HomeMy WebLinkAboutV 2024-0001; OHNSTAD RV VARIANCE; Variance (V)IMPORTANT: A Grant Deed is required if the ownership does not match city records. Ownership on the
deed must correspond exactly with the ownership listed. If the owner noted on the Grant Deed does not
match the person signing as Property Owner, provide paperwork documenting the person signing is
authorized to sign as a Property Owner.
Whenever any excavation, fill, or other project-related improvement requires entry onto adjacent
property for any reason, the Land Use Review Application shall include the written consent or legal
easements or other property rights of the adjacent property owner or their authorized representative,
and shall include such consent with the application package. The application will not be deemed
complete unless and until all necessary consent documents are so filed. The consent shall be in a form
acceptable to the City Planner. If the proposed improvements on the adjacent property change the
nature of the property's development rights (or implied bundle of rights), the city might require
recordation of a Covenant and Agreement for Offsite Improvements and Release of Liability as a
condition of project approval.
Does the project's limits of disturbance encroach on property not owned by the Property Owner?
D Yes 181 No If yes, attach adjacent owner authorization.
PART B. Owner Declarations (to be signed by Property Owner)
I/We hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the information below and that:
1. I/We understand that it is the responsibility of the Applicant to substantiate the request through
the requirements of the application.
2. I/We understand that if there is a zoning violation on the property, application review may be
delayed. Any unpermitted structures or uses must either be removed or legalized at part of this
application.
3. I/We understand that if this application is approved, I/we may be required to record a covenant
with the County Recorder's Office, the form and content that is satisfactory to the City and its
City Attorney, to notify future owners of the project approval and restrictions.
4. If this Land Use Review Application is approved or conditionally approved, I/we hereby certify
that I/we will comply with all conditions attached to the approval action. I/We understand that
the failure to comply with any conditions shall constitute grounds for the revocation or
modification of t he approval, permit, or other authorizations provided.
5. Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to the permit issued, all conditions of approval (if
any) will be completed or secured in the manner as stated or required.
Property Owner Signature(s): /J~-h~ Ofu:/::zzd,
Name(s): Peter-Rolf Ohnstad Date: 03/20/2024
Page 2 of6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
PART E. Contribution Disclosure
Has the Property Owner, Applicant, or Agent had more than $900 worth of business transacted with any
member of city staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past 12 months?
□ Yes l8J No If yes, indicate person(s): ___________________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
PART F. Applicant Declarations (to be signed by Applicant)
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the information below and that:
1. I have carefully reviewed and prepared the application and plans in accordance with the
instructions.
2. I understand that the specific information needed to initiate planning case processing
corresponds to those items listed in the application form's "Minimum Submittal Intake
Requirements Checklist ." I also understand that even if the application is duly filed and
accepted for intake processing, each application submitted to the Planning Division is
required to have specified information included in the application packet before it is
determined to be complete. The specific information to determine completeness is in
"Completeness Determination Requirements Checklist."
3. The Planning Division has developed policies to help ensure that discretionary permit
applications are timely processed. The Permit Streamlining Act shot clock starts on the intake
date the Planning staff accepts a duly filed application.
4. I understand that once an application is determined to be complete, project or design changes
that will increase the number of units, add uses that were not previously listed, substantially
change the site plan, or other changes that trigger the need for additional discretionary
approvals will require a new application, or the filing of other application permit types, which
would restart the review "clock" and extend processing timelines.
5. I understand that upon city review, additional information, documents, reports, entitlements
and fees might be required, including any referral fees. I understand that all fees and deposits
submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the ordinances,
regulations, or policies in effect at the time of the application submittal.
6. I understand that it is my responsibility to ensure that statements are true, that discrepancies do
not exist between the project's description on the application, the architectural plans and the
structural plans. If discrepancies exist between the architectural plans and the structural plans,
the architectural plans shall take precedence. Ultimately, the scope of work, as described on the
permit that authorizes construction, takes precedence over the plans. If there is a discrepancy
between the plans and the description on the permit, the permit governs.
Page 4 of 6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
7. I understand that all materials submitted in connection with this application might become
public record subject to inspection and copying by the public. I acknowledge and understand
that the public might inspect and copy these materials and that some or all of the materials
might be posted on the city website or elsewhere online, outside of the city's control.
