HomeMy WebLinkAboutEIA 00-09; RE-FORMATION OF B&TD #2; UPDATED FEE STUDY REPORT; 2000-12-21-CITY OF CARLSBAD
UPDATED FEE STUDY REPORT
FOR
BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT No. 2
(AVIARA PARKWAY -POINSETTIA LANE)
December 21, 2000
Prepared By
GALEN N. PETERSON
Consulting Engineer_
San Diego, California
(858) 487-7000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1
Process .................................................................................................................................. 1
Background ............................................................................................................................ 1
Improvements ......................................................................................................................... 2
Cost Estimates ....................................................................................................................... 2
Boundaries of B&TD No. 2 ..................................................................................................... 2
Methodology to Determine Fee ............................................................................................... 3
B& TD No. 2 Fee Program ....................................................................................................... 4
. APPENDIX
A Location Map
B Cost Estimates
C Boundaries of B& TD No. 2
D Analysis of Trips
E SANDAG Guide for Traffic Generation Rates
F Methodology to adjust B&TD No. 2 fee for increase in cost of land acquisition
G Glossary
PURPOSE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
UPDATED FEE STUDY REPORT
FOR
BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT NO. 2
(AVIARA PARKWAY -POINSETTIA LANE}
The purpose of this report is to update the actual and estimated remaining cost, estimate the
amount of remaining development and then allocate the cost to each parcel within the boundary
of Bridge and Thoroughfare District No. 2 (B& TD No. 2) which has not previously paid their fees
for B& TD No. 2, to finance the construction of the following two major arterial roadways:
Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and El Camino Real and Aviara Parkway between
Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane. This financing program is required pursuant to
conditions of approval for Local Facilities Management Plans (LFMP) for Zones 5, 19, 20
and 21.
All of Aviara Parkway and portions of Poinsettia Lane have either been constructed or are
currently being constructed by developers. Only Reaches C and E of Poinsettia Lane, as
shown on the Location Map in Appendix A, remain to be constructed. These two remaining
reaches are currently under design. The costs to acquire the right-of-way for and to construct
these arterial roadways have increased significantly and the amount of development within
8& TD No. 2 has changed since the formation of B& TD No. 2. It is necessary to update the
initial Fee Study Report dated April 3, 1997 and modify the fees accordingly.
PROCESS
B& TD No. 2 was originally formed and the levy and collection of B& TD No. 2 fees was
authorized following a duly noticed hearing by the City Council on July 8, 1997. Since that date,
several developments have either paid their fees or received credit for reimbursement of eligible
costs for a portion of the authorized roadways as development has occurred. This updated Fee
Study reflects the updated costs and the num_ber of average daily trips to reflect current
conditions within 8& TD No. 2. The updated fee program must be approved by the City Council
after another hearing is held in order to modify the B& TD No. 2 fees. The fee will be collected
with the issuance of all future building permits within the Fee Area (defined below). In lieu of
fees, construction of all or a portion of the Aviara Parkway and Poinsettia Road improvements
will be required prior to or concurrent with the issuance of building permits for development
within the Fee Area. If such construction is required, credits and/or reimbursements may be
given for actual costs incurred subject to limits as further defined in this report.
BACKGROUND
As a result of approved Local Facilities Management Plans (LFMP) for Zones 5, 19, 20 and 21,
conditions were imposed requiring the development of a comprehensive funding mechanism for
the construction of Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway within the boundaries of the above-
mentioned zones. This funding mechanism must be approved and adopted prior to the
recordation of a final map within the affected zones. Both roadways are considered "developer
funded" since only a portion of the roadways will be included within the City's Capital
Improvement Program. Poinsettia Lane is classified on the Circulation Element of the General
Plan as a four lane, 102 feet right-of-way, major east/west arterial serving undeveloped property
B&TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 1
south of Palomar Airport Road. Poinsettia Lane bisects LFMP Zones 19, 20, and 21 as a
connection between Aviara Parkway and El Camino Real. The eastern link of Poinsettia Lane
serves as the main arterial for future development in LFMP Zones 10, 17, and 18.
Aviara Parkway is a north/south roadway classified as a major arterial on the City's Circulation
Element of the General Plan. Similar to Poinsettia Lane, Aviara Parkway is a 102 feet right-of-
way with four travel lanes. Aviara Parkway bisects LFMP Zones 5 and 20 as a connection
between Poinsettia Lane and Palomar Airport Road.
IMPROVEMENTS
The road segments covered under the B& TD No. 2 fee program include Aviara Parkway from
Poinsettia Lane to Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane from Aviara Parkway to El
Camino Real. The Circulation Element categorizes both of these roads as major arterial roads
with four traffic lanes and a raised median within 102 feet of right-of-way.
The facilities covered by the B& TD No. 2 fee program will be limited to those necessary to meet
the LFMP circulation performance i:;tandard and minimum street drainage needs. In addition,
some underground improvements may be included to avoid unnecessary trenching of the new
road surface in the future. The improvements include the following:
Full width grading of the roadway, paved road surface for two lanes (18 foot
paved section on each side of median for a total of 36 feet paved section),
transition pavement section at major intersections, median curbs, outside
asphalt berms, street drainage facilities (with the exception that drainage
facilities in Aviara Parkway which are included in the City's Drainage Fee
Program have been deleted), culverts, temporary drainage in parkway,
design, contract administration, fee administration, construction inspection,
construction engineering, mitigation measures and land acquisition.
The B&TD No. 2 fee program does not cover additional roadway paving, water facilities, sewer
facilities, reclaimed water facilities, sidewalks, median landscape and irrigation, median
hardscape, street lights, traffic signals and franchise utilities. The cost of traffic signals for
arterial-to-arterial intersections is covered under the City's Traffic Impact Fee program. The
remaining uncovered improvements will be the responsibility of adjacent land developers
pursu~nt to the policy and practice of the City of Carlsbad. • •
COST ESTIMATES
An updated cost estimate for the improvements included in the B& TD No. 2 fee program is
included in Appendix B. The updated cost estimate includes actual and estimated remaining
construction costs, environmental mitigation, land acquisition, contractor's mobilization and
bonds, as well as a contingency amount for the remaining improvements including land
acquisition. The updated cost estimate also includes engineering design, management, and
inspection during construction as well as the administrative cost of acquiring rights-of-way.
BOUNDARIES OF B&TD No. 2
The boundaries of B&TD No. 2 encompasses every parcel identified in Local Facilities
Management Zones 20 and 21 as well as the parcels within (1) the Aviara Master Plan Phase Ill
portion of Local Facilities Management Zone 19 and (2) that portion of Zone 5 located south of
Palomar Airport Road which would have access from the proposed Aviara Parkway and a
parcel which was included as a part of Carlsbad Tract 95-05 Emerald Ridge East (part of
previous Assessor's Parcel Number 212-040-53).
B&TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 2
Appendix C includes a map of the boundaries of B& TD No. 2, which shows assessor's parcel
numbers, zone boundaries and the alignment of Aviara Parkway and Poinsettia Lane.
METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FEE
Since the improvements consist of major arterial roadways, and future parcels will gain access
to these arterials by means of collector roadways, the measure of average daily trips is an
appropriate measure of the benefit to the parcels within the Fee Area from the arterial roadways
and will be utilized as the methodology to apportion benefit within the boundary of the Fee Area.
The net developable acreage and projected future dwelling units -used for the development of
the proposed revised B&TD No. 2 fee are outlined in Appendix D. The assumed dwelling unit
numbers and average daily trips (ADT) are based on the following two scenarios:
■ For those properties with subdivision maps/development projects submitted to the City •
for processing either the dwelling unit densities proposed with those projects were used
or information was used from the San Diego Association of Governments latest guide
showing ADT for non-residential use.
■ For those residential properties where there have been no -preliminary studies
completed relating to future densities, 75% of the net developable acres were multiplied
by the Growth Management Control Point (the dwelling units per acre of non-
coristrained land pursuant to Chapters 21.53 and 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)
to determine the estimated unit intensities.
