HomeMy WebLinkAboutHMPP 06-03; AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK EMERGENCY DREDGE PROJECT; Habitat Management Permit (HMP)0
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION -
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) --(FOR (FOR
DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY) USE ONLY)
□ Administrative Pe~mit □ Plann!=!d Industrial Permit -
-~
□ Administrative Variance □ • Planning Commission Determination ,, . ·>t
~ Coastal Development Permit D.o--c:4-□ Precise Development Plan
□ Conditional Use Permit ~ V □ Redevelopment Permit
□ Condominium Permit □ Site Development Plan
□ Environmental Impact Assessment ~ Special Use Permit (flCJo.-!p}q,,",,.) Ofo-02_
□ □ ,Y V General Plan Amendment Specific Plan ~ ~t.a..J □ □ T,-.-•-••··-n----• 1n.., Hillside Development Permit ---· ·-Obtain from Engineering De artment
□ Local Coastal Program Amendment □ Tentative Tract Map
□ Master Plan □ Variance
□ Minor Conditional Use Permit □ Zone Change -.
□ Non-Residential Planned Development ~ List other ~plications not specified F"I')
□ Planned Development Permit
H Mff er>'h;f Dlef -0
1-1 Mp /tltA/Ott. IJtniJt/1'~;:l/T
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
3) PROJECT NAME: •
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: P.e.mrJtq/ "' 11-e-,c-Jaf!::._,, 4,w{ ?\~t1A1 "/a /eJ .,se41,11~,,,/:r
fl',s,M tt,~ ,,,;He,.,. ,-r/-A--tv4 J.le.a.J,.. -Cree.~ ch11,uHI . ,,
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) • 6) APPLICAN,J' NAME {Print or Type)
c,·ry a/-Cq/l>b~vl O~u? fflJvJ/5.4..
MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS
1, 35 k./t:Ad4t Ave.. I ~..t 5 Feit ,,,.,,_~ e. >' 4t-e.
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE ;
C~41JP c,/J-1 o/J..t>os (!,,J,02 ,t~t; (.(:1// s;JA,t C,I}-120{)8 /7Jo) (_O'-•2.?:J;
EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: J~c.11.) ~ ~ 1. C'fl'/s/µ.J, i:A., v.£
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM TH~_ LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWmAND T~TT AL H ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
KNOWLEDGE. CO E TT THE OF MY KNOWLEDGE. -;-
__ --· /J _ 4-)3/ot .'
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DKrE ,-
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION t,,o,f /4-& 6,I, /lllapj3 7/S"; J,..sf /9$.., / /IJ.,,t' JJJ 9t:; ~,,,,d
P<f/oe.l I at PM / 7 'iS ~
NOTE: A PROP.OSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPlE·APPLICATIONS BE FILED; MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M: •
A PROPOSED PROJECT: REQUIRING ONL v ONE APPLiCATION Bf FILEO, MUST BE·suEiMITTED j:iRlciR':TO 4:oo•P;M.
Form 14 Rev. 03/06 -• ~\p PAGE 1 OF 5
0 0
" 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: !5 2-00 '£3. I C,,1,...-, ,-,HJ ti¼/
9)
10)
13)
16)
ON THE I 1,J€t; r I.
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
BETWEEN I Cq.-,,.0 .,.. t2:,,..,J
(NAME OF STREET)
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8 l. 15
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF I G/ Ct::;1M1",,.,, /2e4 / ·
(NAME OF_.,STREET)
·AND j ·--·e-/ ~,..,,~-a. ~ ·J;.,..
(NAME OF STREET)
PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~11) NUMBER OF EXISTING ,~,12) PROPOSED NUMBER
RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS
TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 04) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/Q 15) PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE
PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED ~17) PROPOSED INCREASE 018) PROPOSED SEWER
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE INADT USAGE IN EDU
19) .-~ GROSS SITE ACREAGE ~20) EXISTING GENERAL ~21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION
22) EXISTfNG ZONING I o., I 23) PROPOSED ZONING I OS 124) HABITAT IMPACTS
IF YES, ASSIGN HMP #
0
0
EJ
[2]-
.[£]
25) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
TO WOR lZ. PURPOSE •
SIGNATURE t~ ·
FOR CITY USE ONL V
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE
,
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
• Form 14 Rev. 12/04
FEE REQUIRED
RECEIVED
/ APR O 4 2006
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT
DATESTAMPAPPLICATION RECEIVED
PAGE2 OF 5
0 0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME: f\,~ ... 1--kJ .~ .. J,a.. c~e-e/c. __ ~~~-~-~,
:,;;;..
APPLICANT NAME: __ G_·ry...,.......,.._ o___,__/_·_C_e.:_.,,_/ s_b11.._ol. __________ _
Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details
necessary to adequate·ly explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project.
You may also include any bac_kground ioformation and supporting statements regarding
the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if
necessary.
Description/Explanation:
,
Project Description 10/96 Page 1 of 1
0
Agua Hedionda Creek Emergency Dredge Project
City ofCarlsbad •
Apri13,2006
Description of Activity
Summary
0
The Agua Hedionda Creek Emergency Dredge Project consists of removal of accumulated
sediment in the Agua Hedionda channel bottom, located within and adjacent to the Rancho
Carlsbad Mobile Home Park, and temporary disposal in Robertson Ranch East, a nearby
upland area. Removals were performed from March 3, 2006 to March 28, 2006 along the Agua
Hedionda Creek Channel from mile 1.30 to mile 1.85. The removal depths of from 4 to 6 feet
generated approximately 15,000 cubic yards of sediment. Due to time and other resource
agency permit restrictions only approximately 15,000 cubic yards of the estimated 30,000 to
40,000 cubic yards of existing deposited material were removed during the emergency .dredge
operations. Pf this amount approximately 2,000 to 3,000 cubic yards of sediment and other
debris were removed from the portion of channel located within the Coastal Zone boundary. The
earthen trapezoidal channels were constructed as flood control facilities in approximately 1970
with the construction of Rancho Carlsbad.
Recent studies show that no endangered plant or animal species have been found in the area of
the proposed dredging. The area is not within designated critical habitat for any federally-listed
species. The proposed activities created temporary impacts on 3.8 acres of Corps jurisdictional
wetlands, and 0.7 acres of Corps jurisdictional non-wetland waters of the U.S. By removing
willow riparian forest and southern willow scrub in the channel between the El Camino Real and
Cannon Road bridges, an additional 0.5 acres of Corps wetland was permanently impacted.
