HomeMy WebLinkAbout2273 CARNELIAN CT; ; CBR2024-2273; PermitBuilding Permit Finaled
Print Date: 07/10/2025
Job Address: 2273 CARNELIAN CT,
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential
Parcel#: 2132411000
Valuation: $36,871.45
Occupancy Group:
#of Dwelling Units:
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
Occupant Load:
Code Edition:
Sprinkled:
Residential Permit
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1712
Work Class:
Track#:
Lot#:
Project#:
Plan#:
Construction Type:
Orig. Plan Check#:
Plan Check #:
Addition
Permit No:
Status:
C cityaf
Carlsbad
CBR2024-2273
Closed -Finaled
Applied: 08/26/2024
Issued: 01/31/2025
Finaled Close Out: 07/10/2025
Final Inspection: 05/06/2025
INSPECTOR: Kersch, Tim
Project Title:
Descript ion: WILSON: 157 SF ADD ITION WITH 157 SF DECK OVER ADDITION// RUN ELECTRICAL FOR FUTURE HOT TUB, NEW 60" CITY
STANDARD FENCE
Applicant: Property Owner:
ANNE PARIZEAU
5304 ONTARIO ST
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-1810
(760) 201-3347
WILSON CW LIVING TRUST 04-22-22
2273 CARNELIAN CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1712
FEE
BUILDING PLAN CHECK
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (LDE)
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (PLN)
DECKS/BALCONY-NEW/REPLACE
SB1473 -GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE
SFD & DUPLEXES
STRONG MOTION -RESIDENTIAL (SMIP)
SWPPP INSPECTION TIER 1 -Medium BLDG
SWPPP PLAN REVIEW TIER 1 -Medium
Total Fees: $3,258.29 Total Payments To Date: $3,258.29 Balance Due:
AMOUNT
$864.50
$204.00
$107.00
$325.00
$2.00
$1,374.00
$4.79
$292.00
$85.00
$0.00
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposit ion" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter
collectively referred to as "fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued t o protest imposition of these
fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their
imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection
fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the
statute of limitation has previously otherwise expired.
Building Division Page 1 of 1
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 I 442-339-2719 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
{Cicyof
Carlsbad
RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION
B-1
Plan Check t0C.'2o29 . -2
Est. Va lu ~ '1 rftt/,/<:s-' 4:Y PC Deposit ~ :V
Date /3 /7& /ZLf
Job Address ---"=::.....i:.:'Z:::.....J.-=3~~~~~~~...:::.J-Sulte: ___ APN: Z-1 ? Vf' J LO 00
CT/Project#: Lot#:. ___ _
Fire Sprinkler@/ no Air Conditioning: yes/ no , Electrical Panel Upgrade: yes I(§
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK: -.1.1~L..L.!11..1Ll,-4-~.J...,.-e--:;.=....:..:,:.._;_;_;,____,~--,-...£--,.;.._,---,~-+~---4l---
' -IJ.a!zi ' ~~
wttl{ ijt Addition/New: I r:;7 Living SF, l S7 Deck SF, ___ Patio SF, ___ Garage SF
fs this to create an Accessory Dwelling Unit? Yes@ New Fireplace? Yes !@f yes how many? __
D Remodel: ____ SF of affected area Is the area a conversion or change of use ? Yes/ No
0 Pool/Spa: ____ SF Additional Gas or Electrical Features? ___________ _
□ Solar: ___ KW, __ Modules, Mounted: Roof/ Ground , Tilt: Yes/ No, RMA: Yes/ No, Battery: Yes/ No
Panel Upgrade: Yes/ No
D Reroof: __________________________________ _
D Plumbing/Mechanical/Electrical Only: _______________________ _
D Other: ----------------------------------=----
APPLICANT. (PRIMARY CONTACT)
-~' Name: ,,z.-ea.v
Addr ss: l'i
Cl.,_t.c:.e...li.tt'zl~ __ Stat-..,.;.,---Zlp:1ZOc,; City r ':;, State:,.-:::.;...1-Zlp: 200"1
:~:~· illNfl! 4 .Jr~J 0 r"'1.c..__~~;~· ~~e,l.Gj ?~~ ~ 0 am•il-co,,__
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
Name: ~ tt.S 1,/J/J p Address: _______________ _
City: _______ State:. __ Zlp: ___ _
Phone: _______________ _
Email:----------.,-------------
Architect State License: ..,,C,o::;a;;.,41...,1..;<,;;.a,B"'-'2;:;._ ___ _
CONTRACTOR BUSINESS
Name: __________________ _
Address: _________________ _
City: _______ State: __ """'Zip: _____ _
Phone: _________________ _
Email: __________________ _
State License:. ______ Bus. License:. _____ _
(Sec. 7031.S Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which req11lres a permit to construct, alter, Improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to Its
Issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he/she Is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
{Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code} or that he/she Is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.S by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$S00)).
1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov
!HIS PAGE REQUIRED AT PERMIT ISSUANCE PLAN CHECK NUMBER: ______ _
A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED TO EITHER A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR OR A PROPERTY OWNER. IF THE PERSON SIGNING
THIS FORM IS AN AGENT FOR EITHER ENTITY AN AUTHORIZATION FORM OR LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.
(OPTION A): LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION:
I herebyaffirmunder penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter9 (commencingwith Section 7000) of Division 3
of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. I also affirm under penalty of perjury one of the
following declarations (CHOOSE ONE):
Di have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the
work which this permit is issued. PolicyNo. ____________________________________________ _
-OR-
DI have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued.
My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: lnsuranceCompany Name: -------------------------I
Policy No. _____________________________ Expiration Date: __________________ 1
-OR-D Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become
subject to the workers' compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to
criminal penalties and civil fines up to $100,000.00, in addition the to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code,
interest and attorney's fees.
CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY, IF ANY:
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code).
Lender's Name: _______________________ Lender's Address: _______________________ _
CONTRACTOR CERT/FICA TION: The applicant certifies that all documents and plans clearly and accurately show all existing and proposed buildings, structures, access roads, and
utilities/utility easements. All proposed modifications and/or additions are clearly labeled on the site plan. Any potentially existing detail within these plans inconsistent with the site plan are
not approved for construction and may be required to be altered or removed. The city's approval of the application is based on the premise that the submitted documents and plans show
the correct dimensions of; the property, buildings, structures and their setbacks from property lines and from one another; access roads/easements, and utilities. The existing and proposed
use of each building as stated is true and correct; all easements and other encumbrances to development have been accurately shown and labeled as well as all on-site grading/site preparation.
All improvements existing on the property were completed in accordance with all regulations in existence at the time of their construction, unless otherwise noted.
NAME {PRINT): _________ SIGNATURE: _________ DATE:. _____ _
Note: If the person signing above is an authorized agent for the contractor r vlde a letter of authorization on contractor letterhead.
-OR-
(OPTION B): OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION:
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: D i, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec.
7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such
work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold
within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
-OR-
;E('1. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
-OR-
DI am exempt under Business and Professions Code Division 3, Chapter 9, Article 3 for this reason:
AND,
'@' FORM B-61 "Owner Builder Acknowledgement and Verification Form" is required for any permit issued to a property owner.
By my signature below I acknowledge that, except for my personal residence in which I must have resided for at least one year prior to completion of the
improvements covered by this permit, I cannot legally sell a structure that I have built as an owner-builder if it has not been constructed in its entirety by licensed
contractors./ understand that a capyof theapplicoble law, Section 7044 af the Business and Professions Code, is available upon request when this application is
submitted or at the following Web site: http:/ lwww.leginfo.ca.gov/ ca/aw. html.
OWNER CERTIFICATION: The applicant certifies that all documents and plans clearly and accurately show all existing and proposed buildings, structures, access roads, and utilities/utility
easements. All proposed modifications and/or additions are clearly labeled on the site plan. Any potentially existing detail within these plans inconsistent with the site plan are not approved
for construction and may be required to be altered or removed. The city's approval of the application is based on the premise that the submitted documents and plans show the correct
dimensions of; the property, buildings, structures and their setbacks from property lines and from one another; access roads/easements, and utilities. The existing and proposed use of each
building as stated Is true and correct; all easements and other encumbrances to development have been accurately shown and labeled as well as all on-site grading/site preparation. All
;:::·;·;:;:~;:" z::::·c;i:·:•~=•• .. "·'· ·" "'"':':~:·71J7J';;r·"";'"· "., ... ::;:;,:;, 11~· .,
I l
Note: If the erson si nln above is an authorized a ent for the ro ert owner include form B-62 si ned b owner.
1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 442-339-2719 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov
2
REV. 04/22
{'City of
Carlsbad
OWNER-BUILDER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
FORM
8-61
Development Services
Building Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
442-339-2719
www.carlsbadca.gov
OWNER-BUILDER ACl<NOWLEDGMENT FORM
Pursuant to State of California Health and Safety Code Section 19825--19829
To: Property Owner
An application for construction permit(s) has been submitted in your name listing you as the owner-builder of the
property located at: 2273 CARNELIAN CT. CARLSBAD CA 92009
Site Address_/ _________________________________ _
The City of Carlsbad ("City") is providing you with this Owner-Builder Acknowledgment and Verification form
to inform you of the rl:!sponsibilities and the possible risks associated with typical construction activities issued
in your name as the Owner-Builder.
The City will not issue a construction permit until you have read and initialed your understanding of each
provision in the Property Owner Acknowledgment section below and sign the form. An agent of the owner
cannot execute this notice unless you, the property owner, complete the Owner's Authorized Agent form and
it is accepted by the City of Carlsbad.
INSTRUCTIONS: Plea~e read and Initial each statement below to acknowledge your understanding and
verification of this information by signature at the bottom of the form. These are very important construction
related acknowledgments designed to inform the property owner of his/her obligations related to the requested
permit activities.
I. .Jtyj_1 understand a frequent practice of unlicensed contractors is to have the property owner obtain an "Owner·
6uilder" building permit that erroneously implies that the property owner is providing his or her own labor and
material personally. I, as an Owner-Builder, may be held liable and subject to serious financial risk for any injuries
sustained by an unlicensed contractor and his or her employees while working on my property. My homeowner's
insurance may not provide coverage for those injuries. I am willfully acting as an Owner-Builder and am aware of
the limits of my insurance coverage for injuries to workers on my property.
II. W I understand building permits are not required to be signed by property owners unless they are responsible
for the construction and are not hiring a licensed contractor to assume this responsibility.
Ill. w./ i understand as an "Owner-Builder'' I am the responsible party of record on the permit. I understand that I
may protect myself from potential financial risk by hiring a licensed contractor and having the permit filed in his
or her name instead of my own.
IV. JiJcL_1 understand contractors are required by law to be licensed and bonded in California and to list their license
numbers on permits and contracts.
V. ..Jtd.._1 understand if I employ or otherwise engage any persons, other than California licensed contractors, and
the total value of my construction is at least five hundred dollars ($500), including labor and materials, I may be
considered an "employer" under state and federal law.
1 REV. 08/20
Ownet-Builder Acknowledgement Continued
VI. Ow I understand if I am considered an "employer" under state and federal law, I must register with the state
and federal government, withhold payroll taxes, provide workers' compensation disability insurance, and
contribute to unemployment compensation for each "employee." I also understand my failure to abide by these
laws may subject me to serious financial risk.
Vll. MI understand under California Contractors' State License Law, an Owner-•Builder who builds single-family
residential structures cannot legally build them with the intent to offer them for sale, unless all work is performed
by licensed subcontractors and the number of structures does not exceed four within any calendar year, or all of
the work is performed under contract with a licensed general building contractor.
VIII. J.,,,t/ I understand as an Owner-Builder if I sell the property for which this permit is issued, I may be held liable
for any financial or personal injuries sustained by any subsequent owner(s) which result from any latent
construction defects in the workmanship or materials.
IX. .W..1 understand I may obtain more information regarding my obligations as an "employer" from the Internal
Revenue Service, the United States Small Business Administration, the California Department of Benefit
Payments, and the California Division of Industrial Accidents. I also understand I may contact the California
Contractors' State License Board (CSLB) at 1··800-321-CSLB (2752) or www.cslb.ca.gov for more information
about licensed contractors.
X. W I am aware of and consent to an Owner-Builder building permit applied for in my name, and understand
that I am the party legally and financially responsible for proposed construction activity at the following address:
,z...1,..7~ c....r-"e,\,·~ CA---) &\.sh~l CA <t~o~1
XI. 41 I agree that, as the party legally and financially responsible for this proposed construction activity, I will abide
by all applicable laws and requirements that govern Owner--Builders as well as employers.
XII. ..ft:d._1 agree to notify the issuer of this form Immediately of any additions, deletions, or changes to any of the
information I have provided on this form.
Licensed contractors are regulated by laws designed to protect the public. If you contract with someone who
does not have a license, the Contractor's State License Board may be unable to assist you with any financial loss
you may sustain as a result of a complaint. Your only remedy against unlicensed Contractors may be In civil court.
It is afso important for you to understand that if an unlicensed Contractor or employee of that individual or firm
is injured while working on your property, you may be held liable for damages. If you obtain a permit as·Owner-
Bui/der and wish to hire contractors, you will be responsible for verifying whether or not those contractors are
properly licensed and the status of their workers' compensation coverage.
Before a building permit can be issued, this form must be completed, signed by the property owner and returned
to the City of Carlsbad Building Division.
I declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand all of the Information provided on this form and that my responses, Including my
authority to sign this form, Is true and correct. I am aware that I have the option to consult with legal counsel prior to signing this form, and I have
either (1} consulted with legal counsel prior to signing this form or (2) have waived tllls right In signing this form without the advice of legal counsel.
~2-i
Property Owner Name (PRINT) Property Owner Signature Date
2 REV. 08/20
C_cicyof
Carlsbad
OWNERS
AUTHORIZED
AGENT FORM
B-62
Pe velopment .Servlgu
lkltld1ns Olvlalon
lAS l'araday A""nue
«2-339-2719
www c.ari>badco.1ov
OWNER'SAUTHORIZED AGENTFORM
Only o prop,,rty OWllf!f, tonuoctor or th,t:/,-outl>orlLed og•mt ma11 submil l)IOl'l'S and oppllc-ations fo, building
~rmtts. To authorlzr: o th;rd..parry agent to s¼,<1 for a bulfdln(I pr:rmit. ttrr: ownr:r's third party ogcmt ,,,._, brl,og
Hrb tug-form, vrhlch Identifies o,., ogenr ond <It• own«r who s/1,,, ts r es,rf!sentlng, and for what Jo~ sfh•
moy obtain p,.rnrlts. T~ form mu!Jt bf! cornpf,rt.,., In Its entlr11tt:y to ~ ac«:ptecl by the atv For r:oeh J<tparottt
permit appllcorton
N_,.r. n,., following Own•r's Aldhorl-d Apr:ni form n ,quired ta k co,npl-,r.d e.,, thtt
IH"OP<!l"tlf own•r °"''" .;,,.,,. ._/1'1fot:lng on l>(ltl:fd to '°"""'' for o r:onsuualolJ -1t
on ltl,vtu,r IH!ho(/.
AUTHOIU.lA'tfON QfAG£NT TQ ACT ON P8QP.&!lTY OWNffl'S HHALf
Excludlna ,,... Pt-operty Owner Ackno'Wle<111e.,...,n,:, the e><ec:utlon o f whleh, und<l,r,n-."ld is mv personal ,_s,onsibilitV,
I ti.rob\/ autl'lortH the klllowln1 person(sl to an as my aaonl(~) to •J>~IV 1'o<, 11a·n, and fll<i! tti. cioeuml!tlt:$
neceui,ry to obtoln an Owner-Guilder P.....,,.t f04' my proJctct. AOD 157 S.F ROOM W ITH 157 S.F . OECK
OVER; AOD JACUZZI ANO GARDEN WALL
Scope of Constfl.lct>on PrOject (or e>eocriptior, ot W o n.): ------------------------
2273 CARNELIAN CT. CARLSBAD CA 92009
ProJect Location 011 Address..; __________________________________ _
760-201-3347 ANNE. PARIZEAU Name of Auth~lted "-"'"' _____________________ Te,t No.-·----------
5304 ONTARIO ST. OCEANSIDE CA 92056
Addr..ss of Authorlz"d A41ent.:. ___________________________________ _
I declare undctr ~ of perjury that I ;om the Pf'C>Pff\Y owner for the aOdreu listed above and I penona,lly RIied
O<.tt the above lnform.ttion and certify It~ .-ccwac;v .
.....,fMrtV Qwne,'s Slanatu"': ~ W:z\,./ Date; & /'-£/ '2.. i
PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2024-2273}
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 08/26/2024 Owner: TRUST WILSON CW LIVING TRUST
04-22-22
Work Class: Addition Issue Date: 01/31/2025 Subdivision: CARLSBAD TCT#02-24 LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13&1.14
Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 09/15/2025 Address: 2273 CARNELIAN CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1712 IVR Number: 58449
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No.
Date Start Date
Thursday, July 10, 2025
BLDG-SW-Inspection
Checklist Item
284213-2025
COMMENTS
Are erosion control BMPs
functioning properly?
Are perimeter control BMPs
maintained?
Is the entrance stabilized to
prevent tracking?
Have sediments been tracked
on to the street?
Has trash/debris accumulated
throughout the site?
Are portable restrooms
properly positioned?
Do portable restrooms have
secondary containment?
Inspection Primary Inspector
Status
Passed Tim Kersch
Reinspection Inspection
Complete
Passed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page 2 of 2
Building Permit Inspection History Finaled
C cityof
Carlsbad
PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2024-2273)
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 08/26/2024 Owner: TRUST WILSON C W LIVING TRUST
04-22-22
Work Class: Addition Issue Date: 01/31/2025 Subdivision: CARLSBAD TCT#02-24 LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13&1.14
Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 09/15/2025 Address: 2273 CARNELIAN CT
IVR Number: 58449 CARLSBAD, CA 92009-1712
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Re inspection Inspection
Date Start Date Status
02/19/2025 02/19/2025 BLDG-11 276378-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Foundatlon/Ftg/Piers
(Rebar)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
02/24/2025 02/24/2025 BLDG-12 Steel/Bond 276747-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Beam
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
02/27/2025 02/27/2025 BLDG-14 277303-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Frame/Steel/Bolting/We
lding (Decks)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
03/12/2025 03/12/2025 BLDG-24 Rough/Topout 278447-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
BLDG-34 Rough 278446-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Electrical
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
03/19/2025 03/19/2025 BLDG-17 Interior 279046-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Lath/Drywall
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
05/06/2025 05/06/2025 BLDG-Final Inspection 283912-2025 Passed Tim Kersch Complete
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes
BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes
BLDG-Structural Final Yes
BLDG-Electrical Final Yes
Thursday, July 10, 2025 Page 1 of2
Apex Building Inspections & Testing, Inc.
Inspection Report
1292-B Simpson Way
Escondido, CA 92029
858.688.5523
www.apexbuildinginspection.com
apexbuildinginspections@gmail.com
Job Name
Wilson Residence addition
Address
2273 Carnelian Court 92009
Architect
Anne the Architect
Engineer
Wynne Engineeringr5
Building Approval No. & Project No.:
CBR2024-2273
General Contractor
Coast Pro Builders
Subcontractor (if any}
Date
Feb 11 2025 Tuesday 0
Jurisdiction
City of Carlsbad
t/ Reinspection This report supersedes any previous special inspection report / site visit or incomplete items on Dec. 17 2024
Type of Inspection: Epoxy Additional lnspection(s}: Performed concrete scanning
DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED
Performed scanning of existing edge of concrete to be drilled and identify areas ok to drill into existing post tension slab . Scanned
West exterior edge for new slab connection for arts & craft enclosure . Scanned with Hilti pX10 for a maximum depth of 6" along 13
linear feet of existing slab edge. All detections of steel reinforce bar or post tension cables were marked with red markers. Also
marked was miscellaneous findings as well (potentially plumbing or electrical )
2) performed Special inspection of steel reinforcement for new slab and footing tie in at room noted above . As per structural details
8,9,& 10 on structural sheet S4.0 , special inspector verified depth , spacing , rebar sizes , cleaning and epoxy used and approved as
per detial 9/S4.0 . All steel reinforcement and epoxy type used meets approved plans and details . Also all thirteen drilled holes were
cleaned and alll loose deposits removed with air compressor and nylon brush repeatedly, during my presence .
Embedded: 6"
Rebar size dia for slab :#4 (1/2")
Rebar size dia for footing tie in : #5 (5/8")
Total dowels installed at slab and footing 21.
Tests Preformed:
Type of sample
Epoxy Type/ Wedge Anchor:
3G
additional pages (NCR'S)
Oty Mix Design # Total C.Y
ESR No.
4057
Certification of Compliance
I hereby certify that I have inspected to the best of my knowledge all
of the above reported work unless otherwise noted. I have found this
work to comply with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
sections of the governing building laws.
Inspector Name Richard B Torres
Inspector Signature ~
Inspector IDs City of San Diego Special Inspector #786
Specified psi@28 Actual psi@28
Expiration Date:
8/2026
Lab ID(s}:seperate w/;
Manufac/Brand:
Simpson Strong Tie
Does Not Con~in 0 Non-Compliant Items
Contains D
Time:
IN OUT
12:00
REG OT TOTAL
800 am 4 hr min
Parking/Toll: $
Approved/ Authorized by
(Project Superintendent/Owners Rep.)
Print Name /Cell No #Edgar Iglesias 760·525-4575
Transmittal Letter
December 4, 2024
City of Carlsbad
Community Development Department -Building Division
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Review: Residential Addition
Address: 2273 Carnelian Ct, Carlsbad CA
True North
COMPLIANCE SERVICES
SECOND REVIEW
City Permit No: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Applicant Name: Anne Parizeau Applicant Email: annethearchitect@gmail.com
True North Compliance Services, Inc. has completed the review of the following documents for the project
referenced above on behalfofthe City of Carlsbad. Our comments can be found on the attached list.
I.
2.
3.
Drawings: Electronic copy dated July 24, 2024, by Anne the Architect.
Geotechnical Report: Electronic copy dated July 27, 2004, by Geocon Incorporated.
Geotechnical Letter: Electronic copy dated July 9, 2004, by Geocon Incorporated.
Attn: Permit Technician, the scope of work on the plans has been reviewed for coordination with the scope of
work on the permit application. See below for information if the scope of work on plans differs from the permit
application:
Valuation:
Scope of Work:
Floor Area:
Confirmed
Confirmed
Confirmed
Our comments follow on the attached list. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of further
assistance.
Sincerely,
True North Compliance Services
Review By: Kareem Al Share -Plan Review Engineer
Quality Review By: Alaa Atassi -Plan Review Engineer
True North Compliance Services, Inc.
8369 Vickers Street, Suite 207, San Diego, CA 92111
T / 562. 733.8030
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
December 4, 2024
City of Carlsbad-SECOND REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page2
Plan Review Comments
HARD COPY -RESUBMITT AL INSTRUCTIONS:
Please do not resubmit plans until all departments have completed their reviews. For status, please
contact building@carlsbadca.gov
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans
for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). Corrected sets can be
submitted as follows:
Deliver THREE corrected sets of plans and TWO corrected calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Division, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (442) 339-2719. The city
will route the plans to True North, Planning and Land Development Engineering Departments (if
applicable) for continued review.
Note: If this project requires FIRE PREVENTION review, ensure that you follow their specific
instructions for resubmittal review. The city will not route plans back to Dennis Grubb &
Associates for continued Fire Prevention review.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. The following comments are referred to the 2022 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical
Codes, California Green Building Standards Code, and Energy Code (i.e., 2021 lBC, UMC, UPC, and 2020
NEC, as amended by the State of California).
B. There may be other comments generated by the Building Division and/or other City departments that will
also require your attention and response. This attached list of comments, then, is only a portion of the plan
review. Contact the City for other items.
C. Respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter.
Indicate which details, specification, or calculation shows the required information. Your complete and
clear responses will expedite the re-check.
D. Where applicable, be sure to include the architect and engineer's stamp and signature on all sheets of the
drawings and on the coversheets of specifications and calculations per CBPC 5536.1 and CBPC 6735. This
item will be verified prior to plan approval.
E. If you have any questions regarding the comments below, please contact Kareem Al Share via email
kareema@tncservices.com or telephone (562) 733-8030.
OCCUPANCY & BUILDING SUMMARY:
Occupancy Groups:
Occupant Load:
Type of Construction:
Sprinklers:
Stories:
Area of Work (sq. ft.):
R3/U
NIA
V-B
Yes
Two
15 7 sq. ft craft room and 157 sq. ft deck.
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
December 4, 2024
NONSTRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
No comments.
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
General:
City of Carlsbad-SECOND REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page3
S l. Provide the geotechnical engineer's stamp and signature on the foundation plan and all sheets containing
foundation details confirming that the foundation plan, details, and specifications have been reviewed and
that it has been determined that the recommendations in the geotechnical report are properly incorporated
into the plans.
PC2: No response has been provided. Comment remains.
Structural Calculations:
S3. A full structural review can't be done at this submittal since no strnctural calculation was provided, please
provide a full set of structural calculations. Additional comments may be generated on the next submittal.
PC2: No response has been provided. Comment remains.
S4. provide calculations for the guard rail connection.
