HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 94-01; Poinsettia Shores; Tentative Map (CT)TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS for
POINSETTIA SHORES
Prepared for
KAIZA GROUP
May 17, 1993
URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING
Consultants to Business and Government
4540 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 106
San Diego, California 92123
(619) 560-4911
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
* EXISTING CONDITIONS 4
THE PROPOSED PROJECT 18
PROJECT ONLY TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT .................... 25
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT ......................................... 43
*YEAR 2000 CONDITIONS 48
« YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS 58
THE TENTATIVE MAP 66
•
REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) 70
*CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 79
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 14
FIGURE 15
PROJECT LOCATION 2
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE (F.M.Z.) BOUNDARIES 5
EXCERPT FROM B.L.E.P. REPORT SHOWING PREVIOUS TRIP
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES 6
EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 10
EXISTING A.M. PEAK HOUR 13
EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR 14
EXISTING INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS 15
POINSETTIA SHORES LAND USE 19
LAND USES WITHIN F.M.Z. 9 20
AREA F NEW COMMERCIAL USE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND
ASSIGNMENT
AREA G & H HOTEL/RESORT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND
ASSIGNMENT
AREA B-1, B-2, AND D RESIDENTIAL USE TRIP DISTRIBUTION
AND ASSIGNMENT
AREA A-1, A-2, A-3, PLUS BONUS DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
26
27
28
29
AREA B-3 AND C RESIDENTIAL USE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND
ASSIGNMENT 30
POINSETTIA SHORES ONLY CUMULATIVE TRIP ASSIGNMENT
(W/O PONTO DRIVE CONNECTION) 31
FIGURE 16
FIGURE 17
FIGURE 18
FIGURE 19
FIGURE 20
FIGURE 21
FIGURE 22
FIGURE 23
FIGURE 24
FIGURE 25
FIGURE 26
FIGURE 27
FIGURE 28
FIGURE 29
FIGURE 30
FIGURE 31
FIGURE 32
FIGURE 33
EXISTING NORTHERLY PARCELS TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND
ASSIGNMENT 33
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
TO AVENIDA ENCINAS 34
F.M.Z. 9 ONLY DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (W/0 PONTO DRIVE
CONNECTION) 35
F.M.Z. 9 ONLY A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 36
F.M.Z. 9 ONLY P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 37
F.M.Z. 22 STREET AND INTERSECTION ASSUMPTIONS 38
ADT VOLUMES ON AVENIDA ENCINAS (WITH PONTO DRIVE
CONNECTION)
F.M.Z. 9 A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (WITH PONTO DRIVE
CONNECTION)
F.M.Z. 9 P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (WITH PONTO DRIVE
CONNECTION)
CITY OF CARLSBAD CUL-DE-SAC POLICY
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT WITH SINGLE ENTRANCE
YEAR 2000 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
YEAR 2000 LANE CONFIGURATIONS
40
41
42
44
45
51
52
YEAR 2000 A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 54
YEAR 2000 P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 55
YEAR 2010 ADT VOLUMES 59
YEAR 2010 LANE CONFIGURATIONS 60
YEAR 2010 A.M. PEAK HOUR 62
ill
FIGURE 34
FIGURE 35
FIGURE 36
FIGURE 37
FIGURE 38
FIGURE 39
FIGURE 40
FIGURE 41
FIGURE 42
YEAR 2010 P.M. PEAK HOUR 63
POINSETTIA SHORES TENTATIVE MAP 67
CONCEPTUAL LANE CONFIGURATIONS AVENIDA ENCINAS
WEST SEGMENT 68
AVENIDA ENCINAS CENTRAL AND NORTH SEGMENTS LANE
CONFIGURATIONS 69
CMP HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC LOS STANDARDS 71
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) SYSTEM 72
POINSETTIA SHORES ONLY ADT DISTRIBUTION TO CMP
SYSTEM 73
YEAR 2010 ADT ON CMP SYSTEM 74
I-5 YEAR 2010 ROUTE CONCEPT IMPROVEMENTS 76
IV
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
TABLE 4
TABLE 5
TABLE 6
TABLE 7
TABLE 8
TABLE 9
TABLE 10
TABLE 11
TABLE 12
TABLE 13
TABLE 14
TABLE 15
TABLE 16
EXISTING I-5 LEVELS OF SERVICE 7
1993 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 11
1993 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 17
F.M.Z. 9 TRIP GENERATION 21
OLD LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION F.M.Z. 9 23
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON 24
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT 47
YEAR 2000 STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
YEAR 2000 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
YEAR 2010 STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
YEAR 2010 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
EXISTING I-5 LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARED TO YEAR 2010
53
56
61
64
ROUTE CONCEPT REPORT 77
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ARTERIAL LEVELS OF
SERVICE 78
RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
PHASING 81
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE 82
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 83
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION AND STREET SEGMENT
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARIES 84-102
SANDAG TRIP GENERATION TABLE MARCH 1993 103-105
TRANSPORTATION PHASING ANALYSIS FOR F.M.Z. 22
PREPARED FOR THE LUSK COMPANY REVISED APRIL 4,
1988 106-111
APPENDIX D YEAR 2000 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
APPENDIX E
WORKSHEETS 112-120
YEAR 2010 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS 121-128
VI
Transportation Analysis
for
^ Poinsettia Shores
INTRODUCTION
j j rban Systems Associates, Inc., (Urban Systems), was retained by the Kaiza Group to
* ^^ prepare a traffic report of possible traffic impacts from the proposed Poinsettia Shores
project in the southwest quadrant of the City of Carlsbad.
