The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 260B; PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION ! 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: \l.,HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLY) □ Administrative Permit -2nd □ Planned Industrial Permit Dwelling Unit □ Administrative Variance □ Planning Commission Determination □ Coastal Development Permit □ Precise Development Plan [g] Conditional Use Permit (Extension) c__op ?.b()C)K l□ Redevelopment Permit □ Condominium Permit □ Site Development Plan □ Environmental Impact □ Special Use Permit Assessment □ General Plan Amendment □ Specific Plan □ Hillside Development Permit □ +eA:t:a:t:ive PaFeel Maf3 Obtain from Engineering Department □ Local Coastal Plan Amendment □ Tentative Tract Map □ Master Plan □ Variance □ Non-Residential Planned □ Zone Change Development □ Planned Development Permit □ List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 209-050-25 ------------------------------ 3) PROJECT NAME: Extension of CUP 260B ------------------------------ 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Extension of CUP 260B for Palomar Transfer Station 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) County of San Diego Department of Public Works, Airports Division c/o: Rick Jenkins 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Waste Management . c/o: Conrad Pawelski, General Manager MAILING ADDRESS 1960 Joe Crosson Dr. El Cajon, CA 92020 CITY AND STATE San Diego, CA ZIP 92123 MAILING ADDRESS PO Box 947 TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE (858) 956-4800 Carlsbad, CA ZIP TELEPHONE 9~l '5 (858)637-5610 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE, 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Form 16 SIGNATURE DATE A portion of lot A and B of Rancho Aqua ~~fn~~~ding to map 823 filed on November 16, 1986 PAGE 1 OF 2 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRI MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUS1i£E SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ON NE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SU.TED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE East (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN Faraday Avenue (NAME OF STREET) 5960 El Camino Real STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF AND Orion St. (NAME OF STREET) El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~ 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ □15) PROPOSED COMM D SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED □17) PROPOSED INCREASE IND 18) PROPOSED SEWER D PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE B 20) EXISTING GENERAL 021) PROPOSED GENERAL 0 PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING 0 23) PROPOSED ZONING 0 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSP CT AND ENJ'ER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO R FOR THIS URPOSE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID Form 16 FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED .! \N 1 4 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE Pl_~ fi(J~,U~""f{.ECEIVED RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than l 0% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN l 0% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person: Title ------------- Address ____________ _ 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Corp/Part: Waste Management of California Title Address: PO Box 947. Carlsbad, CA 92018 Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit. corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person County of San Diego Title Department of Public Works, Airports __ Division Address 1960 Joe Crosson Drive., El Cajon, CA 92020 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 D 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to ( l) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust ________ _ Non Profit/Trust ----------- Title Title ---------------------------- Address ___________ _ Address -------------- 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? OYes ~ No If yes, please indicate person(s): _____________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. at all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Countv of San Diego. Dept of Public Works, Airports Div. c/o: Rick Jenkins Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent ;:Z_/ 4/4-,L,_/ Signature of applicant/date Waste Management. c/o: Conrad Pawelski Print or type name of owner PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT FOR COMPLETE LIST OF ADDITIONAL PERSONS HAVING A FINANCIAL INTEREST. H:ADMINICOUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND use REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLY) D Master Plan □ General Plan Amendment □ Specific Plan □ Local Coastal Plan Amendment □ Precise Development Plan □ Site Development Plan D Tentative Tract Map □ Zone Change □ Planned Development Permit [}g Conditional Use Permit Revision .. □ Non-Residential Planned D Hillside Development Permit Development □ Condominium Permit □ Environmental Impact Assessment ~o Special Use Permit □ Variance □ Redevelopment Permit □ Planned Industrial Permit D =!