8. I understand there are no assurances at any time, implicitly or otherwise, whether provided to
me in writing or by oral communications regarding final staff recommendations to the decision-
making body about t his application or the determination of any decision-making body.
9. If the project is approved or conditionally approved, the approved plan set of project drawings,
civil plans/grading, sections, site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans
shall not be altered without express authorization by the City Planner. Once a permit has been
issued, the Applicant may request permit modifications. "Minor" modifications might be granted
if found by the City Planner to be in substantial conformity with the approved plan set, including
all exhibits and permit conditions. Modifications beyond the scope described in the approved
plan set might require submittal of an amendment to the permit and approval by the authorized
review body.
10. Should any proponent of the project fail to file a timely and valid appeal of the permit within the
applicable appeal period, such inaction shall be deemed to constitute acceptance of the permit
by the Applicant; and agreement by the Applicant to be bound by, to comply with, and to do all
things required of or by the Applicant pursuant to all of the terms, provisions, and conditions of
the issued permit or other approval.
11. As part of t his application, the Applicant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
the City of Carlsbad, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, volunteers, and
agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Carlsbad, its Council, boards and
commissions, officers, employees, volunteers and agents, to attack, set aside, void or annul an
approval of the application or related decision, including environmental documents, or to
challenge a denial of the application or related decisions. This indemnification shall include, but
not be limited to, damages awarded against the city, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and
other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or
proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, city, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such
proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the city for all of the city's costs, attorneys' fees, and
damages that the city incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth herein. The
Applicant shall pay to the city upon demand any amount owed to the city pursuant to the
indemnification requirements prescribed.
Page 5 of 6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
By signing be low, I hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city and I certify that the
application I am submitting, including all additional required information, is complete and accurate to
the best of my knowledge. I understand that any misstatement or omission of the requested
information or of any information subsequently requested might be grounds for rejecting the
application, deeming the application incomplete, denying the application, suspending or revoking a
permit issued on the basis of these or subsequent representations, or for the seeking of such other and
further relief as deemed by the City of Carlsbad.
Applicant Signature: /Jd:1A.--~(f: 0~
Name: Peter-Rolf Ohnstad Date: 03/20/2024
This form must be stapled/attached to the application and shall be effective until replaced or
revoked in writing.
Page 6 of 6
P-1 (A) Form Rev 6/2023
PART A. Project Summary Information
RV Minor Variance-Peter-Rolf Ohnstad
NAME OF PROJECT: ______________________________ _
APPLICATION PERMIT TYPES REQUESTED: RV Minor Variance Permit ------------------------
ACCESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS: 2232820600 ----------------------------
PROPERTY ADDRESS: _7_3_2_3_M_u_s_lo_L_n _______________________ _
CONTACT: □ Applicant D Property Owner lxl Agent
Signature: Aa/a,,;n, ~96~
Name: Adam Kooienga Date: 03/13/2024
Fully describe the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the
scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and
supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet
if necessary.
Applicant is requesting an RV Minor Variance Permit in order to park his RV outside of his home. The
applicant is a Veteran who is labeled at 70% disability (appealing for 100%) with Veteran's Affairs.
The RV is imperative to maintain a somewhat normal lifestyle, as the applicant requires a bathroom in close
proximity at all times due to his disability. A brief summary of the applicant's medical history is attached
with this submittal for your review.
Page 2 of 4
P-1(8) ~onn Re, 6120~3
PART B. Supplemental Information
Denote whether the following items are applicable to the project or if any portion of the property located within any of the
following? Use an addendum sheet to further describe all items marked "yes" in this list (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
1. A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code§ 51178 for State Responsibility
Areas; or any official local maps published pursuant to Government Code§ 51178
for Local Responsibility Areas.
2. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part
660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
3. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code§ 65962.5 or a
hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control
pursuant to Health and Safety Code§ 25356 of the Health and Safety Code.
NOTE: Certification of compliance required on Form P-l {C).
4. A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance
flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
5. A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any
official maps published by the State Geologist.