•
The Poinsettia Shores project will consist of approximately 564 dwelling units with a mix of
affordable housing, condominium townhouses, and detached dwellings. Also proposed are
• approximately 5.6 acres of visitor commercial uses north of Avenida Encinas, 56,800 square feet
south of Avenida Encinas, a 150 room resort hotel with a 25,000 square feet conference center,
and 220 resort timeshare units.
•
The project is located to the west of Interstate 5 (I-5), south of Poinsettia Lane and east of
t Carlsbad Boulevard. The Batiquitos Lagoon is located south of the project area. Figure 1 shows
the project location with respect to I-5 and Poinsettia Lane.
For the purpose of evaluating possible traffic impacts, this report summarizes existing conditions,
future short term conditions, and future long-term conditions. This report is divided into the
- following sections:
• Introduction
• Existing Conditions
* • The Proposed Project
• Project Only Trip Distribution and Assignment
• 006185C 1 POINSHOR/18D
CARLSBAD N CIT\
\
SOURCE- BASE MAP FROM
AERIAL FOTO-MAP BOOK.AUQUST 1968
USED WITH PERMISSION FROM
AERIAL FOTOBANK, INC.
I
5/93
FIGURE 1
PROJECT LOCATION
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-UftBAN SYSTEMS
N
"VNO SCALE
OO6185C
Poinsettia Shores
May 17, 1993
• First Phase Development
• Year 2000 Conditions
• Year 2010 Conditions
• Tentative Map
• Congestion Management Program (CMP)
• Conclusions and Recommendations
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
006185C POINSHOR/180
Poinsettla Shores
May 17, 1993
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
The proposed project is located to the west of I-5, south of Poinsettia Lane, east of Carlsbad
Boulevard, and north of the Batiquitos Lagoon.
The project is within the City of Carlsbad Facilities Management Zone 9 (F.M.Z. 9), as shown in
Figure 2.
The approved F.M.Z. 9 Plan for the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park assumed project traffic
would be distributed as shown in Figure 3, an excerpt from the F.M.Z. 9 traffic report. Although
the directional trip distribution from the current proposed project will differ slightly from the
previous assumptions because the land uses are different, the street segments and intersections
to be analyzed for existing and future conditions would be the same as previously evaluated.
lnterstate-5 is an eight lane freeway extending north/south east of the project area and is the
main travel corridor in western San Diego County. Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on I-5
are currently 157,000 daily vehicles both north and south of Poinsettia Lane. The San Diego
Association of Governments (SANDAG) Draft 1991 Congestion Management Program estimates
an existing level of service "D" for I-5 through Carlsbad, as shown in Table 1, an excerpt from
that program.
Poinsettia Lane is classified as a secondary arterial between Carlsbad Boulevard and I-5, and
intersects at a diamond interchange on I-5. The intersections on Poinsettia Lane at Carlsbad
006185C POINSHOR/18D
231 12 JZONE 9
SOURCE: Autlit, Ht*i«n, FtM»«n Grcup
5/93
FIGURE 2
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE (FMZ) BOUNDARIES
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-UftBAN SYSTEMS
5 OO6J85C
l\30%
LEOEND:
XXX « Ztn DliWbirtlon
XXX " SuUrw Dlitributlon
APPENDIX E
PHASE III AND IV
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
SOURCE
BA riOUITOS LAGOON EDUCA TIONAL PARK/F.M.Z. BU.S.A. INC. '
- 24 -006 J«£
TRANSPORTATION PHASING ANALYSIS FOR BATIOUITOS LAGOON
EDUCATIONAL PARK AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9,
URBAN SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATES. REVISED MAY 4, 1988.
FIGURE 3
EXCERPT FROM B.L.E.P. REPORT SHOWING PREVIOUS TRIP
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
UftBAM SYSTEMS
6
TABLE 1
EXISTING I-5 LEVELS OF SERVICE
Table 2-5 *
EXISTING 1990 FREEWAY SYSTEM LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
1991 CMP - San Diego Region
Route
1-5
Length
Location/Limits (miles')
Mexico Border to SR905 3.00
SR905 to SR75 (S) 1.54
SR75(S)to "L" St. 2.17
"L" St. to SR54 2.62
SR54 to 1st Ave. 7.18
1st Ave. to SR274 6.91
SR274 to Mission Bay Dr. 0.45
Mission Bay Dr. to Oilman Dr. 2.86
Oilman Dr. to 1-805 3.89
1-805 to Manchester Ave. 7.77
Manchester Ave. to Santa Fe Dr. 2.14
1990 Average
Weekday Traffic LOS
43,700-77,600 A
89,600-99,900 B
132,500-144,200 D
141,000-155,900 E
154,000-221,600 F
133,800-220,400 E
120,800 C
161,700-180,600 E
108,100-128,300 C
188,500-221,200 F
166,000-170,000 E
Santa Fe Dr. to SR78
SR78 to Oceanside Blvd.
Oceanside Blvd. to Hill St.
Hill St. to Orange Co. Line
10.59 152,900-165,300 D |
1.14 150,900-155,800 E
1.61 130,200-138,700 D
18.17 105,300-109,800 B
SOURCE
SANDAQ, 1991 DRAFT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS*
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Boulevard and at Avenida Encinas are signalized. The on and off ramp junctions at the I-5
interchange are currently controlled by stop signs facing off-ramp traffic. The l-5/Poinsettia Lane
interchange will be reconstructed using local TransNet funds to provide a four lane overcrossing
with separate left turn lanes and signalized ramp intersections.
The segment of Poinsettia Lane between I-5 and Avenida Encinas currently provides one
eastbound lane at the I-5 overcrossing and three westbound lanes at the Avenida Encinas
intersection. The three westbound lanes provide for separate left turn, through, and right turn
lanes at the intersection. The average daily traffic volumes on Poinsettia Lane directly east and
west of the I-5 interchange are currently 14,000 daily vehicles.
