The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 2018-0007; VALLEY VIEW; CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY; 2008-04-01V Prepared for: CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY FOR THE CLIFF HANGER PROJECT CARLSBAD, CALIFOR"ITA Planning Systems Prepared by: Gallegos & Associates April 2008 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY FOR THE CLIFF HANGER PROJF,CT CARLSBAD, CALIFOR"<IA Prepared for: Planning Systems 1530 Faraday A venue. Suite I 00 Carlsbad. California 92008 Prepared by: Gallegos & Associates 5671 Palmer Way. Suitl' A Carlsbad. California 92010 I 760) 929-0055 PJ. 2-08 National Archaeological Data Base Information Type of Study: Record Search. Literature Review. and Field Survey Arca Covered: Approximately 7 acres USGS 7.5' Quadrangle: San Luis Rey Key Words: Negative sun·ey Authon Monica Guerrero. R PA Projeel Archaeologist Dennis R. Gallegos Project Manager Contributors Karen E. Doose Editing: Report Production :\JCk Doose --OIS Specialist: Field Crev..- Brian Spelts -Fidd Crev,., April 2008 APPE!\DIX A 8 l PJ. 2-08 April J()t)}; TABLE OF CONTENTS con't. LIST OF APPENDICES TITLE Resumes of Key Personnel Record Search Results "\ative .-\.merican Correspondence ii PAGE ,\-] B-1 C-l TITLE: AllTIIORS: DATE: SOURCE OF COPIES: ABSTRACT: EXEC[;TIVE SUMMARY Cultural Re.sources Survey for the Cliff Hanger Project Carlsbad. California Monica Guerrero and Dennis R. Gallegos Gallegos & Associates 5671 Palmer Way, Suite A Carlsbad. California 92010 April 2008 South Coastal lnfonnation Center San Diego State University 4283 El Cajon Blvd. Suite 250 San Diego. California 92105 This study provides the results of a cultural resources record search. literature re\·iew. and tidd survey for the 7-acre Cliff Hang.er Office Building projcct. This study was conducted in compliance with City of Carlsbad and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The study included a record seoirch. literature review. and field surve)' of the 7-acre Cliff Hanger project area. The literature review and field sur\'ey were negative identifying no previously recorded or newly recorded cultural resources within the project area. Ground visibility was poor \\ ithin the project area with vegetation consisting of coastal sage scrub and non·native grasses. Disturbance within the projed area include.s previous grading and fill for construction of Palmer Way. modem trash dumping, and jlligrant camp m:tivities. Given the absence uf previously recorded cultural resources. high level of disturbance. and the negative sun.·ey results, no additional cultural resources work is recommended. As \·isibility was poor throughout the project area. monitoring of brush clearing and initial grading: activities by a qualified an .. ·haeologist and a Native American is recommended to ensure that buried cultural resources (i.e .. artifact deposits. burials. hearths) are e\1.lluated in a timely and proper manner. PJ. 2-08 Arri\ 2008 iii J .1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION I 11\TRODliCTION The Cliff Hanger cultural resources study was prepared b} (hillcgos & Associates. This study was conducted in compliance with City of Carlsbad and California Environmental Quality Act (CFQA) guidelines. The project area is located \vithin the City Df Carlsbad. and is pr,,_,posed for development of an office building. The project area is bound on the northwest and 110rtheast by undeveloped lanJ. on the Sl1uthwest h:, Palmer \Va). and on the south and southeast by Impala Drive and a business park: and. is depicted on the San Luis Rey 7S 1_·sGS topographic quadrangle (Figures 1-1 and 1-1). This study provides the results of a cultural resources record search. literature review. and field survey for the 7-acre Cliff Hanger project area. Resumes of key personnel are included in Appendi:,; A: Record search results in Appendix R: and. Native American Conespondem:e in Appendix C. Confidential maps are not for public review and are bc,und separately in the Confidential Appendix. 1.2 ENVIRONMF.NT AL SETTING The project area is lm:ated approximately 3 miles east of Agua l lcdionda Lagoon. a m~jor estuary along the Southern California coast. During the late Pleistocene and early Holrn.:ene. rising sea level created lagoons from the mouths of major river systems. With stabilization ot' St:a level. coastal lagoons slowly shrank and began to loose their estuarine qualities. as they gradually filled with \\iatcrbome silts. Eventually the lagoons stabilized in a pattern of partial closure during portions of the year as sand and cobble bars fanned across their outlets to the Pacific Ocean. The subsequent lack of tidal flushing changed the salinity !cvds and directly affected the type nf molluscan. as well as other plant and animal species present \\ ithin the lagoon. This change also affected the subsistence economy of precontact populations that relied on th~se resources. As a result of urban PJ.1-08 April 2008 1-1 development. the majorit) of the nati, e vegetation has been replaced by inlroduced non- natin? n·getation. Sediments consist primarily of sand \Vith limited loam. 1.3 BACKGROUND-l'RECONTa\CT The body of cu1Tcnt research or Natin: American tPrecontact) occupation in San Diego County recognizes the existence of at least two maj0r cultural traditions. discussed here as Early Period/ Archaic and I .ate Period. based upon general economic trends and material culture {Tahlc 1-1 ). \Vithin San Diego County. the Early Period/Archaic includes the period from 10.000 to 1.100 years ago. while the Late Period is from 1.300 years ago to historic contact. The Post-Cnntan1Histciric Period covers tht· time from Spanish contact to present. Terminolog)' u:-,cd for the past I 0.000-year hi~tnry of San Diegu County includes a mixture of ideas of ordering cultural resource sites using tem1s for peoples, collc-ctions of artifacts, and temporal time frames. The first ordering was by Malcolm Rogers w!10 used the tenns: She!1-l\•1iddcn peopk. Scraper-Maker culture (scraper-makers), and Yuman (Rogers 1929). Rogers Inter revised his chronology to use the te1111s San Dieguito (Scraper-r-.·taker), La Jolla culture (Shell-Midden people) and Yuman (R()gers 194~)-Claude Wam·n (1968) characterized the San Dieguito Tradition as: ... a wide range of scraper types made on side-struck flakes and finished by well-controlled percussion flaking. leaf-shaped knives or large points of several varieties. leaf-shaped. lanceolate and slight[) shouldered points in small number. Chipped stone crescents. often eccentric in form, hammerstones and crudely tlakeJ tools are kw in number. Milling stones and manos arc 1wticerible ahscnt. 