The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMCUP 09-08; T-MOBILE SD06382 GRAND PACIFIC RESORTS; RADIO FREQUENCY AND POWER DENSITY SPECIFICATIONS; 2009-04-02Darrell W. Daugherty PLAN com fuc. 302 State Place JERROLD T. BUSHBERG Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM ♦HEALTH AND MEDICAL PHYSICS CONSULTING♦ 7784 Oak Bay Circle Sacramento, CA 95831 (800) 760-8414-jbushberg@hampc.eom Escondido, California 92029-1362 Introduction April 2, 2009 At your request, I have reviewed the technical specifications and calculated the maximum cumulative radiofrequency, (RF), power density from the proposed T-Mobile (TM) wireless telecommunications site, (referenced as SD-06382A), to be located at Grand Pacific Resorts, 5805 Armada Dr., Carlsbad, California together with measured existing RF exposures at the site as depicted in attachment one. This proposed TM telecommunication site will consist of a Personal Communications Services (PCS) wireless facility. The facility will utilize directional transmit panel antennae configured in three (3) sectors. The antennae are planned to be mounted on the inside face of the cupola tower walls on the subject building with their center at least 40.75 feet above grade directed at 30 (sector A), 110 (sector B) and 320 (sector C) degrees true north. The antennas specified are Andrew model# TMBX-65 l 6R2M for all sectors. Technical specifications of these antennae are provided in attachment two. The sectorized antennas are designed to transmit with an effective radiated power (ERP) ofup to 800 watts per sector within a bandwidth between approximately 1,850 and 1,990 MHz. Site measurements were made to included all existing ambient sources of RF exposures including the contribution from existing wireless facilities near the proposed site. This information was used together with a worst case (i.e., conservative) calculation of the RF exposure from the proposed wireless facility to determine compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements for RF public exposure safety. The maximum cumulative RF exposure from both the proposed facility and all existing RF sources in the area are provided in this report. RF Exposure Measurement Methods & Results The measurements at the subject property and the surrounding area were made in the morning on March 18, 2009 utilizing a Narda Industries model 8718B broadband exposure meter (serial number 6062)with an associated frequency shaped B8742D probe (serial number 08002). Weather conditions during the measurement period were fair and the temperatures were moderate. Outdoor measurements were made at locations of highest potential public exposure and surrounding area. All measurements were made in 1 accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations as provided in their users guide for this instrument. This included an RF response check to assure that the meter and probe were responding appropriately to an RF energy source. This response check was performed immediately before and after the site measurements and, along with other operational parameters, were found to be operating normally as specified by the manufacturer. In addition, all environmental operating conditions, as specified by the manufacturer for this instrument, were satisfied. The probe and meter were calibrated by the manufacturer with standards traceable to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on August 23, 2007. In accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, the next calibration will be due prior to August 23, 2009. The Narda meter/probe combination senses fields within the frequency range from 300 kHz to 3 GHz and indicates exposure as a percentage of the FCC public exposure standard. The dynamic range of the instrument is between 0.6% and 600% of the FCC public exposure standard. For PCS frequencies, this response range equates to a power density range between6 µW/cm2 and 6 mW/cm2. Reading obtained below 0.6% MPE are reported as the minimum range of the instrument (i.e., 0.6% MPE). The data supplied by the manufacturer sets the frequency response of the probe as± 1 dB and calibration accuracy and isotropicity as± 0.5 dB and ± 1 dB respectively. The probe is isotropic, meaning that it can directly measure the strength of complicated fields independent of the orientation, polarization, or arrival angle. Measurements were made from ground level to head height ( ~6 feet) above the ground. The probe was swept over approximately ± 3 feet to avoid destructive interference thus assuring the highest power density was being measured at a given location. A continuous observation of the exposure allowed the location of the maximum power densities to be determined. During the survey the meter displayed RF exposure levels between 0.1955 and 0.4523 % of the FCC public exposure safety standard. Thus the maximum environmental RF exposure measurement result, at all locations, was recorded as less than 0.6% of the FCC public exposure safety standards for continuous exposure. In so far as it was not possible to determine if all antennae at the site were transmitting at maximum power during the measurements, a conservative multiple of five ( 5) was applied to all reading in order to assure that maximum potential exposures would not exceed the values provided in this report. Even with the conservative multiple of five applied to the measured value (i.e., 0.6%) the exposures would still be below the public MPE (i.e., 3.0%). Calculation Methodology, Results & Recommendations Calculations were made in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 (edition 97-01, page 24, equation 10 ) entitled "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields." Several assumptions were made in order to provide the most conservative or "worse case" projections of power densities. Calculations were made assuming that all channels were operating simultaneous I y at their maximum design effective radiated power. Attenuation ( weakening) of the signal that would result from surrounding foliage or buildings was ignored. Buildings can reduce the signal strength by a factor of 10 (i.e., 10 dB) or more depending upon the construction material. The ground or other surfaces were considered to be perfect reflectors ( which they are not) and the RF energy was assumed to overlap and interact constructively at all locations (which they would not) thereby resulting in the calculation of the maximum potential exposure. In fact, the accumulations of all these very conservative assumptions will 2 significantly overestimate the actual exposures that would typically be expected from such a facility. However, this method is a prudent approach that errs on the side of safety. The maximum public RF exposure from the TM facility was calculated to be less than 3.5 µ W/cm2 (i.e., ~0.4% of the public safety standard. Exposure details are shown in appendix A. Thus, the maximum cumulative exposure from both the proposed facility and existing RF sources will be less than 3.4% of the public safety standard. A sign conforming to with ANSI C95.2 color, symbol and content, and other markings as appropriate, should be placed close to the antennas with appropriate contact information in order to alert maintenance or other workers approaching the antenna to the presence of RF transmissions and to take precautions to avoid exposures in excess of FCC limits. RF Exposure Standards The two most widely recognized standards for protection against RF field exposure are those published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95.l and the National Council on Radiation Protection and measurement (NCRP) report #86. The NCRP is a private, congressionally chartered institution with the charge to provide expert analysis of a variety of issues ( especially health and safety recommendations) on radiations of all forms. The scientific analyses of the NCRP are held in high esteem in the scientific and regulatory community both nationally and internationally. In fact, the vast majority of the radiological health regulations currently in existence can trace their origin, in some way, to the recommendations of the NCRP. All RF exposure standards are frequency-specific, in recognition of the differential absorption of RF energy as a function of frequency. The most restrictive exposure levels in the standards are associated with those frequencies that are most readily absorbed in humans. Maximum absorption occurs at approximately 80 MHz in adults. The NCRP maximum allowable continuous occupational exposure at this frequency is 1,000 µ W/cm2• This compares to 5,000 µ W /cm2 at the most restrictive of the PCS frequencies ( ~ 1,800 MHz) that are absorbed much less efficiently than exposures in the VHF TV band. The traditional NCRP philosophy of providing a higher standard of protection for members of the general population compared to occupationally exposed individuals, prompted a two-tiered safety standard by which levels of allowable exposure were substantially reduced for "uncontrolled " ( e.g., public) and continuous exposures. This measure was taken to account for the fact that workers in an industrial environment are typically exposed no more than eight hours a day while members of the general population in proximity to a source of RF radiation may be exposed continuously. This additional protection factor also provides a greater margin of safety for children, the infirmed, aged, or others who might be more sensitive to RF exposure. After several years of evaluating the national and international scientific and biomedical literature, the members of the NCRP scientific committee selected 931 publications in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on which to base their recommendations. The current NCRP recommendations limit continuous public exposure at PCS frequencies to 1,000 µ W/cm2, and to 200 µ W /cm2 for the most restrictive frequencies ( e.g., VHF TV band). 3 The 1992 ANSI standard was developed by Scientific Coordinating Committee 28 (SCC 28) under the auspices of the fu.stitute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). This standard, entitled "IEEE Standards for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz" (IEEE C95.l-1991), was issued in April 1992 and subsequently adopted by ANSI. A revision of this standard (C95.l-2005) was completed in October 2005 by SCC 39-the IEEE fu.temational Committee on Electromagnetic Safety. Their recommendations are similar to the NCRP recommendation for the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) to the public at cellular and PCS frequencies (410 µW/cm2 and 950 µW/cm2 for continuous exposure at 820 MHz and 1,900 MHz respectively) and incorporates the convention of providing for a greater margin of safety for public as compared with occupational exposure. Higher whole body exposures are allowed for brief periods provided that no 30 minute time-weighted average exposure exceeds these aforementioned limits. On August 9, 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established a RF exposure standard that is a hybrid of the current ANSI and NCRP standards. The maximum permissible exposure values used to assess environmental exposures are those of the NCRP (i.e., maximum public continuous exposure at PCS frequencies of 1,000 µ W / cm2 ) . The FCC issued these standards in order to address its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to consider whether its actions will "significantly affect the quality of the human environment." In as far as there was no other standard issued by a federal agency such as the Environmental Protection Agency (BP A), the FCC utilized their rulemaking procedure to consider which standards should be adopted. The FCC received thousands of pages of comments over a three-year review period from a variety of sources including the public, academia, federal health and safety agencies ( e.g., EPA & FDA) and the telecommunications