The resulting densities and the July 1998 edition of the "Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic
Generation Rates for the San Diego Region" produced by the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG) were Lised to determine the estimated ADT within the Fee Area.
Some or all of the proposed facilities benefit each of the LFMP Zones within the Fee Area as
follows:
■ Only Aviara Parkway benefits that p!)rtion of Zone 5 within the Fee Area.
■ The portion of Zone 19 within the Fee Area is benefited only by that part of Poinsettia
Lane within the boundaries of Zone 19.
■ Both Aviara Parkway and Poinsettia Lane benefit all of Zone 20, except for four parcels,
identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 214-170-72, -73, -74 and -75.
■ The four parcels in Zone 20, identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 214-170-72, -73,
-74 and -75, were previously assessed for Poinsettia Lane in Assessment District No.
88-1 and are therefore only benefited by Aviara Parkway.
■ Zone 21 is benefited only by Poinsettia Lane.
The reason Zone 19 is benefited only by that part of Poinsettia Lane within the boundaries of
Zone 19 is because the City Council approved another secondary access for Zone 19 by means
of Cassia Road. The developer has constructed the Poinsettia Lane improvements within Zone
19 and therefore, the properties within Zone 19 are exempt from any further B&TD No. 2 fees.
Based on the benefit to each zone within the Fee Area as shown above, the total number of
ADT that are of benefit to each roadway is summarized from Appendix D as follows:
B&TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 3
·ADTJO:rAviara • ·• · ADTfor-Poinsettia ,iiFMP:iZC>"~i:{:; :: ;'.;:·) :~~f~•Y: .• . )( . • • .•· < ·•·· iLaaje. •
5
19
4 parcels in
Zone 20
' . , .. ,.\\ <:: ... •
4,288. 0
0 0
1,130 0
20 18,973 18,973
21 0 7,606
B& TD No. 2 FEE PROGRAM
The recommended B& TD No. 2 fee program for the previously described improvements will
have a different amount depending on what LFMP Zone the parcel is located in as identified
above. A summary of the cost estimate (from Appendix B) and the number of average daily
trips as shown above for each roadway are as follows:
Updated Cost Estimate $5,734,534 $16,106,435
Distribution of Trip Benefit (ADT) 24,391 26,579
Preliminary Cost per Trio $235.11 $605.98
Rounded Updated Fee per Trio $240.00 $610.00
The City wHI contribute funds for the City Park (Poinsettia Community Park), the Water
Reservoirs and the two Carlsbad Unified School District School sites as detailed in Appendix
"D" and shown below.
214-140-13 $1,262,250
214-140-39 $0
214-300-09 $7,225
214-140-45 $430,950
214-531-53 $100,470
215-050-74 Middle School $439,200
215-080-05 Water Reservoir $4,922
215-080-23 ter Reservoir $6,885
Other parties, including the City, will also contribute funds for the incremental increase in fee for
the parcels that have already paid the fee or received a credit for building permits due to
• construction of a portion of the improvements. This contribution amount is detailed in Appendix
"D" and summarized below:
B& TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 4
•· Parcels Withih:Zone··. ··. Incremental Fee
••. ·. ..,, .... • • •• • · :Contributed by Others
5 N/A
19 NIA
20 $2,202,240
21 $1,103,520
The following recommendations make up the full extent of the B&TD No. 2 fee program:
1. Based on the above, the recommended updated fee as compared to the initial fee within
each LFMP is as follows:
Parc;els Within-, . lnitial·Fe,eJPer ,
' • Z~ne. : ;Average, •Daily:17~ip ,/ ,., ;'., ]AD:F[ · , .
5
19
4 parcels in
Zone 20
20
21
$260
NIA
NIA
$540
$280
'CllfreotFee,P~r • • . ·•••·· • U.pclQt~d.:Fee f~er •
.• ~v!!r~g~ Dail¥ Tf'.iP • •. j~v~ragE!cDa!IY •
'../;i'.i<,f(jDTt ••· • '•·· TfioJ:ADTlr
$281 $240
NIA NIA
NIA $240
$584 $850
$303 $610
. ** The updated and modified fee will replace the ·current fee after City Council's approval
following a hearing on the updated and modified fee.
2. The B& TD No. 2 Fee is to be paid at the time of building permit issuance for
construction within the Fee Area, provided however properties within Zone 19 are
exempt since Poinsettia Lane improvements were constructed by the developer prior to
recording the final map for the first phase of the subdivision project entitled "Aviara
Phase 111 Revision".
3. The ADT for each project shall be based upon the latest edition of the "Brief Guide of
Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region" produced by the San
Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). A copy of the July 1998 Guide, the
latest edition as of the date of this report, is included in Appendix E. Currently, a single
family detached residence has an ADT of 10, thus the fee for·a single family detached
residence would be 10 times the fee shown in the above table. For multiple land uses
and/or land uses not included in the Guidelines, the City Engineer shall determine the
appropriate traffic generation rate.
4. All new development within the boundary of the Fee Area that are not shown as exempt
from the B&TD No. 2 fee program will be subject to. payment of the B&TD No. 2 Fee.
The exemptions include four parcels included within the boundaries of Assessment
District No. 88-1 (which have previously paid their fair share of the cost for Poinsettia
Lane and are therefore only paying the fee for Aviara Parkway), parcels in the Aviara
Master Plan Phase Ill (which is a portion of LFMP Zone 19) and parcels which have
previously paid the fee. The City purchased the entire Aitchison parcel 215-070-18
since it was almost wholly within the limits of the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way, however
any further development on this parcel will be subject to the B& TD No. 2 fee.
B&TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 5
5. The B&TD No. 2 Fee will be reviewed on an annual' basis and adjusted, if necessary,
when major changes occur (such as a determination of increase in cost of
improvements, or changes in proposed development or number of average daily trips)
or periodically by the City, based on actual construction, incidental, and acquisition costs
or engineering cost estimates and/or the actual number of units constructed or
authorized to be constructed in the Fee Area or any Zone thereof.
6. The B& TD No. 2 Fee will be adjusted annually without notice or public hearing as a part
of the City's Capital Improvement Program budget process. The B& TD No. 2 Fee will
be adjusted according to the two following factors: (i) all costs except land acquisition
will be increased by the Engineering News Record, City of Los Angeles Construction
Cost Index (the costs included in Appendix B are based on the May 1999 Index of
6827.31) and (ii) the cost of acquiring land for right-of-way and mitigation will be
increased according to the methodology contained in Appendix F.
7. The City may use at its discretion all or a portion of the B& TD No. 2 Fee fund to design
and/or construct any portion of Aviara Parkway from Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
Lane or Poinsettia Lane from Aviara Parkway to El Camino Real. Alternatively, the City
may give credits or make reimbursement payments to eligible developers pursuant to
paragraphs 8 through 10 below.
8. A developer who acquires any right-of-way, designs and/or constructs any of the
improvements or installs any required mitigation for the segments of Aviara Parkway or
Poinsettia Lane covered by the fee program may be eligible for credit and/or
reimbursement, subject to the approval of the City Council. . Only those improvements or
work included within the cost estimates upon which the B& TD No. 2 Fee is based are
eligible for credit and/or reimbursement.
9. Any property owner who dedicates right-of-way for either of these two arterial roadways
in advance will be given a credit for such dedication in the amount recommended by an
MAI appraiser, selected and approved by the City.
1 o. Credit and/or reimbursement (if funds are available) may be given for the actual costs
incurred by the developer for the improvements subject to the limits defined below:
Credit
The amount of credit is limited to the total amount of B& TD No. 2 Fee which would be
payable by the developer for his/her development, but not-to-exceed the Estimated Cost
of the Improvements and Acquisition as set forth in the fee program documents, or the
developer's actual cost of the improvements and acquisition, whichever is less.
However, the cost of on-site slope and drainage easements will not be credited since
these areas are normally included in the overall density calculations for the project and
are not required to be dedicated with the project.
