Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CT 05-19; Carlsbad Medical Village; Tentative Map (CT)
cr )F CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPAP^ENT APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECT NAME: CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE DATE: 3/ /08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CA LOT NO(S).: 1 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 MAP NO.: 15638 NUMBER OF ACRES: 2.22 APN(S).: 156-190-54 MILES OF TRAILS: OWNER: CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE, LP Mailing Address: 9225 DOWDY DR. STE. 106 SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 Phone Number: (858) 271-4520 Fax Number: (858) 271-5850 E-Mail: I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above Information Is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. S'anature: y^,,^,^,^^,;;,^.^ Date APPLICANT: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: Signature: (SAME) Date: CIVIL ENGINEER: BRENT C. MOORE FIRM: PARTNERS PLANNING & ENGINEERING Mailing Address: 15938 BERNARDO CETER DR. SOILS ENGINEER: JEFFREY A. CHANEY FIRM: PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Mailing Address: 7715 CONVOY COURT, SAN DIEGO, CA 92127 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 Phone Number: (858) 376-3444 Fax Number: (858) 376-3555 E-Mail: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: (858) 560-1713 (858) 560-0380 State Registration Number: 59121 State Registration Number: GE 2314 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION 1. What water district is the proposed project located in? (check one) [xJCarlsbad Municipal Water District lOllvenhain Qvallecitos 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? $ cut .cy fill .cy GRADING QUANTITIES remedial cy import. cy export. cy SEE REVERSE SIDE HI/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application tor Engineering Plan Check Revised 06/01/07 . i > • I l'. Cl I Y Ul- CAKL^bAU - tNlilNttKlNtj UtKAK I MtlM I APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A wlien not applicable. FOR CITY USE ONLY APPLICATION FOR ( • ali tliat apply) PROJECT I.D. DRAWING NUMBER DEPOSIT/FEES PAID COMMENTS • Adjustment Plat (ADJ) • Certificate of Compliance (CE) • Dedication of Easement (PR) • Type: Type: Type: Encroachment Permit (PR) • Final Map (FM) • Grading Plancheck (DWG) • Improvement Plancheck (DWG) • Parcel Map (PM) • Quitclaim of Easement (PR) • Type: Type: Type: • Reversion to Acreage (RA) • Street Vacation (STV) • Tentative Parcel Map (MS) • Certificate of Correction (CCOR) • Covenant of Easement (PR) • Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) • Trails 1 |<mile Q> mile • Other APPLICATION AC ED BY: RECEIVEB MAR 1 3 2008 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE STAMP APPLICATON RECEIVED H:/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application tor Engineering Plan Check Page 2 Revised 05/01/07 OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DL >TMENT APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Compiete ail appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECTNAME: c::yfca^^^ /i/i^TQ, <^^/yg DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'o4 PROJECTADDRESS LOT NO(S).: ifZfe-^ ITij^ f/^ MAP NO.: NUMBER OF LOTS: / APN(s).: <:> -^5^ NUMBER OF ACRES: OWNER: QtnCjQX^^^HetP > OiLC^t^ Mailing Address: ^22r R^kJoy f7/W<g^ Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: r I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature: y^^^T'^-^-^Z/^^^^^^to.: APPLICANT: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: Signature: /Uc<*-^/f''^ Date: "^/l/o^ aVIL ENGINEER FIRM: nq Add ;R: 'kriTAf^ &^<^^g^^^sSli^ilGlNEER: ( FIRM: MallingAddress: /'=?^'\k^ p^&UU/fruXi Phone Number Fax Number: E-Mail: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: State Registration Number: f State Registration Number: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION 1. What water district is the proposed project located in? (check one) Qcarlsbad Municipal Water District Qoiivenhain Qvallecitos 2. If in the Carlstad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? $ cut cy fill cy GRADING QUANTITIES remedial cy import. cy export. cy SEE REVERSE SIDE H:/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application lor Engineering Plan Check Revised 1/W02 CITY ^pARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPART»«^T APPLICATION ' ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. APPLICATION FOR ( •all that apply) FOR CITY USE ONLY APPLICATION FOR ( •all that apply) PROJECT I.D. DRAWING NUMBER DEPOSIT/FEES PAID COMMENTS • Adjustment Plat (ADJ) Q Certificate of Compliance (CE) Q Dedication of Easement (PR) Type: Q Dedication of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: [] Encorachment Permit (PR) • \^ Final Map (FM) • • Grading Plancheck (DWG) • Q Improvement Plancheck (DWG) • Q Parcel Map (PM) • Q Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: • Q Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: • Type: • Type: • Q Reversion to Acreage (RA) • Q Street Vacation (STV) • Q Tentative Parcel Map (MS) • [3 Certificate of Correction (CCOR) • Covenant of Easement (PR) • Q Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) • • Other • APPLII CATION^ CCEPTED BY: 7 RECEIVED SEP 07 2006 ENGINEERING EIVED £1 CITY OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECTNAME: Qm X^AT^ Kf!D ICft L \/ I L; ^ 6 £ DATE: l-M^D(h PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MeTDvC^i , r)<P{^lC^r 1^ P^tVWClH ^ PjGrr rf^}^ PROJECT ADDRESS: 9fl^^T (5; LaC^^TTrO uuXTi^tc^ LOT NO(S).: TaaCr U*^ MAP NO.: j ^^(/? I APN(S). NUMBER OF LOTS: NUMBER OF ACRES: OWNER: ^Jt(2i Hff)?/ril^ 11L P. MallingAddress: (^X<r DOu>bDij m. Srrgioio Phone Number: •BC'i^ i^'? < - Fax Number: E-Mail: I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature: ^' •^J^ Date: ^A <^/oi APPLICANT: (^/WU.^/5/}0 toiC:Ac \^LI[CK<-^^ LB Mailing Address: qvs Pd. STfe {h^ Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: Signature: y^^^3h^^/hf^ Date: 7/2^0^ CIVIL ENGINEER: Silg^jT HOD^^ FIRM: ?AgTk3P<gC f I ANlvl(>0/:^ l^(?Ai A/Mg^^ MallingAddress: j^^B gggAlft<Ux> q-g.. n<?._ Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: gC^ .^7(,.- ^<^S5 SOILS ENGINEER: rfpF-Pg&y A - Q-f 1% e^ Mailing Address: 77( r gON>>/D'l CjQJttr Phone Number: ^g- ,Cfc^ - /7<3 Fax Number: E-Mail: State Registration Number: ftcj:^ /7j State Registration Number: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION 1. What water district is the proposed project located in? (check one) JCarlsbad Municipal Water District Qoiivenhain water a Qcarl! Qvallecitos 2. If in the Carlstad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage Improvements (if applicable)? $ cut ^110 cy fill cy GRADING QUANTITIES remedial O cy Import. cy export ^-^-^ ^ cy SEE REVERSE SIDE H:/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application tor Engineering Plan Check Revised 1/14/02 C OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPA, ^>1ENT APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. APPLICATION FOR ( >^ ail that apply) FOR CITY USE ONLY APPLICATION FOR ( >^ ail that apply) PROJECT I.D. DRAWING NUMBER DEPOSrr/FEES PAID COMMENTS • Adjustment Plat (ADJ) [] Certificate of Compliance (CE) ^^''^Dedlcatiop-of^Easement (PR) Tvpe: ff oio^^l^ ^^''^Dedlcatiop-of^Easement (PR) Tvpe: ff oio^^l^ Type: Type: [] Encorachment Permit (PR) • Final Map (FM) 0-.