industry. The FCC gave special consideration to the recommendations by the federal health agencies because of their special responsibility for protecting the public health and safety. In fact, the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values in the FCC standard are those recommended by BP A and FDA. The FCC standard incorporates various elements of the 1992 ANSI and NCRP standards which were chosen because they are widely accepted and technically supportable. There are a variety of other exposure guidelines and standards set by other national and international organizations and governments, most of which are similar to the current ANSI/IEEE or NCRP standard, figure one. The FCC standards "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation" (Report and Order FCC 96-326) adopted the ANSI/IEEE definitions for controlled and uncontrolled environments. In order to use the higher exposure levels associated with a controlled environment, RF exposures must be occupationally related ( e.g., PCS company RF technicians) and they must be aware of and have sufficient knowledge to control their exposure. All other environmental areas are considered uncontrolled (e.g., public) for which the stricter (i.e., lower) environmental exposure limits apply. All carriers were required to be in compliance with the new FCC RF exposure standards for new telecommunications facilities by October 15, 1997. These standards applied retroactively for existing telecommunications facilities on September 1, 2000. The task for the physical, biological, and medical scientists that evaluate health implications of the RF data base has been to identify those RF field conditions that can produce harmful biological effects. No panel of experts can guarantee safe levels of exposure because safety is a null concept, and negatives are not susceptible to proof. What a dispassionate scientific assessment can offer is the presumption of safety when RF-field conditions do not give rise to a demonstrable harmful effect. 4 Summary & Conclusions This proposed wireless facility, as specified above, will be in full compliance with FCC RF public safety standards. Wireless PCS and cellular transmitters, by design and operation, are low-power devices. Even under maximal exposure conditions, in which all the channels from all antennae are operating at full power, the maximum cumulative exposure from the proposed TM facility, together with existing RF sources, will not result in exposures in excess of3.4% of the public safety standard at anypublically accessible location. This maximum exposure is more than 29 times lower than the FCC public exposure standards for these frequencies. A chart of the electromagnetic spectrum and a comparison of RF power densities from various common sources is presented in figures two and three respectively in order to place exposures from wireless telecommunications systems in perspective. It is important to realize that the FCC maximum allowable exposures are not set at a threshold between safety and known hazard but rather at 50 times below a level that the majority of the scientific community believes may pose a health risk to human populations. Thus, the previously mentioned maximum exposure from the site represents a "safety margin" from this threshold of potentially adverse health effects of more than 1,470 times. Given the low levels of radiofrequency fields that would be generated from this facility, and given the evidence on biological effects in a large data base, there is no scientific basis to conclude that harmful effects will attend the utilization of the proposed wireless telecommunications facility. This conclusion is supported by a large numbers of scientists that have participated in standard-setting activities in the United States who are overwhelmingly agreed that RF radiation exposure below the FCC exposure limits has no demonstrably harmful effects on humans. These findings are based on my professional evaluation of the scientific issues related to the health and safety of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and my analysis of the technical specification as provided by TM. The opinions expressed herein are based on my professional judgement and are not intended to necessarily represent the views of any other organization or institution. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Jerrold T. Bushberg Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM Diplomate, American Board of Medical Physics (DABMP) Diplomate, American Board of Science in Nuclear Medicine (DABSNM) Enclosures: Figures 1-3; Attachments 1&2; Appendix A, and Statement of Experience. 5 Public Safety Exposure Standards at PCS (r--.Jl,800 MHz)Frequencies 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 *International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA)/ World Health Organization Environmental Health (WHO) Public Safety Exposure Standard (1993). Members of the Scientific Committee were from: • Australia • Canada • France • Germany • Hungary • Italy • Poland • Russia • United Kingdom • United States **International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Public Safety Exposure Standard (1998). Members of the Scientific Committee were from: • Australia • Sweden • France • Germany • Hungary • Finland • Italy • Poland • Austria • United Kingdom • United States • Japan Figure 1 Non Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NI/EMR) : +-Ionizing Electromagnetlc ➔ 1 Radiation Wireless } PCS ~ l ,CX>0 lVIHz Power Line Communication Cellular ~ 900 MHZ 60 Hertz Services I I Vlslble I Televlslon light 1 ~L ~ Ultra- /'\.. Microwaves . vlolet "-~-•~-"~..,," ---...... ~ Tir ~ Electric and Medical diagnosis and therapy Q;O [J;P Magnetic Radio & TV waves Infra-red Ultra-+-X-rays -+ Cosmic violet Rays Fields The Electromagnetic Spectrum Figure 2 ······························································································································································~--- Typical Exp osure from Various Ra dio Frequency I Microwave Sources 350 N e 300 -~ ..._ ~ ..... 