Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 05-17; DONALD CONDOMINIUMS; Site Development Plan (SDP)• CITY OF CARLSBAD • LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) □ Administrative Permit □ Planned Industrial Permit l6l Administrative Variance Avd)s ... o, □ Planning Commission Determination ~ Coastal Development Permit co r eis..Q □ Precise Development Plan □ Conditional Use Permit □ Redevelopment Permit ~ Condominium Permit c? 06-l l g] Site Development Plan □ Environmental Impact Assessment □ Special Use Permit □ General Plan Amendment □ Specific Plan ~ Hillside Development Permit /-ID P oS--(3 □ +eAtati1,1e PaFGel Map Obtain from Engineering Department □ Local Coastal Program Amendment □ Tentative Tract Map □ Master Plan □ Variance □ Minor Conditional Use Permit □ Zone Change □ Non-Residential Planned Development □ List other applications not specified □ Planned Development Permit 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: d} O 3 . o ~ / • D g" 3) PROJECT NAME: Do...v At.. .il C.o.A) j) o H /A} 1 v /f.-1 .S 4) BRIEFDESCRIPTIONOFPROJECT: :2 /<.eSt:0RAJ7"1Al. C.oAJboM/AI/VN 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS w -4 r TAc.ff cD ,;z. -cA ~ 6. R 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) E A.t c_ t3G c K MAILING ADDRESS 7{,0- (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 'SDP-os.-I) 35()5 ~OC.l( Q, DO:€ 12.J>. '-ldc./-t../sf).. ~'-/'{J..3 t-<J!-11TAt<e,e. wA'/ CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP 760 -1/'.Jl 2 THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AN ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORR O E ST OF Y KNOWLEDGE. 7'-l~OC. DATE NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 14 Rev. 03/06 PAGE 1 OF 5 • • 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: nJL/~?. OcGA/f/ "S -r: C,,Q,t..5 8A.D. C4, STREET ADDRESS I' ON THE I W/3.S r I SIDE OF I OCEAAI s--r. (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN I p A c. t .f"t c_.. I AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 011) NUMBER OF EXISTING OJ 12) PROPOSED NUMBER 0 RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ I ~, 15) PROPOSED COMM ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED ,~~~, 17) PROPOSED INCREASE ILo ·_ 118) PROPOSED SEWER ~ PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE INADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 1. ~3 I 20) EXISTING GENERAL IR11 I{ 121) PROPOSED GENERAL 0 PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING It<~ 3 I 23) PROPOSED ZONING 024) HABITAT IMPACTS ~ IF YES, ASSIGN HMP # 25) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED Form 14 Rev. 03/06 FEE REQUIRED DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: :: I~ PAGE 2 OF 5 . 1 16 2005 11:26AM PS CITY OF CARLSBAD LANO USE AEVl!W APPUCATJON 1) APPLICATf NS APi:,,LIED POR: (CHECK BOXES) (FO!t OEPAR'™l:NT USEON D Administrative-Permit ~ Admfnfstra.tfve Varian~ ~ Coastal Development Permit 0 Oo11ditltma1 U~e PGm,lt i--------..i □-S. Condominium Pennit i{fil environmental 1mp~ct Asael/lSment □ [gt General Plan Amendment Hillitlde Development Permit Local Coastal Pr'Ogtam Amendment ~ !8J. . ·□ J.-HO_P_O_S-_l---1 0 Planned lnduitfiaf ?ennit Plannf no CommlMion Oe!JAtmination Prec!Je Development Plan Red$\"6lopment P$rmlt Site Oavefqpment Plan Spedll ~ Permit Specttro Pran +entarl•/$ PARMI Map Obblln fl'Dm Englnsrtng Depsmwnt .. Tentative Tract Map □ □ Mester Plan D Varfanr;:e D □ 2) 3) 4) ,__ ___ ....... Noll-Re.&ldeofial Ph\nnad ceve~pment D Zone Change t---~-- Planm:1d oevefor>ment Pemilt D u~ bth,r ,pplrcatrons nDl speOffled 5} OWNER NAME (Prfnt or Type) ClTY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE SIGNATURE PAGE 06/U (FOR 0SPMTMENT useoNL 1-----r DATE ·---~·•-----,-·-------~-~----NOTa: A PROP08~~ P.MOJEOT'R~UIRIN;G ~UL trPLE ~IC.A TION$ 8E.Pfl.ai;>, NM$T BS JUSMITI'El);PRIOR 10 3:30 P.M. A PRO~ED Pft0,1i;CT REQtURINB ONLY ONI: APPLICA110tt 8E FIL.ED, MUST II! SUSMrrTett'~R TO 4;00 P.M. • • Form 14 fk,iv, 1:?./04 PAGi;; 1 01=5 - , FROM ,.:C~LIFORN~A. OAKS CAR _WAS•-·--:--:-FAX NO •. : 19096961846 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE [ : 1:il~I BeTWESNf ·"~irf~g,i;] SIOSOFI AND[ 16 2005 11:27AM P6 PAGE 06/11 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE{' ..... _,_ .... __ :-_: : ..... 1 10) PROPOSED NUMfll!R OF LOTS DJ 11) NUMl!JER OF EXISTING rr-t 12) PROPQaliitHJIJMBER I :;, ] RESIOEN1'1AI, UNITS L!..,_J OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ir ;- 13} TYPE or sU501V1sroN r;;:;;i14> PROPOSEo JNO 0FF1ce1 [ ~] 15) PRoPoseo OOMM Ee .. 1 l!!:3.{ eQIJARE FOQTAGI: SQl.1ARl;ii FQQTAGJE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED ~ ~ROPOSED INOR5A6E r;-;::i1 Ja. 18} PROPOseaOS~R r;;;-, PRo.ECf INOPEN8PAC1; ~ -IN ADT L!=!J USAGE IN.SOU L!::J 19) GROSS SfTEACRl:AGE r::;:;--120} EXISTING GENERAL i;;:;;;n 21) P~QP~D GeNERAL [ZJ l.::!2J Pl.AN l!:!!.rn Pl-AN D.&SJGlNATION 22) EX1$TING ZONING ~3) PROPOSED ZONING r""7f 24) HASrrAT IMPACTS r;:;;:J ~ .)::::.---1 rFWJl,M$IC!IHt1Mf'f# L.:..=:::l 2.5) IN iHE PROCE S OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY ae NEC=SSARY FOR MEMSgRs OF CITY STAFF, P G COMM!SS~IONcRS oes1GN ffEvteW SOARO MEMBe~s· OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPS: ' 0 ENTER THE SRTY THAT IS tHE SUBJECT OF THIS APPUCATION. JIWE CONSENT TOENTR HIS PU E . • • ~~FTr-~--~---llJJJ-1 vs ,., .. FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION ~IJOATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIREO Form 14 f\41v, 12/()4 . ' ... fESRE UlRED [, : :: : : :: : : : :: ! RECEI\/Fn CITY OF CARLSBAD Pl LI. f1l~ljMr-·nr-nz DATE S'TAMP !@Pl:JCA1f0N KEC.1:IWD_ PAGE2 OF-S • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPUCATJOH Rl!QWRl!Ml!NTS FOR: COASTAL DEVEWPMENT PERMIT (SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR AND MINOR} COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION (FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS) This supplementa1 .application is to he filed for .any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. **Applicu.litm -clwcldist for Non~Single Fmnily Regular C-em·tal Development. Permits. -c.over.-ed IUlder separate hamlout. A proposed project requil'ingthat multiple applications be filed· must be submitted priorto 3:-30 p.m. A proposed project requiring that only one appUcation be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. AU joint application exhibits.,. Le~ Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared at the same-scale. -(U-se a scale -no -sn:iaHer than 1" = 40'.) This supplemental application is ti, be filed for any devek)f).ment Fequiring a Cnastal Development Pemiit is&'Ued by the City of Carlsbad. -L -GENERAL-BACKGROUND A. EslimaLcd ·Cosl of Development: Development costing $60.000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Pen:rut The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project• s cost of development. The primary basis for dctcrmi.ning cost of development will be the application of dollar costs· per square foot for different types of resroenfial construction. These costs are set by the :l.ntemational -Confererrce of Bnilding·Officials -(lCBO) :and :are :applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the foHowinginform.ation to assist in· the deternrinalion of this project's cost of development (CmuracJ.or propos1.1Js nury also be s,tln1Titte,l for co,,sideralimi by J/1e Pl.o.nning Director). Please refer to the current Jee -schedule for the appropriate $!:square foot Jee rate. ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ New Residential Square Footage: erz, Ae:,to ~O:f :!;, ·square foet x $ /t:7h f&'q.ft..=$ Residential Addition Square Footage: -/9: squarefeetx$ 8-/sq. ft.=$ ---0: Any Gange Sq1:1are Footage: '%/_ Z.4G:,l9". -'1 Oq 7 -square feet x $ /sq,~=$ Reside~ Conversion S~uare Foo::: _ri.. --~~ ___ sq.uare.t.eetx$ ±z_ .{sq.ft.=.$ ____ ~.;;,_ ____ _ PJea.<;e contact the Cjty of Catlsbad.BuilrlingDe.partme.ntfor currentfee.ratefor Non­ .Residential uses (.i-.e. RetailJStore; Restaurants; Of.f1ee; and Mannf.actnring/W arehouse nses.) ~ squarefoetx$~/sq.ft=$_. -----~------ COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ _____ G'f,c_5.c,__1.....__....,~\=()~S=......,._-__ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ FOim 13-Revised 04/04 Page 1 of7 • B. Do you wish to apply for: C. D. E. F. G. J. A Minor Coastal .Del'ciopmcnt Permit (U.nrlcr $60,000 cost estimate} D 2. A Regular Coastal .Development .Permit ($60,000 or .mo.re cost estimate) ~ Street address of proposed devek>pment 24et7 Oee:AM ~. CA.l;"k~S!!;A~ LA 9ZCD8, Assessor·s Parcel Number of proposed development z.o-> · 02.l • 02:> Devclopmcnt Description: Briefly-describeproject ~ ~oa-lTt~ C-OHf2:a.11,Ju.,U·~:J-;,, IH j,r?~'( + ~E;.H£:;;td1' qr:12Wf)./f?E;, ~~H ~L ~--QP-B 6'>~ hwt::" pt-1 .. -$,.:re @fGC r>ersat\¼1 Describe the present land uses (i.e. vacant land, single family homes, ap.mm.ents, offices, etc-.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: ~lb\ bLE.. • Fj\r'\1 L...,. J2t:; ~\ ~ Suath: 6~12.k?~P t-11 a-I 'U-:P-+ ,hV~h1 y :~ r:::a~ ~~ Is project located within a 1-00-year flood plain? !ZS.. No II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY III. ♦ ♦ ♦ Form 13 A. Are there existing structures on the property? 