The segment of Poinsettia Lane between Avenida Encinas and Carlsbad Boulevard is currently
one lane in each direction over a bridge spanning the Atcheson Topeka and Santa Fe (A.T.&
S.F.) railroad tracks, which parallel Carlsbad Boulevard in the north/south directions. Currently
this two lane segment accommodates 7,000 vehicles daily with no observed unusual delay to
motorists.
Carlsbad Boulevard is a four lane major arterial extending north/south through the City of
Carlsbad. The current traffic volume is 14,500 daily vehicles both north and south of Poinsettia
Lane.
Avenida Encinas is classified as a four lane secondary arterial extending north/south parallel to
I-5. To the north of Poinsettia Lane only two lanes are currently constructed, and the roadway
006185C 8 POINSHOR/180
*Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
extends for approximately one-half mile to a cul-de-sac. Auto dealerships, motel/hotel, and
medical offices are currently served by this cul-de-sac street. The daily traffic is currently 5,000
vehicles. It is assumed that adjacent development within F.M.Z. 22 will widen the west half of
* this north segment.
To the south of Poinsettia Lane, Avenida Encinas is constructed as a four lane roadway into the
*project area where it intersects with Windrose Circle approximately one-half mile from Poinsettia
Lane. A mobile home park is located on the west side of Avenida Encinas and the Poinsettia
* Village community shopping center is located on the east side. A signalized intersection serves
the main driveways of these two adjacent developments. The current traffic on this segment of
Avenida Encinas is 12,000 daily vehicles.
*
Windrose Circle extends to the south of Avenida Encinas as a two lane roadway, although the
t curb to curb dimension can accommodate four travel lanes and full width shoulders. This street
segment serves 75 existing dwelling units and has a daily traffic volume of 600 vehicles.
Figure 4 shows the existing average daily traffic volumes on existing streets adjacent to the
project and which were previously evaluated in the F.M.Z. 9 Plan.
Table 2 shows existing street segment levels of service, using the City of Carlsbad's Facility
Management Zone Plan methodology of evaluating street segment peak hour operations. The
peak hour volume by direction for each segment was obtained from intersection peak hour traffic
volumes or street segment daily traffic volume counts contained in the City of Carlsbads1 1992
0061 85C 9 POINSHOR/18D
157,000
14,500
14,500
LEGEND
XXXX • SOURCE, CITY OF CARLSBAD. JHK AND ASSOCIATES
1991-1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING REPORTS
XXXX ' SOURCE, SANDAG 1992 TRAFFIC FLOW MAP
FIGURE 4 N
NO SCALE
6/93
097APSHOH-1
EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES |
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
UftBAM SYSTEMS
10
TABLE 2
1993 EXISTING STREET SEGMENT
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
AVENIDA ENCINAS - ""
Poinsettia Lane - Windrose Circle
CARLSBAD BOULEVARD ._ __ ..
Palomar Airport Road - Poinsettia Ln.
Poinsettia Ln. - La Costa Avenue
PPOINSETTIALANE " "- -; . -.
Carlsbad Boulevard - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - 1-5
1-5 - Paseo Del Norte
\WlNDROSE CIRCLE I^Ilf?ll
Avenida Encinas - Navigator Circle (S)
YEAR 1993
CLASSIFICATION
--;Vv-_-r -- W:r
4SA
«inn™^ --_ _ -.i-f.-
4 MA
4 MA
2SA
2SA
2SA
2C
VOLUME
IN THOUSANDS
i : •-•- -
12.0
-„ .-- - ..- _. ..
14.5
14.5
- -.. .. - - -
7.0
14.0
14.0
0.6
PEAK
VPHPL
-
270
290
280
325
665
820
40
PEAK
VPHPL
/CPL
.- ." "
0.15
-
0.16
0.16
0.18
0.37
0.45
0.02
LOS
-- -
A
-
A
A
A
A
A
A
LEGEND:
4MA = 4 lane major arterial
4SA = 4 lane secondary arterial
2SA = 2 lane secondary arterial
2C = 2 lane collector
VPHPL = VEHICLES PER HOUR PER LANE
CPL = CAPACITY PER LANE
(1800 VEHICLES PER HOUR)
LOS:A
B
C
D
E
F
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.01-UP
5/93
PSHOR02.WO1
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
11
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Traffic Monitoring Report prepared by JHK and Associates for the City. Appendix A includes
copies of traffic count summaries referenced to prepare Table 2. Although traffic counts were
conducted in the summer of 1992, these counts are less than one year old, and since land use
development in the project area has not changed substantially since the counts were conducted,
the Year 1993 traffic volumes should be approximately the same.
As shown in Table 2, all street segments currently operate at acceptable levels of service (ie.,
level of service "D" or better), and, therefore, mitigating traffic improvements will not be needed
before some project traffic can be added, based on existing 1993 average daily traffic volumes.
Intersection peak hour levels of service were evaluated using the existing conditions traffic counts
included in Appendix A. The traffic count summaries excerpted from the JHK & Associates
1992 Traffic Monitoring Report also include the intersection level of service calculation
worksheets.
Figure 5 shows the A.M. peak hour traffic flow at key intersections adjacent to the project that
will be impacted by twenty percent or more of project traffic.
Figure 6 shows the P.M. peak hour traffic flow at key intersections.
Figure 7 shows existing lane configurations and traffic controls at the key intersections.
