HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 85-15; PARK VIEW WEST; FINAL NOISE STUDY; 1996-07-30I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT:PARKVIEW WEST
FLR PLAN:4
ROOM:MASTER
SOURCE:1
(l=HIGHWAY, 2=TRAIN, 3=MILITARY JET)
(1) TRANSMISSION LOSS
DATE: 29-Jul-96
JOB #:507-96-001
BY: BILL LAWSON
CODE WALL ASSEMBLY WINDOWS OPEN WINDOWS CLO
TL AREA S/(lOA(TL/10) AREA S/(lOA(TL/1
500
302
700
STUCCO WALL 7/8 11
FIXED WINDOW 3/1611
OPEN WINDOW
43.66 243
26.03 36
0.0105
0.0898
8.0000 o.oo 8
COMPOSITE WALL
TRANSMISSION LOSS=
( 2) ROOM EFFECTS
CODE
VALUE
800
804
900
900
700
ROOM SURFACE
PERSON
FLOOR
CEILING
WALLS W/WINDOWS CLOSED
WALLS W/WINDOWS OPEN
OPEN WINDOW
OPENING TO
OPENING TO
TRANSMISSION LOSS
TOTAL SURFACE AREA
TOTAL ABSORBTION
AVE. ABSORTION COEFF.
OUTSIDE WALL AREA
ROOM CONSTANT
ROOM EFFECTS
(3) NOISE REDUCTION
287 0.0282
15.4938
AREA TREATMENT
247 CARPET
247 DRYWALL
460 DRYWALL
452 DRYWALL
8 OPEN WINDOW
WINDOWS OPEN
15.49
954.00
156.47
0.16
287.00
187.17
2.51
12.98
243
44
287
ABSORB.
COEFF.
0.50
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.00
0.0105
0.1098
0.0000
0.0004
33.7789
ABSORB.
4.00
123.50
7.41
13.80
13.56
8.00
0.00
0.00
WINDOWS CLO
33.78
954.00
148.71
0.16
287.00
176.17
2.74
31.04
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARKVIEW WEST
FINAL NOISE STUDY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.
Coastal Valley Division
495 East Rincon, Suite 115
Corona, CA 91719
Prepared by:
ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4101 Birch Street, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
July 30, 1996
JN:652-96-001
RK:BL:kgd/6029
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Exterior Area -Noise Exposure Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Noise Control Barrier Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Noise Control Barrier Construction Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Interior Area -Noise Exposure Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Noise Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
EXTERIOR NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
EXTERIOR AREA NOISE EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND CONTROL . . . . . . . . . 13
Receiver Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Horizontal Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Vertical Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 14
Source Assumptions .... • .. ; . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 14
Horizontal Geometry ...... : ........ •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Vertical Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
INTERIOR AREA NOISE EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND CONTROL . . . . . . . . . 17
CONCLUSIONS • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 19
APPENDICES
GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A
CITY OF CARLSBAD NOISE STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B
CITY OF CARLSBAD VEHICULAR NOISE ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C
NOISE CALCULATION WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E
NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
A RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
B LOCATION MAP .................................. .
C PLOT PLAN ...................................... .
PAGE
2
8
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
1 NOISE CONTROL BARRIER RECOMMENDATIONS
2 ROADWAY AND SITE PARAMETERS .................... .
3 EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS ............................ .
4 INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS ............................ .
PAGE
4
1 1
16
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PARKVIEW WEST
FINAL NOISE ANALYSIS
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
A final acoustical analysis has been completed to determine the exterior noise
exposure and the necessary mitigation measures for the proposed GREYSTONE
HOMES, INC. Parkview West project located in the City of Carlsbad. The results of
this analysis indicate that future motor vehicle noise from Rancho Santa Fe Road,
Camino de los Caches and Calle Timiteo represents the principle source of community
noise that will impact the site. However, these noise impacts can be adequately
mitigated with appropriate noise control measures.
The results of this study indicate that future projected exterior noise levels along
Rancho Santa Fe Road, Camino de los Caches and Calle Timiteo exceed the City of
Carlsbad ex~erior noise standard of 60 dBA CNEL. To reduce the noise exposu_re of
the exterior living areas, a noise control barrier is recommended along portions of the
· site.
It is expected that the City of Carlsbad inte.rior noise exposure standard of 45 dBA
CNEL will be met for lots 6-8, 14-28, 38-42, 60-63, 74-82, and 84-85 using a
windows closed condition requiring mechanical ventilation.
A detailed list of the noise control measures is presented in the Summary of
Recommendations (Table 1) and are shown on Exhibit A. The noise control analysis
and recommendations in this report are intended to satisfy City of Carlsbad noise
standards.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Exterior Area -Noise Exposure Control
Noise Control Barrier Design
The City of Carlsbad noise standards for residential development require that outdoor
living areas be no greater than 60 dBA CNEL. The findings of this study indicate that
the maximum future unmitigated noise impacts for this site exceed the 60 dBA CNEL
exposure limit for some of the residential dwelling units.
To meet the City of Carlsbad exterior noise standard of 60 dBA CNEL, a noise barrier
is required on a portions of Rancho Santa Fe Road, Camino de los Caches and Calle
Timiteo. Table 1 indicates the location and specifies the height of the recommended
noise control barrier for the Parkview West project. The data in Table 1 are based
upon a barrier location along the boundary line of subject buildings, between the
adjacent roadways and exterior living areas. Indicated barrier heights are assumed to
be the top of the barrier, above pad or:roadway elevation, whfchever is greater. The
plot plan used for this study have been prepared by William Hezmalhalch Architects,
Inc. and are shown on Exhibit A. Barrier locations and heights are also shown on
Exhibit A. Where applicable, the barriers should wrap around the ends of the dwelling
units to prevent flanking of noise into the site.
Noise Control Barrier Construction Materials
The designed noise screening may only be accomplished if the barriers weight is at
least 3.5 pounds per square foot of face area and have no decorative cutouts or line-
3
TABLE 1
NOISE CONTROL BARRIER RECOMMENDATIONS
MINIMUM BARRIER
BUILDING NUMBER ROADWAY HEIGHT1 (FEET)
18-23 Rancho Santa Fe Road 6.0
24-27 Rancho Santa Fe Road 6.0-2.5
28,140 Rancho Santa Fe Road 2.5-2.0
74-81 Rancho Santa Fe Road 2.0
15-18 Camino de los Caches 6.0
38-41 Calle Timiteo 4.0
53 Calle Timiteo 4.0
1 Lot 18 would require a 9.5' noise barrier to attain a 60 dBA CNEL with a 6' noise barrier, Lot 18
would experience noise levels within 65 dBA CNEL.
4
I
I
'I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
·1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
of-site openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The recommended noise
control barrier may be constructed using one of the following alternative materials:
1. Masonry block;
2. Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or 1 inch thick tongue
and groove wood of sufficient weight per square foot;
3. Glass ( 1 /4 inch thick), or other transparent material with sufficient
weight per square foot;
4. Earthen berm;
5. Any combination of these construction materials.
The recommended barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary
openings or decorative cutouts should not-be made. All gaps (except for weep holes)
should be filled grout or caulking.
Interior Area -Noise Exposure Control
Typical California residential building construction will provide a minimum of 12 dBA
noise reduction with windows open and a minimum of 20 dBA noise reduction with
windows closed. To obtain an interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL, lots 6-8, 14-28,
38-42, 60-63, 74-82, and 84-85 will require a mechanical ventilation system to
permit a "windows closed" condition.
5
Based upon this final study, when the operable doors and windows are open for
homes facing Rancho Santa Fe Road, Camino de los Caches and Calle Timiteo, it is
expected that the interior 45 dBA CNEL intrusion limit may be exceeded, as shown
in Exhibit A. Therefore, a "windows closed" condition is applicable to these units,
and a means of mechanical ventilation is required to meet the interior noise standard.
This mechanical ventilation system shall supply two air changes per hour to each
habitable room, including 20% (one-fifth) fresh make-up air obtained directly from the
outdoors. The fresh air inlet duct shall be of sound attenuating construction and shall
consist of a minimum of ten feet of straight or curved duct or six feet plus one sharp
90° bend.
6
I
I
I
I
,,
I
' I
I
' I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
·1
f.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a final noise impact and design study for the
proposed Parkview West residential development is located in the City of Carlsbad.
Included in the report is a discussion of the expected exterior community-noise
environment and recommendations for control of the noise impacts for outdoor areas.
The general location of the proposed project is shown on the Location Map, Exhibit
B. The project is located south of La Costa Avenue and east of Rancho Santa Fe
Road in the City of Carlsbad. The plot plan used for the acoustical analysis of this
project were prepared by William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. and are shown on
Exhibit C.
In the following sections, noise exposures expected within the planned site are
reviewed and compared to the applicable noise standards. Design recommendations
necessary to comply with the noise standards have been presented in the Summary
of Recommendations. A Glossary of _Acoustical Terms is included in Appendix "A".
Noise Standards
The City of Carlsbad Noise Standards based upon the General Plan Noise Element for
the site are included in Appendix "B". The project's residential land use is considered
to be a noise sensitive land use for which an exterior noise standard not to exceed 60
dBA CNEL is required in outdoor living areas and an interior noise standard of 45 dBA
CNEL in all habitable rooms.
7
EXTERIOR NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Exhibit B shows the location of the proposed project within the City of Carlsbad. It
is expected that the primary source of noise impact to the site will be traffic noise
from Rancho Santa Fe Road, Camino de los Caches and Calle Timiteo. The proximity
of the roadway to the site is shown in Exhibit C. Other local roads, such as La Costa
Avenue, are not expected to contribute substantially to the noise impacts for this
project due to their lower volume/speed and shielding by building structures between
the site and these streets.
Railroad lines do not exist and are not planned in the vicinity of the site. It is
expected that railroad noise will make no contribution to the development noise
environment. The site is not impacted by aircraft noise from any established military
or civilian aircraft pattern.
The expected future roadway noise impact was projected using a version of ~he
' '
Federal High_way Administration {FHWA) traffic noise prediction model {FHWA-RD-77-
108) as modified for CNEL and "CALVENO" noise emission curves, together with
several key roadway and site parameters. The key inputs include the roadway
classification {e.g. Urban Arterial, Major, Secondary or Collector); the roadway active
width {the distance between the center of the outer most travel lanes on each side
of the roadway); the roadway design capacity for Level of Service "C"; the travel
speed; the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks in the
roadway volume; the roadway grade; the angle of view; the site conditions ("hard"
or "soft"); and the percent of total average daily traffic {ADT) which flows each hour
throughout a 24-hour period.
10
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
11
lj
I ~
,,
I
I:
I·
I
:1
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2
ROADWAY AND SITE PARAMETERS
RIGHT-
OF-WAY ANGLE
WIDTH SPEED OF
ROADWAY LANES (FT) CLASSIFICATION ADT1 (MPH) VIEW HARD/SOFT
Rancho Santa 4 102 Major Arterial 32,600 45 180 Hard
Fe Rd.
La Costa Ave. 2 68 Collector 6,700 36 180 Hard
Camino de 2 68 Collector 3,600 40 180 Hard
los Coches
Calle Timiteo 2 60 Local 3,000 35 180 Hard
TRAFFIC FLOW DISTRIBUTION
MIX OVERALL% DAY% EVENING% NIGHT~,
Automobiles 97.89 77.50 12.90 9.60
Medium Trucks 1.83 84.80 4.90 10.30
Heavy Trucks 0.28 86.50 2.70 10.80
1 Source: Buildout traffic volumes were obtained from Jim Murry with the City of Carlsbad on July 14, 1996.
11
I
The expected future roadway parameter information for the percentages of I
automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks, and the 24-hourly percentage of traffic
. flow breakdown were obtained from the City of Carlsbad's Noise Guideline Manual I
"Vehicular Noise Assessment" included in Appendix "C". A summary of the roadway
and site parameter values used to project future roadway noise impacts are presented I
in Table 2.
12
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
·I
i
:1
II .,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXTERIOR AREA NOISE EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
The City of Carlsbad standards for residential construction require that the noise
exposures in all usable outdoor areas not exceed 60 dBA CNEL. Analysis and
recommendations for control of motor vehicle noise impacts in outdoor living areas are
presented in this section.
Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Table
2, calculations of the potential worse case traffic noise impacts were completed. The
computer printouts for the specific site impacts are included in Appendix "D". The
preliminary grading plan used in the analysis is included in Appendix "E".
Determination of the potential worse case future traffic noise impacts for the outdoor
usable areas were developed using the roadway noise assumptions in Table 2 and
data from the tentative maps for the project. Calculations were made using the road
and pad grades indicated on the tract maps and the previously specified parameters.
Hard site conditions were utilized for all vehicle types. The site noise analysis
indicate·s a future ~xpected unmitigatep noise exposure of over 60 dBA CNEL for lots
18-28, 140 and 74-81 facing Rancho Santa Fe Road; lots 38-41 and 53 facing Calle
Timiteo; and lots 15-·18 facing Camino de los Caches.
An analysis has been performed to determine the acoustical shielding which may be
used to reduce the expected roadway noise impact to below 60 dBA CNEL for the
affected outdoor usable areas. The barrier analysis was completed using a version of
the FHWA-RD-77-108 Noise Model as modified for CNEL and "CALVENO" energy
curves. Key input data for these barrier performance equations include the relative
source-barrier-receiver horizontal separations, the relative source-barrier-receiver
vertical separations, the typical noise source spectra and the barrier transmission loss.
13
Following are the general assumptions used in determination the source and receiver
geometry:
Receiver Assumptions:
Horizontal Geometry: Distance behind toe-of-slope: 5 feet to 10 feet
Vertical Geometry: Height above pad for ground level receivers:
• Exterior noise: 5 feet
• 1st Floor Interior: 5 feet
• 2nd Floor Interior: 15 feet
Source Assumptions:
Horizontal Geometry: For roadways with grades no greater than 2%, all vehicles
are located at the single lane equivalent acoustic center of
.the full roadway. For roadways with over 2% grade,
vehicle count is divided in half an·d is located at the single
lane equivalent acoustic center for ~ side of the
roadway.
Vertical Geometry: Height above road grade:
Autos
Medium Trucks
Heavy Trucks
14
=
=
=
0.0 feet
2.3 feet
8.0 feet
I
I
;11
f
I
I
,,
I
I
I'
I
·I
II
I
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
These assumptions, together with elevations and distances shown on the tentative
maps were used to fix the horizontal and vertical geometry used in the barrier
analysis. For the purposes of this study, the FHWA traffic noise spectra assumptions
were used in the barrier analysis.
Table 3 shows the exterior noise impacts and recommended noise barrier heights. To
meet the City of Carlsbad 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard, a 6.0 foot noise
barrier is recommended for lots 14-23 facing Camino de los Caches and Rancho Santa
Fe Road. Table 3 indicates the location and height for additional noise barriers.
Detailed recommendations for construction and placement of the noise-control barrier
are presented in the Summary of Recommendations. Once the recommended barriers
are constructed, it is expected that the usable outdoor residential space noise-
exposure levels will be less than the 60 dBA CNEL limit.
The noise analysis indicates that lot 18 would require a 9.5 foot noise barrier to meet
the City of Carlsbad 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard. This is the only lot which
would require a noise barrier over 6.0 feet. With a 6.0 foot wall, noise levels for lot
18 are anticipated to be within 65 dBA CNEL. Therefore, the 6.0 foot wall is
recommended for this particular lot.
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERIOR AREA NOISE EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
This final noise report has evaluated the affects of the precise building placement,
design and materials used for construction and the required noise mitigation measures.
This report will make recommendations for any necessary building upgrades or other
requirements to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard.
Based upon the calculations, it is anticipated that residential dwelling units lots 6-8,
14-28, 38-42, 60-63, 74-82, and 84-85 will require "windows closed" condition
which will require some form of mechanical ventilation system for those structures.
Noise reduction calculations based on individual floor plans were used to estimate
"windows closed" conditions for second floor units at some individual lots. Noise
reduction calculations are provided in Appendix "F". Recommendations for
mechanical ventilation are included in the Summary of Recommendations. Noise
impacts for first and second floor locations are shown in Table 4.
17
LOT
1
6A
68
14
15
18
19
23
27
38
42
40
53
54
61
74
80
82
84
116
130
TABLE 4
INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS
NOISE LEVEL INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL
AT FACADE WINDOWS OPEN1
(CNEL) (CNEL)
FLOOR FLOOR
1ST 2ND 1ST 2ND
51.4 54.1 39.4 42.1
56.0 55.9 44.0 43.9
58.9 58.8 46.9 46.8
58.7 58.6 46.7 46.6
57.5 63.8 45.5 51.8
64.9 72.5 52.9 60.5
59.7 65.9 47.7 53.9
59.6 66.7 47.6 54.7
59.8 64.6 47.8 52.6
52.7 58.6 40.7 46.6
57.3 60.5 45.3 48.5
58.6 58.4 46.6 46.4
55.3 59.7 43.3 47.7
5.2.7 58.8 40.7 46.8
57.5 57.4 45.5 45.4
60.0 65.6 48.0 53.6
59.5 63.7 47.5 51.7
59.3 62.0 47.3 50.0
58.1 62.0 46.1 50.0
40.1 41.5 28.1 29.5
46.2 49.9 34.2 37.9
1 Based upon a minimum 12.0 dBA exterior/interior noise reduction.
2 Based upon a minimum 20.0 dBA exterior/interior noise reduction.
INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL
WINDOWS CLOSED
(CNEL)
FLOOR
1ST2 2ND
31.4 34.1
36.0 35.9
38.9 38.8
38.7 38.6
37.5 43.8
44.9 41.53
39.7 34.93
39.6 35.73
39.8 44.6
32.7 38.6
37.3 40.5
38.6 38.4
35.3 39.7
32.7 38.8
37.5 37.4
40.0 45.6
39.5 43.7
39.3 42.0
38.1 42.0
20.1 21.5
26.2 29.9
3 Based upon individual noise reduction calculation for each floor plan (seE;t Appendix "F").
18
I
I
' I
I
I
t
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I. .,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
1·
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONCLUSIONS
An acoustical analysis and design has been completed for the proposed Parkview
West project. The analysis indicates that the future noise environment is expected
to be dominated by vehicle noise from Rancho Santa Fe Road, Camino de las Caches
and Calle Timiteo. The noise control findings show that the 60 dBA CNEL outdoor
exposure limits are expected to be met with the construction of the recommended
noise control barriers in this study. Compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise
standard and the California Noise Insulation standards will be met for all structures if
the recommended mitigation measures included in this report are implemented.
The analysis and design presented in this report comply with applicable City of
Carlsbad requirements for control of community noise impacts for outdoor living areas.
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS
A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL. The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter
using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high
frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical
method of rating human judgment of loudness.
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL. The composite of noise from all sources near and far. In this context, the
ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVEL (CNEL). The average equivalent A-weighted sound level
during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from
7 p.m. to 10 p.m. and after addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night before 7 a.m. and
after 10 p.m.
DECIBEL (dB). A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the
base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20
micro-pascals.
dB(A). A-weighted sound level (see definition above).
EQUIVALENT SOUND LEVEL (LEO). The sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given
sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time varying noise level. The
energy average noise level during the sample period.
HABITABLE ROOM. Any room meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code or other
applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking or dining purposes,
excluding such enclo·sed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting
corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces.
L(n). The A-weighted s·ound level exceeded during a certain percentage of the sample time. For
example, L 10 in the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the sample time. Similarly L50, L90, L99 etc.
NOISE. Any unwanted sound or sound which is undesirable because it interferes with speech and
hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying. The State Noise Control
Act defines noise as " ... excessive undesirable sound ... ".
OUTDOOR LIVING AREA. Outdoor spaces that are associated with residential land uses typically used
for passive recreational activities or other noise-sensitive uses. Such spaces include patio areas,
barbecue areas, jacuzzi areas, etc. associated with residential uses; outdoor patient recovery or resting
areas associated with hospitals, convalescent hospitals, or rest homes; outdoor areas associated with
places of worship which have a significant role in services or other noise-sensitive activities; and
outdoor school facilities routinely used for educational purposes which may be adversely impacted by
noise. Outdoor areas usually not included in this definition are: front yard areas, driveways,
greenbelts, maintenance areas and storage areas associated with residential land uses; exterior areas
at hospitals that are not used for patient activities; outdoor areas associated with places of worship
and principally used for short-term social gatherings; and, outdoor areas associated with school
facilities that are not typically associated with educational uses prone to adverse noise impacts (for
example, school play yard areas).
PERCENT NOISE LEVELS. See L(n).
SOUND LEVEL (NOISE LEVEL). The weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of a sound level
meter having a standard frequency-filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum.
SOUND LEVEL METER. An instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and
frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of noise and sound levels.
SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVEL (SENEL). The dB(A) level which, if it lasted for one second,
would produce the same A-weighted sound energy as the actual event.
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
' t
I
• I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX 8
CITY OF CARLSBAD NOISE STANDARDS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
Noise Guidelines Manual CITY OF CARLSBAD
IV. PROJECT PROCESSING PROCEDURES
This section is intended to be primarily used by project applicants and citizens who are
interested in understanding how noise issues are addressed during the City's review of a
development proposal.
The purpose of this section is to identify how noise issues are handled in the City's review
of development proposals. It is intended that this section provide the reader with the method
used by City staff to evaluate noise issues of development projects. By understanding this
process, it is intended that proposed projects will, by their planning and design, comply with
the City's policies concerning noise/land-use compatibility.
This section should be used to determine whether a possible noise/land-use conflict would
occur if action is not taken to resolve potential noise problems. It is expected that both
citizens and City staff will refer to this section when evaluating development proposals.
Although noise issues are considered important, it is only one of several planning issues that
might be identified in a new project. Noise issues should be addressed through the routine
project approval process.
A. Guidelines for Complying with City Noise Policies
The most satisfactory method of complying with City noise policies is through good project
design. The design should recognize community noise as a concern and design-out potential
noise conflicts. This section of the manual will provide guidance on ways to comply with City
Noise Policies. The project designer is encouraged to integrate creative solutions to noise
concerns, with the solutions of other site development concerns such as safety, provision and
utilization of open space, view shed enhancement, interior traffic circulation, recreation, etc.
The following is a discussion of methods of complying with City Policies. Table IV-2, at the
end of this section, provides a summary of these suggestions.
1. Residential Noise (Rl
The City of Carlsbad considers residential land uses particularly sensitive to noise intrusion
because residents are expected to use their homes for rest and recreation. Higher levels of
noise interfere with such use. As such, the City has adopted specific noise standards to limit
noise impacts to residential areas. There are a variety of ways to comply with City standards
including the use of creative design alternatives. When noise is an issue on a project the
applicant will be required to comply with the following -to ensure compliance with City
policies:
R.1 All residential lots and dwellings are to be sound attenuated against present and
projected roadway noise, (except as described in R.2 below), which shall be the sum
of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard of 60 dB(A)
CNEL (see Noise Measurement Location in the Definitions Section for the description
of Noise Measurement Location) in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45
dB(A) CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence prepared under the supervision of a
certified acoustical consultant, that these standards will be satisfied in a manner
Project Processing Procedures 18
CITY OF CARLSBAD Noise Guidelines Manual
consistent with applicable zoning regulations to be submitted as follows, (see Section
VI, Noise Study and Report for Specific Submittal Requirements):
a. Submit a Noise Report to the City for approval. The document
should describe, in detail, the exterior noise environment and
preliminary mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to
achieve interior noise standards may be included in the
document.
b. Submit for City approval a Noise Study and Report describing the
acoustical design features of the structures required to satisfy
the exterior and interior noise standards. Additionally, submit
satisfactory evidence indicating that the sound attenuation
measures specified in the approved noise report(s) have been
incorporated into the design of the project.
c. Field testing in accordance with Title 24 regulations may be
required by the City to verify compliance with STC and IIC
design standards.
R.2 All residential lots and dwellings shall. be sound attenuated against present and.
projected noise generated by railroad, interstate highways and prime arterials or the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project,
so as not to exceed an exterior standard of 65 dB(A) CNEL in outdoor living areas and
an interior standard of 45 dB(A) CNEL in all habitable rooms (see Noise Measurement
Location in the Definitions Se·ction for the description of Noise Measurement Location).
Ev.idence prepared under the supervision of a certified acoustical consultant that these
standards wil.l be satisfied in a manner consistent with applicable zoning regulations
shall be .submitted as follows (see Section VI, Noise Study and Report for Specific
Submittal Requirements):
a. Submit a Noise Report to the City for approval. The document
should describe, in detail, the exterior noise environment and
preliminary mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to
achieve interior noise standards may be included in the
document.
b. Submit for City approval a noise report describing the acoustical
design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior
and interior noise standards. Additionally, submit satisfactory
evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures
specified in the approved acoustical report(s) have been
incorporated into the design of the project.
c.. Field testing in accordance with Title 24 regulations may be
required by the City to verify compliance with STC and IIC
design standards.
d. For residential projects near existing or future transportation
corridors, the owner shall be required, prior to recordation of the
Project Processing Procedures 19
l \,
:t
!
,I
,1
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
CITY OF CARLSBAD VEHICULAR NOISE ASSESSMENT
The City considers all sites "hard" sites unless situation 3.b in the following
DETERMINATION OF "HARD" SITE VERSUS "SOFT" SITE exists, in which case a
"soft" site analysis is applicable.
3. Determination of "Hard" Site Versus "Soft" Site
DETERMINATION OF "HARD" SITE VERSUS "SOFT" SITE
(Criteria for Selection of Drop-Off Rate per Doubling of Distance1
, .
2.
Situation
All situations in which the source or the receiver
are located 3 meters above the ground or whenev-
er the line-of-sight• averages more than 3 meters
above the ground.
All situations involving propagation over the top of
a barrier 3 meters or more in height.
3. Where the height of the line-of-sight is less than 3
meters and
a.
b.
There is a clear (unobstructed) view of the
highway, the ground is hard. and there are
no intervening structures.
The view of the roadway is interrupted by_
isolated buildings. clumps of bushes, scat-
tered trees. or the intervening ground is
soft or covered with vegetation.
Drop-Off Rate
3 dB/DD
3 dB/DD
3 dB/DD
4.5 dB/DD
Site Class
Hard
Hard
Hard
Soft
•The line-of-sight is a· direct line between the noise source nominal height and the
observer's ear height (1.5 meters or 5 feet above ground).
EXAMPLE
A
0
B
0
C
0
D
0
50 100 200 400
DISTANCE IN FEET
Let the average A-weighted sound level at point A be 70 decibels.
Using a "Hard" site analysis, the sound level will decrease at a rate of 3 dB/OD. Therefore,
if the sound level is 70 decibels at point A. the sound levels at points B, C, and D will be 67
decibels, 64 decibels, and 61 decibels, respectively.
Using a "Soft" site analysis. the sound level will have a drop-off rate of 4.5 dB/OD. The
sound levels at points B, C, and D will be 65.5 decibels, 61 decibels, and 56.5 decibels,
respectively, again with the assumption that the sound level is 70 decibels at point A.
1Excerpt from FHWA-R0-77-108.
C-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. City of Carlsbad Traffic Mix
In order to achieve the desired accuracy from computerized traffic noise prediction models,
it is necessary to know the approximate proportion of certain motor vehicle types that
comprise the typical population of vehicles using the roadway facilities in an area.
A physical count of vehicle types was conducted at several representative locations in
Carlsbad to characterize the "mix" of vehicles. The computerized noise models are particularly
sensitive to the percentage of trucks in the traffic flow, therefore, the "truck" components
were carefully determined during the counting procedures.
The three vehicle types most generally used in noise modeling (and which were used in noise
modeling for Carlsbad) are automobiles, including pickup trucks, light duty trucks, and motor
homes; medium trucks. including busses; and heavy trucks (3 axle to 5 + axle), which
includes dump trucks, trash trucks, semi trucks, etc.
The Carlsbad Traffic Vehicle Mix Study provided counts from seven locations. Approximately
half of these count locations represented designated truck routes within the City. The
locations are listed below:
• Carlsbad Boulevard -North of Poinsettia (Truck Route)
• La Costa Road -West End of Golf Course
• Palomar Airport Road -East of 5 Freeway (Truck Route)
• Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona (Truck Route)
• El Camino Real -South of College Boulevard (Truck Route)
• Tamarack Road/Adair
• Carlsbad Village Drive/Madison
The projected total Average Daily Traffic (ADT) from the study counts were compared to
existing City traffic-count-based ADT to cross check count validity. Reasonable agreement
was observed between study count data and existing City data.
The study count data was analyzed. It was observed that the "non truck route" and "truck
route" facilities did carry appreciably different percentages of trucks. This would cause
noticeable differences in the results of noise modeling.
We believe that noise modeling done in the City should use the appropriate "truck route" or
"non truck route" vehicle mix to obtain the most representative vehicle noise impact values
for City arterial highways. State of California highway vehicle mix data should be utilized for
modeling State Highway 78 or Interstate 5.
The following summary matrix contains the typical vehicle mix percentages found on the City
of Carlsbad arterial highways.
