HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD 2021-0002; SD07644 BANK OF AMERICA; Consistency Determination (CD)DocuSign Envelope ID: 0EF22BBB-D30F-4CF5-BJ 733DD7DDDB4 PLtJC
CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION
CITY USE ONLY NCVP lo-is Development Number: DEY o~c<f'f
Original Project Number: Consistency Determination Number: r· o 2 0 2.1 -000 2.
PROJECT NAME: T=Mobile Anchor SD06744A
Assessor's Parcel Number(s) and
216-124-25; 7700 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA92009 Address: •
Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary):
Remove two (2) existing antennas and replace with three (3) new antennas. Remove six (6) TMAs and replace with six (6) new RRUs
Add one (1) new antennas FRP box for concealment. Add three (3) new HCS cables.
Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes □ No X
□
Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state.
none.
OWNER NAME (Print): 221 NORTH CEDAR STREET ASSOCIATES APPLICANT NAME (Print): T-Mobile West, LLC
MAILINGADDRESS:23679 Calabasas Road Ste,1057 MAILING ADDRESS: 3300 Irvine Avenue, Suite 300
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Calabasas, CA 91302 CITY, STATE, ZIP: Newport Beach, CA 92660
TELEPHONE: 8188353423 TELEPHONE: 619-786-7384
EMAIL ADDRESS: rzakari@gmail.com EMAIL ADDRESS:~@smartlinkgroup.com
*Owner's signature indicates pennission to conduct a preliminary O\r1 S-ro p-her. W4fd
review for a development proposal.
IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF TO INSPECT AND OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. I
CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY GDocuSlgned by:
KNOWLEDGE. ~}g~~ 1/29/2021
G=·~-1/28/2021
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE
APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): Jeff lacoviello agent for T-Mobile West, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 3300 Irvine Avenue, Suite 300
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Newport Beach, CA 92660
TELEPHONE: 619-786-7384
EMAIL ADDRESS: jeffrey.iacoviello@smartlinkgroup.com
I CERTIFY THAT! AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
~-~ 1/29/2021
SIGNM-~0 DATE
FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: ~ 11.11:0° [C""l, •:c;· q'"' ff"' ll~\ flt--~ [D ~~l::~ t;(.3;;l t::. w ·~r; tE ·~--'
RECEIVED BY: L '1UAr0--te,-vt YlJ, 1-! \o I ~o }-I FEB 10 2021
CITY Or CARLSBAD
I I ",
P-16 Page 2 of2 Revised 02/28/18
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
APPLICATION FOR ZONING/LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS
T-Moblle Site No.:
T-Mobile Site Name:
Property Address:
Assessor's Parcel No:
SD06744A
SD? 44 Bank of America
7700 El Camino Real
216-124-25
221 NORTH CEDAR STREET ASSOCiATES (';Property Owne~l owns the reai property
described above ("Property") and hereby authorizes T-Mobile West, LLC, and its
representatives, to take all such actions necessary for the sole purpose of applying for and
obtaining any building or land use applications, permits and approvals related to T-Mobile's
wireless communications facilities on the Property consistent with the lease between the parties
for the Site.
Authorized Signature of Property Owner:
Robert Zakari
Print Name:
Signature:
l/25/21
Date:
Sprint')> ~ Mobile
FEB 10 2021
CITY Or CAF<LSBAD
P!...A\\J!\J!!\JG C)\\J!S~SJ·.J
~··Mobile· SDD6744A
S0744 BANK OF AMERICA
7700 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 9 2009
PROP081:0 RICPLACl!:Ml:NT ANTll!:NNA WITHIN SCREEN BOX
AEslms.com
877.SAE.sims
CF"Y OF CA1 'L
~··Mobile· :3006744A
S0744 BANK OF AMERICA
7700 EL CAMINO R~AL CARLSBAD CA 9 Z009
AEslms.com
877.SAE.slms
~··Mobile· :3D06744A
S0744 BANK OF AMERICA
7700 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD C A 920 09
~~■CD IISP'L.AGll'MICNT ANTENNA■
WtTHIN ■alll:IEN ■CXI:■
LOOKING 11!!:AST F"R□M
AEslms com
877.SAE.slms
Radio Frequency -Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) Compliance Report (Anchor)
T-Mobile Proposed Facility
Site ID: SD06744A
SD744 Bank of America
7700 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, California 92009
December 3 I , 2020
EBI Project Number:
6220006303
Status: The proposed site will be compliant with the installation of
the mitigation measures described in Attachment I .
Remarks: See signage plan for mitigation measures to be installed upon
upgrade/installation of the site to comply with FCC and T-Mobile standards.
