Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGPA 15-02; OCEAN VIEW POINT; NOISE STUDY; 2015-06-23RE.CE\VE.D NOISE STUDY J\Jl-l 14 2015 "CARLSBAD CIT~~;NG DIVISION Oceanview Carlsbad Tentative MapLA Residential Development Carlsbad, CA Project Proponent: Mrs. Gayl Hynek 8541 Mossrose Way Gilroy, CA 95020 cf o Nick Doenges J. Whalen Associates, Inc. 1660 Hotel Circle N, Ste. 725 5an Diego, CA 92108 Prepared by: Jeremy Louden Ldn&tln#lllfng.lne.. 42428 Chisolm Trail Murrieta, CA 92562 760-473-1253 June 23, 2015 Project: 1572-03 Oceanview Cartsbad Noise Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ................................... , ............................................................................................................. II LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... II GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........................................................................................................................................ Ill EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... IV 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY ........... . .. .......... 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ........ . .. ......... 1 1.3 PROJECT SmlNG .... . ••···••••••••··•••••••••····• ............ 1 2.0 ACOUSTICAL FUNDAMENTALS ................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS AND STANDARDS ........................................................................................... S 4.0 NOISE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 EXISTING NOISE ENViRONMENT0NSITE ............................................... . .. ..... 6 4.2 AIRPORT RELATED NOISE .. . ............. 8 4.3 FUTURE NOISE PREDICTION METHODOLOGY .. ··················•· ........................... 8 4.4 FINDINGS AND MITIGATION ........ . ••••••••••••••• .. 9 LJST OF FIGURES FIGURE l•A: PROJECT VICINITY MAP ................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 1-8: PROJECT SITE PLAN ......................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 4-A: AMBIENT MONITORING LOCATION ................................................................................................. 7 FIGURE 4-8: PALOMAR AIRPORT NOISE CONTOURS ............................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 4-C: FUTURE CUMULATIVE NOISE LEVELS .............................................................................................. 10 IJST OF TABLES TABLE 4-1: MEASURED AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS .................................................................................................. 6 ii Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanview carlsbad Noise Report GLOSSARY OF TERMS Sound Pressure Level {SPL): a ratio of one sound pressure to a reference pressure (lref) of 20 µPa. Because of the dynamic range of the human ear, the ratio is calculated logarithmically by 20 log (L/L,,,) A-weighted Sound Pressure Level (dBA): Some frequencies of noise are more noticeable than others. To compensate for this fact, different sound frequencies are weighted more. Minimum Sound Level (Lm1n): Minimum SPL or the lowest SPL measured over the time interval using the A-weighted network and slow time weighting. Maximum Sound Level (I.max): Maximum SPL or the highest SPL measured over the time interval the A-weighted network and slow time weighting. Equivalent sound level (Leci): the true equivalent sound level measured over the run time. Leq is the A-weighted steady sound level that contains the same total acoustical energy as the actual fluctuating sound level. Day Night sound Level (LON}: Representing the Day/Night sound level, this measurement is a 24 -hour average sound level where 10 dB is added to all the readings that ocrur between 10 pm and 7 am. This is primarily used in community noise regulations where there is a 10 dB "Penalty" for night time noise. Typically LDN's are measured using A weighting. Community Noise Exposure Level (CNEL}: The accumulated exposure to sound measured in a 24-hour sampling interval and artificially boosted during certain hours. For CNEL, samples taken between 7 pm and 10 pm are boosted by 5 dB; samples taken between 10 pm and 7 am are boosted by 10 dB. Octave Band: An octave band is defined as a frequency band whose upper band-edge frequency is twice the lower band frequency. Third-Octave Band: A third-octave