CARLSBAD TRAFFIC MIX
Non Truck Designated Average
Vehicle Category Route Truck Route Total
Automobiles 97.89% 95.24% 96.38%
Medium Trucks 1.83% 3.52% 2.79%
Heavy Trucks 0.28% 1.24% 0.83%
_C-3
The following information was obtained in order to cross check and compare the Carlsbad
Traffic Mix Study results with data from other jurisdictions in the general area.
Typical San Diego Area Vehicle Mix Obtained from Various Agencies
•
•
•
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
A= 93-98% MT = 1-7% HT = ½-4%
Range of mix values from Dr. Alex Segal, Noise Specialist
County of San Diego, Planning Department; February 25, 1992
SAN DIEGO CITY
A = 96-97% MT = 2-3% HT = 1-2%
Range of mix values from Frank Haffner, Noise Specialist
City of San Diego Building Department; February 26, 1992
SAN DIEGO CAL TRANS 1990 EXISTING: ROUTE 76 BETWEEN FOUSSAT ROAD AND
NORTH SANTA FE AVENUE (PEAK NOISE HOUR -LEVEL OF SERVICE C)
A = 97.41 % MT = 1-.82% HT = .77%
Report provided by Neal Davis, Caltrans District 11
Environmental Branch; February 26, 1992
• SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG>
•
A = 97 .3 % MT = 1 . 5 % HT = 1 . 2%
From Regional Vehicle Occupancy and Classification Program
1990 Summary and 1985 Summary provided by Bill Tuomi, SANDAG; March
2, 1992
TYPICAL ORANGE COUNTY AREA VEHICLE MIX
A = 9 7 .41 % MT = 1 . 8 5 % HT = .74%
Orange County Environmental Management Agency. Annual Traffic Census, Average
of 31 major intersections, 19 7 5. Currently used for traffic noise modeling.
' '
We believe that the regional data presented above does validate the results of the Carlsbad
Traffic Mix Study.
C-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
NOISE CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I BACKYARD
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 1 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 55
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 33
OT W/OB= 22
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
56.73
56.08
55.21
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 206.2
ROAD EL= 195.5
( 0=WALL, 1=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775 0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 58.4 56.5 54.8 48.7 57.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 50.9 49.4 43.0 41.5 50.2 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 49.8 48.4 39.3 40.6 49.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.6 57.8 55.2 50.0 59.l
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
55.2
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.4 50.7 45.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.6
55.2 ******* 59.1
54.6 *******
CNEL
54.6
W/ AMBIENT
59.6
55.2
59.1
54.6
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,600
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 95
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 90
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= O.O
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= O.O
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
360
96 .4.4
95.88
94.73
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADjUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 183.2
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL ~EDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
183.2
185.5
191.2
V~ICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING ----------------------------------------------~
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
58.6
50.3
48.8
DAY LEQ
56.7
48.8
47.4
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.9 48.9
42.4 40.9
38.3 39.6
CNEL
58.1
49.6
48.0 ----------------------------------------------------~----------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.6 57.8 55.2 49.9 59.0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
59.0 VEHICULAR NOISE 59.6 57.8 55.2 49.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
59.6
59.6
59.0
59.0
W/ AMBIENT
59.6 ******* 59.6 59.0 ******* 59.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 101
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 96
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE) 10 •
105.75
105.08
103.62
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 175.8
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 2.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
175. 8
178.1
183.8
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
55.7
48.2
45.3
56.7
DAY LEQ
53.8
46.7
43.9
54.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
52.1 46.0
40.3 38.8
34.9 36.1
52.4 47.1
CNEL
55.2
47.5
44.6
56.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.7 54.9 52.4 47.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
56.7
56.7 ******* 56.2
56.2 *******
CNEL
56.2
W/ AMBIENT
56.7
56.7
56.2
56.2
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 14 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,600
SPEED = 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 92
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 87
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST~
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
360
93.18
92.63
91.51
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 212.7
ROAD EL= 194.4
GRADE -6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
194.4
196.7
202.4
DAILY --------------------------------------------~------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
58.7
50.4
48.9
DAY LEQ
56.8
48.9
47.5
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.1 49.0
42.6 41.0
38.5 39.7
CNEL
58.2
49.7
48.2 ---------------------------~----~------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.7 57.9 55.4 50.1 59.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
59.7
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
59.2 VEHICULAR NOISE 57.9 55.4 50.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
59.7
59.7
59.2
59.2
W/ AMBIENT
59.7 ******* 59.7 59.2 ******* 59.2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
:I
·I
I
I
I
1_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 85
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 80
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 63.2
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
85.11
84.64
83.73
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
200.6
202.9
208.6
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.1
50.8
49.3
60.1
DAY LEQ
57.2
49.3
47.9
58.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.5 49.4
43. 0 ·41. 4
38.9 40.1
55.8 50.5
CNEL
58.6
50.1
48.6
59.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.1 58.3 55.8 50.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
60.1
60.1 ******* 59.6
59.6 *******
CNEL
59.6
W/ AMBIENT
64.9
64.9
64.8
64.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -BACKYARD
ADT = 32,600
SPEED = 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 225
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 220
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
******** OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= 0
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE= 90
SITE CONDITIONS {l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
224.59
224.48
224.31
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 207.2
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE DAY
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING NIGHT
207.2
209.5
215.2
DAILY -----------------------------------------------------~---------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0. 865 •
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL 62.9 61.0 59.3 53.2 62.4 53.9 52.4 46.1 44.5 53.2 52.1 50.6 41.6 42.9 51.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 63.8 61.9 59.6 54.1
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO ANP BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------~---PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.8 DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
61.9 59.6 54.1
63.2
CNEL
63.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
63.8
63.8
63.2
63.2
W/ AMBIENT
63.8
******* 63.8 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 63.2 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 63.2
I,
:t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 70
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 60
OT W/OB= 10
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
60.10
59.67
58.96
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
207.0
209.3
215.0
DAILY
-· -------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71.7
62.7
62.3
72.6
DAY LEQ
69.8
61.2
60.9
70.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.0 61.9
54.8 53.3
51.8 53.1
68.3 63.0
CNEL
71.2
62.0
61.6
72.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.6 70.8 68.3 63.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/0
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
72.6
72.6 ******* 72.1
72.1 *******
CNEL
72.1
W/ AMBIENT
72.6
72.6
72.1
72.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -BACKYARD
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 80
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
DT W/OB= 31
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10 •
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
63.91
64.69
71.59
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
225.0
227.3
233.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 71.4 69.5 67.7 61.7 70.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 62.4 60.8 54.5 52.9 61.6 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 61.5 60.0 51.0 52.3 60.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 72.3 70.5 68.0 62.6 71.8
-----~----------------------------------~----NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------~---------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.6 64.7 62.3 56.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/0
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
72.3
66.6 ******* 71.8
66.0 *******
CNEL
, 66. 0
W/ AMBIENT
72.3
66.6
71.8
66.0
I
I
I
,,
I
I
,,
I
,I
I
11
I\
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 23 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 73
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 57
DT W/OB= 16
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
60.11
60.62
62.38
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
10
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
234.3
236.6
242.3
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71.7
62.6
62.1
72.6
DAY LEQ
69.8
61.1
60.6
70.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.0 61.9
54.8 53.2
51.6 52.9
68.3 62.9
CNEL
71.2
61.9
61.3
72.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.5 63.6 61.2 55.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
72.6
65.5 ******* 72.1
64.9 *******
CNEL
64.9
W/ AMBIENT
72.6
65.5
72.1
64.9
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 91
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 52
OT W/OB= 39
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
78.34
79.35
82.28
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
GRADE = 5.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
246.8
249.1
254.8
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
70.5
61.5
59.4
DAY LEQ
68.6
60.0
58.0
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.9 60.8
53.6 52.1
49.0 50.2
CNEL
70.0
60.7
58.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 71.3 69.5 67.1 61.7 70.8
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO ANO BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.9 60.1 57.7 52.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO ANO BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO ANO BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
71.3
61.9 ******* 70.8
61.4 *******
CNEL
61.4
W/ AMBIENT
71.3
61.9
70.8
61.4
.I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1,
I
:I
I
I:
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I.
·1,
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 35
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
{l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
35.71
35.19
34.51
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
10
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
211.0
213.3
219. 0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
60.4
52.9
51.8
61.6
DAY LEQ
58.5
51.4
50.4
59.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
56.8 50.7
45.1 43.5
41.4 42.6
57.2 52.0
CNEL
59.9
52.2
51.1
61.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.6 59.8 57.2 52.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
= =
=
AMBIENT
61.6
61.6 ******* 61.1
61.1 *******
CNEL
61.1
W/ AMBIENT
61.6
61.6
61.1
61.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 40 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 45
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 40
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= O.O
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITI-ONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
45.84
45.36
44.67
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 210.8
ROAD EL= 205.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
205.2
207.5
213.2
DAILY
0 .. 9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 59.4 57.5 55.7 49.6 58.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 51.8 50.3 44.0 42.4 51.1 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 50.7 49.3 40.3 41.5 50.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 60.5 58.7 56.1 50.9 60.0
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ VEHICULAR NOISE 60.5 58.7 56.1 50.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
= = =
=
W/O AMBIENT
60.5
60.5 ******* 60.0
60.0 *******
CNEL
60.0
W/ AMBIENT
60.5
60.5
60.0
60.0
I
I
I
I
i
I
:I
I
I
1·
,,
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 42 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 35
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
{l0=HARD S~TE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
36.94
34.58
35.47
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 209.0
ROAD EL= 214.3
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096 0.103
0.108
0.775 0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
214.3
216.6
222.3
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
60.3
53.0
51.7
61. 5
DAY LEQ
58.4
51.5
50.3
59.7
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
56.6 50.6
45.1 43.6
41.3 42.5
57.0 51.9
CNEL
59.8
52.3
51. 0
61. 0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.3 56.5 53.9 48.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
61.5
58.4 ******* 61. 0
57.8 *******
CNEL
57.8
W/ AMBIENT
61.5
58.4
61. 0
57.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -BACKYARD
ADT = 3,000
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 41
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 36
DT W/OB= 5
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
42.13
41.57
40.70
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE DAY
{ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING NIGHT
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY ---------------------------------~-----------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
59.7
52.2
50.5
DAY LEQ
57.8
50.7
49.1
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ •
56.1 50.0
44.3 42.8
40.0 41.3
CNEL
59.2
51.5
49.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 60.8 59.0 56.4 51.2
----~----------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ VEHICULAR NOISE 60.8 59.0 56.4 51.2
60.3
CNEL
60.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
60.8
60.8
60.3
60.3
W/ AMBIENT
60.8
******* 60.8 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 60.3 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 60.3
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I;
I
'~ I
I'
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 54 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 55
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 25
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE= MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
{lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
57.24 58.18
61. 05
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 {ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 207.4
ROAD EL= 219.4
{0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
219.4
221. 7
227.4
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.4
50.8
49.4
59.5
DAY LEQ
56.5
49.2
47.9
57.7
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.7 48.7
42.9 41.3
38.9 40.1
55.1 49.9
CNEL
57.9
50.0
48.6
59.0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
51.7
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 49.9 47.2 42.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.5
51.7 ******* 59.0
51.1 *******
CNEL
51.1
W/ AMBIENT
59.5
51.7
59.0
51.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO} FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 61 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 55
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12} AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE}
AUTOMOBILES = 10·
300
61.57
61.05
60.11
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 229.4
ROAD EL= 219.4
GRADE = 5.4 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS}
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
219.4
221.7
227.4
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
58.1
50.5
49.4
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
DAY LEQ
56.2
49.0
48.0
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.4 48.3
42.7 41.1
39.0 40.2
CNEL
57.6
49.8
48.7 --------~------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3 57.5 54.8 49.6 58.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
58.7 VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3 57.5 54.8 49.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
59.3
59.3
58.7
58.7
W/ AMBIENT
59.3 ******* 59.3 58.7
******* 58.7
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
' i
11 • I
Ii
I
• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 85
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 48
DT W/OB= 37
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
71.44
72.66
76.14
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
(0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
252.0
25-4. 3
260.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.9 69.0 67.3 61.2 70.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.8 60.3 54.0 52.4 61.1
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 59.l 57.7 48.7 49.9 58.4 -------------------------------------------------.-------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 71.7 69.9 67.5 62.0 71.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.6 59.8 57.4 51.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
71.7
61. 6 ******* 71.2
61.1 *******
CNEL
61.1
W/ AMBIENT
71.7
61. 6
71.2
61.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -BACKYARD
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 95
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 54
DT W/OB= 41
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
83.68
84.71
87.65
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
264.0
266.3
272.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.2
61.2
58.5
71.0
DAY LEQ
68.3
59.7
57.1
69.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.6 60.5
53.3 51.8
48.1 49.3
66.8 61.3
CNEL
69.7
60.5
57.8
70.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ VEHICULAR NOISE 60.9 59.1 56.7 51.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
= =
AMBIENT
71.0
60.9 ******* 70.5
60.4 *******
CNEL
60.4
W/ AMBIENT
71.0
60.9
70.5
60.4
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1· I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 82 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 115
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 65
OT W/OB= 50
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
{l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
107.78
108.74
111.42
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 247.0
ROAD EL= 270.0
{0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
270.0
272.3
278.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
69.1
60.1
57.5
69.9
DAY LEQ
67.2
58.6
56.0
68.1
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ.
65.5 59.4
52.2 50.7
47.0 48.3
65.7 60.2
CNEL
68.6
59.4
56.7
69.4
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.4 56.6 54.3 48.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
69.9
58.5 ******* 69.4
57.9 *******
CNEL
57.9
W/ AMBIENT
69.9
58.5
69.4
57.9
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 84 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 120
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 66
OT W/OB= 54
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS {10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
112.77
113.70
116.32
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 {0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 251.3
ROAD EL= 274.0
GRADE = 4.1 %
.VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
274.0
276.3
282.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
68.9
59.9
57.3
69.7
DAY LEQ
67.0
58.4
55.9
67.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
65.3 '59.2
52.0 50.5
46.8 48.1
65.5 60.0
CNEL
68.4
59.2
56.6
69.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.7 56.8 54.5 49.0
W/O AMBIENT
CNEL
58.1
W/ AMBIENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
69.7
58.7
69.2 *******
69. 7 1,
58.7
69.2 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.1 ******* 58.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: LA COSTA AVENUE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 116 -BACKYARD
ADT = 6,700
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 119
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
670
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 114
DT W/OB= 5
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
124.18
124.84
126.64
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 245.0
ROAD EL= 277.3
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 3 . 0 .%
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
277.3
279.6
285.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.5
50.9
49.0
59.6
DAY LEQ
56.6
49.4
47.6
57.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.8 48.8
43.1 41.5
38.6 39.8
55.2 50.0
CNEL
58.0
50.2
48.3
59.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 40.5
DAY LEQ
38.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
36.1 30.8 39.9
AMBIENT
59.6
40.5
59.1
39.9
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.6
40.5
59.1
39.9
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
-----------------------------------~---------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 130 -BACKYARD
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
25-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST= 58
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 28
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
300
64.00
62.75
60.19
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 228.2
ROAD EL= 208.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
208. 2
210.5
216.2
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 57.9 56.0 54.2 48.2 57.4 MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 50.4 48.9 42.6 41.0 49.7
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 49.4 48.0 39.0 40.2 48.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.1 57.3 54.6 49.5
-------------------------~-------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 48.8 47.0 44.4 39.2
58.6
CNEL
48.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
59.1
48.9
58.6
48.3
W/ AMBIENT
59.1
******* 48.9 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.6
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 48.3
I
I
I
I
I .,
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I BACKYARD WITH WALL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 85
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 80
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 56.5
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
85.45
84.92
83.89
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
200.6
202.9
208.6
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.1
50.8
49.3
60.1
DAY LEQ
57.2
49.3
47.9
58.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.4 49.4
42.9 41.4
38.8 40.1
55.8 50.4
CNEL
58.6
50.1
48.6
59.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 52.0
DAY LEQ
50.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
47.7 42.4 51.5
AMBIENT
60.1
52.0
59.5
51.5
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
61. 7
57.8
61.3
57.7
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 225
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 220
DT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE= 0
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 90
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
225.23
225.04
224.66
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
200.6
202.9
208.6
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775 0.848
0.865
0.129 0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 62.9 61.0 59.3 53.2 62.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 53.9 52.4 46.1 44.5 53.2
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 52.1 50.6 41.6 42.8 51.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 63.8 61.9 59.5 54.1 63.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO ANp BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------~---------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
56.5 VEHICULAR NOISE 57.1 55.3 52.9 47.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
63.8
57.1
63.2
56.5
W/ AMBIENT
63.8 ******~ 57.1 63.2 ******* 56.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -BACKYARD W/ 6' WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 70
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 60
DT W/OB= 10
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
58.41
57.81
56.81
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
207.0
209.3
215.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71. 8
62.8
62.5
72.7
DAY LEQ
69.9
61. 3
61.0
70.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.1 62.1
55.0 53.4
52.0 53.3
68.4 63.1
CNEL
71.3
62.1
61.7
72.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.9 63.1 60.6 55.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/0
= =
=
=
AMBIENT
72.7
64.9 ******* 72.2
64.3 *******
CNEL
64.3
W/ AMBIENT
72.7
64.9
72.2
64.3
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO} FOR CARLSBAD I·
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -BACKYARD W/WALL
.ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%.= 10
CTL DIST= 70
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 60
OT W/OB= 10
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 9.5
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-~0
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=;l.80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SI~E, 15=SOFT SITE}
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
60.41
59.67
58.26
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCK$ = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHIC~E TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
207.0
209.3
215.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
71.7
62.7
62.4
DAY LEQ
69.8
61.2
60.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.0 61.9
54.8 53.3
51.9 53.1
CNEL
71.2
62.0
61.6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 72.6 70.8 68.3 63.0
-------------------------~-------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.3 58.5 56.0 50.6
72.1
CNEL
59.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
72.6
60.3
72.1
59.7
W/ AMBIENT
72.6 ******* 60.3 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 72.1 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 59.7
I
I
I
'I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -BACKYARD W/WALL
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 80
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
OT W/OB= 31
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
62.21
62.59
64.20
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.8 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
225.0
227.3
233.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71.5
62.5
61.9
72.4
DAY LEQ
69.6
61. 0
60.5
70.6
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ •
67.9 61.8
54.6 53.1
51. 5 52. 7
68.2 62.8
CNEL
71. 0
61.8
61.2
71.9
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.5
DAY LEQ
58.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
56.2 50.8 60.0
AMBIENT
72.4
60.5
71.9
60.0
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
72.4
60.5
71.9
60.0
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLOG 23 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
6!;>2-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON --------------------------------------------------~------------------AOT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 73
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 57
OT W/OB= 16
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MEO TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
58.60
58.80
59.82
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAO EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
GRADE = 7.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
234.3
236.6
242.3
DAILY ~-----------------------------------------~--------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
71.8
62.8
62.2
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
DAY LEQ
69.9
61.3
60.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.1 62.1
54.9 53.4
51.8 53.0
CNEL
71.3
62.0
61.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 72.7 70.9 68.4 63.1 72.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.6
DAY LEQ
57.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.3 50.0
W/O AMBIENT
72.7
59.6 ******* 72.2
59.1 *******
CNEL
59.1
W/ AMBIENT
72.7
59.6
72.2
59.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -BACKYARD W/WALL
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 91
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 52
DT W/OB= 39
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
77.13
78.02
80.69
HTH WALL= 2.5
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.2 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
246.8
249.1
254.8
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.6
61.5
59.5
71.4
DAY LEQ
68.7
60.0
58.l
69.6
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.9 60.9
53.7 52.1
49.l 50.3
67.2 61.7
CNEL
70.1
60.8
58.8
70.9
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.l
DAY LEQ
58.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
= =
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
55.9 50.4 59.6
AMBIENT
71.4
60.l
70.9
59.6
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
71.4
60.1
70.9
59.6
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
--------------------~------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK UR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST= 35
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 4.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
35.64
35.19
34.51
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (AD;rt.JSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
211. 0
21.'3. 3
219.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
60.4
52.9
51.8
DAY LEQ
58.5
51.4
50.4
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
56.8 50.7
45.1 43.5
41.4 42.6
CNEL
59.9
52.2
51.1 --------------------------------------------------. ------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 61.6 59.8 57.2 52.0 61.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.3 56.6 53.9 48.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
61.6
58.4 ******* 61.1
57.8 *******
CNEL
57.8
W/ AMBIENT
61.6
58.4
61.1
57.8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO} FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIS'!'= 41
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 36
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 4.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2} AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
{l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
42.09
41.51
40.70
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
{ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
195.5
197.8
203.5
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.7
52.2
50.5
60.8
DAY LEQ
57.8
50.7
49.1
59.1
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
56.1 50.0
44.3 42.8
40.0 41.3
56.4 51.2
CNEL
59.2
51.5
49.8
60.3
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.6
DAY LEQ
54.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
52.1 46.9
W/O AMBIENT
60.8
56.6 ******* 60.3
56.0 *******
CNEL
56.0
W/ AMBIENT
60.8
56.6
60.3
56.0
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 85
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 48
DT W/OB= 37
HTH WALL= 2.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
70.24
71.37
74.64
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
GRADE = 4.2 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
252.0
254.3
260.0
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY ---------------------------------~-----------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 71.0 69.1 67.3 61.3 70.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.9 60.4 54.1 52.5 61.2 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 59.2 57.8 48.8 50.0 58.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 71.8 69.9 67.6 62.1 71.2
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.1 DAY LEQ
58.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
56.0 50.5 59.6
AMBIENT
71.8
60.1
71.2
59.6
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
71.8
60.1
71.2
59.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -BACKYARD W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 95
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 54
DT W/OB= 41
HTH WALL= 2.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
82.68
83.62
86.37
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
264.0
266.3
272.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.3
61.2
58.6
71.1
DAY LEQ
68.4
59.7
57.2
69.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.6 60.6
53.4 51.8
48.1 49.4
66.9 61.4
CNEL
69.8
60.5
57.8
70.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.5
DAY LEQ
57.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
55.3 49.8 59.0
AMBIENT
71.1
59.5
70.5
59.0
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
71.1
59.5
70.5
59.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1 ST FLOOR FACADE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 1 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3 1000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 80
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 33
DT W/OB= 47
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
81.43
80.78
80.14
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 206.2
ROAD EL= 195.5
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
195.5
197.8
203.5
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY ---------------------------------·-----------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
56.9
49.3
48.2
58.0
DAY LEQ
55.0
47.8
46.8
56.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ •
53.2 47.1
41.5 39.9
37.7 39.0
53.6 48.4
CNEL
56.4
48.6
47.4
57.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 51.9
DAY LEQ
50.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
= =
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
47.5 42.3 51.4
AMBIENT
58.0
52.0
57.5
51.4
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
58.0
52.0
57.5
51. 4
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -1ST FLOOR FACAOE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 107
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 96
DT W/OB= 11
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
300
111.50
110.86
109.48
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 175.8
GRADE = 2.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
175.8
178.1
183.8
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
55.5 53.6 51.8 .45. 8 55.0
48.0 46.4 40.l 38.5 47.2
45.1 43.6 34.6 35.9 44.3 ----------~----------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 56.5 54.7 52.2 46.9 56.0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------~-----------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
56.0 VEHICULAR NOISE 56.5 54.7 52.2 46.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
56.5
56.5
56.0
56.0
W/ AMBIENT
56.5 ******* 56.5 56.0
******* 56.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 97
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 90
DT W/OB= 7
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 183.2
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
98.41
97.87
96.73
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
183.2
185.5
191.2
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.5
50.2
48.7
59.5
DAY LEQ
56.6
48.7
47.3
57.7
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.8 48.8
42.3 40.8
38.2 39.5
55.2 49.8
CNEL
58.0
49.5
48.0
58.9
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.5
DAY LEQ
57.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
55.2 49.8 58.9
AMBIENT
59.5
59.5
58.9
58.9
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.5
59.5
58.9
58.9
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 14 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,600
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 102
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 87
OT W/OB= 15
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
360
103.07
102.57
101.56
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 212.7
ROAD EL= 194.4
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0 .. 129
0.049
0.027
194.4
19-6.7
202.4
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING --------------------------------------~--------
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
58.3
50.0
48.5
DAY LEQ
56.4
48.5
47.1
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.6 48.6
42.1 40.6
38.0 39.3
CNEL
57.8
49.3
47.7 ---------------------------------------------------~------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3 57.5 55.0 49.6 58.7
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3 57.5 55.0 49.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.3
59.3 ******* 58.7
58.7 *******
CNEL
58.7
W/ AMBIENT
59.3
59.3
58.7
58.7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 238
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 220
DT W/OB= 18
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 63.2
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
238.04
237.87
237.55
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
200.6
202.9
208.6
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
54.7
46.3
44.8
55.6
DAY LEQ
52.8
44.8
43.4
53.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
• 51.0 44.9
38.5 36.9
34.3 35.6
51.3 46.0
CNEL
54.2
45.6
44.1
55.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.6
DAY LEQ
53.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
51.3 46.0 55.1
AMBIENT
55.6
55.6
55.1
55.1
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
63.9
63.9
63.8
63.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
.PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST= 225
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 220
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE= 0
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE= 90
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
224.59
224.48
224.31
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 207.2
GRADE = 6.6 %
{ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
2·07. 2
209.5
215. 2
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIG~T
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ. CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 62.9 61.0 59.3 53.2 62.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 53.9 52.4 46.1 44.5 53.2
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 52.1 50.6 41.6 42.9 51.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 63.8 61.9 59.6 54.1 63.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ----------------------~----------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
63.2 VEHICULAR NOISE 63.8 61.9 59.6 54.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
63.8
63.8
63.2
63.2
W/ AMBIENT
63.8 ******* 63.8 63.2 ******* 63.2
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 55
DT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
51.78
51.27
50.45
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
(0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
207.0
209.3
215.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
72.3
63.4
63.0
73.3
DAY LEQ
70.4
61.9
61. 6
71.5
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.7 62.6
55.5 53.9
52.5 53.8
69.0 63.6
CNEL
71.8
62.6
62.3
72.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.3 71.5 69.0 63.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
73.3
73.3 ******* 72.7
72.7 *******
CNEL
72.7
W/ AMBIENT
73.3
73.3
72.7
72.7
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 71
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
OT W/OB= 22
HTH WALL= 0.0
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST= HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
******** OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
55.07
55.85
58.36
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18 • HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
225.0
227.3
233.0
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY ---------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
72.1 70.2 68.4 62.3 71.6 63.0 61.5 55.1 53.6 62.3 62.3 60.9 51.9 53.1 61.6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 73.0 71.1 68.7 63.3 72.4
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.5
DAY LEQ
63.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER= CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
61.2 55.9
W/O AMBIENT
73.0
65.5 ******* 72.4
65.0 *******
CNEL
65.0
W/ AMBIENT
73.0
65.5 72.4
6'5. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 23 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 82
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 57
OT W/OB= 25
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
68.a4
69.36
71.11
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.2 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
234.3
236.6
242.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71.1
62.1
61.5
72.0
DAY LEQ
69.2
60.5
60.1
70.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
67. 4 61. 4
54.2 52.6
51.0 52.3
67.7 62.4
CNEL
70.6
61. 3
60.8
71.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.6
DAY LEQ
63.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
61.4 56.0 65.1
AMBIENT
72.0
65.7
71.5
65.1
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
72.0
65.7
71.5
65.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96 B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED = 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 52
OT W/OB= 48
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10 •
3,260
87.28
88.29
91.22
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
GRADE = 5.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
246.8
249.1
254.8
DAILY ---------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY T~UCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING ------------------------------------------------'
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL 70.1 68.2 66.4 60.3 69.6 61.0 59.5 53.1 51.6 60.3 59.0 57.6 48.5 49.8 58.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 70.9 69.0 66.7 61.2 70.3
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING -------------------------------------------~-PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.2
DAY LEQ
60.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
58.0 52.5
W/O AMBIENT
70.9
62.2 ******* 70.3
61.6 *******
CNEL
61.6
W/ AMBIENT
70.9
62.2
70.3
61.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 30
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
60.42
60.11
59.71
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10
10
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
(O=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS}
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
211.0
213. 3
219.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.2
50.6
49.5
59.3
DAY LEQ
56.3
49.1
48.0
57.5
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ •
54.5 48.4
42.7 41.2
39.0 40.2
54.9 49.7
CNEL
57.7
49.9
48.7
58.8
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3
DAY LEQ
57.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
54.9 49.7 58.8
AMBIENT
59.3
59.3
58.8
58.8
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.3
59.3
58.8
58.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 40 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 40
OT W/OB= 23
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10.
300
63.60
63.26
62.77
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 210.8
ROAD EL= 205.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
o. 775
0.848
0.865
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
205.2
207.5
213.2
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
57.9
50.4
49.2
DAY LEQ
56.0
48.9
47.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.3 48.2
42.5 ·41.0
38.8 40.0
CNEL
57.4
49.7
48.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.1 57.3 54.7 49.5
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ~----------------~---------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59 .. 1 57.3 54.7 49.5
58.6
CNEL
58.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
59.1
59.1
58.6
58.6
W/ AMBIENT
59.1 ******* 59.1 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.6 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 58.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 42 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 40
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 10
HTH WALL= a.a
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= a.a
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
41. 05
39.63
40.41
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 209.0
ROAD EL= 214.3
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
214.3
216.6
222.3
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.8
52.4
51.1
61. 0
DAY LEQ
57.9
50.9
49.7
59.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ.
