HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 76-17; La Costa Land Company; Tentative Map (CT)City of Carlsbad
En~ironmental Protection Act of 1972
(Section f9.04. 07()-cairsGad Ht.lnfcTpaTCode)
ENDORSE11ENT OF COHPLIANCE
APPLICANT L.A.. COSTA LAND COHPANY ---------------
TYPE OF PERHIT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION HAP & PLANNED UNIT DEV. PERMIT.
FILE NO CT 76-17 & PUD-7 ---------
ADDRESS AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY:
NORTH SIDE OF LA COSTA AVENUE BETivEEN CADENCIA AND GJ_BP-ALTAR_. __
I declare that I have examined the file relating to the above
captioned activity and have determined that all proceedings re-
quired for compliance v.Ti th the c·i ty of Carlsbad Environmental
Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Chapter 19, Carlsbad Hunicipal
Code) are complete.
DATED: AUGUST 5 1977 -----=-=-=-=-=-=-=---.:=.._z__::::._:c__:__:_ ____ _
Log No.
STAFF REPORT
December 8, 1976
TO: DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: CT 76-17 and PUD-7
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
REQUEST: Deletion of portions of SP-38 and resubdivision of
approximately 50 acres to provide 212 lots and 209
residential units in a Planned Unit Development.
SECTION I: RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends deletion of ~pose portions of SP-38 within the
boundaries of the Vale Unit IJU~boundaries and APPROVAL of Carlsbad
Tract 76-17 and PUD-7 for the following reasons and subject
to the following conditions:
FINDINGS (CT 76-17)
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for
Residential Medium-High density (10-20 dw~lling units
per acre). The subject project will provide approxi-
mately 4.2 dwelling units per acre; and
b) Open Space and circulation are provided for in a manner
consistent with applicable Elements of the General Plan
and the adopted La Costa Master Plan.
2) The proposed map is consistent with the approved Master Plan
because:
a) A Master Plan Parcel Amendment was adopted by the City
Council (City Council Ordinance 9469) to allow a lowering
of allowable density for the subject site.
3) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con-
sistent with the General Plan because:
a) Public facilities will be available concurrent with need
for the development.
4) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
because:
a) The proposed development will not affect any unusual
topographic or geologic features on the site; and
r \ \ -
2) Confirmation availa~ility of service from the Leucadia County
Water Di~trict will terminate :
a) If the Tentative Map is not approved by the City within
6 months of November 19, 1976;
b) Eighteen months after approval or conditional approval
of the tentative map, if a final map is not recorded in
that period; and
c) In the event of revisions of the tentative map which affect
the sewer system or sewer capacity.
3} In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during
the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain
passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate
fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed
as recommended by the Fire Department.
4) Ornamental street lighting shall be pro~ided for a~ re-
quired by Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall deposit
cash in the amount necessary to energize said street lights
for an eighteen month period after construction, to permit
the incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance
district.
5) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to
the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free
of all liens and encumbrances. No easements shall be re-
corded prior to recordation of the final map unless approved
by the City Engineer.
6) New slopes over 5 feet vertical difference adjacent to public
streets shall be 2:1 maximum.
7) Proposed "A" Street shall have a iO foot street section between
Retiro Street and pr0posed "8" Street.
FINDI~GS: PUQ-7
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute
to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community
because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be
developed to its allowable potential and density; and
b) The development will provide comprehensively planned
public park access and private amenities.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vi Gil'l:i 't¥-beca.use:
Tt)4 '." f'fl;pe$e1l ftlt ... •tl.l • .. • .6ovelo_pe.'4. i ..... • .tn .. ~.*'•'r tt•tl,ar to t._ ••ticipatecl fwtvr• dtt't'ctlttfil!N'at ht Ute-'''*-:
3)
,.,
!
. "--~· The design criteria set forth in Section 21.4S.lla and all
minimum development standards set forth in1 Section 21.45.120
will be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all de-
velopment aspects required;
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate
provision for open space, recreational f~cilities, ~ircu
lation and parking.
c) The project will be developed in a mu1ner to be compatible
with surrounding development;
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer
as shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval;
e) Private recreational facilities, and public open space
are readily accessible; and
f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed
in the underlying zone (P-C with Master Plan).
CONDITIONS (PUD-7)
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the applica-
tion and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plot Plan
submitted labeled Exhibit B, dated 11/l/76, Exhibit C dated
11/12/76, Exhibit D dated 11/12/76 and Exhibit E dated 11/12/76.
The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and
other facilities or features shall be located substantially as
shown on Exhibits B, C, D and E unless otherwise provided herein.
Z) All coli\aitiotu shall htt apprl)priately co,itpl.eted •nd the project
c&m>Junced wi'thin 13 aonUu from final City action.
·-..,...,-r-~~ ...... ·'-------·-•·---~ •••
---~------. r ----
3) The set-~acks or y~rds are as fol~ows:
.. ~·· .. :~
aJ Front Yard -minimum 20.00 feet from the right-of-way
line to· the front line of the building.
b) Rear Yard -minimum 10.00 feet from the rear line of
the building to the rear lot line or street right-of-way
line on through lots.
c) Side Yards:
1 )
2)
3)
4}.
·' The side yard adjacent to a lower pad shall be a
minimum of 5.00 feet from building line to property
1 in e.
The side yard adjacent to a pad that is 3.00 feet,
or less, higher shall be a minimum of 5.00 feet
from building line to property line.
The side yard adjacent to a pad that is more than
3.00 feet higher shall be a minimum of 7.50 feet
from building line to property line.
nM i nimum distance b etwe e.n .. Jw i J d i ng..s s h.a ll be., 10. 00
fe<t:t.
'.-·:' """-'·. ...... ' "· ~-'-",· ...•
\ ·--
(
4) Any structure that has a foundation or decking and that extends
higher than 3 ~~et .from t~e ground level, such as patio covers,
etc., shall not be constructed closer ·than~ fel!-t from any
rear property line or any slope, or 5 feet from any side lot·
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
.line or slope.
A lands~ape, irrigation, surfacing and fencing plan for the
recreational vehicle storage area shown on Exhibit C, shall
be submitted to the Planning Director, Parks and Recreation
Director and City Engineer for their ~pproval prior to issuance
of grading permits.
Facilities on lots 210, 211, and 212 as shown on Exhibit C
shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Parks and
Recreation Director prior to building permit issuance for
Unit 3.
Provision for electrical facilities on ]ots 210, 211 and 212
wi 11 be provide!f t'O t..,e satisfactiorJt ·t-t' ·the Parks and Recrea-'
tion Director.
Facilities such as f!icnie taibles, f••,ces, et¢., 'will be pro-
vided on lots f'.a, 211, and 212 as requirttd ;y the Parks and
Recreation Director.
The asphalt trail shown on Exhibit E shall be 6 1 wide minimum.
The concrete walk s.hQcWn on Exhti!Jit D shall be 7 1 and 5 1 as shown on Ute exfli bit.
ll) l'Jle Z0 1 lC¢tiS t-tSt-lltent betWIIft lots 103 lfid 104 Jh-411 be
fe*t•'-" to Ute satisfacti&n of the ParKs and Recreation
Director.
1 2 )
1 3 )
14)
A barrier will be placed on the western portion of lot
210 to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City tngineer
shall approve a plan submitted by the applicant for interim
erosion control on all man-made slopes in excess of five feet
created by this subdivision. Prior to this issuance of
grading permits, the applicant shall post bonds and agreements
ensuring the installation and maintenace of the erosion control
system until permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall submit a permanent landscaping and irrigation plan to the
Parks and Recreation Director for his approval. The plan shall
include all artificial slopes. These slopes shall:
a) Utilize fire-retardant, drought-resistant landscaping
which includes trees and shrubs which reach a variety
of sizes at maturity; and
b) Utiliz~ an_ irrigation system appropriate for common main-
tefl·a•tt of the reftvired laiise-IJtAJ in l:llnfera-ane& wi-th
con~ttlo•s 14, 11 an4 16. ·
··,...·--·. '.
15) Permanent landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on all
lots identified in Condition 13 before any of those lots are
occupied. If residential construction occurs in ~nits, this
condition shall be met on a unit-by-unit basis.
16) Prior to approval of a final subdivision map for any portion of
the PUD area, the applicant shall file with the Clerk of the
City of Carlsbad a petition for the formation of an Open Space
Maintenance District, as provided for in Section 50590 of the
California State Government Code, to provide maintenance of
those areas described in Condition 13. The applicant shall
maintain these areas ans all landscaping installed in con-
formance with Conditions 13 and 14 until such time as an Open
Space Maintenance District is established and accepts main-
te&ance responsibilities as prescribed_in the Open Space .
11'4tiAttRUt£e Act, or wnt i 1 lilt 1 B\4·1l·ll•te rtJ•,p;.llt$ fb 1· 1 i ty is accepted
t11 a<MU••r e•titr cu:c~,tatlle t• t111:e Cift)l . .. ------~--~~~-~~-----~--'---------' --
1 i) prior to the-i ss-uince or bui 1 ding perm'i ts, t1ut pro~~i-~i"o~ of
permanent open space maintenance shall b~ assured to tbe
satisfaction of the City Manager. If the City Council has not
for any reason formed an Open Space Maintenance District as
petitioned by the applicant in conformance with Condition 15,
the applicant shall form a Homenwners' Associatio• tG perform
mat·nt~rtance by anothtr entity acceptable to the City Manager.
lB) cc•tts for th-e project will •• subMitted tof :t1~1 Pdl1 anning it
·-· f)irtttor frar apra..roval prior to issuance.o tJUl -· ng J'erm -s.
19)
20)
Provision for the exclusive use of the .Recreational Vehicle ·
lot shown on Exhibi~·C for. the subject PUD, as provided for
uader S•ction ll.45.120(b), shall be accoa,lished to the
s a.t t s-f att i~illl of th.e City At t•r:~,e-y prfttf' ttt· i 'It~••~• -.f k i Hl-
h~t I ,,.-.rill t $ f i-'r U1~1 1 s t J•hc11e .
A~ce ss eas e'JHflts· will be provided a 1 ong the 1 ot 1 i nes with
••uttin~ stru~tures to allow building ma1ntenanc~ from adja-
. cent pro:perty.
Location and Description of Property:
The so acre site is located on the North side of La Costa A~enue
between Cadencia Street and Gibraltar.
The parcel has been previously subdivide~ f?r multiple_fa~ily
residential. Street improvements are ex1st1ng, and bu1ld1ng pads
have been created.
M+ttfit-ttioF'I of existimt street S)'stS:ms, buildin!J pul trades~and .
uw utifli-~wts w-~ll N q,ceasirJ te at'€11._._,,ate t·"• s4'•J•et f;f":tposal.
_, __ '
The property is characterized by rolling ropography with a number
of natural drainage areas.
A San Diego Gas and Electric power easement runs across the northern
boundary of the project.
A portion of a public dedicated park lies to the south of the San
Diego Gas and Electric easement.
Existing Zoning:
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Land Use:
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Planned Community
Planned Community
R-1-7500
Planned Community
Planned Community and RDM
Vacant
Vacant
Single family homes and Vacant
Vacant
Vacu1t
Past History and Related Cas,s:
The City Council approved CT 72-20 and SP-38 to accommodate Vale
Units II and III (Resolution Nos. 3128 and 3129, June 5, 1973).
Final maps for both units were sub~equently approved.
The City Council approved CT 74-11 for a portion of the Vale II
area to allow 48 condominium units of 4.4 acres (City Countil
Resolution No. 3509 dated September 17, 1974). This approval has
expired.
A partial La Costa Master Plan amendment has been approved for the
subject parcel that lowers the allowable Master Plan density, up
to 6.5 dwelling units per acre.
General Plan Information:
The Vale subdivisions were originally approved under the old General
Plan. The old General Plan allowed higher densitites than the current
General Plan.
The current General Plan designates the area for RM-H (10-20 dwelling
units per acre).
Environmental Impact Information:
Environmental Impact Report No. 35 was certified at the time of
approval of CT 72-20 and SP-38.
su,pleMental inforaat1on has been supplied by the applicant to ttle
satisfaction of staff.