250 ..... ~ ~ 0 200 ~ ~ •11"'1 =s 150 = ·-Q) Q) ~ 100 = ~ 0 ~ 50 ~ ~ 0 250 Police and Mobile Radio FM Radio Station Transmitters CB Mobile Radio Outside Microwave Oven Cordless Phone Figure 3 1 1 0.1 Baby Typical Max. T picaJ _PCS Monitor Public Public Exposure Exposure in from a PCS Neighborhood Transmission Site .................................................................................................................................................................. Attachment 1 Site Specifications ■ ·Mobile· SD063B2A GRAND PACIFIC RESORTS 5805 ARMADA DRIVE,, CARLSBAD,, CA 92008 i>TA"-T4TIC)[b0Tft.f515CT,5A.NOl!C.0,0.<1212\ I IITAIITOJT~ll!!.SO!JTIIONTfLf51SCTTOWARDW51:BI.YD 2TUR'IRIQ.!TlltlT0WSO::SL.V0 07MI 3 TIJRNt.!FrONTOVIS'i'ASOUMO~, O&MI 4 MUCiE CNTO l•&:15 N 16MI '1-~ N e=t1' l•~N 1~•n1 6 TM! TM! !'AI.O"IAR AtRl"ORT ~ £XIT, D'IT ~ 05 Ml 7 TURNIIIGMTO.TOPAI.ClMAltAIRl'llURO/Cll•Sl2! O<IMI ~ T~:!L~Tll~TO a:o~~~! c:3 ~~ Ml AAl!1Vt AT~ AA?'.4DA t)l;I G,\.ll'LSaAD, CA '12«e·4'0'! : DIRECTIONS TO SITE : AI.L ),OU $'11.U. COl?l.l' l<IITII J.l.l,. Al"NCA!M C.00!5 NCWO<'G &Jr NO'l"LJM1HOTO, CALIFORNIA. B\IJUll/lC, COO! • mt (P/l!I.T ' Of TITI.! 1~) lALlfORNl,\ /'LUl'",!11).(; GOO! • ,007 (PART 3 CJ! nnt 2~} CA.l.!f~rA rm:UAMCAI. COO! -2007 (l'.UT 4 Of TITU! ~4, CAt.!fORNIA!L!CTR<CA\.COO!•:IC07{PJJlT50fTITI.!24J CALlfa,tNIAfiR!COO! •20/11(PARTqOfTITL!24) LI~! 5Al'fTY COD! • N f PA IOI • l<\M I l<!ql NATIOAAI..COJNClLOHAADIATIQ'IPROTtCTIO"lANDM!A$1..1Rtl1~TS•"4 R~Lf5 ANO Rfl:UI.ATIClf',S OF PRWAT[ ,l,\D N&:.K: vnums .lMUICAI, I NATIOIW.STAADAJIDSIHSTITIITE(.lN51) IO .t.J'lE!i.lCAMSO::IETTOFTESTiMiMATVIIAl.5(ASTM} 11 f!DfRAI.SP!CIF1CAT1CNS (fED SPEC) 12 UND?R,,I.RITfRSLA.eOFIATORl!S 13 NAT10AAl..1'1RfPllOT!CTIOHASSOCIAT10'l(tll'PAJ (A!lAIXlPTfD!IYTII! STATfAG~!SJ APPLICABLE CODES !~~UMBER APPLICANT CMNll'o.NT~ICATICN5,0c!A T•MO!lt.!U!IA,INC I0160ffifSISCTSU1T!S,! SJ.HDIEOO, CA'l:2121 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 211•022•24 CURRENT ZONING C•T•O/C•2•Q ~:1 ~~G 5~CUPANCY• (E) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. TTP! V•I loll!: SPRll«LfR!O TELECOMMUNICATION ~ NOOfMERCIJ,RENTLY t..0CATEDGWT!!l551Tf LANDLORD CONTACT CARI.SEW> PACl~C RESORT LI.C ~AYENIDA[l,(,M5•20d, CAA:LS!lAD,CA~ rn.,c,1qJ&21••'M T•MOBILE CONTACT CONTACT,Di!Al!SISl(()HSO:I Ttl.{M&J»Mll7 APPLICANT KRYSTALPATTfASOH P~,l'-C »:ISTATfl'LAC! ~~ftr~LE PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONO[IQNAL US§ PERMIT T•l'IO!!IL!l'IIR!U!SSPROl"OS!STOCCr,rrn,rueroo,>WTf»IO MAlllrJ.1NAIIIIWWC.ED,DllolTAl.l'l001LfJU,DIOcc:v,.m1CATIGl'l'S fACILITTATTWl5$1TtTllf(E)fACIUTYC0.515T50fTMIIEE{lJ lt.lDIOeASESTAnc:t.S(RDSJLO;;ArfOOHTMEROOl"Of'AN(EJ lWO &TORY !1\/11.Cllr-ci Q,lf 2102 RllS CA.lllNtT TO 6! IW'LACEI' l'IITUA(NJ!l°'CA9,N!T(!J5D((')PANl!LANT~!ITO!l! Rff'I.AC!D WITII (NJ PAim. AIITV..'<AS MOOWI (TMllX•'515·R2MJ : PROJECT SUMMARY : ARCHITECT lNITtALS CONSTRUCTION INITIALS: OAIC DAI( SITE ACOUlStTION INITIALS LANDLORD INITIALS; CLIENT APPROVALS ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS M!TO,!U.JARO.,IT!CTUR! 4Ul ROl',SON COJRT, SUIT~ N 5.1.NOiEGO,U.~2111 TES(&!ie)~•3130 fAX,(e~J6~Mi-40 CDITACT AATe.~(PROJfCTM.<..'11,~f!;t) CONSULTANT TEAM ACCESSISII IIX Pt5CLA!M~B TMIS P/IOJECT IS AN I.INOCCIJPIED ~IRfLf5i:> T!LECGn".uNlc:ATION5f.AC.1UTYAAD,ACG01101NGT01','1.lfTEN U-ITVIPR!TATiai fACM '!lit CAl.lfON<.l,\ D!PAATl'IENT CJ! I">'! :J~~~~~C":T, 15 EXm>T "1'1'1 01~!0 .lCC!M, ROOf' Pt.AHA.\-0 fi.EYATIOII ARCl-!1t!CTURAI.OtTAILS SHEET INDEX <.) <.) .<:: 0 Pinn Check No: 7 LOT2 H2r;:-M'• -- Plan Check No: ] s isl ! ffi ~ en ; "'I ~"' ~ § ::! i rnmm rn m m ~ i ~ij ~i ~!'i ~ ~ I ~ ~ t en "'I ~ lmlffilml ■ i m1m1m m1m1m 2:~~ri' "Ui , ~· t,~ e~iE ~~"i Ii; •a• ijp ~fe2 ~a~ im :: ~ii~ ~-!i••· a~ ~~j• i~ ;i,~ t£ t:}~ ·"'" ... ~~i! a~ p. ! -!~ I I I I I I I I m1m1m ~2e :~~ ijij~ a l 111 1 11 111 1 11 m~ I ~¥~~ : mm nu L_r_ igi m ii -~~! ¾-------''c-----==='~=~--~---.f ni ! p ~ ~~ -il :E::X:::'T':E::R._IC>:R. :E:~:E:---v'" _p,_,._ 'T'IC>:r--;r:S _.& f I ll-1 i l -.-''% ',r,'1",, ,,-:,;,,,:'A' '< ,I'm{' I ' , m',b',,' ·1' , I M w;,;.,';';;;,,,oru.-, f.c'' ,., ~~gF!ll_E!l~ "£.0·~~ 1 e· , ·1 ~:~~:~-~":_, ... , 580S A.R.lv.lA.DA .OR.IVE SAN Dlr>Oo. CA 92121 Jfltl'Jk-U J =:"-~-""''"----~ CARLSBAD, CA 5>2008 • .. •• · _ .... -... -.--•=-~.!!_-. a r C h i I C C t U r C :ttifCf1t,ll J a r C h i t C C l ll r C :2e ~u ~~ / / / / ( I I I I I I I I I I I / / / / / / / / r-----------' II~ (oJsocr, ~/>/r"N¾fl'A• : "-<IMlfrHJo~ I I I I \ l ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' (£:) T-MO!l•~! AIIUIIIIA5 i.oc~no 11~110 CUl'lll.AWA\.~5, (iYP1 A'ITU..""-5 P~R 5~C~• '-Al'IT~""-5 TOTA\.) ' ' ' ' ' @~!',~-~.#!-GED ROOF PLAN (f}T•r'.celUA.'ITU.'U!i=TfO ll~tllO CIJPGU.l'W.t.S, (TYi'~ .t.NTC,..'iASr!Jl.5~10R•'-.t.NT~10TAI.) ([}T•MC:611.!l!TSUUl'mHT CA81Nf:l"TOMRfl'LACUIHfll,I (NJ'Rll5~10''~fTl"<::!.NT!:O ONMICIIOl'UCT!iU!!-llA5t (f)PA!W'fT [SE] e (E) T•MOBI\.! fOU1PMfNT CABINITS o.trSIOf(!)CUl'(U.T""!ll @~1',!J!,l!,'L WEST ELEVATION (INSIDE ROOF WELL) / / / / / -~ ·, ·, l' __ ,,_,, __ ,_ z 'i-11 <J ;! ; !i!i! ... • h•(j 0 iz ~ •11 "' gL!!!l!i 1-1 ;j~] s!!lij <.) ~ -·"• •h· <.) i:ljf~ ji:;!' ~ . iij:ii ,!!ii ~ :-·····-;, ,!:! >,• <.) i! ... ~;, • -c•i: ~ ~--Q.) !!Ill ~! ,--1 -·-..00~ ,s ~ . o.~ -= ::g ~g " .. z . ~! = . 00 . •z : ~-: H-1 "< 2~ ~-er., (W• "' E-< >8 ~ ~ -,, ::, ~ct"~ ~-\ c...> ~~J <.) Q: . ~ ri~d <.) c...> ~~< O' , ~ o~~ .,:; ; ~~~~ u ~ :.. : o::.::;, 0~u "' (!JT·me1u:P»la.ANTEN'!A SMCWiOASll!OTOBE REPI.J,Cloi.1TMA{NJP»m. A.'fl'fNNA MOOfl. (n-.ax-~i.-R2'!) @~!'!,'!;!"NA FRAMED OPENING ii; lDIGTII•~• HIOTll•ll'I' O!Pll!••S' H!IG>!T•?.<1'1-85 MOOn. Tttaxx-,s1,-R2M (12~~) S!CTOR C @~!',!_~';!NA DIMENSIONS (!)ROOl'l!Vfl.. ~!~::;:1PMEXT l"IICRCl'ltcT!iUB•84St m .. ~~~~!t~~ = ~TfORM~~~!'llf\-!!/2"' "41.V !Ai:. SCR!WS @!~~!~N VIEW (INSIDE ROOF WELL} STA.