PC2: No response has been provided. Comment remains.
Additional comments:
a) PC2: Provide calculations for the spiral stairs, calculations shall be based on site specific seismic
parameters.
b) PC2: Cross reference the spiral stairs sheets where needed on the plans. And remove spiral stairs be
others statement from all the plans.
~I S5.
-'II 10
~ 5.
/SPIRAL ST AIRS BY OTHERS
If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Kareem Al Share via email
kareema@tncservices.com or telephone (562) 733-8030.
[END]
Transmittal Letter
September 6, 2024
City of Carlsbad
Community Development Department -Building Division
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plan Review: Residential Addition
Address: 2273 Carnelian Ct, Carlsbad CA
True North
COMPLIANCE SERVIC<ES
FIRST REVIEW
City Permit No: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Applicant Name: Anne Parizeau Applicant Email: annethearchitect@gmail.com
True North Compliance Services, lnc. has completed the review of the following documents for the project
referenced above on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. Our comments can be found on the attached I ist.
I.
2.
3.
Drawings: Electronic copy dated July 24, 2024, by Anne the Architect.
Geotechnical Report: Electronic copy dated July 27, 2004, by Geocon Incorporated.
Geotechnical Letter: Electronic copy dated July 9, 2004, by Geocon Incorporated.
Attn: Permit Technician, the scope of work on the plans has been reviewed for coordination with the scope of
work on the permit application. See below for information if the scope of work on plans differs from the permit
application:
Valuation:
Scope of Work:
Floor Area:
Confirmed
See Notes Below
Confirmed
Notes: revise the scope of work statement and coordinate with the permit application, there is no proposed
electrical for jacuzzi and garden wall per the permit application. Also specify spiral stairs to be under
separate permit.
Our comments follow on the attached list. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of further
assistance.
Sincerely,
True North Compliance Services
Review By: Kareem Al Share -Plan Review Engineer
Quality Review By: Areli Sanchez -Plan Review Engineer
True North Compliance Services, Inc.
8369 Vickers Street, Suite 207, San Diego, CA 92111
T / 562. 733.8030
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
September 6, 2024
Plan Review Comments
HARD COPY -RESUBMITT AL INSTRUCTIONS:
City of Carlsbad-FIRST REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page2
Please do not resubmit plans until all departments have completed their reviews. For status, please
contact building@carlsbadca.gov
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans
for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). Corrected sets can be
submitted as follows:
Deliver THREE corrected sets of plans and TWO corrected calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Division, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (442) 339-2719. The city
will route the plans to True North, Planning and Land Development Engineering Departments (if
applicable) for continued review.
Note: If this project requires FIRE PREVENTION review, ensure that you follow their specific
instructions for resubmittal review. The city will not route plans back to Dennis Grubb &
Associates for continued Fire Prevention review.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. The following comments are referred to the 2022 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical
Codes, California Green Bui I ding Standards Code, and Energy Code (i.e., 202 1 IBC, UMC, UPC, and 2020
NEC, as amended by the State of California).
B. There may be other comments generated by the Building Division and/or other City departments that will
also require your attention and response. This attached list of comments, then, is only a portion of the plan
review. Contact the City for other items.
C. Respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter.
Indicate which details, specification, or calculation shows the required information. Your complete and
clear responses will expedite the re-check.
D. Where applicable, be sure to include the architect and engineer's stamp and signature on all sheets of the
drawings and on the coversheets of specifications and calculations per CBPC 5536.1 and CBPC 6735. This
item will be verified prior to plan approval.
E. lfyou have any questions regarding the comments below, please contact Kareem Al Share via email
kareema@tncservices.com or telephone (562) 733-8030.
OCCUPANCY & BUILDING SUMMARY:
Occupancy Groups:
Occupant Load:
Type of Construction:
Sprinklers:
Stories:
Area of Work (sq. ft.):
R3/U
NIA
V-B
Yes
Two
157 sq. ft craft room and 157 sq. ft deck.
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
September 6, 2024
ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
A I. On sheet A I, address the following:
City of Carlsbad-FIRST REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page3
a) Revise and update the scope of work statement and coordinate with the permit application, there is
no proposed electrical for jacuzzi and garden wall per the permit application.
ElUSTING BUILDING INFORMATION
BUILT 2007 EXISTING RESIDENCE (R·3 OCC): 2838 S.F.
EX. GARAGE: 587 S.F.
SCOPE OF WORK:
_,.,....,,.,_..,,.....,......._...__,,.,._,,........_ S.f. DECK ABOVE
A
BUILD GARDEN W igi~ ~-~~~~ 2 "----revise
Al PROJECT INFORMATION srre PlAN
b) Revise the fire sprinklers to be deferred submittal only not under separate perrnit.
revise to be deferred submittal
c) Specify spiral stairs to be under separate perrnit or provide appropriate information on plans. This
entails the following:
i) Provide spiral stair detail and address the following comments per CRC R31 I .7. I 0:
ii) Specify the clear width below the handrails of the spiral stairs to be 26" minimum.
iii) Specify The walk line radius to not be greater than 24.5".
iv) Specify tread depth to be 6.75" minimum.
v) Specify the riser to be 9.5" maximum.
vi) Specify the headroom to be 6'6" maximum.
vii) Provide light fixture to illuminate the walking surface of the stairs per CRC R3 l l. 7 .9.
viii) 36" Minimum landing at the top and bottom of the stairs per CRC R3 I 1. 7.6.
ix) Provide anchorage calculations for the spiral stairway.
A2. For the deck, address the following:
a) Enclosed framing beneath the deck and other elevated walking surfaces shall be provided with
openings that provide a net-free cross ventilation area not less than 1/150 of the area of each
separate space. Provide calculations on plans to show compliance with CRC R3 l 7. l .6.
b) Show the balconies sloped to drain a minimum 2%. CRC R3 l l.3.
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
September 6, 2024
A3. For guardrail details:
I
I ' '
City of Carlsbad-FffiST REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page4
a) Intermediate railing shall be spaced such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter shall not pass through.
CRC R312.2 & R3 12.3.
b) Include guard connection detail. Verify that connection shall be capable of resisting a 200 lbs. load
at the top per CBC 1607.9.1.1.
MECHANICAL COMMENTS:
Ml. Indicate how the addition is going to be heated. On the floor plans, show the location of the FAU and all
proposed registers. CRC R303.10.
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS:
El. Identify the location and size (amperage) of the main electrical panel and any sub-panel(s) on the site plan.
E2. On sheet El , revise the electrical plan to show receptacle outlets on the wall-spaces in the craft room to be
compliant with CEC 210.52. Receptacle outlets shall be located not more than 6 feet from wall openings
and 12 feet on center.
PLUMBING COMMENTS:
No comments.
GREEN BUILDING COMMENTS:
No comments.
ENERGY COMPLIANCE COMMENTS:
Tl. For the T-24 under general information, please revise the addition conditioned floor area to be 314 S.F.
Residential Addition
2273 Carnelian Ct
September 6, 2024
OI Zlt>codo 92009
OI Cll_,.Zone ?
10 -...'!\'PO s.nctof•mll-l
u ,,oJ«t,..,,.. 1 ~-..VU'IIC. and/or Alttr~k,n
14 Addition COnd. ,_ .., .. (~ 308 J--314
II hlSllfll COnd. floor Arel (ft1J ldW
u TotalCOnd. ,_ -(ft') •sa.c
10 ADU 8tdt00ffi Count n/•
22 FIIOI '!\'PO Natutalp,
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
General:
City of Carlsbad-FIRST REVIEW
City Permit No.: CBR2024-2273
True North No.: 24-018-756
Page5
S 1. Provide the geotechnical engineer's stamp and signature on the foundation plan and all sheets containing
foundation details confinning that the foundation plan, details, and specifications have been reviewed and
that it has been detennined that the recommendations in the geotechnical report are properly incorporated
into the plans.
Plans:
S2. For detail 1 0/S5.0, lnclude guard connection detail. Verify that connection shall be capable of resisting a
200 lbs. load at the top per CBC 1607.9.1 .1.
Structural Calculations:
S3. A full structural review can't be done at this submittal since no structural calculation was provided, please
provide a full set of structural calculati ons. Additional comments may be generated on the next submittal.
S4. provide calculations for the guard rail connection.
If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Kareem Al Share via email
kareema@tncservices.com or telephone (562) 733-8030.
[END]
GEOCON
INCORPORATED CITY
GEOTECHNICAL ■ENV I RONMENTAL ■
CBR2024-2273
2273 CARNELIAN CT Project No. 06403-32-16C
December I 7, 2024 AaruliQn: WILSON: 157 SF ADDITION WITH 157 SF DECK OVER ADDITION
// RUN ELECTRIC/IL FOR FUTURE HOT TUB, NEW 60" CITY STANDARD FENCE
Mr. Chuck Wilson
2132411000
1/9/2025
2273 Carnelian Court
Carlsbad, California 92009 CBR2024-2273
Subject: STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
VILLAGES OF LA COST A -"THE GREENS"
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.14 (LOT 23)
2273 CARNELIAN COURT
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
References: 1. Update Geotechnicaf Report, Villages of la Costa-The Greens, Neighborhoods 1 .11,
1.13, and 1. 14, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated July
28, 2004 (Project No. 06403-52-16).
2. Final Report of Testing and Observation Services Pe~fonned During Site Grading,
Villages ~f La Costa -The Greens, Neighborhoods 1. 11, 1. 13, 1 .14 and Acicante Road
Stations 10+00 Through 31+70, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon
Incorporated, dated July 27, 2004 (Project No. 06403-52-09).
3. Project Plan Set, Wilson Residence Addition. 2273 Carnelian Court. Carlsbad.
Dear Mr. Wilson:
California, civil plans prepared by Anne the Architect, dated July 2024; structural plans
prepared by Wynn Engineering, Inc., dated July 31, 2024.
In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the referenced structural plans to determine if the
plans and details have been prepared in substantial conformance with the recommendations presented
in our referenced geotechnica.l report.
Based upon our review of the project plans and the information contained within the geotechnical report,
it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the plans and details have been prepared in substantial
conformance with recommendations presented in the geotechnical report.
It should be understood that ow· review was limited to geotechnical aspects of project development and
did not include the review of other details on the referenced plan. Geocon Incorporated has no opinion
regarding other details found on the referenced plans, civil, structural, or otherwise, that do not directly
pertain to geotechnical aspects of site development.
6960 Flander.s Drive ■ Son Diego, California 92121-297 4 ■ Telephone 858,558.6900 ■ Fax 858.558.6159
Should you have any questions regarding this correspondence, or ifwe may be of further service, please
do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
GEOCON INCORPORATED
~ ,///)~
Trevor E. Myers _.A~~~
RCE 63773
TEM:DBE:kv
( e-mail) Addressee
Project NP. 064(l>-32-l 6C Oecen1ber 17, 2(J24
civil engineering
structural design
land surveying
STRUCTURAL
CALCULATIONS
ADDITION
WILSON
2273 CARNELIAN COURT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
Job No: 24-601
JULY 31, 2024
27315 Valley Center Road -Valley Center, CA 92082 -(760) 749-8722-Fax (760) 749-9412
Email: wynneng@wynnengineering.com -Los Angeles (310) 306-9728 -Fax (310) 306-2129
JOB:
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road SHEET NO.: ___ _ OF: ___________ _
Valley Center, CA 92082 CALCULATED BY: DATE:--------(760) 749-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax CHECKED BY: DATE: _______ _
SCALE:-------------------
STRUCTURAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
BUILDING CODE-2022 California Building Code & ASCE 7-16
WOOD FRAMING -Design per 2018 NDS Specification for Wood Construction & Supplement
Douglas Fir-Larch graded per WCLIB or WWPA grading rules as follows:
Member T'tf'e Grade Fb (psi! MemberT'tf'e Grade
Joists No 2 900 Studs STUD
Beams (2x -4x) No 1 1000 Posts (4x) No 1
Beams(6x or larger B&S No 1 1350 Posts (6x or larger) P&T No 1
STEEL -Design per AISC Specification 360-16
Hot rolled steel complying with ASTM specifications as follows:
Section Grade Fl_!Fu (ksi) Section Grade
W -Wide Flange A992 50 / 65 Standard Pipe A53 Gr B
HSS-Tube A500 GrC 50 / 62 Plates & Misc A36
WELDING -E70XX Electrodes with Fy = 70ksi unless noted otherwise in calculations
CONCRETE -Design per CBC Chapter 19 and ACI 318-19 Specification for reinforced concrete
Concrete fc = 2500psi at 28 days unless noted otherwise in calculations. Type II Cement
CONCRETE MASONRY -Design per CBC Chapter 21 and TMS 602-16 Specification for Reinforced Masonry
Medium weight solid grouted CMU with fm = 2000psi unless noted otherwise in calculations
Mortar -Type M or S
Grout fg ~ 2000psi
STEEL REINFORCING -Bars complying with ASTM A615 (A706 for Welded Bars) as follows:
Bar Size Grade Fy(ksi) Bar Size
#3,#4 A615Gr40 40 #5 and larger
STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE LUMBER -Manufactured by Trus Joist per ICC-ER ESR-1387.
Member Type
Parallam (PSL)
Microlam (L VL)
Grade
OF -2.0E
DF -1.9E
Fb (psi!
2900
2600
MemberT'tf'e
Timberstrand (LSL)
Grade
A615 Gr 60
Grade
DF-1.7E
GLUE LAMINATED LUMBER-Douglas Fir-Larch Combination 24F-V4 unless noted otherwise in calculations
MANUFACTURED WOOD I JOISTS -T JI Pro series by Trus Joist per ICC-ES ESR 1153
RETROFIT EPOXY -Hilti RE-500 V3 designed per ICC ER-3814 or Simpson SET-XP designed per ICC ESR-2508
Fb (psi)
700
1000
1200
Fy/Fu (ks,)
35 / 60
36 / 58
Fy (ksi)
60
Fb (psi)
2600
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road
Valley Center, CA 92082
(760) 749-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax
GRAVITY STRUCTURAL LOADS
ROOF LOADS
Dead Loads
Clay Tile Roofing
Plywood Decking
Framing
Insulation
Drywall
Mechanical
Solar/Misc.
Live Load
Total Load
WALL LOADS
Dead Loads
Exterior Walls -Stucco
Interior Walls
Lateral Live Load -Code Minimum
Load (psf)
25.0
10.0
2.5
4.0
0.5
2.5
1.0
4.5
20.0
45.0
Load (psf)
15.0
10.0
5.0
JOB:
SHEET NO.: ----
CALCULATED BY:
CHECKED BY:
2
OF:-----------
DATE:--------
DATE:-------
SCALE: ------------------
FLOOR LOADS
Dead Loads
Finish Flooring
Plywood Decking
Framing
Insulation
Drywall
Mechanical
Misc
Live Load -General Residential
Total Load
DECK LOADS
Dead Loads
Finish Flooring
Plywood Decking
Framing
Stucco
Misc
Live Load
Total Load
Load (psi)
16.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
0.5
2.5
1.0
1.5
40.0
56.0
Load (psi)
22.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
10.0
1.5
60.0
82.0
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road
Valley Center, CA 92082
(760) 749-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax
SEISMIC STRUCTURAL LOADS
Structure Height h,, 26.0ft
Risk Category II
Soil Profile D
Response Modification Factor R 6.5
Importance Factor I 1.00
Structure Period Ct 0.020
)( 0.75
T, 0.230s
TL 8.000s
l.S•Ts 0.864s
EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE
C = pSDS
' (RI I) (Eq 12.8-2) = 0.16
C < pSPI
s -T(RII) (Eq 12.8-3) = 0.39
Note: Where a soils report is not provided
the exceptions given in ASCE 7-16
11.4.8 are used.
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION
HeiQht Area
Diaph
h, a, \\''1
Level ft ft' psf
A Roof 26 1950 25
B Floor 10 2203 16
C Low Roof 13 222 25
D
E
F
* These are Ultimate Loads, Multiply by 0.7 for ASD
WIND STRUCTURAL LOADS
Mean Roof Height h 26.0ft
Roof Angle ~ 20deg
Basic Wind Speed 100 mph
3
JOB:
SHEET NO.: ___ _ OF:-----------
CALCULATED BY: DATE: _______ _
CHECKED BY: DATE:--------
SCALE:------------------
Mapped 0.2s Acceleration Ss 0.97
Mapped 1.0s Acceleration s, 0.35
0.2s Site Coefficient F, 1.20
1.0s Site Coefficient Fv 1.90
Design 0.2s Acceleration Sos 0.78
Design 1.0s Acceleration So, 0.45
Redundanct Factor p 1.30
Seismic Design Catego!}'. D
Cs ~ O.SpS, when S, ~ 0.60
(RI/) (Eq 12.8-6) = 0.00
Cs= 0.044Sosl ~ 0.0 1 (Eq 12.8-5) = 0.03
Governing Seismic Response Coefficient Cs = 0.16
Weiaht ' Moment' Fx3
Wall Story
\\'.., w. h.,x w11 Csxiw_,x%
psf kip ft-kip % kip psf
7.5 63.4 1648 68% 14.6 7.5
15 68.3 683 28% 6.1 2.8
7.5 7.2 94 4% 0.8 3.8
138.9 2424 100% 21.6
Importance Factor 1.00
Exposure Factor -C A 1.29
Topographic Factor ~. 1.00
ZONE
Lateral Pressures Vertical Pressures
ASCE 7-16 Figure 28.5-1
Design Pressure
P,JO
P,
psf
psf
A B
22.0 -5.8
28.4 -7.5
* These are Ultimate Loads, Multiply by 0.6 for ASD
C
14.6
18.8
D E F G H
-3.2 -19.1 -13.3 -13.3 -10. 1
-4.1 -24.6 -17.2 -17.2 -13.0
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road
Va lley Center, CA 92082
(760) 749-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax
SOILS PARAMETERS & LOADING
Parameters Based on Soils Report By:
Soils Engineer
Report No
Dated
General Soils Parameters:
Allowable Net Soil Pressure at Minimum Depth
Plus an increase per depth or width of
To a maximum allowable of
Minimum Footing Depth
Minimum Footing Width
Coefficient of Friction
Passive Pressure -EFP
I Maximum allowable of
Retaining Wall Solis Parameters:
Allowable Net Soil Pressure at Minimum Depth
I
Plus an increase per depth or width of
To a maximum allowable of
Minimum Footing Depth
Coefficient of Friction
Passive Pressure -EFP
I Maximum allowable of
At Rest Pressure -EFP
Active Pressure -Level Slope -EFP
Active Pressure -2:1 Slope -EFP
JOB:
SHEET NO.: ----
CALCULATED BY:
CHECKED BY:
4
OF:-----------
DATE:--------
DATE: --------
SCALE:------------------
GEOCON, Inc
#06403-52-16
7/28/2004
2000 psf
667 psf/ft
2667 psf
12 in
18 in
0.40
300 pcf
2250 psf
2000 psf
667 psf/ft
2667 psf
12 in
0.40
300 pcf
2250 psf
65 pcf
35 pcf
45 pcf
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road
Valley Center, CA 92082
(760) 7 49-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax
Wood Header Schedule
Roof Level Headers
Uniform Dead Load -plf w0
Uniform Live Load -plf wL
Load Duration Factor C0
50
40
1.25
Size Section Properties
Nominal Width Depth
b d
in In
4x4 3.50
4x6 5.50
4x8 7.25
3.5
4x10 9.25
4x12 11.25
4x14 13.25
Floor Level Headers
Uniform Dead Load -plf
Uniform Live Load -plf
Load Duration Factor
A
in 2
12.25
19.25
25.38
32.38
39.38
46.38
s
in 3
7.15
17.65
30.66
49.91
73.83
102.41
378
980
1.00
I
in~
12.51
48.53
111.15
230.84
415.28
678.48
Size Section Properties
Nominal Width Depth
b d A
in in ln 2
4x4 3.50 12.25
4x6 5.50 19.25
4x8 7.25 25.38
3.5
4x10 9.25 32.38
4x12 11.25 39.38
4x14 13.25 46.38
4AF' wl 2 . L =--• where V =-=-AF ,, 3wD+l 2 3 •
8SF.' wL2 .
L h = __ h where M = --= SFh 8
s I
in 3 In'
7.15 12.51
17.65 48.53
30.66 111.15
49.91 230.84
73.83 415.28
102.41 678.48
5
JOB:
SHEET NO.:____ OF: -----------
nr: 1'-' / I
CALCULATED BY: DATE: _______ _
CHECKED BY: DATE: ______ _
SCALE: ------------------
Shear
L,
ft
40.83
64.17
84.58
Allowable Bending Stress -psi
Allowable Shear Stress -psi
Modulus of Elasticity-mpsi
Maximum Length
Bending Deflection
4, L112,o Lll360
ft ft fl
8.13 8.07 9.23
12.78 12.68 14.51
16.85 16.71 19.13
107.92 21.50 21.32 24.40
131 .25 26.15 25.93 29.68
154.58 30.79 30.54 34.96
Shear
L,
fl
2.16
3.40
4.48
5.72
6.96
8.20
Allowable Bending Stress -psi
Allowable Shear Stress -psi
Modulus of Elasticity -mpsi
Maximum Length
Bending Deflection
4, L112,o Lll360
ft ft fl
1.87 3.26 3.18
2.94 5.13 5.00
3.88 6.76 6.59
4.95 8.63 8.40
6.02 10.49 10.22
7.09 12.36 12.04
Fb
Fv
E
Govern
Lg
ft
8.07
12.68
16.71
21.32
25.93
30.54
Fb
Fv
E
Govern
Lg
ft
1.87
2.94
3.88
4.95
6.02
7.09
1000
180
1.7
Design
Length
La
fl
8.0
12.0
16.0
21.0
25.0
30.0
1000
180
1.7
Design
Length
L.
fl
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
7.0
384 E'I 5 wL4 L L:,.240 = J ---where~=----,-= --5 240w0 ... L 384 EI 240
384 E'I 5 wL4 L L -=J ----where~=----=--
6360 5 360wL 384 E 'J 360
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center Road
Valley Center, CA 92082
(760) 7 49-8722
(760) 749-7493 Fax
Wood Header Schedule
Floor Level Headers
Uniform Dead Load -plf
Uniform Live Load -plf
Load Duration Factor
308
840
1.00
Size Section Properties
Nominal Width Depth
b d A s I
in in in 2 in 3 in 4
4x4 3.50 12.25 7.15 12.51
4x6 5.50 19.25 17.65 48.53
4x8 7.25 25.38 30.66 111 .15
3.5
4x10 9.25 32.38 49.91 230.84
4x12 11.25 39.38 73.83 415.28
4x14 13.25 46.38 102.41 678.48
4AF. wl 2 . L. =--• wbere V =-=-AF 3w0 +l 2 3 •
6
JOB:
SHEET NO.: ----OF:-----------
CALCULATED BY: DATE: _______ _
CHECKED BY: DATE: ______ _
SCALE: ------------------
Shear
Lv
ft
2.56
4.02
5.30
6.77
8.23
9.70
Allowable Bending Stress -psi
Allowable Shear Stress -psi
Modulus of Elasticity -mpsi
Maximum Length
Bending Deflection
Lb Lt,240 L63eo
ft ft ft
2.04 3.45 3.35
3.20 5.43 5.26
4.22 7.15 6.93
5.38 9.12 8.85
6.55 11.10 10.76
7.71 13.07 12.67
Fb
Fv
E
Govern
Lg
ft
2.04
3.20
4.22
5.38
6.55
7.71
1000
180
1.7
Design
Length
La
ft
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
L _ 384 EO!
6240 -3 --4
5 wL4 L where~=----,-=--384 EI 240 5 2 OwD+L
384 E0I 5 wL4 L L = 3 -----whereil=----.-=--6360 5 360wl 384 E 1 360
Project Title:
Engineer: 7
Project ID:
Project Descr:
I Multiple. Simple Bearn ;.
LIC# : KW-06014768, Bu!d:20.23.10.02 WYNN ENGINEERING, INC "
: PrOject FIie: deck.ec6
(c) ENER°CALC INC 1983-2023
Description :
Wood Beam Design : deck joists
Calculations per NOS 2018, IBC 2021, ASCE 7-16
BEAM Size:
Wood Species :
Fb-Tension
Fb-Compr
Applied Loads
4x8, Sawn, Fully Braced
Using Allowable Stress Design with IBC 2021 Load Combinations, Major Axis Bending
Douglas Fir -Larch Wood Grade : No.2
900.0 psi Fe -Prll 1,350.0 psi Fv 180.0 psi Ebend-xx
900.0 psi Fe -Perp 625.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Eminbend -xx
Unif Load: D = 0.0220, L = 0.060 k/ft, Trib= 1.330 ft
1Point: D = 0.2130, L = 0.5320 k@ 15.50 ft
Design Summary
1,600.0 ksi
580.0 ksi
Density 31.21 O pcf
Max fb/Fb Ratio = 0.641 · 1
fb : Actual : 862.29 psi at 13.000 ft in Span # 1 Fb : Allowable : 1,345.50 psi
r ······· ............................. T ........... 0{.0.02926) L(O .07980) ........ ············. .,, .................. -r I 4x6 .i,._ 4x6 Load Comb : +D+L
Max fv/FvRatio = 0.313 : 1
fv : Actual : 56.29 psi at 13.000 ft in Span # 1 Fv : Allowable : 180.00 psi
Load Comb : +D+L
Max Reactions (k) Q
Left Support 0.14
Right Support 0.52
l.r !.
