TREE (1) PER VINE. 2. PLASTIC ADAPTER: PA-80 3. POP-UP SPAY BODY 4. TOP OF MULCH (OR FINISH GRADE) 5. SWING JOINT 6. PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL 7. PVC LATERAL PIPE POP-UP BUBBLER PRESSURE COMPENSATING, FULL-CIRCLE SCALE: N.T.S. I-16 2. 1. 4. 3. 7. 6. 5. 1. TREE ROOTBALL 1. 1. MP ROTATOR (12" FOR SHRUBS AND 6" FOR TURF) WITH CHECK VALVE AND PURPLE CAP 2. TOP OF MULCH FOR SHRUBS, OR GRASS FOR TURF AREAS 3. HUNTER SWING JOINT 4. LATERAL ELL OR TEE 5. LATERAL LINE MP ROTATOR WITH INTERNAL CHECK VALVE SCALE: N.T.S I-17 2. 3. 4. 5. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING BURIAL SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. I-18 1. 2. 3. 6. 1. TECHLINE TEE 2. TOP OF MULCH 3. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING 4. TOP OF SOIL 5. NETAFIM INLINE DRIP EMITTER 6. TIE DOWN STAKE (NETAFIM TLS6) NOTES: 1. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY 3' IN SAND, 4' IN LOAM, AND 5' IN CLAY. 2. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION. 3. INSERTION PLOW AND TRENCHED INSTALLATIONS DO NOT REQUIRE TIE DOWN STAKES. 4. 3" 3" 5. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING CENTER FEED LAYOUT SCALE: N.T.S. I-19 2"-4"2. 8. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 8. INSET A 12 " 2. INSET A 4" - 6 " 9. 1. PVC OR POLY SUPPLY HEADER 2. PVC DRIP MANIFOLD FROM CONTROL ZONE VALVE KIT (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND) 3. TECHLINE START CONNECTION MALE ADAPTER AND TEE 4. ROW SPACING. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND. 5. TECHLINE CVRW DRIPLINE 6. PERIMTER LATERALS 2" - 4" FROM EDGE OF AREA PERIMETER 7. AREA PERIMETER 8. PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER 9. MANUAL FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER 3. 1. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 1. 7. 8. 9. 1. 10" ROUND PURPLE VALVE BOX (DO NOT CUT) 2. SLIP X MIPT PVC SCH 40 ADAPTER (2 LOCATIONS) 3. 18" LENGTH OF POLYETHYLENE TUBING 4. CLOSED NIPPLE (2 LOCATIONS) 5. PVC SCH 40 BALL VALVE (LINE SIZE) 6. PVC SCH 40 FIPT X FIPT ELL (3 LOCATIONS) 7. 8" PVC SCH 80 RISER 8. 3/4" GRAVEL UNDER AND AROUND VALVE BOX - FILL TO TOP OF HOLES, WRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC 9. LATERAL LINE (PVC EXHAUST HEADER) 10. SEE VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAG DETAIL MANUAL FLUSH VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR DRIP IRRIGATION SCALE: N.T.S. I-24 5. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING END FEED LAYOUT SCALE: N.T.S. I-22 2"-4" 1. PVC OR POLY SUPPLY HEADER 2. PVC DRIP MANIFOLD FROM CONTROL ZONE VALVE KIT (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND) 3. TECHLINE START CONNECTION MALE ADAPTER AND TEE 4. ROW SPACING. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND. 5. TECHLINE CVRW DRIPLINE 6. PERIMTER LATERALS 2" - 4" FROM EDGE OF AREA PERIMETER 7. AREA PERIMETER 8. PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER 9. MANUAL FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER 2.1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 8. INSET A 12 " 2. INSET A 4" - 6 " SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING IRREGULAR SHAPED LAYOUT SCALE: N.T.S. I-21 1.2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 10. 2"-4" 5. 1. PVC DRIP MANIFOLD FROM CONTROL ZONE VALVE KIT (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND) 2. TECHLINE CVRW DRIPLINE 3. TECHLINE START CONNECTION MALE ADAPTER AND TEE 4. ROW SPACING. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND. 5. PVC OR POLY SUPPLY HEADER 6. TECHLINE TEE 7. AREA PERIMETER 8. MANUAL FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER 9. TOTAL LENGTH SHOULD NOT EXCEED LENGTH SHOWN IN MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH TABLE 10. PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER INSET A INSET A 12 " 1. 4" - 6 " 8. 9. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE TUBING NOTES AND MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH TABLE SCALE: N.T.S. I-23 NOTES: 1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS AND CHANGES IN ELEVATION. SEE DRIPLINE INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR SUGGESTED SPACINGS. 2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LENGTH SHOWN IN THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE. Techline HCVRX Dripline Maximum Lateral Lengths (Feet) 1. TOP OF MULCH 2. PURPLE RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH PURPLE LID 3. AIR RELEASE VALVE W/ BRASS NIPPLE AND BRASS RETURN BEND ON DISCHARGE PORT 4. 3/4" BRONZE BALL VALVE 5. 3/4" BRASS NIPPLE, 2 REQ., LENGTH AS REQ. 6. BRICK SUPPORT 7. LANDSCAPE FABRIC 8. PVC MAINLINE 9. APPROVED TIE ROD MIN. 5/8" DIAMETER 10. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK MIN. 1 CUBIC FOOT 11. 3/4" GRAVEL IN, UNDER AND AROUND VALVE BOX - FILL TO TOP OF HOLES, WRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC NOTE: INSTALL AIR RELIEF VALVE AT HE HIGH POINT OF THE IRRIGATION MAINLINE MAINLINE AIR RELIEF VALVE SCALE: N.T.S. I-20 8. 6. 4. 1. 3. 2. 3" MIN. 5. 9. 10. 7. 11. Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 115 of 117 ~ 111111 I llll 11 0--- • 0---- I I I I I ~ I I 1/ \ \ I \ I i!!::::::::!1:==:::!l::::::±::=l::::::::!1[~:':::li:::::=!!:±:!!:::=::::!!::::::::!6 \ 0---- 0---- 1-1- 1 F=/F=/Fdl~if==+~ I I I I I f I I I I I I 1 M::::::±=±=~z::\1=:!!::::::::!!i ------------------------------- 0---- QJ L ::J [fJ [fJ QJ L (l_ ~ QJ C: I I I I I ----+ 0----0---- 12" Spacing 18" Spacing Flow (GPH) 0.33 0.53 0.77 1. 1 6 0.33 0.53 25 psi 237 173 136 103 335 246 30 psi 327 240 187 142 464 341 35 psi 385 282 221 168 546 401 40 psi 429 315 247 187 611 449 45 psi 467 342 268 203 663 488 50 psi 499 366 287 218 710 521 55 psi 528 387 303 230 752 552 60 psi 554 406 318 241 788 579 0.77 1 .1 6 192 146 266 203 314 239 351 267 381 290 408 311 432 329 453 345 24" Spacing 0.77 1 .1 6 244 184 338 258 400 304 446 340 486 370 520 396 550 418 578 440 "--------------------"--------------------••••••••••••••••••••• ~~~~:r'--'-"~~ lciF=J?'Ff FFFfl 1- -111 11 i' I 11__1111__1111__1 11__1 I 11__1 I 11__1 -11-11~- I ,------ 0---- 2907 Shelter Island Drive #105-417 o--------------------t------t------t------t-----1 c1,Q~ I CITX;; ?1~. r;~F~~,~~BAD 1------------------------+----+--+----+-----1 l'lllLIMU,MtY Clli\l)JNC }'OK 09.17.24 AK 07.31.24 AK 04.08.24 TJ 03.18.24 AK 08.04.23 AK 05.10.23 AK -}f:..T=-I\ Tl.t::..I PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT 5TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL 4TH SUBMITTAL ---------------+----+--+----+-----, DRAWING NAME: 3RD SUBMITTAL 2ND SUBMITTAL 1ST SUBMITTAL f-zl ~; CII _;./\ll 11\III/\L _;.,/\I=-ll'·Jlli\L Lcl'.::~k PI IUII CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION DETAILS 1 0 -st- "l 0 0 I "l N 0 N a... Cl u ......... N N 0 0 I "l N 0 N a... Cl (/) Exhibit 9 Full Size Exhibits “A” – “W” dated Jan. 15, 2025 (on file in the Planning Department) Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 116 of 117 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Exhibit 10 This is a list of acronyms and abbreviations (in alphabetical order) that are commonly used in staff reports. Acronym Description Acronym Description APA American Planning Association LCPA Local Coastal Program Amendment APN Assessor Parcel Number LOS Level of Service