-
Prepared by:
~ ~v~~.se~.~~ !!!;~~
R_:(;f·:n/ED
FEB 10 2021
ci-:-y Or .. A· RLSBAD
P_A~. ,1 'S::: ,;,~,,.... ...._, __ _
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 3
2.0 MPE Calculations ................................................................................................................. 4
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna lnventory ............................................................................................... S
4.0 Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................................. 6
Attachment I a: MPE Analysis and Recommended Signage (Main and Adjacent Roof Level) 7
Attachment I b: MPE Analysis and Recommended Signage (Ground Level) ............................ 8
Attachment 2: RoofMaster ™ Import File ................................................................................... 10
Appendix A: Certifications ........................................................................................................ 11
Appendix B: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Requirements ........................ 14
2 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1.0 Executive Summary
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by T-Mobile to conduct radio frequency
electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for T-Mobile Site SD06744A located at 7700 El Camino Real in
Carlsbad, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed T-Mobile wireless
communications equipment at this site. As described in detail in Appendix B of this report, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for
general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME
modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-
EME fields. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site.
This document addresses the compliance of T-Mobile's proposed transmitting facilities independently at
the site.
The Maximum Emissions Value is 125.3100% of the FCC's general public limit (25.0620% of the FCC's
occupational limit) at the ground level. The proposed site will be compliant With Federal regulations
regarding (radio frequency) RF Emissions with the installation of the mitigation measures.
At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the T •Mobile antennas on the ground level, the maximum power
density generated by the T-Mobile antennas is approximately 125.3100 percent of the FCC' s general public
limit (25.0620 percent of the FCC's occupational limit).
Based on worst-case predictive modellng, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
general public limit within approximately 57 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at the ground level.
Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density will not exceed the FCC's occupational
limit at the ground level.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Attachment I. Posting of the signage brings the site
into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
3 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
2.0 MPE Calculations
Calculations were completed for the proposed T-Mobile Wireless antenna rooftop facility located at 7700
El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California using the equipment information listed below. All calculations were
performed per the specifications under FCC Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65,
"Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Fields" (OET-65). Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line-of-site paths
for good propagation and are typically installed a distance above ground level. Antennas are constructed
to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground
or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility
for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas in the
immediate vicinity of the antennas.
In accordance with T-Mobile's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMaster TM
software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site ground-level resulting from operation of the
antennas. Using the computational methods set forth in OET-65, RoofMaster™ calculates power density
in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each
grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer
antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMaster TM models consist of the Far Field model
as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize
several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially-averaged
power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.
For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by i -Mobile and compared the resultant
worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's general public/uncontrolled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin
65. EBI has performed theoretical worst-case modeling using RoofMaster TM to estimate the maximum
potential power density from each proposed antenna based on worst-case assumptions for the number of
antennas and power. All radios at the proposed installation were considered to be running at full power
and were uncombined in their RF transmission paths per carrier prescribed configuration. Modeling for
Ericsson AIR 6449 and AIR 6488 antennas is based on worst-case assumptions that include all beams
transmitting simultaneously. This is to ensure that all areas of potential concern are taken into
consideration. As such, the results are conservative in nature and reflect potentially higher levels of RF
emissions compared to actual on-air conditions. It is recommended that areas of concern be confirmed
with onsite measurements once the site is active."
The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by T-Mobile in the supplied
drawings.
There are no collocated carriers on the rooftop.
The data for all T-Mobile antennas used in this analysis is shown in Section 3.0. Actual antenna gains for
each antenna were used per manufacturer's specifications. All calculations were done with respect to the
FCC's general public/uncontrolled threshold limits.
Based on information provided by T-Mobile, access to this site is considered uncontrolled.