Once the credit has been determined for a development, the credit shall be considered
to run with the land and be awarded on a building permit-by-permit basis to whoever is
listed as the building permit permittee.
Reimbursement
Reimbursements shall be made in accordance with City Council Policy.
B& TD No. 2 Updated Fee Study Report 6
APPENDIX "A"
Location Map
-----------------. LOCATION MAP
• ~
I ZONE-19
I
~
~ ""~:::::::::~"'{.,, J 19,,
J J
~
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT NAME POINSETTIA LANE & AV/ARA PARKWA y
ROADWAY EXTENSIONS
APPENDIX "B"
Cost Estimates
City of Carlsbad
Bridge & Thoroughfare District No. 2
(Aviara Parkway -Poinsettia Lane)
Updated Cost Estimate
Aviara Parkway
Reach (1) Cost Estimate Remarks
1 $ 2,212,692 Cobbelstone Construction Cost plus R/W from Kelly & Ukegawa
$ 300,000 cost of additional Ukegawa R/W
$ (135,744) Less Estimated Storm Drainage Fees
2 $ 1,310,742 Mariano Construction, Design, Inspection and Constr Admin Cost
$ 6,000 Mariano R/W appraisal
3 $ 1,232,497 Sambi Reimb of elig costs
$ 58,000 Additional R/W per Brabant Ur of 8/13/98 ($240,000-$162,000-$20,000 for inter)
$ 111,600 Additional R/W amount for Sarkaria ($143,000 -$31,400 paid by Sambi)
$ 52,698 Additional City expenses for Sakaria, General Ledger, Org Key 3627000
$ • 5,000 Schindler R/W
General $ 23,294 1/2 Orig Formation costs
$ 78,500 1/2 audited cost of intersection at Aviara Parkway/Poinsettia by Catellus
$ 54,910 Audit costs for Sambi & Cobbelstone
$ • 40,000 Remaining audit costs
$ 67,844 1/2 of City Expense, Account 0015720, 7350 surveys/studies
$ 16,500 1/2 updated Fee Study Report
$ 300,000 Contingency
$ 5,734,534 Total For Aviara Parkway
Notes
(1) See Location Map in Appendix A
Report_App B_Updated Cost Est_ 4 •
City of Carlsbad
Bridge & Thoroughfare District No. 2
(Aviara Parkway -Poinsettia Lane)
Updated Cost Estimate
Poinsettia Lane
Reach (1) Cost Estimate Remarks
Budget amount from Catellus dated 5/12/00
Budget amount from Catellus dated 7/9/99
A $ 1,425,472
B $ 946,257
C
D
E
F
G
$ 630,000
$ 1,645,000
$ 355,000
$ 480,000
$ 7,800
$, 30,900
$ 1,414,749
$ 85,700
$ 49,800
$ 90,000
$ 430,588
$ 15,000
$ 70,000
R/W for Carlsbad Promenade + $5,000 legal expense
R/W estimate for Fernandez, Rudavalis and Baker
R/W for Aitchison + $5,000 for legal expense
R/W for Gallagher + $5,000 for legal expense
R/W for Hidalgo + $5,000 for legal expense
Acquisition Services for R/W
Construction Estimate based on 90% PS&E
Design fee for Reach C
City admin costs for Reach C
Inspection and Constr Admin
R/W for DeJong, Kaiser and Nelson
Appraisal of R/W
Legal and Acquisition costs
This is a wash since Zone 19 paid for improvements in lieu of B& TD#2 fee $
$
$
3,000,000 Construction Estimate based on 30% PS&E plus mitigation
83,000 Design fee for Reach E
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
43,500 City admin costs for Reach E
65,000 Environmental analysis and acquisition of permits
150,000 Inspection and Constr Admin
1,090,000 R/W for Reiter, Maldonado, REH (Harrison) and Sudduth
50,000 Appraisal of R/W
150,000 Legal and Acquisition costs
841,259 Lohf CT 97-15 Construction, design, inspection, R/W and legal
15,000 City admin costs for Reach F
420,000 estimate of R/W for Lohf
635,494 Lohf off-site Construction, design, inspection, R/W and legal
10,000 City admin costs for Reach F
General $ 23,294 1/2 Orig Formation costs
Notes
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
. 78,500 1/2 audited cost of intersection at Aviara Parkway/Poinsettia by Catellus
43,300 Audit costs for Catellus
120,000 _Audit costs for Remaining Poinsettia Reaches
67,844 1/2 of City Expense, Account 0015720, 7350 surveys/studies
15,489 City Expense, Project 3595, Poinsettia Lane
11,989 City Expense, Project 3546, Poinsettia Lane
16,500 1/2 Updated Fee Study Report
1,500,000 Contingency
16,106,435 Total For Poinsettia Lane
(1) See Location Map in Appendix A
Report_App B_Updated Cost Est_ 4
APPENDIX "C"
Boundaries of B& TD No. 2
Boundaries of Bridge and Thoroughfare District No. 2
(Aviara Parkway-Poinsettia Lane)
~ Parcels In Assessment District No. 88-1, Benefited only by Aviara Parkway
r.fJJ Bridge & Throughfare District No. 2 Boundary
~ Local Facilities Management Plan Zone Boundary
21414005 = Assessor Parcel Number @1888 City of Carlab.d
/cargla2/pruducta,lmgln/r178.88/plot4.aml
12/04/00
ltillO 1000
·+· I
ti(J(I o _____ __:_ltillO::..:; 3000
APPENDIX "D"
Analysis of Trips
ANALYSIS OF PARCELS IN ZONE 5 I
APN OWNER GEN.PLAN AREA(Ac.) G.M.C.P. OFFICE MAP MAP Fee ADT Initial Current Updated Fee Exist Fee Future Fee Updated Fee EXIST
LANDUSE11l GR. NET12l SQ.FT. NO.131 DU'S DU'S per unit ADT Fee Fee Fee Credit Payment Payment Payment DU
212 -040 -56 Ukegawa Planned Ind. 9.49 8 90 720 $ 273 $ 240 $ 196.560 $ 172.800
212 -040 -65 Kellv Prooertv-west side Office 6.45 77500 SDP 97-25 0.02 1550 $ 273 $ 240 $ 423.150 $ 372,000
212 -040 -64 Kellv Property-east side Planned Ind. 6.06 5.3 90 477 $ 273 $ 240 $ -$ 114.480
212 -040 -25 Moman Palomar Planned Ind. 13.4 4.86 90 437 $ 273 $ 240 $ 119.410 $ 104,976
212 -040 -59 Laurel Tree RM 9.15 SOP 95-1 138 8 1104 $ 260 $ 240 $ 287.040
Totals 4288 $ 287,040 $ 739,120 $ 764,256
SUMMATION Office 6.45 77,500
Planned Ind. 28.95 18.16
RM 9.15 138
Notes:
(1) For the purposes of computation of the Bridge and Thoroughfare District fee, it has been assumed that the
ultimate land use of the parcels in Zone 5 will be as shown under the column titled "Gen. Plan Land Use".