-<fading Plancheck (DWG) Q-<[friprovement Plancheck (DWG) • Parcel Map (PM) [3 Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: [3 Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: Q Reversion to Acreage (RA) • Street Vacation (STV) Q Tentative Parcel Map (MS) Q Certificate of Correction (CCOR) [] Covenant of Easement (PR) [3 Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) • Other 1 /^l DATE STAMP APPLICATON RECEIVED H:/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Appiication tor Engineenng Plan Check Page 2 Revised 1/14/02 PROJECT MAP REVIEW COMPLETION The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: (i(Xx\^b(Xd M^,diCa i \/l\la^fj Project No. Map No.:_ Sheets No.: Qsr ct)-\c\ _through_ DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the map review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the maps are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Map review of these project maps does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work ofthe responsibilities of compliance with state and local ordinances. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. 11590 West Bernardo Court, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92127 (858)451-6100 Signed Date on Michael L. Foreman, P.L.S. 5778 ^^^N-N^^S^ T:\1Plan Check\Forms\TEMPLATES\PROJECT MAP REVIEW COMPLETION.doc * \ Exp. J4^O/O& No./577^ BUREAU VER ITAS Berryman & Henigar PROJECT PLAN REVIEW COMPLETION Tlie following project plans have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE Project No.:CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 05-19. BV JOB NO. 38006-016694.53 Drawing No.: 443-4 I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the plan review of this project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code. These plans are found to be in substantial compliance with the applicable codes adopted by ordinances. Approval is recommended for permit issuance pending approval by all applicable City departments and agencies. The permittee shall ensure that all plans, specifications and construction conducted hereunder shall comply in all respects to the applicable codes and ordinances and by commencing construction thereunder, agrees to release and indemnify City and its consultants from and against any code violations in the completed work. The issuance or granting of a pemiit based on approval of these plans shall not allow or approve any violation of the applicable codes or ordinances. No pemiit presumed to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of such codes or ordinance shall be valid: BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. 11590 W. Bemardo Court, Ste 100 SanDiego, CA92127 (858)451-6100 Date: Januarv 08. 2007 P.E. (Civil) No.: 36393 Expiration: 6/30/08 Berryman & Henigar PROJECT PLAN REVIEW COMPLETION The following project plans have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE Project No.: CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 05-19, BV JOB NO. 38006-016694.52 Drawing No.: 443-4A I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the plan review of this project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code. These plans are found to be in substantial compliance with the applicable codes adopted by ordinances. Approval is recommended for permit issuance pending approval by all applicable City departments and agencies. The permittee shall ensure that all plans, specifications and construction conducted hereunder shall comply in all respects to the applicable codes and ordinances and by commencing construction thereunder, agrees to release and indemnify City and its consultants from and against any code violations in the completed work. The issuance or granting of a perniit based on approval of these plans shall not allow or approve any violation of the applicable codes or ordinances. No permit presumed to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of such codes or ordinance shall be valid: Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. 11590 W. Bemardo Court, Ste 100 SanDiego, CA92127 (858)451-6100 Date: 1/08/07 P.E. (Civil) No.: 36393 Expiration: 6/30/08_ \ PROJECT MAP REVIEW COMPLETION The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: Cajr\<.hoA KeAiCi^i WllOge^ Project No.: VZ 0(p-^2 Map No.: Sheets No. _through. Title Report dated past the required 30 days with City of Carlsbad approval. DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the map review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the maps are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Map review of these project maps does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work ofthe responsibilities of compliance with state and local ordinances. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. 11590 West Bernardo Court, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92127 (858)451-6100 Signed / Date l-5-20(b~? Michael L. Foreman, P.L.S. 5778 T:\1Plan Check\Forms\TEMPLATES\PROJECT MAP REVIEW COMPLETION.doc ^^arlsbad Medical Viiiage, L. 9225 Dowdy Drive, Suite 106 San Diego. CA 92126 (858) 271-4520 July 13, 2006 Mr. Bob Wojcik City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad.CA 92008-7314 RE: Carlsbad Medical Village GT 05-19 / PUD 05-15 / SDP 05-13 Dear Bob: The purpose of this letter is to request a revision to your department's request that eleven water meters be installed to support 23,475 square feet of building space. Carlsbad Medical Village consists of five smal! individual medical office buildings for sale. Each building Is potentially divisible into two units which may result in ten airspace condominium units. Based upon your department's guidelines to insure that each unit's owner is responsible for the payment for their water usage, you have requested a meter for each potential unit plus and an additional meter for landscaping. Please be aware of the following: a. Although we have establish the ability to sell ten units, we anticipate that a doctor will purchase the entire building (averaging less than 4,700 square feet) and either use the total building himself or lease half of the building to another doctor as an investment. In either case, the water usage in each building witl be minimal. b. An owner's association is to be established by CC&R's to maintain the common areas including landscaping. c. Landscaping will, by far, be the largest user of water. The owner's association will be responsible to pay the bill for this meter. d. Each water meter is a potential maintenance problem for both the City of Carlsbad and the property owners. e. Each water meter is expensive to Install. We are requesting the number of water meters required be reduced to three as follows: a. One meter for landscaping b. One meter to supply buildings 1293 & 1297 Carlsbad Village Drive c. One meter to supply buildings 1281, 1285, and 1289 Carlsbad Village Drive d. As required by the CC&R's. the owner's association will pay the bills for these meters. This in actuality is better security for the City because all the owners will protect against the delinquency of a single doctor. Please be aware that we need to proceed with the submission of the civil plan for your review and approval. We will revise the plan to reflect your approval of this request. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. Sincerely, Russell Ries Managing Member cc: Larry Dutton, Partners, Planning and Engineering, Inc. Rich Byer, BYCOR General Contractors, Inc. From: Bob Wojcik To: Glenn Pruim Date: 04/19/2006 8:08:28 AM Subject: WATER METERS We have had a flurry of questions frora developers about the City's requirement for water meters with industrial and cominercial condominiums. Bill, Kurt Musser, Ron Kemp and I have discussed and researched this matter. We've found that a CMWD ordinance was clear in requiring meters for each occupancy. However, that ordinance had been repealed with no new ordinance concerning this. The CMC is clear on this requirement also. However, that code is a remnant of when the city had a water department and does not govern CMWD. There have been a few inconsistancy in the past on this. But that is cleared up. There may be some very unique situations that may need consideration but I think we have a consensus on the city's position for this matter. Industrial and commercial condominivims will require individual meters if the units have any water facilities (rest room, sinks, showers) or are plijmbed to provide water to the units. I have informed the developers reps and do not expect any significant objection. Just in case you're asked about this, I thought you should know the decision we have come to. Thanks, Bob W. CC: Bill Plummer; Kurt Musser; Ronald Kemp; The Best From: Bob Wojcik To: David Hauser Date: 08/04/2006 8:16:01 AM Subject: FYI: Re: Condo Meter's »> Kurt Musser 07/13/06 4:20 PM »> Carlsbad Municipal Code says one meter for each occupancy but we can certainly talk about it again. »> Skip Hammann 07/13/2006 3:30 PM »> Are there any instances that we would consider a single meter that would be paid for by an HOA? I can think of some. Just thinking out loud. »> Bob Wojcik 07/13/06 1:21 PM »> The question has raised it's head again with a written request. The plea is that, although the one office building is a ten unit airspace condo, it's being sold to one or two owners. Per our past understanding, I will reply that ten condos need ten meters. Just an FYI, They may appeal this decision. A slightly different second request is being made on another office condo. This building will have 26 air space units in a three story building. My gut feeling tells me that this one will also appeal the requirement for individual meters. I just want to confirm that if an appeal goes to City Council\Water Board, 1 have full support and assistance in defending our position. Thanks, Bob W. Jack and Andrea Nathan 1340 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, CA April 9, 2007 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 RE: Carlsbad Medical Viiiage APN: 156-190-53 and 156-190-54 To Whom It May Concern: We are the owner's of Parcel APN 156-190-61 in the City of Carlsbad, which lies to the south of the above referenced project. We hereby grant permission to BYCOR General Contractors or sub- contractors to access our property for the construction of a retaining wall and masonry screen wall. Sincerely, Owner of APN 1 $6-1907^1 CarlsbacJ Medical Village 12xx Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Adjacent Neighbors Lot: 156-190-45 (Northeast corner) 3021 Highland Drive Michele Levy Comments: West building roof overhang 3021 Highland Drive encroaches Carlsbad, California (760) 720-1164 Lot: 156-190-34 (empty lot) 30xx Highland Drive Dennis Baccus 4114 Conquista Avenue Lakewood, California N/A Lot: 156-190-35 (East p/l) 3057 Highland Drive Cathryn Craft 3057 Highland Drive Carlsbad, California (760) 434-7909 Lot: 156-190-18 (Southeast corner) 3081 Highland Drive Joe and Betty Sandy Comments: 0.8' fence encroachment 3081 Highland Drive Carlsbad, California (760) 434-2738 Lot: 156-190-31 (South p/l) 1450 Oak Avenue Ralph A. Marchioni 1450 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California (760) 720-9416 Lot: 156-190-20 ('South p/l) 1350 Oak Avenue Mark A. Peterson and Sue Meyer 1350 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California (760) 730-0473 Comments: 2.0' max encroachment by chain link fence Lot: 156-190-60 (South p/l) 1342 Oak Avenue Karia M Zada 1342 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California (760) 434-3997 Lot: 156-190-61 (Southwest corner) 1340 Oak Avenue Jack and Andrea Nathan 1340 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California (760) 730-3591 / Jack cell (858) 232-0781 Lot: 156-190-33 (Southwest corner) 1330 Oak Avenue William and Stephanie Birmingham 1330 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California (760) 729-4438 Lot: 156-190-32 (West p/l) 1308 Oak Avenue George G and Aida K Awad 5480 Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad, California (760) 438-0099 Lot: 156-190-51 (Northwest corner) commercial - vacant Carlsbad Village Drive City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Medical Village Neighbor Contacts Date: 09/29/2005 Neighbor: Michele Levy Attendees: Rich Byer Larry (tenant in rear building) Russ Ries Concerns: 1. Setback between her property and parking lot 2. Protection for damage to property during construction 3. Loss of income if unable to rent her rear unit during construction All three concerns were addressed and resolved. Rich Byer indicated that she would be identified as additional insured against any damage during construction. She was informed that the setback was 10 feet and she was satisfied. Upon review of the landscape plan, she was concerned about trees planted in the setback which might obstruct her view. She was shown the cut-sheet describing the precast concrete fence and expressed a preference over a masonry wall. She would prefer not to have any fence between the rear building which was located on the property line and building site. In general, she was very positive regarding the site plan and the building design. She will contact the neighbors and schedule a meeting for the afternoon of October 8. Carlsbad Medical Village Neighbor Contacts Date: October 8, 2005 Neighbor: Mark Peterson Sue Meyer 1350 Oak Avenue Attendees: Mark Peterson Sue Meyer Cathryn Craft Michele Levy Scott Kaats (BYCOR General Contractors) Russ Ries Russ had spoken with Mark Peterson earlier in the week. Mark had been given a set of the project's plans by Michele Levy and Mark indicated a desire to discuss the project. He volunteered to invite his neighbors to the meeting. Upon Russ' arrival on October 8, Mark mentioned to Russ that he had shown the plans to the neighbors and they were satisfied and didn't feel a need to attend the meeting. Russ mentioned to Mark that the most important issue currently in discussion with the City of Carlsbad could have an effect on Jack Nathan (1340 Oak Avenue) and Russ needed to review the plans directly with Jack. Mark indicated that Jack had to take his kids to Lego Land. Mark made a telephone call to Jack via cell phone. Jack asked Mark to have Russ call him the following week. Russ reviewed the project plans submitted to the City of Carlsbad. During the review, the neighbors expressed complete satisfaction with the plans with the exception of the concerns listed below. Russ indicated that the two primary outstanding issues with the City of Carlsbad was: a. Grading