The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMCUP 08-04; ALGA CAMINO VERIZON; Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP)1) □ □ D D □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 00 □ 2} 3) Administrative Perml1 Administrative Variance Coastal Development Permlt Conditional Use Permit Condominium Permit Environmental Impact Assessment General Plan Amendment Habitat Management Plan Permit Hillside Oe\'elopment Permit Local Coastal Program Amendment Master Plan Mfnor Conditional Use Permit Non~Residantfal Planned Development ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: CJTY OF CARLSBAD LAND USI: REVIEW APPUCATI □ □ □ □ □ D ·□ □ □ D Planned industrial Permit Planning Commission Determination Precise Development Plan Redevelopment Permit Site Development Plan Special Use Permit Specific Plan +eRtaliiie Fla~e, Map Oblam from Er,9lnee1ing Oapartment Tentative Tract Map Variance Zone Change List other appll9ations not s ecified 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJ R..,L,, y -· --• • • u+ uvls~ J. . .. . ' d~ )., _.....,.........,~"""'-'r-• • ' ' &...i:.'fDf( - ,, ~ 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Ctmlzu:+([1-tp.~.) 6) APPLICANT NAME {Print or Type} I f\ lrXtC.Cl Propt.(+ilS, LC' Coor~;:tid'{-Cj,Uy/ Ve,1<:1vOY\ ¼.J\f,l.kS.$ ·.' .~).tr e-0')\,1\(~iss MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 3~G CeLn1.,~1,o LU ~o µo~t'k S~tD 39' Gv-citr, · ::ti'- ClTY AND STATE: ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE e».,r-._ D{f O e~ q,a,jQ( .J-\(J)il~ CA'.\-q;;w3, q~q#rJ7~ 31) 9 EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAtl ADDRESS: f CERTIFY THAT I A OWNER AND iHAT ALL TH£ ABOVE INFORMATION JS TRUE AND CO B NOWI.EDGE. 1---J t .--(J!C_' DATE /iroTE: A PROPOSEO:PROJE!CT REQUfRING MULTIPLE APPUCATIONS BE Ftl.EO, MUST SE SUBMITTED PRlOR TO 3:3-0 P.M~ A PROf"OSeD PROJECT REQUIRJNG ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE flt.ED, MUST aE SUBMIT'J'eD PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. fq,m 14 Rov. 06/07 (Je;V{)(X)Lfr ~-1 IF l 7) 8} BRIEF LEGAL DESCRJPTIO- LOCATION OF PROJECT: ~-'1«li\1Jl\f\ t:D\'.:\,~ \'"If u.f\~ J ~~ T-L, Gd89-&qq~ ti Cllm..,iYo Tudlt C.oJJ?Jsbad, Ctr 2@ro9 STREET ADORES oNTHeC _. Br,-sT; I {NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, ~T) SIDE OF I.__ ___ ~-·,.,.,.· ,...,..."""""G'i,,,.,.l=Cff/J~nt,,,,,.,'/1.() __ '1_{;, ..... €/K_,,....;;;;..,I !NAME OF STREeTI BETWEEN f I (NAME OF smeirrj ANo ...... l _______ __. 9) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWtNG THJS APPLICATlON t1' MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMM!SstONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT ANO ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. fiWE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PUR?osa 10) PROPE:RTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES ANO CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRiCTlON FILED ON THE PROPERTY TITLE IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. CERTAIN APPROVALS (SUCH AS A CONDITIONAL U~IT) ~ THE DANO BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. ~-TY-0.....,W_N_E .... R.-.----, FOR CITY USE ONLY Form 14 Aw. 06/07 RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2008 CITY OF CARL c-a·Ao PLAN ° DATE ST~~Nirft?iooipN RECEIVED RECEIVED BY; H411 tJ1iF 4 0 0 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 I ~111~11111 ~ lillll 11 II~ 111111~11111111111111 !! !II Applicant: VERIZON WIRELESS Description Amount MCUP0804 732.89 Receipt Number: R0068488 Transaction Date: 01/29/2008 Transaction ID: R0068488 Pay Type Method Descripti~on Amount ------------------------~----------- Payment Check 12229 732.89 Transaction Amount: 732.89 '·-= en (0 ro N C--J N cry cry ('') I'-,.._ r----.y;). (',J tv:i 0 0 "'SI-!.!") N r~ I;:) et:: a::, 0) oco u.J co :::;;: C:,(Y) N-s:t" Cl O)C) Cl ro _J ..--. 1--CNO cr.i ~r.o <I. 0) CO -0 ·~-~ 1--00 1--N ~ co '-O"J 1-tO)C) -st-C) N .. >, ..a '-W C'-1 CO ::;;: N et:: 0 1--. Nu <U * Cl) a.i -~ --...o :::i:::a co ~ (1) tJ * ,...-+-1 ..r::,_ --0 UJ co ••C) > * -.,-• ·ro, ,._ C: cn ON a.. a = o.... ,..__ ~ -.--a., * "' aJ "' +-'::::;, C/J .:,,: w (.) * C..:, U U N O"'l I .. CL c..:, .s:::: u .;(-I N L (..) :::s = Cl (1) C: * "I->, >. i::: CJ) ..0 0::: u.J .