HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-03-10; Planning Commission; ; V 332 - CARLSBAD OCEAN VILLAS~
APPLICATION ~UBMITTAL DATE: 12/18/81
STAFF REPORT ®
DATE: March 10, 1982
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: V-332, CARLSBAD OCEAN VILLAS -Request for approval of a
variance to reduce the required front and sideyards and
to permit tandem parking on property generally located
on the west side of Ocean Street north of Pacific Avenue
in the R-3 zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting the subject variances in order to
develop a four unit condominium project on a .23 acre parcel,
located as described above. The subject property is a rectan-
gular lot sloping downward from Ocean Street to the beach and
currently occupied by a single-family residence and cabana.
The applicant is requesting three variances to the Zoning Ordin-
ance as follows:
1. To reduce the required sideyard setback from 7.5' to
5 I •
2. To reduce the required front yard setback from 20' to
17.5'.
3. To allow tandem parking.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Can the four mandatory findings, required for the
approval of a variance, be made for each request specif-
ically:
a) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property or
to the intended use that do not apply generally to
the other property or class of use in the same
vicinity and zone.
b) That such variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right pos-
sessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone but denied to the property in question.
c) That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
d) That the granting of such variance will not adver-
sely affect the comprehensive general plan.
Discussion
Reduced Side Yard
The west side of Ocean Street is characterized by small lots
ranging in width from 25' to 75'. These lots are further con-
strained by the natural topography which slopes rather steeply to
the ocean. The result is a limited amount of buildable area, and
for this reason, most lots along Ocean Street have been histor-
ically granted variances for reduced side and front yards.
The subject property is 75' in width with topography typical of
the west side of Ocean Street. The requested reduction from 7.5'
to 5' would allow a sideyard setback consistent with or greater
than the majority of sideyards in this area. Therefore, staff
does not believe that the granting of the requested variance
would be detrimental to surrounding properties and public wel-
fare, nor adversely impact the general plan.
Reduced Front Yard
The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required front .
yard from 20' to 17' 6". The Zoning Ordinance makes provision
for modification of front yard setbacks for lots intervening be-
tween other lots having non-conforming front yards.
The Engineering Department is requesting street dedication of 5'
for eventual widening, as a condition of approval of a parcel map
being processed in conjunction with this variance. The project,
as designed, would have a front yard setback of 17 1/2' after
dedication. Adjoining developments appear to set back approx-
imately 16'. Utilizing the provisions of the code, the subject
front yard could be reduced to a similar distance. The reduced
front yard could, then, be accomplished within the provisions of
the code. It is addressed here as it applies to the third
request, tandem parking.
Tandem Parking
The Zoning Ordinance allows that substandard lots, those with
street frontage less than 50', shall be permitted tandem parking
provided there is a minimum of one parking space per dwelling
unit provided for within the required setback lines, and that the
frontyard building setback be no less than 20'. The intent of
requiring a twenty foot building setback is to provide adequate
distance within this area for the second, tandem, parking space.
-2-
ie ' •
The project, as designed, would provide for all resident and
guest parking outside of the 17 1/2 front yard setback. The
driveway area would not then be necessary for required parking.
In the event that it was used, 17 1/2' should be adequate to
accommodate most cars without obstructing the right-of-way.
Due to the sloping topography of the site, limited area exists to
provide the required amount of parking on-site. Staff has obser-
ved other instances of tandem parking on Ocean Street and in
January, 1981, the Planning Commission approved tandem parking
for a 3 unit condominium project to the south of this project on
Ocean Street.
As all required parking would be provided on-site and out of the
front yard setback, staff does not believe that approval of tan-
dem parking would be detrimental to surrounding properties or
public welfare nor adversely affect the General Plan.
Staff believes that due to the severe topography of the lot,
exceptional and extraordinary circumstances do constrain the
development of the property. Staff further believes that other
properties in the area do enjoy reduced setbacks and tandem park-
ing and that approval of the requested variances would not
adversely impact surrounding properties or the general plan.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
have a significant impact on the environment, and therefore has
issued a Negative Declaration on January 11, 1982.