0'Y es O No If yes, riease describe. nlH64-@ fliHlk'( o~~,Wf ¢~~ B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? 01 es O No If yes to either questio~ describe the ext.ent, of the demolition or removaL. including the relocation s:i-te. :if applicable-( also show -on plans). ~~ ~tyb'. ~~ fe;~ I ,-1& 4-61A-Ff""kt? "1-P' ~e r2e,HIP'.k:lbHel? J: ~t-1e2'-7e:;12 LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Existing New Pro12Qsed Total BuiWing Covernge t)~ 0 sq.fL 4 (d31 sq. fl '1lil7 sq. ft Landscaped Area ~ $q.fl 20fo~.ft. 2Dtoj $<l· 11 H.ardscape Area ~o sq.ft. z.G:,f\~.ft. ~11 sq.ft Unimproved Area G::,f,( ~sq.fl. lE:Sl (Lefl Nalural) sq. n. sq. ft ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • • ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ Revised 04/04 Page2-of7 • .B. C. • .Parking: Numbe.r of existing spaces Number of new spaces proposed Existing/Proposed TOI' AL! Number of total spaces required Number of covered spaces Number of uncovered spaces Number of standard spaces Number of compact spaces. • Is tandem parking existing! Is tandem parking proposed? Grade Alteration: • :1 4 1 Is any grading proposed? jKiYes If yes, please complete the foHowing: L Amount of cut 2-.D.-zc;;- 2. Amount of fill 2.o-2~ '3. Maximum height of fill slope z.' 4. Maximum height of cut slope 5' 5. Amount of import or export ¢¢ 6. Location of borrow or disposal :site • ' ., cu. yds. cu. yds. feet feet cu. yds. • ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page3-of7 • • The following materials shall -be submitted. for: each application -or: f-or. -combined. applications. -on. a. single ·project. L REOUIRED PLANS {Alt Temfked--ptans shall-be-mtlared into-wmplete sets. stapled-together, :tfum:..fo.lded to_9"' .:x-12'' with Jo:wer .right.liarul.cm:oer of.plan vismfe.} A. :SIIB ¥LAN -Four {4) ,copies for .a Minor Coastal :IJev.clupment :Permit.. funr '(4;) .copies fur .a Single Fami!y Rcgufar Coastaf .bcvcfopmc.nt Permit on 14"" x 36"'" shcct{s). Eacli site plan shall contain tlic following information: 1. GENERAL-INFORMATION Name~ address~ and phone number of r.~gister.ed civil ~• .... licensed surveyor..,. .landscape architect or land.planner who. preparettthe,maps/.pl~ns. Location.; Ji,ize and .nse-of all-ea-sement-.. Dimensions and· locations of:· a--cess. botli pedestrian and vehi'cular~ snowing se1-vire areas and pcinls on :ingress and egress, off -slr-ret. .parkmg .and loading areas showing localion, number and typical dimensien.of spa~. and.wheel .st~ps . .Distance between buildings andlor structmes. 'Bni-ldi:ng-setback:s {from. rear :and Sides). Location, height and materials. of walls and fences~ Dhnensionsff.ocation. o[ signs. A -suimnary .table-of 1he .folfowing{if-~ppficabie t-0·Lhe.apptit.11Hon}:· 0(1) Street address-and assessor1 s parcel ·number. ·□(2) Site acreage. 0(3) Existing Zone, and Land Use Dci,ignation. 0(4) Proposed land use. :0(5} Totaf.bufillingroverage. 0(6} Percent of sitet-o-be l'dfldsca,ped·. 0(7) Number of parking spaces.required/provided . . 0(8) Square F~e of open or recreational space {if ~cable) . . 0(9) Cubic foo~ge of st.or-age ~ce (if applkaNe). AU applfoable.Fir.e Suppres&'ion Zones as required by the -City'-s Landscape Manual. B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS: Grading and dratnage plans must be included with this: application. In .certain areas, an engineering_~ report -must also be included. Please ronsult the City Planni-n:g and Engineerin;g Department repre.<ientativ.e for a: determina.t.i:on on any _gradin_g plan geotc~hnic.al requirements if the. project is in an overlay zone. The following infonnation shall be -submitted at a ·minimum: Approximate contmrrs at 1 ' mt:ervats for stope.--i less than 5%; 2' +nt:ervals for s1opes -between 5%.and 10%~.and.S intenr.als for.slopes over 10%.(bothexisting.andproposed).. Existing.and proposed lopOgraphie contours within a 1-00-f-ool perim.eler of the boundaries of !he sile. Extend contours sufficiently out from the stte to adequately show the adjacent floodplain {i:f app!icabie). Earthwork volumes: (..'UL,Jill, import and cXP9rL Spot-elevations at-tbe-00mers-ef-eaob-pad. Method of draining each lot. Include a eypical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. wcation, width .andfor size of .all w.ar.errourses lID.d drainage facilities within .and .adjacent to lhe proposed subdivisitm; show location-and-.approximate size of .any proposed dctcntionl.retention basins. Clearly .show and label the 100 year flood line for the before and :after conditions for any project which is within. or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. • • • • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • • • ♦ • ♦ ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • • ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • • • ♦ • ·Form.13 Revised -041-04 Page-4-of7 • C. BUILDING ELEVATIONS· AND· FLOOR PLANS· -Four {4)' copies for a: Minor Coastal Dev-elopment Permit and. four {4) -oopies a Sin_gle Family :Re,gular Coastal Dev-elopment ·Pemlit _prepared on 24" x 36" sheet(s). Eaeh building e!evatiorr and floor-_plan shall include the following informafa.m: Bf. Location. and' size. of storage. areas.. Bf' AU -buildings. structures. wall and/or fences. ·signs and £¥erior iig{ttfit ~ Existing .and.proposed--.(!OllStf.l!Ction. Qi< Provide· docwnentation· demonstrating compliance· with· City Council Policy 44 - Ncighborhood.Arcllitootural Design Grudelines{if applicable). D~ COLORED SITE PLAN. ANll ELEV AUON PL.AN. -Not i:eq~ii;ed_ w.ith first stibmittaL 11. is.the. Applicant'·s resp0nsibility-to -brin_g ·0ne ·(1J ·e0py-0f a colored -site :plan and-one (1} -set ·of ·c0l0red· elevations to tlle Hanning Department by tz~oo.· noon.. eight (8) days p~ior to tlle ]>Janning C-ommisskm meeting. Donotmmmtexhmits. ll. REQUIRED-OOCUMErn·. A.ffl)-SlJBMHTALlTEMS ~-A completed Land'Use Review Application form. ~-Completed Coastal Devclopment Permit Application. _(3t. -Env-iromnentaf Impact Assessment -Part 1 -with -Re,gufar -Ceastaf Develepment ·P-eanfts. iCheck wi:-tfr Pl-annin° staff reu-ardin° Minor· CoasM Devclo=ent Permi~ aml Sin.,.1e: Fanri1"1· Re!?Ulru-· Coustal e e e ru IS' J e 'Dcvdopmcnt P.crm.'its for any environmental review requirements. -~-Disclosure Statement. Two {2} copies. of the Pre1iminacyTitle Report:(-c:mnentwi'lhinthe last: six,.{il}),month&). • CompI-et:ed'"Project Descriptioo/Expfanatfon"·sheet. G. P.rc>perty Owne.r' s .List and Addressed Labels: NOTE:. WHEN THE APPLICATION. iS. TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED l'O BE. HEARD B.Y THE ·DECISION·MA:KING BODY. THE-PROJECT .PLANNER WILL-CONTACT THE APPLICANT AND' ADVISE HJM TO SUBMIT THE RADllJS .MAP, TWO SETS OF THE J>)!OPERTY OWNERS UST AND LABEL-S. THE APPLICANT -SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A , STATEMENT CERT.IFY.ING fflA..T .THE .INFOR.MilfON ..PROVIDED .. REP.RESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED-ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM: THE SAN :DIE-GO,-COUNTY:· :i\SSESSOR1'S OFFICE: THE PROJECT WllL -NOT GO FORWARD· UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS. :RECEIVED. l, A ~wrlU.~n fist of th~ rr.J,mes and &%fresses .of .all ,property .owners .wittnn-.a .60tY-radius of the subject property (including the applicant -and/er owner), The list -shall inelude the San ·Diego·C·rnmty A-ssessor"sparcel:number·fi:om·tne·fattestassessmentrclis. 2. Two {2). separate sets of mailing labels of :the property owners within a «XJ' radius of tlle .subject.property. T.flelist-n,ust-be-type.d fa.all CAPITALLEf'.fERS.Jeft justified;-Y0id-of punctuation~ For any address other thru1 sing1e'-famiiy residence; an· apartment, suite or '·bui:liling number -must ··be included ·on :a -separate '-line. 'DO NOT '-int.'l.ude ·-i1. on 'the ·street address. line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABEL& DO NOT prov.ide addressed. -envelopes. -PROV.IDE-LABELS. -ONLY. Acceptable fonts. are: Arial rn, ·Enterprise TM-0r ·Col.urer NEW ·,(Tr) ·.no ·larger than 11 ·pt. Sample labels ;are :as follows: UNACCEPTABLE Mr-s-. Jane Smith· '123 ·Magnul1a Ave .• Apt "#3 Carlsbad. CA 92008 IINACCEPTABLE Mm. Jane Smith- 123 ·Magnufo.1 Av:e. Apt#'J Cadsbad .. CA 92008 .ACCEPTABLE MRS-JANE SMITH AN3 1.23'.MAGNODA AVE' CARLSBAD CA 92008 • • ➔ ➔ ~ • • ➔ ➔ ➔ • • ➔ • • ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ • • ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ ~ ➔ • ➔ ➔ ➔ ➔ • Form tl Revised-04104' Page5ef7· • I ! 1 3. 4. • 600'" Radius. Map: A .map. to scate not .tess. than-1'~=200' showing each-lot within 600'· of -exterior ·ooundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall ·be -consecutively numbered and corre$p0lld with the .pro.percy owners fist. The scale of the map umy be reduced to--a scale acceptable to-the Planning Dfrect0r. if the required scale is impra~tical. 