HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-33; Aviara PA 30; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (4)1 A
Richmond American Homes
1731 0 Red Hill Avenue
lrvine Ca 92714
September 26,1997
PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 97 - 09
A preliminary decision has been made, pursuant to Section 20.24.120 of the City of
Carlsbad Municipal Code, to approve the tentative parcel map of the proposed minor
subdivision subject to conditions that follow in this letter.
Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the
approval of this tentative parcel map, must be met prior to approval of a final parcel
map.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The developer shall submit proof of a Coastal Development Permit signed and
acknowledged by the developer.
The developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City,
the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City
within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act.
The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
Notes to the following effect shall be placed on the parcel map as non-mapping data:
The parcel created by this subdivision is considered a non-buildable open space
lot as defined for lot 106 of Carlsbad Tract 90 - 30 Aviara Planning Area 30 Unit
3 (Map ## 13431). No development is hereby approved by virtue of this
subdivision. All restrictions and terms of subdivision that apply to lot 106 per
Carlsbad Tract 90 - 30 Aviara Planning Area 30 Unit 3 are hereby included.
The tentative parcel map approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of
the letter containing the final decision for tentative parcel map approval.
2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (619) 438-1161 FAX (619) 438-0894 @
c *‘
I
The City Engineer has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the developer
contained in these conditions of approval, and hereby finds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the
project, and the extent and degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the
impact caused by the project.
The developer may request a review of the preliminary decision with the City Engineer in
writing within ten (IO) days of the date of this letter. Upon such written request the City
Engineer shall arrange a time and place with the developer for such review.
Robert J. Wojcik
Principal Civil Engineer
Land Use Review Division
c: City Engineer Associate Planner, Elaine Blackbum