IV. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Nega-
tive Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Reso-
lution No. 1924, APPROVING V-332, based on the findings and sub-
ject to the conditions contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution No. 1924
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form s. Environmental Documents
6. Exhibit
CDN:ar
2/23/82
-3-
lLOCffea 1T il ON
Site
VICINITY MAP
B.l\CKGROUND DATA SHEEr
I
L" CASE NO: V-332
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD OCEAN VILLAS
REQJEST AND ux:ATION: Reduce required front & side yards and permit tandem
parking on the west side of Ocean, north of Pacific Avenue. 2479 Ocean.
LEX;ALDFSCRIPrION: All of Lot 4 in Granville Park according to Map .
1782 filed.February 21, 1924.
Assessors Parcel Number: 203 021 04 ----
Acres .23 No. of !Qts 1 ------------
GENERAL PIAN A'ID ZONTh1G
General Plan Land Use Designation RMH --------...
Density Allowed __ 1_0_-_2_0 ___ _ Density Prqlosed __ 1_1_._3_9 __ _
Existing Zone -------------R-3 Proposed Zone __ N __ /A _____ _
SUrrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning
North
South
East
West
R-3 -----
R-3· -----
R-3
Ocean
Land Use
SFR & MULTIPLE
SFRS
SFRS & MULTIPLE
OCEAN
PUBLIC FACIL:ITIES
School District CARLSBAD ,-----------------.... . """'"
Water District .. : c;ARLSBAD ~---------.,.-"---,, .. -.... -_..,..._---
Sewer District . . CARLSBAD EDU Is ----------------'------------
Public Facilities Fee Agresnent, dated FEBRUARY 4, 1982 •
(Other: ------------------------~>
X ----
• .. .. ENVIOONMENI'.AL IMPACT ASSESSMENr
Negative,Declaration, issued·~ JAN 11; 1982 ~ No. ..
E.I.R. Certified, dated ---------------~
Other, . -------------------------------------
: .. ~!.hat further information is required, you will be so advised •
• fi '
,-APPLICANT:
1-GENT:
-. • ME!olllERS :
.. : ; • ~-~: ". , . • • . ··•..;··.at.~-'~: .. _-_~
4•:"',f_'.
CARLSBAD OCEAN VILLAS, a general partnership
Name (individual, partnership,.joint venture, corporation. syndication)
PO Box 2489, Del Mar, CA 92014.
Business Address
452-5774 (Anthony De Leonardis)·
Telephone Number·
.. · ...
A°nthony De Leonardis, Managin& Partner
Name
PO Box 2489, Del Ma.r~ CA 92014 •
Business Address
. . .
452-5774
Telephone Number
Lindstrom Investment c·ompany, Inc.
Name ·(individual, partner, joint ..
venture, corporation, syndication)
PO Box 2489, Del Mar, CA 92014
Business Address
436-6185
Telephone N~r
!-iarae
3usiness Address
3210 Carvallo Ct., Carlsbad,· CA ..
Home Address 92008
• Telephone Number
Home Address
. . . Telephone Number Telepoo,ne Number •
. :·; -o.:·soLE :s·HAR;EHOLDER;
_:;:\ff~·~uc~-c~·::•Ltnds~rom ., •• '-.
; ·.--'.:._,
: ~ . -
·:3;{ttli:'t~r;~ttt;,~~r~; 6~~~~l)a~i.; ci/':cj~~-o·~·•··. : .. }(\:,i: '.·
:.;i-, :~'.: ·., ... .
(Attach more sheets if ~eceasary)
.. --
.~.: I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained.
closure is tr~e and correct and that it will remain true and correct
in this dis-
and may be·
-relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
~,,......,·)a_~_
YVL..C.-...-1_..H, -• P ~
I ~1.,,-, ..r A...H-7·_,'. u,,__ y ,J;/2.,(,
Applicant
. If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is detei:mined
: ~..:hat .further informatio·::1--i.s required, you will be so ae-' sed.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD, OCEAN VILLAS, a·general·partnership
Name (individual, partnership~.joint venture, corporation, syndication)
. . .
PO Box 2489, Del Mar, CA .920.14 .•
Business Ad~ess
452-5774 (Anthoo/ De Leonardis)
Telephone Number •
-·. AGENT:
·:'
Anthony De· Leonardis, Managin¥:· Partner·: __ _
Name
PO Box 2489, Del Ma:r; CA 92014 -·
•. <)/~ ·.-:i~~-:··. Business Address
:-iilt"
•. • __ • . MEMBERS: •
4S2-5i74 .· ·,,
Tel_e~hone Number _· ,._ ..
