HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-12-23; Planning Commission; ; V 330 - PLUMB CONSTRUCTIONSTAFF REPORT
DATE: December 23, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: V-330, PLUMB CONSTRUCTION -Request for approval of a
variance to allow construction of a retaining wall up to
8 feet in height upon which a 10-foot high chain link
fence would be erected along the rear lot line of a
through-lot on property located at 2629 Obelisco Place
in the R-1 zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a fence height variance to allow
construction of a retaining wall and chain-link fence to be
erected along the rear property line of a 24,000 square foot
through-lot located on the south side of Obelisco Place between
Obelisco Circle and Obelisco Place. The proposed retaining wall
would vary from 4-feet to 8-feet in height with a chain-link
fence, 10-feet in height, to accommodate a tennis court, which
would be erected on fill soil behind and above the wall. The
total combined height would be 18 feet at the highest point.
Section 21.46.180 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the rear
yard requirements of a through-lot are identical to those of a
front yard for setback purposes. A maximum 42-inch high wall is
allowed under these circumstances.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Can the four mandatory findings for a variance be made
which are as follows:
a) Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property that do not apply to
other property in the same vicinity and zone?
b) Do other properties in the same vicinity and zone
share a similar right which is denied to this
property?
c) Will this variance adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan?
d) Will this variance be detrimental to the public
welfare or property in the vicinity?
III. DISCUSSION
The subject property is rectangular, approximately 225-feet in
depth, and varies from approximately 90-feet in width at the
front of the property to approximately 125-feet in width at the
rear. This rear lot line fronts directly upon Obelisco Circle.
As shown on Exhibit "A", a large home sits toward the front of
the lot providing a large back yard which slopes downward to the
street at the rear lot line. The applicant wishes to fill this
rear lot area to accommodate a tennis court and a smaller play
court. A retaining wall of up to 8-feet fronting on Obelisco
Circle would result from this fill area. The 10-foot high chain
link fence is to be erected above this.
Staff is unable to make all the required findings for approval of
a variance. First, staff feels that no exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances exist on this property which do not
apply to others in the vicinity as the surrounding neighborhood
contains numerous through-lots with sloping topography. Also,
the lot is large enough in size to accommodate open recreational
areas without the need for a wall in the setback. Secondly, the
variance is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial
property right possessed by others because no other property has
a wall or fence over 42" in height in the front yard setback.
While the requested variance would not adversely affect the
General Plan, staff feels that it would be detrimental to the
public welfare in two respects. First, the visual impact of a
potentially 18-foot high wall and fence located on the property
line (10-feet off the face of the curb) would be great. Since
the lot is located near the top of a hill, the wall would be vis-
ible for a great distance.
Secondly, the City Traffic Engineer feels that a vehicle
sight-distance problem presently exists at this corner, and the
proposed wall would increase this problem. Staff recommends that
the applicant pull the proposed tennis court toward the house to
remove it from the setback, which would result in a lesser
retained fill area, and shorter wall.
In summary, staff is unable to find sufficient facts to make the
four mandatory findings for approval of a variance.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is exempt from Environmental Review per Section
19.04.070(f) of the Environmental Ordinance.
V. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution
No. 1899, DENYING V-330, based on the findings contained
therein.
-2-
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution No. 1899
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Exhibit "A", dated November 6, 1981
6. Exhibit "B", dated November 26, 1981
PJK:ar
12/15/81
-3-
LOCATION
t
ARGONAUT
R-1
R-1
CASE NO. V 330
htAP
APPLICANT PLUMB CONSTRUCTION VICINITY MAP
BPiCKGROUND DATA SHEE1'
CASE NO: V-330
APPLICJ\NT: PLUMB CONSTRUCTION
• REXlUE,ST AND IOCATION: Fence height construction up to 18-feet in rear
setback of.through-lot at 2629 Obelisco Place.
LEX:iALDF.sCRIPI'ION: ~ot 681 of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 4, in the County
o'f San_ Diego, State of California, according to Map Thereof 7367 filed
in the Office of the County Recorder, July 19,.1972.
Assessors· Parcel· Nurroor: 21 s 4 6 a 2 J
Acres --•s .... s ___ _ No. of I.ots -------
GENERAL PLAN AND WNING
General Plan Land Use Designation R-L --------
Density Allowed 0-1. 5 ac. ·• Density Proposed -=N...._/A=-----
Existing Zone R-1-15 ____ ___,;;..._ ______ _ Proposed Zone __ __,N/ __ A ___ _
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning
North R-1-15
South R-1-15
Fast R-1-15
West R-1-15
Land Use
Vacant
Vacant
SFD
SFD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
.School District
Water District
Sewer District
San Marcos Unified
Costa Real
Leucadia County EDU's 1 ------------------------
~lie Facilities Fee Agreement~ dated ___ o_c_t_o_b_e_r_l_9_,_1_9_B_l_· _____ _
(Other: )
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A5SESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued Log No. ------------
E.I.R. Certified, dated --------------
-Other, EXEMPT, PER SECTION 19.04.070(f}
,_i: e.,e information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
~c. further informaf'=:1 is required, you will. be s<:-~vised.