0.40
1.37
Y:i.. !:!
13.0 ft 2.50 ft
ax e ecllons
Transient Downward 0.131 in Total Downward 0.175 in
Ratio 1187 Ratio 890
LC: L Only LC: +D+L
Transient Upward -0.001 in Total Upward -0.000 in
Ratio 9999 Ratio 9999
LC: L Only LC: +D+L
WYNN ENGINEERING INC.
27315 Valley Center R01td
Valley Center CA 92082
8
v,n,1 C.nttr (760) 749'8722
Loa Anplt1 (310) 306•9728
www.wynnengtneerlnc.com O!llCKfORY-.......------~1'1-----
\~"'M:i,
'Vt~ n,f-: 1 -r'l~11<, 1(0, 1) :-~
ftiD'f •.
~~·
1J'e3; Z-il\t\~~:'.:\')-; ,i, ,~#
~·.
'lt-!3 :... -z ·l U,,1 )(t: l') ~ ,~ ~ ~ t
• ALL UPPER LEVEL WALLS BEING
REMOVED ARE NON SHEAR
ELEMENTS
\N Y\J
, : 10 s· ~.,,,~(ll·•):: 11'?~.
~ 5:. \\. \!_°¥1) :,_ 2 I] 0 It;-
\1:: C\ ( -7'&, ~ \ (_o, ~~ t.r?ff'lk,
·1
W( J ;, I/ , q (Lr3 )-; I 11 / # -~~
,~ e fi.-
• ' Vl• f'\tW
~)\t°'M'-•.\\~ ~-
WYNN ENGlNEERlNG, INC.
273 15 Valley Center Road
Valley Center, CA 92082
Voice: 760.749.8722
Fax: 760.749.9412
9
Job: __________________ _
Sheet No'-: _______ Of: _______ _
Calculated By: ______ Dote: ______ _
Checked B . Date: ______ _
Scale: _________________ _
CONTINOUS FOOTING SCHEDULE
FOOTING WIDTH (w) FOOTING DEPTH (d) WALL WIDTH ( t)
12" 18"
BEARING PRESSURE
(Pa)
2000psf
Pu w x (2d + t) x Pa
t
Dote Plotted: 7/31/2024 12: 41 PM Plotted By: ELIZABETH ESCOBEDO
File: F: \STRUCTURAL \J0RDAN\CONTIN0US F00TING.DWG
ALLOWABLE POINT
LOAD Pu
6.58k
GEOCON
INCORPORATED
GEOTECHN I CA L ■
Project No. 06403-32-J 6C
July 9, 2024
ENVIRONMENTAL ■ MATERIALS'°
Rtcf:i\/f:D
Mr. Chuck Wilson AUG 2 6 202
2273 Carnelian Court CJTy OF 4
Carlsbad, CA 92009 BUJLDJN CARLSBAD
G D1v1s1
Subject: UPDATED SEJSMIC DES1GN9~METERS
VILLAGES OF LA COST A -"THE GREENS"
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.14 (LOT 23)
2273 CARNELIAN COURT
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
References: J. Update Geotechnical Report, Villages ofLa Costa-The Greens, Neighborhoods 1.11,
I .13, and I. l 4, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated July
28, 2004 (Project No. 06403-52-16).
2. Final Report of Teshng and Observarion Services Petformed During Site Grading,
Villages of La Costa -The Greens, Neighborhoods 1.11, 1. I 3, 1.14 and Acicante Road
Stations l 0+00 Through 3 I + 70, Carlsbad, California, prepared by Geocon
Incorporated, dated July 27, 2004 (Project No. 06403-52-09).
Dear Mr. Wilson:
In accordance with your request, we have prepared this addendum to the referenced repo1ts providing
updated seismic design criteria for the subject property. The geotechnical information presented herein
is necessary to conform to the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) design standards which were
adopted by local agencies after January 1, 2023. The following criteria should be used in design and
construction of the project. The recommendati ons presented in the referenced repo1t s remain applicable
unless superseded here in.
The referenced reports indicate that the property consists of approximately 63 feet of compacted fill
overlying the Santiago Peak Volcanics. Previous laboratory testing of the near-surface soils during the
grading operation indicates that the soil generally consists of "medium" expansive material with a
"moderate" potential for water-soluble sulfate exposure to concrete structures. A Category lll
foundation system and Type V concrete is recommended for the proposed addition.
6960 Flanders Drive ■ Son Diego, California 92121-2974 ■ Telephone 858.558.6900 ■ Fox 858.558.6159
Seismic Design Criteria -2022 California Building Code
Table 1 summarizes site-specific design criteria obtained from the 2022 California Building Code (CBC;
Based on the 2021 International Building Code [!BC] and ASCE 7-16), Chapter 16 Structural Design,
Section 161 3 Earthquake Loads. We used the computer program U.S. Seismic Design Maps, provided
by the Structural Engineers Association (SEA) to calcul ate the seismic design parameters. The short
speclrnl response uses a period of 0.2 second. We evaluated the Site Class based on the discussion in
Section 16 13.2.2 of th e 2022 CBC and Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-16. We expect the buildings will possess
a period of less than 0.5 second; therefore, a site response analysis will not be required in accordance
with ASCE 7-16, Section 20.3 .1 and the building improvements can be designed based on the parameters
presented herein. The values presented herein are for the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake
(MCER)-Sites designated as Site Class D, E and F may require additional analyses if requested by the
project structural engineer and client.
TABLE 1
2022 CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
Parameter Value 2022 CBC Reference
Site Class D Section 1613.2.2
MCER Ground Motion Spectral Response Acceleration -0.969g Figure 16 13.2.1(1) Class B (short), Ss
MCER Ground Motion Spectral Response Acceleration -0.353g Figure 1613.2.1(3) Class B ( I sec), S,
Site Coefficient, FA 1.1 12 Table 1613.2.3(1)
Site Coefficient, Fv 1.947* Table 1613.2.3(2)
Site Class Modified MCER Spectral Response Acceleration 1.078g Section 16 13.2.3 (Eqn 16-20) (short), SMs
Site Class Modified MCER Spectral Response Acceleration -0.688g* Section 16 13.2.3 (Eqn 16-21) ( 1 sec), SM1
5% Damped Design 0.719g Section 1613.2.4 (Eqn 16-22) Spectral Response Acceleration (short), Sos
5% Damped Design 0.459g* Section 1613.2.4 (Eqn 16-23) Spectral Response Acceleration ( I sec), So,
* Sec following paragraph.
Using the code-based va lues presented in Table I, in lieu ofperfom1ing a ground motion hazard analysis,
requires the exceptions outlined in ASCE 7-16 Section 11.4.8 be followed by the project structural
engineer. Per Section 11.4.8 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, a ground motion hazard analysis should be perform ed
for projects for Site Class "E" sites with Ss greater than or equal to l .0g and for Site Class "D" and "E"
sites w ith S 1 greater than 0.2g. Section I l .4.8 a lso provides exceptions whi ch indicates that the ground
motion hazard analysis may be waived provided the exceptions are followed.
G.:ocon Project No. 06403-32-l 6C -2 -July 9. 2024
Table 2 presents the mapped maximum considered geometri c mean (MCEa) seismic design parameters
for projects located in Seismic Design Categories of D through F in accordance with ASCE 7-16.
TABLE 2
ASCE 7-16 PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION
Parameter Value ASCE 7-16 Reference
Mapped MCEa Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA 0.423g Figure 22-9
Site Coefficient, FPGA I. I I 2 Table 11.8-1
Site Class Modified MCEa 0.498g Section J 1.8.3 (Eqn 11.8-1) Peak Ground Acceleration, PGAM
Conformance to the c riteria in Tables l and 2 for seismic design does not constitute any kind of
guarantee or assurance that significant structural damage or ground fai lure will not occur in th e event of
a large earthquake. The primary goal of seismic design is to protect life, not to avoid all damage, since
such design may be economically prohibitive.
The project structural engineer and architect should evaluate the appropriate Risk Catego1y and Seismic
Design Category for the planned structures. The values presented here in assume a Ri sk Category of ll
and resulting in a Seismic Design Category D. Table 3 presents a summary of the risk categories in
accordance with ASC E 7-16.
TABLE 3
ASCE 7-16 RISK CATEGORIES
Risk Building Use Exam1lles Category
I Low risk to Human Life at Failure Barn, Storage Shelter
II Nominal Risk to Human Life at Failure Residential, Commercial
(B uildings Not Designated as I, Ill or IV) and Industrial Buildings
Theaters, Lecture Halls, Dining Halls, Schools,
111 Substantial Risk to Human Life at Failure Prisons, Small Healthcare Faci lities,
Infrastructure Plants, Storage for
Explosives/Toxins
Hazardous Material Facilities, Hospitals, Fire
JV Essential Facilities and Rescue, Emergency Shelters, Pol ice
Stations, Power Stations, Aviation Control
Facilities. National Defense, Water Storage
C..:n,·on Project No. 06403-32-1 <iC July 9, 2024
Should yo u have any questions regarding this letter, or if we may be of further service, please contact
the undersigned at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
GEOCON IN CO RPORA TED
Trevor E. Myers
RCE 63773
TEM:TKR:am
(e-mail) Addressee
Cicncon l'mjccl No. 06403-3 2-1 6C ---l -
~~ ?<__~
Troy K. Reist
CEG 2408
Jul} 9, 2024
FINAL REPORT OF
TESTING AND OBSERVATION
SERVICES PERFORMED
DURING SITE GRADING
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA-
THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13, 1.14
AND ALICANTE ROAD
STATIONS 10+00 THROUGH 31+70
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL
MANAGEMENT COMPANY
C/o MORROW DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
CBR2024-2273
2273 CARNELIAN CT
~: WILSON: 157 SF ADDITION WITH 157 SF DECK OVER ADDITION
2132411000
8/26/2024
CBR2024-2273
111111111111111 I I I I I I I
JULY 27, 2004
GEOCON
I NC O H l'O HATEl1
Project No. 06403-52-09
July 27, 2004
Real Estate Collateral Management Company
c;o Morrow Development Incorporated
1903 Wright Place, Suite 180
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mr. Tim O'Grady
Subject: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBOR.I----IOODS 1.1 I, 1.1 3, 1.1 4 AND
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 0
ALLCANTE ROAD STATIONS I 0+00 THROUGH 31+70
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Gentlemen:
FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION
SERVICES PERFORMED DURJNG SITE GRADING
In accordance with your request and our proposal dated May 6, 2003, we have provided compaction
testing and observation services during the grading of the subject site. Our services were performed
during the period of June 3, 2003 through May 24, 2004. The scope of our services included the
following:
• Observing the grading operation, including the removal and/or processing of topsoil,
colluvium, alluvium, and undocumented fill, and undercutting of transition and cut lots.
• Performing in-place dry density and moisture content tests in fill placed and compacted at
the site.
• Performing laboratory tests to aid in evaluating maximum dry density and optimum moisture
content and shear strength of the compacted fill soils. Additionally, laboratory tests were
performed on samples of soil present at finish-grade to evaluate expansion characteristics and
water-soluble sulfate.
• Preparing an "As-Graded" Geologic Map.
• Preparing this final report of grading.
The purpose of this report is to document that the grading for Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14,
whi ch include 35, 33, and 61 single-family residential pads, respectively, and Alicante Road Stations
I 0+00 to 3 I +70 has been performed in substantial conformance with the recommendations of the
6960 Flonder5 Drive ■ Son Diego, California 9212 1-297 4 ■ Telephone (858) 558-6900 ■ Fox ( 858) 558-6 159
project gcotechnical report and that the fill materials have been properly placed and compacted. Lots
30, 34 through 37, 130, 132, and 134 through 137 are open space/slope zone areas within the
subdivision. The grading operations for Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14, and the subject section of
Alicante Road were performed concurrently with other neighborhoods and the balance of Alicante
Road within The Greens project.
GENERAL
The grading contractor for the project was Signs and Pinnick Incorporated of El Cajon, California.
Grading plans for the project were prepared by Hunsaker and Associates and are entitled Grading
and Erosion Control Plans For: La Costa Greens Neighborhoods I.I I, 1.13 & 1.14, City of Carlsbad
approval dated May 6, 2004. An electronic version of the grading plans was used as the base map for
our "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures l through 5, map pocket). The project geotechnical report is
entitled Update Soil and Geologic Investigation, Villages of La Costa -The Greens, Carlsbad,
California, dated June 25, 2001 (Project No. 06403-12-03).
References to elevations and locations herein were based on surveyor's or grade-checker's stakes in
the field and/or interpolation from the referenced Grading Plans. Geocon Incorporated does not
provide surveying services and, therefore, has no opinion regarding the accuracy of the as-graded
elevations or surface geometry with respect to the approved grading plans or proper surface drainage.
GRADING
Neighborhoods 1.1 l, 1.13 and 1.14 are located within the Villages of La Costa -The Greens
development. These Neighborhoods are bound by Neighborhood 1.10 to the north, La Costa Resort
and Spa to the west, existing Alga Road to the south, and Neighborhood 1.12 and an existing
residential subdivision to the east. Prior to grading, the site was characterized primarily by
moderately sloping hillside terrain dissected by a series of drainages, which have a central confluence
draining southward into San Marcos Creek. Grading for the site consisted of daylight cuts and fills to
achieve finish-grade elevations.
Undocumented fill was encountered near the intersection of Alga Road and Alicante Road. This
material was apparently placed during the grading for Alga Road. The lateral extent of remedial
grading was limited due to the presence of Alga Road and some undocumented fill and alluvium were
left in place as shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figure 2).
Grading began with the removal of brush and vegetation from the area to be graded. The brush was
then exported. Topsoil, undocumented fill, and colluvial and alluvial soils were removed to expose
formational material, where possible.
Project No. 06403-52-09 -2 -July 27, 2004
Within these areas, and prior to placing fill, the exposed ( overexcavated) ground surface was scarified
(where possible), moisture conditioned, and compacted. Areas of remedial grading that exposed
metavolcanic rock were not scarified. Fill materials derived from on-site blasting, and excavations
were then placed and compacted in layers until the design elevations were attained. In addition, fill
was placed as a result of the undercutting of the cut portion of cut-fill transition lots and lots where
metavolcanic rock was exposed at grade. Roadway and parkway undercuts were also performed
where metavolcanic rock was exposed. Roadway undercuts consisted of undercutting to a depth of
approximately 1 foot below the deepest utility. Parkway undercuts consisted of undercutting to a
depth of approximately 6 feet below finish-grade. Lot undercuts consisted of undercutting to a depth
of at least 3 fee t below finish-grade where metavolcanics were encountered. In addition, within the
sedimentary unit, fill was placed as a result of the undercutting of the cut portion of cut-fill transition
to a depth of 4 feet below finish-grade. Where highly expansive claystone or topsoil was exposed at
grade, the lot was undercut 4 feet sloping the bottom of the undercut at a gradient of I percent toward
the deeper fill or adjacent roadway.
Fill Materials and Placement Procedures
The on-site fill materials generally varied between angular gravels and boulders produced by onsite
blasting of hard metavolcanic rock and sandy clays and silty sands generated by excavations within
the surficial soils and sedimentary Santiago Formation. The sandy clays and silty sands derived from
the surficial soils and Santiago Formation were generally suitable for capping material. Structural fill
placed and compacted at the site consisted of material that can be classified into three zones:
• Zone A -Material placed within 3 feet from pad grade, 6 feet from parkway grade, and
within roadways to at least 1 foot below the deepest utility consisted of "soil" fill with a
maximum particle dimension of 6-inches.
• Zone B -Material placed within 10 feet from pad grade and below Zone A consisted of
"soil-rock" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 12 inches. In addition, material placed
on the outer 6 feet of fill slopes and 2 feet below Zone A for fills in roadways and parkways
consisted of "soil-rock" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 12 inches.
• Zone C -Material placed below Zone B consisted of "soil-rock" fill with a maximum particle
dimension of 48 inches. It should also be noted that larger rocks with a maximum dimension
of approximately 8 feet were buried individually during grading operations.
Placement procedures for "soil-rock" consisted of spreading and compacting the materi al with a D9
or larger Caterpillar bulldozer with a maximum lift size of 3 feet. "Soil -Rock" fills were
predominately placed within the deeper portions of canyon cleanouts. Materials placed as "soil-rock"
were watered heavily during spreading to help properly fi ll voids with finer material and "seat" the
larger rocks. During the placement of each lift, compactive effort was applied to the fill by wheel-
rolling with loaded rock trucks such that the entire lift was compacted. "Soil-rock" fills were
Project No. 06403-52-09 -3 -July 27, 2004
predominately placed within the tributary canyon cleanouts and undocumented fill removals within
Neighborhoods 1.13 and 1.14.
"Soil" fills were placed in lifts no thicker than would allow for adequate bonding and compaction.
The soil was moisture conditioned as necessary, mixed during placement, and then compacted
utilizing conventional heavy-duty compaction equipment.
During grading operations, compaction procedures were observed and in-place density tests were
performed to evaluate the dry density and moisture content of the "soil" and "soil-rock" fill material.
The in-place density tests were performed in general conformance with ASTM Test Method
D 2922-0 I, Standard Test Method for Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by Nuclear
Methods.
The results of the in-place dry density and moisture content tests are summarized on Table I. Grading
for Neighborhoods l.ll, 1.13 and 1.14 and Alicante Road Stations 10+00 to 31+70 was performed
concurrently with other Neighborhoods within the Villages of La Costa -The Greens development.
The results presented on Table I apply to Neighborhoods 1.11 , 1.13 and 1.14, and Alicante Road
Stations l 0+00 to 31 + 70 only. As such, the test numbers are not in consecutive order. Any tests taken
outside of the subject neighborhoods and roadway have been addressed in reports for other
neighborhoods within the Greens.
Using methods suggested by AASHTO T224-86, corrections were made to the laboratory maximum
dry density and optimum moisture content on fill soils being tested containing rocks larger than ¾
inch. The values of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content presented on Table I reflect
these corrections.
In general, the in-place density test results indicate that the fill soil has a dry density of least 90
percent of the laboratory maximum dry density near to slightly above optimum moisture content at
the locations tested. In addition, moisture tests performed in "soil-rock" generally indicate moisture
contents near or slightly above the adjusted optimum. The approximate locations of the in-place
density and moisture content tests are shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1
through 5).
Laboratory tests were performed on samples of material used for fill to evaluate moisture-density
relationships, optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557-02), expansion
potential (ASTM D 4829-03), shear strength (ASTM D 3080-03), and water-soluble sulfate content
(California Test No. 41 7). The results of the laboratory tests are summarized on Tables II through V.
Project No. 06403-52-09 -4 -July 27, 2004
Slopes
The projects cut and fill slopes were constructed at inclinations of 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter
with maximum heights of approximately 40 feet. All slopes should be planted, drained and
maintained to reduce erosion. Slope irrigation should be kept to a minimum to just support the
vegetative cover. Surface drainage should not be allowed to flow over the top of the slope.
A buttress fill slope with a maximum height of 40 feet was constructed along the south-facing slope
within the northern portion of the Neighborhood 1.14, adjacent to the SDG&E easement, to stabilize
observed bedding plane shears. The limits of the buttress fill, including the keyway elevations, are
depicted on Figures 2 and 4. The buttress fill backcut was excavated to the design configuration as
recommended in the previously referenced update geotechnical investigation report. Once the design
configuration had been achieved and observed by an engineering geologist, panel drains were
installed on the backcut and connected to a heel drain that currently outlets with a riser at the
intersection of Galena Road and Street "FF" and is to be tied into the storm drain system on
Goldstone Road by the guest builder.
Additionally, a stability fill with a maximum height of20 feet was constructed along the north-facing
slope within Neighborhood 1.11 to stabilize interbedded sandstone and claystone at the upper portion
of the slope and thinly laminated fossiliferous layers of lagoonal deposits within the lower portion.
The limits of the stability fill, including the keyway elevations, are depicted on Figure 5. The stability
fill backcut was excavated to design configuration, panel drains were installed on the backcut and
connected to a heel drain, and extended for future connection to the storm drain system on Street
"DD." The heel drain connection to the storm drain system will be the responsibility of the guest
builder.
Laboratory testing was performed on the fill materials used in the buttress and stability fill to
determine suitable shear strength materials. Table IV presents a summary of the laboratory shear test
results.
During grading, minor seepage was encountered on the cut slope at the back of Lot 97 within
Neighborhood 1.13. The seepage has reduced in volume; however, if seepage continues, remedial
measures may be necessary.
Subdrains
Subdrains were installed at the general locations shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1
through 5). In addition, the subdrains were "as-built" for location and elevation by the project civil
engineer. The subdrains generally consisted of 8-inch-diameter Schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe
placed in crushed aggregate surrounded by Mirafi 140N (or equivalent) filter fabric. The drains were
Project No. 06403-52-09 -5 -July 27, 2004
typically placed at least 15 feet below finish grade and constructed at a flow gradient of at least l
percent. Heel drains from stability fills and buttress fills were constructed wi th 4-inch-diameter
Schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe placed on crushed aggregate surrounded by Mirafi 140N (or
equivalent) filter fabric. The heel drains will be connected into the storm drain system by guest
builders.
The canyon subdrains were outlet into an existing storm drain inlet structure on Alga Road. Subdrain
outlets should be maintained regularly to prevent sediment and debris from obstructing the free flow
of water out of the subdrain system.
Finish-grade Soil Conditions
Observations and laboratory test results indicate that the prevailing soil conditions within the upper
approximately 3 to 4 feet of finish-grade of the lots have an expansion potential of "low" to
"medium" (Expansion Index of 90 or less) as defined by Uniform Building Code (UBC)
Table 18-I-B. Table VI presents a summary of the indicated Expansion Index of the prevailing
subgrade soil conditions for each lot.
It should be noted that although rocks larger than 6-inch in diameter were not intentionally placed
within the street undercut fill and the upper 4 feet of pad grades, some larger rocks may exist at
random locations.
Some samples obtained for expansion testing were also subjected to water-soluble sulfate testing to
evaluate the amount of water-soluble sulfates within the finish-grade soils. These test results are used
to determine the potential for sulfate attack on normal Portland Cement concrete. The test results
indicate sulfate contents that correspond to "negligible" to "severe" sulfate exposure ratings.
Geocon Incorporated does not practice corrosion engineering. Therefore, results of these tests should
be reviewed by a corrosion consultant, and appropriate recommendations should be implemented
during design and construction of proposed improvements. The results of the water-soluble sulfate
tests are summarized on Table V.
SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The soil and geologic conditions encountered during grading were found to be similar to those
described in the project geotechnical report. Santiago Peak Volcanics (Jsp) were exposed at grade on
cut slopes and within cleanouts, in pad undercuts and cut areas within street right-of-ways. The
Santiago Fonnation (Ts) was exposed at grade on cut slopes and within cleanouts in pad undercuts.
Some alluvium (Qal) and undocumented fi ll (Qudf) adjacent to Alga Road were left in place due to
the presence of existing improvements. Compacted soils were placed in areas of fill and are
Project No. 06403-52-09 -6 -July 27, 2004
designated as (Qcf) on Figures 1 through 5. In addition, compacted fill soil placed in undercut areas is
designated as (Que). Tables IX through Table XI presents a summary of As-Graded Building Pad
Conditions for each lot.
The enclosed "As-Graded" Geologic Map depicts the general geologic conditions observed. No soil
or geologic conditions were observed during grading that would preclude the continued development
of the property as planned.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 General
1.1 Based on observations and test results, it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the
grading to which this report pertains has been performed in substantial conformance with
the recommendations of the previously referenced project soils report and the geotechnical
requirements of the grading plans. Soil and geologic conditions encountered during grading
that differ from those anticipated in the project soils report are not uncommon. Where such
conditions required a significant modification to the recommendations of the proj ect soils
report, they have been described herein.
1.2 No soil or geologic conditions were observed during grading that would preclude the
continued development of the property as planned. Based on laboratory test results and
fie ld observations, it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the fi ll soils observed and
tested as part of the grading for this neighborhood were generally compacted to a dry
density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density near to slightly above
optimum moisture content.
2.0 Future Grading
2.1 Any additional grading performed at the site should be accomplished in conjunction with
our observation and compaction testing services. Grading plans for any future grading
should be reviewed by Geocon Incorporated prior to finalizing. All trench and wall backfill
should be compacted to a dry density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry
density near or above optimum moisture content. This office should be notified at least 48
hours prior to commencing additional grading or backfill operations.
3.0 Update Geotechnical Report
3.1 An update geotechnical report should be prepared by Geocon Incorporated for
Neighborhood 1.11, 1.13, and 1.14. The report should include foundation recommendations
for reducing the detrimental effect of expansive soil and differential fill settlement across
Project No. 06403-52-09 -7 -July 27, 2004
individual structures. In addition, retaining wall recommendations and se1snuc design
criteria should be included, as well as other considerations such as swimming pools and
concrete flatwork.
4.0 Slope Maintenance
4.1 Slopes that are steeper than 3: 1 (horizontal:vertical) may, under conditions that are both
difficult to prevent and predict, be susceptible to near-surface (surficial) slope instability.
