HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-06-16; City Council; Resolution 2026-129Exhibit 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-129 .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF $294,926 FROM THE
GENERAL FUND TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
OPERATING BUDGET AND THE CONVERSATION OF ONE PART-TIME FIRE
PREVENTION SPECIALIST POSITION TO A FULL-TIME ASSISTANT FIRE
MARSHAL POSITION TO SUPPORT PHASE 2 OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION
PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized funding on February 25, 2025, for the development of a
comprehensive Wildfire Mitigation Plan to address increasing wildfire risk within the City of Carlsbad;
and
WHEREAS, the Wildfire Mitigation Plan is a proactive, two-phase framework designed to guide
city policy, investment and wildfire risk-reduction strategies; and
WHEREAS, Phase 1 of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan, consisting of a Wildfire Hazard and Risk
Assessment, has been completed and provides a comprehensive evaluation of wildfire hazards, fire
behavior, structural vulnerability, defensible space conditions, operational constraints, and mitigation
opportunities throughout the city; and
WHEREAS, Phase 2 of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan will include development of a Community
Wildfire Protection Plan through collaboration with residents, community stakeholders, regulatory
agencies, land managers, and city staff to identify and prioritize wildfire mitigation strategies and
implementation actions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the City Manager to initiate Phase 2 of the Wildfire
Mitigation Plan on June 9, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department is requesting the conversion of one existing part-time Fire
Prevention Specialist position to one full-time Assistant Fire Marshal position to oversee Phase 2 of the
Wildfire Mitigation Plan, including development of a Community Wildfire Protection Plan and
associated stakeholder engagement, planning, environmental review, and project development
activities; and
WHEREAS, the costs associated with the conversion of this position include salary, benefits,
training, and equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to include funding for the position conversion and
community outreach budget in the fiscal year 2026-27 operating budget; and
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 497 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
WHEREAS, the appropriation required for these items in fiscal year 2026-27 is $294,926.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1.That the above recitations are true and correct.
2.That this action is not a “project” as defined by California Environmental Quality Act, or
CEQA, Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) and does not require
environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) as it is a government
fiscal activity and does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may
result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.
3.That the City Manager or designee is authorized to convert one existing part-time Fire
Prevention Specialist position to one full-time Assistant Fire Marshal position in the Fire
Department to oversee Phase 2 of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan.
4.That the City Manager or designee is authorized to appropriate a total of $294,926 from
the General Fund to the Fire Department’s FY 2026-27 operating budget, including
$75,000 for the purchase and outfitting of one vehicle.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Joint Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, the Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, the Board of Directors of the
Carlsbad Public Financing Authority, the Community Development Commission, and the City Council
as Successor Agency to the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency held on the 16th day of June, 2026, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Acosta, Burkholder, Shin.
NAYS: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
______________________________________
KEITH BLACKBURN, Mayor
______________________________________
SHERRY FREISINGER, City Clerk
(SEAL)
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 498 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
Exhibit 19
1 7
Subject:
Purpose
1
•
•
•
•
•
Background
1 The policy, as it applies to Carlsbad Municipal Water District fees and housing services fees, was approved by the
Board of Directors of Carlsbad Municipal Water District of the City of Carlsbad on June 186, 20246, by Resolution
No. ___1742 and the Community Development Commission on June 186, 20246, by Resolution No. 569___.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 499 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 2
Subject to this Policy
Not Subject to this Policy
• Miscellaneous administrative
fees
• Special events fees
• Streetlight energizing fees
• City Clerk’s Office fees
• Library fees
• Fire fees:
o Fire extinguishing and
alarm systems permit fees
o Annual inspections and
fire code permits
o Other fire fees
• Fees for development
applications, including
entitlements, plan review, permit
issuance, inspections
• Police administrative and service
fees
• Utility account fees for
residential customers
• Fees charged on an hourly, time
and materials, or actual cost of
service basis
• Permit fees required to operate a
business
• Any fees prohibited by law from
exceeding the reasonable cost of
providing services
• Deposits and securities
• Safety Training Center facility fees
• All fees for rental or use of city facilities
and/or equipment
• Administrative citation penalties
• Vehicle, traffic and parking civil penalties
• Development impact fees, utility
connection fees
• Trash collection rates
• Fees set through contracts with third-
party vendors
• Water and wastewater service rates and
property related fees and taxes governed
by Proposition 218
• Utility services fees, recycled water and
wastewater fees, third party hydraulic
modelling fees, and other utility fees
• Fees set by external agencies
• Other monetary exactions imposed on a
project on an ad hoc basis in connection
with the approval of a development
project
• Business license taxes
• Emergency medical services, paramedic
and ambulance fees
• Parks & Recreation and Library & Cultural
Arts program and class fees2
• All fees for services set by state or federal
statute
Statement of policy
It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad that the following guidelines will be used in establishing
and maintaining fees and charges:
1. Revenues for individual fees and in aggregate for any fee program shall not exceed the
reasonable cost of providing services.