'vVarren·s revision to Rogers' I.a Julia culture: was called Encinitas Tradition. ··a simple gathering penple" wherein he identifies: .. flaked stone ttwls arc characteristically .:rude. thL' great rnajmily being percussion flaked and made from ll)Ca) macrocrysw.lline rock. A large percentage of lhc tool as:s~mhlage is composed of crude chopping. scraping and cutting tools and hammcrstones. Projectile points are rare. crudely made and rather large. suggesting the use of darts, rather than bow PJ. 2-08 ,\pri! .::008 an<l anow. Ground stone items include large numbers of manos and milling stones usually shaped through use. and occasional items such as doughnut stones. discs and cogstones ... Bone tools are rare but include awls. antler flakers. beads ... Shdl items are also limited. but include heads. rendams ... Basketry is represl.'ntcd ... l.oosely tlexed burials are found throughout the area ... (Warren et al. l Q98 ). Warren has more recently updated his chronology and for the San Dieguito Tradition (Initial Occupation) has since included milling tools and a wider range of' tools and food sources. In addition. \Varren 11()\\' dis,.:usses the potential of Transitional and inknnediate stages of o.:cupation to co\·er the pa.;;t l 0.000 yr;>ars of" Natiw American occupatiun in San Diego County (W,men et al. 1998). Early Man in San Diego County was discussed by Cieorge Carter in the 1950s: however, little to no _-:vidence rit· Plcisiocene human occupation supports this hypothesis (Carter 1957). 1.3.1 Early Period/Archaic The Eady Period/Archaic includes the San Dieguito. I.a Jolla and Pauma complexes. which are poorly defined. as are the interrelationships bet\\een contemporaneous inland. desert. and coastal assemblages (Gallegos 1987). Initially belie,,ed to represent big game humers. the San Dieguito people are better typified as a hunting and gathering society. These peoph: had a relati'l-dy diverse and non-specialized economy wherein relatively mobik bands accessed and used a wide range of plant. aninrnl. and lithic resl1urce:-.. l'\fovement of early groups from the California cksert may have been spurred by the gradual dcsiu:ation or thl.' vast pluvial lake system that domina1ed inland basim and valleys during the early to middle I folocene. J"his hypothesis is supported hy tht: similarity between Great Basin assemblages and those of early I loloccnc Archai..:: sites in San l)iegn County. Se\'era\ researchers recognized the regional similarity of artifacts and grouped these contemporaneous comple:-.:es under the nomenclature of either the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition or the \}/estem Lithic Co-tradition /Bedwell I 970: Davis et al. !969: Moratto 1984: Rogers 193Q: \Varren 1967). P.I 2-08 April 2008 1-6 Early migrations into San Diego County rnay ha, e come fwm the north. Recent work on the northern Channel islands near Santa Barbara dcmon~trates island occupation dating bac~ to the tennina! Pkistocenl.'.. roughl) 11,600 years ago ( Erlandson et al. I 996: Johnson ct al. 20001. At this early dak. a fully maritime-adapted population exploited shelllish and used seaworthy boats to ply channel ,,.:aters. Fish were captured using bone gor£CS hy 10.00(1 years ago (Rick et al. 2001 ). Such earl) dates are lacking for the adjacent Santa Barbara mainland; presumably because the rise in sea level brought about hv post-Pleistocene deglaciation would have inundated sites along the late Pleistocene/early Holocene coastlines. At this time in San Diego County. the shoreline was situated t\vo to si-.; km forthcr semvard than today"s coast (Masters and Gallegos 1997). Therefore. any t:vidence for early cnusta! adaptation coeval V..'ith that of the northern Channel blands may have been destroyed within this t\VO to six km paleo- shoreline area by sea encroachment thousands of years ago. ·1 he ongm of coastal populations in San Diego County and subsequent interaction between these populations and Great Basinidescrl groups is a subject of some debate (Gallegos 1987). \Vhether coastal or inland migration into San Diego County. the first occupants immediately exploited coa'ital and inland n;soun:es of plants. animals. shellfish. and fish (Gallegos 1991: Kaldcnberg 1982: Kyle et al. 1998; Moriarty 1967). The development of a generalized economic system indicates that the initial occupation. referred to here as San Dieguito, can he placed within the general Archaic pattern. Archaic cullurcs occur within North America at slightly different times in different areas. but :.:src general I~ correlated with local economic specialization growing out of the earlier Palco-Indian Tradition {Willig el al. 1988). Archaic cultures are often represented by more diverse artifact assemblages and more complex regional variation than Paleo-Indian traditions. This cultural pattern is generally thought to haw resulted from the gradual shift av\a} from a herd-hased hunting fon1s to a more diverse and area specitic economy. The earliest sites are found near coastal lagoons and rin:'r \'alleys of San Diego County. These sites are the 1-hmis site (CA-SDl-149). Agua llcdionda Lagoon sit.::s (CA-SDI- PJ 2-08 April 2U(Jl,; 1-7 ~10/UCLJ-M-15 and CA-SDI-10695). Rancho Park North (CA-SDJ-4392/SD\.-1-W-49). and Remington Hills {CA-SDl-11069). dating from 9.500 to 8.000 ~'ears ago. The north San Diego Count~ coastal lagoons suppo11ed large populations. cin.::a 6.000 years ago. as shown by the numi.:rou~ radiocarbon-dated sites adjacent to these lagoons. After 3.UOO 10 roughly 1.500 years ago. there arc tCwer cultural resource sites in north San Diego County. This reduction in number of cultural resource sites can be attributed to the slowing of the rise in sea level and concomitant siltation or cuastal lagoons causing the depletion of ~hellfish and other lagoon resources (Gallegos 1985: l'vliller 1966: V/arrcn and Pavesic 1 %3 ). Cultural resource sites dated tn circa 2.000 )Cars ago are found in the Camp Pendleton area (Byrd and Reddy 2002)_ wherein shellfish (/)(max gou/di;) were collected from upen-shore sand) beach hahitat: and. bay species v..cre s1ill abundant in San Diego Bay. and present but not as dominant in other lagoons. Batiquitos Lagoon. and perhaps other lagoons, reopened circa 1.50(1 years ago and began producing shellfish again. but not at the-quantity. size or variet} of shellfish documented for the i:arly to middle Holocene (Gallegos 1985: Miller I 966 }. Thi: L-1 folla and Pauma complexes, which arc relerrcd to ilS follo\\-ing the San Dieguito Complex. may simply represent seasonal or geographic variations of the some\\ hat older and more general San Dieguito Complex. Inland Early Period /Archaic occupation sites have been reported in C()astal settings. trans\•erse valleys, sheltered canyons. lx·nch\!s and knolls (True 1958: \Vam:n et aL 1961 ). In 11011h San Diego County. non-coastal sites \Vere tenned '"Pauma Cornplt:x'' by True ( 1958. 1980). and v.:erc defined as containing a predominance of grinding implements {rnanos and mctmcs)_ a general lack lif shellfish remains. a greater tool variety. and expressing an emphasis on both gathering and hunting (True 1958. 