The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZC 167; ALICANTE HILLS; Zone Change (ZC)CITY OF CARLSBAD '/. -APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE ' ._ AS PROVIDED FOR IN CHAPTER 2L 52 ·oF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE •• • -_ZONE-CHANGE NO ••• /67 ··• • . · ,_-_~( F=-o-r-· o-=--f=f=-ei-c"""i a....,_l-_--u~s e-).-- FILIN& FEE RECEIPT NO; ------- ' *******************~**~****************************,*****~***~~***~~*****************~*, * , : • . . ,·. . . . . • '· - I~ A REQUEST is HEREBY MADE.TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTY DESC~I~ED ASJ'. . ' . . . . ,, ,-·. I 1.- (Exact Legal Description) ----------------------- See attached legal . From "R.D.M.-to R_;_l-10, 000 classification _ (exact zoning classification} • by ·amending Title 21 of ·the Municipal Code of the :City of Carlsbad. THE PROPE~TY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ADDRESSED AS-A,lf6ante Hill§ -and· fs located on the : North· arid South -------------(North,Sputh,East,Hest) ·side of Alfii Way (Name of Street) ' .• . qan -Marcos . Canyon •• (Name of Street) . bet~ee~"-• iAitism~, Way; • • • (Name of Street) : • -~-I-~ _____ the undersigned state that·_· ____ ·_r_·_a'.m-'·· __ ·-_____ _ ( I, We) I am,_ We are). • the Agent for the Owner of the property ·described he~ei_n., and• her~b.Y ( Owner, Owners) give My (My, Our) La Co~t?-Land Co~pany, An.Illin9is C;rpo~a.:ti6n. Name By: Burton L. Kramer, Vice President authorization to the fil~ng of this application; • .. (Typed or Printed as shown on. Recorded Deed).· _-_. • __ .. -_ • -. Signatur~L~~ -v~~: ,and • ·Name ---=-( T_y_p_e_d_..o_r..;..._P_r_i_n-te_d_a_s_s~t-1o_w_n_o_n_R.....,e-c_-o-rd...,..e-d.,...--:-D-ee_d..,..,).---,.------------'---'-- S i gna tu re -------------------------"----- \ A~PLICAJlON roR CHANGE OF zor~ . -~-r.~ ,, '• Name . . . ; . . . • -. . . . : ~-.. ' -. "' .. . . . . . . ---(-r=T=-y--~-2...,.d_o_r--=P-r..,..i-n t-e-d,--a-s -s_,.h-o-v,-n-o_n __ -=R,-e_c_or_d.,....e-d,-.=D-ee_d..,..,1...--------.--.,...,....,,._.,.----- . . . . . . -. •. ; ,• ... -·. • •. .-. .'. . • . ... ··- ._ ·: .. •.· .... • ..• • .... _. .... · ~i g'na tu re __ ---'---------,--------',-'-,..,.---'--'---~--,._----- • ··Name . . ' . . .... ; . : .. ; •. ~.. ~ -_.: :·. ·····• .. : ... ·,. _· ._.·· .... _.·.:-.. ··• -.... : --.-,(r.;T=-y-p-ed-.-o-r--:::-.p-r-.-i n-=t-e-;d-'-a s-s-.h_o_w_n -o-n--:,:R-e-co_r_d;-e-;d-_· o---· e-e-d-:-::)-------~---------- Signature --------------------'--'------------- Name --(r:T;;-y-p-e'd-or-. 'P::-r-:ic-n-:--t-e-.d _a_s_s-':--h-o-i.-m----'o-n---=R,-e-c-or-d-,-e-d---=o-e_e_,.d~) ---------'------'-'-- Signature ~-----'-----------'-------'-------------- r • • • • THIS APPLICATION. FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN . • IS SUPPORTED BY THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. SUCH a zone change iswarranted because_.it•·:reduces the density· of d~velopment and the intensity of land use adjacent to poten- tiallysen~itive openspace-reservessuchas San Marcos Canyon and La Costa Golf Course. . . 2. SUCH a zone change will be in the ir:iterest of furtherance of • public welfare because·. 1t will require· less public s~rvices to serve the people in the proposed zone. '. • 3. THE permitted uses in this proposed reclassificati-on will not be detrimental in any way to .surrounding prope.rties because the surrounding pr;pe:rty is' open "spa.Ce •• and half' :abre::e'it'ates. Th_e proposed R-1-10, 000 will enhance the rural. res1.dential 'atmosphere . • 4. THE_ property in this application is ·more ·suitable for the· proposed '. zone than_ the existing zone because the::propos~d-.zone integrates- b~tter. with ·the surrounding land. uses~ -_-The proposed. zone retains • the. rural atmosphere thereby enhancing: the environment of San Marcos Canyon . . 5. WHAT were the original deed restrictions, if any, concerning the type and class of permitted uses on the subject property?.