AQMD Air Quality Management District MND Mitigated Negative Declaration BMP Best Management Practice NCTD North County Transit District CALTRANS California Department of Transportation ND Negative Declaration CC City Council PC Planning Commission CCR Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions PDP Planned Development Permit CEQA California Environmental Quality Act PEIR Program Environmental Impact Report CFD Community Facilities District PUD Planned Unit Development CIP Capital Improvement Program ROW Right of Way COA Conditions of Approval RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board CofO Certificate of Occupancy SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments CT Tentative Parcel Map SDP Site Development Permit CUP Conditional Use Permit SP Specific Plan DIF Development Impact Fee SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program DISTRICT City Council Member District Number TM Tentative Map EIR Environmental Impact Report ZC Zone Change EIS Environmental Impact Statement (federal) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GP General Plan GPA General Plan Amendment GIS Geographic Information Systems HCA Housing Crisis Act 2019 IS Initial Study Jan. 15, 2025 Item #1 117 of 117 From:C B To:Lauren Yzaguirre Subject:Palomar and Aviara Office Project Date:Tuesday, January 14, 2025 1:03:10 PM Hi Lauren, Thank You for listening/answering questions when I called this morning. The City of Carlsbad / Jasmyne Sheridan provided support and assistance 09/2024 move into : Vista Azul 1380 Laurel Tree Ln. Apt. 203Carlsbad, Ca 92011. Thanks Again City of Carlsbad! This property has limited parking.Providing no Guest Parking. Residents having more then one car per household must find parking onLaurel Tree Ln. Laurel Tree Ln. Is also forced to accommodate for lack of on site parking for residents and guests of Laurel Tree Apts. Laurel Tree Ln. Not a through street.Cup-de-sac where 24 Hour Fitness is located. Laurel Tree Ln. and Aviara more housing currently under construction. Only exasperates problems. Safety concerns due to speeding cars in out 24 Hour Fitness, Blind Spots trying to pull out of Vista Azul Apts.And recently witnessed disabled man operating scooter not visible to driver almost hit by car. Many cars parked on Laurel Tree Ln.not moved regularly. Not do much to alleviate problems. Parking and Traffic solutions needed. Office project not likely help. Sincerely, Catherine Besmehn Item 1 - Correspondence Received by 3 p.m. 1-14-2025 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Lauren Yzaguirre, Associate Planner Community Development January 15, 2025 Palomar Aviara Office Project SDP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 1 { City of Carlsbad PROJECT LOCATION •SE Corner of Palomar Airport Road & Aviara Parkway •9.07-acres •Office (O) Zone / Open Space (OS) Zone 2 OS O PALOMAR AND AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT SOP 2023-0022/CDP 2023-0034 (DEV2022-0094) 9 0 50 100 200 300 {city of Carlsbad PROJECT FEATURES •42-feet-tall •Three-story medical office •52-foot architectural tower •316 parking spaces •2,702 SQFT outdoor employee eating areas 3 {city of Carlsbad 4 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 2 ZONE 6 i r j I, l I -lm- 1 r r i I I 1, ., ,~ ' . ( ' Pll(J>OSDI l Smm' 62,w:i D S~ 6UI.DIIIG M£IIIICJI.O 'Tll'[·I --A COISlilOCTI~ . , . \ ·~ ~-',::~. ::: : ~- 1u .--,. ... ilr).uy \:~_ \ , -I L ------T'i:o,:; 'l'l••r,..,,.. •• ? ··," \ ¢ \ ~-ilJlJ/ i)j}('', JJJfil· W IJJlj LJ ;,_fl·,J //I/ J '"~ .. J:..~-;".': --.::s:~~--;,':,,;::_,, ~":; .:~::;~:::::::~ __ _}=, . ._~-------~- , -•■.::-.:-.