HomeMy WebLinkAbout; Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area - Parking Circulation Analysis Project; Final Technical Report; 1992-11-04FINAL TECHNICAL _REPOR.T
CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
PARKING CIRCULATION ANALYSIS PROJECT
Prepared for:
Cannon Design Group
and
City of Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency
Prepared by:
JHK & Associates
8989 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 335
San Diego, CA 92108
llak;.
November 4, 1992
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
2
Copies not included
3
Copies not included
Background
Report Organization
CIRCULATION
Introduction
Existing Circulation System
Planned Circulation System Improvements
Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions
Development Opportunities-Future Year 2000
· Conditions
Trip Generation
Analysis of Future Traffic Impacts
Circulation System Recommendations
PARKING
Introduction
Existing Parking Conditions
Future Year 2000 Parking Demand
Analysis of Future Parking Conditions
Proposed Parking Districts
Opportunity Areas for New Parking
Parking Recommendations
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -Proposed Transit Center Site Plan
APPENDIX B -Levels of Service and Intersection
Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis
Description of Methodology
APPENDIX C -Intersection Capacity Utilization
(ICU) and Levels of Service Worksheets -
Existing Year 1991 Conditions
APPENDIX D -Intersection Capacity Utilization
(ICU) and Levels of Service Worksheets -
Future Year 2000 Conditions
APPENDIX E -Parking Space Inventory
APPENDIX F -Core Area Parking Occupancy and
Duration Study
PAGE-1_1
1-1
1-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-4
2-9
2-11
2-13
2-13
2-19
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-7
3-11
3-18
3-20
3-23
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE ·
1.0-1 Study Area Map 1-2
2.1-1 Existing Year 1991 Circulation System and 2-2
Intersection Control
2.1-2 Bus Route Map 2-5
2.1-3 Bicycle Route Map 2-6
2.4-1 Location of Development Opportunities 2-14
2.6-1 Year 2000 Redevelopment Plan Circulation System 2-18
and Intersection Control
3.1-1 Core Area Parking Inventory Map -Existing Year 3-3
1991
3.1-2 Core Area Weekday Parking Occupancy Existing 3-5
Year 1991
3.1-3 • Core Area Saturday Parking Occupancy Existing 3-6
Year 1991
3.1-4 Maximum Weekday Parking Occupancy Public and 3-8
Private Spaces Outside Core Area-Existing Year 1991
3.2-1 Parking Analysis Zones and Free Village Parking Lots 3-10
3.3-1 Proposed Pavement Restriping for Existing Pavement 3-15
Widths
' 3.3-2 Proposed Pavement Restriping Locations 3-16
3.4-1 Potential Parking District Zones 3-21
3.5-1 Existing and Proposed Public Parking Facilities 3-22
LIST OF TABLES
EIGURE fAGE
2.3-1 Roadway Capacity and Level of Service Standards/ 2-10
2.3-2 Intersection Levels of Service Existing Year 1991 2-12
Conditions -PM Peak Hour
2.4-1 Redevelopment Plan General Land Use Concept 2-15
Future Year 2000 Conditions
2.5-1 Trip Generation Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Plan 2-17
Future Year 2000 Conditions
2.6-1 Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service 2-20
Year 2000 Redevelopment Plan Conditions
2.6-2 Intersection Levels of Service Year 2000 2-21
Redevelopment Plan Conditions -PM Peak Hour
3.1-1 Summary of Study Area Parking Supply Existing Year 3-2
1991 Conditions
3.2-1 Total Parking Demand Development Opportunities 3-12
·Future Year 2000 Conditions
3.3-1 Reanalysis of Parking Conditions Within 3-13
Redevelopment Zones
3.3-2 Estimated Number of New Parking Spaces With 3-17
Proposed Restripping
3.3-3 Adjusted Parking Demand Carlsbad Village 3-19
Redevelopment Plan Future Year 2000 Conditions
4-4 Estimated Number of New Parking Spaces with
Proposed Restriping 4-9
4-5 Adjusted Parking Demand Carlsbad Village
Redevelopment 4-11
4-6 Analysis of Parking Demand with Reduced On-Site
Supply 4-12
1. INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the City of Carlsbad has experienced an increase in the demand for
on-street parking, due primarily to commercial growth and expansion. This shortage of
on-street parking is most apparent in the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Plan area. This
area is bounded by the northern city limits, the Pacific Ocean, Walnut Avenue, and
Interstate Route 5. Figure 1.0-1 shows the study area location. Acting on behalf of the
City of Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency, the Cannon Design Group (COO) retained JHK
& Associates (JHK) to examine the parking and circulation needs of the Year 2000 level of
development of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, taking into account both growths in
demand due to commercial development and the development of the transit center in the
center of the study area. JHK served as a subconsultant to CDG and was responsible for
data collection, development of parking needs, and circulation analysis.
1.1 BACKG ROUND
The first step in this analysis was to review the 1986 report prepared by Kaku
Associates th at detailed the parking and circulation analysis conducted for the update of the
1981 Redevelopment Plan. Since the completion of this previous report, the following
circulation and parking improvements have been made in the Carlsbad Village area:
• Carlsbad Village Drive
-Widened from 2 through lanes to 4 through lanes between Harding Street
and Carlsbad Boulevard and on-street parking west of Harding removed.
• Carlsbad Boulevard
-Raised median constructed between Grand A venue and Carlsbad Village
Drive and on-street parking removed from the east side of the street
• Free Village Parking Lots
-Approximately 242 new off-street public parking spaces have been added to
the Village area, 65 of which were built to replace the on-street parking
removed from Carlsbad Village Drive.
1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION
This report is divided into two major sections. Chapter 2 describes existing and
future circulation conditions within the study area, in terms of circulation operations with
the increased trip generation from the development opportunities defined for the downtown
area. Based on Year 2000 travel forecasts and the trip generation potential of these new
1-1
I
I
·~ ·~
I
I
ChristianseJ Cedar
y . ./.\\'.~ .....•...
........ , 0 . 0
(j):
I co :
<I> rr 0 Q. I ,~ !
-.......... .
0 () (I)
0 ::,
0 0 ::i <I> rr 0 Q.
0:, iE---.1 Q.
. .......... --, :
-. I
Pine Ave I I
I
I
I Walnut Ave 1
c: I ::, ()
0 ::,
sa
$ Jefferson St
-0 -CD
sa 0 0 <I>
~ (I) :::;:
Beech 1S4
Ave CD I
~· ----1 §1
<9(✓,
6>.
::, I
sa. Home Ave.
Grand!Ave ---
:-e I I I I II·. ;-11 • I
-< co ..,
sa
·i·········I I
r
I
I
_J
Figure 1.0-1
STUDY AREA MAP
1-2
~l <D-c, • <D
::c 0
9: \
::, 1 (o _____ ,
-d,
~
LEGEND
- - -Project Study AJea
•······· Core AJea
developments, circulation impacts are defined and improvements are recommended.
