HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-10-18; Planning Commission; ; SDP 05-17|HDP 05-13|CDP 05-52|CP 06-11 - DONALD CONDOMINIUMSTh.ty of Carlsbad Planning Department •
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ItemNo. 0
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 18, 2006
Application complete date: February 13, 2006
Project Planner: Greg Fisher
Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle
SUBJECT: SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 05-52/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMINIUMS
-Request for approval of a Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit,
Hillside Development Permit, and Condominium Permit to demolish one single
family home and construct two (2) residential air-space condominiums on a .43
acre site located west of Ocean Street and north of Pacific A venue within the
Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities
Management Zone 1.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6175, 6176,
6177 and 6178 APPROVING Site Development Plan (SDP 05-17), Hillside Development
Permit (HDP 05-13), Coastal Development Permit (CDP 05-52), and Condominium Permit (CP
06-11) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves the demolition of an existing single family home and the subdivision and
construction of two (2) residential air-space condominiums on a .43-acre site. The proposed
project would include a two-story building with private recreational areas. A Site Development
Plan (SDP) is required since the project is located in the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) and
a Condominium Permit (CP) is required to allow an air-space condominium subdivision. The
project is an infill project surrounded by the Army-Navy Academy and a mix of single-family
and multi-family developments and is exempt from environmental review. The project is located
in the coastal zone and is subject to the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and
approval of a Coastal Development• Permit (CDP), which is appealable to the California Coastal
Commission. A Hillside Development Permit (HDP) is required as the project site contains
slopes exceeding 15-percent and slope elevation differences greater than 15 feet. Since the
project is only two units, the Engineering Department will be administratively processing a
Minor Subdivision (MS 05-31) subsequent to the Planning Commission's action on this project.
The project also required an Administrative Variance (AV 05-06) to reduce the front yard
setback from 20-feet to 12-feet. The Administrative Variance was approved by the Planning
Director on September 27, 2006. The project meets all applicable regulations and staff has no
issues with the proposal.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting to demolish one single-family dwelling and develop two (2)
residential air-space condominiums. The 0.43-acre site is located west of Ocean Street and
{'. ....
SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMnlMs
October 18, 2006
Pae 2
North of Pacific Avenue within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local
Facilities Management Zone 1. The site has a Residential Medium-High Density (RMH)
General Plan Land Use designation and is zoned Multiple-Family Residential (R-3). The project
site is surrounded by single family to the north, the Army-Navy Academy to the south,
multifamily residential to the east, and the Pacific Ocean to the west.
The proposed development would consist of a two-story structure with a basement. Each unit
will have a 2-car garage with direct access to each of the units. The one required visitor parking
space will be provided in a covered parking bay. The units are 3,830 square feet and 4,643
square feet in size. Each unit has a separate exterior pedestrian entrance, private rear yard patios
and decks, and private storage space in the basement. The building will have concrete plaster
coated walls with an extensive use of windows and architectural elements of wrought-iron.
The project will take access off of Ocean Street and will be required to enter into a
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement (NIA), because Ocean Street is designated as an
Alternative Design Street. Approximately 2,140 cubic yards of cut would be necessary to
prepare for the basement, with 80 cubic yards to be exported from the site. Runoff from the site
would be treated with drainage swales along the rear of the property in compliance with the
City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit.
IV. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan Residential Medium-High Density (RMH) Land Use designation;
B. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Local Coastal Program (LCP)
Segment, Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone and the Coastal Shoreline
Development Overlay Zone (Chapters 21.201, 21.203 and 21.204 of the Zoning
Ordinance);
C. Multiple-Family Residential Zone (R-3; Chapter 21.16 of the Zoning Ordinance),
Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ; Chapter 21.82 of the Zoning Ordinance), and
Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance);
D. City Council Policy No. 66 (Principals for the Development of Livable
Neighborhoods);
E. Hillside Development Regulations and Guidelines (Chapter 21.95);
F. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
G. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance);
H. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and
Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of
the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. General Plan Residential Medium High Density (RMH) Land Use designation
The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is Residential Medium-High (RMH).
The RMH designation allows residential development at a density range of 8 -15 dwelling units
SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP o!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN,MS
October 18, 2006
Pae 3
per acre with a Growth Management Control Point (GMCP) of 11.5 dwelling units per acre. The
project site has a net developable acreage of 0.17 acres. The project's proposed density of 11.76
du/ac (2 dwelling units) is within the RMH density range of 8 -15 du/ac, but is slightly above
the RMH GMCP of 11.5 du/ac used for the purpose of calculating the City's compliance with
Government Code Section 65863. At the GMCP, 1.95 dwelling units would be permitted on this
0.17 net developable acre property. Although the project exceeds the GMCP for the RMH
General Plan Land Use designation by a fractional unit allocation of 0.05 dwelling units, the
General Plan Land Use Element allows the City to approve residential development at a density
that exceeds the GMCP for the applicable density range provided the proposed residential
development complies with certain findings as discussed below.
