Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3485 MADISON ST; ; AS130131; Permit5/30/25,2:46 PM AS 130131 Permit Data City of Carlsbad Sprinkler Permit Job Address: 3485 MADISON ST Permit Type: SPRINK Parcel No: 2041720900 Lot #: 0 Permit No: AS130131 Status: APPROVED Applied 8/1/2013 Approved: 8/12/2013 Reference No.: Issued: 8/12/2013 PC #: Inspector: Project Title: SALATKA RESIDENCE NEW 13D FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 2-STORY Applicant: CROWN FIRE PROTECTION, INC UNIT "F" 25651 TALADRO CR MISSION VIEJO, CA 714-822-4098 Owner: SALATKA ROBERT&CAROL 457 ARDEN DR ENCINITAS CA Fees ($) Add'I Fees ($) Total ($) Balance ($) 470 0 470 0 about:blank 1/1 Copyright 2013 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Licensed, by agreement, for Individual use and single download on May 19, 2013 to CROWN FIRE PROTECTION INC for designated user William G. Cain. No other reproduction or transmission In any form permitted without written permission of NFPA. For Inquires or to report unauthorized use, contact Ilcenslng@ntpa.org. 230 NFPA 13R . Chapter 10 . System Acceptance AS V-~0131 Nq ~ -~- a----50 1 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Aboveground Piping PROCEDURE Upon completion of work, inspection and tests shall be made by the contractor's representative and witnessed by an owner's All defects be representative. shall corrected and system left in service before contractor's personnel finally leave the job. A certificate shall be filled out and signed by both representatives. Copies shall be prepared for approving authorities, owners, and contractor. It is understood the owner's representative's signature in no way prejudices any claim against contractor for faulty materialpOor workmanship, or failure to comply with approving authority's requirements or local ordinances. Property name 5PLAT-iAA R Date Property address p cI6LLAb, CA Accepted by approving authorities (names) Fl RE. Address Plans Installation conforms to accepted plans ';<Yes [Ti No Equipment used is approved Yes LII No If no, explain deviations Has person in charge of fire equipment been instructed as 'Yes No to location of control valves and care and maintenance of this new equipment? If no, explain Instructions Have copies of the following been left on the premises? System components instructions Yes No Care and maintenance instructions Yes El No NFPA 25 X Yes El No Location of system Supplies buildings Year of - Orifice Temperature Make Model manufacture size Quantity rating SETh 5S41 Z.O(3 Tf VZ 91 Sprinklers RL%A8LI.. 91,716 ILO 17- ___ 7 7-060 Pipe and Type of pipe Type of fittings fittings Maximum time to operate Alarm Alarm device through test connection valve or flow Type Make Model Minutes Seconds indicator Dry valve 0.0.0. Make Model Serial no. Make Model Serial no. Dry pipe Time to trip . Time water Alarm operating through test Water Air Trap point reached operated test connectiont pressure pressure air pressure test outlett properly Minutes Seconds psi psi psi Minutes I Seconds Yes No ithout IW3).0.0. With If no, explain t Measured from the time inspector's test connection is opened © 2010 National Fire Protection Association NFPA 13R (p. 1 of 3) FIGURE 10.1.2 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Aboveground Piping. 2010 Automatic Sprinkler Systems for Residential Occupancies Handbook Copyright 2013 National $:ire Protection Association (NEPA). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and single download on May 19, 2013 to CROWN FIRE PROTECTION INC for designated user William CL Cain. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA. For Inquires or to report unauthorized use, contact licensing@nfpa.org. Section 10.1 • Approval of Sprinkler Systems 231 Operation LI Pneumatic LI Electric LI Hydraulic Piping supervised LI Yes LI No Detecting media supervised LI Yes LII No Does valve operate from the manual trip, remote, or both LI Yes LI No control stations? Deluge and reaction Is there an accessible facility in each circuit if no, explain valves for testing? LI_ Yes LI_No 4 IA Does each circuit operate Does each circuit operate Maximum time to Model supervision loss alarm? valve release? operate release Yes No Yes No Minutes Seconds Location Make and Residual pressure Pressure- and floor model Setting Static pressure (flowing) Flow rate reducing valve lest Inlet (psi) Outlet (psi) inlet (psi) Outlet (psi) Flow (gpm) rlrngtsti Hydrostatic tests shall be made i00pc (1&-ar) for 2 hours or 50 psi (3.4 bar) above S aic pressure in excess of 150 psi (10.2 bar) for 2 hours. Differential dry-pipe valve clappers shall be left open during the test to prevent damage. All aboveground piping leakage shall be stopped. Test description Pnpllm2lirr Establish 40 psi (2.7 bar) air pressure and measure drop, which shall not exceed 11/2 psi (0.1 bar) in 24 hours. Test pressure tanks at normal water level and air pressure and measure air pressure drop, which shall not exceed 11/2 psi (0.1 bar) in 24 hours. All piping hydrostatically tested at si (—. ba!)jpr .t_ hours Dry tested Li if no, state reason piping pneumatically Yes No IJ /4 Equipment operates properly Yes LI No Do you certify as the sprinkler contractor that additives and corrosive chemicals, sodium silicate or derivatives of sodium silicate, brine, or other corrosive chemicals were not used for testing systems or stopping leaks? Yes LI No Drain Reading of gauge located near water Residual pressure with valve in test Tests test supply test connection: psi (— bar) connection open wide: psi (_bar) Underground mains and lead-in connections to system risers flushed before connection made to sprinkler piping verified by a copy of the "Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Underground Piping." "'Yes LI No Other Explain Flushed by installer of underground sprinkler piping 'Yes LI No If powder-driven fasteners are used in concrete, LI Yes LI No If no, explain has representative sample testing been satisfactorily completed? Blank testing Number used Locations Number removed gaskets Welding piping LI Yes If yes Do you certify as the sprinkler contractor that welding procedures comply LI Yes LI No with the requirements of at least AWS B2.1? Do you certify that the welding was performed by welders qualified in LI Yes LI No Welding compliance with the requirements of at least AWS B2.1? I. jA Do you certify that the welding was carried out in compliance with a documented quality control procedure to ensure that all discs are retrieved, that openings in piping are smooth, that slag and other welding residue are removed, and that LI Yes LI No the internal diameters of piping are not penetrated? Cutouts Do you certify that you have a control feature to ensure that LI es Y LI No (discs) all cutouts (discs) are retrieved? © 2010 National Fire Protection Association NFPA 13R (p. 2 of 3) FIGURE 10.1.2 Continued Automatic Sprinkler Systems for Residential Occupancies Handbook 2010 Copyright 2013 National hre Protection Association (NFPA). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and single download on May 19, 2013 to CROWN FIRE PROTECTION INC for designated user William G. Cain. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA. For inquires or to report unauthorized use, contact Iicensing@nfpa.org. 232 NFPA 13R • Chapter 10 • System Acceptance Hydraulic Nameplate provided If no, explain data nameplate LI Yes Eli] No Date left in service with all control valves open Remarks Name of sprinkler contractor Tests witnessed witnessed by Signatures For property owner (signed) Title Date For sprinkler contractor (signed) Title Date Additional explanations and notes © 2010 National Fire Protection Association NFPA 138 (p. 3 of 3) FIGURE 10.1.2 Continued authority having jurisdiction desires to witness the tests, the installer should provide sufficient advance notice. Failure to do so may require that the tests be repeated. 