100~ Radius Occupauts/Addr.ess List .and :L:abels (fur coasfaI 'ZOlle/CDPs only): ·One '(-I) Hst of' the-occupants/addresses located within a 1 O(Y mdfus of'the project site; .am1: two-{2} .sets of "labels (as described in'" A" above) -of .the addresses within a 100' radius. m. SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS -(May apply to· singl'e-family~ regular and minor coastal development permits). -Coastal Overlay Zones r-equire additional information -to ·be submitted as follows:-(refer to the: Mumdpat Code for a: fuU description)" F-0rm 13 A. -Coastal Agricultnre-0\t-erlay Zone 1. Refer to lhe Carlsbad Municipal' Code Section 2L20Z.060'fon.pec.ific requirements. R Coastal Resource Protection Ovei-tay Zone l. Slope analy..islmappi:ng -fm. 25% ancl. ·greater subject -tn. Section. 2-t .203.04(.). of the Carlsbad Municipal·Code. 2. Topog1;aphic and vegetation map_pinglanatysis subject to Subsection 2-I.203.040(.B)(l) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, if :pro~ is iocated along-the first .row of.rots bordering.Bnena Vi&talagoon~!lie~.moutn. 3-. T opograpbic, drainage and-·wetland 11:1apping· -subject to-Subsectii0ns- 2I.203".040(B)(Z)(aj .and ·.(b) of ihe ·Cansl:iad Municipal ·Code .if -:tocatetl em.t .of Interstate 5 fo the Bauquitos Lagoon watershed. 4. Drainage study s.~ to -Subsection 21.203.040(:B}.(3} of the Carlsbad Municipal .Code-if .project .i-s .k-x:ated west .of .exi-sti-ng Pa.~en .dcl Norte, west .of .f-ntefSta.tc 5 -<'W along El Camin0·Rea1-immediately upstream· of existing storm drains. 5.. Goolo_gic report. addressin_g fandsHdes. and slope sta:hWty subject -to -Subsection 21.203.040(B){4} of the Carlsbad Mttnitjpa! Code. ·6.. Geologic ·r-ep.ort. addressing. ;Jand -slides. and. ·seismic hazar-ds. ·subject. t@ Subsection. 2-l.203,040(C)·and-{D) 0f.the-C-ar-isbad-Mumcipat-C-Ode. C. -Coostal Shoreline.Development-0.V-erla-.y ZOlle l. Geotechnical r~port subje£t to-Zl .2oztt 10-if_pr-oject is, tocated agjacent. t.e--an existing ·-seabluff. 'edge i>etween the -sca·and. the ·frr.st1mbHcT-ead:parnHel t-o the -sea; ·also may • be ·required by ·Planning Director if deemed ·necessary consistent with Section 21.204. Imef the Cat=lsbad:Munkipat Cbl:k. 2. Show .aH -stroctures :arid .decks .en .a~.tacent north :and :south :properties .to .perform ''stringtine"" rest .snbjcci; .tfJ, Suf,Rectioo ZJ . ..204-.0SO{B} m t-fw--C.atlmad .Municipal, ;Cede. 3. Unless .otheiwise submitted-project in this zone must ~so :be :submitted with plans .showing: -.a. :Boundaries oandlop0gr.aphy .b-. Existing.and pr-oposed muet-ures c. ·Cirelllatien d. ·Drain~e e_ Finished tq,ograph_y {. Landscaping »~ Coastal Resource Overlay Zone Mello I 1:,CP·Segm-ent . l. "Erosion., sedimentation .aru:l -drainage -report suoject to Section "2-L205J)60 -of ihe Cad"sbad Munitjpa! Code if pmject is-tocated in the Ratiqmt-0& L.!:goon watershed.. Rev-ised:04/-04 r , I I • • l I .. • lV. REQUIRED COASTAL PERMIT FINDINGS -Approval of a regular o. minor -coastal. development permit i'> ba.'>ed-0n the ability to make three -coastal related findings. These three findings are presented below for your review and information. J. That 1.b~ proposed development is in co.nfm.mance with tile Certified Local Coastal P.mgram­ and all applicable policies. 2. That the-development is in conformity-with-the public :access .and public Tecreation palicies-of Chapter 3' of the Coastal Aet. 3. That the development ronforms with .any applicable decision .pertinent to this woposal and/or site .as set by the Coastal: Commission-on.a :previously related appeals .decisioo :per Public Resources Cooe·§-3@604.(c): + •• +. + •• +. +. + + + + + + + + ~ + + +. +. +. + +. + + + + + + + + + Form 13 R:evised-04/04 P-age 7 -0f7 ,,, • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART I {TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CA5'ENO: _____ _ DATE: _____ _ BACKGROUND L 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8:. 9. -cASENAME: DoHA\-D Go\-\00t11.H1v11 > LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: 'DAVl4=» 6=,i;zo"-'F:' -A~l-\\1c.t,,~ ~~ H:Soe.1f\ Ave.-~, rE-za4 CONTACTPERSONANDPHONENUMBER: ~AM. DIE.t:.o, CA eft!:.lO I A~ l~) Tt\01'\~'4 <c\2:f • :;a-?»Z ·'5~0 PROJECT LOCATION: z4g1 OeEAM.. ~. CAl2L~e,AC? , c A ~ zoo f:> PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME A:.."tfil ADDRESS: ~~ 'Cbt-1A&-r.:i, 50&,7 'De: =t:.121' Ae~te"A, '- GE"N~RAI., PLAN DESIGNATION: _li?~M~H~_::r_M_P_•_AM_W_a_u.; __ ~_. _c.A __ Cf_z._z_,o_ ZONING: :R-? t1u1.:r, · 'FA11u ... v OTIW,R.PUBUC AGENCIBS WHOSE APPROVAL lS REQUIRED (i.e.., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): ______________ _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENT AL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: A t:u;;w Z '-''-1 rr CoJ..u:,o vu, .• uun ee.-pL,A.GtY.'2 At..\ E:)<.t::>:nL-4<.o ~\ bl,L. LE:. t=:'A.KI L'::i 12-t:,~, Pt;J..& ce::::.. :IT:\ c. ::pgo ft 2'.N l -=::. :eou~ E?t:e> -ro ::r:H\::. l-\O?TH AL.to !:::C~T\➔ :e'< ~ELapt::o 1<tt::?LPc:..u-nA~ '.'pli?C pb-e"1"""(. A\.OH(.:) O(:..t;..A4 ~Tl Ayp !:>) ,opE:;:> G:;:,EJ➔"TL..~ wt:::::.:>-r --ro -nlE. 81:Ac.H • 1 Rev. 07/26102 .ENVIRONMENTAL "FACTORS-POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The -summary -of ·environmental fucter-s check-ed ·bel-ow "i>vould ·be potentially affected by this project, involving -at -ieast one impact that is a -"Potentially Significant Impact,"' or ""P"otentiafly -Significant 1mpact .Unless Mitigation .Incorporated.,.,. as indicated .by :the-cnecldist .fill :the :foliowing pages. -0 Aesthetics 0Agricul.tural Resources. O.Air Quality ·O. Biological Resources ·O·-c-uitural Resources 0-GeologyJSails. 0· Hazar.ds-./Har.m.im.rs: Materials: ·o Population. and Housing ·O Hydrology/Watei•Quality 0Land-Use and "Plannin_g ·□ Mandatory Findings of Sj_g.nificance. 2 ·□·Public Services. 0Recreation- ·O 'fransportatian/Circulation -Outitities-& Service Systems Rev. 07/26/02 ENVIRONMENTAL JMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDEUNES, Chapte.r 3, Artide. 5, Section !5063 requires that :the City coo.duct .an Environmemat Impact Assessment to -determine i.f a ,project-may ha,<.e -a sign-incant ,effect ,.en the anironment. The Eav-i-romnental Impact .Assessment app-ears m the fult-owing pages m-the fu.r-m-ef -a clrecldist 'Jhls clreclilist ide-.m:ifres-any phys:i-eat, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed proJect and provides the City with. infonnation to me .as the basis fur deciding w.betber ~ prepare .an En.viroomental Impact Report {Ef.R).;. Negaiive DeclMJtlon, -Or to rely on a previously approved BIR or Negative Declarati-0n. • A brief -explanation. is required fur all answers -except "N.o Impact'·' answers that. are adequately. supported by -an inf.-ormati--oo -sourre -cited m the parentheses fuUo'.y\,mg each --question. A "N,..") -Impact" .answer is adequatefy supported if the· referenced information sources show that the-impact simpiy does not apply t-o­ projects like the one involved.. A ... No Impact.,.. answer should be explained when there is no source .document .to :i:efer -ro, .or .it .is .based·.on -pmject-speci1ic facton;.as wen .as general starnlar.ds. • 0'.Less Than ·Signifi.i:fillt Jmp:ac:t~ aP}ilies where me .is .supporting ev.i&mre trutt ·&e potential .impact .is .not -significamfy adverse, -and-the impact does--:ooi -ex.ceed ado-p£d. -generaf-stamfords. and' poficies-. • '-'-.P:o.tetrtiaTty .Significant Unless .Mitigation Iru:or.po.rafoo." .appfteS where .the iru:orpor.afion of mitlgafion measmes has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impmif' to-a "L~ Than S-ignifu:ant: Impact:' The developer must agree to 'the mitigation, and 'the-City ·must·describe 'the-mitigation -measures~ ·and ·briefly explain 110w :they -reduce -the.eirect to a less :th.m signifu:ant !.ev.e!: • 4lotentiaify Stgnifi:eant impact" .is ~p_pr:o_priate·if there-is substantial evidence that an effect is swiiffoantly adverse. • Based on an ''EIA-Part r. if a :pro-posed project· rottld have a po:tenti·ally -significant -adverse·-effect on the­ .envir.omnen!., ·bu! .all pill,emU!.lly s.ignif«:ant ,adv.erse .cll'ecis '(g) ·nav.e .been arully~ ~ely in ,ll1l earlier :EIR or l\.f"ttigated· Negath'e Decfmmi'oo pmsuam 1-0--apptfoabfe -stfilld"ar-ds: and (-b) -hav-e been av.oi{!ro ·or mitigared lJUP.,"'lrallt re 1hat earl:ierEUl-or Mitigared Negative Decimation, inclctding 1evisions ormi.tigation measurns that are imposed upon the _pro.posed _project; .and none of the circumstances· requiring a supplement to or s.upplemen.ta1 EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by. the prior environmenial -document have been incorporated. into 1hls. projecl.,. ilien -no -additional -en,•ironmenlal do.cl.lillellt is .required. • When-'<J)ote-nti-.al:ly -Sr_gnjfu:alrt Impact" :i--s clreeked the pr-oje-ct :i-s not n-a.."eSsari]y :reqmred t-o-prepar-e an-EIR if the ·significant adverse -effect has been -analyzed. adeq:ua:tely in -an earlier EiR pursuant to applicable -standar¢; -a1ld .the effect w.ill .be m'iugated, -0r .a "'.S~t .-0f 0Nerridfug Consid-eratfons" .has .oo,en .made pursuant to that-earlier EIR • A Neg-ati>.