HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 2020-0005; CHILDREN'S PARADISE PRESCHOOL; FINAL SOILS REPORT; 2025-08-18Project No. FC-23-04-124
August 18, 2025
Ms. Julie Lowen
Children's Paradise
211 Main Street, Suite 205
Vista, California 92084
6116 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
3129 Tiger Run Court, Suite 111
Carlsbad, California 92010
Office: (760) 602-7815
smsgeosol.inc@gmail.com
Subject: Final Report of Grading Observations and Soil Testing
New Children's Paradise Preschool
Marron Road, Carlsbad, California
(Project No. SDP2020-0005, Drawing No. 536-?A)
Per the request of Mr. Jerry Condron and as required by the City of Carlsbad, 6116
Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. hereby presents this final report of grading observations and
soil testing performed on subject property. Our firm previously issued a Report of As-
Graded Geotechnical Engineering Observations and Compaction Testing for the subject
project on June 10, 2023. Our firm also prepared a Report of Geotechnical Investigation
And Borehole Percolation Testing report dated January 29, 2019 and the following
additional supplementary documentation:
1. "Response to City of Carlsbad Review Comments, Geotechnical Addendum, Delta
2 Construction Change, Planned Eastern Short Retaining Wall Along The Walmart
Property Boundary, Children Paradise Preschool, Marron Road, Carlsbad,
California," Project No. FC-23-04-124, dated November 14, 2024
2. "Geotechnical Addendum, Delta 2 Construction Change, Planned Eastern Short
Retaining Wall Along The Walmart Property Boundary, Children Paradise Preschool,
Marron Road, Carlsbad, California," Project No. FC-23-04-124, dated November 4,
2024
3. "Geotechnical Foundation Plan Review, Proposed Shade Structures, Children
Paradise Preschool, Marron Road, Carlsbad, California," Project No. FC-23-04-124,
dated October 5, 2024
R18 C1077 D3740 E329
AASH I □
ACCREDITED
Final Report of Grading Observations and Soil Testing August 18, 2025
Marron Road, Carlsbad (Project No. SDP2020-0005, Drawing No. 536-7A) Page 2
4. "Geotechnical Plan Review And Response to Third-Party Review Comments,
Proposed Children Paradise Preschool, Quarry Creek Development, Marron Road,
Carlsbad, California," prepared by 6M.6Geotechnical Solutions, Inc., Project No. Gl-
19-11-155, dated May 28, 2022
5. "Geotechnical Foundation Plan Review, Proposed Children Paradise Preschool,
Quarry Creek Development, Marron Road, Carlsbad, California," prepared by 6Jl6
Geotechnical Solutions, Inc., Project No. Gl-19-11-155, dated June 25, 2020
PREVIOUS FIELD OBSERVATIONS
As previously stated, 6M.6Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. had previously prepared a Report
of As-Graded Geotechnical Engineering Observations and Compaction Testing for the
project. In summary, our representative observed during rough grading the soil removals
down to competent.soil material and soil recompaction of the building pad soils. For more
detailed information on the work performed between April 11, 2023 through May 16, 2023,
refer to our report dated June 10, 2023 (Revised August 11, 2025).
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
The following observations and soil testing during final grading were performed between
June 10, 2023 and July 16, 2025. The earthwork was performed in accordance with the
recommendations presented in our original report dated January 29, 2019 and additional
supplementary documentation referenced herein.
1 . Our representative observed base placement and performed compaction for the
main entry curb & Gutter and driveway approach. Observations and testing
indicated at least 95% compaction levels as presented in memos issued to the
contractor/ contractor's representative on July 16, 2025.
2. Our representative observed the bearing soils for the building, retaining wall and
shade structure footings. The footing excavations were observed to be founded in
suitable recompacted fill or dense formational soils. Footing trench observation
memos were issued to the contractor/ contractor's representative on May 13, 2025,
May 2, 2025, March 25, 2024, November 14, 2023, October 11, 2023 and October
9, 2023.
