HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 01-06; Gilbert Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (2)City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DECISION
February 11,2002
Bob Carlin
710 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd.
San Marcos, CA 92069
SUBJECT: CDP 01-06 - GILBERT RESIDENCE
At the Planning Commission meeting of February 6, 2002, your application was considered. The
Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioner Dominguez Absent) to APPROVE your request. The decision of
the Planning Commission became final on February 6, 2002.
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil
Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad
Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate
court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if
within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied
by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record,
the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be
filed with the Planning Director, Michael J. Holzmiller, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635
Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning
Department at (760) 602-4600.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:MG:mh
Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution No. 5141
c: Gary Gilbert
2325 Pio Pico Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE REVIEW
December 27, 2001
TO: Mike Grim - Senior Engineer
FROM: David Rick - Assistant Engineer
COMPLETENESS REVIEW
PROJECT ID: CDP 01-06 GILBERT RESIDENCE
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project.
Engineering staff does not have any comments to add to the project. Please add the following
conditions of approval to the approving resolution:
NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the
approval of this proposed tentative map, must be met prior to approval of a building permit.
genera/
1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally
established by the City.
3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit an erosion
control plan with the building plans for City approval. Said erosion control shall
be in place prior to beginning any construction or earthwork.
fees/Agreements
4. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
5. Developer shall cause property owner to enter into a lien contract with the City for the
future public improvement of Pio Pico Drive along the subdivision frontage for a half
street width of 30 feet. Public improvements shall include but are not limited to paving,
base, sidewalk, curb and gutter, grading, undergrounding or relocation of utilities,
streetlights.
6. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall
cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area
H:\LIBRARY\ENG\WPDATA\MISC\COMPREV
shown within the boundaries of the project into the existing City of Carlsbad Street
Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Dedications/Improvements
7. Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City
and/or other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the
site plan. The offer shall be made by a separate recorded document. All land so offered
shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost. Streets
that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at
extension 2781.
David Rick
Assistant Engineer - Development Services Division
H:\LIBRARY\ENG\WPDATA\MISC\COMPREV
•^^ ^B^
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
December 26, 2001
Bob Carlin
BC Drafting
710 S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
San Marcos, CA 92069
SUBJECT: CDP 01 -06 - GILBERT RESIDENCE
Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning
Commission on February 6, 2002. However, for this to occur, you must submit the
additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by January 17,
2002, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled
hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining
Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be
scheduled for denial.
1. Please submit the following plans:
A) Ten (10) copies of your site plans, building elevation plans, and floor
plans on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into
81/2'x11"size.
B) One 81/2" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and
floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is
photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be
included on plans.
2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit
the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form:
A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all
property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including
the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County
Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized
B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten
list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of
the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner.
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
CDP 01-06 - GILBERWESIDENCE
December 26, 2001
Page 2
C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property
owners within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of
the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS,
left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a
single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included
but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in the
street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels.
DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY.
Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14
pt, Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as
follows:
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3
Carlsbad, CA 92008
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave.
Apt. #3
Carlsbad, CA 92008
ACCEPTABLE
MRS JANE SMITH
APT 3
123 MAGNOLIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D)
E)
Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots
entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered
and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may
be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required
scale is impractical.
Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee
shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels.
Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are
accepted.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL _
Senior Planner
MG:jl
Attachment
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE
LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES.
APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER
APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
BY:
DATE:
RECEIVED BY
DATE:
iiiii, Inc.
CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL, S QUALITY ENGINEERING
FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTS, INSPECTION
CLIENT: GILBERT
PROJECT: GIL 1001
DATE: 29 NOV. 2001
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA. 92008-7314
Attention: Mr. David Rick, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Side Yard Drainage Swale Requirements for the project located on Pio
Pico Drive, Carlsbad, CA.(APN: 156-350-05)(Gary Gilbert Residence)
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the City of Carlsbad requirements and at the request of Mr. Gary
Gilbert, we have reviewed the side yard drainage swale specifications and
requirements for the subject project. Based on our evaluation of the City Standard
GS-15 with respect to the drainage swale distance from the proposed residential
structure, it is our onion that the side yard swale may be reduced from 5 feet to 3
feet from the structure. Structural foundations adjacent to the drainage swale shall
be deepened to provide a minimum embedment of 12 inches below the swale flow
line grade.
