HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-09-25; Planning Commission; ; CONSIDERATION OF EIR 167, CONSIDERATION OF SP 119 AND CONSIDERATION OF THE TENTATIVE MAP FOR CT 73-20• CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT FOR
SEPTEMBER 25, 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
•
REPORT ON: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN
CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE MAP.
CASE NOS: EIS-167
SP-119
CT 73-20
APPLICANT: B. K. KRAMER, FOR, LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, California
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Background: These items have been continued on several occasions at the
request of the applicant, to permit a revision of the proposed development. Said
revisions have been completed and a revised development plan has been submitted.
As Tentative Map No. 72-24, the Planning Commission and City Council did, in
late 1972 and early 1973, approve the development of a 140 acre parcel in the La
Costa area. As a part of that approval, a 36 acre single-family development known
as Spanish Village Unit No. l was approved with a total of 130 lots. The actual
development is occuring at a total of 107 lots. The applicant is now requesting
to develop the second phase of the overall development consisting of two units
with a total of 1026 d.u. Said phase, containing approximately 96 acres, is
located southerly of and adjacent to La Costa Avenue, i~mediately westerly of the
present westerly most extension of Levante Street. Said property, somewhat
irregular in shape, does have a small frontage of approx. 606 ft. on El Camino Real.
B. Re~uest: That the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council
of an E.I .. , Specific Plan for a 26 lot condominium development with a lot of
1026 d.u. and a Tentative Map with 28 lots on a portion of S.35 & 36, Tl25, R4W,
and S2, Tl3S R4W, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad.
C. Zoning and General Plan
1. Zoning: Existing: P-C
Proposed: P-C (S.P. & T.M.)
Adjacent: North: P-C
East: R-2, RD-M & P-C
South: County A-1-(8)
West: C-2 & County A-1(8)
-2-
2. General Plan: The La Costa Master Plan as approved by Planning
Commission Resolution 808 and City Council Resolution 2058 & Ordinance 9322,
indicates a majority of the property to be potential medium high density
residential with a maximum of 14 d.u. per acre. A small portion adjacent to El
Camino Real is indicated to be potential high density residential with 20 d.u.
per acre. In addition, an elementary s'chool site and park site are indicated
on the subject property. The proposed density of 14 d.u./net acre in the medium
high density area and the 20 d.u./net acre in the high density area does conform
to the La Costa Master Plan.
II: CONSIDERATION OF E.I.R. NO. 167
A. SMmmary: The draft EIR was received May 8, 1973. A letter was sent
by staff to the Applicant 1 s consultant indicating certain deficiencies. An
amendment letter providing additional information was presented in June. The
final draft EIR should be considered to include both these items. In that the
immediate indicated development is the preparation of the land for sale as
condominium lots with the potential number of units, staff can not evaluate the
ultimate project in terms of the total effects on the environment. Therefore,
it is recommended that the environmental consideration be divided into two stages.
At this time, as many environmental considerations as possible should be completed.
As each lot developes in the future, the specific impacts of the precise de-
velopment be presented as an amendment at that time.
The draft EIR, as amended, does adequately express the full range
of environmental impacts as can be possibly known at this stage. Any concern
expressed by staff in the specific discussion will be with regard to the
matter of emphasis or future elaboration rather than completely rewriting the
draft EIR. In reviewing the draft EIR, the relevant issues that should be kept
in mind are:
1. The impacts of the development in terms of grading and drainage.
2. The mitigating measures proposed to preserve the sites between
its initial preparation and the specific development.
3. The development, in terms of street and pad locations, did receive
an approval as a part of the consideration of Spanish Village Unit No. l (CT 72-24).
Therefore, in terms of drainage and public utilities, the two developments are
dependent upon each other.
B. Corrections:
The applicant has revised the draft EIR to include the Amendment letter
and the changes that resulted from the revised development plan. The staff1 s
evaluation will be on the basis of the revised draft EIR.