6. Any historic or cultural resources known to exist on the property.
7. The project requires any approvals under the Subdivision Map Act, such as a parcel
map, a tentative map, or a condominium map.
NOTE: If "yes," you may need to complete Form P-l(EJ and Form P-l{FJ.
8. The project require a Density Bonus Approval.
NOTE: If "yes," you must complete Forms P-l{H}.
9. The project site located within the Coastal Zone.
NOTE: If "yes," you may need to complete Form P-6 and/or Form P-7.
a. If "yes," does any portion of the property contain wetlands, as defined in Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations§ 13577.
Yes
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
No
~
~
~
~
□
Page 3 of 4
P-1(8) fom1 Rc1 6,20:?3
b. If "yes," does any portion of the property contain environmentally sensitive
habitat areas, as defined in Public Resources Code § 30240.
NOTE: If "yes," you may need to complete Form P-17 or Form P 18.
c. If "yes," does any portion of the property contain a tsunami run-up zone or
mapped inundation area.
d. If "yes," does any portion of the property contain any public access to or along
the coast.
10. The project impacts a stream or other resource that may be subject to a streambed
alteration agreement pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Fish and Game
Code§ 1600.
11. Any portion of the property is subject to any recorded public easement, such as
easements for storm drains, water lines, and other public rights of way.
Yes No
□ □
□ □
□ □
□ [x]
□ □
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that I/we have reviewed this Affidavit and the information furnished is true
and correct.
Name: Adam Kooienga
Signature: A~ ~tttt~
This form must be stapled/attached to the application and shall be effective until replaced or revoked in writing.
NOTE: The Applicant, Property Owner, or Agent should use this form when submitting project revisions to update
the information provided in response to issues raised by during the course of the city's review.
Page 4 of 4
P-1(B) Fonn Re, 6(?.0:D
APPEAL OF VA RATING DECISION PETER-ROLF OHNSTAD, JR 473-50-7386
RATING DECISIUON OF 6/13/2023. 8/16/2023
VETERANS STATEMENT OF FACTS:
IN OCTOBER 1975 AS A RESULT OF ANNUAL FLIGHT PHYSICAL I WAS TRANSPORTED FROM NAS
MIRAMAR TO THE BALBOA NAVAL HOSPITAL AND HOSPITALIZED WITH A BLOOD DISORDER
OF LESS THAN 10,000 PLATELETS. I WAS CONFINED TO MY HOSPITAL BED FOR MY OWN
PROTECTION UNTIL HEMATOLOGY DETERMINED THE CAUSE. THE DETERMINATION WAS AN
IDIOPATHEC DISORDER DETERMINED TO BE ITP -IDIOPATHEC THROMBOCYTOPENIA PURPURA
AT AGE 29. HEMATOLOGY RECOMMENDED A SPLENECTOMY AND SURGERY WAS COMPLETED
EARLY DECEMBER 1975 AFTER TWO MONTHS OF PREDNISONE TO RESTOE MY PLATELETS TO
LEVEL WHICH WOULD SURVIVE SURGERY. SURGERY WAS ACCOMPLISHED WITH THE BIOPSY OF
THE SPLEEN AS NORMAL AND HEALTHY. WHAT OCCURRED IN THAT SURGERY WAS AN
UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL OF MY APPENDIX. I HAD AGREED TO A SPLENECTOMY. THE
CONSEQUENCES OF THE UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL OF THE APPENDIX CAUSED A SERIOUS LIFE -
ALTERING EXPERIENCES THAT I STILL LIVE WITH TODAY. THREE DAYS AFTER THE SPLENECTOMY I
REQUESTED THE ATTENDING NURSE FOR HELP AS THE ABDOMINAL PAIN BECAME UNBEARABLE
AND TOLD HER I DIDN'T EXPECT TO BE ALIVE IN THE MORNING. FOUR
DOCTORS SHOWED UP AT MY BEDSIDE AND PALPITATED MY ABDOMEN AND DECIDED
WITHOUT ANESTHESIA OR OPERATING ROOM TO TAKE OUT A SCALPEL AND PROCED TO MAKE
A 4 INCH INCISION IN THE VICINITY OF THE APPENDIX. I WAS UNAWARE THAT THEY HAD EVEN
REMOVED MY APPENDIX. CONSEQUENTLY THAT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL RESULTED IN A
SEVERE CASE PF PERITONITIS THAT DRAINED FROM MY ABDOMEN IN A VERY ;LARGE AMOUNT
AT MY BEDSIDE INTO SEVERAL COFFEE CUPS FULL OF PUS. THIS NECESSITATED HEALING THAT
SCALPEL WOUND FROM THE INSIDE OUT AND REQUIRED PACKING AND CHANGE DAILY OF 30
FOOT OF GAUZE. I REMAINED IN THE HOSPITAL UNTIL CHRISTMAS EVE OF 1975.