006185C 12 P01NSHOR/18D
245 65
LEGEND
XXXX ' SOURCE, CITY OF CARLSBAD. JHK AND ASSOCIATES
1991-1902 TRAFFIC MONITORING REPORTS
6/93
Q97APSHOR-2
FIGURE 5
EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
13
N
N'NO SCALE
OOfff85C
380 165
LEGEND
' SOURCE, CITY OF CARLSBAD. JHK AND ASSOCIATES
1991-1992 TRAFRC MONITORING REPORTS
5/93
G97APSHOR-3
FIGURE 6
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
14
NS^
NO SCALE
OO6f85C
I Mr
LEGEND
- TRAFFIC SIGNAL
• STOP SIQN FACING SOUTHBCHJND TRAFFIC
• STOP SIQN FACING NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC
• INDICATES ADEQUATE SHOULDER
WIDTH FOR RIGHT TURNS
5/03
G97APSHOR-4
FIGURE 7
EXISTING INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS
PO/AfSETr/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
15 OOfffSSC
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Table 3 shows the resulting existing peak hour level of service at the intersections, as calculated
by JHK & Associates in their 1992 Traffic Monitoring Report. As shown in this table, the
intersections that would be impacted by future traffic from F.M.Z. 9 are currently operating at
acceptable levels of service (ie., level of service "D" or better during peak hours).
Therefore, mitigating traffic improvements will not be needed before some project traffic can be
added, based on Year 1993 existing peak hour traffic volumes.
006185C 16 POINSHOR/18D
TABLE 3
1993 EXISTING INTERSECTION
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
I-5 / POINSETTIA LANE SB ON-OFF RAMPS
I-5 / POINSETTIA LANE NB ON-OFF RAMPS
POINSETTIA LANE / AVENIDA ENCINAS
POINSETTIA LANE / CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
AVENIDA ENCINAS / POINSETTIA VILLAGE DWY.
TYPE OF CONTROL
STOP SIGN (1)
STOP SIGN (2)
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
1993 EXISTING
AM
A
B
A
A
A
PM
C
B
B
A
A
FOOTNOTES:
(1) STOP SIGN FACING SB OFF RAMP TRAFFIC.
(2) STOP SIGN FACING NB OFF RAMP TRAFFIC.
5/93
PSHOR03.WQ1
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
•UftBAN SYSTEMS*
17 OOG185C
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The existing development within F.M.Z. 9 includes the Poinsettia Village neighborhood shopping
* center of 169,500 square feet in size, office uses of 21,200 square feet, a mobile home park with
384 dwellings, and 75 detached single family residences.
•The Poinsettia Shores project consists of 211 full sized lot single family dwellings, 170 clustered
single family dwellings, 70 townhouse dwellings, 90 affordable housing apartment dwellings and
• 23 bonus single family dwellings. Also included will be 5.6 acres of neighborhood commercial
uses, 58,600 square feet of travel services, and 220 resort timeshare units adjacent to a 150
room hotel with a conference center of 25,000 square feet.
•
Figure 8 shows the proposed land uses within F.M.Z. 9, for the Poinsettia Shores project only.
g Figure 9 shows all uses within F.M.Z. 9, including existing.
Table 4 lists the existing and proposed land uses in F.M.Z. 9, and shows the average daily, A.M.,
and P.M. peak hour traffic generation. The trip generation rates and peak hour characteristics
used in this table are taken from the SANDAG trip generation tables, included in Appendix B.
•
As shown in Table 4, the combined existing and proposed projects within the F.M.Z. are
projected to generate 35,778 daily vehicle trips, 1,624 A.M. and 3,266 P.M. peak hour vehicle
« trips.
006185C 18 POINSHOFV18D
16 SFD CLUSTERED
.1
58 SFD
PLANNING AREA GENERAL PLAN
RM
RM
RM
RM
RM
RM
RM
RH
RM
N
TS/C
TS/C
OS
RM
OS
OS
OS
150 RDDM HOTEL-
25,000 S.F. CONFERENCE CENTER
5.6 ACRES
TRAVEL SERVICE/COMMERCIAL
LAND USE PLAN
POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN
LEGEND
T.H. • TOWN HOME
SFD • SINOLE FAMILY DWELLING
ARTS. • APARTMENTS
S.F. CDMM. • SQUARE FEET COMMERCIAL
SOURCE
POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN, HPA AND ASSOCIATES
FIGURE 8
POINSETTIA SHORES LAND USESl
5/93
SHORES
SYSTEMS*
19
EXISTING
169.5 KSF
COMMERCIA
EXISTING
384
MOBILE
HOMES
EXISTING
21.2 KSF
OFFICE
A-1.A-2.A-3
211 SFD
(+23 BONUS SFD)
J
EXISTING75
SFD
H
HOTEL
150 ROOMS
25,000 SO. FT.
CONFERENCECENTER
LEGEND
T.H. • TOWNHOME
T.S. ' TIMESHARE
KSF • THOUSAND SQUARE FEET COMMERCIAL
SFD ' SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (FULL SIZE LOT)
SOURCE
LAND USE INFORMATION FROM THE KAIZA POINSETTIA CORPORATION
FIGURE 9
LAND USES WITHIN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
206/93
G97APSHOR-6 OOGfSSC
TABLE 4
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9 TRIP GENERATION
USE
MOBILE HOMES
POINSETTIA VILLAGE
OFFICE
EXISTING SFD
A-1SFD
A-2SFD
A-3SFD
B-l SFD CLUSTERED
B-2 SFD CLUSTERED
B-3 SFD CLUSTERED
CT.H.
DAPTS.