-7-
\
c (
The project therefore conforms to the Carlsbad Environmental Pro-
tection Ordinance by Prior Compliance (Section 19.04.153).
Public Facilities:
-The site is within the water and sewer service areas of the Olivenhain
Municipal and Leucadia County Water Districts.
San Dieguito Union High School District and Encinitas Elementary
School Districts provide school facilities for the area.
Major Planning Considerations:
1. Does the proposal conform to the General Plan and Master Plan?
2. Does the proposal conform to the basic standards and intent
of the PUD section of Title 21?
• SECTION III: DISCUSSIO~
It has been established in previous requests that if a project
density does not exceed the General Plan allowable density it can
be approved.
In the case of the subject subdivision, a specific amendment to the
La Costa Master Plan was adopted by the City Council to allow for a
lowering of density in the subject area.
As a result, staff feels that the subject requests confrom to the
General Plan and Master Plan.
Staff finds that the project as proposed meets the basic requirements
of the Planned Unit Development development criteria.
The proximity of the project to the dedicated public park site and
its provision to incorporate the public and private amenities {physical-
ly and visually) i~to the proj~ct design-provide a bAsis for t~e PUD
concept 1nd intent.
Th-e prGjtct will provide single f&aily det&ctlled dwelling units
.OJt r~1at.i-¥>e--ly. s-m-a-ll le-t-s. The ave-rage lot size is about Sttof)·
sq. ft. with 50 feet of street frontage.
A zero-lot-line concept will be used in building location. This
method provides one wide side yard (approximately 10ft.) and one
zero-side yard. The structure is built along one side lot line
(see Exhibit B). This concept maximizes the usable portion of
the lot wi·fiitn anti alsct ilhnrs for ad~quate set1ucks f>etwe-eA-structur.es.
,,,.
( (
Staff is concerned, however, about one aspect of the applica,nt•s pro-
posal under the PUD concept. The applicant has informed st•ff that a
fee is intended for the Recreational Vehicle storage facili~i~s.
The ordinance does not specifi~ally mention fees in relation to the
required storage facilities, however, staff feels that because of
the small lots, some off-site provision for stor~ge should be guaran-
teed to re~idents of the PUD without substantial cost.
. . Because of the precedent setting nature of this question, staff
f~els that th\ Planning Commission should make a policy decision
on this matter. ·
If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the PUD wit~ no-cost
R-V stortte, a specific condition of approval providing for this
would be in order .
. -
T h e a p p 1 i c an t h a s a 1 s o r e q u e s t e d t h e f o 1 1 ow i n g i n r &·I it r(t to p a r k s
requirements:
Parks:
11 Canon Parks Units 1 to 3 represents a resubdivision of part of the
La Costa Vale II subdivision.· Technically, the dedication required
for this park on the new subdivision, as we calculate it, would be
3.47 acres, less .87 acres because of a 25% credit for private
amenities, or 2.6 acres.
However, this property has already contributed r.35 acres through
the previous Vale II Canon Park dedication. As part of the applica-
tion for this map, we inform you that we will request that the City
Counci-l waive any further park requirement for this project. Further,
while we realize that under your Attorney•s opinon, La Costa can re-
ceive no specific credit for the 1.75 additional acres, we certainly
think that in considering this total project that the facts above
should be recognized ...
The Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed this request and
concurs with the applicant.
TH:mdp
(12/3/76)
Attachments:
Exhibits B(l) -a, b, c and d
Exhibits B, C, D and E
School Letters (San Dieguito, Encinitas)
EIR Supplement
-9-
c\'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
/ \
Planned Unit Development {PUD-7)
Tentative Tract Map (CT 76-17)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the
City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council
Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M.,
on Wednesday, December 8, 1976, to consider resubdivision of
approximately 50 acres to provide 212 lots and 209 residential
units in a Planned Unit Development on property located on the
North side of La Costa Avenue between Cadencia Street and
Gibraltar, and more particularly described as:
Assessor•s Book No. 223, Page 180, Parcels 1, 3-8,
and 19-24. Assessor•s Book No. 223, Page 200, Parcel
1 8.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially
invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions,
please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department.
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
PUBLISH: November 27, 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANN-I-NG CO·J+tU~$10N
\
\
\
>
///
5100 Campus Drive • Newport Beach, California 92660 • (714) 955-2902
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Street
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attn: Mr. Paul Klukas
Re: School Fees
Dear Mr. Klukas:
March 3, 1981
Enclosed please find a copy of a secured agreement between La
Costa Land Company and San Dieguito Union High School District. As
you can see, this agreement provides that we shall pay to the District
the sum of $75.00, $201.00 and $377.00, respectively, for each
dwelling unit containing one, two and three or more bedrooms per
dwelling unit. Based upon the above information, the total school
fees due San Dieguito Union High School District would be $15,330.00.
This is expanded by the attached summary sheet.
There is an existing agreement with the EQ£.~~as Unified School
District which states that no school fees are appl~cable to this
project.
We hope this answers any questions you may have regarding school
fees.
MDD/dc
Enclosures
TY LEVIN
PRESIDENT
LORETTA M. SMITH
CLERK ~ncinitas ~nion ltcbool llistrict
MARY LOU SCHULTZ
G. RONALD SMITH
DONALD E. LINDSTROM
SUPERINTENDENT & BOARD SECRETARY
November 30, 1CJ7'J
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
C<lrlsbad, CA 92108
189 UNION STREET
ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024
TELEPHONE 753·1152
Attn: Planning Department
Re: La Costa Vale n., C:::nnon Pnr'z
Gentlemen:
CAPRI SCHOOL
941 CAPRI ROAD
CENTRAL SCHOOL
185 UNION STREET
FLORA VISTA SCHOOL
1690 WANDERING ROAD
OCEAN KNOLL SCHOOL
91 0 MELBA ROAD
PACIFIC VIEW SCHOOL
608 THIRD STREET
PARK DALE LANE SCHOOL
2050 PARK DALE LANE
An agreement exists between La Costa Land Comp~ny and the Encinitas
Union School District, whereby a school site has been made available
to the School District covering this project. No school fees are
re~uired for this project.
Sincerely,
DONALD E • LINDSTROM
S:JI'ERINTENDENT
/UdVU1/VI~ Harren Roberts
Director of Fl~nning
ls
EXCELLENCE IS OUR GOAL.
SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
SUMMARY SHEET
School fees for Lots 79-87, 89-109, 144-147, 149-153,
172-175, 181-187
UNIT
PLAN BEDROOMS UNITS PRICE TOTAL
A 2 6 201.00 1,206.00
B 2 14 201.00 2,814.00
c 3 18 377.00 6,786.00
D 4 12 377.00 4,524.00
$15,330.00
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
December 13, 1979
Wayne Dernetz, City Manager
Karen Lee, Assistant PlannerR ~
SUBJECT: . SCHOOL FEES FOR CT 76-17, (WOOm·lARD)
On December 3, 1979, we collected school fees for the San
Dieguito Union High School District for 50 lots in CT 76-17.
These fees were based on a developer agreement whi~ was
instituted prior to the adoption of SB 201. Therefore,
these fees ·should have been paid directly to the school
district. Attached is a letter from the Woodward Companies
requesting that the money be refunded to the school district.
The $15,506 should be refunded to the district as soon~as
possible. ' >
Attachment
t
5100 Campus Drive • Newport Beach, California 92660 • (714) 955-2902
December 10, 1979
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attention: Planning Department
Gentlemen:
Attached please find a copy of the receipt from you indicating
that San Dieguito school fees of $15,506.00 were paid on 12-3-79,
for Carlsbad tract 76-17 (50 lots).
Please accept this letter as our demand to you to rebate $15,506.00
in fees to San Dieguito Union High School District.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
THE WOODWARD COMPANIES
LARRY EINSCHMIDT
Controller
LK: lh
Enclosures
RECEIVED
DEC 12 1979
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Dfpartment
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVE:NUE I CARLSBAD. CALIFORNiA 91\JOil
729. 11 (ll
---OAT E _..;._/,l;,,..c:;;;.-) ...... ..;../..;;;~~;;.=.L.I-'/:_,'-j_' u. .... [_
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
.. #
In the matter of the application of
AETNA CAPITAL COMPANY,
a Ca 1 i fo rn i a
DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONE NO. 213-620-2700
ISSUED:
for a Final Subdivision Public Report on
MAP NO. 8619
AMENDED:
"CORONA LA COSTA" ~
CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 6-11
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA ORNIA
EXPIRES:
....,
RECbliVE:J
APR 2 J. 1978
.CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Oepartn :ent
FINAL SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC REPORT
FILE NO. 39657
NOVEMBER 14, 1977
JANUARY 26, 1978
NOVEMBER 13, 1982
This Report Is Not a Recommendation or Endorsement of the Subdivision
But Is Informative Only.
Buyer or Lessee Must Sign That He Has Received and Read This Report.
1bis Report Expires on Date Shown Above. If There Has Been a Material Change in the Offering, an
Amended Public Report Must Be Obtained and Used in Lieu of This Report.
Section 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the practice of discrimination
because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in housing accommodations is
against public policy.
Under Section 125.6 of the California Business and Professions Code, California real estate licensees are
subject to disciplinary action by the Real Estate Commissioner if they make any discrimination, distinction
or restriction in negotiating a sale or lease of real property because of the race, color, sex, religion, ancestry
or national origin of the prospective buyer. If any prospective buyer or lessee believes that a licensee is
guilty of such conduct, he or she should contact the Department of Real Estate.
Information Regarding Schools can be found on Page Seven of this report.
READ THE ENTIRE REPORT on the following pages before contracting to purchase a lot in this
SUBDIVISION.
R/E Form 618
10/76
-1-
COMMON INTEREST SUBDIVISION GENERAL INFORMATION
The project described in the attached Subdivision Public Report is known as a common-interest
subdivision. Read the Public Report carefully for more information about the type of subdivision.
The subdivision includes common areas and facilities which will be owned and/ or operated by an
owners' association. Purchase of a lot or unit automatically entitles and obligates you as a member of
the association and, in most cases, includes a beneficial interest in the areas and facilities. Since
membership in the association is mandatory, you should be aware of the following information
before you purchase:
Your ownership in this development and your rights
and remedies as a member of its association will be
controlled by governing instruments which generally
include a Declaration of Restrictions (also known as
CC&R's), Articles of Incorporation (or association) and
Bylaws. The provisions of these documents are intended
to be, and in most cases are, enforceable in a court of law.
Study these documents carefully before entering into a
contract to purchase a subdivision interest.
In order to provide funds for operat~on and
maintenance of the common facilities, the association
will levy assessments against your lot/unit. If you are
delinquent in the payment of assessments, the association
may enforce payment through court proceedings or your
lot/unit may be liened and sold through the exercise of a
power of sale. The anticipated income and expenses of
the association, including the amount that you may
expect to pay through assessments, are outlined in the
proposed budget. Ask to see a copy of the budget if the
subdivider has not already made it available for your
examination.
A homeowner association provides a vehicle for the
ownership and use of recreational and other common
facilities which were designed to attract you to buy in this
subdivision. The association also provides a means to
accomplish architectural control and to provide a base
for homeowner interaction on a variety of issues. The
purchaser of an interest in a common-interest subdivision
should contemplate active participation in the affairs of
the association. He or she should be willing to serve on
the board of directors or on committees created by the
board. In short, "they" in a common-interest subdivision
is "you". Unless you serve as a member of the governing
board or on a committee appointed by the board, your
control of the operation of the common areas and
facilities .is limited to your vote as a member of the
association. There are actions that can be taken by the
governing body without a vote of the members of the
association which can have a significant impact upon the
quality of life for association members.
Until there is a sufficient number of purchasers of lots
or units in a common-interest subdivision to elect a
majority of the governing body, it is likely that the
subdivider will effectively control the affairs of the
association. It is frequently necessary and equitable that
the subdivider do so during the early stages of
development. It is vitally important to the owners of
individual subdivision interests that the transition from
subdivider to resident-owner control be accomplished in
an orderly manner and in a spirit of cooperation.