plan - City would prefer to have the Southwest corner at the same elevation with the adjacent parcel to the West. b. Screen wall - City code requires a six foot screening wall around the property. City is requesting a solid masonry wall. Developers have proposed a pre-cast concrete wall. Russ indicated that the City's request to lower the elevation of the development would have major impacts on the project. a. It would entail the removal of a large amount of dirt from the site. b. It would require much taller retaining walls along the East property line. c. Whereas, the proposed project's entrance to the site and parking is close to the same elevation as the street, lowering the site would require building a ramp from the street down to the parking lot. This would result in losing parking spaces. d. The additional cost of dirt removal would have to be recaptured by increasing the building size. e. By losing parking spaces and the need to increase income from sales, the building footprint dimensions would have to be reduced and second floors be added. Russ indicated that the City's request for a solid masonry screening wall resulted from a fear that the pre-cast concrete wall proposed creates a maintenance problem. Russ indicated that a. The masonry wall requires an eighteen inch to two foot deep trench around the perimeter of the property. Since many of the neighbors have large trees, bushes, and misc plants at their property line, it would be extremely difficult to build the wall without damage to the neighbors property. b. The pre-cast wall requires posts be installed and results in an easier installation with much less potential damage to neighbors property. c. The maintenance of the fence will be contained within the CC&R's for the project. The mention of the CC&R's resulted in Sue Meyer, an attorney, requesting the ability to review the CC&R's. Russ indicated that she would be provided a draft copy. During the discussion, Mark and Sue voiced the following concerns: a. They were uneasy with the proximity of the Southern most parking space near their property. They are requesting that the last parking space be removed and the screening landscaping be increased. Both Scott and Russ indicated that they would work with the architect to try to accomplish this. b. Their upstairs bedroom faces the development. They would like assurance that the parking lot light located near their property is located and screened in a manner to not light their bedroom. c. They want the ability to chose the landscape material to be used to screen their property. Cathryn Craft expressed complete satisfaction with the plan and expressed her preference for the pre-cast concrete wall. Michele Levy again expressed complete satisfaction with the plan with the stipulation that she wants to avoid tall trees along her property line and wants the pre-cast concrete wall. Carlsbad Medical Village Neighborhood Meeting October 8, 2005 Name: MI r./^l/JLt^ Jtl/V Comments: 'DiO TO Ke miY /y/95 7^/^ 77^ f^fyit R-l?d/.)Aji) ~/?/y ^P/^T/. -77// 5 /'^£t>)c f)i^ y/A.A-A/T^ y/^j3 fS5 //^6 ?uT ///m^^yf y'AJ Name: Carlsbad Medical Village Neighborhood Meeting October 8, 2005 Comments: ji)^ /jiA /y/?/-r mp?y, 6 y/TTlt^ ./J/^T - o /^//i^i/i-'S Name: Comments: Carlsbad Medical Village Neighborhood Meeting October 8, 2005 V i. r- . 2^.y / ^...-i^-^ cf" 1 ""L^S" V' o..^:. €U.^JH••t'V^„'C..S'-^ C> ^ L'^-'tL ^^^^ y Carlsbad Medical Village Neighborhood Meeting October 8, 2005 NAME ADDRESS PHONE Carlsbad Medical Village Neighborhood Meeting October 8, 2005 Name Comments: f^^^^^-^^y f^^^Q.y ..-y<y^^4^-^^ Carlsbad Medical Village Neighbor Contacts Date: October 15, 2005 Neighbor: Jack Nathan Andrea Nathan 1340 Oak Avenue Attendees: Jack Nathan Andrea Nathan Russ Ries Russ had a telephone conversation with Jack Nathan on Oct. 10. During this call. Jack indicated that he and his wife had reviewed the plan with Mark Peterson and Jack indicated that his wife would be the best to review the landscaping plan for the project. I left a voice mail message with Andrea to return me call. On October 12, Andrea returned my call and said that she had further reviewed the plans and wanted to meet and discuss. We set the meeting for October 15 at 9:00am. Before I had the opportunity to review the plans, Andrea said that she had already looked at the plan and concluded that the building behind their property was too high and was going to block their view and reduce the natural light in their back yard. I went ahead with the description of the plan and the reasons for the site plan. I indicated that we were going to eliminate the walkway around the building. I felt that they appreciated this decision. After further discussion regarding the building height, we went into their backyard and I was shown the view that they were concerned about. Over their 6 to 7 foot wooden fence, they see the tali eucalyptus trees across Carlsbad Village Drive at the library parking lot. They also see a two story residence at the Northwest corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and Highlands. I mentioned to them that their backyard is South to North and the sun travels East to West and the building being twenty feet beyond their fence would not block the sun. They agreed with that analysis. After a long discussion, I believe that their objection was that didn't want to see into a doctor's office window and didn't want patients in the doctor's office to be looking at them. I indicated that I would arrange for them to meet with the landscape architect and design a method to screen the building from their backyard. I left feeling that Jack was somewhat comfortable with this. Andrea was still concerned. They both indicated that they were aware that the other neighbors are in favor of the project. Carlsbad Medical Village Neighbor Contacts Date: October 17, 2005 Neighbor: Bill Birmingham Stephanie Birmingham 1330 Oak Avenue Telephone Bill Birmingham Conference: Stephanie Birmingham Russ Ries During the morning of October 17, Bill Birmingham called Russ to discuss project. He and his wife Stephanie had met with Jack and Andrea Nathan on October 16. Jack and Andrea had presented the plan that I had left on October 15. Jack indicated that he and his wife were very concerned about our plan. He said that they have a pool in their backyard and are very concerned about people looking into their backyard from Building "C". He also is very concerned about the water flow into his backyard. He said that during the past winter, he had a lot of water in his backyard. I responded to his concerns by saying that the plans that I had left with the Nathan did not depict a detailed landscaping plan. I mentioned that I had committed to the Nathan's that I would have the landscape architect meet with them to design an environment which would not only screen the entire building but also make it extremely difficult to either look into the windows from his property or look into his property from the offices. In addition, I told him that one of the reason for raising the lot in the Southwest corner was to provide for the water runoff to be carried to Carlsbad Village Drive. Currently the project slopes from the East to the West. The final grading must reduce the East/West slope and create a slope from South to North. Bill understood this and expressed a concern that the design be adequate to carry enough water in case of severe rains as witnessed last winter. 