The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2026-06-01; Traffic Safety and Mobility Commission; 03; All-Way Stop Control at the Intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo DescansoMeeting Date: June 1, 2026 To: Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission From: John Kim, City Traffic Engineer Staff Contact: Miriam Jim, Senior Engineer miriam.jim@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-5796 Lindy Pham, Associate Engineer lindy.pham@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2768 Subject: Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and District: Recommended Action Support staff’s recommendation to install all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. Executive Summary Residents have raised concerns about traffic safety at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. They have also requested the installation of all-way stop control at these three intersections. In response to the requests, all-way stop analysis was performed for each of the three intersections in accordance with the guidelines found in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, or CA MUTCD. Based on the analysis performed, these intersections satisfied at least one of the all-way stop criteria supporting consideration of all-way stop control. Staff recommend the installation of all-way stop control at the intersections Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso to enhance traffic safety. Explanation & Analysis Multi-Way Stop Analysis All-way stop analysis, in accordance with the guidelines found in the CA MUTCD, considers vehicular, pedestrian and bike volumes as well as other factors such as collision history, sight distance, movement conflicts and traffic operations to determine if all-way stop control is TRAFFIC SAFETY & MOBILITY COMMISSION June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 1 of 13 justified at a particular intersection. The analysis conducted by staff is structured around the following four primary criteria and four other optional criteria: Criteria A of the CA MUTCD multi-way stop criteria allows consideration of a multi-way stop as an interim measure prior to installation of a traffic signal. Criteria B allows for consideration of a multi-way stop when there have been five or more reported collisions within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop. Criteria C evaluates the traffic volumes to determine if a multi-way stop can be considered. Criteria C is satisfied if: 1) The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street, total of both approaches averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any eight hours of an average day; and 2) The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street, averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour. 3) If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70% of the values provided in Part 1 and 2. Criteria D allows consideration of a multi-way stop where no single criterion is satisfied but where Criteria B and C are satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. Other Criteria In addition to the four criteria listed above, the CA MUTCD provides other criteria that may also be considered. These criteria are described as: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Analysis Results Staff evaluated the subject three intersections in accordance with the guidelines mentioned above. Based on the analysis results, each of these locations has satisfied at least one of the criteria for all-way stop consideration. Table 1 summarizes the analysis results, and the CA MUTCD worksheets are provided in Exhibits 2, 3 and 4. June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 2 of 13 Table 1: Multi-way Stop Analysis Results Summary INTERSECTION Measure History Volumes 80% of Criteria B & C Left- turn Conflicts Vehicle & Pedestrian Conflicts Sight Distance Neighborhood Collector Streets Alicante Road and Galena Avenue Yes Camino De Amigos Yes Yes Paseo Descanso Yes The following sections provide further explanation for the criteria each intersection satisfied. Intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue Alicante Road and Galena Avenue are both classified as Local/Neighborhood Streets in the General Plan Mobility Element and are located within the city’s southeast quadrant, see Exhibit 1. Alicante Road has a roadway width ranging from 40 to 50 feet, accommodating a travel lane and a buffered bike lane in each direction. On-street parking is not permitted in the vicinity of the intersection. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. South of Galena Avenue, Alicante Road is a divided roadway with a landscaped raised median separating opposing traffic while maintaining one travel lane and a buffered bike lane in each direction. Galena Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a curb-to-curb width of 34 feet and a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. As the roadway approaches the intersection with Alicante Road, it widens to 54 feet to accommodate a dedicated left-turn lane and a landscaped raised median in both directions. The intersection is controlled by side-street STOP signs on Galena Avenue, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 3 of 13 City staff have received residents’ concerns regarding visibility at this intersection along with request for an all-way stop. In response to this request, staff conducted a stopping sight distance analysis and determined that the combination of the trees in the raised median and the roadway’s vertical alignment restricts the visibility of eastbound drivers on Galena Avenue looking toward northbound traffic on Alicante Road, as shown in Figure 2. As a result, the minimum stopping sight distance requirement of 300 feet cannot be met. Implementing all-way stop at this intersection is expected to enhance safety by requiring traffic from all approaches to stop at the intersection. Therefore, satisfying the Optional Criterion C. Based on these findings, staff recommend installation of all-way stop control at the intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue. Intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos are both classified as Local/Neighborhood Streets in the General Plan Mobility Element and are located within the city’s southeast quadrant, see Exhibit 1. Both roadways have similar characteristics, including a 40-foot roadway width that accommodates one travel lane and on-street parking in each direction. The prima facie speed limit on both streets is 25 mph. Camino De Amigos is located east of, and runs parallel to, Melrose Drive in a north–south direction. Calle Hidalgo forms a T-intersection with Melrose Drive and extends eastward, terminating at a cul-de-sac east of Camino De Amigos. Melrose Drive has a posted speed limit of 55 mph. The intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos is two-way stop-controlled, with stop signs on Camino De Amigos. A community playground is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos Avenue Looking South on Alicante Road June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 4 of 13 City staff have received residents’ concerns regarding vehicle speed and pedestrian safety at this intersection along with requests for an all-way stop. In response to these requests, traffic data was collected on Oct. 28, 2025, for an all-way stop analysis. The collected counts indicate that 138 pedestrians crossed at the intersection over the course of a typical day. Because the intersection provides direct access to the community playground, implementing all-way stop control is expected to reduce conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians, therefore