DENSITY BONUS SFD
F TRAVEL SERVICE
G TRAVEL SERVICE
G TIMESHARE
H HOTEL (1)
AMOUNT
384 UNITS
169.5 KSF
21.2 KSF
75 UNITS
50 UNITS
89 UNITS
72 UNITS
58 UNITS
96 UNITS
16 UNITS
70 UNITS
90 UNITS
23 UNITS
5.6 ACRES
58.6 KSF
220 UNITS
150 ROOMS
TRIP
RATE*
5 /UNIT
120 /KSF
20 /KSF
10 /UNIT
10 /UNIT
10 /UNIT
10 /UNIT
8 /UNIT
8 /UNIT
8 /UNIT
8 /UNIT
6 /UNIT
10 /UNIT
400 /ACRE
40 /KSF
8 /UNIT
8 /ROOM
TOTALS
ADT
1,920
20,340
424
750
500
890
720
464
768
128
560
540
230
2,240
2,344
1,760
1,200
*1C fJfJHJJ././Or
AM PEAK HOUR
%
9
3
14
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
3
3
8
5
PHT**
173
610
59
60
40
71
58
37
61
10
45
43
18
67
70
141
60
. 1,625
IN/OUT
SPLIT*
3 7
6 4
9 1
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
2 8
6 4
6 4
6 4
6 4
IN
52
366
53
12
8
14
12
7
12
2
9
9
4
40
42
84
36
763
OUT
121
244
6
48
32
57
46
30
49
8
36
35
15
27
28
56
24
862
PM PEAK HOUR
%
11
9
13
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
9
9
7
7
PHT
**
211
1,831
55
75
50
89
72
46
77
13
56
49
23
202
211
123
84
3,266
IN/OUT
SPLIT*
6 4
5 5
2 8
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
7 3
5 5
5 5
4 6
4 6
IN
127
915
11
53
35
62
50
32
54
9
39
34
16
101
105
49
34
1>727
OUT
84
915
44
23
15
27
22
14
23
4
17
15
7
101
105
74
50
IF39
' SOURCE SANDAG GENERATION RATES, JULY, 1992.
** PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
SFD = DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
T.H. = TOWN HOME
KSF = 1,000 SQUARE FEET
(1) WITH 25,000 SQUARE FOOT CONFERENCE CENTER.
6/93
PSHOR01.WQ1
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
21 OO6J85C
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
The new uses within F.M.Z. 9 proposed by the Poinsettia Shores project would generate only
12,344 daily vehicle trips and 721 A.M. and 1,095 P.M. peak hour vehicle trips.
For comparison, the approved F.M.Z. 9 land use trip generation is shown in Table 5, an excerpt
from the previous F.M.Z. 9 traffic study. A straight comparison can not be made between Tables
4 and 5, since the retail/commercial shown in Table 5 is shown with a cumulative trip rate of 40
trips per thousand square feet compared to the 120 trip per thousand, which is a driveway trip
rate, listed in Table 4 for the existing commercial uses. Table 6 shows a comparison excluding
the existing Poinsettia Village shopping center, the existing mobile homes, office, and residential
units. This table then shows a comparison of the previous undeveloped portion of the Batiquitos
Lagoon Educational Park to what currently is planned for development for the Poinsettia Shores
project.
As shown in Table 6, the Poinsettia Shores project would generate 20,001 fewer daily, 1,544
fewer A.M. and 2,612 fewer P.M. peak hour vehicle trips than the previously approved and yet
to be developed Educational Park land uses.
Therefore, the proposed Poinsettia Shores project will have a significantly less traffic impact to
the local and regional traffic circulation system than the previously approved project for the same
undeveloped area within F.M.Z. 9.
006185C 22 POINSHOFV18D
TABLE 5
OLD LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9
Y£AR/U«> USE
1987
nobilehow Park
1988
Residential (S.F.)
Residential (Pl.F.)
1989
Retail
Office
Institute
Office
Coranercial
RID
Health/Rec
Student Donna
Residential (S.F.)
Residential (B.F.)
1990
Ratal!
Conaercial
RID
Conference
Hotel Suites
Student Dorms
Residential (B.F.)
1991
Institute
R 1 0
Office
Hotel
PHASE
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
AREA
A
C
C
B
a
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
WEUNT
384 DU
S3 DU
52 DU
TRIP
RATE"
5/DU
10/DU
B/DU
SUB TOTALt
134,563 SF
32,443 SF
80,000 SF
64,800 SF
75,000 SF
70,000 SF
97,200 SF
22B ROOfl
52 DU
204 DU
40/K5F
20/KSF
TRIP
ENDS
1,920
530
416
946
5,383
649
23/KSF" 1,840
20/KSF
40/KSF
BASF
40/KSF
6/ROOC
10/DU
B/DU
SUB TOTALi
40,000 SF
69,000 SF
56,200 SF
120,000 SF
300 ROOD
228 ROOD
1*4 DU
40/KSF
40/KSF
B/KSF
1,296
3,000
560
3,688
1,368
520
1,632
20,135
1,600
2,760
450
• • •
8/ROOn 2,400
6/ROOB 1 ,368
B/DU
SUB TOTALt
140,000 SF
192,500 SF
127,500 SF
70 RDtn
1,152
9,730
23/KSF*" 3,220
B/KSF 1,540
20/KSF I 2,550
a/Rocn
SUB TOTAL i
TOTALt
560
7,870
40,601
PEAK HOUR
AH IN/OUT
J» f RATIO" IN OUT
9 173 3t7 52 121
8 42 2l8 8 34
8 33 2i8 7 27
76 15 61
3 161 6i4 97 65
14 91 9i1 82 9
4 74 8t2 59 15
14 181 9(1 163 18
3 90 6i4 54 36
16 90 9l1 B1 9
4 156 6i4 S3 62
8 109 2iB 22 68
B 42 2(8 8 33
8 131 2i8 26 104
1,124 685 439
3 48 6i4 29 19
3 83 6i4 SO 33
16 72 9i1 65 7
__ —
6 144 6t4 86 58
8 109 2iB 22 BB
B 92 2i8 18 74
548 270 278
4 129 8t2 103 26
16 246 9l1 222 25
14 357 9i1 321 36
6 34 6t4 20 13
766 666 100
2,687 1,688 998
PH IN/OUT
t* 1 RATIO* IN OUT
11 211 6t4 127 84
10 53 7l3 37 16
10 42 7i3 29 12
95 66 28
9 484 SiS 242 242
13 84 2i8 17 67
8 147 5i5 74 74
13 168 2iB 34 135
9 270 5i5 135 13S
14 78 1i9 8 71
9 350 6i4 210 140
11 150 7i3 105 45
10 52 7i3 36 16
10 163 7i3 114 49
1,948 975 973
9 144 5t5 72 72
9 248 5tS 124 124
14 63 1i9 6 57
— — — —6 192 SiS 96 96
11 150 7i3 105 45
10 115 7i3 81 35
913 4B4 429
8 258 SiS 129 129
14 216 1t9 22 194
13 331 2iB 66 265
8 45 SiS 22 22
849 239 610
4,017 1,892 2,125
City of San Diego emulative trip rate (See Appendix B).
