HomeMy WebLinkAboutAV 96-05; Avocet Aviara PA 4 Lot 6; Administrative Variance (AV) (7)LOT 6 - AVOCET
-. CITY OF CARLSBAD -
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(FOR DEFT
USE ONLY)
(FOR DEPT
USE ONLY) fi4bQ3 \q '3
General Plan Amendment Master Plan
Specific Plan
Precise Development Plan
Tentative Tract Map
Planned Development Permit
Non-Residential Planned Development
Condominium Permit
Special Use Permit
Redevelopment Permit
Obtain from Eng. Dept
Administrative Variance
Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit
Local Coastal Plan Amendment
Site Development Plan
Zone Change
Conditional Use Permit
Hillside Development Permit
Environmental Impact Assessment
Variance
Planned Industrial Permit
Coastal Development Permit
I, Planning Commission Determination
List any other applications not specified
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).
3) PROJECT NAME:
215-602-60
AVOCET AVIARA PLANNING AREA 4 (LOT 6)
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO ALLOFj
5' PRIVACY WALL WITHIN FRONTYARD SETBACK.
5) OWNER 6) APPLICANT I
I NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) RDC DEVCO I1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NAME (PRINT OR TYPE HUNSAKER ti ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. I I ~~~~~ ~
MAILING ADDRESS
180 NORTH RIVERVIEW, SUITE 130
MAILING ADDRESS
10179 HUENNEKENS STREET, SUITE 200
TELEPHONE I CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE I I ANAHEIM, CA 92808 (714) 998-2550 I SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619)558-4500 I
THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE
IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
7)w~-&D,,doN: PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16228 (CARLSBAD TRACT 85-35
PHASE 1 - UNIT C)
3 LOT 6
CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOW PAGE 2 OF 2 I I
STREET ADDRESS
ON THE I SOUTH SIDE OF ALGA RD
(NORTH, SOUTH EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET)
BETWEEN AND 1 .-
(NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE El
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
13) TYPE OF SUBDMSION
(RES/ corn/ INDUS)
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
0 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 1’1 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
____ 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
w1 14) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL IN/A] 15) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL [N/AI
OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE
1.111 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 0 IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING
17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE
UNITS
20) EXISTING GENERAL
DESIGNATION
21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN Fl
El 23) PROPOSED ZONING
24) IN THE THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING W BOARD MEMBERS, OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE
JECT OF THIS APPLICATION. VWE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION: R),g*.baprQ%’?FL?% IYL’$SaLU Wkld APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
I I I 1
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
RECEIVED BY:
FRM0016 3196
ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT
I I
RECEIPT NO. 3523
@ Printed on recycled paper.
NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY
CASH REGISTER TOTAL 1 $39
._. .
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OFDISCLOSURE OR CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY
APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. ADDlicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT
180 NORTH RIVERVIEW
ANAHEIM, CA 92808
2. Owner
List the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the property involved.
RDC DEVCO -HTP
180 NORTH RIVERVIEW
ANAHEIM, CA 92808
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names
and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning
any partnership interest in the partnership.
N/A
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a
names and addresses of any person serving as officer or
as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. N/A
DISCLOS.FRM 2/96
non-profit organization or a trust, list the
director of the non-profit organization or
PAGE 1 of 2
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1 161 @
~~~ ~~~
LOT 6
Disclosure Statement
5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member o€.City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s)
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other
political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
X
Print or type name of owner
X
Print or type name of applicant
DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME: AVOCET, PLANNING AREA 4 (LOT 6) .- -
APPLICANT NAME: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIKEES( FOR REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT)
Please describe fully the proposed project. include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation:
REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 5' WALL WITHIN THE 20'
FRONTYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT. THIS IS A DECORATIVE
SCREEN/PRIVACY WALL.
Rev. 4/91 ProjDesc.frm
.. . ,-
AVOCET - PARCEL 6
JUSTIFICATION FOR V&UANCE
By law a Va Aice nray be approved only 2 L~lt~;,I Lcts are found to exist. P!casr read these
requirements carehlly and esplain how the proposed project meets each of these facts. Use additional
sheets if necessary.
"" -. ._. . - .e
1. Explain why there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in
the sane vicinity and zone:
SEE ATTACHED
2. Explain why such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property
in question:
SEE ATTACHED
3. Explain why the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is
located:
SEE ATTACHED
4. Explain why the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive plan:
SEE ATTACHED
FRM0004 2/96 Page 5 of 5
c
P
PARCEL 6 JUSTIFICATION
1. This property has extraordinary circumstances or conditions related to it
that do not apply generally to other properties in the area (with the
exception of Parcel 8). This lot is subject to a 50’ rear yard setback from
Alga Road. It is also proposes a Plan 1 which is the single story unit of the
architectural drawings. Due to Council Policy No. 44, the City’s policy which
establishes guidelines for small lot developments, the Plan I is the only
plan type that would work on this lot. Furthermore, the architectural
drawings for Plan 1 show a 5’ decorative privacy wall which runs parallel to
the front of the structure at the southeastern corner of the building. This
variance request is for the allowance of the wall to encroach approximately
1.5’ into the 20’ front yard setback requirement.
2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity
and zone but which is denied to the property in question because owners of
the same model of other homes in the neighborhood have constructed
identical privacy walls. The privacy walls were shown on the building plan
elevations and sales brochures with no indication that some lots could not
accommodate the walls due to encroachment into the front yard setbacks.
3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone
in which the property is located because the location of the wall, which is
only 3‘ from the structure, does not substantially reduce open space and
does not create sight distance problems for neighbors.
4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive
plan because the proposed variance allowing a privacy wall in the front
yard setback of a single family residence does not conflict with the goals
and objectives specified in any element of the City of Carlsbad General
Plan.