HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 2019-0032; LOVE RESIDENCE; FINAL SOILS REPORT; 2021-05-26
May 26, 2021
Project No. 8787.1
Log No. 21450
Elite Home Construction, Inc.
2386 Ivy Road
Oceanside, California 92054
Attention: Mr. Corey Love
Subject: AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Proposed Single-Family Residence
4615 Telescope Avenue
Carlsbad, California
References: Attached
Dear Mr. Love:
In accordance with your request, we have performed geotechnical services in conjunction
with grading at the subject site. Our services consisted generally of the following:
Observation and density testing during grading.
Observation of footing excavations.
Observation and density testing of retaining wall backfill.
Laboratory testing.
Engineering and geologic analyses.
The preparation of this report, which presents the results of our testing and
observations, and our conclusions and recommendations.
GRADING OPERATIONS
Grading was performed on February 5, 2021.Grading for the upper building pad
consisted generally of 1 to 1.5 feet of removals of existing disturbed terrace deposits
down to approved undisturbed terrace deposits and replacement as compacted fill in order
to achieve design finish grades. The garage level was cut to design finish grade exposing
undisturbed terrace deposits. The attached Plot Plan, Plate No. 1 indicates the
approximate limits of grading addressed by this report. The earthwork was performed by
SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY HYDROGEOLOGY
(760) 931-1917 Fax (760) 931-0545
333 Third Stree Laguna Beach, CA 9265 (949) 715-5440 Fax (949) 715-5442
Carlsbad, CA 92008-43695365 Avenida Encinas, Suite A
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
www.hetheringtonengineering.com
AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Project No. 8787.1
Log No. 21450
May 26, 2021
Page 2
Elite Home Construction, Inc. utilizing grading plans prepared by Sampo Engineering,
dated October 15, 2020.
SITE PREPARATION
Prior to grading, the site was cleared of existing surface obstructions, vegetation and
debris. Within the areas of proposed construction, existing disturbed terrace deposits
were removed down to approved undisturbed terrace deposits. Following removals, the
exposed soils were scarified to a depth of 6 to 8-inches, brought to near optimum
moisture conditions and compacted to at least 90-percent relative compaction as
determined by ASTM: D 1557.
SOIL TYPES
The soils utilized as fill consisted of on-site soil. The on-site soil was composed generally
of orange brown silty sand.
FILL PLACEMENT
Fill soils were placed in 6 to 8-inch thick, near horizontal lifts, moisture conditioned to
near optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90-percent relative
compaction as determined by ASTM: D 1557. Compaction was achieved by mechanical
means using a Cat skid steer loader. A water hose was used for moisture conditioning.
FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS
Foundation excavations for the retaining walls were observed by an engineer from this
office. Footings were founded in approved terrace deposits as recommended and
dimensioned in accordance with the foundation plan by Cosart Engineering, dated
November 26, 2019 (Reference 3).
RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls were provided with backdrains consisting of 4-inch diameter, Schedule
40 perforated pipe surrounded by approximately 1-cubic-foot per lineal foot of 3/4-inch
crushed rock, all wrapped in filter fabric.
On-site soils were placed from the top of the backdrain to finished grade in 6 to 8-inch
thick, near horizontal lifts, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Project No. 8787.1
Log No. 21450
May 26, 2021
Page 3
compacted by mechanical means to a minimum of 90-percent relative compaction as
determined by ASTM: D1557.
Density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM: D 6938 (Nuclear Method). The
results of the density tests are presented on the attached Summary of Field Density Tests,
Table I. The approximate locations of the field density tests are indicated on the
accompanying Plot Plan, Plate 1. Maximum dry density/optimum moisture content
determinations are presented on the attached Summary of Maximum Dry
Density/Optimum Moisture Content Determinations, Table II.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our observations and the results of our testing, it is our opinion that the grading
of the site has been performed in general conformance with our recommendations and the
requirements of the city of Carlsbad. The portion of the site addressed by this report is
considered suitable for the intended use. The recommendations for the proposed
construction provided in the “Geotechnical Investigation…” (Reference 1) remain
applicable.
LIMITATIONS
Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under
similar circumstances, by reputable Geotechnical Consultants practicing in this or similar
localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and
professional advice included in this report.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions,
please call this office.
Sincerely,
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
Mark D. Hetherington Edwin R. Cunningham
Civil Engineer 30488 Civil Engineer 81687
Geotechnical Engineer 397 (expires 3/31/22)
(expires 3/31/22)
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Project No. 8787.1
Log No. 21450
May 26, 2021
Page 4
Jose Pimentel
Engineer In Training
Attachments: Plot Plan Plate No. 1
Summary of Field Density Tests Table I
Summary of Maximum Dry Density/ Table II
Optimum Moisture Content Determinations
Distribution: 3-Addressee
1-Via e-mail (elitehomeconstruction@yahoo.com)
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
REFERENCES
Project No. 8787.1
Log No. 21450
1. “Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single-Family Residence, 4615 Telescope
Avenue, Carlsbad, California”, by Hetherington Engineering, Inc., dated March
11, 2019.
2. “Grading Plan for Love Residence, Carlsbad, CA”, prepared by Sampo
Engineering, dated October 15, 2020
3. “ Foundation Plan, 4615 Telescope Avenue, Carlsbad, CA”, prepared by Cosart
Engineering, dated November 26, 2019.
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.
FG: Finish Grade Project No. 8787.1
RW: Retaining wall Log No. 21450
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
(ASTM: D 6938)
Test
No.
Test Date Remarks Soil
Type
Elevation
(feet)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Moisture
Content
(%)
Relative
Compaction (%)
1 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 114.6 13.6 90
2 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 115.4 11.2 91
3 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 116.5 11.9 91
4 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 125.6 8.6 98
5 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 121.8 10.0 96
6 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 118.4 9.2 93
7 2/5/21 FG 1 298.3 116.0 9.0 91
8 5/25/21 RW 1 298.0 114.8 8.6 90
9 5/25/21 RW 1 298.0 116.0 11.7 91
10 5/25/21 RW 1 296.0 115.5 8.1 91
11 5/25/21 RW 1 294.0 115.3 9.8 90
FG: Finish Grade Project No. 8787.1
RW: Retaining wall Log No. 21450
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY/OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT
DETERMINATIONS
(ASTM: D 1557)
Soil Type Description Maximum Dry
Density (pcf)
Optimum Moisture
Content (%)
1 Orange brown silty sand 127.5 10.0
N
PLOT PLAN
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING,INC.
PROJECT NO. PLATE NO.
012
5 1015200
SC
A
L
E
:
1
"
=
1
0
'
LEGEND
8787.1
4615 Telescope AvenueCarlsbad, California
1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DENSITY TEST
APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF CLEANOUT BOTTOM (FEET)
11
297.0
297.0
297.0
297.3
6
10
5
7
8 11
1
4
3 2
9
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF GRADING
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF GRADING