satisfying the Optional Criterion B. Given its proximity to Melrose Drive, higher speed vehicles from northbound Melrose Drive can carry through this intersection, where increased pedestrian crossing activity is expected due to the adjacent playground. In addition, both Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos are residential streets with similar roadway characteristics and carry comparable traffic volumes. Implementing an all-way stop at this intersection would improve overall traffic operations and safety by requiring all approaches to stop, thereby satisfying the Optional Criterion D. Based on these findings, staff recommend installation of all-way stop control at the intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos. Intersection of Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso are both classified as Local/Neighborhood Streets in the General Plan Mobility Element and are located within the city’s southeast quadrant, see Exhibit 1. Both roadways have similar characteristics, including a 40-foot curb-to-curb roadway width that accommodates one travel lane and on-street parking in each direction. The prima facie speed limit on both streets is 25 mph. The intersection is stop-controlled for southbound traffic on Paseo Cerro and eastbound traffic for Paseo Descanso, as shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Intersection of Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso City staff have received concerns from residents regarding safety at this intersection due to its unconventional two-way stop control configuration, which has caused driver confusion, as well as requests to convert the intersection to all-way stop control. In response to these requests, staff conducted the all-way stop analysis and concluded that installing all-way stop control at June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 5 of 13 this intersection is expected to improve traffic operations and safety by clarifying right-of-way assignments and reducing driver confusion, thereby satisfying the Optional Criterion D. Based on these findings, staff recommend installation of all-way stop control at the intersection of Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. Community Outreach Staff have notified affected residents and others who may be interested in the installation of an all-way stop at the subject three intersections. • Doorhangers to residents and property owners adjacent to the intersections • HOA outreach • Updates on Nextdoor Recommendation Based on the findings presented in this report, which are consistent with the criteria described in the CA MUTCD, staff recommend the installation of all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. Next Steps Upon receiving support from the Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission, staff will introduce an ordinance to establish all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso for City Council’s adoption. Once the ordinance is adopted, staff will move forward with the implementation of STOP signs and associated pavement markings at these intersections. Exhibits 1. Location Map 2. CA MUTCD all-way stop application worksheet for Alicante Road and Galena Avenue 3. CA MUTCD all-way stop application worksheet for Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos 4. CA MUTCD all-way stop application worksheet for Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 6 of 13 1 LOCATION MAP June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 7 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 1 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTI-WAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad CALC JND DATE 07/17/2025 CHK KF DATE 07/17/2025 Major St: Alicante Road Critical Approach Speed 40 mph Minor St: Galena Ave Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Critical speed of major street traffic > 40mph RURAL (R) Otherwise URBAN (U) The decision to install multiway stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for multiway stop sign installation: Criteria A - Interim Traffic Control Measure SATISFIED YES NO Where traffic control signals are justified, the MULTI-WAY STOP is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Criteria B - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES NO Five or more reported crashes within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a MULTI- WAY STOP installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Criteria C - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED YES NO C.1 Major Street Vehicular Volume Yes No The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street, total of both approaches averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. U R 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM Hour Both Approaches Major Street 300 210 159 177 165 201 233 204 196 175 Average= 189 C.2 Minor Street Vehicular, Pedestrian & Bicycle Volume Yes No The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street, averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours. U R 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM Hour Both Approaches Minor Street 200 140 40 25 39 36 48 45 38 25 Average= 37 Minor Street Vehicle Delay Yes No N/A Peak Hour Peak Hour Volume Minimum Delay Requirement, seconds per vehicle Average Delay, seconds per vehicle 30 seconds C.3 70-Percent Reduction Yes No If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in C1 and C2. Exhibit 2 June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 8 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 2 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTIWAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad Major St: Alicante Road Critical Approach Speed 40 mph Minor St: Galena Ave Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Criteria D – Combination of Criteria SATISFIED YES NO REQUIREMENT CRITERIA FULFILLED THREE CRITERIA SATISFIED 80% B. Four or more reported crashes within a 12-month period. Yes No C.1. Major Street Volume of at least 240 vehicles per hour Yes No C.2. Minor Street Volume of at least 160 units per hour Yes No Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: Optional Criteria A – Left Turn Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control left-turn conflicts. Optional Criterial B – Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes. Optional Criteria C – Sight Distance SATISFIED YES NO Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop. Optional Criteria D – Residential Street SATISFIED YES NO An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 9 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 1 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTI-WAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad CALC JND DATE 05/11/2026 CHK KF DATE 05/11/2026 Major St: Calle Hidalgo Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Minor St: Camino De Amigos Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Critical speed of major street traffic > 40mph RURAL (R) Otherwise URBAN (U) The decision to install multiway stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for multiway stop sign installation: Criteria A - Interim Traffic Control Measure SATISFIED YES NO Where traffic control signals are justified, the MULTI-WAY STOP is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Criteria B - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES NO Five or more reported crashes within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a MULTI- WAY STOP installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Criteria C - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED YES NO C.1 Major Street Vehicular Volume Yes No The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street, total