2) Net Area based on City GIS Database I I
31 Maos Annroved or in orocess I I
ADT_ZONE-update 14 Page 1 12/13/00
,--ANAlYSlS OF PARCELS IN ZONE 20
APN OWNER GEN. PLAN AREA Ac.) G.M.C.P. FUTURE MAP MAP Fee ADY ,_ Cunent Updatod -Future U.....,od S-Fee Future Fe(! UodalodFe, lnaemental Fee PubbcPatalts EXJS
L..ANOUSE GR. NET 1 DU NO.f21 Dl!S OOS oe,DU ADY Fee Fee Fee FeeCndt Fee Credit Fee Crodit Pavrnent Prnnent Prnnent Conlnbulod Contnbut.edtH DU
211 • 040 -14 McREYNOLDS RLM 23 18.9 CT94-11 49 48 10 480.0 SS40 S 850 S 259200 s 148 800 1
IMarVmB SoccndDU CT94-11 8 8 6 48.0 SS40 S 850 s 25,920 s 14MO
OS 11.3 8.3 0 0
212 -040 • 50 Bes PROGRAM L-2 (Emerakt Point Ellates RL 1868 8.33 1 CT9S-09 18 18 10 180.0 S 566 S 850 S 101 880 S 153 000
212 • 040 -30 PAC WEST-Gr no Homes Cobbds'lone RLM CT 64-32A 212 212 10 2120.0 SS40 S 850 $1144,800 S1 802000
212 -040 -52 EMERALD RIDGE WEST RLM 27.91 CT!iS-03 81 81 10 610.0 SS40 S 850 S 329.400 s 189100
Second OU CTBS-03 9 9 8 54.0 SS40 s 950 s 29160 s 18740
212 -040 -53 EMERALD RIDGE EAST RLM 28.1 CT95-05 80 80 10 600.0 SS40 S 850 S 324 000 s 168 000
SoccndDU CT 95-05 9 9 8 54.0 SS40 s 950 s 29180 s 16,7◄ 0
212 • 040 • 41 PAC WEST Mariano) Standard Pacd'w:: RLM 53.68 CT 97-14 147 147 10 1 ◄70.0 S 566 S 850 S 832 020 S1249500
MULTI CT 97-14 0
212 • 040 • 47 SIM USA INC RLM 12.08 5.4 11 8 10 80.0 S 566 s 950 s 45 280 $ 68000 18
214 -140 -07 SAAIBI RLM CT92-2 137 137 10 1370.0 SS40 s 950 S 739 800 s .C24 700
(Seaside Heaht3) RM CT92-02A 82 82 8 656.0 SS40 s 950 S 354,240 s 203 380
Comm. Fae 252 252.0 SS40 S 850 S 138 080 s 78120
214 • 544 • 03 and-OC SAMBI RM CT 92-02B 48 48 8 384.0 S 566 s 950 s eoJn s 903n $ 136 967 S 248 023
214. 140 • 13 CITY OF CARLSBAD OM'"" 30 29.7 0 0 50 1485.0 SS40 s 950 s 1262250
21'-140 -39 CITY OF CARLSBAD OM'"" 8 0 0 0
214 • 140 • 40 GREYSTONE C-DoSoll RLM CT82-1 112 112 10 1120.0 $540 s 950 S 60-C.800 s 347200
214 -140 -42 BRAMALEA CALIF (Marinef'II Point RLM CT91-12 188 188 10 1 "600 $540 S 850 $1 004 400 s 578 600 214. 140 • 45 cuso Elom 8.45 8.45 0 60 507.0 SS40 s 950 s 430 950
214 -531 • 53 cuso EJemS,,,,,,, 1.97 1.97 0 80 1182 SS40 S 850 s 100 470
214 -531 -51 KRAMER RM 1.08 1 8 8 4 8 32.0 S 566 s •so s 18112 S 27.200 1 21,. 140 ... TABATA RLM 4.17 3.97 32 crea.,, i•,:. 170 -09 THOMPSON {Standard Pacific RLM 10 9.3 3.2 CTS&-14 140 140 10 1400.0 S 566 s 950 $ 792 400 $1190 000 1
RM 10 9.3 8 crea.u 0 0 • S 566 S 050 s s
214 • 170 -38 THOMPSON Standard Pac:fficl RLM 10 98 3.2 cree-1.c
214 -170 -48 WEIDNER !Standard Paci!'ic RLM 5.4 4.8 3.2 CT9S-14
214 • 170 -47 THOMPSON (Standard Peal'lc RM 5 4.8 8 CT9&-14
214 -170 -54 TABATA RLM 1.3 1
214 • 170 -58 ENGLER (Standard Padf'lcl RM 2.16 1.2 8 CT 98--14
214 -170 • 59 ENGLER Standard Peck! RM 1.65 1.4 8 CTBB-14
214 -170 -n Standard Pecif'icl RLM 1.1 CT9$.14 113 113 10 1130.0 S 240 s S 271 200
214 • 170 • 73 S1andardPod>e) RLM 7.12 CTSS-14
214 -170 -74 Standard Paa!lc RLM 19.35 CT 98-14
214 • 170 -75 Standard Pacific:) RLM 5.31 CT9S-U
214 -JOO -09 CITY OF CARLSBAD OSIP""' 6 0.17 0 0 50 0.5 SS40 ---s 950 s 7225
215 • 040 • 03 MUROYA RLM 18.71 11.8 32 38 28 10 280.0 S 566 S 850 S 158 480 S 238 000 1
215 • 040 -04 TABATA Brehm-Aviate Gcoucl RLM 5 5 32 18 12 10 120.0 S 566 $ 850 s 67920 S 102 000
215 • 040 -05 YAMAMOTO RLM 5 4.9 32 18 12 10 120.0 S 566 S 850 s 87920 S 102.000
215 • 040 -OB BUERGER RLM 2.3 1.2 32 CT99-10 12 12 10 1200 S 566 S 850 ··-s 07 920 S 102 000
215 • 040 -09 SUGINO-SHIMOKAJl RLM 2.3 1.7 32 5 4 ,a 10 1000 S 566 S 850 s 56,600 S 95000
215 • 040 • 10 BUEGER RLM 252 2.1 32 CT 99-10
215 • 040 -,, SUGINQ.SHlMOKAJl RLM 2.53 1.1 3.2 4 3 10 30.0 S 566 S 850 s 18 980 $ 25500
215 • 070 -04 RUOVAUS RLM 5.03 3.8 32 12 9 10 90.0 S 566 S 850 s 50 940 S 78 500
215 -070 -08 CARNATION PROP. (Fernandez) d RLM 9.59 09 32 CT9S--18 32 32 10 320.0 S 566 s 950 $ 18ill2._ S 272 000
215 -070 -08 CARDOSA RLM 1.8 1.8 32 8 3 10 30.0 S 566 s 950 s 18 980 $ 25500 ---,
215 -070 -09 UGUORI tlvnnl RLM 1.8 1.8 32 8 3 10 30.0 S 566 S 850 $_~ s 25,500 1
215 -070 -33 McKINNEY RLM 3.75 3.5 3.2 11 8 10 80.0 S 566 s •so r S 45,280 $ 68,000
215 -070 -38 SAK.A.RIA Cart,bed Promenade Partn~ RLM 1548 128 32 40 SOP 98--13 30 10 300.0 S 566 S 850 S 189 800 S 255,000 215 -070 • 13 SCHINDLER ICartsbad Pomenade Pattnm RLM 1008 1.1 32 • SOP 98-13 3 10 -JOO S 566 s 950 S __ 18 980 S 25,500 --------215 • 070 -35 FERNANDEZ RLM 9.86 8.1 32 20 15 10 150.0 S 566 S 850 s 84900 S 127,500
215 -070 • 27 ROESCH {Standard Pacd'icl RLM 27.89 8.4 3.2 CT9&-19 21 21 10 2100 S 566 S 850 S 118,860 ·--S 178,500
215 -070 -18 OCEAN BLUFF Cateli.t5l RLM CT9J.9 98 96 10 9800 SS40 S 566 S 850 $ 518.400 $ 24980 S 297 600 s
RM 0 s 950
215 • 070 -18 AITCHISON RLM 1 1 3.2 0 "'FWI 0 10 S 566 -S 850 s s
