The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 2018-0004; THE SEAGLASS; LEAD PAINT INVESTIGATION; 2015-11-30iEv~~~~VIED t "b. \i_:;. ~-"-' ;---"' OCi i 5 2018 C\TY oFi CARLSBAD pLANN\~G D\V\S\ON LEJ;\D PAINT l~VESTIGATIPN I CONDUFTED AT I 2646 St te Street Carlsbad CA 92008 JMR JO: # 1-1495 :ssrto: I EA/Econ f{enovations 5839 Missipn Gorge Rd. San Dieg,, CA 92120 Novemblr 31, 2015 '. I I ENEcon Renovations 5839 Mission Gome Rd. San Diego, CA 92120 RE: 2646 State Street., Carlsb~d I A 92008 ' : j PROJECT: Lead Paint Investigation I EAfEcon Renovations, Nov'3mber 30, 2015 i i An investigation ·.to identify ,he presenqe o lead-based pairt (LBP) WcjlS performed by JMR Environmental Service~ Inc. (JMR) at 2646 State Street., Carlsba!=f CA 92008, on November 19, 2015. • ! JMR's survey included a thbrough insRect on of the subje9t house. Every room in the house ~as tested, including I the exteriors O s_t~ucture. The ~urpose of this_ survey was to determine the presence and. assess th~ cord1t1on of LBP o~1 fixed and painted surfaces. Many building components :at this site: appeared to be hof ogeneous. The buildings located on these properties are currently s9heduled for demolition. i • I I Equipment used to perform t~e survey ~as I Niton XLp 300 inalyzer. This report includes XRF re~ults, paint 9hip results, and a si~e map. Als,o attached are a summary of Cal/OSHA's Leatt in ConstrLJCtion Standard Title 8, CCR.Sect.ion 1532.1 and a copy of the California Departrent of Pu~lic ealth (CDPH) ln~pector's Certification. -I I Lead Standards 1 : , I : i Several government agencies have deflniti ns for what amount of lead constitutes paint to be considered "lead-bas~d." The Dep~rtment of Housi~g and Urban Development (HUD) has designated the ~mount to be 1.0 mg/cm2, via XRF, or 5,000 ppm, via Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (~S). The 1-1ud 1 regulations are lrelated to potential hazards in the home environment an1ci not to construction activities. CDPH has created lead-rel~ted regula;ionl that have beeniadopted into Title 17 of the California Code of Regulatiqns. These: regulations also define LBP as surface coatings containing lead concentrations of 1.0 mg/bm2, via XRF, o~ 5,000 ppm, via AAS. The CDPH regulations apply only to lead hazar ! abatement actiyities. 4560 Alvarado Canyon Rd., .Suite 2D, Sa'.n Diego, CA 92140 l Tel: (619) 858-7260 I _f Fax: (619) 858-7264 1 ] : I The Consumer Product Saf~ty Commi~sio~ (CPSC) has defined lead-based paint as surface coatings containing l~ad concenirations greater than 190 ppm, via AAS. In 1978, the CPSC banned the sale of lead-basep pl1 int to consumers and the us.e of lead-based paint in residence~ and public buildings. i j The California Department bf Occupaiion I Safety and ealth (Cal/OSHA) Lead in Construction Standard (Title ~. CCR Se~tiorl 1532.1) require~ contractors to protect their workers when there is a potential for lead exposure due td the construction activities. i I I I Currently, Cal/OS.HA has no :lead concei;1tra ion listed where , ontractors are exempt from Title 8, CCR Section 1532.1. i • • Test Procedures Representative fixed, painted, surfaces;wefe tested using t~e Niton Xlp 300 Analyzer. Results greater than 0.5 mg/cm2 are considered to be positive for lead. Paint chip samples are collected from representative componentJ when XRF results are inconclusive. Paint chip satnples are ~lso I collected from dlamaged paint with negative XRF results. Paint chip ~amples ar~. t~en analyzed in a laboratory using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (/lf\S). A total • f zero paint chip sample(s) were collected