1980: Warren el al. 1961: \Vaugh 1986). Early Period/ Archaic sites from l 0,000 to l.300 years ago within San Diego County include a range uf sites 10 include coastal and inland valley habitation sites. inland hunting and milling camps. and quarry sites usually in association y,:ith fine-grained metavolcanic material. Material culture assemblages during this hmg period are remarkably similar in many respeds. These deposib ma) well represent a process of P.I 2·08 April :;oos 1-8 relative terrestrial economic stahility and presumably slow cultural change. Although various cultural trait::; d,;.•,·cloped or disappeared during the long span of I 0.000 to 1.300 years agll. there is u clear pattern of cultural continuity during this period. 1.3.2 Late Period During the Late Peri()d (circa 1 JOO to historic contact_), a material culture pattern similar to that of Histonc Period Native Americans first becomes apparent in the archaeological record. The economic pattern <luring thi:-, pi:riod appe.:1rs tn he one of more intensive and efficient exploitation of local resources. The prosperity of thcsi: highly retincd economic patterns is \\·ell evidenced by the numerous Kwneyaay1Diegucfio and Luisetlo habitation sites scattered throughout San Diego County. This increase in Late Period site Jensit~, probably rdl.:cts both better preservation of thl' more recent archaeological record and a gradual population increase within the region. Ar1ifacts and cultural attributes reflecting this Late Period pattern include small pro_iectile points. pottery, the establishment of pennanent or semi~permanent seasonal habitation sites. a proliferation of acorn processing sites in the uplands. the presence of obsidian frum the Imperial Valley source Obsidian Bulle. and intcm1ent by cremation. Luiseii.n occupation in north San Diego County during the late Holocene has been Yie,vcd as an occupatiun that rt·sulte<l from the migration of a population from the desert to the coast ( Rogers 1966"!, a resettlement called ·•the Shoshoncan Wedge" (Krocber 19:'5 ). Late Period cultural pmtems were shared with groups along the northern cmd eastern periphery of San Diego County. incnrporating many elements of their neighhors· culture~ into Lheir own cultures. This 1ransference and melding nf cultural traits between neighboring groups makes positive association of archaeological deposits \\ith particular ethnographically known cultures difficult. This is particularly true of the groups within San Diego County. Although significant dilkrcnccs exist between Lu1seii.o and Kumeyaay/Dieguefio cultures (including linguistic stock). the king in1ernction of these groups during the Late Period resulted in the exchange of man~ social patterns. Archaeologists must rel) he,wily on ethnographic accounts of group boundaries as PJ. 2-08 April 20()8 J-9 recorded during the Historic Period. altlwugh it is 1101 known ho"' !ong these boundaries had been in place or the Yalidity of these boundaries as presently reported. Krocher ( 1925) placed the Kumeyaay and Luisefto boundary between Agua Hedionda and Batiquitos lagoons. According to Luomala ( I 978) the territory of the Ipai (northern Kumeyaay) extended along the mast from the San I ,uis Rey River in the north to San Diego Bay in the south with San Felipt~ Creek marking the east boundary The territory ()f!he Tipai (southern Kumcyaay_) e:x!ended south from San Diego Ray TO include parts of '.\-1exico and the southern im•untains. Florence Shipek ( J 9Q3) identified the northern and southern KumeyaayiDieguefio tribal boundary-as: In 1769. Kumeyaay national territory starting at the coast about I 00 miles south nf the l\foxican border (below Santo Tomas). thence north to the coast at the drainage di\'idc south of the San Luis Rey RiYer including its tributaries. Using the L.S. Geological Survey topographii.: maps. the boundary with the Luisefio then follows that divide inland. The boundary continues on the div·ide separating Val!ey Center from Escondido and then up along Bear Ridge to the 2240 contour line and then north across the diYide between Valley Center and \liioods Valley up to the 1880-foot peak. tht.m curving arnund cast along the dh,ide above Woods Valley. Further readings pertinent to the Luisello and Kumeyaay (Dieguefio) Native Americans include: Almstedt (1974): Barrov.:s (1900): Bean (1972): Bean and Saubel (1972): Bean and Shipek ( 1978): Burrus (1967); Cuero ( 1968): Drucker ( 1939): Dubois ( 1908): Gifford ( 1918 ); Harrington ( 1978 ); Hedges and Geres ford ( 1986 ): Heizer and Almquist ( 1971 ); Heizer and '),/hippie ( I 95 7): Hooper ( 19~0): Keneally { 1965 ); Kroebt:r (I 925 ); Langdon ( 1970): !\frrrill { \ 973 ): Pouradt: ( 1960): Priestley ( 193 7 ); Rudkin ( 1956 ): Shipek ( 1977. l97R, 1980. 1986a. 1986h. 1987. 1988. 1989a. 198%, 1991. 199)): Sparkman (]908): Spicer ( I 962): Spier (] 913 ): Strong ( 1929): Tibesar { I 955 ): Underhill (194 I): White ( 1963 ): \Volcon ( 1929 ); and \Vood\\ard ( 1934 ). PJ. 2-08 April 21HJ8 1-IO t_.i HISTORICAL BACKGROlJNll The histo~ of San Diego County is commonly presented in tem1s of Spanish. ~v1exican. and American political domination. A <liscuss10n of historic land use and occupation under periods of political rule h~· people of European and Mexican origin is justified on the basis of characteristics associated \\.ith each period. when economic. political. and social activities were influenced l.iy the pn:vailing laws and customs. Certain themes are common to al! periods. such a<.. the development tif transportation. settlement. and agriculture. Robinson ( 1969) provi<les a comprehensive acc0unt of public and privately O\"ined land in California. with a discussion of laws. activilies, and events related to the development of the State. 1.4.1 Spanish Period (1769-1821) The Spanish Period represents exploratiun. the establishment of the San Diego Presidio and missions at San Diego ( 1769) and San Luis Rey ( 1798). anJ asistencias (chapels) to 1hc San Diego Mi.ssi011 at Santa Ysabel ( 1818) and 10 the San Luis Rey Mission at Pala {1816). Horses. cattle. agricultural foods and weed seeds. and a new architectural styk and method of building construction were also introduced. Spanish influence continued alter 1821 when ('alifomia became a p::irt nf Mexico. for a period of time under lvkxican rnle. 1he missions continued to operate as in the past. and laws governing the distribution vr land were .:1!so retained. 1.4.2 Ml.'xican Period (1821~1848) The ~-kxirnn Period includes the initial rdention of Spanish laws and practices until .shmtly befnri.: secularization of the missions in 1834, a decade after the end of Spanish ruk. Although .ievcral grants of land '-Vere made prior !o 1834. vast tracts of land ,vere dispersed 1hwugh land grants offerl'd after secularization. Cattle ranching prevailed OVl'r agricultural acti\"itics. and the development of the hide and tallow trade increased during. the early part of this peritid. The Pueblo of San Diego {present-day Old Town) was PJ. ::!