Institute based on 5,000 total ADT free. EIR.
SOURCE
TRANSPORTATION PHASING ANALYSIS FOR BATIQUITOS LAGOON
EDUCATIONAL PARK AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8,
URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, REVISED MAY 1988.
5/83
PO/MSErr/A SHOffES
-UffBAN SYSTEMS
23 OO6185C
TABLE 6
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
Plan
B.LE.P.
Poinsettia Shores
Change
ADT
32,345
12,344
-20,001
A.M. Peak
Total
2,265
721
-1,544
In
1,512
279
-1,233
Out
753
441
-312
P.M. Peak
Total
3,707
1,095
-2,612
In
1,460
621
-839
Out
2,247
468
-1,779
B.L.E.P. = Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park
Excludes the following existing development within F.M.Z. 9
Poinsettia Village Shopping Center
384 DU Mobile Home Park
21,200 S.F. Office
75 S.F.D.
5/93
SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
24
POINSHOR.T6/18D
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
PROJECT ONLY TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Figures 10 through 14 show the directional trip distribution percentages and ADT assignment
for the new Poinsettia Shores F.M.Z. 9 land use for each individual area of development. Each
area will have a different trip assignment to Avenida Encinas so that each area has a unique
contribution to the cumulative ADT on Avenida Encinas and the regional circulation system.
The previous F.M.Z. 9 trip distribution percentages assumptions are previously shown in Figure
3. These percentages were generally used, but the previous assumption for the Education Park
was that some residents in Encinitas, and to the south, would work at the planned offices and
attend the university previously planned. With a primarily residential element of the current plan,
fewer trips to and from the south on Carlsbad Boulevard are expected. Therefore, the southerly
trip distribution percentages have been slightly changed, as a comparison between these figures
and Figure 3 will verify.
Figure 15 shows the cumulative average daily traffic assignment to each segment of the
adjacent street system.
006185C 25 POINSHOFV18D
30%
672 ADT
5%
112 ADT
1,456 ADT
30%
672 ADT
LEGEND
XX7a ' DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 10
AREA F NEW COMMERCIAL USE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
5/93
G97APSHOR-6
SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
26 OO6185C
265 ADT
5%
30%
1,591 ADT
265 ADT
5%
3,448 AD
30%
1,591 ADT
LEGEND
XX% • DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
6/83
G97APSHOR-7
FIGURE 11
AREA G AND H HOTEL/RESORT
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
PO/NSETT/A SHOffES
URBAN SYSTEMS
27 OO6J85C
30%
532 ADT
5%
89 ADT
30%
532 ADT
5%
89 ADT
LEGEND
XX% m DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX - AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
5/93
G97APSHOR-B
FIGURE 12
AREA B-1, B-2, AND D RESIDENTIAL USE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
PO//VS£Tr/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
28 OOfffSSC
30%
708 ADT
5%
118 ADT
30%
708 ADT
5%
118 ADT
LEGEND
XX% m DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 13
A-1, A-2, AND A-3 PLUS BONUS DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
UftBAN SYSTEMS
29
5/93
G98APSHOR-8 OOGfSSC
5%
34 ADT
30%
206 ADT
30%
206 ADT
5%
34 ADT
LEGEND
XX% ' DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 14
AREA B-3 AND C RESIDENTIAL USE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
5/93
G98APSHOR-10
SHORES
>Uf?BAM SYSTEMS
30 OOfffSSC
5/93
Q98APSHOR-11
FIGURE 15
POINSETTIA SHORES ONLY
CUMULATIVE TRIP ASSIGNMENT
(WITHOUT PONTO DR. CONNECTION)
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
Uf?BAM SYSTEMS
31 OOfff85C
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Figures 16 and 17 show the existing development's trip distribution to the street system,
assuming the completion of Avenida Encinas between Windrose Circle and Carlsbad Boulevard.
* Figure 18 shows Poinsettia Shores daily traffic added to existing daily traffic, to estimate future
buildout of F.M.Z. 9. Also shown are cumulative trip distribution percentages for all development
within F.M.Z. 9.
*
Figures 19 and 20 show the A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic flow distributed to the street system
% using the directional distribution percentages previously shown in figures in this section of the
report.
The average daily traffic and peak hour traffic volumes shown in this section of the report will be
used in following sections for traffic impact evaluation.
•
Ponto Drive is currently a two lane local street that extends north-south parallel and to the west
of the A.T.& S.F. railroad tracks, abutting the north property line of area "F". The extension of
Ponto Drive would extend into the southerly portion of F.M.Z. 22, providing access to Avenida
Encinas for that parcel. The F.M.Z. 9 traffic at the Avenida Encinas/Ponto Drive intersection,
therefore, needs to be adjusted with a part of F.M.Z. 22 traffic added.