215 -070 -34 POINSETT1A HR..LS PART RLM 5.5 3.9 32 12 9 10 900 S 566 s 950 s 50 9-40 s 78500 -
215 -070 -20 H!OAl.GO RLM 2 1.7 32 5 3 10 JOO S 566 S 850 s 16.980 S 25500 1
215 • 070 -23 BOLTON RLM 0.68 0,68 3.2 2 0 10 S 566 S 850 s s . ----------~-1 215 -070 -24 BOLTON RLM 0.51 0.5 3.2 2 1 ,a 10.0 S 566 S 850 s 5660 $8,500
215 • 080 -92 DEJONG RLM 34 54 18 32 CT 90-05 28 28 10 2800 S 566 S 850 _ __(_~~ S 230 000 ·-
215 -080 -04 NELSON (POlenlial church parkJno lo! RLM 5.17 3.1 32 10 7 0 S 566 S 850 ~-s ----
215 -080 -05 C.R.M.W.O. Water Res 1.93 1.93 0 o 3 5.8 SS40 S 850 $ -::.=--..922 --
215 • 080 -28 MOORE RLM 1.18 1.18 32 4 3 10 300 S 566 S 850 s 18,980 S 25,500 1
215 -080 • 19 HADLEY RLM 15.03 11.3 32 CTBB-17 37 37 10 370.0 S 566 s 950 S 209 420 S 314,500
215 -080 -20 MOORE RLM 1.19 1.19 32 • 3 10 30.0 S 566 S 850 ·------· S 18.980 S 25.500
215 • 080 -21 TABATA RLM 2.87 2.2 32 7 5 10 500 S 566 S 850 S 25,300 $42.500 -----·-
.m • 080 -22 KAISER !POtenOal church~ 12 unitsl RLM 10.1 8.7 32 31 21 10 210.0 S 566 S 850 S 118.86Q $ 178.SOQ° -----------
215 -080 -23 CM.W.O. Wtt'.erRes 274 2.7 0 o 3 8.1 S 566 S 850 -------S _____ _!!,885_
Yo1als 151173 Exc.etJt4 nmcets $1,7"8 520 .£~t.!!L ~ -l2.M6,0<IO ~-IB-~~!. M,sue,1123 _, -~-~~-~~ S ---1,512,702 ,_ ~-SUMMATION RL 0 18 18 1,130.0 4DrucetslnAD8B-1 ·---f----------------------- -------o·
RLM 268 1447 183'1 __ Jj_
Second DU 28 28 -----· -----------------
MULTI 0 0 --------------------· -------------·
RM 8 130 -----------. 134 -----------·--,
--------------.. Noles· --·····1---·
1 l Net Area b.ned on er., GIS Oataba$e ·-------------·-------·-
r?l Me.-.. edorlno,oceu -· -. . -
ADT_ZONE-t1pdate 14 Page 1 of 1 17/1JJOO
ANALYSIS OF PARCELS IN ZONE 21
APN OWNER GEN.PLAN ac.J G.M.C.P. FUTURE. MAP Fee ACT ~ Current Updated Future Uodaled Exist Fee Future Fee UDdated Fee Incremental Fee Public Parcels EXIST
LAN!=
Tn DU DU'S DU'S cerDU ACT Fee Fee Fee Credit Fee Credit Pavment Pavment Pevment Contributed llV Citv Contributed DY Cltv DU
215 -020 -01 CARLSBAD I PRTNRS Poinsettia Hiln .10 160 160 8 1280 $ 610 $ 358,400 $ 422,400
215 -020 -06 Reiter .56 3.2 24 30 18 10 180 $ 293 $ 610 s 52,740 $ 109 800
l>M 4.90 6.0 29 39 29 8 232 $ 293 $ 610 s 67,976 s 141,520
215 -020 -07 MALDONADO RLM 20.02 11.94 3.2 38 20 10 200 $ 293 $ 610 s 58454 s 121,695
215 -020 -22 BONS rManzanlta Partners RM 5.77 3.51 SDP98-19 24 24 8 192 $ 293 $ 610 $ 56,256 $ 117,120
215 -020 -13 Manzanita Partners RM 31.65 SOP 98-19 133 133 8 1064 s 293 S 610 $ 311 752 s 649,040
16 8 128 $ 293 S 610 s 37 504 s 78080
215 -020 -1511:ASSOC Mila Lomal CITY RM 20.96 18.07 SDP93-06 344 344 6 2064 S 280 S 610 $ 577,920 $ 681,120
215 -050 -12 RLM 10.10 5.81 3.2 19 14 10 140 $ 293 $ 610 $ 41 020 $ 85,400
215 -050 -18 H n.ohfl Hadl"' RLM 20.34 15.52 CT97-15 73 73 10 730 $ 293 $ 610 $ 213,890 $ 445,300 2
RM 0.86 0 0 8 0
215 -050 -21.mlkasl
RLM 11.00 5.54 3.2 18 13 10 130 $ 293 $ 610 $ 38,090 s 79,300
215 -050 -22 H RLM 9.27 4.68 3.2 15 0 10 0 $ 293 s 610 $ $
215 -050 -44 RLM 5.06 2.55 3.2 8 6 10 60 $ 293 s 610 $ 17 580 $ 36,600
215 -050 -45 RLM 5.07 2.55 32 8 6 10 60 $ 293 s 610 s 17,580 $ 36,600
215 -050 -46 RLM 5.07 2.55 32 8 6 10 60 $ 293 s 610 $ 17,580 $ 36600
215 -050 -47 RLM 5.07 2.55 3.2 8 6 10 60 $ 293 s 610 s 17,580 $ 36600
215 -050 -57 RM 1.10 0.32 6.0 2 0 8 0 s 293 $ 610 $ s 1
215 -050 -58 estem Pacific Housinal RLM 2.88 1.96 6.0 12 CT99-13 9 9 10 90 $ 293 $ 610 $ 26,370 $ 54,900 1
215 -050 -59 estem Pacific Housina RLM 16.37 12.98 32 CT97-15 0 $ 293 $ 610 s $ 1
215 -050 -74 C.U.S.D. School 20.00 18.00 40 720 $ 280 s 610 $ 439,200
215 -050 -73 LEVATINO RM 14.39 5.98 6.0 36 27 8 216 $ 293 $ 610 $ 63.,88 $ 131 760
Totals 7 606 $ 213 890 $ 445,300 $ 936 320 $ 823 770 $ 1715015 $ 1103,520 $ 439 200
SUMMAnON RLM 7423 146 112 171 3 RM 64.70 79 356 373 2 Low Income U4 344
Notes:
1l Net Area based on City GIS Database
n\ Ma~ arvvoved or In ~
ACT_ZONE-update 14 Pge 1 12/13/00
APPENDIX "E"
SANDAG Guide for Traffic
Generation Rates
.-
··•·.
(NOT SO)
BRIEF GUIDE OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES
FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION .so, 8 ~u~e: Sui't' f::
JULY 1998
~,"'! L>iec.· ..:.i•,'."'",.1 ~:''
•f1~!~~=-·!>."\;.' • • .1, •~ 1:-' :-··
NOTE: This h11rng only repreNnt1 a ..-,.ot average. or e111.ma1ed. tr■tf1c gener■ttOn •drl¥9W■v" r■1■1 ■nd some very general mp oa111 tor land uses 1emDhas1s on ■cre11oe and bu11a,n0 sau,1rp 1001,1-,,
1n th■ Sen o .. go region. Th■•• r■tH ■r• 1ub,ect to ch■nve as future docurnen1■11on becomet ■w■1l■bte. o, ■s local 1ourc■s 11r■ upa■t■d F-or more spec,hc 1ntorma11on reg11ra1ng mtlllc oa1J an., !• .
r■t■s. PltllH r■f■r to th■ San Otego Tr1thc Generators manual. Alwa,,. o1tec• "1lrlt ,_., ~,., tlNi, ~ or ap,Wu.,_ ,.,. •.
