HomeMy WebLinkAboutMS 2020-0004; ADAMS STREET HOMES; FINAL SOILS REPORT; 2024-09-19
19 September 2024
Rincon Real Estate Group Job No. 20-12852
5315 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attn: Mr. Kevin Dunn
Subject: Final As-Graded Soils Report
Adams Street Residential Project
3745 Adams Street
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Dunn:
Per the request of Mr. Bryan Knapp with Pasco Laret Suiter and Associates (PLSA)
and as required by the City of Carlsbad, Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. hereby
presents this final as-graded soils report for the work performed at the project site,
refer to Vicinity Map (Figure No. I). The additional earthwork reported herein was
performed between December 13, 2020, and September 16, 2024. Our firm
previously performed a geotechnical investigation of the property, the results of
which were presented in our Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation dated
September 14, 2018. We have also issued the following documents:
1.) Report of Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Storm Water
Infiltration BMPs); dated September 14, 2020.
2.) Recommendations for Foundations Close to Water Infiltration BMP Ponds;
dated February 08, 2021.
3.) Clarification of Recommendation for Foundations Close to Water Infiltration
BMP Ponds; dated August 26, 2021.
4.) Plan Review; dated January 17, 2022.
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 2
5.) Response to Third-Party Reviewer (First), Project No. 9537.1; Log No. 21665;
dated March 04, 2022.
6.) Response to City Reviewer Report Redline Comments; dated March 30, 2022
7.) Response to Third-Party Reviewer (Second), Project No. 9537.1; Log No.
21787; dated April 13, 2022.
8.) Report of Rough Grading Observations and Soil Testing; dated June 12, 2023.
9.) Revised Report of Rough Grading Observations and Soil Testing; dated June
15, 2023, and Revised July 07, 2023.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
As previously mentioned, a rough grading report was issued for this project on June
15, 2023, and revised July 07, 2023. The following is a brief summary of the work
performed. For more detailed information, refer to our July 07, 2023, report.
1. Our representative observed soil removal on all 4 lots. The soils consisted of
dense formational soils and recompacted fill soils were placed on top of dense
formational soils on all 4 building pads. Our representative also observed
grading of the driveway soils and backfill placement along the north property
line retaining wall. The observed soils were tested for the recommended
compaction.
2. Our representative observed and tested the retaining wall backfill placement
for the west property line running along Lots 3 and 4. The backfill consisted
of imported soils. The wall backfill was properly moisture conditioned as
needed, and then compacted and tested for proper compaction. Date of
observations were between June 15 and 26, 2023.
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 3
3. Utility trench backfill placement for the sewer tie-in located on Adams Street
was observed and tested using imported soils. Backfilling for the sewer utility
trenches located on the south side and the north side driveways were also
observed and tested. Date of observations were between June 27 and July 6,
2023.
4. Backfill placement for the domestic water line utility trench to all lots, as well
as the north and south sides of the driveway, were observed and tested. Both
on-site and imported soils were used as backfill. Date of observation was July
10, 2023.
5. Backfill placement for storm drain utility trenches on the south sides of all lots
was observed and tested on July 12, 2023.
6. Backfill placement for the water main trench under Adams Street was observed
and tested. Imported soil material was used as backfill. A total of 4 water
service trenches running perpendicular to Adams Street were observed and
tested on September 28, 2023.
7. Backfill placement for a joint utility trench that starts in the turf area between
Lots 2 and 4 and swings around the driveway area between Lots 1 and 2 was
observed and tested. A portion of the same trench heads south through the
driveway and swings to the west heading into Lots 3 and 4. The backfill
placement was observed and tested. Dates of observation were between
November 3 and 6, 2023
8. Backfill placement of the utility trench where the old water main on Adams
Street was removed, was observed and tested on November 6, 2023.
