The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2026-07-01; Planning Commission; 03; VanderWeit Addition & Remodel: A 377-square-foot second-story addition, reaching a height of 27 feet, and a 434-square-foot first-floor addition to Unit 3462 of an existiMeeting Date: July 1, 2026 3 To: Planning Commission Staff Contact: Mackenzie VanZyverden, Assistant Planner; 442-339-5301; mackenzie.vanzyverden@carlsbadca.gov Subject: reaching a height of 27 feet, and a 434-square-foot first-floor addition to Unit 3462 of an existing 1,628-square-foot duplex. The project also includes widening the driveway to add one visitor parking space and the construction of a detached 436- square-foot storage shed with a height of 13 feet. 3460-3462 Garfield St. / APN 204-150-24-00 / District 1 SDP2025-0011 / CDP2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) Kristin Von Zweck / (760) 479-0537 / kristinvonzweckarchitect@gmail.com ☐ Not a Project ☒ Exempt ☐ IS/ND or IS/MND ☐ EIR☐Other: Permit Type(s): ☒☐☒☐☐☐☐☐Other Commission Action: ☒Decision ☐ Recommendation to City Council ☐ Informational (No Action) Recommended Actions That the Planning Commission ADOPT the Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 1), APPROVING a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption determination, Minor Site Development Plan, SDP 2025-0011, and Coastal Development Permit, CDP 2025-0020, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Existing Conditions & Project Description The 0.18- -3462 Garfield Street on the east side , southeast of the intersection of (see Exhibit 2). 28-square- -story duplex that was constructed in 1948 The duplex is Vernacular in is roughly H-shaped. Each unit consists of an -square-foot unit and a 172-square-foot garage. -square-foot shed in the rear yard Site Map July 1, 2026 Item #3 1 of 84 No public beach access or coastal resources are identified nearby or onsite. While the site is in the Coastal Zone, it is not located within the appeals jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission. Table “A” below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the subject site and surrounding properties. TABLE A – SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE Site Residential, 19-23 du/ac (R-23) Multiple-Family Residential Zone (R-3) Multiple-Family Residence R-23 R-3 Multiple-Family Residence R-23 R-3 Single-Family Residence R-23 R-3 Multiple-Family Residence R-23 R-3 Multiple-Family Residence General Plan Zoning Designation Proposed Project The project involves a Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit for the remodel and expansion of an existing 1,628-square-foot, one-story duplex, along with the addition of a detached storage shed. The project proposes an 811-square-foot addition and remodeled space to the existing residence at 3462 Garfield Street. The remodel to Unit 3462 includes the conversion of an existing bedroom into living room space and stairs to a new second story. There will be first-floor additions to Unit 3462 consisting of a 195-square-foot addition for a playroom and a 239-square-foot addition for a new covered patio. The second-story addition to Unit 3462 consists of a 377-square-foot addition for a bathroom, bedroom, and balcony. A 109-square-foot front patio is also proposed to provide covered entry to the first-floor addition (future garage conversion). The 436-square-foot detached storage shed is proposed to be in the rear yard. The maximum height of the residence with the proposed additions is 27 feet to the peak of the roof, with an architectural projection at 30 feet. The maximum height of the detached storage shed is 13 feet. Building materials for the proposed additions will match those of the existing duplex. Siding is composed of overlapping wooden planks in Sherwin-Williams' “Carlsbad Yellow” with the trim for doors, windows, and roof in white. The roof consists of grey composite asphalt shingles. The property will continue to have a six-foot-tall white, vinyl fence, except for portions of it that will be removed due to their location in the front yard setback. Grading for the proposed project includes 10.2 cubic yards of cut, resulting in 10.2 cubic yards of export. A grading permit is not required for the project. July 1, 2026 Item #3 2 of 84 Separate from the proposed project, the applicant intends to convert the garage to an accessory dwelling unit. The ADU portion of this project is not a part of the project to be considered by the Planning Commission. References for the ADU are included within this staff report for informational purposes only. A separate building permit is required for the conversions but are not included as part of the scope of the Coastal Development Permit (CDP). Related to that request, two replacement parking spots and one visitor parking space will be provided in the driveway with EV charging equipment. As noted previously, there is a 120-square-foot shed in the rear yard of Unit 3460. The site plan indicates that the detached accessory structure is located 1.2 feet from the rear property line (west) and 2.9 feet from the side property line (north). However, the city has no record of a building permit and thus may treat it as non-permitted construction. Any unpermitted structures or uses must either be removed or legalized as part of this application. Without proof of compliance of its construction and legal non-conforming status, the city may not be able to “grandfather” the detached accessory structure and may require its removal or relocation. A condition has been added to the draft resolution that states that it shall be the responsibility of the property owner to prove to the City Planner that such structure was lawfully established, or it must be removed or relocated to comply with zoning and building codes. Public Outreach & Comment The Applicant completed the Early Public Notice procedures pursuant to City Council Policy No. 84 (Development Project Public Involvement Policy). A notice of project application was mailed on Nov. 4, 2025, to all owners of property located within a 600-foot radius and all occupants of property located within a 100-foot radius of the project site. The notice of project application was mailed to a total of 221 addresses. A two-foot-tall by three-foot- wide yellow sign was posted at the project site on Sept. 22, 2025, notifying all pass-by traffic of the Project, which provides the project name, application numbers, description of the project, as well as both applicant and city staff contact information. The project, consisting of additions to a duplex, is not subject to the enhanced stakeholder outreach procedures outlined in City Council Policy No. 84. Response to Public Comment & Project Issues No comments were received and staff has not identified any issues with respect to the additions. Project Analysis General Plan Consistency The City of Carlsbad’s General Plan includes several goals and policies that guide development and land use within the city. A discussion of how the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan policies is summarized in Exhibit 3. Municipal Code Consistency The City of Carlsbad’s Municipal Code, most notably Tile 21 Zoning Code, includes requirements and provisions that guide development and land use within the city, consistent with the General Plan. Specific compliance with these relevant requirements is described in Exhibit 3. Local Coastal Program Consistency The project site is in the Coastal Zone and requires a Coastal Development Permit. The project complies with the Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment), including goals and policies of the General Plan and zoning code standards, as referenced above. Additional information on the Coastal Development Permit and Local Coastal Program findings is included in Exhibit 1. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Pursuant to CMC Section 21.85.030 (D)(1), a project is exempt from the inclusionary housing requirement for existing residences which are altered, improved, restored, repaired, expanded or extended, provided that the July 1, 2026 Item #3 3 of 84 number of units is not increased. Since there will not be an increase in the number of units on the property, the project will be exempt from the inclusionary housing requirement. Discretionary Actions & Findings The proposed Project requires approval of a Minor Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit, both of which are discussed below. Coastal Development Permit (CDP 2025-0020) Approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) is required because the project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Coastal Zone and the building valuation exceeds $60,000.00. Staff finds that the required findings for this application can be met as described in Exhibit 1. The project site is not located within the Coastal Commission’s appeals jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone; therefore, the CDP is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission. Minor Site Development Plan (SDP 2025-0011) Pursuant to CMC Section 21.82.040, approval of a Minor Site Development Plan (SDP) is required in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. The Minor SDP shall be processed pursuant to Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Code and ensures that the site layout, configuration, and site development standards comply with all relevant city standards. Staff finds that the required findings for this application can be met (Exhibit 1). The project’s discretionary applications are all within the purview of the Planning Commission per the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The Planning Commission’s action on the project will be an approval or denial, with an appeal available to the City Council. Environmental Review Prior to final action by the decision-making body on the project, an environmental determination shall be made by the appropriate decision-makers as part of the approval action to ensure agency compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has reviewed the scope of the project and applicable studies provided by the applicant and finds that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to CEQA in accordance with CEQA Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption applies to duplexes and associated accessory structures. In addition, pursuant to the results of 3460-62 Garfield Street – Historical Analysis Report (PanGIS, Nov. 11, 2025), the existing home is not historic, and none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions apply. A draft Notice of Exemption is included as Exhibit 5. This must be reviewed and considered prior to approval of the project. The draft Notice of Exemption demonstrates that the project qualifies for the exemption – and that none of the exceptions to categorical exemptions listed in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 or Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code have been triggered. As part of an additional and optional public disclosure, the draft Notice of Exemption was posted on the city’s website on June 1, 2026, and an email was sent to all interested parties that have expressed interest in this project or have signed up to receive environmental notices. Conclusion Considering the information above and in the referenced Exhibits, staff has found that the proposed project is consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program, provisions of the Municipal Code and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. All required public improvements and utilities are available to serve the proposed development. In addition, there are no environmental issues associated with the project. July 1, 2026 Item #3 4 of 84 The project is conditioned to ensure its compatibility with the surrounding properties and that the public health, safety, and welfare of the community are maintained. The project is required to comply with all applicable California Building Standards Codes and engineering standards through the standard building permit and civil improvement plan checking process. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the resolution, approving the proposed project as described in this staff report. Exhibits 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Project Analysis 4. Disclosure Form 5. Draft Notice of Exemption 6. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 7. Reduced Exhibits July 1, 2026 Item #3 5 of 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CEQA EXEMPTION DETERMINATION, MINOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 377-SQUARE-FOOT SECOND STORY ADDITION WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 27 FEET, AND A 434-SQUARE- FOOT FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO UNIT 3462 OF AN EXISTING 1,628- SQUARE-FOOT DUPLEX INCLUDING WIDENING THE DRIVEWAY TO ADD ONE VISITOR PARKING SPACE AND CONSTRUCTING A DETACHED 436- SQUARE-FOOT STORAGE SHED WITH A HEIGHT OF 13 FEET ON AN APPROXIMATELY 0.18-ACRE LOT, LOCATED AT 3640-3642 GARFIELD STREET WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE CITY’S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 CASE NAME: VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL CASE NO: SDP 2025-0011 / CDP 2025-0020 / (DEV2025-0007) WHEREAS, Henry VanderWeit, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as THE SOUTHEASTERLY 26 FEET OF LOT 9 AND ALL OF LOT 10, BLOCK “P” OF PALISADES, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1747, FILED IN THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEB. 5, 1923. (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” – “I” dated July 1, 2026, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Division, SDP 2025-0011/CDP 2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) – VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL, as provided in Chapters 21.06, 21.16, 21.82, 21.201 and 21.203 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.) and its implementing regulations (the State CEQA Guidelines), Article 14 of the California Code of Regulations section 15000 et. seq., the city is the Lead Agency for the project, as the public agency with the principal responsibility for approving the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on July 1, 2026, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.7581 Docusign Envelope ID: A9DC17D1-A7DC-8633-8209-948E5F74D215 Exhibit 1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) Compliance with CEQA. The proposed action is to add a 377-square-foot second story, reaching a height of 27 feet, and a 434-square-foot first-floor addition to Unit 3462 of an existing 1,628-square-foot duplex. The project also includes widening the driveway to add one visitor parking space and constructing a detached 436-square-foot storage shed with a height of 13 feet on an existing developed 0.18-acre lot. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, allowing for the addition to the duplex and the construction of accessory structures such as the proposed storage shed. The project development consists of a remodel and addition to an existing duplex and proposed storage shed, all of which are located on a residentially zoned property (Multiple- Family Residential (R-3) Zone) surrounded by similarly developed residential land uses. No exceptions to the categorical exemption as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 or Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.070(C) apply. Specifically, the duplex was built in 1948. Pursuant to the results of 3460-62 Garfield Street – Historical Analysis Report (PanGIS, November 11, 2025), the duplex is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs. Therefore, none of the Class 1 exclusions apply. The notice of exemption will be filed with the Recorder/County Clerk within five days after project approval by the decision-making body. C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission APPROVES the project referred to as SDP 2025-0011/CDP 2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) – VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: Minor Site Development Plan (SDP 2025-0011) 1. That the proposed development or use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable master plan or specific plan, complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and all other applicable provisions of this code in that the proposed remodel and addition to an existing duplex and the addition of a detached shed in the rear yard are consistent with the requirements of the Beach Area Overlay Zone and all other development standards in Title 21, including height, parking and setbacks, and lot coverage. In addition, the project is consistent with all the applicable elements of the General Plan. 2. That the requested development or use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, will not be detrimental to existing development or uses or to July 1, 2026 Item #3 7 of 84 development or uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed development or use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the project consists of a remodel and additions to an existing duplex and a new detached accessory structure on a 0.18-acre lot located at 3460 and 3462 Garfield St. The site is surrounded by a mix of existing single-family, duplex, and multiple-family residential developments. The project is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan as discussed in the findings below and Section "A" of the Project Analysis. The proposed remodel will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the use is located, in that the proposed duplex, is a permitted use within the Multiple- Family Residential (R-3) Zone and is compatible with the other residential uses surrounding the project site, including single-family, duplex, and multi-family residential buildings. The proposed remodel to the existing duplex will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation, as the project will not generate any additional average daily trips. The project complies with all minimum development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, including but not limited to the R-3 Zone and the Beach Area Overlay Zone. 3. That the site for the intended development or use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that as demonstrated in the project staff report, the remodel and additions to the duplex comply with all development standards (i.e. front, side and rear setbacks, lot coverage, parking, and height restrictions) of the Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone and the Beach Area Overlay Zone. 4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested development or use to existing or permitted future development or use in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that as demonstrated in the project staff report, the duplex remodel and additions comply with all applicable development standards (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage, parking, and height restrictions) of the Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone and the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ). The curb, gutter, and sidewalk at the project frontage on Garfield Street will be maintained. 5. That the street systems serving the proposed development or use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the duplex remodel and additions will not generate additional traffic since no additional units are proposed. 6. That the proposed development or use meets all other specific additional findings as required by Title 21 and as detailed in the subject Resolution. Coastal Development Permit (CDP2025-0020) 7. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment) and all applicable policies, in that the site is designated R-23 in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and the remodel to the duplex is consistent with the R- 23 designation. The project proposes ground floor and second story additions to an existing duplex and a new detached accessory structure in the rear yard. No agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability, flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exist onsite. Given that the project is in a residentially zoned neighborhood where most dwellings are one- and two-story structures, the addition of a second story to the existing duplex will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the Coastal Zone. July 1, 2026 Item #3 8 of 84 8. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the property is not located adjacent to coastal shores; therefore, it will not interfere with the public’s right to physical access or water-oriented recreational activities. 9. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the city's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil erosion. No steep slopes or native vegetation is located on the subject property, and the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction. General 10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the city’s General Plan, in that the proposed project entails a remodel to an existing duplex on a site that is legal nonconforming with respect to density. The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is R-23, Residential 19-23 du/acre. The existing density is 10 du/ac. To comply with the minimum density of 19 du/ac, two additional units would need to be constructed. Pursuant to Land Use Element Policy 2-P.7(C), when a legal lot is developed with one or more residential units that existed as of Oct. 28, 2004, the existing units are to remain and it is not feasible to construct the number of additional units needed to meet the minimum density without requiring the removal of the existing units, the project is consistent with the R- 23 General Plan Land Use designation. The existing duplex was constructed in 1948 on a lot that was created in 1923 (Lot 10 of Map No. 1747, Feb. 5, 1923). As the duplex meets the above- noted criteria, the project is consistent with R-23 General Plan Land Use designation. 11. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all city public policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. b. The Public Facility Fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. That the project is consistent with the city’s Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50) in that a landscape plan is not required. 13. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. July 1, 2026 Item #3 9 of 84 Conditions: NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of the building permit. Planning Division: 1. Approval is granted for SDP 2025-0011 / CDP 2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) – VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL as shown on Exhibits “A” – “I” dated July 1, 2026, on file in the Planning Division and incorporated herein by reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the city’s approval of this Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 6. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) city’s approval and issuance of this Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit, (b) city’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the city’s approval is not validated. 7. Prior to submitting the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit to the City Planner a 24" x 36" copy of the site plan or other, July 1, 2026 Item #3 10 of 84 conceptual grading plan and preliminary utility plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. The copy shall be submitted to the City Planner, reviewed and, if found acceptable, signed by the city's project planner and project engineer. If no changes were required, the approved exhibits shall fulfill this condition. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Building Division from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 9. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project and substantial work has been performed with at least one major inspection (foundation, underfloor, frame, or final) conducted by the city within 24 months of project approval. 11. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the city that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 12. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, Developer shall submit to the city a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n) Minor Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 13. Developer shall list the following condition on all building permit construction plans. Construction activities shall take place during the permitted time and day per Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 8.48. Developer shall ensure that construction activities for the proposed project are limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; no work shall be conducted on Sundays or on federal holidays. 14. Within 30 days of discretionary approval, Developer shall remove early public notice signage from the project site. 15. Any unpermitted structures or uses must either be removed or legalized before occupancy. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to prove to the City Planner that the existing 120-square-foot detached accessory structure, shown on the approved site plan, is legal non- conforming or it must be removed or relocated to comply with zoning and building codes. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the detached accessory structure meets all applicable building codes, zoning laws, and safety regulations. July 1, 2026 Item #3 11 of 84 Code Reminders: The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 16.Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable city ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 17.Prior to issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay a Public Facility fee as required by Council Policy No. 17. 18.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay the Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 1 as required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050. 19.Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 20.Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Chapter 18.42 and Chapter 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the site plan are for planning purposes only. Docusign Envelope ID: A9DC17D1-A7DC-8633-8209-948E5F74D215 NOTICE TO APPLICANT An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be filed with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission’s decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on the appeal prior to any judicial review. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on July 1, 2026, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Hubinger, Merz, Fitzgerald, Burrows, Foster NAYES: None. ABSENT: Lafferty, Meenes ABSTAIN: None. NICHOLAS FOSTER, Vice Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL STRONG, Director of Community Development Docusign Envelope ID: A9DC17D1-A7DC-8633-8209-948E5F74D215 GAR F I E L D S T MAPL E A V ACAC I A A V ELCAMINOREAL LA COSTA AV ALGARD CA R L S B A D B L CDP2025-0020 / SDP2025-0011 / DEV2025-0007 VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL SITE MAP J SITE Map generated on: 4/1/2026 July 1, 2026 Item #3 14 of 84 Exhibit 2 PROJECT ANALYSIS Exhibit 3 (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) PROJECT ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan (R-23 Residential) Land Use Designation B. Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) and Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.82) C. Coastal Development Procedures for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC Chapter 21.201) and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203) D. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85) E. Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90) F. California Environmental Quality Act Exemption (Environmental Statement) The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail within the sections below. A. General Plan R-23 Residential Land Use Designation The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of R-23, which allows for the development of multiple-family residences at a density of 19-23 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The project consists of a remodel and addition to a duplex on a 0.18-acre site with an existing density of 10 du/ac. To comply with the minimum density of 19 du/ac, two additional units would need to be constructed. Pursuant to Land Use Element Policy 2-P.7(C), when a legal lot is developed with one or more residential units that existed as of Oct. 28, 2004, the existing units are to remain and it is not feasible to construct the number of additional units needed to meet the minimum density without requiring the removal of the existing units, the project is consistent with the R-23 General Plan Land Use designation. The existing duplex was constructed in 1948 on a lot that was created in 1923 (Lot 10 of Map No. 1747, Feb. 5, 1923). As the duplex meets the above-noted criteria, the project is consistent with R-23 General Plan Land Use designation. The project also complies with the other Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table “A” below: TABLE A – GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT COMPLY Mobility Policy 3-P.5 – Require developers to construct or pay their fair share toward improvements for all travel modes consistent with the Mobility Element, the Growth Management Plan, and specific impacts associated with their development. designed to meet all circulation requirements, including vehicular access to and from Garfield Street. In addition, the applicant will be required to pay any applicable traffic impact fees, prior to issuance of a building permit, that will go toward future road improvements. July 1, 2026 Item #3 15 of 84 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) ELEMENT COMPLY Public Safety Goal 6-G.1 – Minimize injury, loss of life, and damage to property resulting from fire, flood, hazardous material release, or seismic disasters. Policy 6-P.6 – Enforce the requirements of Titles 18, 20, and 21 pertaining to drainage and flood control when reviewing applications for building permits and subdivisions. Policy 6-P.34 – Enforce the Uniform Building and Fire codes, adopted by the city, to provide fire protection standards for all existing and proposed structures. Policy 6-P.39 – Ensure all new development complies with all applicable regulations regarding the provision of public utilities and improvements will be required to be designed in conformance with all seismic design standards. In addition, the proposed project is consistent with all the applicable fire safety requirements. Furthermore, the proposed project is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard, and the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction. Action Plan (CAP) as the city’s strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. permit and will be required to comply with the Green Building Code and the city’s CAP, where B. Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) and Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) (Chapter 21.82) The proposed project is required to comply with all applicable land use and development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC), including the Multiple-Family Residential Zone (R-3) (CMC Chapter 21.16) and the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) (CMC Chapter 21.82). The duplex project meets or exceeds the requirements of the R-3 Zone and the BAOZ as outlined in Table “B” below. TABLE B – BAOZ AND R-3 COMPLIANCE BAOZ Standards Required Proposed Comply? 30 feet for roof pitch ≥3:12 July 1, 2026 Item #3 16 of 84 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) 24 feet for roof pitch <3:12 Accessory Structure/Shed: 14 feet for Accessory Structure/Shed: 13 feet R-3 Standards Required Proposed Comply? Interior Side - Duplex: 10% Lot Width – 7’2” Interior Side - Shed: 5’ Rear- Duplex: 14’4” Interior Side: 11’1” (duplex) Interior Side- Shed: 7’2” Rear - Duplex: 46’ Rear – Shed: 18’6” 6 parking spaces: - 4 garage spaces, 2 per unit - 1 Visitor Space (0.30 space per unit) - 1 ADU parking space 3 spots, all uncovered Garage Spaces: The existing duplex consists of 2 existing garage spaces, which will be converted to an ADU under a separate permit, after the action of the subject Minor SDP and CDP. Pursuant to California Government Code § 63314(11), the conversion of a garage into an ADU does not require additional parking, the existing units do not need to be brought into conformance, and additional discretionary permits are not required. However, CMC § 21.10.030(9)(C)(i) states the existing garaged parking spaces converted to an ADU shall be replaced in-kind when the ADU conversion is in the designated replacement parking area – on property west of the railroad tracks. This section also states the replacement parking spaces may be uncovered and located in the front yard setbacks, permitting the parking area is an improved July 1, 2026 Item #3 17 of 84 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) C. Conformance with the Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC Chapter 21.201) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203) The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program but is outside of the Coastal Commission’s appeal jurisdiction. The site is also located within and subject to the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The project’s compliance with each of these programs and ordinances is discussed below: 1. Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies. The Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use designation for the property is Residential, R-23. The R-23 LCP Land Use designation allows for residential development at a density range of 19 to 23 dwelling units per acre. As discussed in Section “A” above, the proposed addition to an existing duplex is consistent with the General Plan pursuant to Land Use Element Policy 2-P.7(C). Therefore, the project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the LCP. The policies of the Mello II Segment also emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The project proposes a remodel and addition to an existing duplex. The development is consistent with the LCP Mello II R-23 land use designation as discussed above. Additionally, no agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability, flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exist onsite. setback on an improved surface to replace the two garage spaces converted to an ADU. ADU Parking: Per Government Code § 66322(a)(1), if the ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of a public transit stop (e.g. Carlsbad Village Station, Poinsettia Station or bus stops) an ADU parking space is not required. This project site is located within one-half mile of the Carlsbad Blvd. & Chestnut Ave. bus stop; therefore, no ADU spot is required. Visitor Parking: One visitor spot, as required by the Beach Area Overlay Zone CMC § 21.82.060, will remain located in the existing driveway. July 1, 2026 Item #3 18 of 84 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) Given that the project is in a multi-family residential neighborhood where most dwellings are one- and two-story structures, the addition of a second story to the duplex will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the Coastal Zone. Also, given that the site does not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access or water-oriented recreational activities are available from the subject site; however, the project does benefit from being in proximity (486 feet) to beach access along Carlsbad Boulevard. 2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The development is subject to the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203). The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone identifies areas of protection: a) preservation of steep slopes and vegetation; b) drainage, erosion, sedimentation, habitat; c) seismic hazards, landslides, and slope instability; and d) floodplain development. The project’s compliance with each of these areas of concern is discussed below: a. Preservation of Steep Slopes and Vegetation. Slopes greater than 25% and possessing endangered plant/animal species and/or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities are considered “dual criteria” slopes and are protected in the Coastal Zone. The project does not support any “dual criteria” slopes. b. Drainage, Erosion, Sedimentation, Habitat. The project will adhere to the city’s Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban run-off, pollutants, and soil erosion. c. Seismic Hazards, Landslides and Slope Instability. The site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction. d. Flood Plain Development. No structures or fill are being proposed within a one-hundred-year floodplain area as identified by the FEMA Flood Map Service Center. D. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85) Since the proposed project proposes a remodel to an existing duplex and no additional units are proposed, the project is exempt from the inclusionary housing requirement. E. Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90) The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of the city. There will be no impact on public facilities because there will be no net increase in the number of dwelling units on site, which will remain at two. F. Environmental Review (California Environmental Quality Act) The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and its implementing regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”) adopted by the Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, list classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and as a result are exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. City staff completed a review of the project and potential environmental impacts associated with the project pursuant to CEQA and July 1, 2026 Item #3 19 of 84 PROJECT ANALYSIS (GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS) concluded that the project qualified for an exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303(a), Existing Facilities, allowing for additions up to 10,000 square feet if the project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available, and the project site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area and 15303(e), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, allowing for the construction of accessory structures such as the proposed storage shed. The project development consists of a remodel and addition to an existing duplex and proposed storage shed, all of which are located on a residentially zoned property (Multiple-Family Residential (R- 3) Zone) surrounded by similarly developed residential with. No exceptions to the categorical exemption as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 or Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.070(C) apply. Specifically, pursuant to the results of 3460-62 Garfield Street – Historical Analysis Report (PanGIS, November 11, 2025), the duplex, which was constructed in 1948, is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs. The notice of exemption will be filed with the Recorder/County Clerk within five days after project approval by the decision-making body. A notice of intended decision regarding the environmental determination was advertised on June 1, 2026, and posted on the city’s website. The notice included a general description of the project, the proposed environmental findings, and a general explanation of the matter to be considered. The findings and determination contained in that notice was declared as final on the date of the noticed decision, unless appealed as provided by the procedures commencing in Chapter 21.54 (Procedures, Hearings, Notices, and Fees) of the Zoning Ordinance. During the 10-day public review period, the city received no comment letters from the public regarding the prospective environmental determination. Since no appeal was filed and no substantial evidence was submitted that would support a finding that the exemption requirements would not be satisfied, the project was determined by the city planner to not have a significant effect on the environment. The CEQA Determination letter is attached to this staff report as Exhibit 5 and demonstrates that the project is categorically exempt from further environmental review. The city planner’s written decision is final and the CEQA determination is not within the Planning Commission’s purview. With the appropriate environmental clearances in place, all the city’s procedural requirements and relevant aspects of CEQA have been satisfied. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code do not apply to this project. July 1, 2026 Item #3 20 of 84 Exhibit 4 July 1, 2026 Item #3 21 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 22 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 23 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 24 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 25 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 26 of 84 Exhibit 5 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION To: Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk From: CITY OF CARLSBAD Attn: Fish and Wildlife Notices Planning Division 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 1635 Faraday Avenue San Diego CA 92101 Carlsbad, CA 92008 MS: A-33 (442) 339-2600 Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act). Project Number and Title: SDP 2025-0011/CDP 2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) – VANDERWEIT ADDITION & REMODEL Project Location - Specific: 3460-3462 Garfield Street Project Location - City: Carlsbad Project Location - County: San Diego Description of Project: Addition of a 377-square-foot second story, reaching a height of 27 feet, and a 434-square-foot first-floor addition to Unit 3462 of an existing 1,628-square-foot duplex. The project also includes widening the driveway to add one visitor parking space and constructing a detached 436-square- foot storage shed with a height of 13 feet. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Carlsbad Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: KRISTIN VON ZWECK Name of Applicant: KRISTIN VON ZWECK Applicant’s Address: 760 Saxony Rd., Encinitas, CA 92024-2350 Applicant’s Telephone Number: (760) 479-0537 Name of Applicant/Identity of person undertaking the project (if different from the applicant above): Exempt Status: (Check One) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); Categorical Exemption - State type and section number: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures – Section 15303(e) Statutory Exemptions - State code number: Common Sense Exemption (Section 15061(b)(3)) Reasons why project is exempt: CEQA Section 15303(e) allows for the construction of accessory residential structures. CEQA Section 15301(e)(2) allows for additions to existing structures under 10,000 square feet where all public services are available, and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Lead Agency Contact Person: Mackenzie VanZyverden Telephone: 442-339-5301 July 1, 2026 Item #3 27 of 84 Revised 04/19 Exceptions to Exemptions CEQA Section 15300.2 – Exceptions Planning staff evaluated all the potential exceptions to the use of Categorical Exemptions for the proposed project (in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2) and determined that none of these exceptions apply as explained below: a. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualiﬁed by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insigniﬁcant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be signiﬁcant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and oﬃcially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. This project is eligible for a Class 3 exemption. Response – The project location is not considered to be a particularly sensitive environment due to the following reasons: The site is not located within an Existing or Proposed Hardline Conservation Area or Standards Area of the Habitat Management Plan, and the project site is currently developed. Therefore, the project will not have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern. b. Cumulative Impact - “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is signiﬁcant.” Response – There is no evidence to conclude that signiﬁcant impacts will occur based on past project approvals or that the proposed Project's impacts are cumulatively considerable when evaluating any cumulative impacts associated with construction air quality, noise, transportation, or water quality in the area surrounding the proposed Project. The Project, and all future projects, will be required to comply with all applicable local, regional, and state laws, regulations, and guidelines, and as described above, any potential impact caused by the Project’s construction and operation would continue to be less than signiﬁcant and would not contribute signiﬁcantly to regional cumulative impact in the broader project region. Therefore, this exception does not apply. c. Signiﬁcant Eﬀect - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for any activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a signiﬁcant eﬀect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Examples include projects, which may aﬀect scenic or historical resources.” Response – There are no unusual circumstances that would have a signiﬁcant impact on the environment due to the project. The Project does not involve any unusual circumstances. The project site has been previously developed and is not located within an existing or proposed Hardline Conservation Areas or Standards Areas of the Habitat Management Plan. In addition, there are no historic resources onsite. d. Scenic Highway - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway oﬃcially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certiﬁed EIR.” Response – The area of proposed development is not located within the viewshed of a state scenic July 1, 2026 Item #3 28 of 84 Revised 04/19 highway or any state highway that is designated as eligible for listing as a scenic highway. The project site is surrounded entirely by existing residential structures. Therefore, implementation of the Project will result in similar visual conditions compared with a no-project scenario. e.Hazardous Waste Site - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Response – The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substance Site (CORTESE) List. f.Historical Resources - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the signiﬁcance of a historical resource.” Response – The existing duplex was constructed in 1948. A Historic and Cultural Resources Report, dated November 11, 2025 (Attachment A), was prepared by Doug Mengers, M.A. (PanGIS), and was provided by the applicant to determine if the Project would impact any historical resources pursuant to CEQA. The report concluded that the house on the Project site is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs, and that no cultural resources were found on site. As such, development of the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the signiﬁcance of a historical resource, and this exception does not apply. Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.070(B) - Exceptions Exceptions. Even though a project may otherwise be eligible for an exemption, no exemption shall apply in the following circumstances: 1.Grading and clearing activities affecting sensitive plant or animal habitats, which disturb, fragment or remove such areas as defined by either the California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code Sections 2050 et seq.), or the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Section 15131 et seq.); sensitive, rare, candidate species of special concern; endangered or threatened biological species or their habitat (specifically including sage scrub habitat for the California Gnatcatcher); or archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods; Or 2.Parcel maps, plot plans and all discretionary development projects otherwise exempt but which affect sensitive, threatened, or endangered biological species or their habitat (as defined above), archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods, wetlands, stream courses designated on U.S. Geological Survey maps, hazardous materials, unstable soils, or other factors requiring special review, on all or a portion of the site. (Ord. NS-593, 2001) Response – The Project site is in a developed part of the city and is surrounded by residential uses. The Project site is developed with a duplex and contains only non-native and ornamental vegetation with no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Furthermore, the site is not within mapped areas of potential critical habitat as depicted in the City’s General Plan1. The existing duplex was constructed in 1948. A Historic and Cultural Resources Report, dated November 11, 2025 (Attachment A), was prepared by Doug Mengers, M.A. (PanGIS), and concluded that the duplex is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs 1 City of Carlsbad. 2015 City of Carlsbad General Plan – Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element. Adopted September 2015. https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/3424/637434861099030000 July 1, 2026 Item #3 29 of 84 Revised 04/19 Furthermore, the likelihood that intact archaeological or cultural resources exist on the Project site is low due to previous site disturbance and small amount of grading required to execute the project. Therefore, earth-moving activities associated with the Project would not aﬀect archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods. Hazardous materials, unstable soils or other factors requiring special review do not apply or are not found within this project location. Lead Agency Contact Person: Mackenzie VanZyverden Telephone: 442-339-5301 Date received for filing at OPR: July 1, 2026 Item #3 30 of 84 8745 Aero Drive, Suite 101 San Diego, California 92123 Phone: 760.683.8335 Fax: 760.884.3763 November 11, 2025 Mackenzie VanZyverden, Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: 3460-62 Garfield Street – Historical Analysis Report Dear Ms. VanZyverden: PanGIS, Inc. (PanGIS) was contracted by Mr. VanderWeit to conduct a historic resource evaluation of their property within the City of Carlsbad. Alterations to the property require a discretionary permit from the City of Carlsbad. A preliminary review indicated that, due to its date of construction, the property at 3460- 62 Garfield Street requires evaluation of its significance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. PanGIS was contracted to conduct the historic evaluation and write a letter of professional opinion for the property. This letter report details the methods and results of the archival and background research, field survey, and historic resource assessment and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility evaluation for the historic-era buildings at the 3460-62 Garfield Street property. In summary, the property at 3460-62 Garfield Street does not meet the criteria for listing on the CRHR and therefore does not qualify as a Historic Resource under CEQA guidelines. Therefore, the project will have no effect to historic properties. Introduction This historical assessment was prepared to determine the historical and architectural significance of potential historic resources located at 3460-62 Garfield Street in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California (Figure 1). Section 21084.1 of CEQA defines a historic resource as any resource listed in, or eligible for listing in, the CRHR. This resource is not listed in the CRHR; is not a California Historical Point of Interest (CHPI); is not a California State Historical Landmark (CSHL); is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places; is not listed on a local register of historic resources; and is not a component of a historic district. The potential historic resources at 3460-62 Garfield Street were evaluated in accordance with CEQA and CRHR guidelines. Project description The owner of the property, Mr. Henry VanderWeit, has applied to the City of Carlsbad Planning Department for discretionary permits to perform work on the duplex currently on the property. A remodel is planned, along with an addition to the subject building. July 1, 2026 Item #3 31 of 84 Attachment 5a Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 2 FIGURE 1. 3460-62 GARFIELD STREET LOCATION MAP July 1, 2026 Item #3 32 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 3 Historical Context The property is located in the City of Carlsbad. A detailed historic context of the City of Carlsbad, including Spanish, Mexican, and Early American periods, was developed as part of the Envision Carlsbad program and is included in Working Paper #4: History, the Arts and Cultural Resources; High Quality Education and Community Services (Dyett & Bhatia and Dudek 2011). Additional information on the history of Carlsbad was obtained from the Regional Historic Preservation Study: Carlsbad, CA (WESTEC 1980) and the Carlsbad Historical Society. American-period development in the area surrounding the property began in the 1860s when a general store and stagecoach stop were built on the former Los Encinitas Rancho, on the road between San Diego and Mission San Luis Rey. In 1868 Matthew Kelly, a San Diego merchant, established a homestead known as “Los Kiotes” on Rancho Agua Hedionda, where he and his children conducted dry farming and ranching through the 1890s. The California Southern Railroad was constructed down the coast in the 1880s, leading to the development of Frazier’s Station, named for John Frazier, who developed mineral and artisanal wells in the area. A townsite was laid out in 1886 and was named Carlsbad after similar springs in Karlsbad, Bohemia. Homes and small farms expanded from the station through the decade (Dyett & Bhatia and Dudek 2011). Drought and a national depression severely limited development in the area during the 1890s and 1900s but picked up in the 1910s. This began with agriculture, including the introduction of avocados in 1916 and flower production shortly after, and eventually included resorts and suburban development. Steady growth continued even through the Depression, though most residential development remained west of Highland Drive and north of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Post-war development included construction of Interstate 5 (1950), incorporation (1952) and annexation, and expansion of single-family residential construction into formerly agricultural areas (WESTEC 1980). Regulatory Framework The historical resources assessment described in this report was conducted in accordance with CEQA Guidelines and using CRHR eligibility criteria, as directed by the City of Carlsbad. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) Under CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.5 defines “historical resource” as: a resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the CRHR (mandatory significance); or a resource included in a local register of historical resources or identified as significant in an historical resource survey unless the preponderance of evidence suggests it is not significant (presumptive significance). An historical resource still may be considered significant in the absence of a federal, state, or local listing if substantial evidence demonstrates its significance (discretionary significance). This includes any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. Generally, a resource shall be historically significant if it is: a) associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States b) associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history c) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values d) has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Critical to the eligibility of a resource for the CRHR is its integrity. The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) offers the following guidance for assessing the integrity of a resource under CEQA: July 1, 2026 Item #3 33 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 4 In addition to having significance, resources must have integrity for the period of significance. The period of significance is the date or span of time within which significant events transpired, or significant individuals made their important contributions. Integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identity as evidenced by the survival of characteristics or historic fabric that existed during the resource’s period of significance. Alterations to a resource or changes in its use over time may have historical, cultural, or architectural significance. Simply, resources must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. A resource that has lost its historic character or appearance may still have sufficient integrity for the California Register if, under criterion 4, it maintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or specific data (OHP 2006:3). Project Methods In accordance with CEQA requirements, CRHR guidelines, and direction from the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, PanGIS focused on resources that were constructed in 1975 or earlier within the project area. Property research was conducted by the property owner and documents were provided to PanGIS. PanGIS Senior Historian Douglas Mengers carried out the CRHR eligibility evaluation and integrity assessment of the property; and co-authored this report. Mr. Mengers is listed on the County of San Diego CEQA Consultants List for Historic Resources, the Directory of Professionals in Public History, and meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for History and Architectural History (36 CFR Part 61). His resume is attached as Appendix A. Senior Archaeologist Alberto B. Foglia performed archival and background research; conducted the architectural survey of the property; assisted with the CRHR eligibility evaluation and integrity assessment of the property; and co-authored this report. Archival and Background Research Research was focused on the evaluation of historic-era resources. To determine the legal history of the property, documents from the Offices of the County Assessor, Recorder and Tax Collector were provided by the property owner, including the Residential Building Record. Additional research conducted by PanGIS included review of County parcel data, U.S. Census records, and historic map review. Aerial photographs consulted include 1938, 1947, 1953, and 1964, and 1967 (NETROnline 2025). Dates of construction were provided on the Residential Building Record. Occupant history was provided by the property owner. PanGIS then conducted research on the individuals to determine if any of them were important to local, California, or national history. A Records Search was also ordered from the Southern California Information Center (SCIC) to determine whether any historic or archaeological resources were present in the vicinity of the property. To develop the historical context of Carlsbad, secondary resources were consulted including government publications and the Carlsbad Historical Society website. To assist in the evaluation of the building, historical contexts related to residential development at the regional level were consulted. This included the San Diego Modernism Historic Context Statement (City of San Diego 2007). Assessment of building materials and condition was informed by the digital research library of the Getty Conservation Institute (2025). Historic Resources Survey Alberto B. Foglia, PanGIS Senior Archaeologist, visited the property on October 16, 2025, to conduct an intensive survey to document the historic-era structures at 3460-62 Garfield Street. The exterior of the structure was examined and photographed; an interior examination was not conducted. Field notes included information on architectural style and features, construction methods, modifications, and property condition. Evaluation and Assessment Several factors were considered in the assessment of the property at 3460-62 Garfield Street, including: the construction history of the property; the property’s relationship to local history; the property’s association with important people or events; the design, style, and construction of the structure and whether it is the work of a master architect or craftsman or possesses high artistic value; whether and to what degree the structure has been modified since construction; and the current condition of the property. July 1, 2026 Item #3 34 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 5 Results Archival and Background Research Results The Residential Building Record (RBR) indicates that the single-family home on 3460-62 Garfield Street was completed in 1948 on parcel 204-150-24-00 (Appendix B). The building is listed as a single-story duplex residence of standard wood frame construction, with a concrete foundation, gabled composite shingle roof, and wood siding. The 1948 footprint was approximately 1614 square feet for the duplex. No architect or builder are listed, and the property is not listed on the Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory. The legal description of the property is Lot 9 and 10 in Block “P” of the Palisades subdivision in the City of Carlsbad. The Property was last purchased on April 24, 1989, by the current owner, Mr. Henry VanderWeit, from Mr. Robert Merrill. Full known occupant history is summarized below in Table 1. TABLE 1. 3460-62 GARFIELD STREET OCCUPANT HISTORY No information 1948-1949 Garfield St. -- Davis, Albert H. 1950 3460 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) Davis, Margaret E. 1950 3460 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) Levin, Isaac S. 1950 3460 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) Wright, Harold B. 1950 3462 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) Wright, Drusilla A. 1950 3462 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) Wright, Steven M. 1950 3462 Garfield St. 1950 Census (37-222B, Sheet 11) No information 1951-? Garfield St. -- Robert Merrill ?-1988 Garfield St. Owner Henry VanderWeit 1989-Present Garfield St. Owner The original owners are unknown. The earliest known occupants of 3460 Garfield Street were Albert H. Davis (b1878 in Indiana), his wife Margaret Davis (b1883 in Ohio), and his partner Isaac Levin (b1873 in Lithuania), all retired. An obituary indicates Albert Davis died late 1950 in Indiana. No other information was available about his wife or partner or their length of residency at 3460 Garfield Street. The earliest known occupants of 3462 Garfield Street were Harold Bell Wright (b1927 in Oregon), a truck driver and clerk for a home builders store; his wife Drusilla Ann Wright (b1928 in California), and their son Steven M (b1950 in California). The Wright’s later had another son and daughter, but by 1962 had relocated to Maricopa County, Arizona. No other information was available about their length of residency at 3462 Garfield Street. Aerial photography confirms the general construction timeline and neighborhood context: the 1938 image shows mainly undeveloped open space, and agricultural development in the form of orchards. Garfield Street appears to have already been paved at this date, with concrete sidewalks already present along it. The streets leading southwest towards the ocean are also paved with sidewalks. However, the streets off it to the northeast remained unpaved. There is already some residential development in the surrounding area. The 1947 aerial shows 3460-62 Garfield Street as an empty lot still, with further housing development elsewhere in the neighborhood. Additional housing development is visible in 1953 and 1964, including the construction of the duplex at 3460-62 Garfield Street and subdivision of the orchard surrounding it. All the orchards are gone by 1964, and by 1967 all the streets have been paved and the neighborhood has essentially taken on its modern appearance, with the exception of a few still undeveloped lots (NETROnline 2025). July 1, 2026 Item #3 35 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 6 The Records Search at the SCIC identified two cultural resources in the general vicinity of the project. Both are mid-20th century historic properties, 147 Maple Avenue (P-37-040689) and a series of eight duplexes along Harding Street (P-37-029981). None of these are near enough to be affected by the proposed project. Survey Results 3460-62 Garfield Street is a vernacular duplex residence, very roughly H-shaped in plan. It is sited on a rectangular lot split down the middle: the two units of the duplex are mirrored along this central split line (Figure 2; Plate 1). Each unit has an integral one-car garage set on either side of the centerline, a front yard, and a spacious backyard. PLATE 1. SOUTHWEST FAÇADE VIEWED FROM ACROSS GARFIELD STREET, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 The structure is of light wood frame construction built on a raised concrete foundation. The terrain slopes downwards to the east-northeast, down from the level of Garfield Street. The top of the concrete foundation, however, remains level across the entire footprint of the structure. This means that the approximately16-inch rise of the foundation at the street frontage increases to roughly 52 inches at the rear. The floor is carried across the foundation on joists, according to the building record. The substantial height of the foundation at the rear then leaves room for a sizeable crawlspace beneath the floor of each unit, which is accessed by wooden doors set in the foundation at the rear of each unit. Both the foundation and the siding of overlapping wooden planks are painted a cream color. All the trim for the windows, doors, and roof are painted white. The paint is all in immaculate condition, with no signs of wear or flaking. All the windows are modern double-glazed, white acrylic replacements done in period style – including imitation mullions attached to the outside of the glazing to better mimic the look of an early-to- mid 20th-century multi-pane window. The owner informed us that when he moved into the property in the early 1990’s a full remodel of both units was done, which included replacing all the windows and doors. The roof was also redone at this time. It is a hipped roof of grey composite asphalt shingles, with projecting rafters and an exposed wooden tongue-and-groove soffit. Both the rafters and soffit are painted white. July 1, 2026 Item #3 36 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 7 FIGURE 2. 