4 EBI Consulting • 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna Inventory
Centerline Power Per
Sector Antenna Antenna Make Antenna Model Height (ft) Azimuth Technology Frequency Band Channel Numberd ERP
Number Above Nearest (") CM) Channels CM)
Walking Surface
A I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 LTE TB TMO West 22.0 15 LTE 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
A I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West 220 IS NR 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
A I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 LTE MACRO 22.0 15 LTE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
A I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 LTE MACRO 220 IS LTE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 700 22.0 IS LTE 700 MHz 40 I 568
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 600 220 IS LTE 600 MHz 80 I 1066
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 600 220 15 NR 600 MHz 80 I 1066
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 2100 22.0 15 LTE AWS-2100 MHz 160 I 5060
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 22.0 15 LTE PCS -1900 MHz 120 I 2885
A 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 22.0 IS GSM PCS -1900 MHz 20 I 481
A 2 RFS APXV M4LI 8 _ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 22.0 15 UMTS PCS -1900 MHz 40 I 962
B I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 L TE TB TMO West 20.6 180 LTE 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
B I ERICSSON SON_AJR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West 20.6 180 NR 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
B I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 L TE MACRO 20.6 180 LTE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
8 I ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 I. TE MACRO 20.6 180 I.TE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
B 2 RFS APXVM4LI 8_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 700 20.6 180 LTE 700 MHz 40 I 568
B 2 RFS APXVM4LI 8_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600 20.6 180 LTE 600 MHz 80 I 1066
B 2 RFS APXV M-4LI 8 _ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600 20.6 180 NR 600 MHz 80 I 1066
B 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_-43-U-NA20 02DT 2100 20.6 180 LTE AWS -2100 MHz 160 I 5060
B 2 RFS APXVM-4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 180 LTE PCS -1900 MHz 120 I 2885
B 2 RFS APXVM4Ll8_43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 180 GSM PCS -1900 MHz 20 I 481
8 2 RFS APXVM4LI 8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 180 UMTS PCS -1900 MHz 40 I 962
C I RFS APXVM-4L18_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 700 20.6 260 LTE 700 MHz 40 I 568
C I RF$ APXVM4Ll8_43-U-NA2005DT 600 20.6 260 LTE 600 MHz 80 I 1066
C I RFS APXVM4LI 8_ 43-U-NA20 0SDT 600 20.6 260 NR 600 MHz 80 I 1066
C I RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 2100 20.6 260 LTE AWS -2100 MHz 160 I 5060
C I RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 260 LTE PCS -1900 MHz 120 I 2885
C I RFS APXVM4Ll8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 260 GSM PCS -1900 MHz 20 I 481
C I RFS APXVM4LI 8_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900 20.6 260 UMTS PCS -1900 MHz 40 I 962
C 2 ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 LTE TB TMO West 20.6 260 LTE 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
C 2 ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West 20.6 260 NR 2500 MHz 68 I 12425
C 2 ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 LTE MACRO 20.6 260 LTE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
C 2 ERICSSON SON_AIR6449 2500 L TE MACRO 20.6 260 LTE 2500 MHz 23 I 1208
• This table contains an inventory of T-Mobile Antennas and Power Values.
5 EBI Consulting • 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
4.0 Summary and Conclusions
All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were above the allowable limits for exposure
to RF Emissions. Based on predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the
FCC's general public limit within approximately 57 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at the ground
level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density will not exceed the FCC's
occupational limit at the ground level.
There are no collocated carriers on the rooftop.
The anticipated maximum contribution from each sector of the proposed T-Mobile facility is 125.3100% of
the allowable FCC established general public limit (25.0620% of the FCC occupational limit). This was
determined through calculations along a radial from each sector taking full power values into account as
well as actual vertical plane antenna gain values per the manufacturer-supplied specifications for gain.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits aria there are no RF hazard mltlgatiof'I measures if'I place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards. For this facility, the calculated values were above the allowable I 00% threshold standard per the
federal government.
EBl's modeling indicates that there are areas in front of the T-Mobile antennas at the rooftop level that
exceed the FCC standards for general public exposure. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the
worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 57 feet
of T-Mobile's Sector A, B, and C antennas at the ground level. In order to alert any workers potentially
accessing the site, a blue Notice sign and a yellow Guidelines sign are recommended at the first point(s) of
access to the rooftop. To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the
rooftop or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
Caution and/or Warning signage is recommended at the site as presented in the Signage Plan -Attachment
I.
6 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
Attachment I a: MPE Analysis and Recommended Signage (Main and Adjacent Roof Level}
Post at Roof
Access Points
ACENT BUILDING ■
Legend
10 fool IJid size
[Avg: 30 to 35 Feet)
Cartier Cokx Code I• T-Mobie
Attachment I b: MPE Analysis and Recommended Signage (Ground Level)
ll;dl,!,lltiO-fj
MAIN ROOF•
Pe,cent MP£ legend
~-5';
5% -loo:t D llm·Slm
■ Sim+
Ptblicl imits
Suia9
10 foot grid size
(Avg: 0 to 6 Feet)
Canier Color Code I• T-Mobie
Sign
IH•HIIII
(ci>) _____ ......,.
:::::-...:=:= -·-----~-
-
&CAUTION
1¥\ ------·--:=-''" ____
----------~---
Notes:
9
Sign Count
12
N/A
Description
Blue Notice Sign
Used to notify individuals they are
entering an area where the power
density emitted from transmitting
antennas may exceed the FCC's MPE
limit for the general public or
occupational exposures.
Guidelines
Informational sign used to notify
workers that there are active antennas
installed and provide guidelines for
working in RF environments.
Yellow Caution Sign
Used to notify individuals that they are
entering a hot spot where either the
general public or occupational FCC's
MPE limit is or could be exceeded.
Red Warning Sign
Used to notify individuals that they are
entering a hot zone where either the
general public or occupational FCC's
MPE limit has been exceeded.
Posting Instructions
Securely post at all access points to the site
in a manner conspicuous to all individuals
entering thereon.
Securely post at all access points to the site
in a manner conspicuous to all individuals
entering thereon.
Securely post near areas where the general
public or occupational MPE limit could be
exceeded as shown in Attachment I at the
site in a manner that prominently alerts
occupational workers and the general
public of RF emissions.
Signage not required.
