The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAV 96-05; Avocet Aviara PA 4 Lot 6; Administrative Variance (AV) (7)LOT 6 - AVOCET -. CITY OF CARLSBAD - LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEFT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) fi4bQ3 \q '3 General Plan Amendment Master Plan Specific Plan Precise Development Plan Tentative Tract Map Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Condominium Permit Special Use Permit Redevelopment Permit Obtain from Eng. Dept Administrative Variance Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Local Coastal Plan Amendment Site Development Plan Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit Environmental Impact Assessment Variance Planned Industrial Permit Coastal Development Permit I, Planning Commission Determination List any other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 3) PROJECT NAME: 215-602-60 AVOCET AVIARA PLANNING AREA 4 (LOT 6) 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO ALLOFj 5' PRIVACY WALL WITHIN FRONTYARD SETBACK. 5) OWNER 6) APPLICANT I I NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) RDC DEVCO I1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NAME (PRINT OR TYPE HUNSAKER ti ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. I I ~~~~~ ~ MAILING ADDRESS 180 NORTH RIVERVIEW, SUITE 130 MAILING ADDRESS 10179 HUENNEKENS STREET, SUITE 200 TELEPHONE I CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE I I ANAHEIM, CA 92808 (714) 998-2550 I SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619)558-4500 I THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF 7)w~-&D,,doN: PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16228 (CARLSBAD TRACT 85-35 PHASE 1 - UNIT C) 3 LOT 6 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOW PAGE 2 OF 2 I I STREET ADDRESS ON THE I SOUTH SIDE OF ALGA RD (NORTH, SOUTH EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN AND 1 .- (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE El 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDMSION (RES/ corn/ INDUS) 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 0 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 1’1 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ____ 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF w1 14) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL IN/A] 15) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL [N/AI OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 1.111 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 0 IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE UNITS 20) EXISTING GENERAL DESIGNATION 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN Fl El 23) PROPOSED ZONING 24) IN THE THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING W BOARD MEMBERS, OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE JECT OF THIS APPLICATION. VWE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: R),g*.baprQ%’?FL?% IYL’$SaLU Wkld APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED I I I 1 TOTAL FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED BY: FRM0016 3196 ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT I I RECEIPT NO. 3523 @ Printed on recycled paper. NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY CASH REGISTER TOTAL 1 $39 ._. . DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OFDISCLOSURE OR CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. ADDlicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT 180 NORTH RIVERVIEW ANAHEIM, CA 92808 2. Owner List the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the property involved. RDC DEVCO -HTP 180 NORTH RIVERVIEW ANAHEIM, CA 92808 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. N/A 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a names and addresses of any person serving as officer or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. N/A DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 non-profit organization or a trust, list the director of the non-profit organization or PAGE 1 of 2 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1 161 @ ~~~ ~~~ LOT 6 Disclosure Statement 5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member o€.City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s) Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) X Print or type name of owner X Print or type name of applicant DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: AVOCET, PLANNING AREA 4 (LOT 6) .- - APPLICANT NAME: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIKEES( FOR REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT) Please describe fully the proposed project. include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 5' WALL WITHIN THE 20' FRONTYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT. THIS IS A DECORATIVE SCREEN/PRIVACY WALL. Rev. 4/91 ProjDesc.frm .. . ,- AVOCET - PARCEL 6 JUSTIFICATION FOR V&UANCE By law a Va Aice nray be approved only 2 L~lt~;,I Lcts are found to exist. P!casr read these requirements carehlly and esplain how the proposed project meets each of these facts. Use additional sheets if necessary. "" -. ._. . - .e 1. Explain why there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the sane vicinity and zone: SEE ATTACHED 2. Explain why such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question: SEE ATTACHED 3. Explain why the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located: SEE ATTACHED 4. Explain why the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive plan: SEE ATTACHED FRM0004 2/96 Page 5 of 5 c P PARCEL 6 JUSTIFICATION 1. This property has extraordinary circumstances or conditions related to it that do not apply generally to other properties in the area (with the exception of Parcel 8). This lot is subject to a 50’ rear yard setback from Alga Road. It is also proposes a Plan 1 which is the single story unit of the architectural drawings. Due to Council Policy No. 44, the City’s policy which establishes guidelines for small lot developments, the Plan I is the only plan type that would work on this lot. Furthermore, the architectural drawings for Plan 1 show a 5’ decorative privacy wall which runs parallel to the front of the structure at the southeastern corner of the building. This variance request is for the allowance of the wall to encroach approximately 1.5’ into the 20’ front yard setback requirement. 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question because owners of the same model of other homes in the neighborhood have constructed identical privacy walls. The privacy walls were shown on the building plan elevations and sales brochures with no indication that some lots could not accommodate the walls due to encroachment into the front yard setbacks. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the location of the wall, which is only 3‘ from the structure, does not substantially reduce open space and does not create sight distance problems for neighbors. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive plan because the proposed variance allowing a privacy wall in the front yard setback of a single family residence does not conflict with the goals and objectives specified in any element of the City of Carlsbad General Plan.