Final Report of Grading Observations and Soil Testing August 18, 2025
Marron Road, Carlsbad (Project No. SDP2020-0005, Drawing No. 536-7 A) Page 3
3. Our representative was requested to observe the backfill placement for the sewer
trench backfill, storm drain and manhole backfill, parking lot pavement subgrade
over-excavation and recompaction. Wall backcuts mostly exposed native
bedrock/ground and did not require major backfilling. Small wedge of backfill
behind the wall consisted of¾" crushed rocks above the backdrainage system.
Retaining walls perforated pipe backdrainage system was also observed by our
representative( s ), however, waterproofing or sealing observations were beyond the
scope of our work. Field memos summarizing field observations and compaction
test results were issued to the contractor/ contractor's representative.
4. Other works not listed herein including final parking lot asphalt paving structural
section subgrade/base/asphalt placement, the curb and gutter soil subgrade,
remaining sitework improvements and wet and dry utility trench backfill observations
and compaction testing were performed by another consultant. The testing
consultant or laboratory should submit under a separate report the related
engineering observations and testing results prepared by the responsible engineer
in charge.
SOIL TESTING
Representative soil samples were collected during grading to determine laboratory
maximum dry density of the soils per ASTM D1557, presented as Maximum Dry Density
& Optimum Moisture Content List, Figure 2. Field density tests were performed at
approximate locations shown on Figure 1, Approximate Compaction Test Location Map.
The complete list of density test results are presented as Compaction Test Results, Figures
3 and 4.
Equipment used for soil compaction included CAT DB Bulldozer and a CAT 963 Track,
excavator and compaction wheel, track loader, wacker, Bobcat, drill rig (for shade
structures foundations), depending on the operations being carried out. Water was added
with a fire hose.
Field density tests yielded a relative compaction of at least 90 percent or 95 percent, at
tested locations, of the maximum laboratory dry density at the tested locations. Areas with
failed tests were brought to the awareness of the grading contractor and recompacted until
the recommended compaction was achieved. In general, the onsite soils used during
grading consisted of clayey silty sand (SM-SC) deposits ranging to low expansion potential
(Expansion Index less than 50 based on ASTM D4829 classification), as confirmed by
additional expansion index (E.1.) testing of rough finish graded soils.
Final Report of Grading Observations and Soil Testing August 18, 2025
Marron Road, Carlsbad (Project No. SDP2020-0005, Drawing No. 536-7A) Page 4
SITE SUITABILITY AND COMPLIANCE
The observed and tested areas of the project site are, in our professional opinion, suitable
for their intended use. The underlying Tonalite crystalline bedrock is suitable to support
the recompacted fill for the new structures to be built and related exterior sitework
improvements.
We certify that the geotechnical engineering aspects of the grading reported herein are in
compliance with the approved geotechnical report and approved grading plans.
LIMITATIONS
The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with currently
accepted principles and practice in the field of geotechnical engineering in the City of
Carlsbad. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is made.
All statements in this grading report are applicable only for the grading operation observed
and tested by our firm. The firm of 8ll8 Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. shall not be held
responsible for fill soils placed without our observations and testing at any other time, or
subsequent changes to the site by others, which directly or indirectly cause poor surface
or subsurface drainage, water erosion, and/or alteration of the strength of the compacted
fill soils.
It is not within the scope of our services to provide quality control oversight for surface or
subsurface drainage construction or retaining wall sealing and base of wall drain
construction. It is the responsibility of the contractor(s) to verify proper wall sealing,
geofabric installation, protection board installation (if needed), drain depth below interior
floor or yard· surfaces, pipe percent slope to the outlet, etc.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of the building or
improvements are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
should not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of
this report modified or verified in writing.