The deposited sediments were tested for metals, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, oil and
grease, and Amphipod Hyalel/a azteca by Ninyo and Moore (February 10, 2006) and found to
not exceed the NOAA Sediment Quality Objectives.
The proposed project area is not tidally influenced. The materials were removed by backhoe or
excavator, and all-terrain dump trucks. Because of the existing topography and the equipment
proposed, no grading of access roads was necessary. No r~contouring of the channel banks
was accomplished with these activities, only the removal of existing sediment in the channel
bottom. The Agua Hedionda channels are serviceable flood control facilities, but the deposition
of sediment has reduced their capacity considerably.
" Purpose and Final Goal of Proposed Activity
The purpose of the Emergency dredge Project was to restore as much of the original capacity of
the Agua Hedionda Creek flood control channel as feasible given the limitations of the agency
permits by removing accumulated sediments. The goal was to perform. a needed rehabilitation
to a publicly owned drainage facility to maintain service essential to the public. Restoring
channel capacity through the dredging activity alleviated potential flooding imp·acts for up to 21 O
residential units. A severe flood without the emergency maintenance of the channel was
conservatively estimated to represent damages of $10 to $20 million to structures and contents.
The additional purpose of the dredging was to maintain operational integrity of the El Camino
Real roadway and bridge. El Camino Real is a regionally significant arterial essential for the
Page 1 of 3
,
0
Agua Hedionda Creek Emergency Dredge Project
City of Carlsbad
April 3, 2006
0
• movement of goods, the public and emergency services for the. City of Carlsbad,, and
neighboring communities.
Work Plan: Agua Hedionda Creek Channel -Mile 1.30 to Mile 1.40
The first phase of the Emergency Dredge Project was to remove the vegetation consisting of
approximately 0.8 acres of willow riparian forest from the channel section between the Cannon
Road bridge and the El Camino Real bridge. • Access to the area was gained from an existing
sewer access road from El Camino Real and from directly from Cannon Road. Small sections
of rip rap on the south and north side of the channel bank were temporarily moved to allow
access by a work crews and backhoe excavators. Vegetation removals consisted of cutting the
trees and shrubs with chainsaws, and removal of cut trees and shrubs by han-d to the staging
areas on the north and south sides of the channel. A chipper was set up to chip the vegetation.
To minimize noise impacts, the chipper was set up on the level paved area at the southwest
corner of Cannon Road and El Camino Real and on the sewer access road. The chipped
material was hauled offsite, to be either stored at the City Public Works yard for use by City
forces, or transported to the EDCO Green Waste Recycling facility in San Marcos. Stumps and
other large materials were left for removal using a backhoe excavator after hand removal
operations were completed.
After vegetation removal, the sediment was dredged to a flowline elevation of approximately
32.0 feet, from the upstream edge of the Cannon Road bridge at 0% longitudinal slope
upstream. The sediment was dredged to restore original channel bottom with approximately a
70-foot bottom width and 2: 1 side slopes. A benched area with a width varying from O to 20 feet
was left with vegetation intact along the southerly side of the channel to protect the viewshed
and to provide some channel shading. When the dredging activity was complete in this section,
the equipment was removed from the channel area, and the relocated rip rap was restored to its
original position.
1, Work Plan: Agua Hedionda Creek Channel -Mile 1.40 to Mile 1.85
Compliance with turbidity requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
certification for the project required construction of a 'pilot' channel on the west side of the
channel. A small diversion berm directed creek flows to the pilot channel. The pilot channel
diverted flows around the area of excavation. When it re~ched the portion of the excavation
already completed west of El Camino Real, the creek flows spread out into the newly dredged
channel. The sediments were removed from the area outside of the pilot channel to their
• original channel invert elevations, until reaching down to elevation 32. The area of the pilot
channel was not dredged during the emergency dredge project becaus.~ doing so caused the
RWQCB turbidity standards to be exceeded. This material will be r~moved as part of the
proposed comprehensive Agua Hedionda Creek Channel Dredging and Improvement project
that is currently under environmental review.
Once the pilot channel was created, the dredging proceeded from upstream to downstream,
towards the El Camino Real bridge. Dredging in this segment of channel was accomplished
using a backhoe excavator and all terrain dump trucks. Removed sediment was deposited at a
Page 2 of 3
0
Agua Hedionda Creek Emergency Dredge Project
City of Carlsbad
April3,2006
0
staging area in an upland staging area north of Agua Hedionda Creek and south of C~nnon
Road. The dredged materials were sifted and recycled for use as construction materials: ·,;;;._
The final stage of dredging was to remove · the sediments from beneath El Camino Real,
completing the emergency channel dredging project. The sediments under the bridge were
removed using a small excavator and placed into trucks for removal by the backhoe excavator.
eyJj>
Page 3 of 3
0 0
City of Carlsbad,
IAffilt■ii d· l•l§►iii• Hiitll
..
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership i11terests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be· disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be
reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, .
..... corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or
other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.n
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
2.
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest
in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title,
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE
BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles, and _addresses of the corporate
officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person PA-vt P J~7,1'1t.. CorpWart C rrY o~ Col)-tZ-L-<,iJ,4-o
Title IJ&l'fl7'1 CIT'I (9"~61Ntr~
Address f(, 1.r 'FiJ.MtO,t't l;tl~
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Title _____________ _
Address 1, 3 S" Fl)-a.,,_o/W lhl ~
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, • partnership,
tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or
partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE
NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and aodresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessa_ry.} >e.~ • 4 t/-e..eAd
Person -----------Corp/Part. ______ , _____ _
Title ___________ _ Title --------------
Address _________ _ Address _____________ _
....
0 0
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a tryst, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an-officeF,.-or director of the no~if>rofit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust,________ Non Profit/Trust __________ _
Title.____________ Title _____________ _
Address __________ _ Address -------------
"
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
D Yes C8})No If yes, please indicate person(s):. ________ __,. __ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge . . • . IL/~
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
I /
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
AGUA HEDIONDA AND CALA VERA CREEKS
DREDGING AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
AUGUST 19, 2005
TASK 1: TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
For the purposes of project design and analysis and for City presentation purposes, the team will
conduct the following topographical mapping tasks:
1.1 -Prepare Aerial Base Maps
Aerial topographic mapping with 1-foot contours and spot elevations will be prepared for Agua
Hedionda and Calavera creeks. The data will provide sufficient detail to develop a bank
stabilization plan for Calavera Creek.
Horizontal control will be NAO 83 per the City of Carlsbad Control Network. The vertical datum
will be ROS No. 17271 (utilizing GPS RTK Methods-Double Occupation). The team will verify if
this is adequate for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) purposes.
