HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCUP 08-07; VERIZON PACIFIC ONE CENTER; Admin Decision Letter• • FILE COPY
City of Carlsbad
■ u Fi;,; •• ,,~■ •J4 •ti a 1,, ,, ,, a
June 18, 2008
Kerrigan A. Diehl
Verizon Wireless c/o Plancom
2nd Floor
302 State Street
Escondido, CA 92029
SUBJECT: MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. MCUP 08-07 -VERIZON PACIFC
ONE CENTER -Request to allow the continued operation of a wireless communication
facility located at 701 Palomar Airport Road, in the M Zone and Local Facilities Management
Zone 3.
Dear Kerrigan A. Diehl,
The Assistant Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a Minor
Conditional Use Permit MCUP 08-07 for the continued operation of a wireless communication
facility located at 701 Palomar Airport Road. A notice was sent to property owners within a 300'
radius of the subject property requesting comments regarding the above request. No
comments were-received within the ten day notice period (ending on May 13, 2008). After
careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Assistant Planning
Director has determined that the four findings required for granting a Minor Conditional Use
Permit can be made and therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following findings
and conditions.
Findings:
1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community,
and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan,
including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan in
that the use is consistent with the General Plan in that the Planned Industrial (Pl)
Land Use designation does not preclude the provIsIon of Wireless
Communication Facility (WCF) uses. The WCF is located on the roof behind an
existing parapet wall which is neither publicly accessible nor visible from
surrounding properties. The WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64,
Wireless Communication Facilities, in that it is in a preferred location and is of a
stealth design. The project's location and stealth design also enable the project to
comply with General Plan objectives that seek to maintain and enhance
Carlsbad's appearance.
2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the existing
WCF is not precluded by the projects' Industrial (M) zoning, which implements the
Pl General Plan J..and Use designation. Furthermore, the existing use does not
1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
• • • MCUP 08-07 -VERIZON PACIFIC ONE CENTER
June 18, 2008
Page 2
result in any additional building coverage, does not alter the existing site design,
and does not interfere with nor is it visible to other surrounding uses.
3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size· and shape to
accommodate the. yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer
areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required
by the Assistant Planning Director in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood in that the WCF is an existing use mounted on a roof top and no
modifications are being. proposed. The original approval of the conditional use
(CUP 03-02) was granted on June· 18, 2003.
4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use in that the unmanned WCF use requires, on
average, only monthly maintenance visits and occasional visits in response to
operational problems.
5. That the proposed WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64 in that it is
located in an industrial zone on the site of an office building owned by Cognac
Carlsbad Pacific Center LLC. The Policy identifies the City's Industrial zones. as
preferred locations for WCFs. Also, the panel antennas and digital dish are
located behind an existing parapet wall that is screened from public view and
supporting equipment is located within the building, all of which complies with
the Policy's stealth design guidelines. Furthermore, the project has been
conditioned to comply with the requirement to maintain compliance with FCC
RF Exposure Guidelines.
6. That the Assistant Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to ~ class
of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant
impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the
requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section
15301 -existing facility, of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination,
the Assistant Planning Director has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2
of the state CEQA Guideline.s do not apply to this project.
• 7. The Assistant· Planning Director has reviewed .each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case that the exactions
are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the
extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused
by the project.
Conditions:
Planning:
1. Approval is granted for MCUP 08-07 as shown on Exhibits "A-"D" dated June 18, 2003
on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by reference. Development
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
• • MCUP 08-07 -VERIZON PACIFIC ONE CENTER
June 18, 2008
Page 3
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on
the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit.
3. Staff is authorized and directed . to make, or require the Developer to make, all
corrections and modifications to the MCUP 08-07 documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any
proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to this
approval.
4. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and
hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents,
and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands,
claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising,
directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Conditional
Use Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility
of electro[l1agnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
5. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required
as part of the Zone 3 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. MCUP 08-07 shall be reviewed by the Assistant Planning Director on a yearly basis to
determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a
substantial negative effect on· surrounding properties or the public health, safety and
general welfare. If the Assistant Planning Director determines that: 1) the minor •
conditional use permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for
which such approval is granted is not being exercised; or 3) the conditions of approval
have not been met; or 4) the minor conditional use permit is being or recently has been
exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval; or 5) the use for which
such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or
more; or 6) the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 7) the
use permitted by the minor conditional use permit is being or has been so exercised as
to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance,
the Assistant Planning Director shall hold an informal public hearing and after providing
the permittee the opportunity to be heard, the planning director may revoke and
terminate the minor conditional use permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the minor
conditional use permit, modify the conditions or impose new conditions.
• • MCUP 08-07 -VERIZON PACIFIC ONE CENTER
June 18, 2008
Page4
8. This Minor Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of 10 years from June 17,
2008 through June 16, 2018. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public
hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding
land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have
not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to
exceed 10 years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days
prior to the expiration date. The Assistant Planning Director· may not grant such
extension, unless he or she finds that there are no substantial negative effects on
surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative
effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the
extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or
substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the
Assistant Planning Director may grant.
9. Developer/Operator shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's
guidelines on limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields.
Within six (6) months from the date of this letter, and with any time extension or
amendment request, the Developer/Operator shall submit to the Assistant Planning
Director either (1) verification that the project is categorically excluded from having to
determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1);
or (2) a project implementation report which provides cumulative field
measurements of RF emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site.· The report
shall quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with the exposure limits
established by the FCC guidelines. Said report shall be subject to review and
approval by the Assistant Planning Director for consistency with the Project's
preliminary report on RF exposure submitted with the initial project application and
for consistency with the FCC guidelines. If, on review, the City finds that the Project
does not meet the FCC guidelines, the City may revoke or modify this conditional use
permit.
10. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the
real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County
Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Assistant Planning Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n)
Minor Conditional Use Permit on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note
the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all
conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in
the Notice of Restriction. The Assistant Planning Director has the authority to execute
and record an amendment to the notice which modifies br terminates said notice upon
a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
11. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Assistant Planning Director within 30 days, any
address change from that which is shown on the permit application. •
Engineering:
12. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the current National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall implement best
management practices at all times. Best management practices include but not limited
to pollution treatment practice·s or devices, general housekeeping practices, pollution
prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management
• • MCUP 08-07 -VERIZON PACIFIC ONE CENTER
June 18, 2008
Page 5
practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater,
receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable.
Code Reminder:
13. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all _applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions.
If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code
Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager
for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
This decision may be appealed by you or any other member of the public to the Planning
Commission within ten days of the date of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to
the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of
$598.50. The filing of such appeal within such time limit-shall stay the effective date of the
order of the Planning Director until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If
you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Gina Ruiz at (760)
602-4675.
::z•lyTU
;/4dr. B:RBERIO
Assistant Planning Director
GTB:GR:lt
c: Cognac Carlsbad Pacific Center LLC, 701 Palomar Airport Rd., Ste. 280, Carlsbad, CA.
Scott Donnell, Team Leader
Tecla Levy, Project Engineer
Glen Van Peski, Senior Civil Engineer
File Copy
Data Entry
92011