Findings of this Report are valid as of this date; however, changes in
conditions of a property can occur with passage of time, whether they be due to
natural process or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes
in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or
broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this Report may be invalidated
wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this Report is subject
to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one year.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of buildings
are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report shall
not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this
Report are modified or verified in writing.
1
7671-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221
, Inc.
CIVIL. GEOTECHNICAL. A QUALITY ENGINEERING
FOUNDATION DESIGN • LAND SURVEYING • SOIL TESTING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT t INSPECTION
This Report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the
owner or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations
contained herein are called to the attention of the project Architect and Engineer
and are incorporated into the plans. Further, the necessary steps shall be taken to
ensure that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the
field.
The Soil Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client
and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, either
expressed or implied, are made as to the professional advice provided under the
terms of this agreement, and included in the Report.
B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of
service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
J+tivSV,*
/Arthur C. Beard RCE RGB
Chief Engineer
1611-A SO. MELROSE DRIVE #285, VISTA, CA 92083-5497 • 760-945-3150 • FAX: 760-945-4221
CARLSBAD REVIEW
DATE
TO:
REVISED PLANrENGINEERING DEPARTME
- JSASWAY
•FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH
*BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY
'COMMUNITY SERVICES/RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT
•PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -VIRGINIA McCOY
* . WATER DISTRICT
LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK
SCHOOL DISTRICT
*NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - Planning Department
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC - BICH TRAN (Memo Only)
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT - LORI ROSENSTEIN
•ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS
FROM: Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CJf J
NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Please review and submit written comments to
Projec^ Plajr/ner in the Planning Department,
I . (If vou have "No Comments"please so state.) If not
receive by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the
proposal has your/endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please
contact <fa'at •43@sf5rB4-I extension Y&13> . The
request for conditions will follow at the appropriate time.
THANK YOU
COMMENTS:
FRM0020 3/99
^^^ ^^^
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
March 14,2001
Bob Carlin
BC Drafting
710 S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
San Marcos CA 92069
SUBJECT: CDP 01-06 - GILBERT RESIDENCE
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit, application no. CDP 01-06, as to its
completeness for processing.
The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application
may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this
communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you
clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the
application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These
issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning
Department will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication.
Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions or
wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:MG:mg
Chris DeCerbo
David Rick
File Copy
Data Entry
Planning Aide
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
ISSUES OF CONCERN
No. CDP 01-06 - GILBERT RESIDENCE
Planning:
1. The proposed single-family dwelling meets all applicable development standards, except
for lot coverage. The project site is zoned One Family Residential (R-1) which allows a
maximum of 40 percent lot coverage. Lot coverage, also known as building coverage, is
defined in Section 21.04.061 as the:
"total ground area of a site occupied by any building or structure as
measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or
supporting members. Building coverage includes exterior structures
such as stairs, arcades, bridges, permanent structural elements
protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies, oriel
windows, stories which overhang a ground level story, garages and
covered carports."
According to the floor plan provided on sheet number 2 of the application submittal, the
first floor of the proposed single-family residence measures 1,735.5 square feet, the
garage measures 462 square feet, and the covered porch measures 152 square feet.
Therefore the total coverage of the building equals 2,349.5 square feet. The lot size of
the project site is 5,100 square feet. The resulting lot coverage is 46 percent. Please
revise the plan to meet the lot coverage development standard.
Engineering:
1. On the site plan:
a. Show the existing or proposed sewer lateral and water service line with meter.