The proposed site will be compliant with the installation of the mitigation
measures.
The actual number of access points may vary based on documentation provided and/or if a survey
was conducted. Recommended signage locations, if applicable, are based on T-Mobile's guidance for
the worst-case scenario in each sector. The actual signage installation is dependent on accessibility
of the facility and antennas. Locations deemed inaccessible due to OSHA safety standards (proximity
to unprotected roof edge or slope, etc.) will be compliant upon installation of recommended signage
at the closest accessible point.
EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street • Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
Carrier I Antenna Number J Emitter Number I Caption I Pattem(.ant) I Freguenc)'. I Power (W) ERP/EIRP I Length (m) I Azimuth(n) I Mechanical Downtllt I Het9h~l't)
T-Mobile 1 1 TMOAl SON_AJR6449 2500 LTE TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 1 2 TMOAl SON_AJR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 1 3 TMOAl SON_AJR6449 2500 l TE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 1 4 TMOAl SON_AJR6449 2500 LTE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 1 TMOA2 APXVAA4ll8_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 700.ant 700 568.28 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 2 TMOA2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 3 TMOA2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 4 TMOA2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 2100.ant 2100 8297.82 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 5 TMOA2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 4731.79 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 6 TMOA2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 788.63 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 2 7 TMOA2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 1577.26 1.83 15 0 22.0
T-Mobile 3 1 TMOBl SON_AIR6449 2500 l TE TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 3 2 TMOBl SON_AIR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 3 3 TMOBl SON_AJR6449 2500 LTE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 3 4 TMOBl SON_AJR6449 2500 l TE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 1 TMOB2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 05D1 700.ant 700 568.28 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 2 TMOB2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 3 TMOB2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 05D1 600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 4 TMOB2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 2100.ant 2100 8297.82 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 5 TMOB2 APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 4731.79 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 6 TMOB2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 788.63 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 4 7 TMOB2 APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 1577.26 1.83 180 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 1 TMOCl APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 05D1700.ant 700 568.28 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 2 TMOCl APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 05D1600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 3 TMOCl APXVAA4L18_ 43-U-NA20 05DT 600.ant 600 1065.59 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 4 TMOCl APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 2100.ant 2100 8297.82 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 5 TMOCl APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 4731.79 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 6 TMOCl APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 788.63 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 5 7 TMOCl APXVAA4l18_ 43-U-NA20 02DT 1900.ant 1900 1577.26 1.83 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 6 1 TMOC2 SON_AIR6449 2500 l TE TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 6 2 TMOC2 SON_AJR6449 2500 NR TB TMO West.ant 2500 20377.35 0.84 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 6 3 TMOC2 SON_AJR6449 2500 l TE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 260 0 20.6
T-Mobile 6 4 TMOC2 SON_AJR6449 2500 LTE MACRO.ant 2500 1981.65 0.84 260 0 20.6
Note that Power 0N) ERP/EiRP values are listed respective to the frequency of the antenna. (Values less than 1,000 MHz are listed as ERP and greater than 1,000 MHz are listed as EiRP.)
Appendix A: Certifications
11 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
Preparer Certification
I, David Keirstead, state that
■
■
•
■
■
12
I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and
compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from
RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications
Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard
to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation.
I have been trained on RF-EME modeling using RoofMaster ™ modeling software.
I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
SD06744A/SD744 Bank of America
6220006303
noo El Camino Real, Carlsbad California
Reviewed and Approved by:
sealed 04jan2021
Michael McGuire
Electrical Engineer
m ike@h2dc.com
Note that EBl's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency-Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering
and design of the building and related structures, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast
equipment on the structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBl's scope of work.
13 EBI Consulting♦ 21 B Street♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
14
Appendix B: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Requirements
EBI Consulting♦ 21 B Street♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of current Maximum Permissible Exposure
(% MPE) as listed in the FCC OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-0land ANSI/IEEE Std C95.I. The FCC regulates
Maximum Permissible Exposure in units of microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2). The number of
µW/cm2 calculated at each sample point ls called the power density. The exposure llmlt for power density
varies depending upon the frequencies being utilized. Wireless Carriers and Paging Services use different
frequency bands each with different exposure limits, therefore it is necessary to report results and limits
in terms of percent MPE rather than power density.
All results were compared to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) radio frequency exposure
rules, 47 CFR l.1307(b)(I) -(b)(3), to determine compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below.
General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
• Public exposure to radio frequencies is regulated and. enforced in units of microwatts per square
centimeter (µW/cm2). The general population exposure limit for the 700 and 800 MHz Bands is 467
µW/cm2 and 567 µW/cm2 respectively, and the general population exposure limit for the PCS and AWS
bands ls I 000 µW/cm2. Because each carrier wlll be using different frequency bands, and each frequency
band has different exposure limits, it is necessary to report percent of MPE rather than power density.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits als.o apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of
incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general
population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of
the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by
some other appropriate means.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
expo.sure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65.