-08 April 2008 1-11 established and transportation routes \\ere expanded. The Mexican Period ended in 1848 as a result of the \1exiran-American War_ 1.4.3 American Period (1848 to Present) rhe American Period began when .Vkxirn ceded California to the United States under the Treaty ofGuada!upe Hidalgo. Te-rms of the treaty brought about the creation of the Lands Commission. in response lO the Homestead Act t1f J 851 that was adopted as a means of validating and settling land mvnership claims throughout the S1ate. Few Mexican ranchos remained intact because of legal costs and the difficulty of producing sufficient cYidence to prn\'e title claims. Much of the land that once cons1i1uted rancho holdings became m,ailahk for settlement by immigrants to California. The influx of people to California and the San Diego region re-suited from several factors including the disi.:overy of gold in the State. 1he conclusion of the Civil War_ the availahility of free land lhrough passage of the Homestead Act. and later. the importance of San Diego County as an agricultural area supported by roa<ls. irrigation systems. and i:onnecting railways. The gJm\th and decline of town:--occurred in response to population fluxes and economic boom and bust cycles. 1.5 PREVIOllS WORK The record search and litcrnture re\·iew v..cre C0mp!eted at the South Coastal lnfom1ation Center {SCIC). San Diego State l.lni\-ersity (SDSl l). San Diego. California. and at the research library nt Gallegos & Associate!'.i. Record search results are pnwided in Appendix B. ·1\venty•SC\'en studies (APC' 1979. 1980: Berryman and Cheever 2001; Brown 2000: Dukc 2002: Fink 1973. 1974a. l974b. 1977: Gal!egos and Guerrero 2001: Gallegos and Kyle I 997: Gross and Alter 1998: Guerrero and Ciallcgos 2003: Hanna l 98 L He,:tor 1983a, 1983h: Highto\\Cr 1976: Quillen I 982; REC ON 1983: Robbins- Wade 1997: Seeman 1981: Smith 1990: Smith and Gilbert 1007: Tang ~004: Vv'ade I 989, I 999: Wade and Hector I 986) ha,·e been conduckJ, and nineteen cullural resource sites and one i~olate a.re rel'.l)rdcd within a one•mik radius nf the project area. One stud:, P.l. 2·08 April 2008 1-12 (Seeman 19821 has heen conducted within the project area. ~o previous!~· recorded sites are recorded \\..ithin the project area. 1.6 HISTORICAL MAI' REVIEW Earl: maps ( 1769-1885 H1stl1ric Roads and Trails: 1872 Official Map of the \\'estem Portitm of San Diego County. California: 1898 Oceanside 15· USUS quadrangle: 1901 San Luis Rey 30· USGS quadrangle: J()42 Oceanside 15· t:SGS quadrangle: and. 1948 San Luis Re~ 7.5· LSGS quadrangle) were reviewed f(.)f historic structurts. features. and roads: hov,eH>r. no items of historical patrimony Here identified on the maps within the Cliff Hanger project area. PJ. 2~08 Ap1il ~008 1-13 SECTION 2 METHODS, RESULTS, AND REC0'1MENDATIONS 2.1 INTRODUCTION Tlw cuncnt study included a record search. literature n:view. and field surn:y llf tht= 7- acr,; Cliff Hanger project area. Suryey methods. rc:c.ultc;. and recommendations are provided bcknv. 2.2 SURVEY MF.THODS The prnJcct area \\as sun'eyed on foul using 10-m intervals between sur\'cy transects. Nick Doose and Brian Spdts c11mpleted the field surwy in \.farch 2008 for a total of 4 person-hours. "\fatiH~ American monitor Mindy Mojado representing the San Luis Rey Hand 0f Luisefio Indians provided monitoring services for fieldv..·mk conducted. 2.3 SLRVE\' RESULTS (i-round visibility was poor \\•ithin the steep slope areas with vegetation consisting of coastal sage scrnh and non-native grasses. Ground visibility was also poor in the Jeye] areas adjacent to Palmer Way with vegetation consisting mostly of mulch and some coastal sage scrub. Disturbance within the project area indudes previous grading and fill rnr rnnstruction of Palmer Way. n10dern trash dumping. and migrant camp activities. Th.-: Jidd surn:y was negmivc idcnti(~ ing none,.,_ rnltural resourecs. 2.4 SLll\1\1ARY AND R£COMMENDATIO'lS The study included a record search. literature revic'>v, and field survey of the 7-acre Cliff Hanger project area. The litt:rature review and ticld sun:·cy were negati\"C identifying no preYiously recordt:d and no new cultural resotm:es within the project area. Gi,·en the absence of previously recorded cultural resources. high lewl of disturbance. and the PJ 2-08 April 2008 2-1 negative surwy results. no additional cultural resource-s work is recommended. As visibility \Vas poor throughout the project area. monitoring of brush clearing and initial grading activities hy a qualilied archaeologist and a '.\lativc American is n~cornmendcd to cnsurc that buried cultural resources (i.t: .. artifact deposits, burials. heanhs) arc evaluated in a timely and proper manner. I' J 2-08 April 2008 2-2 SECTI01' 3 RF:FERENCES CITED Almstedt. Ruth F. J 974 BihliographJ f?f the Dii:;Kue/lo Indians. 13allena Press. Ramona. California. An.:haco]ogical Planning Collaborative ( APC l l 979 Archaeologil'.al Records Search and Reconnaissance Survey. Carlsbad, California. On !i!c. South Coastal Infonnation Center. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. J 980 Archaeological Records Search and field Sut'\"ey. Palomar Airport Effluent Pipelines. San Diego Coun1y. California. On file. South Coastal Jnfonnation Center. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. Baffows. IJm·id Prcscoll 1900 F.//mohotany of" 1he Caliui!Ja Indiam 1f Sourhem Cai!fhmia: pp. 8.10.14. L1nivcrsity of Chicago Press. Chicago. Bean. Lo\,\,el] l 1972 .\Iuka! 's People. Uni,·crsity of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angeles. California. Hean. Lowell J. and Katherine S. Saubel 1972 Temalpakh. Cahuil!a Indian Knowledge and Usage 1~( Plums. Malhi Museum Press. Banning. California. Bean. I.. Land F. C. Shipek I 978 Luiseflo. In Jfandhook ol .,Von Ii Amer;cun Indians. Folume 8.· Bedwell. S. 1·. 1970 Cul(/iJmiu. edited by R. F. Heizer. pp. 550-563. Smilhsonian Im,titution. Washington. D.C. Prehistory and Environment of the PluYial Fork Rock Lake Art'a of South Central Oregon. Ph.D. dissertation. Department uf Anthropology, Lni\-ersit) of Oregon, Eugene. Berryman. Judy A. and Dayle \,1. Cheever ~001 Significance Evaluations of Cultural Resource Sites Located al the Cantarini Pr0pcrty. On fili:. South Coastal lnfomiation Ccnkr. San Diego State Lniversity, San Diego, California. PJ. 2-0B April 2008 3-1 Brown. Joan C. 2000 Cultural Resources Recovered During Pakontological Monitoring of the Carlsbad Corporate Center Project. Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal Infornrntion Center, San Diego State University. San Diego. (_ 'a\ifomia. Hurrus. I-:rnest J. (editor) 1967 Diario de] Co.pitan Comandante Fernando de Rivera) ~foncada con un A.pendicc Documental. Edicion Prologo (Espafiol y Ingles) y notas por E. J. Burrus. Ediciones Jose Porrua Turanzas, Madrid: Colecci6n Chimalistac de Librns y Documentos Acerca de la Nueva Espallol. Vol. 14-25. Byrd. 8. F .. and S. N. Redd) 200J Late Holocene Adaptations along the Northern San Diego Coast: ~ew Perspectives on Old Paradigms. In Cawly.1·,s lo Complexity. Lare 1/oloct>ne ,\'ocie1ies qt the Cai!fhmiu Cuas/, edited hy J. \t Erlandson and T. !.. Jones. pp. 41-62. Perspectives in California Archaeology. Volume-6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, l:niversity of California. Los Angt'ks. Caner. George F. 1957 Pleistoanl.! Man u/ San J);e~o. John Hopkins Press. Baltimore. Cuero. Delfina 1968 Tlw A111ohiography rf Delfina ( 'uero, a.1· told lo Dav.