=eAtati;•e PaFee! Ma13 □ Coastal Development Permit Obtain From Engineering Depanment •,, D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission .. Determination □ Administrative Permit -2nd □ List other applications not DwellinQ Unit specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 209-050-25 3) PROJECT NAME: Coast Waste Management Transfer Station remodel 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for approval, to modify CUP to complete nonpermitted construction conducted.during 1994-95. (11,~7~ Square foot addition _to metal bµilding and reta1m.ng walls.) -• • • 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Airports Division 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) County of San Diego -Dept of Public Works -Coast Waste Management, Inc. Airoorts MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 1960 Joe Crosson Drive MS -119 P.O. Box 947 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE El Cajon, CA 92020-1236 Carlsbad, CA 92018 619-929-9400 ... I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE. BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLE!~E. . ~ ;r T~T~E B OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~ ,~-}~'(// /-Z-y'-9) &'~ /;?,/2oh7~ SIGNATURE (/ DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7)_ BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot A & B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to Map 823 filed on November 16, 1986. f.NoiEFmo1~sEtfp·oo-Jec~REOUIBiNGMULTIPIEAPPLICATIONS~EFIL"EOf.MU~BB~lJBMITTED~P.RIOR~TO'.i:30·P~M}i¥:f~ !;1~£..a~~-,J~~~~~~.!..rt~-~~_p:-f·~:~!.:..;j,£;,_--;:._~;~....-C.$:!':';-:.~ ... .-.... :.::..~::..'"!-~ .. 1.-.:X :;;.:,!:.:!,:.;.· .. r ... ~r ... :'!-: :-:=--~:.-:~ f:.,•.::~~'J ~--y• .. "~':'•:· ... ~~_.-.,n: .. ~ .... ,;.~ ·.··,:·-.. ...,._,~ ... • •;,·~,-., • -:-.. ~,:;::.:. ~A~PROPOSED;_e._ROJEC~QUJRING'.ONLYONE-APPLICATION~BE.flLE{?,tMUST;BE.SUBMITTED~PRIOR;T0,;_4:00 P.:.M:£~;f~J..:n:..:],,:;] Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 . t" ,,1 -• CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLY) □ Master Plan □ General Plan Amendment □ Specific Plan □ Local Coastal Plan Amendment □ Precise Development Plan □ Site Development Plan □ Tentative Tract Map □ Zone Change □ Planned Development Permit rn Conditional Use Permit Revision □ Non-Residential Planned □ Hillside Development Permit Development □ Condominium Permit □ Environmental Impact Assessment r--o Special Use Permit □ Variance □ Redevelopment Permit □ Planned Industrial Permit □ =FeAtati1;•e Parnel Maf3 □ Coastal Development Permit Obtain From Engineering Department □ Administrative Variance □ Planning Commission Determination □ Administrative Permit -2nd □ List other applications not Dwelling Unit specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 209-050-25 3) PROJECT NAME: Coast Waste Management Transfer Station remodel 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for approval-to modify CUP to complete nonpermitted construction conducted during 1994-95. (11,175 Square foot addition to metal building and retaining walls.) - 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Airports Division 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) County of San Diego -Dept of Public Works Coast Waste Management, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 1960 Joe Crosson Drive MS 5-119 P.O. Box 947 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE El Cajon, CA 92020-1236 Carlsbad, CA 92018 619-929-9400 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. z~LEDGE./,;a/2,✓;:91,, SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7). BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot A & B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to Map 823 filed on November 16, 1986. _ ~~¥.~ .. ~~,~~~~~~~~~~-::,,,.~~-~-:r..t~/=!;'~-~:::r~, .... ::;.,. ....... ;.·~-.-~ ... -. ... ~-.<:.::r..,(',tt~"t"~·;.-..,.~1,-rr.;:~~~~-::--;.,m.:,:r11'Z,'t'~·';"'<-t;-f':""-.•~"'<te1~-~•':;,.. •• ~~ -i-:· .. ::-:--;:-?7::· ... ~---~~·-¥<·~--:·; f_ NOTE:~'A':PROP.OSED: PRO'JECTiREOUIRING MULTIPLE'APPLICATIONS·:sE FILED,: MUST-BE. SUBMITTED: P.RIOR,TO'. 3:30 P .M;·~:.-,.:;[" ~•"...._:,,"Pf..t·~~-tt?/~iV,~ .. 4;;-;,i~~'i";:,.,.4~~~'\ .. ~~~~~.;"2-X\.J,_.-:';>.-;., .. ~~---:.;., .... '>...:~,..,.:,<..',S~~!~.,~•.,.;,1;:..;,,,'"";.,.., ',. !..;'.:=:.•~~•.;:~ .. J;;f ::..,.,_•,:ff, •••••.'•\)'),,.;-1:,. "'Z.:".::•:'::• ~ •,....:--f•..,.~<.;.,::,t.;.""-.•J-.:•-;:--•r,-:,~ •• •.•"7"":"...\ •• ,1•" .' -..•~.._,..,,,f~,' • ••:, "r,,i ./~7t.•:!,. ~ ~~~OPOS~.eftOJECT,__REQUIRIN.<3'.ONLYONE-APPLJCATION.BE_FILED;·_MUSTrBE,SUBMITTED-PRIOR..TO.-'4:0d_P~M:~:;.g;,c:,7&;i:?.:;_~:.D Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 ' .. -11 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: 5960 El Camino Real STREET ADDRESS ON THE East (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN Faraday Avenue SIDE OF AND El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) Palomar Airport Road (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~11) NUMBER OF EXISTING ~12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION EJ14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ ~ 15) PROPOSED COMM ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED r-=-:71 ss· 17) PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ~c 22% PROPOSED INCREASE IN L7/ 18) PROPOSED SEWER ~ ADT ~ USAGE IN EDU • 5 (Additional 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING B20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ~ 23) PROPOSED ZONING ~ 21) PROPOSED GENERAL IN/A7 L__j PLAN DESIGNATION L__j 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS •• TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID Form 16 FEE REQUIRED DATE ST AMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 JAN • 21997 crrv OF CAij! ... ~flAD ,~l..Ji~NCJ\iC r:JZ:~;r. { '. /"J ' ' ' ' ' ! ! I I .j I I I I ! I I .,, City of Carlsbad -#J6ieih 1 ■f•l•l§•Eiil 11 f4,ii DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON All APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the name;; and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Coast Waste Management, Inc. 5960 El Camino Real, P.O. Box 947 Carlsbad, CA 92018 2. Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. County of San Die~o Iept of Public Works -Ai1J?2£tq 1960 Joe Crosson Drive El Cajon, CA 92020-1236 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or {2} above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Arie de Jong 622 East Mission Road .. San Marcos, CA 92069 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1} or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as ~fficer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. Tom Garibay Director of Public Works 5555 Overland Avenue MS-0309 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 ?1'"'17.C::: • ·= c:, Pal mas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 •• • (Over) Disclosure Statement Page 2 5. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No~ If yes, please indicate person(s) ____________________ _ Person is defined as: 'Any individual, firm, ccpartnership, joint venture, association, s.ocial club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, cfy municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit.' (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) /4/~ Signature of applicant/date av;t.A-,IJ /5. BcNeL Jk1 Print or type name of_ applicant -.. • City of Carlsbad -:;; 601 ,ii ,t-1 •24-Ei U, ,t4 ., I DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Coast Waste Management, Inc. 5960 El Camino Real, P.O. Box 947 Carlsbad, CA 92018 2. Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. County of San Die~o Department of Airports 1960 Joe Crosson Drive El Cajon, CA 92020-1236 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Arie de Jong 622 East Mission Road .. San Marcos, CA 92069 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. Tom Garibay Director of Public Works 5555 Overland Avenue MS-0309 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 • (Over) Disclosure Statement Page 2 5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No ~ If yes, please indicate person(s). ____________________ _ Person is defined a.s: 'Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust. receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting a.s a unit.' (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) Signature of Owner/date Signature of applican1/date r::::v /<rl-b /s, ~ WEL.. Ski Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant I . ' ' • • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) 1 DAE:!!!~.!~?:;~,,:.:,:. BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME:--------------:------------ 2. APPLICANT: Coast· Wac:te Management, Inc, 3. ADDRESS AND PHO:t\TE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5960 El Camino Real, P.O. Box 947, Carlsbad, CA 92018 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 11,175 Square foot addition to.metal building and ret~inin_,g walls. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact", or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Population and Housing Geological Problems \Vater Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Rev. _4/12/95 .. ,: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (BIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • • • • • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. , "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an "BIA-Part II'\ if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the enviro~ment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the propose~ project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental BIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applic'able standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier BIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 4/12/95 ..... ' . • If there are one or more potentia11y significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuarit to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; ( 4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 3 Rev. 4/12/95 • ... Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): @m}11#MOO.f@J~Ar~t»tm#;:[uij.y.JW)::~n#lJ!tf;it@:::~Jf,aW,¥J,} Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation _ Impact Incorporated Supporting comments to questions are attached following these forms. I. LAND USE~ PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Sources: ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ~cicity?( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations ( e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? ( ) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an unqeveloped area or extension of maJor infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) 4 . Less Than Significant Impact Rev. 4/12/95 No Impact X .JL X X ..L .JL JL .JL _x_ .JL ' . . . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): ~§.PPRl~m~ffihUf#m:me.#.t!ffm~r.f::!W.Jffim4.49it.mit:;@~b:~g1 d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any wat.er body? ( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction groundwater? ( or rate of flow of ) 5 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant . Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact Rev. 4/12/95 .JL X .lL .JL X - X X X X X X .JL ' . . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (§.gM~¥UlJ'l~t.W~AAflfft.1l~f:''®bt=Wi#tt.P:::an,a=::~t;µi@,¢.l h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) -V. AIR QUALITY. ·would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) 6 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Rev. 4/12/95 No Impact X X 1L JL_ L X X Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): @!1RPWffl¢OO:Jl®Wh~1.gsp:n,npm#:t.@m.qW:r;Ml1.ti.tta91'~?.f} f) • Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation ( e.g: bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOU.RCES. V{ould the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species ( e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. \Vould the pr?posal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) 7 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Rev. 4/12/95 No Impact X X ..JL X X X Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): tMW@mMW~iYAA.9.lhMtitm~t!=ffl~fa#f.P-fm4J¢)n?k~!:!a.~~41 IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of pot~ntial health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a). Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) c) Schools? ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) . e) Other governmental services? ( ) • 8 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact .JL X X X .JL X X X X X X X Rev. 4/12/95 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): • t§.e#Plfilff#.if@Jl.®fim~;neyfin.~ki=il$.tfiff~ri#Ho:ij.11ii.::,_;~J~M»eaJ XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( b) Communications systems? ( ) ) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( f) Solid waste disposal? ( g) Local or regional water supplies? ( XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ) ) ) ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( c) Cr~ate light or glare? ( ) ) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) 9 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Rev. 4/12/95 No Impact ......x.. X -X x J.. _x_ ......x.. _x_ X _x_ X. -. . . J Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): {§.~ei:\lfiliieYl@ta~!J'nHr:PlMtn~f':i!ffe.:r;@ff.iM◊:J;!t.tj't~Uith@.); e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histo:ry or prehisto:ry? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current • projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Rev. 4/12/95 No Impact X X X ...x... X -XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 11 Rev. 4/12/95 ... , . . . -DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact1' yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. Air Quality: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional grqwth management. strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are cqnsidered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Poten~ially Significant Impact":· This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. Circulation: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by . regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the 12 Rev. 4/12/95 . i ' •: .. --implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have. been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as ~onditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 13 Rev. 4/12/95 • The following comments respond to the questions for the Environmental Impact I. a. Zoning and general plan allow the use on site. I. b. Use of site is within the adopted policies the site. I. c. Land use has not changed. Request is for approval of building addition. I. d. Property for site has been graded and under use since 1979. I. e. Surrounding property is zoned industrial with a subdesignation for public utility users. II. a. Property is industrial. II. b. Building improvements are for current uses II. c. Site is industrial III. a. No known faults are adjacent to property III. b. Site is a transportation center. III. c. Site requires no fill material and is not on expansive soils III d. None III e. Site is already developed III f Site is already developed III g. Site is already developed III h. Site soils are not expansive III I. Site is developed IV a. Site has a drainage plan consistent with the addition IV b. Site's current drainage system will not be altered IV c. Site's current drainage system will not be altered IV d. No change to any body of water IV e. No change will occur • < IV f. Site is a disturbed site and will not change water IV g. No change will occur IV h. No change to ground water IV I. No change to ground water Va. No change will occur Vb. No change will occur V c. Building will be metal with no air or heating system V d. No change in present operations will occur VI a. No changes will occur from present operations. • VI b. No changes will occur in the onsite circulation or needed for of site VI c. Access will not be changed VI d. Parking capacity has been increased with area used in past now under lease VI e. No change anticipated VI f. supports use of alternative transportation VI g. None apparent VII a. Site is a disturbed site with no impacts VII b. No species in area of construction VII c. Site was previously developed VII d. Site has no habitat VII e. Area is an interior area of the improved site VIII a. Meets energy use plan of City VIII b. Increases the availability of renewable resources VIII c. Site does not effect state resources ' t • IX a. Site use will stay consistent with present usage where the potential of an accident can occur IX b. Site has emergency plan on file and site plan does not change IX c. No increase from improvements to site IX d. Consistent with present site use IX e. None apparent X a. No change anticipated X b. No change in business