<e Declaration -may -be -prepared if -the City -pemei'\res ne-subs-tantial' -evidence -that. the prajoot -or -any --of its ·aspects may -cause a ·significant ·adverse effect -on fue -ertlU-01ll7lent. • If there ar.e 011e or more .potentially. significm1-t adv.erse effects, the Cily. n13Y avoid preparing an ElR if'there --are -miti_gation measures to el.early -reduce. ,adverse -impacts -to ltlSS. -'!ban. -signi-fi:cant. -and -those -mitigation . .measures .are .agreed· .to by .th.e de:v.elo.p.er .prior .to .puhlic·.re1tiew_ .In· this .case;· the .appropriate-·':Potentially • .Significant Jrnp&:t Un-1-ess Mingatien J..qc~' .may be rlrecired,&1-0 a Mitigated Negative Declaratioo -may beprepared. 3 Rev. -07/26/02 • • An EJR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but .not limited to the following ci.rcmnstances: -{l} 1he poten1iaUy ·significant ·adverse effect h.as not been discussed or mitigated in an. earlier EIR pursuant t-0 appfu;able starufards.,. and the developer does not. agree. to miti.gatmn measures that r-educe fue adve$e m1pact to :1ess fuan -sigmficant; (2) a "'Statement ,of 01'eirid'ing Considerations" for 1he ~ignrf-reant adverse-impact· has l10t' been· made-purstrant to an earlr-er EfR; (3} proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to 1ess than significant; or (4) through the EIA-P.rut I .analysis it is not. .possible .t-0 .detennine ilie .level .-0fsignif~ance for .a .potentially adv.erse .effect, or determine the effectiyen.ess of a mitigation measure in reducifrg a-p0termally significant effect-to-below a- level :of·si:g.cificance • A ·discussion ·('}f ·potential ;impacts ,and ihe proposed mitigation measur-es appears at the -end -Of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Parti.-cuhw attention sh-omd be· 1:,ti.ven to discussing­ mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 07/26(02 Issues (and Supporting Infurmation Sources). {:Supplemental -documents may be r-eforr-ed iOMd.attached.} L AESTHETICS-W,mild -the pr-oject:- a} Have a substantial adverse effect -on a.scenie vista? -b) Substantially damage-scenic resources. including hut not limited 10, tr-ees, r.ock outcroppings, and hist-Orie buildings within a State -scenic highway? c) Substantially de.grade the e.xisting visual character or quality -of the site and its surr-ouruiings? -d) Create a new .source of .substantial light -and glare, whfoh would adversely affect day or nighttime vi-ews­ in the area?" II. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES -(In determining whether impacts to agricultural res0UrCes are si_gnificant environmental effects., lead agencies ma:y refer to the -Caiifomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared-by the California Department of Conservation as an -optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and fannland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland -of Statewide Importance ,(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepar-ed poo;uam t-0 the Farmiand Mapping ru'td Monitoring Program. -of the California Resources .Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning_ fur agricultural use, or a W-iUiamson A-ct-c-ORtract? c) Involve other clmnges in the -existing environment, which, due to their location -0r nature, could result in conversion ofFarmland to non-agricultural use? UL AIR QUALITY -(Where available,. tlw -signi:tfoanc.e­ -ctiteria --estab1ishea by ,the -applicable -air ,quality management or air pollution eomrol district may be reli-ed upon to make the following determinations.) Would 1he project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ~} Violate any air qualify standard or contribute­ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation'! 5 Poteul:ially stgnificant Impact D □ D □ 0- D­ O □ □ • Potentially Significant Unle.'1'i Mitigation Incorporated D □ D D D D □ □ □- Le.'1'iThan ~ flllpaCt □ □ D □ D □ □ □ □- No Impact gJ Rev. 07/26/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Soorces). (S-opplementai docmnerrts may be referred 1o and attached.) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of -any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an· applicable federal or state amhient air quality standard (ID.duding. releasing emissions which -exceed quantitative tnresholds f.or ozone precursors)'? d.) Expose sensitive receptors to. substantial. pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number -of people? lV~ BJOLOGJCAL BESOUBCES-Would :the.project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification~ on .any species· identified as, a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in. local -or :re_gional plans,. policies,. or regulati.OllS,. or by Califoo:lia Depllrtlllettt of Fish and Game-0r U:S. Fish.and Wildlife Service'? b) Have a substantial adverse effect -on -any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural: community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ·ur regulations ·ur by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c} Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 -of the Clean Water Act (mcluding but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? -d) Interfere· substantially with :the mov-ement -Of any native resident or migratory fish er wildlife species or with -established native resident or migratoiy wildlife -corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursel)• sites? e) Con.llict with any local policies. or ordinam:es. -protecting biological resour-ces, such .as a tree preservmi:oo policy 0r ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of .an .adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Commm»ty Conservation Plan. or oilier .a,pproved focal, .regional, or .state habitat conservation plan'? g) Impact: tributruy areas that are envrronmemaHy sensiti ve1 Potentially &.ignificanl. Impact .□ D 0 tJ D □ D D • Potentially Signillcanl Unless .Miti-gation Incorporated D □ 0 □ □ □ D □ Less Than Significant. Impact .□· □ D D 0 □ □ □· No hnpact ~ Rev. 07/26/-02 Issues (and Supporting fufunnation Sources). (Supplementa1 documents may bereferredto.andattaciled.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -Would t'he project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the s.igni&ance of a bistoru::al r~urce as defined m. §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi­ cance of mi archeological resource .pursuant to §15064.5-? c) D.irectfy or indirectly destroy a unique pa.feontologi­ cal fesource 01" .site or unique geologic feawe? d) Disturb an.y human. remains,. incl.uding. those interr.ed outside offonmil cemeteries? VI. -GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would ihe project a) Expose people or structures t-0-poten!ial substantial adverse effects, including the risk ·of loss., injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake faul~, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Prioio Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the-area or based on other substantial evidence of :a known uroh? Refer 1o Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii Strong seismic ground.shaking'.? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. -Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of -topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil th.al is unstable. or 1hat W-Ouf-d become unstable as-a result of the­ praject, and -potentially result m -on-or off-site landslide:, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be-located on expansive-so~ as-defined in Table 18 -l~B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating subst-antfal risks t-0-life or _property? 7 Potentially Signific:utt Impact D □ □ D ·□ □ □ □. □ □- • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated' ·□ □· □· □· D □ D ·□ □ □ □· Less Tlran'. S~gnificant Impact □ D □· D □ D D ·□ D ·□ D No Impact Rev. 07/26(02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources}. (S-qppleme.ntal docronents may be referred ·tu mid :attached.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the. use of -septic tanks -0r altemativ-e wastewater -disposal systems· where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater'l VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS­ Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the -public -or -the errvironmen:t through the routine transport, use:, or disposal ofhan1rdous materials"? b-} Create a significant hazard to-the public or environment .through .reasonah'ly foreseeable upset and accident conditions invofving the ref-ease of -hazardous materials into -the -en'Vir-onment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or liandle hazardous. or -acutely ha.mrdous. maierials, \5-Ubstances, -or waste v.i:thin one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on -a site ·which is included on -a -list -of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as-a result, would it ·create a significant hazard to the public -or e.rrvrrontneat? e) For a project within an airport land use plan-, OF where ·such a ·plan bas not ·been adopted_. within two miles of a pubfu: .airport or pubfu: use airport,. would fue :}»"aj-ect res.ult in a safety 'hazard for people residing or worlcing in 1he _p-raject area? _f) For a project within .the vicinity .of .a .private airstrip, would the proj-ect result .in a safety hazard for peeple residmg orworkingintheproject-area? g} Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ·adopted emergency response plan or -emergency evacuation plan'! h) Expose _people ol' stmctures t-o-a sigmfieant :risk of -loss, injmy or death involving wildland fires, including where wU-dfands .are adjacent to urbanized areas or where r-esj.dences are intermixed-with ·wildl-ands1 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would ihe project: .a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Potemially Significant Impact D □ D D D □ 0 D D • Potentially S1gnillcanl Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D □ D D D □ Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D gJ □ □- □- D -0 □ □ -□ Rev. 07/26/02 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources}. (Supplemental docomems may be referred 1o .and :attached.) b) Suostantialtv deplete groundwater supplies. or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would ~ a net deficit .in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table fov-ef {i.