Chapter 3 describes the existing and fu~re parking conditions, detailing existing
and future parking supply and demand. The parking utilization survey, conducted. in
November 1991, serves as a baseline for defining current parking demand within the study
area. Using adopted City of Carlsbad on-site parking standards, future parking demands
are forecasted for Year 2000, assuming implementation of the development opportunities
defined for the downtown area. The increase in parking demand is compared to the
existing parking supply, and suggestions for increasing the amount of public parking are
provided.
1-3
3. PARKING
3.0 INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents a description of the existing and future parking conditions in the
Village area. The results of the parking space inventory and occupancy survey is presented,
along with a summary of existing issues. The existing conditions analysis provides a description
of the baseline condition to be used as the basis for the analysis of future parking demand and
supply.
3.1 EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS
This section presents the methodology and the results of the parking supply inventory and
parking occupancy and utilization survey conducted in the study area.
The first step in the analysis of the current parking situation in the Carlsbad Village
Redevelopment Area was to number the study area blocks to aid in the analysis. An inventory of
all available parking spaces by ownership (public, private), type (parallel, angled), location (off-
street, on-street), and restriction was conducted in mid-November 1991. Table 3.1-1 summarizes
the types of parking spaces available in the study area.
Based on a field survey of the study area, it was determined that a detailed parking survey
would be limited to the area shown on Figure 3.1-1, characterized as the commercial core. The
remainder of the study area not included in the core area is primarily residential in character. A
more generalized parking survey was conducted in this non-core area as described below.
Appendix E of this document contains the results of the detailed parking inventory.
3.1.1 Detailed Parking Occupancy and Utilization Survey
The detailed parking surveys~ conducted on Saturday November 23, 1991, and Tuesday,
November 26; 19 91 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM included gathering data on
parking occupancy and duration by parking space location and type. Parking occupancy is
defined as the number of cars parked in a given location divided by the number of spaces
available. Normally, a parking facility is considered to be at capacity when 85% of the spaces i
are filled (Parkin g Principles. HRB Special Report No. 125, 1971). Parking duradon is the
length of time th at the vehicles remain parked. The data collected was subdivided into weekday
and Saturday parking conditions and public and private ownership. Detailed parking data is
included in Appendix F of this document.
3-1
Location
Core Area
Non-Core Area
Total
Table 3.1-1
SUMMARY OF STUDY AREA PARKING SUPPLY
EXISTING YEAR 1991 CONDITIONS
NUMBER OF AVAILABLE SPACES
On-Stc~t Off-Street
Public Private
578 380 1,460
LQ1a -U12. -
1,656 380 3,032
Thttl
2,418
2MQ
5,068
Note: The fo llowing list summarizes the ownership of the public off-street parking
spaces located within the core area
Ownership of Core Area Off-Street Public Parking Spaces
AT & SF Railroad R/W 208 (Leased)
City Owned
Leased
Total
66
.lQfi
380
Sources: City of Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency and JHK & Associates
3-2
L E G E N D
On-Streat Parking
Unrestricted Parking
A ,. Public parallel
B • Public 45 degrees C ,. Public 90 degrees
D = Private oarollel E = Private 45 degrees
F = Private 90 degrees
Restricted Parking
a= No pkg 3-5 a.m.
b = No pkg 1st-3rd.
Mon .. 3-5 a.m.
d =3 min pkg
e = 20mln pkg
f = No pkg 3-5 a.m ..
2 hr pkg 7 o.m.-6 p.m.
(except sun. & Holidays)
g = 2 hr pkg at 45 degrees
OFF· STREET
• Private off-street pkg
Free village off-street pkg
!~\ti Not Included In core
area
- -Block boundary XX Block number
0->
::::::::::=:=:::t=:=::i=1:=:::=;'=6/:::f:=:=:::::=:::::==:: ... ..... n
121
16A I
I 1 5 30 .. I~
205• I
I
14 ... u, 105 .. >
9t --
~
(1'I
Q
77•
15 ..
45•
=20 -,-62 .. -
29
.... s1· ~ (,> ~ ~
O 10A
Beech Ave
lot
28
167 • ....,
0 0 7A
7f
...., ....
27 ~ 0 (Q
113•
3a• .... 26 -0---C
Figure 3.1-1
7f
0, ~ i~ > ~ 107 ..
CORE AREA PARKING INVENTORY MAP-EXISTING YEAR 1991
3-3
Weekday Core Area Parkin~ Conditions
Figure 3.1-2 shows the overall weekday hourly parking occupancy for each type of
parking space available in the core area. Although the time of peak occupancy varies by type
and location, virtually all of the peak demand periods occur between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM.
Using the 85% occupancy criteria described above, the following observations can be made:
• Only ten of the thirty block faces in the core area experience a peak occupancy at or
above capacity at least once during the weekday;
• Only two of the nine public off-street parking lots experience peak occupancy at or
above capacity at least once during the weekday. These lots are closest to the
commercial district; and
• No private off-street lots experience peak occupancy over 75% during the weekday.
The survey results also revealed average parking duration for the core area parking
spaces. This an alysis revealed that when compared with the parking time restrictions shown on
Figure 3.1-1, the average duration does not exceed the established time limits.
Saturday Core Area Parkin& Conditions
The same methodology and data collection effort was used to determine Saturday parking
conditions as the weekday survey. Surveys were conducted both days to assess the variation in
parking utilization and duration by type of day. Figure 3.1-3 shows the Saturday hourly parking
occupancy for each type of parking available in the core area. Although the time of peak
occupancy varies by type and location, virtually all of the peak periods occur between 12:00 PM
and 1:00 PM. Based on the 85% occupancy criteria described above, the following observations
can be made as to th e Saturday parking usage:
• Only nine of the thirty block faces in the core area experience a peak occupancy at or
above capacity at least once during the Saturday;
• Only one of the nine public off-street parking lots experience peak occupancy at or
above capacity at least once during the Saturday. These lots are closest to the
commercial district; and
• No private off-street lots experience peak occupancy over 75% during the weekday.
The survey results also revealed average parking duration for the core area parking
spaces. This an alysis revealed that when compared with the parking time restrictions shown on
Figure 3.1-1, the average duration does not exceed the established time limits. Appendix F
contains detailed graphics showing core area parking and duration results for the weekday and
Saturday surveys.