• r::~/· --~M !:,tome Address
venture._ ______ syndication)
Business Address 7
_1...:..;t::.-.;~_.:..._1..:,_;;..,~~_-t_o ___ o_o __ ~_-• __ -• _---~ '7b~1'ti~ -__ ((Au,<_ ~P) --
Telephone N~r Telephone Number . -. .
Name Home Address
., ~<::::;/ •.• • : . . ' . . •·-
/iJJf f . ct -.• .,,"'~siness ~'dress -•• :;\';:\ :•·· , -•i-i)i,; ;,' :.;;~f }% 0 .j};\'.;; .. : }/ -
. \.\:, • . Telephone Number .:.\;::. . ... ':· Telephone Number .· ..•.. :,·· .• ··: ....
_-:~~~, --~~1o~1•=~~k~~~:~I~•
· ·: _:-:·j ··>W · r_ • : ~.:. > . -~:,:;:t'.': . · :-::;ilii?if()t.;·.:·)J[!ti/ .. ~:".':;-f ;·:\,_< ;·});;~f{{'?: ·
./f-~~=·!-. . : ~-'
BY
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
D Assistant City Manager
(714) 438-5596
D Building Department
(714) 438-5525
D Engineering Department
(714) 438-5541
CJI Housing & Redevelopment Department
3096 Harding St.
(714) 438-5611
JI! Planning Department
(714) 438-5591
Citp of Carlsbab
NEGATIVE Om.ARA.TI ON
PROJECI' ADDRESS/LCCATION: 2479 Q::ean Street
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
PROJECI' DESCRIPTION: Fequest for approval of a variance to reduce
the required front and side yard setbacks arrl penni t tam.em parkirg
arrl a Tentative Pare-el Map arrl Corrlaninium Pennit to develop 4 units.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envirornnental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implerrentation
of the California Ehvironnental Quality Act arrl the Ehvironmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. 'As a result of said
review, a N:!g' ati ve Declaration ( declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Plannirg Department.
A cq,y of the N:!g'ative Declaration with supportive doa.nnents is on
file in the Plannirg Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
CA. 92008. Ccrrm.ents fran the public are invited. Please subnit
cx::mrents in wri tirg to the Plannirg Department within ten ( 10) days of
date of issuance.
DATED: February 11, 1982
CASE ID: V-332/CP-201
JAMES c.
Plannirg
APPLICANI': CMLSBAD OCFAN VILI.AS
PUBLISH DATE: February 17, 1982
ID-4
5/81
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
D Assistant City Manager
(714) 438-5596
□ Building Department
(714) 438-5525
□ Engineering Department
(714) 438-5541
D Housing & Redevelopment Department
(714) 438-5611
Citp of Carlsbab
~annlng Department
(714) 438-5591 PUBLIC NOI'ICE OF PREPARATIOO
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
'!he Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a
Negative Declaration for the following project:
Project Description: Request for approval of a Variance to reduce the
required front and side yard setbacks and permit tandem parking and a
Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Condominium Permit to develop 4
units.
Project address/location: 2479 Ocean Street
.Anticipated significant impacts: l'bne
we need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have
on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project oould be
revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage.
Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in the environ-
mental review of this project.
Your comnents on the environmental impact of the proposed project may
be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than February 17, 1982.
DATED: January 29, 19 82
CASE NO: V-332/CP-201
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD OCEAN VILLAS
PUBLISH DATE: February 3, 1982
JAMES C.
Planning Director
ND 3
5/81
. .. .
• "ENVIRONMI'¾.t'TAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -Part II
(To Be Completed By The
PLANNING DEPAR1~ffiNT)
CA.5ENO. v-~Z-
DATE: ---------
I. • BACKGROlTh.l])
l. APPLICANf: C-k2.\.~f!abD.&:Jriibt-\· \j\~
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: (714) 4'::?Z-~?f,
ea.fa:?)£ 2..qez-1
:S, DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITIED: ~~ \1?),· t9f,\ •
•
II.. "ENVIRONMENTAL ·tMPACTS
"(EXPLANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANSWERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER
Section III~ DISCUSSION OF Fl-WIRONMENTAL EVALUATION)
.