-e., the pr-odootioo rate -of J}r-e-existmg nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support e..xisting fand uses or _planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c} lm,pactsio groundwater quality? -0,) Substantially alter the ex-isti-ng -drainage pattem-o-f the site o.r area, including through the alteratioo of the course-of ll..Stream or .river. in a.manner. \\ihicb would result in substantial erosioo.. or sift-atioo.-on-or off-. site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site. -or area, including ilirough -ihe alteration -of the course of a stream or rive~ or subst.amially increase .the flow rate or amount (volume), of surface runoff in a manner, whfoh would result in-flooong oi1-or off.. site? f) Create or contribute nmo:ff water, which would­ ·exceed 1he capacity ·of -existing or planned stmmwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted nmoff? g) -Otherwise substantially degrade water-quality'? h) Place.housing w1thin a 100-yearflood'liazardarea as: mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Bonndmy or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? i} Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede m redirect flood flows't j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injwy or death involving flooding,. including Ilooding.as .a·resu1t of fu:e ftulure ofalevee or.dam? k) Inundation by seiche, 1samuni, ormudflow? J) Increased erosion (sediment) inro recei-v.ing surface waters. m) Incrnased :pollutant -dischart:,>es (e.g., -heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface wruers or olher .alteration of receiving surface water quality (e:g., temperarure, dissolved oxygen or lurbidity)? 9 Potentially Significant Impact .0 □· □ □ □ □ ·□ □ ·□ D ·□ Potentially Significant Unless :Mitigatio-.n Incorporated- D .□· □· □ ·□ ·□ ·□ ·□ D . . ·□ LessT.baa­ Significanl. Impact D D .□· □ ·□ D D ·□ ·□. 0 ' . ·□ No Impact ro Rev. 07/26{02 --Issues (and Supportit~ Information Sources}. Potentially (Supp-Iemerrtal docamems may be referred 10 .and .attached.) S-ignificanl Potentialzy Unless Less Than Significam .Mit:igati&ll Signi:fica»t No Impact Incorporated hnpact Impact n) Changes. to receiving water quality {marine, fresh -or □· D D ~ ·wetland w1tters)-0t-lring-0r foUowing oonstruction'! o) lncrease in any ptlllutant to an already impaired 0 □ □ 00 water body -as listed -on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d} list? p) The-exceedance of applicable surface. or groundwater □. □ D ~ receiving water quality objectives or -degradation of . beneficial uses·? IX.. LANDUSE AND PLANNING-W-0ukithe pr-qject: a) Physically divide-an established community? □ □· □ . gf b) Conflict with .any .applicable land .use plan, policy, or □ □ □ gi· regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the- prqject (incln~ but not limited to the _general phm,, specific plan, local -OOaStal program,. or zoning ordinance) adopted for :the -purpose of avoiding -0r miti_gating an environmental effecf! c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ,conservation D □. □. lxJ plan or natural community conservation plan? . . x. MINERAL RESOURCES-Would the.project: .a) .Resn1t .in the Joss of availabilify of .a known .miner.at □· □ □ ~- resource that would be of future value to the region. and the residents of the State'! b) Result in the 1oss of availability of a locatly □ □ :o important mineral resource recovery site. delineated -on a local general plan, specific plan, or other :land use plan'? XI. NOISE-Weuld the pr:aj-ect res.ult -in:. • a) Exposure of per.sons to or gmer.ation of noise 'levels D ·□ □ ~ ift. excess of standards estahlished. m ·the local general 'Plan or noise -ordinance ·or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure. of persons ·io -or generation of -e,'(-cessive. 0 D o· -~- gronndbonme v.ibra:ti:on or groundboume noise levclsi c} A substantial permanent increase in -ambient noise □ D D levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in D D D ~ .ambient noise levels in !he pro~ vicinity above levels existing •.vifuoot the project'? Rev. 07/26/02 ,,. Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources}. (S-appleme.ntal docmnems may be referred 10 .and mtaclled.) e) For a project located within an airport land use. plan -or, where sucll a plan has not been adopted, :within 2 miles of a public .airport or public use-airport, wonid the prqject expose people residing. or worlcing in the project -ar-ea to -ex-cessiv-e-ooise fevefs? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airntri.p, 'would the praject -expose people r-esi-ding OE working in the project area -to excessive noise levels? XIL POPULATION AND HOUSING -Wmild the proje.ct: a) .Induce .substantial growth .in-.an .area either directly (for example. by proposing .ru:w homes-and -businesses) -or indir-ectfy {for -example; ihr-ougn -extension -of roads-or otherin:fi:ru,iruotare)? b) Displace substantial numbei-s of existing l1ousing, necessi-iatin_g.-the -oonstructioo. -of replaoomenthousin_g. elsewhere? c} -Dispf-ace ·substantial numbers of people, -necessitating the construction of replacement-housing elseMiere? xm. PUBLIC SERVICES .a) W.ould the project result :in substantial .adv.erb--e .physical impacts associated with the provision of new ·or physically -altered :govemm00t faciliti:-es, -a need for new or -physically -altered -government £aci.Tuies, 1'he -eonstrucfu:>n -of wbkh .could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acc~ptab-le service ratios, response -times, or other perf.ormaru::e .objectives for .any JJf :the public se1vwes: i) F:ire protection'? ii} Police protection? iii) Schoo.fs:? iv} Parks? v) Other public f.ad.tities? XIV . .R.ECREA.TION a) Would :the -project increase the use of -existing neighborhood and regional· parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical -deterio.r.atioo -0f ilie t.acility w-0uld -OCCUr .or be accelerated? H Potentially Significant Impact □ □ D D □ ·□ . . □- □ D .0 ·□ • Potentially SigmficanL Unless .Miti-gatio-n Incorporated 0- □ D □ □ ·□ :o. □ □ D □ LessTha.n­ &ignificant Impact ·□ □- u D .0 :o □· D □ D No Impact R.ev. -07/26-/-02 , .. Issues (and Supporting lnfomi-ation Sources}. (Supplemental .docmnems may he referred :to..and.attaclled.)- b} Does the project i-nomd'e i:eeremiooal :fuci.lrties. « require 1he -oon:,--trnction -0r expansion -Of r-ecreationaI facilities;. w.hlch mi_gbt have an-adverse _phy.sica'l effect on the environ.menfl XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-W-ould·the·pro-j:ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is. substantial in r.efation to tfle ex-is.ting_ traffic .load .and capacity .of !be street system (!.e.~ result in a substantial .increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to .capacity ratio on. mads.,. -Gr -oongestiru.1-. at mtel'Secfions}'! 'b) Exceed, either individuaTiy or cumtilative1y, a 1eve1 .of sen-ice standard established by .the county congestion management agency for desi_grurted roads orhi_ghways? c} Result in a -change -in air -traffic -patterns, including either an increase in traffic-levels or a clwl_ge in location. that results in substantial safefy risks·z d) Substantially increase hazards due to a: design .feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous inte-!Sections.) or incompatible.uses (e.g., far.m.-equipment).?' e) .Result in .inadequate emergency .access'.r i) R-esuft in insufficient parking -capacity? g) Cooflict with ado.pted .policies, plans, or programs -supportmg alternative transportation. {e.g., bus turn­ outs, -bicycle-racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS -Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment .requirements-of the appifoabie R-egfonaf Water-Quality Control Boanf! h} Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or axpansion of ex:is-1mg. f-aciHti-es, -the -consl.ructlon -of ,vhich Vl-'OOld cause significant env.iromneutal effects? c) Require or result in-the construction of new stom, water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? .d) Have sufficient water supplies .ror..ulable .tu serve .the .project from existing entitlements .and resources, or -a:renew or expanded entitlementsneeded'f 12 Pote.ntialty S:i:gnificant Impact D :□ D D □ □ □· D • Potentially S-ignillcanl Un.less Miti:gation Incorporated D D D D D □ ·□ D □ D LessThm S:i:gnificant No Impact Impact ~ D D D D □ ·□ □ .