APPLICANT:
Name (individuall' partnership, joir..;. ---~nture, corporation,. syndication)
Business Address . .
Telephone Number·
Name
Business Address
Telephone NUml;>er • ....
• ·:~.;:·~.<·\•)~·:~;:;~:-. .. . •
MEMBERSt '.°
Name ·(individual, partner, joint_
·venture;. corporation, syndication}
Business Address
. -... _ ..
T~lephone Number
3".lSiness Address • ,:·-_
Heme Address
Telephone Number
Home Address
; .. ~1~~~::;.i(i~~J~ittft~t\{tf;~it~\?~: ::f{t!l~~i/J~t};;if:~f~{s~ >·c;;~;::.'::-~··: -------------------------l"'>-'·!1i··""· ··"··' " • · -: Telephone Number •. "· .. ,;-~-:i-2ir;~\1'J;;:• ;~i~\ir. c::ii
....;.;;__._...;....,.;.~-------
· :"; t. • --: •;1t~:;i :>:·~ ~:·~.:i'#:it~~i;tl;,~ tt~:tz~.;·~;~ii1}?:Q;?~i#J;t',<~trf~¥/:·-:'
• ..• _.;.. . -• ·,·c .• ,·.~.· ... ·.:.~,·:-.·•.·.'r;;·:..,~.·-·.~ ·•-·· • .., -~ .,.,. -:r -• .. ~;• ..; ...... --~,l,,!--.-.... -~·-: .. • .. • • , ....... .;· .-
-. ;;.-,...;;:;., (Attach more sheets if necessary)
~:=:! __ ·_~-··
_.:_ ........
.~ .. ~ ... -.:~ • :·:\~~' • ~--. • . . ~ _,(~_ ~· .--_-~---.. ?~~±:i~ ... -,,: :~~:-. .: ~ . •-?'.--. -·
---I1""ie 9ecla.::-e· under penalty of perjury that the in£6rir.ation contained in· this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will,. remain true and correct and may be·
-relied upon .as being true and correct until amended9
EY
0-,mer, Par;n~r
--
I
'
!
1
\
i
1 ' . ' '
. I
I
. .
I
I I ' t
C)
I
---t ..,.___
:
•
--
I
• .
,/. . I
---------
I
I I
I
·: .··• .. • , kEVJ . T~IJI {!Ji • .
. (
I
I
I
::3 'l'f-11 CON(. hlDF., . L
iZ 1' f/1.:JNO._Ff/..L . . _ 1
• .#'4 c '?.,. 4 17 O,(,_. F-lTEi../ I) • L
8 1 !IJ TQJ1.t.l.)8 ._ j
: .
:~_.'-~ :'./ /JCtlfJ/:,_ 8/J~K. ccMhr/.~
-r ~ .:=:
l '-4-----___.c..;;..._ ......,_ __
' ' ' I" •
. ' . : j I • i l
-
l
~-------.. , ..
-~~
------r-----
-------'-----r---
J~ fl.#t;,~~~ I -~ / . ~ ··•.
7t-t~11 -, J I . · .
/' I 101
/
I
• I
I -J.J-,:.--N~ C.OH. ~Vl:>'M
~ 6-T(. 6jP.
£.if. tJT r. ',;.::: •• . .
I
woo --· . ,,
4-'-0 1 H lq!
~M.vo WALL
z:
11/z TO ! _c._ur:e,AM K. ...... : .. _ .
-~-~
.. . f:.1!2!:JD!NC1 /JOT/Eh . . . . .. . . . .. ·····:_·_~-l, . :cor· TO O.RLJ/1/ 4Wl.l .,, r-/2ot-t F?c.Cf; , I i'o
__ /.411../. IJt.OPE, . ... . . . . • . • •..
: ~ .'Z; 13 AIZ ?7/WO/Zt:: <Ptl-61/ I 7/ 1;/2 .••
--···· • • C?IT.~ 100 C.Y . •• -
I
GENERAL NOTES
l
GENERAL INFORMATION
\ ' r
\ ~ct_~over r2,8o/.cL.
SYMBOL . LIST
I , +325 I Exist PT Elev CI) Shear Wall No ' i
32 New Fin Elev ~1AC Paving,
Finish Grade
I 14 I Room No
Door :No
---'--Stud Wall
mffiMas.Wall
:,,
__ s ____ ,-I X Dlag Let-in
Window No • ·, .... 7 __ /_., ___ Glass
ffi Revision or Ft' II ~I1 gllF-Earth
fA'\-Det I Sec No
·@-Sheet No WmA W~od
Ex:stir J Area
•
• SHEET INi'EX
. VICINITY 1\1 l\P
. ' .
LEGAL DESC RI Rt~~-· .
REVISIONS BY -------1------l ~ •• ~
,· . . '
I . ; I
I
' ' I 1 ·.:::i
-
...
------------1,..,1 lJh, /2,(3;. V./ I) l{_, --------C-l/ /2,,~ l I IJ:.:
-
a 8Cl/f;c,o c/£.CLE CLEV/lT/Of.J
J
----:
City of C.rlsbad
Plann!ng C01!1mission