Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-19; Design Review Board; ; RP 90-05|CDP 90-02 - ROOSEVELT PARKING LOTSTAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RP 90-5/CDP 90-2 - ROOSEVELT PARKING LOT - Request for a Redevelopment Pennit and Coastal Development Pennit to constmct a 55- space public parking lot on the northeast comer of Carlsbad Village Drive (formerly Elm Avenue) and Roosevelt Street in Sub-area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Design Review Board ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution No. 158 APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Design Review Board Resolution Nos. 156 and 157 APPROVING CDP 90-2 and RP 90-5. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND During the streetscape program on Carlsbad Village Drive, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission directed staff to locate additional parking on or near this street and to maximize the number of spaces at each potential site. In response to this direction, staff has negotiated a 5-year lease, with option to purchase, on a 17,500 square foot site at the northeast comer of Carlsbad Village Drive and Roosevelt Street. On this site, a 55-space public parking lot is proposed. The site is located in Sub-area 1 of the Village Redevelopment Area. It is also in the Coastal Zone and thus is subject to the Local Coastal Plan for the Redevelopment Area. The lot is not being proposed to satisfy off-street parking requirements of other land uses in the Redevelopment Area since doing so would require a Local Coastal Plan Amendment. Use of this site as a parking lot is projected to be temporary while long-term parking solutions are sought and a new Master Plan for the Village Area is developed. 6> >^EI RP 90-5/CDP 90-2 - ROOSWELT PARKING LOT SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 PAGE 2 III. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the proposal comply with the goals and policies of the General Plan as well as those specified in the Village Design Manual for Sub-Area 1? 2. Does the proposal comply with the intent of the Village Design Manual? 3. Is the proposal consistent with the Local Coastal Program? DISCUSSION The proposed parking lot does comply with the goals and policies of both the General Plan and the Village Design Manual for Sub-area 1. The goal of this Sub-area is to function as a major financial, specialty, commercial center for the downtown area. The proposed project complies with this goal by providing parking facilities to serve retail uses, by encouraging pedestrian activity, and by improving automobile circulation in the Village Center and along Carlsbad Village Drive. The layout and design of the proposed parking lot complies with the intent to provide landscaped parking areas in the Village Center. The 55 space parking lot provides a combination of 28 compact stalls and 27 regular stalls accented with perimeter landscaping and interior tree wells. Aisle widths comply v^th engineering standards with the exception of the one which parallels Roosevelt Street. That aisle will be 22.5 feet wide but will be workable as it exclusively serves a short row of compact stalls. The LCP designation for the proposed site is "core area/general commercial". Although not a retail use, the parking lot is consistent with this intent by providing convenient, safe, and attractive off-street parking to encourage pedestrian traffic and improve general circulation for retail uses in the area. The lot v^ll be conditioned to prohibit its use firom meeting off- street parking requirements for other land uses in the Village Redevelopment area unless a formal amendment to the Local Coastal Program is approved by the Califomia Coastal Commission. rv. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The site was field checked during environmental review. It was found to have been previously graded and developed with three residential units. No archaeological sites, rare or endangered plant or animal species are known to exist on the site. The Planning Director has determined that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a Negative Declaration. A copy of the Negative Declaration is on file at the Planning Department. >^^EI RP 90-5/CDP 90-2 - ROOSSTELT PARKING LOT SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 PAGE 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 158 2. Design Review Board Resolution No. 156 3. Design Review Board Resolution No. 157 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet 6. Exhibits "A" - "D" dated September 19, 1990. AS:km August 22, 1990 Gity of Garlsbad ROOSEVELT ST. PARKING LOT RP 90-05 CDP 90-02 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ^ CASE NO: RP 90-5/CDP 90-2 APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUEST AND LOCATION: 55 SPACE PARKING LOT NORTHEAST CORNER OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE (FORMERLY ELM AVENUE) AND ROOSEVELT ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1. 2. 3. 4. and 5. Block 38. MAP 775. APN: 203-304-09 and 20 Acres .40 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 55 spaces GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation CBD Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A Existing Zone N/A Proposed Zone N/A Sunounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site VR Vacant North VR Commercial South VR Commercial East VR Commercial West VR Commercial PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer N/A EDU's N/A Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT JC Negative Declaration, issued August 16, 1990 E.I.R. Certified, dated Other,