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 4
9. The curb subgrade and driveway base perimeter for the 4 lots were observed
and tested. The subgrade consisted of on-site soil material and the base grade
consisted of imported soil material. A joint utility trench located in Adams
Street was also tested using on-site soil material. The Adams Street curb and
gutter subgrade and base grades were also tested. Date of observations were
between November 11 and December 4, 2023.
10. The concrete driveway apron approaching from the east to Lots 1 and 2 were
tested. The subgrade soils for the driveway located between the four lots was
observed and tested, including the base grade and the asphalt concrete. A
small section near the entry of the private driveway was also observed and
tested for the gas tie-in utilities. Date of observations were between December
11 and 13, 2023.
11. The final subgrade soils and base grade soils for the private driveway located
between the four lots was observed and tested. The final asphalt concrete
pavement grade was also tested for the recommended compaction. Date of
observations was December 19, 2023.
12. The Adams Street final soil subgrade and base grade were observed and
tested. The asphalt concrete placed above the base grade was tested for the
recommended compaction. Dates of observations were between January 2
and 15, 2024
13. Backfill placement for a new 2-inch-diameter water line utility trench running
on the north side of Lot 1 and the south side of Lot 2 was observed and tested.
The final subgrade soils for the sidewalk and driveway located on the east sides
of Lots 1 and 2 were also observed and tested. Dates of observations were
between March 13 and July 10, 2024.
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 5
14. Backfill placement for the exterior subgrade soils of the patios for all lots were
observed and tested. The driveway subgrade soils for Lots 3 and 4 were also
tested. Dates of observations were on July 15 and August 15, 2024.
15. An approximately 2- to 3-inch-thick final asphalt concrete cap was placed on
Adams Street and along the area of the private driveway located between the
four lots. The asphalt cap was tested for the recommended compaction on
September 16, 2024.
SOIL TESTING
Representative soil samples were collected during the grading to determine
laboratory maximum dry density of the soils per ASTM D1557-12r21. Field density
tests were performed at approximate locations shown on Figure No. II, Plot Plan, in
accordance with ASTM D6938-17a. The complete list of field density tests results is
shown on Table A of Figure Nos. IIIa-j, and laboratory soil compaction test results
are shown on Table B of Figure No. IIIk.
Equipment used for earthwork compaction included a CAT950 loader, a skid steer,
and a 210 excavator with sheepsfoot compaction wheel. A water hose was used to
add water, when needed, to increase soil moisture. Field density tests yielded a
relative compaction of at least 90 percent (95 percent at certain locations) of
maximum dry density at the tested locations. Density tests were performed with a
nuclear gauge testing apparatus in accordance with ASTM D6938-17a. The maximum
dry density of the soils was determined per ASTM D1557-12r21.
On-site soils used during earthwork consisted of reddish-brown silty sand. Imported
soils consisted of dark yellowish brown silty sand. The existing on-site soils were
determined to have a low expansion potential, with an expansion index (E.I.) of 0
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 6
and the imported soils were classified with low expansion potential, with the highest
E.I. value of 39 per ASTM D4829. The asphalt concrete Hveem maximum compaction
value was provided by the concrete supplier at the time of testing. The numbers are
shown on Table B Figure No. IIIj.
Proper finish drainage for the site was to be implemented by the general contractor
prior to completing construction.
SITE SUITABILITY AND COMPLIANCE
The observed and tested areas of the grading operation, including the underlying
dense formational soils are, in our professional opinion, suitable for their intended
use of supporting the recompacted fills, structure foundations, and new exterior
improvements.
We certify that the soil engineering and engineering geologic aspects of grading are
in compliance with the approved soils report and the approved grading and
foundation plans.
LIMITATIONS
The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with
currently accepted principles and practice in the field of geotechnical engineering in
the City of Carlsbad in the County of San Diego. No warranty, either expressed or
implied, is made.
All statements in this report are applicable only for the grading operation observed
and tested by our firm. The firm Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall not be held
responsible for fill soils placed without our observations and testing at any other time,
Rincon-Adams Street Project Job No. 20-12852
Carlsbad, California Page 7
or subsequent changes to the site by others, which directly or indirectly cause poor
surface or subsurface drainage, water erosion, and/or alteration of the strength of
the compacted fill soils.