1. ·Earth Wi11· the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or grm.md
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
. or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the ~hanncl of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or ony bay, inlet or lake?
·yes • ·Maybe
. ••I_ ..•.••
No
ND 2
..
,, .
2. Air: Will. the proposal have signi-
resul ts in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
Iicant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water nmoff?
c. Alterations to the c:ourse or
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of sur~
face water in any ,mter body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration 0£ surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of grotmd waters?
g. Change in the quantity 0£
ground waters, .either through
• direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of
water othcn"ise available for
public water supplies?
Yes Mafbe No
L.
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results.in:
a. Change in the_diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the mnnbers of
any tmique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the nonnal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? •
5. • ·Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Ch_anges in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfatma)?
b. Reduction of the numbers ·of·
any tmique, rare or-endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals? •
d. Deterioration to existing
£ish or wildlife habitat?
64 • ·Noise. Will the proposal signi.-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7. • "!!_ight tmd Glare. Will the pro ..
posal significantly produce new
light or glare?.
8. Lancl Use. Will the proposal have
significant results in the al.tcr:1tion
of the present or planned lru1<l use of
an area?
-3-
·yes Maybe No
,
Yes Ma:rbe No
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
. posal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use L of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? /
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset ···/ conditions?
· 11. • Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of ···/ an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing, . or create a demand for additional --~L housing?° ..... .
13. • "Tta.nSEOrtatiort/Citculation. Will
the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
.....
a. Generation of additional ··L vehicular movement?
b, Effects on existing parking . facilities, or demand for new ····/ parking?
C, Impact upon existing trans-.. :./ portation systems?
d-Alterations to present .. patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods? ..... , '"""/
e, Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air traffic7 ....... "'"/
f,· Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? ··L
• ·-4-
14. Public Services. Will the pro-
posal have a si&mificant effect
upon, or have •significant. results
in the need for new or altered
govenunental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
£. Other governmental services?
15. Eriergy. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop~
ment of new sources of energy?
16. • Utilities. Will the proposal have -
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
_ following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b, Communications systems?
c. Water? .
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e, Stonn water drainage?
£~ Solid waste and disposal?
17, • I-h.1man Health. Will the proposal
have signig1cant results in the·
creation of any health hnzard or
potential health hazard (excluding•
mental health)?
-s-
Yes Maybe No
··/
··L
... L
..L
·L
··L
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant ~esults in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to.public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal have
s1gn1f1cant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
. .
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building?
Yes Maybe No
L
21. .ANALYZE VIABLE ALTER\!ATIVES TO nm PROPOSF.D PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DE'VELOPMEYI' OP THE PROJECT; b) AL1T:Ril\JATE SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALTERNATE SCJ\LE OF DEVELOPMENT; cl) ALTERNATE
USES FOR TI-IE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FUTURE TIME RATIIBR
'Ill!\.~ NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR 'IRE ·PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT ALTERNATIVE.
-6-
• 22. MI\NDATORY FINDINGS OF.SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES TI IE PROJECT HAVE TI-IE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE TIIE QUALITY OF_
TI-IE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE
DIVERSITI IN TI-IE ENVIRONMENT?
b) OOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE 1HE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO
TI-IE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM,
ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM IMPACT ON TI-ffi ENVIRONMENT .
IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE.
PERIOD OF TIME WHILE IDNG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL IN10
TI-IE FU1URE.)
c) DOES nrn PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS
WIUQI ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BlIT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT MA.Y IMPACT ON TWO
OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES
WHERE TI-IE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL,
BlIT WHERE TI-IE EFFECT OF THE
'IDTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE
ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.)
d) DOES IBE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS,
EITIIER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III.· LISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION
Yes Maybe No
~ ~\~ ~? Pl.EQu~~ ~~-OF A-
Y~\b..~ 7'"0 "PiE-DUC!.E.. ~E... ~\..l\P,1::0-~~
. \/~O ;=\-'0\.1\ 20' -ro r,' ~~ca:: y~ ~
1'lP'·' -rD '=='' •.. "PEP-,M\,~~ ~~~AA..