3-4
600
400
200
0
8:00
0
8:00
1500
1200
900
600
300
0
8:00
9:00 10:00
9:00 10:00
9:00 10:00
11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00
On Street Spaces
11 :00 12:00 1:00 2:00
Off Street Public Spaces
11 :00 12:00 1 :00 2:00
Off Street Private Spaces
I ■ Occupied D Unoccupied I Figure 3.1-2
CORE AREA WEEKDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY
EXISTING YEAR 1991
3-5
3:00 4:00
3:00 4:00 -------
3:00 4:00
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
8:00
0
8:00
1500
1200
900
600
300
0
8:00
9:00 10:Q0
9:00 10:00
9:00 10:00
11 :00 12:00 1 :00 2:00 3:00
On Street Spaces
11 :00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 ----·-----------·
Off Street Public Spaces
11 :00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00
Off Street Private Spaces
I ■ Occupied D Unoccupied I Figure 3.1-3
CORE AREA SATURDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY
EXISTING YEAR 1991
3-6
4:00
4:00
4:00
Non-Core Area Parkin~ Conditions
Occupancy rates were observed in the remainder of the study area on Thursday,
December 5, 1991. Figure 3.1-4 shows the maximum occupancy values for each block in the
non-core portion of the study area. As shown on this graphic, all maximum values outside the
core area are below the 85% threshold. However, the blocks immediately adjacent to Carlsbad
Boulevard experience the highest degree of utilization. Because no blocks were found to have
occupancy values at or above capacity on the weekday, and it was assumed that the Saturday
results would reveal less occupancy, no occupancy survey was conducted on a Saturday outside
the core.
3.1.2 Seasonal Parking Variations
Due to the timing of the Redevelopment Master Plan Implementation effort, the parking
surveys were co nducted during the winter months. Had the survey been conducted in the
summer, an increase in the number of on-street and off-street public parking would be expected
from the beach users. At present, there is free on-street parking available within the beach area,
and a free public parking lots are located at the southern terminus of Ocean Street and along the
west side of the railroad tracks on Washington Street south of Carlsbad Village Drive. The
existing public lots serving the commercial district east of the railroad tracks are over a quarter of
a mile from the beach: Thus, it is anticipated that few beachgoers would utilize the parking areas
intended for the commercial district users. Beach parking characteristics, as they impact the
Redevelopment area parking utilization, should be monitored during the peak summer periods.
As demand for beach parking increases, alternative strategies may be necessary to provide
increased supply exclusively for beach users.
3.1.3 Summary of Existing Parking Conditions
Current weekday parking conditions vary from block to block within the study area.
Several block faces are at capacity (over 85% filled) during peak times, while others are below
capacity. Overall, the core area was found to have 56% of the available public parking spaces
(on-street and off-street) filled at peak times on a weekday. On Saturdays, the parking demand is
somewhat less, with 42% of the available public spaces filled during peak times.
Outside the core area, occupancy rates are lower than in the core area, indicating that a
detailed study of the area outside the core is not necessary.
3.2 FUTURE YEAR 2000 PARKING DEMAND
Based on the land use assumptions presented in Section 2.4, the forecasted parking
demand was estimated using the on-site parking supply standards as set forth by the City of
3-7
1::~! ......
~)f' I :
0:,
~---1
0.
,_
C: ::::,
()
0 5
~
alnut Ave
-9. (l)
~
Beech
Ave
Figure 3.1-4
Jefferson St
-d,
LEGEND
XX% Maximum occupancy
by block
- -Block boundary
~ 0 -50%
........ , 50 -75%
c:.::::..:J 7 5 -85 %
-85+%
MAXIMUM WEEKDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SPACES OUTSIDE CORE AREA -EXISTING YEAR 1991
3-8
Carlsbad Parking Ordinance (May 13, 1986). These parking requirements were evaluated
against the parking ordinances of several other coastal jurisdictions in San Diego County, and
this comparison revealed that the City's requirements are consistent with the requirements
utilized by other coastal jurisdictions. Since the exact location of future development cannot be
determined at this time, the parking demand was calculated on a zonal rather than a block-by-
block basis. The zones used in this analysis were developed with respect to existing and
proposed land use character of the redevelopment area. The following paragraphs summarize
each zone developed for this analysis, and Figure 3.2-1 shows the location of these zones.
Zone 1 -Tourist Serving Commercial <North)
Located to the west of the AT & SF railroad tracks and north of Grand A venue, this zone
is intended to include hotels, institutional and residential uses. No development opportunities
have been identified in this area ..
Zone 2 -Tourist Servin!! Commercial <South)
Located south of Carlsbad Village Drive at Carlsbad Boulevard, this zone is similar to
Zone 1. Uses in this zone are aimed primarily at beach uses in the form of hotels, restaurants,
and beach oriented retail shops. No development opportunities have been identified in this area.
Zone 3 -Residen tial Support
Located to the east of the railroad tracks and north of Beech Boulevard, this zone is
intended for primarily residential uses with some retail and offices uses on the major
thoroughfares.
Zone 4 -Carlsbad Villaf!e Center
Located in the heart of the Village, this zone is intended for mixed use commercial, and
retail intensification. This zone contains the Village public parking lots, and the North County
Transit District is contemplating the construction of commuter rail station/transit center in the
middle of this zone.
Zone 5 -Service Commercial Support
Located to the south of Oak A venue on the east side of the railroad tracks, this zone will
contain light industrial, residential and automotive uses.
3-9
Pine Ave
roo o a C ~ <D en < rr a a
~
I Walnut Ave 1
c: I :::,
()
0 :::,
en --
Free VIiiage Lots
A=33 E .a77
8=30 F=50
C:s29 G=lS
D = 39 H = 51
I =56
Figure 3.2-1
Jefferson St
LEGEND
• - -Project study Area
••••••• Core Area
Parking Analysis Zones
Free VIiiage Parking Lots
Free VIiiage Parking Lots
to be Removed
PARKING ANALYSIS ZONES AND FREE VILLAGE PARKING LOTS
3-10
Zone 6 -Hispanic Mixed Use Support
Located south of Oak A venue and east of Zone 5, this zone is intended for residential and
office uses.
Zone 7 -Office Support
Located east of Carlsbad Village Center, this zone is intended for office and supporting
retail uses.
Zone 8 -Freeway Commercial
Located just west of 1-5 at Carlsbad Village Drive, this zone contains major retail and
lodging services common to freeway interchanges. No development opportunities have been
identified in this area.
Table 3.2-1 summarizes the estimated additional parking demand for each redevelopment
zone assuming implementation of all development opportunities listed on Table 2.4-1. The
following section details the potential circulation and parking impacts of the proposed
Redevelopment Plan on the study area.
3.3 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PARKING CONDITIONS
As discussed in the previous chapter, implementation of the proposed Redevelopment
Plan would include the removal of approximately 168,500 square feet of existing commercial
uses. This removal of existing land use would potentially result in the reduction in demand for
public parking spaces within the Redevelopment Plan Area. However, the discussion of parking
impact present'ed in this section does not discount parking demand for the removal of this
existing land use. A further discussion of this issue and its relationship to the development of
parking analysis findings and recommendations is provided in the Section 3.3.3 Summary.