~ ==:N•.::.,';,':'.,~-~M ..... IW•>NHll■~,~••-H-• -----... -................ . I 6 Smooth Fiber Glass Reinforced Stucco Apolic Aluminum Cladding System Tinted GlassSpandrel Glass 7 ■II ■■ 8 Outdoor Eating Area B 1,330.76 SQFT Outdoor Eating Area A 1,372.58 SQFT I ••J \ . \ ---=:--;:;--. r t ---\ - --J \,-,.. I \ - • 0'\-0 • PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BU ILD ING . . :· -~-:-~r--.~_--;_,2 ---- / ~\ I c;--"" t ~ -'\I ,,,,---..__ .,_/ FF!;R 1 r--l I• ERA TOR ENCLOSURE ROTHERS ' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT i ENCLOSURE PER OTHERS l 1 :~ 1 ----..i:../ l: -l I ~ ~~~ f ' • i DECORATIVE PAVING, TYP. \1 ~ i I ~ ~ \ 1' /... TRASH ENCLOSURE \ ' PER OTHERS \ I I I I ' '\_ \ 1 · l • ,~_.t : '_, J ._J ~ ! I I j J1 • ADJACENT • O.,o . i • -l I \ I \ , -~ • ; 1 \ , i_ t ~ '" _ L , O~MMERCIAL \ \ I i ' ' ' I ,q / I ;,-' ' • ., , ~ f • ff _ ·,-11 / ll ' ) \ ,~~-<! 1.-r-tt--.-~ VEHICULAR SIGHT LINES. I \ \ -~-.__ ~ , _. . .• NO LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS / , . ,.__-:;;--)----~ -~-_ _ , OVER 30" HT PERMITTED EXISTING D.G. TRAIL TO BE \ -----\ -'-" / j ,/ 1 PROTECTED-IN-PLACE \ \ \./ NEW TRAILHEAD SIGNAG r !j • j I ADJ. ACE~T\UNDISTtlRBE D \\ 1'1 fl I -t :1 , f1/;f -.• _, I • M.· ' ~ l I ,/ r, ~,'t\TI V~.'X~~TATlv ~ ~\ I _r _ ,.. ~ 1 1/f/ ( _--_------_ _j 9 Outdoor Eating Area B Outdoor Eating Area A ' --------7 i ! u--~ ., ... •--::J ====--ni _w_.-,-_ I 11 I L ________ _d ., .. .. • : !I f f .. ., -----_:::;., ,. \ ' \ I I I I _J I -~_.:::--~7-F/ =f=:=7!! . y _ _,, _,--- +-j i ~::.."' -----__ __, [ ~.-0 ___ // -=~=r ,,,1, ', L \ -----,.c;;;-, I I \, ---~ 10 ,T. ~ :;. "'\~~ ~,r,; --.,.. .. ---:=. _<! :2;.z --11:" 11 12 13 14 b "' "" b ;:.. TOP OF GLASS TOWER ROOF RIDGE .... FYi.RAPET .... _ROOF LltE .... - 3RD FlOOR (FINISH FLOOR) I -- -------it=-F-""--,------~~----=-:-_-- I / -v~: I I I I I / / L _____ J......- I' i--, .... I I --11--t-1-1--+,--t--t--t -l---------------+----------~--~--~---+ t ---- -..... -,---........ -.. -.-t-+--------------1='1=='---f=l--=i==i===l--=t I 2ND F'LOOR (FINISH FLOOR) ..... - ~ JI 1RST F'LOOR (=H Fldym 11: 1) I l=l====ll=H=l+~f==#===t=!t==t===ll==:dll--l--1-~1 --l-1---t~l~ ______ -;=:=I ====Jt===t==t====t==r====r=,=="".'"I ~I 1 l=!===il==li=~4===il===ll==.Jl======l~~=4=t-:=_t-:=_-:=_t~1_11_-_-r1_--1----i--i..+---------_._+-_____ ...._ ___ -t===,1===tt====t==fl=l====t I • -~ ---I I I I .--1 I=== g \ / \ I I I / □ ' / \ I I I \ I/ ' I I I I I I I I I I I Grand Hope Medical Office Building 15 General Public Concerns •Traffic •Parking {city of Carlsbad PROJECT ANALYSIS General Plan (O/OS) Zoning Ordinance (O/OS) Local Coastal Program (Mello II) 16 -4-j -I i I Recommended Action ITEM 1: PALOMAR AVIARA OFFICE PROJECT 17 ADOPT the Planning Commission Resolution APPROVING of Site Development Plan SDP 2023-0022 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 2023-0034 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. { City of Carlsbad Planning Commission January 15, 2025 {city of Carlsbad CEQA Determination PALOMAR AVIAR OFFICE PROJECT 1919 •CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 through 15164 •Kelly/JRM Office Project •Three-story, approximately 85,000 SQFT •MND & MMRP adopted September 18, 2007 •CEQA Analysis, dated 12/3/2024 •Project is within the scope of the prior environmental document. 1111111 {city of Carlsbad 20(E) 3-Story Condo ----4L..._------~ I , ... ., .• I I ~~t.---1-'---- \ I j I I J ! / I I i I ,··v,1;,,v ~/ I I r . I '{ 1/ I ( \_ AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE 4 A(RPOR T SAFTEY ZONE 6 AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE 2 OP[N SPACE EASEMENT AREA ♦ ... + ... + • ... ♦ .. .. . .. . .. . ~ . ~ . ~