of both approaches averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. U R 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM Hour Both Approaches Major Street 300 210 9 18 19 19 20 18 19 16 Average= 17 C.2 Minor Street Vehicular, Pedestrian & Bicycle Volume Yes No The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street, averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours. U R 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM Hour Both Approaches Minor Street 200 140 18 17 19 11 41 29 26 20 Average= 23 Minor Street Vehicle Delay Yes No N/A Peak Hour Peak Hour Volume Minimum Delay Requirement, seconds per vehicle Average Delay, seconds per vehicle 30 seconds C.3 70-Percent Reduction Yes No If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in C1 and C2. Exhibit 3 June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 10 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 2 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTIWAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad Major St: Calle Hidalgo Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Minor St: Camino De Amigos Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Criteria D – Combination of Criteria SATISFIED YES NO REQUIREMENT CRITERIA FULFILLED THREE CRITERIA SATISFIED 80% B. Four or more reported crashes within a 12-month period. Yes No C.1. Major Street Volume of at least 240 vehicles per hour Yes No C.2. Minor Street Volume of at least 160 units per hour Yes No Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: Optional Criteria A – Left Turn Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control left-turn conflicts. Optional Criterial B – Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes. Optional Criteria C – Sight Distance SATISFIED YES NO Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop. Optional Criteria D – Residential Street SATISFIED YES NO An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 11 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 1 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTI-WAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad CALC JND DATE 03/26/2026 CHK KF DATE 03/26/2026 Major St: Paseo Cerro Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Minor St: Paseo Descanso Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Critical speed of major street traffic > 40mph RURAL (R) Otherwise URBAN (U) The decision to install multiway stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for multiway stop sign installation: Criteria A - Interim Traffic Control Measure SATISFIED YES NO Where traffic control signals are justified, the MULTI-WAY STOP is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Criteria B - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES NO Five or more reported crashes within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a MULTI- WAY STOP installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. Criteria C - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED YES NO C.1 Major Street Vehicular Volume Yes No The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street, total of both approaches averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. U R 8 AM 9 PM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM Hour Both Approaches Major Street 300 210 22 17 12 13 9 11 17 12 Average= 14 C.2 Minor Street Vehicular, Pedestrian & Bicycle Volume Yes No The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street, averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours. U R 8 AM 9 PM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM Hour Both Approaches Minor Street 200 140 30 16 11 25 14 15 28 23 Average= 20 Minor Street Vehicle Delay Yes No N/A Peak Hour Peak Hour Volume Minimum Delay Requirement, seconds per vehicle Average Delay, seconds per vehicle 30 seconds C.3 70-Percent Reduction Yes No If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in C1 and C2. Exhibit 4 June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 12 of 13 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 2 of 2 Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012 Part 2 – Signs MULTIWAY STOP CRITERIA Transportation Department, City of Carlsbad Major St: Paseo Cerro Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Minor St: Paseo Descanso Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Criteria D – Combination of Criteria SATISFIED YES NO REQUIREMENT CRITERIA FULFILLED THREE CRITERIA SATISFIED 80% B. Four or more reported crashes within a 12-month period.Yes No C.1. Major Street Volume of at least 240 vehicles per hour Yes No C.2. Minor Street Volume of at least 160 units per hour Yes No Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: Optional Criteria A – Left Turn Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control left-turn conflicts. Optional Criterial B – Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes. Optional Criteria C – Sight Distance SATISFIED YES NO Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop. Optional Criteria D – Residential Street SATISFIED YES NO An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. June 1, 2026 Item #3 Page 13 of 13 1 Lovelynne Magalued From:Nana de Sammy <susacue83@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 11:31 AM To:Traffic Subject:Proposed 4 way stop To whom it may concern: I agree with the proposed 4 way stop at Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso, I live in Paseo Cerro and even though I do a full stop and look before I go, I have had a couple of close calls with cars that are speeding up Paseo Descanso. Because there's the curve before they reach the top I cannot see the cars if they are overly speeding. It is also difficult to cross the street there when you cannot see the cars coming over the curve. I am grateful the Traffic commission has made this a priority and hope to see this problem solved soon. Thank you, Susana Cuellar 6347 Paseo Cerro, Carlsbad, CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 2 Lovelynne Magalued From:Autumn Codling <autumncodling@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 8:09 AM To:Traffic Subject:All-Way Stop Proposal: Calle Hidalgo & Camino de Amigos Hello, My name is Autumn Codling and I live at 6885 Camino de Amigos, Carlsbad. I am writing in support of the proposed all-way stop at Calle Hidalgo and Camino de Amigos under consideration at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. This intersection is right next to our neighborhood playground and cars regularly speed by while children and families play. Adding an all-way stop will greatly increase safety. Thank you for your consideration, Autumn -- Autumn Codling 619.925.1656 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Lovelynne Magalued From:Erin Wilson <ewilson92009@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 8:01 AM To:Traffic Subject:Fwd: Stop signs ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Erin Wilson <ewilson92009@gmail.com> Date: Wed, May 27, 2026 at 7:55 PM Subject: Stop signs To: <traffic@carlsbad.gov> Attn: Carlsbad traffic safety, We are in full support of all stop signs proposed. I have often thought I should contact the city to request a stop sign or a pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Alicante and Galena but had no idea how to go about it. It’s quite dangerous to cross there, and for everyone’s safety it would be a huge help to have, especially during the holidays when the adjacent neighborhood hosts a holiday light show and the traffic gets very heavy. Thank you, The Wilson Family CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 4 Lovelynne Magalued From:Dan Tomassi <dantomassi@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 