To exceed the GMCP, the project must be consistent with the following required General Plan
findings: 1) that the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in
excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will
not be adversely impacted; 2) that there have been sufficient developments approved in the
quadrant at densities below the control point so that the approval will not result in exceeding the
quadrant limit; and, 3) all necessary public facilities required by the City's Growth Management
Program will be constructed, or are guaranteed to be constructed, concurrently with the need for
them created by this development and in compliance with the adopted City standards. The
proposed project is consistent with the above required findings in that there have been sufficient
developments in the northwest quadrant that have developed at densities below the GMCP such
that the allocation of 0.05 DUs would not result in exceeding the quadrant limit, the project is
conditioned to pay the appropriate fees to comply with City's Growth Management Program, and
the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted as the allocation of 0.05 units has
already been analyzed and anticipated within the northwest quadrant.
The project complies with the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table A below:
TABLE A -GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROPOSED USES &
ELEMENT PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE
Land Use Site is designated for Residential Residential project Yes
Medium-High Density, (RMH -density at 11.76 dwelling
8-15 du/ac) with a GMCP of units per acre (2 DUs*) is
11.5 du/ac. within the RMH density
range of 8 -15 du/ac but
is slightly above the
RHM GMCP of 11.5
du/ac (1.95 DUs).
Housing Provision of affordable housing. The project will be Yes
required to pay an
affordable housing in-lieu
fee in order to provide
their proportionate share
of affordable housing.
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13~CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMnlMs
October 18, 2006
Pae 4
TABLE A -GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROPOSED USES &
ELEMENT PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE
Public Safety Reduce fire hazards to an Meets fire code. Yes
acceptable level.
Open Space Minimize environmental impacts Project does not impact Yes
& to sensitive resources within the sensitive resources.
Conservation City.
Utilize Best Management Project will conform to Yes
Practices for control of storm all NPDES requirements.
water and to protect water
quality.
Noise Residential exterior noise Project is not impacted by Yes
standard of 60 CNEL and potential noise generating
interior noise standard of 45 sources such as Carlsbad
CNEL. Boulevard or the railroad.
Circulation Require new development to Project is conditioned to Yes
construct roadway enter into a NIA.
improvements needed to serve
proposed development.
*The density yield at the GMCP would be 1.95 dwelling units, which pursuant to CMC Section
21.53.230 may be rounded up to the nearest whole unit (2 DUs). See General Plan consistency
discussion above.
B. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Local Coastal Program Segment,
Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone and Coastal Shoreline Development
Overlay Zone
The project site is located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone and within the Mello II
Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The site is also located within and subject to the Coastal
Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203) and the Coastal Shoreline Development
Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The proposed project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the LCP which contains land use
policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within its boundaries.
The policies of the Mello II Segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and
scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access
and prevention of geologic instability and erosion.
The project is consistent with the Coastal Act policies as follows: A) no agricultural lands exist
on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur; B) the site does not contain or impact
environmentally sensitive habitats, water or marine resources; C) the site is geologically stable
and the proposed grading for the site has been limited to the area necessary to develop the site;
D) the project has been designed to reduce the amount of off-site runoff by use ofbio-swales and
has been conditioned to implement the NPDES standards to ensure the quality of the water
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN,MS
October 18, 2006
Pae 5
leaving the site; E) the project meets the parking requirements of the zoning ordinance; F) the
project does not preclude any recreational opportunities or shoreline access as the property is
currently developed with a single family home; and, G) the two proposed residential air-space
condominiums will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public
right-of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone.
The project site is located in the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. This overlay zone
allows development of steep slopes of 25% or greater that do not contain endangered
plant/animal species and/or coastal sage scrub or chaparral plant communities, subject to specific
findings. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of the Coastal
Resource Protection Overlay Zone as illustrated in the table below:
TABLE B -COASTAL RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE COMPLIANCE
FINDING RESPONSE
That a soils investigation be conducted to A soils and geologic analysis of the site was
determine that the site slope areas are stable prepared in conformance with City
and grading and development impacts requirements. The study determined that the
mitigable for at least 75 years, or the life of the proposed development will have a useable life
structure. of at least 75 years and that the development
will have no adverse effect on the stability of
the coastal slope.
Grading of the slope is essential to the The proposed grading is essential to the
development of the site. development of the site since the slopes are
located in the middle of the lot and the site is
further constrained by the coastal string line
setback requirements.
Slope disturbance will not result in substantial Slope disturbance will not damage or alter
damage or alteration to major wildlife major wildlife habitat or native vegetation
corridors, habitat or native vegetation. since it is an infill lot and the site is currently
developed with a single family residence.
There is no native vegetation located on the
site.
No grading or removal of steep slopes will be Review of the proposed project has concluded
permitted unless all environmental aspects that the site contains no habitat or wildlife and
have been mitigated. that no environmental impacts will result from
the project.
