HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 91-07; La Vercia Condominiums; Tentative Map (CT)REVIEW AND COMMENT MEM"'
DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20. 1992 REVISED PLAN D
TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PARKS £ RECREATION DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
CARLSBAD WATER Dl STRICT
LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT
CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
FROM:Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4
NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS
APPLICATION.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LA VERCIA CONDOS
MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. GROUP
5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT
PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department
by APRIL 10, 1992 . if not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have
no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted.
THANK YOU
COMMENTS:
PLANS ATTACHED FRMOO&G 10/91
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEM'—
DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20. 1992 REVISED PLAN D
TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT /
CARLSBAD WATER Dl STRICT
LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT
CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
FROM:Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4
NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS
APPLICATION.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LA VERCIA CONDOS
MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. CROUP
5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT
PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department
by APRIL 10, 1992 . if not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have
no comment, and the proposal has your, endorsement as submitted.
THANK YOU
COMMENTS:
PLANS ATTACHED FRMOOKC 10/91
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO -
DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20, 1992 REVISED PLAN D
TO:
ONLY)
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEM
POLICE DEPARTMENT 0-,
FIRE DEPARTMENT /
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PARKS S RECREATION DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
CARLSBAD _ WATER Dl STRICT
LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT
CARLSBAD _ SCHOOL DISTRICT
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
FROM:Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4
NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS
APPLICATION.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LA VERCIA CONDOS
MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. GROUP
5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT
PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department
by APRIL 10, 1992 . [f not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have
no comment and the proposal has your, endorsement as submitted.
THANK YOU
COMMENTS:
PLANS ATTACHED FRM002G 10/91
City of Carlsbad
Police Department
Date: April 3, 1992
To: Planning Department
From: Police Department/Crime Prevention
Subject: Plan Review #CT 91-7/CP 91-4
The area of concern to the Police Department with this plan is:
General building security.
General security for residents.
Plan review recommendations
Keying- Upon occupancy by the owner each single unit shall have
locks using combinations which are interchange-free from locks used in
all other separate dwellings, proprietorships or similar distinct
occupancies.
Lighting- Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within
the building complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least
twenty-five one hundredths (.25) footcandles at the ground level during
the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and
vandalism-resistant covers.
Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a maintained
minimum of one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface during the
hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and
vandalism covers.
Landscaping- The exterior landscaping should be kept at a
minimal height and fullness giving police, security services the general
public surveillance capabilities of the area.
256O Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92OO8-728O (61 9) 931 -21 OO
Addressing- All residential dwellings shall display a street
number in a prominent location on the street side of the residence in such
a position that the number is easily visible to approaching emergency
vehicles. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and
shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are
attached.
There shall be positioned at each entrance of a multiple family dwelling
complex an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the complex which
shows the location of the viewer and the unit designations within the
complex. In addition, each individual unit within the complex shall display
a prominent identification number, not less than four (4) inches in height,
which is easily visible to approaching vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic.
It is recommended that house numbers be displayed in illuminated fixtures
on the front of residences, clearly visible from the street.
Residential Considerations-
A Crime Prevention measure which should be used throughout the
entire project would be the installation of high quality burglar resistant
hardware on doors and windows. The doors and windows should also be of
sufficient strength to resist break-ins.
Doors-It is recommended that dead-bolt locks be installed on all
access doors of any residential building and attached garages, including
the door leading from the garage area into the dwelling.
Dead-bolts shall have a minimum protection of one inch and be
constructed so as to repel cutting tool attacks. The dead-bolt shall have
an embedment of at least three-fourths inch into the strike plate area.
Strike Plate and dead-bolt are to be installed with wood screws that are
three inches in length.
All entry and exit doors to dwelling units should be arranged so that the
occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without
opening the door. Except for doors requiring a fire protection rating which
prohibits them, such view may be provided by a door viewer having a field
of view of not less than 180 degrees. Mounting height shall not exceed
fifty-four inches from the door. It is not recommended to place glass
panels within in forty inches of a locking device..
The inactive leaf of a double door shall be equipped with metal flush bolts
have a minimum embedment of five-eights inch into the head and
threshold or the door frame.
Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top
and bottom. The bottom track shall be so designed that the floor cannot be
lifted from the track when the floor is in the locked position.
Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with non-removable hinge
pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the
exterior by removing the hinge pins.
Garage Doors-Doors that exceed sixteen feet in width shall have
two lock receiving points; or, if the door does not exceed nineteen feet, a
single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking
point located either at the floor or door frame header; or, torsion spring
counter balance type hardware may be used.
Fences and Walls-Interior six foot stucco walls on unit fronts and
between unit patios creates total privacy and reduces surveillance and
territoriality between residents. For example, a shorter stucco wall for a
symbolic barrier and rod iron fencing on top forces residents to see past
their own walls and into the common areas creating surveillance and a
feeling of community.