C. Acce~tability of Draft Report: The draft, as amended, titled 11 Spanish
Village Westr, proposed by the La Costa Land Company and prepared by Rick Engineering
Company, was accepted by the Planning Director as a preliminary EIR. This report
was forwarded to the following agencies for comments:
1. Department of Agriculture.
2. L.A.F.C.O.
3. County of San Diego Parks and Recreation Dept.
-3-'
4. Comprehensive Planning Organization
5. State of California, Dept. of Fish and Game
6. San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
7. San Diego County Sanitation and Flood Control.
No written response has been received.
D. Final E.I.R.: The final EIR will include the draft EIR as amended
and the staff comments below. Rather than repeating the information contained
in the draft EIR, staff will only commend to enlarge upon or to correct the
draft EIR as amended.
1. Project: The total number of condominium units proposed in the
project is 1026 on a total of 96 gross acres. The overall gross density is
10.68 d.u.
2. The Environmental Setting: The environmental survey for the total
La Costa area should be utilized as a part of this consideration.
3. Mitigation Measures: The mitigating measures should have included
the immediate landscaping and all irrigation of all slope;created to guarantee
their preservation. In addition, wherever possible, all slopes of 25% or greater
could have been preserved. The movement of dirt has been somewhat reduced as
a result of the revised plan.
4. Alternatives: The potential alternatives are limited for the parcel
in that a previous commitment for the extension of Levante Street and Anillo Way,
require that a majority of the grading proposed to be done whether the indicated
Unit 2 is developed or not. Therefore, the potential lot layout is limited.
However, this does not limit the range of densities within the established lot
pattern. In that the previously approved La Costa Master Plan has further
invited the land use alternatives to residential and specific densities, even
the densities possible are limited.
E. Staff Recommendation on the E.I.R.
l. That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the
Final EIR BE APPROVED to include:
a. the amended draft EIR
b. Any response received from those agencies notified.
c. Any public input received as a part of the public hearing
held regarding this EIR
Justification is based upon:
a. In that a land sales program is proposed, the development to occur
is only estimated, these materials do adequately express the total effect of the
proposed development on the environment~
2. That the Planning Commission require that an amendment to this
final EIR be provided for each lot when the precise development has been de-
terminted.
-4-
III. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. SP-119
A. Description of Project: The applicant is proposing to develope the
subject property into a 28 lot subdivision with the lots to be sold for future
development. The subdivision will contain a total of 85.7 net acres and will
consist of 25 residential lots, a 10 acre site to be reserved for a school site
and a 4.9 acre park site. In addition, easements consisting of an 16.8 acre
open space easement to the City and a 2.5 acre easement to S.D.G. & E. are
proposed.
Access is proposed to be provided by extending Anillo Way and Levante
Street through the property to intersect with El Camino Real. Anillo Way is
proposed to have a 60 ft. right of way and Levante Street a 60 ft. right of
way until it intersects with Anillo Way, when it will widen to 84 ft. right of
way to El Camino Real.
LOTS
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
The indicated densities on the proposed lots are as follows:
ACREAGE
GROSS NET
2.2 2.2
2. 1 1 . 7
2 .4 1. 7
3.3 2.6
2. l 2 .1
2 .7 1. 9
1.7 1.7
2.2 2.2
1.6 1.6
3.1 3.1
1.5 1.5
3.2
5.3
2.3
7.0
1.3
1.4
9.0
7.4
1.9
1.4
1.1
l.5
2.3
l.8
1.4
3.2
5.3
2.3
7.0
l.3
1.4
9.0
7.4
l.9
1.4
1.1
l.5
2.3
l.8
l.4
DENSITY
GROSS NET
20 d.u.
16 .19
14 .16
11. 03
14.
9.96
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
20 d.u.
20 II
20
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
TOTAL UNITS
44
34
34
36
29
26
23
30
22
43
21
44
74
32
98
18
19
126
l 03
26
19
15
21
32
25
19
-. Subtotals: 73.20 Gross Acres 70.60 Net Acres 14.01 D.U. 14.53 d.u. * 1026 d.u.