15 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street♦ B1,1rlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1 387 CALLE AVANZAD □. SAN CLEMENTE, CA 9 2673 949-39 1 -6B24
Structural Analysis
for
T-Mobile
Revision Record
o 1 11/25/2020
Site Name SD744 Bank Of America
Site Number SD06744
Proiect Anchor Modification
Site Location 7700 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Structure Type Rooftop
Structural Usage Ratio 88.7%
Overall Result PASS
C81291, ires 9/30/2021
Tahzay Ramirez, P .E.
FEB 10 2021
CITY OF CARLSBAD
P!..AI\Ji\1!1\!G ~l'JlSlC,l.J
Scanned, electronic, or other reproductions of these Structural Calculations may be provided for recording purposes or to expedite receipt of
Information. In no event shall this document be used as a certified version of the Structural Calculation unless a wet seal and signature is present.
Page 1 of 10
M SQ~l~Jl(J•i,,
3B7 CALLE AVANZADD
SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673
949-391 -6B24
Assumptions and Limitations:
11/25/2020
SD06744
TR
The analysis contained herein is performed to the minimum design wind, ice, and other
environmental loading prescribed by the governing codes and standards. Other, larger loading
conditions required by the local jurisdiction or structure owner should be made known to M Squared
immediately for analysis. No lessor conditions will be accommodated. If wind or ice or other relevant
parameters are different from the minimum values recommended by the local adopted code, the
client shall specify the exact requirements.
The analysis performed is to the theoretical capacity of the members and connections. No
accommodations are taken for any damaged, rusted, deteriorated, or otherwise compromised
member conditions. The members and components of the structure/tower analyzed herein are
assumed to be monitored and properly maintained. This analysis shall not be co~sidered a condition
assessment of the structure. It is the responsibility of the client's contractor to notify the Engineer of
Record of any fatigued or compromised components prior to constri.1ction so appropriate measures
are implemented, ifrequired.
Information provided by the client is assumed accurate and current. The client has the sole
responsibility to ensure the information provided to the Engineer of Record and used in the
performance of this analysis is complete and correct In the absence of information to the contrary, it
is assumed that all structures were constructed in accordance with the drawings and specifications
produced by M Squared and that their capacity has not significantly changed from the "as new"
condition. In addition, in the absence of building plans or original construction documentation, the
proposed design can only be determined from observable field data and is supplemented by best
judgement and experience. If any additional information is presented at any time that contradicts
what is referenced in this analysis, the analysis becomes invalid and must be perforn1ed again with
the new information.
Construction not performed in accordance with the provisions contained herein will void
this report. It is assumed that construction drawings and performance of work shall be modified to
comply witl1 the conditions and limitations determined herein. Discrepancies between field
conditions and this report should be immediately brought to the attention of the Engineer of
Record for review.
Page 2 of 10
.,
M SQ ~,~_IJt,;•ir
3B7 CALLE AVANZAD □
SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673
949-391 -6B24
11/25/2020
SD06744
TR
Scope of Work: Evaluate existing site components for the proposed loading conditions. Evaluate
proposed FRP screen design
Site Data:
111 Seismic Design Category
• Soil Class
111 Short Period Spectral Response Coefficient,
• Wind Design Category
• Base Wind Speed,
Standards:
Sos
V
■ CBC 2019 Title 24 Part 2, California Building Code
D
D
0.823g
C
96mph
• ASCE 7-16 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
111 TIA-222-H Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antenna
111 ANSI/ AISC 360 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
• ACI 318 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
• ACI 530 Building Code Requirements & Specification for Masonry Structures
• ANSI/ AWS NDS National Design Specification for Wood Construction
References:
Type Author Title/Name/Project No. Rev.
Construction M Squared Wireless Anchor SD06744 -SD744 Bank of America B
Drawinas Smartlink T-Mobile
Recommendations:
Site is adequate to rsupport the proposed construction.
Page 3 of 10
Date
11/10/2020
M SQUARE•
Structural Analysis
Revision0
Seismic Loads
11/25/2020
S006744
TR
Telecommunication cabinets, radio equipment, and appurtenances are non-structural components to be designed under the
provisions of ASCE 7-16, chapter 13.