When contemplating the purchase of a dwelling in a
common-interest subdivision, you should consider
factors beyond the attractiveness of the dwelling units
themselves. Study the gov,erning instruments and give
careful thought to whether you will be able to exist
happily in an atmosphere of cooperative living where the
interests of the group must be taken into account as well
as the interests of the individual. Remember that
managing a common-interest subdivision is very much
like governing a small community ... the management
can serve you well, but you will have to work for its
success. ...:-.....
DRE
-2-of 7 pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
SPEX:IAL NOI'ES
THIS REPORI' COVERS ONLY WI'S 110 THROUGH 132 AND 139 TEROUGH 143.
THIS PROJECT IS A PlANNED DEVEWPMENT. IT INCWDES CCM-DN AREAS AND C(MJI)N
FACILITIES WHICH WILL BE OPERATED BY AN :m::ORPORATED CWNERS ASSOCIATICN. THE
ASSOCIATICN HAS THE RIGHT TO IEJY. ASSESSMENTS AGAINST YOU FOR MAIN'I'ENAOCE OF
'!'HE C(M.!N AREAS AND OTHER PURPOSES. YOOR CON'I'OOL OF OPERATIONS AND EXPENSES
IS N:>RMALLY LIMITED TO THE RIGHT OF YOOR EI..ECIID REPRESENTATIVES TO VOI'E ON
~ ProviSIONS AT MEETINGS.
THE SUBDIVIDER HAS STATED THAT HE WILL ProviDE YOO WI'IH A COPY OF 'IHE ARI'ICLES
OF :IN::ORPORATION I RESTRICTIONS AND BYlAWS I BY FURNISHING YOO COPIES PRIOR TO
CI.DSE OF ESCRCM. 'IHESE IXX'tJMENTS CCNI'AIN NUMERCUS MATERIAL PROVISICNS THAT
SUBSTANTIALLY .AFFEX:T AND CCNI'ROL YOOR RIGHTS I PRIVTI..EGES I USE I OBLIGATICNS I AND
COSTS OF MAINTENANCE AND OPERATICN. YOU SHOUID READ AND UNDERSTAND 'IHESE
IXX'tJMENTS BEFORE YOU OBLIGATE YOORSELF TO PURCHASE A Im.
THE SUBDIVIDER STATED HE WILL FURNISH THE CURRENT OOARD OF OFFICERS OF THE
H<l-1EClVNER ASSCX:IATICN THE BUILDING PLANS TO m:LUDE DIAGRAMS OF r.a::ATION OF MAJOR
cc:::MPCtmNTS I 11l'ILITIES AND RELATED DATA. 'IHESE I'IEMS WILL BE :n1PORI'ANT TO THE
BOARD OF OFFICERS OR THOSE WHO WILL MANAGE OR REPAIR a::Mm' FACILITIES IN '!HIS
SUBDIVISIOJ.~. -
THE SUBDIVIDER OF THIS Pro.m:'I' HAS INDICATED THAT HE INmNDS TO SELL ALL OF 'IHE
UNITS IN '!HIS PRQJECI'. HOVEVER, ANY avNER, INCLUDING THE SUBDIVIDER, HAS A
LEX:;AL RIGh"T TO LEASE THE UNITS. PROSPEX:TIVE PURCHASERS SHOULD CCNSIDER THE
POSSIBLE EFFECTS CN THE DEVELOPMENT IF A SUBSTANTIAL PORI'ICN OF THE UNITS BEX:CME
REm'AL PROPERI'IES.
WARNING: WHEN YOU SELL YOUR I.Dr TO sa1EONE ELSE YOU MUST GIVE THAT PERSCN A COPY
OF THE DEX:lARATICN OF RF.STRICTICNS, AND OF THE ARI'ICI.FS OF INCORPORATION, AND OF
THE BYIAWS. IF YOO FO~ TO DO THIS IT MAY COST YOU A PENALTY OF $500.00 -
PWS ATTORNEYS FEES PWS DAMAGES. (SEE CIVIL CODE SEX:TION 1360.)
INTERESTS TO BE CONVEYED: You will receive fee title to a specified lot, together
with a nanbership in "corona La COsta Hcmeowners Association" and rights to use
the conm:m area.
r.o::::ATION AND SIZE: In the City of carlsbad. This is the third phase which consists
of apprOXJ.Ina.tely 6. 21 acres divided into 28 lots, in addition to the c:x:mron area
which consists of lots 210 and 211 on which conrnunity facilities consisting of
landscaped area and park will be constructed. This phase is part of a total project
which, if developed as proposed, will consist of a total of 8 phases and 209
residential lots. The current sewer moratorium may lessen the possibility of future
ohases ..
The subdivider has posted a J::x:md in the anount of $60,000 to assure completion of
inprovements described in the "Planned Construction Statem:mt", attached to the
bond. The estimated canpletion date for these improvements is March, 1978.
There is no assurance that the total project will be canpleted as proposed.
MANAGEMENI' AND OPERATION: The COrona La COsta Hcmeowners Association which you
nrust jom, manages and operates the ccmron areas in accordance with the
Restrictions, Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws.
Page 3 of 7 Pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
.MAIN'l'ENAta AND OPERATI<:.:NAL EXPENSES: The subdivider has sul::mitted a budget for
the rraintenance and operation of the carm:m areas and for long tenn reserves. You
should obtain a copy of this budget fran the su.b:li vider. Under this budget 1 the
m:mthly assessrrent against each sutx:iivision unit is $15.34 of which .25 is a
m:mthly oontribution to long tenn reserves and is not to be used to pay for
current operating expenses.
IF 'lHE BUI:X:iET FURNISHED TO YOU BY THE DEVELOPER SHOWS A M:Nl'HLY
ASSESSMENI' FIGURE WHICH VARIES 10% OR M:>RE Fro1 THE ASSESSMENT
»UJNT SHewN IN THIS PUBLIC REPORI', YOU SHCULD CONTACT THE DE-
PARIMENT OF REAL ESTA'IE BEFORE ENTERING mro AN AGREEMENT TO
PURCHASE.
The association may increase or decrease assessrrents at any time in accordance
with the procedure prescribed in the CC&R' s or Bylaws. In considering the
adviSability of a decrease (or a smaller increase) in assessrrents, care should
be taken not to eliminate arrotmts attributable· to reserves for replacement or
major maintenance.
THE INFORMATIOO m:uJDED IN THIS PUBLIC REPORI' IS APPLICABLE "AS OF
THE DATE OF ISSt.JAl'X:E. EXPENSES OF OPERATIOO ARE DIFFICULT TO PRE-
DICT ACCURATELY AND EVEN IF ACCURATELY ESTIMATED INITIALLY 1 M:>ST
EXPENSES INCREASE WITH THE AGE OF FACILITIES AND WITH TICREASES IN
COST OF LIVJNG.
M::>nthly assessments will COI.llleilce on all lots in phase 3 during the m:mth following
the closing of the first sale of a lot. From that tine, the subdivider is required
to pay the association a rconthly assessrrent for each lot which he owns.
The remedies available to the association against owners who are delinquent in the
paynent of assessrrents are set forth in the CC&R' s. These rerredies are available
against the subdivider as well as against other owners. The sul::di vider has posted
a oond in the arrount of $2 1 577.12 as partial security for his obligation to pay these
assessments. The governing OOdy of the association should assure itself that the
subdivider has satisfied his obligations to the association with respect to the
paym=nt of assessrrents before agreeing to a release or exoneration of the security.
The subdivider has entered into an agreerrent with the hcmeowners association to
subsidize.
Each of the subsidizations, by phases, shall not 1 under any circumstances, exceed
a total reriod of six ( 6) m:mths for each succeeding phase, said six ( 6) m:mth
tenn to catmence on the first day of the m:mth following the nonth in which the
last escrow closes for the next preceding phase of the project. There is no
guarantee that the subdivider will canplete all of the phases of the project 1 and
at the end of the six ( 6) m:mth subsidization reriod for any particular phase,
the subsidization by the subdivider of the Association shall cease and if there is
no succeeding phase a::mrenced, there shall be no further subsidization by the
subdivider of the Association of any succeeding phase.
Page 4 of 7 Pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
PHASES '10 BE
SUBSIDIZED
PER UNIT PER IDN'I'H
SUBSIDIZATION
'IDTAL MJNTHLY SUBSIDIZATION
(Not to exceed six nonths)
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Phase v
Phase VI
Phase VII
$12.48
6.77
3.82
2.42
1.28
.52
$686.40
561.91
427.84
331.54
207.36
97.24
The subdivider has posted a Bond in the anount of $13,873.74 for the above
subsidy.
THE SUBDIVIDER HAS STATED THAT HE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A COPY OF
THE SUBSIDY AGREEMENT BY FURNISHING YOU COPIES PRIOR '10 THE CIDSE
OF ESCru:l'J.
EASEMENTS: Easements for utilities, drainage, and other purposes are shown on the
title report and the subdivision map recorded in the Office of the San Diego
County Recorder, July 12, 1977, as File No. 77-277688.
RESTRicriONS: This subdivision is subject to . restrictions recorded in the Office
of the San Diego County Recx::>rder, November 2, 1973, as File No. 73-307983;
November 16, 1973, as File No. 73-321220; December 19, 1973, as File No. 73-349970;
May 15, 1974 as File No. 74-126131; October 19, 1977, as File No. 77-430967, and
November 7, 1977, as File No. 77-460848, which include, arrong other provisions,
the following:
Non-payrren.t of assessments to owners association may result in a
foreclosure against the owner.
The l'lomaowner association may levy a fine against you for violation
of CC&R' s or By-Laws.
Single family residence only pennitted on any lot.
TAX ESTIMATES: If the subdivider is unable to give you the current tax infonnation
for your house and lot, you may approximate your taxes as follows:
TAKE 25% OF THE SALES PRICE, DIVIDE BY 100, AND THEN MULTIPLY
BY THE TOI'AL TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE FOR THE 1976-77 FISCAL
YFAR IS $10.661. THE TAX RATE AND ASSESSED VALUATICN MAY
~ IN SUBSEQUENI' YEARS. FOR EXAMPLE, ANY BOIDED DEBT OR
SP.OCIAL DISTRicr ASSESSMENT APPROVED AFI'ER THE AOOVE TAX RATE
HAD BEEN SEI' COUID INCREASE THE FtJ'I'ORE DATE.
<Xl'IDITIONS OF SALE: If your purchase involves financing, a fonn of deed of trust
and note will be used. These d.ocurcents contain the following provisions:
A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE: THIS MEANS THAT DURING THE TERM
OF THE WAN THE RATE OF INTEREST MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED
PERIODICALLY IN ACCORD WITH THE ProviSICNS OF THE .t.ClAN IXXlJMENTS.
An acceleration clause: This rreans that if you sell the property,
the lender may declare the entire unpaid balance imrediately due
and payable.
Page 5 of 7 Pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
.. A· Late Charge. This m=ans that if you are late in making
your rn:mthly paym:mt you may have to pay an additional anount
as a penalty.
A Prepayment penalty. This means that if you wish to pay off
your loan in whole or in part before it _is due, you may be
required to pay an additional arrount as a penalty in accordance
with the tenns of the loan.
BEFORE SI~, YOU SHOUID READ AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND ALL I.DAN J:XXlJMEN'I'S.
PURCHASE M:>NEY HANDLING: The subdivider must impound all funds received fran you
m escrow depos~tory liDtil legal title is delivered to you. (Refer to Sections
11013, 11013.2(a) of the Business and Professions Code) If the escrow has not
closed on your lot within one year of the date of your escrow, you may request
return of your deposit.
Aetna capital Ccxrpany is wmlly owned by the escrow depository,
Brentwood Savings and Loan.
GEOI.CGIC CONDITICNS: THE UNIFORM BUilDING CODE, CHAPTER 70, PROVIDES FOR IJ.X'AL
BUilDING OFFICIALS 'ID EXERCISE PREVENTIVE MEASURES DURING GRADING 'ID ELIMINATE OR
MINIMIZE DAMAGE FI01 GEOI.(X;IC HAZARDS SUCH AS lANDSLIDES' FAULT MJVEMENTS I EARI'H-
CUAKE SHAKING, RAPID EROSICN OR SUBSIDENCE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS r.a::ATED IN AN
AREA WHERE SQ.1E OF THESE HAZARDS MAY EXIST. SCl-1E CALIFORNIA COONTIES AND CITIES
HAVE AOOPI'ED ORDINANCES THAT MAY OR MAY 001' BE AS EFFEX::I'IVE IN THE CONI'ROL OF
GRADING AND SITE PREPARATICN.