\OAROSH!I.PIPE (GAlV) @~!'.!f!!!NA ATTACHMENT Attachment 2 Antenna Specifications -~ --~NDREW, TMBX-6516-R2M DualPol® Panel Antenna . Patented cross dipole and feed system . Rugged, reliable design with excellent PIM suppression . Includes factory installed AISG RET actuator . Fully compatible with Andrew Teletilt® remote control antenna system ELECTRICAL Frequency Range (MHz): 1710-2155 Characteristic Impedance (Ohms): 50 Azimuth BW (Deg): 65 ± 6 Elevation BW (Deg): 7.2 ± 1.1 Gain (dBi): 17.5 ± 0.7 Polarization: ±45° Front-to-Back Ratio (dB) o• 2" 4" s• a• 10• Copel, 180° ± 30°: >25 >25 >25 >24 >24 >24 Total Power, 180° ± 30°: >24 >24 >24 >24 >24 >22 Upper Sidelobe (dB) o• 2" 4• s• a• 10• Main Beam to +20°: >18 >18 >17 >17 >15 >12 VSWR / Return Loss (dB): 1.35:1 / 16.5 Port-to-Port Isolation (dB): >30 Electrical Tilt Range (Deg)*: 0-10 Electrical Downtilt Accuracy (Deg): ± 0.6 Cross-pol (dB) o• 2" 4" 6~ ~~ 1~~- 3 dB Beamwidth: >15 >15 >15 >15 >15 >14 Intermodulation Products (dBc) 3rd Order, 2 x 20 Watts: Max. Input Power (Watts): Lightning Protection: PERFORMANCE TRACKING Gain Variation (dB) (between UL and DL frequency pair): Electrical Tilt Accuracy (Deg) (between UL and DL frequncy pair within 0.5°): Azimuth HPBW (Deg) (between UL and DL frequncy pair): MECHANICAL Net Weight (kg/ lbs): Dimensions-LxWxD: (with actuator) Max. Wind Area (m2 / ft'): Max. Wind Load (N / lbf): Max. Wind Speed (km/h/ mph): Hardware Material: Connector Type: Color: 155 250 DC Ground 1.3 <0.5 9 5.1 / 11.2 1499 x 168 x 84 mm 59 x 6.6 x 3.3 inch 0.11 / 1.2 298.0 / 67.0 241 / 150 *Specifications may vary Decibel® Base Station Antennas Standard Mounting Hardware: Hot Dip Galvanized 7-16 DIN, Female (2) Off White TM602030A when using 0° or 1° electrical tilt Andrew Corporation 2601 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas U.S.A. 755082-3521 Tel: 214.631.0310 Fax: 214.688.0089 Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 www.andrew.com 3/9/2007 Page 1 of 3 dbtech@andrew.com Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. 3Q() 2llO 2so,J' f: m ~ 2e0\ ' •. ,\40 JOO I mi 280 *~ ~ 2!SO 220 i40'\ uii'-, 220 TMBX-6516-R2M Decibel® DualPol® Panel Antenna Base Station Antennas AZIMUTH PATTERN ELEVATION PATTERN 210 200 .. ,.,,_,,,., 160 150 190 180 t70 1732 MHz, Tilt: 2° 200 100 ,00• no 1&1 1880 MHz, Tilt: 2° '.,{'' \711 ~ '80 ' ~l• l~-},r,, ~/uo l,iO ·130 $0 t,Q 70 BO l 110 1 100 110 i ,20 130 3li· 3-1)1).~ l 210/. 210 ; 260'· '\. 2C· .. 230; :II~, 3001 2'11), /' 280/ ~' , . • 290t, \ 2so't 2«1\ 230; Note: Scale 5 dB per division. Fax: 214.688.0089 VO 1~ .!00 190 1&0 t1t,1 160 1732 MHz, Tilt: 2° 1880 MHz, Tilt: 2° 3/9/2007 1,0 Andrew Corporation 2601 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas U.S.A. 755082-3521 Tel: 214.631.0310 Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 www.andrew.com Page 2 of3 dbtech@andrew com Information co"ect at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. j100 I /t10 ,·;20 0130 Appendix A Andrew Model# TMBX-6516-R2M Electrical Downtilt 2 degree Exposure Calculation 16 ft AGL Antenna RF Center 40.75 ft ERP 800 Watts (PCS) 0.00400 0.00350 0.00300 0.00250 N e C) ~ 0.00200 e 0.00150 0.00100 0.00050 0.00000 0 200 400 RF Exposure Levels AGL= 16 feet Antenna Center 40.75 feet AGL 600 800 1000 Distance to base of antenna in feet Appendix A 1200 1400 1600 (IMaxgainl ARL~(dB~: ~-1_5._5__, Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Ant. base angle 0 90.000 1 87.686 2 85.380 3 83.089 4 80.819 5 78.579 6 76.373 7 74.208 8 72.087 9 70.017 10 67.999 11 66.038 12 64.134 13 62.289 14 60.505 15 58.782 16 57.119 17 55.516 18 53.973 19 52.487 20 51.059 21 49.686 22 48.366 23 47.099 24 45.881 25 44.712 26 43.589 27 42.510 28 41.474 29 40.479 30 39.523 31 38,603 32 37.720 33 36.870 34 36.052 35 35.266 Antenna gain -21.7 -20.8 -20.4 -20.7 -23.3 -24.5 -24.5 -24.5 -24.5 -21.9 -18.2 -17.4 -16.2 -16.1 -17 -19.5 -20.7 -21.4 -18.3 -17.7 -17.3 -20.4 -24.2 -22.5 -11.8 -8.6 -6.2 -4.3 -3.1 -2.3 -1.9 -1.9 -2.5 -3.7 -3.7 -5.5 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP in cm in mW -37.2 -36.3 -35.9 -36.2 -38.8 -40 -40 -40 -40 -37.4 -33.7 -32.9 -31.7 -31.6 -32.5 -35 -36.2 -36.9 -33.8 -33.2 -32.8 -35.9 -39.7 -38 -27.3 -24.1 -21.7 -19.8 -18.6 -17.8 -17.4 -17.4 -18 -19.2 -19.2 -21 754.38 152.4369 755.00 187.5383 756.84 205.6317 759.90 191.9066 764.17 105.4605 769.62 80.0000 776.23 80.0000 783.97 80.0000 792.81 80.0000 802.71 145.5761 813.63 341.2636 825.53 410.2891 838.37 540.8664 852.11 553.4648 866.71 449.8731 882.11 252.9822 898.29 191.9066 915.19 163.3390 932.79 333.4955 951.04 382.9041 969.90 419.8460 989.34 205.6317 1009.33 85.7215 1029.83 126.7915 1050.81 1489.6697 1072.26 3112.3612 1094.13 5408.6638 1116.40 8377.0284 1139.06 11043.0741 1162.07 13276.6953 1185.42 14557.6069 1209.09 14557.6069 1233.05 12679.1455 1257.30 9618.1155 1281.81 9618.1155 1306.58 6354.6259 Apdx. A Page 1 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00009 0.00011 0.00012 0.00011 0.00006 0.00005 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00008 0.00017 0.00020 0.00026 0.00025 0.00020 0.00011 0.00008 0.00007 0.00013 0.00014 0.00015 0.00007 0.00003 0.00004 0.00045 0.00090 0.00151 0.00225 0.00284 0.00328 0.00346 0.00333 0.00279 0.00203 0.00196 0.00124 Precentof FCC STD 0.00895 0.01099 0.01199 0.01110 0.00603 0.00451 0.00444 0.00435 0.00425 0.00755 0.01722 0.02011 0.02571 0.02547 0.02001 0.01086 0.00795 0.00652 0.01281 0.01414 0.01491 0.00702 0.00281 0.00399 0.04507 0.09044 0.15095 0.22456 0.28436 0.32847 0.34612 0.33270 0.27861 0.20328 0.19558 0.12436 I ' Max gain I ARL 24.15 _(dBd): _ 15.5 Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Ant. base angle 36 34.509 37 33.779 38 33.077 39 32.400 40 31.747 41 31.118 42 30.510 43 29.924 44 29.358 45 28.811 46 28.282 47 27.771 48 27.277 49 26.798 50 26.335 51 25.887 52 25.453 53 25.032 54 24.624 55 24.228 56 23.844 57 23.471 58 23.109 59 22.758 60 22.416 61 22.084 62 21.762 63 21.448 64 21.142 65 20.845 66 20.556 67 20.274 68 