4.6 foot chain link fence on back wall breaks down the barrier and gives
people a vehicle for climbing in an area with little surveillance.
By, Jodeene R. Sasway
Crime Prevention Specialist
(619)931-2195
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENI
LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION
TO: PROJECT PLANNER/^//^
FROM: d/Sun. J )a*t/sy
VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL
DATE 3 — ' J2
PROJECT ID
PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project
application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application is now or
was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The
project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be
resolved 4& the applicant-. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed
pnor to resubmittal of the jproject for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or
concerns are as follows: /
(/
The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted
to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting.
The^abovexnpted issues are of^serioTiSv concern or of a sensitive nature. It is
Ajaggested'thai a aieetflag be^held with the applicant and the following Engineering
/ /Staff members-io discusVour concerns with the project:
V
Alsa attached is a^tedlinpd check^rim of the-s1?e~plan. This pjan-should be given
tc/tne ap^canl'iCH: corrections ania chjafges as iroted-^Ptealse have the applicant
retuh/the fedSn^d zJnnVwh the/^prtected site^plarTto assist us in our continued
'/revifew.
?/•
i rt? 7. ft.
at?
City of Carlsbi J 92074
Fire Department Bureau of Prevention
Plan Review: Requirements Category: Fire Conditions
Date of Report: Wednesday, April 8.1992
Contact Name Elaine Blackburn
Reviewed by
Address 2075 Las Palmas
City, State Carlsbad CA 92009
Bldg. Dept. No. Planning No. CT91-7
Job Name La Vercia Condos
Job Address Tamarack Ste. or Bldg. No.
Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is
based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal;
therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica-
tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with
applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure
to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to
construct or install improvements.
Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to
plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this
office for review.
For Fire Department Use Only
Review 1 st 2nd 3rd
CFD Job# 92074 File*
Other Agency ID
2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121
Requirements Category: e Conditions 92074
Deficiency Item: Satisfied 05 Access during construction
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall be provided
and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the access road has
become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may, in the interest of public
safety, require that construction operations cease until the condition is corrected.
Deficiency Item: Satisfied 07 Security gate systems
All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a "Knox", key-operated
emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and
approvals prior to installation.
Deficiency Item: Satisfied 08 Fire lanes
Private roads and driveways which serve as required access for emergency service vehicles shall be
posted as fire lanes in accordance with the requirements of section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
Deficiency Item: Satisfied 13 Monument sign
A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street indicating the
addresses of the buildings on site.
Page 2 04/08/92
Carlsbad
Municipal Water District
595° El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Engineering: (619) 438-3367 .-.-..-: -~.:--^
Administration: (619) 438-2722 :,^V , ''
Fax: (619) 431-1601 r oE
Date: MAtzciH 2.G \
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
TO: ElAlKtE.
FROM: .TE)2g.y V-/H i TT-e V A«S£oC . EKlfcP^ . CMWD NO.
SUBJECT :
Q.T. H--I/C F* <=\\-4 (t=, unft Cbndo)
In response to your inquiry of MAfgov-l 24, l^^g. _ , the
District has reviewed subject project and the Carlsbad Municipal
Water District conditions for potable water, reclaimed water and
sewer systems are as follows:
1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and
sewer system shall be evaluated in detail to insure that
adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands are met.
2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and
charges which will be collected at time of issuance of the
building permit. The San Diego County Water Authority
capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application
for meter installation.
3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
A. Meet with the City Fire Marshall and establish the fire
protection requirements .
B. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit
to the Planning Department for processing and approval.
"Serving Carlsbad for over 35 years"
Page 2
City of Carlsbad
Date 3-G
C. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review,
comment and approval of the preliminary system layout
useage (G.P.M. - E.D.U.) plan for potable, reclaimed and
sewer systems prior to the preparation of improvement
plans.
4. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer
facilities are available at the time of application for such
water service and sewer permits will continue to be available
until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the
final map.
5. 'p-ffc/Nfeiau-ATioMoP WAreg AMP 5>ewEg. Sae^cE^ SHOUUP
ge DOME. VMITN TH& cny* TAMAK/iCK. /xve.
<=.T. »Mppge>veM&KiTS ferry PaoJec/r -*3'Z03 , PW6»* 321-60W * /
TUP'S ITEMS 3 A. g 4.0 MOST 0000^. PR\og To &
OF THE
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.
F. Jelirry Whitley
Associate Engineer
FJW:jm
GUAf=y^,C-ny EKJlfo.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TRANSMTTTAL
To Project Planner : EJ\Qir\&
Project Id: ^r-fA^ 7
Via Assistant City Engineer : _ ^ & ^' /
COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for
application completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are:
_ Complete and suitable for continued review.
V" Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please
see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items.
In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for
Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Major
Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditoning
of the project are as follows:
d tiW
/''"]
£> r\ 'Q4 i n'ke.sTij - .
15
c.