The instability is typically limited to the outer 3 feet of a portion of the slope and usually
does not directly impact the improvements on the pad areas above or below the slope. The
occurrence of surficial instability is more prevalent on fill slopes and is generally preceded
by a period of heavy rainfall, excessive irrigation, or the migration of subsurface seepage.
The disturbance and/or loosening of the surficial soils, as might result from root growth,
soil expansion, or excavation for irrigation lines and slope planting, may also be a
significant contributing factor to surficial instability. It is therefore recommended that, to
the maximum extent practical:
• Disturbed/loosened surficial soils be either removed or properly recompacted.
• Irrigation systems be periodically inspected and maintained to eliminate leaks and
excessive irrigation.
• Surface drains on and adjacent to slopes be periodically maintained to preclude
ponding or erosion.
It should be noted that although the incorporation of the above recommendations should
reduce the potential for surficial slope instability, it will not eliminate the possibility and,
therefore, it may be necessary to rebuild or repair a portion of the project's slopes in the
fu ture.
5.0 Drainage
5.1 Adequate drainage provisions are critical to the future performance of the project. Under no
circumstances should water be allowed to pond. The building pads and sheet-graded areas
should be properly finish-graded so that drainage water is directed away from foundations,
pavements, concrete slabs, and slope tops to controlled drainage devices.
5.2 All underground utilities should be leak free. Utility and irrigation lines should be checked
periodically for leaks for early detection of water infiltration and detected leaks should be
repaired promptly. Detrimental soil movement could occur if water is allowed to infiltrate
the soil over a prolonged period.
Project No. 06403-52-09 -8 -July 27, 2004
5.3 Landscaping planters adjacent to paved areas are not recommended due to the potential for
surface or irrigation water to infiltrate the pavement's subgrade and base course. We
recommend that subdrains to collect excess irrigation water and transmit it to drainage
structures or impervious above-grade planter boxes be used. In addition, where landscaping
is planned adjacent to the pavement, we recommend construction of a cutoff wall along the
edge of the pavement that extends at least 6 inches below the bottom of the base material.
LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained herein apply only to our work with respect to
grading and represent conditions at the date of our final observation on May 24, 2004. Any
subsequent grading should be done in conjunction with our observation and testing services. As used
herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of the work with which we
agreed to be involved. Our services did not include the evaluation or identification of the potential
presence of hazardous or corrosive materials. Our conclusions and opinions as to whether the work
essentially complies with the job specifications are based on our observations, experience and test
results. Subsurface conditions, and the accuracy of tests used to measure such conditions, can vary
greatly at any time. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, except that our services were
performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and location.
We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the site by others, by the
uncontrolled action of water, or by the failure of others to properly repair damages caused by the
uncontrolled action of water. The findings and recommendations of this report may be invalidated
wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and
should not be relied upon after a period of three years.
Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please
contact the undersigned at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
GEOCON INCORPORATED
SR:AS :IT-I:bjl
(3/del)
(3/del)
Addresse
John Laing Homes
Attention: Ms. Liz Albano
Project No. 06403-52-09 -9 -July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd .
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
06/03/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:35 75 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.I 14.2 91 90
2 06/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 79 11 0 117.0 14.6 109.0 14.6 93 90
3 06/03/03 Unit: 1. 14; Lot: 35 83 4 0 122.9 12.0 113.0 12.0 92 90
4 06/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 86 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.4 20.2 91 90
5 06/03/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:34 90 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.9 17.7 93 90 . -. ----... ---... -. ---. ·-... -------------· -. -.. -. ----. ---------------------. ---.. --.. ----...... -. --. -------. ----------. -----.. -. --.... --.... ---.. -----... -.. ---------------. ----------. ---------
6 06/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 87 11 0 117.0 14.6 109.0 15.0 93 90
7 06/04/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:35 80 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.1 19.5 92 90
8 06/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 93 11 0 I 17.0 14.6 107.4 20.5 92 90
9 06/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 95 4 0 122.9 12.0 114.5 15.4 93 90
10 06/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 79 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.4 20.6 92 90 ---·-··----·-······· ... -.. ----------···-·······-· II 06/05/03 Unit: l.l4;Goldstone 11+45 82 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.3 18.1 92 90
12 06/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 86 11 0 117.0 14.6 111.5 15.0 95 90
13 06/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 90 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.0 19.8 91 90
14 06/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 93 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.3 15.4 93 90
15 06/06/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 34 97 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.3 16.8 91 90 ... ----........... ········-······· . ···-· ·······------------------·······•·····-·•······--·-----....... ·······--·· ---------------------······ .................. . 16 06/06/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:35 l00 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 19.1 90 90
17 06/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 IOI 11 0 117.0 14.6 109.9 14.8 94 90
18 06/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 105 5 0 123.0 I 1.0 112.5 11.5 91 90
19 06/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 96 5 0 123.0 11.0 110.3 17.9 90 90
20 06/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 94 5 0 123.0 11.0 112.4 20.0 91 90 ---. ------.. -------·------. --. -·.. --...... -. . . . . ---.. -----... ---. --
21 06/06/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:34 106 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.7 15.4 91 90
22 06/06/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:34 110 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.0 18.4 91 90
23 06/06/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:36 114 II O 117.0 14.6 109.6 15.6 94 90
24 06/06/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:35 118 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.6 17.1 93 90
25 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 93 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.2 18.3 91 90 ------------· -···· . -.......... ·····. ---·-....... ···-------........ -----------------------------------------------······-------------·----...... . ............ .
26 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 97 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.5 18.0 91 90
27 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14: Street GG 13+15 104 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.9 16.4 91 90
28 06/09/03 Unit: J. 14; Lot: 24 100 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.0 17.7 91 90
29 06/09/03 Unit:1.14;StreetGG13+45 110 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.0 17.6 91 90
30 06/09/03 Unit: l.14;Goldstone 12+10 128 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.5 18.0 91 90 ----··-· . ··········-···---------······· ----------···· . ..... ····------·-·----
31 06/09/03 Unit:1.14:Lot:36 132 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.0 17.3 91 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
32 06/09/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:27 78 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.3 13.0 91 90
33 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 82 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.9 16.7 90 90
34 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 86 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.8 16.0 91 90
35 06/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 89 14 20 127.9 9.8 117.3 10.8 92 90
36 06110103 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 93 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.7 15.1 92 90 -------------------------------------·--···························-······-······--------------------··------·-------·························•··------------------------------· ...... ----------
37 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 135 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.6 15.6 90 90
38 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 96 I 3 0 119.2 13.4 112.7 16.2 95 90
39 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 99 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.8 15.7 93 90
40 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 120 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.4 14.6 91 90
41 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot 27 102 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.8 17.2 91 90 ···------······-· ........... ---. •-------.. -----. .. .......... ----------------------.... --···--------•-··· ...... ---
42 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 104 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.4 IS.I 90 90
43 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 106 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.3 15.6 91 90
44 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 108 15 0 125.0 10.4 114.2 10.8 91 90
45 06/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 110 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.6 16.0 92 90
46 06/11/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:26 113 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.7 16.6 90 90 ... --.... -----······ ............... ·······-------------------·····•···------·······-·---------·-········· ····---..... ···--·•····· -.... .
47 06/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:23 116 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.5 15.4 91 90
48 06/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 118 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.4 16.2 93 90
49 06/12/03 Unit:l.14;StreetGGl2+75 114 14 0 122.2 12.1 110.4 16.3 90 90
50 06/12/03 Unit:l.14;StreetGG12+40 116 14 0 122.2 12.1 115.I 11.0 94 90
51 06/13/03 Unit:1.14;StreetGG 13+45 117 14 0 122.2 12.1 114.6 12.8 94 90 ··• .. ... -······ ··----······-· ····• ...... .. . ... -. ·-....•.................... ······-· ··-·-·· ··············· ----· ..... ·····
52 06/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 23 120 14 40 133.6 7.8 123.8 9.1 93 90
53 06/16/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:23 123 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.3 18.5 92 90
54 06/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 122 13 0 I 19.2 13.4 I 10.0 15.5 92 90
55 06/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 13+65 124 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.4 17.6 92 90
56 06/1 6/03 Unit:l.14;StreetGGJ2+25 120 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.7 18.5 92 90 .. ·············-....................... ···•···· ···-·· ...... -----•···· ..... ······· ········· ....... ... .... .. .. ....... --········· ... .
57 06/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 124 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.0 21.1 90 90
58 06/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 120 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.1 20.6 90 90
59 06/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 12+00 125 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.6 20.8 91 90
60 06/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 123 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.3 22.1 92 90
61 06117/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:25 126 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.l 18.3 91 90 .... ......... . ...... ...... . ....... ····--·-······· --·••· --..... ··••-..... .
62 06/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 17 129 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.4 20.I 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Com. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
63 06/17/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:20 131 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.9 20.5 90 90
64 06/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 14+00 134 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.4 19.7 90 90
65 06/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 18 139 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.4 14.4 91 90
66 06/19/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:24 137 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.0 15.5 90 90
67 06/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 136 11 0 117.0 14.6 110.0 19.0 94 90 ... -------. ---------. -.. ---.... -.. -. --. -. -. -...... ---------.. -... --.. -.. ---------. -. ----. --. -..... --.. -------. ------... -------. -·-. ---. --...... -... ----. --------------------... -------------. -------
68 06/19/03 Unit:1.14;StreetGGl3+00 138 II O 117.0 14.6 107.l 14.9 92 90
69 06/19/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:21 140 13 0 119.2 13.4 111.2 16.8 93 90
70 06/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 142 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.3 21.0 90 90
71 06/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 146 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.9 20.5 91 90
72 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Loi: 32 60 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.8 18.0 90 90 ---. --------... -. -. ---------·----. --.. -. -..... -..... -. . . -.. -. ----. . . . -. --
73 06/20/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:33 63 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.8 18.4 90 90
74 06/20/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:31 66 13 0 119.2 13.4 112.0 14.l 94 90
75 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone lo+60 69 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.6 19.7 90 90
76 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot:31 70 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.9 22.3 90 90
77 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 72 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.4 15.6 92 90 ... -----. -. --. --------.... -. -.. -------. -. -... -.... ---. --· -. ---. -------... -.. ---.. -•·. -------.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --. -....... -..... .
78 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 75 13 0 119.2 13.4 112.7 14.4 95 90
79 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 31 80 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.3 20.9 91 90
80 06/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 83 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.6 17.4 93 90
81 06/23/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:31 85 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.5 22.3 90 90
82 06/23/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:33 88 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.1 23.9 90 90 . . ---.. --. . . . . . . . --... -... -... -. -. . . . . . --.. -. . . . . . . . . . ... -. . . . . . . --. . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . --. . . . .
83 06/23/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:32 91 13 0 119.2 13.4 114.2 14.0 96 90
84 06/23/03 Unit: l.14;Goldstone 11+15 87 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.1 21.0 91 90
85 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 104 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.4 16.2 90 90
86 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 107 14 0 122.2 12.l 114.0 14.9 93 90
87 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 110 14 O 122.2 12.I 109.6 17.6 90 90 ····· ·····•·•··•· -··· ----· ····-.. .. .. ·········•·--·--·----· --·-··-··-••-•···--·--·· ••• • ............ ··········· . ·········-····· ...... ---
88 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 94 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.3 20.8 90 90
89 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 98 I 3 0 119.2 13.4 109.4 17.1 92 90
90 06/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 96 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.9 18.4 90 90
91 06/24/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:33 106 13 0 11 9.2 13.4 108.4 18.2 91 90
92 06/24/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 103 13 0 I 19.2 13.4 113.0 16.6 95 90 . ····-···· .••• . . . .. ·-• ••·••·•• .. .. ...... -··-····-· .. -... --· ........ --
93 06/24/03 Uoit:1.14;Lot:31 IOI 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.8 20.3 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pd) (%) (pc() (%) (%) (%)
94 06/24/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 113 13 0 ll9.2 13.4 107.6 17.8 90 90
95 06/25/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 l 15 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.7 18.4 91 90
96 06/25/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 12+00 123 13 0 I 19.2 13.4 107.9 17.4 91 90
97 06/25/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 129 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.4 19.0 92 90
06/25/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 121 13 0 I 19.2 13.4 107.8 15.2 90 90 ·····-------------------------········--------------------------------------·-·······----------------------·--------------------·-·----------······--------------------------------..... 06/25/03 Unit: I. l 4; Lot: 25 130 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.6 14.1 93 90
100 06/25/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 12+00 133 13 0 119.2 13.4 l09.9 16.0 92 90
101 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 10+20 60 13 0 119.2 13.4 114. l 18.6 96 90
102 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 31 63 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.5 20.0 91 90
103 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 66 13 0 119.2 13.4 11 l.9 15.8 94 90 -----------........... ---------. -·---•··• ··•·· --------------.... ------.. ---------.. . ..... ····-. .... -.... 104 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 31 72 13 0 119.2 13.4 I 10.0 18.4 92 90
105 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+90 69 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.5 14.8 92 90
106 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 70 13 0 119.2 13.4 113.S 18.3 95 90
107 06/26/03 Unit: I. 14; Lot: 28 73 13 0 119.2 13.4 106.9 16.0 90 90
108 06/26/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 75 13 0 119.2 13.4 112.2 15.7 94 90 -.. ----. -.. -.. -.. --... ---.. -----. -.. --. -... -. -....... ---. ------------------·· •·••---··-·· ----..... ·--------------------·-····· ----------·· ·-··-109 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+25 78 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.7 15.0 93 90
I LO 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 10+20 80 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.9 16.8 93 90
111 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 83 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.3 15.6 92 90
112 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 86 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.6 15.3 92 90
113 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 87 13 0 119.2 13.4 112.8 17.2 95 90 ------····· --•• ---.... -.... -----. . -. ---. --.... -..... --------. -.. --. -. -... -.. -. . -. ----··---------.. . ........ -.... ·•··•· 114 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 90 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.9 18.8 91 90
115 06/27/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 92 13 0 119.2 13.4 113.8 17.4 95 90
l l6 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 95 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.8 15.7 91 90
117 06/30/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: l30 97 l3 0 l l9.2 13.4 109.2 15.7 92 90
118 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 98 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.4 16.I 91 90 ······••-•·· . ----...... ··--·---·-• ......... -----------.. ------------.. . ........ . --... -·-------. . ..... ··-·· 119 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+50 100 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.0 15. l 92 90
120 06/30/03 Unit: I. 14; Lot: 27 102 ll 0 117.0 14.6 105.7 18.7 90 90
121 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 103 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.4 19.5 90 90
122 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 10+15 l05 JI 0 I 17.0 14.6 106.3 17.8 91 90
123 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 130 109 13 0 l l9.2 13.4 107.9 15.1 91 90 .... .. .. ----------....... --.... . ·••----···· 124 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 32 107 13 0 I l9.2 13.4 108.5 15.5 91 90
Project No. 06403-I 2-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pd) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
125 06/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 104 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.0 16.3 91 90
126 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 105 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.2 17.1 92 90
127 07/01 /03 Unit:1.14;Lot:32 110 l3 0 119.2 13.4 !08.5 18.8 91 90
128 07/01/03 Unit: 1.l4;Ooldstone9+10 112 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.8 15.7 90 90
129 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 10+50 112 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.6 17.3 92 -. ---. -. --.. -------. ---•• ---·. ---..... ---------.. -.. ------. ---... ---. --. ----. ----..... ---------.. --... -------.... -. -.. ---------·. --. --. -----------. ---. ---... -. ----. -. ----.. ---. -... ------
130 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 114 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.0 16.l 91
13 I 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+80 111 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.4 16.4 91 90
132 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14;Goldstone 10+50 116 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.8 17.2 91 90
133 07/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 117 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.6 17.I 92 90
134 07/01/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:31 118 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.4 16.7 91 90 •. ···-----... ----------------···············-·· --------................. . .. ·••·
135 07/01/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:27 115 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.1 15.9 92 90
136 07/02/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:32 117 13 0 119.2 13.4 112.3 15.3 94 90
137 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+00 120 13 0 l 19.2 13.4 108.5 15.7 91 90
138 07/02/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:31 122 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.4 16.3 93 90
SZ 139 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 120 8 0 117.0 14.8 105.0 14.8 90 90 -----------------. . --------. ---... ---.. -.... ---. ---.. ---. . . ..... --.. ------------------. -....... -.. ------. -. ----. -. ------------. ---. --.. -. ---.. ---... ---. -. ----.. --
140 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+00 85 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.9 16.1 91 90
141 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 12+85 89 13 0 119.2 13.4 110.2 13.4 92 90
142 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+40 93 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.6 15.0 92 90
143 07/02/03 Unit: l.14; Alicante 12+20 96 13 0 119.2 13.4 11 1.3 10.9 93 90
144 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 120 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.5 14.9 91 90 ----------------· -------·-------------------·····-···------------------------------------·-·· -··· .. ------· ................. .
145 07/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 118 8 0 117.0 14.8 105.2 15.9 90 90
SZ 146 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 124 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.2 16.0 90 90
SZ 147 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 37 127 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.6 15.8 91 90
SZ 148 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 123 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.4 16.3 90 90
SZ 149 07/03/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:36 129 13 0 119.2 13.4 109.3 16.8 92 90 --. -----------. --.. -. ---.. -----. -----•• ---• -. --.. ---.... -. --... -----.. ---.. --. . . -..... -. -----. -. ---. -------. --. ----. -----. -.. -.. -. -. -..
SZ 150 07/03/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 36 132 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.4 16.3 91 90
151 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 125 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.2 17.0 91 90
152 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 12+15 127 13 0 119.2 13.4 107.3 17.3 90 90
153 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 134 13 0 I 19.2 13.4 110.4 16.9 93 90
SZ 154 07/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 135 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.6 16.4 91 90
--+ --• --· -• ------• -•• --• --• --•••• -• ---· • ----• --•• ---•• ----•• -----• • • • • • • • ----• --•
159 08/14/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 164 14 40 133.6 7.8 125.6 9.0 94 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Deas. Coat. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
160 07/03/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:36 136 13 0 119.2 13.4 108.8 15.7 91 90
170 07/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 26 I 19 14 10 125.0 10.9 115.4 14.0 92 90
171 07/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 l 18 14 10 125.0 10.9 112.2 15.2 90 90
172 07/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 31 125 11 0 117.0 14.6 110.8 18.6 95 90
173 07/07/03 Unit: l.14;Goldstone9+85 123 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.1 15.9 92 90 --•----------··-------·---········----·-························------------·----·----·----------------·· ----------------------·-•······-·········---------------------------------
174 07/07/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:24 126 II 0 117.0 14.6 112.0 18.3 96 90
175 07/07/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:34 121 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.8 16.6 90 90
176 07/07/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:28 129 II O 117.0 14.6 106.2 16.1 91 90
177 07/07/03 Unit: l.14;Goldstone 10+00 130 ll O 117.0 14.6 110.5 15.0 94 90
178 07/07/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:32 123 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.5 19.4 90 90 --" -----. -. . . . • . . . . . . -... -. --.. --. . . . . ... -. --. -. ---... -.. -... --· --. -.. ----. -. . . . . . . .. -----------. -. . . . -....
179 07/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 11+00 133 11 0 11 7.0 14.6 109.2 17.7 93 90
190 07/08/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:26 139 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.5 18.4 90 90
191 08/15/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 120 166 14 30 130.7 8.8 118.4 IO.I 91 90
192 07/08/03 Unit: l.l4;Lot:26 149 LI 0 117.0 14.6 109.3 16.9 93 90
193 07/08/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 37 131 ll 0 117.0 14.6 105.9 18.9 91 90 -... ----. -. . --. . . ---. -' ... -. -. --. . . . . . . . . . . ... -. -. --. ---.. ---... -------------. -. . ----. -----------------... -..... -. . . . . . -
194 07/08/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:38 134 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 18.3 90 90
195 07/08/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:39 137 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.9 11.2 92 90
195A 07/08/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:39 137 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 18.6 90 90
196 07/08/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 38 140 11 0 117.0 14.6 99.9 18.6 85 90
196A 07/08/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:38 140 II O 117.0 14.6 108.4 18.I 93 90 ....... -----. -. --. . . . . . . -.... -. . . . . . . -. -. --. --. -.. --... -' ---. -.... -. --. . . . -.. ---..... --. . . . . . . . ----.... -.... -.... -. -.. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... -..... -. . . . . . . . . . . . --... --.. -.. -
197 07/08/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:40 143 II O 117.0 14.6 105.7 16.5 90 90
198 07/08/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 39 145 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.5 16.8 92 90
199 07/08/03 Unit:i.14;Lot:37 134 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 19.3 90 90
210 07/09/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:29 98 LI O 117.0 14.6 110.6 16.2 95 90
211 07/09/03 Unit: 1.14;Alicantel l+90 100 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.L 19.6 91 90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... -. -. . . --........ -...... -. . . -................ -... --... -. . . -. . . . . . .... -.. --. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... --. . . -. --
212 07/09/03 Unit:l.l4;Alicante13+40 103 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 15.9 90 90
213 07/09/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:46 124 II O 117.0 14.6 108.3 17.5 93 90
214 07/09/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot:41 127 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.3 18.5 90 90
215 07/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 40 130 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.7 16.8 90 90
216 07/09/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:41 133 LI 0 117.0 14.6 106.2 16.3 91 90 . ···-····-· .. .. . .. . ... --...... .... -... ·········· ... . ----------.......... .
217 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 40 136 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 19.0 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
218 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 41 139 11 0 117.0 14.6 l03.3 11.6 88 90
218 A 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 41 139 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.8 16.0 92 90
219 07/10/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:46 140 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.6 19.8 90 90
220 07/10/03 Unit: l.l4; Lot: 43 143 11 0 117.0 14.6 110.3 17.1 94 90
221 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 47 146 I I 0 117.0 14.6 106.l 20.9 91 90 -----·-······------------·--·············-······ ····-···························-·-········----···························-···-· ----··················-······ -------------··········
222 07/10/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 46 149 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.7 20.4 91 90
223 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 47 152 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.0 16.7 90 90
224 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 46 155 11 0 117.0 14.6 105.5 18.0 90 90
225 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 48 148 14 0 122.2 12. I 111.7 14.8 91 90
226 07/10/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:50 168 14 0 122.2 12.l 109.5 18.1 90 90 ·--------------------..... -------·-····· ... -................. --------············-······-.................... .
227 07/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 53 155 14 0 122.2 12.I 109.8 16.9 90 90
228 07110/93 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 55 157 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.4 17.8 90 90
229 07/11/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 52 162 14 0 122.2 12.l 104.9 23.0 86 90
229 A 07/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 52 162 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.7 16.5 90 90
240 07/11/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:55 150 14 0 122.2 12.1 113.4 17.l 93 90 ---------------------------------· ... --....... ---· -----...... -··------·-··············· ---------•-·········· .... ·-·-----------------------·············· ··---------·----------241 07/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:54 161 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.9 17.6 92 90
242 07/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:47 157 14 0 122.2 12.I 111.8 18.4 91 90
243 07/11/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:47 161 14 0 122.2 12.l 110.6 18.7 91 90
244 07/11/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:52 164 14 0 122.2 12.l 115.8 16.3 95 90
245 07/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:49 166 14 O 122.2 12.1 109.5 18.4 90 90 . ---------. -----. ------------------... --·. ----............. --.. --. -.. -. . . . . . . ........ --. -------. -----. . . . . . ............ ---. -. -... .
246 07/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 47 163 14 0 122.2 12.1 110.0 14.4 90 90
247 07/11/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:46 166 14 0 122.2 12.1 110.7 17.0 91 90
248 07/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:58 174 14 0 122.2 12.1 111.9 15.6 92 90
249 07/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 60 177 14 0 122.2 12.l 110.2 16.2 90 90
260 07/11/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:61 179 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.9 18.0 93 90 . ------.. -. . . ---------. -. -... -. -----------. -. ----------------• -· -... -. . . . . -.. -----......... ---. . . --. --.... -------• ---------. -.. -. . . . . . . . .. .
261 07/11/03 Unit:l.l l ;Lot:59 188 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.3 16.4 91 90
262 07/14/03 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 58 178 11 0 l l 7.0 14.6 l05.4 17.1 90 90
263 07/14/03 Urtit:l.l l ;Lot:60 181 11 0 117.0 14.6 112.0 15.6 96 90
264 07/14/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:58 184 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.6 19.8 93 90
265 07/14/03 Unit:1.ll;Lot:61 189 II 0 117.0 14.6 106.3 17.4 91 90 . . . . . . . . . --. . . . . . . --. -. -. -. . . --. --. ---. ---. --........ --------· --.. ----------. --. . . . . -----.. ----. . --. ----
266 07/14/03 Unit:1.l l ;Lot:59 190 II 0 117.0 14.6 109.6 16.9 94 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
267 07/14/03 Unit:1.ll;Lot:60 193 JI 0 117.0 14.6 108.2 17.5 92 90
268 07/14/03 Unit:J.ll;Lot:65 161 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.6 21.5 90 90
269 07/14/03 Unit: l.ll;Lot: 68 172 II O 117.0 14.6 107.5 18.2 92 90
270 07/14/03 Unit:1.ll;Lot:66 165 II 0 117.0 14.6 108.1 18.0 92 90
07/14/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:69 176 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 20.3 90 --·-·---·····•··•··---···-·············----------------···-···················· -----------------·----------------····--------------------------·············-----------------07/14/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:65 166 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.0 16.0 90
273 07/15/03 Unit: 1.1 I; Lot: 65 168 11 0 Jl 7.0 14.6 110.5 18.0 94 90
274 07/15/03 Unit: l.ll;Lot: 65 171 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.8 16.8 90 90
275 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:66 174 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.0 19.6 90 90
276 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:67 179 II 0 117.0 14.6 106.7 16.8 91 90 .. ······ ···········-···--•• --------------------............... ---------, ---· ... -------------... ········· .............. ·-----........ .