· (Give expirat_ion date of_these restrictions). La Costa Larid Company r~-c~~d~d C.C.&R's to protect the original develop:m~nt co_ncept. • Ariy confl·icting requirements of 'those C.C.&R's wii1 be amended to comply with R-1 development. ~ • APPUCATJON ·FoR CHANGE OF zo.t1.L --1,;-.. --/- 6. THE adopted General Plan of the City of Carlsbad recognizes the property de::.:ri bed herein for • ---r-( R,_e_s__,i,...,d,_e_n_t..,..i a_.,lc--,-. --=c_o_m_m_e r_c_i,_a~i-,-. _,.I-nd..,..u_s_t_r_,,i_a~l ~) ----- Residential •• • . use of l arid. ------------------0 PT ION AL-------------·-----------• THE FOLLOWING SPACES ARE FOR SIGNATURES OF OWNERS WHOSE PROPERTIES LIE WITHIN .A RADIUS OF 300 FEET OF THE PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE RECLASSI.FIED AND WHO . APPROVE OF THE CHANGE (attach extra sheets if necessary)· •• . NO. ON MAP NAME ADDRESS LOT BLOCK TRACT -3-.. • APPLJCfi,TION .FOR CHANGE OF ZON~ -.-;;;-;--~?c.... .. ,-------- OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) SS CITY OF CARLSBAD ) I, (We) Burton L. • Kramer being duly sworn depose and ----,-.(t--ta_m_e ).---------- de cl are to the best of my knowledge that the foregoing is -(-.-m_iy_,_o_u_r...,.) ___ _ true and correct under the penalty of purjury: EXECUTED AT __,,(-=-c1"e""'."·.t-y..-) ----------(.-c=S-ta--=-t-e~) -~ DATE ---..(.,..,..Mo_n_t.,...,h ).------,(-=-oa-y-.-)-. ----(=Y.,.._.e-a r-,,)-- APPLICANT, OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT: .La Costa Land ·company· , ·By: Burton L~ Kramer, Vice Pres~ (Print.Name) Cos'ta Del Mar Road• • • (Mailing Address) Carlsbad, California 92008 (City and State) .(Zip) 714 ·729-9111 • (Area Code) .(Telephone Number) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __ /~d~z,6_.,..._· ____ DAY OF 9--• /V,;, //11Lv RE.o ;z: ~L../HAN (Notary Public) -' OFFICIAL SEAL . MILDRED I. HOLMAN NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA SAN Dli;GO COUNTY ~:.. e~lres. AUG 7, 1971 IW9 N. Beech St 1:.:.:.......,Jd . . · -., _,., o, CA 9120:l~ • • APPLIC/\JIO-l'l -FOR CHANGE OF ZONE 11EXHIBIT liAII FILING FEES: $100.00 plus $5.00 for each addition~l lot or parcel. THIS APPLICATIO~I SHU.LL BE FORMALLY FILED ON THE FIRST .. MONDAY OF THE MONTH .. THE . . . - PUBLIC HEARING AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION LEVEL WILL BE HELD NOT. SOONER THAN THE SECOND TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH .. . . ' . . . . -. . . ' - IN ADDIT_ION TO HAVING THIS APPLICATION COMPI..ETELY FILLED OUT, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS . • MUST BE ATTACHED: ~,, ," . 1. •• PLOT PLAN A complete Plot Plan (see exhibit 1i811 ) (28 copies & t sepia) • • 2. 300 FOOT RADIUS MAP - A ·map_ to scale not less than 111 :; 200' showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries -of the subject property,· the zone classification of each within 300 • feet of _the exterior boundaries of: • • the subject property, and each lot within 300 feet of_ the exterior boundari.es -- . of the subject property sha.11 be consecutively numbered to correspond with_ the property owner's list. 3. _ PROPERTY OWNERS I UST - A typewritten list.showing the number_. of each . lot from Item 2 above, followed by the owner'_s name clnd address_.· In' addition ,,· the applicant must ·file an affidavit that it is an accurate list taken from the la test equalized assessmwnt ro 11 on file in the office of the Assessor • of San Diego County, 855 Williamston Street, Vista,·california. (!'hone (714) • -· 724-8571. *, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~-* * OFFICE USE·ONLY . . . . . DATE RECEIVED: FORMAL FILING DATE: -------------------- APPROVED FOR FILING WITH _tHE PLANNING COMMISSIO~BY~: --,(.-::P:-::-1-a-nno-c. _i=-n-g---=-oe_p_a_r..,.tm_e_n_t ..... )-- -5- ·lS-G. ••• ·:-~ ,' ·, .o . ··-a.·· I . .. ·• co.: .· 'I\) . ·c ... . . • _: . ' ·,. ·.·. 0 . . . ' ' . 1, .• • 0)·· I -4 •·ffl .... ··m . . . ,, 0 .:........:...____:_~~...