-T->v^e^LS> r
a
i, VL,
\Kv ^ ot^^' ^lA^zU
I &U* / of "f^rnn/^f/o'/) r ^u^a-a^/ ~f-tU (^*G jj f' \jr^ / \cttL,CA Cd O&s Jrtfo ns-> ft(\\- I H)^0 rfu Qu>/yejs vinl D&
\MKoV- V-YlTyDLg/)^ -Vt> ^>A^). IA- \.QD^flr<ar.-K 1^ HDr
Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be
given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the
applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us
in our continued review.
CTTY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION
INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Project Id tfl^Ol Field Check by: _ Date
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION EXPLANATION
_ Inadequate traffic projections provided
_ Street level of service problems
_ Intersection level of service problems
V Driveway problems - -r? y-ovvcV-e-* 9--O O^^-r c \-iD|O DtfC— f' '•' L
****** ^ v— ^ &, ('!> ->HCorner sight distance problems *****
Non standard street improvements proposed
Pedestrian circulation problems
Offsite street improvements needed
Street parking problems
Intersection distance problems
Cul-de-sac length problems , ^ , _ ,- ,-^~ f*'^ V-
X Parking aisles lack turnarounds -
* 'Cl •— - - *_ Parking lot dimensions inadequate \ !" V^ ' '" ^' v UL •
_ Truck access inadequate
_ Parking lot lacks adequate circulation
_ Private street widths not to code
_ End space needs 5' side backup area
_ Adjacent property access not considered
_ Surrounding circulation conflicts exist
_ Inadequate street/parking lot lighting
_ Growth management circulation requirements not met
Other (list) T>v,-,^ »>..•' .<•,* 0'0vor% a\o> (
SEWERAGE DISPOSAL
_ Easement widths not to standard
_ Gravity flow not maintained
_ All weather access not provided
_ Offsite sewer improvements required
_ Non-standard facilities proposed
_ Facilities not in compliance with
sewer master plan
_ Growth management requirements not met
Other(list)
WATER FACILITIES
S Fire hydrants not properly shown or located
_ Water meter access problems
_ Water line conflict with sewer line - «%• ' < ^ ^ ° <-°
_ Water easements inadequate
_ Offsite water facilities required
^. Other (list) &Jr> —"' ' "P'r<-'pc"> -"1 ~ - ..^v \
DRAINAGE
_ Proposed desiltation controls inadequate
_ Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system
_ Erosion problems at proposed outlets
_ Overland flow exceeds city standard
_ Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters
_ Improper diversion of drainage proposed
_ Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot
_ Parking lot drains across sidewalk
_ Inadequate site or lot drainage
_ Inadequate drainage behind retaining wall *
Proposed drainage too close to structure — r\ef*'K si p1' ' ;"V;<~- * ! "V " "* ,
Lot drainage not to street or approved ' ' * " ' ~ "" "
drainage course *'""'
_ Excessive use of curb drains
_ Narrow sideyard requires special design
_ Pad sites not proposed to surface drain
_ All weather access not provided to facilities
^ Offsite drainage improvements required - ~\"Q>. r^. 0 << a £.. K A-»e?> :^><1^>, v'~ 'nTO
_ Facilities not in compliance with master """•"-' ' V*5" ' i
drainage plan
_ Easement widths not to standard
_ Inadequate facilities proposed to handle
upstream flows
Encroachment into flood hazard area
Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps
Growth management requirements not met
Other (list) - &$,#". <•: . C. -j-1"
1
* n 4
snn,S AND GEOLOGY
_ Soils report inadequate for scope of work
_ Site requires geologic review
_ Geologic hazards not properly mitigated
_ Excessive grading proposed for site
_ Onsite spoil/borrow site problems
_ Cut and/or fill height problems
(\-&Proposed slopes exceed 2:1 standard -* $io/ -.,
Inadequate slope setbacks from site boundary "' ' \ ' * *' "' " ••
Slope stability problems exist
Retaining or cribwall height problems
Other (list) o<?^A
CONSTRUCTION . .,. ,..-
_ Site lacks adequate construction staging area
_ Project phasing problems
_ Offsite haulage into sensitive
neighborhood proposed
_ Construction access problems
_ Other (list)
LAND TITLE
Utility easement conflicts exist
*/ Notice of violation on property
S Unpaid liens or taxes exist
Assessment district reapportionment required
Access to public resources not provided
Facilities reimbursement agreement exists
/_ Title Report boundary conflicts with site plan boundary
Other (list)
FIELD CONDITIONS
Site plan conflicts with field conditions
Existing public facilities damaged or
inadequate
Existing overhead facilities to be addressed
Utility conflicts with proposed improvements
Major utility relocations required
Other (list)
GENERAL LOT REQimt..*fFNTS
Lot width not per Code requirements
Lot area is less than required per zoning
Lot not fronting on dedicated public
street or easement
Panhandle lot not to code
Lot depth to width exceeds 3:1
Lot depth less than 90 feet