Topographic mapping will include property lines and relevant easements, based on available
record maps and preliminary title reports provided by the City.
1.2 -Prepare Digital Orthophotography
Digital color orthophotos will be provided for vegetation base mapping and presentations.
1.3-Supplemental Field Survey Work
Field surveys will identify surface utilities that show up in the aerial mapping. Spot elevations
will be obtained for ridgelines, center and edge of banks, top of slope, toe of slope and spot
elevations adjacent to channels for Calavera Creek and Agua Hedionda Creek.
Deliverables in electronic format (provided to engineers during design phase):
Field Note ASCII File;
Aerial mapping at 1"=40' with 1 foot contours in AutoCAD format;
DTM;
Survey Point File
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
2.1 Data Gathering and Review
The team will review previous plans and reports prepared by Rick Engineering including the
RCMHP Preliminary Alternatives Analysis for Agua Hedionda Channel Maintenance (2003; 2004),
1
the Carlsbad Channel and Basin Project SUP Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (2000) and the
Ninyo & Moore Limited Geotechnical Evaluation Rancho Carlsbad Channel and Basin Project
(2004). Existing bridge plans will be reviewed to determine the footprint of the excavation required
for the Agua Hedionda Creek dredging. The Calavera Creek channel footprint is well defined;
however, as-built control points will have to be determined due to changes in the channel bottom
that have occurred from storm damage.
2.2 Draft Design Plans
Preliminary design plans will incorporate vertical and horizontal controls, typical cross sections,
easements and property lines for the Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creek Channels. The as built
plans for the bridges will be reviewed.
A local scour analysis will be performed on each of the bridge bents for the 100-year event. A Type
Selection Report for the proposed modification will also be prepared. A seismic analysis of the
modified pier condition of each of the bridges will be conducted. The analysis will be based on
recommendations found in the current version of the Caltrans Memorandum to Designers 20-4 and '
the Seismic Design Criteria
The design calculations for the bridge modifications will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans
Bridge Design Specifications LFD Version 2000. The bridge plans will show all details necessary for
the construction.
The team will submit 30 % and 65 % design level plans. Based on City-supplied creek dimensions
and elevations, estimate of the volume of material that will be excavated will be estimated. The
team will determine control elevations for the Calavera Creek Channel confluence to assess if
velocity dissipation features or improvements are required to reduce the water surface elevation.
Once th~ preliminary footprint has been established, the team will identify and verify dredging
requirements and quantities •
Sediment characteristics (particle size, chemical analysis, composition, etc.) of the material to be
excavated will be identified to evaluate whether the material can be reused for beach sand
replenishment, fill material at other locations, or other recycling purposes. Depending on how the
dredge.material may be reused or recycled, staging areas for dewatering may be required and will
be determined to effectively and efficiently manage dredge spoils if necessary. The team will
conduct an evaluation of the dredged materials and disposal methodology
The design plan will include an evaluation of the impacts to the existing slopes along the creeks
identifying where vegetation removal may occur and whether mitigation or replacement planting
would be necessary for habitat replacement. Areas that provide opportunities for aesthetic
treatment, community benefit (e.g., green space corridors/landscape nodes), onsite habitat
enhancement, and permanent Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be noted.
2.3 Draft Erosion Control Plan/SWPPP
The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will provide an approach to monitoring the
various phases of project construction and specify the appropriate BMPs along the alignment as
construction progresses. The SWPPP will be developed in accordance with the requirements of the
2
State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 99 -08-DWQ/National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System General Permit CAS000002 (Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with
Construction Activity) (General Permit). Any municipal or jurisdictional requirements will also be
incorporated where appropriate.
Because Aqua Hedionda Lagoon is impaired for sedimentation/siltation, monitoring for visible
(i.e., sediment) and nonvisible pollutants in project-related storm water discharges will be
necessary. The General Permit requires sampling and analysis for sediment or turbidity when the
construction site runoff discharges directly into a water body that is impaired by sediment/silt or
turbidity (per the Clean Water Act Section 303( d) list). However, the crux of the SWPPP will be to
prevent storm water discharges from areas disturbed by construction activities by incorporating
BMPs that will minimize or eliminate the need for storm water sampling and analysis (i.e., avoid
offsite discharges). Likewise, BMPs will also address nonvisible pollutants that could be potentially
released from construction site materials and impact receiving waters (cause or contribute to an
exceedance of water quality objectives).
Based on project design drawings, corresponding erosion control plans will be prepared. These
plans will present specific BMPs for source control relative to construction components and nearby
receiving waters. The erosion control drawings will be incorporated into the project SWPPP for
comprehensiveness. Sediment control BMPs will also be presented, along with those for nonvisible
pollutant control.
2.4 Preliminary Estimates
The team will prepare preliminary cost estimates based on current industry material costs, labor
rates, production rates and standard construction practices. The most recent reference
documents, such as RS Means Heavy Construction Cost Data, or other similar documents will be
utilized to determine construction and material costs. The preliminary cost estimates will be
prepared based on standard construction practices and may not reflect the contractor's actual
methods of construction, permitting costs, labor increases, subcontractor mark-up, access
requirements, project phasing, overhead, profit or taxes.
2.5 Preliminary Hydraulic Analysis
A hydraulic analysis and ~odel of the proposed new channel configuration will be prepared,
incorporating the excavation (flowline) elevation, improvement features within the channel, and
side slope treatment features. The hydraulic model will serve to evaluate several options or
alternatives for appropriately conveying a 100-year storm event. For instance, modifying Agua
Hedionda Creek with a low-flow pilot channel will allow existing vegetation the opportunity to
become established around the pilot channel during small rainfall events. Such a pilot channel will
improve the channel efficiency, increase capacity, and provide an area for sediment deposition and
reduce slope damage. The hydraulic model will be prepared in conjunction with the draft design,
and upon acceptance from the City, will serve as the basis for the 30 percent design.
The Hydraulic analysis will be documented and the hydraulic model will be prepared to conform
to the submittal requirements as outlined by FEMA. The hydraulic model and documentation will
be utilized as part of the submittal for the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) ..
3
2.6 Draft Basis of Design Report
Following City review and comment on the draft engineering design, the Basis of Design report
. will be agreed upon. Five (5) copies of the draft Basis of Design report will be submitted to the City
describing the design process, methodology, and assumptions for the draft design.
2.7 QA/QC
The project engineer will provide oversight and review for engineering-related tasks including
work associated with the topographical survey work and the structural bridge design.