activity XI a. Area will also be sprinklered and alarmed to fire department XI b. No changes apparent XI c. No effect XI d. No change apparent XI e. None apparent XII a. No additional utilities needed XII b. None needed XII c. None needed XII d. None needed XII e. No increased capacity XII f No added capacity needed XII g. No additional need is created XIII a. No view effected XIII b. None apparent XIII c. No additional lighting needed XIV a. Site was previously disturbed • XIV b. None on the site originally XIV c. None affected XIV d. None affected XIV e. None affected XV a. Not affected X.Vb. None affected XVI a. No material changes to community • XVI b. Addition to this developed site to not bring cumulative impacts XVI c. No affects additional affects are expected from the site EARLIER ANALYSIS The site was originally reviewed in 1979 when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the site as a municipal solid waste facility for the use as a transfer station (1,600 tons/day) including recycling, fleet maintenance, and administrative uses. The site became inactive in 1981 and was repermitted in 1984. The repermitting in 1984 was for the same uses as originally permitted but on a lesser scale (400 tons/day). The site subsequent to review was given a conditional use permit in 1984 and again reviewed in 1989 and 1995. • . .. . .. ·"' I / r CASE NO. DATE: • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART I (To be Completed by APPLICANT) Applicant: Coast Waste Management, Inc. Address of Applicant: 5960 El Camino Real, P. o. Box 947 Carlsbad, CA 92018-0947 Phone Number: ( 619) 929-9400 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): Conrad Pawelski GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific) Project Description: Transfer station remodeling and relocation of recycling sorter. Increase permitted throughput at station from 400 tons per day of MSW to 900 tons per day of MSW. Project Location/Address: Eastern portion of the existing building at 5960 El Camino Real, Carlsbad Assessor Parcel Number: 760 166 84 General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: Industrial I M-Q Local Facilities Management Zone: 5 Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone? No Please describe the area surrounding the site to the North: 3-acre graded parcel East: Natural slope South: Natural slope West: Easement road and disced bareland List all other applicable permiti & approvals related to this project: Solid waste facilities permit revision 2 • • (Please be Specific. Attach Additional Pages or Exhibits, if necessary) 1. Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site. Remodeling and expansion of building does not change any slopes that are on the property under its present developed state. 2. Pl ease describe energy conservation measures i ncorporate.d into the design and/or operation of the project. The building expansion is structural only with no utilities in the metal addition to the building. 3. PLEASE ATTACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates). Project is an expansion of existing station's permitted use from 400 to 900 tons of MSW with remodeling and relocation of recycling sorting system and addition to metal building to enclose load out area. b. If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies), square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities. c. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(ies), average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities. d. If an institutional project, indicate the major project/site function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 3 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET This project is the remodeling and relocation of functions which presently occur on the site along with the request to increase the daily tonnage limit from 400 tons to 900 tons per day of municipal solid waste. These three items being requested are The remodeling portion of the project is a 960 square foot building addition to the existing metal building using the same color and type of materials. This addition is to further enclose the load out area for the trucks used to transport the trash to the landfill site. The icrease in warehouse space will require 1 additional parking space which as of last CUP review the site had 2 additional spaces beyond that required. Relocation of the sorter which had been located generally on the northwestern area of the site will be relocated onto a concrete pad east of the existing building. The sorter when operating utilized 4 employees for material processing, future labor recycling labor will remain the same. The final segment of the project is for the increase in daily permitted tonnage for the transfer station. This increase is to accomodate the City of Carlsbad's needs and the County of San Diego. This facility is a public need since the facility is used for the City of Carlsbad's Source Reduction and Recycling Element which establishes the City's waste management plan. Our requested increase in the tonnage limit from 400 to 900 tons per day still remains under the scope of study tonnage of 1,600 tons per day operation when originally reviewed. The increase in daily tonnage will generate the following traffic increase: Transfer Truck trips (roundtrip) 45 Collection Truck trips (roundtrip) 118 .. . . I. 2) 3) 4) • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each item was checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Could the project significantly impact or change present or future land uses in the vicinity of the activity? EXPLANATION: The property's usage does not change from the present use. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of aesthetic value? YES EXPLANATION: This application is to provide the same but expanded public benefit services as required by the municipality under State law. Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? EXPLANATION: No established or planned ne'ighborhoods exist within 3/4 mile. Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? EXPLANATION: None exist near the facility nor are zoned for future development. 4 NO X X X X .•:. 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) • - Could the activity increase the number of low and moderate cost housing units in the city? YES EXPLANATION: This is an industrial site with no increased employment needed in conjunction with this project and is only utilized based on the City's municipal needs since it is~ facility for public benefit. Could the activity significantly affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? EXPLANATION: This project will require no increase in labor. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? EXPLANATION: None are located on or adjacent to the site. Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? EXP,LANATION: None are in the immediate area. Could.the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? EXPLANATION: None are 'located near the site. 5 X X X X X 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant resources? EXPLANATION: Site has no areas to impact near the site. Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal species in the activity area? -YES EXPLANATION: No rare or endangered species exist in the area of remodeling. Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands or beaches? EXPLANATION: The proposed changes do not impact the offsite features. Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin ation of agricultural lands? EXPLANATION: The project proposed does not change the use of the site. Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop ment of already developed areas? EXPLANATION: Proposed changes do not increase or change any offsite uses of areas. 6 NO X X X X X 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) - Will the activity require a variance from estab lished environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? EXPLANATION: Meets all standards set for the original project. Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? EXPLANATION: Site changes are still below the original'ly reviewed scop of the project. Will the activity require certification, authoriza tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? EXPLANATION: Revision to the Solid Waste Facilities Permit Application. Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? EX PLANA TI ON: Conditional Use Permit•modification. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? EXPLANATION: Site is a public benefit site with use based on the municipality's needs and State requirements. 7 YES X X __lill X X X • 20} Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? EXPLANATION: Site is not within a flood plain. 21} Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 22) EXPLANATION: None within the area. Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? EXPLANATION: Activity is contained within the building. 23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? EXPLANATION: None anticipated. 24) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) EXPLANATION: Use is withing the original planned use as reviewed in 1979. 8 YES NO X X X X . X 25) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? EXPLANATION: . Remodeling of the site has no utilities other than fire sprinklers. 26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? EXPLANATION: None on site. 27) Will there be a significant change to existing 1 and form? (a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: ___ 1_20 ____ _ (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: Minor . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: N/A EXPLANATION: Retaining wall is built to the bedrock around all existing slope. 28) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? EXPLANATION: No utilities are anticipated to be needed additionaly for the project. 9 -YES NO X X X X 29) 30) 31) Will the project significantly increase wind or water erosion of sojls? EXPLANATION: Improvements and modifications to the site do not cr,eate any impact. Could the project significantly affect existing fish or wildlife habitat? EXPLANATION: Site does not impact any water way. Will the project significantly produce new light or glare? EXPLANATION: Site changes will have no additional lighting requirements nor glare since no glass will be used. -YES NO X X X ... ... .. ..., ... I I. STATEMENT OF NON-SI.FICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS • If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: This site holds a State Solid Waste Facilities Permit and a Conditional Use Permit permiting all of the activities occuring on the site presently and planned. This application is to revise the State Solid Waste Facilities Permit and modify the Conditional Use Permit to approve the remodeling and the increase the daily throughput of tonnage. This site was originally permitted and built by the County of San Diego in 1979. At that time the site was permitted for the daily throughput of 1,600 tons per day. The County operated the site for a period of about 2 years and ceased operations which through nonuse rendered the Solid Waste. Facility