Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-03-04; City Council; 08; Police Department UpdateCA Review JRT Meeting Date: March 4, 2025 To: Mayor and City Council From: Geoff Patnoe, City Manager Staff Contact: Christie Calderwood, Chief of Police christie.calderwood@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2216 Reid Shipley, Assistant Chief of Police reid.shipley@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2257 Subject: Police Department Update Districts: All Recommended Action Receive a report on the Police Department’s anticipated demands for service, challenges and potential staffing needs over the next five years. Executive Summary The Carlsbad Police Department is committed to maintaining the high level of service expected by people who live or do business in or visit Carlsbad while strategically meeting the growing demands for service from the community and the requirements of state law. The department’s leadership consistently assesses its daily operations, staffing, procedures and resources, as well as ongoing crime trends and future community needs, to ensure it is doing all it can to safeguard Carlsbad’s safety and well-being. This assessment has identified several ongoing and future challenges in the city and in the law enforcement landscape that are likely to impact the department. These include a growing population, changes in housing types, recent changes in state law, and even technological advances. The overall workload demand on Police Department employees has exponentially increased over the last few years and the department is working to manage the current workload, which can result in low morale, fatigue, retention challenges, and difficulties compounded by the nationwide staffing challenges affecting law enforcement agencies. This report is intended to inform the City Council about these growing demands and challenges and how the department proposes the city can best prepare itself to meet them. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 1 of 104 Explanation & Analysis Increasing population In addition to the 115,000 people who have made Carlsbad their home, the Police Department is responsible for the safety and security of: • About 63,000 people who work in the city but live elsewhere • Almost 11,000 visitors or hotel guests each day, with more than 5,000 overnight visitors per day These figures are averages, they don’t show how much tourism increases the number of people in Carlsbad in the summer months and holidays. Carlsbad beaches, restaurants, malls and Legoland amusement park are just a few of the tourist attractions that drive this increase. The San Diego Association of Governments, the planning agency for the San Diego region, projects these numbers will all increase over the next seven years. The chart below shows the number of people served by the police in 2022, applying a consistent 1.03% population growth rate to all figures from 2022 through 2029. 2022 2029 SANDAG population estimates 115,585 119,072 Workers 60,000 61,788 Visitors / hotel guests 21,219 21,855 Total policed population 196,804 202,715 Population per officer* 1,491 1,536 Population per patrol officer* 3,393 3,495 *The population per officer and per patrol officer ratios are calculated based on full staffing levels. The per officer ratio is determined using 132 sworn police officers, while the per patrol officer ratio is based on 58 allocated patrol officers. So, while Carlsbad has an approximate resident population of 115,000, the Police Department effectively serves around 197,000 people each day. And according to the data from SANDAG, the city’s population will be 3.8% larger in 2035 than it was in 2022, with its population peaking in 2035. Growth in housing units Along with population growth, the city was mandated by state law to accommodate and plan for a total of 3,873 new housing units by 2029. Most of this anticipated housing will be multi-family projects, such as apartments and condominiums, including high-density housing. Multi-family projects traditionally generate more calls for service to the Police Department than neighborhoods of single-family homes. Changing business types The city’s evolving business landscape is also expected to increase demands on the department. Carlsbad’s economy has evolved over the last five years, with increases in tourism and visitors, and more people patronizing its retailers and restaurants. This is particularly relevant to the March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 2 of 104 Police Department because as service-based businesses often attract more patrons, demands for police services also increase. Crime trends and changing landscape The city’s crime rate has decreased in recent years. In 2023, Carlsbad’s overall crime rate decreased by 6%, including an 8% drop in both crimes against persons and crimes against property. This aligns with the trend in the broader San Diego region, which saw a 5% overall decline in crime. Carlsbad’s overall crime rate decreased in mid-year 2024 by an additional 4%, which also aligns with the county’s overall 4% decrease in crimes. The city had a 5% decrease in both crimes against property and crimes against society,1 but a 5% increase in crimes against persons. The crime rate in Carlsbad is significantly lower in all categories than the county’s average crimes per capita of 41.16 crimes per 100,000 people. However, these crime rates do not reflect city priorities related to quality of life issues and calls for service response times.2 Carlsbad Police officers were involved in three officer-involved shootings in a seven-month period in 2023 and 2024. Two of the incidents involved subjects who were carrying ghost guns, non-serialized and untraceable firearms that are purchased illegally, without a background check. The third incident involved an officer being violently attacked from behind. Calls for service The Police Department is committed to maintaining an exceptional standard of service. It operates under a "no-call-too-small" philosophy, ensuring every call for service receives a high- quality response. While crime statistics show a decrease in crime in Carlsbad, and the number of cases and 911 calls slightly declined in 2024, the calls for service to the department have remained generally steady over the last five years, though the Police Department saw a 5.3% increase in calls for service from 2022 to 2024. 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Dispatched calls 62,389 66,568 62,022 64,081 60,916 Officer-initiated calls 48,059 40,589 41,172 50,708 47,830 Total calls for service 110,448 107,157 103,194 114,789 108,746 Number of cases 8,222 8,704 8,348 8,389 7,900 911 calls 31,642 36,154 34,550 35,926 31,648 1 The relatively new category of crimes against society includes drug-related offenses and prostitution. 2 SANDAG’s 2023 Annual Crime Bulletin report used a different set of data than had been used in previous years, including only those reported crimes that meet specific criteria. This means that some reported incidents in the city may not be reflected in the final count. Additionally, the California Department of Justice has begun deactivating and rejecting reports for over 70 criminal charges, such as Penal Code 488 – Petty Theft, many of which are still actively used by the Police Department, as well as for prosecution by the District Attorney’s Office. As a result of this, the crime statistics that are reported by the Department of Justice and SANDAG may be underreporting actual cases until the Legislature deactivates these Penal Code charges. Despite this challenge, the data SANDAG uses continues to be the most optimal method for collecting crime data and examining crime rates. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 3 of 104 Many calls for service in Carlsbad are specifically related to quality-of-life issues, which don’t necessarily warrant a crime report or result in an arrest but can take up just as much of an officer’s time and attention. To maximize department resources, the department enables community members to file reports on less serious crimes online so that our Records Division can process that would otherwise generate calls for service from officers. Mental health calls In recent years, there has been a shift in law enforcement’s role in mental health emergencies. Officers are now expected to serve as the primary response when someone experiences a mental health crisis, and to intervene on their behalf. Our officers are trained in de-escalation techniques and can call on the expertise of Psychiatric Emergency Response Team members to better address mental health issues. While the volume of these calls has remained fairly consistent over the last five years, responses to mental health emergencies have grown more compassionate, which requires more time to be spent on each call for mental health services. In 2020, the Police Department’s Policy regarding the Countywide Crisis Management Philosophy and De-Escalation Policy went into effect, as detailed below. This change in philosophy placed greater emphasis on pre-engagement considerations with a subject in crisis, which requires additional time to call for service, as well as the need to deploy more officers and equipment to ensure a higher probability of a peaceful outcome. For example, from Jan. 1, 2024, to Dec. 9, 2024, we engaged with one resident 166 times, spending a total of 84 hours and 27 minutes with them and had to detain the person twice for being a danger to themselves or others. Ratio of officers to residents According to data from SANDAG, in fiscal year 2023-24, our region averaged 1.32 sworn officers for every 1,000 residents, which is significantly lower than the national average of 2.4 sworn officers for every 1,000 residents. As of fiscal year 2023-24, the Carlsbad Police Department had 1.14 sworn officers for every 1,000 residents, the fourth lowest ratio in the region. Sources: SANDAG, San Diego County and cities’ authorized staffing Region’s sworn officer-to-population ratios March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 4 of 104 ~ (IJ u ~ C ~ l/) 114 1.15 l.16 122127 ■FY 20l8-l9 ■FY2022-23 It should be noted that these numbers are all based on full staffing numbers, even though the department’s staffing levels are continuously fluctuating due to people out on various types of leave, due to injury, family leave, military leave, etc., as well as vacancies from retirements or resignations. The city budget is a crucial consideration when evaluating factors related to increasing staffing. According to data from SANDAG, in fiscal year 2023-24, Carlsbad had the lowest General Fund expenditures allocated to law enforcement each year at 21%. The regional average is 29% and the highest allocation is the City of El Cajon at 47%. As of fiscal year 2024-25, Carlsbad is at 25%. Response times The Police Department monitors response times for what are considered Priority 1-4 calls to use department resources effectively and efficiently, ensuring the fastest possible response to service calls without compromising safety or thoroughness. Response times directly impact the service level the Police Department provides to the community. • Priority 1 calls involve serious crimes in progress or threats to life and are dispatched immediately. The current national average for Priority 1 calls is six minutes. • Priority 2 calls involve complaints about less serious crimes with no threat to life and are dispatched as quickly as possible. • Priority 3 calls involve minor crimes or requests for service that are not urgent and are dispatched as quickly as possible, once higher priority calls are addressed. • Priority 4 calls that involve minor requests for police services are dispatched when no higher-priority calls are pending. The department’s response times have increased over the last three years. Response times by priority of call 2021 2022 2023 2024 Priority 1 calls 4:49 5:07 6:17 6:45 Priority 2 calls 9:17 10:54 14:00 17:45 Priority 3 calls 42:13 48:45 32:56 45:31 Priority 4 calls 25:45 28:59 29:24 38:47 (in minutes:seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 2021 2022 2023 2024 Priority 1 calls Priority 2 calls Priority 3 calls Priority 4 calls March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 5 of 104 -- -- The city’s Strategic Plan for 2023-2027 states that the city will maintain the following high levels of service annually in support of the quality of life and safety: Respond to approximately 100,000 police calls for service annually with a response time for priority one calls that is lower than the national average of six minutes. The Police Department was unable to maintain a response time lower than the national average of six minutes for Priority 1 calls in 2023 and 2024. There are many variables that factor into response times, but one consistent factor is staffing; more officers, and experienced officers, can respond to calls more swiftly. The department has implemented significant measures to try to reduce response times at all levels. This included a concerted effort to make an impact on Priority 3 calls in 2023, which was temporarily successful but ultimately found to be unsustainable. Impact of training new officers The city hired 15 officers to fill existing vacancies in 2024. Each of those officers was required to spend a certain time working alongside a field training officer, not only to learn about the community, but also to be coached on how to meet the department’s standards in handling calls, interacting with community members and the other aspects of patrolling the city. Having new officers inevitably extends response times because trainees usually take longer to navigate a call from beginning to end, as well as to properly document incidents, which creates time when they’re not available to respond to other calls. Time spent per call Between 2019 and 2024, there has been a noticeable increase in the amount of time officers and non-sworn personnel need to spend per service call across all priority levels. Average time spent per call Year All patrol Sworn Non-sworn 2019 31 30 37.53 2020 32 31 39.62 2021 32 31 50.04 2022 29 29 97.39 2023 32 30 47.89 2024 32 31 50.13 (In minutes:seconds) Since 2019, the average time spent per call has increased from 30.67 to 31.69 minutes per call – a 1.02 minute increase. When applied to the total number of calls for service in 2024, officers are spending an additional 1,849 hours annually on these calls. Between 2022 to 2024, the Police Department saw an average increase of 2.48 minutes per call, resulting in a total of 4,495 additional hours. The increased amount of time spent per call takes the officer away from being able to engage in proactive police work. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 6 of 104 Several factors contributed to this increase: • Changes in state law and requirements • The demands of taking advantage of new technologies • Changes in services from outside law enforcement partners • Departmental obligations, such as training • Increasing community requests Legislative and policy impacts De-escalation policies Assembly Bill 392, adopted in 2019, amended Sections 196 and 835a of the California Penal Code, adding the following language: ”… [I]t is the intent of the Legislature that peace officers use deadly force only when necessary in defense of human life. In determining whether deadly force is necessary, officers shall evaluate each situation in light of the particular circumstances of each case, and shall use other available resources and techniques if reasonably safe and feasible to an objectively reasonable officer.” In the years that followed, law enforcement organizations, including the Carlsbad Police Department, met with community members, activist groups, and other interested parties to share expectations and community desires. The discussions led to a change in policing tactics and strategies. One major change was the Countywide Crisis Management Philosophy and De-Escalation Policy adopted by the department in 2020. Recognizing the need for a unified approach, the department spearheaded the development of this policy, which every law enforcement agency in San Diego County now follows. The policy is designed to ensure all agencies in the region respond to critical incidents consistently and effectively and includes comprehensive guidance for de-escalating potentially violent situations. Building on this foundation, the department created an internal policy that not only aligned with the county’s philosophy but also set a higher standard for crisis response and de- escalation, reflecting the department’s deep commitment to protecting human life. The result was Policy 303, a model framework for handling critical incidents. This policy ensures that, whenever possible, officers work toward resolving situations safely while prioritizing the well- being of the community, city personnel, and the involved parties. Implementation of effective de-escalation and crisis management takes time and resources. This shift in philosophy added a higher emphasis on the evaluation and preparation officers do before engaging with a subject in crisis, or any potentially violent situation, which adds additional time to calls for service and often requires more officers and equipment to ensure a higher probability of a peaceful outcome. The department’s personnel are expected to employ proper de-escalation principles and tactics with the understanding that other responses to non- critical calls for service may be impacted. As with many changes in policy or practice, there can be unintended consequences. Committing more time and resources to deal with dynamic situations in a comprehensive way has put a March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 7 of 104 strain on some aspects of service. Most notably, fewer officers may be available, which can lead to delayed responses, particularly for Priority 2, 3 and 4 calls. Changes in state law Racial and Identity Profiling Act Under the state’s Racial and Identity Profiling Act, which became law in 2015, all California law enforcement agencies are required to collect and report detailed information about every person either detained or searched by police. Most agencies were required to begin collecting their data by 2022, while the Carlsbad Police Department began in 2021. Adding this new reporting requirement to every detention and search added to the time officers spend on those calls, delaying them from being able to respond to other pending calls for service. Senate Bill 43 California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5150 allows police officers to place someone who is a danger to themselves or others in involuntary psychiatric detention of a person. Senate Bill 43, which took effect Jan. 1, 2025, expanded the definition of “gravely disabled” to include “severe substance abuse disorder.” The change in this definition, combined with the opioid epidemic over recent years, is likely to increase how many people the department will be required to detain under Section 5150. Senate Bill 929 and Assembly Bill 118 Senate Bill 929 requires the California Department of Health Care Services to collect expanded quarterly data on all mental health detentions to include in an annual report by May 1 of each year. Under Assembly Bill 118, the County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency has requested police departments to collect and provide data to the behavioral health director in the county. This means Records staff now need to provide a separate data collection sheet to include the total number of 5150 detentions and information about each detainee, including the detainee’s age, sex, and gender identity. This law was enacted in 2022, with a staggered implementation. The County has requested Carlsbad Police Department provide its first quarterly report by May 2025. Senate Bills 16 and 1421 Senate Bill 16 and SB 1421 (both enacted in 2021) amended Penal Code Section 832.7 to mandate the disclosure of certain police officer and departmental records. The expansion of this law greatly increased the workload of the Department’s Professional Standards Bureau, as well as the Records Division in both reporting and producing certain records. Senate Bill 2 Senate Bill 2 (2021) focused on police accountability by increasing the categories of personnel records that may be publicly disclosed. It established a decertification process for law enforcement officers found guilty of misconduct, ensuring officers who engage in serious misconduct cannot be rehired in other jurisdictions within the state. It aimed to strengthen accountability and public trust in policing. This law has also greatly impacted the workload of the Professional Standards Bureau. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 8 of 104 Assembly Bill 481 Assembly Bill 481 (2021) requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from their governing bodies for the use of military equipment before the agencies can fund, acquire or use military equipment as defined in the law. This law also requires the City Council to review the city’s ordinance each year along with an annual military equipment report which is prepared by the Police Department, also increasing the workload of the Professional Standards Bureau and Administrative staff. Senate Bill 899 Currently, only certain restraining orders require police to seize firearms. Senate Bill 899, which goes into effect Jan. 1, 2026, will prohibit the subjects of additional types of restraining orders from possessing, accessing or acquiring firearms, ammunition and body armor. So essentially, these additional types of restraining orders may now mandate law enforcement to collect all such prohibited items during the duration of the order. There are many types of restraining orders, including those for civil harassment, elder abuse and domestic violence, and these gun restrictions can last from one to five years. Enforcing this law will place additional strain on the department’s evidence-storage capacity and require more staff involvement to ensure that the department seizes these firearms and prohibited items. Public Records Act The California Public Records Act is designed to ensure transparency and accountability in government by granting the public access to records held by state and local government agencies. Members of the public have the right to inspect or obtain copies of public records maintained by state and local government agencies. The California Public Records Act in 2021 was expanded to include access to police records by allowing the public to obtain information about sustained findings of officer misconduct. The Police Department has seen a 36% increase in Public Records Act requests since 2021: Year Requests 2021 74 2022 61 2023 92 2024 101 The Records staff, the Professional Standards Bureau and Administrative staff are all greatly impacted by this law. Technology advancements The use of body worn cameras, license plate readers, theft trackers, and improvements in commercially available surveillance systems (e.g., Ring cameras, CCTV, Find My Phone, Apple AirTags, etc.) have improved the Police Department’s ability to respond to and resolve otherwise challenging criminal cases. But while this technology is highly effective, it comes with a tremendous amount of follow-up that did not exist in years past. These new technologies required increased supervision of these programs, as well as training, transparency, and auditing to ensure compliance with the law and department policies. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 9 of 104 Professional partnership impacts • The county’s Vista Detention Facility is temporarily no longer accepting female arrestees, as of September 2024. Officers must now transport female prisoners to the Las Colinas Detention Facility in Santee. The average drive time is 400% greater. When an officer transports a female arrestee, they may be out of service for two to three hours or more, leaving their area of the city under the responsibility of another officer who must cover two areas. • Tri-City Hospital has shut down its full-service Crisis Stabilization Unit and is no longer authorized to evaluate and treat individuals who may need involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. If Exodus Recovery’s North Coastal Crisis Stabilization Unit in Oceanside is overloaded, officers are now required to transport mental health detainees to the County Mental Health facility in San Diego or another authorized facility in the South County. • Due to an increase in violent patients, the Scripps Hospital Group is now requiring all law enforcement agencies to have a two-officer response when delivering or standing by with an arrestee or patient, taking more officers out of the field when an arrestee is taken to the hospital. These procedural adjustments are still relatively new, so their full impact has yet to be seen. Departmental obligations Several changes in the above-mentioned laws have caused the Carlsbad Police Department to increase the training requirements for all personnel. In addition to quarterly training on perishable skills, officers are mandated to attend training in: • The principles of de-escalation • Defensive Tactics and the proper use of force to safely and effectively arrest and control a suspect • The firearms tactical knowledge and skills to prevail in a lethal force encounter • Defensive driving and maneuvering and pursuit training • Strategic communications to improve an officer’s ability to persuade a subject to voluntarily comply with the officer’s commands • The requirements for detentions within the police department and jails. • How to integrate emergency medical personnel in a wide range of potential situations and crises • Securely using the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (This training is required by state law to have access to the system’s sensitive information.) The department requires each officer to take 52 hours of training every two years, 18 hours more than state standards require. This training is essential to the success of our department members and directly contributes to the Police Department’s track record of successful resolution of critical incidents. Community requests and special events There is a growing need for increased police presence at various community events. The city’s 5-Year Strategic Plan includes the Police Department supporting annual special events. In 2024 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 10 of 104 alone, we have committed to the following city and city-sanctioned events, or have received the following requests from various community groups: • City events: These include the TGIF Concerts in the Park and the Citizen's Police Academy, as well as the Police Department Citizen Academy • City-sanctioned events: Almost 40 events, including the Carlsbad Marathon, Carlsbad 5000, Spring and Fall Street Faires, Art in the Village, Art Walk, Lancer Day Parade and 4th of July fireworks. • Community requests: More than 30 events, including events at elementary schools and senior facilities, homeowners association meetings, neighborhood watch meetings, active shooter and workplace violence trainings, E-bike safety classes, and other miscellaneous requests. These events lead to an increased demand for overtime obligations outside of standard patrol duties, often requiring officers to work mandatory overtime shifts to work the events. For example, the Carlsbad Marathon requires 42 police personnel to staff the event, while each Street Faire requires 31 police personnel. In 2024, the Police Department worked 1,729.5 hours of overtime on city-sanctioned special events. Department overtime Department overtime can be costly for the city as well as taxing on staff. While employees understand upon being hired that as emergency workers, overtime will be part of the job, we have seen our overtime budget increase year over year, which can cause a burnout effect on our employees, leading to retention issues. FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Patrol overtime budget $827,124 $1,194,739 $1,281,224 $1,293,476 $1,201,000 Actual patrol overtime $999,278 $1,194,367 $1,358,993 $1,292,186 $1,185,164 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 11 of 104 Department’s current organization Staffing challenges and current staffing levels The Carlsbad Police Department has been chronically short-staffed – consistently operating with fewer employees than needed to meet the demands of the department – for an extended period of time due to retention issues and other employee leaves, such as injuries. At any given time, between ten and 14 officers in the department’s Patrol Division of 58 cannot be deployed because of mandatory training, court appearances, sick leave, on-duty injuries, family and medical leave, bereavement leave, military leave, administrative leave, time off and other reasons. The non-deployable personnel rates for the patrol division over the last two years have fluctuated between 18% and 25% of the number of officers. In 2024, the average non-deployable personnel rate for sworn staffing was 19%. When deployable numbers fall below the minimum staffing policy, officers are required to cover shifts, leading to overtime costs and officer fatigue. In 2024, 33 Police Department employees were hired to replace vacancies, including 15 sworn officers and 18 civilian personnel. Traditionally, the Police Department has employed tenured personnel, which leads to experienced decision making in the field. With multiple retirements, a significant influx of new officers have joined the department, necessitating additional training, development, and supervision to ensure their performance aligns with community 132 sworn personnel, 55 non-sworn, 187 personnel total March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 12 of 104 CHIEF OF POLICE ASSISTANT CHIEF MANAGEMENT ANALYST --~ PUIUC l~fO/KICIAl. MUMA Ul PiubUc lnforrnillt40f'I M;,n,11~ -- AOMINISTRATIVE MANAGER OPERATIONS BUREAU SUPPORT OPERATIONS p ROFE~IONAlSTANOAR05 & SERVICES BUREAU I CRIME AN.ti. YSlS [11 Senior Crime Anal.,st (1) Crimf AnailVSt R.!COR.DS O)S.,,..,,.,or (S) Speclall,u COMMUNICATIONS [1)M,1nage, 14) SopeNisors [16, OperalOfS ,.au'oloayJ. {l)l,T Watch Command;e:r (1),....,,n, (13/0fflw, (l)K,9 [1)Ra111!!r (1) FroM Oeslc CSO P".trolht:nlr'tll (l)LT W.1<h COO>m>_, (1),.... .... (IS}Offlc<r, l l(.g () (l)C>O >-- >-- PlittOI DIYl f01,T, Wi!ICh tonv,,.,od« m~arns (13) off1Ur1 (II•·• {21CSO. u,..,.., (II f""'' O<>lc cso Pwol Effn111C 2 fUl.T,w,11,ch CCfM\IIWlt:r mse,i-eanu (17}0ffim> 1 <-9 !I lllC>O BUREAU INVHTIGA T10NS UJ Ututenilnt GENERAL INV£ST1GAT10NS (IJS...