277 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:65 178 II 0 117.0 14.6 105.7 17.5 90 90
278 07/15/03 Unit:l.lJ;Lot:66 181 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.9 19.7 92 90
279 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:61 185 11 0 117.0 14.6 111.5 16.5 95 90
281 07/15/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+80 115 14 0 122.2 12.I 110.4 12.4 90 90
286 07/15/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+10 117 14 20 127.9 9.8 117.8 10.0 92 90 . --..... -. --... ----. --......... -. . . ------. ---.. -. . . . -.. -----. -. -----. . . . ·•-.. . . . . . . .. -. --. --. . . .... .
SZ 289 07/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 137 119 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.8 13.0 90 90
290 07/15/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 I 18 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.5 12.8 90 90
291 07/15/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 12+00 117 14 30 130.7 8.8 120.5 8.9 92 90
SZ 292 07/15/03 Unit: J.14;Lot: 122 121 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.1 14.9 92 90
293 07/15/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 123 122 14 0 122.2 12.1 111.4 15.0 91 90 •• --------·· •••• ··-·· --·-···---.. --···· ...... ···•···· ·---·. --. . ·-----···-.. ········---···· ... ...... .. ······----·-·· ----------··· 294 07/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+10 123 14 20 127.9 9.8 116.J 9.9 91 90
295 07/16/03 Unit: 1.14; AJicante 12+05 124 14 20 127.9 9.8 120.2 10.6 94 90
296 07/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 121 125 14 0 122.2 12.1 113.5 12.5 93 90
SZ 297 07/16/03 Unit: l.l4;Lot: 119 124 14 0 122.2 12.l 111.6 13.1 91 90
298 07/16/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot: 119 125 14 20 127.9 9.8 115.8 9.7 91 90 .. ----· -------.. -. --. . . . . . . . -. -.. -. . . . . . . . . . -.. --. . ... -· . ----. . . . -. . . . . . . -. -·. -.. . .. ---..... -.. ------
299 07/17/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 125 14 0 122.2 12. I 112.2 13.3 92 90
300 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:58 188 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.8 19.1 92 90
301 07/15/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:60 195 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.3 21.6 92 90
306 07/16/03 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 70 174 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.I 19.8 91 90
309 07/16/03 Unit:1.ll;Lot:71 183 II 0 11 7.0 14.6 107.2 16.3 92 90 ····--··-·······-....... ---· -----...... ·-····••· ·-----··· ····· ....... . . ............. ... -••·
312 07/16/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:71 186 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.5 16.0 92 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
314 07/16/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:70 179 12 0 124.5 10.7 112.7 15.4 91 90
317 07/16/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:70 191 12 0 124.5 10.7 114.5 14.6 92 90
318 07116/03 Unit: LI I; Lot: 30 I 93 12 0 124.5 L0.7 111.7 20. l 90 90
3 I 9 07 /16/03 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 31 196 12 0 124.5 10. 7 111.5 18.5 90 90
320 07/17/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:48 169 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.8 18.1 92 90 ----. ----. -.. -----------.. --. -----. -------.. -..... -----.... -----------------------------------.... -.. ---------. -----------. -----. ---. ----.. --.... ------------------------------. --------.... -.. --... ----
321 07/17/03 Unit:l.14;StreetEE 10+20 164 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 20.8 90 90
322 07/17/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 45 167 11 0 117.0 14.6 102.4 18.7 88 90
322A 07/17/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:45 167 II 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 18.0 90 90
327 07/18/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:44 158 II 0 117.0 14.6 107.1 21.8 92 90
328 07/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 51 170 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.9 20.5 92 90 ----------------------------------··••···••·· ···········----------------· ----------------........ ····---------------··-·· ·•············· ..... -----------· 329 07/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 48 173 11 0 II 7.0 14.6 l05.7 16.8 90 90
330 07/17/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 120 134 14 0 122.2 12.1 111.0 13.8 91 90
331 07/17/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 120 127 14 0 122.2 12.l 111.8 12.5 91 90
332 07/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 121 132 14 0 122.2 12.l l 15.6 9.8 95 90
333 07/18/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 119 130 13 0 119.2 13.4 111.4 13.6 93 90 •• -----------.. ---------------·····--··. ------·-........ ····-----·----------· ·---···-·--· ·--........... .
334 07/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante I 1+60 125 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.5 14.7 90 90
335 07/18/03 Unit:1.l4;Alicantel3+70 127 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.4 13.5 92 90
340 07/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 54 168 12 0 124.5 10.7 I 13.0 20.5 91 90
341 07/18/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 56 171 12 0 124.5 10.7 111.7 15.5 90 90
350 07/21/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 129 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.1 10.1 90 90 . -. ---... -. ---. ----. . -. --. . . .............. -.. --.... ----. --. -----... -. --.. -.... --.. -.. -. --. -. --. -. --. ----------. . . . . .. --. -. . . . -. . . ...... .
351 07/21/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 14+60 130 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.8 9.8 91 90
352 07/21/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 124 133 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.4 10.5 90 90
353 07/21/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 15+00 131 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.2 7.9 91 90
354 07/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 14+25 134 14 60 139.2 5.8 128. l 13.0 92 90
355 07/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 124 135 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.3 8.6 90 90 .... --........ -----.. --... -... -· ... ·-· -.... -.. -. -. . -.. -. . . . -. . . . . ·-. --.... -. -. --. . . . . . . . .. .
356 07/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 138 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.9 12.I 91 90
357 07/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 16+00 140 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.0 9.2 91 90
358 07/23/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:l24 142 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.5 11.5 91 90
359 07/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+45 138 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.9 10.4 90 90
380 07/23/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 133 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.l 10.6 90 90 ·················-.. -· --·· ···--· . ........ .. ······-·····--·-·-···· .. ·-··-----·-. --····---·•· 381 07/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 11+50 136 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.0 7.9 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
382 07/24/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 138 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.3 9.0 91 90
383 07/24/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 119 132 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.7 12.0 92 90
384 07/24/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 17+00 145 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.8 14.2 91 90
385 07/24/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 137 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.1 8.7 91 90
386 07/25/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:119 134 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.5 9.4 92 90 --·-···-..... -........... -.. -·-------·-·. ------... -------------.. -----------------. -----.. -..... --------------•• --.. -. ----. ----... --... ----. -. -------------. -. ----.. --------. -.. --------------. ----
387 07/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 121 140 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.2 11.8 91 90
388 07/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 126 139 14 60 139.2 5.8 127.4 9.5 91 90
389 07/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 141 14 60 139.2 5.8 128.I 12.9 92 90
408 07/28/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 141 14 0 122.2 12.l I I 1.4 17.2 91 90
409 07/28/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 119 142 14 0 122.2 12.I 113.0 15.8 92 90 ---------------·-······ ------------------------------------······---·----------······ ---------------------... -------····--
411 07/28/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 146 14 20 127.9 9.8 115.4 10.8 90 90
412 07/28/03 Unit: 1.1 3; Lot: 121 143 14 0 122.2 12.1 111.4 16.0 91 90
415 07/29/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 122 148 14 0 122.2 12.I 110.3 13.0 90 90
416 07/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 150 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.9 15.7 90 90
440 07/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 122 151 14 20 127.9 9.8 120.6 9.9 94 90 . -. . . -. . . . . . . . .. -------.... -. . . . . . . . . .. -..... --. ' -. -. . . . . .. --. -.. --. -. . . . . -... ----. . . ---. -. ---... -. --. -----... ---. -. ----. . -----------..... -. --. -.. --. . . . . -.. -..... ---...... --.
443 07/30/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 148 14 0 122.2 12.I 110.2 15.1 90 90
444 07/30/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:119 149 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.6 13.5 92 90
447 07/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Street AA 11+90 153 14 20 127.9 9.8 115.9 II.I 91 90
448 07/30/03 Unit: f.13; Lot: 121 151 14 20 127.9 9.8 118.6 10.6 93 90
449 07/31/03 Unit: 1.1 3; Lot: 120 154 14 0 122.2 12.1 110.4 14.8 90 90 --------. ·-. ----. ---. ---..... -. -....... ---. . . . . . . . -................ ----..... -..... -. --· ..... -.. ---... . -------. --. --------------------.. --. -. --. ---. -..... -... -. . . . . .. -' -.. -. -----.. ---.
450 07/31/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 155 14 0 122.2 12.1 109.6 13.1 90 90
451 07/31/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 156 14 0 122.2 12.1 ll0.7 13.4 91 90
452 08/01/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 156 14 30 130.7 8.8 121.8 12.2 93 90
453 08/01/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 121 157 14 0 122.2 12.1 114.8 16.5 94 90
454 08/01/03 Unit: 1.1 3; Street AA 10+45 158 14 60 139.2 5.8 131.9 7.9 95 90 -. -------.... -. . . -'. . . -. . . . . --.. -. . . . . . . . --.. --. -. --.. ---. . .. ---. --. --.. -.. -. -.. -. . . --.... -. -. . . . . -. -. --. . ----.. -. ---. --. --------. . ---... -.. --... ---... -...
467 08/04/03 Unit: 1.13;Lot: 119 158 14 40 133.6 7.8 125.1 11.2 94 90
468 08/04/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 121 159 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.5 9.7 90 90
469 08/04/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 158 14 40 133.6 7.8 122.6 9.9 92 90
470 08/05/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 125 161 14 20 127.9 9.8 118.6 13.9 93 90
471 08/05/03 Unit: 1.13; Street AA 10+25 162 14 20 127.9 9.8 118.0 14.6 92 90 ... ··--··· •··• ....... ··-········-· .... -· -------••·· ................ -·· .... ------····· .. ·-· ... ... . .......... . --. ···-··•·· .... .
472 08/05/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 123 164 14 20 127.9 9.8 114.9 11.7 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
484 08/08/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 119 160 14 30 130.7 8.8 119.5 12.2 91 90
485 08/11/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 121 163 14 30 130.7 88 121.6 9.0 93 90
495 08/14/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 117 164 14 0 122.t 12.1 110.2 16.l 90 90
496 08/14/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 119 162 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.9 8.8 91 90
497 08/14/03 Unit:l.13;StreetAAll+00 168 14 30 130.7 8.8 117.5 12.2 90 90 .. -. -· ..... -.. ---. -.... -.... ·-. -------. -----.. -· -------------------. -........... ---------.. ----------------. -------. -. ---. -.. ---------------------------.. -.. --------.... --.. -.. -. --------
498 08/14/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 124 166 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.8 10.6 90 90
499 08/18/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 125 167 14 20 127.9 9.8 115.5 13.J 90 90
506 08/18/03 Unit: 1.1 4; Lot: 126 168 14 20 127.9 9.8 I 18.9 9.9 93 90
523 08/20/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 170 14 30 130.7 8.8 122.0 8.8 93 90
524 08/20/03 Unit: l.l3;Lot: 116 171 14 30 130.7 8.8 119.4 10.2 91 90 ........ . .............. -----·· ······•------.......... -----.. . . . ... ·······-·······--·-···••··•·-....... ------sz 525 08/20/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 10 326 14 40 133.6 7.8 125.2 8.6 94 90
550 08/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 172 14 30 130.7 8.8 123.9 12.6 95 90
551 08/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 115 170 14 30 130.7 8.8 120.5 10.1 92 90
552 08/25/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:1l7 173 14 30 130.7 8.8 120.1 13.I 92 90
553 08/25/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 126 175 14 30 130.7 8.8 122.8 10.8 94 90 ..... ·-··-··· ........ ------··· .. -------------------------------....... , ... ·······--···---------------
616 09/02/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 126 178 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.7 9.3 90 90
617 09/02/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 176 14 40 133.6 7.8 122.6 8.0 92 90
618 09/03/03 Unit: 1.13;StreetAA9+60 370 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.3 9.7 91 90
619 09/03/03 Unit: 1.13;StreetAA9+60 373 14 50 136.4 6.8 124.4 9.3 91 90
642 09/05/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 114 175 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.9 8.4 91 90
----• --•• ------------••• -• --•• -• -•• -•••••••••• ----------•• -• --• • • • • • • • -> • • --• --• • • -• ------• • • • • • • • -• -• -• • --•• ---• -• --------• -•• -------• --• -•• -• -• --••••• ----••••••••• --• -•
643 09/05/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 117 178 14 60 139.2 5.8 130.3 6.4 94 90
673 09/10/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 190 14 40 133.6 7.8 123.3 10.5 92 90
674 09/10/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 108 194 14 50 136.4 6.8 125.4 8.8 92 90
675 09/10/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 106 196 14 50 136.4 6.8 123.8 I I.I 91 90
676 09/10/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 200 14 50 136.4 6.8 128.4 9.0 94 90
--•· ................ -·· .. ······-··---··· -·-·--···--
677 09/11/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 124 180 14 50 136.4 6.8 122.2 11.4 90 90
678 09/11103 Unit: l.13; Lot: 122 182 14 50 136.4 6.8 123.0 12.3 90 90
679 09/11/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 119 183 14 50 136.4 6.8 126.9 9.6 93 90
680 09/11/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 110 203 14 50 136.4 6.8 130.5 9.8 96 90
681 09/12/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 107 198 14 50 136.4 6.8 125.3 9.5 92 90
•• ···•------·••· •••• ---·-··· --••-· ·----··-· -----·-··············-···. . ..... ------· ... ... ---·····-·······
682 09/12/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 129 185 14 50 136.4 6.8 124.1 10.9 91 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
683 09/12/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 127 181 14 50 136.4 6.8 127.9 9.6 94 90
711 09/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 127 181 14 20 127.9 9.8 118.6 13.l 93 90
712 09/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 182 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.9 10.1 91 90
713 09/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 180 14 40 133.6 7.8 124.6 9.0 93 90
714 09/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 126 187 14 0 122.2 12.1 113.8 12.8 93 90 ---------.. --. -----.. --... -..... ---· ... -. ---........ --· -· ....... ----.. -... -....... --.. --....... ------.. --... -.. ·-....... -. -. -. ----· ---------------------•-•-····· -·----·
715 09/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 184 14 0 122.2 12. I 118.4 8.9 97 90
716 09/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 128 186 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.0 8.5 91 90
717 09/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 126 185 14 20 127.9 9.8 115.2 13.1 90 90
718 09/17/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 127 188 14 60 139.2 5.8 130.3 6.2 94 90
719 09/17/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 123 187 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.8 I 0.1 91 90 ...... -. --------------. -... -. --... ------... -----. ----. -. --. -. -. -·-. --------. -----. -. -. ------------....... -------
740 09/17/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 109 205 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.3 9.6 90 90
741 09/17/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: l 06 208 14 50 136.4 6.8 124.3 8.5 91 90
742 09/18/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 109 209 14 30 130.7 8.8 123.8 9.6 95 90
743 09/18/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 106 2 11 14 30 130.7 8.8 119.7 12.6 92 90
744 09/18/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 108 2 12 14 50 136.4 6.8 122.9 10.0 90 90 ------------------··••· ... ············ ----·-···· ----..... -------------------······· ............ , ...
760 09/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 11+00 128 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.3 17.6 94 90
761 09/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 12+00 132 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.2 16.9 92 90
762 09/19/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 13+00 138 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.8 17.3 90 90
sz 763 09/19/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: I 19 140 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.6 16.7 92 90
sz 764 09/19/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 144 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.2 16.5 92 90
• -• -• + +. • • --• • • • • •• -• • • •••••••• --• -• • • -• • • • • • ------• ---• • • ---------• -• --•••• -• ---• -•• ----·------------········---·-. . --.......... .... sz 765 09/19/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 146 24 0 117.0 14.7 103.3 11.2 88 90
sz 765 A 09119/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 146 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.2 17.8 93 90
766 09/22/03 Unit: l.13; Street AA 9+75 164 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 19.3 91 90
sz 767 09/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 19 149 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.1 21.2 93 90
sz 768 09/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 153 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.3 19.2 92 90 ············ .... ··-•-•·••· ······-.............. ·····-···. --·· -···· . . -. ---. -----... -.... -. --.. --------·-·····-·-·· -·-· --· ... sz 769 09/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 158 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 21.2 90 90
sz 770 09/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 119 168 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.2 20.2 92 90
sz 771 09/22/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 121 162 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.4 19.0 92 90
772 09/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 47 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.0 19.3 90 90
773 09/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 51 176 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 19.7 90 90 .................. •·•• ------··. ·--------··· -... ·-· --.......
774 09/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 54 174 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.6 20.9 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (fl) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
775 09/22/03 Unit:1.l4;Lot:56 174 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.0 21.8 91 90
776 09/22/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 49 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 20.3 90 90
777 09/22/03 Unit:I.14;Lot:53 175 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.0 20.1 91 90
778 09/23/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 56 175 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.7 18.5 94 90
779 09/23/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:119 171 10 0 114.0 13.0 106.9 17.7 94 90 ----... ----------------... -. -------------... -..... ---. ----.. --...... -----.. -.. -------.. -.. --.. -. ---------------. --· --. --. --. -. -----------. -.. ----. --. ---------------------------.. ---. --.... --. -----.. -.
800 09/23/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 174 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.1 19.6 92 90
801 09/23/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 122 170 10 0 ll4.0 13.0 1Q6.0 16.3 93 90
802 09/23/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 121 178 10 0 114.0 13.0 103.6 15.0 91 90
818 09/26/03 Unit:l.13;StreetAAll+OO 166 25 0 119.0 14.0 108.5 17.0 91 90
819 09/26/03 Unit:l.13;StreetAA13+65 169 25 0 119.0 14.0 106.7 17.4 90 90
--. -------.. ----------------.. --........ ----. --.. ---------------. -----..... -. -. --. ---------. -.. ----. ---------........... ---. ---... .
820 09/26/03 Unit: 1.13; Street AA 12+50 172 25 0 119.0 14.0 108.9 20.4 92 90
821 09/26/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 120 185 25 0 119.0 14.0 109.4 18.6 92 90
822 09/26/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 188 25 0 119.0 14.0 109.3 17.0 92 90
835 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Alicantc 16+05 157 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.5 13.5 91 90
836 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Alicante 14+95 I 54 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.9 14.1 92 90 . -. -----------------. -. --------. ---------. . . .. -. . -..... -.. -. --. . . -. -. --------. -. -. -----. -. . ------. . . . -... ---. ---. -. -------. -------. . -. -.. -. ---. --------
SZ 837 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 125 161 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.2 16.3 90 90
SZ 838 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 165 3 0 119.0 13.2 112.2 13.0 94 90
SZ 839 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 125 170 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.8 14.3 91 90
SZ 840 09/29/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 122 174 23 0 114.l 16.4 101.4 11.l 89 90
SZ 840 A 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 174 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.5 15.1 90 90 --.... ---. ---------. --. ------------. ---. --. ---. -... -------------. -. ---. ---.. -------. ---------.. -.. ---' .. -. -. -.. ----. ---------.. -. ---..... -.. -. --. -......... -----.... -. . ---. -... ---. -.. ---
841 09/29/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 46 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.7 13.8 92 90
841 A 10/01/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 46 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.6 16.8 93 90
SZ 842 09/29/03 Unit: l.l3;Lot: 126 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.1 17.3 90 90
843 09/29/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:122 183 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.6 13.I 92 90
SZ 844 09/29/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 127 186 24 0 117.0 14.7 103.4 15.6 88 90 ---. -. ' . -. --. ----------. --. -. . . . -. . . .. --. . -. . . -------. -~ . . --. -----------. ----... -.... -. ---. . .. --. -.... -. . -.. -. ---.. ---. . . -. . . -... -........ ----. ---..
SZ 844A 09/29/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:127 186 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 14.9 91 90
845 09/29/03 Unit: 1.l3;Lot: 124 189 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.6 16.3 91 90
866 10/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 137 14 40 133.6 7.8 120.6 10.8 90 90
867 10/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 l40 14 40 133.6 7.8 123.1 9.2 92 90
868 10/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 23 143 14 40 133.6 7.8 119.9 12.7 90 90 .. --• ------. . . -. ----------. --. . .. --. . . --... -....... --. -. . -· -. -.. --. -----. -.. --........ -. -.. --. --. . .. ---. . . . ... --. . . .. . . . . . . . . . -----.. -.. -
869 10/02/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 107 215 14 40 133.6 7.8 125.5 11.9 94 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
880 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 43 176 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.9 18.6 94 90
881 10/03/03 Unit: l. 14: Lot: 45 177 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.8 18.0 91 90
882 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 44 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.4 16.6 92 90
883 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 37 139 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.2 15.1 90 90
884 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 40 155 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 14.9 90 ·····-·-·-------------···---·----------------------------------------------------------············-····-------------------------------------------···-·····-------------------------···· 885 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 38 148 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.7 18.3 92
886 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 41 162 25 0 119.0 14.0 106.6 18.6 90 90
889 10/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 153 14 40 133.6 7.8 125.8 8.0 94 90
890 10/03/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 105 218 14 40 133.6 7.8 126.6 10.8 95 90
891 10/03/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 108 216 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.4 10.0 91 90 -····· .......... -•------------------.. ······---------•--....... ---------------········· -----------------.. ----------••••••••••••• 892 10/03/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I IO 219 14 40 133.6 7.8 126.3 10.5 95 90
893 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 20 153 14 40 133.6 7.8 119.9 11.8 90 90
894 10/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 156 14 40 133.6 7.8 123.4 14.0 92 90
900 10/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 128 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 19.6 90 90
901 10/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 30 131 l l 0 117.0 14.6 108.8 16.5 93 90 -----------· ........ --------------... -...... ------------------------------· ····••---. --------···-.. --902 10/06/03 Unit: 1.14; Goldstone 9+60 1.34 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.2 16.9 91 90
903 10106103 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 137 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.9 18.3 91 90
904 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 14+30 143 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 19.0 90 90
905 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 15+25 L47 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.8 19.2 90 90
906 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 16+15 151 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.2 15.9 92 90 -·-·-· ---·-·-·· ---···------. ----------------------------------. -----·········-······--· . ·····-· .. ------907 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 14+55 150 II 0 11 7.0 14.6 107.1 17.2 92 90
908 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 146 ll 0 117.0 14.6 106.9 16.7 91 90
909 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante L5+25 154 11 0 117.0 14.6 108.5 17.6 93 90
910 10/08/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 21 155 14 60 139.2 5.8 125.3 6.6 90 90
911 10/08/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 20 155 14 60 139.2 5.8 126.3 8.0 91 90 ... ····••-• ............... -------.. -------------------------.... -----··------·· ---------·····-------sz 920 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 146 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.l 19.4 91 90
sz 921 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 29 150 11 0 117.0 14.6 106.4 17.1 91 90
sz 922 10/07/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 142 11 0 117.0 14.6 104.9 19.9 90 90
943 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 24 152 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.6 16.9 95 90
944 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 13+50 151 24 0 I 17.0 14.7 109.9 17.2 94 90 ---------... . . ......... ·-······· ---... -----··· . ....... -..... ----------.. . ········--------945 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Street GG 13+80 155 24 0 11 7.0 14.7 109.9 17.2 94 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
946 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 158 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.6 17.1 92 90
947 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 20 160 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 16.8 91 90
948 10/09/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 23 155 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.2 17.8 91 90
949 10/09/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 21 159 24 0 117.0 14.7 111.5 17.3 95 90
950 10/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 20 161 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 18.0 90 90 -···-····-·--··--···-·-···-···-----------···-········--·······-··--········-•·----·-·-·•··-----------------·········-------······-----···········----------------------··········-------·-···-·······---
951 10/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 20 158 24 0 117.0 14.7 112.3 16.5 96 90
952 10/10/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 19 156 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.7 16.7 94 90
953 10/10/03 Unit: l.l4; Lot: 17 164 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.8 20.0 90 90
954 10/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 21 167 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.4 17.4 91 90
955 10/10/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 19 170 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.6 17.0 95 90 .. ········-··. -----------······ ---------------· ---------------------
956 10110103 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 17 173 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 18.5 91 90
957 10/10/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:4 176 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.5 17.5 93 90
958 10/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 2 174 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.8 17.2 93 90
959 10/10/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 8 179 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.5 19.0 92 90
960 10/13/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:4 177 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.8 17.5 92 90
----•• ---••• ---••••••• --•• -----• ---•• ---•• --------------------------• -----------•• ---• -----•• -----•••••••• -•• -• ---+ ••• --•• --• -+ + ••••••• ---••••••••••••••••••••••• --• -• • • • • • •••••• + •••••
961 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 1 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.8 17.5 93 90
962 10/13/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:7 181 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 17.6 91 90
963 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 3 183 14 0 122.2 12.1 108.0 9.3 88 90
963 A 10/13/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:3 183 14 0 122.2 12.1 110.4 14.7 90 90
964 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 17+95 181 14 30 130.7 8.8 120.6 9.1 92 90 . .. --· --· .. -.. . . ..... . ... -··•·••· ... ········--·-· ·-----------········--·---····-··-·-··--····· --------------···--965 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Galena 18+10 184 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 16.6 91 90
966 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 9 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.0 17.3 92 90
967 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 2 185 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.1 12.8 92 90
968 10/13/03 Unit: 1.13; Street AA 13+25 183 14 30 130.7 8.8 118.8 10.3 91 90
969 10/13/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 18+25 186 14 30 130.7 8.8 120.2 12.0 92 90
..... ....... --------.. ·········•··•······ -----........ ·••·•• .. ··-·· •·••·--·····---...... ..... ····•···•······ ············· •·••··· .......... .