20.000 69 19.733 70 19.472 71 19.218 72 18.970 73 18.729 74 18.493 75 18.263 Antenna gain -8.6 -13.9 -13.9 -24.5 -19 -19 -13.3 -11.3 -11.3 -11.3 -11.3 -13.2 -13.2 -18.5 -18.5 -24.5 -24.5 -24.5 -14.8 -14.8 -9.9 -9.9 -9.9 -7.8 -7.8 -7.8 -7.2 -7.2 -7.2 -8.4 -8.4 -8.4 -8.4 -12.2 -12.2 -12.2 -20.3 -20.3 -20.3 -20.3 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP in cm in mW -24.1 -29.4 -29.4 -40 -34.5 -34.5 -28.8 -26.8 -26.8 -26.8 -26.8 -28.7 -28.7 -34 -34 -40 -40 -40 -30.3 -30.3 -25.4 -25.4 -25.4 -23.3 -23.3 -23.3 -22.7 -22.7 -22.7 -23.9 -23.9 -23.9 -23.9 -27.7 -27.7 -27.7 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 1331.58 3112.3612 1356.81 918.5229 1382.25 918.5229 1407.89 80.0000 1433.71 283.8507 1459.72 283.8507 1485.90 1054.6054 1512.24 1671.4369 1538.73 1671.4369 1565.37 1671.4369 1592.14 1671.4369 1619.05 1079.1703 1646.08 1079.1703 1673.23 318.4857 1700.49 318.4857 1727.86 80.0000 1755.33 80.0000 1782.90 80.0000 1810.56 746.6034 1838.32 746.6034 1866.15 2307.2252 1894.07 2307.2252 1922.07 2307.2252 1950.14 3741.8811 1978.28 3741.8811 2006.49 3741.8811 2034.77 4296.2544 2063.11 4296.2544 2091.51 4296.2544 2119.96 3259.0422 2148.48 3259.0422 2177.04 3259.0422 2205.66 3259.0422 2234.32 1358.5949 2263.04 1358.5949 2291.80 1358.5949 2320.60 210.4214 2349.45 210.4214 2378.33 210.4214 2407.26 210.4214 Apdx. A Page 2 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00059 0.00017 0.00016 0.00001 0.00005 0.00004 0.00016 0.00024 0.00024 0.00023 0.00022 0.00014 0.00013 0.00004 0.00004 0.00001 0.00001 0.00001 0.00008 0.00007 0.00022 0.00021 0.00021 0.00033 0.00032 0.00031 0.00035 0.00034 0.00033 0.00024 0.00024 0.00023 0.00022 0.00009 0.00009 0.00009 0.00001 0.00001 0.00001 0.00001 Precentof FCC STD 0.05864 0.01667 0.01606 0.00135 0.00461 0.00445 0.01596 0.02442 0.02359 0.02279 0.02203 0.01375 0.01331 0.00380 0.00368 0.00090 0.00087 0.00084 0.00761 0.00738 0.02213 0.02149 0.02087 0.03287 0.03194 0.03105 0.03467 0.03372 0.03281 0.02423 0.02359 0.02297 0.02238 0.00909 0.00886 0.00864 0.00131 0.00127 0.00124 0.00121 I I Maxgain I ARL 24.75(dBd): 15.5 Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Ant. base angle 76 18.038 77 17.819 78 17.605 79 17.395 80 17.191 81 16.991 82 16.795 83 16.604 84 16.417 85 16.234 86 16.055 87 15.880 88 15.709 89 15.541 90 15.376 91 15.215 92 15.057 93 14.903 94 14.751 95 14.602 96 14.457 97 14.314 98 14.174 99 14.036 100 13.901 101 13.769 102 13.639 103 13.512 104 13.386 105 13.263 106 13.143 107 13.024 108 12.907 109 12.793 110 12.680 111 12.570 112 12.461 113 12.354 114 12.249 115 12.146 Antenna gain -20.3 -11.4 -11.4 -11.4 -11.4 -5.6 -5.6 -5.6 -5.6 -5.6 -5.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP -35.8 -26.9 -26.9 -26.9 -26.9 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 -16.7 -16.7 -16.7 -16.7 -16.7 -16.7 -16.7 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -16.8 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 incm in mW 2436.22 210.4214 2465.22 1633.3904 2494.26 1633.3904 2523.32 1633.3904 2552.43 1633.3904 2581.56 6209.9769 2610.73 6209.9769 2639.92 6209.9769 2669.14 6209.9769 2698.39 6209.9769 2727.67 6209.9769 2756.98 12390.5330 2786.31 12390.5330 2815.66 12390.5330 2845.04 12390.5330 2874.44 12390.5330 2903.86 12390.5330 2933.30 17103.6967 2962.77 17103.6967 2992.25 17103.6967 3021.76 17103.6967 3051.28 17103.6967 3080.83 17103.6967 3110.39 17103.6967 3139.97 16714.3690 3169.56 16714.3690 3199.18 16714.3690 3228.80 16714.3690 3258.45 16714.3690 3288.11 16714.3690 3317.78 16714.3690 3347.47 16714.3690 3377.17 10305.9964 3406.89 10305.9964 3436.62 10305.9964 3466.36 10305.9964 3496.12 10305.9964 3525.89 10305.9964 3555.67 10305.9964 3585.46 10305.9964 Apdx. A Page 3 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00001 0.00009 0.00009 0.00009 0.00008 0.00031 0.00030 0.00030 0.00029 0.00028 0.00028 0.00054 0.00053 0.00052 0.00051 0.00050 0.00049 0.00066 0.00065 0.00064 0.00063 0.00061 0.00060 0.00059 0.00057 0.00056 0.00055 0.00054 0.00053 0.00052 0.00051 0.00050 0.00030 0.00030 0.00029 0.00029 0.00028 0.00028 0.00027 0.00027 Precent of FCC STD 0.00118 0.00898 0.00877 0.00857 0.00838 0.03113 0.03044 0.02977 0.02912 0.02849 0.02789 0.05446 0.05332 0.05222 0.05114 0.05010 0.04909 0.06641 0.06510 0.06382 0.06258 0.06138 0.06020 0.05907 0.05664 0.05559 0.05456 0.05356 0.05259 0.05165 0.05073 0.04983 0.03019 0.02967 0.02915 0.02866 0.02817 0.02770 0.02723 0.02678 I I Maxgain I ARL 24.75(dBd): .__1_5._5_ Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Antenna Ant. base angle gain 116 12.044 -3.4 117 11.944 -11 118 11.846 -11 119 11.749 -11 120 11.654 -11 121 11.560 -11 122 11.468 -11 123 11.377 -11 124 11.288 -11 125 11.200 -11 126 11.113 -11 127 11.028 -11 128 10.944 -10.7 129 10.861 -10.7 130 10.779 -10.7 131 10.699 -10.7 132 10.620 -10.7 133 10.542 -10.7 134 10.465 -10.7 135 10.389 -10.7 136 10.314 -10.7 137 10.240 -10.7 138 10.168 -10.7 139 10.096 -10.7 140 10.025 -10.7 141 9.956 0.7 142 9.887 0.7 143 9.819 0.7 144 9.752 0.7 145 9.686 0.7 146 9.621 0.7 147 9.557 0.7 148 9.494 0.7 149 9.431 0.7 150 9.369 0.7 151 9.308 0.7 152 9.248 0.7 153 9.189 0.7 154 9.130 0.7 155 9.072 0.7 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP -18.9 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.5 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -26.2 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 -14.8 in cm in mW 3615.26 10305.9964 3645.08 1790.9769 3674.90 1790.9769 3704.74 1790.9769 3734.59 1790.9769 3764.44 1790.9769 3794.31 1790.9769 3824.18 1790.9769 3854.07 1790.9769 3883.97 1790.9769 3913.87 1790.9769 3943.78 1790.9769 3973.70 1919.0663 4003.63 1919.0663 4033.57 1919.0663 4063.52 1919.0663 4093.47 1919.0663 4123.43 1919.0663 4153.40 1919.0663 4183.38 1919.0663 4213.36 1919.0663 4243.35 1919.0663 4273.35 1919.0663 4303.36 1919.0663 43~3.37 1919.0663 4363.39 26490.4897 4393.41 26490.4897 4423.44 26490.4897 4453.48 26490.4897 4483.52 26490.4897 4513.57 26490.4897 4543.62 26490.4897 4573.68 