7:11 AM To:Traffic Subject:Alicante and Galena stop sign My address is 2211 Azurite Place, Carlsbad CA 92009 I support the proposed All-Way Stop Sign to be located at Alicante Road and Galena Avenue Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 5 Lovelynne Magalued From:Justin Curry <justindcurry@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 6:59 AM To:Traffic Subject:Alicante and Galena Stop I wanted to express my support for the proposed all-way stop at Alicante and Galena. I live nearby and regularly walk to the park with my 3-year-old son, which requires crossing this intersec on. The traﬃc volume and vehicle speeds can make it feel unsafe for pedestrians, especially families with young children. There have been mul ple mes where turning vehicles or fast-moving through traﬃc made crossing uncomfortable and unpredictable, even while using cau on. An all-way stop would make the intersec on feel signiﬁcantly safer and more accessible for families, pedestrians, and children walking to the park. I appreciate the city evalua ng proac ve safety improvements before a serious accident occurs and strongly support the proposal. Thank you, Jus n Curry 408-205-1318 CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 6 Lovelynne Magalued From:Ryan Klein Geltco <rklein@geltco.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 9:14 PM To:Traffic Cc:jimcarey331@gmail.com; jlolmore@gmail.com; michael.rabil@gmail.com; peterkhughes@gmail.com; srandenberg@gmail.com; jgieda@gmail.com; leandra.goldflam@gmail.com Subject:New All Way Stops Proposed at Paseo Cerro & Paseo Descanso Dearest Members of the City of Carlsbad TraAic Safety & Mobility Commission, Firstly, we would like to thank you kindly for your thoughtful consideration towards the safety of our communities. The new all-way stops proposed at the corner of Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso are vital for the safety of our families, our children and our community. This proposal should clearly help improve pedestrian access, make it easier for cars to turn onto busy streets and reduce speeding. We are vehemently in favor of this as we have young children that play in close to proximity to this intersection. We thank you kindly again for your attention, consideration and thoughtfulness in regards to this matter. We have copied several other families who are in close proximity to this intersection and in strong support of this proposal as well. With sincere appreciation and gratitude, The Klein Family – located at 6385 Paseo Descanso, Carlsbad, CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 7 Lovelynne Magalued From:Tracy Quinn <tracy.w.quinn@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 7:14 PM To:Traffic Subject:Statement of Support / June 1 Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission Meeting Hello, My name is Tracy Quinn and I live at 3516 Corte Ramon . I am writing in support of the proposed all-way stop at Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos under consideration at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. This intersection is right next to our neighborhood playground and cars regularly speed by while children and families play. Adding an all-way stop will greatly increase safety. Thank you for your consideration, Tracy Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 8 Lovelynne Magalued From:Janelle Harshman <janelle.harshman@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 6:37 PM To:Traffic Subject:Stop sign Camino de Amigos Hello, My name is Janelle Harshman and I live at 6833 Camino de Amigos, Carlsbad. I’m writing in support of the proposed all-way stop at Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos being considered at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. We’re really happy this is being considered because our daughters ride their bikes on this street often, and we think it would make the area much safer for kids and families. Since the intersection is right next to the neighborhood playground, there are always children nearby, and cars regularly drive through too fast. We appreciate your consideration and support for improving safety in our neighborhood. Thank you, Janelle CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 9 Lovelynne Magalued From:Greg Hein <flyfishinggreg2@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:03 PM To:Traffic Subject:Proposed 4 way stop Good afternoon Ms. Hansen, I've recently become aware that the City of Carlsbad is considering installing a 4 way stop at the intersection of Paseo Descanso and Paseo Cerro. I happen to live in the village of Marvilla and pass through that intersection multiple times per day. While I don't object to the change [ moving from 2 way to 4 way], I don't see the value. I've lived in the community for 15 years and never had an unsafe encounter. There is excellent visibility, minimal traffic and the streets that feed that intersection are short and 3 of 4 originate in cul du sacs. There is no "through traffic" component that might encourage speeding. Melrose Drive from Rancho Santa Fe South to Palomar Airport Road is however a drag strip. The posted speed limit of 55mph is rarely observed and it passes through two or three busy crosswalks. Furthermore, it travels adjacent to an elementary school. As Melrose leaves a residential corridor in Carlsbad and then enters an industrial part of Vista, the speed limit is reduced to 45 mph. Hard to make any sense of that. I would prefer that the City of Carlsbad spend its resources solving a legitimate safety problem rather than adding stop signs to a location that is already safe. Let's not have this become a case of our government imposing a solution for a non-existent problem while it ignores the real problem that exists 100 yards away. I've been an elected member of the Rancho Carrillo Board of Directors for 8 years. I understand how complicated governance can be. My Email is from me only. I'm not speaking for our community. Still, I would love to be able to comment, in Open Session, that the Commission listened and is addressing a concern that is frequently talked about in Rancho Carrillo. Sincerely, Greg Hein CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 10 Lovelynne Magalued From:Manek Dustoor <mdustoor@inquerygroup.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:21 PM To:Traffic Subject:Stops at Alicante & Galena We are a resident family on Ammonite Place in Carlsbad and whole heartedly support the installation of all-way stop signs at the intersection of Alicante and Galena. The uphill climb from the intersection of Alicante with Alga makes it difficult to spot speeding cars or ebikes and it is simply a dangerous intersection waiting for a catastrophe. Thanks. Manek Manek Dustoor 6977 Ammonite Place Carlsbad, CA 92009 Cell: 616.460.0113 mdustoor@inquerygroup.com CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 11 Lovelynne Magalued From:Todd & debbie S <tdschonenberg@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 2:48 PM To:Traffic Subject:Proposed all way stop signs - Paseo Cerro and Descanso For traffic safety and mobility commission Surprised to see the proposed all way stop for this intersection. Not in opposition, but nobody is going to get killed at this location. However, the speed limit on Melrose from Rancho Santa Fe to Palomar Airport Road needs attention. It is currently the only stretch of Melrose from its origin to vista that is at 55. In both directions, it heads downhill through the rancho carillo neighborhood, bottoming at pointsettia. This is right by an elementary school with a busy crosswalk. The HOA has done a good job of clearing sight lines for traffic turning on to Melrose, but the speed limit ( and frequent violation of it) makes this a much higher risk intersection. I am aware of a number of accidents along this roadway. Hoping you can give this the attention it deserves...55 by a school and less by home depot doesn't make much sense... Todd Schonenberg 6348 Paseo Cerro Carlsbad CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 12 Lovelynne Magalued From:Sherif Hanna <sherifhanna@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 2:29 PM To:Traffic Cc:Erene Mina Subject:Support for 4-way stop signs at Alicante and Galena Dear Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission, I'm writing to support the proposal to install 4-way stop signs at the intersection of Alicante and Galena. Without the stop signs, pedestrians, especially children (of which there are many in our neighborhood), face two dangers: 1. Cars traveling northbound on Alicante towards Galena cannot see pedestrians who are about to cross, because the intersection lies at the top of a hill. With an obscured view, drivers may proceed into the intersection before realizing that pedestrians are already crossing. 