band is defined as a frequency band whose upper band- edge frequency is 1.26 times the lower band frequency. Response Time (F,S,I}: The response time is a standardized exponential time weighting of the input signal according to fast (F), slow (S) or impulse (I) time resJX)nse relationships. Time response can be described with a time constant. The time constants for fast, slow and impulse resJX)nses are 1.0 seconds, 0.125 seconds and 0.35 milliseconds, respectively. iii ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/1S 1572-03 Oceanview carlsbad Noise Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This noise study has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the development of the proposed residential project. The project known as Oceanview cartsbad Tentative Map Residential Development consists of thirteen (13) new single-family units. The project site is located at the end of Twain Avenue, north of Faraday Avenue, east of cannon Road in the City of Carlsbad CA. Airport Noise Levels The McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) adopted March 4, 2010 was compared to the project site location. According to adopted ALUCP the project site is located outside the 60 dBA CNEL. Therefore, no additional mitigation is required to meet the City of carlsbad's 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard for outdoor usable space. Transoortation Noise Rndinos The primary source of noise impacts to the project site will be background vehicular noise from cannon Road located over 2,000 feet west of the project site and Faraday Avenue located down a large slope is over 600 feet west, south, and east of the project site. Based on the exterior noise model, the worst-case cumulative noise level from the roadways was found to be 52.8 dBA CNEL at the site. Combined Aircraft and Roadway Noise Levels Based on the exterior noise model for the roadway the worst-case exterior noise level at the building fac;ade of the site is 52.8 dBA O\IEL. The airJX)rt related activities at the site is well below 60 dBA CNEL based on the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) noise contours. To be conservative, a worst case noise level of 56.1 dBA CNEL was utilized based on the ambient noise measurements. The combination of the roadway and airuaft activities was combined and yields a cumulative future noise level of approximately 58 dBA CNEL at the project site. Based upon these findings the future noise levels were found to be at or below 60 dBA CNEL and no noise mitigation is required to comply with the City of C.arlsbad Noise standards. The building facades would also be below the 60 dBA CNEL. Therefore, no interior mitigation is required. Project Related Roadway Noise Levels The combined existing plus project traffic volumes would equate to an overall worst-case noise level of 49 dBA CNEL. This is well below the City's 60 dBA CNEL threshold and no project related traffic noise impacts would occur. iv Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this Study Toe pur~e of this Noise study is to determine potential onsite traffic noise impacts created from nearby cannon Road and Faraday Avenue. Should impacts be determined, the intent of this study would be to recommend suitable mitigation measures to bring those impacts to a level that would be considered less then significant. 1.2 Project Looltion The proposed project is located within the City of carlsbad, CA More specifically, the project site is located at the end of Twain Avenue, north of Faraday Avenue, east of cannon Road in the City of carlsbad CA. Access to the project site is from Twain Avenue. A general project vicinity map is shown in Figure 1-A on the following page. 1.3 Project Setting The proposed project consists of 13 single-family residences. The existing site conditions are characterized as undisturbed land. Residential uses exist adjacent to the site to the north. A project site plan is shown in Figure 1-B on Page 3 of this report. 1 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/'23/15 1572-03 Oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report Oceanside 1:1 a Carlsbad Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 Figure 1-A: Project Vicinity Map till "41/!ACOSTA I IIONldPacl<aidP-1'1), Vista §:I l,gol!ond C.hlomio Reaort "' The llolffl' Ffr/ds ,;. [fill a \ ~ 4 l riu r,n 11 _v .r Project Site .f"t•i('l{o1Cl~" + [fill Mcaelan.Pelomai Airpon \ @Il \ us,l'Rd I BIil $$1 IWICM } ~.,.