IN ORDER TO CLEAR OUT THE WARD OF PATIENTS FOR THE HOLIDAY I MET WITH THE THEN
FLIGHT SURGEON CAPTAIN MARIOKA USN AS TO THE DISPOSITION OF MY CASE AND A RELEASE
FROM THE HOSPITAL ON CHRISTMAS EVE. HE OFFERED TO ME AFTER DISCUSSION THAT I
COULD GO HOME IF I HAD THREE PERSONS THAT WOULD TEND TO MY WOUNDS THOSE
THREE PERSONS WERE LT. JENKINS, LT MENGEL AND LATER MY WIFE PHOEBE ALLEN. THEY
DEMONSTATED TO THE DOCTORS THEY COULD DRESS MY WOUND. THEIR STATEMENTS OF
WHAT OCCURRED ARE PART OF MY ORIGINAL VA CLAIM IN 2004. UNFORTUNATELY, WY WIFE
PHOEBE PASSED AWAY IN 2001. SHE WAS MY PRINCIPAL CAREGIVER.
THE AGREEMENT I MADE WITH CAPTAIN MARIOKA WAS STRAIGHTFORWARD : IF I AGREED
NOT TO SUE FOR THE MALPRACTICE OR TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE SURGEONS, HE
WOULD RELEASE ME WITH MY FLIGHT STATUS RESTORED THAT CHRISTMAS EVE. I ACCEPTED
HIS OFFER, SIGNED THE AGREEMENT AND WAS TRANSPORTED HOME BY MY SQUADRON
MATES. WHILE IN THE HOSPITAL I WAS NEVER VISITED BY ANYONE WHO MIGHT HAVE TOLD ME
ABOUT ANY RIGHTS I MIGHT HAVE HAD. I RETURNED TO THE COCKPIT IN JANUARY 1976 WHILE
DEPLOYED ON THE USS NIMITZ
AND RESUMED FLYING WHILE STILL CHANGING THE DRESSINGS IN THE APPENDEAL SCALPEL
WOUND. I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THOSE FLIGHTS AND WITNESSES TO THOSE
FLIGHTS.
SO, WHAT WERE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE INAPPROPRIATE UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL OF
MY APPENDIX. HAVING DESIRED TO MAKE TH E NAVY MY CAREER I APPLIED FOR
AUGMENTATION INTO THE REGULAR NAVY WHICH WOULD ALLOW ME TO PURSUE A
FULFILLING 20 YEAR CAREER . UNFORTUNATELY, THE NAVY BOARD DENIED MY AUGMENTATION
REQUEST WITH THESE THREE WORDS 'INSUFFICIENT MEDICAL EVALUATION".
THAT RECORD EXISTS SOMEWHERE IN THE AUGMENTATION BOARD RECORDS OF 1976 OR 1977.
THAT DECISION LEFT ME WITH A DECISION TO REMAIN IN SERVICE WITHOUT GUARANTEE OF A
CAREER OR PURSUE A CAREER OUT OF THE NAVY. THE DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED WHEN I
FIRST APPLIED FOR VA DISABILITY IN 2004 WAS WELL ARGUED FOR ME BY DR. KRAVETZ AND HIS
ANALYSIS OF THE COMBINED SURGERY OF A "CLEAN" SURGERY WITH A "DIRTY "SURGERY AND
WAS PRESENTED IN MY INITIAL APPLICATION FOR VA COMPENSATION 29 YEARS AFTER THE
SURGERY IN 1975. DR. KRAVETZ CALCULATED THAT I HAD OVER 26 LITERS OF BLOOD
TRANSFUSED.
