The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 92-06E; SEASIDE ESTATES; Admin Decision LetterI t • • City of Carlsbad •AFl,i,ii,l·■•J=i•ifiiii,t=i,il October 9, 1998 Fred Caso Pacific Heritage Development 15707 Rockfield Blvd., Suite 255 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: SEASIDE ESTATES-SDP 92-06(E) The City has completed a review of the application for a Site Development Plan as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"X" dated October 7, 1998, on file in the Planning Department. Per Condition No. 26 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3591, Condition No. 2 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3979, and Condition No. 1 of Planning Commission No. 3977, this application is a request for the architectural and building placement approval of 44 single-family homes on standard 10,000 square foot and larger single-family lots which were previously subdivided and graded as part of Sambi Seaside Heights -Carlsbad Tract 92-02(A). It is the Planning Director's determination that the project is consistent with Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and therefore APPROVES this request based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. All findings of SDP. 92-06(A), as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3979, shall apply as findings of SDP 92-02(E). 2. That the Planning Director has determined that the project is exempt form the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15182. of the state CEQA Guidelines and will not have an adverse significant impact on the environment. 3. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan and the Zone 20 Specific Plan, all the homes and driveways within the project will meet City standards, and the homes have architecture and materials compatible with the surrounding community. 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 1 SDP 92-06(E) -SEA. ESTATES October 9, 1998 Page 2 • 4. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that the project meets all required City standards without the need for a variance from those standards. The four floor plans can be accommodated within the building envelope of each previously subdivided lot, as shown on Exhibits "A" -"X", dated October 7, 1998. 5. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that the placement of the single-family homes adhere to all setback requirements of the One Family Residential Zone (R-1- 10000-Q) and Specific Plan 203, including the 50 foot building setback from Aviara Parkway. The architectural elevations adhere to the architectural standards of Specific Plan 203 and the Hillside Ordinance and uniform fencing around the perimeter of each lot has been provided consistent with the standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 6. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the 44 single-family units on previously subdivided lots would not generate additional traffic beyond that analyzed and approved through CT 92-02(A). Conditions: 1. Staff is authgrized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Site Development Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 2. Approval of SDP 92-06(E) is granted subject to the approval of CDP 98-42. SDP 92-06(E) is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4400, for CDP 98-42 and all applicable conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3979. 3. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 4. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body. The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the Planning Director and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. I , I SDP 92-O6(E) -SEA. ESTATES October 9, 1998 Page 3 • 5. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director prior to the approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. Engineering: General: 6. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within the project, the developer shall submit to an receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to hauling operation. NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering conditions, upon the approval of this proposed Site Development Plan, must be met prior to issuance of a building permit. Fees/Agreements 7. This project is within the proposed boundary of the Poinsettia Lane/Aviara Parkway Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee District (B&TD #2). The intersection of Poinsettia Lane with A viara Parkway must be demolished and reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Until this reconstruction project is secured, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,. each proposed project within the original Sambi subdivision is required to pay a fair share contribution towards this· work. Therefore, the developer shall pay $540/ADT ($5,400/Unit) to meet this requirement. Special Engineering Conditions: 8. The 20% single garage driveway gradient, for proposed Lot No. 18, shall be reduced to be no greater than 14%, in accordance with City Standards. This shall be shown on the Conforming Mylar Site Development Plan. 9. There shall be no encroachment of any structure into the existing 20' water easement, at proposed Lot No. 34, unless specifically approved by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, District Engineer. (See sheet 3 of 5 of the site plan.) SDP 92-06(E)-SEAa ESTATES October 9, 1998 Page4 0 to. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals· herein granted: institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek dan1ages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Site Development Plan. • This decision may be appealed by you or any member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of receipt of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission at 2075 Las Palmas Drive in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $400.00. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Director until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Jeff Gibson at (760) 438-1161, extension 4455. GW:JG:eh c: Principal Planer -Adrienne Landers File Copy Data Entry