2 Resolutions No. 2008-192 and No. 2015-173 authorized the City Manager or a designee to set all fees included in
the Community Services Guide provided that fees both do not exceed the cost of providing the program and that these fees are no lower than the lowest fee charged for similar programs in the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San
Marcos, Escondido, or Encinitas.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 500 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 3
2. Comprehensive review of all city fees and charges shall occur every five to seven years.
3. In certain circumstances where cost recovery may be unrealistic or undesirable, the City
Council may subsidize a portion of or an entire fee program and/or individual fees.
4. In certain circumstances where immediate adjustments to full cost recovery may be
impractical, it may be appropriate to phase in fee increases over multiple years.
5. The procedures for adopting fees for development applications or projects shall follow
the procedures for adopting various fees provided by Government Code sections 66016-
66019, or other applicable law, and shall be effective no sooner than 60 days following
the final action.
6. Fees and charges should be sensitive to the “market” for similar services.
7. A unified approach should be used in determining cost recovery levels for various
programs and their individual fees and charges based on this policy.
Influential Factors to Cost Recovery Policy
Reasonable, routinely reviewed, and well managed fees for services are one of the many
responsible financial steps needed to support the city’s overall financial sustainability. When
considering whether fees and charges should be adopted to recover 100% of the costs of
providing services, city staff and the City Council will consider the following influential factors:
• The level of cost recovery should consider the degree to which the public benefits from
the service versus the degree to which the user of the service themselves benefits.
• The level of cost recovery should consider how the pricing of services can affect the
demand and subsequent level of services provided.
Based on the consideration of factors that influence cost recovery policy, the degree to which
pricing for services recovers the city’s costs of providing the service will vary.
• Low-level cost recovery services should aim to recover between 0%-30% of their costs.
These include services where there is no intended relationship between the fee and the
benefit received, that are essential to community safety, or for services where
collecting fees would discourage compliance.
• Mid-level cost recovery services should aim to recover between 31%-80% of their costs.
These include services where the specific user of the service receives a higher level of
benefit than the general taxpayer, but where the city has an interest in encouraging
compliance by subsidizing the cost of the service.
• High-level cost recovery services should recover between 81%-100% of their costs.
These include services where the individual primarily and directly benefits from the
service, not the community at large. These may be services that could otherwise be
provided by the private sector or use of the service is not encouraged.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 501 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 4
Service/Program Cost Recovery
Target
Pricing Strategy
General and Administrative Fees – Finance, Clerk, City Manager
Appeals to City Council MID (31%-80%) Both individual and
community benefit from
the service
Business license master list of new/active
licenses
HIGH (81%-100%) Individual benefit received
from the service
Community facilities district annexation
services
HIGH (81%-100%) Individual benefit received
from the service
Miscellaneous services where amount of the
fee is not set by state or federal statute
HIGH (81%-100%) Individual benefit received
from the service
Special Events Fees
City-sponsored special events. Special
events sponsored by the city or a non-profit
organization with a community-wide benefit
that are free and open to the public
LOW (0%-30%) Community primarily
benefits from the service
Special events that are open to the public
where admission or fees for participation
are not charged
MID (31%-80%) Both the event sponsor
and the community benefit
from the service
Special events where admission is ticketed
or fees for participation are charged
HIGH (81%-100%) Individual benefit received
from the service
Library Fees
Library card replacement, hold requests,
interlibrary loans, general day-to-day service
fees
LOW (0%-30%) Community primarily
benefits from the service
Refund processing initiated by customer LOW (0%-30%) Community primarily
benefits from the service
Fire Fees
Fire code permits, annual occupancy
regulatory inspections (both state-
mandated and non-mandated)
MID (31%-80%) Both individual and
community benefit from
the service
Fire/life safety plan check and inspection
fees for development services (e.g.,
sprinkler, alarms, new construction)
MID (31%-80%) Individual benefit received
from the service. Fees
should generally be set at
the higher end of the mid-
range
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 502 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 5
Police Fees
Patrol and general enforcement services MID (31%-80%) Community primarily
benefits from the service
Copies of reports for victims of crimes MID (31%-80%) Ensure access to valuable
service
All fees for records management, towing, or