•- (SJ Oll!ttcllvel ll)CSO, FAMILY Slltv!(B (1) Seq:eHt (l)C>tltcllvti ($)$00, (IJC>O ,~rule~;on Via NARCOTICS UNIT (!JS...•- (3) l>etoctlvti (2JTMkFort:r Otf<ors PftOP1:Rll' I EVIDENCE (2)59«1obm .Sl"ECAl INVt$TIGA110N5 {OUC:ut41nant CRIME SUPP'RESS.ON ftAM [ll~aJlt r1,offic:ffli ''"''""" Ot,mUAO. TEAM m Stretiilflt {G)Officffl QllMES Of VIOlDICE {11-S(fl(:iJl"lt mDl!!tectlvl'S tlle>o (llfl,c...,,nt& twl1111u$,pet.. TRAFFIC.UNIT mue,,,i,~ 411Sarlfl'I' tl)Mg11w0ffit~111 U,AcddMl lin'll!~COl'1 21-- PROFB.SIONM. SlRYKf.S & STANDARD'S IJUREAU tilScrgr::;;,int 121 Hourty, PT Adn.n. AlllltMlts TUJNINGUNIT 01 Se-r~ant Ul TtliRlftC COOrct.nauw expectations. Approximately 50% of the patrol division has less than five years of policing experience. The Center for Public Safety Management, which conducted a staffing assessment in 2019 recommends the “rule of 60.” The “rule of 60” has two parts: • The first states that 60% of the sworn officers in a department should be dedicated to the patrol function. The Police Department is currently running at 48%, with 64 officers out of 132 working in a patrol capacity. • The second states that no more than 60% of a patrol officer’s time should be committed to calls for service, allowing the officer to respond to management-directed operations such as proactive enforcement, crime prevention, community policing and citizen safety initiatives. Proactive policing is essential to our operations as it emphasizes crime prevention over reactive responses. It also addresses the concerns of our community members and the expectations of having an engaged, proactive police department. Due to the current patrol staffing shortages, officers from specialized units are frequently used to supplement patrol operations. This includes officers from the Traffic Division, Homeless Outreach and Crime Suppression teams. However, reassigning these specialized units reduces their overall effectiveness. • Traffic Division: Fewer officers are available to address traffic complaints, leading to a potential increase in traffic collisions due to reduced enforcement. Additionally, these officers are often pulled away to assist with the planning and staffing of special events. • Crime Suppression Team: The members of this team, which focuses on proactive policing and locating individuals under investigation by detectives, are unable to perform this critical work when reassigned to patrol. It is important to emphasize that the department uses these units to temporarily support patrol operations, not to permanently reassign officers from their specialized duties. To address patrol staffing, special assignments have gone unfilled, degrading department effectiveness. Currently positions in Investigations, Traffic, school resources officers and the Crime Suppression Team are unfilled due to patrol staffing needs. These positions will remain unfilled until patrol staffing meets acceptable levels. Due to current staffing levels, the Police Department has had to withdraw from or decline participation in several San Diego County task forces, including those focused on regional auto theft, terrorism, internet crimes against children, human trafficking, drug trafficking and computer and technology crimes. Participation in task forces allows collaboration on investigations, especially those where the criminal activity exceeds the borders of Carlsbad, often requiring state and federal resources to resolve. It also maintains strong partnerships with our fellow agencies and helps combat the sort of region-wide crime that can target our community. While each task force conducts important regional investigations, the Police Department has prioritized its investment in those that directly and significantly impact our community. The department has maintained involvement in narcotics and gang task forces, with one detective assigned to each. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 13 of 104 The San Diego Regional Public Safety Training Institute in Miramar is the police academy where recruits for police agencies across the county undergo rigorous training to become police officers. Agencies in the region are expected to assign an academy training officer to supervise, train, mentor and guide recruits. Carlsbad has been out of compliance; the last time we assigned an academy training officer was in 2013. The department intends to fulfill our obligation to the academy in 2025 to ensure Carlsbad’s police recruits will remain eligible for the academy. The city’s 5-Year Strategic Plan states that the city will maintain the following high levels of service annually in support of the quality of life and safety “complete investigations for violent crimes, property crimes, fraud and financial crimes, auto theft, juvenile crime, elder abuse and child abuse.” Fiscal Analysis There is no fiscal impact from receiving this report. Next Steps The Police Department will continue to work with the City Manager and the Finance Department to present needs in the future budget processes. The Police Department will keep assessing its services and staffing needs, submitting budget requests as necessary. Environmental Evaluation This action does not require environmental review because it does not constitute a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act under California Public Resources Code Section 21065 in that it has no potential to cause either a direct physical change or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Exhibits 1. San Diego Association of Governments report, Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY2022-23 2. San Diego Association of Governments report, What Will the Region Look like in 2050, March 2024 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 14 of 104 Free Language Assistance | Ayuda gratuita con el idioma | Libreng Tulong sa Wika Hỗ trợ ngôn ngữ miễn phí | 免费语言协助 | 免費語言協助 | ةﺪﻋﺎﺴﻣ ﺔﯾﻮﻐﻟ ﺔﯿﻧﺎﺠﻣ | 무료 언어 지원 | ﮏﻤﮐ نﺎﺑز نﺎﮕﯾار 無料の言語支援 | Бесплатная языковая помощь | Assistência linguística gratuita | मु� भाषा सहायता Assistance linguistique gratuite | ជំនួយ��ឥតគិតៃថ� | ఉ�త �� స�యం | ການຊ່ວຍເຫຼື ອດ້ານພາສາຟຣີ Kaalmada Luqadda ee Bilaashka ah | Безкоштовна мовна допомога SANDAG.org/LanguageAssistance | 619.699.1900 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022-23 May 2024 CJBULLETIN Research findings from the Criminal Justice Clearinghouse Exhibit 1 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 15 of 104 S A NDA G Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 2 Introduction This annual Criminal Justice (CJ) Bulletin is part of the “Crime in the San Diego Region” series and focuses on regional public safety allocations over the past ten years. County and municipal public safety staffing and expenditures for FY 2022–23 are compared to FY 2013-14 (ten years), FY 2018–19 (five years), and FY 2021–22 (one year).1 Actual expenditures, adjusted to current dollars, are used for all years presented in this report to ensure comparability across categories and jurisdictions.2 The methodology section at the end of this bulletin explains how the data were compiled. Specifically, this bulletin describes: •how dollars are spent in parts of the CJ system regionally over time; •how jurisdictions have allocated dollars for law enforcement; •how this information is related to the population served; and •how staffing figures are related to expenditures. Highlights •The region’s public safety expenditures in FY 2022–23 were $2.72 billion, 2% lower than the previous year and the third consecutive decline when adjusted for inflation. This equates to $817 per resident. •Almost half (49%) of the public safety dollars spent in FY 2022–23 (around $1.3 billion) were allocated to law enforcement activities. •Expenditures in FY 2022–23 were lower for all categories except prosecution and public defense, compared to the prior year. •Over one in every four (29%) general fund dollars was dedicated to law enforcement by cities with individual police departments, ranging from 21% to 47%. •Regionally, there were 1.32 sworn officers per 1,000 residents in FY 2022-23 (ranging from 0.88 to 2.55), lower than the 2022 national figure (2.4). •Almost all law enforcement agencies noted experiencing staffing-related challenges and difficulties in FY 2022-23. •Across the eleven law enforcement agencies, a total of $163.61 million was spent for overtime expenses in FY 2022-23; about $65.12 million more than was budgeted. 1 It should be noted that the public health crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic still had ongoing effects through FY 2022-23, affecting law enforcement efforts in many ways due to changes in crime trends and challenges with budgeting and staffing. Thus, any comparisons and analyses related to the years affected by the pandemic must take into consideration its effects on annual expenditure data. 2 Actual expenditures are updated annually for prior years based on the current CPI and most recent agency data. Therefore, dollar amounts presented here may vary from those presented in prior reports. More detail regarding the adjustments made to the figures is provided in the methodology section. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 16 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 3 Public safety expenditures In FY 2022–23, $2.72 billion were spent on local public safety efforts in the San Diego region. When adjusting for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI), these expenditures represent a slight decrease of 2% from the previous year ($2.78 billion), and the third consecutive decline (Figure 1 and Appendix Table 1). This one-year decrease was due in part to lower operating expenditures, such as staffing and overhead costs. Conversely, the five-year decrease was partially due to decreases in salaries and benefits and services and supplies. Based on the 2022 population estimate for the San Diego region, the cost for public safety per resident in FY 2022–23 was $817 (not shown). Figure 1 Public safety spending in the San Diego Region FY 2013–14 through FY 2022–23 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures To supplement budgets, local public safety agencies rely on grants to fund operations and special programs. Overall, 15 agencies (including all eleven law enforcement agencies, the District Attorney, City Attorney, Probation, and Superior Court) reported spending a total of $59.34 million in grant funds in FY 2022–23 (3% of total expenditures).3 Grant fund expenditures ranged from <1% (Probation, Coronado Police Department, and San Diego Police Department) to 10% (La Mesa Police Department) of actual expenditures (Appendix Table 9).4 Distribution across categories About half (49%) of the public safety dollars spent in FY 2022–23 was allocated to law enforcement activities, while the other half was divided across six other categories, a proportion that has been relatively stable over time (Table 1).5 3 The type of additional funding received from grants was at the discretion of the reporting agencies. There may be variability regarding what additional funding was or was not included. 4 Child Support Services did not receive expenditures from grant funding the previous year, and thus it was not included in this comparison. 5 The “Other” category includes San Diego County’s Public Safety Executive Office, Child Support Services, Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board, and the City of Oceanside Harbor Police. $2.54 $2.53 $2.60 $2.63 $2.71 $2.73 $2.86 $2.79 $2.78 $2.72 2013–2014 2014–2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 Ex p e n d i t u r e s i n b i l l i o n s March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 17 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 4 Table 1 Allocation of public safety expenditures in FY 2022–23 Category Allocated expenditures Law enforcement 49% Corrections 20% Court-related 11% Prosecution 9% Probation 5% Public defense 4% Other 2% Total $2,717,678,005 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures Change across categories In FY 2022–23, public safety spending increased in two categories (Prosecution and Public Defense) by 1% and 8%, respectively, and decreased in the other five, compared to the prior year. Decreases ranged from -2% (Courts and Corrections) to -6% (Probation) (Figure 2 and Appendix Table 1). These changes across categories are explained in more detail in the following sections. Figure 2 Five- and one-year public safety expenditure changes SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures <-1% -7% 21% <1%<1% -7%-10% 1% -2% 8% -3%-2% -6%-3% Prosecution Court-related Public defense Law enforcement Corrections Probation field services & admin Other Pe r c e n t c h a n g e i n e x p e n d i t u r e s 5-year change 1-year change March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 18 of 104 ■ ■ Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 5 Law enforcement Just over $1.33 billion was spent on regional law enforcement activities in FY 2022-23 (Appendix Tables 1 and 3). Law enforcement expenditures decreased by 3% over the prior year, which was the third consecutive decrease for this category (not shown). The difference in population size served by the ten reporting agencies (Figure 3) is a likely factor contributing to the substantial variation in annual expenditures across each of the jurisdictions (excluding the Harbor Police),6 which ranged from $16.21 million in Coronado to $553.87 million in the City of San Diego (Figure 4 and Appendix Table 3). Across the eleven agencies (including Harbor Police), six agencies (Sheriff, Harbor, Chula Vista, Coronado, Oceanside, and El Cajon) had increased spending over the past year (1% to 9%, respectively) (Figure 5 and Appendix Table 3). The other five agencies decreased their spending, ranging from <-1% (Carlsbad) to -9% (National City). Increases in agency expenditures were largely related to increases in staffing costs, either through rising salaries, overtime, or increased retirement and/or health care benefits. Additionally, the resumption of in-person events/activities that were postponed and/or paused due to COVID-19 (e.g., award ceremonies) also contributed to increases. Decreases in agency expenditures were primarily caused by difficulties in maintaining staffing levels, project cuts, and refining pension contributions. Figure 3 Population estimates by jurisdiction in 2022 SOURCE: SANDAG Population and Housing Estimates, 2022 6 Harbor Police is not shown in Figure 3 because there is no population base related to the area served by this agency. Figure 4 Law enforcement expenditures by agencies in FY 2022–23 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures 1,374,790 946,561 276,785 173,048 150,679 115,585 105,638 61,471 60,472 22,777 San Diego Sheriff Chula Vista Oceanside Escondido Carlsbad El Cajon National City La Mesa Coronado $553,873,072 $405,057,914 $68,966,301 $64,071,137 $48,967,491 $42,555,799 $41,785,385 $44,663,333 $24,472,327 $21,920,723 $16,205,854 San Diego Sheriff Oceanside Chula Vista Escondido Carlsbad Harbor El Cajon National City La Mesa Coronado March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 19 of 104 I I I I I I I ■ I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■ Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 6 Figure 5 Five- and one-year law enforcement expenditure percent changes by agency SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures The proportion of FY 2022–23 general funds allocated to law enforcement for the nine incorporated cities that maintain their own police department varied considerably across jurisdictions, ranging from 21% in Carlsbad to 47% in El Cajon. The regional municipal average for these nine jurisdictions was 29% (Figure 6). Figure 6 Proportion of FY 2022–23 general funds allocated to law enforcement by jurisdiction SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures 1% -2% 12%13% -3% -6% -2% -13% 5% <-1% -2% 5% <-1% 3%3% 9% -3% 2% -3% -9% 6% -3% -8% 1% Pe r c e n t c h a n g e i n e x p e n i d t u r e s 5-year change 1-year change 21%22% 26%28% 34%37%37%39% 47% Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado San Diego Oceanside La Mesa NationalCity Escondido El Cajon 29% Regional average March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 20 of 104 ■ ■ Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 7 In FY 2022–23, just over one-fifth (22%) of the County of San Diego’s total actual expenditures were allocated for public safety. This proportion is not included in Figure 6 because it includes functions other than law enforcement (e.g., services provided by prosecution agencies, Public Defense, Probation, San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Detention Services and Court Services Bureau, Public Safety Group Executive Office, Grand Jury, and Child Support Services). Per capita funding is an additional way to examine relative spending on law enforcement across jurisdictions. In this regard, the per capita amount spent ranged from $231 per resident in Chula Vista to $712 in Coronado, with a regionwide average of $401 (Appendix Table 8 and Figure 7). Figure 7 Law enforcement per capita spending across local agencies in FY 2022-23 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures Prosecution This section describes spending for criminal prosecution in FY 2022–23 for two local public agencies – the San Diego County District Attorney and the San Diego City Attorney’s Criminal Division, both of which include victim services. Total spending for criminal prosecution in FY 2022–23 was $241.22 million, which included $216.07 million for the District Attorney’s Office and $25.15 million for the City Attorney’s Criminal Division (Appendix Table 1). Prosecution staffing included 1,026 staff positions from the District Attorney’s Office and 181 staff positions from the City Attorney’s Office (Appendix Table 2). When adjusted for inflation, expenditures over the previous year increased 2% for the District Attorney’s Office and <1% for the City Attorney’s Office (Appendix Table 1). $231 $325 $362 $368 $398 $399 $403 $423 $712 Chula Vista Escondido La Mesa Carlsbad National City Oceanside San Diego El Cajon Coronado FY 2 0 2 2 –20 2 3 p e r c a p i t a f u n d i n g $401 Regional average March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 21 of 104 I Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 8 Salaries and benefits increased for the District and City Attorney’s Office, due at least in part to the addition of new staff and an increase in costs related to negotiated labor agreements and required retirement contributions. $241.22 million spent by prosecution in FY 2022–23. The increase from the prior year was driven by new staff and labor agreement changes. Public defense The Department of the Public Defender consists of four separate divisions: the Primary Public Defender, the Alternate Public Defender, the Multiple Conflicts Office and the Office of Assigned Counsel, all ethically walled to avoid conflicts. The Public Defender’s diverse staff provides constitutionally required legal representation to indigent persons charged with a crime, all persons at arraignment except those who have retained private counsel, and in some civil cases such as mental health matters, civil contempt, probate conservatorships and immigration law removal proceedings. The Public Defender is a California State Bar approved provider of mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) credits for attorneys throughout the state. Public defense spending in FY 2022–23 totaled $114.67 million (Appendix Table 1). Spending for public defense (which includes 532 staff positions) increased 8% over the past year and 21% over the past five years (Figure 2 and Appendix Tables 1 and 2). The changes in expenditures were associated with personnel costs from the addition of 90 new staff positions to manage growing case responsibilities and post-conviction relief activities for the Public Defense Pilot Program, Clerical Support, Trial and Investigative Support, Fresh Start Program, Collaborative Courts, Mental Health Unit, Indigent Defense, and Administrative and Clerical Support. Increases in public defense staffing costs were also due to negotiated labor agreements. $114.67 million spent by public defense in FY 2022–23. An important driver of the increase compared to prior years was the added staffing to address the growing number of cases and newly created units. Court-related services In FY 2022–23, court-related service expenditures totaled $285.55 million and included the Superior Court, Sheriff’s Court Services Bureau, Grand Jury, and Pretrial Services (Appendix Table 1). Additional information regarding these different functions is provided below. • The Superior Court, one of the state’s 58 trial courts, handles all San Diego County judicial matters related to felonies, misdemeanors, civil cases, small claims, traffic, property titles, divorce, probate, conservatorship, mental health, and juvenile proceedings. Judges’ salaries and benefits are paid by the state and are not included in the Court's actual expenditures presented in this bulletin. • The Sheriff’s Court Services Bureau staff provides weapon screening and court facility security around the County and executes, serves, and returns all writs, warrants, and other processes (e.g., subpoenas, eviction notices, and restraining orders) issued by the Court. • The Grand Jury is a group of 19 citizens who investigate civil matters, as well as issue criminal indictments. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 22 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 9 • Pretrial Services staff provides the judiciary with information regarding offender risk, which is used for custody release and bail decisions.7 Expenditures for the court-related services category decreased by 2% in the past year, marked by less expenditures by the Grand Jury (-8%), Sheriff’s Court Services Bureau (-5%), and the Superior Courts (-2%) (Appendix Table 1). These decreases are due to lower contracted costs associated with information technology projects and staff that performed Grand Jury coordination functions. Lower Superior Court expenditures could be explained by the fixed firmed pricing on the Court's contracts. $285.55 million spent by court- related services in FY 2022–23. The Grand Jury, Superior Court, and the Sheriff’s Court Services spent less than the previous year. Probation field services and administration Probation spent $144.12 million in FY 2022–23 for field services and administration, a 6% decrease compared to the previous year and a 7% decrease from five years prior (Appendix Table 1). This decrease in expenditures is partially due to the absence of a one-time hazard and telework payment that was included in FY 2021-22. Furthermore, probation experienced a notable 35% reduction in departmental administrative expenditures compared to the previous year.8 $144.12 million spent by Probation in FY 2022-23. The decrease in probation expenditures is due to the absence of a one-time hazard and telework payment included in the prior year. Corrections facilities The corrections category includes spending related to adult correctional institutions operated by the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, juvenile facilities managed by the Probation Department, institutional services provided by Probation, and the Chula Vista City Jail.9 A total of $536.17 million (Appendix Table 1) was spent on corrections in FY 2022–23. The total expenditure for this category decreased by 2% over one year and increased by less than 1% compared to five years prior (Figure 2 and Appendix Table 1). All three facilities had decreases compared to the prior year (-1%, -10%, -46%, respectively). Decreases in expenditures were a result of expiring contracts, decreased costs in projects, and reclassification of expenses. 7 For fiscal years prior to FY 2016–17, pretrial services were a Superior Court unit, however, due to insufficient funding in August 2015, a Pretrial unit was established at the Sheriff’s Department that includes staff from the Sheriff's Detentions Processing Division, Jail Population Management Unit, and Reentry Services Division. 8 While this decrease appears impactful and presumably indicates some sort of operational change, the decrease actually stemmed from Probation reclassifying the type of expenditures that are considered eligible administrative expenditures. 