-son's Hook Shop. Los Angeles. California. Florence Ship!!k. Davis. Emma Lou, Clark W. Brott and David L. Weide I 969 ·1 he Western Lithic Co-Tradition. S'an DieRO ,'111se11m h.q)l!rs 6. San Diego Museum or Man. San Diego. California. Drucker, Philip 1939 Culture Element Distributions -V: Southern California l.'niwrsuy 1~( ( ·u.t{tornia A111hropoluxical Rffords I ( 1 ):5--17. Berkeley. California. Dubois, Constance 1908 ·111e Religion of the Luisefio Indians. /..'11i1'e1·si1y of Cu/ifhrnia and Ethnology ( 8 ):69-186. Duke. Curt 1001 P.1.2-08 April 2008 Puhlirn1io11s in American Archaeology Berkeley. California Cultural Resource Assessment Cingu!ar Wireless facility :\o. SD 918- 03. San Diego County, California. On file. South Coastal lnfonnation Center. San Diego State t:niversity, San Diego. California. 3-2 Erlandson . .I. M .. D. J. Kennett B. L. lngram, D. A. Guthrie. D. P. Morris. M.A. Tvesko\". G. J. West. and P. L Walker J 996 An Archaeological and Pakontologica! Chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261). San Miguel Island. California. Radiocarhon 38: 355- '.173 Fink. (iary R. 1973 Archaeological Sur\'ey of the Propos~d Letterbox Canyon Landfill Site. On file. South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State University, San Diego. California. ]974u 197-l-b Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Palomar Airport Master Plan Project. On file, South Coastal lnfr1rmation Center. S,m Diego State University. San Diego. California. Archaeological Suney of the Proposed Airport Road Landfill Site Pro_iect No. RP0408. County of San Diego. 1977 Archaeological Survey. Palomar Solid \Vaste Transfer Station. Carlsbad. California. On file, South Coastal lnfonnation Center. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. Oallcgos. Dennis R. 1985 Batiquitos Lagoon Revisited. (_ 'asual /1aper.,· of 1he ( '11/tumf Resource Manageme111 ('enler. Vol. 2. No. 1. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. 1987 199] 2002 PJ 2-08 April ~008 A Review and Synthesis of Environmental and Cultural Material for the Batiquitos Lagoon Region. San DieguilO-La .Jolla: Chro11ology anJ ( 'onlrm·t>r.<.y, San Diego Archneological Society. San Diego. California. Antiquity and Adaptation at Agua Hedionda. Carlsbad, California. In I !unter-<.l1.llherers o(Ear~v 1/o!ocene ( 'ooslal ( 'al{(Ornia. edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Roger H. Colten. Institute of Archaeology. l lniversity of California, Los Ang.des. Southern California in Transition: Late Hokicenc Occupation of Southern San Diego County. In ('0111(1.'sfa lO Complexity: l.uh: 1/oloi.:em: Sodetie,<; of tht: Cal/fUrnia Comr. Edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Tcny Jones. Institute of Archaeology. 1 lnivcrsity of California. Los Angeles. Gal !egos. Dennis R. anJ f\fonica Guerrero 2001 Historical/Archaeological Survey for the Palomar Transfer Station Pro_iect, Carlsbad, California. On file. South Coastal lnfonnation C.:nter, San Diego State Uniwrsity. San Diego. California. Gallegos, Dennis R. and Carolyn E. Kyle 1997 Historical/Archaeological Suncy for the Beckman Property. City of Carlshad. California. On file. South Coastal lnfo1111ation Center. San Diego Stati.: l lniversity, San Diego. California. Ciifford, Edward W. 19 I 8 Clans and \foietk~s in Southern California. Uniwrsil_r o_f ( 'u/if()rniu Puhlica1iom in Ameriwn An·lweology and E1hno!n:.,.,_'l· 14: 167-174. Bcrkd0y. California. Gross. Timothy and Ruth Alter 1998 Archaeological Testing of a Portion of SDI-14809. An Archaeological Site on a Segment of the South Agua Hedionda Trunk Se,ver. Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal Infi)mrntion Center. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. (iuenero, rvlonica and Dennis R. Gallegos 2003 City of Carlsbad \.Vater and Sev,:er Master Plans. Cultural Resource Background Study. City of Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State University. San Diego. California. Hanna. David C. 1981 Addendum to the Cultural Resource Survey Rcpon for Carlsbad Highlands, City of Carlsbad. San Diego County. California. On fik. South Coastal lnformatiun Center. San Diego State Uni,cr~ity, San Diego. California. HaiTington. J.P. l 978 Chi111:,I.chi11ich. Malki Museum Press. Banning. California. l lcctor. Susan 1983a 1983b P.1 2-0S April 2008 Archaeological ln\·estigations at SDM-\V-1459/SDI-5224, City Puhlic Safety Center. Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal lnfonnation Center. San Diego Stak Lniversity. San Diego, California. Archaeological Survey nf Del Mar Financial, Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal lnfonmition Center. San Dieg{) State University. San Diego. California. lkdges. K .. and C. Beresford 1986 Santa Ysabel Ethnohotan)'. San Diego :\4usl!WII (?/. Jfan, Ethnic T<'chnology Xole,\ (20)58. I kizcr. Robert r. anJ A. 1-. Almquist 1971 ]he Other Calilornhms. Prl!judice and Disaiminution wuh:r Spain. Alt>xico and the l '11i1ed Sta1es 10 I 920. Lniversit)' of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angdes. California. IIeizer. Robert F. and M.A. Whipple 1957 The Cali/Ornia lndiw1s. University of California Press. Berkeley. Hightower. .Janet l Q76 Archai:o!ogical Suney frn thl'! Propt1sed Palomar Shredder. Carlsbad. California. On tile. South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State I jnivcrsity. San Diego. California. Hooper. Lucille 1920 The C'ahuilla Indian!'.>. l/niw:rsily of and EIh1wlog) C 'al!fhrnia Puhlicatiom· in Johnson. J. ::woo American An·lweolog_1· California. 16:315<180. Berkeley. R .. T. V./. Stalford. H. 0. Ajie. and D. P. Mlmis A.rlingtnn Springs Re,,-isitcd. In Proceedin[p o.f rhe j 1 " Ca!Uomia Island\· ,\)mposium. edited hy D. BrO\vne. K. Mitchell. and H. Chaney. pp. 541-545. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. Santa Barbara. California. Kal<lenherg. Russell I.. 1982 Rancho Park North, A San Dieguito-Lu Jolla Shellfish Processing Site on Coastal Southern California. Ocrnsional Paper .\'o. 6. Imperial College Museum Socie1y. EI Centro. Califrirnia. Keneally, Finbar O.F.M. l 965 The Wri1i11g.<, of h.!rmi11 Frnncisco de las11en. Academy uf American Franciscan History, Washington. D.C. Krncher. Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California (first edition). Bureau o( American E!lmology Bulle/in ""8. \\'ashington. D.C. Kyle. Carolyn E .. Adella B. Schroth, and Dennis R. Gallegos 1998 Remington Hills Archaeological Data Reco\'el") Program for Prehistoric Site CA-SDI-11079. Otay l"V1esa. San Diego. California. On file, South Coastal lnfomrntion Center. San Dio;:-go State Uni,ersity, San Diego, California. P.I 2-08 April 2008 Langdon. \fargan:t 1970 A Grammur <4 Dief:uet10, 7111: Afe.rn Grande Dialect. University of California Press, Rerkele) and Los Angeles. California. l,uomala. Katherine ]978 Tipai and !pai. In HunJhook rfrhe North American Indians. Vol 8. California. edited by R. F. Hei1er. pp. 592-609. Smithsonian Institution. Washingtgn. D.C. Masters. Patricia M .. and Dennis R. Gallegos I 997 Em,ironmental Change and Coastal Adaptations in San Diego County During 1he tv1iddlc Holocene. In Archaeologi o(the Ca/ifim1iu CoasT D11ri11K the AhJd!e llolocene. edited b) J. M. Erlandson and i\l A. Glassow. pp. 11-22. Per<;pectives in California Archaeology. Volume 4. Institute of Archaeology. Lniversity of California, L(is Angeles. MernlL Ruth Earl I 973 Plants \.lsed in Basketry by California Indians. Uniwrsity '!f Cal!fOmia Puhlicatiom i11 An.:hu~'ologl' and Ethnology. Vol. 20. Reprinted by Ballena Press. Ramona. Californiu. ;-..,tiller, Jacqueline 1966 The Present and Past Molluscan Faunas and Environments of Four Southern California Coastal Lagoons. ~1.A. thesis. University of California. San Diego, California. Moratto. \.1. J. 1984 ( 'ahfhrnia Archaeology. Academic Press. Orlando. Florida. Moriarty. James R. III 196 7 Transitional Pre-Desert Phase in San Diego County. Sdence 1 55 (3762):553-555. Ptiuradc. R. F 1960 the Hisw1y o( San Diego· '/he E.rplorers: Chapter 1. Puhlishing Co .. San Diego. California. Priestly, 1-krbert I. (Ed.) lJnion-T rihune 1937 A lli.11ori..:11/, Po!irica{ und Xatuml De.~cription o(Cali/ornia in /775 by l'uiro Fuges. S'oldier n( .\"puin. t·ni\ersity of California Press. Berkeley. CalifPmia. Quillen. Dennis K. 1982 Archaeological Suney of the City of Carlsbad Proposed Operations Center. Carlsbad. California. On file. South Coastal lnfonnation Center, San Diego State Uni\CT~i1y. San Diego. California. PJ. 2-08 April 2008 3-6 RECOI\ 1983 Draft Fnvironmental Impact Report for Delmar Financial. Carlsbad. Callfornia. On fih:. South Coastal lnfonnation Center. San Diego State Unin~rsity. San Diego. California. Rick. T. C. . .I. M. Erlandson. and R. L. Vellanowcth 2001 Paleocoastal tvfarinc Fishing on the Pacific Coast of the Americas: Perspectives from Daisy Cave. California. Ameriwn A.11tiquiry 66 (4J: 595-614. Robhins-Wadc. Mary 1997 An:haeologica! Sur\'t:y and Testing for the Terraces at Sunny Creek. Carlsbad. California. On lile. South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State l lniversity, San Diego. California. Robin~nn. Alfred 1969 Ufe in Caliti1rnia During a Rl!.,idence rf Se,·eral rmrs in rhm TerrilmT. Da Capo Press. New York. Rogers. Malcolm 1929 The Stone Art of the San Dieguito Plateau. Amaican Anthropologist J 1(3 I 19J9 Early Lithic Industries of the Lov.er Basin of the Colorado and Adjacenl Desert Regions. San Diego Museum Papas. No. 3. i\fay 1945 !966 An Outline of Yuman Prehistory. fothropolugy I ( 1 ). .~ncient lfunta.v of rhe Far 1'Ve,·r. Companj. San Diego, California. Rudkin. Charles (Transl. and Ed.) Soutln\'eslern Jmmw/ rf Union-"fribune Puh!ishing 1956 Ohserraliow, on Cal~f()nzia r'72-r'I.)() b_v F1.1ther Luis Sale.\ O.P. Da\vson·s Book Shop. Los Angeks. California. Seeman. I .any 1982 Draft Environmental Impact Report. Rc\ised Parks and Recreation Element, Carlsbad. California. On tik. South Coastal Information Center_ San Diego State University. San Diego. California. Shipek. r!orence C. 1977 A Strategy for Change: The Luisefio of Southern California. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii. Honolulu. PJ. 1-08 April 2001-l l 978 History of Southern California Mission Indians. In Handbook ,~fXorlh Amt'rirnn !11dian1. Volume 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution. Washington. D.C. 1980 Prepared Direct Testimony· Part One: Value of Aboriginal Water Rights of !he San Luis Rey River Reservations. 185 I. Part Two: 19860 J(.J86b Histul) of Agriculture and Irrigation for the La Jolla, Pala. Pauma. Rincon and San Pasqual Indians of Southern Califr)rnia. Submitted l0 the l!. S. Court of Claims for San Luis Rey Ri\-er Reservation Water Case. Docket 80A-I. The Antiquity of the Kumeyaay: Myth and Ckologic Reality. (Jccasimwl Papers 011 Linguistics. No. 13. Papers from the 1983. 1984 and 1985 Hokan-Pcnutian Language Conferences. Southern Illinois l,"niversity. Carbondale. Illinois. rt1e Impact of Europeans t :pon the Kumcyaa}. ln The lmpacf ,~( European Explorarion and Sel(/emenf fd Local Xative Amerit·ans. Cabrillo Historical Association. Reprinted in 1992. 1987 Saints or Oppressors. Franciscan Missionaries of California: Teachers of Agriculture or Exploiters. In 111e ,\Iissions (!/ Ca!UOrnia. edited by R. Cosio and J. H. Costo. American Indian Historical Society. San Francisco. Califixnia. J 988 /'ushed into the Rocks 5.:vuthern Cali/Ornia Indian Land frnurc 1769- 1986. b1iversity of Nebraska Press. Linculn. Nebraska. 1989a I989b 1991 ]99) PJ. 2-08 April ~008 \'1ission Indians and Indians of California Claims Cases. American Indian (Juartcrly 13(4 ):409-420. An Example-oflntensive Plani Husbandry: The Kumeyaay ofSouthem California. In Foraging and Fanning· The Ernlution of' l'lant Exp/oNa1ion. edited by D. R. Harris and G. C. Hillman. Um.,"in- 1 !yman. London. De(tina Cui:m. Her Awohiography. An .frrnunf 1~(thc Res/ f!{ Her Life and 1-kr Ethnohotanil' Contrib111ions. Ballena Press. Menlo Park, California. Kumeyaa) Plant Hushandf). Fire. \Vater and Erosion Control Techniques. In Bl!jiire the Wi/dernes.,· • f--,'nvironmental Managemenr hy .\'ative Ca/ifhmians. Ballena Press. Menlo Park. California. 3-8 Smith. Brian F. 1990 Phase 1 Constraints Analysis Results of an Initial Cultural Resources Sur\'cy of the Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real Road Widening Project. On file. South Coaslal Information Center. San Diego State Universit~. San Diego. California. Smith, Brian F. and Shannon Gilhen 2007 Results of a Data Recon~ry Program for the Carlsbad Oaks Sites: Archaic and Late Prehistoric Camps in the Agua Hedionda Drainage. On file. South Coastal lnfonnation Center, San Diego State Uni"ersity. San Diego. California. Sparkman, Philip Stedman 1908 The Culture of the I .uist'1)0 Indians. Puhlh'ariom in American Ardwco/ogy 358. Berkeley. California. Spicer. Edward 11. {;11ivl:'rsi1y 1!f ( ol!forniu and J,)lmology 20(16):292- 1962 ()des oj"ComJ1.e.,1: file !mpad of SJwm and Mexico and 1he United Stales on the /11dia11s of /he Sowl1111!sl, 1533-1900. L'.niversity of Arizona Press. Tucson. Spier. Leslie 1923 Southern Diegueiio Customs. l 'niiwsitr of C'alifhmill Puh!imtiom in ~ . ~ . Amerirnn Archueo!ogy and Ethnology 20(16). Strong. William. D. 1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. l/niversily (?f C'u!Uhrnia Publicu1ions i11 American Archaeniog;-and Ftlmolof!J' 26( 1 ): 1-350. Tang. Hai. Midiael Hogan. Josh Smallwood. Terry Jacquemain. and Laura l lens!ey Shaker 2004 ldenli fication and Evaluation of Historic Properties. San Diego County \Vater Authority. Seawater Desalination Pro_iect. in the Cities of CarlsPa<l. Vista. and San Marcos. California. On tile. South Coastal lnfonnation Cenk:r. San Diego State Lniversity. San Diego, California. Tihesar, Antonine 1955 Writings r~/' .lunipero S'errn (Vols !