The first step in the analysis of parking impacts was to determine the existing parking
conditions within the parking analysis zones defined in the Section 3.2. For the purposes of this
analysis, the focu s was placed on the existing parking spaces available for use by the general
public (off-street free Village parking lots). Using the utilization survey information compiled in
the first phase of the study, existing parking supply, peak parking utilization, and surplus parking
supply was calculated for each of the nine (9) free Village parking lots in Zone 4. It is important
to note that with the construction of the Commuter Rail Station project, (a retail commercial and
office development proposed to be located adjacent to the planned NCTD Transit Center) the
existing free village parking lot on the northeast corner of State Street/Grand Avenue would be
removed, thus reducing the public parking supply by 15 spaces. Figure 3.2-1 shows the location
of each of these free Village parking facilities. Table 3.3-1 summarizes the results of this
analysis.
3-11
Table 3.2-1
TOTAL PARKING DEMAND
DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES
FUTURE YEAR 2000 CONDITIONS
Total On-Site
Parking Proposed Parking
ZQm Land Use lntensitl'. farkine Rate Demand farkine Defkientl'.
3 Single Family Residential 18DU 2/DU 36 36 0
3 Multifamily Residential 50DU 2/DU + visitor 117 117 0
3 Multifamily Residential 200DU 1.5/DU + visitor 362 320 42
3 Retail Commercial 22,000 SF 1/300 SF 73 30 43
Total Zone 3 552 467 -85
4 Single Family Residential 17DU 2/DU 34 34 0
4 Multifamily Residentital lO0DU 2/DU + visitor 262 262 0
4 Multifamily Residential 40DU 1.5/DU + visitor 723 31 41
4 Retail Commercial 135,000 SF 1/300 SF 450 147 303
4 Hotel/Inn 140 Room 1.2/Room 168 168 0
4 History Museum 15,000 SF 1/500 SF 30 30 0
4 Restaurant 8,000 SF 1/100 SF 80 0 .80
4 Office 40,000 SF 1/300 SF 134 14 120
Total Zone 4 1,230 686 -544
5 Multifamily Residential 24DU 2/DU + visitor 57 57 0
5 Light Industrial 12,500 SF 1/400 SF 32 32 0
5 Auto Service 12,500 SF 4/Bay 24 24 0
(6 Bays)
Total Zone 5 113 113 0
6 Multifamily Residential 12DU 2/DU + visitor 30 ~o 0
6 Office 6,000 SF 1/300 SF 20 20 0
Total Zone 6 50 50 0
7 Retail Commercial 5,000 SF 1/300 SF 17 8 9
7 Office 35,000 SF 1/300 SF 117 63 54
Total Zone 7 134 71 -63
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT
AREA 2,079 1,387 -692
Source: IBK & Associates
3-12
Table 3.3-1
REANALYSIS OF PARKING CONDITIONS
WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT ZONES
Parking Observed
Village Lot* Sueell Vehicles Occueancr Surelus
A 33 26 79% 7
B 30 30 100% 0
C 29 25 86% 4
D 39 4 10% 35
E 77 27 35% 50
F 50 21 42% 29
H 51 27 53% 24
I 56 35 63% 21
Total Free
Village
Parking Lots 365 195 53% 170
* It is important to note that with the construction of the Commuter Rail Station project (a retail
and commercial development proposed to be located adjacent to the planned NCTD Transit
Center), the existing free village parking lot on the northeast corner of State Street/Grand
Avenue would be removed, thus reducing the public parking supply by 15 spaces.
3-13
3.3.1 Additional On-Street Parking Supply
It was observed in the field review of the study area that several streets in the
Redevelopment Plan Area are wide enough to provide additional on-street parking by replacing
the current parallel parking with various forms of angled parking. For each pavement width of at
least 47', generic pavement striping templates were developed showing the allowable striping
designs for angled parking. Figure 3.3-1 shows the type of striping design and Figure 3.3-2
shows the locations where each type may be applied. Assuming all of the recommended
restriping is implemented, approximately 58 new on street parking spaces could be provided in
the following zo nes:
• Zone 1 -One additional space
• Zone 4 -Thirty-five additional spaces
• Zone 6 -Three additional spaces
• Zone 7 -Nineteen additional spaces
Table 3.3-2 details the impact of the restriping by each candidate roadway segment. It is
important to note that the existing angled parking currently available in the village area was
implemented through -a special ordinance passed by the City Council, and a similar ordinance
would be required for the recommended restriping. In the future, angled parking could be
implemented as redevelopment occurs and site specific needs are identified. However, the
calculation of overall parking needs as described in the following sections does not include these
additional 58 sp aces.
3.3.2 Forecasted Parking Impacts
Based on the land use and parking demand assumptions described in the previous section,
the total parking demand was compared with the proposed on-site parking supply, and the
existing surplus parking available in the Free Village parking lots in the study area. The amount
of surplus parking supply that could be used to serve the parking deficit estimated in the previous
section is based on the existing surplus parking supply observed during the survey, and adjusted
by the following fac tors:
• 15 percent reduction due to the 85% standard utilization factor which typically
refle cts at capacity conditions;
• 10 percent reduction due to locationaVproximity concerns regarding potential for
serving proposed developments; and
• 10 percent reduction for sampling/survey error.
3-14
Type 1 -47' Street Width
Type 2 -50' Street Width
Type 3 -55' Street Width
Type 4 -60' Street Width
Type 5 -70' Street Width
12'
t
--t
t 8' ... 11',5' •I• 11'.5' •
10'.5'
l
13'
4T
I .
! l
I
I
...
fi]
13'
l l
11',5' "" 11'.5'
55'
11'
60'
70'
Figure 3.3-1
11.5'
PROPOSED PAVEMENT RESTRIPING
FOR EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTHS
3-15
1T
16'
20'
8'
II
.. 0
i g1
I a.
i
]
Ctlristiansen ·-·-· ........ i Way
I
C ::,
()
Q. ::,
Cedar
Ave
2l
0:, () 0 0 ~ :::i
(t) rr c5 0 aa.
0 g
(t)
~ a ::;: g,
Beech 2l g
,»
---4 , I -s. I (!) ..,
U) ~t -+ io<
~:~
U) :::c --a
19: . ::,
Note: Figure 4-2 shows proposed pavement restrlplng by type.