1 assured him that the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department would be analyzing our design and make sure that this was the case. I told Bill that I would like to meet with him and his wife and we established a meeting for October 18 at 5:00pm at their house. Around 12:30pm 1 received a conference call from Bill and Stephanie Birmingham. Stephanie indicated that she had just returned from a meeting with Jason Goff and the City of Carlsbad offices. She was extremely agitated. She said that Jason agreed with her desire to lower Building "C". She said that Jason told her that he had requested that we redesign the project and lower the west side of the project and that we had many options but were unwilling to explore them. After listening to her complaints, I concluded that her main concem is that people in the offices will be looking into her backyard. I indicated to her that the closest point of her property. Northeast corner, is approximately 45 feet from the Southwest corner of the building and the pool is over 70 feet from the building. I again committed to have the landscape architect meet with them and the Nathan's. I mentioned that a solid screening fence could be added to the slope leading to the building which would completely eliminate the ability to look from the offices into their backyard. Stephanie indicated that she was not interested in meeting. As a result of the telephone conversation, I indicated to Bill and Stephanie that meeting on October 18 was pointless as I need more clarification from the City of Carlsbad. Carlsbad Medical Village Neighbor Contacts Date: October 18, 2005 Neighbor: Andrea Nathan 1340 Oak Avenue Telephone Andrea Nathan Conference: Russ Ries During a October 18 telephone conversation with Jason Goff to establish a meeting to discuss the project, I learned that on the previous day not only Stephanie Birmingham met with Jason but also, Andrea Nathan. Jason told me that both Stephanie and Andrea did not approve of the project and that they were writing him a letter to document their concerns. Since I had setup a meeting with Jason for October 25, I felt that I should have a copy of the Stephanie and Andrea letter prior to the meeting to properly prepare. I called Andrea to request a copy. At the beginning of the conversation, Andrea told me that she was upset with me because Jason Goff had told her and Stephanie that I was not being honest with them and discussing the options available. I indicated to her that we would be meeting with Jason and would be discussing the options he thought we have. She mentioned that she was aware that her neighbors to the East were in favor of the project and she was upset that she would be the most negatively effected. She mentioned that the Peterson's had a parking lot adjacent to their property and she would prefer the same. I told her as I have told her before, that the City has requested and in fact the best way to screen the noise created by a project such as ours was to surround the heavy traffic areas with buildings. This was accomplished by placing the buildings in the configuration as shown. She still indicated that she would be happier with a parking lot. I mentioned that if we were forced to remove building "C" that we would have to modify the other buildings to two floors which would not be acceptable to her neighbors. I again volunteered to have her meet with the landscape architect to design the slope behind her property. She did not express any desire to participate. She said that she would be working witii Jason. She did agree to send me a copy of her letter to Jason. City of Carlsbad Planning Department EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad Medical Village PROJECT NUMBER: CT 05-19/SDP 05-13/PUD 05-15 This early public notice is to let you know that a development application for a medical office project within your neighborhood was submitted to the City of Carlsbad on August 16, 2005. The project application is undergoing its initial review by the City. LOCATION: The project site is located on the south side of Carlsbad Village Drive, one parcel west of Highland Drive, and east of Fire Station No. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development proposal for 5 single-story medical office buildings (23,475 square feet) ranging in size from approximately 3,915 to 5,265 square feet. The site plan proposes a single access driveway off Carlsbad Village Drive for ingress and egress of the site, 122 off-street parking spaces to accommodate medical office uses, outdoor eating areas for employees in 5 various locations, retaining walls, exterior parking lot lighting, landscaping, and a pre-cast masonry wall along the east, west, and south property lines. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Jason Goff, Associate Planner at jgoff@ci.carlsbad.ca.us, (760) 602-4643, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us Carlsbad Medical Village APN's 156-190-53 300 150 156-190-54 N 300 600 IZlFeet Air Photo Date: April 2001 PWOJECTDATA a wummm m ixvaimoir MM (nr) rtW. nMNEO UMT DEWUMKNT (PUD) SW OCDO. cwjnMW tttas-uM (HUUKn ID K MSenCD) miL ME MBk UI *aa (MI.W S.F.) m (MK HM MIOTCD) U3.4T0 U. sju K.r. Nj n/iooa •.r.l au n/iooo s/.' nj n/ioon s.r. ni/iooo ar.l I (IflM MUMin) f—swts—" 3*49 frm MHMOE. ME 300 •«M moo. ouTOiMM nto) 7-3110 iSn?. (xn aryaaaa v or a viciNrrYiuP 9CM£ N.T.S. E imc (KK UL sec. iiJtuao) C ±ITM Cf. TOTM. sniKWE CUSS B oma: V *jstf »f. omcx v 0^ sr. OASS i omx V 4j>ie ir. cuus a omcx r 3jBie u. cuss • tif-«- mt. MK tm mam, N ^^^^ ® 9QU0 MOWT FENCt E NIH OF TO nWOM ODUNT MMM i or Fuu. Bze mca m MW or rtmm § tr catmcr smes MK WW or nwMHo CHKZI El unn pou MO mat wcDn ucMT mE ma • trat CMUWO SWUM) cs-to) A-1 lEAFTf CmOS MASCAM WARNER h I t • c t s SHSEfMlliiM,SuHvai>i CNUM HtnCW. VUAOl: LT. CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE CARLSBAD VIOAGE DRIVE CAW.SBAD. OU.IFORNIA BUIUMWO "A* NORTHWEST ELEVATION BUILDING -A' M0BTHBA8T ELEVATION BUILDING 'A* ENLAHGED HARPSCAPE PLAN BUILDINa 'A" SOUTHEAST ELEVATION © MATCRUtS lEOEND ©DaHaaMUMHN OOtOtB OOUM ML « MIIWOM e © mum ml AMMLTUMMIC S fllONK a U HOUM KTK. OOOI uwTnnuc FEATURES LEQEND A-2 OFFICE 'A' ELEVATIONS AND ENLARGED HARDSCAPE PLAN ISmCMIX MASCAn WARNER b I t • C t I CARLSBAD MEDICAL VILLAGE SHSEranllMlSullrffi SMH(9B,UlhinliKni CARLSBAD VILIAGE DMVE CARLSBAD, CAUFOftfAA Carlsbad Medical Village, L.F^ 9225 Dowdy Drive, Suite 106 San Diego, CA 92126 (858) 271-4520 January 4, 2006 RECEIVED JAN 0 9 2006 Mark Peterson ENGINEERING Sue Meyer DEPARTMENT 1350 Oak Avenue \ v, ^10-1'^' Carlsbad, CA Jack Nathan Andrea Loosen , r , , 1340 Oak Avenue \ 1W ^ ^ Carlsbad, CA Bill and Stephanie Birmingham 1330 Oak Avenue . , Carlsbad, CA it I,, \ \ > ^ ^ RE: Carlsbad Medical Village 13xx Carlsbad Village Drive APN's: 156-190-53-00 & 156-190-54-00 I have received copies of correspondence you have had with Mr. Jason Goff of the City of Carlsbad between the dates of October 20, 2005 and October 24, 2005. These letters and e- mails were the result of various conversations I have had with each of you either in-person or telephonically. As I have mentioned to you, when the individuals who comprise the partnership I represent began evaluating the