As the project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and is
located between the ocean and the first public road parallel to the ocean, it is subject to the
provisions of the Coastal Shore1ine Development Overlay Zone. However, the proposed
development complies with all applicable requirements of the Coastal Shoreline Development
Overlay Zone as described in the table below:
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMnlMs
October 18, 2006
Pae 6
TABLE B -COASTAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE
COMPLIANCE
STANDARD PROVIDED
Lateral Access The project has been conditioned to grant an easement
25' dry sandy beach for a minimum of25' dry sandy beach.
Bluff Top Access Beach is accessible via existing stairways located
Applies to lots where no beach is approximately 380 feet north and 420 feet south of the
present or where beach is not subject site. Since the access is available and the beach
accessible. is present, the requirement does not apply to the
project.
Geotechnical Report A geotechnical analysis and wave runup study for the
Analyze cliff erosion and geologic project were prepared. The analysis concluded that the
conditions. proposed development will have no adverse effect on
the stability of the coastal slope and that the site is
suitable for the proposed development.
Appearance The proposed residential structure has been designed
Building developed on site with a with attractive architectural features (fa9ade elements,
general attractive appearance related columns, arched windows, stone accents, and
to surrounding development and decorative s-tile roof), which are compatible with the
natural environment. surrounding development and natural environment.
Ocean Views The project design is consistent with the other adjacent
Building designed to preserve to the buildings along Ocean Street and the proposed
extent feasible ocean views. structure complies with applicable side yard setback
requirements, which will, to the extent feasible,
continue to preserve existing ocean views from the
street. Decorative open fencing will replace the
existing solid gates along the side property lines
increasing the ocean view to the west from Ocean
Street.
Natural Features The proposed project has been designed to step-down
To the extent feasible, retain natural the hillside, consistent with this requirement.
features and topography.
Grading The improved site has been previously graded to
Grading executed so as to blend with accommodate the existing structure. Grading for the
existing terrain. proposed project is limited to the excavation of the
basement area and approximately 2,140 cubic yards of
cut will warrant a grading permit.
"Stringline" The project adheres to all coastal "stringline" setback
Maintain a "stringline" setback for requirements. The project consists of the demolition of
structures, patios, decks, and other a single family home and the construction of two
similar structures. residential air-space condominiums that will adhere to
the stringline setback requirement.
Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello II Segment land use policies and the
Coastal Resource Protection and Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zones.
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP 0!21cP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMnlMs
October 18, 2006
Pae 7
C. R-3, Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ), and Planned Development Regulations
The two-unit air space condominium project meets or exceeds the requirements of the R-3
(21.16), BAOZ (21.82), and Planned Development regulations (21.45) as outlined in the Table C
below:
TABLE C-R-3, BAOZ, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
COMPLIANCE
R-3 Standards Required Provided
Building Height 35 Feet 30 Feet
Setbacks Front: 20' Front: 12'*
Interior Side Yard: 7'6" Interior Side Yard: 7'6"
Rear: 15' Rear: 143'
Lot coverage 60% 25%
Beach Area Overlay Required Provided
Zone (BAOZ)
Building Height 30'; two stories with~ 3:12 roof 30'; two stories with~ 3:12 roof
pitch pitch
Resident Parking 2 parking spaces per unit, one Each unit has a two-car garage.
must be covered.
Visitor Parking One space per two units One covered visitor parking space.
Table C General Required Provided
Development
Standards
Applicable to all
Planned
Developments
Visitor Parking One space per two units One covered visitor parking space.
Screening of Parking Screened from adjacent property. Guest parking is covered and the
Areas perimeter of the site is thoroughly
landscaped which will minimize
the visibility from adjacent
properties.
Storage space 480 cubic feet/unit or 392 cubic Storage exceeds the minimum 392
feet/unit if in one location. cubic feet/unit.
Table D Small-Lot, Required Provided
Single-Family and
Two-family
Dwelling
Development
Standards
Maximum Building 30'; two stories with~ 3:12 roof 30'; two stories with~ 3:12 roof
Height pitch pitch
Resident Parking Two-car garage per unit. Each unit has a two-car garage.
SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN,MS
October 18, 2006
Pae 8
TABLE C -R-3, BAOZ, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Table E Multiple-Required Provided
Dwelling
Development
Standards
City Council Policy See Table D below See Table D below
No. 66 (Livable
Neighborhoods)
Maximum Lot 60% 25%
Coverage
Maximum Building 35 Feet 30'; two stories with~ 3:12 roof
Height pitch
Architectural Design 1. There shall be at least 3 separate The building exceeds the minimum
Elements building planes on all building of 3 building planes and the
elevations. The minimum offset minimum depth of 18 inches from
in planes shall be 18 inches and the front most plane to the rear
shall include but not be limited plane on all building elevations.
to building walls, windows and
roofs.
2. Building facades shall The project includes a variety of
incorporate a minimum of four architectural enhancements as
design elements traditionally found in Tuscan
Architecture, such as columns,
arched windows, stone accents,
and s-tile roof.