9 Chula Vista City Jail operations are sustained by revenues from U.S. Marshals Service (USMS). Through an Intergovernmental Agreement, USMS inmates are housed at the Chula Vista jail facility at a per diem rate. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 23 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 10 Across all three institutions, a total of 3,076 correctional staff positions were funded in FY 2022-23, an increase of 12 positions compared to the 3,064 positions funded in FY 2021–22 (Appendix Table 2). This change was likely driven by the slight increase of <1% in non-sworn positions. $536.17 million spent on corrections in FY 2022–23. The Sheriff’s Detention Services, the Probation Department, and Chula Vista City Jail spent less than the previous year. Other agencies In FY 2022–23, spending for “Other” areas related to public safety totaled $63.41 million (Appendix Table 1). The two groups in this category include: (1) San Diego County Public Safety Executive Office, which provides administrative oversight to nine County public safety departments including Child Support Services, which establishes and enforces child support orders and oversees and manages the Bureau of Public Assistance Investigations; and (2) Oceanside Harbor Police, which oversees emergency response for maritime law enforcement in Oceanside. Expenditures for the “Other” category were 3% lower compared to the previous year and 10% lower compared to five years prior; however, there was considerable variation across the groups. Child Support Services and Oceanside Harbor Police have both experienced decreases over the past five years, while the Public Safety Executive Office experienced increases (Appendix Table 1). Child Support Services’ expenditures decreased due to vacancy levels and underfilling of positions. Oceanside Harbor Police’s decreases are due to the restructuring of $63.41 million in expenditures in FY 2022–23. The Public Safety Executive Office had a one-year expenditure increase, while Child Support Services and Oceanside Harbor Police had one-year decreases. Oceanside Police’s responsibilities at the harbor. While Oceanside Police continue to provide land-based law enforcement at the harbor, beginning February 2023, firefighter and lifeguard personnel now handle safety services and rescue operations as part of a new safety plan. Lastly, the Public Safety Executive Office expenditure increases are attributed to the addition of one staff to support programs and initiatives for justice integration, technology costs and increases in salaries and benefits. Staffing In addition to expenditures, this bulletin describes staffing levels as another way to examine resources dedicated to public safety. Staffing constitutes one aspect of total expenditures, which among other factors (such as salaries, benefits, services, and supplies) may influence expenditure changes. Therefore, staffing and spending may not always trend in the same direction or to the same degree. Specifically, three of the seven categories (law enforcement, probation, and corrections) had an inverse relationship between expenditures and staffing, with the three categories experiencing decreases in expenditures, but increases in staffing. Two out of seven categories (prosecution and public defense) experienced an increase in both expenditure and staffing. The remaining two categories (court and other) experienced a decrease in both expenditure and staffing (Table 2). March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 24 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 11 Table 2 One-year changes in expenditures and staffing by category in FY 2022–23 Category One-year change Expenditures One-year change Staffing Law enforcement -3% 2% Corrections facilities -2% <1% Court-related -2% -1% Prosecution 1% 2% Probation (field services and administration) -6% 3% Public defense 8% 20% Other -3% -2% SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures and Authorized Staffing Law enforcement sworn and non-sworn staff Across the eleven agencies (including Harbor Police), there were 6,064 law enforcement- funded staff positions in FY 2022–23 (Appendix Tables 2 and 6), including 4,376 sworn officers and 1,688 non-sworn staff (Appendix Tables 2, 4, and 5). Of the eleven local law enforcement agencies, eight had a one-year increase in total staffing ranging from 1% (Carlsbad, Escondido, Sheriff, and the San Diego Police Department) to 11% (Oceanside), and three experienced no changes (Coronado, La Mesa, and Harbor) (Appendix Table 6). Sworn staff comprised 72% of all law enforcement staffing throughout the region in FY 2022– 23, ranging from 64% (Oceanside) to 82% (Harbor) (not shown). Of the eleven agencies, five saw increases in their sworn staff numbers and six agencies saw no change (Appendix Table 4). Non-sworn staff comprised 28% of all law enforcement staffing throughout the region in FY 2022-23, ranging from 18% (Harbor) to 36% (Oceanside) (not shown). The notably high proportion of non-sworn staff in Oceanside is due to the 2022 expansion of the Community Service Officer Program, funded by Measure X. Out of the ten agencies with sufficient non- sworn staffing for a robust comparison (e.g., greater than 30), eight saw their number of non- sworn staff increase over the past fiscal year and two agencies experienced no changes (Appendix Table 5). The regional average of budgeted sworn officers per 1,000 residents in FY 2022–23 was 1.32.10 This figure has remained relatively consistent over the past five years (Figure 8 and Appendix Table 7). The FY 2022–23 regional figure for San Diego County remains significantly lower than the 2022 national average of 2.4 per 1,000 population (not shown).11 The number of budgeted sworn law enforcement officers per 1,000 population in FY 2022–23 varied across the jurisdictions (from 1.04 in Chula Vista to 2.02 in Coronado) (Figure 8 and Appendix Table 7). Compared to FY 2021-22, the per capita rate (per 1,000 residents) of sworn officers decreased for three agencies (Chula Vista, Coronado, and La Mesa), increased for five (El Cajon, Escondido, National City, Oceanside, and the San Diego Police Department), and stayed the same for two (Carlsbad and the Sheriff’s Department) (Appendix Table 7). 10 Harbor Police is not included in Figure 8 because there is no population base related to the area served by this agency. However, they had 140 sworn officers in FY 2021-22, which informed the regionwide ratio. 11 Federal Bureau of Investigation (2022). Crime Data Explorer. Clarksburg, West Virginia.: U.S. Department of Justice. Available at: https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/le/pe. Note: this is the most up to date data on the national average of sworn officers. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 25 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 12 Figure 8 Region’s sworn officer-to-population ratio in FY 2018–19 and FY 2022–23 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Authorized Staffing Since the Great Recession in 2008, when budgets significantly decreased, this publication has collected information on the number of frozen positions across the region. A frozen position is one that has been budgeted for, but has not been filled, and may or may not be filled in the future. This practice is used if there is a hiring freeze, or if a position is deliberately left vacant to utilize savings from forgone salaries. Due to staffing vacancies caused by residual effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the nationwide law enforcement staffing crisis,12 and increased retirements and resignations, two agencies reported having frozen positions in FY 2022-23; Chula Vista Police Department reported 6 frozen sworn positions and the Sheriff’s Department reported 14 sworn positions. 12 Young, R, Sayers, D., & Sanchez, R. (2022). ‘We need them desperately’: US police departments struggle with critical staffing shortages. CNN. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/19/us/police-staffing-shortages-recruitment/index.html 0.93 1.05 1.09 1.04 1.15 1.22 1.21 1.27 1.44 1.44 2.10 1.04 1.06 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.27 1.29 1.32 1.45 1.48 2.02 Sw o r n o f f i c e r s p e r 1 , 0 0 0 r e s i d e n t s FY 2018-19 FY 2022-23 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 26 of 104 • Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 13 Supplemental Questions to Public Safety Agencies in FY 2022-23 Each year, this analysis incorporates several supplementary questions aimed at highlighting specific events unique to the year under review to gauge the effects they had on the region’s public safety agencies. In FY2022-23, agencies were specifically requested to offer additional qualitative insights into their budget data to provide context on how they adjusted their budgets and allocated resources to navigate challenges related to staffing and overtime expenditures. Challenges Related to Staffing Levels Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the workforce has seen severe disruptions. Across the nation, the number of vacancies and unfilled positions has remained at an extremely high rate, resulting in record breaking staffing shortages.13 The pandemic’s effects on staffing levels have impacted all areas of employment, including San Diego County’s public safety agencies. In addition to the pandemic, anecdotal information pointed to additional challenges affecting staffing among law enforcement agencies. Recent social movements related to the reallocation of public safety funding and criminal justice reforms may have had effects on the general public’s perception of law enforcement which could have affected the number of new applicants interested in working in local law enforcement agencies. Additionally, generational changes and the approach of younger generations to work and work-life balance might be affecting staffing among law enforcement agencies, as younger generations often seek greater flexibility, career advancement opportunities, and a supportive workplace culture that may clash with the traditional hierarchical structures within law enforcement organizations. As agencies grapple with these shifting dynamics, adapting their strategies to attract and retain talent from diverse generational backgrounds becomes imperative for ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of law enforcement efforts. When asked whether they faced challenges filling or maintaining sworn staffing levels, all law enforcement agencies, apart from Coronado, responded affirmatively. Law enforcement agencies reported having difficulties related to higher-than-average attrition rates, challenges in recruitment efforts, and increases in unfilled positions. To further understand the impact that staffing challenges have had on law enforcement agencies’ operations and expenditures, an additional question was asked to better understand how agencies have handled these challenges. Law enforcement agency responses included exploring new recruitment strategies (e.g., contracting public relations companies, producing social media content), offering hiring incentives (i.e., lateral incentives to attract applicants with prior experience), increasing recruitment frequency, and making salaries more competitive. Many agencies also noted that these challenges have caused them to incur increased overtime costs. The use of law enforcement’s overtime is further discussed below. Outside of law enforcement agencies, staffing challenges were less pertinent in other public safety agencies. 13 Ferguson, S. (2023). Understanding America’s Labor Shortage. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.uschamber.com/workforce/understanding-americas-labor-shortage March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 27 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 14 Use of Overtime Budgeting for law enforcement overtime is a standard practice to guarantee that unexpected events can still be handled to ensure public safety without increasing the number of an agency’s sworn staff. Of the eleven law enforcement agencies in the region, all but Coronado reported that their use of overtime had exceeded what they had budgeted in FY 2022-23; however, the variation between budgeted amount and actual overtime across the law enforcement agencies varied drastically, ranging from El Cajon’s $370,548 to the Sheriff’s $44.3 million (Figure 9 and Appendix Table 10).14 The variation in actuals spent on overtime is likely due to the different degree of challenges with higher-than-average attrition and retirement rates, and a steadily decreasing candidate pool, as discussed previously. Across the eleven agencies, a total of $98.49 million was budgeted for overtime expenses in FY 2022-23 and $163.61 million was spent (not shown). Figure 9 Percentage of variation between budgeted and actual overtime by law enforcement agencies in FY 2022–23 SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities’ Expenditures 14 Coronado is not included in Figure 9 because their actual use overtime did not exceed what they had originally budgeted 22%27%28% 52% 72%74%77%87%91% 108% March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 28 of 104 - Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 15 Summary As described in this annual CJ Bulletin, compared to the prior year, regional public safety spending fell 2% in FY 2022–23 to $2.72 billion, when adjusted for inflation. In FY 2022–23, approximately $817 were expended for public safety per person living in San Diego County. The number of sworn law enforcement staff per 1,000 residents in FY 2022-23 (1.32) was consistent with the prior year and remained considerably lower than the national average (2.4). While the staffing rate has remained relatively consistent over the years, many law enforcement agencies noted experiencing challenges related to filling and maintaining staffing due to high attrition rates, recruitment challenges, and increases in retirements. If you are interested in learning more about the data presented here, please contact the SANDAG Criminal Justice Clearinghouse at (619) 699–1900 or visit SANDAG.org/CJ. You can also access criminal justice data through SANDAG’s open data portal (opendata.sandag.org). Methodology The methods used in the preparation of the data presented in this bulletin, as well as other factors to consider when interpreting the information, are outlined below. • All figures for all years, including FY 2022–23, are based on actual expenditures rather than budgeted figures, unless otherwise noted. • Data presented in this bulletin include figures for departments funded by the County and municipal governments. Other entities, such as state and federal justice agencies (e.g., California Highway Patrol, Department of Homeland Security), are not included because they are not part of the local decision-making process. • Minor revisions in methodology, regarding specific categories of expenditures to be included or excluded, may result in differences between the current bulletin and earlier versions of this report. Every year, each agency revises data for one, five, and ten years prior to the current fiscal year. SANDAG updates the report with the revised expenditures for those selected years and maintains the same figures from the previous report for the additional years reported. • To adjust for inflation, expenditures for prior years have been adjusted to be consistent with current dollars, based on the CPI for the San Diego metro area, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Prior to FY 2016-17, reports used the annual CPI rate for the first half of the year. To allow for the reporting of actual expenditures rather than the budgeted amount, the CPI used since then is based on the average of the CPI for the second half of one year (2022 for this report) and the first half of the following year (2023 for this report). • While fire departments and emergency medical services provide essential first- responder services in cases of public safety emergencies, their funding traditionally has not been included in the public safety figures compiled by SANDAG because they are not directly related to law enforcement and offender accountability. • Dollar amounts represent employee salaries and benefits, plus department services and supplies, unless noted otherwise. Capital expenditures are not March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 29 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 16 included because these one-time costs could artificially skew comparisons. • Each staff year represents the equivalent of one full-time position. Part-time staff may be represented by decimal units. Staffing numbers reflect all authorized positions whether filled or vacant. • Information is presented by fiscal year (July 1 through June 30). Population data are presented for calendar years (January 1 through December 31). • For comparability across jurisdictions, some line items have been included or excluded as discussed in this bulletin. Local departments have approved all numbers presented in this bulletin prior to publication. • Law enforcement expenditures may vary with respect to whether parking enforcement, recruits, and animal control are included. However, the data presented in this bulletin are consistent: parking enforcement and recruits are included (except for the Sheriff’s jurisdiction where parking enforcement is provided and regulated by each city) and costs for animal control are excluded. • As of FY 2011–12, facilities and maintenance costs are excluded from all agencies’ expenditures. • There are nine incorporated cities in the region that operate their own police departments. The Sheriff’s Department contracts to provide services to the remaining nine incorporated cities and the unincorporated areas of the county. These groups and the Harbor Police provided information regarding law enforcement for this report. • The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department figures for law enforcement do not include expenditures or staffing for their detention facilities or court services. However, it is important to note that the Sheriff's Department provides certain resources and services to the entire San Diego region, including search and rescue, emergency planning, aerial services, crime lab, specialized response (e.g., bomb, SWAT), and mutual aid coordination. • The Criminal Division of the San Diego City Attorney’s Office prosecutes misdemeanors for the cities of San Diego, Poway, and the unincorporated area of 4S Ranch. • Adult correctional facilities include the Central Jail, East Mesa, Rock Mountain, George Bailey, Las Colinas, South Bay, and Vista, all operated by the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, as well as the Chula Vista operated Chula Vista City Jail. Juvenile facilities operated by the Probation Department include Youth Transition Campus and East Mesa Juvenile Detention Facility. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 30 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 17 Appendix Table 1 Criminal justice expenditures by category San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Category FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Law enforcement $1,214,642,578 $1,326,081,685 $1,373,605,744 $1,332,539,336 10% <1% -3% Prosecution – Total $222,223,548 $241,359,053 $237,750,400 $241,218,473 9% <-1% 1% District Attorney $200,922,630 $217,486,742 $212,635,590 $216,070,361 8% -1% 2% City Attorney $21,300,918 $23,872,311 $25,114,810 $25,148,112 18% 5% <1% Public defense $92,536,901 $95,041,108 $106,280,945 $114,673,345 24% 21% 8% Court-related $303,574,984 $308,371,072 $291,166,814 $285,549,924 -6% -7% -2% Superior Court $222,978,095 $215,349,215 $203,769,672 $200,044,730 -10% -7% -2% Sheriff's Court Services Bureau $77,980,404 $92,416,313 $86,642,033 $82,478,684 6% -11% -5% Grand Jury $685,510 $605,544 $496,287 $455,285 -34% -25% -8% Pretrial Services* $1,930,975 $0 $258,822 $2,571,225 33% -- 893% Probation $169,653,747 $155,581,745 $152,669,679 $144,116,125 -15% -7% -6% Adult Field Services $93,380,241 $87,211,047 $101,008,527 $96,724,646 4% 11% -4% Juvenile Field Services $56,493,174 $41,951,446 $47,037,027 $44,407,063 -21% 6% -6% Department Administration $19,780,332 $26,419,252 $4,624,125 $2,984,416 -85% -89% -35% Corrections facilities $470,946,730 $534,597,455 $549,680,896 $536,169,135 14% <1% -2% Probation Institutional Services $83,321,918 $84,149,792 $66,654,004 $60,055,899 -28% -29% -10% Sheriff Detention Services $385,202,549 $448,274,001 $480,673,699 $474,835,029 23% 6% -1% Chula Vista City Jail $2,422,263 $2,173,662 $2,353,193 $1,278,207 -47% -41% -46% Other $67,799,609 $70,472,981 $65,377,829 $63,411,667 -6% -10% -3% Public Safety Executive Office $4,239,825 $5,265,007 $6,551,565 $6,841,811 61% 30% 4% Child Support Services $61,055,651 $62,532,184 $56,266,975 $55,178,825 -10% -12% -2% Oceanside Harbor Police $2,504,133 $2,675,790 $2,559,289 $1,391,031 -44% -48% -46% Total $2,541,378,097 $2,731,505,099 $2,776,532,307 $2,717,678,005 7% -1% -2% * The large increase in expenditures in Pretrial Services is due to more funding via the 2021-2022 Budget Act in Senate Bill 129 that created the Pretrial Supervised Own Recognizance (SOR) Monitoring and Community Support Services. NOTES: All expenditures are based on salaries and benefits plus services and supplies, except Superior Court, which is based on all operational and support expenditures excluding capital outlay and security. Salaries for the Superior Court judges are not included because they are paid directly by the state. The Law enforcement category includes parking enforcement for all agencies except the Sheriff’s Department. To reduce the impact of inflation on comparisons over time, data have been adjusted to be consistent with current dollars now based upon the average of the 2022 Second Half and 2023 First Half CPI for the San Diego metro area, as described in the methodology section of the report. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Actual Expenditures March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 31 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 18 Appendix Table 2 Criminal justice staffing by category San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Category FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Law enforcement - Total 5,607.00 5,905.00 5,948.0 6,064.00 8% 3% 2% Sworn 4,122.00 4,285.00 4,350.00 4,376.00 6% 2% 1% Non-sworn 1,485.00 1,620.00 1,598.00 1,688.00 14% 4% 6% Prosecution – Total 1,146.50 1,159.00 1,186.00 1,207.00 5% 4% 2% District Attorney - Total 985.00 982.00 1,006.00 1,026.00 4% 5% 2% Attorneys 318.00 332.00 341.00 346.00 9% 4% 2% Investigators 173.00 134.00 135.00 135.00 -22% 1% 0% Other 494.00 516.00 530.00 545.00 10% 6% 3% City Attorney - Total 161.50 177.00 180.00 181.00 12% 2% 1% Attorneys 60.25 73.00 75.00 75.00 25% 3% 0% Investigators 9.00 14.00 14.00 13.00 -- -- -- Other 92.25 90.00 91.00 93.00 1% 3% 2% Public defense - Total 357.00 388.00 442.00 532.00 49% 37% 20% Attorneys 221.00 234.00 254.00 278.00 26% 19% 9% Investigators 48.00 53.00 71.00 84.00 75% 59% 18% Other 88.00 101.00 117.00 170.00 93% 68% 45% Court-related - Total 1,693.00 1,688.00 1,583.00 1,572.00 -7% -7% -1% Commissioners/referees 24.00 20.00 16.00 16.00 -- -- -- Other 1,230.00 1,204.00 1,145.00 1,133.00 -8% -6% -1% Sheriff's Court Services Bureau 419.00 464.00 421.00 423.00 1% -9% 1% Grand Jury 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- -- Pretrial services 19.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 -- -- -- Probation - Total 846.00 657.00 633.00 649.00 -23% -1% 3% Probation Officers 607.00 441.00 426.00 425.00 -30% -4% <-1% Other 239.00 216.00 207.00 224.00 -6% 4% 8% Corrections facilities - Total 2,767.00 2,815.00 3,064.00 3,076.00 11% 9% <1% Sheriff Sworn 1,250.00 1,269.00 1,396.00 1,396.00 12% 10% 0% Probation Officers 455.00 407.00 338.00 342.00 -25% -16% 1% Chula Vista City Jail Sworn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- -- Non-sworn corrections 1,062.00 1,139.00 1,330.00 1,338.00 26% 18% 1% Other - Total 491.00 535.00 484.00 475.00 -3% -11% -2% Public Safety Executive Office 11.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 -- -- -- Child Support Services 471.00 512.00 461.00 461.00 -2% -10% 0% Citizens' Law Enforcement Review Board -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Oceanside Harbor Police 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 -- -- -- Total 12,908 13,147 13,340 13,575 5% 3% 2% NOTES: All staffing numbers include positions authorized (budgeted) to be filled. Percent changes are not presented for comparison numbers equaling 30 or less. The Law Enforcement category includes parking enforcement for all agencies except Sheriff. Non-Sworn Corrections includes non-sworn staff who work in corrections facilities run by the Sheriff's and Probation Departments and Chula Vista Jail. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Authorized Staffing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 32 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 19 Appendix Table 3 Law enforcement agency expenditures by jurisdiction San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad $36,979,860 $42,196,347 $42,609,551 $42,555,799 15% 1% <-1% Chula Vista $56,779,019 $65,657,053 $62,214,756 $64,071,137 13% -2% 3% Coronado $12,752,887 $14,532,464 $15,753,232 $16,205,854 27% 12% 3% El Cajon $33,885,775 $39,371,587 $40,877,451 $44,663,333 32% 13% 9% Escondido $46,890,228 $50,641,715 $50,487,757 $48,967,491 4% -3% -3% La Mesa $19,409,908 $22,390,307 $22,653,603 $21,920,723 13% -2% -3% National City $22,736,177 $28,090,852 $26,838,320 $24,472,327 8% -13% -9% Oceanside $61,694,028 $65,807,288 $65,361,142 $68,966,301 12% 5% 6% San Diego $527,933,174 $565,869,739 $603,620,769 $553,873,072 5% -2% -8% Sheriff - Total $356,267,048 $387,046,223 $402,164,645 $405,057,914 14% 5% 1% Del Mar $2,454,616 $2,741,091 $2,676,903 $2,560,787 4% -7% -4% Encinitas $15,675,767 $17,534,001 $17,785,501 $17,154,927 9% -2% -4% Imperial Beach $7,747,759 $8,466,028 $8,428,078 $8,181,959 6% -3% -3% Lemon Grove $6,113,461 $6,848,327 $6,750,104 $6,678,907 9% -2% -1% Poway $13,007,074 $14,282,661 $14,440,366 $14,047,870 8% -2% -3% San Marcos $20,049,530 $22,546,980 $23,324,936 $22,350,095 11% -1% -4% Santee $16,079,297 $16,833,170 $17,081,755 $16,250,452 1% -3% -5% Solana Beach $4,390,297 $4,880,647 $4,953,566 $4,800,167 9% -2% -3% Vista $24,042,675 $26,515,419 $27,082,089 $26,210,501 9% -1% -3% Harbor Police $39,314,474 $44,478,110 $41,024,518 $41,785,385 6% -6% 2% Total $1,214,642,578 $1,326,081,685 $1,373,605,744 $1,332,539,336 10% <1% -3% NOTES: All expenditures are based on salaries and benefits, plus services and supplies. To reduce the impact of inflation on comparisons over time, data have been adjusted to be consistent with current dollars now based upon the average of the 2022 Second Half and 2023 First Half CPI for the San Diego metro area, as described in the methodology section of the report. In order to increase comparability, parking enforcement is included in the expenditures for all agencies, except Sheriff total and contract cities (i.e., Del Mar, Encinitas, Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, Poway, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, and Vista), regardless of whether that agency usually includes parking enforcement in their expenditures. Data for the Sheriff's contract cities were obtained from the Sheriff's Department and include only Sheriff contract amounts. The Sheriff's total includes actual expenditures for the contract cities and unincorporated areas, as well as for services, such as search and rescue, which are provided to the entire region, as described in the methodology. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Actual Expenditures March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 33 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 20 Appendix Table 4 Sworn law enforcement agency personnel by jurisdiction San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad 114.00 119.00 132.00 132.00 16% 11% 0% Chula Vista* 237.00 249.00 287.00 289.00 22% 16% 1% Coronado 44.00 45.00 46.00 46.00 5% 2% 0% El Cajon 122.00 126.00 126.00 136.00 11% 8% 8% Escondido 168.00 159.00 159.00 159.00 -5% 0% 0% La Mesa 68.00 69.00 70.00 70.00 3% 1% 0% National City 84.00 90.00 86.00 89.00 6% -1% 3% Oceanside 202.00 216.00 217.00 219.00 8% 1% 1% San Diego 1,978.00 2,043.00 2,036.00 2,036.00 3% <-1% 0% Sheriff - Total 980.00 1,029.00 1,051.00 1,060.00 8% 3% 1% Del Mar 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 -- -- -- Encinitas 60.00 61.00 61.00 61.00 2% 0% 0% Imperial Beach 28.00 28.00 27.00 28.00 -- -- -- Lemon Grove 24.00 24.00 23.00 24.00 -- -- -- Poway 50.00 49.00 51.00 51.00 2% 4% 0% San Marcos 79.00 79.00 82.00 82.00 4% 4% 0% Santee 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 0% 0% 0% Solana Beach 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 -- -- -- Vista 93.00 93.00 93.00 96.00 3% 3% 3% Harbor Police 125.00 140.00 140.00 140.00 12% 0% 0% Total 4,122.00 4,285.00 4,350.00 4,376.00 6% 2% 1% *Chula Vista’s sworn officer total includes six frozen positions. A frozen position is one that has been budgeted for, but has not been filled, and may be filled in the future. This status is used if there is a hiring freeze, or if a position is deliberately left vacant to utilize salary savings and indicates that an agency is operating without all necessary sworn officers. NOTES All staffing numbers reflect positions authorized (budgeted) to be filled. Percent changes are not presented for comparison numbers equaling 30 or less. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Authorized Staffing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 34 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 21 Appendix Table 5 Non-sworn law enforcement agency personnel by jurisdiction San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad 48.00 54.00 54.00 55.00 15% 2% 2% Chula Vista 82.00 91.00 111.00 121.00 48% 33% 9% Coronado 20.00 24.00 25.00 25.00 -- -- -- El Cajon 67.00 63.00 62.00 63.00 -6% 0% 2% Escondido 59.00 58.00 57.00 59.00 0% 2% 4% La Mesa 30.00 30.00 31.00 31.00 -- -- 0% National City 38.00 39.00 37.00 39.00 3% 0% 5% Oceanside 81.00 97.00 92.00 124.00 53% 28% 35% San Diego 512.00 567.00 548.00 578.00 13% 2% 5% Sheriff - Total 519.00 560.00 550.00 562.00 8% <1% 2% Del Mar 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 -- -- -- Encinitas 23.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 -- -- -- Imperial Beach 15.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 -- -- -- Lemon Grove 9.00 11.00 10.00 10.00 -- -- -- Poway 18.00 17.00 16.00 16.00 -- -- -- San Marcos 25.00 23.00 24.00 24.00 -- -- -- Santee 22.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 -- -- -- Solana Beach 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 -- -- -- Vista 36.00 33.00 34.00 34.00 -6% 3% 0% Harbor Police 29.00 37.00 31.00 31.00 -- -16% 0% Total 1,485.00 1,620.00 1,598.00 1,688.00 14% 4% 6% NOTES: All staffing numbers reflect positions authorized (budgeted) to be filled. Percent changes are not presented for comparison numbers equaling 30 or less. In order to increase comparability, parking enforcement personnel are included for all agencies, except Sheriff, regardless of whether that agency usually includes parking enforcement in their budget. For Escondido, non-sworn staff are based on full-time positions only. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Authorized Staffing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 35 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 22 Appendix Table 6 Total law enforcement agency personnel by jurisdiction San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad 162.00 173.00 186.00 187.00 15% 8% 1% Chula Vista* 319.00 340.00 398.00 410.00 29% 21% 3% Coronado 64.00 69.00 71.00 71.00 11% 3% 0% El Cajon 189.00 189.00 188.00 199.00 5% 5% 6% Escondido 227.00 217.00 216.00 218.00 -4% <1% 1% La Mesa 98.00 99.00 101.00 101.00 3% 2% 0% National City 122.00 129.00 123.00 128.00 5% -1% 4% Oceanside 283.00 313.00 309.00 343.00 21% 10% 11% San Diego 2,490.00 2,610.00 2,584.00 2,614.00 5% <1% 1% Sheriff - Total 1,499.00 1,589.00 1,601.00 1,622.00 8% 2% 1% Del Mar 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 -- -- -- Encinitas 83.00 83.00 83.00 83.00 0% 0% 0% Imperial Beach 43.00 40.00 39.00 40.00 -7% 0% 3% Lemon Grove 33.00 35.00 33.00 34.00 3% -3% 3% Poway 68.00 66.00 67.00 67.00 -1% 2% 0% San Marcos 104.00 102.00 106.00 106.00 2% 4% 0% Santee 82.00 79.00 79.00 79.00 -4% 0% 0% Solana Beach 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 -- -- -- Vista 129.00 126.00 127.00 130.00 1% 3% 2% Harbor Police 154.00 177.00 171.00 171.00 11% -3% 0% Total 5,607.00 5,905.00 5,948.00 6,064.00 8% 3% 2% *Chula Vista’s sworn officer total includes six frozen positions. A frozen position is one that has been budgeted for, but has not been filled, and may be filled in the future. This status is used if there is a hiring freeze, or if a position is deliberately left vacant to utilize salary savings and indicates that an agency is operating without all necessary sworn officers. NOTES: All staffing numbers reflect positions authorized (budgeted) to be filled. In order to increase comparability, parking enforcement personnel are included for all agencies, except Sheriff, regardless of whether that agency usually includes parking enforcement in their budget. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Authorized Staffing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 36 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 23 Appendix Table 7 Sworn officers per 1,000 population by jurisdiction San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad 1.04 1.04 1.14 1.14 10% 10% 0% Chula Vista 0.92 0.93 1.05 1.04 13% 12% -1% Coronado 1.88 2.10 2.06 2.02 7% -4% -2% El Cajon 1.19 1.21 1.22 1.29 8% 7% 6% Escondido 1.13 1.05 1.05 1.06 -6% 1% 1% La Mesa 1.15 1.15 1.17 1.16 1% 1% -1% National City 1.40 1.44 1.37 1.45 4% 1% 6% Oceanside 1.17 1.22 1.23 1.27 9% 4% 3% San Diego 1.47 1.44 1.44 1.48 1% 3% 3% Sheriff - Total 1.06 1.09 1.12 1.12 6% 3% 0% Del Mar 2.36 2.33 2.35 2.55 8% 9% 9% Encinitas 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 1% 1% 1% Imperial Beach 1.03 1.01 0.97 1.07 4% 6% 10% Lemon Grove 0.93 0.90 0.87 0.88 -5% -2% 1% Poway 1.02 0.99 1.04 1.05 3% 6% 1% San Marcos 0.90 0.83 0.85 0.88 -2% 6% 4% Santee 1.08 1.06 1.06 1.02 -6% -4% -4% Solana Beach 1.27 1.23 1.23 1.33 5% 8% 8% Vista 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.96 0% 5% 7% Total 1.27 1.27 1.30 1.32 4% 4% 2% NOTES: All staffing numbers reflect positions authorized (budgeted) to be filled. Harbor Police is not included in the Table because there is no population base related to the area served by this agency; however, they had 140 sworn officers in FY 2022-23 that informed the regionwide ratio. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Authorized Staffing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 37 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 24 Appendix Table 8 Law enforcement expenditures per capita San Diego region, FY 2013-14, FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction FY 2013-14 FY 2018-19 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Change 10-year Change 5-year Change 1-year Carlsbad $336.62 $370.16 $368.91 $368.18 9% -1% <-1% Chula Vista $221.43 $244.45 $226.69 $231.48 5% -5% 2% Coronado $544.81 $678.58 $704.62 $711.50 31% 5% 1% El Cajon $331.54 $378.74 $395.93 $422.80 28% 12% 7% Escondido $314.87 $335.22 $489.02 $324.98 3% -3% -34% La Mesa $329.17 $372.82 $380.23 $362.49 10% -3% -5% National City $379.44 $448.21 $427.71 $398.11 5% -11% -7% Oceanside $356.32 $372.70 $369.79 $398.54 12% 7% 8% San Diego $391.98 $399.36 $427.79 $402.88 3% 1% -6% Sheriff - Total $387.15 $409.21 $428.72 $427.93 11% 5% <-1% Del Mar $578.51 $639.10 $628.68 $651.77 13% 2% 4% Encinitas $256.43 $281.02 $285.53 $278.87 9% -1% -2% Imperial Beach $285.54 $306.75 $303.45 $311.78 9% 2% 3% Lemon Grove $236.54 $257.70 $256.22 $245.17 4% -5% -4% Poway $265.03 $288.43 $295.09 $288.11 9% <-1% -2% San Marcos $227.56 $237.26 $242.21 $238.82 5% 1% -1% Santee $289.23 $298.20 $300.74 $275.36 -5% -8% -8% Solana Beach $327.17 $351.99 $358.25 $374.66 15% 6% 5% Vista $247.84 $258.69 $262.25 $261.34 5% 1% <-1% Total $375 $394 $409 $401 7% 2% -2% NOTES: All expenditures are based on salaries and benefits, as well as services and supplies. To reduce the impact of inflation on comparisons over time, data have been adjusted to be consistent with current dollars based upon the average of the 2022 Second Half and 2023 First Half CPI for the San Diego metro area as described in the methodology section of the report. In order to increase comparability, parking enforcement is included in the expenditures for all agencies, except Sheriff total and contract cities (i.e., Del Mar, Encinitas, Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, Poway, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, and Vista), regardless of whether that agency usually includes parking enforcement in their budget. Sheriff total and contract cities do not include Court or Detention Services, but the total does include services provided to the entire region, as described in the methodology. SOURCES: SANDAG; San Diego County and Cities' Actual Expenditures March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 38 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 25 Appendix Table 9 Percentage of public safety expenditures from grant funds San Diego region, FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction Expenditures from grant funding Total expenditures % of expenditures from grants Carlsbad $481,729 $42,555,799 1% Chula Vista $873,988 $64,071,137 1% Coronado $63,686 $16,205,854 <1% El Cajon $801,217 $44,663,333 2% Escondido $1,568,170 $48,967,491 3% Harbor $447,639 $41,785,385 1% La Mesa $2,254,067 $21,920,723 10% National City $342,601 $24,472,327 1% Oceanside $2,248,871 $68,966,301 3% San Diego $2,223,306 $553,873,072 <1% Sheriff $28,746,483 $405,057,914 7% District Attorney $16,578,767 $216,070,361 8% City Attorney $559,792 $25,148,112 2% Superior Court $2,032,769 $205,656,373 1% Probation $404,610 $204,172,024 <1% Total $59,627,695 $1,983,586,206 3% NOTES: Agencies reporting no grant funds used for FY 2022-23 expenditures are not included. The Sheriff’s Department’s grant total includes expenditures in Detention Services and Law Enforcement. SOURCE: SANDAG; San Diego Cities and County Expenditures March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 39 of 104 Public Safety Allocations in the San Diego Region: Expenditures and Staffing for FY 2022–23 26 Appendix Table 10 Law enforcement agencies' variation between budgeted and actual overtime San Diego region, FY 2022-23 Jurisdiction Budgeted Actual Variance Carlsbad $2,535,186 $3,240,021 -$704,835 Chula Vista $2,979,964 $5,288,670 -$2,308,706 Coronado $997,000 $996,168 $832 El Cajon $1,661,974 $2,032,522 -$370,548 Escondido $1,777,280 $3,324,928 -$1,547,648 Harbor Police $2,700,000 $4,100,000 -$1,400,000 La Mesa $1,059,000 $1,846,728 -$787,728 National City $931,351 $1,601,841 -$670,490 Oceanside $2,630,927 $5,015,883 -$2,384,956 San Diego $40,162,474 $50,818,779 -$10,656,305 Sheriff $41,057,635 $85,349,374 -$44,291,739 Total $98,492,791 $163,614,914 -$65,122,123 SOURCE: SANDAG; San Diego Cities and County Expenditures March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 40 of 104 1 560K 1.05M 1.37M 1.87M 2.50M 2.81M 3.10M 3.33M 3.35M 3.43M 3.40M 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 infobits Series 15 Forecast: What Will the Region Look Like in 2050? MARCH 2024 Every four years, the SANDAG Data Science team works with local jurisdictions, the California State Department of Finance, demographic and economic experts, and other stakeholders to create a long-term forecast that predicts what the region will look like in terms of population, housing units, and number of jobs. The draft Series 15 forecast, which has a launch year of 2022 and looks out to 2050, was recently completed and is being used in the modeling and planning for the 2025 Regional Plan to identify how we will improve transportation, equity, and the environment for people in the greater San Diego area to meet our regional goals. It is also used by local jurisdictions as part of their planning efforts and by other municipal departments and agencies. This InfoBits highlights trends from this new forecast and discusses implications for the region. Series 15 forecast data will also be available on SANDAG’s Open Data Portal in Spring 2024. Did you know? How Will the Number of People in the San Diego Region Change? As Figures 1 and 2 show, the greatest population growth in the San Diego region occurred between 1950 and 1990. Since then, the population has continued to grow, but at a slower rate, to approximately 3.33 million residents in 2020. Between 2020 and 2042, the region is expected to add almost 103,000 residents. After that, the population is expected to decrease to around 3.40 million in 2050. In 2050, the population will be three percent higher than in 2022, adding 1 new resident for every 29 living here now. The forecasted trends are similar to California state trends over the same period. Figure 2: HISTORIC AND FORECASTED POPULATION IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION Figure 1: HISTORIC AND FORECASTED CHANGE IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION POPULATION 1950-1970 1970-1990 1990-2010 2010-2030 2030-2050 144% 83% 24% 8% 2% Our population forecast reflects assumptions regarding births, deaths, and net migration. We are expecting to see fewer births, more deaths, and an initial increase but eventual decline of net migration, which translates to smaller population growth in our future. By 2050, we are expecting births to be lower than in 2022, reflecting in part the aging of the population, as well as lower birth rates among young individuals, which has been a trend in recent years. For deaths, the model assumes there will be improvements in infant mortality, but that rates will be stable for other ages. With an aging population, there will be more deaths in 2050 than in earlier years. Finally, net migration reflects both domestic and foreign migration into and out of the San Diego region. For the past two decades, net domestic migration has been an outflow and while international migration has typically been positive, it has not been enough to offset the outflow in recent years. Population Assumptions Forecast Historic The region’s population in 2050 is expected to be only 3% higher than in 2022, with an additional 1 resident for every 29 we had in 2022. Jurisdictions with the largest growth in population and housing between now and 2050 include San Diego, Chula Vista, and San Marcos. 1 in 5 people will be over the age of 65 in 2050, compared to 1 in 10 in 2000. Exhibit 2 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 41 of 104 ■ I t t • • •O• • •O• • •O t 26% 19% 11% 22% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 0-17 18-24 25-64 65+ infobits Series 15 Forecast: What Will the Region Look Like in 2050? MARCH 2024 2 Over the coming decades, the region’s population will become older and more diverse ethnically. While one in ten of our residents was over the age of 65 in 2000 (and the median age was 36), they will be around one in five by 2050 (and the median age will be 42) (Figure 3). This translates to several policy implications, from the need for services, transportation choices, types of trips with fewer school-age children, and also the type of housing that may be needed. As Figure 4 shows, the region will also continue to grow more diverse over time, with the greatest change in the proportion of the population that is Asian, which reflects births, life expectancy, and migration trends. The non- Hispanic White population is expected to shrink, in part due to mortality associated with the Baby Boom generation and migration out of the region. How Will the Characteristics of People in the San Diego Region Change? Jurisdiction Population Change #Population Change % Carlsbad 1,240 1.1% Chula Vista 48,702 17.6% Coronado -1,536 -6.9% Del Mar -220 -5.6% El Cajon -6,404 -6.1% Encinitas -1,688 -2.7% Escondido 448 0.3% Imperial Beach -841 -3.2% La Mesa -1,255 -2.1% Lemon Grove -979 -3.6% National City 174 0.3% Oceanside 10,481 6.1% Poway -228 -0.5% San Diego 65,345 4.8% San Marcos 16,423 17.5% Santee 3,861 6.5% Solana Beach -879 -6.9% Vista -1,195 -1.2% Unincorporated -18,505 -3.6% Region 112,944 3.4% Between 2022 and 2050, the population of eleven of the region’s jurisdictions (including the unincorporated area) is expected to decline, while eight jurisdictions are projected to grow. The jurisdictions with the largest population growth include San Marcos (18%), Chula Vista (18%), Santee (7%), Oceanside (6%), and the City of San Diego (5%). Because San Diego is the largest city in the County, it will have the greatest increase in population in terms of the number of new residents (Table 1). Table 1: FORECASTED CHANGE IN POPULATION BY JURISDICTION 2022-2050 Figure 4: ETHNIC BREAKDOWN OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION’S POPULATION, 2000-2050 NOTE: American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander races comprise less than one percent of the population and are included in the Other category. Figure 3: AGE BREAKDOWN OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION’S POPULATION, 2000-2050 55% 38% 9% 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 White Hispanic Asian Black Two or more Other March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 42 of 104 S A NDA G ■ ■ ■ ■ ----------------------------------------------------------■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 infobits 3 How Will the Number of Housing Units in San Diego County Change? Our housing model starts with the existing housing stock, excluding group quarters, and considers how many are occupied, what the vacancy rate is for owned and rented properties, how many are unavailable because they are vacation homes or used for short term rentals, and what the household formation rate is expected to be. Housing Assumptions The Series 15 forecast predicts both how many households and housing units there will be in the future. Because the population is aging, there will be an increased need for housing since older individuals are more likely to live in households with fewer people than younger individuals. This trend, combined with the fact that population growth in the San Diego region has historically exceeded housing production, shows how even with a slowing in population growth (and eventual decline), there remains a need for more housing production. The Series 15 forecast expects the region to add over 202,000 housing units from 2022 to 2050 (an increase of 16% from the current housing stock) (Figure 5). Table 2: FORECASTED CHANGE IN HOUSING BY JURISDICTION 2022-2050 Figure 5: HISTORIC AND FORECASTED POPULATION AND HOUSING GROWTH IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION 2000-2050 As Table 2 shows, each of the jurisdictions in the region is expected to add housing units, with those jurisdictions with the largest population growth adding the greatest number of housing units, including San Marcos (32%), Chula Vista (30%), Oceanside (21%), San Diego (19%), and Santee (17%). Again, as the largest jurisdiction in the County, San Diego is adding the greatest number of housing units (107,235), more than four times more than Chula Vista (which is adding the second greatest in terms of number). Series 15 Forecast: What Will the Region Look Like in 2050? MARCH 2024 Forecast Historic Jurisdiction Housing Change #Housing Change % Carlsbad 6,153 12.8% Chula Vista 26,550 30.1% Coronado 134 1.4% Del Mar 111 4.2% El Cajon 1,708 4.7% Encinitas 2,118 7.9% Escondido 6,216 12.6% Imperial Beach 868 8.7% La Mesa 1,938 7.4% Lemon Grove 757 8.2% National City 2,492 14.0% Oceanside 13,954 20.6% Poway 1,929 11.5% San Diego 107,235 19.4% San Marcos 10,444 32.3% Santee 3,653 17.0% Solana Beach 239 3.7% Vista 3,436 10.2% Unincorporated 12,884 7.2% Region 202,819 16.4% Population Housing March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 43 of 104 S A NDA G ___ -0-----0-------__ ..o--------o infobits 4 How Will the Number of Jobs in San Diego County Change? While the Series 15 forecast projects that the number of people in the region will eventually decrease, it also includes continued growth in the number of jobs in the region. Continued job growth is also possible for several reasons. A key factor is that the region’s prime working age population (25 to 64) remains stable and changes the least of all age groups (Figure 3). Additionally, the job forecast accounts for more individuals working more than one job, gig work increasing, and the region being able to attract workers from outside the county. At the regional level, wage and salary jobs will increase eleven percent, with all jurisdictions having some level of increase. The jurisdictions with the largest increase include Imperial Beach (50%), whose general plan allows for a significant amount of business development, Chula Vista (38%), Oceanside (36%), and San Marcos (30%) (Table 3). Table 3: FORECASTED CHANGE IN WAGE AND SALARY JOBS BY JURISDICTION 2022-2050 For our job forecast, economic data are used with the population data to forecast the number of jobs, rather than the number of employed persons in the region. In Series 15, both wage and salary and non-wage and salary workers, such as real estate agents and Uber/Lyft drivers, are included. This change better accounts for the different types of jobs in the region. Since 2010, non-wage and salary jobs in the region have been growing twice as fast as wage and salary jobs. Job Assumptions Takeaways »As we plan transportation options for the region, it is important to consider the fluctuation we will see over time and include flexibility, such as policies, programs, and projects that can be modified to best meet the needs of the population. »An aging population translates to a need for the region to meet the needs of older individuals, at the same time the school-age population will be decreasing. »Even though population growth is slowing, there is pent up demand for housing, and an older population means that the average household size will be smaller, supporting continued emphasis on housing production for residents. About SANDAG InfoBits SANDAG serves as the region’s clearinghouse for information and data. InfoBits publish timely, relevant information to the public while providing context on complex issues facing the region. Series 15 Forecast: What Will the Region Look Like in 2050? MARCH 2024 Jurisdiction Jobs Change # Jobs Change % Carlsbad 5,994 7.6% Chula Vista 28,473 38.1% Coronado 240 0.8% Del Mar 50 1.3% El Cajon 4,474 10.2% Encinitas 848 3.2% Escondido 2,108 3.9% Imperial Beach 2,532 49.9% La Mesa 2,222 8.8% Lemon Grove 1,431 18.0% National City 3,196 8.2% Oceanside 17,223 35.8% Poway 281 0.8% San Diego 67,305 7.7% San Marcos 12,204 30.4% Santee 1,466 8.2% Solana Beach 131 1.4% Vista 2,638 6.8% Unincorporated 17,941 11.5% Region 170,757 10.6% March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 44 of 104 S A NDA G Free Language Assistance I Ayuda gratuita con el idioma I Libreng Tu long sa Wika I Ho trd ng6n ngQ mien phf ~JU'/l'-gtg,Jl;/J I ~~i'll'-gt1}Jl;/J I r'-"lt.i.w..Jehc:lc.<#' I -'f-li '2:!01 7'1~ I ....s,.. ... sy.,.,10 _A,~lu I #M,10)~~5t:li I 5ecnnarHa5l5l3blKOBa5l noMOLL\b Assistencia lingufstica gratuita I "!!1~iP-TTi;iT~ I Assistance linguistique gratuite I i:l§WlilfiJliHi~ni;,rui sw'"@ 2;5--,,;;.i--,, ~;;;,,"""®o I rnu~.::im@~o'11JW'1~'11JJ3 I Kaalmada Luqadda ee Bilaashka ah I 5e3KOWTOBHa MOB Ha AOnoMo,a SANDAG.org/LanguageAssistance I (619) 699-1900 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 45 of 104 S A DA G March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 46 of 104 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 47 of 104 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 48 of 104 Draft Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast Presented to Sustainable Communities Working Group February 15, 2024 Agenda | 2 Welcome & Introductions Timeline and Collaborative Efforts Terminology Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast Next Steps California Population March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 49 of 104 I • I • I • I • I • I • I SA NDA G Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast Timeline February- May Draft region-level growth forecast March- October Jurisdictions review land use assumptions December Draft Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast (baseline) January Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) land use pattern for the 2025 Regional Plan Spring Release Draft 2025 Regional Plan and draft EIR Fall Anticipated adoption of Final 2025 RP and certification of Final EIR by Board June Begin region-levelgrowth forecast development 20252024 | 3 2022 September Begin sub-regional framework development 2023 | 4 Collaborative Effort 42 one-on-one meetings to review land use inputs Web maps, jurisdictional visual and tabular data reviews Permitted projects included (using Annual Progress Reports) Approximately 2.5 million records used as input 25 one-on-one reviews of draft forecast output March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 50 of 104 SA NDA G SA NDA G | 5 Terminology Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast (RGF) • Demographic and economic forecast used to inform the 2025 Regional Plan • Series 15 is the latest series, replaces Series 14 used in the 2021 Regional Plan. Regional Growth Forecasts are refreshed on four- year cycles incorporating latest inputs from jurisdictions, recent trends, and datasets. • Pursuant to California Government Code 65584.01(a), Regional population growth is within +/-1.5% of most recent California Department of Finance population projection (Vintage 2023; 2023.7.19) • Base year = 2022; Horizon year = 2050* Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) • Requires planning scenario that shows alignment of transportation, housing, and land use that supports meeting SANDAG’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets set by California Air Resources Board (CARB) per SB375 • Separate process informed by Series 15 jobs, population, and housing • Typically, SCS envisions majority of growth in existing urban and infill areas, co-located near transit investments, with the goal of reducing vehicle miles traveled • SCS land use scenario “shall consider existing residential zoning obligations to accommodate RHNA of the current housing element planning period..” Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) • Plan for addressing 8-year cycle of housing growth. Housing and Community Development (HCD) considers Department of Finance data on future population and housing growth to determine regional housing need • 6th Cycle Determination & Allocation: 2021-2029, 171,685 units • 7th Cycle Determination & Allocation: Not started * Countywide projection available through 2060 Statutory Requirement for SANDAG Regarding California Department of Finance Projections | 6 3,000,000 3,100,000 3,200,000 3,300,000 3,400,000 3,500,000 3,600,000 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000 4,000,000 •Pursuant to California Government Code 65584.01(a), SANDAG’s Regional Growth Forecast for population growth is required to be within +/-1.5%of most recent California Department of Finance population projection at the time the Forecast is prepared •Series 14 Forecast was paired to an earlier DOF projection (2020.1.10) which was substantially higher than the current DOF projection (2023.7.29) that Series 15 is paired with •The 6th Cycle RHNA was paired to an earlier DOF projection (2019.3.27), which was even higher DOF Projection for 6th Cycle RHNA DOF Projection for Series 14 Forecast DOF Projection for Series 15 Forecast Source: California DOF, Demographic Research Unit. P-1A Total Population Projections, California (Releases: 2023.7.29; 2020.1.10; 2019.3.27) March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 51 of 104 SA NDA G SA NDA G Recent Department of Finance (DOF) Population Estimates and Projections for the State of California Population Estimates for the State of California As of July 1, 2023 Source: Press Release, December 19, 2023, California Department of Finance, “State Population of 39.11 Million in July Reflects Continuing Recovery From Covid-Era Decline.” •39.11 million people statewide •-0.1% decline from July 1, 2022 (-37,203) •409,150 births + 301,881 deaths = natural change of 107,269 •115,900 foreign in migration – 260,408 domestic net out migration = net migration loss of 144,472 •Natural change – net out migration = loss of 37k persons | 8 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 52 of 104 July 1, 2023 Populat10A Estimates €aunty Percentage of California's Population Percent of State Population O o.001oo.99 -l.00!02.99 -3.00to8.43 -25.12 MolPinPilredbV: cai1lorri!I Oepartmentol Fhlnce Oemographiclleseilrch\Jnit, ~ 2023 SA NDA G Population Projections for the State of California Nov-21 Sources: 2020-2050: California DOF, Demographic Research Unit. P-1A Total Population Projections, California, 2020-2060 (Baseline 2019 Population Projections; Vintage 2023 Release). July 2023. 2010-2019: State of California, Department of Finance, E-2. California County Population Estimates and Components of Change by Year — July 1, 2010–2021, December 2021. 2010, 37.4 2015, 38.9 2020, 39.5 2022, 39.0 2023, 39.0 2025,39.0 2030, 39.4 2035, 39.9 2040, 40.1 2045, 40.2 2050, 40.0 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 40 40.5 41 Mil l i o n s | 9 •Population has declined by approximately 500k people between 2020 and 2022 •Over the next twenty years, population is projected to increase by approximately 1.2 million to a peak of 40.2 million in 2044 •Population will then decline from 2044 to 2050 by approximately 200k to 40 million Components of Change for the State of California Sources: 2020-2050: California DOF, Demographic Research Unit. Report P-CC: Projected Total Population and Components of Change, 2020-2060 (Baseline 2019 Population Projections; Vintage 2023 Release). July 2023. 2010-2019: State of California, Department of Finance, E-2. California County Population Estimates and Components of Change by Year — July 1, 2010–2021, December 2021. 2010, -49,573 2015, -177,038 2020,-350,066 2025, -38,858 2030, 59,004 2035, 67,058 2040, 62,199 2045, 59,274 2050, 56,958 2010, 271,985 2015, 228,933 2020, 69,548 2025, 82,885 2030, 42,753 2035, -2,970 2040, -39,259 2045, -69,645 2050, -92,747 -400,000 -300,000 -200,000 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 2029 Net Migration Estimate Net Migration Projection Natural Change Estimate Natural Change Projection | 10 •Natural change and net migration estimates reached low points in 2020 •Net migration is projected to become positive in 2027 •In 2029, net migration (55,495) is projected to exceed natural change (52,184) and become the driver of population for the State into 2050 •Natural change (births – deaths) is projected to become negative by 2035 and continue decreasing out to 2050 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 53 of 104 , I I I ---□ SA NDA G ---- SA NDA G Draft Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast for the San Diego Region: Regional and Subregional Results What Will the Region Look Like in the Future? Population peaks around 2042 and then decreases Population will be older More houses needed More jobs and people working longer | 12 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 54 of 104 SA NDA G 2022 1.16 million 20291.23 million 2035 1.28 million 2040 1.3 million 2050 1.33 million 2022 1.24 million 20291.32 million 2035 1.37 million 20401.41 million 20501.44 million 2022 3.29 million 2029 3.33 million 2035 3.40 million 2040 3.43 million 2050 3.40 million 2022 2.14 million 20292.18 million 2035 2.23 million 20402.29 million 2050 2.37 million 2022 1.61 million 20291.64 million 2035 1.68 million 2040 1.72 million 2050 1.78 million 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 Draft Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast | 13 Housing Stock Households Forecast Population Jobs (Total) Sources: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast and SANDAG’s 2010 Annual Estimates Jobs (Wage & Salary) 2010, 6,889 2015, -7,099 2020, -6,000 2025,700 2030, 7,400 2035, 6,000 2040,3,200 2045, 700 2050,-100 2010, 25,040 2015, 22,245 2020,12,450 2025, 9,204 2030, 5,841 2035, 2,089 2040, -1,748 2045,-4,886 2050, -7,000 -30,000 -25,000 -20,000 -15,000 -10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 2030 San Diego Region: Components of Population Change Sources: 2020-2050: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast. 2010-2019: State of California, Department of Finance, E-2. California County Population Estimates and Components of Change by Year — July 1, 2010–2021, December 2021. | 14 •Both net migration and natural change (births – deaths) are down from recent history •Net migration, currently negative, is projected to become positive in 2025 but flip back to negative by 2050 •By 2030, net migration (7,400) is projected to exceed natural change (5,841) •Natural change is projected to become negative by 2040 Net Migration Estimate Net Migration Projection Natural Change Estimate Natural Change Projection March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 55 of 104 --.--------------◄ •--------..-·•----------•--- 1 ----•---~---------•----.---------------◄ -------------◄ ____ ..,. ------•--------------------=------.-------• -------s----• .---------------•--------♦------===------ ~O.to SA NDA G SA NDA G | 15 San Diego Region: Aging Population Males Females Source: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast •Median age is projected to increase from 36 to 42 by 2050 •All age groups 30-34 and below are projected to decrease •All age groups 35-39 and above are projected to increase •18k fewer children aged under 5 •180k more people aged 65 to 69 •77k more people aged 85+ San Diego Region: Population by Key Age Groups in 2022 and 2050 Percentages represent that age group’s share of the total population in each year.| 16Source: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast By 2050, the Region’s population is projected to include: •94k fewer children •34k fewer young adults •Stable prime working age population (3k fewer) •244k more older adults 65+ 0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 15.8% 22.4% 10.1% 8.8% 22.4% 18.9% 51.7% 49.9% Ages 65+ Ages 25-64 Ages 18-24 Ages 0-17 2022 2050 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 56 of 104 -2022 85+ c:::J 2050 80 to 84 75 to 79 70 to 74 65 to 69 60 to 64 55 to 59 50 to 54 45 to 49 40 to 44 35 to 39 30 to 34 25 to 29 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5 to 9 Under s 100,000 50,000 0 50,000 100,000 SA NDA G --SA NDA G Subregional: Population Change, 2022-2050 | 17 Jurisdiction Population Change # Population Change % Carlsbad 1,232 1.1% Chula Vista 48,716 17.6% Coronado -1,536 -6.9% Del Mar -220 -5.6% El Cajon -6,413 -6.1% Encinitas -1,689 -2.7% Escondido 437 0.3% Imperial Beach -821 -3.1% La Mesa -1,259 -2.1% Lemon Grove -979 -3.6% National City 166 0.3% Oceanside 10,460 6% Poway -228 -0.5% San Diego 65,353 4.8% San Marcos 16,433 17.6% Santee 3,883 6.6% Solana Beach -879 -6.9% Unincorporated -18,523 -3.6% Vista -1,189 -1.2% Region 112,944 3.4% San Diego Region: Persons and Housing Units Added Since 2010 | 18Sources: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast and SANDAG’s 2021 and 2022 Annual Estimates 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 Housing Unit Growth Population Growth •Region has added approximately 191k persons and 81k housing units from 2010 to 2022 •Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast expects Region to add an additional 112k persons and 202k housing units from 2022 to 2050 •Reflective of housing policies included in Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast lessening housing pressure in the Region March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 57 of 104 Camp Pendl~ion Pr. ,me, nd Yu,mo ~ rvr,r, . , San Posquol J !.:l ~f\lO{ir,n CoonryotSClnOoego i • "! .amo'f'SO~ "'.:,~,' ,~ <~,,~~ ;~:_ ~ ";;r .,'1' Solana Beac -. ~ ay 1.-I DelM ~-_.,- DRAFT Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast: Population • 1 dr,t represents SO people °"'"'«I,.,.,,,..,,..... _....,, .. ...,..,,,_. Sot,,c•SA'sDAGOt•ll~ ..... 15 ~alG<ow1~J.....,a,;~V24/'2024 SA NDAG , ,, , I , , , , , , , , tl]u,ma.BC A , ' , ' ,, ' r Lr~ I 1--I I I Cop,ton Gronde Reset\lO{!O'l UNITfOSTATfS MEXICO SA NDA G SA NDA G San Diego Region: Housing Units by Structure Type | 19 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 2010 2012 2014 2018 2020 2022 2026 2029 2032 2035 2040 2050 Existing Housing Units, Historical and Projected, 2010-2050 Multi Family Single Family •Between 2010 and 2022, the Region added 47k MF and 34k SF units •Between 2022 and 2050, the Region is projected to add 171k MF and 32k SF units •Multi Family will become a greater proportion of the total housing stock, while Single Family will become a smaller proportion 37.1%38.5%45.2% 62.9%61.5%54.8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2026 2029 2032 2035 2040 2050 Single Family and Multi Family Units as Percentage of Total Units Multi Family Single Family Sources: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast and SANDAG’s 2021 and 2022 Annual Estimates San Diego Region: Historical and Projected Household Size and Vacancy Rate, 2000-2050 | 20Source: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast, American Community Surveys, and Department of Finance E-5 and E-8 Reports 4.4% 8.9% 6.8%6.1%7.2% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% Gross Vacancy Rate 2.73 2.75 2.83 2.73 2.46 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 Average Household Size March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 58 of 104 ■ ■ ---- SA NDA G SA NDA G Subregional: Housing Change, 2022-2050 | 21 Jurisdiction Housing Change # Housing Change % Carlsbad 6,150 12.8% Chula Vista 26,556 30.1% Coronado 134 1.4% Del Mar 111 4.2% El Cajon 1,705 4.7% Encinitas 2,118 7.9% Escondido 6,211 12.5% Imperial Beach 876 8.7% La Mesa 1,938 7.4% Lemon Grove 757 8.2% National City 2,491 14% Oceanside 13,947 20.6% Poway 1,928 11.5% San Diego 107,244 19.4% San Marcos 10,446 32.3% Santee 3,662 17.1% Solana Beach 239 3.7% Unincorporated 12,868 7.2% Vista 3,438 10.2% Region 202,819 16.4% Average Household Size Gross Vacancy Rate Jurisdiction 2022 2050 2022 2050 Carlsbad 2.55 2.32 6.5%7.9% Chula Vista 3.22 2.92 3.1%3.2% Coronado 2.32 2.15 22.9% 24.2% Del Mar 1.99 1.86 24.9% 27.2% El Cajon 2.91 2.63 3.3%3.8% Encinitas 2.48 2.27 7.8%9.4% Escondido 3.11 2.79 3.7%4.2% Imperial Beach 2.78 2.53 7.1%8.8% La Mesa 2.39 2.2 4.7%5.5% Lemon Grove 3.04 2.73 3.7%4.4% National City 3.26 2.91 5.0%5.9% Oceanside 2.72 2.46 6.4%8.9% Poway 2.96 2.67 2.9%3.6% San Diego 2.54 2.28 6.8%8.3% San Marcos 2.98 2.67 4.6%5.4% Santee 2.79 2.54 2.8%3.2% Solana Beach 2.29 2.12 14.4% 16.8% Unincorporated 2.91 2.62 6.5%7.1% Vista 3.03 2.74 3.7%4.3% Region 2.73 2.46 6.1%7.2% | 22 Subregional: Change in Household Size and Vacancy Rate, 2022-2050 Source: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast •Following the Region, the Average Household Size is expected to decrease for all jurisdictions while the Gross Vacancy Rate rises •Reflective of lessening housing pressure and an aging population March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 59 of 104 DRAFT series 15 Regional Crowth Forecast: Housing 1 dot represenls 20 • housing un,1s SANDA G ...... ,,,, ,,.'•,,Ill~ ,-.. -,1 ... ,·-, ~ ,~-·-.' , r ,nPosQ i ~~ ~t I Tl)uan.~ s.c Couniyo/San~ m,sotlOl"I Q-.,,.,.,r,on UNJJEOSTATES """"o SA NDA G SA NDA G Subregional: Jobs (Wage & Salary) Change, 2022-2050 | 23 Jurisdiction Jobs (Wage & Salary) Change # Jobs (Wage & Salary) Change % Carlsbad 5,992 7.5% Chula Vista 28,525 38.2% Coronado 240 0.8% Del Mar 50 1.3% El Cajon 4,468 10.2% Encinitas 850 3.3% Escondido 2,107 3.9% Imperial Beach 2,517 49.6% La Mesa 2,222 8.8% Lemon Grove 1,431 18% National City 3,189 8.2% Oceanside 17,218 35.8% Poway 281 0.8% San Diego 67,301 7.7% San Marcos 12,207 30.4% Santee 1,461 8.2% Solana Beach 131 1.4% Unincorporated 17,931 11.5% Vista 2,636 6.8% Region 170,757 10.6% | 24 Subregional: Change in Population, Housing, and Jobs 2022-2050 Jurisdiction Population Change # Population Change % Housing Change # Housing Change % Jobs (wage & salary) Change # Jobs (wage & salary) Change % Carlsbad 1,232 1.1%6,150 12.8%5,992 7.5% Chula Vista 48,716 17.6%26,556 30.1%28,525 38.2% Coronado -1,536 -6.9%134 1.4%240 0.8% Del Mar -220 -5.6%111 4.2%50 1.3% El Cajon -6,413 -6.1%1,705 4.7%4,468 10.2% Encinitas -1,689 -2.7%2,118 7.9%850 3.3% Escondido 437 0.3%6,211 12.5%2,107 3.9% Imperial Beach -821 -3.1%876 8.7%2,517 49.6% La Mesa -1,259 -2.1%1,938 7.4%2,222 8.8% Lemon Grove -979 -3.6%757 8.2%1,431 18% National City 166 0.3%2,491 14%3,189 8.2% Oceanside 10,460 6%13,947 20.6%17,218 35.8% Poway -228 -0.5%1,928 11.5%281 0.8% San Diego 65,353 4.8%107,244 19.4%67,301 7.7% San Marcos 16,433 17.6%10,446 32.3%12,207 30.4% Santee 3,883 6.6%3,662 17.1%1,461 8.2% Solana Beach -879 -6.9%239 3.7%131 1.4% Unincorporated -18,523 -3.6%12,868 7.2%17,931 11.5% Vista -1,189 -1.2%3,438 10.2%2,636 6.8% Region 112,944 3.4%202,819 16.4%170,757 10.6% Source: Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 60 of 104 \ DRAFT Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast: Employment • ldo1,epresents20]0bs o.,i.... ........ """"~'~~'!ltw, _,,,..,.,~,""""''°"' SouN:•SA'IO,,,,CO,..,,s.,,..g ~c..-.h10,..:-.V2-no.24 SA NDA G Pio ,mo 1dYum'IO . V:. "Y-i-n·-, .-:-~~·-;. j ~~ '1 --;.., j Tiju,ma.B.C ?nPosquo, "' UN/TED STATES MEXICO SA NDA G SA NDA G | 25 Summary The Series 15 Draft Regional Growth Forecast has been a collaborative effort between SANDAG and our member agencies Key takeaways include: •Series 15 presents a slow growth scenario for the San Diego region which mirrors state trends and the California Department of Finance projection •An aging population is projected, with more older adults and fewer children •Housing pressure is projected to ease as units are continually added •Continued job growth is projected, due to stable prime working age population and increased labor force participation Next Steps – Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast December Draft Series 15 Regional Growth Forecast (baseline) February Draft SR 15 Forecast presented to Sustainable Communities Working Group (SCWG) Spring Release Draft 2025 Regional Plan and draft EIR Fall Anticipated adoption of Final 2025 RP and certification of Final EIR by Board20252024 | 26 2023 Spring Draft SR 15 Forecast presented to Board of Directors Meeting March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 61 of 104 SA NDA G SA NDA G Questions Stay connected with SANDAG Explore our website SANDAG.org Email: grace.chung@sandag.org Follow us on social media: @SANDAGregion @SANDAG March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 62 of 104 CITY OF CARLSBAD Fiscal Year 2022-23 Growth Management Program Monitoring Report July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Carlsbad City Council Mayor Keith Blackburn Mayor Pro Tem Priya Bhat-Patel, District 3 Council Member Melanie Burkholder, District 1 Council Member Carolyn Luna, District 2 Council Member Teresa Acosta, District 4 February 2024 Report prepared in cooperation with the following City of Carlsbad district and departments: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Community Development Community Services Fire Library & Cultural Arts Parks & Recreation Public Works June 25, 2024 Item #10 Page 6 of 44 Attachment A March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 63 of 104 POPULATION Existing Population (as of June 30, 2023) The performance standards for city administrative facilities, library facilities, and parks are stated in terms of population. The demand for these facilities is based on each new dwelling unit built and the estimated number of new residents it adds to the city, which is determined using the average number of persons per dwelling unit. Utilizing data from the 2020 Federal Census (total population divided by total number of dwelling units), the average for Carlsbad is 2.44 persons per dwelling unit. As shown in Table 4, as of June 30, 2023, the city’s population is estimated to be 117,107, which is calculated by multiplying 2.44 persons per dwelling unit by the number of dwelling units and accessory dwelling units and adding population in commercial living units (professional care facilities). The population estimates are based on the 2020 Census population estimate and the city’s dwelling unit estimates and may vary from estimates of other agencies. The city’s population estimate methodology has been refined and updated since the last (March 2022) Growth Management Program Monitoring Report for FY 2021-22, as described below: • The FY 2021-22 report utilized a persons per dwelling unit (2.404) estimate that was based on the April 2020 Census total population (114,746) divided by the 2020 Census total dwellings (47,734). The city maintains a database of existing dwellings, which differs from the 2020 Census dwelling estimate. Because the city uses its dwelling database to estimate population, as shown in Table 4, a more accurate method to calculate persons per dwelling is to divide the 2020 Census total population (114,746) by the city’s estimated total dwellings in April 2020 (46,772), which results in 2.44 persons per dwelling. • The FY 2021-22 report utilized data from the 2010 Census for the number of group quarters (professional care facilities/commercial living units) in the city, as that data was not yet available from the 2020 Census. Since the last report (March 2022) for FY 2021-22, additional data from the 2020 Census was evaluated regarding the number of group quarters (professional care facilities/commercial living units). The 2020 Census reports a lower population in group quarters (professional care facilities/commercial living units) compared to the 2010 Census. Overall, the updated population estimate methodology results in a population estimate that is 693 persons less than the FY 2021-22 report. The reduction in population is primarily due to the updated 2020 Census group quarters information. The city’s population estimate remains higher when compared to the population estimates from the California Department of Finance (DOF) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG); both agencies are estimating a decline in population since the 2020 Census. The Department of Finance (DOF) estimates that Carlsbad’s population, as of January 1, 2023, was 114,549 (316 less than the DOF January 1, 2022, estimate). SANDAG’s current population estimates are consistent with the DOF. City staff will continue to monitor projected population estimates from the DOF and SANDAG. The city updates its population estimate methodology after each decennial census; the next will be in 2030. The city’s method ensures a consistent methodology over a 10-year period, which provides stable population projections for public facility planning purposes. If other agencies continue to estimate a declining population, the city’s population estimates will remain conservatively high and will be adjusted after the 2030 Census. June 25, 2024 Item #10 Page 15 of 44March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 64 of 104 Table 6: Existing Population (as of June 30, 2023) Quadrant Existing Dwelling Units Existing Accessory Dwelling Units Total Existing Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit Population Population in Professional Care Facilities 2020 Census Population in Professional Care Facilities After 2020 Total Population NW 12,781 310 13,091 31,944 172 - 32,116 NE 7,460 56 7,516 18,340 179 270 18,789 SW 10,274 54 10,328 25,201 139 - 25,340 SE 16,488 206 16,694 40,735 127 - 40,826 TOTAL 47,003 626 47,629 116,220 617 270 117,107 Buildout Population (as of June 30, 2023) Table 5 estimates the number of dwellings that will exist at buildout based on current (June 30, 2023) General Plan residential land use designations. Table 7: Estimated Buildout Population (as of June 30, 2023) Quadrant Dwelling Units8 Population9 NW 15,644 39,215 NE 8,996 22,550 SW 11,978 30,026 SE 17,228 43,186 Total 53,846 134,977 The section below titled “Housing Element Rezone Program” identifies how the rezone program affects the estimated buildout population. The rezone program was approved by City Council on January 30, 2024, which is outside the reporting period of this report; however, the information is provided in anticipation of questions about the rezone program. 8 Includes existing accessory dwellings. 9 Includes population in group quarters (e.g., professional care facilities) – an additional 0.86% of household population. June 25, 2024 Item #10 Page 16 of 44March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 65 of 104 Housing Element Implementation and Public Safety Element Update Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report prepared by City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Scott Donnell, Senior Planner prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2215 Faraday Avenue, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 July 2023 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 66 of 104r RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. Environmental Scientists I Planners I Engineers rinconconsultants.com Environmental Impact Analysis Population and Housing Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 4.11-1 4.11 Population and Housing This section evaluates the impacts on the regional housing supply and population growth associated with implementation of the proposed project. 4.11.1 Setting a. Existing and Forecasted Population, Housing, and Employment Based on information collected by the City of Carlsbad, as of January 1, 2023, Carlsbad had 47,003 housing units, excluding accessory dwelling units, and as of June 30, 2022, Carlsbad had a population of 117,800 residents. According to the city’s 2021 to 2029 Housing Element Update, as of 2018, the city contains a total of 57,491 jobs (City of Carlsbad 2021). The City of Carlsbad’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 GMP Report estimates the number of dwelling units that will exist at buildout based on the 2015 General Plan land use designations. According to the FY 2021-22 GMP Report, by the year 2035, Carlsbad would have 52,263 dwelling units and a population of 133,515 people. The buildout population discussed in the FY 2021-22 GMP Report does not take into account future residential density increases that would result from development projects and Housing Element programs (City of Carlsbad 2023a). The FY 2021-22 GMP Report does not analyze employment. Therefore, data from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is used to forecast employment. SANDAG’s most recent Series 14 Regional Growth Forecast (RGF) has a horizon year of 2050, and takes into account the adopted general plans and policies from the 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated County, including the City of Carlsbad. The Series 14 RGF is used to support regional planning efforts such as the 2021 Regional Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy as well as local planning such as the development of general plans and long-range plans. The Series 14 RGF predicts that employment is predicted to increase from 75,912 jobs in 2016 to 103,979 jobs in 2050 (approximately 37 percent increase) (SANDAG 2019). 4.11.2 Regulatory Setting a. State California Housing Law California Housing Element law (Government Code Sections 65580 to 65589.8) requires that local jurisdictions outline the housing needs of their community, the barriers or constraints to providing that housing, and actions proposed to address these concerns over an eight-year planning period. In addition, Housing Element law requires each city and county to accommodate its “fair share” of the region’s projected housing need over the Element planning period. Cities and counties must demonstrate that adequate sites are available to accommodate this need, and that the jurisdiction allows for development of a variety of housing types. This housing need requirement is known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and apportions to each jurisdiction’s projected need. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 67 of 104 Ci t y o f C a r l s b a d Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n a n d P u b l i c S a f e t y E l e m e n t U p d a t e ES -24 Im p a c t Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e ( s ) Re s i d u a l I m p a c t Im p a c t N O I -4 . Fu t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t u n d e r t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t wo u l d n o t b e e x p o s e d t o e x c e s s i v e n o i s e l e v e l s f r o m o v e r h e a d f l i g h t pa t t e r n s f r o m t h e M c C l e l l a n -Pa l o m a r A i r p o r t d u e t o t h e d i s t a n c e o f th e d e v e l o p m e n t f r o m t h e a i r p o r t o r wi t h i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f A i r p o r t La n d U s e C o m p a t i b i l i t y P l a n a n d G e n e r a l P l a n P o l i c i e s . Im p a c t s w o u l d be l e s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t . No n e re q u i r e d . Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h o u t M i t i g a t i o n Cu m u l a t i v e I m p a c t : Un d e r a w o r s e -ca s e s c e n a r i o , tw o p r o j e c t s w i t h i n 1, 0 0 0 f e e t o f e a c h o t h e r c o u l d c o n t r i b u t e t o a c u m u l a t i v e n o i s e im p a c t f o r s e n s i t i v e r e c e i v e r s l o c a t e d e q u i d i s t a n t b e t w e e n t h e t w o co n s t r u c t i o n s i t e s w i t h c o n c u r r e n t o n -si t e a c t i v i t i e s . Co n s t r u c t i o n ac t i v i t i e s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t w o u l d c o m p l y w i t h Ch a p t e r 8 . 