It is not within the scope of our services to provide quality control oversight for
surface or subsurface drainage construction or retaining wall sealing and base of wall
drain construction. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verify proper wall
sealing, geofabric installation, protection board installation (if needed), drain depth
below interior floor or yard surfaces; pipe percent slope to the outlet, etc.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of the building or
improvements are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this
report should not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the
conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. 20-12852
will help expedite a response to your inquiry.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
_______________________________ ______________________________
Jaime A. Cerros, P.E. Richard A. Cerros. P.E.
R.C.E. 34422/G.E. 2007 R.C.E. 94223
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
VICINITY MAP
Adams Street Homes
3745 Adams Street
Carlsbad, CA.
Figure No. I
Job No. 20-12852
SITE
Thomas Guide San Diego County Edition pg 1106-F6
Old Water Main Line
(removed)
LEGEND
Storm Drain Trench
Location
Sewer Trench Location
Water Trench Location
New Water Trench Location
Joint Utility Trench Location
245
246
Approximate Location of
Field Density Test
10
9
5
254
11
12
6
7
14
15
16
17
18
1
2
3
4
8
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
47
48
49
50
51
54
5352
55
56
6162
57
58
59
60
63 64
65
66
67 68
45
37
30
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
84 83
85
86
87
8889
91 92 93
94
90
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
149
148
147
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224225
226
227228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
122
244
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
20-12852-24X36-P5-9-17-24.ai
J 2023
Adams Street Homes
3745 Adams Street
Carlsbad, CA.
Figure No. II
Job No. 20-12852
PLOT PLAN AND
SITE SPECIFIC
GEOLOGIC MAP
NOTE: This Plot Plan is not to be used for legal
purposes. Locations and dimensions are approximate.
Actual property dimensions and locations of utilities
may be obtained from the Approved Building Plans
or the “As-Built” Grading Plans.
REFERENCE: This Plot Plan was prepared from an existing undated
GRADING PLAN by PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES
and from on-site field reconnaissance performed by GEI.
Scale: 1” = 10’
(approximate)
(September 2024)
f6a
Qop
Qaf
2-4
4
GEOLOGY LEGEND
Artificial Fill
Old Paralic Deposits
( units 2-4 )
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
1 2/13/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 79 10.4 118.0 92 1
2 2/13/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 81 11.3 119.8 93 1
3 2/13/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 79 9.6 117.5 91 1
4 2/13/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 ADU 79 10.0 117.9 90 2
5 2/14/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 3 80 9.1 118.4 91 2
6 2/14/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 3 81 9.9 119.0 91 2
7 2/14/23 FILL PLACEMENT BMP 80 10.4 122.4 94 2
8 2/14/23 FILL PLACEMENT EAST OF LOT 3 79 10.3 120.1 92 2
9 2/14/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 3 81.5 9.7 119.8 92 2
10 2/15/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 4 81 9.3 119.7 92 2
11 2/15/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 3 81.5 10.3 118.6 91 2
12 2/15/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 4 81.5 11.0 120.1 92 2
13 2/15/23 FILL PLACEMENT WEST OF LOT 4 82 10.4 121.3 93 2
14 2/16/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 3 83 8.7 119.3 91 2
15 2/16/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 83 9.4 120.2 92 2
16 2/17/23 FILL PLACEMENT NORTH OF LOT 3 83 9.3 118.7 91 2
17 2/17/23 FILL PLACEMENT TURF AREA 80 9.0 117.4 90 2