LAND US£ TIUI' CAffGOIIIIS DnMAlED WEEKDAY VEHICLE NIGHEST PEAK HOUR '\. tplua IN:OUT r■tiol TRIP LENGTH
ll'IUMAIIY:DIVElnB►.PAA,aYJ' TIUI' G£NEIIATION IIATE IDIUVEWAY) ...._. 1:00-9:10 A.M. a.tween :t:OC>-4:30 ~.M. fM.6e1'
AGIUCULTVIIE IOpon Soacal (80:18:2] 2/acre·· 10f
Allll'ORI' (78:20:2] 12 ~
Commercw,I 60/acro. 100/tkght. 70/1000 ""· h." •· 5 .. 16:41 6'1, 15:51
General Avilt10n 6/ecre. 2/fhght 6/based aircran• •• 9'1, (7:31 15', (5·51
Hehpons 1001-•··
AUTOM091U1
Car Wash
A111oma1Ic 900/1111. 600/acre·· 4" (5:51 9'1, rs,51
S.tt-NMt 100/WHh ltlll"" ... 15:51 8" 15,51
Gmohne (21:51:28] 2E
wrth/Food Man 160/vehk:te t•ma 1pace0 7'1, 15:51 8'1, 15,51
with/Food Man & Car W■sh 155/vahicte tuet1ng apace•• 8" 15:51 9 .. (5:51
Older Service S11t10n 0.11gn 150/vetucNI fueling ■PKe. 900/11111on·· 7" (5:51 s .. (5:51
Sales (0.111r & Repair) 50/1000 1q. fr_ 300/■cr■. 60/a■rvace st■U-•· 5'1, 17:31 8'1, 14'61
Auto Repair Canter 20/1000 IQ. ft .. 400/Kr■. 20/NrvtCI 11111" 8"' (7:31 11 .. 14c61
AU1o Pans Sales 60/ 1000 IQ. h. •• ... 10',,
Quick Lube 40/sennce 1111r· 7'1, (6:41 10.. 15,51
Tira Store 25/1000 IQ. ft .. 30/HFVICl ll■II .. 7" 16c4J 11'1, (5:5)
CEMETIIIY 5/ocre·
CHURCH tor Synagogue) (64:25:11] 9/1000 IQ. ft .. 30/■cre .. CQu■druple rates 5" 16:41 8'-(5:5) 5 1
tor Sunday. or days of asHmbly)
COMMERCIAIIIIETAIL'
Super Regional Shopping Canu,r • 40/1000 SQ. '1: .. c 400/acre" 2 .. 17:31 9'1, 15:51
(More 1han 60 acres. more than
600.000 sq. ft .. w/usunlly 3+
m■Jor stores)
Regional Shopping Center (54:35:11] 50/1000 sq. tt .. c 50p/■cre· 2'I, (7:31 9,. (5:51 5.2
13~0 ocros. 300.~00.000
1q. tt .. w/u1u■lly 2• m■1or 110,es)
Communny Shopping C.n1er (47:31:22] 70/1000 IQ. h .. 700/acre· •· 3'1, 16:41 10.. 15:51 36
I 10.30 ocros, 100.000-300.000 IQ. h ..
w/usually 1 m11or 11ore. delBched
res11ur■n1(1J. grocery and drugstore)
Ne1ghborhOOCI Shopping Cen1er 120/10001Q. fl., 1200/ecre• •• .._, 16:41 10'-15:51
(Less 1h1n 10 ■cr•s. less Thin
100.000 IQ. rt .. w/usually grocery
& drug5101e. cle■ners. be■U1y & barber shop.
& flSI food Hrv1cesl
Comme,ml Shops (45:40:15]
Spee11ltv Re11il/St11p Commerci1l 40/1000 sq. ft .. 400/acre· 3'1, 16:41 9'1, (5:5) 4.3
-~LeclfonlCS Super11ore 50/1000 IQ. It"" 10" 15:51
Factory Out~I 40/1000 SQ. fl.•• 3'1, 17:3) 9'1, 15:51
Superm■U1a1 150/1000 sq. fl.. 2000/acre• .. 4'1, 17:31 10,, 15:51
Drugstore 90/1000 SQ. 11."" 4" 16:41 10" 15:51
Conven .. nce M1rlcet ( 15· 1 6 houra) 500/1000 IQ. h."" 8'1, 15:5) 8" (5:51
Convenience Markel (24 hours) 700/1000 IQ. h."0 91b 15:51 7'1,, 15:51
Conven .. nce Markel Cw/g11ohne pumps) 850/1000 sq. fl .. 550/vehtcle tuehng apace•· 6" 15:51 7'1, 15:51
Discount Club 60/1000 1Q. ft .. 600/■cre· ·• 1--. 17:31 9'-15.51
Discount Store 60/1000 IQ. 11 .. 600/ocre"" 3'1, 16:41 8'1, (5:51
Fumnura Store 6/1000 1Q. '1 .. 100/■cre•· 4'1, 17:31 9'-15:5)
LumtKir S1ore 30/1000 IQ. h .. 150/acre•· 1--. 16:4) S'IO 15:51
Home Improvement Suc,ors1ore •0/1000 IQ. II."" 5'1, 16:41 8'1, 15:5)
Harctwara/P11n1 Store 60/1000 IQ, ti.. 600/■cre .. 2'1i 18'41 8'1i 15:51
Garden NurHry 40/1000 sq. fl., 90/acre .. 3'-16:41 1Qlf, 15:5)
Mixed Use: Commerciet Cw/1upermari:el)/flftad■nlill { 110/1000 IQ. It.. 2000/■cre· (commercial only) 3'1i 16:41 9'I, 15:51
5/ctwalltna unit. 200/■cre· tras1d■nt1■I ontv) . 9'1, (3:7) 13'1, cs:4)
EDUCATION
Unaversny (4 years) 191,9:0] 2.5/student. 100 acre· 1(1'1, 18:21 !!'Ii 13:71 8.9
Junior College 12 YfllS) 192:7:1] 1 .6/Hudtlnt, 18/ 1000 IQ. It .. 80/■cre: 12" 19:11 8" 1•:e1 9.0
High School (75:19:6] 1.8/Hudant. 13/1000 aQ. It .. SO/acre·•· 2•'li 17:31 12'1i (3:7) •.8
MICldlo/Junior H,gh (63:25:12] 1.4/11udonL 12/1000 IJQ. h. •Dtacro·· 30'li 16:4) 9'1i 14:6) 5.0
El■ment■rv (57:25:10] 1.2/lludenl, 14/1000 SQ. It .. 60/■cre .. 28'1i 16:41 7'1i 13:7) 3.4
Day Care (28:58:14) 5/ch~d. 80/1000 IQ. h."" 17,r, 15:5) 18'1i 15:5) 3.7 -· (35:42:23] 3.4
Bonk IWolk~n only) 160/1000 IQ. h .. 1000/acro" .. 4'1i 17:31 8'1i 14:6)
with O,,._,.Through 200/1000 IQ. ft.. 1500/■cra• 5'1i 16:41 1(1'1, 15:51
Drld-Through only 2501125 .,,_oy)/lane" 311, 15:5) 13!1, 15:5)
S■v,ngs & Loan 60/1000 IQ. h .. 600/ocro•• 2'1i 9'I,
Or,.,.Through only 100150 -ayJ/lane·· ·"' 15'1i
IIOSPITAL (73:25:2] 8.3
General 17/bod. 20/1000 1q. h .. 250/ocro• B'li 17:31 1011 13:7)
Convain<an1/Nuroing 3/bod"" 7'1i 16:•1 7'1i 1•:Bl -lndU1Uill/BU1ine11 Part,~ IIIC:Udedl-[79:19:2) 18/1000 aq. ft .. 200/ocro" •• 1n 18:21 1ft 12:8) 9.0
lndunrial Park Cno comn..aaiJ 7/1000 IICI· h. 80/ocro·· 11 .. 19:1) 12'1i 12:8)
lndustr11I Piant Cm~ dlitail 192:5:3] 10/1000 aq. ft .. 120/ocro· 1•'1i 18:2) 15 .. (3:7) 11.7
Monu!octunng/-4/1000 IJQ. ft. 50/ocro"" 19" 19:1) 2011 12:8)
Warehousing 5/1000 IJQ. h. BO/aero·· 13'1i 17:3) 15'1i 1•:61
Star-2/1000 IQ. h .. 0.2/vautt. 30/acro· ll'li 15:61 ll'li (5:51
Sdenca RNNrch &,Deve1oprnen1 8/1000 IQ. ft. 80/ocro· lll'li (9,11 14'1i 11:9)
IOVEIII
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cittes of Cartsbad. Chula Vista. Coronaoo. Del Mar. El Ca,on, Encinitas, EsconGOD, Unpena,1 Baaeh, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National C11~.