during this investigation. : ; I I I Sites are surveyed using theictockwise theo . When using this theory the inspector must first identify the main entry ~oint of the unit, enter at that loc~tion, sample that room first, and then sample all remaining rooms iri a dlockwise rotation!. The wall numbers are also identified using the clockwi~e theory. : ]1 lls are. numbered in the following manner. When an inspector is standih~1 in the e~try way to a room, that entry wc;1II is wall #A; the wall immediately to the inspbctor's left is 1 all #B; the wall dpposite the inspector is wall #C; and the wall to the inspebtor's right is wall #D. i : I XRF assays were performbcl using tDe '1unlimited" mode. At this setting the XRF continues to assay the substrate until i~ has determined thej painted surface to be either positive or negative with a cpnfidence lf,3vel of 95%. XRF assay results are given on the following pages. Positive as~ay results ~re haded. i • Discussion I In this summary the tested surfaces are' gr9uped into one of 1three ranges of lead content. The purpose of this is to cat~gorize the surface lead content as relatively high, mid-ranged, or relatively low. This will he1lp in complying :With the Cal/OSH~ lead standard as explained later. Furthermore, this cat~gorization iden ,ifies which surfade coatings HUD, CDPH, and CPSC consider "lead-based.1' • Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St, Carlsbad CA 92008 \ : I Based on XRF and laboratoty results, ti,e 101lowing surface are consi~ered to contain lead concentrations in exces~ of 0.05 mg/cmi or 1,000 ppm. • Interior -wood sills and window comp0nents, interior door jambs • Kitchen -walls, ceiling; baseboards, c~ramic countertopl tile, wood cabinetry • West bedroom -all walls and ceiling I l ' • Exterior -walls, wood sills and window components, door jambs, columns, fascia and eaves. : ! I ,! • • : i I i • A visual inspection determin~d several Jainlts to be in "fair" dr "poor" condition, including but not necessarily limited to; the following: • Exterior eaves ' • I • I ! Loose and peeling paints mu~! be removed [Ind remaining pjnt stabilt,ed prior to building demolition. i j : I Please note that although some of the t1sted paints did not exceed the HUD/CDPH definition of LBP,. all site pairyts should bi3 considered having k lead content requiring dust c~ntrols and pers?nal protection_ d~ring b\Jildirg ~emo~ition or r~n~vation, ~n compliance with Title 8, CCR Section 1532.1. lh1s Is further e~plamed m the follpw1ng section. : ; I I Cal/OSHA Compliance Rec()mmendati~ns Title 8, CCR Sec.tion 1532.1. nequirements apply to all construction activities where lead is disturbed and a potential for employee e~posure exists. Since common lead analysis methods have a minimum'. detection :lim\t, a painted su~ace cannot be shown by practical means to be completely lead4ree. In effect, CaltpsHA's requirements apply to all paint that is disturbed ~y an empl9ye 1 . Newer paints often contain small amounts of lead (up to 90 ppm is i allowed) due to contaminatio~ during the manufacturing process. When any amount of lead (s disturbed an employee initial 1 exposure assessment must be performed. If an empl:oyer has exposure data (air sample results) from similar workplace operations and conditions withih the past 12 mbnths then this data can be utilized. ; [ If employee exposure data: from similar Jorkplace operati,ons are not available, then initial air monitming is reqLJired. Several jprovisions are r~quired during the initial air monitoring including respi~atory protecti n, protective clpthing, change areas vvith storage facilities, hand