980 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 12 172 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.5 15.6 90 90
981 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 10 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.6 17.3 91 90
982 10/14/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:8 184 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 15.l 91 90
ST 983 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 55 170 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.9 15.0 92 90
ST 984 10/14/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:52 170 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 16.8 91 90 . . . . --. . ... -. . . . . . . . -.. -. . . ... -. . --. . . . . . . . . .... --. -. --. -. -... -----.. -.. ----. --. -' ~. . ---. . . . . -... --. . . . . . -...... --. . . . . . . --. . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . -........ .
ST 985 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 48 166 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.2 11.3 89 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RES UL TS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
ST 985 A 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 48 L66 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.7 14.5 90 90
986 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 46 I 89 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 14.9 91 90
987 10/14/03 Unit: l.l4; Lot: 6 188 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.4 16.0 91 90
988 10/14/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:4 189 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.0 13.3 92 90
989 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 2 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.2 15.8 92 90 ·-·-··· •• ····---•. ·------· ----·-----------------·······•·---------.... ----------------------········-··--· ----· --..... -----------------------.. -------------------. -------... -----------... --------· ----990 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 17+15 L87 3 0 119.0 13.2 112.3 14.0 94 90
991 10/14/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 15+35 159 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.8 13.6 91 90
992 I0/L4/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 16+70 173 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 L5.8 91 90
993 10/15/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 128 l 92 3 0 l 19.0 13.2 109.2 14.1 92 90
994 10/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 129 194 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 18.l 91 90 -----------·-········ ... -· ... ············--·----.. ···--·--------·· ----·---··•··· ••••••••• -··--·-· ---------------------------... -----------------------------·· ...... -----------
995 l0/L5/03 Unit: l.13;Lot: 127 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.0 15.8 91 90
ST 996 10/15/03 Unit: l.l3;Lot: 120 172 24 0 ll7.0 14.7 107.4 16.l 92 90
ST 997 10/15/03 Unit: l.l3; Lot: 124 183 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.3 15.5 94 90
998 10/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 114 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.5 l8.3 90 90
SZ 999 10/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: l 16 195 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.5 14.9 90 90 ----------.. ---. ---------. -------. ---. -------. -. ----. ---' --. ---. . . . --. --. . -. . . -... --.. ----. . . -. ---.. -. -. . -
SZ 1000 10/15/03 Unit:l.13;Lot:115 200 24 o 117.0 14.7 107.2 15.7 92 90
SZ 1001 10/15/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 118 205 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 14.5 90 90
SZ 1002 10/15/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 116 210 24 0 117.0 14.7 103.2 12.0 88 90
SZ 1002 A 10/16/03 Unit: l.13; Lot: 116 210 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.1 15.1 92 90
1003 10/15/03 Unit: l.14;Alicante20+20 198 16 0 120.1 11.9 109.3 13.6 91 90 ------------·--·-···· --------·------------· ····-·······-··-... •········-···············-----------------· --------.......... ---------.. . ············ --------------··· ······-· ................. .
1004 10/15/03 Unit: l.14;Alicante22+25 200 16 0 120.1 11.9 108.4 15.l 90 90
1005 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14;Alicante20+20 202 25 0 119.0 14.0 106.9 15.3 90 90
1006 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 23+20 207 16 0 120.1 11.9 108.6 12.8 90 90
1007 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 1 191 24 0 l 17.0 14.7 105.0 17.3 90 90
1008 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 20+90 201 25 0 119.0 14.0 110.3 14.6 93 90 --------· ... . . ... ---. . ···············-------------------1009 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Alicante 23+10 209 25 0 I 19.0 14.0 107.7 15.3 91 90
ST 1013 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 125 11 0 117.0 14.6 110.4 17.8 94 90
ST 1014 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 33 135 11 0 117.0 14.6 107.4 16.5 92 90
1020 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Galena 16+75 180 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.0 17.3 92 90
1022 10/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Galena 17+10 184 25 0 119.0 14.0 107.5 13.8 90 90 ------. . . ---------'.... --·· ----···-··········--------.......... -····-··----------------............... ---• .. . 1026 10/17/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: l 14 214 4 0 122.9 12.0 110.7 13.7 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MOO OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
1027 10/17/03 Unit:l.l3;Lot:117 217 4 0 122.9 12.0 108.9 10.0 89 90
1027A 10/17/03 Unit:l.l3;Lot:117 217 4 0 122.9 12.0 111.9 13.2 91 90
1028 10/17/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 107 220 24 0 l 17.0 14.7 105.8 17.3 90 90
1029 10/17/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 224 24 0 ll7.0 14.7 107.l 14.9 92 90
1047 10/20/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 133 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 18.9 91 90 ------------. ---------. -. ---• --••• -. ----. -. -------------------------------------.. --. --------·-----. --------------. -. --. --.... --..... -.. ----. -. -.. -. -----. --. ---.. -------------------------. ---. -. ---. ----.
1048 10/20/03 Unit:l.ll;Lot:28 136 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.2 16.3 91 90
1049 10/20/03 Unit:l.ll;Goldstonell+OO 132 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.1 18.0 90 90
SZ 1151 10/29/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:l35;(Buttress) 181 24 O 117.0 14.7 105.9 15.5 91 90
SZ ll52 10/29/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 185 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.1 14.5 91 90
SZ 1153 10/29/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 181 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 14.6 91 90 . .... .. ....... ...................... ··•········ •·•· -----·····. -------------------· ---. ... .... -----··················-------
1154 10/29/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:135;(Buttress) 184 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.6 IS.I 94 90
1155 10/29/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 187 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.3 14.6 93 90
1156 10/29/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 189 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 17.I 90 90
1157 10/29/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 190 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.7 14.0 91 90
1158 10/29/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:135;(Buttress) 193 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.7 16.I 90 90 ---.. --. -----. -----. . . . . . . . . . -...... -.. --. • . -... -. . . . . . .... -. ---. . -. ----. . . . -. -.. --. -. ------------.. --. -
1161 10/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 195 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.4 13.1 93 90
1162 10/30/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 197 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.5 14.0 91 90
1163 10/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 200 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.7 15.1 91 90
1164 10/30/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:l35;(Buttress) 202 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.3 17.2 91 90
....... 11.6? ..... 1.01~0103 .. Unit: Ll~;_l:-?~: __ 13.5; .<B.u~u:~~~~········ ......................... ~05 .. . ?~ ........ ~ .... 1_17.? 14.7 106.? ...... ~?:?.. 9.1 .......... 9~ .. .
1166 L0/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 16 148 24 0 117.0 14.7 111.3 15.6 95 90
1167 10/30/03 Unit: l.l4; Lot: 14 142 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.2 16.1 90 90
1168 10/30/03 Unit: 1.14: Lot: 135; (Buttress) 208 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.l 15.1 92 90
1169 10/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 210 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 16.8 91 90
1170 10/30/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 213 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.3 16.0 91 90 ·---. ----. . .. --. ------.. -................. -....... ---... -.. ---. . . ----.. .. . . . -..... -.... ------------------
1171 10/30/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 30 390 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 14.9 91 90
1174 10/31/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:135;(Buttress) 216 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.6 16.3 90 90
1175 10/31/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:135;(Buttress) 219 24 0 11 7.0 14.7 106.7 17.6 91 90
1176 10/31/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 223 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.3 16.l 91 90
1177 10/31/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135; (Buttress) 227 24 0 l 17.0 14.7 107.9 15.7 92 90 ---.......... ·-·-· .......... -------····· .. -·--..... .. ---..... ------·----.... ---..... .
FG 1187 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 56 176 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.2 17.5 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
FG 1188 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 55 177 23 0 I 14.1 16.4 102.9 18.1 90 90
FG 1189 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 54 177 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.9 17.3 91 90
FG 1190 11/04/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:53 177 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.3 16.2 93 90
FG 1191 11/04/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:52 178 23 0 114.1 l6.4 103.6 18.0 91 90
FG 1192 11/04/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:5I 178 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.3 19.0 90 90 --·-··-········----------------·· -------······-.. ----···········•-·······-··········-------------------································-·······-------------------------··········--···················· FG 1193 11/04/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: 50 149 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.9 15.9 93 90
FG 1194 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 49 179 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.6 13.0 92 90
FG 1195 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 48 180 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.8 14.5 92 90
FG 1196 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot:47 180 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.8 19.0 90 90
FG 1197 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 46 180 23 0 114.l 16.4 103.2 18.3 90 90 ····••··•··········· .... --........................ -----------------------------------------------···· ..... ·• ·····•··•······· ·-·-·-··········· ----------------------·-------·
1198 I 1/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 130 [40 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.8 17.3 90 90
FG 1199 11/04/03 Unit:1.14:Lot:30 143 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.8 17.8 90 90
FG 1210 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 31 141 3 0 I 19.0 13.2 108.9 15.2 92 90
FG 1211 11/04/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:32 140 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 19.8 90 90
FG 1212 11/04/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:33 140 3 0 119.0 13.2 11 3.4 13.1 95 90 ---. -. . . -. . . -.. --. . ---. --. . . . --. . . . . . . . ------. -.. -..... -.... -. --. . -.. -. ·• -.. --...... -. -. -. -. . . ------.. -...... ---. --.... --.... ---. -------.. --. . ----. . -. -. . . . . . . . . . ..... ----------
FG 1213 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 34 139 14 0 122.2 12.1 112.2 14.7 92 90
FG 1214 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 35 139 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.8 17.5 90 90
FG 1215 I 1/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 36 142 14 0 122.2 12.1 111.5 19.0 9 I 90
FG 1216 11/04/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:38 150 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.4 18.5 90 90
ST 1217 11/04/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:38 153 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.2 15.7 90 90 -----------··········· .............. -•. ----•.••. -------······ .... ----•···•···•·------····················· ----------·········· .. ---FG 1218 I 1/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 39 156 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.0 17.6 91 90
ST 1219 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 39 158 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.2 15.9 90 90
FG 1220 11/04/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:40 181 23 0 114.1 16.4 102.5 16.2 90 90
FG 1221 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 41 140 23 0 114.1 16.4 105.8 18.2 93 90
SZ 1222 11/04/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot:40 172 23 0 114.1 16.4 103.0 18.4 90 90 ----............... ·•· ....... -·····················-----------·······------· --··········--· --......................... ----. .... .... . ............ .
FG 1231 11/05/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:20 161 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.1 15.l 92 90
FG 1232 I 1/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 21 161 24 0 117.0 14.7 113.9 15.3 97 90
FG 1233 11/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 22 161 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.9 13.6 91 90
FG 1234 11/05/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 23 161 3 0 I 19.0 13.2 106.9 15.3 90 90
FG 1320 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 19 160 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.2 13.4 92 90
--• -• --••• ----• -----• • • • • • • •• -• --••• -• • • -• ' •• -• --' • • -•••• ----• ----• --• ---•• ---.. + • ---• • • -• • • • • • + --• -----• -• • • -•• -••
FG 1321 11/11/03 Unit: l.l4;Lot: 18 157 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.9 15.I 93 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
FG 1322 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 17 154 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.2 13.7 92 90
FG 1323 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 16 150 24 0 J 17.0 14.7 105.6 15.7 90 90
ST 1324 11/11/03 Unit: 1.1 4; Lot: 18 175 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.7 17.2 93 90
ST 1325 ll/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:20 178 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.4 12.8 90 90
FG 1326 11/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:29 144 24 0 117.0 14.7 111.3 17.0 95 90 --· ... ------.. -.. -· ----. --. ----... ··-------. -... --• --------------. -..... -... -. -. ----. --. --. -... --. ------------. ----.. -... -.. --. ------... -------. -. --. --.. ----.. -. --. -. ---. ----------. -. -..... ·--.... --.
FG 1327 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 28 142 3 0 119.0 13.2 113.7 13.0 96 90
FG 1328 11/11/03 Unit:!.14;Lot:27 141 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.0 17.6 94 90
FG 1329 11/11/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:26 139 25 0 119.0 14.0 110.0 14.0 92 90
FG 1330 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 25 139 25 0 119.0 14.0 112.1 14.7 94 90
ST 1331 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 27 147 3 0 119.0 13.2 114.5 13.6 96 90 --------------•••• -----------···• ---···· .... ·········-·-··--·--------------------···· --·--------------------····· -... ·······----·-··--···--... ·····--------------........ ·-······ FG 1332 11/11/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:24 155 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.I 15.5 92 90
FG 1334 11/11/03 Unit: l.14;Lot: l 193 3 0 119.0 13.2 106.7 13.2 90 90
FG 1335 11/11/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:2 l92 3 0 119.0 13.2 114.I 13.0 96 90
FG 1336 11/11/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 3 192 3 0 119.0 13.2 l09.I 12.7 92 90
1436 11/21/03 Unit: l.ll;Alicante31+71 201 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.7 19.6 95 90 ··-----------·-----------···· --····· ---·-······ ·······-·········-------------·············· -----------------... ···-·-----------------------·····-------------.... ----------------------------
1509 12/03/03 Unit: l.ll;Alicante30+50 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.0 19.0 91 90
FG 1514 12/02/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot: 15 147 24 0 117.0 14.7 11 0.2 17.3 94 90
FG 1515 12/02/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 14 143 24 0 117.0 14.7 l08.0 16.l 92 90
FG 1521 12/03/03 Unit: l.14;Lot:4 191 23 0 114.1 l6.4 105.3 19.9 92 90
FG 1522 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 5 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 l 10.8 15.2 95 90 ---.. -..... -. -......... --. ---. -.. ---. --. ---------------. -. ----. . • . -..... -. ---.... -..... --... -. ----. -.... --. . . . . . . . . ... ---. ----. -.... -. . . . . . . . . ---. ---.. --... ---. ---------. -------
FG 1523 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 6 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 l09.I 16.9 93 90
FG 1524 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 7 189 3 0 119.0 l3.2 l08.5 17.9 91 90
FG 1525 12/03/03 Unit:l.l4;Lot:8 187 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.5 16.9 93 90
FG 1526 12/03/03 Unit:l.14;Lot:9 183 3 0 119.0 13.2 112.2 12.5 94 90
FG 1527 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14: Lot: 10 180 3 0 119.0 13.2 110.4 13.6 93 90 ----------···-··-------· •• ------------····· ... • ••• ----------....... ·-·•··· ············-----················ ·-... -----------····•·••··-····-•-----------·-· ·---------FG 1528 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 11 177 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.3 14.6 91 90
FG 1529 12/03/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:12 l75 3 0 119.0 l3.2 l08.2 14.I 91 90
FG 1530 12/03/03 Unit: 1.14;Lot: 13 172 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.2 15.3 92 90
1550 12/03/03 Unit: l.ll;Alicante31+00 205 24 0 11 7.0 14.7 107.0 16.0 91 90
1551 12/03/03 Unit: l.ll;Alicante29+00 221 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.6 15.8 95 90 ... -----• • • • . . . • .. • •••••••• -. . ..... -----. -. ----. ---...... --. ---... -.. ---. -' -.. ---. . -. --. --... -. -.... --· -.. -.. -...... --.. -.. -. ---..... -.. -.. --.. --. -----------------
1552 12/03/03 Unit: l.ll;Alicante26+75 223 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.1 18.3 92 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req 'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pc!) (%) (%) (%)
FG 1656 12/15/03 Unit: 1.14: Lot: 93 181 23 0 114.1 16.4 104.5 20.0 92 90
FG 1657 12/15/03 Unit: t.14;Lot:94 185 23 0 114.1 16.4 103.0 18.7 90 90
FG 1658 12/15/03 Unit: 1.14: Lot: 95 188 23 0 l 14.1 16.4 105.6 18.8 93 90
FG 1659 12/15/03 Unit: l.14; Lot: 96 189 23 0 114.l 16.4 102.9 19.3 90 90
FG 1676 12/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 44 179 24 40 130.3 9.3 124.9 10.3 96 90 --. ---. -----.. -------. ----.. -•. -. --.. -----------... --... -------. -----------.. --------. -------------. ----... ----.. ----... ----. -. -.. ---------. --.. -----------. -. -------. ----· --. ---. -----. -. -·--.• ---------..
FG 1677 12/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 43 179 24 40 130.3 9.3 122.5 8.8 94 90
FG 1678 12/16/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 42 178 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.6 14.6 95 90
FG 1679 12/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 119 187 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.8 14.1 91 90
FG 1700 12/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 120 188 3 0 119.0 13.2 109.7 15.1 92 90
FG 1701 12/16/03 Unit: 1.1 3; Lot: 121 189 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.3 17.8 92 90 ------. ····-······-••···•··········---------------·· ---···-· ....................... ······-···········-···--····· ·••·······················--·············-····· .. ---------------------------•
FG 1702 12/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 122 190 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.0 16.1 90 90
FG 1703 12/16/03 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 123 191 24 0 I 17.0 l4.7 109.3 14.7 93 90
ST 1708 12/18/03 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 135 208 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 14.5 90 90
ST 1709 12/18/03 Unit:1.14;Lot:135 203 32 0 123.2 11.6 111.0 12.0 90 90
2035 01/19/04 Unit: 1.13; Street AA 14+35 187 25 0 119.0 14.0 107.9 16.7 91 90 ---------·-.............. ----------
2036 01/19/04 Unit: 1.13; Galena 19+95 188 25 0 119.0 14.0 110.4 15.8 93 90
2037 01/19/04 Unit: l.13; Street AA 15+l5 l91 25 0 I 19.0 14.0 106.9 14.0 90 90
2[10 01/28/04 Unit: l.13;Galena20+00 184 17 0 116.5 13.3 110.2 16.9 95 90
2111 01/28/04 Unit: l.13;Galena22+00 188 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.4 18.1 91 90
2ll2 01/28/04 Unit: 1.13; Street AA 14+90 191 17 0 116.5 13.3 107.8 15.7 93 90 ...... ------···· ----.... ··•······················-·--·······-·--•-·•······--------·--------------------················-· .. --------------------------------
2113 01/29/04 Unit: J.13; Galena22+50 196 17 0 116.5 13.3 104.7 15.3 90 90
2114 01/29/04 Unit: 1.13; Galena 23+50 209 17 0 116.5 13.3 110.2 15.9 95 90
2115 01/29/04 Unit: l.13;Street BB 12+20 215 17 0 116.5 13.3 107.5 17.5 92 90
2116 01/29/04 Unit: 1.13: Galena25+00 219 17 0 I 16.5 13.3 108.5 17.0 93 90
2117 01/29/04 Unit: 1.11 ; Lot: 68 188 17 0 116.5 13.3 107.6 16.6 92 90 ----·------------------········-···· -
2118 01/29/04 Unit:l.ll;Lot:66 206 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.2 15.8 91 90
2119 01/29/04 Unit:l.ll;Lot:69 194 17 0 116.5 13.3 105.4 16.2 90 90
2120 01/27/04 Unit:J.13;Lot:112 192 14 50 136.4 6.8 122.9 8.3 90 90
2150 01 /29/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 69 208 17 0 I 16.5 13.3 104.5 16.0 90 90
2151 01/29/04 Unit:l.ll;Lot:67 199 17 0 116.5 13.3 105.3 17.0 90 90 . . --------·--·· ··········· --------... --------•···· ···-···.. ... . .......... -----------------------------------------·-···-·. -....... -·· ·············-··· ·········-····-2152 01 /29/04 Unit: J.J I; Lot: 68 203 17 0 116.5 13.3 104.9 16.5 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) (%)
2153 01/29/04 Unit: l.11; Lot: 64 204 17 0 l 16.5 13.3 108.5 14.9 93 90
2154 0l/29/04 Unit: l.l I; Lot: 70 209 17 0 116.5 13.3 105.6 17.2 91 90
2155 01/30/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 68 207 17 0 l 16.5 13.3 106.5 15.5 91 90
2156 01/30/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 60 196 17 0 116.5 13.3 104.4 17.8 90 90
2157 01/30/04 Unit: l.l l; Lot: 62 200 17 0 116.5 13.3 104.3 18.4 90 90 .... -.... ----..... ----. -· --------. --....... --........... --. --.. ----.. -.. ----. -.... -------------. -.... -. --. ----. -----. -.... -· .... -·--. -· -·. ---.. --. -· --------. ---... -· -. --...... --. --.. --.. -......... ---------
2158 01/30/04 Unit: I.I l; Lot: 71 208 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.7 15.4 92 90
2159 01/30/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 72 209 17 0 116.5 13.3 105.6 16.5 91 90
2160 01/30/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 73 210 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.3 16.2 91 90
2161 01/30/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 112 195 17 0 I 16.5 13.3 105.0 18.0 90 90
2162 01/30/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: l ll l 97 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.7 15.9 92 90 ... ----------·---------------·········. ··-----------------------------····------·•·····-·--·-···· ----------•------------------------· ------2163 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 112 202 24 0 117.0 14.7 !OS.I 16.8 90 90
2164 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 10 206 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.l 19.0 91 90
2165 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 111 210 24 0 I 17.0 14.7 108.l 15.9 92 90
2166 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Street BB 12+50 214 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.7 17.6 91 90
2 l 67 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 112 214 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 17.4 90 90 .............. -----------------····------·----·-····--·---------· -. -----. . . -. -...... -. ----..... -. ----. --.... -. -. -. -. -........ --. ---. -. . . -. -. ---···--------·-
2168 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 111 217 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.4 15.8 93 90
2169 02/02/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 111 220 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 18. I 90 90
2225 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 00 219 33 0 I 16.5 13.5 104.7 18.5 90 90
2226 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 102 224 33 0 116.5 13.5 104.5 18.0 90 90
2227 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 100 226 33 0 116.5 13.5 105.5 16.9 91 90 --·················-·····. ... --· ·····--·-··-· -· ----··--··----· --------------...•..••••.. ··-········-·············· ····-··· ...............
2228 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 100 229 33 0 116.5 13.5 104.9 17.3 90 90
2229 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 100 222 33 0 116.5 13.5 106.9 16.7 92 90
sz 2237 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13;Lot: 105 216 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.8 14.3 91 90
sz 2238 02/05/04 Unit: l.13; Lot: 105 219 24 0 l 17.0 14.7 105.9 16.6 91 90
2239 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 108 221 24 0 117.0 14.7 104.9 17.0 90 90 .. -----. -. ----.. -.... -..... -· .... -· . ----.. --. ----------. --. --.. -.. -. --. -. -. -. --... --....... --. -. -. -.... -. -....... ............ ··-·-.............. --...... ··············--..... --·-
2240 02/05/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 223 23 0 114.l 16.4 102.9 18.4 90 90
2241 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 226 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.5 17.2 90 90
2242 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 10 223 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.l 15.4 92 90
2243 02/06/04 Unit: l.13; Lot: 108 224 24 0 11 7.0 14.7 105.0 16.6 90 90
2244 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 106 225 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.4 16.2" 90 90 --------------·········· ···-----· ······· -·····--------· ....... ······--. ·••···· ·-·-----------.... ··-···•·• ·······--····· ·---................ ····-···--··
2245 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 04 225 24 0 I 17.0 14.7 106.8 17.2 91 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
2246 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 102 224 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.6 16.5 91 90
2247 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 97 234 17 0 J 16.5 13.3 104.9 16.3 90 90
2248 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 99 233 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.7 18.1 90 90
2249 02/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: JOO 232 17 0 116.5 13.3 106.0 15.4 91 90
2280 02/11/04 Unit: l.13;Galena25+75 218 33 0 116.5 13.5 108.0 15.8 93 90 ·-· --. -.. ---. --------------. ---------------------------------------------... -. -----------. ----------------------. ---------.. -------. --. ---.. --------------------------. --.. ----------. ----.. ---. -. ----... -... 2281 02/11/04 Unit: l.l3; Galena 25+50 221 33 0 l 16.5 13.5 105.5 17.3 91 90
2296 03/10/04 Unit:l.13;Lot:36;BrowDitch 275 14 40 133.6 7.8 121.8 7.9 91 90
2297 03/10/04 Unit:l.13;Lot:36;BrowDitch 274 14 40 133.6 7.8 122.4 8.4 92 90
2298 03/10/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 36; Brow Ditch 268 14 40 133.6 7.8 122.6 9.2 92 90
FG 2299 02/17/04 Unit: l.14; Lot: 57 176 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.3 14.9 91 90
-• . -·············-····••·••· -------------------------------------------------.... --····•···· ·····-------------------------------------·-···· -----------------------------. -------------FG 2344 02/19/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 97 236 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.1 16.0 92 90
FG 2345 02/19/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 98 236 24 0 I 17.0 14.7 107.0 14.8 91 90
FG 2346 02/19/04 Unit:l.13;Lot:99 235 3 0 119.0 13.2 111.6 13.7 94 90
FG 2347 02/19/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 100 234 3 0 119.0 13.2 112.4 14.5 94 90
FG 2348 02/20/04 Unit: J.13; Lot: 104 227 24 0 117.0 14.7 110.2 16.l 94 90 -.. -------. ----------. ------. . --------------. --. ---. -. -. --.. -. -. ---. -. . . . ------. --... ---. -.. -. -. ---. -. ------. ---.. ----. . --. --. -. -------.. ---.. ---. . -. --. ----. --. -------. ----. ---. ---------.. ---
FG 2349 02/20/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 103 226 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.8 14.3 93 90
FG 2360 02/20/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 02 225 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.7 15.0 90 90
FG 2361 02/20/04 Unit: l.13: Lot: 101 225 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.2 16.1 93 90
ST 2369 02/20/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: l 13 209 3 0 119.0 13.2 106.8 15.3 90 90
ST 2370 02/20/04 Unit: J.13; Lot: l 17 214 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.9 13.8 92 90 ---.. --------···-··--·-····-····-··-. -········-----··---.. -. ----------------------------------------------------------------------·••·••-------·-·······-··---·-·--·-·-··--····--·-
2399 03/10/04 Unit: 1.13; SD Easement 230 33 0 116.5 13.5 107.2 15.8 92 90
2400 03/10/04 Unit: 1.13; SD Easement 253 24 0 117.0 14.7 107.6 17.0 92 90
2401 03/10/04 Unit: l.l3;SDEaserneat 240 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.1 17.3 90 90
2403 03/10/04 Unit: 1.13; SD Easement 245 33 0 116.5 13.5 104.9 16.8 90 90
2405 03/11/04 Unit: 1.13; SD Easement 262 33 0 116.5 13.5 106.3 18.5 91 90 -. -----.. --. --. -. . ------.. -. --. -. -. -. . . . -.. -------------. . . ---. . . . . -. -. -. . --. -.. -. --------. --. . . . --. -------. ---------. --. . . .. ---. . -. -... -....... .