Also plot the sewer main with invert elevation to verify available sewer gravity
flow.
b. Show off-site topography west of the subject lot approximately 30 feet from the
rear property line.
c. Show the driveway between the edge of street pavement and the concrete
driveway. This portion of the driveway shall be constructed with asphalt concrete
and labeled accordingly.
d. Our records indicate that the existing street centerline to right-of-way width is 20
feet. The site plan indicates 25 feet. Please recheck this distance and revise
accordingly.
e. Plot the easement identified under item #5 of the preliminary title report.
2. Grade and construct the proposed driveway so that the elevation of the driveway at the
new right-of-way boundary is at the future grade of the public utility parkway. This grade
is based on a 2% drop in grade 20 feet from the street centerline, a 7% rise in grade 5
feet from this point and a 2% rise in grade an additional 5 feet to the future property line.-
These changes in grade will raise the on-site driveway slope grade to approximately
14% which is the maximum grade permitted on a driveway serving a single-family
house.
3. Locate the rip rap dissipators further east of the rear property line and further from the
side property lines. Also, level the elevation of the rip rap and place a berm at the west
end of the leveled grade. Doing so will reduce velocity flows beyond point of discharge
and provide improved infiltration rates. Direct runoff to flow to the inside of the property
from the dissipator.
4. Why are the drainage patterns along the side property line "snaking"? It doesn't appear
that enough space between the building and side property lines exists for this pattern.
Show straight swales to the dissipators. Also, obtain a letter from a registered soils
engineer permitting a substandard distance of 3 feet from foundation to swale. City
standards require 2% positive drainage 5 feet away from foundation but allow for a
distance of 3 feet with a soils engineer's approval.
5. Show how surface drainage will flow once it reaches the bottom of the driveway. How
will it be diverted around the garage?
Memorandum
TO: Mike Grim - Planning Department
FROM: David Rick -Assistant Engineer
DATE: March 9, 2001
CDP 01-06 GILBERT RESIDENCE
COMPLETNESS AND ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project
for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering
review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues
which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a
determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. On the site plan:
a. Show the existing or proposed sewer lateral and water service line with
meter. Also plot the sewer main with invert elevation to verify available
sewer gravity flow.
b. Show off-site topography west of the subject lot approximately 30 feet
from the rear property line.
c. Show the driveway between the edge of street pavement and the
concrete driveway. This portion of the driveway shall be constructed with
asphalt concrete and labeled accordingly.
d. Our records indicate that the existing street centerline to right-of-way width
is 20 feet. The site plan indicates 25 feet. Please recheck this distance
and revise accordingly.
e. Plot the easement identified under item #5 of the preliminary title report.
2. Grade and construct the proposed driveway so that the elevation of the
driveway at the new right-of-way boundary is at the future grade of the public
utility parkway. This grade is based on a 2% drop in grade 20 feet from the
street centerline, a 7% rise in grade 5 feet from this point and a 2% rise in
grade an additional 5 feet to the future property line. These changes in grade
will raise the on-site driveway slope grade to approximately 14% which is the
maximum grade permitted on a driveway serving a single-family house.
3. Locate the rip rap dissipators further east of the rear property line and further
from the side property lines. Also, level the elevation of the rip rap and place
a berm at the west end of the leveled grade. Doing so will reduce velocity
flows beyond point of discharge and provide improved infiltraion rates. Direct
runoff to flow to the inside of the property from the dissipator.
4. Why are the drainage patterns along the side property line "snaking"? It
doesn't appear that enough space between the building and side property
lines exists for this pattern. Show straight swales to the dissipators. Also,
obtain a letter from a registered soils engineer permitting a substandard
distance of 3 feet from foundation to swale. City standards require 2%
positive drainage 5 feet away from foundation but allow for a distance of 3
feet with a soils engineer's approval.
5. Show how surface drainage will flow once it reaches the bottom of the
driveway. How will it be diverted around the garage?
If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at 602-2781.
DAVID RICK
Assistant Engineer
Engineering Development Services Division
Patricia A. Dresselhaus
6+9/729-3751
cVP~o/~o&.
f-yt-s