TASK 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DOCUMENTATION -
3.1 Initial Study/ Notice of Preparation/Data Collection 'i: . ">--'
. ,,.--~&. '
Initial Study<IS). The team will prepare a draft IS and provide five (5) copies for City review. One
set of revisions will be incorporated and a Final IS will be provided to the City and appended to the
Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Report (EA/EIR) document. The IS will also be
appended to the NOP.
NOP/Scoping Meetings. Prepare NOP and submit five (5) copies for City review. The team will
incorporate one set of revisions and submit a master copy and digital copy (PDF format with IS and
project map) of final NOP to the City for distribution.
The team will attend three (3) scoping meetings for the public and agencies. The team will assist
the City in the preparation of the scoping meetings by providing project summary information in
bullet format (for use in a PowerPoint presentation) and a visual display of the project area (aerial •
base map with the project boundary).
Data Collection. The team will utilize available information to minimize cost. Existing
documentation prepared for the project includes the current spring biological surveys prepared by
RECON (protocol level surveys for least Bell' s vireo and southwesterµ willow flycatcher and
vegetation mapping), the hydrologic report prepared by Rick Engineering (August 2000), and the
geotechnical investigations prepared by GEOCON Guly 2000; September 2002) and Ninyo and
Moore Ganuary 2004). As applicable, the team will incorporate in-house baseline data from the
Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) for the Cannon Road Reach 4 project.
The following is a description of the data sources to be used to provide regional characterizations
for each of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) issues to be assessed in the EA/EIR.
Biological Resources -A biological resources map will be developed using data from the
California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Designated Critical
Habitat, and the National Wetland Inventory. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be mapped
following EDA W's wetland delineation study for Calavera Creek. Wetland delineation for Agua
Hedionda Creek and vegetation mapping along Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks, including the
area between Cannon Road and El Camino Real bridges will be based on RE CON' s surveys
conducted in 2002 and spring of 2005.
4
Existing biological information is sufficient to serve as the basis of the biological resources section of
the'EA/EIR. To address additional biological analysis requirements, rare plant surveys and a
wetland delineation survey for Cannon Road will be conducted as part of a separate contract. Costs
for these surveys are npt included in this fee proposal. The findings of these additional analyses
will be provided in independent letter reports and summarized in the EA/EIR. Existing reports,
including the team's letter reports and previous survey work conducted by RE CON will be
provided as appendices to the EA/EIR.
Focused surveys for the light-footed clapper rail will be conducted within suitable marsh
vegetation habitats within the study area. A series of five surveys will be conducted,
following a methodology accepted by the USFWS. Surveys for light-footed clapper rail will
occur between February 15 and May 31. ,
Cultural Resources -The bottoms of both Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks, having been
repeatedly dredged, are unlikely to contain intact cultural sites. However, cultural deposits within
undisturbed sediments along the banks of these creeks could be affected by the stabilization efforts.
The team will conduct a records search, which will identify all previously recorded archaeological
resources within 1 mile ~f the project area. Following the records search, a qualified archaeologist
will examine areas subject to physical disturbance within the project area, including the drainage
banks. Identified cultural resources will be recorded in. standard Department of Parks and
Recreation format. The results of the records search and site investigation will be summarized in an
appropriately formatted EA/EIR section.
Land Use -The City of Carlsbad General Plan, zoning ordinances, the PEAR for Cannon Road
Reach 4, and other planning documents for the City of Carlsbad will be used to determine land use
compatibility and other land use related issues. Existing and planned land uses with the project
study area (approximately 1-mile radius) will be mapped on aerial base maps.
Water Resources -The best and condensed source of regional water resources and water quality
information is through Project Clean Water, which provides regional watershed management
planning and information resources. The Watershed Urban Runoff Management Plan for the
watershed in the study area that is disseminated through the website would be referenced for
information such as sensitive waters, predicted growth, pollutants of concern, resources requiring
protection, and other water resource issues. Local municipalities in concert with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) develop these plans. The plans address all current regulatory·
compliance needs, as well as holistic approaches to improving water quality. Other reference
documents will include the City of Carlsbad General Plan (1994), General Plan Master EIR (1994)
and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Plan.
Traffic and Transportation -Da~racterize existi~g and future traffic volumes in the study
area and condition of existing roadways , will be gathered from the City of Carlsbad traffic
engineering department and if1 appropriate, SANDAG's travel demand forecasting model and
regional growth projections. The proposed dredging and improvements are not expected to
generate significant traffic volumes and therefore, no traffic modeling is included in this scope.
Noise -Noise measurements will be obtained at up to three locations along the residences located
immediately adjacent to Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks to determine existing noise levels. A
5
discussion of potential noise sources during construction and estimated~ noise levels will be
described. Applicable planning documents, such as the Noise Element of the City's General Plan
will be used to determine the allowable noise limits of _particular areas. Noise sensitive land uses
will also be identified, including ~ospitals, schools, churches, and elder care facilities.
Air Quality -Regional air quality will be described using information from the San Diego Air
Pollution Control District's air quality monitoring network. Additional information may be
provided through the California Air Resources Board or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Visual Resources -In addressing potential impacts to visual resources local and state scenic
highway sources will be consulted, and sensitive receptors in the vicinity of Agua Hedionda Creek
and Calavera Creek will be descri,bed. El Camino Real has been designated a First Priority Scenic
Route in the_ San Diego County General Plan, and a Community Theme Corridor in the City of
Carlsbad General Plan. Applicable goals related to visual resources will be identified.
Geology and Soils -Information will be derived from published geologic literature and maps, such
as the Kennedy Maps showing geologic formations for the San Diego area, and U.S. Department of
Conservation Soil Survey Maps of San Diego County.
Paleontology -Analysis of paleontological resources will be based upon a review of the potential
for fossiliferous strata identified in published geologic literature and based on discussions with
paleontologists at the San Diego Natural History Museum.
Agricultural Resources -The existing study area is not expected to affect existing agricultural
resources since proposed dredging and maintenance activities will occur within a developed area.
Further analysis will be dismissed upfront in the IS evaluation.
Recreation -Data sources for recreation will include maps of existing recreation, park facilities, and
wildlife refuges within the study area. Plans for future recreation opportunities will be gathered
from the City of Carlsbad's General Plan.
3.2 Screencheck Draft EA/EIR
The EA/EIR will be prepared in compliance with the NEPA and CEQA.