Figure 3.3-2
PROPOSED PAVEMENT RESTRIPING LOCATIONS
3-16
Jetterson St
LEGEND
Type 1
-----• Type 2
-•-Type3
m ~11m Type 4
11 11 11 Type 5
No Change
~ :?!,~ ~~ study Area
Table 3.3-2
b~ 11MA TED NUMBER OF NEW PARKING ..,. ~.:ES
WITH PROPOSED RESTRIPING
Existing Proposed New
Parking Restriping Parking Net
Segment Width Spaces Type Spaces Increase
Beech Avenue between Carlsbad Blvd.
and Washington Street 47' 11 1 12 +l
Cedar Avenue between Garfield Street
and Carlsbad Boulevard 50' 12 2 13 +1
Oak Avenue between Railroad
and State Street 60' 12 4 13 +1
Oak A venue between State Street
and Roosevelt Street 47' 24 1 25 +1
Beech Street between State Street
and Roosevelet Street 47' 20 1 21 +1
Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village
Drive and Oak Avenue 47' 22 1 26 +4
Roosevelt Street between Oak Avenue
and Pine Avenue 47' 24 1 25 +l
Roosevelt Street between Pine Avenue
and Walnut Avenue 47' 33 1 35 +2
Oak Street between Roosevelt Street
and Madison Street 47' 24 1 25 +l
Madison Street between Oak Avenue
and Carlsbad Village Drive 60' 27 4 40 +13
Grand A venue between Roosevelt Street
and Madison Street 70' 19 5 30 +11
Madison Street between Grand Avenue
and Arbuckle Street 50' 18 2 19 +l
Grand Avenue between Madison Street
and Jefferson Street 70' 14 5 22 +8
Oak Avenue between Madison Street
and Jefferson Street 47' 22 1 23 +l
Oak Avenue between Jefferson Street
and Harding Street 47' 42 1 45 +3
Harding Street between Oak Avenue
and Carlsbad Village Drive 55' 22 3 25 +3
Harding Street between Carlsbad Village
Drive and Grand A venue 55' 33 3 38 +5
Other Existing Spaces (On-street) 1.277 1.277
Total On-street Spaces 1,656 1,711 +58
3-17
Thus, existing surplus parking supply available in the free Village parking lots has been
reduced by 35 percent for the purposes of this analysis. Through this calculation, the amount of
additional parking spaces needed to be provided in additional public lots was derived. Table
3.3-3 summarizes the results of this analysis. As shown, assuming the on-site parking supply
is constructed as proposed, approximately 702 additional parking spaces would be required to
serve the potential demand brought about by the new development in the Redevelopment area.
These spaces would be needed in Zones 3, 4, and 7 to accommodate forecasted demand.
3.3.3 Summary
As discussed in the introduction to this chapter, some existing parking spaces within the
Redevelopment Plan Area will be made available upon the implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan due to removal of the existing land uses. However, due to concerns relating
to the actual ability of these spaces to satisfy future demand, it is recommended that the
calculation of fu ture parking needs as shown above not be reduced. Specifically, a more detailed
parking and land use survey would have to be conducted in the Redevelopment Plan Area to
confirm the availablity and accessibility of these residual parking spaces to serve the proposed
Redevelopment Plan Area projects. Also, the exclusion of these residual spaces from the
calculation of future parking supply requirements will provide a safety margin within the
Redevelopment Plan Area relating to the need to provide an adequate supply of high quality
public parking fac ilities.
3.4 PROPOSED PARKING DISTRICTS
One of the contributing factors to lower than desired economic activity within the Village
has been the difficulty of accommodating parking requirements on small lots. Where parking·
has been developed on these sites, the results have been generally undesirable with asphalt
replacing front and side yard landscaping and reducing the sense of a pedestrian friendly Village.
The proposed plan for the Village addresses this problem through the creation of a Parking
District which will allow all or a portion of required parking to be accommodated in public
parking resources. This mechanism will allow retention of a Village character by reducing
parking on individual sites, promotion of retail activity by limiting curb cuts and vehicular
conflicts and vehicular/pedestrian conflicts, reduction of the overall parking space requirements
through shared parking and ease of shopper access.
Precise parki ng district boundaries will be established at a later date following more
detailed study and public hearings. More than one district or "benefit zone" with differing
requirements and costs might be established to reflect the differing needs and benefits of
different Village subareas. Areas west of the AT & SF railroad right-of-way and south of
3-18
Table 3.3-3
ADJUSTED PARKING DEMAND
CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUTURE YEAR 2000 CONDITIONS
Total On-Site Off-Site Additional Residual
Parking Proposed Parking Surplus* Off-Site
l&fil Land Use luteusih: farkin2 Bate llemand farkiui: Demand (Adjusted) Parking Demand
3 Single Family Residential 18 DUs 2/DU 36 36 0
3 Multifamily Residential 50DUs 2/DU + visitor 117 117 0
3 Multifamily Residential 200 DUs 1.5/DU + visitor 362 320 42
3 Retail Commercial 22,000 SF 1/300 SF 73 30 43
Total Zone 3 552 467 85 0 85
4 Single Family Residential 17 DUs 2/DU 34 34 0
4 Multifamily Residentital 100 DUs 2/DU + visitor 262 262 0
4 Multifamily Residential 40DUs 1.5/DU + visitor 72 31 41
4 Retail Commercial 135,000 SF 1/300 SF 450 113 337
4 HoteVInn 140Room 1.2/Room 168 120 48
4 Museum 15,000 SF 1/500 SF 30 0 30
4 Restaurant 8,000 SF 1/100 SF 80 0 80
w 4 Office 40,000 SF 1/300 SF 134 14 120
I ..... Total Zone 4 1,230 \0 574 656 110 546
5 Multifamily Residential 24DU 2/DU + visitor 57 57 0
5 Light Industrial 12,500 SF 1/400 SF 32 32 0
5 Auto Service 12,500 SF 4/Bay 24 24 0
(6 Bays)
Total Zone 5 113 113 0 0 0
6 Multifamily Residential 12DU 2/DU + visitor 30 30 0
6 Office 6,000 SF 1/300 SF 20 20 0
Total Zone 6 50 50 0 0 73
7 Retail Commercial 5,000 SF 1/300 SF 17 8 9
7 Office 35,000 SF 1/300 SF 117 63 54
Total Zone 7 134 71 71 0 71
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT
AREA 2,079 1,275 812 110 702
Note: • The total surplus parking in the free Village parking lots calculated to be of 170 spaces (see Table 3.3-1) was adjusted downward by 35 percent based on the factors
described in Section 3.3.2.
Source: JHK & Associates
Carlsbad Village Drive would likely be treated differently from the older retail core near the
North State Street/Grand Avenue intersection. Figure 3.4-1 shows the broad area which would
be considered for inclusion in the overall parking district
To support the parking district and continued economic revitalization within the Village,
additional parking resources will be required. The following section details several areas of
opportunity for prov iding additional centralized parking in the Redevelopment Plan Area.
3.5 OPPORTUNITY AREAS FOR NEW PARKING
Several options for creating centrally located public parking facilities were explored.
Figure 3.5-1 shows the location of the new public lots proposed for the Redevelopment area. As
with all redevelopment plans, it is understood that the new development would occur gradually.
Thus, the proposals for providing new public parking areas are recommended in phases and
should be implemented as demand for the new parking presents itself. The following paragraphs
summarize the potential locations for the new parking facilities.
Zone 3 -Railroad Right of Way CA)
The construction of the proposed Commuter Rail Station/fransit Center on the AT & SF
railroad right of way at State Street presents an opportunity to provide joint use parking with
NCTD. The Transit Center proposes 110 surface parking spaces south of the Beech Street for
the use of rail commuters. For Phase I of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment effort, this
surface parking area could be expanded by approximately 100 spaces just north of Beech Street.
