HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-10; Planning Commission; ; CT 80-31|CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIESSTAFF REPORT
DATE: December 10, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CT 80-31/CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIES - Request for
a Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit
to develop 9 units on the northwest corner of Uni-
cornio Street and Cacatua Street in the RD-M zone.
Continued from the Planning Coinmission meeting of
November 12, 1980.
As the Planning Commission will recall, this item was con-
tinued from your meeting of November 12, 1980 to allow staff
to prepare an approval resolution for the project. Attached
for your review is the resolution containing the findings
and conditions for approval of the project. If the Planning
Coinmission agrees with the attached findings and conditions
then your action is to adopt Resolution No. 1721.
The Coinmission also requested maps showing existing zoning
and land use in the area which are attached.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolu-
tion No. 1721, APPROVING CT 80-31/CP-113 based on the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 1721
Zoning and Land Use Maps
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Reduced Elevations and Site Plan
BH: jt
SFfZ- |cSp&. <SPP.
0(4 Its
VAcAgt vAc^af VA«sA>vr s/Ao^Kit VAox^A-r V^t^t^-t- j^j^
6FE.
CT(5C?-3l/<: P 113
CVCMT PR0mTIE5
LAWD U5E:
RO-Nl-Q
r"
}
\
\
\
\
p-C \
\
st
CT<50-3\/CP 113
am f=ROPCRTID
ZOKJIMG
arcbiteci STEM S. FASCBML m and associates mmimu - mmim' miwmm 7193 dairesiont mi M-m California 321U 7H'279-2t38i
BACEOSPOUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 80-51/CP^i:^3
APPLICANT: PROPERTIES
KECXIEST AND LOCATICa^I: "REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT
TO DEVEtOP 9 UNITS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER QF UNICORNIO STREET AND CACATUA STREET.
LEX3AL DESCRIPTICN: 1-OT ^85 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 3, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7076, FILED'IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OCT. 6/71.
Assessors Parcel Number: 215 _ 350 _ 61
• ^8 sSn Ty-i+-0 1 Acres '^^ No. of Lots
GENERAL PLAN AND ZKMNG
General Plan Land Use Designation RMH
Density Allowed 10-20 Density Pressed 19.25
Existing Zone Proposed Zone RDM
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
North RDM S R-l VACANT S SFR
South RDM VACANT AND MULTIPLE FAMILY
East RDM MULTIPLE FAMILY (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
West RDM VACANT S SFR
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District SAN MARCOS UNIFIED
Water District ^OSTA REAL
: PERMIT NOS:
Sewer District LEUCADIA COUNTY EDU's^'^^ 11563-68 S 10^93-95
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated MAY 16, 1980
(Other: )
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
^ Negative Declaration, issued AUG. 8, 1980 ^ ^7^+0
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
rtoJECT • SUMMAKY 1
vnt • ROM
OBVEKMae (ACTVM) - 11,13} #
iwiT Tire A um » 4 • sios
c nu • 1 sa4«
p • I i"n6
icnALHOtUNns 1 let^n^
B ON emEET 6isr
-sag
Bsa - s
a/a •
cara .a is
CmCKCD ' ~
iMtCT
P0MB BBtlOMS
UEST ELSiATIgN CU>4115C*P)— EAST ELBAri<?M UJHB/>,-B.<>.)
U£ST EJ-E.WIOSJ (UMIT Ac-;^) va-.to-
~fi3UTH 'EL.E\AngVI eoui t«i'-r.o-
ooMTcim
J0«NOaQ>l2-48S
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 12, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CT 80-31/CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIES - Request for a
Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit
to develop 9 units on the northwest corner of
Unicornio Street and Cacatua Street in the RD-M
zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative
Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit to develop 9
units on a .47 acre parcel, located, as described above.
The subject property is a previously graded corner lot,
fronting on both Unicornio Street and Cacatua Street.
The proposed one-level, stacked units would range in size
from 1923 to 2227 square feet. Resident parking would be
provided in a common underground garage, gaining access
from Unicornio Street.
II. ANALYSIS
1. Does the project meet all development standards of
the Condominium Ordinance?