The team will develop the necessary technical analyses for water resources, traffic and
transportation, noise, air quality, visual resources, geology and soils, paleontological resources, and
other environmental resources that could be affected by the proposed project. The technical
analyses developedin support of the EA/EIR will use industry accepted analysis and modeling
techniques and regulatory standards and guidelines. It is anticipated that several environmental
resource and issue areas will be identified as "Effects Not Found to Be Significant'' that do not
require further analysis, minimizing the complexity of the EA/EIR. These issue areas will be
addressed in the IS for the project, which will be appended to the EA/EIR.
The EA/EIR will include a concise Summary of the environmental analysis and an Introduction that
describes the environmental process for the reader. The existing environmental conditions will be
described, significance criteria clearly identified, and environmental consequer{ces analyzed with
6
~. ,..j
'V-" yy0v ? ~✓... r-t--1
regard to the significance criteria. Reasonable mitigation easures will ~roposed where
necessary and feasible to reduce impacts to below a 1 el of significance. The responsible agency
for implementation of each mitigation measure will be clearly identified. The EA/EIR will include
other mandatory sections as required by CEQA and NEPA, including potential growth-inducing
effects of the project and cumulative effects. The team will develop a draft Mitigation Monitoring
Reporting Program (MMRP) and recommends including this as a section in the Draft EA/EIR.
Two meetings will be held with the City during preparation of the screencheck documents.
3.3 aft otice of Availability (NOA)/Notice of Completion (NOC)/Public Review Process r ~P""" 2..-c. )?
(50) paper co ·es will be reproduced and 1 CD copy (PDF format and Word file) of the Draft
IR including app dices will be provided to the City. A camera-ready master copy will also
be p pared for the Ci use. A draft NOA will be prepared for review and distribution by the
City. e City will post th NOA at the Clerk's office for a 30-day period. The City will arrange to
publish e NOA in local ne papers. The City will be provided with fifteen (15) CD copies of the
Draft EA Rand fifteen (15) p er copies of the executive summary for submittal to the State
Clearinghou e. The team will p pare the NOC for the City's review and distribution to the State
Clearinghouse.
Following a 45-day public review period, the team will work with City staff to prepare respqnses to
comments. Letters and individual comments will be coded and a good-faith written response will
be prepared. The responses will be displayed in the Preliminary Final EA/EIR opposite the
comment, using corresponding coding
A MMRP will be prepared following comments received during the public review process.
Five (5) copies of the Draft Responses to Comments and MMRP will be submitted for the City's
review. One (1) round of revisions will be incorporated for the documents. Following the City's
review, twenty five (25) copies of the Final EA/E , ngs w1 e ared.
The Corps will be responsible for preparation the Findings of No Significance.
The team will attend tw0 meetings during preparab7"Tl"f"l+-#tif>-'F+n-::H~'F
and Findings.
TASK 4: ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Draft Conceptual Mitigation Plan
The primary environmental mitigation for the project will include mitigation for permanent and
temporary impacts to wetland and non-wetland waters of the U.S. under the jurisdictionof the
CORP and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). The RWQCB and California Coastal
Commission will also have review and approval authority over the project's proposed mitigation.
In accordance with resource agency guidelines, it is expected the wetland mitigation will occur
within the same watershed as the proposed project (i.e., Carlsbad Hydrologic Unit), and that some
of the mitigation will occur within the coastal zone to the extent feasible.
7
The primary objectives of the wetland mitigation for the Agua Hedionda and Calavera creek
channels are:
• Negotiate in a coordinated manner with the City to obtain agency approval for the minimum
amount of wetland mitigation necessary
• Work with City and agency staff to prepare a suite of alternative mitigation options for
consideration
• Identify the least expensive, preferred mitigation option that meets expectations of the City
and the agencies
• Prepare a clear and concise wetland mitigation plan including an implementation cost
estimate
• Manage the wetland mitigation task in an organized and efficient manner to accelerate
agency approval and permitting so that the dredging and improvement project is complete
on schedule, or ahead of schedule
Based on the project description in the RFP, a review of background documents, and a site visit
conducted by the team, it is estimated that dredging activities within Agua Hedionda Creek
(between Cannon Road and 3,100 feet upstream) would affect approximately 0.4 acre of willow
woodland, 0.2 acre of channel bank, and 2.6 acres of non-wetland waters ( open sandy channel). A
minimal amount of additional jurisdictional area may be temporarily impacted to gain access to the
dredging areas.
It is anticipated that 1 to 2 acres of wetland creation/restoration and approximately 2 to 5 or more
acres of wetland enhancement ( e.g., exotic plant removal) may be required as mitigation. The
Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (1999) indicates that the
mitigation requirement for wetland habitats is to achieve "no net loss" (minimum 1:1 replacement)
and that the "mitigation ratio varies by type of replacement habitat."
Five (5) copies of the draft conceptual mitigation plan will be submitted to the City for review.
Two sets of revisions will be incorporated prior to submittal of the plan to the r~source agencies.
4.2 Final Conceptual Mitigation Plan
As a cost-saving effort, the team will work together during the final project design to incorporate
design measures that minimize the wetland mitigation requirements and cost for potential offsite
mitigation. This can be accomplished by avoiding and minimizing impacts to jurisdictional areas
and implementing potential onsite mitigation to the extent feasible, while still meeting the dredging
and flood control needs of the project. For example, based on measurements in Agua Hedionda
Creek upstream of El Camino Real Bridge, willow woodland habitat areas within some of the outer
portions of the channel bed can be preserved while still dredging a 70-foot bottom width. Potential
onsite mitigation and restoration opportunities to be considered by the EDAW team and City staff
include:
-Establishing native riparian habitat on the Agua Hedionda Creek banks once the dredging is
complete creating,
-Managing volunteer wetland vegetation in Agua Hedionda Creek in years between dredging
maintenance cycles to remove nonnative exotics, and
8
-Restoring wetland/riparian along Calavera Creek as part of the bank stabilization and erosion
control work.
EDAW will work closely with City staff to identify and evaluate potential offsite mitigation
alternatives to select a mitigation alternative that is cost effective and meets the future mitigation
requirements agreed upon with the agencies. A number of potential wetland mitigation I opportunities exist. Since it would reduce the cost of mitigation, the first mitigat~on alternatives
that will be considered will be property owned by the City (e.g., San Marcos Creek) or property the
City may be considering purchasing. Other potential offsite mitigation alternatives include:
!