School Site 17.32 Ac. l O. 00 ac. N/A N/A N/A
(Lot 134
Park Site
( Lot 135) 5.48 Ac. 4.9 Ac. N/A N/A N/A
Public
TOTALS
Streets NtA l O. 50 AC. II II II
96 Acres 85.50 Acres l O .68 d. u. 12.0 d.u. * 1026 D.U.
* Due to Lot configuration and Ordinance requirements, the decimal place units have
been removed. Thus, the total units would be reduced to approx. 1013 d.u. for
the proposed lot configuration.
B. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council that the Specific Plan BE APPROVED . Justification is based upon:
1. Conformance of the Plan to the General Plan commitment as established
by the La Costa Master Plan.
2. Conformance of plan to zoning ordinance considerations for property
located in the P-C Zone District.
3. The size and location of the subject property is considered to be
sufficient for the proposed development.
C. Conditions of Approval: Any approval should be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The approval of Specific Plan is granted for the land described
in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the
plot plan submitted labeled Final Revised Exhibit A, dated Sept. 17, 1973.
The location of all buildings, fences, signs, roadways, parking areas,
landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially
as shown on the plot plan labeled Final Revised Exhibit A, dated Sept. 17,
1973, except or unless indicated otherwise herein.
2. Prior to the development of lots 108-135, a specific plan of the pro-
posed development shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City
Council for consideration and approval.
3. Prior to the issuance of any permits on lots 108-133, a tentative
map shall be submitted to the City for consideration and approval.
4. Any minor change may be approved by the Planning Director. Any
substantial change will require the filing of an application for an
amendment to be considered by the Planning Commission.
5. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the STate of
-6-
California, City of Carlsbad, and any other governmental entity, shall
be complied with.
6. No signs or advertising of any type whatsoever shall be erected or
installed until plans therefore have been approved by the City of CArlsbad.
7. Prior to obtaining any permits, and within 30 days hereof, the
applicant shall file with the Secretary of the Planning Commission written
acceptance of the conditions stated herein.
8. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed hereon shall
be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior to obtaining final building
inspection clearance. Deviation from this requirement shall be permitted
only by written consent of the Planning Director.
9. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan prepared by a landscape
architect shall be submitted to the Planning Director for consideration and
approval. Said plan shall be for all slope areas within the development.
10. Prior to inspection clearance, all landscaping shall be installed.
Said landscaping shall, at all times, be maintained in a manner acceptable
to the Planning Director.
11. All utilities, including electrical, telephone and cable television,
shall be installed underground and/or shall be completely concealed from
view.
12. All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the
subdivision ordinance and other City standards, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad, and free
of all liens and encumbrances.
13. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall enter into
a mutually acceptable agreement with Encinitas Union and San Dieguito
Union High School Districts to provide for future school requirements that
will result from the proposed development.
IV. CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE MAP NO. CT 73-20
A. Tentative Map : A total of 28 lots are proposed. Lots 134 & 135 are
indicated to be utilized for a school site and park site respectfully. As the
Commission is aware, the City and representatives of La Costa have been meeting
to resolve the parks allocation for the total La Costa area. As a result of
this study, it may be that Lot 135 will not be needed for a park site. It is
recommended that an option be provided to permit the resolution of this requirement
before recordation of the final map on Unit One of this subdivision.
The applicant indicates that the subdivision will be developed into two
units with 893 d.u. in the first unit (indicated as Unit No. 2) and 113 d.u. in
the second unit (indicated as Unit No. 3).
-7-
B. Staff Recommentation: That it be moved that the Planning Commission re-
commend to the City Council that CT 73-20 BE APPROVED subject to the conditions
outlined below. Justification is based upon:
l. Conformance of the tentative map to the La Costa Master Plan.
2. Conformance of the tentative map to all municipal codes and the
State of California Subdivision Map Act.