2. Does the project justify the proposed density of
19.25 du/acre by the guidelines set in the Land Use
Element of the General Plan?
3. Does the project meet all aspects of the design
criteria of the Condominium Ordinance?
Discussion
The project satisfies the basic development standards of the
Condominium Ordinance. Resident parking, storage areas, a
trash enclosure and separate utility meters would be provided
in the underground garage. Sufficient space exists, on-street,
to exceed visitor parking requirements. Laundry facilities
would be included in each unit.
Also, the open recreation area requirement is met by a
combination of private balconies and a common pool area.
Staff's primary concern is the projects proposed density of
19.25 du/acre which appears inconsistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan. The land use designation for
this property is RMH, Residential Medium High Density. The
category would permit 10 du/acre and a potential maximum of
20 du/acre if certain criteria are met. The Land Use Element
specifies:
The criteria shall be reviewed on a project-by-project
basis and shall include such things as slope of land,
soil stability, compatibility with surrounding land
uses, flood plain protection, adequacy of public facilities,
on-site amenities and preservation of unique and desirable
natural resources. In other words, the density allocation
for any project starts at the low end and, if a higher
density is desired, the proposed development must prove
itself worthy of the higher designation.
The project site is a flat parcel, with no unique features,
separated by one lot, to both the north and west, from R-l
zones. Although the applicant proposes to provide on-site
amenities, in the form of recreation area, beyond those
required by development standards of the Condominium Ordinance,
staff feels that this alone does not justify the significant
increase in density.
Since the proposed development is in close proximity to
property zoned R-l, staff feels a lower density would be
more desirable and compatible with existing and future
surrounding land uses.
With respect to design criteria, the issue of land use
compatibility is also a significant concern of staffs. As
outlined in the Condominium Ordinance, proposed developments
"shall be compatible with existing and planned land uses and
shall not constitute a disruptive element to the neighborhood
or community."
Staff feels, therefore, that the project, at the density
proposed, is inconsistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and does not meet the design criteria of the
Condominium Ordinance.
III. RECOr/IMENDATION
It is recoinmended that the Planning Coinmission adopt Resolution
No. 1721, DENYING CT 80-31/CP-113, based on the findings
contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
PC Resolution No. 1721
Background Data Sheet
Location Map
Disclosure Form
Reduced site plans and elevations
Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F and X dated Nov. 3, 1980
Exhibit H dated July 3, 1980
CDN:ar
11/4/80 -2-
If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
that further information is required, you will be so advised.
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
^ffiMBERS;
vont Properties,
Name (individual.
Inc California Corporation
partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
922.9 Sunset Blyd, #41.'^; Ins AngelPS, Ca 90069
Business Address
(?13) R74-5986
Telephone Number
Joe Ayvasi
Name
Corn, Platz & Co, 515 N. Brand Blyd. Glendale, Ca, 92130
Business Address
(213) 242^2152
Telephone Number
Ajax N. V, Netherland Antilles Corporation
Home Address Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corgoration, syndicatiori) ,, ,,
c/o Curacao International Trusf Company N.V,
8 Handelskade P.O. Box 812 Curacao, Netfierland Antilles Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the. information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
BY H.H. Hovsepian
Agent, Owner, Partner
If after the information you havo submitted has bcon reviewed, it is determined
tliat further infonnation is quired, you v;il], be so advised
APPLICANT: -£v^t-P^gGfier-t4-es, Inc Califoraia Cor-po)^atlQn
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
-9229-Suase4^EJ-vxL-iL4n; Ljai_i\ng£l£i^,^a_9i)Q&a-
Business Address
AGENT:
.''lEMBERS :
Telephone Number
Joe Ayvasi
Name
Dorn, Platz & Co, 515 N. Brand Blyd, Glendale. Ca, 92130
Business Address
(213) 242-2152
Telephone Mumber
Ajax N. V. Netherland Antilles Corporation
Name (individual, partner, joint jJome Address
venture, corporation, syndj-cation) ,, ,,
c/o Curacao international Trust Company N.y.
8 Handelskade P.O. Bex 812 Curacao, Netherland Antilles
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Nimiber Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
JiiMj^-bpysejiian
Aoc;nt . O.jrinr. Partner