-." /''•"(' :i ~ I l ' t; o-, @TI Omol La eaiia ... Aucrt& S'po r ui ec,11 eoun11y aui, -i.,~O' 86!Jql,1IQ.1 l"11"9' 0 @D Sf.af~ Mat!M'. toS&a AV't Source: Google Maps, 2015 2 1572-03 Oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report ~ :::, &' :::, "' C a. :::, !? ... :::, !' O'I --t! ..... ... Ill t;; '-.I 6 w 0 @ II> ~-(l) ~ () ~ ig: II> a. z ~- ;o ~ ;+ w Vl 0 C: ti 11) ~ ::, 0.. 3 a, ~ g ::, VI C: a: ::, IO I <' ~ 3: a, -< N 0 .... ~ I I I I I p,a,ant_llNI...,., ., ......... Mlllt,Wif-,Om't.a L __ _ PR(P,.RED BY: ., , .. I _,.,...,. ,._ ·r _I- IDT A 'i \ \ >U:SNaTJOF4 rr/1 'I0-5Cll£ OCTA"- Cf' STE: 'Tl .s· C i .. I m -a a a u, if -a iii ::I 2.0 ACOUSTICAL FUNDAMENTALS Noise is defined as unwanted or annoying sound which interferes with or disrupts normal activities. Exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause hearing loss. The individual human response to environmental noise is based on the sensitivity of that individual, the type of noise that occurs and when the noise occurs. Sound is measured on a logarithmic scale consisting of sound pressure levels known as a decibel (dB). The sounds heard by humans typically do not consist of a single frequency but of a broadband of frequencies having different sound pressure levels. The method for evaluating all the frequencies of the sound is to apply an A-weighting to reflect how the human ear responds to the different sound levels at different frequencies. The A-weighted sound level adequately describes the instantaneous noise whereas the equivalent sound level depicted as Leq represents a steady sound level containing the same total acoustic.al energy as the actual fluctuating sound level over a given time interval. The community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the 24 hour A-weighted average for sound, with corrections for evening and nighttime hours. The corrections require an addition of 5 decibels to sound levels in the evening hours between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. and an addition of 10 decibels to sound levels at nighttime hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. These additions are made to account for the increased sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours when sound appears louder. A vehicles noise level is from a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and tires. The cumulative traffic noise levels along a roadway segment are based on three primary factors: the amount of traffic, travel speed, and the vehicle mix ratio or number of medium and heavy trucks. The intensity of traffic noise is increased by higher traffic volumes, greater speeds and increased number of trucks. Because mobile/traffic noise levels are c.alculated on a logarithmic sc.ale, a doubling of the traffic noise or acoustic.al energy results in a noise level increase of 3 dBA. Therefore the doubling of the traffic volume, without changing the vehicle speeds or mix ratio, results in a noise increase of 3 dBA. Mobile noise levels radiant in an almost oblique fashion from the source and drop off at a rate of 3 dBA for each doubling of distance under hard site conditions and at a rate of 4.5 dBA for soft site conditions. Hard site conditions consist of concrete, asphalt and hard pack dirt while soft site conditions exist in areas having grade changes, landsc.aped areas and vegetation. On the other hand, fixed sources radiate outward uniformly as it travels away from the source. Their sound levels attenuate or drop off at a rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance. The most effective noise reduction methods consist of controlling the noise at the source, blocking the noise transmission with barriers or relocating the receiver. Any or all of these methods may be required to reduce noise levels to an acceptable level. 