C. Conditions of Approval: Any approval should be subject to the following conditions:
l. Prior to the recordation of the final map on Unit No. 2, either one of
the following shall be accomplished:
(a} The City Council shall have considered and approved the parks
program for the La Costa area and all required parks have been dedicated
to the City to meet the Parks Ordinance requirements for all proposed
development in that area covered by the La Costa Master Plan.
(b) Lot l~ shall be dedicated to the City of Carlsbad for park
purposes.
2. The open space easement indicated on lots 119, 120, 122, 125 and 126 shall
be dedicated to the City of Carlsbad.
3. The applicant shall install a fully actuated traffic signal at the
proposed intersection of Levante Street and El Camino Real, in a manner
acceptable to the City Engineer.
4. El Camino Real shall be dedicated and improved on the basis of 126 ft.
right-of-way to City standards and specifications.
5. La Costa Avenue shall be improved in a manner acceptable to the City
Engineer.
6. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the total property shall be annexed
to the Leucadia County Water District.
7. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to
the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition
to all the requirements, limitations and restrictions of all municipal
ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which,
hereafter may be in force for the purpose of preserving the residential
characteristics of adjacent properties.
8. The C. C. & R's for this development shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
9. The developer shall enter into a mutually acceptable agreement with
the Encinitas Union and San Dieguito Union School District to provide
for future school requirements that will result from the proposed de-
velopment.
-8-
10. All public improvements shall be made in conformity to the City
of Carlsbad Engineering Design Criteria and Standard Plans, the Sub-
division Ordinance and other City standards to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad, and free of all
liens and encumbrances. Improvement plans for water and sewer system
shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts.
11. All utilities, including provisions for cable TV shall be placed
underground and/or shall be completely concealed from view.
12. Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as required by
Municipal Ordinance Code. The developer shall post a bond in the amount
necessary to energize said street lights for an eighteen month period
after construction to permit the incorporation of the subdivision into
a maintenance district.
13. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required
for checking and approval, before construction of any improvements is
commenced. The subdivider shall submit the original drawings revised
to reflect as-built conditions, prior to acceptance of the subdivision
improvements by the City.
14. All land/or easements required by this Ordinance shall be granted
to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free of all liens
and encumbrances.
15. All facilities provided to adequately control drainage on the subject
property shall be maintained by the property owner(s) in perpetuity.
16. The subdivider shall dedicate to the public, all rights of ingress and
eqress from lots abutting upon restricted access streets and roads over and
across the lines of said lots abutting said streets and roads. This
dedication shall be so designated on the certificate sheet of the Final
Map with the intent that the owners of said lots will have no rights of
access whatsoever to said streets and roads. The words "access rights
dedicated to the City" shall be lettered along the road adjacent to the lots
affected on the map proper. This requirement shall apply to Lot 108-110
along El Camino Real. and lots adjacent to La Costa Avenue.
17. Street names shall be subject to approval and shall be designated in
accordance with the standards and policies adopted by the Planning Commission
on file in the Planning Department. Said names shall be approved by the
Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map.
18. If required by the City Engineering Office, the improvement plans shall
include a report of a geological investigation and a complete grading plan
of the entire site. The report and plan shall be prepared by Civil Engineers
licensed by the State of California, and experienced in erosion control, who
shall be acceptable to the City Engineer, and they shall certify that they
have investigated the site and prepared data with full consideration of the
consequences to be included and neighboring properties.
-9-
ATTACHED MATERIALS: In addition to area maps, please find attached the
following:
l. Letter from P. Duvel, Leucadia Co. Water District.
2. Letter from A.M. Reilly -Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
3. Two letters from W. A. Berrier -San Dieguito Union High School
4. Letter from J. B. Askew-Director of Public Health.
( (
) .
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
1959 EL CAMINO REAL • LEUCADIA. CALIFORNIA 92024 O 753-0155
May 23, 1973 RECEIVED
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
MAY 2 4 1973
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Department _ Carlsbad, California 92 008
Attention: Director of Planning
Re: CT73-20 Spanish Village # 2
Gentlemen: .
In response to your request. The following information is
provided regarding proposed sewer service to referenced project.