Oceanside, Poway, San 019gO. San Marcos. Sanlee. Solana Belch, Vma and County ol San Diego
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Depanrnent of TransponabOn, County WIier AUlhonty, U.S. Qepanment ol Defense, S.0. Unil.ad Pon 01s1ne1 and T1)U■na/Ba1a Celrlomi.a.
LAND USE T111P CATEGOIIIES UTIMATED -EXDAV VEHICLE HIGHEST ~I( HOUR'\ lplu• IN:OUT r■t,01 AIIY:OfVEIITEl►.PUNl\'T T111P GUIUIATION IIATE IDIIIVIEW~ ......... 1:00-9:30 A.M. a.n.-n .>:OO-a:30 ,0."'11
IJllliARY . ("4·"4: 12] 50/1000 IQ. ft .. 400/Kre .. 2 .. (7.31 ,er. 15 5
UHIGING (58:38:4]
Hotel IW/CDl"IWM'lbOn fa,otn,n/rnutM'Will 10/oca.ipiled room. 300/ac,e 6'1, 16·4) 8, 1641
Molel 9/oc:cup,ea room. 200/ acre· 8'1, 14:61 gs, (6 4j
Resort Ho1eI 8/oc:cuDled room. 100/acre· 5'1, 16'4) 7' (4 6:
Business Hotel 1 /~ room·· e" 14:6) 9" 16"41
MIUTAIIY (82:16;2] 2.5/nutlt■ry & CMll■n personnel" 9 .. (9:11 ,er. I2.e,
MACE
Standard Commercial Otfte11 (77:19:•J 20/1000 aq. ft .. 0 300/■cre· 14 .. (9.11 13 .. (2:81
Class than 100.000 SQ. h.) -·;4, lzlrgo IH,gh-fhse) Commercaal OtflQI (82:15:3] 17/1000 IQ. ft .. 0 600/■cre· 13'1, 19 11 12·81
(more then 100.000 10. tt .. 6• stones)
Office Park c■ve,age 400.000 aq. ft.) 12/1000 &Q.ft .. 0 200/■cre .. 13'1, (9:1) 13'1, 12 Bl
Sing~ Ter111n1 Off~ 14/1000 SQ. ft .. 180/■cre· 15 .. 19.1) 15;, ,2 a,
CorDOf'■t■ HeaDQLllners 7/1000 IQ. ft .. 110/acre· 17'1, 19:1) 16'1, (1·91
Governrnanl IClvic Center) (50:34:16) 30/1000 ■o. h.00 9'1, 19:1) ,2 .. (J 71
Post ON,ce
Central/Walk-In Onty 90/1000 ■Q. h.00 5 .. 7'1,
Commun11y Ino1 including ma~ drop lane) 200/1000 SQ, tt .. 1300/acre· 6'1, 16·4) 9 .. (5.51
Communny lw/mall arop ~ne) 300/1000 IQ, tt.. 2000/acre· 7 .. 15:5) ,o .. 15·51
Mail Drop Lane only 1500 (750 on.wov)/lane" 1 .. 15:51 12'1, 15:51
Oepanment of Mo1or Vehicles 180/1000 IQ. ft .. 900/acre·· 6 .. 16·4) '°" (4:6)
Med1ce1-0ental 160:30:10) 50/1000 ■q. h .. 500/■cre· 6'1, (8:21 ,,,. 13 71
l'AIIKS 166:28:6) .... 8'1,
Cnv CdavaI0pedJ 50/.cre·
Regional (d....,.loped) 20/00'8°
Neighborhood/County (unde\leloped) 5/acra t■dd tor 1pecif1c 1pon uses). 6/p1cn1c 111e· ••
Stele (average 1000 acres) 1/acre. 10/picn,c srte"'
Amusement (Theme) BO/acre. 130/acre f1ummer onty)"" 6-. 16·41
San Diego Zoo 115/.cre"
sea World BO/acre'
RECREATION
Beach. Ocean or Bay (52:39:9] 600/1000 ft. 1hofal1ne, 60/acrG"
Beech. Lake (fresh waler) 50/1000 ft. 1horailne. 5/acre'
Bowhng Canter 30/1000 IQ. h .. 300/acr■. 30/l■na •• 7 .. (7:3) 11'1, 14:6)
Campground 4/c■mpsite"' ... 8'1,
Goll Courn 7/acr■ . .aO/hc»I!. 700/courae•• 6 .. 18:2) 8'1, (3.7)
Driving Range onlv 70/■crG. 1.a/tff box' 3'1, (7:3) 9'1, 15:5)
M■rin■s 4/berth. 20/acre• •· 3'1, (3:7) 7'1, (6·4)
Mul1~rpose Cm1m1ture golf. video nrcade. t>anrng c■g■. etc.) 90/■cr■ 2'1, 6'1,
Racquetball/Health Club 30/1000 IQ. ft .. 300/acre. 40/coun' 4 .. (8:4) 9'1, (8:4)
Tennis Couns 16/■cre. 30/coun" 5'1, 11'1, 15:5J
Spans Facilities
Outdoor Stadium SO/acre. 0.2/aear
Indoor Arena 30/acre. 0. 1 /seat"
Racetrack 40/acra. 0.6 seat'
Theaters (mul11pl■x w/mat1nee) (66:17:17) 80/1000 SQ. ft .. 1.8/aeat. 360/screen· ,,.,. e" 16·4J
RESIDENTIAL (86:11:3)
Estate. Urban or Rural 12/dwelling unit .. 8'1, (3:7) 10'1, (7:3)
cava11ge 1-2 DU/acre)
Single Family Datached 10/dwellmg unil•• 8'1, (3:7) 10'1, (7:3)
Iaverage 3-6 OU/acre)
Condormmum 8/dwtllmg unil-■ 8'1, (2:8) '°"' (7:3)
101 any mullt-tem1Iv 6-20 OU/acre)
Apanment 6/dwelhng un11-■ e" (2:8) 9'1, (7:3)
Ior env mut11-tem1lv units more than 20 DU/acre)
Milrtary Housing Iott-base. mul11-tam1ly)
Closs than 6 DU/acre) 8/dwalhng Uml 7" (3:7) 9'1, (8:4)
(6-20 DU/acre) 6/ctwelhng uml 7 .. (3:7) 9'1, (6:4J
Mobile Home
Family 5/dwelhng unil. 40/acre• a" (3:7) ,, .. 16:4)
AaUIIS Only 3/Gwelhng uml. 20/acre' 9'1, (3·7) ,os. (6:4)
Re11remen1 Communnv 4/dwelhng umr .. 5'1, 14:61 7'1, (6:4)
ConJ~'!O•le Care Fac1h1y 2/dwtlhng umt" 3'1, (6:4) 8'1, (5:5)
IIESTAURAHT' (51:37:12)
Ouahtv 100/1000 SQ. ft .. 3/H&t. 500/acre·" 1'1, (6:41 8'1, (7:3)
Sn-ciown. high 1urnover 160/1000 SQ. ft~ 6/seet 1000/acre' H 8., 15:5) Bib (6'4)
Fast Food (w/dmm-through) 650/1000 IQ. ft .. 20/s■al 3000/acre' •• 7'1, (5:5) 71> (5:5)
Fest Food CwI1hout dnv~through) 700/1000 ■Q. 11.·· 5"' (6·4) 7'1, (5:5)
Det1c.atessen (7em-4pmJ 150/1000 SQ. ft., 11/1■81' 9'1, 16:4) 3 .. (3:7)
TllANSl'ORTATICIN
Bus Depot 25/1000 ••. 11.··
Truck Terminal 10/1000 IQ. tt .. 7/bav. BO/acre·· 9'1, (4:BJ 8'1, (5:5)
Wat■rpon/Marrne Terminal 170/benh. 12/acre"
lransi~ Sumon CLrghr Rail w/p1ulung) 300/acr■, 2111/parlung apace C4/occupied)'" 14 .. (7:3) 15 .. (3:7)
Perk & Ride Lots {400/acr■ t600/D■'\f'ed acre). 1 .... (7:3) 15'1, (3:7)
5/parlcmg apace {8/occus»e<t)' "
• Pum■ ry aour~: S.n o.r,o Tr•H,~ GMIM•ton.