~T\vE.. ~ ~ ~.CDfiC>t::>\.J\\N\Ut-J\ ~rr.
h& P. -P-.bP'a, Or e-&,\~U~~J ~~\~
~ ~ec'-/~ c.Jf-.. ¢RA.Ott--lC:,i \~ ~r
\--S-·\.-e> AJ4.T1C-4P~Tl=.D ~"t'~ C-4~'~ C.UP>P>~,_-
~~:,i~O\~ O'?,O\¼A.~ vJ\U-Mr,;7bt~TE-..&1-lY ~-
~N vz,~~l"Nl::s\·-o-\-E»·~ ~
-7-
. )
DISCUSSIO~ OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
-r,4,c.-~~ YA~\A~ ~po, f2E.ou.CED
~ \~· c::::!D~l"'::>vetT-Wtn-\-~ ~ \'4.--n+E-~ ~-b~u.,~\4 -n-EP,-E...i \':::' ~~y A ~ ~ ~~
~le!.. ---~~~.-. \-\..l \:1-\,E ~ ••
\1 ~ t--\or A.~(!..\,?~~,-~\~ ft.:{oj~ .
\N t U-?lb."'~~ ~\ eurE:... -,o r\-E
~~-
-n-\-e: ~L,\c.Ab-1-T" \? 'n=-:o~, \.-bi~ ~
,• 4 C!ot-l(:%)M\1-\tut--A"'u1'-l.l~ ~ A~~
•• C..JJ.~~ -~~ 'V;Jm--\ MUCTlPL.E-
~MlLY ~'~~~EC> ~~
~LO -e,e_ C.OM\?~e\.E "'1 lT\-\ -t'L\.~ ~
-~\'1'EO. ~o ~->~
' .
IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY 1HE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
~i~d the propGsed project COULD.NOT hav~ a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
will ~e prepared. •
J find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
Date: • \ /zi/ez,
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
"\
·9-
....
...
..
MITIGATING MFASURES (Continued)·
,
..
• VI • 'APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MF..ASURES
.
IBIS IS TO CERTIFY TIIAT I HAVE REVIEWED 11-lE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA-
SURES AND CONCUR lHIB THE ADDITION OF IBESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date: • ------------Signature of Applicant
•
•
-10-
• ' Ff:L $100.00
Received RECEIPT NO: • '2.19 Z":)
DEC 18 19_81. ENVIRONMENTAL I1',1PAq' ASSESSMENT FORM -Part I
(To be Completed by APPLICANT) .
CITY 06 CARLSBAD CASE NO: i/ --33 2-
DATE: • --------
Applicant:-' CAR.LS'?.~ ~ \/tll~~ A ~A12.1""N.E::R.~l-+'\P
Address of Applicant : AN~ Lf :be: l...e:o'f.4 ~LO\<;., l'\~ (n ~ c.c.-eN E:3"1.A \._
'Pbtz:.tNE::'2..... ?. o. ~ "1-4~9 "":Diel /,AvA..bf_ > Cbl\;::oR.NIA 91..014-
Phone Number: (714) 4S7...-0S78
Name, address and phone mnnber of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant):
·GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: 4-
Project Location/Address: -Z.4-"79 Oc..E-~ S,-_
Assessor Parcel Nwnber: -z.o~ -o-z.. \ -• o4-
Zone of Subj cct Property: -e.-3 ---------------------
Proposed Use of Site: 12-E=4::.l0E:J,..t,(~L. CDl'IDOM\1'.l.lUM,~
List all other applicable applications related to this project: ------
]) V1=4.Z\C:,,J..J,c..e.. -R:>,-z_ <c,' '51DE: y.A-120 b.N.o "'IAl-.LDclY\. ?A.e.lc::JNe,......_
_.i) \V\ \·~ex-C..ON.DC..,\IN l~ -:p El2..IV\t",
ND 1
EIR l
2. . ~)escribe the 2.ctivity area, inciuding distinguishing
natural and marnGade characteristics;. also provide precise
_slo~e analysis when appropriate.
-6\-t""C=:; I<:::.· LOCATE:'D o,0 ~ o~~~ F~,
~.,.,.,•N ~ Oc..El:SM S.-riz..CE.T 1'0 "'l"t-4-E ~, A'f;J.D
1'"l-\-e. 1'~\F-r c.. oc...e~ --ro -r-1--te:-· w~.-
3. Describe energy conservation measures· incorporated into
the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
specific discu~sion of· energy conservation requirements
see of the City I Ei., EIR Guidelines). -
fl -II a•.! iz. -It I~ t vi 2-f /ulf ·_..-1 lu•t1 ~ J t. tJ•.,'<!:f' •
l'i,o._..,. sit o...,,,.. ,t * .... J.s a #d "llf1i,,,.,.,_, -l/v$J -l,s,/,.rs
4. If residential, include the number of units," schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type-of
household Eize expected.