56.2 50.1
44.5 43.0
40.7 41.9
56.6 51.4
CNEL
59.3
51.7
50.4
60.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.8 56.0 53.3 48.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
61.0
57.9 ******* 60.5
57.3 *******
CNEL
57.3
W/ AMBIENT
61. 0
57.9
60.5
57.3
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON --------------------------~------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 44
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 36
DT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0 ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS {l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
300
45.06
44.53
43.72
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1. 1.1
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 59.4 57.5 55.8 49.7 58.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 51.9 50.4 44.0 42.5 51.2 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 50.2 48.7 39.7 41.0 49.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 60.6 58.8 56.1 50.9 60.0
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
60.0 VEHICULAR NOISE 60.6 58.8 56.1 50.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
60.6
60.6
60.0
60.0
W/ AMBIENT
60.6
******* 60.6
60.0
******* 60.0
I
I
-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 54 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 30
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
62.16
63.10
61.56
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 207.4
ROAD EL= 219.4
(O=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
219.4
221.7
227.4
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.0
50.4
49.3
59.2
DAY LEQ
56.1
48.9
47.9
57.4
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.4 48.3
42.5 41.0
38.9 40.1
54.8 49.6
CNEL
57.5
49.7
48.6
58.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.2
DAY LEQ
51.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
48.8 43.6 52.7
AMBIENT
59.2
53.3
58.6
52.7
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.2
53.3
58.6
52.7
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 61 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 80
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 55 OT W/OB= 25
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
81.18
80.79
80.09
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 229.4
ROAD EL= 219.4
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT.
0.096
0.103
0.108
219.4
221.7
227.4
DAILY
0-. 9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL AUTOMOBILES LEQ 56.9 55.0 53.4 47.1 56.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 49.3 47.8 41.5 39.9 48.6 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 48.2 46.8 37.7 39.0 47.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 58.0 56.3 53.6 48.4 57.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.0
DAY LEQ
56.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
53.6 48.4
W/O AMBIENT
58.0
58.0 ******* 57.5
57.5 *******
CNEL
57.5
W/ AMBIENT
58.0
58.0
57.5
57.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 94
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 48
DT W/OB= 46
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
80.37
81.60
85.07
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
(l0=HARD SlTE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= . 0
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.2 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
252.0
254.3
260.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.4
61.3
58.6
71.2
DAY LEQ
68.5
59.8
57.2
69.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.8 60.7
53.5 51.9
48.2 49.4
67.0 61.5
CNEL
69.9
60.6
57.9
70.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.0
DAY LEQ
60.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
57.8 52.3 61.4
AMBIENT
71.2
62.0
70.6
61.4
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
71.2
62.0
70.6
61.4
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= .114
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 54
OT W/OB= 60
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
102.59
103.61
106.56
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
GRADE = 4.0 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
264. 0
266.3
272.0
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY ------------------------~--------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
69.4
60.3
57.7
DAY LEQ
67.5
58.8
56.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
65.7 59.6
52.4 50.9
47.2 48.5
CNEL
68.9
59.6
56.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 70.1 68.3 66.0 60.5 69.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------·---------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.5
DAY LEQ
59.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
57.3 51.8
W/O AMBIENT
70.1
61.5 ******* 69.6
61. 0 *******
CNEL
61.0
W/ AMBIENT
70.1
61.5
69.6
61. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 82 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260 SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 188
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 65
DT W/OB= 123
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
180.63
181. 59
184.28
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 247.0
ROAD EL= 270.0
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
270.0
272.3
278.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
66.9
57.9
55.3
67.7
DAY LEQ
65.0
56.4
53.9
65.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
63.2 57.2
50.0 48.5
44.8 46.1
63.5 58.0
CNEL
66.4
57.2
54.6
67.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.8
DAY LEQ
58.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
55.7 50.2 59.3
AMBIENT
67.7
59.8
67.1
59.3
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
67.7
59.8
67.1
59.3
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
~-------------------------------------------------------~------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 84 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 120
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 66
DT W/OB= 54
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS {l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
112.77
113.70
116.32
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 {ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 {0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 251.3
ROAD EL= 274.0
GRADE = 4.1 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
274.0
276.3
282.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
68.9
59.9
57.3
DAY LEQ
67.0
58.4
55.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
65.3 59.2
52.0 50.5
46.8 48.l
CNEL
68.4
59.2
56.6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 69.7 67.9 65.5 60.0 69.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.7 56.8 54.5 49.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
69.7
58. 7 • ******* 69.2
58 .1 • *******
CNEL
58.1
W/ AMBIENT
69.7
58.7
69.2
58.1
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: LA COSTA AVENUE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 116 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 6,700
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 121
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 114
DT W/OB= 7
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST= HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
670
125.7.1
126.37
128.17
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
{10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
10
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 245.0
ROAD EL= 277.3
{0=WALL,1=BERM)
GRADE = 3.0 %
GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
{ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
277.3
279.6
285.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.5
50.9
49.0
59.6
DAY LEQ
56.6
49.4
47.6
57.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.8 48.7
43.0 41.5
38.5 39.8
55.2 49.9
CNEL
58.0
50.2
48.3
59.0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 40.7
DAY LEQ
38.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
36.3 31.0 40.1
AMBIENT
59.6
40.7
59.0
40.1
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.6
40.7
59.0
40.1
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
-----------------------------------------·--------------. ------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 130 -1ST FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR % = 10 CTL DIST= 70
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 40
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST= liVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10 •
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
75.86
74.62
72.06
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 228.2
ROAD EL= 208.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
208.2
210.5
216.2
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 57.2 55.3 53.5 47.4 56.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 49.7 48.2 41.8 40.3 48.9 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 48.6 47.2 38.2 39.4 47.9 --------------------------------------~------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 58.4 56.6 53.9 48.7 57.8
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPA~TS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 46.8 45.0 42.3 37.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
58.4
46.8 ******* 57.8
46.2 *******
CNEL
46.2
W/ AMBIENT
58.4
46.8
57.8
46.2
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1ST FLOOR FACADE WITH WALL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 238
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 220
DT W/OB= 18
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 56.9
ROADWAY VIEW:
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
238.16
237.96
237.59
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
200.6
202.9
208.6
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM T_RUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
54.7
46.3
44.8
55.6
DAY LEQ
52.8
44.8
43.4
53.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
51. 0 44. 9
38.5 36.9
34.3 35.6
51. 3 46.0
CNEL
54.2
45.6
44.1
55.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 49.2 47.4 44.9 39.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
55.6
49.2 ******* 55.1
48.7 *******
CNEL
48.7
W/ AMBIENT
59.3
57.6
59.1
57.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/ 6' WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 55
OT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
50.05
49.37
48.20
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10
(0=WALL, 1=BERM) BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
207.0
209.3
215.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
72.5
63.5
63.2
73.4
DAY LEQ
70.6
62.0
61.8
71.6
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.8 62.7
55.7 54.1
52.7 54.0
69.1 63.8
CNEL
72.0
62.8
62.5
72.9
--------------------------. ------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.4
DAY LEQ
63.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
61.l 55.8 64.9
AMBIENT
73.4
65.4
72.9
64.9
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
73.4
65.4
72.9
64.9
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
~ROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 55
DT W/OB= 8
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 9.5
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0 ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
52.42
51.57
49.95
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
207.0
209.3
215. 0
DAILY ---------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
72.3 70.4 68.6 62.5 71.8 63.3 61.8 55.5 53.9 62.6 63.0 61.6 52.6 53.8 62.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 73.2 71.4 68.9 63.6 72.7
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.6 58.8 56.3 50.9
CNEL
60.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
73.2
60.6
72.7
60.0
W/ AMBIENT
73.2
******* 60.6
72.7
******* 60.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 71
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
DT W/OB= 22
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
53.22
53.59
55.21
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
{0=WALL,1=BERM) BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
225.0
227.3
233.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
72.2
63.2
62.6
73.1
DAY LEQ
70.3
61.7
61.2
71. 3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.5 '62.5
55.3 53.8
52.1 53.4
68.8 63.5
CNEL
71.7
62.5
61. 9
72.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
60.3
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.5 56.0 50.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
73.1
60.3 ******* 72.6
59.7 *******
CNEL
59.7
W/ AMBIENT
73.1
60.3
72.6
59.7
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
----------~----------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 23 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 82
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 57
DT W/OB= 25
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
67.58
67.79
68.81
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
GRADE = 7.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
234.3
236.6
242.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 71.2 69.3 67.5 61.4 70.7 MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 62.2 60.6 54.3 52.7 61.4 HEAVY TRUCKS . LEQ 61.6 60.2 51.2 52.4 60.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 72.1 70.3 67.8 62.4 71.6
------------------~--------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.2
DAY LEQ
58.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.9 50.5
W/O AMBIENT
72.1
60.2 ******* 71.6
59.6 *******
CNEL
59.6
W/ AMBIENT
72.1
60.2
71.6
59.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1!
I 1·
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 52
DT W/OB= 48
HTH WALL= 2.5
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
86.11
87.00
89.67
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
246.8
249.1
254.8
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.l
61.1
59.1
70.9
DAY LEQ
68.2
59.6
57.6
69.1
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.5 60.4
53.2 51.7
48.6 49.8
66.7 61.3
CNEL
69.6
60.3
58.3
70.4
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.3 58.5 56.1 50.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
70.9
60.3 ******* 70.4
59.8 *******
CNEL
59.8
W/ AMBIENT
70.9
60.3
70.4
59.8
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD . I ---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 30
HTH WALL= 4.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
300
60.56
60.02
59.71
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 {0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
211.0
213.3
219.0
DAILY -----~------------------------------------------~--------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0 .12.9
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
58.1
50.6
49.5
DAY LEQ
56.2
49.1
48.0
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.5 48.4
42.7 41.2
39.0 40.2
CNEL
57.6
49.9
48.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE
VEHICULAR NOISE
59.3 57.5 54.9 49.7
--------------------------·------~------------
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
53.3
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NI~HT LEQ
51.5 48.8 43.7
58.8
CNEL
52.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
59.3
53.3
58.8
52.7
W/ AMBIENT
59.3 ******* 53.3 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.8 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 52.7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 44
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 36
OT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 4.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
{l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
45.05
44.47
43.72
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
{0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.4
51.9
50.2
60.6
DAY LEQ
57.5
50.4
48.7
58.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
55.8 49.7
44.0 42.5
39.7 41.0
56.1 50.9
CNEL
58.9
51.2
49.4
60.0
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AN.D BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.8 54.0 51.4 46.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
= =
=
AMBIENT
60.6
55.9 ******* 60.0
55.3 *******
CNEL
55.3
W/ AMBIENT
60.6
55.9
60.0
55.3
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
I
I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96 I B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------.-----------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 94
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 48
DT W/OB= 46
HTH WALL= 2.0
OBS HTH= 5.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
'RT ANGLE= 9 0
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
79.22
80.35
83.62
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
GRADE = 4.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
252.0
254.3
260.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
70.5
61.4
58.7
DAY LEQ
68.6
59.9
57.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66. 8 '60. 8
53.5 52.0
48.3 49.5
CNEL
70.0
60.7
58.0 --------------------------------------------------·------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 71.2 69.4 67.1 61.6 70.7
--------------------------. ------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
60.5
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.7 56.3 50.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
71.2
60. 5 • ******* 70.7
60.0 *******
CNEL
60.0
W/ AMBIENT
71.2
60.5
70.7
60.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -1ST FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT =
SPEED=
PK HR%=
32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
CTL DIST=
DIST N/F=
DT WALL=
DT W/OB=
HTH WALL=
OBS HTH=
AMBIENT=
ROADWAY VIEW:
45
10
114
76
54
60
2'.o
5.0 o.o
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
101. 64
102.58
105.33
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
264.0
266.3
272.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
69.4
60.4
57.7
70.2
DAY LEQ
67.5
58.8
56.3
68.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
65.7 59.7
52.5 50.9
47.3 48.5
66.0 60.5
CNEL
68.9
59.6
57.0
69.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.0
DAY LEQ
58.2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
55.9 50.4 59.5
AMBIENT
70.2
60.0
69.6
59.5
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
70.2
60.0
69.6
59.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 2ND FLOOR FACADE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
./
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 107
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 96
OT W/OB= 11
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= Q.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
.114. 76
113.94
112.09
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 175.8
GRADE = 2.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY
0.775
0.848
0.865
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
·EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
175.8
178.1
183.8
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL AUTOMOBILES LEQ 55.4 53.5 51.7 45.6 54.9 MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 47.8 46.3 40.0 38.4 47.1 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 45.0 43.5 34.5 35.8 44.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 56.4 54.6 52.1 46.8 55.9
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ------------------------~--------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
55.9 VEHICULAR NOISE 56.4 54.6 52.1 46.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
56.4
56.4
55.9
55.9
W/ AMBIENT
56.4 ******* 56.4
55.9
******* 55.9
I
I,
I
I
,,
I
.1
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I,
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 6 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 97
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 90
DT W/OB= 7
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
101.37
100.61
98.93
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 202.7
ROAD EL= 183.2
(0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
183.2
185.5
191.2
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.4
50.l
48.6
59.3
DAY LEQ
56.5
48.6
47.2
57.5
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.7 48.6
42.2 40.7
38.1 39.4
55.0 49.7
CNEL
57.9
49.3
47.9
58.8
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.3 57.5 55.o 49.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
59.3
59.3 ******* 58.8
58.8 *******
CNEL
58.8
W/ AMBIENT
59.3
59.3
58.8
58.8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 238
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 220
OT W/OB= 18
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 63.2
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
239.02
238.76
238.20
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
200.6
202.9
208.6
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
54.6
46.3
44.8
55.6
DAY LEQ
52.7
44.8
43.3
53.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
51.0 "44.9
38.4 36.9
34.3 35.6
51.3 46.0
CNEL
54.1
45.6
44.0
55.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.6 53.8 51.3 46.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
55.6
55.6 ******* 55.1
55.1 *******
CNEL
55.1
W/ AMBIENT
63.9
63.9
63.8
63.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST;= 225
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 220
OT W/OB= 5
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE= 0
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE= 90
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
225.35
225.13
224.71
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= . 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 207.2
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
207.2
209.5
215.2
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
62.9
53.9
52.1
63.7
DAY LEQ
61.0
52.4
50.6
61.9
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
59.3 53.2
46.1 44.5
41.6 42.8
59.5 54.1
CNEL
62.4
53.2
51.3
63.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
63.2 VEHICULAR NOISE 63.7 61.9 59.5 54.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
63.7
63.7
63.2
63.2
W/ AMBIENT 63.7 ******* 63.7 63.2
******* 63.2
,,
I
I
I
I
.1·
I·
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
,1,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1\
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 55
DT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
55.06
54.16
52.30
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.8 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
2Q7.0
209.3
215.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
72.1
63.1
62.8
73.0
DAY LEQ
70.2
61.6
61.4
71.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.4 62.3
55.3 53.7
52.4 53.6
68.7 63.4
CNEL
71. 6
62.4
62.1
72.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.0 71.2 68.7 63.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
73.0
73.0 ******* 72.5
72.5 *******
CNEL
72.5
W/ AMBIENT
73.0
73.0
72.5
72.5
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 71
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
DT W/OB= 22
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
60.18
60.04
60.05
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
225.0
227.3
233.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
PK HR LEQ
11.1
62.7
62.2
DAY LEQ
69.8
61.2
60.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.0 61.9
54.8 53.3
51.8 53.0
CNEL
71.2
62.0
61.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 72.6 70.8 68.3 63.0 72.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
72.1 VEHICULAR NOISE 72.6 70.8 68.3 63.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
72.6
72.6
72.1
72.1
W/ AMBIENT
72.6 ******* 72.6
72.1
******* 72.1
I
I
I
I. ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
,I'
,,
1·
I
I
/\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 23 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 82
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 57
DT W/OB= 25
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
72.94
72.78
72.68
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 7.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
234.3
236.6
242.3
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.8
61.8
61.4
71.8
DAY LEQ
68.9
60.3
60.0
70.0
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ.
67.2 61.1
54.0 52.4
50.9 52.2
67.5 62.1
CNEL
70.3
61.1
60.7
71.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.8 70.0 67.5 62.1
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
71.8
71.8 ******* 71.2
71.2 *******
CNEL
71.2
W/ AMBIENT
71.8
71.8
71.2
71.2
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 52
DT W/OB= 48
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
89.3.1
92.56
92.96
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
GRADE = 5.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
246.8
249.1
254.8
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.0 68.1 66.3 60.2 69.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 60.8 59.3 52.9 51.4 60.1 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 58.9 57.5 48.4 49.7 58.2 --------------------------------------------------·------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 70.7 68.9 66.6 61.1 70.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
66.5 VEHICULAR NOISE 67.1 65.2 62.9 57.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
70.7
67.1
70.2
66.5
W/ AMBIENT
70.7 ******* 67.1
70.2 ******* 66.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 30
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
62.74
62.07
60.76
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
10
(0=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
211.0
213.3
219. 0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.0
50.5
49.4
59.2
DAY LEQ
56.1
49.0
48.0
57.4
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.3 48.3
42. 6 41. 1
38.9 40.2
54.7 49.5
CNEL
57.5
49.7
48.7
58.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.2
DAY LEQ
57.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
54.7 49.5 58.6
AMBIENT
59.2
59.2
58.6
58.6
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
59.2
59.2
58.6
58.6
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 40 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 40
DT W/OB= 23
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
66.01
65.33
63.97
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 210.8
ROAD EL= 205.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
205.2
207.5
213.2
DAILY -------------------------------------------------~-------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
---~-----------------------------~-------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 57.8 55.9 54.1 48.0 57.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 50.2 48.7 42.4 40.8 49.5
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 49.2 47.7 38.7 39.9 48.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 57.2 54.5 49.3 58.4
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------~---------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 57.2 54.5 49.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.0
59.0 ******* 58.4
58.4 *******
CNEL
58.4
W/ AMBIENT
59.0
59.0
58.4
58.4
I
I
I· ' "
I
I
I
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 42 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 40
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 30
DT W/OB= 10
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD S~TE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
40.72
40.23
39.58
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER = _ 0
PAD EL = 209.0
ROAD EL= 214.3
(0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
o.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
214.3
216.6
222.3
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
59.9
52.4
51.2
61.1
DAY LEQ
58.0
50.8
49.8
59.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
56.2 50.1
44.5 42.9
40.8 42.0
56.6 51.4
CNEL
59.4
51.6
50.5
60.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.1 59.3 56.6 51.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
61.1
61.1 ******* 60.5
60.5 *******
CNEL
60.5
W/ AMBIENT
61.1
61.1
60.5
60.5
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED~ 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 44
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 36
DT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76, P=52 ,-S=36, C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE =
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
:OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
48.56
47.59
45.60
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE DAY
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING NIGHT
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY ---------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRl:JCKS
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789 0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL AUTOMOBILES LEQ 59.1 57.2 55.4 49.4 58.6 MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 51.6 50.1 43.8 42.2 50.9 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 50.0 48.6 39.5 • 40. 8 49.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 60.2 58.4 55.8 50.6
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS. WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.2 DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
58.4 55.8 50.6
59.7
CNEL
59.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
60.2
60.2
59.7
59.7
W/ AMBIENT
60.2 ******* 60.2 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 59.7 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 59.7
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I·
I
1·
I
1·
I
I
-1\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 54 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 30
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
{M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
{lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
59.77
59.70
59.91
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
( 0=WALL, l=BERM) BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 207.4
ROAD EL= 219.4
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
219.4
221.7
227.4
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.2
50.6
49.4
59.4
DAY LEQ
56.3
49.1
48.0
57.6
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.5 '48.5
42.8 41.2
39.0 40.2
54.9 49.7
CNEL
57.7
49.9
48.7
58.8
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.4 57.6 54.9 49.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.4
59.4 ******* 58.8
58.8 *******
CNEL
58.8
W/ AMBIENT
59.4
59.4
58.8
58.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOlSE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 61 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 80
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 55
DT W/OB= 25
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
83.62
82.96
81.58
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
.PAD EL = 2 2 9 . 4
ROAD EL= 219.4
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775 0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
219.4
221.7
227.4
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 56.7 54.8 53.1 47.0 56.2 MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 49.2 47.7 41.3 39.8 48.5 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 48.1 46.7 37.6 38.9 47.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 57.9 56.1 53.5 48.3 57.4
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AN.D BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ VEHICULAR NOISE 57.9 56.1 53.5 48.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
W/O AMBIENT
57.9
57.9 ******* 57.4
57.4 *******
CNEL
57.4
W/ AMBIENT
57.9
57.9
57.4
57.4
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
,,
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 94
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 48
DT W/OB= 46
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST= HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
(lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
82.48
83.71 86.60
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
( O=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
25.2. 0
254.3
260.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.3
61.2
58.6
71.1
DAY LEQ
68.4
59.7
57.1
69.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.6 60.6
53.4 51.8
48.1 49.4
66.9 61.4
CNEL
69.8
60.5
57.8
70.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
65.8 VEHICULAR NOISE 66.3 64.5 62.1 56.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/0 AMBIENT
71.1
66.3
70.5
65.8
W/ AMBIENT
71.1
******* 66.3 70.5
******* 65.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10 CTL DIST= 114
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 54
DT W/OB= 60
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
104.23
105.25
108.04
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.775
0.848
0.8(>5
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
264.0
266.3
272.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
69.3
60.2
57.6
70.1
DAY LEQ
67.4
58.7
56.2
68.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
65.6 59.6
52.4 50.8
47.1 48.4
65.9 60.4
CNEL
68.8
59.5
56.9
69.5
-------~-------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.3 63.5 61.1 55.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
W/0 AMBIENT
70.1
65.3 ******* 69.5
64.8 *******
CNEL
64.8
W/ AMBIENT
70.1
65.3
69.5
64.8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
.I
II'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 82 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 188
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 65
DT W/OB= 123
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
181.44
182.40
184.81
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 247.0
ROAD EL= 270.0
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
270.0
272.3
278.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
66.9
57.9
55.3
67.7
DAY LEQ
65.0
56.3
53.8
65.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ ·
63.2 57.2
50.0 48.4
44.8 46.1
63.5 58.0
CNEL
66.4
57.1
54.5
67.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.5 60.7 58.4 52.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
67.7
62.6 ******* 67.1
62.0 *******
CNEL
62.0
W/ AMBIENT
67.7
62.6
67.1
62.0
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO} FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 84 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 120
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 66
DT W/OB= 54
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2} AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE}
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
114.59
115.52
118.13
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 251.3
ROAD EL= 274.0
GRADE = 4.1 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
274.0
21·6. 3
282.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 68.9 67.0 65.2 59.1 68.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 59.8 58.3 52.0 50.4 59.1 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 57.2 55.8 46.8 48.0 56.5 --------------------------------------------------~------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 69.6 67.8 65.5 60.0 69.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
62.0 VEHICULAR NOISE 62.5 60.7 58.3 52.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
W/O AMBIENT
69.6
62.5
69.1
62.0
W/ AMBIENT
69.6 ******* 62.5 69.1 ******* 62.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I:
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: LA COSTA AVENUE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 116 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 6,700 PK HR VOL= 670
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 121
DIST N/F= 36
OT WALL= 114
OT W/OB= 7
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 245.0
ROAD EL= 277.3
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
133.67
134.32
136.12
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 3.0 %
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
277.3
279.6
285.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.2
50.6
48.7
59.3
DAY LEQ
56.3
49.l
47.3
57.5
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.5 48.5
42.7 41.2
38.3 39.5
54.9 49.7
CNEL
57.7
49.9
48.0
58.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.1 40.3 37.7 32.4
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.3
42.1 ******* 58.7
41.5 *******
CNEL
41.5
W/ AMBIENT
59.3
42.1
58.7
41.5
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 130 -2ND FLOOR FACADE
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 3,000
SPEED = 35
PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST= 70
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 40
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15. 0.
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
300
78.27
77.03
74.47
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 228.2
ROAD EL= 208.2
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DA:Y
0.775
0.848
0.865
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
EVENING
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
208.2
210.5
216.2
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 57.0 55.1 53.4 47.3' 56.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 49.5 48.0 41.7 40.1 48.8 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 48.5 47.1 38.0 39.3 47.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 58.2 56.4 53.8 48.6 57.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO ANP BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 50.4 48.6 45.9 40.8
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/0
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
58.2
50.4 ******* 57.7
49.9 *******
CNEL
49.9
W/ AMBIENT
58.2
50.4
57.7
49.9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2ND FLOOR FACADE WITH WALL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CAMINO DE LOS COCHES -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,600 PK HR VOL= 360
SPEED= 40
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 238
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 220
OT W/OB= 18
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 63.2
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
239.02
238.76
238.20
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 200.6
( 0=WALL, l=BERM)
GRADE = 6.6 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
200.6
202.9
208.6
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
54.6
46.3
44.8
55.6
DAY LEQ
52.7
44.8
43.3
53.8
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
51.0 '44.9
38.4 36.9
34.3 35.6
51. 3 46.0
CNEL
54.1
45.6
44.0
55.1
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
55.6
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.8 51.3 46.0
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
55.6
55.6 ******* 55.1
55.1 *******
CNEL
55.1
W/ AMBIENT
63.9
63.9
63.8
63.8
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
PROJECT-: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 15 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 225
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 36
DT WALL= 220
DT W/OB= 5
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
********
LF ANGLE= 0
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 90
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10.
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
3,260
225.35
225.13
224.71
MEDIUM T~UCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.1
ROAD EL= 207.2
GRADE = 6.6 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS}
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
207.2
209.5
215.2
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
62.9 61.0 59.3 53.2 62.4 53.9 52.4 46.1 44.5 53.2 52.1 50.6 41.6 42.8 51.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 63.7 61.9 59.5 54.1 63.2
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.7
DAY LEQ
61.9
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
59.5 54.1
W/O AMBIENT
63.7
63.7 ******* 63.2
63. 2 ·*******
CNEL
63.2
W/ AMBIENT
63.7
63.7
63.2
63.2
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 18 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/ 6' WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 63
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 55
OT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
55.06
54.16
52.30
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 214.5
ROAD EL= 207.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
207.0
209.3
215.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
72.1
63.l
62.8
73.0
DAY LEQ
70.2
61. 6
61.4
71.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
68.4 62.3
55.3 53.7
52.4 53.6
68.7 63.4
CNEL
71.6
62.4
62.1
72.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.0
DAY LEQ
71. 2
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
68.7 63.4 72.5
AMBIENT
73.0
73.0
72.5
72.5
*******
*******
W/ AMBIENT
73.0
73.0
72.5
72.5
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 19 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED = 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 71
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 49
OT W/OB= 22
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
54.96
55.34
56.95
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 {0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 215.0
ROAD EL= 225.0
GRADE = 7.8 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
225.0
227.3
233.0
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY ---------------~~----------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
o.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 72.1 70.2 68.4 62.3 71.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 63.0 61.5 55.2 53.6 62.3
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 62.5 61.0 52.0 53.2 61.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 73.0 71.2 68.7 63.3 72.4
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.5
DAY LEQ
64.6
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
=
=
=
=
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
W/O
62.2 56.8 65.9
AMBIENT
73.0
66.5
72.4
65.9
*******
***'****
W/ AMBIENT
73.0
66.5
72.4
65.9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 23 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 82
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 57
DT W/OB= 25
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
69.14
69.34
72.68
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 3.18
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
PAD EL = 225.7
ROAD EL= 234.3
GRADE = 7.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
234.3
236.6
242.3
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
71.1
62.1
61.4
72.0
DAY LEQ
69.2
60.5
60.0
70.2
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ •
67.4 61.3
54.2 52.6
50.9 52.2
67.7 62.3
CNEL
70.6
61.3
60.7
71.4
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AN.D BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.3
DAY LEQ
65.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
63.0 57.6
W/O AMBIENT
72.0
67.3 *******
71.4
66.7 *******
CNEL
66.7
W/ AMBIENT
72.0
67.3
71.4
66.7
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 27 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------ADT = 32,600
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DIST N/F= 76
DT WALL= 52
DT W/OB= 48
HTH WALL= 2.5
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS (l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
87.65
88.54
92.96
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10
BARRIER= 0 (0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 230.6
ROAD EL= 246.8
GRADE = 5.2 %
(ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
246.8
24·9 .1
254.8
V.EHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.775 0.848
0.865
0.129 0.049
0.027
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
-----------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.0 68.1 66.4 60.3 69.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.0 59.5 53.l 51.6 60.3 HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 58.9 57.5 48.4 49.7 58.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 70.8 69.0 66.6 61.2 70.3
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.1
DAY LEQ
63.3
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER =
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER =
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
60.9 55.4
W/O AMBIENT
70.8
65.1 ******* 70.3
64.6 *******
CNEL
64.6
W/ AMBIENT
70.8
65.1
70.3
64.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLE TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 38 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 3,000 PK HR VOL= 300
SPEED = 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 60
DIST N/F= 12
OT WALL= 30
OT W/OB= 30
HTH WALL= 4.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10
62.74
62.07
60.76
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.75
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= O
PAD EL = 215.3
ROAD EL= 211.0
(O=WALL,l=BERM)
GRADE = 5.4 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
211. 0
213.3
219.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
58.0
50.5
49.4
59.2
DAY LEQ
56.1
49.0
48.0
57.4
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
54.3 48.3
42.6 41.1
38.9 40.2
54.7 49.5
CNEL
57.5
49.7
48.7
58.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.2 57.4 54.7 49.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
59.2
59.2 ******* 58.6
58.6 *******
CNEL
58.6
W/ AMBIENT
59.2
59.2
58.6
58.6
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL {CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------~ROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: CALLED TIMITEO -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 53 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
ADT = 3,000
SPEED= 35
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 44
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
PK HR VOL=
DIST N/F= 12
DT WALL= 36
DT W/OB= 8
HTH WALL= 4.0
(M=76,P=5'2,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
******** OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE=180
SITE CONDITIONS {l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
300
48.56
47.59
45.60
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 {0=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 201.9
ROAD EL= 195.5
GRADE = 4.0 %
VEHICLE TYPE
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
195.5
197.8
203.5
DAILY ---------------------------------------------------------------------AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
59.1 57.2 55.4 49.4 58.6
51.6 50.1 43.8 42.2 50.9 50.0 48.6 39.5 40.8 49.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE 60.2 58.4 55.8 50.6
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.2 58.4 55.8 50.6
59.7
CNEL
59.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/O AMBIENT
60.2
60.2
59.7
59.7
W/ AMBIENT
60.2 ******* 60.2 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 59.7 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 59.7
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD
PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTE FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 74 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON
ADT = 32,600 PK HR VOL= 3,260
SPEED= 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 94
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 48
OT W/OB= 46
HTH WALL= 2.0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=l2) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=180
(l0=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
10 .