26490.4897 4603.75 26490.4897 4633.82 26490.4897 4663.89 26490.4897 4693.98 26490.4897 4724.06 26490.4897 4754.15 26490.4897 4784.25 26490.4897 Apdx. A Page 4 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00026 0.00005 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00003 0.00003 0.00046 0.00046 0.00045 0.00045 0.00044 0.00043 0.00043 0.00042 0.00042 0.00041 0.00041 0.00040 0.00040 0.00039 0.00039 Precentof FCC STD 0.02634 0.00450 0.00443 0.00436 0.00429 0.00422 0.00416 0.00409 0.00403 0.00397 0.00391 0.00385 0.00406 0.00400 0.00394 0.00388 0.00383 0.00377 0.00372 0.00366 0.00361 0.00356 0.00351 0.00346 0.00341 0.04649 0.04585 0.04523 0.04462 0.04403 0.04344 0.04287 0.04231 0.04176 0.04122 0.04069 0.04017 0.03966 0.03916 0.03867 ' Max gain I 24.75 (dBd): ------~ 15.5 Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Antenna Ant. base angle gain 156 9.015 0.7 157 8.959 5.8 158 8.903 5.8 159 8.848 5.8 160 8.793 5.8 161 8.739 5.8 162 8.686 5.8 163 8.634 5.8 164 8.582 5.8 165 8.531 5.8 166 8.480 5.8 167 8.430 5.8 168 8.381 5.8 169 8.332 5.8 170 8.283 5.8 171 8.236 5.8 172 8.188 5.8 173 8.142 5.8 174 8.096 5.8 175 8.050 5.8 176 8.005 5.8 177 7.960 9.3 178 7.916 9.3 179 7.872 9.3 180 7.829 9.3 181 7.786 9.3 182 7.744 9.3 183 7.702 9.3 184 7.661 9.3 185 7.620 9.3 186 7.580 9.3 187 7.539 9.3 188 7.500 9.3 189 7.461 9.3 190 7.422 9.3 191 7.383 9.3 201 7.020 9.3 211 6.690 11.7 221 6.390 11.7 231 6.116 11.7 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP in cm in mW -14.8 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -6.2 -3.8 -3.8 -3.8 4814.35 26490.4897 4844.46 85721.5444 4874.57 85721.5444 4904.68 85721.5444 4934.80 85721.5444 4964.93 85721.5444 4995.05 85721.5444 5025.19 85721.5444 5055.32 85721.5444 5085.46 85721.5444 5115.61 85721.5444 5145.76 85721.5444 5175.91 85721.5444 5206.07 85721.5444 5236.23 85721.5444 5266.39 85721.5444 5296.56 85721.5444 5326.73 85721.5444 5356.90 85721.5444 5387.08 85721.5444 5417.26 85721.5444 5447.45 191906.6335 5477.64 191906.6335 5507.83 191906.6335 5538.02 191906.6335 5568.22 191906.6335 5598.42 191906.6335 5628.62 191906.6335 5658.83 191906.6335 5689.04 191906.6335 5719.25 191906.6335 5749.47 191906.6335 5779.68 191906.6335 5809.90 191906.6335 5840.13 191906.6335 5870.35 191906.6335 6172.75 191906.6335 6475.37 333495.5068 6778.19 333495.5068 7081.18 333495.5068 Apdx. A Page 5 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00038 0.00122 0.00121 0.00119 0.00118 0.00116 0.00115 0.00113 0.00112 0.00111 0.00109 0.00108 0.00107 0.00106 0.00104 0.00103 0.00102 0.00101 0.00100 0.00099 0.00098 0.00216 0.00214 0.00211 0.00209 0.00207 0.00205 0.00202 0.00200 0.00198 0.00196 0.00194 0.00192 0.00190 0.00188 0.00186 0.00168 0.00266 0.00243 0.00222 Precentof FCC STD 0.03818 0.12203 0.12053 0.11905 0.11760 0.11618 0.11478 0.11341 0.11206 0.11074 0.10944 0.10816 0.10690 0.10567 0.10445 0.10326 0.10209 0.10094 0.09980 0.09869 0.09759 0.21606 0.21369 0.21135 0.20905 0.20679 0.20457 0.20238 0.20022 0.19810 0.19601 0.19396 0.19194 0.18994 0.18798 0.18605 0.16827 0.26573 0.24251 0.22220 . " ~Max gain I ARL~(dBd): --1_5._5~ Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Antenna Ant. base angle gain 241 5.864 13.4 251 5.631 13.4 261 5.417 13.4 271 5.218 13.4 281 5.034 13.4 291 4.861 14.6 301 4.701 14.6 311 4.550 14.6 321 4.409 14.6 331 4.276 14.6 341 4.151 14.6 351 4.033 14.6 361 3.922 15.3 371 3.817 15.3 381 3.717 15.3 391 3.622 15.3 401 3.532 15.3 411 3.446 15.3 421 3.364 15.3 431 3.287 15.3 441 3.212 15.3 451 3.141 15.3 461 3.073 15.3 471 3.008 15.3 481 2.946 15.5 491 2.886 15.5 501 2.828 15.5 511 2.773 15.5 521 2.720 15.5 531 2.669 15.5 541 2.619 15.5 551 2.572 15.5 561 2.526 15.5 571 2.482 15.5 581 2.439 15.5 591 2.398 15.5 601 2.358 15.5 611 2.320 15.5 621 2.282 15.5 631 2.246 15.5 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP -2.1 -2.1 -2.1 -2.1 -2.1 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 incm in mW 7384.31 493276.0015 7687.58 493276.0015 7990.97 493276.0015 8294.46 493276.0015 8598.04 493276.0015 8901.70 650264.4129 9205.44 650264.4129 9509.25 650264.4129 9813.12 650264.4129 10117.04 650264.4129 10421.02 650264.4129 10725.04 650264.4129 11029.11 763994.0688 11333.22 763994.0688 11637.36 763994.0688 11941.53 763994.0688 12245.74 763994.0688 12549.97 763994.0688 12854.24 763994.0688 13158.52 763994.0688 13462.83 763994.0688 13767.16 763994.0688 14071.52 763994.0688 14375.89 763994.0688 14680.28 800000.0000 14984.68 800000.0000 15289.10 800000.0000 15593.54 800000.0000 15897.99 800000.0000 16202.45 800000.0000 16506.93 800000.0000 16811.41 800000.0000 17115.91 800000.0000 17420.42 800000. 0000 17724.94 800000.0000 18029.47 800000.0000 18334.01 800000.0000 18638.55 800000.0000 18943.11 800000.0000 19247.67 800000.0000 Apdx. A Page 6 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00302 0.00279 0.00258 0.00240 0.00223 0.00274 0.00256 0.00240 0.00226 0.00212 0.00200 0.00189 0.00210 0.00199 0.00188 0.00179 0.00170 0.00162 0.00154 0.00147 0.00141 0.00135 0.00129 0.00124 0.00124 0.00119 0.00114 0.00110 0.00106 0.00102 0.00098 0.00095 0.00091 0.00088 0.00085 0.00082 0.00080 0.00077 0.00074 0.00072 Precentof FCC STD 0.30223 0.27886 0.25809 0.23955 0.22293 0.27417 0.25637 0.24025 0.22561 0.21225 0.20005 0.18887 0.20984 0.19873 0.18848 0.17900 0.17021 0.16206 0.15448 0.14742 0.14083 0.13467 0.12891 0.12351 0.12402 0.11903 0.11434 0.10992 0.10575 0.10181 0.09809 0.09457 0.09124 0.08807 0.08507 0.08222 0.07952 0.07694 0.07448 0.07215 r-7Max gain I ARL~(dBd): .