2. Cars traveling southbound on Alicante towards Galena cannot see pedestrians, because the curve in the road obscures the view of the intersection. This is especially acute given that many drivers speed through that segment, creating a very dangerous situation for pedestrians crossing Alicante at Galena. Because of this, as a parent of two children and a member of the community who regularly uses its nearby facilities, I am fully supportive of installing 4-way stop signs at that intersection. Given that the location is at the top of a hill for northbound cars, and around a curve for southbound cars, it will be crucial to include clear, advanced warning signs to alert drivers in advance. You may also want to consider rumble strips along the northbound and southbound segments of Alicante near Galena to alert drivers about the upcoming stop signs. Thank you for your time and dedication to keeping our community's streets safe. This is a long overdue safety measure, and I am grateful that you took the initiative to consider it. Sincerely, Sherif Hanna 6968 Ammonite Pl CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 13 Lovelynne Magalued From:Bob Pham <bob.pham@ymail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:27 PM To:Traffic Subject:New All-Way Stops Proposed Hi Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission, My family lives on Galena Ave, and we are in full support of installing an all-way stop at the intersection of Alicante Rd and Galena Ave. This intersection has long been a safety concern due to vehicles speeding along Alicante in both directions—both northbound and southbound as cars come around the curve near Jardin Park. For residents in this neighborhood, crossing Alicante or turning onto it from Galena has consistently felt unsafe. The current conditions create unnecessary risk for drivers, pedestrians, and families walking in the area. An all-way stop would meaningfully improve visibility, reduce speeds, and create a safer and more predictable traffic flow for everyone. We look forward to a safer and more community-friendly intersection. Thank you for your consideration. Bob Pham CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 14 Lovelynne Magalued From:Rick Curry <currypolo@me.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:04 PM To:Traffic Subject:Traffic Stops Traﬃc Safety and Mobility Commission: As two visi ng grandparents we would strongly support these four way stops especially Galena and Allicante which is very dangerous to cross as there is limited visibility due to the hill and at mes seems like a raceway and not a neighborhood street. Thanks for making the eﬀort to look into this! Rick and Maxine Curry Sent from my iPad CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 15 Lovelynne Magalued From:Debbie Schonenberg <debkat02@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:02 PM To:Traffic Subject:Proposed 4-way stop at Paseo Cerro & Paseo Decanso Good idea. It’s needed. Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 16 Lovelynne Magalued From:John M. Gennaro <johnmgennaro@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 12:22 PM To:Traffic Subject:Proposed all-way stop Hello! My name is John Gennaro. I met with city officials a few months ago about adding stop signs to the intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and I wanted to share my thoughts with the commission. Camino De Amigos is the main street of our Meadowood community, and its intersection with Calle Hidalgo is a major crossing point. Our neighborhood playground sits right on that corner, meaning tons of kids and seniors cross Calle Hidalgo there every single day. Unfortunately, I’ve personally seen cars slam on their brakes after entering the community just to avoid hitting neighbors. I strongly support adding an all-way stop to this intersection. It’s a simple fix that will genuinely save lives and make our community safer. Thank you CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 17 Lovelynne Magalued From:Crystal Knoblauch <crystalknoblauch@hotmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 11:16 AM To:Traffic Subject:All ways stops proposed Hi, I live at 3506 Calle Hidalgo, Carlsbad CA 92009. I am writing in support of the proposed all-way stop at my intersection: Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos under consideration at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. This intersection is right next to our neighborhood playground and cars regularly speed by while children and families play. Adding an all-way stop will greatly increase safety. Thank you for your consideration, Crystal K CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 18 Lovelynne Magalued From:Rebecca Gennaro <rebeccalawson81@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 11:13 AM To:Traffic Subject:Statement of Support: June 1 Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission Meeting Hello, My name is Rebecca Gennaro and I live at 6803 Corte Adalina. I am writing in support of the proposed all- way stop at Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos under consideration at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. This intersection is right next to our neighborhood playground and cars regularly speed by while children and families play. Adding an all-way stop will greatly increase safety. Thank you for your consideration, Rebecca -- Rebecca Gennaro 858.449.5248 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 19 Lovelynne Magalued From:sue13525 <sue13525@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2026 6:39 AM To:Traffic Subject:Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descano Thank you for considering the stop signs here. When coming out of Paseo Cerro it's hard to see the cars coming up the hill. The cars tend to come up the hill faster than expected because they have the right of way. I can't tell you how many near miss accidents I have had. Sent from my Galaxy CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 Lovelynne Magalued From:Kate Heyde <kateheyde@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 4:03 PM To:Traffic Subject:In support of Calle Hidalgo and Camino de Amigos stop sign Hello, I am wri ng in support of a recent no ﬁca on received in my neighborhood for a new stop sign on Calle Hidalgo and Camino de Amigos. There is a toddler playground right next to that intersec on and it needs a 4 way stop. Thank you! Kate Heyde 702-321-1333 CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 2 Lovelynne Magalued From:Dan Tomassi <dantomassi@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 2:33 PM To:Traffic Subject:Re: Alicante and Galena stop sign Hello, please disregard the message I sent regarding Alicante and Galena – I had the loca on confused. I sent a separate message regarding Alicante and Goldstone, which is truly the area where we have a safety issue. Alicante and Galena would be ridiculous to put a stop sign as it would impede the ﬂow of traﬃc for no reason whatsoever. Sent from my iPhone > On May 28, 2026, at 7:11 AM, Dan Tomassi <dantomassi@gmail.com> wrote: > > My address is 2211 Azurite Place, Carlsbad CA 92009 > > I support the proposed All-Way Stop Sign to be located at Alicante Road and Galena Avenue > > Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Lovelynne Magalued From:Carl Boode <Cboode21@outlook.