PURCHASERS MAY DISCUSS wriH THE DEVEI.OPER, THE DEVEI.OPER 1 S EN3INEER, THE ENGINEERING
GEO:r.o:;IST I AND THE I.CCAL BUilDING OFFICIALS 'ID DEl'ERMINE IF THE AOOVE-MENI'IONED
HAZARDS HAVE BEEN CCNSIDERED AND IF THERE HAS BEEN ADEQUATE CCMPLIAN::E WITH
CHAPTER 70 OR AN EQUIVALENT OR IDRE STRINGENT GRADING ORDINANCE DURING THE
CCNSTRUCI'ION OF THIS SUBDIVISICN.
FILLED GROUND: ~st lots contain filled ground varying to a miximum dept of 16
feet. These soils are to be properly compacted for the intended use under the
supervision of a state licensed engineer.
SOIL CONDITIONS: An engineering report has been filed which indicates soil is
expansive, and included in the report are certain rea:>ItTCei1dations. Subdivider has
certified that he will comply with the rea:mren.dations of the engineer, that the
purchasers 1 funds will be inp:>tmded in escrow, and that no escrow will close
liDtil reccrrrcendations have been completed.
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: The subdivider advises that there is presently a rronthly sewer
service charge.
PUBLIC TRANSPORI'ATION: Bus service is approximately 3 miles from the sulxlivision
at El camino Real and La Costa.
Page 6 of 7 Pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
SOIOO!.S': The Encinitas Union and San Dieguito Union High School District(s) have
furru.shed infonnation of the nearest sclx:x)ls, distances to the rrost rerrote lot,
availability of school bus transporation, and bus charges, as indicated:
SChools Grades Distance (Miles) Bus Available Charges
Capri Elemental:y K-6 4 Yes
941 Capri Road
oak Crest Junior High 7&8 5 1/2 Yes
675 Balour Drive
San Diegui to High 9-12 6 3/8 Yes
800 Sante Fe Drive
The Encinitas Union District advises:
In view of space limitations, all new students will be placed on
the year-round calendar.
While bus transportation is provided at District expense; our fleet
is inadequate to rreet our needs.
The San Dieguito Union High District advises:
At the present tine all school facilities of the San Dieguito Union High School District
are extremely over~ed. OVer twenty portable buildings have been added in the
past five years in order to keep up with the rising enrollrrent. The District has
nearly reached the point where the addition of rrore portable buildings will place
a severe strain an the pennanent facilities such as gym and locker areas, P .E.
fields, restroarns, etc.
The District opened a second high school in 1974; l'lowever, the base population from
new hares and those scheduled to be canpleted in the future continues to result in
overcrowded conditions. Portable classroans have already been added at the new
school in view of these circumstances.
In sunmary, the quality of the educational program in the San Dieguito District is
severely threatened by the continued influx of new hc:m:s. The District is currently
studying alternative rrethods of musing the student overflow.
NOTE: This school infonnatian was correct as of the date of this report. Purchasers
may contact the local school district for current infonnation an school assignnents,
facilities and bus service.
For further infonnatian in regard to this subdivision, you may call (213) 620-2700,
or examine the docum:nts at the Depart:ment of Real Estate, 107 South Broadway, Room
7001, ws Angeles, california. 90012.
RG/ Page 7 of 7 Pages File No. 39657 LA
(Amended)
. '
'
SAN DIEGUITO
~~ ... L;.: ; ... :· :~· :. :: IJICWI WU fl . .
IIUU lfJtl
' UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT· m•n
2151 HE\'iCASTL£, CARDIFF, CALIFORHIA 92007
August 11, 1976
• 714-753·5491
l
. -··
..
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue ·
Ca.:Tsbad · Califorrda 92008 .. )_
Gentlemen
RE: Canyori Park Unit Uo. 1
Our district has reviewed the proposed 210 unit development
generally locat~d ------~i~n_L~a~C~o~s~ta~----------------------------
and have evaluated the impa~t of that development on the facil-
ities of our district.
-j Please be/infoll.!!ed that our district is able to assure you that'
~chool facilities and services will be available concurrent with
, need for this development.
Very t{uly yours
w~~~ Q ,&~" oL
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
-~-,·-n.E CE 1 V ED
AUG 11 \976
C11Y OF CARI_S8AD
Planning Department
•.,
'l
'SOARD OF TRUSTEESt OouyiU M. Fouquet,
President
Jack P.. Stevens,
VIce Pruldcnt
Daniel J. Rodriguez,
CleriC
Ol.vld H. Tnomp~on
-·•
111.-to•ILII~.,... r' Rob~rt A. Merlo John J. DillY,
. . . -~ "
Don w. Mite
.. . . ~ ..
•.-CLARKE
,£St0(NT
. .... . t \
CAPRI SCHOOL
• ~I CAPRI RQAO
._G. MUNOZ. PH. 0.
VICE P~ES!PENT €ncinitas ~nion §§>dJool District CENTRAL SCHOOL
1B5UNt0"1 Sf flEET .. . .
JOUGLAS J. HOLLOWAY
ClEFU: I
189 UNION STREET. OCEAN KNOLL SCHOOL
910 MELBA ROAD -~
MARY LOU SCHULTZ
LORETT II M. SMITH
ROBERT l. BRICKMAN, PH.O~-
Su?ERtNHNOENT & BOARD SECRETARY
ENCJNITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PACIFIC VIEW SCHOOL
TELEPHONE 753·1152
August 9, 1976
Donald Agatep, Planning Director
City of Carlsbad
Carlsbad, California
Dear Don:
££a THIRD STREET ... .
PARKDALE LANE SCHOOL
20(;() PARK DALE LANE
(1) Re: · Project at La Costa Vale #2 (210 ~ingle family units)
.An-agreement exists between La Costa-Land Development Company and this
District whereby a portion of a school site .has been made available to
us covering this project.
(2) Re: Monte Vista Unit Dl (215 single family units)
This project, a portion of Santa Fe Knolls, is covered by a tentative
agreement between this school district and La Costa Land Development
Company whereby a school site will be provided in the vicinity of the
, project. Prior to approval of a tentative map, we expect delineation
of the exact site location.
The Board of Trustees has been made aware of La Costa's }faster Plan.
Sincerely,
~.-{3,/cr~=--
Robert L. Brickman, Ph. D.
Superintendent
RLB:h
cc: Fred.Morey
\
RECEIVED
f\UG 11 '916
, .-Of CARLSBJ\D c, ~ '{ · . . Department p\annln&
December 8, 1976
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
-"\,./ CANNON PARK UNITS: I, II AND III.
~.1 Staff Environmental Analysis for Cahnon Park Units: I, II and III.
The project site has already been graded and had a portion of the
street system completed. Since the 11 natural 11 environment of the
s i t e h a s a 1 ready been seve ~1 y d i s r u pte d , the c r i t i c a 1 i s s u e s ad-
dressed in the E.I.R Supplement are:
1) The impacts relating to service and utility requirements;
2) The effect of the project on the nearby protected area in San
~1 a r c o s C a ny o n ;
3) The impacts of traffic noise from La Costa Avenue;
4) The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other
development in the La Costa area;
5) The impacts of energy consumption.
The supplemental environmental information substa~iates the fact that
impacts resulting from the proposed project are less than those which
would result from the previously aooroved project. The one exception
to this is that the previous higher density project would probably
have supplied housing which was priced to serve a greater portion of
the housing market.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
The followinq are mitigation measures which may be adopted as a part
of the project approval:
1) All construction in the project area shall occur during normal
daytime working hours.
2) Grading shall be limited to the m1n1mum areas necessary to
accomplish the planned development. This requirement shall be
met to the satisfaction of the City Enqineer.
3) Vegetation clearing operations shall be made no more than 2 weeks
in advance of grading.
4) No grading shall occur during the months of January through
March, except when special measures can be taken to control
siltation. This shall be met to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
-1-
·s) All drainage facilities shall be constructed concurrent with
grading activities.
6) All graded surfaces shall be watered and rolled to form a
compacted cap of soil.
7) Surfaces shall be graded to direct runoff toward planned
drainages and, wherever possible, away from cut and fill slopes.
8) Ground cover with appropriate irrigation systems shall be
planted on all slopes upon completion of any grading activities.
9) During construction, City Building and Engineering Inspectors
shall attempt to ensure that all waste chemicals (especially
paints, fuels and lubricants) are properly contained and trans-
ported off-site where they can be recycled or destroyed.
10) All utilities, including provisions for cable television, shall
be placed underground.
11) In order to protect San Marcos Canyon from the adverse impacts of
development, the following measures shall be implemented:
a) Access to the Canyon shall be restricted by requiring fencing
of all lots abutting the canyon.
b) A rim walk/nature trail shall be provided along the perimeter
of the canyon, but internal access shall be discouraged by
posting of signs and construction of barricades.
c) Catchment basins shall be installed to trap any run-off
directed toward the canyon.
d) The City's leash law should be strictly enforced to res-
trict the roaming of domestic animals in the canyon.
12) Native landscaping shall be used wherever possible in the project
area.
13) All new street lights in the Master Plan shall be of a type
which conserves energy. Optimum spacing of street lights
shall be utilized.
14) All development within the project area shall utilize wherever
possible the following energy-saving techniques:
a) Architectural design which reduces window and door openings,
and takes advantage of winter sun and summer shade;
b) Insulation for all structures according to State standards;
c) Solar heating for both space and water heatinq;
d) Landscaping using deciduous trees (to shade in summer and
allow sunlight in winter) and windbreaks.
-2-
15) All lots abutting La Costa Avenue which are subject to ambient
noise levels,in excess of 60 dB(a) shall be subject to in-
vestigation by a qualified acoustician, who shall recommend
measures necessary to attenuate noise levels to 60 dB (a) or less.
DHW:AR
-3-
December 29, 1976
TO: CITY MANAGER
FR0~1: ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADDED CONDITIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUT IONS-LW.{LANILJ31)J_...,_ .APPROVAL OF
CT 76-17 AND PUD-7
Staff suggests a modification of one condition and the adding of
another to the subject Resolutions. It is suggested that Condition
18 of Resolution 1301 be reworded as follows:
(18) Recreational vehicle storage is to be provided for
the use of the property owners who reside within
the PUD. Recreational vehicle spaces required
for this PUD shall not be used for another purpose.
The storage site shall be maintained by the
Homeowners Association of this PUD.
This change is more in keeping with the Ordinance requirement
(21.45. 120(6)) and gives specific direction to the applicant as to
what is expected for the use, maintenance and the relation of the
site to the PUD.
The added condition is suggested for both the CT and PUD approving
Resolutions. They are:
Add Condition (8) to Resolution 1300 as follows:
(8) Prior to final map approval the applicant shall
secure approval of amendment to SP-38 to allow
development in accordance with CT 76-17.
And add Condition 20 to Resolution 1301 as follows:
(20) Approval of this request is not effective until the
applicant has secured approval of amendment to
SP-38 to allow development in accordance with PUD-7.
These added conditions are necessary since there is a Specific Plan
approved and effective ori this site. Planning Staff did not note
this until after the legal notice had been published. The Planning
Commission noted in their approval that SP-38 needed an amendment;
however, the City Attorney has advised that amendment to an S.P.
r e.q u i r e s f u 1 1 1 e g a 1 n o t i c e w i t h p u b 1 i c h e a r i n g . S t a f f w i 1 1 pro c e s s
this amendment as soon as possible using information and the
property owner list supplied with the application for CT 76-17 and
PUD-7. -
BP:cpl (12/29/76)
A
I.ACDStA
COSTA DELMAR ROAD -:-CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 -:-TELEPHONE 714/753-1181 or 438-9111
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
June 17, 1980
Attention: Brian Milich
Planning Department
Dear Brian:
Your letter dated May 8, 1980 addressed to Jim Goff regarding
the Corona La Costa RV Storage yard indicated a condition of
approval of the agreement was that the project would be com-
pleted by June 18th.