-4). Academy of American Franciscan fiistDry. \\\1shington. D.C True, Delhen L. 1958 An Early Comrlex in San Diego County, California. American Antiqui~i·. J31l,:225-6J. PJ 2-08 ,\pril 2008 1980 The Pauma Complex in Northern San Diego Count;r. lhe .lournal of Xe1r Wor!dArchm.:ologyJ:1-39. Lnderhill. Ruth J 941 Indians o( 5,'0111hern ( 'a/ifornia. Bureau of Indian Affairs; Shcnrnmn Pamphlets, No. 2. \Vadt;!, Sue A 1989 Archaeological and Paleontologkal Constraints for the Fox Property. On file. South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State University. San Diego, California. 1999 Public v-.:orks Cc>nter: Archaeological Re.sources Information. On tilt'. \Vade, Sue A. 1986 South Coastal Information Center. San Diego State Unhersity. San Dieg.o. California. and Susan M. Hector Archaeological \fonitoring of the Encina Gas Pipeline Project: Profiles of Subsisiencc Patterns Along the South Shore of :\gua Hedionda Lagoon. On file, South Coastal lnfom1ation Center. San Diego State University. San Di('go. California. Warren. Claude N. 1967 ·1he San Dk·guito Complex; A Rc\'iew and Hypothesis. American Antiquity. VoL 32. No. 2. pp. 168-185. I 968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adnpwtion on the Southern Coast. In Ardwic Prehistory in the Western [:ni1eJ ,1.,·1utes. edited hy C. I. Williams. Easlern Xew Afrxh'o Unil·ersity Con1rib111ions ;,, Anlhropology 1(3):1-14. \\iarren. Claude N. and Max G. Ptrvesic J 963 Appendix I: Shell Midden Analy~is 01·1he Site SDi-603 and \\'ntTen. C. 1961 PJ. 2-08 April 2008 Ccologirnl Implications for Cultural DC\elopment on 8atiquitos Lagoon. San Die-go County. California. On tile. South Coastal lnfonnation Center. San I)iego State University. San Diego. California. '.\ .. D. L. True. and A. R. Eudey Early Gathering: Complexes of Western San Diego Count). California: Results and Interpretation of an Archaeological Survey. Archaeo!ogirnl Survey Anmml Report 1960~1961. University of California Press. Los Angeles. 3-10 Warren. Claude I\ .. Gre1chcn Siegler. and hank Dittmer 1998 Paleo-lndian and Early Archaic Periods. ln Prt'i1istorii.: and J!istoric Ardweolozy <?t" Jletropolium San Diego. A Historic Propertie.\ Rackground Srwfv (screen check drall). On tile, ASM Affiliates. Carlshad. California. Waugh, J\1. (i. 1986 Intensification and Lam.I-Use: An.:haeological Indication l)f Transition and Transfonnation in a Late Prehistoric (\m1pkx in Southern California. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Antbropolog). lJni\'crsity of California. Davis. White. Raymond C. 1963 Luiseflo Social Organizations. lh1iversity t!f Calithrnia P11hlicatiom in -lmericun Ar('haeology and Erhnolofa.,.11', 48(2):l-194. Berkeley. Califomia. \Villig, Judith A.. C. '.'vtelvin Aikens and John L. Fagan I 988 1:arly Human Occupation in Far We stem North America: The Clo\ is- Archaic Interface. _,\'crnda ,\'rate Museum .4.mhropoloxical Papers. No. 21. Carson City. Nevada. V/olcott. \-1arjorie l. 1929 Pioneer .Voles .from 1he Diaries t!f Judge Be,y·amin Haye.\. Los Angeles. California. \\"oodward. Arthur 1914 1\otes on the Indians of San Diego County from thi: Manuscripts of Judge Benjamin II ayes. The ,\h1.1·1erkey 8( 5 ): 140-150. Southwe~t \luscum. Los Angeles. California. PJ. 2-08 ,\pril 2008 3.11 APPENDIX A RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL APPENDIX B RECORD SEARCH RES UL TS CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM SITE FILES RECORD SEARCH Company: Gallegos & Associates Company Representative: Nick Doose Date of Request: 4/4/2008 Date Processed: 4/7/2008 Project Identification: Cliffhanger Search Radius: within designated boundaries Historical Resources: DSL Date: 4/7/2008 Trinomial (CA-SD!) and Primary (P-37) site maps have been reviewed All sites within the project boundaries and the specified radius of the project area have been plotted. Copies of the site record forms have been included for all recorded sites. Previous Archaeological Project Boundaries: DSL Date: 4/7/2008 Project boundary maps have been reviewed. National Archaeological Database (NADB) citations for reports within the project boundaries and within the specified radius of the proiect area have been included. Historic Maps: DSL Date: 4/7/2008 The historic maps on file at the South Coastal Information Center have been reviewed, and copies have been included. Historic Addresses: DSL Date: 4/7/2008 A map and database of historic addresses {formerly Geofinder) has been included. HOURS: 2 COPIES: 129 RUSH: No Thi$ i!i not an invoice. Please pay from the monthly billing !ifatement APPENDIX C NATIVE AMERICAN CORRESPONDENCE :GiA LL [GOS '----I ~--·- & 1\ssorimc.1 Larry Myers Natin: .American Heritage Commission 915 Capitol Ytall, Room 36➔ Sacramento. CA 95814 Dear i\fr. Myers. 5671 Palmer Wah ~uite A Carlsbad, (.'allfornia, 92010 Phone: (760) 929-0055 Fu: (760) 9~'Ml056 gall~o~@aol,com April 2. 2008 Gallegos & Associates is in the process of preparing a record search update, literarnre re\·iew. and field su,,:e: for the Clifthanger project The project area is located in Carlsbad. north San Dkgo County ( Figun:s I and 2 ). The update will identif)·: previously recorded sites; sites nominated to the.: ~ational Register of Historic Places {NRHP) and potential ~ational Register Properties; Traditional Cultural Properties; and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources \\'ithin the ClifThanger project area. v..:e n:spectfu!ly n:quest any infi.mnation and/or input that you may ha\'e regarding Native American concerns either directly or indirectly associated with this project. \Ve are alsli interested in knowing if there are individuals in the area who should be contacted prior to completion of this study. V,/e appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions or require an) further information, please do not hesitate to call. Best regards. I )ennis ti-allegos Project Manager Enclosure:; IG-·1 i JIIALLEGOS L ______ -~------- & As.\oClates Bennae Calac Pauma Valley Band of Luisciio Indians P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley. CA 92061 Dear :\1s. Cabe. 5671 Palmer Wa~, Suitt,·"' Carlsbld. Califorma, now (760) 929.-0055 gallcgo~@aoJ.com April 9. ~008 Gallegos & Associates is in the prnccs~ of preparing a record search update, literature n.:.'vkv,·, and licld survey for the Cliff Hanger project. The pro_iect area is located in Carlsbad, San Diego County (Figure!'; 1 and 2). The update '"ill idcntif): previously recorded sites: sites nominated Lo the ;•<ational Register of Historic Places (".