other items which are not limited per state
or federal statute
MID (31%-80%) Individual benefit received
from the service, or fee is
administrative as pertains
to a violation of code/law
Utility Administrative Fees
New account set up, reinstating of service
for delinquent accounts to the extent not
limited by SB 998,3 all other fees subject to
this policy
MID (31%-80%) Individual benefit received
from the service
Land Development Permitting & Inspection Services
Discretionary Entitlement Permit (review
and processing, including but not limited to
general plan amendment, rezone, local
coastal plan amendment, conditional use
permit, coastal development permit, site
development plan)
HIGH (81%-100%)
Individual directly
benefiting from the
permitted action pays a
majority, if not all the
permit processing costs
Minor Discretionary Permit (review and
processing, including but not limited to
permits that are more administrative in
nature (i.e., accessory dwelling units))
LOW (0%-30%)
Ensure compliance with
essential regulatory codes
and standards by
minimizing the permit
application costs
Ministerial Permit (review and processing,
including but not limited to building,
grading, map, and improvement plan)
HIGH (81%-100%)
Individual directly
benefiting from the
permitted action pays a
majority, if not all the
permit processing costs
3 SB 998 limits the amount that qualifying low-income residential water customers must pay for service
reconnections after shutoff to $50 during normal business hours and $150 after normal business hours. These
figures are subject to annual inflationary adjustments for changes in the Consumer Price Index. See California Health and Safety Code 116914. Details for residential water customers are available in the Carlsbad Municipal
Water District’s Residential Water Service Shutoff Protection Policy for Nonpayment of Charges.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 503 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 6
Minor Ministerial Permit (review and
processing, including but not limited to
minor commercial or industrial tenant
improvements, adjustment plats, right-of-
way use or encroachment agreements)
MID (31%-80%)
Ensure compliance with
essential regulatory codes
and standards by
minimizing the permit
application costs
Administrative Ministerial Permit (review
and processing, including but not limited to
minor and/or routine residential repairs
LOW (0%-30%)
Ensure compliance with
essential regulatory codes
and standards by
minimizing the permit
application costs
Permit Inspection Services HIGH (81%-100%)
Individual directly
benefiting from the
permitted action pays a
majority, if not all the
permit processing costs
Procedures
This Cost Recovery Policy establishes a scheduled program to comprehensively review the fee
schedule to determine if the current fee amounts are reflective of the costs to provide such
services and are consistent with best practices and statutory requirements.
• A comprehensive analysis of city service delivery costs associated with fees and charges
shall be made approximately every five to seven years.
• Off-cycle updates will occur annually, where fees will be adjusted by a percentage equal
to the change in the San Diego Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or another reasonable inflationary factor.
• Individual fees may be adjusted during the interim period based on supplemental
analysis whenever there have been significant changes in costs.
• The City Council shall have the opportunity to review and the authority to approve any
changes to the Master Fee Schedule.
• The City Council may decide to increase fees over a period not to exceed three years of
five years in certain circumstances where immediate adjustments to targeted cost
recovery amounts may be unrealistic. In exceptional cases, city staff may recommend
that the City Council consider a phase-in period exceeding five years to achieve targeted
cost recovery rates.
Comparability with Other Communities
Comparing the city’s fees to other communities provides useful background information in
setting fees. It allows the city to assess the market price of the service as compared to other
agencies as well as to learn about alternative methods of charging fees for certain services.
However, fee surveys should never be the sole or primary criteria in setting city fees as there
are many factors that affect how and why other communities have set their fees at their levels.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 504 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26
City Council Policy Statement
June 18, 2024June 16, 2026
Page 7
Terms and Limitations
1. All rights and obligations existing under any user fee schedule in effect prior to the
effective date of a resolution approving a user fee update, shall continue in full force
and effect. Updates to user fee schedules should not affect or disrupt the continuity of
the city’s business or administration of its law, including:
• Actions and proceedings that began before the effective date of the resolution.
• Prosecution for ordinance violations committed before the effective date of the
resolution.
• The amount, or collection, of license, fee, penalty debt, forfeiture, or obligations
due and unpaid as of the effective date of the resolution.
2. This Cost Recovery Policy does not invalidate any action taken prior to its effective date
if the action was proper under the law governing the action at the time the action was
taken.
June 16, 2026 Item #6 Page 505 of 618
Docusign Envelope ID: EC574C28-EE41-8112-82BD-B665E154CC26