Recreation space 15 foot by 15 foot patio or 120 Balconies exceed the minimum
(private) square feet of balcony area per 120 square feet per unit.
unit.
* An Administrative Variance (AV 05-06) was granted by the Planning Director on
September 27, 2006 to reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 12 feet.
D. City Council Policy No. 66 (Livable Neighborhoods)
The proposed project complies with the applicable guidelines of City Council Policy No. 66,
Livable Neighborhoods as shown in Table D below. The air space condominiums as designed
have met all the livable neighborhood guidelines applicable to a two-unit development.
--SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 05-52/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMINIUMS
October 18, 2006
Pae 9
TABLED: CITY COUNCIL POLICY 66-LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS
Principle Comoliance Comments
1 Building Facades2 Front Entries2 Porches
Facades create interest and character and should be The project provides clearly
varied and articulated to provide visual interest to identifiable front gates from Ocean
pedestrians. Clearly identifiable front doors and porches Street, as well as a second floor
enhance the street scene and create opportunities for balcony facing Ocean Street.
greater social interaction within the neighborhood.
Building entries and windows should face the street.
Front porches, bay windows, courtyards and balconies
are encouraged.
2 Garages
Homes should be designed to feature the residence as Each unit will have a two car garage
the prominent part of the structure in relation to the and there is one additional covered
. street. A variety of garage configurations should be parking space for visitor parking .
used to improve the street scene. This may include
tandem garages, side-loaded garages, front-loaded
garages, alley-loaded garages and recessed garages.
3 Street Design
An interconnected, modified (grid) street pattern should Ocean Street is identified as an
alternative design street and does be incorporated into project designs when there are no
topographic or environmental constraints. not require improvements.
Interconnected streets provide pedestrians and
automobiles many alternative routes to follow, disperse
traffic and reduce the volume of cars on any one street
in the neighborhood. Streets should be designed to
provide both vehicular and pedestrian connectivity by
minimizing the use of cul-de-sacs.
The street network should also be designed to create a This project does not involve any
safer, more comfortable pedestrian and bicycling new streets.
environment. Local residential streets should have
travel and parking lanes, be sufficiently narrow to slow
traffic, provide adequate access for emergency and
service vehicles and emergency evacuation routes for
residents and include parkways with trees to form a
pleasing canopy over the street. Local residential streets
are the public open space in which children often play
and around which neighborhoods interact. Within this
context, vehicular movement should be additionally
influenced through the use of City-accepted designs for
traffic calming measures.
• • • SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP 05-52/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN"ffiMS
October 18, 2006
Pa e 10
4
5
6
TABLED: CITY COUNCIL POLICY 66 -LIV ABLE NEIGHBORHOODS
CONTINUED
Principle Compliance Comments
Parkways
Street trees should be planted in the parkways along all Ocean Street is identified as an
streets. Tree species should be selected to create a alternative design street and does
unified image for the street, provide an effective not require improvements.
canopy, avoid sidewalk damage and minimize water
consumption.
Pedestrian Walkways
Pedestrian walkways should be located along or visible Ocean Street is identified as an
from all streets. Walkways (sidewalks or trails) should alternative design street and does
provide clear, comfortable and direct access to not require improvements. Each
neighborhood schools, parks/plazas and transit stops. unit has separate access from Ocean
Primary pedestrian routes should be bordered by Street.
residential fronts, parks or plazas. Where street
connections are not feasible (at the end of cul-de-sacs),
pedestrian paths should also be provided.
Centralized Communitv Recreation Areas The project consists of only two
Park or plazas, which serve as neighborhood meeting units and is not required to provide
places and as recreational activity centers should be community recreation areas.
incorporated into all planned unit developments. As
frequently as possible, these parks/plazas should be
designed for both active and passive uses for residents
of all ages and should be centrally located within the
project. Parks and plazas should be not be sited on
residual parcels, used as buffers from surrounding
developments or to separate buildings from streets.
E. Hillside Development Regulation and Guidelines
The project is subject to the Hillside Development Regulations because the site contains slopes
over 15% and slope elevation differences greater than 15 feet. The steeper slopes traverse the
site from northwest to southeast. The steep slope area is roughly 568 square feet in area with a
slope gradient of 40% or greater.
The development complies with the ordinance and the Hillside Guidelines as follows: the
proposed project is: a) consistent with the Land Use and Open Space/Conservation Elements of
the General Plan since the site has been previously graded and developed, there exist no natural
hillsides, and the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species,
b) the project design minimizes the amount of grading to an acceptable quantity of 4,976 cubic
yards per acre, will incorporate an aesthetically pleasing design with landscaping, and
retaining/planting walls will be developed primarily on the perimeter of the site and the new 2-
unit condominium will be developed in approximately the same location as the existing building;
c) the existing hillside is manufactured and accordingly, there will be no impacts to natural slope
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP 0!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN,MS
October 18, 2006
Pa e 11
or resource areas, wildlife habitats or native vegetation; d) there will be no impact on lagoons or
riparian ecosystems in that the project has been conditioned to submit an erosion control plan
consistent with the NPDES permit requirements as required by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and the City of Carlsbad.