Given that the parki ng demand for the rail station is expected to increase over time and would
encroach on this extension of the lot, Phase II could entail the construction of 2 additional levels
of parking in a parking structure, adding a total of approximately 370 total spaces by Year 2000
with implementation of the Redevelopment Plan.
The construction of the surface parking area at this location could satisfy the parking
deficit of 85 spaces found for Zone 3, based on forecasted demand.
Zone 4 -Carlsbad Village Drive/Roosevelt Street ffi)
As shown on Figure 3.5-1, currently two public parking lots are located on Roosevelt
Street, one just north of Carlsbad Village Drive, and a second lot just south of Grand Avenue.
These lots are separated by an existing private commercial building. In total, there are 107
existing parking spaces in these lots. By obtaining the parcel separating these two lots and
converting it into additional surface parking, approximately 21 new parking spaces could be
provided in Phase I of the Redevelopment, providing a total of 128 surface parking spaces for
public use. Phase II of the redevelopment effort include the construction of a parking structure
3-20
I
I
Christiansen
y
I
I
OJ () 0 0 C...,
<D ;;;-< rr O 0 a. Q.
<DI ~· t----, ~· ···: :::, I : ~ HomeAve. .
: I
......... .....--1--, - - -
0 fi £ a. o 5
~:::,~~~::_-!E~µ~~J.J:.ll;J;=l:l==:illLll---!---4CQ~---1
I
I Pine Ave I
1-------+-----I ()
0 ::i. (I>
I I
I I rr 0 Q.
I I Walnut Ave 1
a:, c:.---.1
Q.
c:: I ::,
()
0
::,
~
-< , I
(D I .... I (/) -+
-----•
Figure 3.4-1
POTENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT ZONES
3-21
Jefferson St
Carlsbad
Village Drive
LEGEND
- - -Project study Area
•·•····· Core Area
k 1 ?J Zones
CD 0 C
(I)
~ a.
I
Pine Ave I ~==+r--..,_ ___ ,
I
()
Q ;:;;-
0-a a.
I ..... ,.c;, .. ,.;.;;.,.;;.,
Potential New Spaces
lot Phase I Phose2
(Cunuattve)
A 100 370
B 21 244
C 125 125
D 175
Total 246 914
Walnut Ave
1
1
I t-l-s .,.,..g_-ii;_-:J;_-JTJ::.-+1j_;--t-----I---+-,--++--+--~ c: I t:LZZ:::J f--'-"..;__+-'-~ ::::,
0 0
::::,
U> -
Figure 3.5-1
$ Jefferson St
LEGEND
- - -Project Study P<lea
-Existing VIiiage Parking Lots
lSS1 Proposed VIiiage
Parking Facllltles :iii: VIiiage Parking Lot , _____ , To Be Removed
EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES
3-22
on this site, adding an additional two levels over the three combined surf ace lots. Approximately
223 new spaces could be provided in Phase II for a total of 351 public parking spaces on this site.
Zone 4 -South State Street/Carlsbad Villa&e Drive CO
With the construction of a parking deck with a simple ramp within the Oak Street right of
way at the east side of the railroad tracks, approximately 125 new parking spaces could be added
to the existing 92 public parking spaces on this site for a total of 217 public parking spaces.
Zone 4 -Museum Block Parkin& Structure CD}
As shown on Figure 3.5-1, a public parking structure could be provided adjacent to the
Museum/Inn Project on Grand Avenue at Washington Street. With the construction of this three-
level parking structure, approximately 175 additional parking spaces would be added to the
public parking supply at the later stages of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This
parking structure would serve the parking needs for the Museum/Inn Project and the displaced
Village Faire private parking lots currently on this site.
Thus, four sites for new public parking facilities have been identified. The construction
of new surface parking lots and a simple ramp structure in Phase I of the Redevelopment Plan
would yield approximately 246 spaces, increasing the total public parking supply from the
current level of 380 to· 611. In Phase II, a total of 1,279 public parking spaces would be available
in the Village area for public use.
The implementation of the proposed public parking facilities in Zone 3 and 4 would
satisfy the forecasted parking deficit of 702 spaces, and would yield additional spaces to serve
future unforecasted demand.
3.6 PARKING RECOMMEND A TIO NS
With the implementation of all proposed development opportunities and the construction
of the additional public parking facilities, all expected parking demand will be served. It is
assumed that the construction of the new public parking facilities will be provided to coincide
with the increased demand of the Village redevelopment.
Assuming the on-site parking supply is constructed as proposed, approximately 702
additional parking spaces would be required to serve the potential demand brought about by the
new development in the Redevelopment area. These spaces would be needed in Zones 3, 4, and
7.
3-23
Precise parking district boundaries will be established at a later date following more
detailed study and public hearings. More than one district or "benefit zone" with differing
requirements and costs might be established to reflect the differing needs and benefits of
different Village subareas.
To support the parking district and continued economic revitalization within the Village,
additional parking resources will be required. The following list summarizes several areas of
opportunity for providing additional centralized parking in the Redevelopment Plan Area.
• Railroad Right of Way (A): approximately 100/370 total spaces in Year 2000 with
implementation of the Redevelopment Plan.
• Carlsbad Village Drive/Roosevelt Street (B): approximately 21/244 additional
parking spaces
• South State Street/Carlsbad Village Drive (C): approximately 125 additional parking
spaces
• Museum Block Parking Structure (D): approximately 175 additional parking spaces
Thus, fo ur sites for new public parking facilities have been identified. The construction
of new surface parkin_g lots and a simple ramp structure in Phase I of the Redevelopment Plan
would yield approximately 231 spaces (246 spaces minus 15 spaces removed from public
parking lot G), increasing the total public parking supply from the current level of 380 to 611. In
Phase Il, a total of 1,279 public parking spaces would be available in the Village area for public
use.
Shared Parking Opportunities
Given the mix of land uses proposed for the Village area under the Redevelopment Plan
there is a potential for reducing the calculated parking demand by approximately 10 to 15 percent
through the utilization of the Shared Parking principle. This principle states that through the
combination of land uses with differing peak periods of usage (i.e. an office building and a movie
theater), the amount of parking supply can be reduced while still accommodating the actual
parking demand. However, since the actual location, timing, and mix of land uses to be
developed in the Village area under the Redevelopment Plan is unknown at this time, it is
difficult to quantify exactly how much and where this reduction in parking demand would be
applicable. As development projects are implemented in the Village area, it is recommended that
a detailed shared parking analysis be conducted.
3-24
APPENDIXE
PARKING SPACE INVENTORY
PARKING SPACE INVENTORY
The following tables detail the results of the parking space inventory conducted in the
study area in November 1991. These tables show the number of parking spaces by type, location
and restriction. Figure 1 shows the block numbering scheme used to identify each block. Table
1 details the on-street parking space inventory by block face and Table 2 details the off-street
parking inventory by block. Both tables include shading to indicate the Commercial Core Area
that was the focus of the occupancy and duration survey conducted for this study. This inventory
was used as a basis for calculating occupancy and duration rates detailed in the following
appendix, Appendix B-2.