___ Cl:: * 0 "' !Cl '° t--:::?:......___ 1--co * ,:::i-c, -:, >-I ~= ....... * -, -..,,... ro * * * * _9 ~ i ty oJ.St..~l.~Jl..~9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Appllcant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The follm'lling information MY§! be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed untfl this fnformatton is completed. ?lease print 1. APPUCANT {Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE; LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having a financial Interest in the appflcaUon. rf the applicant includes a corporation or partnershie, include the names, title, addresses of aIT individuals owning more than 100/4 of the shares. tf NO INDIVlOUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% • t SE INDICATe NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. ff publlc!y-owned corporation, clude the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. ( e pag d rt necess~ry.) Person________ Corp/Part \/.tR'\ l,DlJ Ll)1~&S Title ___________ _ Address ---------- OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of 6LL persons having any ownership, interest In the property Involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership {i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profitt corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include 1he names, titJe, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares, IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE {NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publtcJil-owned corporation, Include the names, trues, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary,) ,~ Title~ _ Corp/Part<ld£_UL p~~ LLL-- Tftle ___________ _ Address_________ Address ___________ _ ll~eeo L,~.J'o\\a.. V\Ll~\Y1 *_l_c)1) ________ _ ~~ ~ ~· lli-tJ---2- 1635 Faraday Avenue• Cadsbad, CA 92008-7314 • {760) 602-4000 • FAX (760) 6Q2.8.559 • www.c!.catlshad.ca.us @ I I J 3. NON-PROFIT ORG.TION OR TRUST • If any person identified pursuant to (1) or {2} above is a nongrgfit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. ~: ProliUTrusl 1\1 1 ~ ;: ProfiUTrust fi JI fr Address. ________ _ Address. __________ _ 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes IZJ No If yes, please indicate person(s): _________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above infomiation is true and correct to the best of my knowiedge. Signature of owner/date Print or type name of owner J-~ ~(~J) ,.flMliJfw (i/11<,J&.,w ~ gnature of applicarit/date ltJ 'b'J.,,u ()I. t).m,. Z,c:\r'--" C{) w'G K'-i~l.A 0tffH/£S Jvtil£5L:i!Yb 1~1££/l~S • .,X}.,l( tc -t6ltfP Print or type nartie of applicant LL) fr H;ADMIN\.COUNTER\OtSCLOSURE STATEMENT 12106 RQW:aore FU-~✓~ PR.CT DESCRJPTION/EXPLAN.N PR~ECT NAME: ~~ ~ ~ APPLICANTNAME: ~li==~i;~~£S ~u\¾-S k-.1 ri\ S·H~S, ht, \lb-ten! iJ~ ~&£ Please describe fufJfthe proposed proJect by appiication type. lncfude any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background informatlon and supporting statements regarding the reasons for. or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. DescriptionJExpianation: Project Desoriptioo 10/96 pa..ae-5 r,, r of1 • HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS RADIO AND TELEVISION BY E-MAIL KIM@MILESTONEWIRELESS.COM April 22, 2008 Ms. Kim Shaves Milestone Wireless 14110 Ramona Drive Whittier, California 90605 Dear Kim: • WILLIAM F. HAMMETT, P.E. DANE E. ERICKSEN, P.E. STANLEY SALEK, P.E. MARK D. NEUMANN, P.E. ROBERT P. SMITH, JR. RAJAT MATHUR, P.E. FERNANDO DIZON ROBERT L. HAMMETT, P.E. 1920-2002 EDWARD EDISON, P.E. As you requested, we have analyzed the RF exposure conditions for proposed modifications to the existing Verizon Wireless base station (Site Alga Camino) located at 6989 El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California. An electronic copy of our report is enclosed. Fields in publicly accessible areas at the site are calculated to be well below the applicable limits. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and would welcome any questions on this material. Please let me know if we may be of additional assistance. Sincerely yours, William F. Hammett tm Enclosure e-mail: bhammett@h-e.com - US Mat!: Box 280068 • San Francisco, California 94128 Delivery: 470 Third Street West• Sonoma, California 95476 Telephone: 707/996-5200 San Francisco• 707/996-5280 Facsimile • 202/396-5200 D.C. • • Verizon Wireless • Base Station Alga Camino 6989 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Verizon Wireless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate proposed modifications to its existing base station (Site Alga Camino) located at 6989 El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California, for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields. Prevailing Exposure Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15, 1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent stand~rd, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar exposure limits. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Personal Wireless Service Personal Communication ("PCS") Cellular Telephone Specialized Mobile Radio [ most restrictive frequency range] Approx. Frequency 1,950 MHz 870 855 30-300 Occupational Limit 5.00 mW/cm2 2.90 2.85 1.00 General Facility Requirements Public Limit 1.00 mW/cm2 0.58 0.57 0.20 Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about 1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO VWAlgaCamino588 Page 1 of 4 • • Verizon Wireless• Base Station Alga Camino 6989 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California wireless services, the antennas require line-of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas. Computer Modeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and Facility Description Based upon information provided by Verizon, including drawings by ACO Architects, Inc., dated April 2, 2008, that carrier presently has twelve Ante! directional panel antennas on the two-story commercial building located at 6989 El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California. The antennas are mounted in three groups of four, each with two Model RWA-80014 and two BXA-185060/8CF. The antennas oriented toward 335°T are located in roof dormers on the north side of the building, at an effective height of about 27 feet above ground. The other two groups are oriented toward 115°T and 200°T at an effective height of about 33 feet above ground and are located on the east and south faces of the building, respectively. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction is 2,050 watts, representing the simultaneous operation of seven cellular service channels at 250 watts each and one PCS channel at 300 watts. Presently located on the same building are similar antennas for use by Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, and AT&T, other wireless telecommunications carriers. Study Results The proposed changes to the site, consisting simply of adding screens to hide the east and south antennas, do not change the existing RF exposure conditions. For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the Verizon operation by itself is calculated to be 0.0087 m W/cm2, which is 1.6% of the applicable public limit. The contribution from Verizon to the total cumulative exposure level with the other carriers is not significant in terms of compliance with the standards limiting human exposure to RF energy. iil1 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO VWAlgaCamino588 Page 2 of 4 • • Verizon Wireless • Base Station Alga Camino 6989 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California Recommended Mitigation Measures Due to their mounting locations, the antennas are not accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. To prevent occupational exposures in excess of the FCC guidelines, no access within 2 feet directly in front of the Verizon antennas themselves, such as might occur during construction of the proposed screens or other maintenance work on the building, should be allowed while the base station is in operation, unless other measures can be demonstrated to ensure that occupational protection requirements are met. Posting explanatory warning signs* at the screens and/or antennas, such that the signs would be readily visible from any angle of approach to persons who might need to work within that distance, would be sufficient to meet FCC-adopted guidelines. Similar measures should already be in place for the other carriers at the site; applicable