F. Subdivision Map Act
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed Minor Subdivision and is of the opinion
that the subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and
the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The Engineering Department will take action on the Minor
Subdivision subsequent to the Planning Commission's action on the SDP, HDP, CDP, and CP.
The project is conditioned to install all infrastructure improvements concurrent with
development. The proposed building setbacks will allow for adequate air circulation and the
opportunity for passive heating and cooling.
G. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
For all residential developments less than seven units, the inclusionary requirement may be
satisfied through the payment of an inclusionary housing in-lieu fee. The project has been
conditioned to pay the fee prior to building permit issuance.
H. Growth Management Regulations
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance
with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in the table below.
TABLE E -GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration 6.95 sq. ft. Yes
Library 3.71 sq. ft. Yes
Waste Water Treatment 2EDUs Yes
Parks .01 acre Yes
Drainage .74 CFS Basin A Yes
Circulation 16ADT Yes
Fire Station No. 1 Yes
Open Space 0 acres NIA
Schools Carlsbad Unified (E=.179/M=.079/HS = .098) Yes
Sewer Collection System 2EDUs Yes
Water 220 GPD Yes
The proposed project is 0.05 units above the Growth Management Control Point (11.5 DUs/ac)
for RMH properties. The maximum unit yield of the property is 1.95 dwelling units at the City's
GMCP. Pursuant to City Council Policy No. 43, the project "qualifies" for a 0.05 dwelling unit
allocation from the excess dwelling unit bank as the project dwelling unit yield at the GMCP for
the property results in a unit yield that includes a fractional unit of 0.5 or greater (1.95 DUs). In
this circumstance, a fraction of a unit may be granted in order to round up to the next whole unit;
SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13/CDP o!2/CP 06-11-DONALD CONDOMIN,MS
October 18, 2006
Pa e 12
provided the maximum density of the applicable General Plan Land Use designation is not
exceeded. With the 0.05 dwelling unit allocation the project density is 11.76 DUs/acre, which is
within the RMH density range (8 -15 DUs/ac).
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15322 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class
32 Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the
Zoning Ordinance, the project site is within the City limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is
surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence that the site has any value as habitat for
endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will not result in significant
effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately
served by all required utilities and public services. The project is exempt from further
environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15322 of the State CEQA guidelines. A
Notice of Exemption will be filed upon final project determination.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6175 (SDP)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6176 (HDP)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6177 (CDP)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6178 (CP)
5. Location Map
6. Background Data Sheet
7. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
8. Disciosure Statement
9. Reduced Exhibits
10. Exhibits "A" -"K" dated October 18, 2006
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
DONALD CONDOMINIUMS
SOP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 05-52/CP 06-11
• BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SDP 05-17 /HDP 05-13ICDP 05-52ICP 06-11
CASE NAME: DONALD CONDOMINIUMS
APPLICANT: Eric Beck --~-----------------------
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Condominium Permit to demolish one
single family home and construct two (2) residential air-space condominiums on a .43 acre site
located west of Ocean Street and north of Pacific A venue within the Mello II Segment of the
Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 6 of Granville Park, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of Californian according to Map thereof No. 1782, filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 21, 1924.
APN: 203-021-08 Acres: .43 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: =2--"'u=n=its=----------
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Medium-High Density (RMH)
Proposed Land Use Designation:N =--~I A:..=..--------------------
Density Allowed: --=--8-~1~5-"-d~u/~a~c ___ _ Density Proposed: -=-1 =l.'-'-7-=--6-=d=u/...::.:a-=--c _______ _
Existing Zone: Multiple Family Residential (R-3) Proposed Zone: N::....:..:...:IA-=----------
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning General Plan Current Land Use
Site R-3 RMH Single Family
North R-3 RMH Single Family
South R-3 Private School (P) Army Navy Academy
East R-3 RMH Multiple Family
West NIA NIA Pacific Ocean
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: [8'.] Yes D No Local Coastal Program Segment: =M=e=ll=o-=11=-------
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: [8'.] Yes D No Coastal Development Permit: [8'.] Yes D No
Local Coastal Program Amendment: D Yes [8'.] No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: RMH
Existing LCP Zone: R-3
Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N_IA __ _
Proposed LCP Zone:N ;:_;~I A-=---------
Revised O I /06
• PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad --"-=~~----
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): =2 ________________ _
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
[;8J Categorical Exemption, Section 15322 (In-Fill Development Projects)
D Negative Declaration, issued ____________________ _
D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _
D Other, ___________________________ _
Revised O 1/06
• CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 05-17/HDP 05-13/CDP 05-52/CP 06-11 -DONALD
CONDOMINIUMS
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: l GENERAL PLAN: Residential Medium High
ZONING: Multiple Family Residential -R-3
DEVELOPER'S NAME: Eric Beck =~~-------------------------
ADDRESS: 24423 Whitaker Way, Murrieta, CA 92562
PHONE NO.: 619-232-5990 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: =-20~3~-0_2_1-~08~------
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): -'--'.4-=-3-=-ac=re--'-=s ____ _
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: =-=A=-s =so:::..::o=nc-=:a=-s =po=s=si=b=le'-------------
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage= =6.=-9-=--5 ____ _
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage= ~3-~7~1 ____ _
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) =-2 _____ _
D. Park: Demand in Acreage= ..:...:'0'-"1 _____ _
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS= ~·7~4 _____ _
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan faciFties on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
A
16ADT
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = -=--1 _____ _
Open Space: Acreage Provided = ;:..;Ne:....::/ A-=-------
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer:
Carlsbad Unified=
Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin ~
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD =
(E=. l 79/M=.079/HS = .098)
2
A
220
L. The proposed project is .05 units above the Growth Management Control Point for RMH
properties.