80.93
82.05
86.60
SITE CONDITIONS
AUTOMOBILES =
MEDIUM TRUCKS=
HEAVY TRUCKS =
10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
( 0=WALL, l=BERM) BARRIER= 0
PAD EL = 234.6
ROAD EL= 252.0
GRADE = 4.2 %
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
DAY EVENING NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
252.0
254.3
260.0
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE
PK HR LEQ
70.4
61.3
58.6
71.1
DAY LEQ
68.5
59.8
57.1
69.3
EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
66.7 60.7
53.5 51.9
48.1 49.4
67.0 61.5
CNEL
69.9
60.6
57.8
70.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ
65.1
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.3 61.0 55.5
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
W/O
=
=
=
=
AMBIENT
71.1
65.2 ******* 70.6
64.6 *******
CNEL
64.6
W/ AMBIENT
71.1
65.2
70.6
64.6
FHWA -RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) FOR CARLSBAD I
---------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECT: PARKVIEW WEST NOISE STUDY
ROADWAY: RANCHO SANTA FE -CARLSBAD
LOCATION:BLDG 80 -2ND FLOOR FACADE W/WALL
JOB#:
DATE:
BY:
652-96-001
26-Jul-96
B. LAWSON __________________________________________________ , __________________ _
ADT = 32,600
SPEED = 45
PK HR%= 10
CTL DIST= 114
DIST N/F= 76
OT WALL= 54
OT W/OB= 60
HTH WALL= 2 . 0
OBS HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW:
PK HR VOL=
(M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE=
MED TRUCK SLE DIST=
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST=
********
LF ANGLE=-90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE=l80
SITE CONDITIONS (lO=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
3,260
102.96
103.90
108.04
MEDIUM TRUCKS= 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 1.11
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER= 0 (O=WALL,l=BERM)
PAD EL = 246.0
ROAD EL= 264.0
GRADE = 4.0 %
EL AUTOMOBILES =
EL MEDIUM TRUCKS=
EL HEAVY TRUCKS=
264.0
266.3
272.0
VEHICLE TYPE
AUTOMOBILES
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEQ
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ
DAY EVENING
0.775
0.848
0.865
0.129
0.049
0.027
NIGHT
0.096
0.103
0.108
DAILY
0.9789
0.0183
0.0028
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING -----------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
69.3 67.4 65.7 59.6 68.8
60.3 58.8 52.4 50.9 59.6 57.6 56.2 47.1 48.4 56.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------VEHICULAR NOISE
VEHICULAR NOISE
70.l 68.3 65.9 60.4
---------------------------------------------NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AN:D BARRIER SHIELDING ---------------------------------------------PK HR LEQ
64.2
DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ
62.4 60.0 54.5
69.6
CNEL
63.7
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER =
MIT PK HR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER=
W/0 AMBIENT
70.1
64.2
69.6
63.7
W/ AMBIENT
70.1 ******~ 64.2 CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 69.6 MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = ******* 63.7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX E
I PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\\
- -
', ----.. - - - -
--w-
-· -
-- -
-
ELEV
~RRAN
'248.5
/
I
---------·--------
EXIST ~
C
f'ARl/::<i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT:PARKVIEW WEST
FLR PLAN:2
ROOM:MASTER
SOURCE:1
(l=HIGHWAY, 2=TRAIN, 3=MILITARY JET)
(1) TRANSMISSION LOSS
DATE: 29-Jul-96
JOB #:507-96-001
BY: BILL LAWSON
------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE WALL ASSEMBLY WINDOWS OPEN WINDOWS CLO
TL AREA S/(l0A(TL/10) AREA S/(l0A(TL/1
500
302
700
STUCCO WALL 7/811
FIXED WINDOW 3/1611
OPEN WINDOW
43.66 115
26.03 24
0.0050
0.0599
8.0000 0.00 8
COMPOSITE WALL
TRANSMISSION LOSS=
(2) ROOM EFFECTS
CODE
VALUE
800
804
900
900
700
ROOM SURFACE
PERSON
FLOOR
CEILING
WALLS W/WINDOWS CLOSED
WALLS W/WINDOWS OPEN
OPEN WINDOW
OPENING TO
OPENING TO
TRANSMISSION LOSS
TOTAL SURFACE AREA
TOTAL ABSORBTION
AVE. ABSORTION COEFF.
OUTSIDE WALL AREA
ROOM CONSTANT
ROOM EFFECTS
(3) NOISE REDUCTION
147 0.0549
12.6072
AREA TREATMENT
188 CARPET
188 DRYWALL
332 DRYWALL
324 DRYWALL
8 OPEN WINDOW
WINDOWS OPEN
12.61
708.00
121. 36
0 .17
147.00
146.47
0.98
11.63
115
32
147
ABSORB.
COEFF.
0.50
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.00
0.0050
0.0798
0.0000
0.0006
32.3903
ABSORB.
4.00
94.00
5.64
9.96
9.72
8.00 o.oo o.oo
WINDOWS CLO
32.39
708.00
113.60
0.16
147.00
135.31
1.26
31.13
PROJECT:PARKVIEW WEST
FLR PLAN:3
ROOM:MASTER
SOURCE:1
(l=HIGHWAY, 2=TRAIN, 3=MILITARY JET)
DATE: 29-Jul-96
JOB #:507-96-001
BY: BILL LAWSON ------------------------------------------------------------------------(1) TRANSMISSION LOSS ------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE WALL ASSEMBLY WINDOWS OPEN WINDOWS CLO
TL AREA S/(lOA(TL/10) AREA S/(lOA(TL/1 ----~-------------------------------------------------------------------500
302
700
STUCCO WALL 7/8"
FIXED WINDOW 3/16"
OPEN WINDOW
43.66 230
26.03 32
0.0099
0.0798
8.0000 0.00 8
COMPOSITE WALL
TRANSMISSION LOSS=
(2) ROOM EFFECTS
CODE
800
804
900
900
700
ROOM SURFACE
PERSON
FLOOR
CEILING
WALLS W/WINDOWS CLOSED
WALLS W/WINDOWS OPEN
OPEN WINDOW
OPENING TO
OPENING TO
270 0.0300
15.2343
AREA TREATMENT
200 CARPET
200 DRYWALL
325 DRYWALL
317 DRYWALL
8 OPEN WINDOW
230
32
262
ABSORB.
COEFF.
0.50
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.00
0.0099
0.0798
0.0000
0.0003
34.6537
ABSORB.
4.00
100.00
6.00
9.75
9.51
8.00 o.oo o.oo ------------------------------------------------------------------------
VALUE WINDOWS OPEN WINDOWS CLO ------------------------------------------------------------------------TRANSMISSION LOS.S
TOTAL SURFACE AREA
TOTAL ABSORBTION
AVE. ABSORTION COEFF.
OUTSIDE WALL AREA
ROOM CONSTANT
15.23
725.00
127.51
0.18
270.00
154.72
34.65
725.00
119.75
0.17
262.00
143.44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ROOM EFFECTS 3.00 3.17 ------------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(3) NOISE REDUCTION 12.23 31.48
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX F
I NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F:\REAL\622~16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/9
ARTICLE III
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
section 7.
Section 8.
section 9.
Section 10.
Section 11.
Sect.j.on 12.
section 13
Section 14.
section 15.
section 16.
section 17.
Section 18.
section 19.
Section 20.
section 21.
section 22.
section 23.
Section 24.
section 25.
section 26.
section 27.
ARTICLE IV
section 1.
Section 2.
section 3.
Section 4.
section 5.
Section 6.
ARTICLE V
section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
240
USE RESTRICTIONS . . . . . . . . . .
single Family Residence ........ .
Business or Commercial Activity .... .
Leases ...
Nuisances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
signs. ~ ....... . . -. ·•
CFO Notices to Purchasers
Parking and Vehicular Restrictions .. .
Animal Restrictions .......... .
Unsightly Items ...... .
Temporary Buildings .......... .
Common Area Facilities . . . . .. .
outside Installations. . . . . .. .
Post Tension Slabs . . . . .. .
Insurance Rates. . . . . . . ..
Window Covers. . ......... .
Drilling . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pesticides and Fertilizers . . . ..
Hazardous or Toxic Waste ..... .
Exterior Lighting. . . . . .... .
View Obstruction . . . . . .. .
Landscaping .......... .
owners' Duties: Front and Rear Yard
Landscaping .............. .
Reclaimed Water on Common Area
Landscaping .............. .
Violation of Governing Instruments .. .
Construction by Declarant. . . . ..
Landscape Maintenance Standards .....
MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS ..... .
Organization . . . . . . . . ..
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Voting Rights ............. .
Two Classes of Memberships . . . ..
Special Class A Voting Rights ..... .
Vesting of Voting Rights ... .
COVENANT FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS
Covenant to Pay Assessment ...... .
Purpose of Assessments ...... .
Amount of Regular Assessments and
Limitation on Increases in Regular
Assessments .............. .
special Assessments for Capital
Improvements and Limitation on Increases
In special Assessments ........ .
special Quorum and Meeting Requirements
for Increases In Assessments ..... .
Exceptions from Limitation on Assessment
Increases ....... .
Reimbursement Assessments
Rate of Assessment ...
ii
9
9
9
9
9
1-0
10
10
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
F:\REAL\622~16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/9
Section 9.
section 10.
Section 11.
Section 12.
section 13.
Section 14.
Section 15.
section 16.
Section 17.
section 18.
Section 19.
ARTICLE VI
Section 1.
section 2.
section 3.
section 4.
Section 5.
section 6.
Section 7.
section 8.
Section 9.
section 10.
Section 11.
ARTICLE VII
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
ARTICLE VIII
Section 1.
Section 2.
ARTICLE IX
ARTICLE X
Section 1.
241
Date of Commencement of Regular
Assessments: Due Dates ...... .
Certification of Payment ....... .
Exemption from Regular Assessments -
Dwelling Unit ........... .
Exemption from Regular Assessments----
Common Area ............ .
Reserves ............. .
Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments;
Remedies of the Corporation .....
Subordination to Certain Trust Deeds
Exempt Property .......... .
Enforcement of Reimbursement Liens .. .
Delivery by Owner ......... .
Late Charges and Interest on Delinquent
Assessments ............ .
DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE CORPORATION
General Powers of the Corporation ... .
Contracts of the Corporation ..... .
General Powers and Duties of
Corporation ............ .
Restrictions on Power of the Board .. .
Limitation on Board Authority to
Contract ........... .
Corporation Rules ......... .
Entry onto Lots ............ .
Damage from Wood-Destroying Pests.
Corporation Documents to Declarant .. .
Litigation Authority ....... .
Maintenance of Concrete Terrace Drains
INS{JRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Waiver by Members. . ..... .
Other Insurance; Annual Review .. .
Premiums and Proceeds. . . . . . ..
Payment of Taxes or Premiums by
Mortgagees .......... .
Annual Notification of Insurance ..
Notice of Cancellation or Modification
of Coverage .............. .
Requirements of Federal Agencies ... .
DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION AFFECTING COMMON
AREA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Consent of owners to Rebuild
No Consent Required With Adequate
Insurance. . . . . . . . ....
EMINENT DOMAIN
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL.
Members of Committee
iii
23
23
23
24
24
25
27
28
28
28
29
30
30
30
31
33
33
34
35
35
35
36
37
38
38
39
39
39
40
40
40
40
42
42
42
43
44
44
F:\REAL\622~16369008\CClRS rev 10/22/9
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
section 8.
Section 9.
Section 10.
ARTICLE XI
ARTICLE XII
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
Section 9.
Section 10.
Section 11.
Section 12.
ARTICLE XIII
ARTICLE XIV
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
Section 9.
Section 10.
ARTICLE XV
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
ARTICLE XVI
Section 1.
Section 2.
242
Review of Plans and Specifications ... 44
Meetings of the Architectural Committee. 45
No Waiver of Future Approvals. . 46
Compensation·of Members ......... 46
Inspection of Work ........... 46
Nonliability of Architectural Cemmit~ee
Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Nonapplicability to Declarant ...... 47
Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Appeal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8
NOTICES.
RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES ....... .
Notice to Mortgagees of Default .. .
Assessments on Foreclosure ...... .
Right of First Refusal .. .
Required Consent of Owners . . . . .
Rights of First Mortgagees ...... .
Payment of Taxes and Insurance Premiums.
Priority on Distribution of Proceeds
Notice of Destruction or Taking ...
Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage Protection Clause ...... .
Federal Agency Agreement ..
Conflicts ............. .
ENFORCEMENT OF BONDED OBLIGATIONS ..
EASEMENTS AND OWNERS' PROPERTY RIGHTS
owners' Easements of Enjoyment .....
Waiver of Use . . . . . . . . . . . .
Owners' Rights and Duties: Utilities
Common Area Easements ......... .
Party Walls and Fences ...... .
Encroachment Easements ...... .
Pedestrian Trail Easement. . . .
Creation of Easements. . . . ..
Easements for Corporation ....... .
Amendment to Eliminate Easements
ANNEXATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annexation With Consent ...... .
Annexation Without Consent
Supplementary Declaration ....... .
Effective Date of Annexation
Commitment by Declarant to Pay
Assessments ............ .
Deannexation by Declarant .. .
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS
1354, 1365 AND 1365.5 ....... .
Budgets and Financial statements ..
Certification of Report ........ .
iv
49
50
50
50
50
50
51
51
52
52
52
52
52
53
54
55
55
56
56
57
57
58
59
59
59
59
60
60
60
60
61
61
61
63
63
64
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
ARTICLE XVII
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
Section 9.
Section 10.
Section 11.
Alternative Financial Statements
Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Policies on Remedies ..... .
Summary of Insurance Coverage
Fiscal Duties of Board ....
Withdrawal of Funds from the
Corporation's Reserve Accounts ...
GENERAL PROVISIONS ..... .
Enforcement .... .
Severability ........... .
Term . . . . . . . . . .
Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nonliability of Officials.
Construction ............. .
Singular Includes Plural
Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporation Management Document
Conflicts .......... .
Attorneys' Fees
The Declaration.
EXHIBIT "A" -Annexable Area
EXHIBIT "B" -Landscape Maintenance Area
V
243
65
65
65
65
65
66
69
69
69
69
69
70
70
70
70
71
71
71
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 245
hypothecated, leased, used, occupied and improved subject to the
following easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions and
equitable servitudes, all of which are for the purpose of
uniformly enhancing and protecting the value, attractiveness and
desirability of the Properties, in furtherance of a general plan
for the protection, maintenance, subdivision, improvement and
sale of the Properties or any portion thereof. The covenants,
conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements and equitable
servitudes set forth herein shall run with the Properties, shall
be enforceable equitable servitudes, unless unreasonable, and
shall be binding upon all persons having any right, title or
interest in the Properties, or any part thereof, their heirs,
successors and assigns; shall inure to the benefit of every
portion of the Properties and any interest therein; shall inure
to the benefit of and be binding upon Declarant, each Owner and
their respective heirs, executors and administrators; and may be
enforced by Declarant, by any owner or by the Corporation (as
hereinafter defined).
2
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
246
Section 1. -Annexable Area. The term ~Annexable
Area" shall mean and refer to all or any portion of the real
property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference which may be annexed to the
Properties pursuant to the terms of the Article of this
Declaration entitled "ANNEXATION."
Section 2. Architectural Committee. The term
"Architectural Committee" shall mean and refer to the Committee
created pursuant to the article of this Declaration entitled
"Architectural Control".
Section 3. Architectural Guidelines. The term
"Architectural Guidelines" shall mean and refer to the guidelines
created by the Architectural Committee to govern design
standards, criteria, procedures, rules and instructions adopted
or to be adopted by the Architectural Committee, as such
Architectural Guidelines may be amended or supplemented from time
to time pursuant to the Article of this Declaration entitled
"Architectural Control." Architectural Guidelines include
criteria established by the City for the purpose of uniformly
enhancing and protecting the attractiveness and desirability of
the Properties.
Section 4. Board of Directors. The term "Board of
Directors" or "Board" shall mean and refer to the duly elected
Board of Directors of the Corporation.
Section 5. City. The term "City" shall mean and
refer to the City of Carlsbad, California, a municipal
corporation of the State of California.
Section 6. Common Area. The term "Common Area"
shall mean and refer to all the real property and improvements,
including, without limitation, streets, landscaping, storm drain
facilities, designated portions of fences and walls, lighting,
cabana, pool and spa which are owned by the Corporation in fee or
by easement for the common use and enjoyment of all of the
owners. The Common Area to be so owned by the Corporation at the
time of the conveyance of the first Lot within the Properties
shall include that certain real property located in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, described
more particularly as follows: Parcels 133, 135, 139, 142, 144,
148, 155 and easements over portions of Parcels 149 and 154, all
as shown on Parcel Map No. 17744, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, September 5, 1996 as File
No. 1996-0450805, of Official Records. Common Area shall also
include "Landscape Maintenance Areas" as such term is defined
hereinbelow.
3
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 247
Section 7. CFD Notices. The term "CFD Notice" as
used herein shall mean and refer to the written "Notice of
Special Tax" required to be provided pursuant to the California
Government Code to prospective purchasers of a Lot or lessees of
a Lot for a term exceeding five years which describe information
for Community Facilities-Dis~rict 94-2 of the San Diegaito Union
High School District as set forth in the "Notice of Special Tax
Lien for Community Facilities District No. 94-2 of the San
Dieguito Union High School District" which recorded December 8,
1994 as File No. 1994-0703418. This CFD was established for the
purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds
of which are being used to finance school facilities, and
providing funds to finance the acquiring, leasing and/or
constructing of school facilities, including, but not limited to,
interim facilities.
Section 8. Corporation. The term "Corporation"
shall mean and refer to ON THE PARK MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, a
nonprofit mutual benefit co~poration, its successors and assigns.
Section 9. Corporation Management Documents. The
term "Corporation Management Documents" shall mean and refer to
the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for the Corporation,
this Declaration, any supplementary Declarations, the
Architectural Guidelines and Corporation Rules, if any, and any
amendments to the foregoing.
section 10. Corporation Rules. The term
"Corporation Rules" shall mean and refer to the rules adopted,
amended and repealed from time to time by the Board pursuant to
the Section of the Bylaws entitled "Corporation Rules;
Enforcement" of the Article entitled "MEMBERS."
Section 11. Declarant. The term the "Declarant"
shall mean and refer to GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, its successors and assigns, including the successors
and assigns of GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. with respect to any property
which may be annexed to this Declaration pursuant to the Article
of this Declaration entitled "Annexation".
Section 12. Declaration. The term "covenants"
and/or "Declaration" shall mean and refer collectively to the
covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements,
liens and charges imposed by or expressed in this Declaration.
Section 13. Federal Agencies. The term "Federal
Agencies" shall mean and refer to any of the following agencies
to the extent that any such agency is a Mortgagee, owner, insurer
or guarantor of a Mortgage within the Properties: FHLMC (Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation), FNMA (Federal National Mortgage
Association), and GNMA (Government National Mortgage
Association) .
4
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 248
Section 14. Final Subdivision Public Report. The
term "Final subdivision Public Report" or "Public Report" shall
mean and refer to the report issued by the California Department
of Real Estate pursuant to section 11018.2 of the California
Business and Professions Code.
Section 15. Improvement. The term "Improvement"
shall mean and refer to any structure or appurtenance thereto of
every type and kind, including but not limited to buildings,
walkways, sprinkler pipes, garages, room additions, patio covers,
swimming pools, spas, recreational facilities, roads, driveways,
parking areas, fences, screens, screening walls, retaining walls,
stairs, decks, landscaping, antennas, hedges, windbreaks,
plantings, planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, exterior air
conditioning and water softening fixtures or equipment, and the
installation, alteration (which shall include change of material,
exterior appearance, color or texture), removal or replacement
thereof.
Section 16. Landscape Maintenance Area. The term
"Landscape Maintenance Area" as used herein may include certain
plantings, planted trees, shrubs, slopes and other landscaping
improvements, if any, including designated fences and walls,
which shall be maintained by the Corporation, which Landscape
Maintenance Area is identified on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference. Additional Landscape
Maintenance Area may be included within future Phases of the
Properties as described in the.Supplementary Declaration for such
Phase. The Corporation shall have a nonexclusive easement for
maintenance purposes over any Landscape Maintenance Area;
provided, however, that the corporation, acting through the
Board, may reasonably restrict access to portions of the
Landscape Maintenance Area.
Section 17. Lot. The term "Lot" shall mean and
refer to any numbered plot of land (or parcel) shown upon any
recorded subdivision map, including, but not limited to a Parcel
Map, of the Properties (with the exception of the public streets
or alleys and the common Area).
Section 18. Member. The term "Member" shall mean
and refer to those persons entitled to membership in the
Corporation as provided in this Declaration and in the
Corporation Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
Section 19. Mortgage or Mortgagee. The terms
"Mortgage" or "Mortgagee" shall mean and refer to respectively
any duly recorded and valid mortgage or deed of trust encumbering
a Lot and the holder of the mortgagee's or beneficiary's interest
under any such Mortgage. The term "First Mortgage" and "First
Mortgagee" shall mean and refer respectively to a Mortgage which
has priority over all other Mortgages encumbering a specific Lot
and the holder of any such First Mortgage.
5
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 249
Section 20. Owner. The term "Owner" shall mean and
refer to the record Owner, whether one or more persons or
entities, of a fee simple title to any Lot which is a part of the
Properties, including contract purchasers, but excluding those
having such interest merely as security for the performance of an
obligation.
Section 21. Pedestrian Trail. The term "Pedestrian
Trail" shall mean and refer to those portions of Parcels 132 and
135 of the Properties for public pedestrian trail purposes which
is located within a seventy foot (70') easement granted to the
city, as shown on the recorded tract map for the Properties. The
corporation shall be responsible for maintaining the Pedestrian
Trail.
Section 22. Phase. The term "Phase," "Phase of the
Development" or "Phase of the Properties" shall mean and refer to
the real property identified by this Declaration, being Phase 1
of the Properties, and those portions of real property as shall
be identified by a Supplementary Declaration of covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions to be recorded pursuant to the terms
of the Article of this Declaration entitled "ANNEXATION." The
Properties as described in Recital A of this Declaration may also
be hereafter referred to as "Phase 1 of the Properties."
Section 23. Properties. The term "Properties" shall
mean and refer to that certain real property in the city of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, described as
Parcels 43 through 59, 109, 110, 123 through 131, and Parcels
133, 135, 139, 142, 144, 148, 155 and easements over portions of
Parcels 149 and 154 all as shown on Parcel Map No. 17744, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
September 5, 1996 as File No. 1996-0450805, of Official Records.
The term "Properties" shall also include all real property which
is annexed to this Declaration pursuant to the provisions of the
Article of this Declaration entitled "ANNEXATION."
Section 24. Regular Assessment. The term "Regular
Assessment" shall mean and refer to the amount which is to be
paid by each Owner to the Corporation for common expenses as
provided by the terms of this Declaration.
Section 25. Reimbursement Assessment. The term
"Reimbursement Assessment" shall mean a charge against each owner
and their Lot for the purpose of reimbursing the Corporation for
any costs incurred by the Corporation on behalf of an individual
Owner. A Reimbursement Assessment may also be levied by the
Corporation for purposes of collecting any monetary penalties
which may be imposed by the Corporation against an Owner as a
disciplinary measure for failure of an Owner to comply with
provisions of this Declaration, the determinations of the Board
or the Architectural Committee, or any rule or regulation adopted
by the Corporation.
6
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 250
Section 26. Special Assessment. The term "Special
Assessment" shall mean a charge against each Owner and their Lot,
representing a portion of the cost to the Corporation for
installation, construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement
of.any capital improvements on any of the Common Area which the
corporation may from time to-time authorize pursuan~ t~ the·
provisions of this Declaration.
Section 27. Supplementary Declaration.
"Supplementary Declaration" shall mean and refer to
annexing additional property and extending the plan
Declaration to such additional property.
7
The term
a document
of this
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE II
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF COVENANTS
251
The covenants, conditions and restrictions set-forth in
this Declaration constitute a general scheme for the development,
protection and maintenance of the Properties to enhance the
value, desirability and attractiveness of the Lots for the
benefit of all owners of Lots therein. These covenants,
conditions and restrictions are imposed upon Declarant and upon
the owners of all Lots. Said covenants, conditions and
restrictions are for the benefit of all Lots, and shall bind the
owners of all such Lots. Such covenants, conditions and
restrictions shall be a burden upon and a benefit to not only the
original owner of each Lot, but also their successors and
assigns. All such covenants, conditions and restrictions are
intended as and are hereby declared to be covenants running with
the land o~ equitable servitudes upon the land, as the case may
be.
8
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE III
USE RESTRICTIONS
252
All real property within the Properties shal-1 be held,-
used and enjoyed subject to the following limitations and
restrictions.
Section 1. single Family Residence. Except as
provided elsewhere in this Declaration, each Lot shall be used as
a single residence for a single family and for no other purpose.
Section 2. Business or Commercial Activity. No
part of the Properties shall ever be used or caused to be used or
allowed or authorized in any way, directly or indirectly, for any
business, commercial, manufacturing, mercantile, storage, vending
or other such non-residential purposes; except Declarant, its
successors ~r assigns, may use any portion of the Properties for
a model home site, and display and sales office during the
construction and sales period. The provisions of this Section
shall not preclude professional and administrative occupations
without external evidence thereof, for so long as such
occupations are in conformance with all applicable governmental
ordinances and are merely incidental to the use of the dwelling
unit as a residential home.
Section 3. Leases. Any agreement for the leasing
or rental of a Lot (hereinafter in this Section referred to as a
"lease" shall provide that the terms of such lease shall be
subject in all respects to the provisions of the Corporation
Management Documents and any applicable agreement between the
Corporation and any of the Federal Agencies. Said lease shall
further provide that any failure by the lessee thereunder to
comply with the terms of the foregoing document shall be a
default under the lease. All leases shall be in writing. The
owner of said leased or rented Lot has the duty and obligation to
furnish the Board with the name or names of the individuals
currently leasing or renting said Lot and to maintain with the
Corporation a record of the current mailing address of said
owner. Any Owner who shall lease their Lot shall be responsible
for assuring compliance by such owner's lessee with the
Corporation Management Documents. Other than the foregoing,
there shall be no restriction on the right of any owner to lease
their Lot.
Section 4. Nuisances. No noxious or offensive
activity (including but not limited to the repair of motor
vehicles) shall be carried on, in or upon any Lot or the Common
Area, nor shall anything be done therein which may be or become
an unreasonable annoyance or a nuisance to any other Owner.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing provisions, no
loud noises or noxious odors, no exterior speakers, horns,
whistles, bells or other sound devices (other than security
9
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 253
devices used exclusively for security purposes), noisy or smoky
vehicles, large power equipment or large power tools, unlicensed
off-road motor vehicles or items which may unreasonably interfere
with television or radio reception-of any owner in the
Properties, shall be located, used or placed on any portion of
the Properties, or exposed to the view of other owners--without ··
the prior written approval of the Architectural Committee. The
Board of Directors shall have the right to determine in
accordance with the Bylaws if any noise, odor, interference or
activity producing such noise, odor or interference constitutes a
nuisance.
Section 5. Signs. No sign, poster, display,
billboard or other advertising device of any kind shall be
displayed to the public view on any portion of the Properties or
any Lot, without the prior written consent of the Architectural
Committee, except for the following: (a) one sign for each
dwelling unit, of not more than six (6) square feet, plain block
letters, advertising the dwelling unit for sale or rent, or (b)
signs, regardless of size or number, used by Declarant, its
successors or assigns, to advertise the Properties during
construction and sale period. All signs or billboards and the
conditions promulgated for the regulation thereof shall conform
to the requirements of all applicable governmental ordinances.