18 2/17/23 FILL PLACEMENT ADU LOT 4 83 10.3 119.3 91 2
19 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT 82 10.7 120.3 92 2
20 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 85 11.4 119.4 92 2
21 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 3 85 9.7 117.3 90 2
22 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 87 10.3 119.8 92 2
23 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 3 87 11.4 119.0 91 2
24 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 4 87 11.7 120.1 92 2
25 2/21/23 FILL PLACEMENT LOT 3 87 12.0 118.3 91 2
Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIa
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
26 2/22/23 FILL PLACEMENT SEEPAGE PIT 79 9.7 119.3 91 2
27 2/22/23 FILL PLACEMENT SEEPAGE PIT 81.5 10.3 120.4 92 2
28 2/22/23 FILL PLACEMENT SEEPAGE PIT 87 9.1 118.3 91 2
29 2/27/23 FILL PLACEMENT SEEPAGE PIT 86 8.2 128.4 98 2
30 2/27/23 FILL PLACEMENT SEEPAGE PIT 86 10.4 115.5 89 2 SEE RETEST NO. 90
31 2/28/23 DRIVEWAY 79 10.3 120.1 92 2
32 2/28/23 GRADING LOT 3 86.5 10.1 119.4 92 2
33 3/3/23 FILL PLACEMENT DRIVEWAY 81 14.0 120.0 92 2
34 3/3/23 FILL PLACEMENT DRIVEWAY 81 14.4 119.9 92 2
35 3/6/23 FILL PLACEMENT DRIVEWAY 82 13.0 118.7 91 2
36 3/6/23 FILL PLACEMENT DRIVEWAY 82 10.3 120.7 93 2
37 3/6/23 FILL PLACEMENT DRIVEWAY 84 10.7 115.4 88 2 SEE RETEST NO. 93
38 3/8/23 GRADING LOT 2 85 13.2 117.4 90 2
39 3/8/23 GRADING LOT 1 86 13.8 117.9 90 2
40 3/9/23 GRADING LOT 1 86 14.5 116.0 90 4
41 3/9/23 DRIVEWAY 86 11.1 119.1 93 4
42 3/9/23 GRADING LOT 2 87 13.3 116.7 91 4
43 3/9/23 GRADING LOT 2 87 13.9 116.3 91 4
44 3/10/23 GRADING LOT 1 87 14.1 117.2 91 4
45 3/10/23 GRADING LOT 2 88 12.2 114.5 89 4 SEE RETEST NO. 87
46 3/10/23 GRADING LOT 1 88 11.8 118.8 93 4
47 3/10/23 GRADING LOT 2 88 12.5 117.5 92 4
48 3/10/23 GRADING LOT 1 88 10.8 119.9 93 4
49 4/28/23 FILL PLACEMENT in NORTHWEST CORNER 87 9.2 117.1 91 4
50 4/28/23 FILL PLACEMENT in NORTHWEST CORNER 89 9.9 118.6 92 4
51 5/1/23 FILL PLACEMENT in NORTHWEST CORNER 91 7.6 116.2 91 4
52 5/31/23 WALL BACKFILL LOT 2 86.5 9.6 117.9 92 4
53 6/1/23 WALL BACKFILL LOT 2 90.9 10.4 115.8 90 4 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIb
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
54 6/2/23 WALL BACKFILL LOT 1 89 8.2 117.2 91 4
55 6/2/23 WALL BACKFILL LOT 1 87 7.4 120.1 93 1
56 6/2/23 WALL BACKFILL LOT 1 91.7 9.1 118.0 92 1
57 6/14/23 PAD #1 FSG 7.1 117.9 90 2
58 6/14/23 PAD #1 FSG 9.4 117.0 91 4
59 6/14/23 PAD #1 FSG 7.4 120.7 93 2
60 6/14/23 PAD #1 FSG 6.9 118.7 91 2
61 6/14/23 PAD #1 ADU FSG 9.0 116.3 91 4
62 6/14/23 PAD #1 ADU FSG 6.9 119.6 92 2
63 6/14/23 PAD #2 FSG 6.0 117.7 90 2
64 6/14/23 PAD #2 FSG 8.2 119.7 92 2
65 6/14/23 PAD #2 FSG 7.1 120.6 92 2
66 6/14/23 PAD #2 FSG 8.1 117.9 90 2
67 6/14/23 PAD #2 ADU FSG 6.8 121.0 93 2
68 6/14/23 PAD #2 ADU FSG 7.5 120.1 92 2
69 6/15/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT4) 80 10.1 115.7 90 4
70 6/15/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT4) 82 7.8 116.5 91 4
71 6/16/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT4) 84 9.0 117.3 91 4
72 6/21/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT4) 80 8.1 117.4 92 4
73 6/21/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 82 6.2 115.9 90 4
74 6/21/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 84 9.4 118.8 93 4
75 6/21/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 86 9.9 117.0 91 4
76 6/21/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 86 8.5 118.0 92 4
77 6/26/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 87.5 7.4 119.0 93 4
78 6/26/23 WEST P/L WALL BACKFILL (LOT3) 87.5 6.8 120.1 94 4
79 6/27/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT1) 90 8.3 116.4 91 4
80 6/28/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT2) 87.5 10.6 115.2 90 4
81 6/28/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT2) 90 9.9 117.9 92 4 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIc
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
82 6/29/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT4) 89 10.1 116.1 90 4
83 6/29/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT3) 88 8.6 117.0 91 4
84 6/29/23 SEWER TIE-IN (LOT3) 91 9.3 115.5 90 4
85 7/5/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-SOUTHSIDE 85.7 8.1 120.0 92 2
86 7/5/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-SOUTHSIDE 84.7 13.0 117.0 90 2
87 7/5/23 LOT 2 BUILDING PAD 89 4.4 119.1 91 2 RETEST OF NO. 45
88 7/5/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-SOUTHSIDE 86 9.8 116.9 98 3
89 7/5/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-SOUTHSIDE 86 8.5 113.0 95 3
90 7/5/23 LOT 3 BUILDING PAD 86 5.0 125.1 96 2 RETEST OF NO. 30
91 7/6/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-NORTHSIDE 86 10.1 120.0 92 2
92 7/6/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-NORTHSIDE 85 11.0 116.9 90 2
93 7/6/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-NORTHSIDE 84 10.8 117.6 90 2 RETEST OF NO. 37
94 7/6/23 SEWER TRENCH-DRIVEWAY-NORTHSIDE 91 11.8 118.1 91 2
95 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 1 90.5 10.4 116.0 97 3
96 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 4 87 8.9 115.9 90 1
97 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 4 85.5 14.0 115.0 90 4
98 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 3 86 8.4 110.6 93 3
99 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 3 87 11.2 115.0 90 4
100 7/10/23 DOMESTIC WATERLINE TRENCH, Lot 2 90.5 9.0 115.6 90 4
101 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 2 FSG 11.5 119.2 91 2
102 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 1 FSG 12.4 114.9 90 4
103 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 1 FSG 15.0 107.8 91 3
104 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 3 FSG 9.1 118.0 92 4
105 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, North of Lot 3 FSG 7.4 116.2 91 4
106 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Between Lots 3 & 4 FSG 8.2 117.6 92 4
107 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 4 FSG 6.1 115.5 90 4
108 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 2 FSG 8.8 115.8 90 4
109 7/12/23 STORM DRAIN TRENCH, Lot 2 FSG 10.1 117.7 92 4 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIId
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
110 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 8.2 117.0 91 4
111 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 7.9 116.8 91 4
112 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 8.6 118.1 92 4
113 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG 9.1 117.5 92 4
114 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG 8.8 117.7 92 4
115 9/28/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 8.2 116.0 90 4
116 9/29/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 8.7 115.9 90 4
117 9/29/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG 8.0 116.2 91 4
118 9/29/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 8.2 116.0 90 4
119 9/29/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG-2 9.1 116.5 91 4
120 9/29/23 WATER MAIN TRENCH- ADAM'S STREET FSG 8.1 117.0 91 4
121 10/11/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- North Adams St.FSG-1 7.1 120.4 94 4
122 10/12/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- Adams St./ E. Lot 2 FSG-1 5.9 117.7 92 4
123 10/12/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- North Adams St.FSG-2 8.2 118.4 92 4
124 10/13/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- Adams St./ Drwy FSG-1 6.5 115.4 90 4
125 10/13/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- Adams St./ Drwy FSG-1.5 8.4 115.9 90 4
126 10/13/23 WATER SERVICES TRENCH- South Adams St.FSG-1.5 7.3 116.1 90 4
127 11/3/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH between Lots 1 & 2 FSG-1.5 8.9 115.4 90 4