•Along Agua Hedionda Creek east of Rancho Carlsbad Golf Course and also south of Freeway 78
•Mitigation opportunities within Agua Hedionda Lagoon
•Potential mitigation bank in the Canyon de las Encinas drainage south of Palomar Airport Road
•Lake Val Sereno along Escondido Creek at which Wildlands, Inc. is attempting to establish a
mitigation bank now that The Environmental Trust no longer manages the site
Once the City approves use of a mitigation site approved by the resource agencies, EDA W will
prepare a mitigation plan that will include ongoing monitoring, in accordance with the RFP, to
ensure establishment of the vegetation. The plan will be prepared with sufficient detail to meet
resource agency expectations to complete project permitting. This scope does not include
preparation of mitigation site grading or landscape construction plans (i.e., bid documents),
although EDA W can provide mitigation construction plans upon request.
Five (5) copies of the final conceptual mitigation plan will be submitted to the City for review and
distribution. •
TASKS: FINAL ENGINEERING
5.1 Final Design Plans
The configuration of Aqua Hedionda Creek and,proposed repair work of Calavera Creek will be
finalized. Once all designs have been accepted and approved, bridge plans will be incorporated,
final plans and quantities will be developed.
5.2 Final Erosion Control Plan/SWPPP
Following review by the City, the team will incorpora!e final revisions and submit five (5)
copies of the final documents.
5.3 Final Estimates
Once all designs have been accepted and approved, final quantities will be developed.
5.4 Draft and Final Specifications
Final specifications package prepared in Green Book format will be submitted to the City.
9
5.5 Final Hydraulic Analysis
The Hydraulic analysis documentation and the hydraulic model will be prepared to conform to the
submittal requirements as outlined by FEMA. The hydraulic model and documentation will be
utilized as part of the submittal for the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
5.6 Final Basis of Design
The final Basis of Design report will detail the final alignment configurations, assumptions for the
hydraulic analysis, and recommendations for the Agua Hedionda Creek and Calavera Creek
dredging and flood control improvements. Proposed assumptions for enhancement and velocity
dissipation of the channel will be included.
5.7 QNQC
The project engineer will provide oversight and review for engineering-related tasks including
work associated with the structural bridge design.
TASK 6: PERMIT PROCESSING
The team will be responsible for supporting the City in preparing applications and processing the
following regulatory permits to implement the project:
• Individual permit for impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands from the Corps
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (404 permit);
• Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act (401 certification);
• Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) from the California Department of Fish and Game
pursuant to Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code; and
• Coastal Development Permit (CDP) from the City of Carlsbad pursuant to the California
Coastal Act.
The potential exists for least Bell's vireo, light-footed clapper rail, and southwestern willow
flycatcher to occur at the Agua Hedionda bridge crossing. Assuming the project "';"ill be designed in
conformance with the avoidance measures and habitat compensation guidelines in the City of
Carlsbad's Habitat Management Plan, these species will be covered under the Section 10a Take
Authorization Permit. Accordingly, this scope of work does not include formal consultation with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or California Department of Fish and Game •
(CDFG) regarding these or any other threatened or endangered species.
Task 6.1 Resource Agency Meetings/Coordination
The.overall approach to acquiring permits includes effective communication with agency staff to:
(1) help develop strategies and alternatives early in the process that will comply with regulatory
requirements, (2) identify acceptable mitigation so that mitigation concept plans are familiar to
agency staff prior to application submittal, and (3) ensure that the team is preparing all information
necessary to submit a complete application package in the initial submittal. Agency schedules
10
mandated by regulations are initiat_ed only once an application is considered complete, so
submitting a complete application is imperative to meet the aggressive schedule.
Tow_ard this end, the team will mee~ with agency staff starting early in the process and continue
through sub_mittal and processing (four meetings). Meetings will include one joint pre-application
meeting (Corps, RWQCB, and CDFG likely held at the CDFG offices); one joint agency field
meeting (also including c;ity staff charged with processing the CDP), and two meetings during
permit processing/negotiations.
Task 6.2 Resource Agency Permits
404 Individual Permit
Based on the meeting/coordination feedback and sensitive project design, a permit application will
be prepared and submitted to the Corps for an Individual 404 permit. To facilitate the process, a
Draft Public Notice and Draft 404(b)(l) alternatives analysis will be provided to the Corps. The
Corps will only issue the 404 permit once other permits are issued, specifically the 401 certification.
Although the application will be submitted simultaneously with other permits, this will be the last
permit to be obtained.
It is assumed that the Corps as the federal lead will coordinate with the California Coastal
Commission to obtain a Coastal Consistency Determination.
401 Certification
Based on the meeting/coordination feedback and sensitive project design, a permit application will
be prepared for the City's submittal to the RWCQB for the 401 Certification. Permit application
fees will be paid by the City and are not included in this cost estimate.
Str~ambed Alteration Agreement
Based on the meeting/coordination feedback and sensitive project design, one (1) application will be
prepared for the City's submittal to the CDFG. Permit application fees will be paid by the City and
are not included in this cost estimate.
Coastal Development Permit
A portion of the project footprint extends into the coastal zone. In the study area, the coastal zone
boundary is roughly contiguous with El Camino Real. As part of the project, dredging and
bridgework would occur at the El Camino Real and Cannon Road bridges, and in the channel
between the two bridges. A CDP from the City of Carlsbad must be obtained, although the permit
will be appealable to the California Coastal Commission.
The team will complete the CDP application. The City has noticing requirements for adjacent
property owners (within 600 feet) and residents (100 feet). The team will prepare the appropriate
noticing maps and address labels. The team assumes City staff will perform the actual distribution
with the labels provided.
11
TASK 7: FEMA PERMIT PROCESSING
Task 7.1 Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
The City will provide input files from the latest HEC-1 and HEC-RAS studies performed by
others. The team will evaluate the hydraulic alternatives and review a copy of the previously
approved Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Based on this information, the team
will generate a revised hydraulic analysis and model for a new submittal to secure an approved
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR).
Based on this available information, our team will prepare the necessary studies and applications
for submittal to FEMA with supporting documentation as follows:
1. Completed application forms
2. Narrative description of the project and submittal
3. Hydrologic Computations along with digital files of modeling output
4. Hydraulic Computations along with digital files of modeling output
5. Certified topographic map with floodplain and floodway delineations, if applicable
6. Annotated FIRMs, or FBFMs reflecting changes due to the project
7. Items required to satisfy any NFIP regulatory requirements
Our team will (a) provide all of the data used in determining the revised floodplain boundaries,
flood profiles, floodway boundaries, etc.; (b) provide all data necessary to demonstrate that the
physical modifications to the floodplain meet NFIP regulations, have been adequately designed
to withstand the impacts of the 1 % annual chance flood event, and will be adequately
maintained; and (c) demonstrate that the revised information (e.g., hydrologic and hydraulic
analyses and the resulting floodplain and floodway boundaries) is consistent with the effective
FIS information.