Section 6. CFD Notices to Purchasers. Each owner
of a Lot, including Declarant, prior to the execution of a
contract to sell a Lot, shall provide the CFO Notice under the
terms and in the format prescribed by the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, (Government Code Sections
53340.2 and 53341.5, as applicable) which CFO Notice shall be
acknowledged and executed by said prospective owner or Lessee as
prescribed in such Government Code Sections.
Section 7. Parking and Vehicular Restrictions. No
Owner shall park, store or keep any vehicle, except wholly within
the parking area designated therefor, and any inoperable vehicle
shall be stored only in enclosed garages. Two covered parking
space per Lot shall be used for the parking of motor vehicles and
shall not be utilized for any other use that would prohibit
parking of motor vehicles to the satisfaction of the City. No
Owner shall park, store or keep on any property or street (public
or private) within the Properties any large commercial-type
vehicle (including, but not limited to, any dump truck, cement
mixer truck, oil or gas truck or delivery truck), any
recreational vehicle (including, but not limited to, any camper
unit or motor home), any bus, trailer, trailer coach, camp
trailer, boat, aircraft, mobile home, inoperable vehicle or any
other similar vehicle or any vehicular equipment, mobile or
otherwise, deemed to be a nuisance by the Board, upon any
unenclosed parking space, so as to be visible from anywhere in
the Properties. The above excludes camper trucks and similar
vehicles when used for everyday-type transportation, subject to
approval by the Board. No owner of a Lot shall conduct repairs
10
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 254
or restorations of any motor.vehicle, boat, trailer, aircraft or
other vehicle upon any portion of any Lot or upon the Common
Area, except wholly within the Owner's garage, and then only when
the garage door is closed, or on a portion of the Common Area
specifically designated for the use thereof; provided, however,
that such activity shall ·at no time be permitted if-it-is
determined by the Board or its agent to be a nuisance. Garage
doors shall remain closed except for reasonable periods while the
garages are being used. No owner shall store their vehicle in
the guest parking spaces. In accordance with Section 22658.2 of
the California Vehicle Code, the Corporation, through its
officers, committees and agents, is empowered to establish and
enforce parking restrictions within the private streets, if any,
as well as to enforce those parking limitations by all means
lawful, including the removal of any violating vehicles by those
so empowered. In addition, the appropriate local government
authority is hereby authorized to impose and enforce all
provisions of the applicable California Vehicle Code sections on
any private streets contained within the Properties.
Section 8. Animal Restrictions. No insects,
reptiles, poultry or animals of any kind shall be raised, bred or
kept on any Lot or the Common Area, except usual and ordinary
dogs, cats, fish, birds and other household pets (excluding,
without limitation, equine, bovine, sheep, swine, goats and other
such animals) may be kept on Lots, provided that they are not
kept, bred or maintained for commercial purposes or in
unreasonable quantities, nor in violation of the Corporation
Rules. As used in this Declaration, "unreasonable quantities"
shall ordinarily mean more than two (2) pets per household,
provided, however, that the Corporation (or the Architectural
Committee or such other person or entity as the Corporation may
from time to time designate) may determine that a reasonable
number in any instance may be more or less. The Corporation,
acting through the Board of Directors, shall have the right to
prohibit maintenance of any animal which constitutes, in the
opinion of the Board, a nuisance to any other Owner. Animals
belonging to Owners, occupants or their licensees, tenants or
invitees within the Properties must be either kept within an
enclosure, an enclosed yard or on a leash being held by a person
capable of controlling the animals. Furthermore, any owner shall
be absolutely liable to each and all remaining Owners, their
families, guests, tenants and invitees, for any unreasonable
noise or damage to person or property caused by any animals
brought or kept upon the Properties by an owner or by members of
their family, their tenants or their guests; and it shall be the
absolute duty and responsibility of each such Owner to clean up
after such animals which have used any portion of the Common Area
or any portion of another's Lot.
Section 9. Unsightly Items. No rubbish, trash,
debris, garbage or other waste material shall be kept or
permitted upon any Lot or Common Area, except in sanitary
containers located in appropriate areas screened and concealed
11
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CCI.RS rev 10/22/96 255
from view, and no odor shall be permitted to arise therefrom so
as to render the Properties, or any portion thereof, unsanitary,
unsightly, offensive or detrimental to any other property in the
vicinity thereof or to its occupants. Such containers shall be
exposed to the view of neighboring Lots only when set out for a
reasonable period of time (not to exceed twenty-four (-24} hours--
before and after scheduled trash collection hours). There shall
be no exterior fires whatsoever except barbecue fires contained
within receptacles therefor and fire pits in the enclosed yards
designed in such a manner that they do not create a fire hazard.
No clothing or household fabrics shall be hung, dried or aired in
such a way in the Properties as to be visible to other property,
and no lumber, grass, shrub or tree clippings or plant waste,
metals, bulk material or scrap or refuse or trash shall be kept,
stored or allowed to accumulate on any portion of the Properties
except within an enclosed structure or appropriately screened
from view. Weeds shall be regularly removed from the Lots and
shall not be allowed to accumulate.
Section 10. Temporary Buildings. No temporary
outbuilding, tent, shack, shed or other temporary building or
structural improvement of any kind shall be placed upon any
portion of the Properties, except such structure that does not
extend above the height of the fence or wall enclosing the Lot
and is not visible from any other Lot or Common Area within the
Properties. No garage, trailer, camper, motor home or
recreational vehicle shall be used as a residence in the
Properties, either temporarily or permanently.
Section 11. Common Area Facilities. Nothing shall
be altered or constructed in or removed from the Common Area
except upon the written consent of the Architectural Committee,
subject to the provisions of this Declaration limiting
construction on portions of the Common Area.
Section 12. Outside Installations.
(a) No radio station or shortwave operators of
any kind shall operate from any Lot or dwelling unit unless
approved in writing by the Architectural Committee, or by the
Board of Directors, and the same be contained within a building
or underground conduits. No exterior radio antenna, C.B.
antenna, television antenna, or other antenna of any type shall
be erected or maintained in the Properties without the prior
written approval of the Architectural Committee or the Board,
except that video or television antennas or satellite dishes,
which are not visible from any street or Common Area, and that
have a diameter or diagonal measurement allowed by California Law
are acceptable without the prior written approval of the
Architectural Committee or the Board.
(b) No fence or wall shall be erected, altered or
maintained on any Lot in the Properties, except with the prior
written approval of the Architectural Committee. Unless
12
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 256
otherwise provided by this Declaration, all walls or fences
initially constructed by Declarant shall be permanently
maintained by the Owners of the Lots on which they are located.
Any alterations or modifications of the walls or fences not
addressed herein shall be subject to the prior written approval
of the Architectural Committee.
(c) No other appliances or installation on the
exterior of the roofs of structures including, without
limitation, roof-top turbine ventilators and air conditioners,
shall be permitted unless they are installed in such a manner
that they are not visible and are sound buffered from streets,
common Area, or neighboring Lots, except that attic ventilators
and solar panels which are architecturally treated in conformity
with guidelines contained in the Architectural Guidelines and
which have been approved by the Architectural Committee pursuant
to the provisions of the Article entitled "ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL"
of this Declaration, and as further regulated by the City,
Directors of Planning and Building, shall be permitted.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any roof appurtenances shall be
governed by the Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the
satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Land Use Planning Manager
and Building and Planning Director.
Section 13 Post Tension Slabs. Due the expansive
soil conditions the concrete slab for the residences.in the
Properties were reinforced with a grid of steel cables which were
installed in the concrete and then tightened to create very high
tension. This type of slab is commonly known as "Post Tension
Slab." Any attempt to alter or pierce the Post Tension Slab
foundation (for example, cutting, drilling or installation of
subterranean improvements such as new plumbing or a floor safe)
is very hazardous and may result in serious damage to the
residence and/or personal injury. By accepting a grant deed to a
Lot in the Properties, each Owner specifically covenants and
agrees that: (1) such owner shall not cut into or otherwise
tamper with the Post Tension Slab; (2) such Owner shall not
knowingly permit or allow any person to cut into or tamper with
the Post Tension Slab so long as such Owner owns any interest in
the Lot; (3) such owner shall disclose the existence of the Post
Tension Slab to any tenant, lessee or subsequent purchaser of the
Lot; and (4) such Owner shall indemnify and hold Declarant and
its respective officers, employees, contractors and agents, free
and harmless from and against any and all claims, damages,
losses, or other liability (including attorney's fees) arising
from any breach of this Section.
Section 14. Insurance Rates. Nothing shall be done
or kept in the Properties which will increase the rate of
insurance on any property insured by the Corporation without the
approval of the Board, nor shall anything be done or kept in the
Properties which would result in the cancellation of insurance on
any property insured by the corporation or which would be in
violation of any law.
13
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
Section 15. Window Covers. curtains, drapes,
257
shutters or blinds may be installed as window covers. No window
shall be covered with aluminum foil, sheets, newspapers or
similar material not designed for use as a window cover.
Section 16. -Dril-ling. No oil drilling;-oil -
development operations, oil refining, quarrying or mining
operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any Lot, nor
shall oil wells, tanks, tunnels or mineral excavations or shafts
be permitted upon the surface of any Lot or within five hundred
feet (500') below the surface of the Properties. No derrick or
other structure designed for use in boring for water, oil or
natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any
Lot.
Section 17. Drainage. There shall be no
interference with the established drainage pattern over any Lot
within the Properties, unless an adequate alternative provision
is made for proper drainage and is first approved in writing by
the Architectural committee. For the purposes hereof,
"established" drainage is defined as the drainage which exists at
the time that such Lot is conveyed to a purchaser from Declarant,
or that which is shown on any plans approved by the Architectural
Committee, which may include drainage from the common Area over
any Lot or Lots in the Properties.
Section 18. Pesticides and Fertilizers. Large scale
use of herbicides, pesticides or fertilizers during landscape
maintenance activities and installation of ~ertain planting
materials are prohibited unless applied by applicators licensed
by the state of California.
Section 19. Hazardous or Toxic Waste. Nothing other
than natural rain water may be discharged into the storm drains
and storm drainage system located on private or public property.
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination system, Section 5650
of the California Fish and Game Code and San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board Order No. 90-42 adopted by the City Council
Resolution No. 90-235 prohibit, among other things, discharging
anything other than natural rain water into storm drainage
systems. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as
gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint
thinners, wood preservative and other such fluids shall not be
discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drains or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of
pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and
other such .chemical treatments shall meet Federal, state, County
and city requirements as prescribed on their respective
containers. All Owners within the Properties are required to
comply with such restrictions.
Section 20. Exterior Lighting. Any exterior
electrical, gas or other artificial lighting installed on any Lot
or Common Area or shall be positioned, screened or otherwise
14
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
directed so as not to unreasonably disturb the dwelling unit
located within other Lots or neighboring properties.
258
Section 21. View Obstruction. Declarant makes no
representations or warranty with respect to the presence or
absence of any view from -any-portion of any Lot or Gommon Area --
within the Properties. Any existing view may change or be
blocked or impaired depending upon construction, landscaping or
other activities undertaken on remaining land located within the
Properties or on land located outside the boundaries of the
Properties. Each owner, by accepting title to a Lot in the
Properties, hereby acknowledges that (a) there are no protected
views within the Properties, and no Lot in the Properties is
assured the existence or unobstructed continuation of any
particular view, (b) any construction, landscaping or other
installation of improvements by Declarant, other Owners, or
adjacent landowners may impair the view from any Lot or Common
Area within the Properties, and the owners hereby consent to such
view impainnent.
Section 22. Landscaping. No trees shall be
installed within the Properties which have an invasive root
system, produce excessive litter or which may become too large
relative to the lot size. Native vegetation located within the
Properties which presents a fire hazard to structures shall be
modified or removed in accordance with City specifications as
established in the City Landscape Guidelines Manual, on file with
the City.
Section 23. owners' Duties: Front and Rear Yard
Landscaping. It shall be the responsibility of each Lot owner to
maintain the front yard and rear yard landscaping (including
terrace drains) on their Lot in a clean and attractive condition
at all times, in accordance with the general standards of
maintenance within the Properties. Front yard landscaping and
irrigation will be installed on each Lot prior to the close of
Escrow from Declarant to an owner. It shall be the
responsibility of each Lot Owner to landscape, irrigate and
maintain the rear yard landscaping on their Lot within six (6)
months of such Owner's initial occupancy of the dwelling located
on the Lot. In the event that any owner shall fail to maintain
the landscaping on their Lot, or fails to install the rear yard
landscaping, then, upon a vote of a majority of the Board of
Directors, and after not less than thirty (30) days' notice to
the owner and an opportunity to be heard before the Board, the
Corporation shall have the right to enter upon such Owner's Lot
to perform the necessary installation or maintenance, and the
cost of such installation or maintenance shall be a Reimbursement
Assessment chargeable to such Lot, and shall be payable to the
Corporation by the Owner of the Lot. Installation of landscaping
shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Article
entitled "ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL" of this Declaration.
15
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
Section 24. Reclaimed Water on Common Area
259
Landscaping. The Common Area has been designed to utilize
reclaimed water (treated wastewater) for irrigation. Reclaimed
water is not potable and therefore not suitable from human
consumption and prolonged skin contact (such as child's play).
The California Department of ·Health Services has de~ermined·tha~
inadvertent consumption of reclaimed water by domestic pets and
other animals will not cause harm and further has not resulted in
any significant adverse health consequences, however, it is
recommended contact and consumption be reasonably avoided. It
should be noted that standards for reclaimed water and its
suitability for irrigation purposes are determined by applicable
governmental agencies, which standards may vary from time to
time. As with any water spray, the repeated spray of reclaimed
water may spot, stain, discolor or otherwise adversely impact
personal property, fencing and other Improvements over time.
Section 25. Violation of Governing Instruments.
There shall be no violation of the restrictions of this
Declaration or of the Corporation Rules adopted in accordance
with the provisions of the Bylaws. If any Owner, their family,
guest, licensee, lesse-e or invitee, violates any such
restrictions, the Board may impose a reasonable Reimbursement
Assessment upon such Owner for each violation and may suspend the
voting privileges of such owner as further provided in the
Bylaws. such Reimbursement Assessment shall be collectible in
the same manner as Regular Assessments hereunder, but the Board
shall give such Owner notice and hearing before invoking any such
Reimbursement Assessment or suspension.
Section 26. Construction by Declarant. Nothing in
this Declaration shall limit the right of the Declarant to
commence and complete construction of improvements to the
Properties or to alter the foregoing or the Lots or Common Area
or to construct such additional improvements as the Declarant
deems advisable prior to the completion and sale of all of the
Properties. The Declarant may use any of the Lots within the
Properties owned by it for model home sites and incidental
parking. The Declarant shall have the right and an easement to
enter upon, use and enjoy and designate and permit others
(including, without limitation, Declarant's agents, employees,
representatives, contractors and prospective purchasers) to enter
upon, use and enjoy the Common Area for any purpose in connection
with or incidental to the construction, development, sale, lease
or other transfer of property within or adjacent to the
Properties (including, without limitation, the erection,
construction and maintenance of displays, sales offices and
incidental parking, exhibits, sign and other structures);
provided, however, that such use shall not be for a period beyond
the earlier of (a) three (3) years from the date of issuance of
the most recently issued Final subdivision Public Report for the
Properties, or (b) the sale by Declarant of all Lots within the
Properties, and provided further that the exercise of such right
16
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 260
and easement shall not unrea~onably interfere with the reasonable
use and enjoyment of the Common Area by the Members.
Section 27. Landscape Maintenance standards. All
landscaped areas within the Properties shall be maintained in a
healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash-and
debris.
17
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&.RS
rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE IV
MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS
Section 1. -Organization. The Corpora~ion is •
261
organized as a California corporation under the California
Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. The Corporation is
charged with the duties and vested with the powers prescribed by
law and set forth in the Articles, Bylaws, and this Declaration.
Neither the Articles nor Bylaws shall, for any reason, be amended
or otherwise changed so as to be inconsistent with this
Declaration. In the event that there should exist any ambiguity
in any provision of the Articles or Bylaws, then such provision
shall be construed, to the extent possible, so that such
provision shall be interpreted so as to be consistent with the
provisions of this Declaration.
Section 2. Membership. Every person or entity who
is a record Owner of a fee or undivided fee interest in any Lot
which is subject by covenants of record to assessment by the
Corporation, shall be a Member of the Corporation. Membership
shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from the fee
ownership of any Lot which is subject to assessment by the
Corporation. ownership of such Lot shall be the sole
qualification for membership. Transfer of a Lot shall
automatically transfer membership in the Corporation.
Section 3. Voting Rights. The Corporation shall
have two (2) classes of voting membership:
Class A. Class A Members shall be all Owners
with the exception of Declarant and shall be entitled to one (1)
vote for each Lot owned. ·When more than one person holds an
interest in any Lot, all such persons shall be entitled to all
rights and privileges of membership. The vote for such Lot shall
be exercised as its Owners collectively determine, but in no
event shall more than one vote be cast with respect to any Lot.
Class B. The Class B Member shall be the
Declarant and shall be entitled to three (3) votes for each Lot
owned. The Class B membership shall cease and be converted to
Class A Membership on the happening of any of the following
events, whichever occurs earlier:
(a) On the second anniversary of the
conveyance of the first Lot in the most recent Phase of the
Properties; or
(b) On the fourth anniversary of the
conveyance of the first Lot in the first phase of the Properties.
Section 4. Two Classes of Memberships. Any action
by the Corporation which must have the approval of the membership
18
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
of the Corporation (other than Declarant) before being
262
undertaken, shall require the vote or written assent of both a
majority of the Class B membership as well as a· majority of the
Class A membership so long as there are two (2) outstanding
classes of Membership, unless a specific provision of this
Declaration or the Bylaws or -Articles of the Corporati~n-requires
the approval of a greater percentage of the voting membership.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by the Corporation
pursuant to the Article of this Declaration entitled "ENFORCEMENT
OF BONDED OBLIGATIONS" shall only require a majority of the
voting power of the Owners other than Declarant.
Section 5. Special Class A Voting Rights.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Article, if the Class A
Members do not have sufficient voting power pursuant to the
voting rights set forth in this Declaration and the Bylaws to
elect at least one (1) director at any meeting at which directors
are to be elected, and at which Class A Members are entitled to
vote, then.such Class A Members shall, by majority vote, among
themselves,elect one (1) director and the remaining vacancies on
the Board shall be elected by the Class B Member so long as there
are two outstanding classes of membership in the Corporation or
so long as a majority of the voting power of the Corporation
resides in the Declarant. In no event shall the Class A Members
be entitled to elect more than one (1) director to the Board
pursuant to the provisions of this special Class A voting right.
Section 6. Vesting of voting Rights. All voting
rights which are attributable to a specific Lot pursuant to the
terms of this Declaration shall not vest until such time as such
Lot is subject to Regular Assessments pursuant to the terms of
this Declaration. Declarant shall have the right at any time,
and from time to time, to commence the payment of Regular
Assessments on all Lots within a Phase of the Properties prior to
the closing of the first escrow therein in order to have the
voting rights with respect to such Lots.
19
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
r•v 10/22/96
ARTICLE V
COVENANT FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS
263
Section 1. ·Covenant to Pay Assessment. BeGlarant;-
on behalf of itself, and for each Lot owned, hereby covenants,
and each owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed therefor,
whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed
to covenant and agree to pay to the Corporation: (1) Regular
Assessments or charges, (2) Special Assessments for capital
improvements, and (3) Reimbursement Assessments, all such
assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter
provided. The Regular Assessments or charges must be in an
amount sufficient to include an adequate reserve fund for
maintenance, repairs and replacement of the Common Area that must
be replaced on a periodic basis, and this reserve fund must be
collected as a Regular Assessment rather than as a Special
Assessment.-Each of such assessments, together with interest,
costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, shall also be the personal
obligation of the person who was the owner of such Lot at the
time the assessment fell due. The personal obligation for
delinquent assessments shall not pass to such person's successors
in title unless expressly assumed by them. The Corporation shall
not impose or collect an assessment or fee that exceeds the
amount necessary to defray the costs for which it is levied.
Section 2. Purpose of Assessments. The assessments
levied by the Corporation shall be used exclusively to promote
the recreation, health, safety and welfare of the residents of
the Lots and for the improvement, operation and maintenance of
the Common Areas and the performance of the duties of the
Corporation as set forth in this Declaration.
Section 3. Amount of Regular Assessments and
Limitation on Increases in Regular Assessments. The amount and
time of payment of Regular Assessments against each Lot shall be
determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation giving
due consideration to the current maintenance costs and future
needs of the Corporation. Except as provided in this Section,
the Corporation shall levy Regular and Special Assessments
sufficient to perform its obligations under the governing
documents and this Article. However, annual increases in Regular
Assessments for any fiscal year, as authorized by subdivision (b)
of Section 1366 of the California Civil Code, shall not be
imposed unless the Board has complied with subdivision (a) of
Section 1365 of the California Civil Code, the provisions of
which are set forth in the Article of this Declaration entitled
"COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1354, 1365 AND 1365.5,11 with
respect to that fiscal year, or has obtained the approval of
Owners, constituting a quorum, casting a majority of the votes at
a meeting or election of the Corporation conducted in accordance
with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 7510) of Part 3 of
Division 2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code and Section 7613
20
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
264
of the Corporations Code. Notwithstanding more restrictive
limitations placed on the Board by the governing documents, and
except for the terms of this Declaration as provided for in
Section 6 below, the Board of Directors may not impose a Regular
Assessment that is more than twenty percent (20%) greater than
the Regular Assessment for the Corporation's preceding-fiscal
year against each Lot without the vote or written assent of
Members, constituting a quorum, casting a majority of the votes
at a meeting or election of the Corporation. For purposes of
this Section, quorum means more than fifty percent (50%) of the
Owners of the Corporation. Notwithstanding any limitation
contained in this Declaration to the contrary, in the event that
the amount of Regular Assessments as apprpved by the California
Department of Real Estate in connection with the issuance of a
Final subdivision Public Report on a subsequent Phase of the
Development is greater than the amount authorized by this
Declaration without a vote of the membership, then the Board, on
behalf of the Corporation and without the requirement of a vote
of the membership, shall be entitled to increase the maximum
Regular Assessment amount as reflected in such Final Subdivision
Public Report. The Corporation shall provide notice by
first-class ~ail to the owner of each Lot of any increase in the
Regular Assessments of the Corporation not less than thirty (30)
nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the increased assessment
becoming due.
Section 4. Special Assessments for Capital
Improvements and Limitation on Increases In Special Assessments.
In addition to the Regular Assessments authorized above, the
Corporation may levy, in any assessment year, a Special
Assessment applicable to that year only for the purpose of
defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction,
reconstruction, restoration, repair or replacement of a capital
improvement within the Common Area including fixtures and
personal property related thereto or any other action or
undertaking on behalf of the Corporation, provided that any
Special Assessment for all Lots for the fiscal year in the
aggregate in excess of five percent (5%) of the budgeted gross
expenses of the Corporation for that fiscal year shall be
approved by the vote or written assent of Members, constituting a
quorum, casting a majority of the votes of the Corporation at a
meeting or election of the Corporation. This limitation on
Special Assessments shall not apply to any Reimbursement
Assessment which is authorized by the provisions of this
Declaration. The Corporation shall provide notice by first-class
mail to the Owner of each Lot of any increase in the Special
Assessments of the Corporation not less than thirty (30) nor more
than sixty (60) days prior to the increased assessment becoming
due.
Section 5. Special Quorum and Meeting Requirements
for Increases In Assessments. For purposes only of Section 3 and
Section 4 of this Article, a quorum means more than fifty percent
(50%) of the Members of the Corporation. Any meeting or election
21
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 265
of the Corporation for purposes of complying with Sections 3 and
4 of this Article shall be conducted in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 5 of Part 3, Division 2 of Title 1 of the
California Corporations Code dealing with meetings and voting and
Section 7613 of the California Corporations Code dealing with
proxies.
Section 6. Exceptions from Limitation on Assessment
Increases. The limitation on percentage increases of Regular and
Special Assessments under Sections 3 and 4 above shall not limit
assessment increases necessary for addressing emergency
situations. For purposes of this Section, an emergency situation
is any one of the following:
(i)
order of a court;
An extraordinary expense required by an
(ii) An extraordinary expense necessary to
repair or maintain the Properties or any part thereof for which
the Corporation is responsible where a threat to personal safety
on the Properties is discovered;
(iii) An extraordinary expense necessary to
repair or maintain the Properties or any part thereof for which
the Corporation is responsible that could not have been
reasonably foreseen by the Board in preparing and distributing
the proforma operating budget, as required under the Article of
this Declaration entitled "COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS
1354, 1365 AND 1365.5." However, prior to the imposition or
collection of an increased assessment under this Section, the
Board shall pass a resolution containing written findings as to
the necessity of the extraordinary expense involved and why the
expense was not or could not have been reasonably foreseen in the
budgeting process, and the resolution shall be distributed to the
Members with the notice of assessment.
Section 7. Reimbursement Assessments. The
Corporation shall levy a Reimbursement Assessment against any
owner as a monetary penalty for failure of an owner to comply
with the terms of the Declaration, the determinations of the
Board or the Architectural Committee, or any rule or regulation
adopted by the Corporation, or as a means of reimbursing the
Corporation for costs incurred by the Corporation in the repair
of damage to the Common Area for which the Owner, their family,
guests, employees, tenants, agents, or invitees, was allegedly
responsible or as a means to force an Owner to comply with the
terms of this Declaration, the determinations of the
Architectural Committee, the Corporation's Articles or Bylaws, or
any rule or regulation adopted by the Corporation, if such
failure results in the expenditure of monies by the Corporation
in carrying out its functions hereunder. Except for collection
of fines, such assessment shall be for the purpose of reimbursing
the Corporation, shall be limited to the amount so expended, and
shall be due and payable to the Corporation when levied.
22
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
Section 8. Rate of Assessment. Unless otherwise
required by the California Department of Real Estate in
connection with the issuance of a Public Report· for a Phase of
the Properties, Regular and Special Assessments for each Lot
266
shall be uniform. Regular Assessments shall be collected on a
monthly basis, unless some other period for collection-is adopted
by the Board.
Section 9. Date of Commencement of Regular
Assessments: Due Dates. The Regular Assessments provided for
herein shall commence as to all Lots within a Phase of the
Properties (including those owned by Declarant) no later than
(but earlier at the discretion of the Declarant) the first day of
the month following: (a) the conveyance of the first Lot by
Declarant to an individual Owner, (b) conveyance of the Common
Area to the Corporation, or (c) the first residential occupancy
of a Lot, whichever first occurs within such Phase. Once Regular
Assessments have commenced as to a Phase, such assessments may
not cease and such Lots shall be subject at all times to the
provisions of the Declaration, including the power of the
Corporation to collect such assessments through the enforcement
of a lien as provided in this Declaration. The first Regular
Assessments shall be adjusted according to the number of months
remaining in the fiscal year of the Corporation. The Board of
Directors shall fix the amount of the Regular Assessment against
each Lot at least sixty (60) days in advance of each fiscal year
of the Corporation at an amount not in excess of the maximum as
provided in this Declaration. Written notice of the amount of
the Regular Assessments against each Lot shall be sent to every
owner subject thereto. The due dates shall be established by the
Board of Directors. Regular Assessments shall be deemed
delinquent fifteen (15) days after the due dates established by
the Corporation. In the event the Board shall determine at any
time that the estimate of the Regular Assessment for the current
fiscal year is, or will become, inadequate to meet the expenses
of the Corporation for any reason, it shall immediately determine
the approximate amount of such inadequacy and issue a
supplemental estimate of the total Corporation expenses and
determine the revised amount of the Regular Assessment against
each Owner.
Section 10. Certification of Payment. The
Corporation shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge,
furnish a certificate signed by an officer of the Corporation
setting forth whether the assessments on a specified Lot have
been paid. Said signed certificate shall be conclusive evidence
as to all third parties relying thereon to show that all
assessments acknowledged therein have been paid but shall not
relieve any Owner of the responsibility for assessments not in
fact paid.
Section 11. Exemption from Regular Assessments -
Dwelling Unit. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained elsewhere in this Article, the Declarant and any other
23
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 267
owner of a Lot within the Properties which does not contain a
residential dwelling unit shall be exempt from the payment of
that portion of the Regular Assessments which is for the purpose
of defraying expenses and reserves directly attributable to the
existence and the use of the residential structural improvements.
The exemption may include, but shall not necessarily be limited--
to:
(1) Roof replacement;
(2) Exterior maintenance;
(3) Walkway and carport lighting;
(4) Refuse disposal;
(5) Cable television; and
(6) Domestic water supplied to a portion of the
dwelling units.
This exemption from ~he payment of Regular
Assessments attributable to the dwelling units shall be in effect
only until the earliest of the following events: (a) a notice of
completion of the structural improvements on the Lot has been
recorded, (b) occupation or use of the dwelling unit on the Lot,
(c) completion of all elements of the residential structures on
the Lot which the Corporation is obliged to maintain, or (d) upon
request of the Declarant if necessary to comply with any
regulations of any of the Federal Agencies.
