Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 00-46; Sisson Minor Subdivision; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (3)City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 24, 2001 Craig Sisson 411 Tamarack Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CDP 00-46 - SISSON MINOR SUBDIVISION The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on January 7, 2002. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 10:00. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Mike Grim at (760) 602-4623. CITY OF CARLSBAD ^^^^U GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:mg:jt c: » File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Public Works - Engineering March 19, 2001 Craig Sisson 411 Tamarack Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 MS 00-08: SISSON MINOR SUBDIVISION COMPLETE APPLICATION & INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits within the City of Carlsbad. Engineering Department staff has reviewed the tentative parcel map, application No. MS 00-08, as to its completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of the application may have already begun, the official acceptance date of the application is the date of this letter. Staff may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, design issues exist which must be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination to approve or deny the project. These issues of concern are as follows: 1. On the tentative parcel map: a. Provide a dimensioned cross section of Tamarack Avenue; b. Recheck the new property line lengths on the west property line. According to the scale, the lengths should be exchanged; c. Add the bearings to all property lines; d. Add MS 00-08 at the top of the Map; e. Under "informational notes", indicate which parcel is 0.57 AC and 0.29 AC instead of labeling max. or min; f. Add the following to the legend: i. Under "15", add that the junction box is to be removed. ii. Under "22", add that the wood fence is to be removed. iii. Under "24", add water meter and service line to be abandoned. iv. Under "26", indicate that the overhead utility lines are to be placed underground. The project will be conditioned to require the lines to be located underground prior to recordation of the parcel map. v. Under "8", the Asphalt pavement must be replaced with P.C.C. apron within the public right-of-way, including the proposed dedication. g. Show location of street sewer and water main. 2. Correct the right-of-way dedication to read "10 feet from face of curb" instead of 20 feet. Readjust the easement boundary line accordingly. 3. Show proposed grading of Parcel 1. All subdivisions are required to show grading of each developable lot. Provide grading quantities. 4. Extend the driveway for Parcel 2 to the garage. Provide at least 24 feet of paved area for vehicle backup so that drivers can exit onto Tamarack Avenue in a forward position. The "loop" design shown between the paved and gravel driveway is only temporary and a future solution must be addressed before the subdivision is to occur. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 6O2-272O - FAX (760) 6O2-8562 QENERfci SERVICES. CSStlES; Place a street tree on Parcel 1. Because of utility conflicts, the tree needs to be placed on private property approximately 3 to 4 feet from the new right-of-way boundary. Plant a 15 gallon Canary Island Palm or Sristania Conferta. Other species may be acceptable. Contact Fred Burnell in the Carlsbad Public Works General Service Division if further details are needed or if you wish to use a species other than the ones listed above. 6. The Tentative Parcel Map indicates that two water meters are located on the panhandle to Parcel 2. If one meter is for Parcel 1 then that existing service shall be abandoned and a new service line installed for Parcel 1. The meter service to Parcel 2 must be abandoned and a new service line installed and located between the property line and edge of concrete driveway, behind sidewalk. Place both meters in the public right-of-way fronting their respective properties and located as close together as possible. 7. The tentative parcel map will not be valid until a coastal development permit is issued. Coastal Development Permit 00-46 will not be scheduled to the Planning Commission until all issues with the tentative parcel map are resolved. Attached is a red-lined check print of the project for your use in making the requested revisions. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. Submit five sets of plans with your next plan check submittal. If you have any questions regarding the engineering issues of concern, please contact me at (760) 602- 2781. Sincerely, DAVID RICK Assistant Engineer - Land Development Section Attachment: redlined parcel map c: (letter only) file Senior Engineer - Land Development Section Planner - Mike Grim Fred Burnell - General Services Kurt Musser - Maintenance and Operations !LE COPY City of Carlsbad Planning Department October 26, 2000 Mr. Craig Sisson 411 Tamarack Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CDP 00-46 - SISSON MINOR SUBDIVISION Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit, application no. CDP 00-46, as to its issues of concern. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. Please contact your staff planner, Mike Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:MG:mh Chris DeCerbo David Rick File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ISSUES OF CONCERN No. CDP 00-46 - SISSON MINOR SUBDIVISION Planning: 1. The proposed two-lot panhandle subdivision meets all applicable regulations of the One Family Residential (R-1-7,500) Zone with regard to lot dimensions and street frontage, panhandle width and depth, and lot area. 2. The proposed subdivision requires the filing of a Tentative Parcel Map (also known as a Minor Subdivision) through the Engineering Department. The Minor Subdivision submitted with this Coastal Development Permit (MS 00-08) was rejected because it was not prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor. You should note that no processing of the Coastal Development Permit is possible without an accompanying Minor Subdivision application. Staff is obliged to present the Coastal