2406 03/1 1/04 Unit: 1.13; SD Easement 275 33 0 116.5 13.5 106. l 18.0 91 90
FG 2435 03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 71 211 24 0 ll7.0 14.7 107.2 15.9 92 90
FG 2436 03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 70 210 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.6 18.2 90 90
FG 2437 03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 69 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.4 16.7 90 90
FG 2438 03/22/04 Unit: 1.ll;Lot:68 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 109.2 15.1 93 90 ··-···-·--·-----------------------·-· -·-••••·• -----------------------------·· --...... ------------------------····-·· ·---------------------------FG 2439 03/22/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 67 208 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.4 17 .3 90 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No.
FG 2440
FG 2441
FG 2442
FG 2443
FG 2444 -------------
FG 2445
FG 2446
FG 2447
FG 2448
FG 2501
FG 2502
FG 2503
FG 2504
FG 2505
FG 2506
------.
FG 2525
FG 2526
FG 2527
FG 2528
FG 2529 ·-. . ....
FG 2530
FG 2531
FG 2532
FG 2537
FG 2538 -. ------
FG 2539
FG 2540
FG 2541
FG 2542
FG 2670
ST 2671
Date
03/22/04 Unit: l.l 1; Lot: 66
03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 65
03/22/04 Unit: I.I 1; Lot: 64
03/22/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 63
03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 62 ·········-----····-·---·········•····
03/22/04 Unit: I.I 1; Lot: 61
03/22/04 Unit: I. 11 ; Lot: 60
03/22/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 59
03/22/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 58
Location
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 105 -·--············ ----------····· ....
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 106
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 107
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 108
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 109
04/01/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 110 ···········------· --....... -----------·-····· -·-··· 04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 18
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 17
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 16
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 115
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: I 14
-·····-··--··· ·········------·--·-.. ........ . .. ---------··-· .... -.. .
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 113
04/06/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 112
04/06/04 Unit: l.13; Lot: 1 l l
04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 124
04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 125 ----·. . --·· ··------04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 126
04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 127
04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 128
04/07/04 Unit: 1.13; Lot: 129
05/05/04 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 37
05/05/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 65
Project No. 06403-12-09
Elev.
or
Depth Curve
(ft) No.
208
207
207
204
201
200
198
196
195
228
227
227
226
225
225
188
190
191
24
24
24
17
17
24
17
17
17
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
191 24
192 24 ---------------·
194 24
198 24
199 24
191 3
191 3 ................
192 24
195
198
200
146
192
3
3
3
24
24
Plus
3/4"
Rock
(%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Adj.
MDD
(pct)
117.0
117.0
117.0
116.S
116.5
117.0
116.5
116.5
Adj.
OMC
(%)
14.7
14.7
14.7
13.3
13.3
14.7
13.3
13.3
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pct)
Field
Moist
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
Req'd.
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
0 I 16.S 13.3
l06.S
109.6
107.7
104.9
107.0
105.6
108.9
108.4
105.2
110.3
105.6
108.4
15.8
16.3
15.1
16.0
15.5
18.3
15.6
16.8
13.8
16.1
16.8
15.7
91
94
92
90
92
90
93
93
90
94
90
93
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
0 117.0 14.7 --------------·------0 117.0 14.7
0 117.0 14.7
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0 ............
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 117.0
0 119.0
0 119 0
0 117.0
0 I 19.0
0 119.0
0 119.0
0 117.0 -----------....
0 117.0
14.7 106.1 18.4 91 90
14.7 106.S 17.2 91 90
14.7 105.4 17.8 90 90 -··•·••·····-········ ..... ........... . ---·
14.7 l06.6 15.8 91 90
14.7 106.9 16.3 91 90
14.7 108.0 16.3 92 90
14.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
l05.7
107.3
107.l
109.2
107.4
13.2 107.0
13 2 108.6 . --------------
14.7 l 10.3
13.2
13.2
13.2
14.7
14.7
107.3
109.4
l09.1
105.4
104.9
15.1
17.2
18.4
16.1
16.I
90
92
92
93
92
14.2 90
14.7 91 .... -------..
16.0 94
15.S 90
16.0 92
14.S 92
16.6 90
14.5 90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
July 27. 2004
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 3/4" Adj. Adj. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock MDD OMC Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Dare Location (ft) No. (%) (pct) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
2720 05/18/04 Unit: 1.11 ; Lot: 77; Stability Fill 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.4 17.7 90 90
2721 05/18/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 79; Stability Fill 211 24 0 117.0 14.7 [06.4 18.2 91 90
2722 05/19/04 Unit: 1.1 l; Lot: 76; Stability Fill 214 24 0 117.0 l4.7 106.8 16.5 91 90
2723 05/19/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 79; Stability Fill 217 3 0 119.0 13.2 107.4 14.4 90 90
2724 05119/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 77; Stability Fill 220 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 17.2 90 90 -------· .. -··-· .. -------------·. ---------...... ----------....... --------............ ---------------------.•. --------------. -.... ---------------·-· ......... ---·--------... --....................... ·-·. ····--------
2725 05/19/04 Unit: l.11; Lot: 76; Stability Fill 220 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.2 15.8 92 90
2726 05/19/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 87 224 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.5 18.3 91 90
2727 05/19/04 Unit: 1.1 l; Lot: 75 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.I 17.8 91 90
2728 05/19/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 77 207 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.2 15.8 91 90
2729 05/l 9/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 80 205 3 0 119.0 13.2 108.0 13.9 91 90 ............................ ---------····· .. . ------------··•-•··--•·-----------. . ••· ····-·-·--·---. ----·-------------------------------·····•·
ST 2742 05/21/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 78 219 24 0 117.0 14.7 108. l 17.3 92 90
FG 2743 05/21/04 Unit: I.I I; Lot: 75 211 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 16.0 91 90
FO 2744 05/21/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 76 210 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.7 16.8 93 90
FG 2745 05/21/04 Unit: 1.1 1; Lot: 77 209 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.8 17.3 90 90
FG 2746 05/21/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 80 207 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.6 15.7 91 90 --· . ····--.. . . ..... --.. -----------···--------------------------.. . . ------·····-···--..... ------------· ----...............
FG 2747 05/24/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 72 211 24 0 117.0 14.7 108.0 18.3 92 90
FG 2748 05/24/04 Unit: 1.11; Lot: 73 212 24 0 117.0 14.7 105.9 16.l 91 90
FG 2749 05/24/04 Unit: 1.14; Lot: 45 180 24 0 117.0 14.7 106.6 17.4 91 90
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27, 2004
-TEST SUFFIX
TABLE I
EXPLANATION OF CODED TERMS
A, B, C, ... : Retest of previous density test failure, following moisture conditioning and/or recompaction.
-STRIKE-OUT
Fill in area of density test failure was removed and replaced with properly compacted fill soil.
-PREFIX CODE DESIGNATION FOR TEST NUMBERS
FG -FINISH GRADE ST -SLOPE TEST
SZ -SLOPE ZONE
-CURVENO.
Corresponds to curve numbers listed in the summary of laboratory maximum dry density and optimum
moisture content test results table for selected fill soil samples encountered during testing and observation.
-ROCK CORRECTION
For density tests with rock percentage greater than zero, laboratory maximum dry density and optimum
moisture content were adjusted for rock content. For tests with rock content equal to zero, laboratory
maximum dry density and optimum moisture content values are unadjusted.
-TYPE OF TEST
SC: Sand Cone Test (ASTM D1556)
NU: Nuclear Density Test (ASTM D2922)
OT: Other
-ELEY A TI ON/DEPTH
Test elevations/depths have been rounded to the nearest whole foot.
Project No. 06403-12-09 July 27. 2004
Sample
No.
3
4
5
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
24
25
33
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 1557-02
Maximum Optimum
Description Dry Density Moisture Content
(pct) (% dry weight)
Yellowish brown, Silty, fine to medium SAND 119.0 13 .2
Olive brown, Clayey, fine to medium SAND 122.9 12.0
Reddish brown, Silty to Clayey SAND 123.0 11.0
Light olive, Clayey, fine SAND 117.0 14.8
Olive brown, Silty SAND 114.0 13.0
Light Olive gray, Clayey, fine SAND 117.0 14.6
Dark brown, Clayey, fine SAND 124.5 10.7
Olive yellow, Sandy CLAY, with trace gravel 119.2 13.4
Grayish brown Silty, fine to coarse, SAND 122.2 12.1
Light olive, Silty, fine to medium SAND 125.0 10.4
Dark brown, Clayey, fine to medium SAND, with 120.1 11.9 trace gravel
Light yellowish brown, Silty, fine to medium 116.5 13.3 SAND, with trace clay
Grayish green, Clayey, fine to medium SAND 117.0 14.7
Olive brown, Sandy CLAY 119.0 14.0
Light olive brown, fine SAND 116.5 13.5
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
Sample
No.
El-A
EI-B
EI-C
EI-D
EI-E
EI-F
EI-G
EI-H
EI-I
EI-M
EI-N
EI-O
EI-P
EI-Q
EI-R
EI-S
EI-AH
EI-AI
El-AJ
EI-AK
EI-AL
EI-AM
EI-AN
EI-AO
EI-AP
EI-AQ
EI-AR
El -AS
TABLE Ill
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 4829-03
Moisture Content Dry Density Expansion
Before Test(%) After Test (%) (pct) Index
10.6 23.0 107.7 51
12.1 24.4 104.2 52
11.1 22.1 107.5 45
12.1 26.6 101.6 54
11.0 19.6 107.8 27
11.6 24.0 103.8 49
12.6 24.0 102.9 71
12.5 24.6 103.3 65
11.4 21.4 105.6 35
13.1 27.3 103.1 87
12.1 26.8 103.4 63
I 3.4 26.1 100.5 62
14.1 30. l 95.6 80
10.7 22.7 108.4 48
14.4 32.9 95.0 70
12.5 26.5 103.1 59
11.0 21.3 109.0 52
10.7 23.8 106.8 55
13.1 28.5 96.5 71
12.7 26.2 100.8 54
13.9 25.5 98.8 40
13.6 27.7 95.7 32
12.7 25.2 103.2 61
10.1 20.2 109.8 31
12.9 28.2 100.8 66
11.9 28.4 102.8 65
11.5 26.4 97.l 41
11.2 24.9 106.2 53
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE IV
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SHEAR TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 3080-03
Sample Dry Density Moisture Content Unit Cohesion Angle of Shear
Resistance ( degrees) No. (pct) (%) (pst)
3 107.0 13.3 450 33
8 105.4 14.8 350 31
24 105.2 14.8 480 35
33 104.8 13.6 500 35
Samples were remolded to a dry density of approximately 90 percent of maximum dry density at near optimum moisture content.
TABLE V
SUMMARY OF WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
CALIFORNIA TEST NO. 417
Sample Water-Soluble Sulfate(%) Sulfate Exposure
No. UBC Table 19-A-4
EI-A 0.1 75 Moderate
EI-B 0.175 Moderate
El-C 0.028 Negligible
EI-D 0.035 Negligible
EI-E 0.049 Negligible
EI-F 0.115 Moderate
EI-G 0.041 Negligible
EI-H 0.027 Negligible
EI-I 0.046 Negligible
EI-AH 0.375 Severe
El-AI 0.080 Negligible
EI-AK 0.207 Severe
EI-AM 0.030 Negligible
EI-AO 0.315 Severe
El-AP 0.600 Severe
EI-AQ 0.129 Moderate
EI-AS 0.405 Severe
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE VI
SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.11, LOTS 58 THROUGH 92
Lot Numbers Sample at Expansion UBC
Finish Grade Index Classification
5 8 through 63 EI-AS 53 Medium
64 through 69 EI-AR 41 Low
70 through 73 EI-AQ 65 Medium
74 EI-AO 31 Low
75 through 77 EI-AP 66 Medium
78 and 79 EI-AO 31 Low
80 EI-AP 66 Medium
81 through 86 EI-AN 61 Medium
87 through 92 EI-AH 52 Medium
TABLE VII
SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.13, LOTS 97 THROUGH 129
Lot Numbers Sample at Expansion UBC
Finish Grade Index Classification
97 through I 00 EI-AI 55 Medium
101 through 104 EI-AJ 71 Medium
I 05 through 110 EI-AK 54 Medium
111 through 114 EI-AL 40 Low
115 through 118 EI-I 35 Low
119 through 124 EI-G 71 Medium
125 through 129 EI-H 65 Medium
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
Lot
No.
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
TABLE VIII
SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.14, LOTS 1 THROUGH 57 AND LOTS 93 THROUGH 96
Lot Numbers Sample at Expansion UBC
Finish Grade Index Classification
1 through 4 EI-M 87 Medium
5 through 8 EI-N 63 Medium
9 through 13 EI-O 62 Medium
14 through 16 EI-R 70 Medium
17 through 20 EI-Q 48 Low
21 through 24 El-A 51 Medium
25 through 29 EI-S 59 Medium
30 through 34 EI-B 52 Medium
35 through 39 EI-C 45 Low
40 and 41 EI-D 54 Medium
42 and 43 EI-E 27 Low
44 through 46 EI-D 54 Medium
47 through 49 EI-E 27 Low
50 through 54 EI-F 49 Low
55 through 57 EI-AM 32 Low
93 through 96 EI-P 80 Medium
TABLE IX
SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.1 1, LOTS 58 THROUGH 92
Pad Condition Approximate Maximum Approximate Depth
Depth of Fill of Differential Fill
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 17 13
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 16 12
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 26 22
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 28 23
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 4 I
Undercut due to claystone 4 l
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 16 12
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
Lot
No.
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
TABLE IX (Continued)
SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA-THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.11, LOTS 58 THROUGH 92
Pad Condition Approximate Maximum Approximate Depth
Depth of Fill of Differential Fill
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 16 12
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 15 11
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 9 5
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 15 11
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 8 4
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 24 20
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 22 18
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 14 10
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 14 10
Cut NIA NIA
Undercut due to claystone 4 1
Undercut due to claystone 4 1
Undercut due to claystone 4 l
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Undercut due to claystone 4 1
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Cut NIA NIA
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
Lot
No.
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
11 3
114
11 5
116
11 7
11 8
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
TABLEX
SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.13, LOTS 97 THROUGH 129
Pad Condition Approximate Maximum Approximate Depth
Depth of Fill of Differential Fill
Undercut due to rock 9 6
Undercut due to rock 9 6
Undercut due to rock 4 1
Undercut due to rock 4 1
Undercut due to rock 4 1
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 13 7
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 8 4
Undercut due to claystone 4 I
Fill 29 9
Fill 36 28
Fill 51 44
Fill 46 32
Fill 34 22
Fill 22 14
Undercut due to rock 4 I
Undercut due to cut-fill transition 10 6
Fill 18 14
Fill 30 17
Fill 36 24
Fill 37 24
Fill 40 30
Fill 38 33
Fill 54 25
Fill 61 14
Fill 63 13
Fill 60 I l
Fill 64 17
Fill 60 13
Fill 47 17
Fill 44 16
Fill 32 20
Fill 26 14
Fill 25 17
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE XI
SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.14, LOTS 1 THROUGH 57 AND LOTS 93 THROUGH 96
Approximate Approximate Depth Lot No. Pad Conditio n Maximum Depth of of Differential Fill Fill
l Fill 23 10
2 Fill 24 10
3 Fill 32 15
4 Fill 38 24
5 Fill 37 31
6 Undercut due to cut-fiJl transition 22 18
7 Undercut due to cut-fi ll transition 16 12
8 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 12 8
9 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 9 4
10 Undercut due to cut-fi ll transition 19 15
11 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 5 1
12 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
13 Undercut due to claystone 4 I
14 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
15 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
16 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 24 20
17 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 36 32
18 Fill 36 32
19 Fill 46 40
20 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 38 34
21 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 26 22
22 Fi11 45 36
23 Fill 63 27
24 Fill 69 28
25 Fill 43 25
26 Fill 60 35
27 Fill 74 30
28 Fill 79 28
29 Fill 74 18
30 Fill-Alluvium 67 21
31 Fill-Alluvium 81 5
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
TABLE XI {Continued}
SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.14, LOTS 1 THROUGH 57 AND LOTS 93 THROUGH 96
Approximate Approximate Depth Lot No. Pad Condition Maximum Depth of of Differential Fill Fill
32 Fi ll-Alluvium 86 19
33 Fill-Alluvium 86 19
34 Fill 75 34
35 Fill 71 55
36 Fill 42 35
37 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 18 14
38 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 17 13
39 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 14 10
40 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 15 11
41 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 14 10
42 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
43 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 7 2
44 Fill 11 3
45 Fill 24 l8
46 Fill 32 22
47 Fill 26 10
48 Fill 18 13
49 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 10 5
50 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 9 4
51 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 12 8
52 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 16 10
53 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 19 14
54 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 21 17
55 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 15 10
56 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 22 18
57 Undercut due to cut-fill transition 18 14
93 Undercut due to claystone 4 l
94 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
95 Undercut due to claystone 4 1
96 Undercut due to claystone 4 l
Project No. 06403-52-09 July 27, 2004
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES
1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE
AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION
OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN
IS EMINENT.
2. lHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO lHE SATISFACTION
OF lHE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING
RAINFALL.
3. lHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY lHE CITY
INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR
UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE.
4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE
AT lHE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN lHE FIVE (5)
DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT
( 40%). SILT AND OlHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER
EACH RAINFALL.
5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM
AGGREGATE.
6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER
PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST
BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED.
7. lHE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE lHE AUlHORITY TO ALTER
lHIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WllH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY
REGULATIONS.
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE:
I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNO'M..EDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID
THE MOBIUZA TION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO
A VOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION
RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT All TIMES,
COMPLY WITH THIS OTY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLCTE AND APPROVED
BY THE CITY OF CARLS8AD.
l.b."' t1.. u i \ J.> f'\
OW!J,~(SJ{OWNER'S AGENT NAME (PRINT)
--t,'vv\.. WA
OWNER(S}/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE}
E-29
\/J,/1..:,l.( ~
STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM
TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP
E-29
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE
CB ___ _
SW
Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non--Stoon Water Waste Management and Materials
BMPs Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs
C
i .!ii .!ii .!2 " ,, 0 ,, ., C u u "' E C " ,,
C 0 2 2 ,g .!: ·E Q. 0 lj 6 ,, " E " ,, ·5 "' 2 "' -~ ~ °'-"' "' C Q) Q. .!: E ., " " g CT ~ 0 6 Oo " t: C" 8 :;; w 6 Best Management Practice' -1:1 C ;g ID Q. :;; :;:; :c ., ,. ., " ~ -~ s 0., i ii :l $i ., C E u~ g" "' " ,, 2 ! (BMP) Description ➔ u a, Vl -~ ., ., "' ., "' "' C 0 :::, ., :5 ,i,;., ! " C 15 0 'O C il~ ]~ a !s C c,, "' :g lj 2 Oc,, 0 0 ID ~-~ ~ O:;:; <.> 1l " :gg :g l >< " "' Nu, c,t:;:;: ~.£ cte 3 "' ., t-~ -~ i! ~ ~ ~~ :.:::: ~ :=. ~::;:; ~ ,, 8-:;; ]g :g ~ ~g c O UC ~ ,, 0 "u l~ 2 5 '[§ 0 0 ,, " & -o 0 ~g 0 •-C ., ~ oe " .r; .0 C -~ ia: o_ oo c.:, WO u'5 in Vl <.> ;;: en> Vl Vl o._ in C "'"' Q._ >0 "'"' 2 in Vl<.> Vl ::::E
CASOA Designation ➔ ,.._ ., O> ,,, .... "' "' ,.._ ., 0 N ,,, ,.._ C0 ' N ,,, .... "' I I I ' ' I I I I I I ' ' I ' I I I I I I I
<.> <.> ti <.> w w w w w w w w I!: I!: Vl Vl Vl Vl i i i i i Construction Activity w w w Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl z z z z
I/ Gradina/Soil Disturbance ./
Trenchina/Exca\lOtion
Stockomna
Drillina/Borina
Concrete/Asphalt Sowcuttina
r., Concrete Flatwork
Paving
Conduit/Pioe Installation
1...-Stucco/Marlor Woric /
I I Waste Disoosal __,.
Staaina/Lav Down Area
E~u--ment Maintenance and Fuelina
Hazardous Substance Use/Starace
Dewaterino
Site Access Across Dirt
Other /listl:
Instructions: 1. Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction.
2. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list al BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASOA) designation number. Choose one ar more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column.
3. Refer to the CASOA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and haw to apply them to the pro;,ct.
SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL CHOSEN BMPs ABOVE
ON THE PROJECTS SITE PLAN/EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET FOR A SAMPLE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
-BMP's are subject to field inspection-
Page 1 of 1
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Address: J.~I ~ WI\ Q. \ i °'I\ C.....r\-
Assessar' s Parcel Number: ,i 1 ' ;). '-\ \ -I o ' I>->
Emergency Contl'ct:
Name: (_ \.,.._<,,k Wi\ ~'\
24 Hour Phane:I' I)' B \ -1] ( (..
Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality
(Check Box)
□ MEDIUM l,2!I. LOW
"' " ~-C "" il E ,, ., ~"' oO NC oo :,:::::,;
"' I
i
" ;;
~]
$lj ~ g'
86 <.>::::E
C0 I
i
/
REV 02/16
. .
Ccityof
Carlsbad
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST
B-50
Development Services
Building Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
442-339-2719
www.carlsbadca.gov
:~ ~:~,t is int~ed to leuilding pennil applicants identify which Climate Action Plan (CAP) o,dinance ,equi,ements
apply to their project. This completed checklist (B-50) and summary (B-55) must be included with the building permit
application. The Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) can be referenced during completion of this document.
NOTE: The following type of permits are not required to fill out this form
❖ Patio I ❖ Decks I ❖ PME (w/o panel upgrade) I ❖ Pool
The B-50 checklist was originally developed several years ago to support implementation of the CAP. Recent updates to
the California Building Standards Code have imposed newer performance standards on building permit applications.
Therefore, the applicant is advised to review all applicable code sections and apply the maximum performance standard,
which may exceed the CAP consistency checklist requirements
Consultation with a certified Energy Consultant is encouraged to assist in filling out this document. Appropriate
certification includes, but is not limited to: Licensed, practicing Architect, Engineer, or Contractor familiar with Energy
compliance, IECC/HERS Compliance Specialist, ICC GB Energy Code Specialist, RESNET HERS rater certified, certified
ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner, ICC Commercial Energy Inspector and/or Plans Examiner, ICC CALgreen
Inspector/Plans Examiner, or Green Building Residential Plan Examiner.
If an item in the checklist is deemed to be not applicable to a project, or is less than the minimum required by ordinance,
check N/A and provide an explanation or code section describing the exception.
The project plans must show all details as stated in the applicable Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) and/or Energy Code and
Green Code sections.