wa$hing facilities, biological monitoring, and various types of training (see the included summary of Title 8, CCR Section i1532.1 ). We recommend initial air monitoring begin in areas where Rainted surfaces have higher I I j Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St, Carlsbad CA 92008 I • I II . l lead concentrations so that the results, if fayorable, can apply to other painted surfaces with similar or lower lead cohcentrations (i~ the work practides ate similar). Favorable results would be those that ~re! below th~ a, tion level of 30 '1,icrograms per cubic meter of air (µg/m3). I Inspection Limitations I I This investigation was plailned, develop d, and implemtnted based on previous experience in performing LJBP investigatibns. This inspection was patterned after Chapter 7 of the· HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and C1~:mtrol of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 [ Revision). ; JMR utilized statJ of the art practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while p~rforming this investigation. Evaluation of th~ _relative ris:k of exposur~ 1to lead ide~tifie~ 1 _dur!ng this investigation is based on cond1t1ons obse~ed at the time of the investigation. ~MR cannot be responsible for changing coryditions that m]1y alter the relativp. exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. : \ I i , ' I , l JMR Environmental Services: Inc. appreciates the opportunity1to provide these services. Sincerely, ~\/u~1 David Weaver, Project Man~ge~ JMR Environmental Services Inc CDPH Certification # 15363 ·, Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St, Carlsbad CA 92008 Appendices: 'i I I XRF Re~ults 1 XRF Calibrntion Form Site Pia~ I j - j I i I I • Summary of Title 8,' cqR Section 1532.1 CDPH Inspector's Certi ,cation I i I Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St., Carlsbad CA 92008 \ XRF :RESULTS Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St., Carlsbad CA 92008 Customer: EA/Econ Renovations 1Read[ng No. Time Type 11/19/2015 11:31 SHUTTER_CAL 2 11/19/2015 11:32 CALIBRATION 3 11/19/201511:33 CALIBRATION 4 11/19/2015 11:33 CALIBRATION 5 11/19/2015 11:34 PAINT 6 11/19/2015 11:34 PAINT 7 11/19/2015 11:35 PAINT 8 11/19/2015 11:35 PAINT 9 11/19/2015 11:35 PAINT 10 11/19/2015 11:36 PAINT 11 11/19/2015 11:36 PAINT 12 11/19/2015 11:36 PAINT 14 11/19/2015 11:37 PAINT 15 11/19/2015 11:38 PAINT 17 11/19/2015 11:38 PAINT 18 11/19/2015 11:39 PAINT 19 11/19/2015 11:39 PAINT 20 11/19/2015 11:40 PAINT 21 11/19/2015 11:40 PAINT 22 11/19/2015 11:41 PAINT 23 11/19/2015 11:41 PAINT 24 11/19/2015 11:42 PAINT 25 11/19/2015 11:42 PAINT 26 11/19/2015 11:44 PAINT 27 11/19/2015 11:44 PAINT 28 11/19/2015 11:44 PAINT 29 11/19/2015 11:44 PAINT 30 11/19/2015 11:45 PAINT 31 11/19/2015 11:45 PAINT 32 11/19/2015 11:45 PAINT 33 11/19/2015 11:45 PAINT 34 11/19/2015 11:46 PAINT 35 11/19/2015 11:46 PAINT 36 11/19/2015 11:46 PAINT 37 11/19/2015 11:46 PAINT 38 11/19/2015 11:47 PAINT 39 11/19/2015 11:47 PAINT 40 11/19/2015 11:48 PAINT 41 11/19/2015 11:48 PAINT 42 11/19/2015 11:48 PAINT 43 11/19/2015 11:49 PAINT 44 11/19/2015 11:49 PAINT 45 11/19/2015 11:50 PAINT 46 11/19/2015 11:51 PAINT 47 11/19/201511:51 PAINT 48 11/19/2015 11:52 PAINT 49 11/19/2015 11:52 PAINT 51 11/19/2015 11:53 PAINT 52 11/19/2015 11:54 PAINT 53 11/19/2015 11:54 PAINT 55 11/19/2015 11:55 PAINT 56 11/19/2015 11:56 PAINT 57 11/19/2015 11:56 PAINT 58 11/19/2015 11:57 PAINT 59 11/19/2015 11:57 PAINT 60 11/19/2015 11:57 PAINT JMR Environmental Services, Inc. 4560 Alvarado Canyon Rd, Ste 2D San Diego, CA 92120 Duration Units 58.09 cps Sequence ROOM TYPE Final WALL COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION Res Results 35 mg/ cm •2 Final 35 mg/ cm •2 Final 35 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.69 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.62 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.74 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.19 mg/ cm •2 Final 7.36 mg/ cm •2 Final 7.89 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.15 mg / cm •2 Final 6.29 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.72 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.15 mg/ cm •2 Final 10.57 mg/ cm •2 Final 8.4 mg / cm •2 Final 3.14 mg/ cm •2 Final 11.04 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.68 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.74 mg/ cm •2 Final 1.58 mg/ cm •2 Final 6.85 mg/ cm •2 Final 5.28 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.09 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.14 mg/ cm •2 Final 6.84 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.16 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm "2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.12 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.09 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.14 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.67 mg/ cm •2 Fmal 5.77 mg / cm •2 Final 3.66 mg/ cm •2 Final 6.32 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.69 mg / cm •2 Final 2.11 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.65 mg/ cm • 2 Final 6.82 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.73 mg/ cm •2 Final 6.28 mg/ cm •2 Final 5.8 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.12 mg/ cm •2 Final 4.77 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 2.1 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.71 mg /cm •2 Final 4.73 mg/ cm •2 Final 3.16 mg / cm •2 Final 3.16 mg/ cm •2 Final LIVING ROOM A LIVING ROOM A LIVING ROOM A LIVING ROOM A LIVING ROOM A LIVING ROOM 8 LIVING ROOM B LIVING ROOM C LIVING ROOM D KITCHEN A KITCHEN B KITCHEN B KITCHEN C KITCHEN C KITCHEN C KITCHEN C KITCHEN D KITCHEN D KITCHEN D EAST BEDROOM D EAST BEDROOM A EAST BEDROOM A EAST BEDROOM A EAST BEDROOM A EAST BEDROOM B EASTSEDROOM B EAST BEDROOM B EAST BEDROOM C EAST BEDROOM C EAST BEDROOM C EAST BEDROOM D EAST BEDROOM D EAST BEDROOM D BAIHKOOM A BATHROOM B BATHROOM C BATHROOM C BATHROOM D BATHROOM D WEST BEDROOM A WEST BEDROOM A WEST BEDROOM B WEST BEDROOM C WEST BEDROOM D D D EXTERIOR A EXTERIOR A EXTERIOR A EXTERIOR A EXTERIOR A EXTERIOR A ENTRY DOOR ENTRY DOORJAMB WALL WINDOW COMPONENT WINDOW COMPONENT WINDOW COMPONENT WALL WALL DOORJAMB WALL WALL WINDOW COMPONENT WALL WALL CEILING BASEBOARD OOORJAMB CABINETRY COUNTERTOP DOORJAMB DOORJAMB WALL WALL WALL WALL WALL WINDOW COMPONENT ENTRY OOORJAMB ENTRY DOORJAMB WALL WALL WINDOW COMPONENT CEILING WALL WALL WINDOW COMPONENT WALL WALL CEILING DOORJAMB WALL WALL WALL WINDOW COMPONENT BASEBOARD WALL ENTRY DOOR ENTRY DOORJAMB DOORJAMB EAVES HANDRAIL HANDRAIL WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL WOOD DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL WOOD WOOD WOOD CERAMIC WOOD WOOD WOOD DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD DR'rWALl DRYWALL WOOD DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL WOOD DRYWALL DRYWALL DRYWALL WOOD WOOD DRYWALL WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT iNTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT INTACT 385.24 Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Positive Negative Negative Positive Positive Negative Positive Action Level PbC PbC Error Pb L 6.35 0 1.05 1 0.5 1 <LCD 1 <LCD 1 <LCD 1 1.3 1 1.5 0.5 l <LOO 1 <LOO 1 <LOO 1 0.22 1.7 1.7 1.8 1 2.7 1 1.9 1 2 1.8 1 15.8 1 0.6 1 0.7 1 < LOO 1 < LOO 1 <LCD 1 < LOD 1 < LOD 1 <LCD 1 <LOD 1 <LOD 1 < LOD 1 < LOO 1 < LOO 1 < LOO 1 <LOO 1 < LOD 1 1.5 1 <LOD 1 < LOD 1 <LOO 1 < LOD 1 2.8 1 1.a 1 1.5 0.7 1 <LOO 1 1.7 1 < LOO 1 < LOD 1 2.3 1 2 1 <LOO 1 21 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.2 1 0.5 0.03 < LOO 0.24 < LOD 0.35 < LOO 0.2 1.3 0.3 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.1 0.22 0.7 0.7 1.7 1 0.7 1.1 1.3 2.7 0.3 1.9 0.5 2 0.5 1.8 7.5 8.4 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.03 < LOO 0.14 < LOO 0.97 < LOO 0.44 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.34 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOD 0.18 < LOO 0.16 < LOO 0.21 < LOO 0.29 < LOD 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.3 1.5 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0,9 2.6 0.5 .1.0 0.4 1.5 0.2 0.7 0.11 < LOO 0.5 1.7 0.1 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.8 2.3 0.5 2 0.11 < LOD 5.1 4 Project: 2646 State Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 PbL Error PbK PbK Error~ 0 0 0 0.1 < LOO 0.43 0.1 < LOO 0.43 0.1 < LOO 0.42 0.2 < LOO 1.12 0.03 < LOO 1.9 0.24 < LOD 2.85 0.35 < LOO 2.2 0.2 2.1 0.9 0.3 1.5 0.8 0.2 < LOO 1.05 0.03 < LOO 0. 79 0.03 < LOO 2.01 0.03 < LOO 1.2 0.1 < LOO 1.15 0. 7 < LOO 2.55 0.3 1.7 0.7 0.3 1.8 0.7 1.3 3.S 1.5 0.3 1.8 0.6 0.5 2.4 1.1 0.5 2.1 1 3.9 15.8 7.5 0.2 < LOO 1.05 0.2 < LOO 1.05 0.03 < LOO 2.97 0.14 < LOO 2.24 0.3 < LOO 0.97 0.44 < LOD 1.43 0.03 < LOO 2.84 0.34 < LOO 2 0.03 < LOO 1.83 0.03 < LOO 2.33 0.18 < LOO 2.62 0.16 < LOO 2. 71 0.21 < LOO 1.97 0.29 < LOO 0.03 < LCD 0.03 < LOO 0.3 < LOD 0.03 < LOD 0.03 < LOD 0.03 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.7 2.8 v . .J 1.7 0.4 1.6 0.2 < LOO 0.11 < LOO 0.5 1.8 0.1 < LOO 0.03 < LOO 0.8 2 0.5 2.2 0.11 < LOD 1.8 21 1.21 1.22 0.95 1.35 0.84 1.19 2.22 1.82 0.9 1 0.8 0.9 2.28 1 2.11 1.93 -i 0.9 1.77 5.1 Customer: EA/Econ Renovations JMR Environmental Services, Inc. Project: 2646 State Street 4560 Alvarado Canyon Rd, Ste 2D Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Diego, CA 92120 61 11/19/2015 11:58 PAINT 2.62 mg/ cm '2 Final EXTERIOR 4.1 4.1 62 11/19/2015 11:58 PAINT 3.17 mg/ cm '2 Final EXTERIOR WOOD INTACT Negative 1 < LOO 0.37 < LOO 0.37 < LOO 1.65 63 11/19/2015 11:58 PAINT 4.22 mg/ cm '2 Final WINDOWSILL WOOD INTACT Positive 1 2.4 1 0.6 0.3 2.4 1 64 11/19/2015 ll:S9 PAINT 4.76 mg/ cm '2 Final A WAU WOOD INTACT Positive 1 1.8 0.5 1.8 0.5 2.1 0.9 65 11/19/2015 12:00 PAINT 5.25 mg/ cm '2 Final A EAVES WOOD INTACT Positive 1 2.2 0.8 66 11/19/2015 12:00 PAINT 2.09 mg/cm '2 Final A FASCIA WOOD INTACT Negative 1 < LOO 67 11/19/2015 12:01 PAINT 4.72 mg/ cm '2 Final EXTERIOR A FASCIA WOOD INTACT 1 1.5 68 11/19/2015 12:01 PAINT 3.17 mg/cm '2 Final EXTERIOR A WALL WOOD INTACT Positive 1 3.7 1.3 3.7 1.3 69 11/19/2015 12:02 PAINT 4.72 mg/cm'2 Final EXTERIOR A EAVES WOOD POOR Positive 1 2.3 0.8 0.9 0.3 2.3 0.8 71 11/19/2015 12:03 PAINT 3.16 mg/ cm '2 Final EXTERIOR A WINDOWSILL WOOD INTACT Positive 1 5.7 1.7 5.7 2.3 5.7 1.7 72 11/19/2015 12:03 PAINT 21.52 mg/ cm '2 Final EXTERIOR A WALL WOOD INTACT Positive 1 1.1 0.2 1.1 0.2 1.2 0.3 73 11/19/2015 12:06 SHUTTER_CAL 56.17 cps Final 384.42 5.88 0 1 0 0.02 0 74 11/19/2015 12:07 PAINT 19.91 mg/ cm '2 Final Positive 1 1.1 0.1 1.1 0.1 < LOO 0.56 76 11/19/2015 12:08 PAINT 19.97 mg/ cm '2 Final Positive 1 0.1 1 0.1 < LOO 0.58 78 11/19/2015 12:09 PAINT 20.04 mg/ cm '2 Final Positive 0.1 0.1 < LOO 0.55 XRF CALl~RATION FORM Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State SI., Carlsbad CA 92008 Inspector: JMR Job#: Job Name: I • I .. I I i' -I I - ' XRF CALIBAATION FOR I , I I I Thomas lcopich 1-1495 I [ I i EA/Ecori State St Project Date: November 23, 2015 I Device: NITON XLP300 -~--~-"'-"-'------- • • I I Job Address: ___ 2--"6--'-4-"--6--"'S-=ta~' te"-• -"-S-==-t. 1,__C;:;..;a=r.;.,=cl~=ba~i:1:::...