Section 12. Exemption from Regular Assessments -
Common Area. The Declarant and any other owner of a Lot shall be
exempt from the payment of that portion of the Regular
Assessments which is for the purpose of defraying expenses and
reserves directly attributable to the existence and use of a
Common Area facility that is not complete at the time the Regular
Assessments commence. Any exemption from the payment of Regular
Assessments attributable to Common Area facilities shall be in
effect only until the earliest of the following events: (a) a
notice of completion of the Common Area facility has been
recorded, (b) the Common Area facility has been placed into use,
or (c) upon request of the Declarant if necessary to comply with
any regulations of any of the Federal Agencies.
Section 13. Reserves. The Regular Assessments shall
include reasonable amounts as determined by the Board collected
as reserves for the future periodic maintenance, repair or
replacement of all or a portion of the Common Area, or any other
purpose as determined by the Board. All amounts collected as
reserves, whether pursuant to this Section or otherwise, shall be
deposited by the Board in a separate bank account to be held in
trust for the purposes for which they are collected and are to be
segregated from and not commingled with any other funds of the
24
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 268
Corporation. Such reserves shall be deemed a contribution to the
capital account of the Corporation by the Members.
Section 14. Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments;
Remedies of the Corporation. Each Owner of any Lot on becoming
an Owner of any Lot, is and shall be deemed to covenan~ and agree
to pay to the Corporation each and every of the assessments
provided for in this Declaration; and agrees to the enforcement
of all such assessments in the manner herein specified. In the
event an attorney or attorneys are employed for collection of any
assessment, whether by suit or otherwise, or to enforce
compiiance with or specific performance of the terms and
conditions of this Declaration, each Owner agrees to pay·
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs thereby incurred in addition
to any other amounts due or any other relief or remedy obtained
against said Owner. In addition to any other remedies herein or
by law provided, the Board, or its authorized representative, may
enforce the obligations of the owners to pay the assessments
provided for in this Declaration, and each of them, in any manner
provided by law or in equity, or without any limitation of the
foregoing, by either or both of the following procedures:
(a) Enforcement by Suit. By commencement and
maintenance of a suit at law against any Owner or Owners
personally obligated to pay assessments for such delinquent
assessments as to which they are personally obligated, such suit
to be maintained in the name of the Corporation. Any judgment
rendered in any such action shall include the amount of the
delinquency, together with interest thereon as provided for
herein, costs of collection, court costs and reasonable
attorneys' fees in such amount as the Court may adjudge against
the delinquent owner. suit to recover a money judgment for
unpaid assessments shall be maintainable without foreclosing or
waiving the lien hereinafter provided for.
(b) Enforcement bv Lien. There is hereby created
a claim of lien, with power of sale, on each and every Lot to
secure payment to the Corporation of any and all assessments
levied against any and all owners of such Lots pursuant to this
Declaration, together with interest thereon as provided for in
this Declaration, and all costs of collection which may be paid
or incurred by the Corporation in connection therewith, including
reasonable attorneys' fees. At any time after the occurrence of
any delinquency in the payment of any such assessment, the Board
or any authorized representative thereof may make a written
demand for payment to the delinquent Owner. Said demand shall
state the date and amount of the delinquency. Each delinquency
shall constitute a separate basis for a demand or claim of lien
or a lien, but any number of defaults may be included within a
single demand or claim of lien and any demand or claim of lien or
lien on account of prior delinquencies shall be deemed to include
subsequent delinquencies and amounts due on account thereof. If
such delinquency is not paid within ten (10) days after delivery
of such demand, the Board or its duly authorized representative
25
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
269
may thereafter elect to file and record a Notice of Delinquent
Assessment ("Notice") on behalf of the Corporation against the
Lot of the defaulting owner in the Office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County. The amount of the assessment, plus any
costs of collection, late charges and interest assessed in
accordance with this Declaration shall be a lien on-the Owner's--
Lot from and after the time the Corporation records the Notice of
Delinquent Assessment. Such Notice shall be executed and
acknowledged by any officer of the Corporation and shall contain
substantially the following information:
(1) The claim of lien made pursuant to this
Declaration;
(2) The name of the record Owner;
(3) The legal description of the Lot against
which claim of lien is made;
(4) The total amount claimed to be due and
owing for the amount of the delinquency, interest thereon,
collection costs, and estimated attorneys' fees (with any proper
offset allowed);
(5) That the claim of lien is made by the
corporation pursuant to this Declaration;
(6) That a lien is claimed against said Lot
in an amount equal to the amount stated, tqgether with all other
amounts becoming due from time to time in accordance with this
Declaration; and
(7) The name and address of the trustee
authorized by the Corporation to enforce the lien by public sale.
Upon such recordation of a duly executed
original or copy of such Notice, the lien claimed therein shall
immediately attach and become effective in favor of the
Corporation as a lien upon the Lot against which such assessment
was levied. Such a lien shall have priority over all liens or
claims created subsequent to the recordation of this Declaration,
except for tax liens for real property taxes on any Lot and
assessments on any Lot in favor of any municipal or other
governmental assessing unit and except for certain Trust Deeds as
provided in the Section of this Article entitled "Subordination
to Certain Trust Deeds" below. Any such lien may be foreclosed
by appropriate action in Court or in the manner provided by the
California Civil Code for the foreclosure of a deed of trust with
power of sale, or in any other manner permitted by law. The
Board is hereby authorized to appoint its attorney, any officer
or director of the Corporation, or any title company authorized
to do business in California as Trustee for the purpose of
conducting such power of sale foreclosure. The lien provided for
herein shall be in favor of the Corporation and shall be for the
26
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
270
benefit of all other Lot Owners and shall secure payment of all
sums set forth in the Notice, together with all sums becoming due
and payable in accordance with this Declaration·after the date of
recordation of said Notice. The Corporation shall have the power
to bid in at any foreclosure sale and to purchase, acquire, hold,
lease, mortgage and convey any Lot. In the event such--
foreclosure is by action in Court, reasonable attorneys' fees,
court costs, title search fees, late payment fees, interest and
all other costs and expenses shall be allowed to the extent
permitted by law. Each Owner, by becoming an owner of a Lot,
hereby expressly waives any objection to the enforcement and
foreclosure of this lien in this manner. Upon the timely curing
of any default for which a Notice was filed by the Board and the
payment of all sums secured by the lien created by the
recordation of such Notice, the Board shall cause an officer of
the Corporation to file and record an appropriate release of such
Notice in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
California. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for
the assessments provided for in this Declaration by non-use or
abandonment of their Lot. Notwithstanding anything contained in
this Declaration to the contrary, no action may be brought to
foreclose the lien created by recordation of a Notice of
Delinquent Assessment, whether judicially, by power of sale, or
otherwise, until the expiration of ten (10) days after a copy of
said Notice, showing the date of recordation thereof, has been
mailed to the owner of the Lot which is described in such Notice.
Section 15. Subordination to Certain Trust Deeds.
The lien for the assessments and any allowable costs and charges
permitted by Civil Code Section 1366 provided for herein in
connection with a given Lot shall subordinate to the lien of a
First Mortgage, given and made in good faith and for value that
is of record as an encumbrance against such given Lot prior to
the recordation of a Notice of Delinquent Assessment for the
assessments provided for in this Declaration against such given
Lot. The sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect any
assessment lien created pursuant to the terms of this Declaration
to secure assessments becoming due whether prior to, on, or after
the date of such sale or transfer, nor shall such sale or
transfer diminish or defeat the personal obligation of any owner
for delinquent assessments as provided for by Section 1 of this
Article; provided, however, that the sale or transfer of any Lot
pursuant to a judicial foreclosure or foreclosure by power of
sale of a First Mortgage, shall extinguish any assessment lien
which has attached and become effective with regard to the Lot
being so transferred prior to the time of such sale or transfer,
and shall prohibit the recordation of any assessment lien against
such Lot on account of assessments which became due prior to the
date of such sale or transfer; provided, however, that there
shall be a lien on the interests of the purchaser at such sale
which shall attach, be created and become effective and be
foreclosed in accordance with this Declaration and which shall
secure all assessments becoming due after the date of any such
sale or transfer. For the purpose of this Section, a sale or
27
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
transfer of a Lot shall occur on the date of recordation of a
deed or other instrument of title evidencing the conveyance of
record title to the Lot.
271
Section 16. Exempt Property. The following property
subject to this Declaration shall be exempt from the assessments-
created herein: All properties dedicated to and accepted by any
local public authority and the Common Area.
Section 17. Enforcement of Reimbursement Liens.
(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Article or elsewhere in this Declaration, in
the event the Corporation imposes a Reimbursement Assessment as a
monetary penalty for failure of a Member to comply with the terms
of the Declaration or as a means of reimbursing the Corporation
for costs incurred by the Corporation in the repair of damage to
the Common Area for which the Member was allegedly responsible or
as a means to force a Member to comply with the terms of this
Declaration, such Reimbursement Assessment, late charges,
interest or any costs in connection with the collection of such
Reimbursement Assessment, shall not be characterized or treated
as an assessment which may become a lien against a Member's Lot
enforceable in the manner provided by the California Civil Code
for the foreclosure of a deed of trust with power of sale as
provided in this Article. A Reimbursement Assessment imposed for
any purpose other than the purposes enumerated hereinabove in
this Section shall be enforceable in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Article.
(b) The provisions of subsection (a) hereinabove
relating to restrictions on the enforcement of Reimbursement
Assessments for certain purposes shall not apply to any interest
charge or late charge for delinquent Regular or Special
Assessments imposed pursuant to this Article or to any costs
reasonably incurred by the Corporation (including attorneys'
fees) in its efforts to collect delinquent Regular or Special
Assessments.
Section 18. Delivery by owner. Each owner of a Lot
shall, before the execution of an offer to purchase or lease,
make available for examination by the prospective purchaser or
lessee, and as soon as practicable before transfer of the
interest being acquired, give to each purchaser or lessee (a) a
copy of this Declaration and copies of the Bylaws and Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation, (b) copies of any other
instruments which define the rights and responsibilities of the
owner as a member of the Corporation, (c) to the extent
available, a copy of the most recent financial statement
distributed by the Corporation in accordance with the Article of
this Declaration entitled "COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS
1354, 1365 AND 1365.5," (d) a statement prepared by the Board of
Directors as to the amount of the Corporation's current Regular
and Special Assessments and fees, as well as the amount of any
28
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
272
delinquent assessments and information relating to penalties,
late charges, interest and other charges authorized by this
Declaration which are or may be a lien on such Owner's Lot as of
the date the statement is issued, and (e) written notice of any
change in the Corporation's current Regular and Special
Assessments and fees which have been approved by the
Corporation's Board, but which are not yet due and payable as of
the date disclosure is provided, as required by this Section, to
the prospective Owner.
Section 19. Late Charges and Interest on Delinquent
Assessments. Any assessment imposed pursuant to the terms of
this Declaration, if delinquent, shall include a late charge in
the maximum amount which shall be imposed by the Board in
accordance with and subject to the limitations of California·
Civil Code Section 1366 as the same may be modified from time to
time by statute or judicial decision. Interest shall accrue on
all sums imposed in accordance with this Article, including the
delinquent-assessment, reasonable costs of collection and late
charges, at an annual percentage rate of twelve percent (12%)
interest, commencing thirty (30) days after the assessment
becomes due, or such higher percentage rate of interest
authorized by California Civil Code Section 1366 as modified from
time to time by statute or judicial decision.
29
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE VI
DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE CORPORATION
273
Section 1. General Powers of the Corpora~ion. All-
powers relating to the management, operation and maintenance of
the Common Area, as well as certain rights, duties and powers
relating to the Lots, as hereinafter set forth, shall be vested
in the corporation and in its Board of Directors. The specific
and primary purposes and powers of the Corporation and its Board
of Directors are to provide for the operation, control, repair,
maintenance and restoration of the Common Areas, provide
architectural control of the Properties, provide recreational
activities for the Members, and to enforce the provisions of this
Declaration and the Corporation's Articles and Bylaws, and any
other instruments relating to the management and control of the
corporation and the Properties. The Corporation may do any and
all other acts and things that a nonprofit corporation is
empowered to do, which may be necessary, convenient or desirable
in the administration of its affairs for the specific and primary
purposes of meeting its duties as set forth in this Declaration.
The Corporation, through its Board of Directors, shall have the
authority to delegate its powers to committees, officers of the
Corporation or its employees. The foregoing power of the
Corporation shall include the right to join with the Declarant in
the execution of any lot line adjustment and to accept title to
additional property or to quitclaim all right, title and interest
in and to any Common Area as necessary to transfer title in
accordance with any lot line adjustment, provided that such lot
line adjustment and the resulting conveyance are made for the
following reasons and with the following conditions: (a) for the
purpose of eliminating encroachments due to engineering errors or
errors in construction by Declarant of any Improvements upon any
of the affected property, (b) to permit changes in the
development plan in circumstances where such changes are the
result of topography, obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or other
environmental conditions, (c) are the requirement of a regulatory
agency, (d) do not have a significant negative impact upon the
Corporation or the Owners, or (e) to transfer the burden of
management and maintenance of any Common Area which in the
reasonable judgment of the Board is generally inaccessible or is
not likely to be of any particular use or benefit to the owners.
Section 2. Contracts of the Corporation. The
Corporation shall have the right and power to employ or engage a
manager and other employees or agents and contract for such
services, labor and materials as the Board may deem reasonable or
necessary to operate and maintain the Properties and the Common
Area, and the improvements thereon, and to discharge its other
duties as herein provided. Any agreement for professional
management of the Corporation or for services of the Declarant
must provide that the management contract may be terminated by
either party without cause or payment of a termination fee upon
30
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
no more than ninety (90) days written notice, and the term of
274
such contract shall not exceed one (1) year. Any management
company or agent that handles funds for the Corporation should be
covered by a fidelity bond, which must provide the same coverage
required of the Corporation under the Article of this Declaration
entitled "INSURANCE."
Section 3. General Powers and Duties of
corporation. In addition to the duties and powers enumerated in
its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, or elsewhere provided
for herein, and without limiting the generality thereof, and
subject to the limitations on the power of the Board as set forth
in Sections 4 and 5 of this Article, the Corporation, acting
through the Board shall:
(a) Own, operate and maintain all Common Area
within the Properties. Such maintenance shall include, but shall
not be limited to, removal of all dirt, litter and other debris
from the Common Area by means of street sweeping or other
appropriate means as shall be established and enforced by the
Board. The responsibility of the Corporation to maintain the
Common Area shall commence on the date of commencement of Regular
Assessments for the respective Phase of the Properties;
(b) Maintain such policy or policies of insurance
as the Board deems necessary or desirable in furthering the
purposes of and protecting the interests of the Corporation and
its Members including, but not limited to, hazard and liability
insurance, plate glass insurance, fidelity bonds, worker's
compensation and officers' and directors' liability insurance.
If applicable, the Corporation shall be required, if available,
to maintain fire and extended coverage insurance on insurable
Common Area improvements on a current replacement cost basis in
an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the
insurable value (based on current replacement costs);
(c) Have the authority to obtain, for the benefit
of the Common Area, all utility services unless such services are
separately charged to the Owners;
(d) Maintain all drainage facilities and
easements owned by the Corporation, if any;
(e) Maintain the Pedestrian Trail in a clean,
safe condition, free from debris and hazardous items;
(f) Maintain the private streets, sewers and
storm drains within the Properties;
(g) Pay taxes and assessments which are or could
be·come a lien on the Common Area, if any, or some portion
thereof;
31
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
{h) Prepare budgets and financial statements for
the Corporation and its Members as prescribed in the Article of
this Declaration entitled "COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS
1354, 1365 AND 1365.5";
(i) Initiate -and execute disciplinary prGceedings
against Members of the Corporation for violations of provisions
of the Corporation Management Documents in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Declaration;
{j) Disclose information in accordance with
Section 11018.6 of the California Business and Professions Code
and Sections 1354, 1365 and 1365.9 of the California civil Code;
(k) The right to join with the Declarant in the
execution of any lot line adjustment and to accept title to
additional property or to quitclaim all right, title and interest
in and to any Common Area as necessary to transfer title in
accordance-with any lot line adjustment, provided that such lot
line-adjustment and the resulting conveyance are made (i) for the
purpose of eliminating encroachments due to engineering errors or
error in construction of any Improvements upon any of the
affected property, (ii) to permit changes in the development plan
in circumstances where such changes are the result of topography,
obstruction, hardship, aesthetic or other environmental
conditions, (iii) are the requirement of a regulatory agency,
(iv) do not have a significant negative impact upon the
corporation or the Owners, or (v) to transfer the burden of
management and maintenance of any Common A~ea which in the
reasonable judgment of the Board is generally inaccessible or is
not likely to be of any particular use or benefit to the owners;
(1) Permit utility suppliers to use portions of
the Common Area reasonably necessary to the ongoing development
and operation of the Properties;
(m) Grant permits, licenses and easements for
utilities and other purposes;
(n) Obtain and distribute to Owners and tenants,
if applicable, annual information made available from Caltrans
and North County Transit regarding the availability of public
transportation, ride-sharing, and transportation pooling services
in the area. Said information shall be provided by each Owner,
including Declarant, to a purchaser or tenant of said Owners Lot.
. (o) Distribute information concerning and
encourage participation by owners {but assume no responsibility
nor liability for) the City's established program to assist
owners and other residents with the removal and proper disposal
of toxic and hazardous waste products;
(p) Subject to compliance with Civil Code Section
1354, have the authority to institute, defend, settle or
32
275
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
intervene in litigation, arbitration, mediation, or
276
administrative proceedings in its own name as the real party in
interest and without joining with it the indiviaual Owners of the
Properties, in matters pertaining to the following:
(i) -Enforcement of this Declaration and
the Bylaws of the Corporation;
(ii) Damage to the Common Areas;
(iii) Damage to the Lots that the
corporation is obligated to maintain or repair;
(iv) Damage to the Lots which arises out
of, or is integrally related to, damage to the Common Areas or
Lots that the Corporation is obligated to maintain or repair.
(g) Comply with the terms and provisions of
California -Civil Code section 1375, as amended, in connection
with any potential litigation based upon a claim for defects in
the design or construction of the Properties.
Section 4. Restrictions on Power of the Board. The
Corporation shall be prohibited without the prior vote or written
assent of a majority of the voting power of the Corporation
(excluding the voting power of the Declarant) from doing either
of the following: (a) incurring aggregate expenditures for
capital improvements to any portion of the Properties in any
fiscal year in excess of five percent (5%) of the budgeted gross
expenses of the Corporation for that fiscal year; or (b) selling
during any fiscal year of the Corporation property of the
Corporation having an aggregate fair market value greater than
five percent (5%) of the budgeted gross expenses of the
Corporation for the fiscal year; (c) paying compensation to
members of the Board or to officers of the Corporation for
services performed in the conduct of the Corporation's business;
provided, however, that the Board may cause a member or officer
to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in carrying on the
business of the Corporation; and (d) filling of a vacancy on the
Board created by the removal of a Board member.
Section 5. Limitation on Board Authority to
Contract. The Board of Directors shall be prohibited from taking
any of the following actions, except with the assent, by vote at
a meeting of the Corporation or by written ballot without a
meeting, pursuant to Corporations Code Section 7513, of a simple
majority of the Members, other than the Declarant, constituting a
quorum consisting of more than 50 percent of the voting power of
the Corporation residing in Members other than the Declarant:
Entering into a contract with a third person wherein the third
person will furnish goods or services for the Common Area or the
Corporation for a term longer than one year with the following
exceptions: (a) a management contract, the terms of which have
been approved by the Federal Housing Administration or Department
33
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 277
of Veterans Affairs; (b) a contract with a public utility company
if the rates charged for the materials or services are regulated
by.the Public Utilities Commission; provided, however that the
term of the contract shall not exceed the shortest term for which
the supplier will contract at the regulated rate; (c) prepaid
casualty ·and/or liability ins-urance policies of not -to--exceed
three years duration, provided that the policy permits for short
rate cancellation by the insured; (d) lease agreements for
laundry room fixtures and equipment of not to exceed five years
duration provided that the lessor under the agreement is not an
entity in which Declarant has a direct or indirect ownership
interest of ten percent (10%) or more; (e) agreements for cable
television services and equipment or satellite dish television
services and equipment of not to exceed five years duration
provided that the supplier is not an entity in which the
subdivider has a direct or indirect ownership interest of ten
percent (10%) or more; (f) agreements for sale or lease of
burglar alarm and fire alarm equipment, installation and services
of not to exceed five years duration provided that the supplier
or suppliers are not entities in which the subdivider has a
direct or indirect ownership interest of ten percent (10%) or
more; or (g) a contract for a term not to exceed three years that
is terminable by the Corporation after no longer than one year
without cause, penalty or other obligation upon ninety (90) days
written notice of termination to the other party.
Section 6. Corporation Rules. The Board shall also
have the power to adopt, amend, and repeal such rules and
regulations as it deems reasonable which may include the
establishment of a system of fines and penalties enforceable as
Reimbursement Assessments, as more fully set forth in the Bylaws
of the Corporation. The Corporation Rules shall govern such
matters in furtherance of_ the purposes of the Corporation,
including, without limitation, the use of the Common Areas
provided, however, that the Corporation Rules may not
discriminate among Owners, and shall not be inconsistent with
this Declaration, the Articles or Bylaws. Any Corporation Rule
which imposes a system of fines or penalties must provide that
the accused be given notice and the opportunity to be heard by
the Board with respect to the alleged violations before a
decision to impose discipline is imposed. A copy of the
Corporation Rules as they may from time to time be adopted,
amended or repealed or a notice setting forth the adoption,
amendment or repeal of specific portions of the Corporation Rules
shall be delivered to each Owner in the same manner established
in this Declaration for the delivery of notices. Upon completion
of the notice requirements, said Corporation Rules shall have the
same force and effect as if they were set forth in and were part
of this Declaration and shall be binding on the Owners and their
successors in interest whether or not actually received thereby.
The Corporation Rules, as adopted, amended or repealed, along
with current copies of the Declaration, and Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, shall be available
at the principal office of the Corporation to each Owner and
34
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 1D/i2/96 278
Mortgagee upon request. In the event of any conflict between any
such Corporation Rules and any other provisions of this
Declaration, or the Articles or Bylaws, the provisions of the
corporation Rules shall be deemed to be superseded by the
provisions of this Declaration, the Articles or the Bylaws to the
extent of any such conflict. -
Section 7. Entry Onto Lots. The Corporation and
its representatives shall have the right to enter upon any Lot
within the Properties to the extent such entry is necessary in
connection with the performance by the Corporation of its duties
and responsibilities under this Article or under this
Declaration, including, without limitation, the construction,
maintenance or effectuation of emergency repairs for the benefit
of the Lots, the Common Areas, or for any of the Owners within
the Properties.
Section 8. Damage from Wood-Destroying Pests. The
Owner of each Lot shall be responsible for the repair and
maintenance of the dwelling unit on that Lot as may be occasioned
by the presence of wood-destroying pests or organisms. Upon
approval of the majority of all Members of the corporation, the
responsibility for such repair and maintenance may be delegated
to the Corporation which shall be entitled to recover the cost
thereof as a Special Assessment. The costs of temporary
relocation during the repair and maintenance of the dwelling unit
shall be borne by the Owner of the dwelling unit being repaired.
The Corporation may cause the temporary, summary removal of any
occupant of a dwelling unit for such periods and at such times as
may be necessary for prompt, effective treatment of wood-
destroying pests or organisms. In the event of such removal, the
Corporation shall give notice as specified in California civil
code Section 1364, and such notice by the Corporation shall be·
deemed complete when given as specified therein.
Section 9. Corporation Documents to Declarant. In
addition to documents to be provided to Declarant as set forth in
Section 1 of the Article of this Declaration entitled "COMPLIANCE
WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1354, 1365 AND 1365.511 , commencing with
the close of the first sale escrow and terminating ten years
after the closing of the final sale escrow for a Lot in the
Properties, the Board shall provide Declarant or a designated
representative of Declarant copies of all Corporation
correspondence to its general membership, minutes of each meeting
of the Corporation or its Board, and a full copy of the reserve
study conducted pursuant to civil Code Section 1365.5, as set
forth in the Article of this Declaration entitled "COMPLIANCE
WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1354, 1365 AND 1365.5.11 Declarant shall
further be entitled to: (a) inspect and copy the books and
records of the Corporation during normal business hours; and (b)
receive written notice of all meetings of Owners of the
corporation and be permitted to designate a representative to
attend all such meetings. In the event Declarant is no longer an
Owner of a Lot, the Board shall notify Declarant of the amount of
35
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
reimbursement of the Corporation's costs which the Declarant
279
shall pay prior to making such distribution, which shall be equal
to the cost it would charge its Members for such distribution, if
any.
Section 10. Litigation Authority. The-Corporation--
shall be authorized, but not required, to perform any act
reasonably necessary to resolve any civil claim or action through
alternative dispute resolution proceedings such as mediation,
binding arbitration, or non-binding arbitration proceedings. The
Board, on behalf of the Corporation, shall also be authorized,
but not required, to perform the following acts:
(a) To provide, or in good faith attempt to
provide, one hundred twenty (120) days advance notice of the
corporation's intent to initiate the prosecution of any civil
action and of the nature and basis of the claim to every member
of the Corporation and every entity or person who is a
prospective party to the civil action; provided that notice can
be given (i) more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the
expiration of any pertinent statute of limitations, and (ii)
without prejudice to the Corporation's right to enforce the
governing documents, and further provided that no such notice
need be given prior to the_filing of an action in small claims
court.or an action solely to enforce assessment obligations;
(b) Prior to initiating the prosecution of a
civil action solely for declaratory relief or injunctive relief
to enforce the Declaration, or for declaratory relief or
injunctive relief to enforce the governing documents in
conjunction with a claim for monetary damages not in excess of
five thousand dollars ($5,000), to endeavor to submit the matter
to alternative dispute resolution in compliance with the
provisions of Section 1354(b) of the Civil Code;
(c) Immediately after initiating the prosecution
or defense of any civil action, making a reasonable effort, in
good faith, to meet and confer with every person who is a party
concerning appropriate processes for resolving the civil action,
including available alternative dispute resolution proceedings,
concerning appropriate processes for avoiding or reducing costs;
(d) Considering diversion of the prosecution or
defense of any civil action to alternative dispute resolution
proceedings such as mediation, nonbinding arbitration, or binding
arbitration; and
(e) Agreeing to participate and participating
fully and in good faith in the resolution of any civil action
through any alternative dispute resolution proceedings,
including, but not limited to, mediation, nonbinding arbitration,
and binding arbitration, and paying costs reasonably incurred by
the Corporation on account of those alternative dispute
resolution proceedings.
36
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 280
Section 11. Maintenance of Concrete Terrace Drains.
All concrete terrace drains located within a Common Area Lot
shall be maintained by the Corporation. Any concrete terrace
drains located within an individual Lot shall be maintained by
the individual Lot Owner. such maintenance shall include keeping
the drains clean and free from debris.
37
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE VII
INSURANCE
281
Section 1. Types. The Corporation, to the-extent--
available, shall obtain and continue in effect in its own name
the following types of insurance:
(a) A comprehensive policy of public liability
insurance covering the Common Areas with a limit of not less than
One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for claims for personal
injury and/or property damage arising out of a single occurrence,
such coverage to include protection against such risks as shall
customarily be covered or available with respect to planned unit
developments and shall contain an endorsement which shall
preclude the insurer from denying the claim of an Owner because
of negligent acts or omissions of the Corporation or other
owners;
(b) A policy of fire and casualty insurance with
extended coverage for the full replacement value of the Common
Area improvements, without deduction for depreciation, and
clauses waiving subrogation against Owners and the Corporation
and persons upon the Properties with the permission of an Owner,
such insurance to afford protection against loss or damage by
fire and other hazards covered by the standard extended coverage
policy of hazard insurance;
(c) Fidelity coverage against dishonest or
fraudulent acts on the part of directors, officers, managers,
trustees, employees or volunteers who handle or who are
responsible for handling funds belonging to or administered by
the Corporation in the same amount set forth above for public
liability insurance; and such fidelity bonds shall name the
Corporation as obligee and beneficiary, and shall be written in
an amount equal to at least the estimated maximum of funds,
including reserves, in the custody of the Corporation or a
management agent at any given time during the term of the
fidelity bond. However, the bond shall not be less than a sum
equal to three (3) months' aggregate assessments on all Lots,
plus reserve funds. The bond shall cover persons serving without
compensation by endorsement to the policy if not otherwise
covered under the policy. The Board of Directors may purchase
such other insurance as it may deem necessary, including, but not
limited to, plate glass insurance, medical payments, malicious
mischief and vandalism insurance, worker's compensation, and
directors and officer's liability.
(d) such other types of fidelity bonds, insurance
policies, coverage and endorsements as may be required from time
to time pursuant to the Article herein entitled "RIGHTS OF
MORTGAGEES."
38
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 282
All insurance policies required to be obtained by the
Corporation pursuant to this Declaration shall show the
corporation, or an authorized representative of-the corporation
(including its insurance trustee), as the named insured. The
"loss payable" clause of said policies shall show the Corporation
or the insurance trustee as a trustee for each owner and-the
Mortgagee.