4 Lein Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Dceanview Carlsbad Noise Report 3.0 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS AND STANDARDS The City of carlsbad's Noise Guidelines Manual (1995) requires that all exterior sensitive areas shall limit noise exposure. For noise sensitive residential land uses, the City has adopted a policy which has established a "normally acceptable" exterior noise level goal of 60 dBA CNEL for the outdoor areas and an interior noise level of less than 45 dBA CNEL. For residential properties identified as requiring a noise study, the study shall document the projected maximum exterior noise level and mitigate the projected exterior noise level to a maximum allowable noise level as identified in the Noise Guideline Manual. california Noise Insulation Standards (california Ccxle of Regulations, Title 24) and the City of carlsbad Noise Element establish an interior noise standard of 45 dBA for residential structures. Acoustical studies must be prepared for residential structures that are proposed to be located within the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contours of 60 dBA or greater. In addition, the Oty requires residential structures located within the CNEL noise contours of 60 or greater to prepare an acoustical study. The studies must demonstrate that the building is designed to reduce interior noise to 45 dBA or lower (CNEL). 5 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanview car1sbad Noise Report 4.0 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Existing Noise Environment Onsite Noise measurements were taken using a Larson-Davis Model LxT Type 1 precision sound level meter, programmed, in "slow" mode, to record noise levels in "A" weighted form. The sound level meter and microphone were mounted on a tripod, five feet above the ground and equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after the monitoring using a Larson-Davi~ calibrator, Model CAL 200. Monitoring location 1 {Mll) was located in the future location of Lot 7. The results of the noise level measurements are presented in Table 4-1. The noise measurements were monitored for a time period of 20 minutes during standard traffic conditions. The existing noise levels in the project area consisted primarily of traffic from cannon Road and Faraday Avenue and aircraft noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport. The ambient Leq noise levels measured in the area of the Project during the morning hours was found to be roughly 56 dBA. The statistical indicators Lmax, Lmin, LlO, LS0 and L90, are given for the monitoring location. As can be seen from the L90 data, 90% of the time the noise level is approximately 42 dBA from the nearby roadways. The lower noise levels are due to distance separation and the vertical off set between the roadways and the Project site (the roadways are located over 100 feet below the site). The noise monitoring locations are provided graphically in Figure 4-A on the following page. Table 4-1: Measured Ambient Noise Levels Measurement Noise Levels (dBA} Identification Description Time Leq Lmax Lmin L10 LSO L90 MLl Future Lot 7 10:25 a.m. -56.1 73.8 40.3 57.2 45.5 42.1 10:45 p.m. Sol.rce: Lein Consulting, Inc. 5/20/15 6 ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanvlew Carlsbad Noise Report b'. :I &' :I "' C tt :I !:,0 ... :I C'I 0, B -... UI ' I J. 1, I I I I I L __ _ PREPARED 61': ,c,tO ,._ filtT ,0 "' I 't _ _, .... (1.19 9'wtV ClfTAI. ft) /IIOIJ ...... ,e::-_~--= .. .trr .,.r \ \ Ill' A i' --7 ' I ~ \ f♦ '\w .. \\ l sa SHCO , or • f'OR -SCAtC OCTM. Of SIIC I I ~ C C i t ~ > 3 O" ii' :::, ,... ]: 0 :::, g ::J, :::, C i er. 0 :::, 4.2 AirJX)rt Related Noise To determine the airJX)rt related noise environment and impact JX)tentials the McClellan- Palomar AirJX)rt Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) was compared to the project site location. According to the ALUCP adopted March 4, 2010, the project site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours from the airJX)rt. Therefore, no mitigation related to airJX)rt noise is required. The project site and future noise contours are provided graphically in Figure 4-2 below. Figure 4-B: Palomar Airport Noise Contours 4.3 Future Noise Prediction Methodology ,...t._ .... C::J•--oe c::IM .. ~ ·--_,. -~-_,, .. ~ --- ...,,_..__ ... ~...,.._ _ _....,.., ... ~---·-..... -.._, ___ , ... _ .. _,_ Con-c,atibllHy Poley Map: NolN The primary source of noise impacts to the project site will be background vehicular noise from Cannon Road located over 2000 feet west of the project site and Faraday Avenue located over 600 feet west, south, and east of the project site. The projected roadway noise levels from vehicular traffic were calculated using the methods in the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA-RD-77-108, 8 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report December, 1978). The FHWA Model uses the traffic volume, vehicle mix, speed, and roadway geometry to compute the equivalent noise