SHORTSIGHTEDLY WE APPLIED FOR CROHN'S DISEASE AS A RESULT OF THE 1975 SURGERY.
WHAT WAS TOTALLY OVERLOOKED IN APPLYING FOR INITIAL DISABILITY WAS THE ORIGINAL
DIAGNOSIS IN 1975 OF ITP. THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEVERE ABDOMINAL ADHES IONS OF
MY INTESTINE AS A RESULT I HAVE DEALT WITH NOW FOR 49 YEARS. THE NET RESULT IS A
SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME AND LITTLE CONTROL OF THE BODILY FUNCTION. MISSING 6 FEET
OF SMALL INTESTINE . TOTALLY DEPRESSING KNOWING I CAN'T TRAVEL ANYWHERE WHERE I
DON'T HAVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO A TOILET. I CAN'T EVEN TAKE A DOG FOR A WALK. I
HAVEN'T HAD A SOLID STOOL IN 49 YEARS. A SHART IS A DISASTER FOR ME.
MY VA RECORDS SHOW I HAVE BEEN HOSPITALIZED IN AT LEAST 4 VA HOSPITALS OVER THESE
49 YEARS. ADDITIONALLY, I HAVE BEEN HOSPITALIZED FOR SURGERIES AT SCRIPPS HOSPITALS
GREEN, ENCINITAS, AND MEMORIAL. MY LAST BOWEL RESECTION WAS DONE BY DR. WORSEY
AT SCRIPPS MEMORIAL AND HIS SPECIALTY WAS TO TRY AND REDUCE THE INTESTINAL
ADHESIONS THAT RESULTED FROM THE 1975 SURGERY. ONE ADDITIONAL HOSPITAL WHERE I
HAD CORRECTIVE SURGERY FOR FECAL MATTER DRAINING FROM THE "APPENDIX" SCAR WAS
PERFORMED AT THE 7™ DAY ADVENTIST HOSPITAL IN NAHA, OKINAWA IN DECEMBER OF 1992.
UNUSUAL WAS THE SURGEON PRAYING OVER ME BEFORE HE OPERATED. I WAS
RECOMMENDED BY THE THEN VA DR. KALMAZ AT THE VA HOSPITAL IN LA JOLLA TO SEEK
OUTSIDE MEDICAL HELP IN MY CARE WHICH NECESSITATED TRIPS TO THE MAYO CLINIC IN
ROCHESTER AND THE ULTIMATE REPAIR OF FIVE INCISIONAL HERNIAS AND A BIOLOGICAL
ABDOMIAL MESH.INSERTED. THIS SURGERY WAS UNAVAILABLE TO ME IN LA JOLLA. OF NOTE
NONE OF THSES SURGICAL COSTS WERE BORNE BY THE VA SYSTEM AND INDEED OTHER THAN
THE REMICADE TREATMENTS I RECEIVED IN LA JOLLA MY MEDICATION COSTS FOR HUM IRA
AND STELARA ARE NOT COVERED BY VA PHARMACIES. IF I DIDN'T HAVE ACCESS TO MEDICAL
CARE BEYOND THE VA, I WOULD BE DEAD.
TO IGNORE THE NEXUS LETTER OF MY PRIMARY CARE VA DR. IVIE FROM OCEANSIDE
REGARDING CONNECTION OF IGA NEPHROPATHY AND ITS RELATION TO AN ALREADY
COMPROMISED AUTO-IMMUNE SYSTEM FROM THE ITP SURGERY IN 1975 (LOSS OF SPLEEN)
NECESSITATES A REEVALUATION OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED HERETOFORE.