5i = 0.372
5'As= 1.235
Ground Level Equipment
Amplification Factor, ap:
Response Factor, RP:
Overstrength Factor, O.,:
Occupancy Category:
Importance Factor, Ip:
Site Class:
Connection Height, z:
Building Height, h:
Calculations
Sos= 0.823 g
1.0
2.5
2.0
II
1.50
D (no soil report)
0.0 ft
0.0 ft
Seismice Design force: Fp = (0.4ap$osWp)/(Rp/lp)*(l+2z/h) = 0.198 Wp
Fp.-= 0.371 Wp
Fp,max = 1.976 Wp
Use Eh = Cle= 0.371 Wp
Elevated Appurtenances
Amplification Factor, ap: 1.0
Response Factor, Rp: 2.5
Importance Factor, Ip: 1.00
Connection Height, z: 22.0 ft
Building Height, h: 32.6 ft
Calculations
Seismice Design force: Fp = (0.4apSosWp)/(RJlp)*(1+2z/h) = 0.310 WP
Fp,Min = 0.247 Wp
Fp,max= 1.317 WP
Use Eh= Cle= 0.310 Wp
(ASCE 7-16, table 13.6.1, section 13.6)
(ASCE 7-16, table 13.6.1, section 13.6)
(Eq. 13.3-1)
(Eq. 13.3-2)
(Eq. 13.3-3)
(Eq. 13.3-1)
(Eq. 13.3-2)
(Eq. 13.3-3)
Page 4 of 10
M SQUARE.:.,
Structural Analysis
Revision0
Wind Loads
Wind forces for building appurtenances are determined in accordance with ASCE 7-16 chapter 29.
Category: II
Basic Wind Speed: V =
Exposure Catagories:
K.i= 0.9
1.0
Ground Level Equipment
96 mph
C
Height Above Ground, z = 7 ft
K, = 2.01(15/z,)21• = 0.849
Velocity Pressure with no Ice: q, = 0.00256K,KztK.tv2 =
Minimum Design Wind Loading, qmin = 16.0 psf
Use q, = 18.02 psf
Gust Effect Factor, G = 0.85
Elevated Appurtenances
Height Above Ground, z = 22 ft
K,= 2.01(15/z,)21•= 0.920
Velocity Pressure with no Ice: q, = 0.00256K,KztK.tv2 =
Minimum Design Wind Loading, q..., = 16.0 psf
Use q, = 19.54 psf
Gust Effect Factor, G = 0.85
Excerpt from ASCE 7-16 Table 29.3-1
a le z..., C I E
8 7 uoo 30 0.3 320 0.333
C 9.5 900 15 0.2 500 0.2
D 11.5 700 7 0.15 650 0.1.25
18.0 psf
19.5 psf
(ASCE 7-16 section 26.5)
(ASCE 7-16 Table 26.6-1)
(ASCE 7-16 section 26.8.2)
(ASCE 7-16 Table 29.3-1)
(ASCE 7-16 Eq. 29.3-1)
(ASCE 7-16section 29.8)
(ASCE 7-16 Table 29.3-1)
(ASCE 7-16 Eq. 29.3-1)
(ASCE 7-16section 29.8)
Page 5 of 10
11/25/2020
SD06744
TR
~. M SQUARE•
Structural Analysis
Revision 0
Equipment Cabinet Properties & Forces
Description Weight Height
(lbs) (in)
Ex.Rack
Ex. PB6200
Description
Ex. Rack
Ex. PB6200
500
2800
G,tront1
1.340
1.320
Cabinet Overturning[5)
Description OTMWlncl
(lb--ft)
Front-Back
Ex.Rack 0
Ex. PB6200 0
Side
Ex.Rack 0
Ex. PB6200 0
Fastener Check
Description Tension
Fasteners
Ex.Rack 2
Ex. PB6200 2
Notes:
72
60.8
G,s1c1el'l
1.376
1.321
RM..,,..,i3I
(lb-ft)
219
2570
354
2608
Shear
Fasteners
4
4
Width
(in)
21
27.6
Depth
(in)
13
27.2
Wind Forces
Ar.front. A,,s1c1e
(ft2) (ft2)
10.5 6.5
11.7 11.5
OTM-RM-(4)
(lb--ft) (lb-ft)
556 179
2628 2100
556 290
2628 2131
0..Tu O..Vu
(lbs/bolt) (lbs/bolt)
348 93
233 519
Seismic Forces
Frmn,1'1 Fs1c1/'l <4 o.25osD
(lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs)
0 0 185 82
0 0 1037 461
Governs? NetOTM Uplift
(lb--ft) (lbs)
Seismic 377 348
Seismic 528 233
Seismic 266 246
Seismic 497 219
Fastener cl>Rnt[6J cj,R.,,,16J Combined
Type (lbs/bolt) (lbs/bolt) Stress
1/2" Hilti 1128 1120 0.391
1/2" Hilti 1128 1120 0.670
111 -Force coefficients determined from ASCE 7-16 figure 29.5-1 for square cross sections and interpolated for varying
aspect ratios.
121 -Equipment located indoors. Wind loads do not apply. Values set to zero.
131 -Dead loads for wind resisting moments reduced by 0.9
141 -Dead loads for seismic resisting moments reduced by 0.9-0.2505•
[5J Overturn Moments assume the cabinet center-of-gravity is at h/2.
161 -Bolt strengths Rnt and R,., for are computed in accordance with AISC 13111 ed.