1. The northern half of CT73-20 is within the boundaries
of Leucadia County Water District. Sewer service will
be avaiiable upon payment of applicable connection
fees, surcharge fees, lateral connection fees, engineering
and inspection fees, and monthly sewer service
charges.
2o The southern half of CT-73-20 is not within boundaries
of LCWD. Sewer service will be available upon :• . .-
annexation to LCWD and payment of annexation fees,
back taxes, legal and filing fees, connection fees,
surcharge fees, engineering and inspection fees, and
monthly sewer service charges o
Should you need more information on this subject, please contact
the Leucadia County Water District office.
Very truly yours ,
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
~.v~
Paul Duvel \
District Supervisor
PD:Cab
( ) ( •
Olivenhain Municipal W crter District
BOARD Of DIRECTORS
James B. Wood, Pres.
Howard Golem, V. Pres.
Roger G. ivliller, Treasurer
Joseph Wankel, Director
Otto Berk, Director
1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024
PHONE 753-6466
May 16, 19 73
COUNSEL
Vern Peltzer
ENGINEER
Boyle En(!ineering
MANAGER-SECRET ARY
Bill H ollingsworlh
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008 RECEIVED
Attention: Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
Subject: SP-119 and CT 73-20
Spanish Village at La Costa
Gentlemen:
MAY 1 8 1973
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Pl~nning Department
This is in response to your request for comments
relative to the subject proposed development.
The development is located within the Olivenhain
Municipal Water District. The District can deliver water
to each unit in the development upon completion of the
necessary financial arrangements.
Yours truly,
~~-Executive Assistant
AR: js
INTERSECTION OLIVENHAIN ROAD AT RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
(
<l!itp of ~arLsbab
l/ay 29, 1973
(
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
RECEIVED
Mr. Donald A. Aga tep
Director of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mr. Agatep:
MAY 31 1973
.CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Department
Your request for ourrecornmenda.tions concerning Tentative Map No. CT
73-20 of the subdivision to be known as Spanish Village at La. Costa.
Unit No. 2, has been received and reviewed by this department.
This subdivision would be acceptable to the Department of Public Health
provided:
1. All domestic water supplied to this subdivision comes from the 0livenha.in
Municipal Water District.
-2. All buildings constructed in this subdivision are connected to the
Leucadia County Water District public sewer system.
3. The sewer and water lines are not laid in the same trench in any
part of this subdivision.
4. Proper drainage is maintained throughout the subdivision so as .to
prevent ponding and/or storage of surface water.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to make recommendations concerning
the proposed subdivision.
JBA:GQ:sd
cc: Federal Housing Ad.ministration
Veterans Administration
~/)~;;;;;
J. B. ASKEW, M.D.
Director of Public Health
Department of Real Estate (Sub. Sec.)
(
SAN DIEGUITO
UNlON H!GH SCHOOL DlSTRICT
2151 flEWC~STI.E, CARDIFF, CALIFO!IHIA 92007
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Agatep:
• 714-753·6491
MAY1 6 1973
tltY OE CARLSBAD
.e,~·~t
I have been asked to comment on the following maps -CT 73-25, CT 73-19, ~P-119 .-
CT 73-20 relative to the impact that the proposed developments may have on the San
Dieguito Union High School District. As has been explained.by this office before,
school facilities of the San Dieguito High School District are operating on an
extended day basis with double sessions being a distinct possibility sometime during
the next school year. The district is currently building a second high school,
however, current information would indicate that the present rate of building in
the district will make even these facilities overcrowded as earl_y as the fall of 1975 .
. At present there is no high school site in the portion of the San Dieguito Union High
School District that is .located within the boundaries of the city limits of Carlsbad.
A study is currently-underway to determine the humber and location of additional sites
to accommodate the anticipated influx of new students from housing developments
currently under construction or proposed. The absence of sites or written agreements
by which to acquire them in the Carlsbad area compels us to oppose any additional
dwelling units within that area of our district that is within the city limits of
Carlsbad.