Figure 1
CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT
STUDY AREA
BLOCK NUMBERING SCHEME
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-Sam, Face
Block Block General Public Parking Private Parking NP 3-Sam 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm Sub Block
# Face Location Parallel 45* 90* Parallel 45* 90* NP 3 Sam 1 3 Mon 3 min 20 min <Sun & Holidavs> 2 Hr 45* -Total Total
1 North On -Street 8 8
0
1 South On-Street 15 3 18
0
1 East On-Street 20 20
0
1 West On-Street 12 12
0 58
2 East On-Street 15 ' 15
0 15
3 North On-Street 8 8
0
3 South On-Street 12 12
0
3 East On-Street 2 2
0
3 West On-Street 21 21
0 43
4 North On-Street 8 8
0
4 South On-Street 13 13
ci
4 East On-Street 20 20
0 41
5 North On-Street 12 12
0
5 South On-Street 29 29
0
5 East On-Street 8 8
0 49
6 North On-Street 8 2 10
0
Block Block General Public Parking
# Face Location Parallel 45• 90*
6 South On-Street 8
6 East On-Street
6 West On-Street 10
7 East On-Street 7
8 North On-Street 14
8 South On-Street 4 9
8 East On-Street
8 West On-Street 21
9 South On-Street 3
9 East On-Street 7
9 West On-Street 8
10 North On-Street
10 East On-Street
10 West On-Street 36
11 North On-Street 6
11 South On-Street 4
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am,
Private Parking NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm
Parallel 45• 90* NP 3-5am 1 3 Mon 3 min 20 min <Sun & Holidavs> 2 Hr 45•
6
'
2
Face
Sub
Total
8
0
6
0
10
0
7
0
14
0
13
0
0
0
21
0
3
0
7
0
8
0
0
0
2
0
36
0
6
0
4
0
Block
Total
34
7
48
18
38
Block Block General
Location # Face
11 East On-Street
11 West On-Street
12 North On-Street
12 South On-Street
13 West On-Street
17 North On-Street
17 South On-Street
Public Parking
Parallel 45• go•
12
6
g
2
11
11
11
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am,
Private Parking NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1am-6pm
Parallel 45• go• NP 3-5am 1 3 Mon 3 min. 20 min. <Sun & Holida S> 2 Hr 45•
Face
Sub
Total
12
0
6
0
g
0
2
0
11
0
11
0
11
0
Block
Total
28
11
Block Block General
Location # Face
17 East On-Street
17 West On-Street
23 North On-Street
24 North On-Street
24 South On-Street
24 East On-Street
Public Parking
Parallel 45• go•
20
7
5
7
16
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am, Face
Private Parking NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm Sub Block
Parallel 45• go• NP 3-5am 1 3 Mon 3 min. 20 min. <Sun & Holida S> 2 Hr 45• Total Total
0
0
20
0 7
5
0
7
0
16
0
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am, Face
Block Block General Public Par1<Ing Private Par1<ing NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm Sub Block
# Face Location Parallel 45• 90* Parallel 45• 90' NP 3-5am 1 3 Mon 3 min. 20 min. <Sun & Holida S> 2 Hr 45* Total Total
24 West On-Street 18 18
0 46
25 North On-Street 12 12
0
25 South On-Street 6 6
0
25 East On-Street 12 12
0
25 West On-Street 16
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am,
Block General NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm
<Sun & Holida S>
Face
Sub Block
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am, Face
Block Block General NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm Sub Block
# 20 min. <Sun & Holida S>
35 North On-Street 12 12
0
35 South On-Street 12 12
0
35 West On-Street 17 17
0 41
36 North On -Street 10 10
0
36 South On -Street 2 2
0
36 West On-Street 16 16
0 28
37 North On-Street 6 6
0 6
38 North On-Street 10 10
0 10
39 North On-Street 0
0
39 South On-Street 12 12
0
39 East On-Street 16 16
0
39 West On-Street 13 13
0 41
40 North On-Street 7 7
0
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-5am, Face
Block Block General Public Parking Private Parking NP 3-5am 2 Hr Pkg 1 am-6pm Sub Block
# Face Location Parallel 45* 90* Parallel 45* 90* NP 3 Sam 1 3 Mon 3 min 20 min <Sun & Holldavs> 2 Hr 45* -Total Total
40 South On-Street 0
0
40 East On-Street 10 10
0
40 West On-Street 9 9
0 26
41 North On-Street 8 8
0
41 South On-Street 7 ' 7
0
41 East On-Street 19 19
0
41 West On-Street 21 15 36
0 70
42 North On-Street 14 14
0
42 South On-Street 6 6
0
42 East On-Street 13 13
0
42 West On-Street 22 5 27
0 60
43 South On-Street 2 2
0 2
44 East On-Street 20 20
0 20
45 South On-Street 17 17
0
45 West On-Street 12 12
0 29
46 North On-Street 2 2
0
Table 1
ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
Time Restricted Parking
NP 3-Sam, Face
Block Block General Public Parking Private Parking NP 3-Sam 2 Hr Pkg 1am-6pm Sub Block
# Face Location Parallel 45• go• Parallel 45• go• NP 3 Sam 1 3 Mon 3 min 20 min <Sun & Holidavs> 2 Hr 45• -Total Total
46 South On-Street 0
0
46 East On-Street 16 16
0
46 West On-Street 14 14
0 32
47 North On-Street 0
0
47 South On-Street 13 13
0
47 East On-Street 11 11
0
47 West On-Street 18 18
0 42
48 North On-Street 8 8
0 8
49 North On-Street 20 20
0 20
50 South On-Street 22 22
0
50 West On-Street 11 2 13
(j 35
51 North On-Street 19 19
0
51 South On-Street 0
0
51 West On-Street 17 17
0 36
52 South On-Street 13 13
0 13
TOTAL 1656
Block
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Table 2
OFF-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
PUBLIC PRIVATE
Unrestricted Unrestricted 2 Hr
33
11
80
4
99
273
8
33
73
33
Block
Total
33
0
11
80
4
99
0
273
8
33
73
33
0
t::m::tt=i44·t>@@r ~ ttttrtosm:@tt -Jrn=:t:l ostt@:m
:ftll:fis::W:t\'}~~-= ::1::m::t2osltll ft::::J:\235.tt::t
t::1tt=t1st:t:::tt-rnrnrr1:12:t:tttlrlzi1l1H>a&112t:mtt
·17 7 7
22 40 40
Block
#
23
24
25
Table 2
OFF-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
PUBLIC PRIVATE
Unrestricted Unrestricted 2 Hr
10
11
Block
Total
0
10
11
1wmm1r2attttt Mi 11tttttsaJtttit -r@t1naa::11It
1mm:::n:::1211i1r::::1~ :::rw:1:nna:t:11:1: -11::1a1s.=mri1
ftitfi2a@:%ftf -· ': ::ttIJh:S7\t:tf: -::ttJfditz@tfi
tt:=:itm2§ttti11 ••&1■1i1~•1 =
1aztm@J@
30 29 29
31 0
-:@:::::1r::,11@Jtttttt< : :1:r:::::26!t:11=,1ttJ.-<t @2e.411rm
tt@t:t 33ftf::tn,::,::, :,,,1:07:.-. -l??t tt:::@tN:fl:: :fill-J@:f:400:ft?i
~ ,, :: lft:::tsotttr
35 25 25
36 0
37 0
38 0
39 51 51
40 132 132
41 59 59
42 116 116
43 0
44 0
Block
#
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Total
Table 2
OFF-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
PUBLIC PRIVATE
Unrestricted Unrestricted 2 Hr
72
99
274
380 2827 205
Block
Total
0
72
99
0
0
0
274
0
3412
APPENDIXF
CORE AREA PARKING OCCUPANCY
AND DURATION STUDY
CORE AREA PARKING OCCUPANCY AND
DURATION SURVEY
The following graphics show the detailed results of the Parking Occupancy and Duration
Survey conducted by JHK & Associates on November 23 and November 26, 1991 in the
Commercial Core of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Study Area. The graphics show public
parking (both on-street and off-street parking) and private off-street parking. Public off-street
parking consists of the nine free village parking areas shown in Figure 1. Figures 2 through 5
detail weekday parking occupancy and duration, and Figures 6 through 9 detail the Saturday
results.