Page 6 of 10
11/25/2020
SD06744
TR
ESR-1917 I Most Widely Accept id Trusted
TABLE 4-DESIGN INFORMATION, STAINLESS STEEL KB-TZ
Nominal anchor diameter
DESIGN INFORMATION Symbol Units 'la 1/2 s,.
AnchorO.D. ci.(d,) in. 0.375 0.5 0.625
(mm) (9.5) (12.7) (15.9)
Effective min. embedment' in. 2 2 3''4 31/a 4 hor (mm) (51) (51) (83) (79) (102)
in. 4 5 4 6 6 8 5 6 8 Min. member thickness h.'fii"t (mm) (102) (127) (102) (152) (152) (203) (127) (152) (203)
in. 4% 37/a 5112 411, 71/2 6 7 a1,. 6 Critical edge distance Cce (mm) (111) (98) (140) (114) (191) (152) (178) (225) (152)
In. 21/2 271a 21/9 Cmv, (mm) (64) {73) (54) Min. edge distance In. 5 53/, 51/4 for s2: (mm) (127) (146) (133)
in. 2',. 2',. 2
Smi-t (mm) (57) (73) (51) Min. anchor spacing
fore;, in. 31/2 41/2 3'1,
(mm) (89) (114) (83)
Min. hole depth in concrete in. ?:la 'f'la 4 11. (mm) (67) (67) (102)
Min. specified yield strength fy lb/in2 92,000 92,000
{N/mm2) (634) (634)
Min. specified ult. Strength ,,.., lb(tn2 115,000 115.000
(Nlmm2) (793) (793)
Effective tensile stress area As,.N
in2 0.052 0.101
(mm2) (33.6) (65.0)
Steel strength in tension N .. lb 5,968 11,554
(kN) (26.6) (51.7)
Steel strength in shear v .. lb 4,720 6,880
(kN) (21.0) (30.6)
Pullout strength in tension, N,,.,. lb 2,340 2,735
seismic2 (kN) (10.4) (12.2) NA
Steel strength in shear, seismic2 v .... 9
lb 2,825 6,880
{kN) (12.6) (30.6)
Pullout strength uncracked lb 2,630 5,760
concrete' Np..im:r {kN) (11.7) NA (25.6)
Pullout strength cracked lb 2,340 3,180 NA concrete' Np.'-' (kN) (10.4) (14.1)
Anchor categor/ 1 2
Effectiveness factor k.,,.,, uncracked concrete
Effectiveness factor kc, cracked concrete5 17 24 17
'-Pc.N = k • .,_/kc, •
Strength reduction factor ¢,for tension. steel failure
modes7
Strength reduction factor ,t, for shear. steel failure modes7
Strength reduction Q factor for tension, concrete failure
modes, Condition B8 0.65 0.55
Coefficient for pryout strength, k,,, 1.0
Strength reduction ¢. factor for shear, concrete failure
modes. Condition B9
Axial stiffness in service load P-lbfin.
range• p.. lbfin.
For SI: 1 inch= 25.4 mm, 1 !bf= 4.45 N, 1 psi= 0.006895 MPa For pound-inch units: 1 mm= 0.03937 inches.
'See Fig. 2.
311, 2'ts
(83) (60)
51/2 5112
(140) (140)
2'1. 2%
(70) (60)
41/a 41/4
(105) (108)
3'1, 43/,
(98) (121)
92,000
(634)
115,000
{793)
0.162
(104.6)
17,880
(82.9)
9,870
(43.9)
5,840 NA (26.0)
9.350
(41.6)
NA
NA 5,840
(26.0)
1
24
17 17
1.0
0.75
0.65
0.65
2.0
0.70
120,000
90,000
2See Section 4. 1.8 of this report. NA (not applicable) denotes that this value does not control for design.
'For all design cases 'P0_p=1.0. NA (not applicable) denotes that this value does not control for design. See Section 4.1.4 of this report.
'seeACI 31B-14 17.3.3 or ACI 318-11 D.4.3, as applicable.
5SeeACI 318-14 17.4.2.2 or ACI 318-11 D.5.2.2, as applicable.
Page 9 of14
,,.
0.75
(19.1)
331. 431.
(95) (121)
6 8 8
(152) (203) (203)
10 7 9
(254) (178) (229)
4'/4 4
(108) (102)
10 81/2
(254) (216)
5 4
(127) (102)
91/2 7
(241) (178)
4112 5'1.
(117) (146)
76,125
(525)
101,500
(700)
0.237
{152.8)
24,055
(107.0)
15,711
(69.9)
8,110
(36.1) NA
12.890
(57.3)
12,040 NA (53.6)
8,110 NA (36.1)
I 24 17
6For all design cases 'l'c.N "'1.0. The appropriate effectiveness factor fer cracked concrete {ka) or uncrac~ed concrete (k"""") must be used.
7The KB-TZis a ductile steel element as defined by ACI 318 D.1.