□ D Rev. -0.1/26/02 I' Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). {Supplemental -docrunentsma.y :b.ere'Jerred:ro:and-aUaclled.J e} Result in a. -detemiinatioo cy the wastewat-et ·tr-eatment provider, whfoh: ·serves ·or may ·serve fue ,proJect that it .bas adequate .capacity to .serve :the praj.ecf' s projected.. demand in aMilfon. to the provider"s. existing -eo:mmfunents'l f) .Be -seIWal by .a landfill with sufficient ,per,mitted -capac-rty to accommodate {he. pr-oject .. -s salm waste disposal -needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes. and. re_gul-ations ·related 1o soH:d.waste'l XVII. MANDATORY Jl'INDINGSQFSI-GNJFJCA'NCE- .a) Does ,the pr-0ject hav.e :the potential -to ,degrade ,Jhe quality of the environment;, substantially reduce-tlre ·habitat of :a fish ar·wilillife species, \'.ause :a fish ar wildlife population to dr-op-oo!ow self-sustaining fo"·els, ·threaten -to ,eH:minate ·a plant ,or ·ammaf· -C0111IllU1lity, reduce the number .or restrict the-.ran_ge of a. rare-or endanger.ed._pfant or animal or efimmate important examples ,of ,the -major 'l_)ellods of Cruifomia histo:iy or :prehistory? -bJ Does the project. have impacts that. are indiv-iooall:y limited, ,tmf ,cmnulafrvel:y ,considerable'! -ecurrmla­ tively consider.ahlii" means that the .incremental effects of a prtjiect are considenilile when viewed.in .connection with ilie -effects .of _past projects, :the effects of other current projects, and the eff,ects of -1n:obable-.futur.e,µrojeets'?) cc) Does the project have -env.ironmental effects, which will arose the .substanrial .adverse effects on human beings, either directly or 'indirectly? xvm_ EARLIER.ANALYSES PotentiaUy 'S:i:gnificant In1_pact D 0. D .□ D □ • Potentially Significant Unless Mit.!gmion Incoq,orated □ □ D □ LessThan 'S:i:gnificant Inl_pact D □ D D □ No Impact Earlier analyses may -be-'t!Sedwhere, -~ t&1he-tieriflg, programEIR,-or·o'Ji.er-cE'-Q-Apr-0eess-, ·ooe--OF mor-e 'effects -lrav-e ·been -adeq_uately -anaiyz:-ed 'ffi -an earlier BIR ur negative -declaration. Section 1506'3(~)0)1,.1}}. In this· .case .a discussion .should' identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier ·•yses used.. Identify earlier-analyses -and-state v.½iere ·fu~, -are .-available. for review. h:) 1mpacts -.adequmcly ~essed. Identify whlch .effects .from the~ -ehecltlist were within the ·set,pe ·of and -adeqW:tely -ami;lyzed in @ ·ear.fier ·dow.-nen-t pur-suan-t t-0--appfieabie-fegal, ·standaf-ds-, and mrte whether -such effects were addressed by mitigation measures 'based -on the ·earlier .analysis. c} Miti_gation measures. For effects that are "L-ess Than Si_gnificant -with Mitigation J:ncm:porated," .describe: .the mitigatlon measr.a:es7 which were iaco:q;lamted -1.1.r ref med from .the .earlier--4.i:cm:rrent and· the-e,a:ent ,to whicll they ~ess site--spoomc-cen:dinens for ,the project. l3 , , • • DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AIR QUALITY-Would the project: :a) CoatTICt witib-~bswud ~ a0f ffle.applicab.le-air equality plan? No :Imp-art. The project site is foc.ated in the S:an Diego Arr Basin w:hkh is a federal and state m:m--attam:ment area for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to IO microns in diameter {PM10). The periodic vfolations of nat4onal Ambient Afr -Quality Standards {AAQS) in the San Diego Afr Basin (SDAB), particulaey for ozone in inland foothill ~. requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County,.. this attainment planning process is embodied -in .fue Regional Air Quality -S.trategies {RAQS) ~ev.eloped join.tty by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Gmremnrents (SANDAG). A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state­ mand-ated p-lan. This local pl:an was -rombined with pl-ans from -au -0ther California non--att-ainment -areas having .serious-ozone problems .and used to create the California State J:mplementation P:fan-(SJP). The SJ.P w.as adopted· by the Air Resources Board (MIB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1"994,.. and was forwarded to -the Enwr-onmentaf Protection Agency {EPA) fur -approval. After cCOOS-ider.abie -analysis -and -debate, particular.fy regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996-. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS tl'n-eugh ttw. land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the -air -quality pl-arming --document. These growtl.1 assun:lptioas -are based -on each-city',s and the Comrty's _.general: plan. If .a proposed-proj-ect is-consistent wi1h its· .appf:icab:te-General PI-arr, 1hen the project presumably has been anficipated with the regional air qualify planning process. Such con...<:istency would ensure th.at :fue prqject would ,not-ha:v:e 'fill ·adverse ,region-al afr ·quali-zy impact -section 151'25{B) .of the ·state-.iJf -California Environment Q.ualily Act. {CEQA) Guidelines .contains specific reference-to the-need to e-vafuate-any inconsistencies between the-proposed pr.ojeci and the appf"icaofe-air qua.ray -management-pl-an. Transportation Control. Measures (T-CMs) -ar-e 0pmt-of the RAQS. The RAQS -and T-OM vian 'Set forth .the ste.ps needed .to .accomplish .attainment of state .and fecreraf· -ambrent .air _quality standards. The· California Air Resources. Board provides crite.ria for detemiining whethe.r a project conforms with the RAQS whicl1 include the follo-wi-ng.:. • Is a-regional .air-q-uali1y ,plan: being implemented in the ,project.ar-ea'! • ls the _project consistent with the growth assumptions in-the regrorntl air qfflflify-ptarr?- The pr-Qject area is located in ,the San Diego Air Basin, -and -as such, is located .in an area wher.e .a B:AQS is being implemented. The project is coosisten:t with tlre growth assumptions of tlre City's General Plan and the-RAQS. Therefore, :th.e ;project is ronsi:stent with 1he :regionai :air .quality :plan :and will in no way ronflic.t or :obstruct implementation of the regi-Oruu plan. b:} Violate any mr-quality standard or contribute-substantialfy-to-an-existing or-projected :air-quality violation"? Less Than Signifieant Impact. The-closest air quality mooiroring station ro the project site-is m the-Ci{y of -Oceanside. Data ..a:v.ailable fur :this :mmri.wring .site :through April, 2002 indicate :that. :the most recent .air q:cm:lrty vi-Otations reooroed were fur the state one liouf staruiar-4 fur ozone <one-~ in a--Oth 2000 an.4 200-t} aru!-000. day in 2001 -for othe federal .g..hour-average ·-for ,ozone ·and ooe day for the 24--ahmrr·state ·standar-d for-suspended J>articulates in 19.% .. No· violations of.My o.ti'ret' air qualliy .standards b.ave-been· rerorded'.rec-ently. Jf fuereis _gradin;g associated with the pnljec4 fue project woilldinvdlve miriim:il short-term emissions-associated with grading. and constru£.1fon. Such -emissfoDs wooid be :minimi1led -through ·standard -construclion measures -such -as :fue use -of ~prn_periy tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-ter.m-emissions associated with-mwcl to-and from the-project wiU :be·.minima1. Although-air -pollutant .emissions would he-associated :wi.fh the,pmj.ect, :they :would·.ne«her !'.esult .in the vielatioo -of any aii; iUality standarcd fc{lmpi.:i-sing-onfy an ~ eootri-buti~11 to.-ever,aH mt ·basin qua!i-t'f ·readings:-), nor contribute ·substantially ·-to -an '6Xisting ,or ]Kojected air ,quality-violation. Any impact is assessed. -as less than: significant. -<!} Res.ult-in-a~-<!-oosid-er.abte ttet~«~tt-iieriapellutant fer.which_the.Jm!ject region-.is mm-attainnumt nnder .arr .applkabfe· feder.at or Biate: .ambient :air 4PJality .standanf! 14 Rev. -07/26/02 ,. • • Less Than Significant Impact. The-Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone-for ozone-and suspended fine­ pmticalates. The proposed ·project would represent a contrrbntion 10 a co:rrudatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions. associated with the proposed project would be -minimal. Given -the limited -emissions potentially associated wi.th the proposed pr-oject,, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the _proposed-_project is im_pl-emented. Accordin_g to the CEQAGuid.e1ines Section 151.30 (a:)(4)~ the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered -de-minimus. Any impact is -assessed-as-less-than significant. EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of-Carlsbad Planning Department.Jocated-at 1635 F.ru:aday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia, 92008. 1. Final Master Errvirorrme.crud fmpacl Re_port-forihe ·City of Carlsbad -General Phm Uprlme {MEIR. ·93--01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department_ March 1994. 