•
City of c\arlsbad
l:fF•hh•ei~l•J§•Eilil,i§UI
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot b~-
reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or
other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be.
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest
in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title,
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE
BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, includ~ the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate
officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person [~iC-J!,ec..k Corp/Part. _________ _
Title ________ __,..---Title
Address '2.t-14'21 wh.·+A ~tA. \J/A.'fAddr-es_s ________ _
Hv rn e.,-\-A • CA. 9' ;, cs b ;t
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership,
tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or
partnership. include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE
NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned~orporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.) -
Person ·f£ Te.fl Do &AL. t) Corp/Part ___________ _
Title O ¼/A.J t,;. R, Title ____________ ~_
Addre~s 3'5'oS-Roe,1(f21u6-~ RD. Address ------------
l AIU .. S B11lJ C.4, 7c;l009 7
1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
_.
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
l·
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profitrrrust'---------Non Profit/Trust~--------
Title -----------Title ____________ _
Address Address ----------------------
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Coun~il within the past twelve (12) months?_
D Yes ~ No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
tierriS1fue and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
£(Jal'-7-/'l·O~
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
ER I c... !3&c..(<
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
_.
I
"""w"""""w""'"""""-....,'"""'-""""""""'...,.,.. 11 I at'nllUAOIMIITO,MUIT•ll"IWU!tTWIIIUIIHIQMtUUIC~Affl!MWlfT.. t:i OITKIIXIITllfQ!"IIKCll.l'N.ACT)P1lL01TONf.ul!CClfQISTIIUW.W. -----t i
1
1
I
CAL&:W"•l'-D"
LEGEND -EXIS'mO(l'~ICl'JflntllST'CN!IVWJ.l.'-GUI
~ !illl.DHOFOOTl'IIWJ 1f, = ""'" = !fDICl:IW'l.l -OD.VJM,t,'l'1Mn!Wl>'fS
~
I
!
NOT!: Notenoe,'M!llorhedgetl'Nlort)<,tv.ohctM(42")t, ==:==~~~~~ belcceted~k>theree.rdlhlreqwedtcr¢yen:IM!tbadc. Per CtyafCarl&bad M~!apal Code214S.130Wlb, Ftn::ie11 cr ~ SOOSheel:A.2(~)111'1dA.7(typlcalcletli)
CALCULATIONS FOR SIWI LANDSCAf'EAREA
1.0'1'11Zf.M.$'~ZUI'• 11.0:2010.IT,11101. lrnllll:lil1mHHilaad1Gmndlllzlld!lbll ·l:ial:lll;!l
,ID,llSJfOlOfllll.7.U'zlu.&'• IG~80.Fr,
tomsrttl.NIDSCAPl!AA!A• (ald~--•11,20!1.q.t.) s.c,..IGQ.Fr,
'IOTH,l'EllCOOMlEO#WiDSCIJ'l!M!A•
i;j I, ~,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~P~CIACAYE
PIAN """"' ~ 0
,:,
(/) m
::i= Cl ~ ! ::> 0) z "' i ·e cl z 0 .e .. C .. ~ ::.s z 0 0 11 t.) ,,;
"' D.-..J .c ,g:C, ~ .. 'C i 'S .. z 0 .. ej w 'lil' zc, C .. ~ ... -in i 'i'a.:H w II) Nlih-!! ix: C C : o fil c: B ..J u NCO < 0 ... ,;!'~'S z ... z C, Cl.a° oi ~~<l:U C"'
SUBMITTALRECORD
SIJBMITTAl.1 1""'2ll05
CCCRSVIEW "'"""' f'LNlNING DEPT 61711ml
PLANl!iSUE
Pl..'UNINGOEPT """""
PROJECTHUIIBER: tool
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE
PLAN
f A I A ~i...---------------------------------------------.....1----
-
i
!