I would like to have the opportunity to present additional information to the city of
Carlsbad should this matter come before them for their consideration. PJ~ese sdvjs~
?s to hearing dates bz mailing coeies of the Planning Connnission and City Conncil
agendas to this office for .f~rusal.
bfs
BOARD OF TRUSTEES:
ADMINISTRATION:
, Sincerely, •
lJJJJ)~G ~
\... William A. Berrier
Superintendent
David H. Tnompson,
President
o. B. snolders,
Vice Pre~ldent
William A. Berrier,
Superintendent
Douglas M. Fouquet,
Clerk
Robert A. Morton,
Assistant Superintendent
E. Donald Frick Don W. Mitchell
John J. Dally,
Business Manager
( (
SAN lOI EGUI T O.
UNION HIGH SCHOOL D!STRICT
2151 rmvr.ASTL£, CARDIFF, CALIFORNIA 92007
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008 •
Dear Mr. Agatep:
• 714.:..753·6491
MAY 1 6 1973
~tty OE CARt..SBAO
e.~-~~t
I have been asked to comment on the following maps -CT 73-25, CT 73-19, • SP-°119 ,-
CT 73-2Q,_relative to the impact that the proposed developments may have on the San
Dieguito Union High School District. As has been explained by this office before,
school facilities of the San Dieguito High School District are operating on an
extended day basis with double sessions being a distinct possibility sometime during ·
the next school year. The district is currently building a second high school, •
howeve.r, current information would indicate that the present rate of building in
the district will make even these facilities overcrowded as early as the fall of 1975. •
At present there is no high school site in ~he portion of the San Dieguito Union High
School District that is located within the boundaries of the city limits of Carlsbad.
A study is cu_rrently underway to determine the number and location of additional sites
to accommodate the anticipated influx of new students ·from housing developments
currently under construction or proposed. The absence of sites or written agreements _
by which to acquire them in the Carlsbad area compels us to oppose any additional
dwelling units within that area of our district that is within the_ city limits of
Carlsbad._ .
I would like to have the opportunity to present additional information to the city of
_Carlsbad should this matter come before them for their consideration . .J!.J~as 0 QQ'U~r
~s to hearing dates by mailing copies of . the Planning Corrnnission and City toUI1,,ci1:._
agendas to this office for perusa~: ..,,.
bfs
BOARD OF TRUSTEES:
ADMINISTRATION:
\ Sincerely, ' \ ~ • • UJ ~ Cl ~"-
David H. Thompson,
President
O. B. Sholders,
Vice President
WIiiiam A. Berrier,
Superlntend"1'lt
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
Douglas M. Fouquet,
Clerk
Robe<t A. Morton,
Assistant Superintendent
E. D onald Frick Don W. Mitchell
John J. Daily,
8usine55 Manager
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
San Diego Coast Area
P.O. Box 38
Carlsbad, California 92008
Mr. Paul A. Williams
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Williams:
92008
July 19, 1973
RONALD REAGAN, Govern'or
RECEIVED
JUL 2 0 1973
:C]LYi :OE CAR LSBAD
·E.lannlng Department
Vie are returning the draft environmental impact report for Spanish
Village ':7est as you requested.
Vie have no comments on the report except to thank you for the review
opportunity.
Sincerely,
~wr~
Area Manager
J PW:rlm
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
July 16, 1973
County Parks and Recreation Dept.
450 Fletcher Parkway, Suite #220
El Cajon, California, 92020
·, ELePHOl~E:
(714) 729-1181
D EJM □
□ LEB 0
0 HTC 0
0 OLK
0WCT
,,.
□COPY
□FILE
Enclosed for your review is a copy of the· draft environmental
impact report for SPANISH VILLAGE WEST.
. Your comments would be greatly appreciated by ·a.s.a.p.(we are late mailing)
In the event that no comments are rece ·ived by ti1e aforementioned
dates we will assume yo-u are .;.n ,c.o,nc.ur.rence with the report.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
PAUL A. WILLIAMS.
Planning Department