FOR ANYONE IN THE MEDICAL FIELD TO CLAIM I AM IN REMISSION FROM ANY OF THE
DISABILITY CLAIMS I HAVE SUBMITTED I PRAY DOES NOT MAKE ME SEEK LEGAL MEDICAL
ADVICE. I SERVED MY COUNTRY WITH PRIDE AND MANAGED TO HIDE MY DISABILITIES AND
SERVE MY COUNTRY WHILE COMMANDING ACTIVATED VESSELS IN DESERT SHIELD AND DESERT
STORM AND BEING AWAY WHERE I HAD NO ACCESS TO MEDICAL CARE. I WAS AWARDED
MERCHANT MARINE EXPEDITIONARY MEDALS IN VIETNAM AND THE PERSIAN GULF. I SERVED
30 YEARS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO SECURE THE 20 YEAR PENSION
REQUIREMENTS AS I SPENT ALL OF MY VACATIONS RECOVERING FROM A TOTAL OF 17
DIFFERENT SURGERIES. MY LAST FIVE YEARS PRIOR TO MY APPLICATION FOR SERVICE
CONNECTED DISABILITY, WAS AS THE DELIVERY CAPTAIN IN NEW ORLEANS FOR THE BOB HOPE
CLASS STRATEGIC DELIVERY VESSELS FOR THE NAVY T-AKRS 301-307. WHILE IN NEW ORLEANS
I HAD ACCESS TO MEDICAL CARE AND WAS ABLE TO RETIRE RATHER THAN RETURN TO
COMMANDING CONTAINER SH IPS IN A FOREIGN TRADE. IF I HAD REVEALED MY CONDITION TO
THE USCG I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO WORK AND SUPPORT MY FAMILY. FLYING IN THE
AIRLINES WAS OUT OF THE QUESTION . IT WAS AT MY MERCHANT MARINE RETIREMENT IN
2004 PRUDENT FOR ME TO FILE FOR VA DISABILITY, UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS LET THE
IGNORANT VETERAN BEWARE. THAT THE APPLICATION FOR CROHN'S DISEASE WAS ONLY A
PARTIAL RESULT OF THE ADVERSE MEDICAL CARE RENDERED AT THE BALBOA NAVAL
HOSPITAL IN 1975.
I WOULDN'T WISH MY CURRENT MEDICAL CONDITION ON ANYONE AS I AM CURRENTLY AT
STAGE 4 KIDNEY DISEASE WHILE UNDERGOING CONTINUAL CARE OF THE CROHNS AND
MONITORING IT ANNUALLY AT UCSD COLONOSCOPIES AT NO EXPENSE TO THE VA.
,
Per the California Environmental Protection Agency's website, "While Government Code
Section 65962.5 [referred to as the Cortese List] makes reference to the preparation of a "list,"
many changes have occurred related to web-based information access since [the amended
statute's effective date in] 1992 and this information is now largely available on the Internet sites
of the responsible organizations. Those requesting a copy of the Cortese "list" are now referred
directly to the appropriate information resources contained on the Internet web sites of the
boards or departments that are referenced in the statute."
Below is a list of agencies that maintain information regarding hazardous waste and substances
sites.
Department of Toxic Substances Control
www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/CorteseList/default.htm
www. cale pa. ca .gov/database/calsites
www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public
EnviroStor Help Desk (916) 323-3400
State Water Resources Control Board
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
County of San Diego
Department of Environmental Health Services
www.co.san-diego.ca.us/deh
Hazardous Materials Division
www.sdcounty.ca.gov/deh/hazmat/hazmat permits.html
Mailing Address:
County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
P.O. Box 129261
San Diego, CA 92112-9261
Call Duty Specialist for technical questions at (858) 505-6880, fax (858) 505-6868 (fax)
Environmental Protection Agency
National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCLIS")
www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites
(800) 424-9346 or (702) 284-8214
National Priorities List Sites in the United States
www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npVnpl. htm
P-1(C} Page 2of 2 Revised 02/13
( City of
Carlsbad
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV)
MINOR VARIANCE
P-12
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(442) 339-2610
www.carlsbadca.gov
RV Minor Va riance: A variance granted by the City Planner to allow a recreational vehicle (i.e. boat,
trailer) to be parked in the required front yard setback area of a single-family residence that is located
in a single-family residential zone. An RV Minor Variance application is required whenever an
applicant desires to park a recreational vehicle in a front yard setback. An RV Minor Variance may
be approved as an administrative act by the City Planner.
Submitting your application: Submit your application, plans and fees at the public counter of the
Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, 442-339-2600. Your application will not be accepted
unless all of the required materials are submitted. See Fee Schedule for processing fee amounts.