'-/ <.IN/TS
SflltlJ-~ f-.,"'--f
'/ fl. I t:. Ir fl.. Ir A/(,.£-,'
. .
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,.
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
Lld lo&ding faciljties.
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities.
7. If institutional, indicate the major function,· estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
fn.cilitics, and community benefits to be d~riv0d from t:he
px-oject.
I. • ENVIRONMBNT.?'.L ·IMPACT .ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing~ check in the
appropriat·c space. (Discuss all items checked yes~ Attach
additional sheets as nece~saryl.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
'7}
8)
9)
Could the project significantly change preseµt
·1and uses i:i the vicinity of th_e. activity?
Could the activity affect the µse of a rec-
reational area, or a~·ea of important
aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?·
Could the ~cJ.i.vi ty result in the displacement
of community residents?
Could the activity increase the number of low
•and moderate cost housing units in the city?
Could -::he activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity tirea uni.qu~, that is, not:
found in other parts of the County, State,
·or Nation?
Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extr~ction, or conservation
of a scarce-natural resource?
lO)· Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source'of_water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
species?
11} Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
· 12) •• ~re there any rare er endangered plant
species in the activity area~
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the ciLy's lagoons, bays, or
ticlclilnds?
YES NO
X
----X
x·
X
X
·x
-x
X
X
•
14) Couid the c1.cti.•.rity change existing features of
any.of the city's beaches?
15) Could· the activity result in the erosion or
el~mination of ~gricul~ural lands?
.16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already devel'oped areas?
17) Will the activity require a-variance from
established c-:nvironmental standards (air, water,
• , \ ? noise, ecc,.
I
lU) Will the activity require certification,
-authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state er federal environment.al control
agency?
19) Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) . Will the activity involve construction of
t~cilities in a flood plain? •
22) Will the activity invclve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of .
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24)" ·could the activity result in the generation
of s~gnificant amounts of noise?.
25)
26)
27)
28)
29)
Conlrl the activity re·sult in the generation
of sign if icnnt amoun·ts of dust? • '
Will the a.ctivity involve the bu:r.ning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note,
surface, ground water, off-shore).
Will the project substantially incrcnse fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)?
Will there be a.significant change to existing
l,snd form?
-..1.,..
X
X
X. --
X
X
X-
x-·
. . . ,.
(a) in·d.i.cutc \~stimqted grading to be done in
cubic yards e>oo· --~
(b) perce·ntage of alteration to the present
land form . 35 Yo
(c) maximum.height of cut or fill slopes
No· ·s\o_ee!:.S \?~~o~E;..O __ _
I
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers., _drains, or
strc~ts?
31) Is the activity carried out as pa~t of a i~rger
project or series of projects?
I. ;
X
...
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFEC'IS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
1§) C.ot:::.~,oL..... --pe-fU'-"\l, (t.Ec;l.lt.,"l.E::C:> . We ~~ E M.Er 'N ~
1>f..vnn'E\'L. ~•'t..... S."iY\°O Alt.Eb.. ~o l+E:: t ~ S.:a"T\!.'F'l'CO
'Nt'rt--4-:I:>O-~lC:..~. No -pii.ue.L~"'> .o.t"1.E: ~,~~ee::,-..)
i§) ~~-r(Nc.,._ <::;(oE. y~!,. CJ"F-LO~ bO"jc:.a::,,,Jr--ro
t>~E= rz::rx: ~(UE; s. C5' wt'oE-r-,.-r-1'"'1-K::: u~iM.u~.
-z..s;) Eu1\ .. o(Mc-__ ~l'LL. -ee-'2,tv,.'f:IE:PDeI:> INTO ~~-nNl,,...__
'""2.E>o/o ~opE.
III. COMVIENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF WE -QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for ariswering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed). •
Date Signed _\_-z.~/.'--14/'--e,_:_\ ______________ _ ~,