Figure 21 shows the street and intersection assumptions from the portion of F.M.Z. 22 south of
* Poinsettia Lane and abutting F.M.Z. 9. As shown, a signalized intersection is shown for the
006185C 32 POINSHOFV180
3.070 ADT
15%
3,070 ADT
27.5%
5,625 ADT
15%
3,069 ADT70%
14,319 ADT
64 APT
15,660 ADT
POINSETTIALN
L> NOTE' PDINSETTIA VILLAGE
ADT REDUCED 10% FDR
'PASS-BY' TRIPS
ORIGINATING IN F.M.Z. 9
PDINSETTIA
VILLAGE
2)MOBILE HOMES ADT
REDUCED 10X FOR SHOPPING
TRIPS AT POINSETTIA
VILLAGE THAT DO NOT
ADD ADT TD AVENIDA ENCINAS
27.5%
5,625 ADT
LEGEND
XX% m DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
N
V
NO SCALE
FIGURE 16
5/93
G98APSHOR-13
EXISTING NORTHERLY PARCELS TRIP DISTRIBUTION
AND ASSIGNMENT
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
U/70A/V SYSTEMS
33 OOfftSSC
10%
76 ADT
25%
188 ADT
5%
38 ADT
LEGEND
XX% m DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
5/93
G98APSHOR-U
FIGURE 17
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
TO AVENIDA ENCINAS
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
34
28%
9,515
11%
3,730
21%
6,995
LEGEND
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ROUNDED)
XX% m DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
FIGURE 18
TOTAL F.M.Z. 9 PROPOSED PLUS EXISTING
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AND
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(WITHOUT PONTO DR. CONNECTION)
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
35
5/93
G98APSHOR-15 006J85C
80
14 66
135
•54
•121
\ f22 81
205
POINSETTIA LN.
oz
o
o
33
•103 24 5 3
152
95
154
•2
-172
•8
103 5 5
81'
66
54 473
•79
205
N
VNO SCALE
6/93
G98APSHOR-16
FIGURE 19
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9 ONLY
AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
36 OO6J85C
178
I
32 146
I
206
168
•144
•174
24 198
POINSETTIA LN.
Oz
O
O72
•222 96 5 3
•290
t
345
96->
275—*.
180-^
197
217 12
5
198146
463
463
-174 X,
-927
408
•175
X X 314-
I I 409-^'
144784
408-165-
463
409 Ik
\\ls3
N
V
NO SCALE
5/S3
G98APSHOR-17
FIGURE 20
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9 ONLY
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
UftBAM SYSTEMS
37 OO6185C
RIGHT IN AND OUT ONLY
LEGEND
f
t-
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
RIGHT IN AND OUT ONLY INTERSECTION
N
V
NO SCALE
5/03
G98APSHOR-18
FIGURE 21
F.M.Z. 22 STREET AND INTERSECTION ASSUMPTIONS
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-UffBAN SYSTEMS
38 OOfft85C
PoinseWa Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
central portion of the F.M.Z. 22 parcels, while the southerly portion is served by a right-in-out-
only intersection on Carlsbad Boulevard, and a connection of Ponto Drive south to Avenida
Encinas.
Appendix C shows excerpts from the F.M.Z. 22 transportation analysis that includes the
expected trip generation and directional distribution from the portion of F.M.Z. 22 south of
Poinsettia Lane. Based on these assumptions, a certain amount of daily traffic from F.M.Z. 22
has been added to Avenida Encinas and the resulting cumulative ADT and peak hour volumes
are shown in Figures 22, 23, and 24. These volumes will be used for impact analysis in the
following sections of this report.
00618SC 39 POINSHOFV18D
LEGEND
XXXX • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
5/93
G98APSHOR-19
FIGURE 22
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
ON AVENIDA ENCINAS
(WITH PONTO DR. CONNECTION)
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
40 OOff185C
150
F.M.Z. 22
34 A
s 1 T
^ t 34m
Q
CQ
CO_J
Qi<£CJ
oi
Q
0E-
V. 115 5 2
50 1 15
y^-210 J T ^
1 100 *-
165 155 —^
^_
^^5
•< 170
AVENIDA ENCINAS
^ t f "°~105 1 55
N
V
NO SCALE
FIGURE 23
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
(WITH PONTO DRIVE CONNECTION)
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
5/93
Q98AP3HOR-20 41
OOfffSSC
Q
m
a
CDCO
o
220 166
345
/r
I
360
F.M.Z. 22
34
341t
A
'
0E-
120 1 15
J I L
JF H
120
280
180
165
AVENIDA ENCINAS
x A
1 T
1
31°
215 15
5
NvNO SCALE
FIGURE 24
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 9 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
(WITH PONTO DRIVE CONNECTION)
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS6/93
G99APSHOR-21 42
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT
Initial development of the Poinsettia Shores project is proposed for the easterly portions with
* access to existing Windrose Circle and Avenida Encinas. The extension of Avenida Encinas to
the west and the construction of the bridge over the A.T.&S.F. tracks and new intersection at
Carlsbad Boulevard is planned for the second phase of development.
•
The first phase of development is recommended to proceed with a single access street within
f the City of Carlsbad cul-de-sac policy, as shown in Figure 25.
Condition #3 of the City's cul-de-sac policy should apply since existing Avenida Encinas is a four
f
lane secondary arterial street with a raised median and parking is prohibited. The cul-de-sac
length should be measured from the existing traffic signal at the entrance driveways to the mobile
f home park and Poinsettia Village shopping center.
Figure 26 shows the single access cul-de-sac for the first phase of development. Since the
shopping center has a driveway between Poinsettia Lane and the signalized entrance, this
driveway and the driveway within the shopping center parking lot should be considered as a loop
street for emergency access purposes. Therefore, the single entrance to the first phase of
Poinsettia Shores should be considered to begin at the signalized driveway.