00 Olh■r 1ource1: ITE Tr,p G.n«•t,on R•Port/6th Edt11anl TnD Generation Ra1n lather egenc:,ea anCI pubhc■11onl). w■rioua SANDAG & CAL TRANS ■tud1H. repon1 and ■11Ima1ea
• TIID c■t■aorv pe,c:entaga ratt01 are ClaI1y trom local household turveya. ah•n c:anno1 be apphed 10 vety 1pealIc land UHi, and Clo not mc:lud• no~H•d•nt Clrn,e,a Cdralt SANDAG Anal,s.1$ al Trrp ~ rawIHd ~ovamber, 1990) PRIMARY• on■ UII) Cliractly belWNn origin and SHImary du11na11on DIVERTED• hnied lnp Chawtng on• er mo•• ttoD• along the way 10 a primary C1■111nat1onl whoH dI11•nc:• carnpared 10 d•r•c:t dIa1ance .! 1 milt. PA.55-BY • undIvenad ar diverted c 1 mile.
L Trip 0length1 ara average weighted tor ■11 lflPt to and lrom genaral land UH ai1•. (All trrpa m1ern-wida average length• 6.9 mIleal
' F111■c:1 anwi equation: Ln(T) -0.768 Ln(x) ♦ 6.25} T • totel lflDI .• -1.000 IQ, 11. ° Fin■c:I curve equa11on: LnOl • 0. 766 LnC ■I + 3.95
• Fm■c:1 c:u.... ■ic1uatron; 1 • -2.169 lnldl + 12.115 I• 111p1/DU. Cl• den■tlY COU/ac:raL DU• ctw.lilng un,1 ,
• SuggHted PASS-SY 1un0,,,.nad or d•vmed Cl mill) pereenteQH for trip ,a1, fllCluctlOM only duung P.M. peak penod lb.■Nd on c:omblnatron of'°'"' da1a/rh't■w and Oth•r IOUICH'"I COMMERCJAVRETA.IL
Ragioql Shopping Center Cornrnuruty • • ---SDICl■lfy RaWI/Str1P Commere&■I Cother) -·· C~c:-aM■rilal Dtacount Club/Store FINANCIAL. -AIJ1'0MO!JLE
GaaohnaSuitton RESTAURANT au.,,,., Sit-clown high IUfflOWI' F .. , Food
2"" 3"" ·"" '"" ·"" 50,,
30..
25 ..
""" '"". 2"" ·""
TIIIP LfNCl .. ......
,:::
e,
10:
e,
6C
6>
5<
63
6 1
7.9
47
APPENDIX "F"
Methodology to adjust
B& TD No. 2 fee for increase
in cost of land acquisition
METHODOLOGY TO ADJUST B&TD NO. 2 FEE FOR
INCREASE IN COST OF LAND ACQUISITION
The methodology to be used by the City in determining the adjustment to the 8& TD No.
2 fee to reflect the increase in cost of land acquisition for both right-of-way and mitigation
will be according to the following steps:
1. The estimated average value of land used in this report was $275,000 per acre.
2. Determine if vacant parcels within 8& TD No. 2 have sold between the periods in
which the adjustment to the 8&TD No. 2 fee is to be made.
3. Calculate the value per acre of any of the vacant parcels sold in Step 2 above
that were purchased by the City for right-of-way for or mitigation of 8&TD No. 2
improvements ("Value of Land Purchased by City") •
4. Calculate the average value per acre for vacant parcels sold to parties other than
the City for between the periods in which the adjustment to the 8& TD No. 2 fee is
to be made, ("Average Value of Sold Parcels") -
5. If no vacant parcels have sold between the periods in which the adjustment to
the 8&TD No. 2 fee is to be made, apply a six percent (6%) per year simple
compounded increase to that portion of the 8& TD No. 2 fee related to the cost of
land that has not been acquired for right-of-way or mitigation ("Six Percent
Increase in Land Value")
6. Determine the value of land for purposes of calculating the fee increase ("Value
for Fee Increase") by selecting one of the following in the priority listed below with
{a) being the first priority and (c) being the last priority.
(a) "Value of Land Purchased by City"
(b) "Average Value of Sold Parcels"
(c) "Six Percent Increase in Land Value"
7. Calculate the percentage increase in land value in 8& TD No. 2 as compared to
the original value of $275,000 or the inflated value from the previous period in
which the adjustment to the 8&TD No. 2 fee was made("% Increase in Land
Value").
8. Apply the percentage increases as determined in Step 7 above to the land
portion of the 8& TD No. 2 fee related to the cost of land that has not been
acquired for right-of-way and mitigation ("Land Portion of Fee").
9. Calculate the total 8&TD No. 2 fee by adding the "Land Portion of the Fee"
calculated in Step 8 above to the balance of the 8& TD No. 2 fee related to all
remaining costs that will be increased by. the Engineering News Record, City of
Los Angeles Construction Cost Index.
1 0. See the following example for the guidelines in calculating this increase in the
8&TD No. 2 fee.
Years after
fee Adoption
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Notes
Value of land
EXAMPLE OF METHODOLOGY TO ADJUST B& TD NO. 2 FEE
FOR INCREASE IN COST OF LAND ACQUISITION
Average Value of Six percent Value for fee
purchased by City(1) Sold parcels (1) Increase in value increase % increase land portion of
(per acre) (per acre) (per acre) (per acre) in land value Zone 21 fee (2)
$ 275,000 $ 234
$ 290,000 $ 290,000 5.5% $ 247
$ 312,000 $ 312,000 7.6% $ 265
$ 330,000 $ 325,000 $ 330,000 5.8% $ 281
$ 349,800 $ 349,800 6.0% $ 298
$ 370,788 $ 370,788 6.0% $ 316
$ 400,000 $ 400,000 7.9% $ 340
$ 424,000 $ 424,000 6.0% $ 361
$ 430,000 $ 430,000 1.4% $ 366
$ 465,000 $ 465,000 8.1% $ 396
$ 490,000 $ 490,000 5.4% $ 417
1. Blank values in this column assume that no land sales occur that year.
2. The percentage of the Zone 21 fee related to the cost of land to be acquired equals 38.4% during the initial period.
balance of Total
Zone 21 fee (3) Zone 21 fee
$ 376 $ 610
$ 389 $ 636
$ 403 $ 668
$ 417 $ 698
$ 431 $ 729
$ 447 $ 762
$ 462 $ 803
$ 478 $ 839
$ 495 $ 861
$ 512 $ 908
$ 530 $ 947
3. This example assumes that the balance of the Zone 21 fee increases at the rate of three and one-half percent (3.5%) per year based on ENR increase.
APPENDIX "G"
Glossary
Ac or AC
ADT
APN
Apts
B&TD
CIP
DU •
DU's
ECR
EDU
GIS
GMCP
LFMP
LS
MULTI
OS
PFF
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RTIP
R/W
SANDAG
SFD
Acre
Average Daily Trips
Assessor's Parcel Number
Apartments
GLOSSARY
Bridge and Thoroughfare District
Capital Improvement Program
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Units
El Camino Real
Equivalent Dwelling Unit
Geographic Information System
Growth Management Control Point
Local Facilities Management Plan
Lump Sum
Multi-family Dwelling Unit
Open Space
Public Facilities Fees
Residential Low (density)
Residential Low-Medium (density)
Residential Medium (density)
Residential Medium-High (density)
Regional Transportation Improvement Program
Right-of-Way
San Diego Association of Governments
Single Family Dwelling