128 11/3/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH between Lots 1 & 3 FSG-0.5 13.4 108.6 91 3
129 11/6/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH between lots 2 & 4 FSG-1 10.1 116.0 90 4
130 11/6/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH between lots 1 & 3 FSG-0.5 8.3 115.4 90 4
131 11/6/23 OLD ADAMS ST. WATER MAIN REMOVAL TRENCH FSG-2 8.6 118.7 91 2
132 11/6/23 OLD ADAMS ST. WATER MAIN REMOVAL TRENCH FSG-2 8.9 119.6 92 2
133 11/17/23 CURB SUBGRADE, South of Lot 2 FSG 13.7 110.2 93 3
134 11/17/23 CURB SUBGRADE, South of Lot 2 FSG 14.6 111.1 93 3
135 11/17/23 CURB SUBGRADE, South of Lot 4 FSG 12.8 112.6 95 3
136 11/20/23 CURB SUBGRADE, East of Lot 4 FSG 12.0 110.8 93 3
137 11/20/23 CURB BASE GRADE, South of Lot 4 FBG 8.4 123.6 95 5 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIe
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
138 11/20/23 CURB BASE GRADE, Northeast of Lot 3 FBG 6.8 124.8 96 5
139 11/20/23 CURB SUBGRADE, West of Lot 1 FSG 10.1 116.1 90 1
140 11/20/23 CURB BASE GRADE, West of Lot 3 FBG 6.9 123.7 95 5
141 11/20/23 CURB BASE GRADE, South of Lot 2 FBG 7.1 124.4 95 5
142 11/20/23 CURB BASE GRADE, East of Lot 4 FBG 7.6 124.0 95 5
143 11/22/23 CURB SUBGRADE, West of Lot 2 FSG 9.4 120.0 93 1
144 11/22/23 CURB BASE GRADE, Southwest of Lot 2 FBG 6.9 123.9 95 5
145 11/22/23 CURB SUBGRADE, Northwest of Lot 1 FSG 7.0 121.9 95 1
146 11/22/23 CURB BASE GRADE, North of Lot 1 FBG 6.6 124.8 96 5
147 11/22/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH/ Adams Street FG-1 8.6 119.4 93 1
148 11/22/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH/ Adams Street FG-1 7.4 121.6 95 1
149 11/22/23 JOINT UTILITY TRENCH/ Adams Street FG-1 7.0 120.8 94 1
150 12/4/23 CURB & GUTTER SUBGRADE, Adams Street FSG 6.4 117.0 91 1
151 12/4/23 CURB & GUTTER BASE GRADE, Adams Street FBG 5.1 124.0 95 5
152 12/4/23 CURB & GUTTER SUBGRADE, Adams Street FSG 6.8 118.8 92 1
153 12/4/23 CURB & GUTTER BASE GRADE, Adams Street FBG 4.0 124.3 95 5
154 12/11/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH, Lot 2 FSG 7.1 120.5 94 1
155 12/11/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH FSG 9.5 121.7 95 1
156 12/11/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH, Lot 1 FSG 11.2 120.1 93 1
157 12/12/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH, Lot 2 FBG 4.9 127.1 97 5
158 12/12/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH FBG 5.2 127.3 98 5
159 12/12/23 CONCRETE APRON-DRIVEWAY APPROACH, Lot 1 FBG 5.8 124.9 96 5
160 12/13/23 GAS TIE-IN UTILITY TRENCH Drwy/ Adams St.FSG-1 6.9 116.5 91 1
161 12/13/23 GAS TIE-IN UTILITY TRENCH Drwy/ Adams St.FSG 7.2 117.1 91 1
162 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE, South of Lot 2 FSG 7.4 121.4 95 4
163 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE, West of Lot 3 FSG 6.9 121.8 95 4
164 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE, South of Lot 4 FSG 8.1 122.1 95 4
165 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE, East of Lot 3 FSG 6.8 121.5 95 4 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIf
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
166 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE Center of 4 lots FSG 6.5 122.8 96 4
167 12/19/23 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-2.5 9.8 120.3 94 4
168 12/19/23 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-1 10.1 118.7 93 4
169 12/19/23 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-0.5 8.8 121.9 95 4
170 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, South of Lot 2 FBG 11.5 110.1 98 6
171 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, Southwest of Lot 2 FBG 12.2 108.5 97 6
172 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, Southwest of Lot 3 FBG 12.0 109.0 97 6
173 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, West of Lot 2 FBG 11.9 109.5 98 6