=;CA=--=--=9=2-=--00;:;_;8;;,__-+1 ________ _ Calibration Check ToleranJ.. Used: -~.4 mg/cm2 & +0.2 Jg/cm2 Use Level Ill (1.02 mg/ cm 2) NIST SRM Pa:int film J ! I First Calibration Check ! I 1st Reading 1.0 2nd Reading 1.0 ! 13rd Reading i.O I Second Calibration Check! 1st Reading 1.0 2nd Reading 1.0 I : j3rd Reading to I Third Calibration Check {If! Needed) ' Time: --+------- rst Average 1 1 : st Average -1.02 mg/cm 2 n.o -O.Q4 Time: __ I ___ _ rst Average ~st Average -1.02 [ mg/cm2 -0.04 Time: --.,..-------- 1st ReadinQ 2nd Reading 3rd Reading 11 st Average i1 st Average -1.02 1 mg/cm2 *Use the Test Mode Reading . *Tolerance Values for EDAX/MAPf-4: Minus Value = -0.4 mg/cm2 Positive Value = +0.2 mg/cm2 ; SITE LAN Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St., Carlsbad CA 92008 r--. ,( ~ t J? ... c . ? (/ 1 D' f 0 0 ,1 9 f t if ) ,t t f SUMMA.RY OF q)!~UOSHA'S LEAD IN cpNSTRUCTION STANDARD TITLE:8, 1ccR SECTl(l)N 1532.:1 I I i Lead Paint Investigation 2646 State St, Carlsbad CA 92008 . ' State of California-Health and Human Service~ Agency I California Department of Public Health I i LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION RE~ORT I :.. I I : • Section 1 -Date of Lead Hazard Evalu~tion i[ I -l 9-'l.J:::> µ \ I I Section 2 -Type of Lead Hazard Evalu1ation (Check orje bok only) ~ad Inspection D Risk assess~ent O CleJrancl Inspection O Other (specify) I · I ------ Section 3 -Structure Where Lead Haz~rd Evaluation Was I onducted I Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)] City --='2"--b L(_f:.---=-~...c.cc..~.c,____,~'-.,.--r:J:UG_~'-----\ ---"-:"· ~l:sW Construction date (year) of structure Type of structure (check one box only D M~ltl-unit building ; I School or daycare D Ot~er (specify) __ '_--,-1 ______ _ I I Section 4 -Owner of Structure (if busl?ess/agency, lis.t co~tact person) Name I Teleph 1 one number ~t\. /E~.f\ (_~r:C 1 ~t1 "2-\3-c8° I • I Section 5 -Results of Lead Hazard Evaluation (check all that apply) I , I I • I □ No lead-based paint detected. g'Lead-based paint detected. I 17,.,("' I 0 No lead hazards detected. : ~ Lead haz1rds detected. I Section 6 -Individual Conducting Lead: Hazard Evaluation Teleph'one number Zip Code 12.t)~~ Zip Code I , . (cl 'fl ~S \s -'1.2-bO Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)] I Y.S f,\J f\\V (}SOd 'Q Cs.N i):/\, ~ o\s., 21> CDPH certification number I \ I I City Zip Code Date Section 7 -Attachments 1~ '. I I I ' A. A foundation diagram or ske:~h of the structure indicating the specifc locations of each l~ad hazard or presence of lead-based paint; ; j I 8. Each testing method, device, and sampli~g procedure used; \ C. All data collected, including quality contr91 data, laboratory res Its, including laboratory !ame, address, and phone number. First copy and attachments retained by inspectof; Second copy and attachments retained by owner CDPH 8552 (6107) Ttrd copy only (no attachmeLs) mailed or faxed to: ckntornia Department of Public Health Childhood Lead Pol.saning Prevention Branch Reports 850 Marina Bay Par.kway. ~uil~jflg P, Third Floer Rithmond, CA 94a'iJ,i'itNJ§' '''T:'i' . FJ,, (S10) '20·5'· rl itroPoF·ic>r<:::rfc::: s ::31 c::>ri ii) • _::,:·:::···· ·::,::·: ·:: <:,. • . .:_. : \' ·: .:· .. : :. : ,_:: ... :,, : ...... ~ .. :, :•· ~-~--.: ', ;:•·· . .-::. :: .. ·:-... •'•;.. -~·:.: '