NOTE: A proposed project requiring application submittal must be submitted by
appointment*. Please call 442-339-2600 to make an appointment.
*SAME DAY APPOINTMENTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE
Appeal procedures for RV Minor Variances: When the RV Minor Variance is approved or denied
by the City Planner, you may appeal this decision to the Planning Commission. You must draft a
letter requesting the appeal, submit it to the City Planner, and pay the required fee within ten (10)
calendar days from the date of the decision.
If your appeal of the City Planner's decision on the RV Minor Variance is denied by the Planning
Commission, you may appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. You must
submit a letter requesting the appeal and pay the required fee to the City Clerk within ten (10)
calendar days from the date of the Planning Commission decision. See fee schedule for required
appeal fees.
The following materials shall be submitted for each application or for combined applications on a
single project.
I. REQUIRED PLANS (AH required plans shall be collated into complete sets, stapled
together, then folded to 9" x 12" with lower right hand corner of plan visible.)
A. SITE PLAN -Four (4) copies prepared on 24" x 36" sheet(s). The site plan shall include the
following information:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
O a. Name and address of applicant, engineer and/or architect, etc.
O b. Footprint of all buildings and/or structures. De. Dimensions and locations of driveway(s).
O ct. Distance between buildings and/or structures.
D e. Building setbacks (front, rear and sides).
O f. Location, height and materials of walls and fences.
O g. A summary table of the following :
0(1) Site acreage.
0(2) Existing Zone and General Plan Land Use Designation.
0(3) Building square footage.
B. PHOTOGRAPHS of the front, sides and rear of the property.
P-12 Page 1 of 3
MAR 2 6 2021.
Revised 3/22
...
II. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS
D A. A completed Land Use Review Application Form.
OB. Completed RV Minor Variance Justification Form. De. Disclosure Statement. (Not required for tentative parcel maps.)
OD. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet.
O E. Property Owners List and Addressed Labels.
NOTE: WHEN THE APPLICATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY
THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE
APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE RADIUS MAP, TWO SETS OF THE
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED
REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD
UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED.
1. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 300-foot radius
of the subject property (including the applicant and/or owner) and the applicable Homeowners
Association (HOA). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number
from the latest assessment rolls.
2. Mailing Labels -two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 300
foot radius of the subject property and the applicable HOA. For any address other than a
single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide
addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt., Arial
Rounded MT Bold 9 pt., Courier 14 pt., Courier New 11 pt., and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample
labels are as follows:
ACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3
Carlsbad,CA 92008
ACCEPTABLE (with APN)
209-060-34-00
MRS. JANE SMITH
APT 3
123 MAGNOLIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3. A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within a 300 foot radius of the exterior
boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and
correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale
acceptable to the City Planner if the required scale is impractical.
P-12 Page 2 of 3 Revised 3/22
JUSTIFICATION FOR RV MINOR VARIANCE
An RV Minor Variance may be approved if the City Planner determines that access to the side or
rear yard cannot be provided. In order to approve the request, the City Planner shall be required to
make the following findings. Please read these carefully and explain how the proposed project meets
each of them. Use additional sheets if necessary.
1. Parking in or access to the side or rear yard would require one of more of the fo llowing: a)
extensive grading, b) structural alteration to the existing residence, or c) the removal of
significant or unique landscaping. A fence shall not be deemed to prevent access to the side
or rear yard.
Applicant does not have access to the side or rear yards, in both cases significant grading, structural
alterations, or removal of significant landscaping would need to be made to have access to park the RV.
2. Parking of the recreational vehicle in the front yard would not interfere with visibility to or from
any street.
Due to disability, the applicant does not use the RV for recreational purposes. Additionaly, when
the RV is parked in the driveway visibility to or from any street is not blocked.
3. Parking of the recreational vehicle in the front yard would not interfere with traffic on the street
or sidewalk nor encroach into the street and utility right-of-way.
Parking the RV in the driveway does not interfere with traffic on the street or sideway, the length of
of the RV fits within the limits of the driveway.
P-12 Page 3 of 3 Revised 3/22