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 2:23 PM To:Traffic Cc:Dan Tomassi Subject:Proposed Galena Ave./Alicante Rd. stop sign Dear Sirs, I reside at 2219 Azurite Place in La Costa Greens, and received your no ce of a mee ng to discuss several proposed new four way stop signs in the area, including one at the above men oned intersec on. I completely agree with the comments made by Dan Tomassi ( a board member of our HOA and a neighbor) that safety would be be er served if the stop sign loca on were shi ed to Goldstone, a few hundred feet to the north. It is almost a completely “blind” turn le (north bound) on to Alicante from Goldstone ( the right turn onto Alicante is nearly as bad) and my wife and I both try to avoid it, even if it is the more direct route. By contrast, the current proposed stop sign loca on has good sight lines at adequate distances in all direc ons, in my opinion. Please reevaluate the current proposal and consider what would be a three-way stop at Alicante and Goldstone Roads. Respec ully, Carl Boode 520-237-8078 Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 4 Lovelynne Magalued From:Rebecca Janzon <rebeccajanzon19@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 1:27 PM To:Traffic Subject:New All way stops - Alicante Road and Galena Ave. Hi, I wanted to write to let you know that I am 100% in favor of this new stop. I live at 6955 Goldstone Rd, Carlsbad, CA 92009 and ride my bike on Alicante. I have been nearly hit by a car coming up Alicante from Alga on several occasions. They drive far to fast, over the speed limit and there is very limited visibility. Kind regards, Rebecca Janzon 6955 Goldstone Rd, Carlsbad, CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 5 Lovelynne Magalued From:Fan Wu <fannyw2006@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 12:56 PM To:Traffic Subject:Fwd: Alicante and Galena stop sign Hello, Our address is 2218 Azurite Place, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Guo-hua and I have same concerns as Dan expressed in below email. Please evaluate safety of Goldstone and Alicante intersection before finalizing any decision regarding the placement of an all way stop sign. Your consideration is very much appreciated. Thank you! Fan and Guo-hua 2218 Azurite Place, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Sent from my iPad From: Dan Tomassi <dantomassi@gmail.com> Date: May 29, 2026 at 11:58:23 AM PDT To: traffic@carlsbadca.gov Subject: Re: Alicante and Galena stop sign Hello, My address is 2211 Azurite Place, Carlsbad, CA 92009. I understand the City is considering an all-way stop at the intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue. While I appreciate the effort to improve safety in the area, I would strongly encourage the City to evaluate the intersection of Alicante Road and Goldstone Drive as a higher-priority location. For residents who live on Goldstone and the surrounding streets, entering Alicante Road can be extremely challenging and, at times, unsafe. Traffic frequently travels at high speeds in both directions, and visibility at the 6 Goldstone intersection is significantly restricted. Drivers attempting to pull onto Alicante often have limited sight distance to approaching vehicles, creating a hazardous situation that residents encounter every day. In contrast, the proposed intersection at Alicante and Galena does not present the same visibility concerns. While traffic calming measures may be beneficial there, the most significant safety issue in this area is the combination of speed and limited visibility at Alicante and Goldstone. As a resident who regularly uses this intersection, I believe an all-way stop at Alicante and Goldstone would provide a substantially greater safety benefit, improve access for residents, and reduce the risk of collisions. I respectfully request that the City conduct a thorough evaluation of this intersection before finalizing any decision regarding the placement of an all-way stop. Thank you for your time and consideration of this important safety concern. Sincerely, Dan Tomassi 2211 Azurite Place Carlsbad, CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 7 Lovelynne Magalued From:Dan Tomassi <dantomassi@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 11:58 AM To:Traffic Subject:Re: Alicante and Galena stop sign Hello, My address is 2211 Azurite Place, Carlsbad, CA 92009. I understand the City is considering an all-way stop at the intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue. While I appreciate the effort to improve safety in the area, I would strongly encourage the City to evaluate the intersection of Alicante Road and Goldstone Drive as a higher-priority location. For residents who live on Goldstone and the surrounding streets, entering Alicante Road can be extremely challenging and, at times, unsafe. Traffic frequently travels at high speeds in both directions, and visibility at the Goldstone intersection is significantly restricted. Drivers attempting to pull onto Alicante often have limited sight distance to approaching vehicles, creating a hazardous situation that residents encounter every day. In contrast, the proposed intersection at Alicante and Galena does not present the same visibility concerns. While traffic calming measures may be beneficial there, the most significant safety issue in this area is the combination of speed and limited visibility at Alicante and Goldstone. As a resident who regularly uses this intersection, I believe an all-way stop at Alicante and Goldstone would provide a substantially greater safety benefit, improve access for residents, and reduce the risk of collisions. I respectfully request that the City conduct a thorough evaluation of this intersection before finalizing any decision regarding the placement of an all-way stop. Thank you for your time and consideration of this important safety concern. Sincerely, Dan Tomassi 2211 Azurite Place Carlsbad, CA 92009 CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 Lovelynne Magalued From:Brandon Curtis <brandonrcurtis@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 1, 2026 7:34 AM To:Traffic Subject:Opposition to Four Way Stop: Calle Hidalgo and Camino de Amigos Traﬃc Safety Commission, I am a homeowner on Calle Hidalgo and am wri ng to express with my opposi on to the four way stop that is proposed at the intersec on of Calle Hidalgo with Camino de Amigos. There is very li le distance between the right turn lane from Melrose to our neighborhood to where the city has proposed pu ng one of the two addi onal stop signs. I’m very concerned that the city would be exposing the residents of Meadowood, our guests, delivery drivers, etc. to an increased risk of a rear end collisions if this intersec on becomes a four way stop. Vehicles are going 50+ miles an hour on Melrose and even at a safe and reasonable rate of speed, the turn from Melrose onto Calle Hidalgo does not oﬀer much visibility at all to a stopped car. In