174 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, South of Lot 4 FBG 12.5 107.6 96 6
175 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, Northwest of Lot 3 FBG 12.2 108.9 97 6
176 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, Northwest of Lot 4 FBG 11.9 107.3 96 6
177 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY BASE GRADE, West of Lot 1 FBG 12.0 108.0 96 6
178 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT, South of Lot 2 FPG N/A 143.2 98 7
179 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT, South of Lot 3 FPG N/A 140.9 97 7
180 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT, Northwest of Lot 1 FPG N/A 142.8 98 7
181 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT GRADE, West of Lot 1 FPG N/A 144.0 99 7
182 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT GRADE, North of Lot 3 FPG N/A 143.2 98 7
183 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT GRADE, East of Lot 4 FPG N/A 141.7 97 7
184 12/19/23 DRIVEWAY A/C PAVEMENT GRADE, Center of 4 Lots FPG N/A 143.0 98 7
185 1/2/24 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-2 8.5 122.0 94 2
186 1/2/24 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-0.5 8.0 124.5 95 2
187 1/2/24 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-1 7.6 122.8 94 2
188 1/2/24 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-0.5 8.1 126.0 97 2
189 1/2/24 ADAMS STREET FILL PLACEMENT FSG-0.5 8.9 124.9 96 2
190 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 8.6 125.0 96 2
191 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 6.8 123.8 95 2
192 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 7.4 125.1 96 2
193 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 9.0 124.2 95 2 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIg
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
194 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET BASE GRADE FBG 14.1 106.6 95 6
195 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET BASE GRADE FBG 12.8 108.2 96 6
196 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET BASE GRADE FBG 12.1 109.1 97 6
197 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET TRENCH BACKFILL FSG 6.8 123.9 95 2
198 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET AC PAVEMENT GRADE FPG N/A 141.1 97 7
199 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET AC PAVEMENT GRADE FPG N/A 141.1 97 7
200 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET AC PAVEMENT GRADE FPG N/A 140.3 96 7
201 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET AC PAVEMENT GRADE FPG N/A 142.0 97 7
202 1/4/24 ADAMS STREET AC PAVEMENT GRADE FPG N/A 141.3 97 7
203 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 8.7 124.6 96 2
204 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 6.4 123.9 95 2
205 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 7.6 122.1 95 4
206 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 8.6 124.5 95 2
207 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 6.7 123.2 94 2
208 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET SUBGRADE FSG 6.5 123.9 95 2
209 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 13.0 106.5 95 6
210 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 12.7 107.0 95 6
211 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 12.5 107.3 96 6
212 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 13.3 106.4 95 6
213 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 13.1 106.2 95 6
214 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 12.6 107.9 96 6
215 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 12.8 107.3 96 6
216 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET BASE SUBGRADE FBG 13.1 106.6 95 6
217 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 141.8 97 8
218 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 143.6 98 8