4 8 o f t h e C M C a n d w o u l d o c c u r M o n d a y t h r o u g h F r i d a y fr o m 7 a . m . t o 6 p . m . an d S a t u r d a y 8 a . m . t o 6 p . m . ; n o w o r k sh a l l b e co n d u c t e d o n S u n d a y s a n d a n y f e d e r a l h o l i d a y . N o n e t h e l e s s , l a r g e r de v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s c o u l d c o m b i n e t o g e t h e r , o r c o m b i n e w i t h sm a l l e r d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s , t o s u b s t a n t i a l l y i n c r e a s e n o i s e l e v e l s a t sp e c i f i c n e i g h b o r i n g n o i s e -se n s i t i v e r e c e i v e r s . Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e NO I -1 w o u l d r e d u c e c o n s t r u c t i o n n o i s e i m p a c t s f r o m d e v e l o p m e n t s to t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e . H o w e v e r , a s e x a c t c o n s t r u c t i o n d e t a i l s a r e un k n o w n a t t h i s t i m e , e v e n w i t h m i t i g a t i o n t h e p r o j e c t ’ s c o n t r i b u t i o n to a c u m u l a t i v e n o i s e i m p a c t c o u l d b e c o n s i d e r a b l e . No f e a s i b l e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d . Cu m u l a t i v e l y co n s i d e r a b l e i m p a c t . Po p u l a t i o n a n d H o u s i n g Im p a c t P O P -1 . Th i s S E I R a s s u m e s a f u l l b u i l d o u t o f 3 , 2 9 5 r e s i d e n t i a l un i t s i n C a r l s b a d a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t , w h i c h e q u a t e s to a p o p u l a t i o n i n c r e a s e o f a n e s t i m a t e d 8 , 2 6 0 r e s i d e n t s c o m p a r e d t o th e e x i s t i n g p o p u l a t i o n . H o w e v e r , g r o w t h r e s u l t i n g f r o m t h e p r o j e c t i s an t i c i p a t e d a n d w o u l d n o t c o n s t i t u t e s u b s t a n t i a l u n p l a n n e d po p u l a t i o n g r o w t h . T h i s i m p a c t w o u l d b e l e s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t . No n e r e q u i r e d . Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h o u t M i t i g a t i o n Im p a c t P O P -2 . Im p l e m e n t a t i o n o f p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t w o u l d n o t r e s u l t in t h e d i s p l a c e m e n t o f s u b s t a n t i a l n u m b e r s o f p e o p l e o r h o u s i n g . T h e pr o p o s e d p r o j e c t w o u l d f a c i l i t a t e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f n e w h o u s i n g i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h S t a t e a n d l o c a l h o u s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . T h i s i m p a c t wo u l d b e l e s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t . No n e r e q u i r e d . Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h o u t M i t i g a t i o n March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 68 of 104 City of Carlsbad 2021 Housing Element Update Addendum prepared by City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Scott Donnell, Senior Planner prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2215 Faraday Avenue, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 February 2021 April 6, 2021 Item #6 Page 24 of 570March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 69 of 104 2015 General Plan EIR Land Use Planning, Housing, and Population Findings The 2015 General Plan EIR determined that impacts to land use, housing, and population would be less than significant as they pertain to conflicts with applicable land use plans (Section 3.9, Land Use Planning, Housing, and Population: 3.9-11 through 3.9-22). It found that General Plan implementation would not physically divide an established community and would, in fact, would beneficially increase connectivity locally and regionally. The General Plan EIR further stated that individual development projects would be subject to project-specific development and planning review, including adherence to standards for land use planning, housing, and population. The General Plan projected that in horizon year 2035, Carlsbad will have 52,320 units (Section 3.9, Land Use, Housing, and Population: 3.9-13), which allowed for 6,798 new housing units citywide between 2015 and horizon year 2035. As of 2019, Carlsbad had 46,382 housing units built. Therefore, as of early 2021, the city had an available housing unit capacity of 5,938 through horizon year 2035 under the existing General Plan and as analyzed under the 2015 General Plan EIR. Addendum Analysis Carlsbad’s RHNA for the current planning period, 3,873 units, falls within projected horizon year buildout analyzed in the 2015 General Plan EIR and includes 2,095 very low and low income housing units, 749 moderate housing units, and 1,029 above moderate housing units. The draft 2021 Housing Element Update identifies a range of tentatively reserved sites that could be developed to meet the City’s sixth cycle RHNA throughout Carlsbad. Some of these sites may differ from those identified in the 2015 General Plan and could require land use changes that would allow for increased density or other provisions. As discussed in Section 5 Addendum Methodology, the City of Carlsbad has several options for sites that could undergo land use changes through Program 1.1 to facilitate development of RHNA housing units during the sixth cycle (2021-2029), but has not formally decided upon those sites. Government Code Section 65583 (c)(1)(A) states that cities have up to three years from the time a Housing Element is adopted to rezone sites, including adoption of minimum density and development standards. The sites inventory (provided in Appendix B of the draft 2021 Housing Element Update) yields housing units that far exceed the number needed to meet the RHNA requirements, as demonstrated in Table 3. During the implementation of Program 1.1 (to be completed within three years of adoption of the Housing Element), the City of Carlsbad will select sites from the sites inventory that yield enough units to meet RHNA requirements. Once preferred sites are chosen from the sites inventory, the City of Carlsbad would evaluate any proposed land use changes that may be necessary for potential environmental impacts prior to approval. Furthermore, each future development proposal would be subject to further environmental analysis, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) and as required by state law, to evaluate potential impacts specific to that proposal. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN With the passage of SB 330 in 2019, a “city shall not enact a development policy, standard, or condition that would…[act] as a cap on the number of housing units that can be approved or constructed either annually or for some other … period.” As the voter-initiated Growth Management Plan establishes caps on the number of dwelling units and imposes a moratorium (under certain conditions) on new development (including residential) that fails to meet certain standards, the City of Carlsbad may need to eliminate or modify parts of the Growth Management Plan. To ensure the Item #6 Page 96 of 570March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 70 of 104 Growth Management Plan’s consistency with state law, the City has included Program 2.2 in the draft 2021 Housing Element Update which requires plan compliance as necessary with SB 330 before the bill’s sunset date of January 1, 2025. The program also recognizes and accommodates the potential requirement for voter approval of plan changes. However, the number of housing units identified in the draft 2021 Housing Element Update to meet the City’s RHNA obligation would not exceed the overall citywide dwelling unit cap imposed by the Growth Management Plan (54,599 units). Therefore, the City of Carlsbad will continue to implement the Growth Management Plan to the extent permitted by state law. Conclusion The draft 2021 Housing Element Update updates policies, contains analysis of demographics and current state law, and provides for the implementation of programs that will accomplish the goals and objectives of the Housing Element in accordance with California Government Code Section 65583 (c)(1)(A). The housing units proposed under the draft 2021 Housing Element Update to satisfy the City of Carlsbad’s RHNA obligation are within the growth envisioned and assessed in the 2015 General Plan EIR and, therefore, the draft 2021 Housing Element Update would not result in new or more severe impacts (direct or indirect) than were analyzed in the 2015 General Plan EIR. Adoption of the draft 2021 Housing Element Update would not result in impacts (direct or indirect) beyond those addressed or analyzed in the General Plan EIR, nor does the draft 2021 Housing Element Update present new information that shows new or more severe impacts than those described in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the draft 2021 Housing Element Update is within the scope of the 2015 General Plan EIR and no additional environmental assessment of land use planning, housing, or population is required. Item #6 Page 97 of 570March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 71 of 104 9 La n d U s e P l a n n i n g , H o u s i n g , a n d Po p u l a t i o n EI R E v a l u a t i o n C r i t e r i a EI R Si g n i f i c a n c e Co n c l u s i o n EI R M i t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e s CE Q A G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 1 5 1 6 2 Is a S u b s e q u e n t E I R N e e d e d ? Ar e O n l y M i n o r Te c h n i c a l Ch a n g e s o r Ad d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y o r Di d No n e o f t h e Co n d i t i o n s De s c r i b e d i n §1 5 1 6 2 O c c u r ? (§ 1 5 1 6 4 ( a ) ) Pr o j e c t is wit h i n th e Sco p e o f Ge n e r a l P l a n EI R ? Do t h e P r o p o s e d Ch a n g e s I n v o l v e a Ne w o r Su b s t a n t i a l In c r e a s e i n t h e Se v e r i t y o f Pr e v i o u s l y Id e n t i f i e d Im p a c t s ? Ar e T h e r e N e w Ci r c u m s t a n c e s In v o l v i n g a Ne w or S u b s t a n t i a l In c r e a s e i n t h e Se v e r i t y o f Pr e v i o u s l y Id e n t i f i e d Im p a c t s ? Is T h e r e N e w In f o r m a t i o n o f Su b s t a n t i a l Im p o r t a n c e Re q u i r i n g N e w An a l y s i s o r Ve r i f i c a t i o n ? Wo u l d ad o p t i o n o f th e dr a f t 2 0 2 1 H o u s i n g E l e m e n t U p d a t e : a. Ph y s i c a l l y d i v i d e a n e s t a b l i s h e d co m m u n i t y ? Be n e f i c i a l No n e No No No Ye s Ye s b. Con f l i c t w i t h a n a p p l i c a b l e l a n d u s e pl a n , p o l i c y , o r r e g u l a t i o n o f a n ag e n c y w i t h j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r pr o j e c t s i n C a r l s b a d ( i n c l u d i n g , b u t no t l i m i t e d t o , a g e n e r a l p l a n , sp e c i f i c p l a n , l o c a l c o a s t a l p r o g r a m , or z o n i n g o r d i na n c e ) a d o p t e d f o r th e p u r p o s e o f a v o i d i n g o r mi t i g a t i n g a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l ef f e c t ? Le s s t h a n si g n i f i c a n t No n e No No No Ye s Ye s c. In d u c e s u b s t a n t i a l p o p u l a t i o n gr o w t h i n a n a r e a , e i t h e r d i r e c t l y (f o r e x a m p l e , b y p r o p o s i n g n e w ho m e s a n d b u s i n e s s e s ) o r in d i r e c t l y ( f o r e x a m p l e , t h r o u g h ex t e n s i o n o f r o a d s a n d o t h e r in f r a s t r u c t u r e ) i n e x c e s s o f t h e Gr o w t h M a n a g e m e n t P l a n ? Le s s t h a n si g n i f i c a n t No n e No No No Ye s Ye s April 6, 2021 Item #6 Page 94 of 570March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 72 of 104 EI R E v a l u a t i o n C r i t e r i a EI R Si g n i f i c a n c e Co n c l u s i o n EI R M i t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e s CE Q A G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 1 5 1 6 2 Is a S u b s e q u e n t E I R N e e d e d ? Ar e O n l y M i n o r Te c h n i c a l Ch a n g e s o r Ad d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y o r Di d No n e o f t h e Co n d i t i o n s De s c r i b e d i n §1 5 1 6 2 O c c u r ? (§ 1 5 1 6 4 ( a ) ) Pr o j e c t is wit h i n th e Sco p e o f Ge n e r a l P l a n EI R ? Do t h e P r o p o s e d Ch a n g e s I n v o l v e a Ne w o r Su b s t a n t i a l In c r e a s e i n t h e Se v e r i t y o f Pr e v i o u s l y Id e n t i f i e d Im p a c t s ? Ar e T h e r e N e w Ci r c u m s t a n c e s In v o l v i n g a Ne w or S u b s t a n t i a l In c r e a s e i n t h e Se v e r i t y o f Pr e v i o u s l y Id e n t i f i e d Im p a c t s ? Is T h e r e N e w In f o r m a t i o n o f Su b s t a n t i a l Im p o r t a n c e Re q u i r i n g N e w An a l y s i s o r Ve r i f i c a t i o n ? d. Di s p l a c e s u b s t a n t i a l n u m b e r o f ex i s t i n g h o u s i n g o r p e o p l e , ne c e s s i t a t i n g t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f re p l a c e m e n t h o u s i n g e l s e w h e r e ? No i m p a c t No n e No No No Ye s Ye s April 6, 2021 Item #6 Page 95 of 570March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 73 of 104 www.carlsbadca.gov/envision Introduction 10-1 2021-2029 Housing Element April 2021 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 74 of 104 {'city of Carlsbad 10-29 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Housing Needs Assessment  The City of Carlsbad is committed to the goal of providing adequate housing for its present and future residents. To implement this goal, the city must target its limited resources toward those households with the greatest need. This chapter discusses the characteristics of the city’s present and future population in order to better define the nature and extent of housing needs in Carlsbad. Abbreviations and acronyms used in this section: ACS American Community Survey AFFH Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing AI Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice AMI Area Median Income CDBG Community Development Block Grant CCRC Continuing care retirement community CHAS Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy FPL Federal poverty level HCD California Department of Housing and Community Development HEAC Housing Element Advisory Committee HUD Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area PITC Point-in-Time Count PM 2.5 Fine particulate matter ROI Regional Opportunity Index RHNA Regional Housing Needs Allocation SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments SB State Senate Bill 10.2.1 Population Characteristics  Population Growth  Since its incorporation in 1952, Carlsbad has grown steadily and substantially over the decades from a population of 9,253 in 1960 to 105,185 in 2010 and an estimated 114,4631 in 2020, as shown on Table 10-3. Table 10-3 shows Census based population for 2010, California Department of Finance estimates for 2020, and SANDAG population projections for the region for 2030 and 2050. It is important to keep in mind that each data source has different accuracies based on how the numbers are established. The Census, being based on a full survey of every household, is the most accurate.      1 California Department of Finance Population Estimates, 2020 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 75 of 104 10.2 10-30 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing   TABLE 10‐3: POPULATION GROWTH  JURISDICTION 2010(1)  POPULATION ANNUAL GROWTH RATE  2020(2) 2035(3) 2050(3)  2010‐2020 2020‐2035  Carlsbad 105,185 114,463 124,351 124,518 0.8% 0.6%  Chula Vista 243,916 272,202 326,625 345,586 1.1% 1.2%  Coronado 24,697 21,381 24,165 24,219 ‐1.4% 0.8%  Del Mar 4,161 4,268 4,672 4,732 0.3% 0.6%  El Cajon 99,478 104,393 109,383 115,465 0.5% 0.3%  Encinitas 59,518 62,183 65,264 66,670 0.4% 0.3%  Escondido 143,976 153,008 172,892 173,625 0.6% 0.8%  Imperial Beach 26,324 28,055 30,369 31,691 0.6% 0.5%  La Mesa 57,065 59,966 70,252 77,881 0.5% 1.1%  Lemon Grove 25,320 26,526 28,673 30,903 0.5% 0.5%  National City 58,582 62,099 73,329 85,121 0.6% 1.1%  Oceanside 167,344 177,335 188,597 189,377 0.6% 0.4%  Poway 47,811 49,338 53,062 53,149 0.3% 0.5%  San Diego 1,301,617 1,430,489 1,665,609 1,777,936 0.9% 1.0%  San Marcos 83,772 97,209 109,095 113,015 1.5% 0.8%  Santee 53,413 57,999 63,812 66,313 0.8% 0.6%  Solana Beach 12,867 13,838 14,207 14,870 0.7% 0.2%  Vista 93,717 102,928 111,771 126,455 0.9% 0.6%  Unincorporated County 486,550 505,675 617,570 647,233 0.4% 1.3%  REGION TOTAL 3,095,313 3,343,355 3,853,698 4,068,759 0.8% 1.0%  Sources: (1) U.S. Census, 2010; (2) California Department of Finance,2020; (3) SANDAG 2050 Regional Growth Forecast, Series 13       March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 76 of 104 I 10-31 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Between 2010 and 2020, Carlsbad’s population grew at an annual rate of 0.8 percent per year, which matched the growth rate for the entire county. According to SANDAG, Carlsbad’s projected population growth from 2020 to 2035 will decline slightly to 0.6% per year while the county’s overall growth rate will increase to 1.0 percent per year. Primary Data Sources  As part of the Housing Element, a variety of data sources are used to provide the data needed. Because of this, timeframes are not always the same. To help provide comparisons between various data sources, 2018 was selected as the primary year to represent current conditions as data from this year was available from the American Community Survey (see below) for all the data sets this survey produces. For future projections, the year 2035 is typically used. While further out than the planning period for the Housing Element, this year matches the buildout year used in the current Carlsbad General Plan and is used here for consistency. 2010 Census. The Census is considered the most accurate data source due to the large sampling conducted. Unfortunately, the Census was last updated in 2010, with data from the 2020 Census not available at the time this Housing Element was developed. Because of this, 2010 Census data is typically used for historic context. American Community Survey (ACS). Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACS is an ongoing monthly survey sent to about 3.5 million households that provides updates to key information on a yearly basis. In addition to updates on Census information, the ACS also covers topics not on the 2010 and 2020 Census, such as education, employment, internet access, and transportation. California Department of Finance. The State provides up-to-date numbers on population and housing. For housing, the State estimates total and occupied housing units, household size, household population, and group quarters population. ACS data are used to distribute 2010 census housing units into standard housing types (single detached units, single attached units, two to four units, five plus or apartment units, and mobile homes). Housing units are estimated by adding new construction and annexations and subtracting demolitions and adjusting for units lost or gained by conversions. Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). Each year, HUD receives custom tabulations of ACS data from the U.S. Census Bureau. These data, known as the "CHAS" data, demonstrate the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for low-income households. On August 25, 2020 HUD released updated CHAS data for the 2013-2017 period, which is used in this Element. SANDAG 2050 Regional Growth Forecast, Series 13. SANDAG produces growth forecasts of population, housing, employment, income, and land use for jurisdictions in San Diego County. These forecasts were used in the Housing Element to discuss future trends and needs.    March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 77 of 104 Wl 10-32 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing Age Trends  Housing needs are determined in part by the age of residents; each age group often has a distinct lifestyle, family characteristics, and income level, resulting in different housing needs. A significant presence of children under 18 years of age can be an indicator of the need for larger housing units since this characteristic is often tied to families and larger households. The presence of a large number of seniors may indicate a need for smaller homes that are more affordable and require less maintenance to allow residents to age in place. As summarized in Table 10-4, the median age for Carlsbad residents in 2018 was 42.4, —the second highest for northern San Diego County cities and nearly seven years higher than the median age for county residents as a whole. In 2018, Carlsbad residents under 18 years of age represented 23 percent of the city’s population (a decline of 1 percent), while seniors (over 65 years of age) represented 17 percent (a 4 percent increase from 2010). According to SANDAG projections for 2035, many of the age groupings (cohorts) will change very little between 2018 and 2035 (see Chart 10-1). There will be a small increase in the 5 to 19 age group and a small reduction in the 45 to 54 age group. What is notable is the large, and continuing growth of the 65 and over age group. TABLE 10‐4: AGE CHARACTERISTICS AND PERCENT SHARE OF TOTAL POPULATION  JURISDICTION  UNDER 18 YEARS OVER 65 YEARS  MEDIAN  AGE 2018  2010 2018 2010 2018  # % # % # % # %  Carlsbad 25,382 24% 26,587 23% 13,912 13% 19,151 17% 42.4  Encinitas 12,120 20% 12,957 21% 8,393 14% 11,124 18% 43.1  Escondido 39,590 27% 12,957 9% 15,574 11% 17,632 12% 33.8  Oceanside 33,213 20% 37,474 21% 21,261 13% 27,214 16% 37.6  Poway 11,935 25% 12,142 24% 5,968 12% 8,123 16% 40.6  San Marcos 22,717 27% 25,355 27% 9,849 12% 11,057 12% 34.2  Vista 24,997 27% 25,274 25% 9,226 10% 9,676 10% 32.7  San Diego Co. 724,168 23% 726,344 22% 351,425 11% 439,595 13% 35.6  Source: US Census 2010, American Community Survey, 2018..      March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 78 of 104 10-33 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing CHART 10‐1: AGE DISTRIBUTION 2010‐2018, 2035 PROJECTED   Sources: US Census 2010, American Community Survey, 2018, SANDAG Regional Growth Forecast     Race and Ethnicity  According to Census data from 2010 and ACS estimates from 2018, the racial composition of the community did not change much over this period. In 2018, 72.8 percent of Carlsbad residents were White, 14.3 percent were Hispanic/Latino, 8.2 percent were Asian, and 3.2 percent reported two or more races. All other racial groups reported less than one percent of the population (Table 10-5). TABLE 10–5: RACE/ETNICITY 2010 AND 2018  RACE/ETHNICITY 2010 2018  # % # %  Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 13,969 13.3% 16,202 14.3%  Non‐Hispanic  91,216 86.7% 97,468 85.7%       White 78,765 74.9% 82,786 72.8%       Black 1,231 1.2% 921 0.8%       American Indian and Alaska Native 271 0.3% 191 0.2%       Asian 7,332 7.0% 9,274 8.2%       Native Hawaiian and Other        Pacific Islander  182 0.2% 252 0.2%       Some other race alone 235 0.2% 405 0.4%       Two or more races 3,200 3.0% 3,639 3.2%  Total Population 105,185 100.0% 113,670 100.0%  Total percentage may not sum to 100% due to rounding.  0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Under 55 to 19 20 to 44 45 to 64 65 and over To t a l  Po p u l a t i o n 2010 2018 2035 (Projected) March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 79 of 104 I l l I • • • 10-34 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing 10.2.2 Employment Characteristics  Employment has an important impact on housing needs. Incomes associated with different jobs and the number of workers in a household determines the type and size of housing a household can afford. In some cases, the types of the jobs themselves can affect housing needs and demand (such as in communities with military installations, college campuses, and large amounts of seasonal agriculture). Employment growth typically leads to strong housing demand, while the reverse is true when employment contracts. Occupation and Wage Scale  As of 2018, the two largest occupational categories for city residents were Managerial/Professional and Sales/Office occupations (Table 10-6). These categories accounted for more than 76 percent of jobs held by Carlsbad residents and approximately 62 percent of jobs held countywide by all San Diego County employed residents. Management jobs are the highest paid occupations in the San Diego region, while food preparation, personal care and service, and cleanup and maintenance are among the lowest paid (Table 10-7). The high proportion of Managerial/Professional jobs accounts for Carlsbad’s relatively high median household income. TABLE 10–6: EMPLOYMENT PROFILE FOR CARLSBAD EMPLOYED RESIDENTS   CARLSBAD SAN DIEGO COUNTY  OCCUPATIONS OF EMPLOYED RESIDENTS # % # %  Managerial/Professional 28,606 50% 663,848 41%  Sales/Office 14,929 26% 340,781 21%  Service 7,512 13% 317,821 20%  Production/Transportation/Material Moving 3,830 7% 161,909 10%  Construction/Extraction/Maintenance 2,614 5% 122,071 8%  Total1 57,491 100% 1,606,430 100%  1Civilian population 16 years and over.  Total percentage may not sum to 100% due to rounding.  Source:  American Community Survey 2018 ACS estimates.     March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 80 of 104 10-35 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing TABLE 10–7: AVERAGE ANNUAL SALLARY BY OCCUPATION  OCCUPATIONS AVERAGE SALARY  Management  $136,531  Legal   $120,265  Computer and Mathematical    $104,627  Healthcare Practitioners and Technical    $102,053  Architecture and Engineering  $99,949  Life, Physical, and Social Science    $87,579  Business and Financial Operations  $80,850  Educational Instruction and Library  $66,690  Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media    $61,614  Construction and Extraction  $60,047  Protective Service   $58,837  MEDIAN ANNUAL SALARY1 $57,815  Community and Social Service    $56,793  Installation, Maintenance, and Repair    $54,945  Sales and Related Occupations  $45,974  Office and Administrative Support  $45,385  Production    $43,823  Transportation and Material Moving    $39,362  Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance    $36,248  Healthcare Support  $35,609  Personal Care and Service  $34,806  Farming, Fishing, and Forestry  $33,243  Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations  $31,942  1Median of salaries reported by EDD.  Sources:  State Employment Development Department (EDD), Occupational Employment & Wage Data 2020 – 1st  Qtr.    Employment Trends  In 2013, SANDAG projected that Carlsbad’s employment base will grow by over 18,310 jobs between 2012 and 2035. Table 10-8 provides SANDAG’s employment projections for Carlsbad and the San Diego region (county-level). These data project that Carlsbad’s share of regional employment growth is expected to increase between 2012 and 2035, as employment in Carlsbad is projected to grow by 28 percent, compared to 22 percent countywide. TABLE 10–8:  EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS  PLACE 2012 2035  CHANGE (2012‐2035)  # %  San Diego Region 1,450,913 1,769,938 319,025 22%  City of Carlsbad  66,279  84,589 18,310 28%  Source:  SANDAG 2050 Regional Growth Forecast.  