__1_5._5____. Max exposure: I 0.003461151 mW/cm 2 Max ERP (W): 800 Ant type: TMBX-6516-R2M Feet to Depress Ant. base angle 641 2.211 651 2.177 661 2.144 671 2.112 681 2.081 691 2.051 701 2.022 711 1.994 721 1.966 731 1.939 741 1.913 751 1.888 761 1.863 771 1.839 781 1.815 791 1.792 801 1.770 811 1.748 821 1.727 831 1.706 841 1.686 851 1.666 861 1.647 871 1.628 881 1.609 891 1.591 901 1.573 911 1.556 921 1.539 931 1.523 941 1.507 951 1.491 961 1.475 971 1.460 981 1.445 991 1.431 1001 1.416 1011 1.402 1021 1.389 1031 1.375 Antenna gain 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 RF Exposure Level dB from Prop dist Act ERP max ERP in cm in mW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 19552.24 800000.0000 19856.81 800000.0000 20161.40 800000.0000 20465.99 800000.0000 20770.58 800000.0000 21075.19 800000.0000 21379.79 800000.0000 21684.41 763994.0688 21989.02 763994.0688 22293.65 763994.0688 22598.27 763994.0688 22902.91 763994.0688 23207.54 763994.0688 23512.19 763994.0688 23816.83 763994.0688 24121.48 763994.0688 24426.13 763994.0688 24730.79 763994.0688 25035.45 763994.0688 25340.11 763994.0688 25644.78 763994.0688 25949.45 763994.0688 26254.12 763994.0688 26558.80 763994.0688 26863.47 763994.0688 27168.16 763994.0688 27472.84 763994.0688 27777.53 763994.0688 28082.21 763994.0688 28386.91 763994.0688 28691.60 763994.0688 28996.29 763994.0688 29300.99 763994.0688 29605.69 763994. 0688 29910.39 763994.0688 30215.10 763994.0688 30519.80 763994.0688 30824.51 763994.0688 31129.22 763994.0688 31433.93 763994.0688 Apdx. A Page 7 TMBX-6516-R2M Feet from site: 30 Level mW/cm 2 0.00070 0.00068 0.00066 0.00064 0.00062 0.00060 0.00058 0.00054 0.00053 0.00051 0.00050 0.00049 0.00047 0.00046 0.00045 0.00044 0.00043 0.00042 0.00041 0.00040 0.00039 0.00038 0.00037 0.00036 0.00035 0.00035 0.00034 0.00033 0.00032 0.00032 0.00031 0.00030 0.00030 0.00029 0.00029 0.00028 0.00027 0.00027 0.00026 0.00026 Precentof FCC STD 0.06992 0.06779 0.06575 0.06381 0.06195 0.06018 0.05847 0.05428 0.05279 0.05136 0.04998 0.04866 0.04739 0.04617 0.04500 0.04387 0.04278 0.04173 0.04072 0.03975 0.03881 0.03791 0.03703 0.03619 0.03537 0.03458 0.03382 0.03308 0.03237 0.03168 0.03101 0.03036 0.02973 0.02912 0.02853 0.02796 0.02740 0.02686 0.02634 0.02583 , . STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE Jerrold Talmadge Bushberg, Ph.D., DABMP, DABSNM (800) 760-8414 jbushberg@hampc.com Dr. Jerrold Bushberg has performed health and safety analysis for RF & ELF transmissions systems since 1978 and is an expert in both health physics and medical physics. The scientific discipline of Health Physics is devoted to radiation protection, which, among other things, involves providing analysis of radiation exposure conditions, biological effects research, regulations and standards as well as recommendations regarding the use and safety of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. In addition, Dr. Bushberg has extensive experience and lectures on several related topics including medical physics, radiation protection, (ionizing and non-ionizing), radiation biology, the science of risk assessment and effective risk communication in the public sector. Dr. Bushberg's doctoral dissertation at Purdue University was on various aspects of the biological effects of microwave radiation. He has maintained a strong professional involvement in this subject and has served as consultant or appeared as an expert witness on this subject to a wide variety of organizations/institutions including, local governments, school districts, city planning departments, telecommunications companies, the California Public Utilities Commission,national news organizations, and the U.S. Congress. In addition, his consultation services have included detailed computer based modeling of RF exposures as well as on-site safety inspections and RF & ELF environmental field measurements of numerous transmission facilities in order to determine their compliance with FCC and other safety regulations. The consultation services provided by Dr. Bush berg are based on his professional judgement as an independent scientist, however they are not intended to necessarily represent the views of any other organization. Dr. Bushberg is a member of the main scientific body of International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) which reviews and evaluates the scientific literature on the biological effects of non- ionizing electromagnetic radiation and establishes exposure standards. He also serves on the ICES Risk Assessment Working Group that is responsible for evaluating and characterizing the risks of non- ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Dr. Bushberg was appointed and is serving as a member of the main scientific council of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement's (NCRP). He is also a Scientific Vice-President of the NCRP, a member of the NCRP Board of Directors and chairs its committee on Radiation Protection in Medicine. In addition, Dr. Bushberg is a member of NCRP's scientific advisory committee on Non-ionizing Radiation Safety. The NCRP is the nation's preeminent scientific radiation protection organization, chartered by Congress to evaluate and provide expert consultation on a wide variety of radiological health issues. The current FCC RF exposure safety standards are based in large part on the recommendations of the NCRP. Dr. Bushberg was elected to the International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) which has as its primary area ofresponsibility the examination and interpreting the biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy and presenting its findings in an authoritative and professional manner. Dr. Bushberg is also a member of a six person U.S. expert delegation to the international scientific community on Scientific and Technical Issues for Mobile Communication Systems established by the Federal Communications Commission. Dr. Bushberg is a full member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, the Health Physics Society and the Radiation Research Society. Dr. Bushberg received both a Masters of Science and Ph.D. from the Department of Bionucleonics at Purdue University. Dr. Bushberg is certified by several national professional boards with specific sub-specialty certification in radiation protection and medical physics. Prior to coming to California, Dr. Bushberg was on the faculty of Yale University School of Medicine.