'For use with the load combinations of ACI 318-14 Section 5.3 or ACI 318-11 Section 9.2, as applicable. Condition B applies where supplementary reinforcement in
conformance with AC! 318-14 17.3.S(c) or ACI 318-11 D.4.3(c). as applicable, is not provided, or where pullout or pryout strength governs. For cases where the
presence of supplementary reinforcement
can be verified, the strength reduction factors associated with Condition A may be used.
•Mean v~lues shov,,n, act1Jal stiffness may vary considerably depending on conttete strength, loading and geometry of application.
Page 7 of 10
•• M SQIJ,l~~(,&!,
Structural Analysis
Revision0
Appurtenance Properties and Forces
Description Weight Height
AIR6449B41
RRU4415B25
RRU4424B25
Description
AIR6449B41
RRU4415B25
RRU4424B25
Notes:
(lbs) (in)
103
46
88
Cr,tmnt0
1.310
1.304
1.304
33.1
16.5
16.5
C,,s1d/
1.350
1.330
1.312
Width Depth
(in) (in)
20.6 8.3
13.4 5.9
13.5 9.6
Wind Forces
At,rront A1,s;11e
(ft2) (ft2)
4.74 1.91
1.54 0.68
1.55 1.10
Seismic Forces
Ftront b Fside b Qi; 0.2SosD
(lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs)
0 0 32 17
31 14 14 8
31 22 27 14
• -Force coefficients c, are determined from ASCE 7-16 figure 29.5-1 for square cross sections and interpolated
for varying aspect ratios.
b -F = q2Gc,A1, ASCE 7-16 equation 29.5-1. Antenna wind loads do not apply (behind screen wall).
l oCS. 4-+-o ,"7 >< l'1 '
2-.
Page 8 of 10
11/25/2020
SD06744
TR
M SQIJ.~~~}~
Structural Analysis
RevisionO
-w,~\ :
0,v;.1'1 .~qp~!.. >',I.~ I{ '?.-s')( $,·;/
= CP'1ts"'i
-sclsvvi~c...:
l...Oi--:S.i 'lt.1-:. l,<"°p'~·"-S1 ~ \'3.o'..¼-
11/25/2020
S006744
TR
' ¼t" 'ffl°? "'-'S-pJ-f. X 82 ~'f" = '-/ \i!:"
,;;; ~w --c,.'.:;,\ x <;"~, ~ i ~~
0 .;"') G<&-~ f~C
(fl ,-,,..J (:z l)\f'(,,"''N •
R...,-.. l'U.P ,
,z'-=-zrz..3
Re. e • 0
tl=-
/ll..,,'3, J
=m:,
-\oS-r,7~
1/. l I/ ~SQ~ ,! 12.-' ¢ rrt.f ~ I"' "" ~ =--u'Ls-~ ~1-r:u,v'
12..'SO_ -d--------r .,_ I lu g-u;.~~\)
eflt/· 7 '.s'C.R .. ~-) i 11(/) 'ft 'F o~.
Page 9 of 10
BEARING ON FRP
Bolt Allowable for Given FRP Plate Thickness (1)
MATERIAL BOLT DIAMETER
THICKNESS 3/8 .. 1/2" 5/8" 3/4"
1/8" 469 625 781 938
1/4" 938 1250 1563 1875
3/8" 1406 1875 2344 2813
1/2" 1875 2500 3125 3750
3/4" 2813 3750 4688 5625
1" 3750 5000 6250 7500
(1) BEARING on FRP plate or web controls (Factor of Safety= 3.0; Fp=J0,000 psi)
The designer must con.firm that no other component of connection conh·ols.
BOLT SHEAR
1"
1250
2500
3750
5000
7500
10000
Bolt Allowable for Given Bolt Diameter {2)
BOLT TYPE & BOLT DIAMETER
APPLICATION 3/8" 1/2" 5/8"
316SS-single shear (3) 1408 2503 3912
316SS-double shear 2816 5007 7823
FRP threaded rod (4) 300 600 900 single shear
FRP threaded rod -600 1200 1800 double shear
(2) The designer must con.firm that no other component of connection conh·ols.
(3) SHEAR of bolt conh·ols. Fv=0.17*FU = 0.17*75,000 psi= 12,750 psi
(4) SHEAR of FRP threaded rod controls (Facto1· of Safety= 4.0).
Ultimate values from Dynaform~ Design Gu;de
3/4" 1"
5633 10014
11265 20027
1000 2050
2000 · 4100
RATIO OF EDGE DISTANCE TO FASTENER DIAMETER
Edge Distance -cl* bolt to END
Edge Distance -cl* bolt to SIDE
Bolt Pitch -cl* to cl*
* -"cl" is centerline
www.fibergrate.com I 800-527-4043
RANGE
2.0-4.0
1.5-3.5
4.0-5.0
Page 10 of 10
RECOMMENDED
3.0
2.5
5.0
57