March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 81 of 104 10-36 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing  Employment and Housing Impacts in Times of COVID‐19  The San Diego region, as is the case with the rest of California and the nation, saw an economic downturn as a result of COVID-19. A recent study by SANDAG states “current forecasts estimate that the economy will contract 4.7% ($12.4 billion) in 2020. This almost erases the economic gains of the previous two years. Forecasts produced pre-COVID had estimated 2.0% annual growth for 2020, so the setback to the economy is closer to 7.0%.” The report goes on to note that “with an estimated 176,000 workers still unemployed due to COVID-19 in the San Diego region, lower-income workers are more likely to be out of work as this pandemic continues, compared to middle- and high-income workers.” The impacts on employment are especially pronounced for disproportionately affected groups, including females, minorities, lower-income households, and young adults. The impacts of underemployment will certainly exacerbate the affordability of and access to housing in the region and to Carlsbad. The following chart illustrates the impacts on employment by income in the San Diego region, showing the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic over a four-month period in 2020. Lower-income wage earners (those earning below $27,000) experienced an over 23% decrease in employment.   COVID‐19 Impacts on the San Diego Regional Economy, SANDAG, October 15, 2020    10.2.3 Household Characteristics and Special Needs  Groups  Household Type  The U.S. Census defines a household as all persons who occupy a housing unit, which may include single persons living alone, families related through marriage or blood, and unrelated individuals living together. Information on household characteristics is important to understanding the growth and changing needs of a community. A family-oriented community may need large housing units, March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 82 of 104 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% -0.8% -8.5% -23.3% 3/18 3/25 4/1 4/8 4/15 4/22 4/29 5/6 5/13 5/20 5/27 6/3 6/10 6/17 6/24 7/1 7/8 7/15 7/22 7/29 -Below $27,000 -$27,000 to $60,000 -over $60,000 10-37 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing while a community with more single or elderly households may need smaller units with fewer bedrooms. As shown in Table 10-9, roughly 32 percent of the city’s households in 2018 were married families without children, 25 percent were married families with children, 14 percent were other families, and 29 percent were non-family households. Among the non-family households, more than three-quarters were single-households and about one-third were seniors living alone. In fact, senior households saw the highest growth rate among households: growing by 36 percent between 2010 and 2018. TABLE 10–9: HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS  HOUSEHOLD TYPE  2010 2018 % CHANGE (2010‐ 2018) # % # %  Total Households 40,152 100% 43,293 100% 8%  Family Households 26,699 66% 30,741 71% 15%  Married with Children 9,626 24% 10,791 25% 12%  Married No Children 11,917 30% 13,778 32% 16%  Other Families 5,156 13% 6,172 14% 20%  Non‐Family Households 13,377 33% 12,552 29% ‐6%  Singles 10,656 27% 9,928 23% ‐7%  Singles 65+ 3,153 8% 4,186 10% 33%  Other 2797 7% 2624 6% ‐6%  Average Household Size 2.48 2.61 5%  Sources:  U.S. Census, 2010 and American Community Survey, 2018.    The city had a relatively low average household size of 2.61 in 2018, increasing slightly from 2.48 in 2010. Countywide, the average household size was slightly larger, at 2.87 in 2018. 2018 ACS estimates suggest an approximate eight percent increase in the number of households (to 43,293), reflective of Carlsbad’s more modest growth since 2010. Percentages of family households, including those with children, and non- family households, including those with singles aged 65 years and over, are similar to the percentages noted for 2010 in Table 10-9.    March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 83 of 104 10-38 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing Household Income  Income is the most important factor affecting housing opportunities, determining the ability of households to balance housing costs with other basic necessities. The 2018 ACS estimates reported that the median household income in Carlsbad was $107,172. Compared to neighboring jurisdictions, only Encinitas had a median household income higher than Carlsbad (Chart 10-2). CHART 10‐2: MEDIAN HOUSHOLD INCOME, 2018  For purposes of the Housing Element and other state housing programs, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has established five income categories based on Area Median Income (AMI) of a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The AMI, which is different than the estimated median household incomes shown in Chart 10-2, is applicable to all jurisdictions in San Diego County and changes with the cost of living. The AMI for a four-person household in San Diego County is $92,700 (2020), an increase of $10,900 from the AMI in 2018. There are five income categories based on the AMI and used in the Housing Element:  Extremely Low-income (up to 30 percent of AMI)  Very Low-income (>30and ≤ 50 percent of AMI)  Low-income (>50 and ≤ 80 percent of AMI)  Moderate Income (>80 and ≤ 120 percent of AMI)  Above Moderate Income (>120 percent of AMI) $74,855  $107,172 $113,175  $68,652  $105,732  $76,619  $105,821  $65,696   $‐  $20,000  $40,000  $60,000  $80,000  $100,000  $120,000 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 84 of 104 10-39 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing According to the CHAS data prepared by the Census Bureau for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), between 2013 and 2017, 9 percent of Carlsbad households had extremely low-incomes, 7 percent of households were very low-income, and 11 percent were low-income (Table 10-10). Of the total 11,620 lower income households (extremely low-, very low-, and low-income combined), the percentage of renters and owners was evenly split at 50 percent each. The small majority of moderate-income household were owner-occupied (56 percent), whereas a significant majority of the above moderate-income households were owner-households (76 percent). Note that the CHAS data does not provide an above-moderate income category (more than 120 percent AMI) as established by HCD; instead, it is simply grouped as part of household income above 100 percent of AMI, as reflected in Table 10-10.   TABLE 10–10: HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE 2017   OWNER RENTER TOTAL % OF TOTAL1  Extremely Low‐ income 1,625 2,160 3,785 9%  Very Low‐income 1,605 1,400 3,005 7%  Low‐income 2,600 2,230 4,830 11%  Moderate Income  (81‐100% AMI) 1,870 1,495 3,365 8%  Moderate/Above  Moderate Income  (above 100% AMI)  20,455 7,850 28,305 65%  TOTAL1  28,150 15,130 43,280 100%  1 Total percentage does not sum to 100% due to rounding.   Source:  2013‐2017 CHAS data, released August 2020.    The Housing Element must project housing needs for extremely low-income households as a portion of the very low-income household RHNA target. For Carlsbad, approximately 3,785 extremely low-income households and 3,005 very low-income households were identified in the 2013-2017 CHAS data. These household totals equate to 56 percent and 44 percent, respectively, of the total extremely low and very low-income households. These percentages suggest that of Carlsbad’s RHNA share of 1,311 very low-income households, at least 734 units should be available for extremely low-income and 577 units for very low- income households. As indicated in this Housing Element (refer to Section 10.3), the city continues to help meet the need for affordable housing by designating adequate sites and financial assistance and by approving affordable housing projects, including modification of development standards as necessary. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 85 of 104 10-40 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing Special Needs Households  Certain groups have greater difficulty finding decent, affordable housing due to special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one’s income, family characteristics, or disability status, among others. In Carlsbad, persons and families with special needs include seniors, persons with disabilities, large households, single-parent families, homeless, farmworkers, students, and military personnel. Table 10-11 summarizes the presence of special needs groups in the city and the following discussion summarizes their housing needs. TABLE 10–11: SPECIAL NEEDS GROUPS IN CARLSBAD  SPECIAL NEEDS GROUPS NUMBER  % OF TOTAL  POPULATION  Seniors 19,151 15%  Disabled Persons 12,381 8%  Persons in Large Households1 8445 7%  Persons in Single Parent Households1 15,036 12%  Homeless Persons 147 <1%  Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting and Mining Workers2 427 <1%  Students3 8,723 6%  Military2 6,412 7%  1Based on number of households multiplied by average household size.  2 Veteran Civilian Population 18 years and over.  3 Population enrolled in college or graduate school.    Sources:  Regional Task Force on the Homeless, 2020; 2018 ACS estimates.    Senior Households  Senior households have special housing needs due to three concerns – income, health care costs, and disabilities. According to the 2018 ACS estimates, 19,151 seniors (aged 65 and over) resided in the city in 2018 and 11,115 households were headed by seniors. Among the senior-headed households, 79 percent were owners and 21 percent were renters. The 2018 ACS reported that seniors 65 and over earned a median income of $81,462 (over three-quarters of the citywide median income, as reported by the Census Bureau). In addition, approximately 27 percent of the senior population also experience one or more disabilities, which can affect housing needs and costs. In 2020, approximately 11 percent of the applicant households on the waiting list for housing vouchers are seniors. Housing options for special needs groups, especially seniors and persons with disabilities are limited and identified as a regional housing impediment.   March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 86 of 104 10-41 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Carlsbad is a popular retirement community, and includes facilities that provide assisted living, nursing and special care, and general services to seniors. As of September 2020, Carlsbad had 2,207 beds within 25 licensed senior residential care facilities, according to the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division2. Almost 95 percent of these beds were provided in nine larger facilities having more than six beds, including three continuing care retirement communities (CCRC). The largest of these communities is La Costa Glen (1,233 bed capacity), which opened in 2003 and completed construction of its final phase in 2008. A planned fourth CCRC – Dos Colinas – was approved by the City Council in January 2012. When constructed, Dos Colinas will provide living and support services to more than 300 seniors. The approval is valid until 2022. Since the last Housing Element Update, the following senior housing projects have been approved, permitted for construction, or completed:  As part of the inclusionary requirement for the West Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, construction was completed for the 101-unit Portola Senior Apartments. The project includes 100 one- and two- bedroom units that are restricted to 70 percent of AMI and is completely leased up.  In 2019, permits were issued for Casa Aldea/Cannon Road Senior Housing. Consisting of 98-unit senior apartments, of which 20 units will be restricted to low-income residents, Casa Aldea is currently under construction.  Also, under construction are two additional senior facilities. The first is Summit Carlsbad, a 101-unit senior community featuring assisted living and memory care units. The second is Oakmont Assisted Living project, a 115-bed assisted living facility and 54-beds in the memory care component.  Marja Acres, approved on November 3, 2020, will feature 248 townhomes, 46 affordable senior apartments, and 10,000 square feet of commercial space and community recreation uses. Of the 46 affordable units, 9 units are for seniors earning 60% AMI and 37 units are for seniors earning 50% AMI.   Persons with Disabilities  Many disabled persons can have special housing needs because of their disabilities, often fixed and limited income, lack of accessible and affordable housing, and medical costs associated with their disabilities. The Census defines a “disability” as “a long-lasting physical, mental, or emotional condition. This condition can make it difficult for a person to do activities such as walking,   2 https://www.ccld.dss.ca.gov/carefacilitysearch/DownloadData March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 87 of 104 10-42 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing climbing stairs, dressing, bathing, learning, or remembering. This condition can also impede a person from being able to go outside the home alone or to work at a job or business.” According to the 2018 ACS estimates, 12,381 persons with one or more disabilities resided in Carlsbad in 2018, representing more than 11 percent of the city’s residents over five years of age. Of the population with disabilities, 5,918 (48 percent) were seniors. Individuals with cognitive, ambulatory, or independent living difficulties represented the most common disabilities, as reported in Table 10-12. TABLE 10–12: INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES IN CARLSBAD   YOUTH   (AGE 5 ‐ 17)  ADULTS   (AGE 18 ‐ 64)  SENIORS   (AGE 65+) TOTAL  Individuals Reporting One or More Disabilities 642 5,821 5,918 12,381  With hearing difficulty 38 891 2,330 3,259  With vision difficulty 10 540 655 1,205  With cognitive difficulty 487 1,732 1,310 3,529  With ambulatory difficulty 29 1,532 3,075 4,636  With self‐care difficulty 203 657 1,070 1,930  With independent living difficulty N/A 1,510 2,254 3,764  Columns do not sum to total individuals because individuals may report more than one disability.  Sources:  2018 ACS estimates.    For those of working age, disabilities can also restrict the type of work performed and income earned. In fact, according to the 2018 ACS estimates, 76 percent of individuals over 16 with a reported disability were not in the labor force; 24 percent were employed; and no individuals with a disability were reported to be unemployed (i.e., looking for work). Persons with Developmental Disabilities  Senate Bill 812 (Chapter 507, Statutes of 2010) amended state housing element law (California Government Code Section 65583) to require the analysis of the disabled to include an evaluation of the special housing needs of persons with developmental disabilities. A developmental disability is defined as a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability. This definition includes intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism. The California Department of Developmental Services contracts with nonprofit regional centers to provide or coordinate services and support for individuals with developmental disabilities. In the San Diego region, the San Diego Regional Center, with a satellite office in Carlsbad, provides a variety of services to persons with developmental disabilities and advocates for opportunities to maximize potential and to experience full inclusion in all areas of community life. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 88 of 104 10-43 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing As of March, 2019, the San Diego Regional Center served approximately 29,206 clients with developmental disabilities who live in San Diego County, with the Carlsbad satellite office serving 22 percent of these clients. This includes 151 clients who live in Carlsbad with 67 of these individuals being children under the age of 18 who live with their parents. The remaining 84 clients are adults over the age of 18; over half (57 percent) of these individuals live with their parents, while 23 live in their own apartments with “come-in support” and assistance and 13 live in licensed group homes. Additional persons with developmental disabilities may reside in Carlsbad but are not seeking assistance from the San Diego Regional Center. While some developmentally disabled individuals can live and work independently within a conventional housing environment, more severely disabled individuals will require a group living environment with supervision. In general, the San Diego Regional Center (and its clients) prefer to house persons with developmental disabilities with family members. When that is not feasible, come-in support and licensed group apartments housing four to six persons (with individual bedrooms, but shared bathroom and kitchen facilities) are preferred. This type of housing may be designed to look like a big house and is compatible with and appropriate for existing residential neighborhoods with good access to transit and services. Incorporating ‘barrier-free’ design in all new multifamily housing (as required by California and Federal Fair Housing laws) is especially important to provide the widest range of choices for disabled residents. In 2011, the city adopted a reasonable accommodation ordinance to provide flexibility in development standards for housing for persons with disabilities. The ordinance became effective in 2013 and one request for reasonable accommodation was received in 2019. The City regularly awards Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to provide supportive services such as food for lower income persons and emergency and temporary housing for victims of abuse. In January 2013, the City provided $1,065,000 in CDBG funds to assist in the acquisition of property for a hospice home in Carlsbad for primarily low-income households. Additionally, in January 2020, the City provided $4,043,392 to assist in the construction of 48 units of supportive apartment units for very low- and extremely low-income homeless veterans and veteran families, and people experiencing homelessness with a serious mental illness. This supplemented the $4,250,000 awarded by the city in 2017 for a total of almost $8.3 million in project assistance. The most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and physical therapy are provided. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for the developmentally disabled is the transition from the person’s living situation as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 89 of 104 --- 10-44 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing Large Households  Large households are defined as households with five or more persons in the unit. Lower income large households are a special needs group because of their need for larger units, which are often in limited supply and therefore command higher rents. In order to save for the necessities of food, clothing, and medical care, it is common for lower income large households to reside in smaller units, frequently resulting in overcrowding. According to 2018 ACS estimates, 2,363 households, or 5.3 percent of the total households in Carlsbad, had five or more members. This proportion is greater for renters (5.7 percent) than for owners (5.0 percent). The share of large households out of total households in Carlsbad (5.3 percent) was significantly lower than the proportion of large households statewide (13.6 percent of total households). According to the 2018 ACS estimates, the city’s housing stock included 30,435 units with three or more bedrooms. Among these large units, 28,874 were owner-occupied and 5,561 were renter-occupied. While overall units have increased by 660 units since 2014, the total number of these units for rent has declined by 313 units. Taken together, this suggests that rental of large units may be competitive to attain. (ACS 2018, Table S2504). Single‐Parent Households  Carlsbad was home to 3,152 single-parent households with children under age 18 in 2018, according to the 2018 ACS estimates. Of these, 2,423 (77 percent) were female-headed families with children. Single-parent households, in particular female-headed families, often require special assistance such as accessible day care, health care, and other supportive services because they often have lower incomes. In fact, according to the 2018 ACS estimates, 36 percent of all single-parent female-headed households with children lived in poverty during the previous year, a ten percent increase from the 26 percent reported in 2014. This suggests a need for affordable units with adequate bedroom counts and potentially some on-site or nearby day care and other services (see Program 2.9 in this Housing Element). The official poverty definition used by the Census is based on income before  taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public  housing, Medicaid, and food stamps).  The income levels vary by the number of  individuals in a household.  More on this definition can be found at this link:    https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty/guidance/poverty- measures.html#:~:text=If%20a%20family%27s%20total%20income,it%20is%2 0considered%20in%20poverty.&text=The%20official%20poverty%20definitio n%20uses,Medicaid%2C%20and%20food%20stamps) March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 90 of 104 10-45 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Persons experiencing homelessness  HUD defines a person as homeless if they: 1. Lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; 2. The primary nighttime residence is a publicly or privately operated shelter designed for temporary living arrangements; 3. The primary residence is an institution that provides a temporary residence for individuals that should otherwise be institutionalized; or 4. The primary residence is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s 2019 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress, the State of California had the highest population of persons experiencing homelessness with 151,278 individuals, 108,432 of those individuals being unsheltered. The term unsheltered from HUD is defined as “anyone whose primary nighttime residence – where they sleep is a place not designed or ordinarily used for sleeping, including cars, parks, abandoned buildings, bus or train stations, airports, camping grounds, etc.” The County of San Diego has the fifth largest population of persons experiencing homelessness in the United States with 7,619 persons experiencing homelessness during the 2020 Point-in-Time Count (PITC) and nearly 3,971 individuals were unsheltered. The Regional Task Force on Homelessness believes that over the course of a year that 20,000 individuals experience homelessness in San Diego County. Out of the PITC counts conducted, 64.1 percent of the persons experiencing homelessness were concentrated in the City of San Diego. The North County Coastal area has 8.3 percent of the total persons experiencing homelessness. In the City of Carlsbad, data from 2020 the PITC from 2020 showed 147 individuals experiencing homelessness with 53 sheltered and 94 unsheltered. As shown in Chart 10-3, the annual PITC data for the last decade shows the number of those unsheltered in the city has fluctuated from a low of 21 persons in 2011 to a high of 152 in 2018. The recent counts conducted in 2019 and 2020 have shown a decline in unsheltered persons.    March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 91 of 104 --- 10-46 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing CHART 10‐3: UNSHELTERED POPULATION IN CARLSBAD, 2011‐2020  In the North San Diego County area, the majority of homeless persons congregate in the cities of Oceanside, Vista, and Escondido (Table 10-13). This is reflected in the number of shelters and service agencies in those communities (Table 10-14), some of which are also in Carlsbad. Within the city is La Posada de Guadalupe which provides 50 year-round beds for emergency shelter and an additional 10 beds in the winter. Located at 2478 Impala Drive in Carlsbad, this facility is self-described as a 24/7 men’s short-term housing program for homeless men and employed farm workers. In addition to these beds, La Posada also provides 50 beds for transitional housing to male farmworkers and persons experiencing homelessness. TABLE 10–13: PERSONS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS BY JURISDICTION, 2020  UNSHELTERED  SHELTERED   EMERGENCY  SHELTERS  TRANSITIONAL  HOUSING SAFE HAVENS TOTAL  %  UNSHELTERED  Carlsbad 94 53 0 0 147 63.9%  Encinitas (San Dieguito, Solana Beach & Del Mar) 47 25 8 0 80 58.8%  Escondido 264 202 52 11 429 61.5%  Oceanside 242 35 131 0 408 59.3%  San Diego City 2,283 1,759 809 36 4,887 46.7%  San Marcos 8 0 0 0 8 100.0%  Vista 51 49 0 0 100 51.0%  San Diego County Unincorporated 193 0 0 0 193 100.0%  Source:  San Diego Regional Task Force on the Homeless, We All Count Point‐In‐Time Count, 2020.       March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 92 of 104 160 152 140 120 100 80 78 60 40 20 0 2011 2012 2013 20.15 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 10-49 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Farmworkers  Based on the General Plan Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element as well as recent development primarily in Robertson Ranch, there are approximately 725 acres of agricultural land in Carlsbad (including active or fallow), a reduction of about 210 acres from that estimated in 2008. According to California Employment Development Department data for 2020, 3,290 persons were employed in agriculture (including fishing and forestry occupations) in San Diego County, earning average annual wages of $33,243, substantially lower than the county area median income (AMI) for a four-person household ($92,700). However, this data compares individual income versus household income and does not necessarily constitute the agricultural worker household’s entire income. According to the 2018 ACS estimates, 627 persons who lived in Carlsbad were employed in the farming, forestry, and fishing occupations in 2018. However, the Census likely underestimated the true number of farmworkers in Carlsbad due to the seasonal nature of the employment, the use of migrant laborers, and the significant level of under- reporting among undocumented persons. In comparison, the US Department of Agriculture’s 2017 Census of Agriculture reported that in San Diego County, 2,202 persons were hired farm labor (full- time), 7,982 persons were employed for 150 days or more, and 4,353 were hired for 150 days or less. In 2008, the City Council approved $2 million in Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee funding to rebuild and expand the city’s existing homeless/farmworker shelter, La Posada de Guadalupe. Completed in July 2013, the expansion provides 50 to 72 beds specifically for farmworkers in addition to the 50 beds the shelter already provides for other homeless persons (which may include farmworkers). In 2020, the City Council approved $58,000 in CDBG funding for preliminary planning and design work for a future expansion of the shelter. Students  Typically, students have low incomes and therefore can be impacted by a lack of affordable housing, which can often lead to overcrowding within this special needs group. Carlsbad is located in proximity to California State University at San Marcos, Mira Costa Community College, and Palomar Community College. In addition, the University of California at San Diego, the private University of San Diego, as well as the region’s largest university, San Diego State University, are located within a 30 to 45-minute drive from Carlsbad. According to ACS estimates in 2018, approximately eight percent of Carlsbad residents were enrolled in a college or graduate school. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 93 of 104 --- 10-50 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing Military  The U.S. Marine Corps Camp Pendleton is located about five miles north of Carlsbad, adjacent to the city of Oceanside. As a result, there is demand for housing for military personnel in Carlsbad. This demand has two components: active military personnel seeking housing near the base, and retired military remaining near the base after serving. Most enlisted military individuals earn incomes at the lower range of the military pay scale and need affordable housing options. As of July, 2020, Camp Pendleton had approximately 7,300 housing units on base. However, the waiting list for on-base housing can take up to 18 months, depending on rank, the number of bedrooms requested, and various other factors. The 2018 ACS estimates reported that 533 residents in Carlsbad were employed by the military (down from 917 in 2014). Although proximity to the base makes Carlsbad a desirable place to reside for all military ranks, high housing costs may explain the relatively low number of military personnel residing in the city. In addition to current military personnel, the 2018 ACS estimates reported 6,412 Veterans over the age of 18 live in Carlsbad. Veterans comprise about 7.1 percent of the population in Carlsbad, which is comparable to the proportion of veterans in San Diego County as a whole (7.9 percent). Windsor Pointe (formerly known as Harding Veterans Housing and Oak Veterans Housing) was approved by the Planning Commission in January 2017. The Windsor Pointe project consists of two sites, Harding Street and Oak Avenue. The Harding Street site will consist of a 26-unit affordable apartment building and received approval for a density increase from 30 to 48 dwelling units per acre. The Oak Avenue site will have a 24-unit affordable apartment building and was approved for a density increase from 30 to 55 dwelling units per acre. Of the 50 total units, 48 are affordable and 2 units are manager units at market rate. When completed, the project will provide permanent supportive housing to very low and extremely low-income homeless veterans and veteran families, and people experiencing homelessness with a serious mental illness. 10.2.4 Housing Characteristics  Housing Type  According to SANDAG estimates, Carlsbad had 46,382 housing units as of 2019. Among these units, as indicated in Chart 10-4, two-thirds (69 percent) were single-family, including 55 percent consisting of single-family detached units and 14 percent single-family attached units; -multi-family dwelling units comprised 29 percent of the city’s housing stock in 2019 and the remaining 3 percent were mobile homes (see Chart 10-4).   March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 94 of 104 10-70 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing The Village   Carlsbad Village—the city’s downtown—is Carlsbad’s oldest and most walkable neighborhood. The Village is home to most of Carlsbad’s historic resources and cultural arts, including the Carlsbad Theatre, New Village Arts Theatre, Old Santa Fe Train Depot, and Army and Navy Academy. Its history can be traced back to at least the 1880s when the rail line linking San Diego and Los Angeles was constructed. Its importance to the community can be demonstrated through formation of the Village Redevelopment Area in the 1980s and adoption of the Village and Barrio Master Plan in 2018. The Village’s beachside location, popular restaurants, and stores make the city’s downtown attractive to residents and visitors alike. The Village train station makes transit use realistic for nearby residents. Recent construction includes a variety of apartments and condominiums, some in a “mixed use,” commercial below and residential above, format. Additionally, new businesses occupy recently completed and existing commercial buildings. The mix of new and “repurposed’ buildings and commercial and residential uses only adds to the Village’s desirability. The Barrio  Established in the 1920s, the roughly 135-acre Barrio area first served as a residential enclave for new immigrants supporting the agriculture economy of the city. Today, the Barrio reflects elements of its past in its historic buildings as well as in its long-time residents and cohesive community. As with the Village, the street grid and alleys that cross much of the Barrio contribute to a connected and walkable community. Residents can also walk to the beach or the train station, both about a mile or less away. Land use in the Barrio is primarily residential, with a wide range of housing types, from single-family and two-family dwellings on small lots within the center of the neighborhood along Roosevelt and Madison streets to higher density multi- family residential development located around the neighborhood’s perimeter west of Interstate 5 and east of the railroad tracks. Proximity to the Village means residents have access to a variety of commercial services, but the Barrio itself also features neighborhood markets and small commercial and industrial areas. Community assets in the Barrio include a Boys and Girls Club, Pine Avenue Community Park and Chase Field, the adjacent City of Carlsbad Senior Center, and recently completed community center and gardens and public art.  The 2018 Village and Barrio Master Plan sets forth a vision to honor the very best of these two neighborhoods while adapting to changing community, environmental and economic needs. This is expressed through the plan’s policies and standards that support and enhance the Village and Barrio’s historical roots and mix of uses in a walkable, beachside environment. Race  Race is a known contributor to unfair housing practices. The existence of a concentration of minorities living in one location may be an indicator that some minority groups in Carlsbad do not have as many housing choices as non- minority residents. Between 2015 and 2018, there was a slight increase in Asian (+0.5 percent) and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (+0.1 percent) residents, as well as residents of two or more races (+0.4 percent); and slight decrease in White (-0.1 percent), Black/African American (-0.3 percent), and American Indian/Alaska Native (-0.2 percent) residents, as well as residents of some other race (-0.5 March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 95 of 104 10-71 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing percent). Concurrently, there was also a slight decrease in the Hispanic or Latino population (-0.6 percent). It is important to note that the overall racial makeup of Carlsbad residents is fairly homogenous, with over three-quarters of the population being White (see Table 10-23). TABLE 10‐23:  RACIAL MAKEUP OF CARLSBAD RESIDENTS, 2015‐2018  RACE  PERCENTAGE BY YEAR  2015 2016 2017 2018  White alone 84.5 84.4 84.7 84.4  Black or African American alone 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9  American Indian and Alaska Native alone 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2  Asian alone 7.8 7.6 7.6 8.3  Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific  Islander alone  0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2  Some other race 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.7  Two or more races 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.3  Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 14.9 14.1 14.1 14.3  White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 73.5 73.8 73.6 72.8  Source: American Community Survey 5‐Year Estimates, 2015‐2018, Table S0601    Segregation  This Housing Element uses the dissimilarity index to identify potential areas of racial segregation within Carlsbad. The index of dissimilarity is a measure of residential segregation. It compares the spatial distributions of different groups among units in a metropolitan area. Segregation is the smallest when majority and minority populations are evenly distributed. The index ranges from 0.0 (complete integration) to 1.0 (complete segregation). Data shows that Carlsbad faces some segregation challenges, according to the index of dissimilarity, collected during the 2010 Decennial Census (see Figure 10-1). The Village-Barrio neighborhood (loosely represented by Census Tract 179) and the northeast corner of the city, however, show slightly less segregation than the rest of the city; this is also where a higher percentage of the Hispanic or Latino population live compared to the rest of the city. As a proxy to measuring changes in residential segregation patterns over time, Figure 10-2 shows the change in the percentage of White residents within the city between 2015 and 2018. Central Carlsbad and the northwest corner of the city show an increase in White residents, while the western coast, north, and northeast area. While areas with an increase in White residents (Central Carlsbad and the northwest corner of the city) are presumed to experience increased segregation, areas with a decrease in White residents (western coast, north, and northwest areas of the city), and therefore an increase in minority races, are presumed to experience increased diversity and integration.   March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 96 of 104 10-72 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing EL CAMINORE AL POINSETTIA LN COLL E G E B L C ANNONR D FAR AD A Y A V LA C O S T A AV PALOMAR AIRP O R T RD ALGA RD C A R L S B A D B L AVIARAPY TAMARACK AV M E L R O S E D R RANCH O S A N T A F E RD C A R LS B A D VILLAGE DR OLIVENHAI N R D C A R L S B A D B L CARL S B A D V I L L A G E D R Pacific Ocean Figure 10-2: Change in Residential Segregation Patterns 0 1 20.5 Miles Sources: City of Carlsbad, 2020; Mintier Harnish 2020; Regional Opportunity Index, 2014Revised: 12/24/2020 Village Barrio 100 Ac.50Ac. < -5 percent change -5 - 0 percent change 0 - 5 percent change 5 - 10 percent change Quadrants City of Carlsbad Village / Barrio Inset Map NWNW SWSW SESE NENE March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 97 of 104 CJ CJ {city of Carlsbad 10-77 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Poverty  According to the 2018 ACS 5-Year estimates, the northeast area of the city experienced the highest rates of poverty (see Figure 10-5). Additionally, most areas of the city experienced a decrease in poverty rates while two census tracts (one at the north end and on the central-east side of the city) saw an increase in poverty rates (see Figure 10-6). AFFH-related programs under the Fair Housing goal and policies in Section 10.7 will work to improve housing choices for lower- income groups through the continuation of financing programs and increasing production of affordable housing. Income and Wealth Distribution  The Gini coefficient (sometimes called the Gini index or Gini ratio) is an important tool for analyzing income and wealth distribution within a region but should not be mistaken for an absolute measurement of income or wealth. For instance, it is possible for a high-income area to have the same distribution as a low-income area, as long as income is distributed similarly. Like the index of dissimilarity, it varies between 0.0 and 1.0, with 1.0 indicating maximum inequality. Table 10-26 shows that Carlsbad has a more equitable income distribution than Encinitas, San Marcos, San Diego, and the county, but is more inequitable than Escondido, Oceanside, and Vista. While a Gini coefficient of 0.4504 indicates that Carlsbad could be a more economically equitable place, this is not a unique challenge to the region. Figure 10-7 shows a map of Gini coefficients by census tracts. The areas along the northern, western, and southern edges of the city exhibit the most inequitable wealth distribution in the city and is most equitable in the center of the city. TABLE 10‐26:  GINI COEFFICIENTS BY CITY, 2018  CITY GINI COEFFICIENT  Carlsbad 0.4440  Encinitas 0.4983  Escondido 0.4387  Oceanside 0.4343  San Marcos 0.4508  Vista 0.4058  San Diego 0.4710  San Diego County 0.4630  Source: American Community Survey, 2018 5‐Year Estimates, Table B19083    March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 98 of 104 10-78 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing EL CAMINORE AL POINSETTIA LN COLL E G E B L C ANNONR D FAR AD A Y A V LA C O S T A AV PALOMAR AIRP O R T RD ALGA RD C A R L S B A D B L AVIARAPY TAMARACK AV M E L R O S E D R RANCH O S A N T A F E RD C A R LS B A D VILLAGE DR OLIVENHAI N R D C A R L S B A D B L CARL S B A D V I L L A G E D R Pacific Ocean Figure 10-5: Persons Living in Poverty, 2018 0 1 20.5 Miles Sources: City of Carlsbad, 2020; Mintier Harnish 2020; Regional Opportunity Index, 2014Revised: 12/24/2020 Village Barrio 100 Ac.50Ac. Quadrants City of Carlsbad 0 - 5 percent 5 - 10 percent 10 - 15 percent 15 - 20 percent Village / Barrio Inset Map NWNW SWSW SESE NENE March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 99 of 104 CJ~~_L_____J,~~~ {city of Carlsbad r· --~ CJ CJ -- O BJ 10-79 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing EL CAMINORE AL POINSETTIA LN COLL E G E B L C ANNONR D FAR AD A Y A V LA C O S T A AV PALOMAR AIRP O R T RD ALGA RD C A R L S B A D B L AVIARAPY TAMARACK AV M E L R O S E D R RANCH O S A N T A F E RD C A R LS B A D VILLAGE DR OLIVENHAI N R D C A R L S B A D B L CARL S B A D V I L L A G E D R Pacific Ocean Figure 10-6: Change in Poverty Rates 0 1 20.5 Miles Sources: City of Carlsbad, 2020; Mintier Harnish 2020; Regional Opportunity Index, 2014Revised: 12/24/2020 Village Barrio 100 Ac.50Ac. < -5 percent change -5 - 0 percent change 0 - 5 percent change Quadrants City of Carlsbad Village / Barrio Inset Map NWNW SWSW SESE NENE March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 100 of 104 -CJ CJ CJ CJ {city of Carlsbad 10-81 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing Special Needs Populations  Certain households and residents, because of their special characteristics and needs, have greater difficulty finding decent and affordable housing and are more sensitive to changes in circumstances, which may lead to housing disparities. These circumstances may be related to age, family characteristics, disability, health status, current housing status, and type of employment. Expanded discussions about these groups (i.e., senior households, persons with disabilities, persons with developmental disabilities, large households, single-parent households, persons experiencing homelessness, farmworkers, students, military personnel (including veterans and those currently active)), can be found under the Special Needs Households section. This Housing Element provides policies and programs under the Housing Implementation section that address improving housing access for populations that may otherwise experience hardships in accessing decent and affordable housing. These include assistance for special needs populations (Program 2.9) such as seniors, persons with physical and/or mental disabilities (including developmental disabilities), large households, extremely low-income households, single-parent households, female head of households, veterans, farmworkers, students, and military personnel. While Program 2.9 covers many special needs populations, other programs highlight additional actions for specific population groups, such as seniors (Program 2.10), persons with disabilities (Program 2.11), large families (Program 2.12), persons experiencing homelessness (Program 2.13), and military personnel and students (Program 2.14). Programs include efforts that range from providing CDBG funds groups that provide services for those with special needs, to engaging with housing advocates and encouraging housing developers to designate affordable housing units for special needs populations, to continuing to ensure reasonable accommodations to building or zoning requirements, to providing housing navigation services, to ensuring that local military and student housing offices have updated information about the availability of low-income housing in the city. The information provided in this section is a sample of the programs the City plans to provide in implementing this Housing Element. The Housing Implementation subsection of Section 10.7 has a complete list of all policies and programs, as well as details about each program. Although not historically standard to housing elements, persons living with HIV/AIDS are included in the AFFH section for several reasons. First, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, which is primarily enforced by HUD, prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS. Second, California has the largest number of HIV and third largest number of AIDS cases in the United States, and San Diego County has the third largest number of people living with HIV and AIDS in California. Third, in 2016, the City of San Diego had the greatest proportion of diagnoses (67.8 percent), followed by Chula Vista (6.5 percent) and Oceanside (3.2 percent). While Carlsbad is not among the cities with the highest percentage of March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 101 of 104 --- 10-82 City of Carlsbad  10 Ho u s ing residents living with HIV/AIDS (88 persons), it is important to acknowledge as a regional issue. The city will also continue to support the development of housing for persons and households with special needs as it continues to implement the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. The city also staffs a housing navigator to provide housing opportunities for special needs populations city by connecting them to resources and information on assisted and below market housing. AFFH-related programs under the Fair Housing goal and policies in Section 10.7 will work to create even more opportunities to improve housing choices for special population groups in the city. Displacement Risk   Because of federal protections and legal avenues available to help persons with special needs and/or persons in minority groups, income is used as the main criteria for determining displacement risk. Between 2015 and 2018, median home sale prices have gone up 19.4 percent (see Homeownership Market section), while the citywide household median income rose 18.3 percent. Housing prices that rise more quickly than household income will eventually lead to certain residents being priced out of their community. Data also shows, however, that the housing cost burden experienced by households across the city have generally decreased between 2015-2018. This data, however, aggregates residents at different income levels. A map of cost burden shows that residents in every census tract spends at least 20 percent of their income towards housing costs. Most of the city spends over 30 percent of their income on housing, and roughly a third of the city spends over 40 percent of their income on housing (Figure 10-8). Residents living in living on the west, north, central, and southeast areas of the city spend the greatest proportions of their income on housing. These areas of Carlsbad, however, do not show a direct relationship with the other typical indicators of disadvantage, such as high poverty rates, extremely low household incomes, or linguistic isolation. In many of these census tracts, poverty rates are among the lowest in the city. In the northern area of the city, including the Village-Barrio area, however, some of the highest percentages of cost-burdened households overlap with some of the lowest household incomes in the city. March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 102 of 104 10-83 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing EL CAMINORE AL POINSETTIA LN COLL E G E B L C ANNONR D FAR AD A Y A V LA C O S T A AV PALOMAR AIRP O R T RD ALGA RD C A R L S B A D B L AVIARAPY TAMARACK AV M E L R O S E D R RANCH O S A N T A F E RD C A R LS B A D VILLAGE DR OLIVENHAI N R D C A R L S B A D B L CARL S B A D V I L L A G E D R Pacific Ocean Figure 10-8: Cost Burden, 2018 0 1 20.5 Miles Sources: City of Carlsbad, 2020; Mintier Harnish 2020; Regional Opportunity Index, 2014Revised: 12/24/2020 Village Barrio 100 Ac.50Ac. 20 - 30 percent 30 - 40 percent 40 - 50 percent Quadrants City of Carlsbad Village / Barrio Inset Map NWNW SWSW SESE NENE March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 103 of 104 CJ --CJ {city of Carlsbad 10-89 General Plan  10 Ho u s ing EL CAMINORE AL POINSETTIA LN COLL E G E B L C ANNONR D FAR AD A Y A V LA C O S T A AV PALOMAR AIRP O R T RD ALGA RD C A R L S B A D B L AVIARAPY TAMARACK AV M E L R O S E D R RANCH O S A N T A F E RD C A R LS B A D VILLAGE DR OLIVENHAI N R D C A R L S B A D B L CARL S B A D V I L L A G E D R Pacific Ocean Figure 10-10: Persons Who are Linguistically Isolated, 2018 0 1 20.5 Miles Sources: City of Carlsbad, 2020; Mintier Harnish 2020; Regional Opportunity Index, 2014Revised: 12/24/2020 Village Barrio 100 Ac.50Ac. 0 - 5 percent 5 - 10 percent 10 - 15 percent 15 - 20 percent Quadrants City of Carlsbad Village / Barrio Inset Map NWNW SWSW SESE NENE March 4, 2025 Item #8 Page 104 of 104 CJ {city of Carlsbad Christie Calderwood, Police Chief Reid Shipley, Assistant Police Chief March 4, 2025 Police Department Update 1 { City of Carlsbad TODAY’S PRESENTATION •Increasing population & housing units •Crime trends & changing landscape •Calls for service •Response times •Factors impacting workload •Staffing challenges •Staffing requests in future budget cycles •Staffing justifications •Impacts ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE 2 { City of Carlsbad PROPOSED ACTION Receive an informational report on the current state of the Police Department and proposed next steps in the following five years. 3 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad Population 4 POPULATION & HOUSING INCREASES 11,000 visitors/ hotel guests daily (average) 63,000 workers 3,873 new housing units by 2029 2024 115,000 2029 119,000 (estimated) HOTEL ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE CRIME TRENDS •Overall crime is down in Carlsbad •5% increase in crimes against persons at mid-year 2024 •Crime trends require more time and resources: •Organized burglaries •Organized retail thefts •Internet crimes against children •Scams against the elderly •Seizure of large amounts of narcotics •Involved in 3 officer-involved shootings in 7 months 5 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE 6 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Dispatched Calls Officer Initiated Calls 911 Calls CALLS FOR SERVICE ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE --- 7 90,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE REPONSE TIMES CY 2021 Actual CY 2022 Actual CY 2023 Actual CY 2024 Actual Priority 1 Calls 4:49 5:07 6:17 6:45 Priority 2 Calls 9:17 10:54 14:00 17:45 Priority 3 Calls 42:13 48:45 32:56 45:31 Priority 4 Calls 25:45 28:59 29:24 38:47 *national average for Priority 1 calls is 6 minutes 8 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE WORKLOAD IMPACTS •New legislation •Technology advancements •Professional partnership changes •Departmental obligations •Population increase & growth management •Community requests 9 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad NEW LEGISLATION •AB 953 - Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) •AB 392 - Peace officers: Deadly Force 10 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENTS •Body worn cameras •Theft trackers •License plate readers •Home surveillance systems •Find My Phone •Apple AirTags 11 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad PROFESSIONAL PARTNERSHIP CHANGES •Vista Detention Facility changes •Closing of Crisis Stabilization Unit at Tri-City Hospital •Two-officer response requirement at Scripps Hospital 12 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad DEPARTMENTAL OBLIGATIONS •Training standards •Thorough and timely reporting 13 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad POPULATION INCREASE 14 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE 2024 115,000 2029 119,000 (estimated) 11,000 visitors/ hotel guests daily (average) HOTEL 3,873 new housing units by 2029 COMMUNITY EVENTS & REQUESTS •Carlsbad Marathon, Street Faires, TGIF Concerts, etc. •HOA Meetings •School presentations 15 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad STAFFING CHALLENGES •Deployable numbers •Department reorganization •Impacts to service level 16 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad 3-YEAR AVERAGE ANNUAL STAFFING Authorized 132 Vacancies 5 Staffing 127 Out of Service 24.5 Deployable 102.5 17 Deployable 78% Non-deployable 22% { City of Carlsbad 2024 AVERAGE ANNUAL STAFFING Injured 7 Modified 2 FMLA 1 Military 1.5 Other 1 Academy 4 Field Training 4 Out of Service 20.5 Authorized 132 Vacancies 4.5 Staffing 127.5 Out of Service 20.5 Deployable 107 18 Working 81% Vacancies 3% Leaves 9% Other 1% Academy 3%Field Training 3% SWORN •CSO to cover front desk •HOT Sergeant to Training Sergeant •Reduction of four “960” officers •Juvenile Detective to Property Crimes •CSO from Traffic to Investigations •Unfilled positions in Crime Suppression Team •Unfilled Motor Officer position DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION 19 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE IMPACTS •Increased response times •Overall service level •Reactive vs. proactive •Recruitment & retention 20 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad PROPOSED SOLUTIONS •Developed over the past year •Will be proposed during each budget cycle •Will be reviewed annually to reflect changes in law enforcement/community expectations 21 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad POTENTIAL STAFFING NEEDS IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS •Police Officers •Special Events Sergeant •ICAC Detective •Digital Forensic Specialist •PSSB Sergeant •Senior Office Specialists •Community-oriented policing team •Property & Evidence Supervisor •Communications Operators 22 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE FY 2025-26 STAFFING REQUEST TO BE SUBMITTED TO CITY MANAGER •(3) Police Officers •(1) Special Events Sergeant •(1) ICAC Detective •(1) Digital Forensic Specialist 23 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE STAFFING JUSTIFICATIONS 3 POLICE OFFICERS •Help with patrol staffing and ability to fill other positions •Improve response times •Better able to address quality of life issues •Improve member wellness with less OT requirements 24 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE STAFFING JUSTIFICATIONS SPECIAL EVENTS SERGEANT •Recent national incidents reinforce need for special event security •40 annual special events •Traffic Division span of control is 12:1 •250-400 traffic complaints annually 25 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE STAFFING JUSTIFICATIONS ICAC DETECTIVE •Cases involving child sexual abuse and online exploitation •Currently handled by our Child Abuse Detective •Current open cases: 74 •80-100 reports requiring review at all times 26 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE STAFFING JUSTIFICATIONS DIGITAL FORENSIC SPECIALIST •Most cases have some form of digital evidence •Specialized field requiring ongoing training to keep up with legal/technological changes •Allow for timely investigation of critical cases •Currently required to utilize regional lab that has extensive delays 27 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE EFFECT ON INTERNAL PARTNERS •Human Resources •City Attorney’s Office •IT •Fleet 28 ITEM 8: POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE { City of Carlsbad