Development Permit to the final decision-making body (i.e. the Planning Commission) within six (6) months from the receipt of a complete application. The Coastal Development Permit application was deemed complete on September 30, 2000. Therefore, the Coastal Development Permit must be heard by the Planning Commission before March 30, 2000. Should a Minor Subdivision not be processed within that time, you may request a 90-day extension, withdraw the Coastal Development Permit, or go forward to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial. MEMORANDUM August 14, 2000 TO: SENIOR PLANNER MIKE GRIM FROM: Associate Engineer - Land Use Review PRE 00-39: SISSON - 411 TAMARACK AVE. The Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Prior to formal application submittal the following items should be adequately resolved/addressed: 1. Right-of-way dedication will be required along Tamarack Avenue. A minimum of 20 feet behind the curb face will be required. This dimension could change slightly because of the requirements for an at grade railroad crossing. Prior to formal submittal, please consult with the North County Transit District. 2. Show all existing property lines' bearings and dimensions. Show all existing easements. 3. Show the existing street cross-section for Tamarack Avenue. Also show the existing street grades. 4. Show driveway for adjacent property. Note that the panhandle lot's driveway needs to be 3 feet away from the property line. This dimension is measured to the top of the 3-foot curb height transition. it 5. Show dimension to existing fire hydrant. * 6. Show all existing utilities and streetlights. Show the distance from the existing telephone poles to the westerly property line. Are they within an easement? Do they need to be moved? Submit a letter from the telephone company indicating their disposition. 7. Show existing topography surrounding project site. 8. The Pacific Bell pedestal at the northeast property corner might need to be moved. The water meter boxes will need to have traffic lids. 9. Note that the driveway .portion to the back lot is not an easement; it is actually a portion of the back lot. 10. A soils letter should be submitted regarding the adequacy of the lot for the proposed use. 11. The site plan submitted does not show enough information to determine if a grading permit will be required. Show existing and proposed contours and the proposed earthwork volume. 12. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project, additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please contact me at (760) 602-2758. FRANK J. JIMENO Associate Engineer Senior Civil Engineer - Development Services City of Carlsbad Planning Department November 12, 1996 Mr. Rodney Miles P.O. Box 6905 Laguna Miguel, CA 92607 SUBJECT: TAMARACK PROPERTY INVESTORS PRE 96-52 APN: 206-042-001 c/f f A preliminary review of your project was conducted on November 7, 1 996. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1. Pursuant to Section 21.10.080(d)(4) of the Zoning Ordinance, the maximum length of the panhandle portion of a lot shall not be greater than 1 50 feet. Accordingly, this project should be revised to reduce the length of the panhandle from 192.27 feet to 1 50 feet. Engineering: 1. " The existing conditions of CT 87-04 indicate additional right-of-way is required along Tamarack Avenue. The centerline to curb face distance is shown as being 32'. This dimension could change slightly because of new standards or requirements for an at grade Rail Road crossing. At the time of project submittal, this department would forward a copy of the proposed subdivision to the North County Transit District for input and specific dedication requirements. 2. The possibility of a combined panhandle access on the east side of this project appears to make more sense. Also, the proposed panhandle as shown on the west side of the project could not be supported because of proximity to the tracks and to the mast arms associated with the tracks. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 PRE 96-52 - TAMARACK PROPERTY INVESTORS NOVEMBER 12, 1996 PAGE 2 3. The length of the panhandle appears to be too long, and the lot to width ratio should conform to Section 20.16.010 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. Grading and drainage was not shown but should be considered as sensitive in nature. 5. The remaining 2 lots to the east could be included and thus improved by an overall adjustment or reconfiguration of this subdivision. Please contact Chris DeCerbo at (619) 438-1161, extension 4445 if you have any questions. Sincerely, / •> . «.l$tfajl__ GARY/E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:CD:vd c: Michael J. Holzmiller Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Memorandum To: SENIOR PLANNER, CHRIS DECERBO From: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, Clyde Wickham Date: 7 November 1996 Re: PRE 96-52, RODNEY MILES FLAG LOT We have reviewed the above mentioned application and have a few comments to add to the report. • The existing conditions of CT 87-4 indicate additional right of way is required along Tamarack Ave. The centerline to curb face distance is shown as being 32'. This dimension could change slightly because of new standards or requirements for at grade Rail Road crossings. At the time of project submittal, this department would forward a copy of the proposed subdivision to the AT&SF railway company for input and specific dedication requirements. • The possibility of a combined panhandle access on the east side of this project appears to make more sense. Also, the proposed panhandle as shown on the west side of the project could not be supported because of proximity to the tracks and to the mast arms associated with the tracks. • The length of the panhandle appears to be too long, and the lot to width ratio should conform to section 20.16.010 of the Municipal Code. • Grading and drainage was not shown but should be considered as sensitive in nature. • The remaining 2 lots to the east could be included and thus improved by an overall adjustment or reconfiguration of this subdivision. If you h€Ve any further questions or require further review, please contact thisAf/iceA /ickham Engineer L t n I J; 3 Review Division