ifl~T ~:':!2~~;~1 m-~ rn-39@-
i l ~::fl::~::
fa:\'\J/, lillfil Not Included i:r:::t}J In core area
;:::::::::::::::::;:::::: *:Iilf !l~Ilii
-~---=·=·-·=•:•:-;.;.: •. -~:
~i::::1:1:::::l:~I,
~~~~;[~~~!:>
)]~j~J:
;111_~:
t.~;:;:~;;:~ lf\$
I
15
14
Figure 1
29
Beech
Ave
28
27
26
,,
0 8 ~ Cl) ::;:
32
D
33
Cl
EJ
CURRENT PUBLIC OFF STREET PARKING SUPPLY
VILLAGE AREAi JANUARY 1992
,,i,;:::
.,.1>:-:,: --z:::::::
ill it?
Jli!ii ~~~:::::::: .l~j1~~
tl~\t
~ltf
:1111 '~\f
:j
if
I ~ff
,:,.,:. ll ~\
1111111111111 < 50%
-·-50-75%
I ■■ ■ 75 • 85%
-85 +%
tEil Not Included
In core area
Figure 2
I
i(/)
--+ 19.
-(I) .~ -~ 29 I -I -I Beech i Ave _
111111111111111111111111111111
28
! 27 I -I
26 t::.JI
MAXIMUM WEEKDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY
ON AND OFF STREET PUBLIC SPACES
IIUIIIIIIIIII < 5()'%,
-·-50-75%
I ■■■ 75-85%
-85+%
Not Included
In core area
Block boundary
!1111111111111,
~ 6 ~
"llllllllllllli
........
Beech Ave
~1111111111i
Figure 3
::V 0 0 en (l) < (l) ::;:
!IJIIUIIIIIII, ~3~ -.atw11111i
MAXIMUM WEEKDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY
PRIVATE SPACES
~:·~ t~~i: I ~~~~
!t/:t:J ~o~~~;l~~~d
Block bounda
ocknumb I i I ..
I en
1,8
!
14
Figure 4
--+ I 9.
-(I)
■ ,~
-■
; 29 ~ -I -■
■
■ I Beech • i Ave : -·-·-··
28
'f11111111111111111111111111ii
27
26
AVERAGE WEEKDAY DURATION
PUBLIC SPACES
32
111111111111111111111
Ill
•■••I :33:-.... ~
I
UIIIIIIIIIII --·-I ■■■
0 -2 hrs
2 -3 hrs
3 -4 hrs
-4+hrs
Not Included
In core area
Block bounda
..... • 6. • • ••••
Beech Ave
:lillllllllllll::
~28~ lii11ummi
!!1,1111111111'1:
~l 5~
=i1111111111i
Figure S
AVERAGE WEEKDAY DURATION
PRIVATE SPACES
;::o
0 0 <n (D < (t) ::;:
1111111111111 -·-I ■■■ --
< 50%
50-75%
75 -85%
85+ %
Not Included
in core area
El
::
Im
14
illlllllllllllli §
Figure 6
' :~
~ ~ § = e -~ s
291
Beech ~
Ave i
ll111111111111111111111111111
28
27
26
I -I -I -I i 32 -I -I -I
B
MAXIMUM SATURDAY PARKING OCCUPANCY
PUBLIC SPACES
-::r.·•._:.
1111111111111 < 50% ~~~~~ ':;.· .••
••••
-85+%
Not Included
In core area
Block b ounda
!,1111111111'1:
14~
11111111,i 1111111111
ji;;;
Figure 7
Beech Ave
!llllllllltlll: ~26i
i111uu111ii
;o
0 0 en ~ (I) :::;:
!,IIIIIDllllf: ~4~
=iu111111ui
(\;/Jil/\lil}rtft:i/:/ttttrtttitt:: ..
MAXIMUM WEEKEND PARKING OCCUPANCY
PRIVATE SPACES
INIIIIIIIIIII o _ 2 hrs ••-2 -3hrs
1 ■ ■ ■ 3 -4 hrs
-4+hrs
hl:ld ~o~~~~l~~~d
:::::::~. a8'A--A j I -
-~
8 !lllllllllllli,
ns~
~1111111111ii
,:::I::f: I
1 I
18
1 -I -I -
I s. .Cl) .~ -I -I 29 -I -I Beech i Ave
ll1111111111111111111111111111
On
Street-
28
I -I -- I I -- I I --32 I I -- I I -- I I -i I
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllil I lll111111111111111111
•■■•El
27 :33:~ ····1
j ii 1! 26 1134 ! e 5 5 i
Figure 8
AVERAGE SATURDAY DURATION
PUBLIC SPACES
1111111111111 -·-I ■■■ -(is]
0 -2 hrs
2 -3 hrs
3 -4 hrs
4 + hrs
Not Included
In core area
Block bounda
!1111111111111:: i6 ~
-.111111111111i
••••
!1,111111111111::
~15i
=i1111111111i
i 'la1
111111ui
':::ii
-
-_,
···::/\I
~ 0 -(!)
~
••••
Beech Ave
d,lllllUIJIII:
~28i
~IUIIUll5
L---
Figure 9
AVERAGE WEEKEND DURATION
PRIVATE SPACES
!IIIIWIIIIII:
i32i
=iu11111111i
••••
9111111111111:: ~4~ =itimmuii