10.2 Acceptance Tests 10.2.1* Flushing of Underground Connections. A.10.2.1 Underground mains and lead-in connections to system risers are required to be flushed before a connection is made to sprinkler piping in order to remove any foreign mate- rials that have entered the underground piping during the course of the installation. 10.2.1.1 Underground mains and lead-in connections to system risers shall be flushed before a connection is made to sprinkler piping. FAQ There are two reasons that underground pipe is required to be flushed prior to aboveground Why are underground mains pipe being connected. First, the underground pipe sometimes gets installed with stones, and lead-in connections gravel, blocks of wood, bottles, work tools, work clothes, and other objects left inside. These required to be flushed prior to connection to aboveground objects need to be removed before water pushes them up into the sprinkler system. Under- pipe? ground pipe tends to be the largest pipe in a fire protection system. The smaller pipe above- ground feeding the sprinkler system might get completely blocked if just one of these objects is not removed and gets pushed into the aboveground pipe when the water fills the system. The second reason that underground pipe needs to be flushed prior to the connection of aboveground pipe is that the underground pipe is sometimes installed by a different contrac- tor than the aboveground pipe. In order to ensure reliability of the system, the aboveground contractor needs to be certain that the appropriate tests have been run on the underground pipe and that it is safe to connect his or her work to that pipe. 10.2.1.2 The flushing operation shall be continued until the water issuing from the main is clear. 2010 Automatic Sprinkler Systems for Residential Occupancies Handbook CROWN FIRE PROTECTION, INC. 29321 SANDALWOOD COURT SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO , CA 92675 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR SALATKA RESIDENCE 3485 MADISON STREET , CARLSBAD FILE NAME : SALATKA RESIDENCE DATE : JULY 26, 2013 -DESIGN DATA- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: DENSITY: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: NAME OF CONTRACTOR: DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: RESIDENTIAL N/A 2 MOST REMOTE S 16FT X 16FT 2 sprinklers 26.2 gpin 31.2 gpm 31.2 gpin @ 30.5 7/16 inch CROWN FIRE PROT 0 own g m - C ID .1D - T? dfluDm0 .0 CL CD V m gm a: •°- z ca Co IOi W.G.C. CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM (LICENSE # 49081069 HRS SYSTEMS, INC. REVIEWED These pins rind/or calculations have been reviewed and were found to be in substantial conformance with the following guidelines, NFPA1 3Q_424-othef.-- Final approvI of these plans and/or calculations is subject to acceptance By th• ority Having Jurisdiction'. Date As (-~> 0 ( I 100. 0 G 80.0 A U G E P 60.0 R E 2 S U R E 40.0 WATER SUPPLY ANALYSIS Static: 75.60 psi Resid: 69.30 psi Flow: 1210.0 gpm LEGEND i Available pressure 75.59 psi @ 31.2 gpm 2 Required pressure 51.28 psi @ 31.2 gpm Source Supply Curve System Demand Curve p S i 20.0 B 0.0 -14.7 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 FLOW (GPM) (Note: Dashed Lines indicate extrapolated values from Test Results) SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3 DATE: 7/30/2013 C:\PROGRAM FILES\HRS SYSTEMS\HASS83\SALATKA RESIDENCE.SDF JOB TITLE: SALATKA RESIDENCE NFPA WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) S 75.6 69.3 1210.0 75.6 31.2 51.3 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 31.2 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 0.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 5.