I was not advised of this condition of approval until May 13th
and the grading permit was not signed and approved until May 21,
therefore there is no way we can complete the work by June 18th.
We are completing the bidding for the work this week and expect
to start the project next week and I will advise you when we
expect completion.
Sincerely,
~~~-Les Vaughn, Project Coordinator
LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
LLV/bl
.. l RECEIVED
--
t . ·-
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
April 29, 1980
Mr. Jim Goff
c
Vice President
Planning & Research
Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
C!Citp of C!Carl~&ab
RE: CORONA LA COSTA RV STORAGE AGREEMENT ~·
Dear Jim,
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
Per our phone conversation, I have enclosed a recreational
vehicle storage agreement for the Corona La Costa subdivi-
sion. As I have indicated, a minor change to the agreement
was made, deleting reference to the La Costa Land Company
in approving an alternate RV storage site. Since La Costa
must propose the alternate site, it is appropriate to l.imit
approval of such a site to the city planning and engineering
departments.
Please sign the agreement and return it to the Planning
Department for the Planning Director's signature.
If you have any questions please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
Planning Director
-
By
A Planner
JCH:BM:ma
c
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CORONA LA COSTA RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
STORAGE AGREEMENT
(PUD-7(A)/SP-38(B}
In order to ensure the maintenance of a recreational vehicle
storage yard for the residents of the Corona La Costa
Subdivision (PUD-7/CT 76-17), the undersigned hereby agrees
that in the event that the San Diego Gas and Electric
Company terminates the License Agreement (No. 1979-3-1)
between the San Diego Gas and Electric Company and the Corona
La Costa Homeowners Association, which permits the presently
proposed recreational vehicle storage yard, an alternative
site substantially equivalent in size and located in the
vicinity of, but not necessarily in, the Corona La Costa
Subdivision shall be provided for the Corona La Costa
residents.
Said alternate site must be approved, in writing, by the
Planning Director and City Engineer. The writing may include
reasonable conditions, substantially similar to those already
imposed with respect to the presently proposed vehicle_:
storage yard, necessary to reduce actual or likely negative
impacts to adjacent properties.
This agreement to provide an alternate recreational vehicle
storage yard site shall obligate the undersigned for a
period of five years from the signature of this agreement
by La Costa Land Company.
Signature
Date
LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
Irv Roston
Executive Vice President
James c. Hagaman
Planning Director
(Date)
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
December 4, 1978
Mr. Don E. Woodward
THE WOODWARD COMPANIES
€itp of ~arlsbab
4500 Campus Drive, Suite 142
Newport Beach, CA 92660
RE: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING -CANNON PARK SUBDIVISION
(CT 76-17, PUD-7)
Dear Mr. Woodward:
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
As you are probably aware, the provision of a private recreational
vehicle parking area accompanying your Cannon Park subdivision,
has been a point of contention during the final occupancy approvals
of the latest phase of development. The approved Planned Unit
Development for your project (PUD-7; City Council Resolution
No. 4081, February 1, 1977), requires that a RV storage area be
provided for the use of the property owners who reside within the
PUD. The official exhibit of the PUD identifies the location
of the storage lot as an area on the east side of Cadencia Street,
north of La Costa Avenue.
Apparently some confusion has arisen, since the designated site
is currently developed with residential units, and no alternative
site has been processed through the city. Nonetheless, the
recreational vehicle storage area requirement is a condition of
approval that must be met. We have made the concession of allowing
final occupancy to the current development phase, with the under-
standing that approvals of occupancy of the tract model homes
and building permits for any additional construction of the sub-
division, would be withheld until the RV storage area is completed.
We have met with Fred Morey of the La Costa Land Company and have
·;(eceived correspondence from him presenting a proposal to convert
Lot 471 of La Costa Vale 3 subdivision for recreational vehicle
parking. This solution to the problem would appear to be initially
acceptable, however PUD regulation require that off-site RV areas
be approved b~ City Council. Therefore, an amendment to PUD-7.
is rec,{uired.
... .. ,,
. Mr. Don E. Woodward
'December 4, 1978
Page Two· ·(2)
I am sending you exerpts of the zone code provision pertaining
to amendments to Planned Unit Developments. As you will note in
this provision, the Planning Commission first considers the
proposed amendment. If they determine the change will be minor
in nature, the amendrr1ent may be approved by the Commission with
a resolution, and made part of the original City Council approval.
If the Planning Commission does not determine the amendment to
be minor, then a public hearing will be required.
Mr. Morey mentioned in his letter that La Costa Land Company is
preparing a site plan of the proposed RV area for Planning ~
Department review. We would like to begin processing the PUD
amendment promptly, so that conflict does not occur when you wish
to draw building permits on a future phase of Cannon Park sub-
division.
Incidently, we are still withholding occupancy for one unit in
your current development phase, pending completion of some improve-
ments to the open space lots. Your Building Superintendent
assured me the work would be finished shortly. I will final
that unit as soon as we are notified that the work has been
completed. ··
Please notify me at the Planning Department if you have any
questions.
Yours truly,
·,J~tJ~
David Abrams
Assistant Plann~
cc: Fred J. Morey, Vice-President
Governmental Relations,
La Costa Land Company
Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, California 92008
Enclosure
DA/ar
.-.... r' ..
i ~·(· ,• ..
:-•
I
. . .
.-
---·.
.. .. ·~
. ,
.'.--.
.. .:_-· .. ·.· . · ... ; 0 -. .!
.. '; . .. ,. .• . ·--:-:
:.
.. · ' .. _~ --~ ...
I ' -0 \· ,
' I . . .
I I
~ . ~ . I~
I
,
· 21.45(. o--21.4S.1Go
-•.
-
any extension thereof, the property covered by the planned unit
development penni t shall riot be us~ for any purpo5e or use
other than that authorized by the permit. (Ord. 9459 S2(part),
1976) •
21.45.140 Extension of time. The city council may, rcsolut~on, grant an extension of time for a planned unit
·· velop;aent permit in accord with the procedures of Section
'20.12.110. (Ord. 9459 §2(part), 1976?. -
by
de-
21.45.150 Cance~l,tion of a Planned unit develop~ent
Eermit. h plunned unit ucveloprnent permit may be cancelled.
at any time prior to the co~~encement of construction. Can-
cellation may be initiated by the owner of the property covered
by the permit by means of a·written co~unicatiori, _signed by
all interested parties, directed to the planning director in·
the office of the planning depa=tment. The ~lanning director
shall inform the city council of all such ccr.~-:-:unica~ions. The
permit shall beco::7le void one hundred h:enty days af~er receipt
of the co::u11unication in the office of the planning department.
(Ord. 9459 S2(part), 1976) •
5 ·-21.45.160 i'.mendm-=nts. (a) 1unenc1-nents to a olanned unit eevel'c-.pm~nt p~rwi t may oe initiated by the p:::-operty 0\•ir.er 0!."
authorized asent as follo•~s:
· · · (1) A request for an a.-nend:-nent shall-be··submi tted to--
the planning cepart~ent in written fo~ and shall be accom-·
· · p<miea by such additional graphics, sta-::s:::=nts, or other in-·.
fonnation as may be re~uire.d to suppo:::-t the propcsed 2,!;\encr::ent •.
. The planning cc~~ission!hall consider the proposed a.~encment
.at its next regular ~eeting·_ ·
· (2) If the planning co~~ission considers the a~ena-
::0·' ment xninor in nature, the additional graphics, stater::ent or
. . other inforrration ~=Y be approved by the planning cc~~ission.
---.. _:'resolution and r..ade part of the original city council app::cval
··· "'ithont the necessity of a public hearing~
• '. (3) A minor amen611ent shall not change the densities
-' or the boundaries of the subject property, o:::-involve an addi-
tion of a new use or group of uses not shown un the original
permit or the rearrangr~r.:ent of uses within the c2vel.o!_);-:-:ent, or
changes of greater than ten percent in c._?,?roved yarcs, cover-
age, height, open space or landscaping, Frovided no changes·
· • shall l;>e less than required by this chapter. If the ·planning
commission determines that the amen~~ent is not minor or that
· .• a hearing is otherwise necessary it ~hall .set the. matter for
·public hearing .
(4) If a public hearing is required, the applicant
I shall submit a ,complete_d application \-lith graphics, state-
• .. ~ llle]!ts r 1:>r ot!ler information as may be required t_o. support the
.. ~
.•.• __. r. ~: .. . ,
.
• .. )
p!:oposed modification. ., .·
,
.. ... , . .·
.,. ·•
r •'0 '430-10 i .. :; ... ·· . . :,.•
.. ·· .'· ... ,.
.•
,. (Carlsbad 7/20/76)
. . . : :· .,.,. .·. -~-: -;.· i . . ....... ,., ... · .. ···. ·~ :. .. ... . .. . . .. . .. .
·. ;~ _-.-.· .: ··(5( ;..·. fe~· of fifty d~llars plus one dollar per unit
·'is' required for all property \o~ithin. the portion of the pl.:mncd
\.tnit dcvclopr:10nt to be <:trnendcd.
..
~ . _,, .· : .. . ~.
(6) l.n ::!pplication for an amendment .of a planned
.unit dcvelopr:1.::nt pcr;l'it for wh~ch ~1.. hc.lring_ is rc~J:lircd sha~l .
be proccs~;0.d, heard and c!ctc.::nn:~cd ~n c:ccordancc Wl.th the pro-
Vl!:ions of thi5 ch~1ph!r -.'lp;,>licable to the adoption of a plannC'd
unit dcvcloF:~cnt peewit. · -. .'
.... i .
; ·I
(b) 'fhc cily co'uncil m.1y hy motion initi;,tc an ilmendrao.lt
to a pl.:mnccl unit d<.:ovr!lopment pccmit;, Stlch';unentlmr~nt ~hnll l:.-•1
r,roccs~cd, hcilrd .:-an<l dc·L<nmincd in ilccorc<~ncc Hith the tcn~:J . . ~) o £ th!. !1 chapter .:1pp l i c<~IJl c to the ;nlop tion of '' p li1nnc<l
.•· ....
~
B!pus Drive Suite 412 Newport Beach, California 92660 (714) 556-7017
January 25, 1977
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, Calif. 92008
Attention: Mr. Mike Zander
Reference: Revised street names for CT 76-17 Canon Park
Dear Mike:
The following is a list of the street names we reserved
for the above subdivision. Please retain for your files.
Thank You.
"A" STREET
"B" STREET
"C" STREET
"D" STREET
"E" STREET
"F" STREET
"G" STREET
"H" STREET
"!" STREET
"J" STREET
Retiro street to be renamed
Sincerely,
THE WOODWARD COMPANIES
~
DON E • \'700DWARD
DEW/njd
cc: Norman C. Arndt
Irv Roston
VERDE STREET L' I ,l /
HATACA ROAD
CARLINA STREET
VIANDA AVENUE
BRAVA COURT
HADERA COURT
SOLANO STREET
CIELO PLACE
~ANTERO AVENUE
f<ANA COURT
Del Rey Avenue-
RECEiVED
JAN 2 6 1977
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Elannlng Department
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
January 28, 1977
Mr. Don Woodward
4500 Campus Drive #412
~itp of QI:arlsbab
Newport Beach, California 92660
Dear Mr. Woodward:
TELEPHONE:
{714) 729-1181
Thank you for your letter of January 25, 1977. There should be no
problem incorpor~:ting your suggested names for streets 11 A11
-11 J 11 •
You may wish to reconsider changing the name of Retiro to Del Rey
Avenue. However, the Engineering Department has indicated that
such a change will involve three new street signs at a cost of
$235.50. Since Retiro is an existing street, the cost would be
assessed to the individual requesting such a change.
If you still wish to change the name, a letter to the Planning Com-
mission is needed, stating the street names, reason for the change,
and a statement indicating that the cost would be assumed by your-
self. ~·
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at the City Planning
Office, 729-1181, extension 25.
Sincerely,
Charles D. Grimm
CITY OF CARLSBAD
JR. PLANNER
CDG:ar
-+ ----..J ~
ANNH. CLARKE
PRESIDENT
CAPRI SCHOOL
941 CAPRI ROAD
DANIEL G. MUNOZ, PH. D.