15 R.ev. 07/26/02 • • LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 16 Rev. 07/26/02 • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION Rl!QUIRl!Ml!NTS FOR: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (INCLUDING AMENDMENTS) A Hillside Development Permit (HDP) is required when development is proposed on any slope that has a gradient of 15% or greater and a slope height of greater than 15 feet. Development means grading, erecting or construction on a hillside area. A single-family home need not obtain a Hillside Development Permit, provided that the development complies with lhe Hillside Development Ordinance and lhe Hillside Development and Design Guidelines. (See 21.95.040) It is highly recommended that you, as an applicant: 1) review Chapter 21.95 and Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside Ordinance, Excavation and Grading); and 2) discuss the Hillside Development with a City Planner before submitting an application for a Hillside Development Permit. The Hillside Development Permit should be submitted concurrently with any permit or application for development of a hillside area. Generally the steps involved in reviewing your Hillside Development Permit application are as follows: 1. A Hillside Development Permit application is submitted to the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue. The application must be submitted with and reference any other pem1it application for development of a hillside area, such as a tentative map, site development plan, etc. 2. A Planning Department counter person generally checks your application for completeness. If your application is incomplete, it cannot be accepted. If your application appears complete, it is accepted. 3. The Hillside Development Permit application is typically reviewed, processed, and approved concurrent with the first permit or application you may have with the City for that hillside area. 4. For approval of a Hillside Development Permit the following findings must be made~ a. That undevelopable areas of the project have been properly identified. b. Thal the development is consistent with lhe Purpose and lnlenl provisions (Section 21.95.010) of the Hillside Ordinance to; (1) Implement the goals and objectives of the Land Use and Open Space/Conservation Elements of the Carlsbad General Plan. (2) Assure hillside conditions are properly identified and incorporated into the planning process. (3) Preserve and/or enhance the aesthetic qualities of natural hillsides and manuf acturcd slopes by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land, minimizing the amount of project grading, and incorporating contour grading into manufactured slopes which are located in highly visible public locations. (4) Assure that the alteration of natural hillsides will be done in an environmentally sensitive manner whereby lagoons and riparian ecosystems will be protected from increased erosion and no substantial impact~ to natural resource area~, wildlife habitats or native vegetation areas will occur. c. Thal hillside development complies with the Hillside Development and Design Standards (CMC 21.95.120) and substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the Hillside Development Guidelines Manual. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Fonn4 Revised 06/05 Page lof4 ' I • d. That development is consistent with the provisions of Section 21.53.230 and 240 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A proposed project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring that only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. The following materials shall be submitted for each application or for combined applications on a single project. I. REQUIRED PLANS (All required plans shall be collated into complete sets, stapled together, then folded to 9" x 12" with lower right hand corner of plan visible.) dA. Five (5) copies on 24" x 36" sheets of the slope analysis -Include north arrow and scale (see Section 21.95.020 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code). The slope analysis should be the same scale as the site plan and grading plan. Identify slopes (1) 0 to less than 15% slope (2) 15% to less than 25% slope (3) 25% to 40% slope (4) Slope greater than 40% Indicate the acreage of land in each slope category TOTAL .. zz1 % Slope= Vertical Distance x 100 Horizontal Distance (Distance between contour intervals) 100% SLOPE PROFILE(S): Five (5) copies on 24" x 36" sheets -Include vertical and horizontal scale. A minimum of three (3) slope profiles (slope cross sections) shall be provided and indexed on the constraints map. See Section 21.95.llO(b) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for additional requirements. Assurance of SLOPE ANALYSIS and SLOPE PROFILE accuracy. Both the slope analysis and slope profiles shall be stamped and signed by either a registered landscape architect, civil engineer or land surveyor indicating the datum, source and scale of topographic data used in the slope analysis and slope profiles, and attesting to the fact that the slope analysis and slope profiles have been accurately calculated and identified. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN: Five (5) copies on a 24" x 36" sheet(s). The scale should be consistent with all other exhibits. Each landscape plan shall contain the following information: 1. Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. 2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species, and their size for each planting zone in a legend. (Use symbols). 3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to maintain each zone. 4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common) for all areas. 5. Percent of site used for landscaping. 6. Water Conservation Plan. 7. All applicable Fire Suppression Zones, as required by the City's Landscape Manual. ♦ ♦ • • • • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • ♦ • • ♦ ♦ • • • • • • • ♦ ♦ Form4 Revised 06/05 Page 2of4 ' r • Show with a SITE PLAN, GRADING PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND BUILDING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS how development fulfills the following Hillside Development and Design Standards (21.95.120). Submit five (5) sets of each plan. 1. Coastal Zone Requirement (if applicable). 2. Manufactured slopes of greater than 40% gradient. 3. Contour grading. 4. Volume of grading -Volume of earth moved for cuts and fills shall be minimized. The larger volume of the total cut or total fill volumes divided by the total graded area in acres that is cut and filled shall equal the volume of hillside grading for the project. The relative acceptability of hillside grading volume shall be determined by the following: Cubic Yards of Cut or Fill Grading per Acre of Cut and Fill Area (in Acres) 0-7,999 Cubic yds./acre 8,000 -10,000 Cubic yds./acre > 10,000 cubic yds./acre 5. Slope height. Relative Sensitivity of Hillside Grading Volume Acceptable Potentially acceptable Unacceptable 6. Screening manufactured slopes. . 7. Slope edge building setbacks. For all buildings that are subject to this slope edge building setback, a profile of the 0.7 foot horizontal to 1.0 foot vertical diagonal plane shall be submitted. 8. Roadway design. 9. Hillside and hilltop architecture. 10. Hillside drainage 11. Modifications to the development and design standards. If requesting a modification to the development and design standards pursuant to Section 21.95.140 provide the necessary findings and plans required by that section. 12. Show all Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be used to reduce storm water waste discharge during the "use" or existing development phaqc, 13. Provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines. II. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS ~ A completed Land Use Review Application Form. ~ Environmental Impact Assessment Form (Fee not required with initial submittal. Fee to be determined after review of project and environmental impact assessment form.) ~ A completed "Disclosure Statement." ~~ A completed Project Description/Explanation sheet. I.db., Two (2) copies of a preliminary title report (current within the last six (6) months). ~ If Hillside Development Permit is not accompanied by any other permit, also include the following information on slope analysis: location, slope and width of driveway, building ,A. . setbacks, location of any retaining walls and drainage systems. fJ/r-~-Infill Residential Projects that require a Hillside Development Permit and are bordered on a minimum of two sides (property lines) by existing single family residential development shall be required to: 1. Post project notices on the project site pursuant to Planning Department Administrative Policy No. 37 (see Planning Dept. Policy No. 37). • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Form4 Revised 06/05 Page3of4 l ' I • \ t.,. • 2. Submit project photo-simulation exhibit<; to the Planning Department upon determination that the project application is complete. The photo-simulation exhibits should be scaled representations of the project, as viewed from adjacent streets and adjacent developed single-family residential properties. , / /I' OH. Biological resource, cultural resource, and/or other environmental documentation that are f' 1 necessary to make an environmental determination (i.e. EIR, Negative Declaration or ~ / Exemption). l..!df. Signed "Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement" form. JJ/ /x OJ. Preliminary Hydrology map and calculations for lot<; exceeding one acre. Show before and after discharges to each included drainage basin. If a preliminary Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required, the Hydrology map and calculations may be incorporated into the preliminary SWMP. OK A preliminary Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be provided, if the project • is defined as a "Priority Development Project'' pursuant to Section Fl.b.