Permit permit to expire. Coast Waste took over the site as a leasee of the County in July of 1984. Shortly thereafter we applied for a new Solid Waste Facility Permit to reactivate the station with the daily tonnage reduced to 400 tons. Our request to increase the tonnage to 900 tons per day will remain below the tonnage originally permitted in 1979. However, since the tonnage is changing from the level stated on the current Conditional Use Permit and State Solid Waste Facilities permit these will have to be reapplied for modification due to the increase from the 400 ton permitted level. III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature __ d._~--:-=--..e.ft_v-=--~-~~~~-· ---,--------- (Person Completing Report) Date Signed _____ 0_3_1_27_1_9_5 ______________ _ 11 . •· • • • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION JAN 3 0 1997 err, Of CARLSBAD PROJECT NAME: Coast Waste Tr~nsfer Station Remodel APPLICANT NAME: Coast Waste Management, Inc. _ _..;:;.=~==--=====::.z._...=!!.:::..:..__ __________ _ Pleas_e describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any • background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. Project Description: Remodeling of Coast Waste Management, Inc.'s transfer station sorting floor and truck load out area. Remodel adds additional floor space for interim storage ( 48 hours over weekends landfill closure) and/or sorting of refuse/recyclables for transit to landfills or recyclables processors. Load out area for transfer trucks include a second load out area enclosed under roof Construction of site was started in 1995 without permit. Submitted for acceptance and approval is previously partially constructed improvements and planned changes to complete the remodeling. Site Changes Are: • Addition of 11,175 square feet to the metal building 8,195 square feet of tipping floor 2,980 square feet of load out area • Additional leased property of 2.115 acres of adjacent property located directly west of site • Employee/handicap/service vehicle parking spaces increased from 50 to 139.spaces • Truck parking increased from 62 to 72 spaces • Retaining walls for split level floor Operational Changes Requested: • Increase daily tonnage from 400 tons of trash to 1200 tons per day based on a 361 day average along with recyclable tonnage increased from 120 tons to 300 tons. Total daily through put of combined materials changed from 520 to 1500 tons. • Add one half hour to the transfer station operating time, 5:00 AM from 5:30 AM with station operations closing at 8:00 PM daily. • Add operating days to include Sunday (presently Monday through Saturday). • Non-commercial use of site for disposal on Saturdays and Sundays. ProjOHc.frm • PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: Coast Waste Transfer Station Remodel APPLICANT NAME: Coast Waste Management, Inc. ________ ......._ ____________________ _ Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any . background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. Project Description: Remodeling of Coast Waste Management, Inc.' s transfer station sorting floor and truck load out area. Remodel adds additional floor space for interim storage (48 hours) and/or sorting of refuse/recyclables for transit to landfills or recyclables processors. Loadout area for transfer trucks include a second loadout enclosed under roof. Construction of site was started in 1995 without pennit. Submitted for acceptance and approval is previously partially constructed improvements and planned changes to complete the remodeling. Site Changes are: Addition of 11,175 square feet to the metal building 8,195 square feet of tipping floor 2,980 square feet of loadout area Additional leased property of 2.115 acres of adjacent property located directly west of site Employee, /handicap/service vehicle parking spaces increased from 50 to 139 spaces. Truck parking increased from 62 to 72 spaces Retaining walls for split level floor Rw. 4/91 Proj0.1c.frm JAN-10-02 07:52AM FROM-WASTE MGMT.MIN UPSTAIRS +17607544180 -T-161 P.02/02 F-254 CALIFORNIA Western Area -Slate of Officers (Slate No. S) Lawrence O'Donnell ID President Ra.vmond P. Burke Vice President Ronald Law Vice President E. Richard Acuna Vice President Dan Day Vice President Nick J. Sikich Vice P.residenr Dous:las J. Diemer Vice President Scott A. Bradley Vice President Lawrence L. Galek Vice President and Assistant Treasurer Duane C. Woods Vice President and Assistant Secretary David P. Steiner Vice President and Secrewv Bruce E. Snyder Vice President ChiefFinancial Officer and Controller Ronald H. Jones Vice President and Treasurer Robert G. Simpson Vice President and Assistant Treasurer Frances Sewell Assistant Treasurer Linda J. Smith Vice President and .Assistant Secretarv Frank J. Clement Assistant Treasurer Lee A. McCormick Assistant Treasurer JAN-,9-02 17:10 FROM·COASi WASTE - , I' • , \ I ' ' , I'' I, ,;, "". .. ,,. ..... fl• ,/. ,,. ; ' I!·: I +7609310219 LIM 'Wlfi111 Of \,:8810~ me. $l1t1~ or Offic:or, T-844 P.07/08 F-538 , I .. ·,· I I:: i I ' ' !1 ' ,' 1!' i ..r,--,·1 l'"f.l:w ::1 l,llill1I~ i,i;,j,r;i'*'~•f i:., ;. , · I . I .. ' I; EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL PERSONS HAVING A FINANCIAL INTEREST. City of Carlsbad (Lessee of Palomar Transfer Station from County of San Diego) 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Palomar Transfer Station, Inc. (Lessee of County of San Diego) 8364 Clairemont Mesa Blvd. San Diego, CA 92111 PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR-TRANSFER STATION CUP 260(8) .. CD .i.: 0