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 26.2 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 21.0 K= 4.90 7.0 13.0 2 21.0 K= 4.90 7.3 13.2 3 21.0 - - - - 7.6 - - - 4 21.0 - - - - 10.1 TR 21.0 - - - - 14.8 Fl 6.0 - - - - 23.6 F2 6.0 - - - - 26.6 BR 0.0 HOSE STREAM 30.5 5.0 Ui 0.0 - - - - 31.0 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 33.9 U3 0.0 - - - - 38.9 U4 0.0 - - - - 43.4 U5 0.0 - - - - 47.9 - - - S 0.0 SOURCE 51.3 31.2 NOTES SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4 DATE: 7/30/2013 C:\PROGRAM FILES\HRS SYSTEMS\HASS83\SALATKA RESIDENCE.SDF JOB TITLE: SALATKA RESIDENCE NFPA PIPE DATA Pipe Tag K-fac Add Fl Add Fl To Fit: L C (Pt) Frm Node El (ft) PT (q) Node! Nom ID Eq.Ln. F (Pe) r To Node El (ft) PT Tot.(Q) Disch Act ID (ft.) T Pf!ft. (Pf) Pipe: 1 4.90 13.0 Disch 9.50 150 0.6 3 21.0 7.6 0.0 1.000 2L:10.0 10.00 0.0 1 21.0 7.0 13.0 1.101 19.50 0.031 0.6 Pipe: 2 4.90 13.2 Disch 1.00 150 0.3 3 21.0 7.6 0.0 1.000 L: 5.0 10.00 0.0 2 21.0 7.3 13.2 1.101 B: 5.0 11.00 0.032 0.3 Pipe: 3 0.0 0.0 12.00 150 2.5 4 21.0 10.1 26.2 1.000 L: 5.0 10.00 0.0 3 21.0 7.6 26.2 1.101 B: 5.0 22.00 0.112 2.5 Pipe: 4 0.0 0.0 L: 5.0 28.00 150 4.7 TR 21.0 14.8 26.2 3 1.000 B: 5.0 14.00 0.0 4 21.0 10.1 26.2 1.101 4R: 4.0 42.00 0.112 4.7 Pipe: 5 0.0 0.0 15.00 150 8.7 Fl 6.0 23.6 26.2 4 1.000 L: 5.0 5.00 -6.5 TR 21.0 14.8 26.2 1.101 20.00 0.112 2.2 Pipe: 6 0.0 Fixed Pressure Loss Device F2 6.0 26.6 26.2 TR 3.0 psi, 26.2 gpm Fl 6.0 23.6 26.2 Pipe: 7 0.0 0.0 6.00 150 3.9 BR 0.0 30.5 26.2 Fl 1.000 L: 5.0 6.00 -2.6 F2 6.0 26.6 26.2 1.101 C: 1.0 12.00 0.112 1.3 Pipe: 8 H.S. 5.0 Disch 6.00 150 0.5 Ui 0.0 31.0 26.2 F2 1.500 2L:14.0 14.00 0.0 BR 0.0 30.5 31.2 1.598 20.00 0.025 0.5 Pipe: 9 0.0 0.0 104.00 150 2.9 U2 0.0 33.9 31.2 BR 1.500 L: 7.0 10.00 0.0 Ui 0.0 31.0 31.2 1.598 G: 3.0 114.00 0.025 2.9 Pipe: 10 0.0 Fixed Pressure Loss Device U3 0.0 38.9 31.2 Ui 5.0 psi, 31.2 gpm U2 0.0 33.9 31.2 Pipe: 11 0.0 0.0 14.00 150 4.4 U4 0.0 43.4 31.2 U2 1.000 L: 2.3 3.50 0.0 U3 0.0 38.9 31.2 0.995 G: 1.2 17.50 0.254 4.4 Pipe: 12 0.0 0.0 18.00 150 4.6 U5 0.0 47.9 31.2 U3 1.000 ---- 0.00 0.0 U4 0.0 43.4 31.2 0.995 18.00 0.254 4.6 Pipe: 13 Source 0.0 5.00 150 3.3 S 0.0 51.3 31.2 U4 1.000 B: 7.0 8.18 0.0 U5 0.0 47.9 31.2 0.995 G: 1.2 13.18 0.254 3.3 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5 DATE: 7/30/2013 C:\PROGRAM FILES\HRS SYSTEMS\HASS83\SALATKA RESIDENCE.SDF JOB TITLE: SALATKA RESIDENCE NOTES (HASS) Calculations were performed by the HASS 8.4 computer program under license no. 49081069 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 208 Southside Square Petersburg, TN 37144 (931) 659-9760 The system has been calculated to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.002 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.028 gpm. Total pressure at each node is used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 12.9 ft/sec at pipe 12. Items listed in bold print on the cover sheet are automatically transferred from the calculation report. Available pressure at source node S under full flow conditions is 75.59 psi compared to the minimum required pressure of 20.00 psi. PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: * MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D N Eli Tee LngEii ChkVlv BfyVlv GatVlv AlmChk DPViv NPTee 0.995 1.55 3.87 1.55 3.87 4.64 0.77 7.73 7.73 3.87 PAGE: F MATERIAL: CPVC HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E L B R C S G 45 El BrT RunT Cpig SwCk Gate 1.101 1.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 1.598 2.00 7.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 14.00 3.00 FLOW TEST SUMMARY REPORT pagel LOCATION :3485:MäisonStTret DATE: 7-11-13 Carlsbad, CA TIME: 8:00 AM Static Hydrant Number: 1 Flowing Hydrant Number: 2 Elevation: 0 Elevation: 0 Dist. Between Hydrants: Diameter of Main: - 8 Outlet Diameter: 2.50 in Number flowing: 1 Coeff.: 0.90 Static pressure: 84.00 psi Residual pressure: 77.00 psi Pitot Reading: 52.00 psi Flow: 1210.4 gpm Flow at 20 psi: 4003.0 gpm GRAPH: PSI I I 100 + I 90 +/Normal Pressure-No Flow-84.00 psi I S\\ /Test Flow-1210.4 gpm-77.00 psi I 80 + \\R. I 70 + .... I 60 + : 50 + ...............I 40 + 30 + .... I 20 + Avail. Flow @ 20 psi=4003.0 gpm I 10 + 0 +-+---+----+-----+------+.