above referenced property, our interest was and has always been to provided a quality medical office development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. We are aware that, even after an appeal to the City Council, a 56,763 square foot, two story assisted care facility had been previously approved for the site. All development standards were in compliance, including the height of this approved building (two stories with the height between 28 feet and 36 feet). Although financially it is in our best interest to maximize the size of the structures being built at the site, the partners designed a much less obtrusive plan to reduce the impact upon the surrounding neighbors. The partners fully understand that it is very challenging to satisfy all neighbors of an in-fill site surrounded by terraced residential lots, it is especially difficult when dealing with a lot that has a slope in excess of 7% from east to west with the low point at the southwest corner located 290 feet south of Carlsbad Village Drive. The five small craftsman style medical office buildings totaling 23,475 square feet are designed to be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhood. The current resubmitted design is based on City of Carlsbad Planning and Engineering Departments' staff input from a Preliminary Review (PRE 05-24) process initiated in April 2005. This document is on file for public review in the Planning Department and contains the staff comments that establishes the basis for the conceptual design of the project including: buildings located along the perimeter and parking located in the center of the site. In addition, the single story scale and the craftsman architecture elements were added by the development team to be responsive to the concerns expressed by the neighborhood during approval hearings for the previous project. The purpose for explaining this background is to demonstrate the sincere efforts for a sensitive design that would get City and neighborhood support, without relying on the precedent of development intensity established by the previously approved project on the subject site. Carlsbad Medical Village '^'^ January 4, 2006 Page 2 In your correspondence with Mr. Goff and me, the following concerns have been identified: a. A parking space near the rear of 1350 Oak Avenue A parking lot light pole behind 1350 Oak Avenue Height of building pad behind 1340 Oak Avenue Water drainage onto the backyard of 1330 Oak Avenue b. c. d. e. Height of Building C behind 1340 Oak Avenue and northeast of 1330 Oak Avenue Windows along the south and west wall of Building C behind 1340 Oak Avenue Concern a: The architect has re-designed the parking area behind 1350 Oak Avenue to remove the parking space as requested. The landscaping in the area has been correspondingly increased. Concem b: The position of all light poles in the parking will be reviewed to make sure that the light fixtures are screened from the adjacent neighbors. Concern c & d: The following chart summarizes the elevations of the existing residential lots and the elevation of the subject lot. Please note that the residential lots along Oak Avenue have been terraced to create level narrow lots with a successive reduction in elevation of three to four feet from east to west. As a result of this east to west slope gradient and the terracing of the Oak Avenue residential lots, the undeveloped subject lot drains from the east to west and from ngrth-tp sgyih resulting in excessivejfliaier drainage onto the backyard of 1330 Oak Avenu^ot is^ot actually adjacent to the subject site p'Since we met and I presented you a set of plans for fhe ~" deWloprnerrt,iheliraTilecT and civil engineer have made significant revisions to the southwest corner of the development. The "Finished Grade" elevation has been lowered by one foot and the south and west slopes have been modified to increase the landscape area. Address Residential Lot Elevation Undeveloped Site Elevation at East West 3021 Highland Drive 155.0 153.0 Empty lot 149.0 146.0 3057 Highland Drive 149.0 146.0 3081 Highland Drive 149.0 148.0 1450 Oak Avenue 144.0 149.0 1350 Oak Avenue 140.2 143.0 1342 Oak Avenue 137.1 139.0 1340 Oak Avenue 134.4 135.0 1330 Oak Avenue 130.4 131.0 1308 Oak Avenue 131.0 Proposed Finished Grade 146.0 141.3 141.0 140.5 140.5 140.5 138.9 138.5 138.5 138.5 Residential vs Proposed -9.0 -7.7 -8.0 -8.5 -3.5 0.3 1.8 4.1 not adjacent 7.5 (*) (*) At southwest corner - reduces toward north direction (Carlsbad Village Drive) (Elevation is defined as feet above sea level) Carlsbad Medical Village ""•^ January 4, 2006 Page 3 Please note the existing slope from east to west. The fall is in excess of 24 feet. Among the many design parameters governing the proposed grading plan are the requirements to provide a relatively flat pad with not more than a 5% slope and direct onsite drainage through a filtering system before depositing on Carlsbad Village Drive. In addition, it is extremely undesirable to either remove dirt from the site or transport dirt to the site. As the above chart describes, after grading, the fall is reduced to 7.5 feet. The grading lowers the east by 7 feet and raises the west property line by 7.5 feet. This results in a near balance of site grading eliminating the requirement to either import or export a large amount of dirt. The proposed lot has to be relatively flat to conform to the Federal laws requiring equal access to all individuals. The primary Federal regulation is referred to as "ADA" (Americans VVitti-\ Disabilities Act). All avenues of travel within the site cannot have a slope greater thaH[4.5%. sn — addition, building codes require that medical offices provide five parking stalls per 1 ,(M^jgLiate feet of building space. Normal offices require only four stalls per 1,000. Industrial buildings require only two parking stalls per 1,000 square feet. As a result of the city's parking requirement and the site's land use designation which allows for medical office developments, the property has to be utilized very efficiently. There is no storm drain system below Carlsbad Village Drive. All excess water drainage of the proposed lot is first filtered and then deposited on Carlsbad Village Drive. This means the water that is currently moving from east to west and north to south and is ending up in the backyard of 1330 Oak Avenue needs to be diverted to the north. The elevation of Carlsbad Village Drive at / the west boundary is approximately 132 feet. In order to provide the necessary flow along the / 290 foot west property line, the required 2% slope from south to north results in the southwest ' corner being a minimum 5.8 feet above the street or 137.8 feet The proposed building pad is 138.5 feet which is approximately only 8 inches higher than the '' ' minimum required with drainage problems, ADA issues, and balanced grading addressed and resolved. Concern e: The zoning (Residential Professional "RPQ") of the proposed development allows a building height of 35 feet. The partners' desire to design a more of a "residential" versus "commercial" look resulted in single story craftsman style buildings. Although each of the five buildings will have a unique appearance, the height of each of the buildings is only 18.5 feet. This is just a little over 14 of the height allowed and 16.5 feet below the previously