level. A spreadsheet calculation was used which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time pericx:ls used in the calculation of CNEL Weighting these equivalent noise levels and summing them gives the CNEL for the traffic projections. Mobile noise levels radiant in an almost oblique fashion from the source and drop off at a rate of 3 dBA for each doubling of distance under hard site conditions and at a rate of 4.5 dBA for soft site conditions. Hard site conditions consist of concrete, asphalt and hard pack dirt while soft site conditions exist in areas having slight grade changes, landscaped areas and vegetation. Hard site conditions, to determine the worst-case findings, were used to develop and analyze the noise levels along the roadway segments. The future traffic noise model utilizes a typical vehide mix of 96% Autos, 2% Medium Trucks and 2% Heavy Trucks for both roadways. The vehicle mix provides the hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA Model. 4.4 Rndings and Mitigation Roadway Noise cannon Road and Faraday Avenue are expected to have 24,600 ADT and 6,400 ADT, respectively, according to the SANDAG Series 12 Traffic Prediction Model for the year 2035. The speed limit along cannon Road is 50 MPH and 40 MPH on Faraday Avenue. Based on the exterior noise model, the worst-case rumulative noise level from all the roadways was found to be 52.8 dBA CNEL at the site. The modeling results are provided in Rgure 4 on the following page. No noise barriers, existing structures or topography that may affect noise levels were incorporated in the calculations. Combined Aircraft: and Roadway Noise Levels Based on the exterior noise model for the roadway the worst-case exterior noise level at the building fac;ade of the site is 52.8 dBA CNEL. The airport related activities at the site is well below 60 dBA CNEL based on the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) noise contours. To be conservative, a worst case noise level of 56.1 dBA CNEL was utilized based on the ambient noise measurements. The combination of the roadway and aircraft: activities was combined to determine the overall rumulative noise levels at the building facades. 9 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report Figure 4-C: Future Cumulative Noise Levels Project Name: Oceanview Carlsbad Date: 26-May-15 Project Number: 15-72 Location: Carlsbad I Traffic volumes, Mix a; s~s Autos Med. Tru;seavyTrucks I Mix Ratio by Percent 96.0 2.0 2.0 Propagation Rule Soft Roadway ADT Speed MPH CNEL @ SO Feet 60 CNEL (Feet) Faraday Avenue 6,400 40 66.2 129 cannon Road 24,600 50 74.2 442 I Noise Reduction clue to Distance I Distance Reduction Resultant Level Faraday Avenue 600 -16.19 50.0 Cannon Road 2,200 -24.65 49.5 Cumulative Noise Level 52.8 dBACNEL Sound levels are logarithmic and so cannot be manipulated without being converted back to a linear scale. You must first antilog each number, add or subtract and then log them again in the following way: Li 56.l 5:2.8 L = 10 * Log Lf 1010 or L = 10 * Log [1010 + 1010] = 57.8 dBA CNEL Adding the two noise sources yields a cumulative future noise level of approximately 58 dBA CNEL at the project site. Based upon these findings the future noise levels were found to be at or below 60 dBA CNEL and no noise mitigation is required to comply with the City of carlsbad Noise standards. The building facades would also be below the 60 dBA CNEL. Therefore, no interior mitigation is required. Project Related Roadway Noise Levels To determine if off-site noise level increases associated with the development of the proJX)sed project would create noise impacts, the traffic volumes for the existing conditions and the traffic volume increase of the proposed project were analyzed. The project is estimated to generate 130 10 Ldn Consulting, Inc, 6/23/15 1572-03 O::eanview Carlsbad Noise Report daily trips with a peak hour volume of 13 trips. The existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes at the project access point, within the cul-de-sac of Twain Avenue, has six homes with an estimated peak volume of 6 ttips and a daily trip @te of 60 ADT. The combined existing plus project traffic volumes would equate to an overall worst-case noise level of 49 dBA CNEL. This noise level is well below the Oty's 60 dBA CNEL threshold and no project related traffic noise impacts would occur. ,, Lein Consulting, Inc. 6/23/15 1572-03 Oceanview Carlsbad Noise Report