keep-back distances have not been determined as part of this study. Conclusion Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the Verizon Wireless base station located at 6989 El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California, will comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base stations. Posting of explanatory signs is recommended to establish compliance with occupational exposure limitations. * Warning signs should comply with OET-65 color, symbol, and content recommendations. Contact information should be provided (e.g., a telephone number) to arrange for access to restricted areas. The selection of language(s) is not an engineering matter, and guidance from the landlord, local zoning or health authority, or appropriate professionals may be required. fij ~ HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. ~\~\ ~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS [a 1£1 lhw sAN FRANc1sco VWAlgaCamino588 Page 3 of 4 • • Verizon Wireless • Base Station Alga Camino 6989 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California Authorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration Nos. E-13026 and M-20676, which expire on June 30, 2009. This work has been carried out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct. April 22, 2008 ~,.Jr, HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. ~s.:.1.J~,,"""' CONSULTING ENGINEERS i1:il ka.~ sAN FRANc1sco E-13026 M-20676 E,cp.~ VWAigaCamino588 Page 4 of 4 • • FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Frequency Applicable Range (MHz) 0.3 -1.34 1.34-3.0 3.0-30 30-300 300-1,500 1,500 -100,000 1000 -100 ..o"' t ·-E 10 :S: en u o§~ 1 i:i.. o E '-" 0.1 0.1 Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequency of emission in MHz) Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field Field Strength Field Strength Power Density (V/m) (Alm) (mW/cm2) 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 614 823.8/f 1.63 2.19/f 100 1801/ 1842/ f 823.8/f 4.89/ f 2.19/f 900/ f2 1801/ 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 3.54'\ff 1.59{/ Vf/106 {!1238 f/300 f/1500 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 / Occupational Exposure ---./ PCS Cell.~,.,_ ___ _ ----· - Public Exposure 10 100 104 105 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO FCC Guidelines Figure 1 II" • • RFR.CALC TM Calculation Methodology Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. Near Field. Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel ( directional) and whip ( omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications base stations, as well as dish (aperture) antennas, typically used for microwave links. The antenna patterns are not fully formed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. . . S 180 O.lxPnet mW 2 For a panel or whip antenna, power density • = -0-x 2 h, in /cm , BW TC X D X fi . . S O.lxl6x17xPnet . mW, 2 and or an aperture antenna, maximum power density max = 2 , m ,cm , rcxh where 8Bw = half-power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts, D = distance from antenna, in meters, h = aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and YJ = aperture efficiency (unitless, typically 0.5-0.8). The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: S 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP . mW, 2 power density = 2 , m ,cm , 4x1exD where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accurate projections. t.~1 rr.;:.':lt?;.-t~,,~ HAMMETT & EDISON INC ii\ i?::;; , • ~ ~·"""' CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~ d.:.~::1 SAN FRANCISCO Methodology Figure 2 Al a Camino Mod I Car shad, CA 92009 Proposed 1/ertwn \ reltl56 Alltm'! Enclooure View 2 View Notes: Looking south west at proposed site from Dove Lane Verizon Wireless 15505 Sand Canyon Ave Building "D" 1st Floor Irvine, CA 92618 Milestone Wireless Attn: Kim Shaves 3 7 Gardenpath Irvine, CA 92603 Applicant Photographic Simulations Provided By: 11 ,-~•"•J!iR< DmEAi"""~ SM~im_,lifizted 20014 C......w lilne Af>I"" Volley, CA 92308 ' www.dmvnzdrsii,,z.com (866) 961-9295 Contact n,;,""""' ,;,,oMio,,;, .... ,,,..._,, .. """. connpftM/ ~ al rho ,,,.,,,,,,,..,J-f«ifit),. fora .ct._.,,_,......., ,-tffff fo dw"""'1Nff<dplom.. ~0.-U•-~--s---n...,a...,..