3535 HARDING ST. SKETCH MAP July 1, 2026 Item #3 37 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 8 Multiple metal roof vents project from the roof. The roof of each unit also has a projecting square element with its own hipped roof of unknown function – possibly a dormer or roof vent. The property is accessed from the southwest façade, which faces onto Garfield Street (Plate 2). A PVC white picket fence closes off the front yards of both units, with a white trellis arch providing foot access through the fence for each unit. Paths of concrete pavers lead through the front yard lawns to the concrete path leading up to the front porches. Both front yards are well landscaped and manicured. The two front yards are separated by a double wide concrete driveway, which provides access to the two garages set into the main mass of the building. Both garage doors are modern metal rolling shutter doors, painted white, with double central windows with shades. Front doors to each unit, painted white, with large windows at the top half, are set into a projecting mass on either side of the garage, at the corners nearest to the garages. Concrete porches with two steps on either side lead up to the front doors. The porches appear to be part of the original foundation of the building. Overhanging shed porch roofs cover the front doors and porches, and single triple-light picture windows, with a large central light and two narrower single-hung sash windows, fill up the majority of the remaining spaces on either side of the façade. Each of the faces of the projecting masses that look onto the driveway on both units have a narrow single-hung window. PLATE 2. SOUTHWEST FAÇADE VIEWED FROM DRIVEWAY, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 The northwest and southeast façades are nearly identical, due to the mirrored layout of the building. The terrain slopes downward to the backyard on either side of the building, with red concrete pavers forming a hardscaped path to the backyard. Both façades had three rectangular single-hung sash windows, roughly evenly spaced, with the central window being shorter and nearly square (Plate 3). Between the last two windows to the northeast is a side door, accessed by a concrete porch with four steps (Plate 4). A shed porch roof overhangs the doors on either façade. The main difference between the two façades is a large wooden deck added off of the entire northwest façade, which the owner informed us was constructed in 2010 (Plate 5). The original concrete porch and steps were left in place beneath the deck. Additionally, the last window before the backyard was replaced with a door at that time. To the rear of the concrete porch on the southeast façade, an outdoor shower was added, closed in on all sides by a wooden fence with a wooden door facing northeast (Plate 6). A small shed roof covers half of the shower, pitched to the southwest. Both side yards have landscaping along the fencing, with the vegetation being much more extensive along the southeast fence. July 1, 2026 Item #3 38 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 9 PLATE 3. SOUTHEAST FAÇADE VIEWED OVER THE SIDE GATE, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 PLATE 4. SOUTHEAST FAÇADE PORCH, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 July 1, 2026 Item #3 39 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 10 PLATE 5. NORTHWEST FAÇADE DECK, FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 PLATE 6. OUTDOOR SHOWER OFF THE BACK OF THE SOUTHEAST PORCH, FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 The northeast façade is the rear of the building. A fence divides the back into separate yards for each unit: however, both units are currently inhabited by members of the same extended family so there is a gate that connects both yards near the façade, as well as a hole through the fence with a slide halfway down the July 1, 2026 Item #3 40 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 11 fence. Two play structures cover about a third of the back yard of the south unit, with one third being grass, and the third nearest the façade a patio of red concrete pavers (Plate 7). A similar patio of red concrete pavers, about two rows of pavers shorter, covers the same area of the yard of the north unit. A large tree is located in the southeast corner of the northern yard, with a small shed opposite it and oriented parallel to the rear fence line in a northwest to southeast direction (Plate 8). PLATE 7. BACKYARD OF SOUTH UNIT (3462 GARFIELD STREET), FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 PLATE 8. BACKYARD OF NORTH UNIT (3460 GARFIELD STREET), FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 This rear façade is where the foundation is the highest, and two small wooden doors centered on each unit lead to crawlspaces within the foundation and under the floor. At each corner of the rear façade are two July 1, 2026 Item #3 41 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 12 bays that project from above the level of the foundation, supported by posts at each corner. The space underneath is being used as storage for both units. There are no windows on either bay. The north unit has two windows – a portrait aspect single hung sash window to the northwest and a large landscape aspect picture window with three lights of equal dimension. The center light is a single pane, while the flanking windows have single-hung sashes. This is probably a modification and not a direct replacement. The south unit has three portrait aspect single hung sash windows, in what is probably the original layout (Plates 9-10). PLATE 9. REAR OF SOUTH UNIT (3462 GARFIELD STREET), FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 PLATE 10. REAR OF NORTH UNIT (3460 GARFIELD STREET), FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 July 1, 2026 Item #3 42 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 13 Modifications and additions The exterior footprint of the structure appears wholly intact. The only modern structural addition appears to be the deck added to the northwest façade in 2010. All the windows and doors are modern replacements, with a window on the northwest façade being modified into a door, and two windows in the northeast façade of the northern window being modified into a large triple-light picture window. Electrical, gas, and water utility pipes are mounted on the exterior of both units of the building. Modern lighting fixtures and a satellite dish are surface mounted to the building exterior. Modern metal gutters and downpipes have been mounted to the eaves and sides of the house. Condition The entire building is in great condition, despite having few original elements. It has quite clearly been well maintained at regular intervals. All the paint is in good condition, as are all of the wooden elements. The owner confirmed that extensive remodeling was carried out in the early 1990’s, and it is likely that when the deck was installed in 2010 further touchups, including repainting, may have been done. Resource Importance and Impact Identification Resource Importance The NRHP guidelines for requirements of age, criteria of significance, and historic integrity were used to assess the eligibility of surveyed resources, with reference to the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Technical Assistance Series #6: California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register) (OHP nd). The NRHP eligibility evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Identification, Evaluation, and Historical Documentation (NPS 1983) and National Register Bulletin 15 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (NPS 2002), as established in 36 CFR 800.4. As set forth in Bulletin 15, the process of evaluation includes the following steps: 1) Categorize the property. A property must be classified as a district, site, building, structure, or object. 2) Determine which prehistoric or historic context(s) the property represents. A property must possess significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture when evaluated within the historic context of a relevant geographic area. 3) Determine whether the property is significant under the National Register Criteria. This is done by identifying the links to important events or persons, design or construction features, or information potential that make the property important. 4) Determine if the property represents a type usually excluded from the National Register. If so, determine if it meets any of the Criteria Considerations. 5) Determine whether the property retains integrity. Evaluate the aspects of location, design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling, and association that the property must retain to convey its historic significance. As a duplex residence, the historic-era structure at 3460-62 Garfield Street is best classified as a building. As a vernacular residence in suburban Southern California, the property can best be evaluated in the context of 1940s-1950s suburban residential development. The historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street does not represent a property type usually excluded from the National Register. It is not a religious property; has not been removed from its original location; is not the birthplace or grave of a historical figure; is not a cemetery; is not a reconstructed building; is not commemorative in intent; and has not achieved significance within the past 50 years. Significance and integrity aspects for the historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street are addressed in detail below. July 1, 2026 Item #3 43 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 14 California Register of Historical Resources Significance Evaluation Eligibility While the property has played a general role in suburban residential development in Carlsbad, it does not appear to be directly associated with events that have made significant contributions to the history of the area. Therefore, the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 1. No information was found to indicate that specific individuals associated with the property were known to have influenced the history of the area. Therefore, historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street are recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 2. The property is a modest example of local vernacular architecture and is not a unique or outstanding example of its type. It does not appear to be the work of a master architect or craftsman or possess high artistic value. Therefore, the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 3. The structure is a common property type that has not yielded, and is not likely to yield, important information about history or prehistory that is not available through historic research. Therefore, the historic- era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street are recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 4. Integrity Integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource’s period of significance. Historical resources eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Evaluation of integrity for the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is detailed below. LOCATION: The building retains integrity of location. The building is in its originally constructed location. DESIGN: The building mostly retains integrity of design. The structure appears to have always been residential and the property’s original historic function is apparent. The basic layout of the building is still intact, including the trim and position of most doors and windows – even if the latter have been replaced over time, and some changes in the position of windows and doors have been made. The wooden deck off of the northwest façade is modern, but does not detract from the original design of the building. SETTING: The building does not retain integrity of setting. When constructed, the area surrounding the building was mixed rural-residential development. All the other surrounding fields and orchards that originally existed when 3460-62 Garfield Street was built were gone by 1964. MATERIALS: The building does not retain integrity of materials. While the building still reveals the construction preferences of those who built it and some of the materials available during the period of significance, all of the doors are modern replacements and the windows are modern double-paned glass windows with acrylic framing. WORKMANSHIP: The building retains integrity of workmanship. Even with modern additions and material replacements, the structure still presents evidence of 1940s-1950s construction methods. FEELING: The building does not retain integrity of feeling. The surrounding empty and agricultural lands have been replaced by modern apartment buildings and single-family homes. The aesthetic and historic sense of a mid-20th century mixed agricultural and residential area is no longer present. ASSOCIATION: The building is not associated with any important historic events or persons. In summary, while the historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street retain a measure of historical integrity, it is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 1 through 4. Therefore, it is not considered a historic resource per CEQA guidelines. July 1, 2026 Item #3 44 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 15 California Environmental Quality Act Significance Criteria Evaluation The historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street do not qualify as a historical resource under the terms of CEQA, as they do not meet any of the definitions set forth by CEQA. The historic-era buildings at 3460- 62 Garfield Street Drive are not listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, on the CRHR; are not included in a local register or identified as significant in an historical resource survey; nor have they been determined to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. Impact Identification/Project Assessment of Effect The project proposes the extension and modification of the duplex at 3460-62 Garfield Street. The historic- era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is recommended as not eligible for listing in the CRHR. Moreover, it does not qualify as a historic resource under CEQA provisions. As such, no historic properties (i.e., resources eligible for listing in the CRHR) have been identified, and the project will have no effect on historic properties. A DPR form for the property is attached as Appendix C. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 218-9724 or at dmengers@pangis.com. Thank you. Regards, Douglas Mengers, M.A., RPA, DPPH Director of Cultural Resources PanGIS, Inc. Alberto Bello Foglia, M.A., RPA Architectural Historian PanGIS, Inc. Attachments Appendix A: Douglas Mengers resume Appendix B: Residential Building Record Appendix C: DPR Form July 1, 2026 Item #3 45 of 84 Mackenzie VanZyverden Correspondence November 11, 2025 Page 16 References City of San Diego 2007 San Diego Modernism Historic Context Statement. City of San Diego for State of California Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento, CA. Dyett & Bhatia and Dudek 2011 Envision Carlsbad, Working Paper 4: History, the Arts and Cultural Resources; High Quality Education and Community Services. Dyett & Bhatia Urban and Regional Planners and Dudek for City of Carlsbad. Accessed at: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/784/6374293741516300 00. Getty Conservation Institute 2025 AATA Online. Getty Conservation Institute. Accessed at https://aata.getty.edu/primo- explore/search?vid=AATA. National Park Service (NPS) 1983 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. National Park Service: Washington, D.C. 2002 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin. National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service: Washington, D.C. NETROnline 2025 Historic Aerials. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC. Accessed at https://www.historicaerials.com. Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) nd Technical Assistance Series #6: California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register). Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation: Sacramento, California. 2006 Technical Assistance Series #3: California Register of Historical Resources: Questions and Answers. Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation: Sacramento, California. WESTEC 1980 Regional Historic Preservation Study. WESTEC Services, Inc. for the Comprehensive Planning Organization of the San Diego Region. Accessed at: http://www.carlsbadhistoricalsociety.com/. July 1, 2026 Item #3 46 of 84 3460-3462 Garfield Street – Historic Resource Evaluation APPENDICES July 1, 2026 Item #3 47 of 84 3460-3462 Garfield Street – Historic Resource Evaluation Appendix A Resume July 1, 2026 Item #3 48 of 84 Doug Mengers M.A., RPA #39693945, DPPH Architectural Historian/Principal Investigator Cultural Resources Mr. Mengers is an Architectural Historian and Principal Investigator for cultural and historic resources and the built environment with extensive project experience for Planning and Public Works throughout the County of San Diego. With 17 years as a professional Cultural Resource Manager, he has a deep understanding of CEQA and NEPA, NHPA Section 106/110, NRHP and ARPA compliance services relevant to Federal, State, County, and City regulations and guidelines. He meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOI) for History, Architectural History, and Archaeology qualified professionals. He services include preparation of 100’s of Mitigated Negative Declarations, EIRs, Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Programs, Response to Comments and CEQA Findings; Preparation of documents pursuant to the NEPA, Environmental scoping and research, site evaluations, and environmental constraints assessments; CEQA and permit strategy development; development and maintenance of project schedules and budgets; historical resource evaluations, Notice of Determinations with the State Clearinghouse, management of project mitigation monitoring and reporting, including construction. Select Project Experience: Caltrans D-11 Environmental On-Call Contract Cultural Resources, SR-67 Widening, San Diego County, CA (2024 – 2025) PanGIS has been subcontractor for cultural resources on the Caltrans D11 environmental on-call for many years performing studies for architectural history, archaeology, and GIS for various transportation projects. For the current on-call, PanGIS is performing archaeological and architectural historian studies for the expansion of SR-67. Project tasks include delineation of the APE, Records search, calls to landowners, survey of ROW for archaeology, built-environment surveys, recording resources, DPR forms, Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), and GIS mapping and databases. Mr. Mengers is the Principal investigator for the built environment resources for structures over 45 years that are within the ROW are being evaluated for the NRHP. City of San Diego Design of Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Restoration Project, San Diego, CA (2019-2024) Architectural Historian and Cultural Resources Principal Investigator Mr. Mengers with staff have conducted records searches, requested a NAHC Sacred Lands File Search, authored Native American outreach letters, performed intensive linear ground surveys, completed historic research, managed the paleontology and archaeology study, updated DPR forms, wrote Historical Resources Technical reports Education M.A., Applied Anthropology, San Diego State University 2014 B.A, History, University of California at San Diego 2012 B.A, Anthropology, University of California at San Diego 2012 Professional Certifications & Registrations Secretary of Interior Standards for History, Architectural History, and Archaeology Caltrans PQS Equivalent for Archaeology, History and Architectural History SANDAG Architectural Historian II County of San Diego CEQA Archaeological and Historic Resources Consultant List County of San Diego Directory of Professionals in Public History CEQA Practices Certificate - UCSD Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Principal Investigator CPUC Qualified Archaeologist MCTD Rail Safety Training Hazwoper 40 Hour Areas of Expertise CEQA/NEPA /Section 106 Compliance Archaeological Field Studies Historic–Era Structure Evaluations Historic Artifact Analysis Historic Publications Environmental Contract/Project Management SB 18/ AB 52 ESRI ArcGIS Resource Agency Coordination Cultural/Tribal EIR Sections July 1, 2026 Item #3 49 of 84 with recommendations, al sections for the EIR. PanGIS coordinated with State Parks for a testing permit, wrote a testing plan and report, conducted testing at two archaeological sites to determine their depth and geographic extent with additional GIS mapping for the Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Design Phase 1 Project. Recent tasks included testing archaeological sites that may be impacted by the construction. PanGIS coordinated with State Parks for a testing permit, wrote a testing plan and report, conducted testing at two archaeological sites to determine their depth and geographic extent with additional GIS mapping created for the Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Design Phase 1 Project. DPR forms GIS updates were authored and submitted to SCIC. This includes recording the remains of a historic-era ranch. The purpose is to perform an evaluation for eligibility per CRHR and City of San Diego register. The goal of this project is to restore the historic coastal salt marsh habitat, wetland functions, and increase climate resiliency, in the Los Peñasquitos Lagoon. City of San Diego Chollas Creek Multi-Use Path & Barrio Logan Improvements 1, San Diego, CA (2024-2025) PanGIS Principal Investigator for Cultural Resources will manage the cultural resource services for 4 Projects. Project A - Barrio Logan Sewer Improvements - Staff will conduct a record search and order the NAHC SLF search and letters will be sent to the Tribal groups listed on the SLF search. Results of the records search, and Native American outreach will be incorporated into a report for the City. Project B - Barrio Logan Water Improvements - Staff will conduct a record search and order the NAHC SLF search and letters will be sent to the Tribal groups listed on the SLF search. Results of the records search, and Native American outreach will be incorporated into a report for the City. Project C - Chollas Creek Multi-Use Path (West) - Staff will conduct a record search and order the NAHC SLF search and letters will be sent to the Tribal groups listed on the SLF search. Results of the records search, and Native American outreach will be incorporated into a report for the City. Project D - Chollas Creek Multi-Use Path (East) - PanGIS will provide archaeological resource services for the Project. PanGIS will update the Phase I Cultural Resources study completed in 2014. PanGIS will conduct a record search and order the NAHC SLF search and letters will be sent to the Tribal groups listed on the SLF search. A PanGIS Senior Archaeologist and Archaeologist (or Native American Monitor) will survey the project area recording any finds. Results of the survey, records search, and Native American outreach will be incorporated into a report for the City. The reports will be CEQA plus documents, that will address NEPA compliance (Section 106) due to the possibility of federal funding. The reporting will allow the City to update the IS/MND. City of San Diego As-Needed Stormwater Design and Engineering Services For The Engineering & Capital Projects Department, San Diego, CA - Task #1 - Bayview Terrace/Skyline (2024) Principal Investigator for Cultural Resources, Mr. Mengers managed a team required to prepare a historic resources survey letter report to assist the geotechnical consultant and City staff. He worked with City staff to prepare a testing plan map and manage archaeological testing plans or activities Deliverables include a Cultural Resources Inventory Report to identify cultural, historical, and or paleontological resources in the area and to evaluate the potential impact the project might have on these resources. PanGIS staff conducted literature and archival research, the NAHC outreach, a pedestrian survey and evaluations to determine if any located resources meet any qualified criteria for eligibility. Task #2 City of San Diego As-Needed Stormwater Design & Engineering Services North Park SD Replacement (North) (2024) Principal Investigator for Cultural Resources, Mr. Mengers prepared a Cultural Resources Inventory Report to identify cultural, historical, and/or paleontological resources in the area and to evaluate the potential impact the project might have on these resources. He managed the literature and archival research and staff conducting a pedestrian survey of the site for archaeological resources and environmental monitoring during possible geotechnical tasks. He will provide support to the City throughout coordination with EPA and the State Historic Preservation Officer, to complete the Section 106 process. July 1, 2026 Item #3 50 of 84 DPR 523 form for 2178 Cambridge Avenue, Cardiff-by-the-Sea, Encinitas, CA 92007 (2024) PanGIS was contracted to provide historic cultural services for the project. Architectural historian Mr. Mengers authored the DPR Form and provided resource evaluation per City of Encinitas Local Register. DPR 523 form 2215 Edinburg Avenue, (also referred to as the Bergmann-Rivers Project Cardiff-by-the-Sea, Encinitas, CA 92007 (2024) PanGIS was contracted to provide historic cultural services for the project. Architectural historian Mr. Mengers authored the DPR Form and provided resource evaluation per City of Encinitas Local Register. County of San Diego Department of General Services HCDS Affordable Housing Initiative Project – 3177 Ocean View Boulevard Historic Resource Assessment, San Diego, CA (2023) PanGIS was subcontracted to conduct the historic evaluation and write a letter of professional opinion for the property. PanGIS Director of Cultural Resources Douglas Mengers performed archival and background research; conducted the architectural survey of the property; carried out the CRHR, Local Register, and County RPO eligibility evaluation and integrity assessment of the property; and authored this report. DPR 523 form 1023-1025 Bonita Drive, Encinitas, CA 92024 (2023) PanGIS was contracted to provide historic cultural services for the 1023-1025 Bonita Drive project. Architectural historian Mr. Mengers authored the DPR Form and provided resource evaluation per City of Encinitas Local Register. DPR 523 form 1005 Wotan Dr. Encinitas, CA – Historic Resource Evaluation, (2023) PanGIS was contracted to provide Historic-era Cultural Services for the property. The structures are over 50 years old and therefore the City of Encinitas is requesting a DPR 523 form for City staff review. To meet the City’s requirement, Architectural historian Mr. Mengers conducted background research, performed a field recording of the structures on the property and prepared a DPR 523 form. DPR 523 form 730-732 Snapdragon, Encinitas, CA – Historic Resource Evaluation, (2023) PanGIS was contracted to provide Historic-era Cultural Services for the property. The structures are over 50 years old and therefore the City of Encinitas is requesting a DPR 523 form for City staff review. To meet the City’s requirement, Architectural historian Mr. Mengers conducted background research, performed a field recording of the structures on the property and prepare a DPR 523 form. 4152 Bachman Place – Historic Resource Evaluation, San Diego, CA (2023) PanGIS was contracted to conduct the historic evaluation and write a letter of professional opinion for the property. Architectural historian Mr. Mengers authored a letter report which details the methods and results of the archival and background research, field survey, and historic resource assessment and City of San Diego Historical Resources Register eligibility evaluation for the historic-era structure at 4152 Bachman Place. DPR 523 from 2087-2089 Edinburg Avenue Historic-Era Architectural Evaluation, Cardiff-by-the-Sea, CA, (2023) PanGIS was contracted to conduct the historic Resource Assessment and write a letter of professional opinion for the property. Architectural historian Mr. Mengers performed a field survey and photography documentation, created GIS deliverables (DPR maps), and wrote the DPR form. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and County of San Diego Department of Public Works Bridge Upgrade and Maintenance Projects, San Diego County, CA (2017-2025) The County is conducting preventative maintenance and upgrades for bridges funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Caltrans is the review agency and documents are prepared in compliance with NEPA, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and County CEQA Guidelines. Cultural Resources Director Mr. Mengers has managed staff July 1, 2026 Item #3 51 of 84 conducting archaeological, historical, and GIS services for six separate bridge projects: • County of San Diego Sunrise Hwy Bridge Project (2024-2025) • County of San Diego Live Oak Park Road Bridge Project (2021-2023) • County of San Diego Scour Mitigation for Willows Road Bridge Project, Alpine, CA (2019-2021) • Caltrans FNAE and Historic Properties Action Plan for Cottonwood Creek Bridge Widening Project (2020) • County of San Diego Lawson Valley West Bridge Replacement Project, San Diego County, CA (2020) • County of San Diego/Caltrans- Pamo Road North Bridge (2018) Staff have prepared FNAE (Finding of No Adverse Effect) & Action Plans for NRHP eligible properties, conducted record search, Class III archaeological survey, DPR form update, ASR (Archaeological Survey Report), and GIS mapping for archaeology and biological resources (vegetation, sensitive species, jurisdictional delineation for Waters of the State and Waters of the U.S, location). PanGIS provides archaeological monitoring during geotechnical testing, archival record search, field surveys, HPSR technical reports, and plans for the Phase 1 and Phase III data recovery. Historic Resources Evaluation for the Cottonwood Sand Mine Project, San Diego County, California (2019) As San Diego County CEQA Consultant – Historic Resources, Mr. Mengers performed archival and background research, carried out an eligibility evaluation and integrity assessment of the historic resources observed in the project area, and authored the final report. PanGIS staff evaluated the Cottonwood Golf Club and a single-family residence and its associated outbuildings at the project site that were potentially historically significant because of their age. The resources at 3121 and 3629 Willow Glen Drive are recommended not eligible for the CRHR and the Local Register, nor do they meet the qualifications as historical resources pursuant to CEQA or the RPO. As these resources are not recommended as historically important, the Project will not result in a significant adverse impact, and therefore the effects of the Project on the built environment resources addressed in this report are proposed as not significant. The results of this evaluation will assist the County in determining the direct construction impacts to these resources. The evaluation of the built environment resources at 3121 and 3629 Willow Glen Drive in the Valle De Oro Community Planning area in unincorporated San Diego County, California, was performed for eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), San Diego County Local Register of Historic Resources (Local Register), and the County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). The report has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prior to the redevelopment of 24 parcels covering 277 acres which would result in the demolition of the Cottonwood Golf Club and a single-family residence and its associated outbuildings. This report follows the County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance (County of San Diego 2007a) and Report Format and Content Guidelines (County of San Diego 2007b). The results of this evaluation will assist the County in determining the direct construction impacts to resources. County of San Diego DGS HHSA Affordable Housing Initiative Project – Historic Resource Assessment 5001 73rd Street, San Diego, County of San Diego, CA (2022) Architectural Historian Mr. Mengers conducted an evaluation of the built environment resource potentially historically significant because of its age, for eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), San Diego County Local Register of Historic Resources (Local Register), and the County Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). The report has been prepared in accordance with the CEQA. He conducted the historic evaluation and authored a letter of professional opinion for the property. County of San Diego DGS HHSA Affordable Housing Initiative Project –Historic Resource Assessment 6255 Mission Gorge Road, San Diego, CA (2021) Architectural Historian Mr. Mengers conducted a historic resource evaluation of County-owned property within the City of San Diego. The property is being considered for redevelopment as part of an affordable housing initiative. Due to its date of construction the structure required an evaluation of its significance pursuant to CEQA guidelines and the County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). He conducted the historic evaluation and authored a letter of professional opinion for the July 1, 2026 Item #3 52 of 84 property. The report details the methods and results of the archival and background research, field survey, and historic resource assessment and California Register of Historical Resources. Caltrans D-11 Environmental On-Call Contract (2014 – 2025) PanGIS has been subcontractor for cultural resources on the Caltrans D11 environmental on-call for many years performing studies for architectural history, archaeology, and GIS for various transportation projects. For the current on-call, PanGIS’ Principal Investigator for cultural resources is performing archaeological studies for the expansion of SR-15. The key purpose of project is to improve the preferred highway commercial access route for the Port of San Diego’s marine terminals as well as access to other working waterfront terminals at the San Diego Naval Station between the Chollas Creek Channel and the Seventh Street Channel. Mr. Mengers is PanGIS’ cultural lead for this project, providing record search, Sacred Lands File Search with the NAHC, drafting AB-52 (CEQA) letters for Caltrans, the lead agency, and writing the technical reports. Tasks will include: Supplemental records search, Native American Contact Program, archaeological survey including on Naval Facilities, and Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), Extended Phase I investigation, lab analysis, and reporting, and write a Discovery and Monitoring Plan (PRDMP). Caltrans D-11 Historic District SR-163 Bridge Rail Upgrade Project San Diego, CA (2018-2019) Four bridges over SR-163 are part of a Historic District and must be upgraded to meet current safety standards. Senior Historical Archaeologist worked with a team of architectural historians to conduct research and make recommendations. He surveyed the bridges, took photos, produced a photo appendix, completed site inventory forms, and was responsible for creating APE maps for direct and indirect effects. He was responsible for completing two Historic Property Survey Reports (HPSR) and the Finding of Effect or Finding on No Effect (FOE/FONE), along with GIS deliverables and exhibits. City of San Diego, 2100 Kettner Redevelopment (2018-2020) Principal Investigator Mr. Mengers provided on- site project management for archaeological testing and data recovery of cultural material. He managed 3-5 archaeologists excavating a series of trenches across one full city block of Little Italy. House foundations, privys, and historic trash deposits were found at the project site. He wrote the testing plan and report and the Historical Resource Technical Report. County of San Diego DGS HHSA Affordable Housing Initiative Project –Historic Resource Assessments, San Diego, CA (2021-2025) PanGIS was contracted by the Prime to conduct historic resource evaluations of County of San Diego owned properties, some located in the City of San Diego. The properties are being considered for redevelopment. Preliminary reviews indicate that, due to its date of construction, the buildings require evaluation of its significance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and the County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). PanGIS’ Architectural Historian and Principal Investigator for archaeological resources conducts the historic evaluations and writes a letter of professional opinion (LPO) and (HRER) for the properties. This letter reports detail the methods and results of the archival and background research, field survey, and historic resource assessment and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and RPO eligibility evaluation for the historic era buildings. Properties include Health Services Complex located on Rosecrans, which include building evaluations and archaeological studies; 6225 Mission Gorge Road/Grantville; 73rd Street; 200 S. Magnolia Ave, 3177 Ocean View; 4588 Market Street with an HRER; 5202 University Ave; Ramona Sherriff substation (County land) with additional archaeological resources investigation. City of Carlsbad Cultural Resources Survey For The Carlsbad Boulevard And Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Project, Carlsbad, CA (2022-2023) Senior archaeologist and architectural historian Mr. Mengers led the cultural resources services. He managed staff conducting background research with a records search and a Sacred Lands File with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the project area. He managed July 1, 2026 Item #3 53 of 84 staff conducting the pedestrian reconnaissance archaeological and architectural survey of the study area and documented existing conditions, relocated previously identified resources and documented newly observed cultural resources including the California State Parks Tamarack Comfort Station that has been determined eligible for listing on the CRHR and NRHP. He authored the archaeological and historic resources survey report of a Cultural Resources Technical Report per CEQA Guidelines. Caltrans D-11 Historic District SR-163 Bridge Rail Upgrade Project San Diego, CA (2018-2019) Four bridges over SR-163 are part of a Historic District and must be upgraded to meet current safety standards. Senior Historical Archaeologist worked with a team of architectural historians to conduct research and make recommendations. He surveyed the bridges, took photos, produced a photo appendix, completed site inventory forms, and was responsible for creating APE maps for direct and indirect effects. He was responsible for completing two Historic Property Survey Reports (HPSR) and the Finding of Effect or Finding on No Effect (FOE/FONE), along with GIS deliverables and exhibits. County of San Diego Dep’t of Planning and Land Use - Historic Resources Evaluation Report for the 1118 N Anza Street Townhomes Project, El Cajon, San Diego County, CA (2018) Senior Historical Archaeologist Mr. Mengers authored the report on an evaluation of the built environment resources at 1104, 1112, 1118, 1132, and 1136 N Anza Street in the Bostonia neighborhood of El Cajon, San Diego County, California, for eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), San Diego County Local Register of Historic Resources (Local Register), and the County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). The report has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. The report follows the County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Guidelines. Mr. Mengers evaluated five single-family residences and their associated outbuildings at the project site that were potentially historically significant because of their age. The evaluation assisted the County in determining the direct construction impacts to these resources. SANDAG/NCTD Del Mar Bluffs Stabilization Projects 4/5 (DMB5) San Diego County, CA (2017-2024) Architectural Historian/Senior Archaeologist Mr. Mengers managed the cultural resources investigations to determine potentially significant prehistoric and historic resources including water features and historic structures within the project boundaries. Study included an archival record search, a Sacred Lands File Search, information requests from local Native American tribal representatives, and an intensive pedestrian survey of the project area. He prepared a report documenting archaeological and historical resources and potential for impacts, including NRHP evaluations with SHPO concurrence. This project is subject to NEPA review for Section 106 compliance with USACE as the lead Federal agency. During the survey, PanGIS staff recorded or updated sixteen archaeological sites, most associated with the 1910 construction of the AT&SF railway, including historic retaining walls, drainage systems, foundations, pilings, and trash scatters. San Diego High School Constraints Analysis, Phase 1, San Diego, CA (2019) PanGIS provided due diligence and constraints analysis services for cultural resources sensitivity analysis for historical (built) resources (historic-era structures and landscape features) for Whole Site Modernization Improvements and Long-Range Facilities Master Plan at San Diego High School. Initial research indicated that many of the existing structures were constructed prior to 1970, therefore requiring an assessment due to age and potential status as historic resources. Project Architectural Historian Mr. Mengers authored the historic constraints analysis. The goal of the historic-era structures and landscape features analysis is to determine if any built environment resources within the project area are likely to be considered historic resources under State guidelines and, if so, to determine if any built environment resources are likely to be or are potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP or Local Registers. Mr. Mengers performed a reconnaissance survey to identify resources likely to require a full evaluation. The results of the analysis will assist the San Diego Unified School District in determining direct construction impacts to historic resources and guide future historic resource evaluations. July 1, 2026 Item #3 54 of 84 Historic Resources Survey and Section 106 Evaluation for the La Salina Wastewater Treatment Plant Decommissioning Project, Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (2018) Senior Historian Mr. Mengers conducted an historic structures evaluation for NEPA and CEQA compliance. The project site is adjacent to Loma Alta Creek and came under review by the Army Corp of Engineers, section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Historic era storage tanks and related features on the property were recorded and a DPR form for the storage tanks was produced and included a preliminary evaluation for eligibility under section 106. Mr. Mengers was the primary author for a report section about the storage tanks including a historic context of 20th century wastewater treatment in San Diego County, that is included in the final cultural report. The evaluation is associated with a proposal to convert plant from waste water treatment to storm water treatment, including demolition and removal of several modern structures at south end of property. Lyons Valley Environmental Studies, Jamul, San Diego County, CA (2020) The County of San Diego required the property owner to conduct environmental studies, including cultural resources. The project site is 2.6-acres and falls under San Diego County (County) jurisdiction, therefore, the County guidelines for cultural resources must be followed. PanGIS Principal Investigator Mr. Mengers, who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in history (36 CFR Part 61), managed the archaeological study. He conducted a site visit to collect information about the property necessary for any DPR forms and preliminary site evaluation. Mr. Mengers is on the County CEQA list for both Archaeology and Historic Resources and as Principal Investigator, he summarized the record search findings, evaluated the record search findings in support of the project’s County of San Diego and CEQA obligations, documented the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological survey and authored the Archaeological Technical Cultural Report that conforms to the County’s Archaeological Technical Report guidelines. Mr. Mengers managed PanGIS staff conducting the records search at South Coastal Information Center (SCIC), sending Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Land Search letters to tribes, and performing an archaeological survey. Cultural Resource Services for Historic Properties for the Gold Rush Multi-Use Trail Project in the City of Sonora, CA (2025) PanGIS is a subcontractor to Wood Rogers, Inc. for this project. The proposed Project is the construction of a multi-use trail in the City of Sonora along SR-49 by the Tuolumne County Transportation Council. PanGIS conducted background research, conducted a pedestrian survey and documentation of historic-era built environment buildings and objects within the project ROW, and will write the HPSR, HRER, and associated DPR forms. Doug Mengers, PanGIS Senior Archaeologist and Historian, meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in archaeology and history (36 CFR Part 61) and will be the Project Lead Cultural Resource Specialist for this effort. Mr. Mengers is highly qualified and has many years of experience conducting resource evaluations and writing Section 106 and CEQA-compliant reports for historic and archaeological resources. July 1, 2026 Item #3 55 of 84 3460-3462 Garfield Street – Historic Resource Evaluation Appendix B Residential Building Record July 1, 2026 Item #3 56 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 57 of 84 July 1, 2026 Item #3 58 of 84 3460-3462 Garfield Street – Historic Resource Evaluation Appendix C DPR 523 Form July 1, 2026 Item #3 59 of 84 Page 1 of 15 *Resource Name or #: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad P1. Other Identifier: APN 204-150-24-00 DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date *P2. Location: ☐Not for Publication ☒Unrestricted *a. County San Diego and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Luis ReyDate 1997 T 12S ; R 4W ; NW of NW of Sec 7 ; S.B. B.M. c. Address 3460-3462 Garfield Street City Carlsbad Zip 92008 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Center Zone 11N , 467,627 mE/ 3,668,261 mN e. Other Locational Data: Lot on the east side of Garfield Street, at the three-way junction with Maple Avenue. *P3a. Description: This is a single- split line. Each unit has an integral one- a front yard, and a spacious backyard. The residence is roughly H-shaped in plan, raised concrete foundation, under a hipped roof of grey composite asphalt sh Continuation Sheet for detailed description. *Attachments: ☐NONE ☒Location Map ☒Continuation Sheet ☒Building, Structure, & Object Record ☐Archaeological Record ☐District Record ☐Linear Feature Record ☐Milling Station Record ☐Rock Art Record ☐Artifact Record ☐Photograph Record ☒ Other: DPR 523k Sketch Map: *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP3. Duplex Residential *P4. Resources Present: ☒Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐ District ☐Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: Street view facing east (10/16/2025) *P6. Date Constructed/Age & Source: ☒Historic ☐Prehistoric ☐Both 1948 (Building Record) *P7. Owner and Address: Henry VanderWeit 3460 Garfield St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 *P8. Recorded by: Alberto Foglia PanGIS, Inc. San Diego, CA *P9. Date Recorded: 10/16/2025 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive *P11. Report Citation Mengers, Douglas, and Alberto Bello Foglia (2025) 3460-62 Garfield Street – Historical Analysis Report. PanGIS, Inc. for City of Carlsbad, Community Development Department. July 1, 2026 Item #3 60 of 84 *Resource Name or # 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad *NRHP Status CodeN/A Page 2 of 15 DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information (This space reserved for official comments.) See Page for Sketch Map State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD (This space reserved for official comments.) (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) B1. Historic Name: None B2. Common Name: None B3. Original Use: Residential B4. Present Use:Residential *B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular *B6. Construction History: replacement of all windows, doors, and roof. Deck addition to northwest façade in 2010. *B7. Moved? ☒No ☐Yes ☐Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: Divided wood fence surrounding property, two play structures and shed in rear. B9a. Architect:Unknown b. Builder:Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development Area: Carlsbad Period of Significance: 1948 Property Type: Building Applicable Criteria: None Historical Context the village to be renamed Carlsbad (Carlsbad, California 2020). American- established a homestead known as “Los Kiotes” on Rancho Agua Hedionda, where he and his children conducted dry farming and ranching through the 1890s. The California Southern Railroad was constructed down the coast in the townsite was laid out in 1886 and was named Carlsbad after similar springs in Karlsbad, and Dudek 2011). <Continued> B11. Additional Resource Attributes None *B12. References: Working Paper 4: History, the Arts and Cultural Resources; High Quality Education and Community and Dudek for City of Carlsbad. B13.Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: A. Foglia & D. Mengers (PanGIS, Inc.) *Date of Evaluation: 10/16/2025 July 1, 2026 Item #3 61 of 84 Page 3 of 15 *Resource Name or # _3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad *Map Name: San Luis Rey *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1997 DPR 523J (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) * Required information State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial July 1, 2026 Item #3 62 of 84 Page 4 of 15 *Resource Name or # 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad DPR 523K (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow. State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# SKETCH MAP Trinomial *Drawn by: A. Foglia (PanGIS, Inc.) *Date of map: _11/3/2025_______ July 1, 2026 Item #3 63 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _5___ of _15___ *P3a. Description: <Continued> 3460-62 Garfield Street is a vernacular duplex residence, very roughly H- shaped in plan. It is sited on a rectangular lot split down the middle: the two units of the duplex are mirrored along this central split line (Figure 1). Each unit has an integral one-car garage set on either side of the centerline, a front yard, and a spacious backyard. FIGURE 1. SOUTHWEST FAÇADE VIEWED FROM ACROSS GARFIELD STREET, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 The structure is of light wood frame construction built on a raised concrete foundation. The terrain slopes downwards to the east-north-east, down from the level of Garfield Street. The top of the concrete foundation, however, remains level across the entire footprint of the structure. This means that the approximately16-inch rise of the foundation at the street frontage increases to roughly 52 inches at the rear. The floor is carried across the foundation on joists, according to the building record. The substantial height of the foundation at the rear then leaves room for a sizable crawlspace beneath the floor of each unit, which is accessed by wooden doors set in the foundation at the rear of each unit. Both the foundation and the siding of overlapping wooden planks are painted a cream color. All the trim for the windows, doors, and roof are painted white. The paint is all in immaculate condition, with no signs of wear or flaking. All the windows are modern double-glazed, white acrylic replacements done in period style – including imitation mullions attached to the outside of the glazing to better mimic the look of an early-to-mid 20th-century multi-pane window. The owner informed us that when he moved in to the property in the July 1, 2026 Item #3 64 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _6___ of _15___ early 1990’s a full remodel of both units was done, which included replacing all the windows and doors. The roof was also redone at this time. It is a hipped roof of grey composite asphalt shingles, with projecting rafters and an exposed wooden tongue-and-groove soffit. Both the rafters and soffit are painted white. Multiple metal roof vents project from the roof. The roof of each unit also has a projecting square element with its own hipped roof of unknown function – possibly a dormer or roof vent. The property is accessed from the southwest façade, which faces Garfield Street (Figure 2). A PVC white picket fence closes off the front yards of both units, with a white trellis arch providing foot access through the fence for each unit. Paths of concrete pavers lead through the front yard lawns to the concrete path leading up to the front porches. Both front yards are well landscaped and manicured. The two front yards are separated by a double wide concrete driveway, which provides access to the two garages set in to the main mass of the building. Both garage doors are modern metal rolling shutter doors, painted white, with double central windows with shades. Front doors to each unit, painted white, with large windows at the top half, are set into a projecting mass on either side of the garage, at the corners nearest to the garages. Concrete porches with two steps on either side lead up to the front doors. The porches appear to be part of the original foundation of the building. Overhanging hipped porch roofs cover the front doors and porches, and single triple-light picture windows, with a large central light and two narrower single-hung sash windows, fill up the majority of the remaining spaces on either side of the façade. Each of the faces of the projecting masses that looks onto the driveway on both units have a narrow single-hung window. July 1, 2026 Item #3 65 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _7___ of _15___ FIGURE 2. SOUTHWEST FAÇADE VIEWED FROM DRIVEWAY, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 The northwest and southeast facades are nearly identical, due to the mirrored layout of the building. The terrain slopes downward to the backyard on either side of the building, with red concrete pavers forming a hardscaped path to the backyard. Both facades had three rectangular single-hung sash windows, roughly evenly spaced, with the central window being shorter and nearly square (Figure 3). Between the last two windows to the northeast is a side door, accessed by a concrete porch with four steps. A shed porch roof overhangs the doors on either façade. The main difference between the two facades is a large wooden deck added off of the entire northwest façade, which the owner informed us was constructed in 2010 (Figure 4). The original concrete porch and steps were left in place beneath the deck. Additionally, the last window before the backyard was replaced with a door at that time. To the rear of the concrete porch on the southeast façade, an outdoor shower was added, closed in on all sides by a wooden fence with a wooden door facing northeast (Figure 5). A small shed roof covers half of the shower, pitched to the southwest. Both side yards have landscaping along the fencing, with the vegetation being much more extensive along the southeast fence. July 1, 2026 Item #3 66 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _8___ of _15___ FIGURE 3. SOUTHEAST FAÇADE VIEWED OVER THE SIDE GATE, FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 FIGURE 4. NORTHWEST FAÇADE DECK, FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 July 1, 2026 Item #3 67 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _9___ of _15___ FIGURE 5. OUTDOOR SHOWER OFF THE BACK OF THE SOUTHEAST PORCH, FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 The northeast façade is the rear of the building. A fence divides the back in two to separate yards for each unit: however, both units are currently inhabited by members of the same extended family so there is a gate that connects both yards near the façade, as well as a hole through the fence with a slide halfway down the fence. Two play structures cover about a third of the back yard of the south unit, with one third being grass, and the third nearest the façade a patio of red concrete pavers (Figure 6). A similar patio of red concrete pavers, about two rows of pavers shorter, covers the same area of the yard of the north unit. A large tree is located in the southeast corner of the northern yard, with a small shed opposite it and oriented parallel to the rear fence line in a northwest to southeast direction (Figure 7). July 1, 2026 Item #3 68 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _10___ of _15___ FIGURE 6. BACKYARD OF SOUTH UNIT (3462 GARFIELD STREET), FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 FIGURE 7. BACKYARD OF NORTH UNIT (3460 GARFIELD STREET), FACING EAST, 10/20/2025 This rear façade is where the foundation is the highest, and two small wooden doors centered on each unit lead to crawlspaces within the foundation and under the floor. At each corner of the rear façade are two bays that project from above the level of the foundation, supported by posts at each corner. July 1, 2026 Item #3 69 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _11___ of _15___ The space underneath is being used as storage for both units. There are no windows on either bay. The north unit has two windows – a portrait aspect single hung sash window to the northwest and a large landscape aspect picture window with three lights of equal dimension. The center light is a single pane, while the flanking windows have single-hung sashes. This is probably a modification and not a direct replacement. The south unit has three portrait aspect single hung sash windows, in what is probably the original layout (Figures 8-9). FIGURE 8. REAR OF SOUTH UNIT (3462 GARFIELD STREET), FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 July 1, 2026 Item #3 70 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _12___ of _15___ FIGURE 9. REAR OF NORTH UNIT (3460 GARFIELD STREET), FACING WEST, 10/20/2025 Modifications and additions The exterior footprint of the structure appears wholly intact. The only modern structural addition appears to be the deck added to the northwest façade in 2010. All the windows and doors are modern replacements, with a window on the northwest façade being modified into a door, and two windows in the northeast façade of the northern window being modified into a large triple-light picture window. Electrical, gas, and water utility pipes are mounted on the exterior of both buildings. Modern lighting fixtures and a satellite dish are surface mounted to the building exterior. Modern metal gutters and downpipes have been mounted to the eaves and sides of the house. Condition The entire building is in great condition, despite having few original elements. It has quite clearly been well maintained at regular intervals. All the paint is in good condition, as are all of the wooden elements. The owner confirmed that extensive remodeling was carried out in the early 1990’s, and it is likely that when the deck was installed in 2010 further touchups, including repainting, may have been done. *B10. Significance: <Continued> Drought and a national depression severely limited development in the area during the 1890s and 1900s but picked up in the 1910s. This began with agriculture, including the introduction of avocados in 1916 and flower production shortly after, and eventually included resorts and suburban July 1, 2026 Item #3 71 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _13___ of _15___ development. Steady growth continued even through the Depression, though most residential development remained west of Highland Drive and north of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Post-war development included construction of Interstate 5 (1950), incorporation (1952) and annexation, and expansion of single-family residential construction into formerly agricultural areas (WESTEC 1980). Archival Research The original owners are unknown. The earliest known occupants of 3460 Garfield Street were Albert H. Davis (b1878 in Indiana), his wife Margaret Davis (b1883 in Ohio), and his partner Isaac Levin (b1873 in Lithuania), all retired. An obituary indicates Albert Davis died late 1950 in Indiana. No other information was available about his wife or partner or their length of residency at 3460 Garfield Street. The earliest known occupants of 3462 Garfield Street were Harold Bell Wright (b1927 in Oregon), a truck driver and clerk for a home builders store; his wife Drusilla Ann Wright (b1928 in California), and their son Steven M (b1950 in California). The Wright’s later had another son and daughter, but by 1962 had relocated to Maricopa County, Arizona. No other information was available about their length of residency at 3462 Garfield Street. Aerial photography confirms the general construction timeline and neighborhood context: the 1938 image shows mainly undeveloped open space, and agricultural development in the form of orchards. Garfield Street appears to have already been paved at this date, with concrete sidewalks already present along it. The streets leading southwest towards the ocean are also paved with sidewalks. However, the streets off it to the northeast remained unpaved. There is already some residential development in the surrounding area. The 1947 aerial shows 3460-62 Garfield Street as an empty lot still, with further housing development elsewhere in the neighborhood. Additional housing development is visible in 1953 and 1964, including the construction of the duplex at 3460-62 Garfield Street and subdivision of the orchard surrounding it. All the orchards are gone by 1964, and by 1967 all the streets have been paved and the neighborhood has essentially taken on its modern appearance, with the exception of a few still undeveloped lots (NETROnline 2025). Resource Importance As a duplex residence, the historic-era structure at 3460-62 Garfield Street is best classified as a building. As a vernacular residence in suburban Southern California, the property can best be evaluated in a context of 1940s-1950s suburban residential development. The historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street does not represent a property type usually excluded from the National Register. It is not a religious property; has not been removed from its original location; is not the birthplace or grave of a historical figure; is not a cemetery; is not a reconstructed building; is not commemorative in intent; and has not achieved July 1, 2026 Item #3 72 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _14___ of _15___ significance within the past 50 years. Significance and integrity aspects for the historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street are addressed in detail below. CRHR Eligibility and Integrity While the property has played a general role in suburban residential development in Carlsbad, it does not appear to be directly associated with events that have made significant contributions to the history of the area. Therefore, the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 1. No information was found to indicate that specific individuals associated with the property were known to have influenced the history of the area. Therefore, historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street are recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 2. The property is a modest example of local vernacular architecture and is not a unique or outstanding example of its type. It does not appear to be the work of a master architect or craftsman or possess high artistic value. Therefore, the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 3. The structure is a common property type that has not yielded, and is not likely to yield, important information about history or prehistory that is not available through historic research. Therefore, the historic-era building at 3460-62 Garfield Street are recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 4. LOCATION: The building retains integrity of location. The building is in its originally constructed location. DESIGN: The building mostly retains integrity of design. The structure appears to have always been residential and the property’s original historic function is apparent. The basic layout of the building is still intact, including the trim and position of most doors and windows – even if the latter have been replaced over time, and some changes in the position of windows and doors have been made. The wooden deck off of the northwest façade is modern, but does not detract from the original design of the building. SETTING: The building does not retain integrity of setting. When constructed, the area surrounding the building was mixed rural-residential development. All the other surrounding fields and orchards that originally existed when 3460-62 Garfield Street was built were gone by 1964. MATERIALS: The building does not retain integrity of materials. While the building still reveals the construction preferences of those who built it and some of the materials available during the period of significance, all of the doors are modern replacements and the windows are modern double-paned glass windows with acrylic framing. July 1, 2026 Item #3 73 of 84 age of *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) *Recorded by: *Date  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: 3460-3462 Garfield Street, Carlsbad Page _15___ of _15___ WORKMANSHIP: The building retains integrity of workmanship. Even with modern additions and material replacements, the structure still presents evidence of 1940s-1950s construction methods. FEELING: The building does not retain integrity of feeling. The surrounding empty and agricultural lands have been replaced by modern apartment buildings and single-family homes. The aesthetic and historic sense of a mid-20th century mixed agricultural and residential area is no longer present. ASSOCIATION: The building is not associated with any important historic events or persons. In summary, while the historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street retain a measure of historical integrity, it is recommended ineligible for the CRHR under Criterion 1 through 4. Therefore, it is not considered a historic resource per CEQA guidelines. CEQA Significance Evaluation The historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street do not qualify as a historical resource under the terms of CEQA, as they do not meet any of the definitions set forth by CEQA. The historic-era buildings at 3460-62 Garfield Street Drive are not listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, on the CRHR; are not included in a local register or identified as significant in an historical resource survey; nor have they been determined to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. *B12. References: <Continued> NETROnline (2025) Historic Aerials. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC. Accessed at https://www.historicaerials.com. WESTEC (1980) Regional Historic Preservation Study. WESTEC Services, Inc. for the Comprehensive Planning Organization of the San Diego Region. Accessed at: http://www.carlsbadhistoricalsociety.com/. July 1, 2026 Item #3 74 of 84 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Exhibit 6 This is a list of acronyms and abbreviations (in alphabetical order) that are commonly used in staff reports. Acronym Description Acronym Description July 1, 2026 Item #3 75 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 TS - AMP AMPERAGE A.B. ANCHOR BOLT ABV ABOVE A/C AIR CONDITION AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACC ACCESS ADJ ADJUSTABLE or ADJACENT AGG AGGREGATE ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM ANOD ANODIZED ASPH ASPHALT A.S.T.M. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING MATERIALS AUTO AUTOMATIC AWN AWNING APPL APPLIANCE ADDN'L ADDITIONAL & AND @ AT BA BATHROOM BD BOARD BDRM BEDROOM BETWN BETWEEN BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCK BLK'G BLOCKING BLW BELOW BM BEAM B.M. BENCH MARK B.N. BOUNDARY NAIL BOT OR BOTT BOTTOM BRG BEARING (NON) BRM CST BROOM CLOSET BRZ BRONZE BTU BRITISH THERM. UNIT BW BASE OF WALL B.B. BOTTOM OF BEAM C CENTER LINE CAB CABINET (S) CB CATCH BASIN CDR CEDAR CEM CEMENT CER CERAMIC CHAM CHAMFER CI CAST IRON CIRC CIRCLE/CIRCULAR CJ'S CEILING JOISTS C.T. COOKTOP CL OR CLOS CLOSET CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR CNTRL CONTROL C.O. CLEAN OUT COTG/COTW CLEAN OUT TO GRADE/WALL COL COLUMN COMBO COMBINATION COMP COMPOSITION CONC CONCRETE CONN CONNECT CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUE/CONTINUOUS CONTR CONTRACTOR CRB CRUSHED ROCK BASE CPT CARPET CSMT CASEMENT CST CAST C.T. CERAMIC TILE CNTR COUNTER CTSK COUNTERSINK CU FT CUBIC FEET CU IN CUBIC INCHES CU YD CUBIC YARDS CW COLD WATER COMB COMBUSTION CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT d PENNY (NAIL) D DRYER DBL DOUBLE DET DETAIL DF DOUGLAS FIR DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN DG DECOMPOSED GRANITE D/H DOUBLE HUNG DIA OR DIAM DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL DIM DIMENSION DIN RM DINING ROOM DISP DISPOSAL DN DOWN DP DEEP DR DOOR DS DEEP SINK D.S. DOWN SPOUT DV DRYER VENT DW DISHWASHER DWG DRAWING DWR DRAWER (S) o DIAMETER E EAST ELEC ELECTRICAL EA EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT ELEV ELEVATION E.N. EDGE NAIL ENCLOS ENCLOSURE EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT EWWF ELECTRICALLY WELDED WIRED FABRIC (E) or EXIST EXISTING EXP EXPANSION EXP EXPOSED EXT EXTERIOR FAST FASTENER FAU FORCED AIR UNIT FBGL FIBERGLASS FBO FURNISHED BY OTHERS/ FURNISHED BY OWNER FCO FLOOR CLEAN OUT F.D. FLOOR DRAIN FD FIRE DAMPER FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIN.FLR. FINISH FLOOR FG FIXED GLASS FG FUEL GAS FHMS FLATHEAD MACHINE SCREW FHWS FLATHEAD WOOD SCREW FIN FINISH FLR.JST. FLOOR JOIST FLASH FLASHING FLUSH FLUSH BEAM FLR FLOOR FLUOR FLUORESCENT F.N. FIELD NAIL FND FOUNDATION FOB FACE OF BRICK FOB FACE OF BEAM FOC FACE OF CURB FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FOM FACE OF MASONRY FOS FACE OF STUD FP FIREPLACE FTG FOOTING FIX FIXED FLD FIELD FIN N FINISH NAIL FRZ FREEZER G GAS GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GAR GARAGE GB GRAB BAR G.F.I. GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GI GALVANIZED IRON GL GLASS GLU-LAM GLUED LAMINATED GRD GRADE GRND GROUND GRVL GRAVEL GTR GUTTER GYP GYPSUM GYP.BD. GYPSUM BOARD GLULAM GLUED LAMINATED BEAM H HIGH HB HOSE BIBB HC HOLLOW CORE HD HOLDDOWN HDR HEADER HDWD HARDWOOD HF HEMLOCK FIR HORIZ HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT HVAC HEATING/VENTILATING/AIR CONDITIONING HW HOT WATER IB IRONING BOARD ICBO INTERNATIONAL CONF. OF BUILDING OFFICIALS INCAN INCANDESCENT INCL INCLUDE INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR INV INVERT JAC JACUZZI JAN JANITOR JST JOIST JT JOINT KIT KITCHEN K.P. KING POST L LENGTH LAB LABORATORY LAM LAMINATE LAV LAVATORY LB POUND LB LAG BOLT LF LINEAL FEET LIN LINEN LIV. RM. LIVING ROOM LNDSCP LANDSCAPE LOC LOCATION LP LAMINATED PLASTIC LT LAUNDRY TUB LTWT LIGHT WEIGHT LUM CLG LUMINOUS CEILING LWC LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE M MEN MSTR MASTER MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MB MACHINE BOLT MBR MEMBER M.C. MEDICINE CABINET MDL MODEL MECH MECHANICAL MED MEDIUM MEM MEMBRANE MANUF MANUFACTURER MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MS MOP SINK MT METAL THRESHOLD MTD MOUNTED MTL METAL MTR METER &/OR LOCATION MIL MILLIMETER ML MICRO-LAM MICRO MICROWAVE N NORTH NAT'L NATURAL N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO. OR # NUMBER NOM NOMINAL N.R.C. NOISE REDUCTION COEFFICIENT N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE O/ OVER OBS OBSCURE O/C OR O.C. ON CENTER OCC SEP OCCUPANCY SEPARATION OHMS OVERHEAD MACHINE SCREW OHWS OVERHEAD WOOD SCREW OPG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE OSB ORIENTED STRAND BOARD OVHD OVERHEAD PL PLATE LINE PANT PANTRY PBD PARTICAL BOARD PC PHOTOELECTRIC CELL PENT PENETRATION PERF PERFORATE PERIM PERIMETER PH PANIC HARDWARE PH PAPER HOLDER PL PLATE PLAS PLASTER/PLASTIC PLF POUNDS PER LINEAL FOOT PLYWD PLYWOOD PKT POCKET PNL PANEL POST POST PR PRESSURE RELIEF PR PAIR PRE FAB PREFABRICATED PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PT POINT PT POST TENSIONED PTD PAINTED PTDF PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVMT PAVEMENT PWDR POWDER ROOM PUE PACIFIC UTILITY EASEMENT PG&E PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC R RISER R.A. RETURN AIR RAD RADIUS R.D. ROOF DRAIN REF REFRIGERATOR REF REFERENCE REIN REINFORCE REQ'D REQUIRED RES RESILIENT RS RESAWN REV REVISED RHMS ROUNDHEAD MACHINE SCREW RHWS ROUNDHEAD WOOD SCREW RR'S ROOF RAFTERS RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING ROS ROUGH SAWN RDWD REDWOOD RWL RAIN WATER LEADER RVS REVERSE S SEWER S SOUTH SAF SAFETY S.C. SOLID CORE SCHED SCHEDULE S.D. STORM DRAIN SECT SECTION SERV SERVICE S.F. SQUARE FEET SH/SHLVS SHELF/SHELVES S.H. SINGLE HUNG SHT SHEET SHTH'G SHEATHING SHWR SHOWER SIL SILICONE SIM SIMILAR SL SLIDER (ING) SOF SOFFIT S&P SHELF & POLE SPEC SPECIFICATION SPKR OR SP SPEAKER SPL SPLASH SQ SQUARE S4S SURFACED FOUR SIDES SS STAINLESS STEEL STC SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUC STRUCTURE/STRUCTURAL SUSP SUSPENDED SYM SYMMETRIC/SYMMETRICAL SYS SYSTEM SEW SEWING SPEC.INSP SPECIAL INSPECTION SDG&E SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SOAP SOAP DISH SIN.LITE SINGLE LITE T TREAD TAB TABULATION T&B TOP & BOTTOM T.BAR TOWEL BAR T.O.B. TOP OF BEAM TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK TC TIME CLOCK T.C. TRASH COMPACTOR T.O.C. TOP OF CURB TEL TELEPHONE TV TELEVISION TEMP TEMPERED/TEMPERATURE T&G TONGUE & GROOVE T.O.G TOP OF GRADE THK THICK THRU THROUGH TP TOP OF PAVEMENT TR TOWEL RING TRTMT TREATMENT TS TOP OF SIDEWALK TS TUBE STEEL T.O.S. TOE OF SLOPE TSB TOP SET BASE T.O.W. TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL TPH TOILET PAPER HOLDER TN TOP OF NAILER UPPER UPPER CABINETS UC UNDER COUNTER UBC UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UMC UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE UPC UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OHTERWISE UR URINAL UTIL UTILITY V VOLTS VT VINYL TILE VB VAPOR BARRIER VERT VERTICAL VTR VENT THRU ROOF VTW VENT THRU WALL VAC VACUUM W WIDTH/WIDE/WEST W WOMEN/WATER/WASHER W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT W/A WHERE APPLICABLE W/D WASHER/DRYER WC WATER CLOSET WCO WALL CLEAN OUT WD WOOD WG WIRE GLASS WF WIDE FLANGE (STEEL) W.H. WATER HEATER W.I. WROUGHT IRON WDW WINDOW WP WATERPROOF/WEATHERPROOF WR WATER RESISTANT WSCT WAINSCOT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC WWM WELDED WIRE MESH ABBREVIATIONS SHEET INDEXPROJECT DATA CONSULTANTS CODES & GOVERNING 1.THE WORK INCLUDES ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION , AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE DEMOLITION AS SHOWN AND NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS SPECIFIED. THE GENERAL CONDITIONS AND DIVISION 1 APPLY TO THIS SECTION AS FULLY AS IF REPEATED HEREIN. 2.THE DRAWINGS SHOW GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO EXAMINE THE SITE TO DETERMINE THE EXACT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CHARACTER, AND EXTENT OF THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND OPERATIONS REQUIRED. 3.THE FAILURE OR OMISSION OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VISIT THE SITE AND ACQUAINT HIMSELF WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL IN NO WAY RELIEVE HIM FROM OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO HIS BID OR TO HIS CONTRACT. 4.THE INFORMATION INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS REPRESENTS THE CHARACTER OF THE MATERIALS TO BE ENCOUNTERED AND THEIR LOCATIONS. 5.IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEED, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS REFLECT THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS. 6.EXISTING UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO START OF ANY WORK. 7.IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT CERTAIN LINES CANNOT BE OR HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED, AND NO INDICATION IS CONTAINED ON ANY OF THE DRAWINGS OR REFERRED TO IN THE SPECIFICATIONS (I.E., STORM DRAINAGE, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, SEWER, WATER, OR GAS);THEREFORE, EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION DURING CLEARING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, TRENCHING, AND LIKE WORK. SHOULD ANY SUCH LINES BE ENCOUNTERED, GIVE NOTICE (IN WRITING) AND DO NOT PROCEED UNTIL ADEQUATE INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN MADE, THE LINE IDENTIFIED, AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED AS TO HOW TO PROCEED. 8.PROVIDE BARRICADE WARNINGS (SIGNS AND LIGHTING), DUST BARRIER, AND MAINTENANCE AND SUPERVISION THEREOF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE REQUIREMENTS, OR AS MAY BE DIRECTED FROM TIME TO TIME. ALL TEMPORARY BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, AND PROTECTIONS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE DEMOLITION WORK IS STARTED. 9.THE USE OF PROPER PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 10.EXISTING WORK AND ITEMS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE REMOVED IN SUCH MANNER THAT MINIMUM DAMAGE AND DISTURBANCE IS CAUSED TO ADJACENT AND CONNECTION WORK SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING AND/OR REPLACING ALL EXISTING WORK SCHEDULED TO REMAIN WHICH IS DAMAGED BY THESE OPERATIONS. 11.DEMOLITION SHALL INCLUDE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURE, PREPARATION OF EXISTING AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW MATERIALS, AND REMOVAL OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TO ALTER OR REPAIR THE EXISTING BUILDING AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS SPECIFIED. ALL AREAS TO BE PATCHED TO MATCH ADJACENT AREAS. 12.ALL REMOVED MATERIAL RESULTING FROM THE WORK OF THIS SECTION, EXCEPT AS INDICATED OR SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, IS THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED TO A LEGAL DISPOSAL AREA. ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS WORK SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY AND SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE. 13.STOCKPILING OF REMOVED MATERIALS ON THE PROJECT SITE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL. 14.EXISTING APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE DUE TO WORK UNDER THIS SECTION. SUCH DAMAGED FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED IN KIND. 15.PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN BRACING AND SHORING AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOR SAFETY. 16.PROTECTION OF UTILITIES. PRESERVE IN OPERATING CONDITION ALL ACTIVE UTILITIES TRAVERSING OR WITHIN AND ABOUT THE SITE; PROTECT ALL SUCH PROPERTY AND ITEMS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PIPING, CONDUITS, DRAINS, MANHOLES, MAINS, LATERALS, CATCH BASINS, VALVE BOXES, METERS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES AND STRUCTURES. PROMPTLY REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO SUCH UTILITY OR WORK DUE TO WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNING UTILITY OR MUNICIPAL BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION 17.NO BLASTING OR ON-SITE BURNING WILL BE PERMITTED. 18.NOISE ABATEMENT. NOISE SHALL BE KEPT AT A REASONABLE LEVEL AS RELATED TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT USED AND THEIR HOURS OF USE. THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE USE OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, I.E., JACK HAMMERS, POWER-DRIVEN FASTENERS, ETC. NOISE ABATEMENT CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL ORDINANCES. 19.DUST PALLIATION. DURING DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARING, KEEP DUST, DIRT, AND POLLEN FROM VEGETATION FROM BLOWING OR SPREADING BY MEANS OFWATERING DOWN AT REGULAR INTERVALS AND AS DIRECTED. 20.AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 11017 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE AND WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SAN DIEGOCOUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. AGENCIES DEMOLITION NOTES VICINITY MAP B.O.B. BOTTOM OF BEAM L IIC IMPACT INSULATION CLASSIFICATION B.U.R BUILT-UP-ROOFING BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TS TITLE SHEET / DEMO NOTES AO EXISTING CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY & TOPO SURVEY A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A-1 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS A-2 DIMENSION PLANS A-3 ELEVATIONS A-4 ELEVATIONS A-5 SITE SECTION A-6 WORKSHOP / STORAGE PLANS T.M.E TO MATCH EXISTING HERS PROJECT MISCELANEOUS NOTES Construction of the proposed project shall be done in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Municipal code which includes amendments to the 2022 California * City of Carlsbad, zoning ordinance; current edition * California Mechanical Code; 2022 edition * California Plumbing Code; 2022 edition * California Electrical Code; 2022 edition *California Fire Code: 2022 edition * California Building Energy Efficiency Standards; 2022 edition * California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 edition, * 2022 California Residential Code * 2022 California Building Code code of Regulations (title 24) and which also adopts the following: Surveyor: Coffman Land P.O. Box 2497 Julian, California 92036 Contact: Richard Coffman 760-520-4340 SCOPE: -EXISTING GARAGES CONVERTED TO ADU -NEW ADDITION @ 2ND FLOOR FOR ADU -NEW ADDITIONS @ 1ST & 2ND FLOOR FOR 3462 UNIT -MINOR REMODELING TO 3462 UNIT -(NO REMODELING OR ADDITIONS BEING DONE AT UNIT 3460) -NEW WORKSHOP/STORAGE IN REAR YARD AT UNIT 3460 A.P.N.#: 204-150-2400 SITE ADRESS: 3460 & 3462 GARFIELD STREET, CARLSBAD, CA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS: THE SOUTHEASTERLY 26 FEET OF LOT 9 AN D ALL OF LOT 10, "BLOCK P" OF PALISADES, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF N O. 1747, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 5, 1923. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING AND PROPOSED: MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 19-23 DWELLING UNITS/ACRES (R-23) OVERLAY ZONES: BEACH OVERLAY ZONE (BAO) PARKING: NO REPLACEMENT PARKING FOR CONVERTED GARAGE IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE PARCEL IS IN THE AB 2097 RADIUS. HOWEVER, 2 PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE FRONT YARD, PER SHEET A, AS 'VISITOR PARKING'. LOT SIZE: 8729 S.F. GROSS 8729 S.F. NET LOT COVERAGE: 60% 60% OF 8721 S.F. = 5,232 S.F. ALLOWED ACTUAL: EXISTING UNIT 3460:814 S.F. EXISTING UNIT 3462:814 S.F. EXISTING GARAGES CONVERTED TO LIVABLE FOR UNIT 3462: 344 S.F. ADDITION TO UNIT 3462 @ 1ST FLOOR:195 S.F. NEW DETACHED WORKSHOP/STORAGE:426 S.F. NEW FRONT COVERED PATIO:109 S.F. NEW REAR COVERED PATIO:239 S.F. 2941 S.F. TOTAL (34%) LANDSCAPING: TO REMAIN AS IS (EXCEPT AT NEW BLDG.FOOTPRINTS). PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING AFTER CONSTRUCTION: 48% OF LOT. USE ZONE: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB-NON RATED (EXISTING RESIDENCE IS NOT SPRINKLERED) 436 S.F. TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC REQUIREMENT:2.61 kWdc ROOF MOUNTED SYSTEM WATER HEATING:SINGLE 240V HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER EV CHARGING STATION:2 PROVIDED IN DRIVEWAY, PER SITE PLAN EARTHWORK VOLUMES:UNIT 3460: 0 UNIT 3462: 5.2 CU.YDS. CUT WORKSHOP: 5 CU.YDS. CUT FILL: 0 EXPORT: 10.2 CU.YDS. Civil Engineer: Ardolino Coastal Engineering p.o. Box 1226 Cardiff by the Sea, Ca. 92007 Contact: Brian Ardolino 760-334-1373 EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGES: EXISTING NORTH UNIT GARAGE: 3460 172 S.F. EXISTING SOUTH UNIT GARAGE: 3462 172 S.F. EXISTING NORTH UNIT: 3460 814 S.F. EXISTING SOUTH UNIT:3462 814 S.F. TOTAL EXISTING LIVABLE AREA:1628 S.F. NEW DETACHED WORKSHOP/STORAGE:426 S.F. PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGES: EXISTING NORTH UNIT: 3460 814 S.F. EXISTING SOUTH UNIT: 3462 814 S.F. AREA OF GARAGES CONVERTED TO ADU:344 S.F. ADDITION @ 2ND FLOOR FOR ADU:351 S.F. ADDITION TO UNIT 3462 AT 1ST FLOOR:195 S.F. ADDITION TO UNIT 3462 AT 2ND FLOOR:377 S.F. TOTAL PROPOSED LIVABLE AREA:2895 S.F. TOTAL LOCKABLE STORAGE AREA: UNIT 3460: (DETACHED) 160 S.F. LOCKABLE STORAGE AREA: UNIT 3462:(DETACHED)266 S.F. 436 S.F. TOTAL 8. Full Size Exhibits “A” – “I” dated July 1, 2026 on file in the Planning Division Exhibt 7 July 1, 2026 Item #3 76 of 84 LEGEND --------I N D/CA TES SURVEYED PROPERTY LIN E--------I N D/CA TES RIGHT OF WAY---I N DICATES STREET CEN TERLI N E--------I N D/CA TES LOT LIN E- - - - - - - - - -I N D/CA TES SURVEY REFEREN CE POIN T ( ... ) l-.. / H---ll ■ ... IE] I N DICATES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP 21442INDICATES RECORD DATA PER MAP 1747IND/CA TES RECORD DA TA PER MAP 14991IND/CA TES FOUN D MON UMEN T AS DESCRIBEDIN MO N UMEN T N OTESINDICATES FOUN D M-10 MON UMENT AS DESCRIBEDIN MO N UMEN T N OTESIND/CA TES EXISTIN G ELECTRIC METERIND/CA TES EXISTIN G GAS METERIND/CA TES WATER METER0 I N D/CA TES POWER POLE---"-----I N DICATES COMMUN ICATION OVERHEAD LIN E- --- -- - -I N D/CA TES ELECTRIC OVERHEAD LIN E------r□l------lO---I N D/CA TES EXISTIN G VARIABLE HEIGHT VIN YL FENCE-----x--- I N D/CA TES EXISTIN G VARIABLE HEIGHT WOOD FEN CE .I / I I N D/CA TES BUILDIN G FOOTPRIN T AT GROUN D LEVEL v? z:<Z½l ?'../j I N D/CA TES EXISTIN G WOOD STAIRS/DECK � � � � ��I I N DICATES EXISTIN G CON CRETE PAVER$ �t;�•-: �-·�·•-·��:'_ •• _.·_· •_/�---1 I N DICATES EXISTIN G CON CRETE SURFACE-I N D/CA TES MAJOR CON TOUR LI N EIND/CA TES MIN OR CON TOUR LIN EINDICATES SPOT ELEVATION (DIRT/GRASS)I N D/CA TES SPOT ELEVATION (FIN ISHED SURFACE ON HARDSCAPE) -----ACACIA STREET DETAIL A SCALE< r-20· 1" = 1 o' *INTENDED FOR 24"x36" PLOT-- --- -0 10 20 30 40 COFFMAN LAND� JN : 24236 COFFMAN LAN D CON SUL TIN G, IN C. (760)520-43409666 BUS/N ESSPARK AVE. SUITE 106, SAN DIEGO, CA 92131 r-1 I I I I I BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CHESTNUT AVENUE 3460 GARFIELD SI REET, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 APN= 204-150-24 ---=M=APLE AVENUE i:::i � � � 0 0t � i;2 cci � :----1 � cci � I [El � 0, " '-� I ;::::� � 0, 0, a oi Cl• ... p"� ,..I"' �1�""\ oi � ,_1,_ "') ,,.o a -. p I ··•_1;;'?,c .o �a a c:i � �1------------------------------------------------------- ... c:i !fJ@fiJuO@[}!] @[}' &@u ® N 56'00'41 "£ 121.21'(0 c:i aac:i ... ��f'J.fi::_ -:---s---r::--:R':��,-;';--��-r:-••1;",-;"1:"';"';;"�(N ';; 5�5�'5�8 ';; '4 "; 8 '�'£�1 ;; 2 i; 1.�12�')�T----:-....................... =�===4'=--=;:�....,.r-:::::::::! ,,_ . -��· rt 1�\J □ □ GE·L.r□ □ □ □ □-::�s □ □ w·�\�f□ c/S� □ C'-Pi'.JD □ □ □ c},'l □ □ □ �� °' ', J,,·,(CIJ_.,�-- •□□□□ ... • ;;0., //j ;cl�' □�□�□�-�□'_e}�.i""•T,,....,.......,_,._..., \ ,.'',-, ,, ';'0 I /f}'I I ~ "' , •I' ':; o. 7'; . WOOD DECK O O O O O 0 18.2' ----ti---ji-8.'·�: . .,_'.-H----� � � ��,-� � □□□□-□□□ EXISTING SHED -- ' I • I _,-, I �,..,. _,, ·.l.; ., • ,,\')l:',IS:::J □ □ □ □ □ □ ' • :. ', : -·' •!fJ@fiJuO@[}!] @[}' &@u ® --� � � � � � � � � CON CRETE ---�'.c:--l □□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □STA/RS □ □ □ □ □ □-117s0 □ ,. □ □ □ □ □;"I'll □ □ □□□□□□□□□ -A-"�□□ □ □ □ □ �l--□□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ □□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□ '□□□□□□□□□□ □□ □ □ □ □ □ [},:�,f.XCJ 1.2' -I X +-X LOT10 AND PORTION OFLOT9 ,,,.s-B--BlG-E�l3,.i::L.e__X--'---X----X, ----...! "'·t(□ □ □ □ □ X------1-1 a '' ' - I ·' 3460 GARFIELD STREET SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE FF=63.65' □□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 90\()\S-X � □□□□□□□□□Ll □□□□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□ □□ □ □ □ □ □ [l,,JJ □□ □□ □ □ □ □ /iftr·□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□ □,n □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ ['.:?.:�?□□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □□ 9:tFb □ □ □□ □□□tJ □□□□□□ ----------------------------� •□□□□□2□□ □□ □ □□□□□ x�' • • ; .,,_ • .- � _ • .,. /-, □ □ □ op'::.J'"□ □ □ d □ □ □ □ □ □ □□ .. .. . _pc;J □□□□□□qn•. □□ □□□D-□. •. :: •. • .. □ CONCRETE CY ,,0c.IHJ El] El □ □ □ El O LJ [:: I [l □ □ □□:�-t:Vb' □• --·. ·'' . STAIRS J l-·□ □ □ d □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ c.-, • . • .J □ ••. •. •. :_ •. • .• � � � � � □. . X N 56'00'44"£ 121.20' '[} '[} v .. , ' ' rn ,_,, . -c:i SEE DETAIL A --------+--------- - I ACACIA ----1--- 121.1 8' (121.17') {121.15'} STREET N 55'5 8'50"£ 732.16'(N 55'5 8'21 "E 732.15'){N 55'27'£ 732.00'J N 55'58'50"£ 762.16' (N 55'5 8'21 "£ 762.16') {N 55'27'£ 762.16'} {{N 55'2 8'00"£ 762.14'}}L ------------------_ J 1.3' � ;_ IV) :-,. (0 <O ... __: ...,: LO C'\j C'\j .....: ,.., "' "' ,l:: 3:: "' ::: It � "' "' • --"' b ;_ t') p p ... ;,;�� :z: :z: -'-'- 610.9 8 ' (610.9 8') {610.8 5' I I [ill ---• SHEET 1 OF 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUN TY OFSAN DIEGO, STA TE OF CALIFORN IA, DESCRIBED AS:THE SOUTHEASTERLY 26 FEET OF LOT 9 AN D ALL OF LOT 10,"BLOCK P" OF PALISADES, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUN TYOF SAN DIEGO, STA TE OF CALIFORN IA ACCORDIN G TO MAPTHEREOF N O. 1747, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUN TYRECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUN TY, FEBRUARY 5, 1923. UTILITY NOTE THE LOCATION S OF UN DERGROUN D UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON VISIBLE ABOVE GROUN D STRUCTfJRES AN D RECORD DRAWIN GS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR. THE DEPICTEDLOCATIONS, SIZES AN D TYPES OF UN DERGROUN DUTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY VARY FROM THE RECORD DRAWIN GSAND/OR ACTUAL AS-BUILT LOCATION S. ADDITION AL BURIEDUTlLITIES/.STRUCTURES MAY BE EN COUN TERED. N O EXCAVATION SWERE MADE DURIN G THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TOLOCATE BURIED UTILITIES/STRUCTURES. COFFMAN LAN D CON SUL TI N G AN D THE UNDERSIGN ED LAN DSURVEYOR MAKE N O CLAIM AS TO THE ACCURACY OFUNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON . THE USER OF THISSURVEY IS RECOMMENDED TO CON DUCT IN DEPEN DENT PHYSICALINSPECTION OF EACH U N DERGROUN D UTILITY PRIOR TOEXCAVATION OR CON STRUCTION . DATE OF SURVEY TOPOGRAPHIC DA TA AN D PLAN /METRICS SHOWN HEREIN WASOBTAINED BY TRADITION AL GROUN D SURVEY FIELD DATACOLLECTION METHODS .DA TE OF FIELD SURVEY: N OVEMBER 5, 2024 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARIN GS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CENTERLIN EOF GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP N O. 21442.I.E. N 34'00'39"£ CURRENT VESTED OWNER THE CURREN T VESTED OWNER AT THE DA TE OF THIS SURVEY IS:HEN RY VAN DER WEIT A N D MARILYN R VAN DER WEIT,A HUSBAN D AN D WIFE PER GRAN T DEEDDOCUMENT N O. 200 8-0621016 MONUMENT AND ANALYSIS NOTES 0 [El @] [Q] m [I] @] [ill FOUN D 2" PIPE & DISC STAMPED "LS 5 8 19" PER CR 2092 8.FOUN D M10 MON UMEN T STAMPED "RC£ 16583" PER PM 16289PER PARCEL MAP 21442. FOUN D LEAD & DISC STAMPED "RC£ 27214" PER CR 14995.FOUN D 3/4" PIPE & DISC STAMPED "LS 9117" PER PM 21442.FOUN D 3/4" PIPE & DISC STAMPED "RC£ 27214" PER CR 15010.FOUN D LEAD & DISC STAMPED "LS 6091" AT 1.50' OFFSET TOR/W, AS SHOWN ON CR 467 85.FOUN D LEAD & DISC STAMPED "LS 92 82" AT 1.50' OFFSET TOR/W PER CR 467 85.FOUN D 3/4" PIPE WITH DISC STAMPED "LS 4611" AT 30'OFFSET TO R/W PER MAP 1747. SURVEYOR'S CERT/FICA TION THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UN DER MY DIRECTION IN CON FORMA N CE WITH THE PROFESSION AL LAN D SURVEYORS ACT. N OVEMBER 21, 2024RIC DATE PR • SURVEYOR N O. 9312,EXP. 9/30/2026 July 1, 2026 Item #3 77 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 APPROX. LOCATION EX 4"CLAY SEWER LATERAL. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFYLOCATION, ELEVATION AND CONDITION Smartblocks.co.uk © PORTION OF LOT 9 GM WM GMEMEM EXIST.CONCRETE & STOOP COM COM COM N56°00'41"E 121.21' (N55°58'48"E 121.12') N56°00'44"E 121.20' N3 4 ° 0 0 ' 1 5 " W 7 2 . 0 2 ' N3 4 ° 0 0 ' 3 9 " W 7 2 . 0 2 ' N CL PL PL PL PL OE OE OE 7. 2 ' S I D E SE T B A C K 7. 2 ' S I D E SE T B A C K 20'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK NEW ADDITION @ 1ST FLR. TO UNIT #3462 TO BE CONVERTED TO ADU 46'-0" EXISTING 2 BEDRM. SOUTH UNIT NEW FRONT PORCH BOTH 1-CAR GARAGES EXISTING 2 BEDRM. NORTH UNIT EXIST. WD.DECK 20'-0" 8' - 6 " PARKING SPACE NEW WORKSHOP/STORAGE (< 14' HI W/ 3:12 PITCH) 7'-0" 18'-6" 14.4' REAR SETBACK10 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " ( E X I S T I N G ) 5'-0" (EXIST.) 5'-0" (EXIST.) EXIST. 3' HIPICKETFENCE EV CHARGING/VISITOR EXIS T .DRA I N A G E EXIS T . DRAI N A G E EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE 60'-0" R.O.W. 58.2 56.7 57.4 58.2 56.7 NOTE: NO CHANGES TO EXISTING R.O.W. OR DRIVEWAY. ALL ITEMS SHOWN ARE EXISTING U.N.O. NEW POST FOR NEW 2ND FLR. NEW POST FOR NEW 2ND FLR. NEW POST FOR NEW 2ND FLR. EXIST. DRAINAGE EXIST. DRAINAGE 12'-8" EV CHARGINGEQUIP; PER ORDINANCE NO.CS-437 EV CHARGINGEQUIP; PER ORDINANCENO.CS-437 PROVIDES 160 S.F. OF LOCKABLE STOR.SPACE PROVIDES 266 S.F. OF LOCKABLE STOR.SPACE 24 ' - 7 " STAIRS EXIST. 6' HI FENCE TO BE REMOVED FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK EXIST. 