Section 2. Waiver by Members. As to each of said
policies which will not be voided or impaired thereby, the
Members hereby waive and release all claims against the
corporation, the Board, the Declarant and agents and employees of
each of the foregoing, with respect to any loss covered by such
insurance, whether or not caused by negligence of or breach of
any agreement by said persons, but to the extent of insurance
proceeds received in compensation for such loss only.
Section 3. Other Insurance; Annual Review. The
corporation may purchase such other insurance as it may deem
necessary, including, but not limited to, plate glass insurance,
worker's compensation, officers' and directors' liability, errors
and omission insurance and blanket policies of hazard insurance
for the Lots. The Board shall annually determine whether the
amounts and types of insurance it has obtained provide adequate
coverage for the corporation in light of inflation, practice in
the area in which the Properties are located, or any other factor
which tends to indicate that either additional insurance policies
or increased coverage under existing policies are necessary or
desirable to protect the interests of the corporation. If the
Board determines that increased coverage or additional insurance
is appropriate, it shall obtain the same. In the event that the
corporation decide~ to obtain blanket policies of hazard
insurance for the dwelling units on the Lots, neither the
Corporation nor the Owners shall be required to rebuild after
destruction by fire or other casualty or loss unless the dwelling
units on the Lots are insured under a group or blanket hazard
insurance policy which contains a "Replacement Cost Endorsement",
providing for replacement of the dwelling unit from the proceeds
of such insurance. The Corporation shall not have the authority
to rebuild the dwelling unit on a Lot and assess the cost of
repair or replacement to the Owner of a Lot experiencing such
loss; provided, however, in the event of a shortfall in funds
necessary to rebuild a dwelling unit by reason of undercoverage
under the blanket policy, such shortfall for purposes of
reconstruction may be obtained through a Special Assessment
levied against all Lots in the Properties in accordance with the
procedures for a Special Assessment as set forth in the Article
of this Declaration entitled "Covenant For Maintenance
Assessments".
Section 4. Premiums and Proceeds. Insurance
premiums for any such blanket insurance coverage obtained by the
Corporation and any other insurance deemed necessary by the
Corporation shall be an expense to be included in the Regular
39
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 283
Assessments levied by the corporation. The Corporation is hereby
granted the authority to negotiate loss settlements with the
appropriate insurance carriers. Any two (2) directors of the
Corporation may sign a loss claim form and release form in
connection with the settlement of a loss claim, and such
signatures shall be binding on the corporation and 'the.-Members. · -
Section 5. Payment of Taxes or Premiums by
Mortgagees. Mortgagees may, jointly or singly, pay taxes or
other charges which are in default and which may or have become a
charge against the Common Area, unless such taxes or charges are
separately assessed against the Owners, in which case the rights
of Mortgagees shall be governed by the provisions of their
Mortgages. Mortgagees may, jointly or singly, also pay overdue
premiums on hazard insurance policies, or secure new hazard
insurance coverage on the lapse of a policy, for the Common Area
and the Mortgagee making such payments shall be owed immediate
reimbursement therefor from the Corporation.
Section 6. Annual Notification of Insurance. The
Corporation shall, upon issuance or renewal of insurance, but no
less than annually, notify its Members as to the amount and type
of insurance carried by the Corporation, and it shall accompany
this notification with statements to the effect that the
Corporation is or is not insured to the levels specified by
Section 1 of this Article, and that if not so insured, Owners may
be individually liable for the entire amount of a judgment, and
if the corporation is insured to the levels specified in Section
1 above, then Owners may be individually liable only for their
proportional share of assessments levied to pay the amount of any
judgment which exceeds the limits of the Corporation's insurance.
The Association shall further prepare and distribute to all its
Members a summary of the Association's insurance coverage
pursuant to Section 1365 of the California civil Code.
Section 7. Notice of Cancellation or Modification
of coverage. All insurance policies and fidelity bonds
maintained by the Corporation must provide that such policies or
bonds may not be cancelled, reduced or substantially modified
without at least ten (10) days' prior written notice to the
corporation, and in the case of fidelity bonds, to each mortgage
servicing contractor acting on behalf of any of the Federal
Agencies.
Section 8. Requirements of Federal Agencies.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article, the
Corporation shall obtain and maintain in effect such fidelity
bonds and insurance policies, coverages and endorsements which
shall be required from time to time by the Federal Agencies,
except to the extent that any such policies, coverages and
endorsements are not available or have been waived in writing by
the particular Federal Agency that had imposed the requirements.
These may include, but are not limited to, the following: (a)
Fidelity Bond; (b) Hazard Insurance; (c) Liability; (d) Flood
40
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 284
Insurance; and (e) Earthqua~e Insurance. All insurance policies
must have the "standard mortgagee clause" or equivalent
endorsement providing that coverage of a mortgagee under the
insurance policy will not be adversely affected or diminished by
an act or neglect of the Mortgagor, which is commonly accepted by
private institutional mortgage investors in the area in which the
Property is located, unless such coverage is prohibited by
applicable law. A mortgagee clause in favor of mortgagees
holding Mortgages on Lots is not required on a policy insuring
the Common Area.
41
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE VIII
DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION AFFECTING COMMON AREA
285
Section 1. Cons-ent of owners to Rebuil-d.--If all or
any portion of the Common Area is damaged or destroyed by fire,
or other casualty, and the amount of the insurance proceeds
available plus the deductible amount designated in the fire and
casualty insurance policy does not total at least ninety percent
(90%) of the cost to repair or rebuild, then neither the Board,
the Corporation, nor any agent or employee thereof shall be
required or permitted to take any action to repair or rebuild the
damaged portions, or to cause the damaged portions to be repaired
or rebuilt without the written consent of at least fifty-one
percent (51%) of the Members of each class as to the manner of
repair or reconstruction and the payment therefor, except as
provided in Section 2 of this_ Article in the event adequate
insura~ce proceeds are available as set forth therein.
Section 2. No Consent Reguired With Adeguate
Insurance. If the cost of repairing or rebuilding the portion of
the Common Area so damaged or destroyed does not exceed by ten
percent (10%) (less the deductible) the amount of insurance
proceeds available to the Corporation, the Board shall be
authorized and required without the consent or approval-of the
Members, to contract to repair or rebuild the damaged portions of
the Common Area substantially in accordance with the original
plans and specifications therefor. Subject to the provisions of
the Article of this Declaration entitled "RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES,"
in the event any excess insurance proceeds remain, or in the
event of a decision by the Corporation not to reconstruct or
replace such damages or destroyed improvements, such sums may be
retained in the general funds of the Corporation or all or a
portion thereof may be distributed pro rata to the Owners,
subject to the prior rights of Mortgagees whose interest may be
protected by insurance policies carried by the Corporation. The
rights of an Owner and the Mortgagee on their Lot as to such pro
rata distribution shall be governed by the provisions of the
Mortgage encumbering such Lot.
42
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CCARS
rav 10/22/96 _
ARTICLE IX
EMINENT DOMAIN
286
The term "taking" as used in this Article-shall mean --
condemnation by eminent domain or sale under threat of
conde~ation. In the event of a threatened taking of all or any
portion of the Common Area or the improvements thereon, the
Owners hereby appoint the Board and such persons as the Board may
delegate to represent all of the Owners in connection with the
taking. The Board shall act in its sole discretion with respect
to any awards being made in connection with the taking and shall
be entitled to make a voluntary sale to the condemnor in lieu of
engaging in a condemnation action. Any awards received on
account of the taking shall be paid to the Corporation. In the
event of a taking of less than all of the Common Area, the rules
as to restoration and replacement of the Common Area and the
improvements thereon shall apply as in the case of destruction of
improvements upon the Common Area. In the event of a total
taking, the Board may in its sole discretion retain any award in
the general funds of the Corporation or distribute pro rata all
or a portion thereof to the owners. The rights of an owner and
the Mortgagee of a Mortgage on their Lot as to such pro rata
distribution shall be governed by the provisions of the Mortgage
encumbering such Lot.
43
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE X
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL
287
Section 1. ·Members of Committee. The-Architectural
Committee shall consist of not less than three (3) members as
shall be determined by the Board. The initial members of the
Architectural Committee shall be representatives of Declarant,
whose business address is 495 East Rincon, Suite 115, Corona,
California 91719. Subject to the following provisions,
Declarant shall have the right and power at all times to appoint
and remove a majority of the members of the Architectural
Committee or to fill any vacancy of such majority until the
"turnover date" which shall be the date on which either (a)
ninety percent (90%) of the Lots subject to this Declaration have
been sold and the deeds recorded ("close of escrow"); or (b) five
years following the date of issuance of the Final Subdivision
Public Report for the Properties, whichever occurs earlier.
Commencing one year from the date of close of escrow for the sale
of the first Lot in the Properties to a purchaser (other than a
Developer) from Declarant, the Board shall have the power to
appoint one member to the Architectural Committee, until the
turnover date. Thereafter, the Board shall have the power to
appoint and remove all of the members of the Architectural
Committee. Persons appointed to the Architectural Committee by
the Board shall be from the membership of the Corporation, but
persons appointed to the Architectural Committee by Declarant
need not be Members of the Corporation. Tbe Architectural
Committee shall have the right and duty to promulgate reasonable
standards against which to examine any request made pursuant to
this Article, in order to ensure that the proposed plans conform
harmoniously to the exterior design and existing materials of the
buildings in the Properties. The Architectural Committee may
designate and appoint a representative who is a licensed
architect and a majority of the members of said Architectural
Committee may, from time to time, remove or replace such
representative. The designated representative of the
Architectural Committee may be, but need not be, a member of the
Architectural Committee.
Section 2. Review of Plans and Specifications. The
Architectural Committee shall consider and act upon any and all
plans and specifications submitted for its approval under this
Declaration and perform such other duties as from time to time
shall be assigned to it by the Board, including the inspection of
construction in progress to assure its conformance with plans
approved by the Architectural Committee. No construction,
alteration, addition, modification, decoration, redecoration or
reconstruction of an Improvement in the Properties shall be
commenced or maintained, until the plans and specifications
therefor showing the nature, kind, shape, height, width, color,
materials and location of the same shall have been submitted to
the Architectural Committee and approved in writing by the
44
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 288
Architectural Committee. The address for submission of such
plans and specifications shall be the address of the principal
place of business of the Corporation. The Architectural
Committee shall approve plans and specifications submitted for
its approval only if it deems that the construction, alterations
or additions contemplated thereby in the locations indicated wi~l
not be detrimental to the appearance of the surrounding area of
the Properties as a whole, that the appearance of any structure
affected thereby will be in harmony with the surrounding
structures, and that the construction thereof will not detract
from the beauty, wholesomeness and attractiveness of the Common
Area or the enjoyment thereof by the Members, and that the upkeep
and maintenance thereof will not become a burden on the
Corporation. The Architectural Committee may condition its
approval of proposals or plans and specifications for any
Improvement (a) on such changes therein as it deems appropriate,
(b) upon the agreement by the person (referred to in this Section
as "applicant") submitting the same to grant appropriate
easements to the Corporation for the maintenance of the
Improvement, or (c) upon the agreement of the applicant to
reimburse the Corporation for the cost of such maintenance, or
all three, and may require submission of additional plans and
specifications or other information prior to approving or
disapproving material submitted. The Architectural Committee may
also issue rules or guidelines setting forth procedures for the
submission of plans for approval, requiring a fee payable to the
Corporation to accompany each application for approval, or
additional factors which it will take into consideration in
reviewing submissions. The Architectural Committee may provide
that the amount of such fee shall be uniform, or that it be
determined in any other reasonable manner, such as by the
reasonable cost of the construction, alterations or additions
contemplated. The Architectural Committee may require such
detail in plans and specifications submitted for its review as it
deems proper, including, without limitation, floor plans, site
plans, drainage plans, elevation drawings and description or.
samples of exterior material and colors .. Failure to comply with
the requirements for Architectural Committee approval shall be
deemed sufficient basis for the Architectural Committee to refuse
to review the submission. Decisions of the Architectural
Committee and the reasons therefor shall be transmitted by the
Architectural Committee to the applicant at the address set forth
in the application for approval, within thirty days after receipt
by the Architectural Committee of all materials required by the
Architectural Committee. Any application submitted pursuant to
this Section shall be deemed approved, unless written disapproval
or a request for additional information or materials by the
Architectural Committee shall have been transmitted to the
applicant within thirty days after the date of receipt by the
Architectural Committee of such application or additional
information.
Section 3. Meetings of the Architectural Committee.
The Architectural Committee shall meet from time to time as
45
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 289
necessary to perform its duties hereunder. The Architectural
Committee may from time to time, by resolution unanimously
adopted in writing, designate an Architectural Committee
representative (who may, but need not, be one of its members) to
take any action or perform any duties for and on behalf of the
Architectural committee, except the granting of varianses
pursuant to Section 9 of this Article. In the absence of such
designation, the vote of a majority of the members of the
Architectural committee taken without a meeting, shall constitute
an act of the Architectural Committee.
Section 4. No Waiver of Future Approvals. The
approval of the Architectural Committee to any proposals or plans
and specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed or
in connection with any other matter requiring the approval and
consent of the Architectural Committee, shall not be deemed to
constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent
as to any similar proposals, _plans and specifications, drawings
or matter whatever subsequently or additionally submitted for
approval or consent.
Section 5. Compensation of Members. The members of
the Architectural Committee shall receive no compensation for
services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses incurred
by them in the performance of their duties hereunder.
Section 6. Inspection of Work. Inspection of work
and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows:
(a) Upon the completion of any work for which
approved plans are required under this Article, the owner shall
give written notice of completion to the Architectural Committee.
(b) Within sixty (60) days thereafter, the
Architectural committee or its duly authorized representative may
inspect such Improvement. If the Architectural Committee finds
that such work was not done in substantial compliance with the
approved plans it shall notify the Owner in writing of such
noncompliance within such sixty (60) day period, specifying the
particulars of noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to
remedy the same.
(c) If upon the expiration of thirty (30) days
from the date of such notification the owner shall have failed to
remedy such noncompliance, the Architectural Committee shall
notify the Board in writing of such failure. After affording
such Owner notice and hearing, the Board shall determine whether
there is a noncompliance and, if so, the nature thereof and the
estimated cost of correcting or removing the same. If the Board
determines a noncompliance exists, the owner shall remedy or
remove the same within a period of not more than forty-five (45)
days from the date of announcement of the Board ruling. If the
Owner does not comply with the Board ruling within such period,
the Board, at its option, may record a notice of noncompliance ·in
46
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 290
the Office of the San Diego County Recorder and may peacefully
remove the noncomplying Improvement or otherwise peacefully
remedy the-noncompliance, and the Owner shall reimburse the
Corporation, upon demand, for all expenses incurred in connection
therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the owner
to the Corporation, the Board shall levy a special Reimbursement-
Assessment against such owner for reimbursement.
{d) If for any reason the Architectural Committee
fails to inspect the Improvement within sixty (60) days after
receipt of said written notice of completion from the owner, or
the Owner requesting such inspection has not been notified of any
noncompliance within thirty (30) days after such inspection, the
Improvement shall be deemed to be completed in substantial
conformance with said approved plans and specifications.
Section 7. Nonliability of Architectural Committee
Members. Neither Declarant, the Architectural Committee nor any
member of the Architectural Committee, the Board nor their duly
authorized representative, shall be liable to the Corporation, or
to any owner for any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in
any way connected with the performance of the Architectural
Committee's duties hereunder, unless due to the willful
misconduct or bad faith of the Architectural Committee. The
Architectural Committee shall review and approve or disapprove
all plans submitted to it for any proposed Improvement,
alteration or addition, solely on the basis of aesthetic
considerations and the overall .benefit or detriment which would
result to the immediate vicinity and the Properties generally.
The Architectural Committee shall take into consideration the
aesthetic aspects of the architectural designs, placement of
buildings, landscaping, color schemes, exterior finishes and
materials and similar features. The Architectural Committee's
approval or disapproval soall be based solely on the
considerations set forth in this Article, and the Architectural
Committee shall not be responsible for reviewing, nor shall its
approval of any plan or design be deemed approval of, any plans
or design from the standpoint of structural safety or conformance
with building or other codes.
Section 8. Nonapplicability to Declarant. The
provisions of this Article shall not apply to any Lot owned by
Declarant prior to the construction on such Lot by Declarant of a
residential dwelling unit or prior to the conveyance of such Lot
by Declarant to a member of the public.
Section 9. Variance. The Architectural Committee
may authorize variances from compliance with any of the
arc~itectural provisions of this Declaration, including without
limitation, restrictions upon height, size, floor area or
placement of structures, or similar restrictions, when
circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship,
aesthetic or environmental consideration may require. such
variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at
47
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 291
least two (2) members of the Architectural Committee, and shall
become effective upon recordation in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County. If such variances are granted, no
violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained
in this Declaration shall be deemed to have occurred with respect
to the matter for which the variance was granted. The-granting--
of such a variance shall not operate to waive any of the terms
and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to
the particular property and particular provision hereof covered
by the variance, nor shall it affect in any way the Owner's
obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations
affecting their use of the premises, including but not limited to
zoning ordinances and Lot setback lines or requirements imposed
by the City of Carlsbad or any other governmental authority.
section 10. Appeal. In the event plans and
specifications submitted to the Architectural Committee are
disapproved thereby, the party or parties making such submission
may appeal-in writing to the Board. The written request must be
received by the Board not more than thirty (30) days following
the final decision of the Architectural Committee. The Board
shall submit such request to the appropriate Architectural
Co~ittee for review, whose written recommendations will be
submitted to the Board. In the event plans and specifications
submitted to the Architectural Committee are approved, such
decision shall be final unless the decision is appealed to the
Board within ten (10) days of the decision by the Architectural
Committee. such decision may be appealed by any member of the
Board, the Architectural Committee or any Owner. Within forty-
five (45). days following receipt of the request for appeal, the
Board shall render its written decision. The failure of the
Board to render a decision within said forty-five (45) day period
shall be deemed a decision in favor of the decision made by the
Architectural Committee.
48
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XI
NOTICES
292
In each instance in which notice is to be-gLven to tha
Owner of a Lot, the same shall be in writing and may be delivered
personally, in which case personal delivery of such notice to one
or two or more co-Owners of a Lot, or to any general partner of a
partnership owning such a Lot, shall be deemed delivery to all of
the co-Owners or to the partnership as the case may be, and
personal delivery of the notice to any officer or agent for the
service of process of a corporation owning such Lot sha11· be
deemed delivery to the corporation or such notice may be
delivered by United states mail, certified or registered, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the Owner of such
Lot at the most recent address furnished by the Owner in writing
for the purpose of giving notice, or if no such address shall
have been £urnished, then to the street address of such Lot, and
any notice so deposited in the mail within San Diego County,
California, shall be deemed delivered forty-eight (48) hours
after such deposit. Any notice to be given to the Corporation
may be delivered personally to any member of the Board, or
delivered in such other manner as may be authorized by the
Corporation. Any notice to be given to the Corporation shall be
delivered by the United states mail, certified or registered,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and any notice so
deposited in the mail within San Diego County, California, shall
be deemed delivered forty-eight (48) hours after such deposit.
49
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
• ARTICLE XII
RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES
293
Notwithstanding any provisions to the con~rary-as may--
be provided elsewhere in this Declaration, Mortgagees shall have
the following rights: -
Section 1. Notice to Mortgagees of Default. Any
Mortgagee of any Mortgage on a Lot shall be entitled to receive,
upon written request to the Corporation, written notification
from the Corporation of any default by the Owner (truster) of
such Lot in the performance of such Owner's obligations under the
Declaration or the Corporation's Articles or Bylaws which is not
cured within thirty (30) days from the date of such default.
Section 2. Assessments on Foreclosure. Any First
Mortgagee of any First Mortgage who obtains title to a Lot
pursuant to the remedies provided in the Mortgage (but exclusive
of a deed in lieu of foreclosure), or through foreclosure of the
First Mortgage, shall not be liable for any claims for unpaid
assessments or charges against such Lot which accrued prior to
the acquisition of title to such Lot by the First Mortgagee of
the First Mortgage.
Section 3. Right of First Refusal. Any Mortgagee
of a Mortgage who comes into possession of a Lot pursuant to the
remedies provided in such Mortgage, or for~closure of the
Mortgage, shall be exempt from any right of first refusal, and
any right of first refusal shall not impair the rights of a
Mortgagee to:
(a) Foreclose or take title to a Lot pursuant to
the remedies provided in the Mortgage, or
(b) Accept a deed (or assignment) in lieu of
foreclosure in the event of default by the truster of the
Mortgage, or
(c) Sell or lease a Lot acquired by the
Mortgagee.
Section 4. Required Consent of owners. Unless at
least two-thirds of the Owners, excluding the vote of Declarant,
(based on one vote for each Lot owned) have given their prior
written approval, the Corporation and the owners shall not be
entitled to:
(a) Change the method of determining the
obligations, assessments (whether Regular ·or Special), dues or
other charges which may be levied against the owner of a Lot;
50
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rav 10/22/96 294
(b) By act or omission seek to abandon,
partition, release, subdivide, encumber, sell or transfer any
property or any improvements which are owned, directly or
indirectly, by the Corporation; provided, however, the granting
of easements for public utilities or other public purposes
consistent with the intended-use of the Common Area, or joining--
in the execution of a lot line adjustment as provided for
hereinabove is not a transfer in the meaning of this clause;
(c) By act or omission change, waive or abandon
any scheme of regulations, or enforcement thereof, pertaining to
the architectural design and exterior maintenance of the
dwellings situated on each Lot or the upkeep of the Common Areas
within the Properties;
(d) Use hazard insurance proceeds for losses to
the Common Area property for other than the repair, replacement
or reconstruction of such improvements;
(e) Fail to maintain fire.and extended coverage
insurance on insurable Common Area property on a current
replacement cost basis in an amount not less than one hundred
percent (100%) of the insurable value (based on current
replacement cost);
(f) Abandon or terminate the corporation, except
for abandonment, partition or termination as may be provided by
law;
(g) Fail to maintain an adequate reserve fund for
the replacement of equipment and facilities used for Common Area
maintenance.
Section 5. Rights of First Mortgagees. All First
Mortgagees of Mortgages on individual Lots, or insurers or
guarantors of said First Mortgage, shall, upon written request to
the Corporation, be entitled to:
(a) Inspect the books and records of the
Corporation during normal business hours;
(b) Receive an annual audited financial statement
of the corporation within ninety (90) days following the end of
any fiscal year of the Corporation provided, however, that such
audited statements shall be made available only if they have been
prepared by the Corporation in the regular course of business;
(c) Receive written notice of all meetings of the
Owners of the Corporation and shall be entitled to designate a
representative to attend all such meetings.
Section 6. Pavment of Taxes and Insurance Premiums.
Mortgagees of Mortgages on Lots within the Properties may,
jointly or singly, pay taxes or other charges which are in
51
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96 295
default and which may or have become a charge or lien against any
Common Area property, if any, and may pay overdue premiums on
hazard insurance policies or secure hazard insurance coverage
upon the lapse of a policy for any Common Area property and the
mortgagees making such payments shall be owed immediate
reimbursement therefor from the Corporation.
Section 7. Priority on Distribution of Proceeds.
No owner or any other party shall have priority over any rights
of Mortgagees of Mortgages upon individual Lots pursuant to their
Mortgages in the case of a distribution to Owners of insurance
proceeds or condemnation awards for losses to or a taking of all
or any portion of the commonly owned property, if any, and/or the
individual Lots and improvements thereon.
Section 8. Notice of Destruction or Taking. In the
event that any Lot or the improvements thereon or any commonly
owned property, if any, or portions thereof, are substantially
damaged or -destroyed, or are made the subject of any condemnation
proceeding in eminent domain or are otherwise sought to be
acquired by a condemning authority, the Corporation shall
promptly notify all First Mortgagees of Mortgages affected by
such destruction, taking or threatened action who have requested
such notice in writing.
Section 9. Insurance. Notwithstanding any other
provisions herein, the Corporation shall continuously maintain in
effect such casualty, flood and liability insurance and fidelity
bonds meeting the insurance and fidelity bond requirements for
planned unit development projects established by the Federal
Agencies, and their respective successors or assigns, so long as
it is a Mortgagee or Owner of a Lot within the Properties, except
to the extent such coverage is not available or has been waived
in writing by FHLMC, FNMA or GNMA.
Section 10. Mortgage Protection Clause. No breach
of the covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained,
nor any lien created hereby, shall defeat or render invalid the
lien of any First Mortgage or first deed of trust made in good
faith and for value, but all of said covenants, conditions and
restrictions shall be binding upon and effective against any
Owner whose title is derived through foreclosure or trustee's
sale, or otherwise.
Section 11. Federal Agency Agreement. The Board
shall enter into agreements with any of the Federal Agencies to
the extent possible under the terms and provisions of the
Corporation Management Documents to take actions that would
satisfy guidelines and regulations of any such Federal Agency
which would permit such Federal Agency to purchase, insure or
guarantee, as applicable, First Mortgages encumbering Lots within
the Properties.
52
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
section 12. Conflicts. In the event of any
296
conflicts between any of the provisions of this Article and any
other provisions of the Corporation Management Documents, the
provisions of this Article shall control.
53
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XIII
ENFORCEMENT OF BONDED OBLIGATIONS
297
In the event that the improvements to any-commanly
owned or maintained property within the Properties have not been
completed prior to the issuance of a Final Subdivision Public
Report covering such tract by the Department of Real Estate of
the State of California, and the Corporation is obligee under a
bond or other arrangement (hereinafter the "Bond") to secure
performance of the commitment of Declarant to complete such
improvements, the following provisions shall apply:
(a) The Board shall consider and vote on the question
of action by the Corporation to enforce the obligations under the
Bond with respect to any improvements for which a Notice of
Completion has not been filed within sixty (60) days after the
completion-date specified for such improvement in the Planned
Construction Statement appended to the Bond. If the Corporation
has given an extension in writing for the completion of any
common improvement, the Board shall consider and vote on the
aforesaid question if a Notice of Completion has not been filed
within thirty (30) days after the expiration of such extension.
(b) In the event that the Board determines not to
initiate action to enforce the obligations under the Bond, or in
the event the Board fails to consider and vote on such question
as provided above, the Board shall call·a special meeting of the
Members for the purpose of voting to override such decision or
such failure to act by the Board. such meeting shall be called
according to the provisions of the Bylaws dealing with meetings
of the Members, but in any event such meeting shall be held not
less than thirty-five (35) days nor more than forty-five (45)
days after receipt by the Board of a petition for such
meeting,signed by Members representing five percent (5%) or more
of the total voting power of the Corporation.
(c) The only Members entitled to vote at such meeting
shall be the Owners other than Declarant. A vote at such meeting
of a majority of the voting power of such Members, other than
Declarant, to take action to enforce the obligations under the
Bond shall be deemed to be the decision of the Corporation and
the Board shall thereafter implement such decision by initiating
and pursuing appropriate action in the name of the Corporation.
54
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XIV
EASEMENTS ·AND OWNERS' PROPERTY RIGHTS
section 1. owners' Easements of Enjoyment.-
298
Declarant hereby reserves, with the right to grant and transfer
same, for the benefit of every Owner in the Properties, a right
and easement of ingress and egress and of enjoyment in, to and
over the common Area (except for any slope areas on the Common
Area) which easement shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with
title· to every Lot, subject to the following provisions:
(a) The right of the Corporation to reasonably
limit the number of guests of Owners using the Common Area
facilities;
(b) Th~ right of the Corporation to establish
uniform rules and regulations pertaining to the use of the Common
Area;
(c) The right of the Corporation in accordance
with the Articles, Bylaws and this Declaration, with the vote or
written assent of a majority of the total voting power of the
Corporation, which shall include a majority of the votes residing
in Members other than the Declarant, to borrow money for the
purpose of improving the common Area and the facilities and in
aid thereof, and, subject to the provisions of the Article of
this Declaration entitled "RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES," to mortgage,
pledge, deed in trust, or hypothecate any or all of its real or
personal property as security for money borrowed or debts
incurred, provided that the rights of such Mortgagees shall be
subordinated to the rights of the owners;
(d) Subject to the provisions of the Article of
this Declaration entitled "RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES," the right of
the Corporation to dedicate, release, alienate or transfer the
Common Area to any public agency, authority, utility or other
person for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be
agreed to by the Members. No such dedication, release,
alienation or transfer shall be effective, unless an instrument
signed by Members entitled to cast at least a majority of the
total voting power of the Corporation, which shall include a
majority of the votes residing in Members other than the
Declarant, agreeing to such dedication, release, alienation or
transfer has been recorded;
(e) The rights and reservations of Declarant as
set forth in this Declaration, including the right of Declarant
and its sales agents, representatives and prospective purchasers,
to the non-exclusive use of the Common Area and any facilities
thereof, without cost, for access, ingress, egress, use and
enjoyment, in order to dispose of the Properties as provided
herein, until the earlier of (i) three years from the date of
55
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CClRS rev 10/22/96
issuance·of the most recently issued Final subdivision Public
Report for the Properties, or (ii) the close of escrow for the
sale of all of the Lots in the Properties; provided, however,
299
that such use shall not unreasonably interfere with the rights of
enjoyment of the other Owners as provided herein;
(f) The right of the Board to suspend the rights
and easements of use and enjoyment of the recreational
facilities, if any, located on the Common Area of any Member, and
the persons deriving such rights and easements from any Member,
for any period during which the payment of any assessment against
such Member and their Lot remains delinquent; and, after notice
and hearing with an opportunity to be heard, to impose monetary
penalties or suspend such use rights and easements for a
reasonable period of time as determined by the Board for any
violation of this Declaration, Articles, Bylaws or Corporation
Rules, or other Corporation Management Documents, it being
understood that any suspension for either non-payment of any
assessment -0r breach of such restrictions shall not constitute a
waiver or discharge of the Member's obligation to pay assessments
as provided herein;
(g) The right of the Corporation, acting-through
the Board, to reasonably restrict access to areas of the Common
Area.
section 2. Waiver of use. No owner may exempt
themselves from personal liability for assessments duly levied by
the Corporation, nor release the Lot or ot~er property owned by
them from the liens and charges hereof, by waiver of the use and
enjoyment of the common Area and the facilities thereon or by
abandonment of their Lot or any other property -in the Properties.