VICE PRESIDENT qEnclnltas ltnlon ~cbool 1.91strtct CENTRAL SCHOOL
185 UNION STREET
DOUGLAS J. HOLLOWAY
CLERK
MARY LOU SCHULTZ
LORETTA M. SMITH
ROBERT L. BRICKMAN, PH.D.
SUPERINTENDENT & BOARD SECRETARY
January 6, 1977
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California
189 UNION STREET
ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024
TELEPHONE 753-1152
Attention: Planning Department
Re: Canon Park Units 1, 2,
Gentlemen:
OCEAN KNOLL SCHOOL
910 MELBA ROAD
PACIFIC VIEW SCHOOL
608 THIRD STREET
PARKDALE LANE SCHOOL
2050 PARK DALE LANE
Our District has reviewed the proposed 210 single family unit develop-
ment located in Carlsbad, subject above, and has evaluated the poten-
tial impact of that development on the facilities of our District.
The District is able at this time to provide school services concur-
rent with need.
Sincerely,
~r?;er~«-·-
Robert L. Brickman, Ph. D.
Superintendent
h
JAN 1 0 1977
.CITY OF CARLSS,t\iJ
Planning Oepartm~r,1
(
(
'v,..l
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 4-76
On motion by Nember SCHULTZ
following resolution is adopted:
, seconded by Hember SHITH , the
HHEREAS, the present and foreseeable growth Hithin the boundaries of this
school district is far greater than the capacity of the district to provide
services to children, and
IVHEREAS, it is becoming increasingly more difficult to obtain voter approval
for general obligation bonds ~vhich fund the construction of public schools,
and
\ffiEREAS, other sources of income for constructing schools and purchasing
capital equipment are expensive and consequently subject to voter rejection,
and
HHEREAS, no additional County, State, or Federal funds or assistance are
provided to school districts which face this dilemma.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees, representing the
electorate within the boundaries of this school district, stand firmly in
support of limiting development \vithin these boundaries to no more than
100 dwelling units per year.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of _Aug__l:lSt ___ , 1976 by the Governing
Board of the Encinitas Union School District of San Diego County, California,
by the following vote:
AYES: Hembers Smith, Schultz, Hollm·my, Nunoz and Clarke
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
STATE OF Cli.l.IFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
)
)
)
ss
I, _ Douglas Jon Hollmvay _, Clerk of the Governing Board of the
Encinitas Union School District of San Diego County, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution
adopted by the said Board at a special meeting thereof held at its regular
place of meeting at the time and by the vote above stated, which resolution
is on file in the office of said Board.
;
,.
lACDStA
Dr. Robert L. Brickman
Superintendent
Encinitas Union School District
189 Union Street
Encinitas, California 92024
\ \
January 5, 1977
/'" ·-:--~ J f"t' . .. ,. •• -
Re: Your Letter dated August 9, 1976 to Don Agatep, Planning Director,
City of Carlsbad ..... re: Project La Costa Vale 2 (210-single family units)
and my letter to you, dated November 19, 1976.
Dear Dr. Brickman:
Your letter of August 9, 1976 covered La Costa Vale 2-210-single family
units. This is the 209 units described in my November 19, 1976 letter. That
project was before the City Council last night, January 4th, under the name
of Canon Park Units 1, 2, and 3.
I would appreciate it if you would forward to the City Planning Department
a letter identical in form to your November 22, 1976 letter concerning our
project Santa Fe Knolls. A draft of the suggested letter is enclosed.
FJM/eem
Encl.
Sincerely,
LA COST A LAND COMPANY
~ I Fr~~orey
Vice President
~at .. ,
'
cc: City Manager /.
Planning Director JAN 1 0 1977
CITY OF CAR!.SSA;)
Plannlna Departr.,c;n t . -.,.)
COSTA DEL MAR ROAD • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • AREA CODE 714 • TELEPHONE 729· 9111
I
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, Ca • 92008
Attention: Planning Department
Subject: Canon Park Units 1, 2, and 3 -CT 76-17
Gentlemen:
DRAFT
Our District has reviewed the proposed 210 single family unit development
located in Carlsbad, California, subject above, and has evaluated the potential
impact of that development on the facilities of our District •.
The District is able at this time to provide school services concurrent with
need.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Brickman, Ph. D.
Superintendent
1-5-77
l.RCDStR
Planning Commission
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, Ca I iforn i a 92008
Subject: Parking for Recreational Vehicles, Boat Trailers, Etc.
Gentlemen:
December 8, 1976
In a staff report submitted to you regardi tion 5 on
Page 5, Condition 19 on Page 6, and the rst
Page 9 all concern recreational vehicle storage facilities. Since this subject, we
think, is broader than the subdivision in question, we are submitting these separate
comments:
1. In a letter submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning
Department on November 12, 1976, copy attached, we made clear our thinking in
regard to recreational vehicle parking.
113. RV Parking: As we understand the PUD Ordinance, it requires the
provision of a certain amount of space for recreational vehicle and boat-trailer
parking, either within the project or outside of it. It is our intention in this regard
to provide a temporary fenced space of about 8000 square feet adjacent to the project
and to provide whatever guarantees the City requires that a bigger and more appropriate
facility will be constructed and located in the area of La Costa Avenue and Rancho
Santa Fe Road to provide service to the entire southeast quadrant of La Costa. We
further point out that it is our intention to charge going commercial rates for such
storage whether it be at the temporary site or at the more permanent site later on. To
do otherwise would mean that all homeowners would be paying for the cost of recreat-
ional parking as compared to users. We think this would be a mistake.
The temporary facilities will have adequate space for 26 recreational vehicles
and a schematic of the site will be made available to you by the close of business of
November 15, 1976.
Incidentally, you should be aware that the CC&R•s on all of La Costa•s land
prohibits recreational vehicle parking in the streets and driveways. Therefore, by
necessity, we would have been providing this facility, even if no City requirement-is
involved. 11
(Continued)
COSTA DEL MAR ROAD • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • AREA CODE 714 • TELEPHONE 729-9111
Planning Commission, City of Carlsbad Page -2-
December 8, 1976
2. All La Costa property that has been sold since inception of the project has contained as
part of the protective conditions and restrictions, the following paragraphs:
116. No living trailer, house car or 11campster 11 , boat or boat trailer shall be parked
on any road or bui I ding site either temporarily or permanently, or shall any such motor vehicle
not capable of being operated be parked for longer than forty-eight (48) hours outside of a
garage on any street, lot or building site. Other than customary maintenance work and minor
emergency repairs, there shall be no painting, repairing or mechanical work done on any motor
vehicle on any street, residential lot or building site. 11
While not specified in the CC&R•s, it has been obvious to us for some time that for us to enforce
the CC&R•s it would be necessary to make provisions at other locations in the community for
recreational vehicular parking, and it has been our plan to provide for a satisfactory storage
situation at appropriate locations with all of the protection and accessibility required for such
equipment.
We have generally thought that those people who are affluent enough to own recreational
vehicles and boats and boat trailers should be able to pay for the cost of security and access-
ibility for the storage of such equipment. We have never thought that Government should
concern itself with the welfare of boats and recreational vehicles, except to see to it that in
strategic locations in the community opportunities are given for private enterprise to provide
storage facilities.
If Government desires to prepare to storage the vehicles in subdivisions, it can do so by re-
strictive ordinances in the same manner that the La Costa CC&Rs provide.
3. We have proposed a temporary parking facility to meet the specific terms of your PUD
Ordinance. In this regard, along with several others, we think that the use of the PUD Ordin-
ance as presently written is somewhat inappropriate in a Master Plan Community. However,
until the tools are sharpened, it is the only way that we can handle the subdivision under dis-
cussion.
We are certainly not anxious to have a series of small RV parking facilities spread throughout
the La Costa community.
We would certain discourage, as suggested on Page 9 of the Staff Report to you, the approval
of a PUD with no cost RV storage for all of the reasons described above.
cc: City Manager, City Attorney,
Planning Director
Sincerely,
LA COS. TA LAN~:~MPANY ~=;~~J~ rv~
Fred J. Morey, Vice Pres~
Governl:'tal Relations l
MEMORANDUM -December 2, 1976
TO: Planning
FROM: Engineering
SUBJECT: CT 76-17 {CANON PARK), REQUEST FOR
We have reviewed the subject application and submit the following
conditions:
1. In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during
the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain
passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate
fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed
as recommended by the Fire Department.
2. Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as
required by Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall
deposit cash in the amount necessary to energize said
street lights for an eighteen month period after
construction, to permit the incorpor~tion of the sub-
division into a maintenance district.
3. All land and/or easements required shall be granted to
the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free
of all liens and encumbrances. No easements shall be
recorded prior to recordation of the final map unless
approved by the City Engineer.
4. New slopes over 5 feet vertical difference adjacent to
public streets shall be 2:1 maximum.
5. Proposed "A" Street shall have a 60 foot street section
between Retiro Street and proposed "B" street.
2~?-~
Tim Flanagan {/
City Engineer
TCF:DCG:ms
•
'"'" -,
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DI~TRICT
POST OFFICE BOX 2397 • LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA 92024 • 7!53-011515
November 19, 1976
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mr. Bud Plender, Assistant Planning Director
Re: Sewer Availability
Canyon Park Units No. 1, 2 & 3
CT 76-17 and PUD 7
Gentlemen:
This is to advise you that the property referenced above owned by
La Costa Land Company is located entirely within the boundaries of the
Leucadia County Water District. Sewer service will be available to the
property when arrangements are made for instalaiion, by the owner, at his
expense, of any necessary on-site and off-site sewerage system to service
the property. The Leucadia County Water District will furnish sewer ser-
vice to said property upon payment of the applicable connection fee charges,
service lateral fees and monthly sewer service charges.
REH/jrg
cc:
This letter shall expire and shall be of no further force or effect;
1. If the tentative map is not approved by the City of Carlsbad
within six (6} months of the date hereof; or
2. Eighteen (18) months after approval or conditional approval
of the tentative map if a final map is not filed within that
period; or
3. In the event of revisions of the tentative map which affect the
sewer system or sewer capacity.
Rick Engineering Company
Yours very truly,
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
Richard E. Hanson
Secretary-Manager
DISTRICT OFFICE: 1960 LA COSTA AVENUE • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
, .. ,~,..._
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY I ~~A~~~~~~Lc~~~~~W~r~
5620 FRIARS ROAD • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110
TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 291-0707
[!] Conference Report
D Telephone Conversation
Job: 6939
Date: November 3 1 1976
Prepared by: Robert c. Ladwi g
Copies to: Tom Hagemanv/
Mik Hamada
Jack Bevash
DOn Woodward
l~dRt;\~}~
Regarding: LA COSTA VALE UNIT 2, CANYON PARK
Present:
Tom Hageman -City of Carlsbad
Mik Hamada -Rick Engineering
Jack Bevash -Jack Bevash Associates
Fred Morey -La Costa
Don Woodward -The Woodward Company
Bob Ladwig -Rick Engineering -<>~ '\P ~ ,')) -?:. ;,..,
'{_<,) I<)
Ql'
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CANYON PARK 1 UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
AND PUO NO. 7.
The purpose of the meeting was to review the submittal for plan approval
with the City and to assign the various items yet left to be deter.mined
or submitted to the City. The first item is the landscape plan and for
the amenity lot or park lot. Don Woodward will be working with Jack
Bevash on this item and preparing this document.
The second item is the written statement from La Costa on requesting
the 50' open space credit for the easement lot and the walkway to the
private amenity lot. Mr. Morey will prepare the request on behalf of
La Costa Land Company. Also included in La Costa's comments by Mr. Morey
will be discussions on levels of landscaping and maintenance, and whose
responsibility it will be for these various maintenance considerations.
The third item discussed was the RV parking. Mr.Bevash will prepare a
OAWCO PRESS
Conference Report -La Costa Vale 2, Canyon Park
November 3, 1976
Page 2 of 2
schematic plan and Mr. Morey will provide written discussion as to
the interim RV parking along with the per.manent RV parking and the
necessary suggested language for implementation of both approaches.
All of the above items are to be submitted back to the City by Novem-
ber 12 to stay on the present Planning Commission/City Council agendas.