(2)(a) of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 2001-01. At a minimum, the SWMP shall identify: 1. Hydrologic Unit the project contributes to. 2. Impaired water bodies in the ba<iin and pollutant<; impacting the water body. 3. Drainage characteristics of the project site. 4. Anticipated pollutants-of-concern "prior" to development. 5. Anticipated pollutants-of-mncem "after'' development. 6. Types of source control BMP measures to be implemented to avoid pollutant contact with storm water. 7. Types of treatment control BMP measures to be implemented. Provide manufacturer specification sheets or detail sheets of the device. 8. Hydrologic/Hydraulic calculations to verify "flow-based" or "volume-based" methods are met to verify treatment control devices are adequate per Order 2001-01. 9. Include a topographic exhibit demonstrating the project and treatment control device locations. ~_.arly Public Notice Package. ~~perty Owners List and Addressed Labels NOTE: WHEN THE APPUCATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PACKAGE INCLUDING THE RADIUS MAP, TWO SETS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ • • ♦ • • ♦ • • • • • ♦ • Form4 Revised 06/05 Page4of4 • City of Carlsbad lii•11h1b•i•J4•Filiiei4,41 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person [P--iC-~ec:..k Corp/Part _________ _ Title _______ -t-----.--Title ____________ _ Address 1..'-14 '2], wh,·+~~t,l Vl"'/Address H.vtnt.4-A CA Cf ;1'56;2---------• OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person f£ re/l Da &AL.,) Corp/Part. _________ _ Title O w&i!. tf Title ____________ _ Address 3S-o:S-fl.oc.1(R11M.e, RiJ. Address __________ _ CAt2(S BAlJ C,4, "7plt>09 I 1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} • • 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profitrrrust_______ Non Profitrrrust. ________ _ Title___________ Title ____________ _ Address ----------Address ___________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes ~ No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. ·enififfie and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant ::t(?JJ '?-/11·0~ Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page2 of2 _ FROM .: CAL I FORNI A OAKS CAR WAS. FAX NO. :19096961846 -□v. 16 2005 11:25AM P3 l"HIJC.. 1:1.::lf .J..1. ___ Qj_ty of Carlsbad P1annin9 Department DISCLOSURE STATEM·ENT Applicant's statement OI' di~loatrrl:) of ~rtain ownership intere~ts on aJf applications which wi1f raqurre discretlcma action on the art of the Cl Countil or an a ofntecl Board, CommfssfOn or Committee. The following informstiQn MU§T be disclosed at thet time of applioaUon submittal. Your project cannot be reviewec:I until this Information Is oompfetad. Please prtnt. . Note: . · . · Parson fa· d&ffned.as "Any lndivJdutl, firm•, co-partnership, Joint v~nture,· :!'.,aociatlon, $OOl~t club, frabllmal org#11iatfon, ·cori,o~on, ~stat•. 1rust;.~Jve~, aytjdlc:ata, In ~Is and 1ny other .GOOl'\ty,_ c:tt.y-an~ coµnty, b{fY mui"llclpaftty, df,trtctor of.her pO!HfcaJ oobdMslon or.an.y other group. er comb~lon acting . .a~ • ~ni"t.,. •• ,• -may Sign. this .dooum~hf; hQW8VW, th~ ~egaJ ·;,~me and entfty ·or the 'appllca~t and ·prop~rw owner mum be pmvii:tatf balOVJ, • • • • • • • ' 1. 2. APPLICANT (Not the appUcanf s agent) • Provide the CQMf?WE, 1.§.GAL names and addresses of Abb person.& having a financial interest in the apprloaUon. If the applicant lneludes a corogratfon m: partaorsh[n, Include the names. title, !ilc;fdres1$eS of all Individuals owning more than 10% of the-.Stram, IF NO INOMDUALS OVVN MORI'.:; THAN 10¾ OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON"APPLICASI.E (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a pub}fglv"owneg t::ol'DOrf!t!!m, include the names, tlt.les, and addresses of the oorporate officers. (A separate pa=-may be attached ff necessary.} /., Person WA ~t:le; ~v 1~ '" Ccrp/Part._-a,~......,.,.[b----- Tftle ~,~ Title Addras~ ~ A,. ~"rAddreas.___ ________ _ ~ D•6~ U9Z.te'( OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide th& PQMPLE!i, LEGAb names sod addresses of & persons havfng any QWnership Interest in the. pr<'.)perty involved. Arso. pm\lide the nature of the legal ownership (l.e, partnership, tenants ln cormnon, non--profft, corporation, mG.), If the own11:1rshJp Includes 11 g>rpgmtfOQ or AA®emhjg, Include the names, title, addres$es of au lndlvlduels owning mo('$ than 10% of tha shares, IF NO INDMDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10%' OF THE SHARE:S, PLEASE INDtCATE NON--APPUCABLE (N/A) IN THE. SPACE. BELOW. If a _gYliifffdYilWJleg carooratto(Jg include the names, titles, and addresses of· the corporate offlcera. (A separate page may be attacttea if necessary.) . Person'B.;715Ar+l}49.,....,.-.:·~ 1> Corp/Part, __________ _ Tftfe~~,_:.f f~t,:z: Titte __________ ~ Address@f!:? bsu-ArAeaey-, Address_ · 7'&414 _____ " ___ _ ~lAAl. eJer,1..s Q!Q, """,i.lo 1 •□v. 16 2005 11:26AM P4 • PAGE 04/11 . . . . 3. NONwPROFlT ORG~NI~ TI{?N OR TRUST ff any pereoo identffled pursuant to (1) ot (2) abow ls .a l!Q!Jproflt omamz~n QC@ 10-JII, list the namelll and addresses of Alf! per$Cn serving ~s an officer Qr director of the nort-profit organization or aa trustee or beneflolary of the. • Non Profivrrust Non Profit/Trust,._ ______ __ Tilfe:.----------Title __________ ~--- Mdress___, ________ _ Address,__ _________ _ 4. Have you had more than· $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boarda.1 Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the pasU.welve (12) months? 0 Yes ~No lf ye~. please indlcate p~rson(s); _________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. ,: ppllca WA~it!.rr;. Q&J1.s Prtnt or type name of applfcant Si gent lf app datte A'(t! e. k?.4-\J I~ Prlntor typ& name of owner/applicant's agent· H:ADMIN\OOUNTER\DlaC\.OSURa STATEMENT" 5198 Page2 of.2 • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION . PROJECT NAME: D~ f4a6! t?E'.plTtAL.. ~P4?t-1 iH uJNf=S APPLICANT NAME: ~ 1a 61 WJP • ~ l::rft'.)i[Jti!? ~ 6--J,.i.J rJ u.Jb Ai G;; 0~'1 ~ . . . Please describe fully the proposed proJect by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: Project site consists of a 10,058 s.f. lot, zoned R-3, in the RMH General Plan with the Beach Area Overlay zone, currently occupied by a single family dwelling unit, attached garage, low masonry walls along north and south property lines and various masonry paved walkways. Topography of the site consists of level and sloping portions along with existing primary and secondary seawalls along the beach portion. The proposed scope of work is to remove the ~xisting single-family dwelling and replace it with 2 residential condominium dwelling units in approximately the same footprint of the existing dwelling. (approximately 4,697 sq. ft. of coverage or 47%). The new structure will incorporate and expanded basement level as a part of the overall foundation system and providing additional living and storage space. The overall height at any point within the scope of the proposed development is not proposed to exceed the 30-ft. maximum. The proposed 2 new residential condominium units each have attached 2-car garages, private entrances, one guest space for the 2 units, varied wall planes, roof element, window treatments and extensive patio walkways and landscaping elements. The proposed project is consistent with the zoning regulations, general plan, overlay zoning and local coastal requirements along with all development along Ocean Street. Project Description 10/96 Page 1 of 1 FROM : CALIFORNIA OA~? .. fAR W8J ....... .a:. FAX NO. : 1909?961~46 16 2005 11:25AM P2 PAGE 02/ii City: of Carlsbad .. IIIDiifHPii&WiHOIIII BAZARDOUSWASTEAND.Str.BSTANCESSTATEMENT .. ' . consuttauon Of Lists ot Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification or Compliance with Governm~nt Cod& Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California G0"8mment Code ·Section 65962.5, I have consulted fhe • Hazardous Wastes and Substances SHes List r.ompiled by the OalifOmla Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (Chffi?k one): ~e development project and any alternatives proposed in this appllcatton Im ngt contained on the lists. complied purs\;(ant to Section 659825 of the State Government Code. D The development proJect and any alternatives proposed in this appllcatfon tm contained on the nsts compiled pursuant to Section 66982:5 of the State Government Gode. 1:4,4tL t;dl..ltAN we,,s,cA. u2.1c, P.none Number:7' t) "',fr ,., .--l.J. r "l.. . . . Address of Site:)!£-f? 42<,.f.Ad :S::U C-J1:'2 l.'$. &Ant -'<!I... -%J ~ <2 R': Locaf Agency (Olty and County): bl:::J?kfr:~~-~d . .Rua:f.ze: Assessor's book, page, and pa.reef number:,_ 2.Q~ • a~) • Oz!? .~ • SpeQlfyrlst(s):ff~½ H~~-4 L<JM;f~ &~:fA~6: ~l:fe'. ~'ftf6~ Regulatory Identification Number: lJ /J-. • · LJ '• '