dense fog, which is common in this area, the turn oﬀ Melrose onto Calle Hidalgo with am added stop becomes extremely dangerous. For this reason, it was always my belief that the city never made this a four way stop in the past as it was much safer to have traﬃc con nually moving. I am also very concerned that our neighborhood has gone 26 years without a four way stop sign at this intersec on and this is a precursor to opening Calle Hidalgo between Melrose and Rancho Santa Fe in San Marcos. I am adamantly opposed to any such plan. There is a clearly visible “Dead End” sign immediately ahead of the proposed stop sign and I really don’t see how adding a stop sign leading to a dead end street with 10 houses and a minimal amount of traﬃc is a safety improvement. The added risk of rear end collisions is too signiﬁcant for this stop sign to be put in and I’m strongly opposed to any changes at all for the traﬃc pa erns on Calle Hidalgo. Best regards, Brandon Cur s 3515 Calle Hidalgo CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 2 Lovelynne Magalued From:Judy White <kalamazoojudy@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 29, 2026 6:15 PM To:Traffic Subject:Stop sign I was so glad to see that you are going to put a stop sign in our neighborhood on Alicante. But then I saw that it was going at the wrong corner. To go anyplace north from my house, I have to go on Goldstone to Alicante to turn left. What a dangerous situation that corner is. The traffic coming south on Alicante comes up a hill before that corner. We at the corner at Goldstone cannot see them coming early enough. Besides, many of them have gained too much speed by that hill and are going too fast. Add to that all of the cars parked on Goldstone near the tennis courts. Red curbs at that corner could be helpful to keep the sight line clear from Goldstone. Please research this corner once again. The next corner that you are considering is not a problem. People have just started up the hill coming north and are easily seen from all points of the corner. However, I would prefer two stop signs to none.. Thank you for letting us have feedback before you make this decision. Judith White, 2226 Azurite Pl, La Costa Greens CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Lovelynne Magalued From:Jeff Burris <the4jbs@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, May 30, 2026 11:27 AM To:Traffic Subject:Intersection proposal Dear City of Carlsbad, I am writing regarding the recent notice concerning the proposed installation of a four- way stop at the intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue. As a resident of the La Costa Greens community, which is located within the immediate area of this intersection, I would like to share my concerns regarding the proposal. While the notice outlined the proposed change, it did not provide the underlying reasons or traffic study findings that prompted the recommendation. Based on my observations as a resident, I do not believe the Alicante/Galena intersection warrants a four-way stop. Traffic volumes at this location are generally low, and even during peak periods, the intersection does not appear to experience significant congestion or present notable traffic safety concerns. If the proposal is intended to address pedestrian safety, I would encourage the City to consider alternative measures, such as installing a marked crosswalk with pedestrian- activated flashing amber beacons, similar to the crossing currently located at Alicante Road and Lapis Road. Additionally, I bring over 30 years of experience as a peace officer, including extensive work in traffic enforcement and traffic-related roadway assessments. Based on that experience, I do not see a compelling justification for converting the Alicante/Galena intersection into a four-way stop. In contrast, I believe the intersection of Alicante Road and Goldstone Drive deserves greater consideration for a multi-directional stop. As a T-intersection, it presents more significant visibility challenges due to changes in roadway elevation to the north and roadway curvature to the south, both of which can make it difficult for motorists to see 4 approaching traffic. From a traffic safety perspective, this location appears to present a stronger case for additional traffic controls. I respectfully encourage the City’s traffic engineers to reevaluate the current proposal and consider whether safety improvements would be more appropriately directed toward the Alicante/Goldstone intersection rather than Alicante/Galena. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regard, Jeff Burris CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 Lovelynne Magalued From:Andy Deninger <andy.deninger@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 1, 2026 11:03 AM To:Traffic Cc:Tina Deninger Subject:June 1 Meeting - Input on Galena & Alicante Intersection I am writing to comment on the proposal to add a stop sign, etc. to the intersection of Galena and Alicante. My family and I live in the La Costa Greens community and have been at this location since 2007. This is a very dangerous intersection that needs attention to slow cards driving on Alicante to allow cars leaving Galena to exit safely. It is also very dangerous to turn left onto Galena while traveling southbound on Alicante due to a blindspot caused by the downward slope of Alicante. It would also be very advantageous to have a cross walk at this location. It is very unsafe to cross and the nearest crosswalk is a long walk away.\ Thank you, Andy & Tina Deninger CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 2 Lovelynne Magalued From:Thomas Harleman Jr <twhjr@roadrunner.com> Sent:Monday, June 1, 2026 11:03 AM To:Traffic Subject:All way stop for Alicante and Galena Ave I will be a ending. Live on Galena Ave and it’s desperately needed to allow pedestrians and cars speeding a reason to slow down and stop for pedestrians and children to cross. It’s bad now! Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: Do not open a achments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Lovelynne Magalued From:Celine Martin <celinemartin818@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 1, 2026 10:32 AM To:Traffic Subject:Statement of Support: June 1 Traffic Saftey & Mobility Commission Attachments:IMG_1153.jpeg Hello, My name is Celine Martin and I live at 3534 Corte Lupe. I am writing in support of the proposed all-way stop at Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos under consideration at the June 1 Traffic Safety meeting. This intersection is right next to our neighborhood playground and cars regularly speed by while children and families play. Adding an all-way stop will greatly increase safety. ***Now if only we could get better signage at the intersection of Melrose and Alga entering our neighborhood...I see people turning left from the middle lane nearly every day and people turning right from the middle lane almost running over anyone in the crosswalk. Thank you for your consideration, Celine Martin 760-717-8719 celinemartin818@gmail.com CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 Lovelynne Magalued From:Greg Gossard <greg@thegossardgroup.