Project Name/Building
Permit No.: WILSON ADDITION BP No.: Date: 8-21-24
Property Address/APN: 2273 CARNELIAN CT. / 2132411000
Applicant Name/Co.: A PARIZEAU
Applicant Address: 5304 ONTARIO ST. OCEANSIDE CA 2056
Contact Phone: 760 201 3347 Contact Email: ANNETHEARCHITECT@GMAIL.COM
Contact information of person completing this checklist (if different than above):
Name:
Company
name/address:
B-50
Contact Phone:
Contact Email:
Page 1 of 7 Revised 12122
Use the table below to determine which sections of the Ordinance checklist are applicable to your project. For alterations and additions to existing
buildings, attach a Permit Valuation breakdown on a separate sheet. For purposes of determining valuation, the amount should be upon either
the actual contract price for the work to be permitted or shall be determined with the use of the current "ICC Building Valuation Data" as
published by the International Code Council, whichever is higher (refer to Section 18.04.035 of the CMC).
Building Permit Valuation (BPV) $ breakdown ___________ _
□ New construction
XO Additions and alterations:
□ BPV < $60,000
XO BPV ~ $60,000 □ Electrical
service panel upgrade only
□ BPV ~ $200,000
BPV ~ $1,000,000
Nonresidentlal and hotels/motels
□ New construction
□ Alterations:
□ BPV ~ $200,000 or additions~
1,000 square feet
□ BPV ~ $1,000,000
~ 2,000 sq. ft. new roof addition
Instructions:
2A*, 3A*, 4A*
N/A
1A, 4A
1A, 4A*
2B*
1 B, 2B, 3B, 4B and 5
1B, 5
1B, 2B, 5
2B, 5
*Includes detached, newly constructed ADU
All residential additions and alterations
1-2 family dwellings and townhouses with attached garages
only.
*Multi-family dwellings only where interior finishes are
removed and significant site work and upgrades to structural
and mechanical, electrical, and/or plumbing systems are
ro osed
*Multi-family dwellings only where ~$1,000,000 BPV AND
affecting ~ 75% existing floor area
Building alterations of~ 75% existing gross floor area
1 B also applies if BPV ~ $200,000
1. Choose first between residential or non-residential based on the type of project being submitted.
2. Next chose between new construction or addition/alteration for residential or non-residential.
3. The columns to the right of your selection will determine which sections of the CAP program are applicable to your project.
4. Appropriate details must be included on the plans for selections made.
EXAMPLE:
Scope of work includes a new, 2 story, single family residential structure.
The selections would be: Residential and New construction in the table above. For a 2-story structure, CAP sections 2A, 3A and 4A would be
applicable. (Solar PV, water heating, EV charging) The * indicates that new detached ADU's are included.
EXAMPLE:
Scope of work includes a tenant improvement (i.e., alterations) valued at over one million dollars.
The selections would be: Non-residential and Alteration BPV ~ $1,000,000. CAP sections 1 B, 2B and 5 would be applicable to this project. (Energy
efficiency, Solar PV and Transportation Demand Management (TOM)*)
It may be necessary to supplement the completed checklist with supporting materials, calculations or certifications, to demonstrate full compliance with
CAP ordinance requirements. For example, projects that propose or require a performance approach to comply with energy-related measures will need
to attach to this checklist separate calculations and documentation as specified by the ordinances.
3
Please refer to Section 18.30.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMG) and Section 150.2 of the CEC for more information. Appropriate
details and notes must be placed on the plans according to selections chosen in the design.
A. [8j Residential addition or alteration 2: $60,000 building permit valuation.
Details of selection chosen below must be placed on the plans
referencing CMC 18.30.060.
□ N/A ________ _
Year Built Single-family Requirements
□ Before 1978 Select one option:
□ Duct sealina □ Attic insulation □Cool roof
□ 1978 and later Select one option:
□ Liahtina oackaae □ Waterheatina packaae
□ Between1978-1991
XO 1992 and later
□ Exception: Home energy score
2:7 (attach certification)
Multi-family Requirements
□ Atticinsulation
Select one option:
□ Duct sealinq □ Attic insulation □ Cool roof
Select one option:
X□ Lighting package □ Water-heating
package
B. 0 New Nonresidential construction (including additions over 1,000sf), new hotel/motel construction AND alterations 2:
$200,000 building permit valuation. See Section 18.21.050 of the CMC and CALGreen Appendix AS.
At least one measure from each applicable building component required. 0 N/A _______ _
AS.2O3.1.1 Choose one:
□ Outdoor lighting □ Restaurant service water heating (Section 140.5 of the CEC)
□ Warehouse dock seal doors □ Daylight design PAFs □ Exhaust air heat recovery
0 NIA ________ _
AS.2O3.1.2.1 Choose one: □ .95 Energy budget
(Projects with indoor lighting OR mechanical)
□ .90 Energy budget
(Projects with indoor lighting AND mechanical) □ N/A _______ _
AS.211.1 ** D On-site renewable energy:
0 N/A
AS.211.3 .. □ Green power: (If offered by local utility provider, 50% minimum renewable sources)
0 N/A
AS.212.1 □ Elevators and escalators:(Project with more than one elevator or two escalators)
□ N/A
AS.213.1 D Steel framing: (Provide details on plans for options 1-4 chosen)
0 N/A. ________ _
* High-rise residential buildings are 4 or more stories.
** For alterations~ $1,000,000BPV and affecting> 75%existing gross floor area, OR alterations that add 2,000 square feet of new roof addition: comply
with Section 18.030.040 of the CMC (section 28 below) instead.
4
2. Photovoltaic Systems
A. □ Residential new construction. Refer to Section 150.1(c)14 of the CEC for single-family requirements and Section
170.2(d) of the CEC for multi-family requirements. If project includes installation of an electric heat pump water
heater pursuant to CAP section 3 below (residential water heating), increase system size by .3kWdc if PV offset
option is selected.
Floor Plan ID (use additional CFA orSARA #d.u. Calculated kWdc* Exception
sheets if necessary)
□
□
□
□
Total System Size: kWdc
kWdc = (CFAx.572) / 1,000 + (1.15 x #d.u.)
'Formula calculation where CFA = conditional floor area, #du= number of dwellings per plan type
If proposed system size is less than calculated size, please explain.
B. 0 Nonresidential, hotel/motel and multifamily additions, alterations and repairs of these projects i:!:$1,000,000 BPV AND
affecting i:!:75¾ existing floor area, OR addition that increases roof area by i:!:2,000 square feet. Please refer to
Section 18.30.040 and 18.30.070 of the CMC when completing this section.
Choose one of the following methods: (Gross floor area or Time-Dependent Valuation method)
□ Gross Floor Area (GFA)Method
GFA: Min.System Size: kWd
D If< 1 O,OOOs.f. Enter: 5 kWdc
D If ~ 10,000s.f. calculate: 15 kWdc x (GFA/10,000) **
**Round building size factor to nearest tenth, and round system size to nearest whole number.
D Time-Dependent Valuation Method
C. 0
Annual TDV Energyuse:*** ______ x .80= Min. system size: ______ kWdc
*** Attach calculation documentation using modeling software approved by the California Energy Commission.
*All newly constructed non residential, hoteVmotel and highrise multifamily buildings that are required by CEC section
140.10(a) to have a PV system shall also have a battery storage system meeting CEC section 140.10(b). Non
residential, hotel/motel and multifamily additions, alterations or repairs that trigger solar due to the Cartsbad Climate Action
Plan will NOT require battery storage. Battery storage is required when triggered by CEC section 140.10(a) an~or 170.2(g).
5
3. Water Heatln
A. Residential. Refer to Section 18.30.050 of the CMC and Sections 150.1 (c)8 or 170.2(d) of the CEC when completing this
section. Provide complete details on the plans.
Residential new construction and alterations:
□ Required: 60% of energy needed for service water heating from on-site solar or recovered energy.
For systems serving individual units, choose one system:
□ Single 240-volt heat pump water heater AND compact hot water distribution AND Drain water heat recovery (low-rise
residential only)
□ Single 240-volt heat pump water heater AND PV system .3 kWdc larger than required.
□ Heat pump water heater meeting NEEA Advanced Water Heating Specification Tier 3 or higher.
□ Solar water heating system that is either .60 solar savings fraction or 40 s.f. solar collectors
□ Gas or propane system with a solar water hearing system and recirculation system.
For systems serving multiple units, choose one system:
□ Heat pump water heating system with recirculation loop tank and electric backup.
□ Solar water heating system that is either:
□ .20 solar savings fraction □ . 15 solar savings fraction, plus drain water heat recover
OR:
□ System meets performance compliance requirements of section 150.1(d) or 170.2(d) and deriving at least 60% of energy from
on-site solar or recovered energy.
□ Exception: _____________________________________ _
B. Nonresidential and hotel/motel new construction. This section also applies to high-rise residential. Refer to Sections 18.030.020
and 18.040.030 of the CMC and Sections 140.5 and 170.2 of the CEC when completing this section. Provide complete details
on the plans.
1. Non-residential:
D Required: Water heating system derives at least 40% of its energy from one of the following:
□ Solar-thermal □ Photovoltaics □ Recovered energy
□ Required: High-capacity service water heating system
2. Water heating system is (choose one):
0 Heat pump water heater
D Electric resistance water heater(s)
□ Solar water heating system with .40 solar savings fraction
3. Hotel/motel:
□ Required: High-capacity service water heating system (meeting Section 170.2(d) of the CEC)
□ Required: Located in garage or conditioned space
Exception:
6
4. Electric ehlcle Charging
A □ Residential • New construction and major alterations.• This section also applies to hotel/motel projects. Refer to Section
18.21.030 of the CMC and Section 4.106.4 of the GBSC when com letin this section.
Choose one:
XO One and two-family residential dwelling alterations with attached private garage. (not required if a panel upgrade would be
needed)□ New detached ADU. (no EV space required when no additional parking facilities are added)
□ New one and two-family residential dwellings and townhouse with attached private garage.
□ One EV Ready parking space required □ Exception: __________ _
□ New and major alterations to multi-family and hotel/motel projects: □ Exception: ________________ _
Total Parl<ing Spaces Proposed EVSE Spaces
EV Capable ( 10% of total) I EV Readv /25% of Total) I EV chargers (5% of Total)
I I
*Major alterations are:
(1) for one and two-family dwellings and for town houses with an attached garage, alterations have a building permit valuation ~ $60,000 or
include an electrical service panel upgrade.
(2) for multifamily dwellings (three units or more without attached garages), alterations have a building pennit valuation~ $200,000, i nteriorfinishesare
removed and significant site work and u pgradesto structural and mechanical, electrical, a nd/orp lumbing systems c:1re proposed.
B. D Non-Residential • New construction □ Exception: _____________ _
Please refer to Section 18.21 .040 of the CMG when completing this section
Total Parking Spaces
Proposed EV Capable I EVCS (Installed with EVSE) I EV Ready (optional) I EV Space (optional)
I I I
Calculation: Refer to the table below:
Total Number of Parking Spaces provided Number of required EV Capable Spaces Number of required EVCS (Installed with EVSE)
D 0-9 1 1
D 10-25 4 1
□ 26-50 8 2
□ 51-75 13 3
□ 76-100 17 5
□ 101-150 25 6
□ 151-200 35 9
□ 201 and over 20 percent of total 25 percent of Required EV Spaces
Calculations: Total EV Capablespaces= .20xTotal parking spaces proposed (rounded up to nearest whole number)
EVSE Installed = Total EVSE Spaces x .25 (rounded up to nearest whole number)
EVSE other may be "EV Ready" or "EV Space"
7
..
5. O Transportation Demand Management (TOM): Nonresidential ONLY
An approved Transportation Demand Management (TOM) Plan is required for all nonresidential projects that meet a threshold of employee-generated ADT.
City staff will use the table below based on your submitted plans to determine whether your permit requires a TOM plan. If TOM is applicable to
your permit, staff will contactthe applicant to develop a site-specific TOM plan based on the permit details.
Acknowledgment:
Employee ADT Estimation for Various Commercial Uses
Office (all)2 20
Restaurant 11
Retaib 8
Industrial 4
Manufacturing 4
Warehousing 4
1 Unless otherwise noted, rates estimated from /TE Trip
Generation Manual, 1 ()lhEdition
13
11
4.5
3.5
3
1
2 For all office uses, use SANDAG rate of 20 ADT/1 ,000 sf to
calculate employee ADT
3 Retail uses include shopping center, variety store, supermarket,
gyms, pharmacy, etc.
Other commercial uses may be subject to special
consideration
sample calsulatlons:
Office: 20,450 sf
I 1. 20,450 sf/ 1000 x 20 = 409 Employee ADT
Retail: 9,334 sf
1. First 1,000 sf= 8 ADT
2. 9,334 sf -1,000 sf= 8,334 sf
3. (8,334 sf/ 1,000 x 4.5) + 8 = 46 Employee ADT
I acknowledge that the plans submitted may be subject to the City of Carlsbad's Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. I agree to be
contacted should my permit require a TDM plan and understand that an approved TDM plan is a condition of permit issuance.
Applicant Signature: ___________ _
Name: _A PARIZEU _____________ _
Date:_8-21-24 ______________ _
Phone No.: _760 201 3347 ____________ _
8
{'Cityof
Carlsbad
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP) COMPLIANCE
CAP Building Plan
Template
B-55
Development Services
Building Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2719
www.carlsbadca.gov
The following summarizes project compliance with the applicable Climate Action Plan ordinances of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and California
Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), current version. The following certificate shall be included on the plans for all building permits that
are required to comply with the CAP measures:
1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY APPLICABLE: □xvEs □ NO
Complies with CMC 18.30.060
or 18.21.0S0
Existing Structure, year built: 2007
Prepared Energy Audit?
Energy Score: _____ _
Efficiency Measures included in scope:
2. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM APPLICABLE: OYES □ NO
3.
4.
s.
Complies with CMC section 18.30.040 and 2022 California Energy
Code section 150.l(c)14 D Yes D IA
Size of PV system (kWdc):
Sizing PV by load calculations D Yes O No
If by Load Calculations:
Total calculated electrical load:
80% of load:
Exception Requested
Exception Approved a ~::~
Al TERNATIVE WATER HEAT! NG SYSTEM APPLICABLE: □ YES ~ NO
Complies with CMC sections 18.30.020
18.20.030 and/or 18.30.050?
Alternative Source:
o Electric
o Passive Solar
Exception Requested
Exception Approved
ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING APPLICABLE:
O Yes O N/A
D Yes
□Yes
OYES
□No
□No
[x)No
Complies with CMC
section 18.21.030?
Panel Upgrade?
D Yes O N/A D Yes ONo
Required Provided
Total EV Parking Spaces:
No. of EV Capable Spaces:
No. of EV Ready Spaces:
No. of EV Installed Spaces:
Hardship Requested
Hardship Approved
-----0,Ves
□Yes
TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE:
Compliant?
TOM Report on file with city?
O No
□No
DYES L)No
O Yes O No
□Yes o No
(cityof
Carlsbad
RESIDENTIAL GREEN
BUILDING CODE
STANDARDS MANDA TORY
MEASURES
CERTIFICATION
CHECKLIST
Development Services
Building Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
442-339-2719
www.carlsbadca.gov
8-51
This form, signed and completed, and all receipts for the recycled materials shall be
submitted to the Building Inspector prior to Final Inspection.
Site Development Mandatory
4.106.2 A plan is developed and implemented to manage storm water drainage during construction. (X)
4.106.3 The site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water away from buildings. (X)
Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water
flows.
Energy Efficiency
4.201.1 Low-rise residential buildings shall meet or exceed the minimum standard design required by (X)
the California Energy Standards.
Water Efficiency and Conservation
Indoor Water Use
4.303.1 Indoor water use shall be reduced by at least 20 percent using one of the following methods: (X)
1. Water saving fixtures or flow restrictors shall be used. 7/01/2011
2. A 20 percent reduction in baseline water use shall be demonstrated.
4.303.2 When using the calculation method specified in Section 4.303.1, multiple showerheads shall not (X)
exceed maximum flow rates. 7/01/201 1
4.303.3 Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and shower heads) shall (X)
comply with specified performance requirements. 7/01/2011
Outdoor Water Use
4.304.1 Automatic irrigation systems controllers installed at the time of final inspection shall be weather-(X)
based.
Enhanced Durability and Reduced Maintenance
4.406.1 Joints and openings. Annular spaces around pipes, electric cables, conduits or other openings
in plates at exterior walls shall be protected against the passage of rodents by closing such openings (X)
with cement mortar, concrete masonry or similar method acceptable to the enforcing agency.
Construction Waste Management Plan
4.408.1 A minimum of 65 percent of the construction waste generated at the site is diverted to recycle or (X)
salvage. Recycled material receipts from approved recyclers must be attached to this form.
4.408.2 Where a local jurisdiction does not have a construction and demolition waste management (X )
ordinance, construction waste management plan, per form B-59, shall be submitted for approval to the
enforcinQ aQencv.
Building Maintenance and Operation
4.410.1 An operation and maintenance manual shall be provided to the buildinQ occupant or owner. (X)
Environmental Quality
Fireplaces
4.503.1 Any installed gas fireplace shall be a direct-vent sealed-combustion type. Any installed
woodstove or pellet stove shall comply with US EPA Phase II emission limits where applicable. (X)
Woodstoves, pellet stoves and fireolaces shall also comply with aoolicable local ordinances.
B-51 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 05/22
Pollutant Control
4.504.1 Duct openings and other related air distribution component openings shall be covered (X)
during construction.
4.504.2.1 Adhesive, sealants and caulks shall be compliant with voe and other toxic compound (X)
limits. (X )
4.504.2.2 Paints, stains and other coatings shall be compliant with voe limits. (X)
4.504.2.3 Aerosol paints and coatings shall be compliant with product weighted MIR limits for
ROG and other toxic compounds. (X)
4.504.2.4 Documentation shall be provided to verify that compliant VOC limit finish materials
have been used. (X)
4.504.3 Carpet and carpet systems shall be compliant with voe limits.
4.504.4 50 percent of floor area receiving resilient flooring shall comply with VOC-emission limits
defined in the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS) Low-emitting Materials List or
(X )
be certified under the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) FloorScore program.
4.504.5 Particleboard, medium density fiberboard (MDF) and hardwood plywood used in interior
(X )
finish systems shall comply with low formaldehvde emission standards.
Interior Moisture Control
4.505.2 Vapor retarder and capillary break is installed at slab on grade foundations. (X )
4.505.3 Moisture content of building materials used in wall and floor framing is checked before (X)
enclosure.
Indoor Air Quality and Exhaust
4.506.1 Exhaust fans which terminate outside the buildina are provided in every bathroom. (X )
Environmental Comfort
4.507.1 Whole house exhaust fans shall have insulated louvers or covers which close when the
fan is off. Covers or louvers shall have a minimum insulation value of R-4.2.
(X)
4.507.2 Duct systems are sized, designed, and equipment is selected using the following
methods: (X )
1. Establish heat loss and heat gain values according to ACCA Manual J or equivalent.
2. Size duct systems according to ACCA 29-D (Manual D) or equivalent
3. Select heatina and cooling equipment accordina to ACCA 36-S (Manual S) or equivalent.
Installer and Special Inspector Qualifications
702.1 HVAC system installers are trained and certified in the proper installation of HVAC (X )
systems.
702.2 Special inspectors employed by the owner must be qualified and able to demonstrate (X)
competence in the discipline they are inspectina.
I, as the professional responsible for this project, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the mandatory items
listed on this form have been incorporated into the project in order to comply with Title 24, Part 11 of the 2016
California Green Building Standards. All receipts for recycled materials have been attached to this form.
Project Address: ll.-7) Car l\,e,1 )t>,"" u-Plan Check Number:
Print Name: GrM ( l6 l?e_Je.cc..~S Signed~ '---
License Number: L~1 \4\1-.,. Date: it .1_ 7;, -7-oi 5
B-51 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 05/22
C cityof
Carlsbad
Project Name:
Project ID:
DWG No. or Building Permit No.:
STANDARD PROJECT
REQUIREMENT
CHECKLIST
E-36
ec;t lnfomlat1orJ
Development Services
Land Development Engineering
1635 Faraday Avenue
442-339-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
Complete the Table 1 -Site Design Requirement to document existing and proposed site features and the BMPs to be
implemented for them. All BMPs must be implemented where applicable and feasible. Applicability is generally
assumed if a feature exists or is proposed.
BMPs must be implemented for site design features where feasible. Leaving the box for a BMP unchecked means it
will not be implemented (either partially or fully) either because it is inapplicable or infeasible. Explanations must be
provided in the area below. The table provides specific instructions on when explanations are required.
1. Check the boxes below for each existing feature on
the site.
Select the BMPs to be implemented for each identified feature. Explain
why any BMP not selected is infeasible in the area below.
□ Natural waterbodies
SD·G
Conserve natural
features
SD-H
Provide buffers around waterbodies
B. BMPs for Common Impervious Outdoor Site Features (see Fact Sheet BL-2)
1. Check the boxes below for each
proposed feature.
□ Streets and roads
□ Sidewalks & walkways
□ Parking areas & lots
□ Driveways
□ Patios, decks, & courtyards
□ Hardcourt recreation areas
E-36
2. Select the BMPs to be implemented for each proposed feature. If neither BMP SD-B nor
SD-I is selected for a feature, explain why both BMPs are infeasible in the area below.
SD-B
Direct runoff to pervious
areas
□
Page 1 of 4
SD-I
Construct surfaces from
ermeable materials
Minimize size of
impervious areas
D Check this box to confirm
that all impervious areas on
the site will be minimized
where feasible.
If this box is not checked,
identify the surfaces that
cannot be minimized in area
below, and explain why it is
Revised 04/23
□ Other: ______ _ □ infeasible to do so.
C. BMPs for Rooftop Areas: Check this box if rooftop areas are proposed and select at least one BMP (see Fact
elow. Sheet BL-3)
If no BMPs are selected, explain why they are infeasible in the area below.
SD-B
Direct run to pervious areas
□ SD-C
Install green roofs
□ SD-E
Install rain barrels
D. □ BMPs for Landscaped Areas: Check this box if landscaping is proposed and select the BMP below
□ SD-K Sustainable Landscaping
(see Fact
Sheet BL-4)
If SD-K is not selected, explain why it is infeasible in the area below.
Provide discussion/justification for site design BMPs that will not be implemented (either partially or fully):
All development projects must complete Table 2 • Source Control Requirement to identify applicable requirements for
documenting pollutant-generating sources/ features and source control BMPs.
BMPs must be implemented for source control features where feasible. Leaving the box for a BMP unchecked means it
will not be implemented (either partially or fully) either because it is inapplicable or infeasible. Explanations must be
provided in the area below. The table provides specific instructions on when explanations are required.
""""'$'-· ·-·m-~"'~'■l·-;"·-•~;·-i:i:; •• +;[t_.~+ tl}fu~l,.~ " # f''• f[''(l: nc"'l,io/, "¾-"' "i',.,-,. jll.< t-t~"l <+ 14 1' ~•t .,. J M,..., .tu ~! , FttMM-f.)lt+~¼• »~rt'tr;tr+; ~1 'tltn·,tiJid ~fh,tb,~r, tilmM~<l1i ', .. , ~ n • A. Management of Storm Water Discharges
1. Identify all proposed outdoor 2. Which BMPs will be used to prevent 3. Where will runoff from the
work areas below materials from contacting rainfall or work area be routed?
runoff?
□ Check here if none are proposed (See Fact Sheet BL-5) (See Fact Sheet BL-6)
Select all feasible BMPs for each work area Select one or more option for each
work area
SC-A SC-B SC-C SC-D SC-E Other
Overhead Separation Wind Sanitary Containment
covering flows from protection sewer system
adjacent . areas . l1iZI Trash & Refuse Storaqe ~ □ □ J1SI □ □
lizl' Materials & Eouioment Storaae 29, □ . LJ tD □ □
E-36 Page 2 of 4 Revised 04/23
,.
D Loadina & Unloadinq □ □ □ □ u □
D Fuelina □ □ □ □ □ □
□ Maintenance & Reoair □ □ □ □ u □
D Vehicle & Eauioment Cleanina □ □ □ □ □ □
□ Other: □ □ □ □ □ □
B. Management of Storm Water Discharges (see Fact Sheet BL-7)
Select one ootion for each feature below:
• Storm drain inlets and catch basins ... ~ are not proposed D will be labeled with stenciling or signage to
discourage dumoina CSC-Fl
• Interior work surfaces, floor drains & jZl are not proposed □ will not discharge directly or indirectly to the MS4
sumps ... or receiving waters
• Drain lines (e.g. air conditioning, boiler, Ill are not proposed □ will not discharge directly or indirectly to the MS4
etc.) ... or receiving waters .
• Fire sprinkler test water ... are not proposed ~ill not discharge directly or indirectly to the MS4
or receivina waters
Provide discussion/justification for source control BMPs that will not be implemented (either partially or fully):
E-36 Page 3 of 4 Revised 04/23
This E-36 Form is intended to comply with applicable requirements of the city's BMP Design Manual. I certify that it has
been completed to the best of my ability and accurately reflects the project being proposed and the applicable BMPs
proposed to minimize the potentially negative impacts of this project's land development activities on water quality. I
understand and acknowledge that the review of this form by City staff is confined to a review and does not relieve me as
the person in charge of overseeing the selection and design of storm water BMPs for this project, of my responsibilities for
ro·ect desi n.
Preparer Signature: Date:
Print re arer name:
E-36 Page 4 of 4 Revised 04/23