No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP 94-01A; Poinsettia Shores PA B-1; Condo Permit (CP) (13)Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis Octobers, 1997 Eric Munoz oenciwcnPlanning Department RECEIVED 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 OCT 0 6 1997 SUBJECT: CP 94-01 (A); Planning Area B-1 Resubmittal CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. Dear Eric: Accompanying this letter is the resubmittal package for the Condominium Permit Amendment (CP 94-01 (A)) for Planning Area B-1 in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. The resubmittal package is intended to address the single incomplete item as well as the several issues of concern. Update The Condominium Permit amendment has been modified from the previously submitted package. The most substantial modification is the elimination of the request for changes to the architecture for the area identified as financial parcels A and C (Watt Homes). Watt Homes intends to build the approved product for their portion of Planning Area B-1. Therefore, all architecture and documentation referencing financial parcels A and C are now not a part of this Condominium Permit amendment. The remaining financial parcels B and D (Concordia Homes) will continue with the requested amendment to the Condominium Permit. Watt Homes and Concordia Homes are jointly moving forward with the processing of the final map for Planning Area B-1. It is our understanding that the processing of the CP amendment for financial parcels B and D will not affect the processing of the final map pursuant to the following: 1) any request for substantial conformance must be approved by both Planning and Engineering and, 2) no phasing of the final map will be permitted without a tentative map amendment. Since both items can be accommodated by the developers of Planning Area B-1, the processing of the final map should not be affected by the CP amendment. Incomplete Item The single incomplete item was regarding the phasing of the project with multiple final maps. Accompanying this letter are signed statements from the property owners ensuring that the final map will be recorded as a single unit. These signed statements 2386 Faraday Avenue • Suite 120 « Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 • Fax: (619)438-2443 satisfies the only item that deemed that application incomplete. With these signed statements, the application should now be deemed complete. Issues of Concern The following describes how the issues of concern have been addressed. Item 1. The original Condominium Permit amendment submittal included modifications to parcels A and C. Based on the original submittal, it was determined that the CP amendment must be processed as a major CP amendment. However, since the resubmittal is requesting modification to the architecture for only parcels B and D and the single story floor plan was eliminated, a new 10% change analysis was prepared. The new percent change analysis was conducted on a unit-by-unit comparison between the approved and proposed project and demonstrates that all changes to yards, coverage, height, open space or landscaping is less than 10%. Therefore, the determination to allow for the processing of a minor amendment can be made. Item 2. References to the financial parcels are purely for descriptive purposes only and are not to infer that there will be multiple final maps. Accompanying this letter are signed statements from all property owners within Planning Area B-1 assuring that there will be no phasing or multiple final maps. Item 3. Since it is anticipated that the final map will be recorded prior to the need for model homes within parcels B and D, there is no need to identify the location of the model home complex. The location of the model home complex for the product in parcels A and C will be identified at the time of the request for building permits for these models by Watt Homes. Item 4. The floor plans have been renumbered to reduce any confusion regarding the location of each floor plan. Plan numbers 1, 2 and 3 will remain as the approved product type that will be built in parcels A and C. Plan numbers 4, 5 and 6 are the proposed product type for parcels B and D. The site plan as well as the floor plans and elevations have been revised to show the new plan numbers. Item 5. The floor plan showing the TV/media niche within the fireplace encroachment area has been eliminated. Item 6. All references to a tentative map amendment have been removed. Item 7. Since there are no changes to any lot lines or streets, no substantial changes to grading from the approved project and the proposed project is within 10% change, the exclusive use area is the same for both the proposed and the approved projects. Therefore, a comparison of exclusive use areas is not necessary. Item 8. The total square footage of the approved and the proposed project is provided on the accompanying spreadsheet titled "Total Square Footage" Item 9. No comment is needed. Item 10. The note regarding multiple phases has been removed and sign statements are provided to assure that there is no intent to process multiple final maps with this project. Item 11. The requested spot elevations are provided on the site plan. Item 12. The index map on sheet 1 provides the requested information regarding the different product type locations. Summary The accompanying resubmittal package contains a revised project description, three revised site plans, three revised floor plans and elevations, the revised 10% change analysis, the total square footage spreadsheet and the signed statements indicating that there will not be any phasing of the final map. All of these documents and information should allow for the application to be deemed complete, the determination made that the project should be processed as a minor CP amendment and address all issues of concern. Upon your review of the accompanying materials, please feel free to give me a call if you need any additional information or if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stan Weiler cc. Mike Ugar John Snell