!
i
1...--~~o.&~~~
I Unit "A" / Upper Level Floor Plan
t.Hf"A"•Upp•Lnol.•~1oqll
INT"J:'•9'nc.dl • Woqft
lner:1suppoltlngcol111m endliantisbebN
... ,..,
II
JI
II
II
II
II
11 II
11
II
II II
II II
\\
I
I I
11ir,i'
UllJ.
\dT'A"•lrll')IPo,w•S1hql INT"A"•~• • Ml"la
1.KT,".llllftuwl• UMoq• IMT ... •ti.dl ■ nhqfl
INTT•Qwac,11• Wfoqlt
"' 0 0 N ... co "' t:: .. ·e ci z .e ...
'la :!¥.!!! 0 i! E af .. g A.-
,.Q ~B .,
'C 1-a .. 0 .. ej ~ z<:>
co~ .... ~ 'TA.!Jj "' 2-iii: ..... C :i;uo-c .. ., :;i~&B " 0 .. a! ~'a ... ZC> a.~ ! ~~<l:t>
SUBMITTAL RECORD
SIJBMITTAl..1 ,...,..
CCCRE\OEW ~, .....
~OOOEPT """"" PLAN ISSUE
A.ANNlNGDEPT """""'
PROJECTIIUIBER: 0602
FLOOR
PLANS
1. AS . 11..------------------------------------------------
_.
i
! f
"'BUILDING AREA" COVERAGE ■4,788 sq. ft.
"BASEMENT MmA" COVl;;RAQE ■ 3,9!5 aq, ft.
Basement Allowable Area Calculatlon (based on L.F. of perimeter wall}
E!!:!!!!=l•~J.llllA"~ll•O.IT'!ll::ISQ,~-•
e::z3 .. ,,"'91fY.!!)<T'AAU."!JOW.~=~-"14W',o,Gtl,W. ("12W',•211'11o"""-'I.M.U:>.....zl.JIJ
c;::z:::2a•,,"'6el-mNTA'lt~'!JOfloll~<HlM:111•2i4U'AG'l\l,o,i. (216U',.i!HloMN.,o,i.U.,1'1,>.81.l!1
l!l=!l•c::zz::t•~•~AAU>.'«1...-11.l'PMffPl-etoW"...c;wM.
PROPOWI u.mtlU.YICUNCWf'l'QII ➔ "OF'Flll00f0ICA'l'FAPUalJOACCUS ANllltECllU,l'Dtu..sElffl(T
../
~--" ~
IIUICll!tJ1'UWTRJON:~ER'1--
~-~ UPl'Ellnll
I.IQ;l>OaCUCIIUf0ff'-VISTQAAGl!f.<I,>< -~=Pl.,<N
110tt. ==:N::irI~=~.J:.~'m.-=m-~~== DOam011AN0c:CMntl!C'TIOfN:U.llftCIAk'rl,Cla,~lhl:.M1'.rrUte:IIM.ln',
M0lL ~=r~=~~~~~o:,.mo4wc,~
~Yl.14!0, 'Of,atlOD[CIC(T!" PJIUCIU(lfl'OfW/l/1
PBQJECJ GRACING \IOLlJMES
CCA•TltlMWwn..MIULCNOFOCffl'Uff ~__......,r,d-:li:o,'lllellllbeill ......... Olll•-lkng m:,;,o.,=::t/~t::"""-==:rlH~,_,, :Z,IDO CUY0$
'10'1N,P,U:f'OIIOOCA'«l1011 ,.,_ C!.I\U
W111,U,MD.1fCll!t.uclSCUl&IWIOltull .... ~ NCIJYDI
-W.MIWJIT0a1tle'ttUD01M111.C.tl.U,m0Pl'CTII !,NIQI\U
~ co c:, c:, ~ ::::i "' z 0,
:l! .!!! 0 E z 0 ,S ... C 'a; :ll .!!! z 0 0 ,iE c.., -a .. g
"' A.-..I .Cl ::'!!~ ~ en "C i'S "' z 0 :zaj w ..,. C Cl) 0 -en 1: tJf;-a .. w II) ~ii! .... .a a:: C ~o'o-! C "' Cl) olfl=~ ..I ... NQ'i:!o.,_ <( 0 --~ 0 z ... ~ g_~ 0 ~ ~~ci:u C
SUBMITTAL RECORD
SlJEMiTTAl.1 '"""""" CCCREVIEW ''"'""' PI.ANNINGOB'T "22ll!YYl
PLAN ISSUE
PLANNING D&T QW2000
PROJECT HUMBER: ""
FLOOR
PLAN&
SECTION
A.6 'L-------------------------------------------------
-
P~rxAfliv!lllll&'Jftml
)>
:...a
p!~ZI~ ii~ ~ 0 0 go i! iJi;v~ i.