approved project on this site. Even if you add the 7.5 feet increase in elevation along the west property line, the total height above existing grade is still 9 feet lower than the height allowed. In addition, the building code requires a twenty foot distance between the rear property line and Building C. This twenty foot setback has been met on both the south and west sides of Building C. I have volunteered to have the landscape architect meet with each of you individually or as a group to design the trees and plant material used in the twenty foot buffer zone. This offer remains open. You have indicated a preference for a parking lot in the southwest corner. Please be aware of the purpose of the site plan as presented. In order to greatly reduce the impact of a non- residential operation, every attempt is made to shield the neighbors from the activity and noise associated with vehicles entering, parking, and exiting from the property. In addition, the guests and employees exit their vehicles and walk and talk during their travel from their car or travel between buildings. The purpose of having the buildings surround the heavy traffic area is to limit this noise and activity to greatly reduce the impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Repositioning Building C and creating a parking lot in its place results in exposing the interior courtyard activity to the neighbors in the southwest corner and eliminates the additional security benefits of having a building located at the corner versus an open parking lot. In addition, because of a variety of building codes and regulations, most notable set-back and ADA requirements, there is no logical position for Building C other than its current location. Carlsbad Medical Village January 4, 2006 Page 4 Concern f: In order to resolve privacy issues that have been raised, we have worked with the architect to accomplish the following: 1. Eliminated the exterior doors in the west facing walls of Buildings C, D, and E 2. Eliminated the retaining walls along the west and southwest property lines. The 2:1 slope which was created will allow an increased amount of screening landscaping to be added. 3. A six foot wooden screening fence has been added along the south and west sides of building C. The purpose of this fence is to prevent occupants of the offices within Building C to look into the backyards and windows of the Oak Avenue neighbors. The fence also eliminates the possibility of the Oak Avenue neighbors looking into Building C's windows. 4. At the suggestion of the City of Carlsbad planners, the mandated employee lunch areas have been relocated to be better screened from the neighbors. 5. In addition to increasing the amount of landscaping within the twenty foot buffer area on the west and south side of Building C, the required plantings will be mature to provide immediate screening. Since our collective meetings, we have reviewed the design with the architect and civil engineer. We have explored and considered all reasonable design concepts to reduce the overall impact of the development to the entire neighborhood. We analyzed the possibility of removing Building C and redesigning Buildings D & E to two floors. We have concluded that for the proposed site plan, small two story buildings do not make sense. The reasons for this conclusion are as follows: 1. ADA requires equal access to the entire building. As a result, both a stairway and elevator must be provided. These elements require an inordinate amount of space greatly reducing the percentage of usable space within the each building. 2. Within medical offices, equipment must be installed above the ceiling. As a result, the building heights would have to approach the 35 feet limit. Buildings of this height would effect the neighbors to the east. 3. Two story buildings would change the ambiance that the village concept is creating. 4. The only two story building that makes sense is to completely redesign the site and create a two story building similar to the project previously approved. This would result in a 35 foot tall building somewhere in the middle of the site and parking underground and around the periphery. As I discussed with you during our meetings, we have recently comp eted such a building in Encinitas and initially analyzed the possibility of such a building on this site. Our original concept was for an approximately 50,000 square foot building. We decided, however, to sacrifice over 25,000 square feet of space and create the village concept as proposed with only 23,475 square feet of space. Despite the precedent set by the previously approved project, we strongly believe that this concept is much better for the entire neighborhood. Carlsbad Medical Village ' January 4, 2006 Page 5 During the first week of December, we have re-submitted the plan with the above changes to the City of Carlsbad staff for review. I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with each of you to review the revised plan. In order to accomplish this as efficiently as possible, the Art Room has been reserved at the Carlsbad Senior Center located at 799 Pine Avenue on January 25, 2006 between 6:00pm and 7:00pm. I have asked the landscape architect to be present to answer your questions. Thank you for the time. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions. My office telephone number is (858) 271-4520. Sincerely, Russell Ries Managing Member cc: Michele Levy, Adjacent Property Owner Cathryn Craft, Adjacent Property Owner Joe and Betty Sandy, Adjacent Property Owner Ralph A. Marchioni, Adjacent Property Owner KarIa M Zada, Adjacent Property Owner Ray Patchett, City Manager Sandra Holder, Community Development Director Glenn Pruim, Public Works Director Marcela Escobar-Eck, Planning Director Don Neu, Assistant Planning Director Bob Wojcik, Principal Engineer Gary Barberio, Principal Planner Jason Goff, Associate Planner David Rick, Associate Engineer Bob Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates Page 1 of2 David Rick - RE: Carlsbad Medical Village From: David Rick To: Brent Moore Subject: RE: Carlsbad Medical Village After discussing this issue In staff meeting, do to the insignificant amount of diversion, we no longer need you to analyze downstream impacts from the 4cfs. A few other things were brought up though (It happens when I lay out a plan in front of staff). The three foot deepened footing for building E and D should be 3.5 feet deep to establish a 7 foot horizontal distance from footing to slope per soils report Table 7.1. Also, each unit requires a separate water meter. The current proposal shows each building requiring a meter. In the interest of expedting, its ok if you don't want make the watermeter revisions on the plans at this time as I can condition the project that the meters be provided and shown on construction drawings. This last requirment about separate meters for each condominium unit ownership was just discussed recently in our staff meeting. Sorry it wasn't caught before. >>> "Brent Moore" <brent@partnerspe.com> 03/01/06 10:45 AM >>> David, it seems there is one additional comment that we need to come to an agreement on how to best address your concerns and still be able to keep the project moving forward. The comment appears in the Storm Water Management Plan and has to do with draining 4 cfs onto Carlsbad Village Drive. I do not know all of the history on this project; but I was under the impression that the City directed us to drain to the street rather than continue to drain to the adjacent properties to the west. As I do not want to get into a detailed analysis of how the 4 cfs we were planning on directing to Carlsbad Village Drive will affect drainage basin A per the City's Drainage Master Plan, I would prefer to outlet the storm water from the underground detention at the base of the slope along the west side of the property and have the flow drain out through the proposed openings in the wall. At least this way we are not diverting any drainage. Let me know your thoughts. Brent C. Moore, RCE Partners Planning and Engineering 15938 Bernardo Center Drive San Diego, CA 92127 Tel 858 376-3444 Fax 858 376-3555 email: brent@partnerspe.com Original Message From: David Rick [mailto:Drick@ci.carlsbad.