If there are any comments or incorrect statements or if I have left out
any i tams, I ask that all those copied this memo respond back to me as
soon as possible.
Thank you.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SAN DIEGO REGION
6154 MISSION GORGE ROAD, SUITE 205
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120
TELEPHONE: (714) 286-5114
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE
NovEMBER 16, 1976
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92088
ATTENTION! PLANNING DEPAR~MENT
GENTLEMEN!
SuB~EcT: CT 76-17 AND PUD-7
SP-171A
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
RECEIVED
NOV 1 7 1976
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Department
WE HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE SUB~ECT MATERIAL AND HAVE NO COMMENT AT
THIS Tlt1E.
;;:;,·L
FoR: LAOIN H. DELANEY
SUPERVISING ENGINEER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
JOHN R. PHILP, M.D., M.P.H.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
Telephone 236-2243
November 10, 1976
Donald A. Agatep, Director
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Agatep:
RECEI·~rl~ fl
NOV 16 1976
CITY OF CAh " -'"..;
Planning Depa( u, i~ , (
Your request for our recommendations concerning the tentative
map of the subdivision, to be known as Canyon Park, Units 1, 2,
and 3, submitted by La Costa Land Company, Carlsbad, CA., has
been received by this department.
This subdivision would be acceptable to the Department of
Public Health, provided:
1. All domestic water supplied to this subdivision comes
from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
2. All buildings constructed in this subdivision are connected
to the Leucadia County Water District.
3. The sewer and water lines are not laid in the same trench
in any part of this subdivision.
4. Proper drainage is maintained throughout this subdivision,
so as to prevent ponding and/or storage of surface water.
Thank you for giving us this opportunity to make recommendations
concerning the proposed subdivision.
Very truly yours,
')) Nj }.;,, ~~ Mb t/J-t)~ ~/ JOHN R. PHILP, M.D.
Director of Public Health
JRP:HH:mvn
Serving all of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of San Diego County
./
(
\
I I
)
\
( . •,
lACOStA
NOV 12 1976
CITY OF Ch,-:
Planning Dep-· -· ·-art,.,c •. ,
Mr. Ed Johnson, Director
Parks & Recreoti on Deportment
Mr. Tom Hageman
Planning Deportment
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 Elm Avenue
Carl shad, Co I if om i a 92008
Gentlemen:
November 12, 1976
-;, ('f ~:' -~ EI 1'1 ... ., .
.. y ~.J
1 I 7 2 7978
Re: Can'on Park -Parks -Private Amenities -RV Parking
1. Parks: Can'on Parks Unit 1 to 3 repr'esents a resubdivision of part of the La Costa Vale II
subdivision. Technically, the dedication required for this park on the new subdivision, as we
calculate it, would be 3.47 acres, less .87 acres because of a 25% credit for private amenities,
or 2.6 acres.
However, this property has already contributed 4. 35 acres through the previous Vale II Carlon
Park dedication. As port of the application for this mop, we inform you that we will request
that the City Council waive any further park requirement for this project. Further, while we
realize that under your Attorney's opinion, La Costa can receive no specific credit for the
1.75 additional acres, we certainly think that in considering this total project that the facts
above should be recognized.
2. Private Amenities: As we analyze the PUD ordinance, it requires that we provide and
improve 2 acres of land to be maintained for recreational activities of the subdivision, said
land to be owned by and maintained by a homeowners association. We hove made this pro-
vision at two sites. Approximately 1 acre at one site and one site of about 1.4 acres along
the SDG&E easement. We have attempted to install decent but minimum facilities so that the
homeowners association will not be burdened with high operating costs. Our suggestion is that
if the homeowners association, at a later date, wants to install more expensive facilities, for
example, a swimming pool or tennis courts, and maintain such facilities, that this would be
their decision rather than that of the City or the developer. We question the desirability of
installing expensive, costly to maintain facilities in this kind of project.
3. RV Parking: As we understand the PUD Ordinance, it requires the provision of a certain
amount of space for recreational vehicle and boat-trailer parking, either within the project
or outside of it. It is our intention in this regard to provide a temporary fenced space of about
8000 square feet adjacent to the project and to provide whatever guarantees the City requires
that a bigger and more appropriate foe iIi ty wi II be constructed and I ocated in the area of
La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road to provide service to the entire southeast quadrant
COSTA DEL MAR ROAD • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • AREA CODE 714 • TELEPHONE 729·9111
(Continued)
Mr. Ed Johnson, Mr. Tom Hageman
City of Carlsbad 1 Carlsbad 1 Co I iforn i a
' .
Page -2-
November 12, 1976
of La Costa. We further point out that it is our intention to charge going commercial rates
for such storage whether it be at th~_temporary site or at the more permanent site later on.
To do otherwise would mean that all homeowners would be paying for the cost of recreational
parking as compared to users. We think this would be a mistake.
The temporary facilities will have adequate space for 26 recreational vehicles and a schematic
of the site will be made available to you by the close of business of November 15, 1976.
Incidentally 1 you should be aware that the CC&Rs on all of La Costa's land prohibits recr~ational
vehicle parking in the streets and driveways. Therefore, by necessity we would hove been pro-
viding this facilities, even if no City requirement is involved.
We will be anxious to discuss this with you further.
Sincerely,
LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
FJM/eem
\h.ceipt ~lo.~
A P P L I CAT I 0 t l N 0 . C A l{L S BAll T R ACT 7 6-1 7
CITY OF CARLS3AD
( P l e a s e Type o i' P r i n t ) Date: 10-29-76
1 . REQUEST : T c n t a t i v e Sub d i vi s i on !·lap for : _______ .:..___
Land Division
"{Lan-d division --a..._.,i-r--spu.·cc d-iv1s1-on-cornbfnation land anc
air space division)
2. LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the
3.
4 .
5.
side ofLa Costa Avenue -------North between Cadencia Street
and Gibraltar Street
ASSESSOR• S NUt1BER: Book 223 Page 180 Parcel 1,3-8
Book 223 Page 180
223 200
Parcel_l9-24 (If more, please list on
18
·bottom of page).
OWNER(S)-: Name Address ----'--'---'-'-----Ci!IIJt Zip Phone
I h ere by d c c l a r e t h a t CJ l 1 i n f o r m r1 t i a n co n t a i n e d \'I i t h ; n t h ; c: ~pp~ication is true; and that all stand~rd conditions as ~
1nd1cated on the attachment have been rf!ad, understood and agreed to.
-------·Name ____ Address __ City Zip Phone
Burton L. Kramer, Vice-President __ Y.~l, ~ ·--·
Costa Del Mar Road, Carlsbad, California 92008 438-9111
Representing (Company or Corporation)
La Costa Land Company
--------·-----------------
R e l a _t i o n s h i p_j:_Q__ P r o ~.!.Y 0 \'1 n e r W ............ D.L\e--'v"-'e...._l.....,o.....,p~e,..r...._ _________ _
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the
o p p o r t u n i t y t a w o r k \'1 ·j t h t h e a p p 1 i c a n t t h r o u g h o u t t h e P 1 c:t n n i n g
Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the
applicant, the Planning Dcpc:trtment requests that it be given
an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and
plans prior to submittal. This request is not a requirement;
however, it may avoid major redrafting or revision of the plan
which only serves to lengthen the processing time.
ATTACH~1ENTS:
S u p p l e m e n t c..1 1 I n f o r m i:l t i o n F o r· m -P 1 a n n i n g 5 - 1
Time Extension Agreement -Planning 19-1
Standard Conditions -Planning 20-1
Preparation Check List -?~enning 21-1
P r o c e d u r e s -P 1 tl n n i n g : -~
Title 20 -Su~divisi~n Regulations
FORI<!: P 1 il n n i n 0 l 8-1 0 a t e ~~ f P 1 a n n i n q Com rn i s s i on Appro v a 1 ____________ _
If
. S U P P L U1 F.IH A L I N F 0 R 1·1 f\ l I 0 N F 0 R f·t -----·-·----·-----------·--
S P E C I F I C P L/1.!'1/ T EN "i/\T I V E S Ll 8 D I V I S I 0 N i·1 A r
P L Ar'W E 0 UNIT 0 EVE L 0 PI~ F.fH IS l T E DE V F L 0 P 11 EN T P Ll~ N
SPEC lP.L USE PEf~IHT
1 . Gross /\ c res (or s q u J t e f o o t i.i. v e i f ·1 e::; s than a c r c ) _s 0+ ~c:_r_::_ ___ _
2 . Number· of l.ots __ 2J.2 LO~§-----------·.-·-· --------------·-··--
3. T .Y p e of De v e 1 o p men t _ _ Re.§.~d~n..!-i?-1_________ _ _1_r_
1
d u
5
t:·1~ ~ •.• =--I,------(Residential, Cumlilc:r-ciul, ... 1
Present Zone Planned Communi t:f ru posed Zone Same, P. u. D. --·-----------·---( i fCha n g e"r c que s fe'd)
General Plan Land Use Des·igna.tion __ R_.M_.-_H_. ______ _
·~---------------·---------···-----------------
6. Source of LJatct Supply_~livent:ain Municipal Water District
7. f·lethod of Sev1ag~ Di spas a 1 Leuc~?i~-Co~_'t::Y Water District
existing .sewer facilities
~--------
8. Types of Pl~otect ·i ve Covenants to be Recorded La Costa Land Company
~il~ b: __ reviewing tt:_~--=-~~sting C. C. &R ·-~ for the existing lots !:o
_provide fo~ the private amenities and the recreation vehicle parking.
9. Tr~nsportation Hodes Avu.ilabl~ to Serv·ice the Development ______ __
The most accessible Means of transportation available is the
automObile, however ;the ·N""orth · C6ul1Ey"Dus·rrne passes wTEfiTn-aoOO+ •
of the subdivision. I' -------------.. ·-------· ·-----------···-----·--·-
'I 0 • I f \~ e s i d t; 11 t i a 1 d u v e 1 o p m e n t p 1 e a s e c o m p 1 e t e t h e f o 11 o w i 11 g :
a) School.Dist\'ict Sc:1·v·ing the pr·operty ~i~_E._~-~-~~n
Dieguito Union. ----------------·--------------·
b ) Are s c h o o 1 fa c i 1 'it i e s c a p a b 1 c o f s e r v i n g t h i s ·p r o j e c t : _____ _
La Costa Land Company is working with both districts to assist
-w.t"Eh prov1a1ng n-c~-rnns-Tc5r"t:h~s suod~ v~s~on.
( \•J r i t t e n c o n f ·; t m a t i o n o f t h i s l' e q u i r e m e n t rn u s t b e
r e c c i v e d by t h c P 1 ann ·j n 9 De p a I' tli11.: n t u t 1 east on c
week pr-ior to Plnnning Comm·ission hearing. If not
rece·ived by this time the reqttcst will be denied.)
11. Methods proposed to reduce sound levels __ There are no specific
features included in the design of the lots to reduce sound levc 1 ~ ·----------------
1~1 e t h o d s u · · r ' :·· .-, • s0r···~~ ':., c;··· .. , ,.., •-'··. -~ .. '.St'f':"'.
s .T 1\ T na: rn o r 1\ c H E E r1 E r n
T E NT 1\ T I V E S U [3 D 1 V I S I 0 : ~ t1/\ p
CITY OF CAP.LSS~J
The Subdivision Map Act sets a fl.fty (to) d t' Pl · · · · ::J ay 1me re('trict~ _ann1ng Comm1ss1on processing of Tentative Maps. This tim~0 ~-~~~
c ct n o ~ l Y b e e x t e n d t~ d . by t h e 111 u t u a l c o n c u r r a n c l: 0 f t h e 1 · -1r: ~ .~ the City. By acceptlng applications f t• . upp 1Cant ::_;,,
\·li t h o t ~ e r ~ ~ p l i c a t i 0 n s , i 1~ a n ~ t ~ e 111 p t
0~ 0 ~ ~ ~ : ~ 1 ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ s 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r e n c: _ !
cess, t e f1fty (50) day t1me l1m1t is often exceeded If ~~0
bto h~ve your applicatior1 processed concurrently this.agreeyoutw2s~
e Slgned by the applicant or his a ent , men u.u::-c ~~~t~~~tement, th~ City wi~l not ac~ept.yo~~ ~~~l~~~~~~nn~~rt~h~ign
C _adlvedmap untll all prlor necessary entitlements have been p esse an approved. ro-
In either circumstance, the City will process your request within
t he e a r 1 i est t i rn e p e r i o d , h CJ \1 e v e r , i n n o c i r c u m s t a n c e s h a 1 1 t h i s
delay be greater than 150 days from the day of submittal of appli-
cation.