!!I £
!S
t t
ID
ii HIIII.~
I I l
ii .
ii ;: !ff I ,h
I ~ ~
l
~ !Hi ·i ·i I. I. rt i i i i
UHi
DONALD RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS
2497 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California 92008
APN #: 203-021-08
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A portion of Lot 6, Granvllle Park, Map No. 1782 c~ of Csrlsbad, State of Csllfomla -
~,g: 's: ~ ffl II
-II ID 11 l ~r------
0 II :I II
II ri--------
11
II
II
II
iii !
:~-I :~r
II~
II
II
II
I
's• :11 :,;
:1
I
I
I' ,
!
~ ·1 i:t: t h mi ~ i' ,
e1f'i ,,,..,,. ml I ! ~ .... _,_ ~. i I g• ij •I
i1Jtl1/ Ui I : 'ii
• I I' J I ~ -'
ljf 1,1
iu
111 I•
-
I I!
/ 11
I
MT\ Pi Arc
\IJt) Desi9n
6~1 e.,;JNAIR WAY tJ..JOU.A.CA "12041"
851) ...... s+,,,:Z.120 858~~UJ6-o-82+'1 cell
e~ll'l~lt pltw'i:dcoJgn~et.
PblqaAtt~O-~
m ~"' 12ii1° ~ i!! ~ 0 0 go
:,i~§
!. gP 1·! ~h
" I ,. i q ~ !~ a
. ~ i ti Ul
U! ii "~i 1l11
,1 !
n_ ___ _
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II II
II 11----
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II II
II i..r----
I B i!i" I ! ~
fi I
lf d ! 91
I I
i PI I ~1 1
i I
~~ E ,. . ,1 !
i i ! i
1,! ~ DONALD RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS !!! iii u 2497 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California 92008
ill
-I APN #: 203-021-08
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Bl A portion of Lot 6, Granville Park, Map No. 1782
City of Carlsbad, State of Califomla -
!ii It
•Ii id I•
r~1
J1 u \\ !J \\ j!; 1» ii .~ -mN#ffl'ffi \ f r •
II
II
II
II
II II
II
II ,,-----
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II u
p
ll . I ,i i! i !
..... _. ___ ___ ..,,._
·--· "=-:=--=--=--="' e~ -·--
®
I I I
I
I
I
Pl Arc
Desl9n
621 e6NArR. WAV LAJOLl.A.CA 1112Q8i"1
658-+5-t,..2-,Z() 6f;i6 .. SS6-62+'1 ~I-
C!""'fillt pt.,rc;de:sJsn96~bt.J.net:
----~~~=--------------------------'"--~---
North Elevatfop
---,_ ,..,_
""L,__ _______ _
----
,r· ==-~ .......... -11)--Tal-~
' ' ' I : I ----------~~:°:':::: ;::::::: :: :::::::: ::!:::::: :: :::::: :::::::: J:::: ~I: J
South EleY111tlon
•>rtQO.....,..a--e---;------
West EJevatlon
i-7il'Fl!ff-lf-:'o:i';H---=~=-t:Eeifl--t!ti,t---=--
Donald Residential Condomniums
24Cf1 ocean street, Carlsbad, California q2ooe,
view from PAGifiG Avenue to the west
Donald ~eflidential c.ondomnium5
24 Cf 1 ocean street, c.arlf1bad, c.alifornia Cf 2ooe,
view from the beac.h to the south
---~=-:.:✓.:'.; I
;dt.¥;;,::;;;;~;
( view from the be•~ to the 60uU1)
Donald Residential condominiums ~-----"-...__ ____ _
.24 q 1 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California q .2008
.,.._,
N't'IJGANT,
... ~~.IJ;::
Gertlbed. GlrfCll"'l'lla ,.. 200"1
fltk.ka.e.k :•◄ 25 t"titaker ..u.; Murritta.GA 111129•~
7t ,t' Nc.P-,9'1
&udt""""'""" • 2, eonair rtai, U.lclffl,,c.A "l~si
f"'IIIO.eG T HAHi!, ~aid ltftldt11tlal ~I'\!..,,,. •;1•11111 OC.C..Wcct
Gar1tbactG.alfc::il'W• "12006
fll'IIIO...EGT~ .2•1111 ou..isr.recit Crltbs.d. c..-,om1 Ill~
~r'MC.a.•1 201.0:11~6
Ll'6AL.De5Gftl.-noNi ... p('lf"tk:w, cf Lot •
.,...,...'-l"tr'k
MlpMo. 11&2
Glt,iofc..1-9,Ut.c of-c..tt,c:rn11
~ffftOISnuGT, G~ ... ~~%:::~•rOl.ulc.t
""'1-GA
WrEtlOISTIUGT, Glt1JclG.-1tblld
9GHOOt.OISTitJG.T'1 Ge11bN ~IRtd 9r,c,hoQI Oi'ittriGt
~00 Pllnt A¥'fflut
~-,:,,..
( view from U.e beaai to the north)
Donald Residential c.ondomniums
24 Cf 1 ocean street, c.arlsbad, Galifornia Cf 2ooe
view from the beaGh to the north
·cean
treet