Final Report of Grading Observations and Soil Testing August 18, 2025
Marron Road, Carlsbad (Project No. SDP2020-0005, Drawing No. 536-7A) Page 5
If you have any questions or need clarification, please contact this office at your
convenience. Reference to our Project No. FC-23-04-124 will help to expedite our
response to your inquiries.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
Respectfully submitted;
6Jf6Geotechnical Solutions, Inc.
·ncipal Engineer
Attachments:
Approximate Compaction Tests Location Map, Figure 1
Laboratory Maximum Dry Density & Optimum Moisture Content List, Figure 2
Compaction Test Results, Figures 3 and 4
Distribution: Addressee (3, email)
6.IISGeotechnical Solutions, Inc.
Laboratory Maximum Dry Density & Optimum Moisture Content List
(ASTM D1557)
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
REPORT DATED:
Test Results:
Soil Type (1 ):
Maximum Dry Density:
Optimum Moisture:
FC-23-04-124
Children's Paradise Preschool
Marron Road, Carlsbad
August 18, 2025
Dark Brown Clayey Silty Sand
127.0 PCF
11.0%
FIGURE 2
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT LOCATION:
REPORT DATED:
COMPACTION TEST RESUL_TS
FC-23-04-124
Children's Paradise Preschool
Marron Road, Carlsbad
August 18, 2025
FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D6938):
Approximate Approximate Field Fleld
Date Test No. Test Test Moisture Dry Soll
Elevation (MSL) Density Type Location (ft) (%) (pcf)
04/13/2023 1 Pad Area 134'± 11.8 120.4 1
04/13/2023 2 Pad Area 134'± 12.4 119.7 1
04/13/2023 3 Pad Area 135.5'± 14.1 114.3 1
04/13/2023 4 Pad Area 136.5'± 11 .8 119.0 1
04/13/2023 5 Pad Area 137'± 12.2 120.0 1
04/13/2023 6 Pad Area 135.5'± 12.3 118.1 1
04/13/2023 7 Pad Area 136'± 11 .9 120.9 1
04/14/2023 8 Pad Area 138'± 12.1 118.6 1
04/14/2023 9 Pad Area 138'± 12.4 117.3 1
04/14/2023 10 Pad Area 138'± 13.0 114.5 1
04/25/2023 11 Pad Area 134'± 13.5 116.9 1
04/25/2023 12 Pad Area 134'± 13.6 118.1 1
04/26/2023 13 Pad Area 136'± 13.5 119.9 1
04/26/2023 14 Pad Area 136'± 13.2 120.0 1
04/27/2023 15 Pad Area 134'± 12.8 115.5 1
04/27/2023 16 Pad Area 134'± 11 .8 118.0 1
SJISGeotechnical Solutions, Inc.
Max. Relative Dry Compaction Comments Density
(Dcfl (%)
127.0 95 Bottom of Over-Ex@ 132.5'±
127.0 94
127.0 90
127.0 94
127.0 94
127.0 93
127.0 95
127.0 93
127.0 92
127.0 90
127.0 92
127.0 93
127.0 94
127.0 94
127.0 91
127.0 93
FIGURE 3
FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS (ASTM D6938):
Approximate Approximate Fleld Fleld Max. Relative
Date Test No. Test Test Moisture Dry Soll Dry Compaction Comments
Location Elevation (MSL) (ft) (%) Density Type Density (%) (pcf) (pcf.)