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 2, 2026 1:38 PM To:Traffic Subject:Alicante Stop Sign Proposal Hello City of Carlsbad, My address is 2214 Azurite Place, Carlsbad, CA 92009. I understand the City is considering an all-way stop at the intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue. While I appreciate the eAort to improve safety in the area, I would strongly encourage the City to evaluate the intersection of Alicante Road and Goldstone Drive as a more appropriate location; if in fact one is needed at all. Entering Alicante Road from Goldstone Rd is challenging due to visibility and speed of traAic. The proposed intersection at Alicante and Galena does not present the same visibility concerns or as signiﬁcant of a speed concern dues to it’s proximity to the traAic lilght at Alicante and Alga. As a resident who regularly uses this intersection, I don’t personally see the need for a stop sign to be added at either location, but can appreciate you may have traAic incident reports that prove otherwise. The big picture here is that an All-Way stop sign at Goldstone and Alicante would be a far better location from a speed and safety (visibility) perspective than Galena & Alicante. To that end, I respectfully request that the City re-consider it’s evaluation of the traAic measure in this area and either leave it as is, or add a stop sign at Alicante & Goldstone; NOT at Alicante & Galena. Respectfully, Greg Gossard 2214 Azurite Place CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Miriam Jim, Senior Engineer Lindy Pham, Associate Engineer June 1, 2026 All-Way Stop at Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso RECOMMENDED ACTION Support staff’s recommendation to install all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. 2 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP •Park Drive •Hummingbird Road •Black Rail Road •Plum Tree Road •Carrillo Way TRAFFIC CALMING STREETSAll-way stop requests: •Alicante Road and Galena Avenue •Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos •Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso 3 •Vehicle speeds •Visibility •Pedestrian safety •Requested all-way stops 4 RESIDENTS’ CONCERNS & REQUESTS ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP ANALYSIS •Staff utilized criteria found in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) •Key factors considered include: –Vehicular, bike and pedestrian volumes –Collision history –Movement conflicts –Sight distance –Traffic operations 5 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP CRITERIA A – INTERIM MEASURE •Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. 6 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP CRITERIA B – COLLISION HISTORY •Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by an all-way stop installation 7 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP CRITERIA C – MINIMUM VOLUMES 1.The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street, total of both approaches averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; 2.The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street, averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour. 3.If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Part 1 and 2. 8 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP CRITERIA D – 80% MINIMUM VOLUMES •Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values 9 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP A.The need to control left-turn conflicts; B.The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C.Locations where a road user, after stopping cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D.An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. 10 OTHER CRITERIA ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP •Park Drive •Hummingbird Road •Black Rail Road •Plum Tree Road •Carrillo Way TRAFFIC CALMING STREETS Intersection of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue 11 EXISTING CONDITIONS Alicante Road •Posted Speed Limit = 40 mph •Roadway width = 40 to 50 feet •Two-lane roadway •Buffered Bike Lane and no on-street parking •South of Galena Avenue, Alicante Road is a divided roadway with landscaped raised median Galena Avenue •Posted Speed Limit = 25 mph •Roadway width = 34 to 54 feet •Two-lane road with on-street parking in both directions •Stop signs on Galena Avenue •Two collisions reported in the last 5 years •One due to unsafe speed hitting fixed object •One due to R/W violation 12 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP 13 OTHER CRITERIA C – SIGHT DISTANCE ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP •Staff conducted sight distance analysis •Combination of the trees in the raised median and the roadway’s vertical alignment restrict visibility •Minimum stopping sight distance requirement of 300 feet cannot be met Based on the sight distance evaluation performed, Other Criterion C was satisfied. •Park Drive •Hummingbird Road •Black Rail Road •Plum Tree Road •Carrillo Way TRAFFIC CALMING STREETS 14 Intersection of Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos EXISTING CONDITIONS Calle Hidalgo & Camino De Amigos •Posted Speed Limit = 25mph •Roadway width = 40 feet •One travel lane and on-street parking in each direction •Stop signs on Camino De Amigos •Calle Hidalgo forms a T-intersection with Melrose Drive and terminates east of Camino De Amigos •Community playground at northwest corner •Zero collision reported in the last 5 years 15 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP •Traffic data collected on Oct. 28, 2025 •138 pedestrians on a typical day •Intersection provides direct access to community playground •An all-way stop control would reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicular traffic Therefore, Other Criterion B was satisfied. 16 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP OTHER CRITERIA B – PEDESTRIANS/VEHICLE CONFLICTS 17 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP OTHER CRITERIA D – RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREETS •Higher speed vehicles from northbound Melrose Drive can carry through this intersection •Residential streets with similar roadway characteristics and carry comparable traffic volumes •An all-way stop control would improve overall traffic operation and safety Therefore, Other Criterion D was satisfied. •Park Drive •Hummingbird Road •Black Rail Road •Plum Tree Road •Carrillo Way TRAFFIC CALMING STREETS 18 Intersection of Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso EXISTING CONDITIONS Paseo Cerro & Paseo Descanso •Prima Facia Speed Limit = 25 mph •Roadway width = 36 to 40 feet •Two-lane road •On-street parking •The intersection is stop-controlled for southbound traffic on Paseo Cerro and eastbound traffic for Paseo Descanso •One collision reported in the last 5 year •Unsafe speed hitting fixed object 19 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP •Safety concerns due to its unconventional two-way stop control configuration •Existing conditions cause driver confusion •All-way stop control would improve traffic operations and safety Therefore, Other Criterion D was satisfied. 20 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP OTHER CRITERIA D – RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREETS Staff recommend the installation of all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. 21 CONCLUSION ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP NEXT STEPS •City Council to adopt ordinances to establish all-way stops at the subject three intersections •Once ordinance is adopted, STOP signs and pavement markings will be installed 22 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP Staff have notified affected residents and others who may be interested in the project: •Doorhangers to residents and property owners adjacent to the intersections •HOA Outreach •Updates on Nextdoor 23 COMMUNITY OUTREACH ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP RECOMMENDED ACTION Support staff’s recommendation to install all-way stop control at the intersections of Alicante Road and Galena Avenue, Calle Hidalgo and Camino De Amigos, and Paseo Cerro and Paseo Descanso. 24 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP THANK YOU! 25 ITEM 3: ALL -WAY STOP