The undersigned understands that the processing time required by
the City may exceed fifty (50) days, therefore the undersigned
agrees to extend the fifty (50) day processing limitation and fully
concurs with any extensions of time up to one hundred and fifLy
(150) days that may be required to properly review-~11 of my appli-
cations in order that the environmental impact report and any othc~r
p t' e r e q u i s i t e s t o t h i s a p P l i c C\ t. ·j o n qJ ~j '! b e p r o c e s s P. d c a n c u r l' e n t 1 y .
---·---·-rn--~ Name \Print 1 ------------------keTa t i o n s h { p to A p p 1 i c a t i o n
(Property Owner-Agent)
F 0 R r1 ? 1 a n n i n 9 1 9 -1 0 a t e o f P 1 a n n i r q C o m " ~ s s i o n A p p r o v a l
l.,. ,l I I \_J I V f \I\ L ~·· U I·, L/
T E r l T !\ T l V E S U ll lJ l V I S I 0 f'~ 11 !\ P
Sul.Jdivision and development ~~h<.tll meet all requirements of the
s u b d i v i s i on , z on i.n g , l.J u i l d ·j 11 g codes , and G en r;; r C! l P l C! n and o l her
laws, ordinances or regulations of the City of Carlsbad, and other
governmental ilgcncies. Some of the rr,ore pertinent requiremer1ts
and procedures of the City are list2d b~low for your informatio~
and concurrence. Please read this 1~st carefully and feel free
to ask for further informatian or explanation.
1 . F i n a 1 ~~a p s h a l 1 b e co lll!J 1 e t e cl 1·1i t h i n l 8 rn o n t h s f rom t h 2
date of final City Cnuncil action on the Tentative
Subdivision Map. Two extensions of one year each may
be approved by City Council upon staff review of the
original decision.
2. The Final Map shall substantially conform to the
Tentative Subdivision Map. If otherwise, the Final Map
will be rejected and new Tentative Subdivision Map
hearings will be required for the revised plan.
3 • A 1 1 p u b 1 i c i rn p r o v em e n t s s h a 1 l b e m a d e i n c o n f o r m i t y \'li t h t h c_:
Subdivision Ordinance and other City Standards, to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of
Carlsbad and free of all liens and encumbrances.
4. Prior to any construction, the applicant shall submit plans
to fhe appropriate entity providing domestic water to the
proposed development, for its approval of the location,
type and adequacy of water lines.
5. Prior to any construction, the applicant shall obtain approv~l
from the City Fire Department of the location and size of
fire hydrants.
6. The applicant shall install all required fire hydrants ~tnd
dry-stand pipes prior to framing construction, and said
fire appurtenances shall be functional prior to commencing
such wor-k.
7. Street trees, as required by. the City, shall be installed
by the a!Jplicant Cit his expense. Trees shal1 be of r;t
type approved by the Parks Department and shall be installed
to the i r s p e c i f ·j c a t i o n s . I f r·e m ova 1 of a n y ex i s t i n y trees
is required by the City, said removal shall be at the
applicant 1s expense. It shall be the responsibility of
the applicant to make all arrangements with the Parks
Department concerning the requirements of this condition.
8. A detailed grading plan which includes proposed drainage
and erosion control landscaping and for other measures
such ~s desilting basins shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to Final Map.
9. Immediately after grading, erosion control landscaping
and/or other measures such as desilting basins shall
be installed. This control may be the final landscaping,
if so approved.
10. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan shall be sub-
mitted for Pldnning Director's ilpproval for all graded
slopes 5' or greater in heigl1t artd any other areas re-
quired by the City. ·
11. Prior to final building inspection clearanc~, all land-
scaping shall be installed or adequate bonding accepted.
Said landscaping shall be maintained in a manner accept-
able to the Planning Director.
12. No signs or advertising of any type whatsoever shall be
erected or installed until plans thereof have been aJ~r0~2d
by the City of Carlsbad.
As p~rt of the approval process, the City may modify these conditions
or ad~ others, especially those of 3 ~:r2 specific nature, The sub-
divider will be notified of these moaifi:3tions or'additions by
Resolution.
For111 Pl,1nninq ?0-1 D,1te ~--·------····--·· ;,._--~-·--·-·--
o f ;-· 1 ann i n rJ · Co imn i s s ·i on /\ p pro v e1 1 __________________ ·--_
PREPARATION CHECK LISl
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
A. Documents Required for Sub~ittal
1. Application with supplemental information sheet .completed.
/. Time extension a9reernent signed, if desireJ.
~ P h o t o s t a t i c c o p y o f d e e d .,., i t h c om p 1 e t e 1 e g a 1 d e s c r i p t i o r,
of subject property.
~wenty-eight ozalid prints of the Tentative Subdivision
Map.
~nvironmental Impact Statement or Report with Fees (if
required).
6. Fee for tentative subdivision map: $200.00 + $5.00 for each
lot between 1 -25, + $3.00 for each lot between 26 -100,
+ $1.00 for each lot over 100, Exten.sion $100.00 and
Revision $100.00.
7. t~eet name list for new streets (3 names for each street
in conformance to Street Name Policy or one name chosen
from approved Street Name List for each street).
3 Foot Radius Map - A map to scale not less than 111 =
00' showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots
shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the
property owners' list.
9. Property Owners' List -A typewritten list of the name and
a d d r e s s o f a 1 1 p r o p c r t y o \•I n e r s 1·1 i t h 1 n 3 0 0 f e e t a s n o t c d o n
the property owner map. This list must be accurate and
taken from the latest equalized assessment roll on file
in the office of the 1\ssessor of San Diego County, 855
Williamson Street, Vista, California. (Phone 714 72~-8571)
B. Drafting of Tentative Subdivision Map
1. Sheets to be 24" x 36" with 111 border (Standard 11 D11 size)
2. Scale to be indicated: 111 = 80' is generally sufficient,
however, the scale is to be appropriate for sheet size;
but in no case smaller than 111 = 100'. If project is too
large for recommended scale, additional sheets will be
necessary; and a reduced composit of the rnap be submitted
on a 24 11 x 36 11 reproducible.
3. North arrrow oriented to top or left side of sheet.
4. Lettering must be legible.
drawn by mechanical means,
It is preferred that it be
in ink, and heavy upper case.
5. Location rnap showing the distance to the center line of
the nearest intersection.
6. Title block with name of subdivision, name and address of
subdivider and draf~er and pertinent information such JS
number of lots, total acreage and date prepared.
7. Name and address of registered Civil Engineer . .
8. Carlsbad Tract Number, placed top rig~ portion of sheet. '!!2 -!1} ~ ;_ ~ i:..,-~ -tr F 0 R r·1 P 1 a n n i n 9 21-1 First
1f~ ~v v-t-..
P au e .JL!T:i J?,) X f!3 = t:-z..s--
1:{,~ I;£. f-I ~ 1'~
-tfiP--~~2-q '1 J
C·. Information on Map
l • E x i s t ·j n 9 a d j a c e n t p u b 1 i c r i 9 h t s -o f -'II a y , s h o \'1 i n g d i rn e n s i o n s
and distance from property line to center line.
2. Location of existing improve~ents, pavement, curbs, side-
walks, etc.
3. Easements; type and location.
4. Location and dimension of all proposed public rights-of-way.
5. Radii of street curves.
-6. Location and dimension of all public or private easements.
7. Location of rail road tracts within 300 feet.of site.
8. Location and description of existing utilities.
9. Proposed streets to be labeled by alphabetical letters.
1 0 . G r a d e s o f a 11 p r o f' u s e d s t r e e t s
11. Topographic contours at two-feet intervals, with indication
of nra n u fact uri n g s 1 o p e.s .
12. Elevation of proposed building pads or sites.
13. Lot lines and dimensions
14. Lots to be numbered.
15. Location of watercourse or areas subject to flood.
16. Location of proposed storm drains or other means of
drain~ge (grade~ and size).
17. Location of existing building and structures.
18. Location of ~xisting trees within both private and public
lands,
19. Street sections (may be submitted on separate sheet).
20. Delineation of development phasing.
Form -Planning 21-1 Date of Planning Commission Approval -----------
1 )
2)
4)
5)
6)
7)
PfWCEDURES
~-P 1_ i cat i on t_Q__PJ an o_i_r:l__g__~-~-~-~-=_.Ls ~ t~2: I n an effort to a i d the
a p pl1 c a n t , t he P 1 a n n i n g D:: f1 s. r t r;: e n :. r e q u est s that i t be g i v e n
an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application in its
v a r i o u s stages of de v e 1 o p rn en t p l' i or to sub m i t t a 1 . I t ~ s r.1 ore
e f f e c t i v L~ i f a p p 1 i c a n t me e t s d i r e c t 1 y vi i t h s t a f f ; h o 1·1 e v e r ,
\'I r i t t e n o r t e 1 e p h o n e c o 111 rn u n i c a t i o n i s a c c e p t a b 1 e • I t i s t ~ 2
responsibility of the applicant to make the initial contact
for such meeting.
Submittal: Application will be accepted only if the applica-
tion, p1ans and other pertinent materials are complete.
Generally, the date application will be heard will be deter-
mtned by the submittal date as indicated within the approved
Planning Commission calendar.
Planning Commission Calend<:ll:_: The Planning· Commission adopts
an annual calendar that indicates application closing dates,
staff revieH dates, staff report completion du.+es, and Plan-
ning Commission hearing dates. You may acquire this calendar
at the ~lanning Department. ·
Staff Review: On the date as indicated on the Planning Commission
talendar, City Staff conducts a review meeting on all items on
the Planning Commission agenda. The applicant is invited to
attend and to explain the project and respon~ to staff prelirninary
recommendations. Upon completion of this review, Staff will pre-
pare final staff recommendations to be submitted to the Plannirrg
Co mrn i s s i o n . T h e f ~ r: ~1 l ;' e p o t t i'i i t h r.:: c-:: ;;11;: '; n :! :< ·: J n s '.'I i l 1 be
a •; a i l a b ·1 ~ 3 t t h c: ~.1 ~ c. r. r~ ; n ~J r; c p i:i ;' t ;;; e r, t fi v ~ eLl y :;; p :~ i o ; ' t o ~: h 2
Pl • r • • \ • I~ • I f t • "-. ' a n n 1 n ~ " ~, '::: ~ 1 s s 1 D n r 1 c :: ;n ~ 1' :J ~ r-: ·, ~~ c: .Y a e r n c~ o n fJ :" i o r ._ u c ··r ':'
P 1 i! n ~~ i no Com 171 i s s i c !·: meet i ; r; rl c', t ~ ~ . .... ~ '
1!
Hi?;:,. r i n q : l n E P 1 ~~ i ~ :---, i n ·..J C CJ '"~~ .-r~ ·: s : i u r1 L-i f..} .~ c :..: c v t. i" ~/ 2 r: d .; it (~ ,.} :. ~, ·we-an~~ -s·aa y 0 f t h c II! CJ :1 L h it t ' 'I : 3 0 p ~ Ill • I} r' ·) :; ·j n d ~ c a t c: d c II 'L ;1 c
Planning Commission calencL:u-. Depending on the type of appli-
cation, the Planning Commission will either make a finding
and forward to City Council or mak~ final action. ·
Appeals: Final action by Planning Commission may be appealed
to the City Council, provided such appeal is filed wit~in ten
( 1 0) days after the P 1 ann i n g Co mln i s s i on action . The a p p 1 i cant
should review with staff the procedure on the various types of
applications.
.
Final De~ision: The City will notify the applicant and propetty
~wner of the final decision.
F 0 IH1: P 1 ann i n g 3-? 0.:1 t c ) f ? l u n n i n 9 Co rnm i s s i on Appro v a 1 ______ 1_-::!!..::-]_G ___ _