HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCUP 08-24; NEXTEL CA6430F ESCONDIDO CREEK; Admin Decision Letter• • FILE COPY 7•<D•o~ City of Carlsbad
I 4 Fi,,,, •• ,~■-J§ GEM ii; ,14;11
July 6, 2009
Nextel Communications
6391 Sprint Pkwy.
Overland Pk., KS 66251
SUBJECT: MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. MCUP 08-24 -NEXTEL
ESCONDIDO CREEK -Request to allow the continued operation of a wireless
communication facility located at 7730 Rancho Santa Fe Road (Rancho La Costa Village
Shopping Center), in the C-L Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
Dear Nextel,
The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a Minor Conditional Use
Permit (MCUP 08-24) for the continued operation of a wireless communication facility
consisting of 12 antennas mounted on the north, south, and west walls of a commercial
building and located behind RF transparent screens that match the building and eight (8)
equipment cabinets located on the roof and hidden within the existing cupola located at
7730 Rancho Santa Fe Road. A notice was sent to property owners within a 300' radius of the
subject property-requesting comments regarding the above request. No comments were
received within the ten day notice period (ending on March 10, 2009) and a request for an
Administrative Hearing was not filed. After careful consideration of the facts set forth in the
application, and a review of the project's consistency with City Council Policy No. 64, the
Planning Director . has determined that the four findings required for granting a Minor
Conditional Use Permit can be made and therefore, APPROVES this request based on the
following findings and conditions.
Findings:
1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community,
and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan,
including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan in
that the Local Shopping Center (L) Land Use designation does not preclude the
provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) uses. To minimize their
visibility, the existing WCF antennas are mounted on the north, south, and west
walls of a commercial building and located behind RF transparent screens that
match the building and the radio equipment racks are concealed within an
existing cupola. The WCF is consistent with the City Council Policy No. 64
Wireless Communication Facilities, in that the WCF is located in a preferred
Commercial Zone location and has stealth design. The project's location and
stealth design also enable the project to comply with the General Plan objectives
that seek to maintain and enhance Carlsbad's appearance.
1635 Faraday Avenue° Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314" (760) 602-4600., FAX (760) 602-8559 "'www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
• ••
MCUP 08-24 -NEXTEL ESCONDIDO CREEK
July 6, 2009
Page 2
2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the existing
WCF Will not result in any additional building coverage to the existing site and
does not interfere with nor is it visible to other surrounding uses.
3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer
areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required
by the Planning Director in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood in that the WCF is existing and no modifications ar.e being proposed.
The original approval of the use (CUP 03-24) was granted on March 3, 2004.
4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use in that the existing unmanned WCF use would
require, on average, only one monthly maintenance visit and occasional visits in
response to _operational problems.
5. That the proposed WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64 in that the
existing WCF is located in the Loc~I Shopping Center Zone (C-L) and concealed
within the walls and cupola of an existing building. The Policy identifies the City's
commercial zones as preferred locations for· WCFs. Also, the panel antennas are
mounted behind RF transparent material screen that has been painted and
textured to match the existing building surface. The eight equipment cabinets are
roof mounted and screened by the cupola and are not visible from public view.
Furthermore, the applicant, as part of the application provided an updated RF
study, which shows that the level of RF Emissions exposure does not exceed
applicable FCC Maximum Permissible Exposure limits and, therefore, complies
with the FCC RF Exposure Guidelines.
6. That the Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects
that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the
environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for ,he
preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301 -Existing Facility,
of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the Planning Director has
found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not
apply to this project.
7. The Planning Director has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case that the exactions are
imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the
extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by
the project.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for MCUP 08-24 as shown on Exhibits "A" -"G" dated July 6,
2009 on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by reference.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
MCUP 08-24 -NEXTEL ES.DIDO CREEK
July 6, 2009
Page 3
•
2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on
the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit.
•,
3. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and
hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents,
and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands,
claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising,
directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Conditional
Use Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary ·or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility
of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
4. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
ordinances in effect at the time of approval.
5. MCUP 0~-24 shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if
all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial
_negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general
welfare. If the Planning Director determines that: 1) the minor conditional use permit
was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval is
granted is not being exercised; or 3) the conditions of approval have not been met; or 4)
the minor conditional use permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any
of the terms or conditions of approval; or 5) the use for which such approval was
granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 6) the use
is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 7) the use permitted by the
minor conditional use permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance, the Planning
Director shall hold an informal public hearing and after providing the permittee the
opportunity to be heard, the planning director may revoke and terminate the minor
conditional use permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the minor conditional use permit,
modify the conditions or impose new conditions.
6. Developer/Operator shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's
guidelines on limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields.
Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, and with any time extension or
amendment request, the Developer/Operator shall submit to the Planning Director either
(1) verification that the project is categorically excluded from having to determine
compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1); or (2) a project
implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of RF emissions
of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the RF emissions
and compare the results with the exposure limits established by the FCC guidelines.
Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director for
• • MCUP 08-24 -NEXTEL ESCONDIDO CREEK
July 6, 2009
Page4
consistency with the Project's preliminary report on RF exposure submitted with the
initial project application and for consistency with the FCC guidelines. If on review, the
City finds that the Project does not meet the FCC guidelines, the City may revoke or
modify this conditional use permit.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of ten (10) years retroactively from
March 3, 2009 to March 2, 2019. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public
hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding
land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not
been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period o{ time not to exceed
ten (10) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior
to the expiration date. The Planning Director may not grant such extension, unless
he/she finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or
the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses
or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with
conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to
the number of extensions the Planning Director may grant.
8. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address
change from that which is shown on the permit application.
Engineering:
9. Developer shall comply With .the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include
but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent
silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and
educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or
devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water
or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable.
10. Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment
Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF,
Developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form
and Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the
completed PTAF all to the s·atisfaction··of the City Engineer. •
Code Reminders:
12. Approval of this request shall not excµse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
MCUP 08-24 -NEXTEL ES&DIDO CREEK
July 6, 2009
Page 5
NOTICE
•
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions.
If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code
Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager
for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES ·IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
This decision may be appealed by you or any other member of the public to the Planning
Commission within ten days of the date of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to
the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of
$440.00. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the
order of the Planning Director until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If
you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Chris Sexton at (760)
602-4624.
Since ly
GAR T. BARBERIO
Assistant Planning Director
GTB:DH:lt
,.
c: Walt Ordemann, SQ., LLC, 108 Kings Ct, San Carlos, CA 94070
Michele Masterson
Chris DeCerbo
Glen Van Peski
Linda Ontiveros
File Copy
Data Entry