04/28/2023 17 Pad Area 136'± 11.2 119.1 1 127.0 94
04/28/2023 18 Pad Area 136'± 13.9 118.3 1 127.0 93
05/01/2023 19 Pad Area 138'± 12.9 117.0 1 127.0 92
05/01/2023 20 Pad Area 138'± 12.5 118.3 1 127.0 93
05/11/2023 21 Pad Area Rough Finish Grade 10.8 118.4 1 127.0 93
05/11/2023 22 Pad Area Rough Finish Grade 11.4 117.3 1 127.0 92
05/11/2023 23 Pad Area Rough Finish Grade 11.9 119.1 1 127.0 94
05/11/2023 24 Pad Area Rough Finish Grade 10.7 115.5 1 127.0 91
05/11/2023 25 Parking Lot Rough Finish Grade 13.5 120.7 1 127.0 95 Bottom of Over-Ex@ 136.5'±
05/15/2023 26 Trash Enclosure Rough Finish Grade 12.1 124.1 1 127.0 98
05/15/2023 27 Parking Lot Rough Finish Grade 12.9 123.0 1 127.0 97
05/16/2023 28 Parking Lot Rough Finish Grade 12.8 120.9 1 127.0 95
05/16/2023 29 Parking Lot Rough Finish Grade 12.0 123.1 1 127.0 97
06/08/2023 30 Storm Drain Trench Rough Finish Grade 10.9 116.9 1 127.0 92
06/08/2023 31 Storm Drain Trench Rough Finish Grade 11 .5 116.5 1 127.0 92
07/17/2023 32 Sewer Trench Rough Finish Grade 11.0 118.0 1 127.0 93
07/17/2023 33 Sewer Trench Rough Finish Grade 12.0 118.9 1 127.0 94
07/17/2023 34 Sewer Trench Rough Finish Grade 10.4 116.7 1 127.0 92
07/16/2025 35 Curb & Gutter, Finish Base Grade 11 .5 113.8 2 119.0 96
Driveway Approach
07/16/2025 36 Driveway Approach Finish Base Grade 10.8 113.1 2 119.0 95
6.IILGeote<thnical Solutions, Inc.
FIGURE 4
GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND
A pprox. Limits of G rading/
t:om p acted F Iiis
Approx. Compaction Test:
Locet:l on
1FHI / Tonalite (Bedrock)
o . : FC-23-04-124
rt of Grading
Ot'J ---bated:: ausi 202s
.,
,--
··-·:~~-~: :;:_:;;;~~==·--~ \ 1
.--• ---,o
• --·--I I '
.. ..
ACTION TESTS LOCATION M
l SCALE 1"=50'
----------r-----
E------19 4r
.. .
.>0. ·.j ! -~---.--'---.,i . : \ ,••· =
'· /ft~
I,
-IMU t>-.J
I.JOO 0.:,
IP,11 IJIS.00 ·-c-,
ll5.17 1.HJIII , .. 1118 O#}IMU c-, ,.a.,o , .... ., 1'477 --. t>-.J
141.4.J 1.1&70 1,17,.., t>-.J , .. .., ,.-,o , .. ,o t?oGIMU 0.:,
H IJU4 ll.UO U7.50 l[lal/lMU c-,
14'.li ll&OO IJ7,,0 O-;J
141.li IJll.QO I.J:l.<.t 0.:,
IG.lf uuo ,.a,7 rM>IWL O-;J
141.87 141.$11 ·-IIElallWL 0-2
141.87 IAIIO IP,00 C-2
141.D ., . .,., _,,, 0-1 ,a. .. ,_ l;Jf.31 0-2
142.H , .. ,,, ..... EMI IIMU. C-1
14.UI u,.,o IJUII --14.ff I.JUI , .. ,.,
,a.a 140.10 , .. .,
l<UII ffG.10 IJUII ,_ 141UO 1.JUO ·-f,O.,O IJUII EMIIIMU.
loH.71 , ... ,. IJaU BEtllN IMIL 0-!I
144.71 IJll.rl , .... £No IIOtL 0-/1
loH.71 , .. ,. , .... IIElMIMI.I.
y loH.71 , .. ,. , .... £No ll4U
• IIASONRY FENCE WAI.L {/IA)(. HEIG/iraJ2"
"AS BUILT" --------
-·--·-
REVISION DESCRIPllON DAll NIW. DAlE' NM.
GINDlllffll1,I/IL Cffl'MIIIIO'IW.