6' HI FENCE TO BE REMOVED FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK EXIST. LAND-SCAPING; (PRESERVED OPEN SPACE) EXIST. CAL.PEPPER TREE Smartblocks.co.uk © EXIST. LAND-SCAPING; (PRESERVED OPEN SPACE) EXIST. CAL.PEPPER TREE 60'-0" R.O.W. 0 5' 10' 20'40' ADJACENT RESIDENCE ADJACENT RESIDENCE ADJACENT RESIDENCE & STEPS WM EX V C P 8 " S E W E R P E R D W G 4 3 6 - 8 ( C L A Y ) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S EX 6 " A C W A T E R P E R D W G 1 7 0 - 6 , 13 9 - 7 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SSSS EX WATER METER AND 5/8" SERVICE(COPPER) EXIST.CONCRETE & STOOPSTAIRS EXIST. FENCERELOCATED NEW PARKING AREA (GRASSCRETE) EXIST. 3' HI PICKET FENCE EXIST. FENCE RELOCATED NEW PARKING AREA (GRASSCRETE) 170.6 S.F. 85 S.F. 16'-3" 10 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 16'-3" 9' PL. EXISTING LOWER ROOF NEW BALCONY EXISTING LOWER ROOF NEW CRICKETS @ LOWER NEW CRICKET @ LOWER ROOF ROOF LOWER EXIST. ROOF OVER GARAGE REMOVED 10' PL. 9' PL. NEW BALCONY 3:12 PITCH ASPHALT SHINGLE NEW UPPER ROOF (SHOWN DARKER) 3:12 PITCH ASPHALT SHINGLE NEW UPPER ROOF (SHOWN DARKER) 2'- 0 " 2'-0" 2'- 0 " 2'-0" 1'-812" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'- 0 " A 1/8" = 1'-0" -ROOF PLAN -SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NEW AREAS AT GROUND LEVEL SHOWN HATCHED July 1, 2026 Item #3 78 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 EXIST.WALLS TO REMAIN NEW 2X WD.STUD WALLS L E G E N D (FOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED, SEE EXIST.1ST FLR. PLAN; A-1) WALLS BELOW SOLATUBES.T. EXIST.WALLS TO REMAIN EXIST.WALLS TO BE REMOVED (FOR NEW WALLS, SEE 'PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLAN") L E G E N D DN W/C 30 8 0 T E M P . FR E N C H W / 2680 S. GUARDRAIL NEW BEDRM. NEW BATH NEW HALL NEW STAIRS BALC. 6 0 8 0 T E M P . S L . 16 8 0 T E M P . SI D E L I G H T NEWDR E S S E R LINEN NEW BALC. B A- D A-3 C A-3 E A-3 A A-2 CUPOLA ABV. 16 RISERS; TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EA. 11" TYP. PER NOTE#14 HANDRAIL PER NOTE #15 30 6 6 S . H . 30 6 6 S . H . 4066 S.H.4066 S.H. 3020 AWNING TEMP.3020 FIXED 3020 AWNING 4' X 4' 2680PKT.SL. NICHE 30" TEMPGL.DOOR SHWR. 26 8 0 HI SHLF DBL. POLE NEW CL. SINGL. POLE TV 2620 AWNING 2620 AWNING 50 5 0 T E M P . S . H . 3620 SL. 1340TEMP.S.H. 4066 S.H.4066 S.H.4050 S.H. AW N I N G 20 2 0 TEMP. 22"x30"MIN.ATTIC ACCESS(SEE NOTE #12) 22"x30" MIN.ATTIC ACCESS(SEE NOTE #12) (2 ) 3 0 1 0 T E M P . FI X E D T R A N S O M S NEW ADU FAMILY RM. S. REF. NEW ADU KITCHEN ADU NEW ADU DINING 2680 2680 3080 TEMP. FRENCH EX I S T . 2 8 6 8 FR E N C H EXIST. 2640 S.H. EXIST. 3040 S.H. EXIST. GARAGE EXIST. LIVING EXIST. KITCHEN EXIST. LAUN. EXIST. BEDRM. EXIST. BA. EXIST. BEDRM. EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EXIST. 3030 S.H. EXIST. 3640 S.H. EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EXIST. ATTICACCESS 3080 TEMP. FRENCH EX I S T . 2 8 6 8 FR E N C H EXIST. 2640 S.H. EXIST. 3040 S.H. EXIST. GARAGE EXIST. LIVING EXIST. KITCHEN EXIST. LAUN. EXIST. BEDRM. EXIST. BA. EXIST. BEDRM. EX I S T . 19 4 6 EX I S T . 43 4 6 EX I S T . 19 4 6 EX I S T . 3 0 4 0 S . H . S. H . F I X E D S . H . EXIST. 3030S.H. EX I S T . 3 0 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 2 8 6 8 FR . D O O R EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 F I X EXIST. ATTIC ACCESS WALLS REMOVED AS SHOWN GARAGE DOORS REMOVED ROOF OVER GARAGES REMOVED CLOSETS REMOVED DOOR/WALL REMOVED STEPS/DOOR REMOVED ENTIRE WALL REMOVED RE M O V E D RE M O V E D STEPS/DOOR REMOVED ROOF OVER GARAGES REMOVED 18 ' - 0 " ( E X I S T . ) 6' - 5 " ( E X I S T . ) 41'-9" (EXIST.) 17 ' - 2 " ( E X I S T . ) 2'-81 2" (EXIST.) 6' - 5 " ( E X I S T . ) 41'-9" (EXIST.) 17 ' - 2 " ( E X I S T . ) 2'-81 2" (EXIST.) 39 ' - 6 - 1 / 2 " ( E X I S T . ) REMOVED BEDROOM REMOVED ROOF OVER EX I S T . 19 4 6 EX I S T . 43 4 6 EX I S T . 19 4 6 S. H . FI X E D S. H . EXIST. 2640S.H. EXIST. 3040 S.H. EXIST. LIVING EXIST. KITCHEN EXIST. BA. EXIST. BEDRM. EX I S T . 20 4 6 EX I S T . 46 4 6 EX I S T . 20 4 6 S. H . FI X E D S. H . EXIST. 3030 S.H. EXIST. 3640 S.H. 3080 TEMP. FRENCH EX I S T . 2 8 6 8 FR E N C H EXIST. 2640 S.H. EXIST. 3040 S.H. EXIST. LIVING EXIST. KITCHEN EXIST. LAUN. EXIST. BEDRM. EXIST. BA. EXIST. BEDRM. EX I S T . 20 4 6 EX I S T . 46 4 6 EX I S T . 20 4 6 EX I S T . 3 0 4 0 S . H . S. H . F I X E D S . H . EXIST. 3030S.H. EX I S T . 3 0 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 2 8 6 8 FR . D O O R EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 S . H . EX I S T . 3 6 4 0 F I X 3068 TEMP. FRENCH EXIST.GARAGES CONVERTED TO NEW W/C SINKNEW NEW 26 6 8 ADU UP F.F: 63.65 F.F: 63.65 FLOOR OF CONVERTED GARAGE BROUGHT UP TO MATCH LIVING F.F. (converted from exist. garage) NEW STAIRS (converted fromexist. garage) (converted from exist. garage) BATH NEW COV. PATIO NEW STOR. DN REMODELED AREA OF MAIN HOUSE LINE OF ADDITION ABV. COV. PORCH NEW STEPS (converted fromexist. garage) A A-2 EXIST. CRAWL SPACE ACCESS UNDER WINDOW: SINK NEW 2880 50 8 0 T E M P . S L . NEW STAIRS NEW 3080 TEMP. FRENCH W/ (remodeled fromexist. area) NEW PLAYROOM 3462 GARFIELD 3460 GARFIELD NE W 2 6 6 8 NE W EXIST. LAUN. CONVERTED TO CLOSET 2680 CLOSET CONVERTED TO WDW. SEAT NEW (UNDER STAIRS) NEW BALC. ABOVE PR.2668 B A- D A-3 C A-3 E A-3 SHLVS. OR BUILT- IN NEW 2868 W D NEW W/C ADU LAUND.(converted fromexist. garage) NEW STOR. P A N T R Y NE W EXIST. CRAWL SPACE;ACCESS UNDER WINDOW: 331 S.F. 3080 TEMP. FRENCH G A-6 26 4 0 S . H . NEW WORKSHOP / STORAGE 2640 S.H.2640 S.H. H A-6 NEW AREA SHOWN HATCHED 16 RISERS; TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EA. 11" HANDRAIL PERNOTE #15 TYP. 8 RISERS; TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EA. 11 " TY P . NEW CL.(converted fromexist. garage) NE W 1 0 0 6 8 S L . N E W U P P E R NEW NEW 12" 2 EQ. RISERS; NOT TO EXCEED 7" MAX. NEW SL. HANDRAIL PERNOTE #15 NEW NE W 2 6 5 6 S. H . ( E G R E S S ) NE W 2 6 5 6 S. H . ( E G R E S S ) 3026 FIXED TEMP. TRANSOM 4066 S.H. 331 S.F. 4026 AWNINGTRANSOM 50 2 6 F I X E D TE M P . T R A N S O M 40 6 6 T E M P . S . H . 40 2 6 A W N I N G TE M P . T R A N S O M 8X8 POSTS TYP. STORAGE OVER POWDER RM. PER SECTION C 12" SQ. CONC. CURBS TYP. (DASHED) LINE OF ADDITION ABV. (DASHED) ADU BDRM. SHWR. NEW 30"X30" NEW ADU ADU 26 6 8 NEW ADU ENTRY NEW A-1 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -EXIST. & PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLANS PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN (ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING FLOOR PLAN (& DEMO PLAN) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE TYPICAL SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. 2. IN SHOWER/TUB COMBINATIONS, SHOWERS, BATHTUBS AND BIDETS, CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES. (CPC SECTIONS 408,409 & 410) 3. NEW WATER CLOSETS AND ASSOCIATED FLUSHOMETER VALVES, IF ANY, SHALL USE NO MORE THAN 1.28 GALLONS PER FLUSH. (FOR DUAL FLUSH TOILETS, THE EFFECTIVE FLUSH VOLUME IS THE AVERAGE FLUSH VOLUME). NEW KITCHEN FAUCETS MAY NOT EXCEED 1.8 GPM @ 60 PSI, AND LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.2 GPM @ 60 PSI., NEW SHOWERHEADS MAY NOT EXCEED 1.8 GPM @ 80 PSI. NEW IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS SHALL BE WEATHER OR SOIL MOISTURE-BASED. IF WEATHER-BASED, THE CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE EITHER A RAIN SENSOR OR BE EQUIPPED WITH A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM THAT ACCOUNTS FOR LOCAL RAINFALL. 4. ALL FRENCH DOORS TO HAVE TEMPERED GLASS. 5. ALL PLUMBING WALLS AND BATHROOM WALLS TO BE FULLY SOUND INSULATED WITH R-11 MIN. INSULATION BATTS. 6. INSULATE BETWEEN FLOORS PER TITLE 24 7. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR SCUPPER LOCATIONS AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 8. ALL SKYLIGHTS SHALL BE: VELUX (ICC-ES REPORT #: ESR-4108) OR EQUAL. SKYLIGHTS MUST BE TEMPERED GLASS OR "CLASS A" RATED ASSEMBLY WITH AN APPROVED LISTING. 9. ALL CEILING JOISTS AT DROPPED AREAS TO BE 2x6 AT 16" O.C. MINIMUM U.N.O. 10. PROVIDE A RECIRCULATING PUMP FOR EACH WATER HEATER. 11. ALL LOUVERED DOORS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH STUCCO. 12. ATTIC ACCESS SHALL HAVE 30" CLEAR HEADROOM IN ATTIC. SEE MECHANICAL NOTES FOR PASSAGEWAY REQUIREMENTS. 13. ALL NEW GLAZING (FENESTRATIONS) WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A CERTIFYING LABEL ATTACHED, SHOWING THE U-VALUE AND CERTIFICATION BY THE NATIONAL FENESTRATION RATING COUNCIL (NFRC) WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. 14. PROVIDE 42" HIGH PROTECTIVE RAILING FOR PORCHES, BALCONIES, AND OPEN SIDES OF LANDINGS. MAXIMUM OPENING BETWEEN RAILING IS 4". CRC SECTION R312.2 & R312.3) 15. PROVIDE HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE OF THE STAIRS-MIN. TOP OF HANDRAIL SHALL BE BETWEEN 34" & 38" ABV. NOSE OF TREADS. HANDGRIP PORTION SHALL BE BETWEEN 1-1/4" AND 2" DIAM. AND NOT LESS THAN 1-1/2" FROM WALL. ENDS OF HANDRAILS SHALL BE RETURNED OR SHALL HAVE ROUNDED TERMINATIONS OR BENDS. 16. ALL WEATHER EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL HAVE A WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER TO PROTECT THE INTERIOR WALL COVERING AND THAT EXTERIOR OPENING SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF. (CBC CHAPTER 14) 17. MINIMUM UNDERFLOOR VENTILATION SHALL BE EQUAL TO 1 SQ. FT. FOR EACH 150 SQ. FT. OF UNDERFLOOR AREA. ONE VENT SHALL DOUBLE AS AN ACCESS PANEL, AND SHALL HAVE A 18" X 24" CLEAR, MINIMUM OPENING, UNOBSTRUCTED BY DUCTS, PIPES ETC. ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH CORROSION RESISTANT MESH OF ¼" OPENINGS. UNDERFLOOR VENTS SHALL BE LOCATED AS CLOSE TO CORNERS AS PRACTICAL AND SHALL PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION. THE REQUIRED AREA OF THESE OPENINGS SHALL BE EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED ALONG THE LENGTH OF AT LEAST TWO OPPOSITE SIDES. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. PER CODE: S.F./150 = S.F.) SO… SQ.FT. X144 = SQ.IN. NEEDED PROVIDE: ( ) 6" X 14" MIN. GALVANIZED VENTS @ 38 SQ.IN. = SQ. IN. ( 1 ) 18" X 24" MIN. VENTED ACCESS PANEL = 216 SQ.IN. = SQ.IN.. TOTAL 18. FIRE STOPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: A. IN CONCEALED SPACES OF STUD WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INCLUDING FURRED SPACES, AT THE CEILING AND FLOOR LEVELS AND AT 10 FT. INTERVALS BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL: B. AT ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCUR AT SOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS AND COVE CEILINGS C. IN OPENINGS AROUND VENTS,PIPES,DUCTS,CHIMNEYS,FIREPLACES AND SIMILAR OPENINGS THAT AFFORD A PASSAGE FOR FIRE AT CEILING AND FLOOR LEVELS, WITH NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. D. AT OPENINGS BETWEEN ATTIC SPACES AND CHIMNEY CHASES FOR FACTORY-BUILT CHIMNEYS. 19. GAS VENTS AND NONCOMBUSTIBLE PIPING IN WALLS, PASSING THROUGH THREE FLOORS OR LESS, SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY DRAFT STOPPED AT EACH FLOOR OR CEILING. 20. COMBUSTION AIR FOR FUEL BURNING WATER HEATER WILL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. 21. GAS WATER HEATERS REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 2 STRAPS TO RESIST HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ¾" 24" GAUGE STRAPS WITH ¼" X 3" LAG BOLTS ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE FRAMING. PROVIDE A CONDENSATE DRAIN INSTALLED NO HIGHER THAN 2" ABOVE THE BASE OF THE WATER HEATER THAT ALSO ALLOWS FOR GRAVITY DRAINAGE. INSTANTANEOUS WATER HEATERS SHALL HAVE ISOLATION VALVES ON BOTH THE COLD AND THE HOT WATER PIPING LEAVING THE WATER HEATER COMPLETE WITH HOSE BIBS OR OTHER FITTINGS ON EACH VALVE FOR FLUSHING THE WATER HEATER WHEN THE VALVES ARE CLOSED. ES 110.3 THE "B" VENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A STRAIGHT POSITION FROM THE ROOM CONTAINING THE WATER HEATER TO THE ROOF TERMINATION. (FOR FUTURE POSSIBLE SLEEVING FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY HEATER VENTING). A 120-VOLT RECEPTACLE ACCESSIBLE TO THE HEATER SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 3' 22. ALL DOMESTIC HOT WATER PIPING TO HAVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM INSULATION INSTALLED: 1 2" PIPE (1 2" INSULATION): 3 4" PIPE (1" INSULATION): 1" TO 1-1/2" PIPE (1-1/2" INSULATION) CPC 609.11 & ES 150.0(j). ADDITIONALLY, THE 12 HOT WATER PIPE TO THE KITCHEN SINK, AND THE COLD-WATER PIPE WITHIN 5' OF THE WATER HEATER BOTH REQUIRE 1" MINIMUM INSULATION. July 1, 2026 Item #3 79 of 84 EXIST.WALLS TO REMAIN NEW 2X WD.STUD WALLS L E G E N D (FOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED, SEE EXIST.1ST FLR. PLAN; A-1) WALLS BELOW SOLATUBES.T. DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 9'-0"5'-10"24'-9"6'-31 2" 20'-101 2"29'-91 2"9'-0" 17 ' - 1 1 1 2" 9' - 2 1 2" 17 ' - 1 0 1 2" 5' - 6 1 2" 3'- 9 " 5' - 6 1 2" 10'-2"9'-11" WALLS BELOW WALLS BELOW WALLS BELOW 3'-6" 3' - 5 " S T A I R WI D T H GUARDRAIL EQ . 6'- 9 " 6' - 9 " EQ . 2'-7"5'-31 2" 3'-0"7'-11"6'-6"5'-0"5'-0"2'-41 2" 3'- 1 " 2'-10"12"3'-2"5'-9" 1' - 1 0 1 2" 2'-4" EXIST. WALL NEW WALL BLW.BLW. EX I S T . WA L L NE W WA L L BL W . BL W . EX I S T . WA L L NE W WA L L BL W . BL W . 11'-11" OPENING 2'-7"9'-31 2"10'-61 2" GUARDRAIL 3' - 3 " 3' - 1 1 2" 5'-0" (2680 PKT.SL.)1'-7" 3' - 3 " 3'-51 2" S.T. 4'-21 2" 4'-31 2"3'-111 2"3'-3" RISER ALIGNS W/ (E) WALLBLW. 11" TYP. 16 RISERS; TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EA. 12 ' - 5 " EXIST.WALL BLW. NEW WALL BLW. 3'- 9 " 81 2" 18 ' - 0 " ( E X I S T . ) 9'-0"15'-81 2" 6' - 5 " ( E X I S T . ) 41'-9" (EXIST.) 17 ' - 2 " ( E X I S T . ) 6'-0" 2'-81 2" (EXIST.) 6' - 5 " ( E X I S T . ) 41'-9" (EXIST.) 17 ' - 2 " ( E X I S T . ) 2'-81 2" (EXIST.) STAIR LANDING ABV. 5' - 6 1 2" 9'-0"15'-81 2" 12 ' - 5 " 17 ' - 1 1 1 2" 19 ' - 1 1 1 2" 12 ' - 0 " 13'-0" 28'-0" 6' - 0 " LANDING ABV. 3'-6"14 TREADS @ 11" EACH = 12'-10"3' - 5 " 5' - 5 1 2" A L I G N A L I G N FROM (E) WALL 312" 312" 1" AIR- SPACE 312" 312" 1" AIR-SPACE 31 2"31 2" 1" AIR- SPACE SPACE 5'-11 2" 2'-0" 4" 12 " 5'-11 2" 1'-7" 5' - 0 " 2'-31 2" 2'- 3 1 2" 5' - 1 " 5' - 0 1 2" 4" 6 T R E A D S @ 1 1 " EA C H = 5 ' - 6 " 3' - 1 " 3'-6" 16 RISERS; TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EA. RISERS TO BE EQUAL AND NOT TO EXCEED 7-1/2" EACH 5'-81 2" A L I G N 5'-2"2'-111 2" 4' - 5 1 2" 3'- 3 1 2" 4' - 3 " EQ. 2'- 3 1 2" 3'- 0 " 3' - 5 " 8X8 POSTS TYP. RISERABV. S.T. 5'-6" 2' - 2 " 3' - 3 - 1 / 2 " 30"x30"SHWR. 12 ' - 0 " 13'-0" 15'-0" 18 ' - 0 " PR.2668 28'-0" 6' - 0 " 26 4 0 S . H . NEW WORKSHOP / STORAGE 10' WIDE X 8' HIGH GARAGE DOOR 2668 DOOR 2640 S.H.2640 S.H. H A-6 CURB CURBCURB SL O P E : 1 / 4 " / F T . 5'-2"2'-111 2" 4'- 5 1 2" 3' - 3 1 2" 4'- 3 " 2' - 4 1 2" EQ.EQ.10'-0" A-2 1/4" = 1'-0" 1ST FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -DIMENSION PLANS 2ND FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" WORKSHOP FLOOR & DIMENSION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" July 1, 2026 Item #3 80 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 10 ' - 0 " 8'- 1 " EXIST. TOP PL. EXIST. FIN.FLR. TOP PL. 2ND F.F.24 ' - 6 " 30 ' - 0 " TOP PL. 9' - 0 " ( S T U B E N D T R U S S ) 2ND F.F. 9' - 0 " H D R . H T . @ 1 0 ' P L A T E S EXIST./FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE NEW 2ND FLOOR ADDITION NEW FRONT PORCH NEW SHINGLES TO MATCH EXIST.-TYP. NEW ROOFS TO MATCH EXIST.-TYP. NEW WINDOWS/ DOORS TO MATCH EXIST.- TYP. 2' - 6 " EXIST. ROOF/ CONC.STOOP & STEPS TO BE REMOVED EXIST. ROOF/ WD. DECK & STEPS 3 12 3 12 8'- 1 " EXIST. TOP PL. EXIST. FIN.FLR. 8'- 0 " H D R . H T . @ 9 ' P L A T E S 9' - 0 " H D R . H T . @ 1 0 ' P L A T E S 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. 2ND F.F. TOP PL. 9' - 0 " ( S T U B E N D T R U S S ) 2ND F.F.2ND F.F.2ND F.F. 30 ' - 0 " EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE NEW COV. PATIO EXIST. 1ST FLOOR ADDITION @ 1ST FLOOR NEW 2ND FLOOR ADDITION DOOR/STOOP/ STEPS AND SHED ROOF TO BE REMOVED 26 ' - 0 " 2- 6 " 3 12 3 12 A-3 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -ELEVATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" July 1, 2026 Item #3 81 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 NEW COV. PATIO 8' - 1 " EXIST. TOP PL. TOP PL. 9' - 0 " ( S T U B E N D T R U S S ) 2ND F.F. 8' - 0 " H D R . H T . @ 9 ' P L A T E S 27 ' - 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. 2ND F.F. EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE NEW 2ND FLOOR ADDITION ADDITION @ 1ST FLOOR NEW ROOFS TO MATCH EXIST.-TYP. NEW SHINGLES TO MATCH EXIST.-TYP. NEW WINDOWS/ DOORS TO MATCH EXIST.- TYP. EXIST.STORAGE SPACE @ CRAWL SPACE ACCESS 2' - 6 " EXIST. ROOF/ CONC.STOOP & STEPS TO BE REMOVED EXIST. ROOF/ WD. DECK & STEPS EXIST.STORAGE SPACE @ CRAWL SPACE ACCESS 3 12 3 12 8' - 1 " EXIST. TOP PL. EXIST. FIN.FLR. TOP PL. 9' - 0 " ( S T U B E N D T R U S S ) 2ND F.F. 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. 2ND F.F. 9'- 0 " H D R . H T . @ 1 0 ' P L A T E S 8' - 0 " H D R . H T . @ 9 ' P L A T E S 2ND F.F.2ND F.F. 30 ' - 0 " EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE EXIST./ FIN.GRADE NEW COV. PATIO NEW 2ND FLOOR ADDITION EXIST. 1ST FLOOR ADDITION @ 1ST FLOOR LINE OF PAVERS LINE OF PAVERS LINE OF PAVERS 26 ' - 0 " 2- 6 " 4' - 4 " EXIST. ROOF/ WD. DECK & STEPS 3 12 A-4 1/4" = 1'-0" REAR (EAST) ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -ELEVATIONS NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" July 1, 2026 Item #3 82 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 58.4 8' - 1 " NEW FLR.JSTS. NEW FLR. JSTS. EXIST. GRADE TOP PL. NEW PLYWD. SHTH'G EXIST. FTG./ F.F: 63.65 STEM WALL EXIST.HDR. EXIST. SLAB OF GARAGE 58.0 EXIST. SLAB REMOVED OF REC RM. NEW SLAB/FIN.FLR EXIST. FLR.JSTS. REMOVED EXIST. STEM WALL REMOVED EXISTING CRAWL SPACE CONVERTED EXIST. CLOS. REMOVEDNEW WALL FRAMED UP TO EXIST. HDR. EXIST.GARAGEDR. REMOVED NEWWALL NEW ADU ENTRY ALIGN W/ EXIST. RESIDENCE EXIST. WALL/WINDOW REMOVED EXIST./FIN.GRADE NEW FTG. NEW SLAB EXIST. NEW NEW STOR. NEW BEDRM.EXISTING AREA, REMODELED NEW STEPS & FRONT PORCH NEW ADU FAMILY RM. NEW HALL NEW BALCONY NEW BM. NEW 2ND F.F. NEW TOP PL. NEW FLR.JSTS. NEW COV. PATIO GARAGES REMOVED EXIST. ROOF OVER NEW BALC. NEW DECK JSTS; RIP CLG. JSTS. TO CREATE VAULTED CLG. PER SECTION E NEW STUB-END ROOF TRUSSES NEW BEDRM.9'- 0 " 30' 10 ' - 0 " 61.8 61.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 (ASSUMED) 4' - 1 0 " EXIST./ NEW TOP PL. SLOPE: 1/4"/FT. TO SLOPE NEW DECK JSTS; RIP TO SLOPE 61.26 PL 61.67 EXIST. CURB 61.85 DRIVEWAY EXIST./FIN. GRADE EXIST./FIN. EXIST./FIN.GRADE 57 58 EXIST. STREET NEW PWDR. 8' - 6 " ADU LAUND.(converted from exist. garage) NEW ROOF TRUSSES 30' HEAD OUT FOR 3'X2' DOOR OPENING AT STORAGE AREA (SEE SEC. E) GRADE EXIST./FIN. NEWWALL EXIST.WALL POST BEYOND NEW (converted fromexist. garage) NEW HALL A-5 1/4" = 1'-0" SITE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -SITE SECTIONJuly 1, 2026 Item #3 83 of 84 DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB NO. KR I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T 7 6 0 S A X O N Y R O A D , E N C I N I T A S , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 2 4 PH O N E : 7 6 0 - 4 7 9 - 0 5 3 7 E M A I L : k r i s t i n v o n z w e c k a r c h i t e c t @ g m a i l . c o m WE B S I T E : A R C H I T E C T B Y T H E S E A . C O M 5-31-2026 24221 KVZ KVZ TH E S E W O R K S A R E P R O T E C T E D U N D E R T H E C O P Y R I G H T L A W O F 1 9 9 0 A N D M A Y N O T B E D U P L I C A T E D , P U B L I S H E D , S O L D , O R U S E D I N W H O L E O R I N P A R T W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . TH E S E P L A N S A N D A L L C O N T A I N E D T H E R E O N A R E A N O R I G I N A L , U N P U B L I S H E D W O R K O F K R I S T I N V O N Z W E C K , A R C H I T E C T . VA N D E R W E I T A D D I T I O N 34 6 0 & 3 4 6 2 G A R F I E L D S T R E E T CA R L S B A D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 0 0 8 AN D R E M O D E L CDP2025-0020 12 ' - 0 " 13'-0" 15'-0" 18 ' - 0 " PR.2668 28'-0" 6'- 0 " G A-6 26 4 0 S . H . NEW WORKSHOP / STORAGE 10' WIDE X 8' HIGH GARAGE DOOR 2668 DOOR 2640 S.H.2640 S.H. H A-6 CURB CURBCURB SL O P E : 1 / 4 " / F T . 3:12 PITCH ASPHALT SHINGLE 8' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. NEW TRUSSES NEW TRUSSES NEW CAL. FILL 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. NEW WORKSHOP / STORAGE LEAVE 1" AIR GAP BETWEEN WD.FRM'G & CONC. WALL 2' - 0 " SECTION G CONC. CURB WHERE SHOWN ON FLOOR PLANGRADE GRADE REMOVED REMOVED EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. CURB TO 6" HIGHER THAN FIN. GRADE NEW WORKSHOP / STORAGE GRADE REMOVED EXIST./FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 58.6 58 57 56.7 8'- 0 " TOP PL. F.F. 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. 12 ' - 6 " 6'- 8 " GRADEREMOVED EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 3 12 8'- 0 " TOP PL. F.F. 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. G A-6 13 ' - 0 " H A-6 6'- 8 " FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 3 12 56.7 56.7 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. G A-6 12 ' - 6 " H A-6 EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 3 12 10 ' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F.57 58 56.8 8' - 0 " TOP PL. F.F. 13 ' - 0 " EXIST./ FIN. GRADE EXIST./ FIN. GRADE 3 12 A-6 1/4" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN / DIMENSION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" -WORKSHOP/STORAGE PLANS ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION G SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION H SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" July 1, 2026 Item #3 84 of 84 VanderWeit Addition & Remodel Mackenzie VanZyverden, Assistant Planner Community Development July 1, 2026 SDP2025-0011 / CDP2025-0020 (DEV2025-0007) 1 2 P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n •3460-3462 Garfield Street •0.18 acres •1,628-square-foot, one-story duplex •General Plan: R-23 (19-13 du/ac) •Zoning: Multiple-Family Residential, R-3 •Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) 3 4 E l e v a t i o n s 5 E l e v a t i o n s Va n d e r W e i t A d d i t i o n & R e m o d e l Staff has reviewed the scope of the project and finds that the project belongs to a class of projects that are categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to §15303(a) – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. CEQA Exemption Determination 6 Project Consistency 7 •General Plan (R-23, Residential, 19-23 du/ac) •Zoning Ordinance (R-3, Multi-Family Residential) •Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone •Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment) Va n d e r W e i t A d d i t i o n & R e m o d e l Recommended Action 8 ADOPT the resolution APPROVING the Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit, and the CEQA Exemption Determination. Va n d e r W e i t A d d i t i o n & R e m o d e l