219 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 139.8 96 8
220 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 142.5 98 8
221 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 143.1 98 8 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIh
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
222 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 143.8 98 8
223 1/5/24 ADAMS STREET ASPHALT FPG N/A 142.9 98 8
224 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 1 FSG 14.2 117.3 91 4
225 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 1 FSG 9.2 116.8 91 4
226 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 1 FSG 11.0 121.0 94 4
227 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 2 FSG 11.0 116.4 91 4
228 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 2 FSG 13.2 120.7 94 4
229 3/13/24 NEW (2-inch) WATERLINE, Lot 2 FSG 15.4 115.0 90 4
230 7/10/24 SIDEWALK, East of Lot 2 FSG 7.3 122.3 95 1
231 7/10/24 SIDEWALK, East of Lot 1 FSG 5.7 122.7 95 1
232 7/10/24 DRIVEWAY, East of Lot 2 FBG 7.8 128.5 98 5
233 7/10/24 DRIVEWAY, East of Lot 1 FBG 9.6 126.6 97 5
234 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 1 FSG 5.4 123.9 95 2
235 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 1 FSG 4.9 124.1 95 2
236 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 1 FSG 6.2 124.0 95 2
237 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 2 FSG 7.0 123.8 95 2
238 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 2 FSG 6.8 124.4 95 2
239 7/15/24 SIDEWALK/ PATIO SUBGRADE, Lot 2 FSG 7.2 125.3 96 2
240 8/15/24 LOT 3 DRIVEWAY FSG 6.3 124.0 95 2
241 8/15/24 LOT 3 PATIO FSG 5.1 120.1 92 2
242 8/15/24 LOT 4 DRIVEWAY FSG 6.0 124.2 95 2
243 8/15/24 LOT 4 PATIO FSG 6.3 119.0 91 2
244 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Driveway FPG N/A 141.0 95 9
245 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Driveway FPG N/A 142.1 95 9
246 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Driveway FPG N/A 140.9 95 9
247 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Driveway FPG N/A 141.3 95 9
248 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Driveway FPG N/A 142.6 96 9
249 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 142.3 96 9 Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIi
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
TABLE A
Approximate Moisture Dry Degree of
Test Elevation Content Density Compaction Compaction
No. Date of Test Test Location (Feet) (%) (pcf) (%) Curve No. Remarks
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1556 and/or ASTM D6938)
250 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 141.6 95 9
251 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 143.0 96 9
252 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 142.8 96 9
253 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 143.1 96 9
254 9/16/24 AC 3-inch CAP-Adams Street FPG N/A 141.2 95 9
Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIj
Notes: 1) Curve number refers to Table B
2) FSG denotes finish subgrade elevation
3) FBG denotes finish base grade elevation
4) FPG denotes finish pavement grade
Job No. 20-12852
Figure No. IIIk
TABLE B
LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D1557)
Compaction Maximum Optimum
Test Source of Dry Density Moisture Content
Curve No. Description of Material Material (pcf) %
C-1 (SM) SILTY SAND; Red-brown On-site 128.5 8.1
C-2 (SM) SILTY SAND; Red-Brown On-site 130.4 7.6
C-3 (SM) SILTY SAND; Light Olive Brown Import 119.0 13.0
(from University)
C-4 (SM) SILTY SAND; Dark Yellowish-Brown Import 128.3 9.6
(from BMN)
C-5 ¾-inch Rock Base Import 130.5 7.8
C-6 (CMB) Crushed Recycled Base; Dark Gray Import 112.2 13.7
C-7 Asphalt Concrete-Mix Import 146±2 **
C-8 Asphalt Concrete-Mix Import 146±2 **
C-9 Asphalt Concrete-Mix Import 149 **
** Asphalt Concrete-Mix values are Wet Density values and were provided by the supplier.