\lRHP) and po1en1ial >!ational Register Properties; Traditional Cultural Properties: and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources within the Cliff Hanger project area. \Ve respectfully request any information and/or input that you may have regarding Native American concerns either directlJ or indirectly associated \vith this project. V•/e are also interested in knowing if there are individuals in the area \Vho should be conracted pnor to completion of this study. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions or require any further infonnatiLm, please do not hesitate I(, call Bt!st regards. Dennis Galkgos Project ~1anagcr l.,nclosurc:-; • I lenry Contreras San Luis Rey Band of Luise!lo Indians 1763 Chapulin Lane Fallbrook. CA 92028 Dear Mr. Contreras. 5671 Palmer Way, Sui1c A Carlsbad, Cahforma. 92010 (760) 929-0055 g:allcgos(a]acl.com April 9. 2008 Uallegos & Associate:-is in the process of preparing ::i record -;earch udpate. literature review. and field sun ey for the Cliff Hanger proJect. The project area is located in Carlshad, San Diego County (Figures I and]). !"he update will identify· previously recorded sites; sites nominated to the J\:ationa! Register of Historic Places lNRHP) and potential National Register Properties: !'raditional Cultural Propcrtie~; and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources within 1he Cliff Hanger project area. We rcspcctfolly request any information andior input that you may have regarding Native ..-'\mcrican concerns either directly or indire..:tly assol.'.iatcd with this project. V,/e arc also interested in knowing if there arc individuals in the area who should be contacted prior to completion of this study. V./e appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you ha,·c any questions or require any further information. please do not hesitate to call. Res1 regards, Dennis (iallegos Project Managt:r Enclosures Shasla Gaughen Cupa Cultural Cenkr 35008 Pala-Temecula Road. PMB Box 445 Pala, C :\ 92059 Dear \,ts. Gaughen. Stl71 Palm~r Way. Suite,\ Carlsbad, c .. lifornia, 92010 Phone: (760) 929-0055 Fa1: (760) 919--0(156 gal~os.'~Qfllcorn April 9. 2008 Oallegos & Associates is in the process of preparing a record search update, literature review, and field stirvey for the Cliff Hanger pr~ject. The projec1 arec1 is located in Carlsbad, San Diego Count) !Figures 1 and 2). The update \vill identify: previous!) recorded sites; sites nominated to the >.;ational Register of Historic Places ('.\JRHP) and potential ~ational Register Properties: Traditional Cul1ural Properties; and will pro\·ide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources within the Cliff Hanger project area. W-:. respectflllly request an)· infonnation and/or input that you may, have regarding Native American concerns either directly or indirectly associated with this projecl. V•./e are also interestl!d in knowing if there are indi,·iduals in the area who should be contact..::d prior to completion of this study. \Ve appreciate your assistance Ill this matter. If you have any lJ.Uestions or require any further information, please dl) not hesitate to call. Best regards. Dennis Gallegos Project Manager Enclosures ,-----LQlAL LE(; <:S J Assoc iate.1 Cannen Mojado San Luis Rey Band ofLuisefio Indians l 889 Sunset Drive Vista. CA 9]081 Dear J\--1s. Mojado. St.71 Palmer W1y, Suit~ .\ Carhbad, California, 920IO Phone:(760)9!9--0055 Fu: (760) 929..0056 gallegos@aoLtom April 9, 1008 Gallegos & Asso;;:iates 1s in the process of preparing a record search update, literature review, and field sur,·ey for the Cliff Hanger pro.1ect. The project area is ll,cated in Carlsbad. San Diego County (figures l and 2). The update will identify: previously recorded sites: sites nominated to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and potential National Register Properties: Traditional Cultural Properties; and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources within the Cliff Hanger project area. We respectfully request any infonnatinn andlor input that you may have regarding Native American concerns either directly or indirectly associated with this project. We are also interested m knO\ving if there are individuals in the area who should be conta1..·k.•d prior to completion of this study, We appn:ciatc your assistance in this matter. If you ha,-c any qucs1ions or require any further infonnation, please do not he:-;itatc to call. Rest regards. Dennis Gal!cgos Project Manager Enclosures l\tark \fojadu San Luis Rey Band of Luiscfi.o Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista. CA 92081 Dear Mr. MC".iado. 5671 Palmer Wa)·, Su,tt ~ Carlsbad. California, 112010 Phone: (760) 929-005~ Fu: (760)929-0056 galLei:os(g.aol.com April 9. 2008 Gallegos & Assm:1ates is in the process of preparing a record search update, literalllre revie\v. and field survey for the Cliff Hanger project. The project area is located in Carlsbad. San Diego County tFigurcs land 2). fhe update will identify: previously recorded sites; sites nominated 10 the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and pmential National Register Properties: Traditiomil Cultural Properties: and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural n.'source-; within the Cliff Hanger project area. We respectfully request an) infonnation and/or input that you may have regarding Native American concerns either directly or indirectly associated with this project V/e are also interested in knowing iflhere are individuals in the art:a who should be contacted prior to complctinn of this study. We appreciate your a~sis1ance in this matter. It' you ha\'e any questions m require i.111) further information. please do not hesitate to call. Best regards. Dennis Galkgos Project .\fanager 1:::nclosures ' i_G,\A LL E(iOS ·---_j - & As,onate.1 Russell Romo San Luis Rey Band ofLuiseJ1o Indians 12064 Old Pomerado Road Pov.ay, CA 92064 Dear Mr. Ronrn. ~bi I Pal min W:.,l, Suite A Carlsbad, California, 92010 Phone: (7(10) 929-00S!i Fa~: (7b0) 9~9--0~ jl,allegos:,r·aol.corn April 9. 2008 Cia\lcgr,s & Associates is in the process of preparing a record search update. literature re\ icw, and field survey for the Cliff Hang.er project. The project area is located in Carlsbad. San Diego County (Figur0s land 2). The update will identify: pH!\'iously re-curded sites: sites nominated to the '.'Jationa\ Register of I listoric Places (NRHP) and p(Jtential National Register Properties: Traditional Cultural Properties: and will provide recommendations to protect any identified significant cultural resources within the Cliff Hanger project area. We respectfully request any information and/or input that you may have regarding Native American concerns either directly or indirectly as::ociated with this project. Vv'e are also interested in k.110,ving if there are individuals in the area who should be contacted prior to compl..::tion of this study. We appri.:cialt: )OUr assistance in tins matter. If ~ou hav'-' any question,; or rt:quin.: any further information. please do not hesitate to call. Best regarJs. Dennis Gallegos Project Manager Fnclosures