Task 7.2 Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)
Based on this available information, our team will prepare the necessary studies and applications
for submittal to FEMA with supporting documentation previously discussed under Task 7.1.
To s_atisfy FEMA requirements, our team will (a) provide all of the data used in determining the
revised floodplain boundaries, flood profiles, floodway boundaries, etc.; (b) provide all data
necessary to demonstrate that the physical modifications to the floodplain meet NFIP regulations,
have been adequately designed to withstand the impacts of the 1 % annual chance flood event,
and'will be adequately maintained; and (c) demonstrate that the revised information (e.g.,
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses and the resulting floodplain and floodway boundaries) is
consistent with the effective FIS information. The overall goal of the submittal is to receive a
letter from FEMA officially revising the current NFIP map (LOMR) to show changes to
floodplains, floodways, or flood elevations.
This fee proposal assumes FEMA application fees will be paid by the City and therefore, these costs
are not included in this proposal.
12
TASK 8: MAINTENANCE PLAN
8.1 Draft Maintenance Plan
The team will develop a Draft Maintenance Plan that identifies the scope and timing of summer
inspections as well as post-storm inspections during the winter season to identify potential
damage and asses.s whether repairs or maintenance is needed. To maximize efficiency, the plan
will incorporate these project-specific inspections within the scope of the City's current
maintenance program.
The maintenance plan will address sediment gauging and vegetation height monitoring via
measurement posts that will be installed to monitor sedimentation rates and the need for
vegetation management within the channel. The plan will provide trigger maintenance
indicators and other decision-making guidance that will provide straightforward direction .to
Public Works staff on various maintenance requirements to preserve flood control capacity while
managing sensitive environmental resources within the watercourses.
Five (5) copies of the draft Maintenapce Plan will be prepared for the City's review. Revisions
will be incorporated arid a draft Maintenance Plan will l?e incorporated to the EA/EIR.
8.2 Final Maintenance Plan
The Maintenance Plan will be described in the EA/EIR and submitted to the regulatory agencies
during the permit acquisition phase. Following agency review, a Final Maintenance Plan will be
prepared. Five (5) copies of the Final Maintenance Plan will be submitted. The frequency of
inspection is expected to be at least twice annually to determine damage and assess repairs.
Select vegetation may have to be removed annually while sediment removal may be tentatively
scheduled and performed every 3 years or as conditions warrant.
TASK 9: MEETINGS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT/COORDINATION
9.1 Meetings
A Kick off meeting will be held with the City following contract award and notice to proceed to
clarify expectations, identify the project data needs, outline schedule requirements, and establish
communication protocols ..
EDA W's project manager and technical staff (up to three persons) will attend a minimum of three
(3) meetings with City staff in the process of performing the work. These meetings are in addition
to the four (4) meetings plus three (3) scoping meetings identified under Task 3-Environmental
Analysis and Documentation. EDA W's project manager will prepare meeting notes for each
meeting attended. Meeting notes will be distributed to pertinent staff via e-mail; comments
provided will be incorporated in the final meeting notes.
9.2 Project Management/Coordination
EDA W's project manager will provide the day-to-day coordination with the project team and City
staff. A Project Management Plan (PMP) will be prepared through the use of a spreadsheet that
13
-
lists each work product's budget, document control, Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC),
team roles, and delivery dates. The PMP will specify a target endpoint of each rom1d of client and
agency review and projected resubmittal dates. The PMP will also provide deadlines for the
submittal of work products; it will specify the duration of review periods by agencies after their
agreement to these time frames. The Microsoft Project-based project schedule will be updated and
provided to the City's Project Manager.
TASK 10: CONTINGENCY
A contingency of $50,000 will be set aside to cover unforeseen tasks that may arise during project
implementation (e.g. additional fieldwork, studies, meetings, etc.). Use of the contingency funds
will require prior approval by the City.
14
Task3-
Submitted by: EDAW, Inc.
August 25, 2005 Task3:1 Task3,2 Task3.3 Task3.4 Total
Initial Study/NOP/Data Draft EA/EIR/Noticing/ Response to Comments
• Gathering Screencheck-Draft.EA/EIR Public Review Findings/Final EA/EIR mArr :a-. .. tl®fS.-tostsM aRounr 1Jri\'%~tostJ:-..
Environmental Principal $160.00 2 $320.00 2 $320.00 2 $320.00 2 $320.00 8 $1,280.00 ..
Environmental Senior Scientist $150.00 8 $1,200.00 40 $6,000.00 40· $6,000.00 4 $600.00 92 $13,800.00
Environmental Sr. Project Mgr. $130.00 8 $1,040.00 40 $5,200.00 24 $3,120.00 12 $1,560.00 84 $10,920.00
Environmental Engineer $100.00 24 $2,400.00 12 $1,200.00 4 $400.00 40 $4,000.00
Environmental Analyst $80.00 60 $4,800.00 100 $8,000.00 20 $1,600.00 20 $1,600.00 200 $16,000.00
Sr. Biologist I $120.00 7 $840.00 7 $840.00
Biologist I $80.00 60 $4,800.00 24 $1,920.00 12 $960.00 96 $7,680.00
Senior Cultural Resources Specialist $110.00 8 $880.00 4 $440.00 4 $440.00 16 $1,760.00
Staff Cultural Resources Specialist $75.00 40 $3,000.00 32 $2,400.00 8 $600.00 80 $6,000.00
Archaeological Technician $60.00 8 $480.00 4 $240.00 12 $720.00
rT"echnical Editor $85.00 2 $170.00 12 $1,020.00 8 $680.00 2 $170.00 24 $2,040.00
Word Processor $75.00 4 $300.00 20 $1,500.00 14 $1,050.00 2 $150.00 40 $3,000.00
GIS Specialist $90.00 4 $360.00 22 $1,980.00 12 $1,080.00 2 $180.00 40 $3,600.00
Graohic Artist $75.00 4 $300.00 22 $1,650.00 12 $900.00 2 $150.00 40 $3,000.00
[TOTAL EDAW LABOR 92 • $8,490.00 405 $38,070.00 • • 208 $20,950:00 74 $7,130.00 779 $74,640.00
$2;200.00 • $1,100.00 • $400.00 •
10% $220.00 $110.00 $40.00
$2,420.00 $1,210.00 $440.00
•. Cast .-i !IICO!f ~~f •
$25.00 $25.00 $85.00 $135.0
$50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $200.0
$50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $200.0
$20.00 $25.00 $80.00 $125.0
Record/Data Research $350.00 $350.0
Reprographics/Photo Copies $400.09 $1,400.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $5,000.