=.~~~~~~r-"~~~~rr......-~--•• :c· •. ·u· ~ Ill~ . ~ · wa z~ C, '·. z Ill . ~-. CJ. CC: • ... : .... . ,,,,,,·::::,;:,,.,.-.-,,,,:-.=.=:.-.:,.-:-:.-.-.::=:-•: AL I CANTE I-II ll5 ;.;;_:_:~_;;;·;;;·,;~:;:~:-~:,~:;.~:_;:;;~:~;:;;:~;_:_::;. (C. T. 72-25) TENT A T!VE • :·-~·-_··:·:··:····-···:··.·····:··_·:····_··_····_·· • _MAP C. T. 75G. . . . . . . . . . . • • . • TO -A~_COMPANY R;EZONE .••• _·. APPLICATION , • . . . .,· . . . ·. _· . • •. . . . ,1 ,--. . •• __,. -.... -·~ ·.·~· .•. I . . .._. ... ,-·· I\>, . . • (0 . . . I .. • --~' .··co • .····•.·o:,. •. --, . l,___sca1e/"=800'·. Date8~4-75 ·•··• Proj. NCJ.6926 __J 0 ~ 1000' FR-j: SCALE / ·\I I ,· .I: '! I I i ,1 I I i .Case No.ZC-\Co1 Date Rec'd: 'ff-S-(S DRC Date: 9-~-7S P~ Date 2-IO-"J. -~ Des er i pt ion of Request : _ _,Z=-o=tJ..,,,E,,.___=~.,_,,.,,,'----· _.l==_.,i..=O=~~-_e~'O;_;•_-__;_M___c......,..~-=-==_, _ __,t .=D--_--1 (2 ... ,_ App 1 i cant: \...A O)<,i . L. . :t') En9r. or ,Arch. j2,, c.~ EA.,Jfo. • • • • Brief Legal: __ pc,,3,--,oj,,.) MRP No. 7'78"<-J= ohJ~-(.,1:: C.ouf\),'y _ _ 1$ Et!.oFf D €/?,/ ~T.""/0 LJ S.61.-4 TH #..V~.I= S:ce r /2S T? ~ s BM Assessor Book: t,IIP/z_,1,; _ ~age:_ ~111-7 • _P~rce: ~<.Lo/&tertdN General Plan Land Useifescnpt1on:JiEs, Heh-J-/!<:,.>-1 ,,l)&l£Jr'I /~-2.,(:).J>\J Exis~ing Zone: 8 D M · _ · Proposed Zone: __ ---,-_--'--· --.:;--.-....-----1 Acres: . No. of Lots: '-f . · DU 1 s . DU Acre_~ School District_: ..EJ_CJM1.4R) E$C(?AJ1:>J})O _f;1p}Q,{) ·1-/JC-, J--/ _ Wat~r Sanitation District: .. C::~V)) i ~ EOCR..D/H • _ 14ithi n _Coast Pl an J\rea : ____ f & • 7 Coast Permit /\rea: ,t)o · __ _ _· ___ , __ ----------------- f r; I i l· l- 1-· • ...... 0 ENVIRONMENTAL· IMPACT:ASSESSMENT.FORM EIA No .. 30~ Date: ___ __,..------- • Name of· App 1 i cant: La Cos ta Land Company Address: Costa -Del Mar Road· Carlsbad, California.92008 Permit Applied For: Tentative Map C.T. 75..;6, Rezone, Variance Case Nos_.=·----------------------:---------------- • A • ·t The pro .. posed a.ctivity. is located on the Location of Proposed ctw1 y: __ _:..__;::....._ _____ _.;;. ___ ........ ____ ...,,_._ North side bf the La Costa Golf Course, West of San Marcos Canyon East of La:-Costa Valley Units·4 and 5 and.South of the 100 foot wide.S.D.G.&Ee Company easement that traverses the La Costa holdings Background Iriformatioin from Southeast tp Northwest. 1. Give a brief desc~iption of the proposed activity {attach any __ preliminnry development plansL • • _ . • .·. The developer proposes to reques·t a . rezone of the majority of c. T ~ 72-25 from R.D.M~/14 to R-1-10,000.-. The existing· subdivision will be re-subdivided into lots suitable for single family.dwelli:rigs~ · The d~veloper proposes to vacate a portion of the existing.public· streets and construct additional private streetse The private • streets-will be.in a controlled access area -and will be maintained by • a homeowners association e A variance has been ·applied .. for to allow the use of· Hpanhandle 11 ,lots. These lots are lo.cated where· the topography is steep·and roe~ "prevents the installation of . . streetso • • 2 Describe the activity.areas including distinguishing natural. and ·, manmade characteristics; a·lso provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. The.activity area .is a recently complete subdivision. The site is graded and all utilities have been installed. The proposed. development has been designed to conform to the existing grading and still observe good engineering guide lines. The proposed development will help to preserve the openess of the Golf Course and.San Marcos Canyon. " • -.. . . 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM . Environmental Impact Analysis Answer the following q~estions by placing a check in·the appropriate space.· 1. Could the project significantly. change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2 .. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3. Could the activity affect the functioning of an es tab 1 i shed 'community or neighborhood? · 4. Could the activity result in the displace~ent of co~munity residents? 5. Are any of the natural or man-made features in.the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of. the County, State, or nation? 6. Could the activity significantly affect a historica1 or archaelogical site or its setting? 7• Could the activity significantly affect the.potential -use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res- ource? 8. Does the activity area serve as a.-habitat, food source nesti.ng place~ source of water, etco for rare or endangered wildlife or fish species? • 9. Could the activity significantly affect fish~ wildlife or plant 1 ife? • . 10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? • 11. Could the activity change existing features of any of the city I s 1 a goons, bays, or tideland~? • • 12. Could the activity change existing features of any of the City's beaches? 13. Could the activity result ·in the erosion or·elimination of agricultural lands?. 14. Could the activity serve to encourage development of · presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? • Yes No.· X X X X X ' X X X X X ( 0 \ \ Q,- Will the activity require a variance from established· envirornr.ental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? 16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, State or Federal environmental control agency? 17. Will the activity require issµance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 18. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 19. • Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a.·flood plain? • 20. • Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 21. • Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 22. Could the activity result in the_generation.of significant amounts of-noise? 23. Could the activity result in the generati.on of significai:it amounts of dust? • 24. Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? 25. Could the activity result in a significant change in the . quality of aFly portion of.the region's air or-water resources? (Should note sur-face, ground water, off-shore)p • 260 Will there be a significant change to exi.sting land form? . . (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards. • 90, ooo (b) • percentage of alter-ation to the present land fonn. -------80% (c) maximum heig~t of cut or fill slopes. .• 25 feet No X X X X . ··X ,.; • x· . X X X • 27. Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use _of utilities, sewers, dra·ins or streets? • __ _x_ III. State of No Significant Environmental Effects . If you have answered yes tQ one or more of the questions in Section II but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: ~ I • I The use·of "panhandle" lots will not have a significant environmental· effect. This· type of lot will allow ~he developer to .provide lots . in I desirable locations without destroying the natural terrain. The proposed homeowners association can provide guidance to property owners to mitigate maintenance problems. ,/ !' • ·~ .... ;\ a ' . I. ✓. Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II . . (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as may be needed.) Signature ___ ·~"-"'-'=---t__J_--~~~·~·-~r=--..a....a=·----=-~----.-----,. ~ com pl et i ng report) . Date Signed : __ ....;C .... ts:1:<111!:«:r!:!!:O ,e..__/ ...... 3.c,.,--L.I.L2.z..7 ... S,.__ ________ _ Conclusions (To be completed by .the Planning Director). e1ace a check in the appropriate box. ( ) Further ·;nformation is required .. ( ) It ha~ been determined that· the project will not have s.ignificant environmental effects. ( ) You must submit a preliminary environinenta1 impact statement by the following date • . (-) You • should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04 bf the Muni~ipal Code. DATE RECEIVED: ------BY: -=.:------::----=-=~--=-----P 1 an n in g Directors or,,. .... Revised 7/3/74