Section 3. owners' Rights and Duties: Utilities.
Declarant hereby reserves, with the right to grant and transfer
same, easements for installation and maintenance of sanitary
sewer and water, electricity, gas, telephone and cable television
lines, and drainage facilities. The rights and duties of the
owners of the Lots within the Properties granted said easements
shall be governed by the following provisions:
(a) Wherever sanitary sewer house connections
and/or water house connections or electricity, gas, or telephone
and cable television lines or drainage facilities are installed
within the Properties, which connections, lines or facilities, or
any portion thereof, lie in or upon Lots owned by persons other
than the owner of a Lot served by said connections, the Owners of
any Lots served by said connections, lines or facilities shall
have the right, and are hereby granted an easement to the full
extent necessary therefor, to enter upon the Lots or to have
utility companies enter upon the Lots within the Properties in or
upon which said connection, lines or facilities, or any portion
thereof, lie, to repair, replace and generally maintain said
56
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
Joo
connections as and when the same may be necessary as set forth
below;
(b) Wherever sanitary sewer house connections
and/or water house connections or electricity, gas or telephone
or cable television lines or-drainage facilities are installed --
within the Properties, which connections serve more than one Lot,
the Owner of each Lot served by said connections shall be
entitled to the full use and enjoyment of such portions of said
connections as service their Lot;
(c) In the event of a dispute between owners with
respect to the repair or rebuilding of said connections, or with
respect to the sharing of the cost thereof, then upon written
request of one of such Owners addressed to the corporation, the
matter shall be submitted to the Board of Directors who shall
decide and make an assessment against any or all of the Owners
involved, which assessment shall be collected and enforced in the
manner pro~ided by this Declaration.
Section 4. Common Area Easements. The corporation
shall own the Common Area for the use, enjoyment and convenience
of the Owners. Declarant hereby reserves, with the right to
grant and transfer same, to each Owner of a Lot within the
Properties subject to this Declaration an easement over all of
the Common Area, for the benefit of the Lots, the Owners of the
Lots, and each of them, and for their respective families,
guests, invitees, tenants and contract purchasers, for all of the
purposes and uses hereinabove set forth, and without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, for ingress and egress over and
through the Common Area. Additionally, the Owner and occupants
of Lots in any Phase of the Development shall have reciprocal,
nonexclusive easements for ingress, egress and use over the
common Area located within each other annexed Phase, provided
that a Notice of Completion, as defined in California Civil Code
Section 3093, has been recorded for all of the Improvements in
such respective Phase of the Development and (a) the conveyance
of the first Lot by Declarant to an individual Owner, (b)
conveyance of the Common Area to the Corporation, or (c) the
first residential occupancy of a Lot, has occurred within such
Phase. Such ingress, egress and use shall further be subject to
the terms, limitations, restrictions and conditions set forth in
this Declaration, any Supplementary Declaration, or any rules and
regulations adopted by the Board.
Section 5. Party Walls and Fences.
(a) Those Owners who have a common wall or fence
adjoining their Lots and such a wall or fence dividing the Lots
upon which their homes are constructed, shall equally have the
right to the use of such wall or fence except that each shall
have the exclusive right to the use of the interior surface of
the wall or fence on their side. Neither owner shall use any
portion of the wall or fence so as to interfere with the use and
enjoyment of the other Owner. In the event that any portion of
57
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
such wall or fence, except the interior surface of one side, is
damaged or injured from any cause, other than the act or
negligence of either party, it shall be repaired or rebuilt at
their joint expense~
(b) Unless otherwise provided in this Be€lara---
tion, owners of those Lots which have a wall or fence separating
their Lot from the Common Area shall have the right to the use of
such wall except that the Owner and the Corporation each shall
have the exclusive right to the use of the surface of the wall
facing the respective property. Except for the exterior surface
of said wall or wood fence, the maintenance, replacement or
repair of such wall, wood fence, tubular steel or combination
thereof will be the sole responsibility of the Lot owner, unless
the need for maintenance, replacement or repair is a result of
acts of the Corporation, in which case such repair or maintenance
shall be the sole responsibility of the Corporation. To provide
for such maintenance, Declarant hereby reserves for the benefit
of the Corporation an easement of ingress and egress to the Lot
to provide reasonable access to perform such maintenance,
replacement or repair.
(c) Unless otherwise provided herein, for
purposes of this section, the general rules of law regarding
party walls and liability for property damage due to negligence
or willful acts or omissions shall apply. In the event of any
dispute arising concerning a party wall or fence between owners,
said dispute shall be submitted to the Board for a resolution
thereof. In the event the Board cannot or will not resolve such
dispute, or said dispute involves Common Area, said dispute
shall, at the request of either party, be submitted to
arbitration before an arbitrator selected from the panels of the
arbitrators of said American Arbitration Association in
accordance with the commercial arbitration rules of the American
Arbitration Association and the requirements of the law of the
State of California. If the parties are unable to agree on a
single arbitrator, each will select one arbitrator who together
will select a third.
Section 6. Encroachment Easements. Each Lot and
the Common Area is hereby declared to have an easement over all
adjoining Lots and the Common Area for the purpose of
accommodating any encroachment due to engineering errors, errors
in original construction, settlement or shifting or any other
similar cause of any fence or wall. There shall be valid
easements for the maintenance of said encroachments so long as
they shall exist, and the rights and obligations of owners shall
not be altered in any way by said encroachment, settling or
shifting; provided, however, that in no event shall a valid
easement for encroachment be created in favor of an Owner or
Owners if said encroachment occurred due to the willful act or
acts of said Owner or Owners. In the event a fence or wall on
any Lot is partially or totally destroyed, and then repaired or
rebuilt, the Owners of each Lot agree that minor encroachments
58
301
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS r•v 10/22/96
over adjoining Lots shall be_ permitted, and that there shall be 302
valid easements for the maintenance of said encroachments so long
as they shall exist.
Section 7. Pedestrian Trail Easement. The
Pedestrian Trail is part -of the Carlsbad Trail System,--as defined
by and on file with the City of Carlsbad and is subject to City
ordinances and guidelines pertaining to such trails.
section 8. creation of Easements. Each of the
easements provided for in this Declaration shall be deemed to be
established upon the recordation of this Declaration, and shall
thenceforth be deemed to be covenants running with the land for
the use and benefit of the Lots superior to all other
encumbrances applied against or in favor of any portion of the
Properties which is the subject of this Declaration, with the
exception of any easements created in favor of a public agency
after the recordation of this Declaration. In furtherance of the
easements provided for in this Declaration the individual grant
deeds to Lots may, but shall not be required to, set forth said
easements.
Section 9. Easements for corporation. There is
hereby reserved to Declarant, together with the right to grant
and transfer the same to the corporation with the right of the
corporation to grant and transfer same, easements over the
Properties for the purpose of permitting the Corporation to
perform emergency repairs or to do other work reasonably
necessary for the proper maintenance of the Properties and to
discharge any other obligations and powers as described in the
corporation Management Documents, including without limitation a
right of entry for such purpose as provided in the Bylaws.
Section 10. Amendment to Eliminate Easements. This
Declaration cannot be amended to modify or eliminate the
easements reserved to Declarant without prior written approval of
Declarant, and any attempt to do so shall have no effect. Any
attempt to modify or eliminate this Section shall likewise
require the prior written approval of Declarant.
59
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC.ilS
rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XV
ANNEXATION
Section 1. Annexation With Consent. Additional
Lots and Common Area may be annexed to the Properties with the
written consent of not less than 66-2/3% of the total voting
power of the Corporation residing in Corporation Members other
than the Declarant unless the proposed annexation is in
substantial conformance with a detailed plan submitted to the
Department of Real Estate with the application for a Public
Report for the first Phase of the Properties as set forth below.
303
Section 2. Annexation Without Consent. If, at any
time within the third anniversary date of the issuance of the
original Public Report for the immediately preceding Phase of the
Properties, the Declarant should develop additional lands within
the Annexable Area, such additional lands may be annexed to the
Properties without the assent of the Class A Members and be made
subject to the Declaration and thereby become, subject to the
jurisdiction of the Corporation; provided, however, that the
development of the additional lands described in this Section
shall be in accordance with the general plan set forth in this
Article. Detailed plans for the development of additional lands
must be submitted to the California Department of Real Estate
prior to such development of additional lands. If the California
Department of Real Estate determines that such detailed plans are
not in accordance with the general plan on file and such agency
so advises the Corporation and the Declarant, the annexation of
the additional lands must be in accordance with Section 1
immediately above. A Supplementary Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions as described hereinafter in Section 3
of this Article, covering the Annexable Area or portions thereof,
shall be executed and recorded by the owner of such property to
be annexed.
Section 3. Supplementary Declaration. The
additions authorized under the foregoing section shall be made by
filing of record a Supplementary Declaration of covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions, or similar instrument, with respect
to the additional property which shall extend the plan of this
Declaration to such property. Such Supplementary Declarations
contemplated above may contain such complementary additions or
modifications of the covenants, conditions and restrictions
contained in this Declaration as may be necessary to reflect the
different character, if any, of the added property as are not
inconsistent with the plan of this Declaration. In no event,
however, shall any such Supplementary Declaration, revoke, modify
or add to the covenants established by this Declaration within
the.existing Properties, except as hereinafter otherwise
provided. Upon the effective date of annexation as provided in
Section 4 of this Article, the Annexable Area subject to such
Supplementary Declaration shall become subject to this
60
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS
rev 10/22/96 .
Declaration and subject to the functions, powers and jurisdiction 30 4 of the ON THE PARK MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, and thereafter all of
the owners of Lots in said Annexable Area shali be Members of the
ON THE PARK MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, in accordance with the terms
and provisions of this Declaration and such Supplementary
Declaration. Upon the effective date of the annexation as
proviqed in Section 4 of this Article, all Owners of Lots within
a Phase of the Properties for which assessments have commenced
shall have an equal right to the use of all of the Common Areas
within the Phases of the Properties for which assessments have
commenced. Nothing herein shall obligate Declarant to annex to
the Properties all or any·portion of the Annexable Area, and any
decision to effect such annexation.shall be in the sole
discretion of Declarant .
. Section 4. Effective Date of Annexation.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary ~s may be contained
herein, any annexation pursuant to the provisions of this Article
shall only-be effective upon the recordation of a Supplementary
Declaration for each particular Phase, and which has been annexed
pursuant to the provisions of this Declaration; provided,
however, the powers, duties, obligations and other covenants,
conditions and restrictions as set forth herein or in such
Supplementary Declaration shall not commence as to such annexed
Phase until the close of the first escrow within such Phase, or
the conveyance of the Common Area to the Corporation, whichever
is first to occur.
Section 5. Commitment by Declarant to Pay
Assessments. Declarant for itself and its successors and assigns
covenants and agrees to pay to the Corporation, concurrently with
the closing of the escrow for the first sale of a Lot in an
annexed phase, appropriate amounts for reserves for replacement
or deferred maintenance of Common Area improvements in the
annexed phase necessitated by or arising out of the use and
occupancy of the dwelling units on the Lots in such annexed phase
under a rental program conducted by the Declarant which has been
in effect for a period of at least one year as of the date of
closing of escrow for the-first sale of a Lot in the annexed
phase.
Section 6. Deannexation bv Declarant. Declarant
may delete all or a portion of any real property annexed to the
Properties from coverage of this Declaration and the jurisdiction
of the Corporation, so long as Declarant is the owner of all of
such annexed real property, and provided that (a) a Notice of
Deletion of Territory or Termination of Supplementary Declaration
is recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder in the
same manner as the applicable Supplementary Declaration was
recorded; (b) Declarant has not exercised any Corporation vote
with respect to any portion of such annexed real property; (c)
assessments have not yet commenced with respect to any portion of
such annexed real property; (d) no escrow has closed for the sale
of any Lot in any portion of such annexed real property to the
61
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
public; and (e) the Corporation has not made any expenditures or
incurred any obligations with respect to any portion of such
annexed real property.
62
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XVI
306
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1354, 1365 AND 1365.5
Section 1. -Budgets and Financial Statements. -The--
Board of Directors of the Corporation shall have the below
described financial information of the Corporation regularly
prepared and distributed to (a) all Members of the Corporation as
provided herein regardless of the number of Members or the amount
of assets of the Corporation, and (b) Declarant for a period
terminating ten (10) years after the closing of the final sale
escrow for a Lot in the Properties:
(a) A proforma operating budget for the
immediately ensuing fiscal year of the Corporation which shall
include at least the following information shall be distributed
no more than sixty (60) days and not less than forty-five (45)
days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year of the
Corporation:
(i) Estimated revenue and expenses on
an accrual basis;
(ii) A summary of the corporation's
reserves based upon the most recent review or study conducted
pursuant to civil Code Section 1365.5, which shall be printed in
bold type, and shall include all of the following:
(A) The current estimated replacement
cost, estimated remaining life, and estimated useful life of each
major component;
(B) As of the end of the fiscal year
for which the study is prepared, (1) the current estimate of the
amount of cash reserves necessary to repair, replace, restore or
maintain the major components; and (2) the current amount of
accumulated cash reserves actually set aside to repair, replace,
restore, or maintain major components;
(C) The percentage that the amount
determined for purposes of subparagraph (B) (2) is of the amount
determined for purposes of subparagraph (B) (1).
The summary as required by this subsection shall not be
admissible in evidence to show improper financial management of
an association, provided that other relevant and competent
evidence of the financial condition of the association is not
made inadmissible by this provision.
(iii) A statement as to whether the Board
of Directors of the Corporation has determined or anticipates
that the levy of one or more Special Assessments will be required
63
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC•RS rev 10/22/96
to repair, replace or restore any major component or to provide
adequate reserves therefor;
(iv) A general statement setting forth
307
the procedures used by the Board in the calculation and
establishment of reserves to-defray the costs of repair,-
replacement or additions to major components of the Common Areas
and facilities for which the Corporation is responsible.
(b) A balance sheet -as of a designated
accounting date which shall be the last day of the month closest
in.time to six (6) months· from the date of closing of escrow
representing the first sale of a Lot in the Properties -and an
operating statement for the period from the date of the first
closing to the designated accounting date, shall be distributed
to each Member within sixty (60) days after the designated
accounting date. -This operating statement shall include a
schedule of assessments received and_ receivable identified by the
Lot within-the Properties and the name of the person or entity
assessed therefor.
(c) An annual report which shall consist of at
least the following shall be distributed within one hundred
twenty (120) days after the close of.the fiscal year of the
Corporation:
(i) A balance sheet as of the end of
the·fiscal year;
(ii) An operating (income) statement for
the fiscal year;
(iii) A statement of changes in financial
position for the fiscal year; and
(iv) For any fiscal year in which the
gross income of the Corporation exceeds Seventy-Five Thousand
Dollars ($75,000.00), a copy of the review of the annual report
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles by a licensee of the California State Board of
Accountancy. Such financial report shall include any information
required to be reported under Section 8322 of the California
Corporations Code.
(v) A summary as required by Civil Code
Section 1354.
Section 2. Certification of Report. If the report
referred to in subsection (c) above is not prepared by an
independent accountant, it shall be accompanied by the
certificate of an authorized officer of the Corporation that the
statement was prepared from the books and records of the
Corporation without independent audit or review.
64
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
Section 3. · Alternative Financial Statements. In
308
lieu of the distribution of the proforma operating budget
required by this Article, the Board of Directors may elect to
distribute a summary of the items described in Section 1{c) (i)
through (iv) above to all Members of the Corporation with a
written notice that the proforma operating budget is .available--
at the business office of the Corporation or at another suitable
location within the boundaries of the Properties and that copies
will be provided upon request and at the expense of the
Corporation. If any Member requests that a copy of the proforma
operating budget, including items described in Section (1) (c) (i)
through (iv), be mailed to the Member, the Corporation shall
provide such copies to the Member by first-class United States
mail at the expense of the Corporation and mailed within five (5)
days. The written notice that is distributed to each of the·
Corporation Members shall be in at least 10-point bold type on
the front page of the summary of the budget.
Section 4. Minutes. The minutes, minutes proposed
for adoption that are marked to indicate draft status, or a
summary of the minutes of any meeting of the Board, other than an
executive session, shall be available to Members within thirty
days of the meeting. The minutes, proposed minutes, or summary
of the minutes shall be distributed to any Member of the
Corporation upon request and upon reimbursement of the
Corporation's costs in making that distribution. Members of the
Corporation shall be notified in writing at the time that the pro
forma budget, required in Section 1365 of the California Civil
Code, is distributed, or at the time of any general mailing to
the entire membership of the Corporation of their right to have
copies of the minutes of meetings of the Board and how and where
those minutes may be obtained.
Section 5. Policies on Remedies. In addition to
financial statements, the Board of Directors shall annually
distribute within sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of the
fiscal year of the Corporation a statement of the Corporation's
policies and practices in enforcing its lien rights and other
legal remedies against Members for defaults in the payment of
Regular and Special Assessments including the recording and
foreclosing of liens against Members' Lots.
Section 6. Summary of Insurance Coverage. The
Board of Directors shall prepare and distribute to all the
Members a summary of the Association's general liability policy,
the liability policy for the directors and officers of the
Association and, if applicable, the earthquake or flood insurance
policies, and satisfy the notification requirements regarding
these policies as specified in Civil Code Section 1365.
Section 7. Fiscal Duties of Board.
(a) The Board of Directors of the Corporation
shall do all of the following:
65
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC•RS rev 10/22/96
(i) cause a current reconciliation of
the Corporation's operating accounts to be made and review the
same on at least a quarterly basis;
(ii) Cause a current reconciliation of
the Corporation's reserve accounts to be made and review-the same
on at least a quarterly basis;
(iii) Review, on at least a quarterly
basis, the current year's actual reserve revenues and expenses
compared to the current year's budget;
(iv) Review the most current account
statements prepared by the financial institutions where the
Corporation has its operating and reserve accounts; and
(v) Review an income and expense
statement for the Corporation's operating and reserve accounts on
at least a -quarterly basis.
section 8. Withdrawal of Funds from the
Corporation's Reserve Accounts.
(a) Withdrawal of funds from the Corporation's
reserve accounts shall require the signatures of either:
(i) Two members of the Board; or
(ii) One member of the Board and one officer
of the Corporation who is not also a member of the Board.
(b) The Board shall not expend funds designated
as reserve funds for any purpose other than the repair,
restoration, replacement or maintenance of, or litigation
involving the repair, restoration, replacement or maintenance of,
major components which the Corporation is obligated to repair,
restore, replace or maintain and for which the reserve fund was
established. However, the Board may authorize the temporary
transfer of money from a reserve fund to the Corporation's
general operating fund to meet short-term cash flow requirements
or other expenses, provided the Board has made a written finding,
duly·recorded in the Board's minutes, explaining the reasons that
the transfer is needed, and describing when and how the money
will be repaid to the reserve fund. The transferred funds shall
be restored to the reserve fund within one (1) year of the date
of the initial transfer, except that the Board may, upon making a
finding supported by documentation that a temporary delay would
be in the best interests of the Properties, temporarily delay the
restoration. The Board shall exercise prudent fiscal management
in delaying restoration of these funds and in restoring the
expended funds to the reserve account, and shall, if necessary,
levy a Special Assessment to recover the full amount of the
expended funds within the time limits required by this
subparagraph. This Special Assessment is subject to the
66
309
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CClRS rev 10/22/96
310
limitation imposed by Section 1366 of the civil Code, as may be
amended or supplemented, and as further set forth in the Seption
entitled "Special Assessments for capital Improvements and
Limitation on Increases In Special Assessments" of the Article
entitled "Covenant for Maintenance Assessments" of this
Declaration. The Board may, -at its discretion, extend--the date--
the payment on the Special Assessment is due. Any extension
shall not prevent the Board from pursuing any legal remedy to
enforce the collection of an unpaid Special Assessment.
(c) When the decision is made to use reserve
funds-or to temporarily transfer money from the reserve fund to
pay for litigation, the Corporation shall notify the Members of
the corporation of that decision in the next available mailing to
all Members pursuant to section 5016 of the Corporations Code,
and of the availability of an accounting of.those expenses.
Unless the governing documents impose more stringent standards,
the corporation shall make an accounting of expenses related to
the litigation on at least a quarterly basis. The accounting
shall be made available for inspection by members of the
Corporation at the Corporation's office.
(d) At least once every three (3) years, the
Board shall cause a study of the reserve account requirements of
the Properties to be conducted if the current replacement value
of the major components which the Corporation is obligated to
repair, replace, restore or maintain is equal to or greater than
one-half of the gross budget of the Corporation for any fiscal
year. The Board shall review this study annually and shall
consider and implement necessary adjustments to the Board's
analysis of the reserve account requirements as a result of that
review. This reserve study shall at a minimum include:
(i) Identification of the major
components which the Corporation is obligated to repair, replace,
restore or maintain which, as of the date of the study, have a
remaining useful life of less than 30 years;
(ii) Identification of the probable
remaining useful life of the components identified in
subparagraph (i) above as of the date of the study;
(iii) An estimate of the cost of repair,
replacement, restoration or maintenance of the components
identified in subparagraph (i) above during and at the end of
their useful life;
(iv) An estimate of the total annual
contribution necessary to defray the cost to repair, replace,
restore or maintain the components identified in subparagraph (i)
above during and at the end of their useful life, after
subtracting total reserve funds as of the date of the study.
67
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&.RS
rev 10/.22/96
(e) As used in this Section, "reserve accounts"
means moneys that the Board has identified for use to defray the
future repair or replacement of, or additions to, those major
components which the Corporation is obligated to maintain.
(f) As used in this Section, "reserve -account
requirements" means the estimated funds which the Board has
determined are required to be available at a specified point in
time to repair, replace or restore those major components which
the Corporation is obligated to maintain.
68
311
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
ARTICLE XVII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Enforcement. The Corporation, or any --
Owner or the successor in interest of an owner, shall have the
right to enforce by proceedings at law or in equity, all
restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens and
charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this
Declaration or any amendment thereto, including the right to
prevent the violation of any such restrictions, conditions,
covenants or reservations and the right to recover damages or
other dues for such violation; provided, however, that with
respect to assessment liens, the Corporation shall have the
exclusive right to the enforcement thereof. Failure by the
corporation or by any owner to enforce any covenant, condition or
restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver
of the right to do so thereafter. Prior to filing a civil action
by either the Corporation or by an Owner solely for declaratory
relief or injunctive relief, or for declaratory relief or
injunctive relief in conjunction with a claim for monetary
damages, other than Corporation assessments, related to the
enforcement of the Corporation Management Documents, the parties
may be required to comply with California Civil Code Section
1354, if applicable. Failure to comply with the prefiling
requirements of Section 1354 of the Civil Code may result in the
loss of the right to sue regarding enforcement of the Corporation
Management Documents. In any action to enforce the terms of this
Declaration, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs.
Section 2. Severability. Should any of the
covenants contained in this Declaration be void or be or become
unenforceable in law or in equity, the remaining portions of this
Declaration shall, nevertheless, be and remain in full force and
effect.
Section 3. Term. Subject to the limitations set
forth in Section 4 of this Article, this Declaration and the
covenants herein contained shall be in effect until December 31,
2046, and shall automatically be extended for successive periods
of ten .years unless within six months prior to the expiration of
the initial term or any ten year renewal period a written
agreement executed by the then record Owners of more than three-
fourths of the Lots within the Properties shall be placed on
record in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San
Diego by the terms of which agreement the effectiveness of this
Declaration is terminated or the covenants herein contained are
extinguished in whole or in part as to all or any part of the
property then subject thereto.
Section 4. Amendments. Subject to the rights of
lenders as set forth in the Article of this Declaration entitled
69
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS nv 10/22/96
313
"RIGHTS OF MORTGAGEES," this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions may be amended only by the affirmative assent or
vote of both (a) sixty-seven percent (67%) of the voting power of
the Corporation, including the voting power of the Declarant, and
(b) sixty-seven percent (67%) of the voting power of Members
other than Declarant; provided, however, that the percentage of-·
voting power necessary to amend a specific clause or provision
shall not be less than the percentage of affirmative votes
prescribed for action to be taken under that clause; provided
further, that if the two-class voting structure as provided in
this Declaration is still in effect, this Declaration may not be
amended without the vote or written assent of sixty-seven percent
(67%) of the voting power of each class of Members. This
amendment provision shall not be amended to allow amendments by
the assent or vote of less than the prescribed percentage of
voting power required for amendments hereof; provided, however,
that in compliance with Civil Code Section 1356(a), the Board of
Directors of the Corporation or any owner of a Lot may petition
the Superior Court of San Diego County for an order reducing the
percentage of the affirmative votes necessary for such amendment.
An amendment or modification shall be effective when executed by
the President and Secretary of the Corporation who shall certify
that the amendment or modification has been approved as
hereinabove provided, and recorded in the Official Records of San
Diego County, California.
Section 5. Nonliability of Officials. To the
fullest extent permitted by law, neither the Board, the
Architectural Committee, any other committees of the Corporation
or any member of such Board or committee shall be liable to any
Member of the Corporation for any damage, loss or prejudice
suffered or claimed on account of any decision, approval or
disapproval of plans or specifications (whether or not
defective), course of action, act, omission, error, negligence or
the like, made in good faith within which such Board, committees
or persons reasonably believed to be the scope of their duties.
Section 6. Construction. The provisions of this
Declaration shall be liberally construed to effectuate its
purpose of creating a uniform plan for the development of a
residential community or tract and for the maintenance of the
Common Area. The Article and Section headings have been inserted
for convenience only, and shall not be considered or referred to
in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.
Section 7. Singular Includes Plural. Whenever the
context of this Declaration requires same, the singular shall
include the plural and the masculine shall include the feminine.
Section 8. Nuisance. The result of every act or
omission, whereby-any provision, condition, restriction, cove-
nant, easement or reservation contained in this Declaration is
violated in whole or in part, is hereby declared to be and con-
stitutes a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law or equity
70
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/01/96
against a nuisance, either public or private, shall be applicable
against every such result, and may be exercised by the
Architectural Committee, the Corporation, or ariy other land owner
in the Properties. Such remedy shall be deemed cumulative and
not exclusive.
section 9. Corporation Management Document
Conflicts. In case of any conflict between provisions of any of
the Corporation Management Documents with the provisions of
another Corporation Management Document, the order of superiority
of such documents shall be (1) Declaration, (2) Articles, (3)
Bylaws, (4) Architectural Guidelines, and (5) Corporation Rules,
and the provisions of any such documents shall be superseded by
the provisions of the documents shown to be the superior to such
document to the extent of such conflict.
Section 10. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any
controversy or claim respecting this Declaration, or in
connection-with the enforcement of this Declaration, the
prevailing parties shall be entitled, in addition to all
expenses, costs and damages, to reasonable attorneys' fees,
whether or not such controversy or claim is litigated and
prosecuted to judgment.
Section 11. The Declaration. By acceptance of a
deed or by acquiring any ownership interest in any of the real
property included within this Declaration, each person or entity,
for himself or itself, his heirs, personal representatives,
successors, transferees and assigns, binds himself, his heirs,
personal representatives, successors, transferees and assigns, to
all of the provisions, restrictions, covenants, conditions, rules
and regulations now or hereafter imposed by this Declaration and
any amendments thereof. In addition, each such person by so
doing thereby acknowledges that this Declaration sets forth a
general scheme for the improvement and development of the real
property covered hereby, and hereby evidences their intent that
all the restrictions, conditions, covenants, rules and
regulations contained herein shall run with the land and be
binding on all subsequent and future owners, grantees,
purchasers, assignees, and transferees thereof. Furthermore,
each such person fully understands and acknowledges that this
Declaration shall be mutually beneficial, prohibitive and
enforceable by the various subsequent and future owners.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the
Declarant herein, has executed this Declaration on the day and
year first above written.
71
GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.,
a Delawar~,;P-Jr~tion
By: L,/1.c/,,,,....,:1..--p.._,;t.-~----
~ts: Oivision President
F:\REAL\622\16369008\CC&RS rev 10/22/96
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXABLE AREA
That certain real property located in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, state of California, described as follows:
All the Parcels within Parcel Map No. 17744, filed in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 5, 1996 as File
No. 1996-0450805,, of Official Records, excepting therefrom Phase 1
of the Properties.