---------+--------+---------+-----------+ 9001350 1800 2250 2700 3150 3600 4050 4500 FLOW (GPM) NOTES: Flowing hydrant is assumed to be on a circulating main or downstream of the pressure test hydrant on a dead-end system. Flow analysis assumes a gravity flow system with no distribution pumps and having no demand, other than the test flow. Distance between hydrants, elevations & main diameter are for information only. FLOW TEST SUMMARY REPORT page2 100.0 Normal Pressure-No Flow-84.00 psi Test Flow-1210.4 gpm-77.00 psi N N N N N N N N N N N N o N N N N N N 0-- P 30. 0-- S 1 0 Avail. Flow @ 20 psi=4003.0 gpm' 70. 60. P R 50. E S 40. 10. 8501275 1700 2125 2550 2975 3400 3825 4250 FLOW (GPM) .4- (J . RECEIvj3 Carlsbad Municipal Water District JUL 15 2jtabI Water Discharge Event Report 44 Location Mc*i Reason for Discharge Event: Type of Event. . Initial I2iO Dewatering Water Mains N IA- . Estimated Discharge Flow: ---------- GPM Note: includes flow testing and flushing Dewatering Water Mains . Start Time Unscheduled Water Discharge Ji± End Time Clear flow path of debris, surface contaminants and/or hazardous materials. Do not remove native vegetation. . Erosion control, i.e.' sandbags, silt fencing, hay bales, gravel bags, decreasing the velocity of discharged water. Pie-Dechlorination Residual: J), _75 Post-Dechlorination Residual: (Less than 0.1 mg/L) PH within limits of 6.0 and 9.0 Upon completion of dewatering, ensure that the flow path is free of all temporary erosion prevention materials. Upon completion of dewatering, ensure that any sediments or silted areas are cleared. Water Sampling Performed by:------------------- Comments: Submitted by: Reviewed by: (Name & Date) (Name & Date) Flow Test Record Test Hydrant Location 3485 M1tDISOP.I ST. OLS/D, CA Hydrant ID No. Size Main 8 ' Static --- . ......... 64 Residual ......... .-i 7 Pressure Drop., 7(PDII).....K factor for PDll 26 FlowHydrant(s) Hydrant I location Hydrant 2 location Hydrant 3 location Hydrant I Pitot _SZ.PSI GPM: k 0 Ot 0 Size of Orifice 2Yz. Hydrant 2 Pitot . PSI GPM: Size of Orifice__________ Hydrant 3 Pitot PSI GPM: Size of Orifice.__________ Total :J_2___0 ('VI) Calculated test and flow data - 0_xPD2k =Q2 PDI*k Static' .................... 84 Desired Residual ... .... 20 Pressure Drop (PD 2)-1 __________________________________K factor PD 2: 9 2.1O x 45 7fdedby _ equals 39l$ _ GPM at20 psi residual Qi PD2k PD1k .Q2 Comments: Test conducted for: Rfl'LFIRE_SPit.kLEi _STt-4 Conducted by: u...t... Date: 7-_\-t'3 Time: SZo Flow Test Record Formulas GPM-Flow 2 V2" 4" PSI GPM PSI GPM PSI GPM PSI GPM 1 170 16 670 1 430 16 1720 2 240 17 690 2 610 17 1770 3 290 18 710 3 740 18 1820 4 340 19 730 4 860 19 1870 5 380 20 750 5 960 20 1920 6 410 22 790 6 1050 22 2020 7 440 24 820 7 1140 24 2110 8 480 26 860 8 1220 26 2190 9 500 28 890 9 1290 28 2280 10 530 30 920 10 1360 30 2330 11 560 33 950 11 1430 32 2430 12 580 34 980 12 1490 34 2510 13 610 36 1010 13 1550 36 2580 14 630 38 1040 14 1610 38 2650 15 650 40 1060 15 1660 40 2720 0 KFacrorFormula PD K PD K PD K PD K PD K 1= 1.0 21= 5.18 41= 7.43 61= 9.21 81= 10.73 2= 1.45 22= 5.31 42= 7.53 62= 9.29 82= 10.80 3= 1.81 23= 5.44 43= 7.62 63= 9.37 83= 10.87 4= 2.11 24= 5.56 44= 7.72 64= 9.45 84= 10.94 5= 2.39 25= 5.69 45= 7.81 65= 9.53 85= 11.01 6= 2.63 26= 5.81 46= 7.91 66= 9.61 86= 11.08 7= 2.86 27= 5.93 47= 8.00 67= 9.69 87= 11.15 8= 3.07 28= 6.05 48= 8.09 68= 9.76 88= 11.22 9= 3.28 29= 6.16 49= .8.18 69= 9.84 89= 11.29 10= 3.47 30= 6.28 50= 8.27 70= 9.92 90= 11.36 11= 3.65 31= 6.39 51= 8.36 71= 9.99 91= 11.43 1= 3.83 32= 6.50 52= 8.44 72= 10.07 92= 11.49 13= 4.00 33= 6.61 53= 8.53 73= 10.14 93= 11.56 14= 4.16 34= 6.71 54= 8.64 74= 10.22 94= 11.63 15= 4.32 3= 6.82 55= 8.71 75= 10.29 95= 11.69 16= 4.48 36= 6.93 56= 8.79 76= 10.37 96= ' 11.76 17= 4.72 37= 7.03 57= 8.88 77= 10.44 97= 11.83 18= 4.76 38= 7.13 58= 8.96 78= 10.51 98= 11.89 19= 4.90 39= 7.23 59= 9.04 79= ' 10.59 99= 11.96 20= 5.04 40= 7.33 60= 9.12 80= 10.66 100= 12.02 *PD = Pressure drop K = K factor I r-