Project/Field Supplies $120.00 $120.
Mileage & Parking $0.405 120 $48.60 250 $101.25 250 $101.25 220 $89.10 840 $340.
Vehicle Use Rental at cost, Com an 4X4 $75 $75.00 4 $300.00 4 $300.00 2 $150.00 2 $150.00 12 $900.
PROJECT EXPENSES COST $893.60 $2,421.25 $2,616.25 $1,439.10 • $7,370.
EDAW MARKUP ON EXPENSES 10% $89.36 $242.13 $261.63 $143.91 $737.
OTAL PROJECT EXPENSES COST $982.96 $2,663.38 $2,877.88 $1,583.01 $8,107.
$11,892.96 $46,852.68 $25,037.88 $9,153.01
Task 4 -Environmental Mitigation
Submitted by: EDAW, Inc.
August 25, 2ops Task4.1 Task4.2 Total
Draft Conceptual Mitigation Final ·conceptual Mitigation
Plan Plan
Sil ~ ~-i" ,'~,S~t
Environmental Principal $160.00 4 $640.00 4 $640.00 8 $1,280.00
Environmental Sr. Project Mgr. $130.00 8 $1,040.00 8 $1,040.00 16 $2,080.00
Senior Biologist II $130.00 40 $5,200.00 20 $2,600.00 60 $7,800.00
Biologist II $95.00 80 $7,600.00 20 $1,900.00 100 $9,500.00
Technical Editor $85.00 2 $170.00 2 $170.00 4 • $340.00
Word Processor $75.00 4 $300.00 4 $300.00 8 $600.00
GIS Specialist $90.00 12 $1,080.00 8 $720.00 20 $1,800.00
Gra hie Artist $75.00 12 $900.00 4 $300.00 16 $1,200.00
TOTAL EDAW LABOR 162 $.16,930.00 70 • $7;670.00 232 $24,600.00
SAIC $2,000.00 $1,100.00 $3,100.00
SUB-CONSUL TANT COST • • $2,000.00 $1,100,00 , $3,1.00.00
EDAW MARKUP ON SUB-CONSULTANTS 10% $200.00 $110.00 $310.00
TOTAL SUB-CONSUL TANT COST $2,200.00 $1,210.00 $3,410.00
i ~ .
Phone/Fax/Pagers $25.00 $25.00 $50.00
Equipment Rental $50.00 $50.00 $100.00
Maps/Film/Photos $85.00 $85.00
Record/Data Research $250.00 $250.00
Reprographics/Photo Copies $150.00 $20.00 $170.00
Project/Field Supplies $75.00 $75.00
Mileage & Parking $0.405 300 $121.50 120 $48.60 420 $170.10
Vehicle Use (Rental at cost, Company 4X4 $75) $75.00 2 $150.00 1 $75.00 3 $225.00
PROJECT EXPENS_ES COST $906.50 $218.60 $1,125.10
EDAW MARKUP ON EX.PENSES 10% $90.65 $21.86 $112.51
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSES COST $997.15 $240.46 $1,237.61
llfOTAL: EDAW LABOR& OTHERDIRECT COSTS $20,127.15! $9,120:461 . $29,247.6111
ASSUMPTIONS:
Task 6 -Permit Processing
Submitted by: EDAW, Inc.
Augusf25, 2005
Environmental Principal
Environmental Senior Scientist
Environmental Sr. Project Mgr.
Environmental Analyst
Senior Biologist II
echnical Editor
rd Processor
pecialist
hie Artist
LEDAWLABOR
N SUB-CONSULTANTS
Phone/Fax/Pagers
Couriers/Postage
Maps/Film/Photos
Reprographics/Photo Copies
Mileage & Parking
Vehicle Use Rental at cost, Com an 4X4 $75
PROJECT EXPENSES COST
EDAW MARKUP ON EXPENSES
OTAL PROJECT EXPENSES COST
llfOTAL EDAW·LABOR & OTHER DIRECT COSTS
ASSUMPTIONS:
$160.00
$150.00
$130.00
$80.00
$130.00
$85.00
$75.00
$90.00
$75.00
10%
$0.405
$75.00
10%
Task 6.1 Task6:2
Resource Agency
Meetin· Coordination
404, 401, Streambed Alteration
l~lti.111
4 $640.00
40 $6,000.00
36 $4,680.00
8
88
280
$1,040.00
$12,360.00
.l_<iif •
$25.00
$40.00
$50.00
$70.00
$113.40
$75.00
$373.40
$37.34
$410.74
$19,310.14L
A reement, CDP Permits
16
4
6
6
3
. 95
$4,800.00
$3,120.00
$1,280.00
$340.00
$450.00
$540.00
$225.00
$11,395.00 .
$200.00
$20.00
$220.00
$11,615.001·
Total
72
60
16
8
4
6
6
3
183
280
., '
$1,280.0
$10,800.0
$7,800.0
$1,280.0
$1,040.0
$340.0
$450.0
$540.0
$225.0
$23,755.0
$90.0
$65.0
$100.0
$130.0
$113.4
$75.0
$573.4
$57.3
$630.7
$30,985.741
Task 9 -Meetings/Project Management
Submitted by: EDAW, Inc.
August ~5, 2005
Environmental Principal
Environmental Sr. Project Mgr.
Environmental Analyst
Senior Biolo isl II
TOTAL EDAW LABOR
Brown & Caldwell
SUB-CONSUL TANT COST
EDAW MARKUP ON SUB-CONSULTANTS
TOTAL SUB-CONSULTANT COST
Phone/Fax/Pagers
Couriers/Postage
10%
Mileage & Parking $0.405
Vehicle Use Rental at cost, Com an 4X4 $75 $75.00
PROJECT EXPENSES,COST .
EDAW MARKUP ON EXPENSES 10%
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSES COST
TOTAL EDAW LABOR & OTHER DIRECT COSTS
ASSUMPTIONS:
Task 9.1 Task9.2
Project
4 $640.00 8 $1,280.00
40 $5,200.00 24 $3,120.00
8 $640.00
8 $1,040.00
44 $5,840.00 48 $6,"080.00
$75.00
$7.50
$82.50
$5,922.50
---------------
2
• $9,527.40
TotaJ
12 1,920.00
64 $8,320.00
8 $640.00
8 $1,040.00
92 $11,920.00
2