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:42 AM To: brent@partnerspe.com Cc: Jason Goff; emunoz@hofmanplanning.com Subject: Re: Carlsbad Medical Village I just discussed this idea with Jason and we agree that this is a good solution. The changes will need to be made to the other plans as well, inlcuding the landscape plan. We were looking at the transition of the swale beyond the northern terminus of the wall and are confused. It appears that the swale will drop approximately 5 feet from the top of wall to an area unsupported by a slope - a lower flat area. Could you clarify? An alternative solution to consider would be to add an inlet and pipe in the brow ditch at the northern terminus that terminates into the parking lot. Call me if we need to discuss: (760)602-2781. Thanks. »> "Brent Moore" <brent@partnerspe.com> 03/01/06 9:01 AM >» David, in order to accommodate the 3.5' (or you said you would allow 3') setback from the adjacent residential properties, we can make up the loss of slope area behind the wall by utilizing the standard about:blank 03/02/2006 Page 2 of 2 Type B brow ditch with a wall extension as allowed per SDRSD D-75. The detail allows you to construct a maximum 18" wall extension (12" + 6") against the adjacent slope. You could make this concrete earth colored concrete to better blend into the slope. Let me know your thoughts. Russ Ries is chomping at the bit to get this issue resolved. Brent C. Moore, RCE Partners Planning and Engineering 15938 Bernardo Center Drive San Diego, CA 92127 Tel 858 376-3444 Fax 858 376-3555 email: brent@partnerspe.com about:blank 03/02/2006 li 1 LandAmerica Commonwealth Land Title Company 750 "B" Street Commonwealth San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 233-3000 RECEIVED SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE ISSUED BY Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company yUN 1 9 200? Bureau Veritas San Diego File No.: 03206340 Fee: $500.00 Subdivision: Carlsbad Tract CT 05-19 GUARANTEES The County of San Dlego and any city within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00. That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the above referenced subdivision, the only parties having any record title interest in said iand whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication by said map are: The map hereinabove referred to is a subdivision of: See Exhibit A Attached Dated: June 7, 2007 at 8:00 A.M. By Authorized Signatory CLTA Guarantee Form No. 14 (Rev. 4-10-75) Fi^eNo.: 03206340 SCHEDULE A PART I As ofthe date hereof, the party(ies) whose signature(s) will be necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision l^ap Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation ofthe Final Map or Parcel Map of said land and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered by such map are: A. The signature(s) of the party(ies} named hereinafter will be required as owner(s) of the herein named interest of said iand, pursuant to the provisions of Section 66436 of the Subdivision Map Act. Nature of Interest: FEE TITLE Owner(s): Carlsbad Medical Viiiage, L.P., a California Limited Partnership B. The signature of either the trustee or the beneficiary named below but not both, will be required under the provisions of Section 66436, Subsection (a) of the Subdivision Map Act for the following deed(s) of trust: Recorded: December 15, 2006 as File No. 2006-0891007 of Official Records Trustee: Pacific Western Bank Beneficiary: Pacific Western Bank C. The signature(s) of the party(ies) named hereinafter as owner(s) of the interest set forth, may be omitted under the provisions of Section 66436, (a)(3)(A)(i-viii) ofthe Subdivision Map Act, their interest is such that it cannot ripen into a fee title and said signature(s) is (are) not required by the local agency. Nature of Interest: Easement Owner: City of Carlsbad, a municipal Corporation Recorded: February 08, 1967 as File No. 17040 and June 27, 1968 as File No. 108282 of Official Records D. The signatures of the party(ies) named hereinafter as owner(s) of the interest set forth, may be omitted under the provisions of Section 66436, Subsection (a)(3)(A)(i-viii) of the Subdivision Map Act, their interest is such that it cannot ripen into a fee title and said signature(s) is (are) not required by the local agency. Nature of Interest: Easement Owner: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Recorded: April 11, 2007 as File No. 2007-1244260 of Official Records CLTA Guarantee No. 14 (Rev. 4-10-75) Page 2 File No.: 03206340 Exhibit A All that certain real property situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: That portion ofTract 119 of Carlsbad Lands, in the City ofCarlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1661, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March 1, 1915, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the center line of Highland Drive, distant thereon North 34°33'00" West, 372.58 feet from the intersection of said center line of Highland Drive with the center line of Oak Avenue; Thence South 55°27'00" West, 108.38 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing South 55°27'00" West, 87.83 feet; Thence South 34°33'00" East, 182.56 feet; Thence South 55°26'07" West, 89.54 feet; Thence South 34°33'00" East, 25.00 feet; Thence South 55°26'07" West, 65.00 feet; Thence North 34°33'00" West, 3.50 feet; Thence South 55°26'07" West, 116.91 feet to an intersection with a line that bears North 34°33'00" West, 168.50 feet from a point on the center line of said Oak Drive, distant thereon South 55°26'07" West, 467.47 feet from the intersection of said center line with the center line of said Highland Drive, North 34°33'00" West, 290.55 to the Southerly right of way of Elm Avenue, and a point in the arc of 1,242.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, a radial line from said curve bears North 44°59'45" West; Thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 03°47'30" a distance of 82.19 feet to a point of reverse curvature with a 1,158.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly; Thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 13°57'08" a distance of 281.99 feet to an intersection with a line that bears North 34°32'09" West from the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 34°32'09" East, 139.47 feet to the True Point of Beginning. CLTA Guarantee No. 14 (Rev. 4-10-75) Page 3