*006185C 43 POINSHOR/18D
CITY Of CARLSBAD
ENCJIHEERIHG DEPARTKENT
NUMBER:
EFFECTIVE!
SUPERSEDES!
1
12/20/90
9/5/84
SUBJECT;
SINGLE ENTRANCE
AFPROVJJ>d&l *y
LLO*D B.l HV£6S>
(CUL-^DE-SAC)Development
CITY ENGINEER
PURPOSE;
To establish • set of condition* under which it is acceptable for
a development to have only one entrance vhil« ensuring adequate
traffic circulation and fire access.
POLICY:
Single entry point (cul-de-sac) development* shall be permittedonly when the cul-de-sac street is:
1. A 30-foot or 32-foot curb-to-curb private street, a 36-foot or
40-foot curb-to-curb residential street and all the following
conditions are met:
a. Length of street does not exceed 600 feet.*
b. Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 500 ADT.
c. Number of dwelling units does not exceed 50.
* Length nay be increased to a maximum of 1200 feet with
special permission of the City Engineer.
2. A 40-foot curb-to-curb local street and all of the following
conditions are met:
a. Driveway and street intersections are spaced 150 feet or
more apart.
b. The length along streets from entrance to most remote
point does not exceed one-half mile.
c. Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 1200 ADT.
d. Number of dwelling units does not exceed 120.
3. A 4-lane secondary or major arterial with a raised median and
all of the following conditions are met:
a. The length of street does not exceed one-half mile.
b. Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 3000 ADT.
c. The net buildable lot area served by the street does not
exceed 25 acres,
4, A 52-foot wide curb-to-curb industrial street and ajl of the
following conditions are met:
a. The length of street does not exceed one-half mile.
b. Traffic volume at entrance does not exceed 3000 ADT.
c. The net buildable lot area served by the street does not
exceed 25 acres.
FIGURE 25
CITY OF CARLSBAD CUL-DE-SAC POLICY
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS
44
O06185C
POINSETTIALN
Driveway
12,000
Pomsettia
Village Driveway
Loop Street
First phase to be
within a 1/2 mile
radius of the
traffic signal.
LEGEND
XXXX ' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ROUNDED)
O • TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION
FIGURE 26
5/93
G99APSHOR-32
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT WITH
SINGLE ENTRANCE
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
45
*Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
^ As stated in the City's cul-de-sac policy, development shall not exceed an amount that would
generate more than a 3,000 daily vehicle volume at the single entrance, or shall not exceed 25
acres.
•
The existing development of 75 dwellings would generate a maximum of 750 daily vehicles and
is within an area of approximately fourteen acres. As an example of the number of dwelling units
that could be developed, Table 7 shows the amount of units needed to generate a 3,000 ADT
volume, and also shows the traffic generation for a residential density of seven dwelling units per
t acre applied to eleven acres. This calculation assumes that the existing 75 dwelling units are
situated on approximately fourteen acres. The conclusion from this table is that the residential
density is the controlling factor on the amount of dwelling units allowed for the single entrance
t
roadway. The average residential density planned is approximately seven dwelling units per
acre, and even if doubled, within eleven acres, would not exceed a trip generation of 3,000 daily
t vehicles when added to existing traffic at the single entrance.
Therefore, it is recommended that eleven acres of development be allowed, regardless if
residential density, before a second entrance is required.
006185C 46 POINSHOR/18D
TABLE 7
FIRST PHASE DEVELOPMENT
Based on APT:
Existing 75 SFD x 10 T.E./DU = 750 ADT
First Phase 225 SFD x 10 T.E./DU = 2r25Q ADT
Total 3,000 ADT
Based on Density:
7 SFD/acre x 11 acres* = 77 SFD
77 SFD X 10 T.E./DU = 770 ADT
* Assumes 14 acres of existing development.
5/93
PO/MSETr/A SHORES
SYSTEMS
47
POINSHOR.T7/18D
Poinsettia Shores
May 17, 1993
YEAR 2QQQ CONDITIONS
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
The Poinsettia Shores project is planned to begin adding traffic to the street system in late 1994.
However, these initial traffic impacts will be minimal through Year 1994.
The City of Carlsbad has scheduled interchange improvements at l-5/Poinsettia Lane to begin
in April, 1994, and end in May, 1995. The improvements will be City funded.
<l Therefore, as the Poinsettia Shores project proceeds to develop beyond its initial stages, the
interchange capacity will have been increased to accommodate Year 2010 traffic volumes in Year
1995, so that adequate capacity will be available for buildout of the project in several years.
To show that street segment and intersection capacity will be available for project buildout, an
» analysis of Year 2000 traffic conditions was conducted and is included in this section of the
report.
The City of Carlsbad street improvements assumed for Year 2000 are the following:
I
The l-5/Poinsettia Lane interchange improvements include widening the
overcrossing to provide two travel lanes in each direction plus dual left turn lanes
for the left turns onto the northbound and southbound on-ramps. The off-ramps
will be widened with traffic signals installed at the ramp junctions with Poinsettia
Lane.
006185C 48 POINSHOFV18O
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Poinsettia Lane will be restriped or widened both east and west of I-5 to match the
I-5 overcrossing lane configurations, and a traffic signal will be installed at the
Poinsettia Lane/Paseo Del Norte intersection. The existing traffic signal at the
* Poinsettia Lane/Avenida Encinas intersection will be modified to accommodate the
restriping needed to coincide with the I-5 overcrossing lane configurations.
I
The two lane bridge on Avenida Encinas over the A.T.& S.F. railroad tracks is
assumed to be widened using City of Carlsbad Traffic Impact Fee program funds.
i) Although this two lane bridge does not need to be widened in Year 2000 based on
segment capacity, the geometric design of the westbound lanes may dictate the
need for widening to resolve design requirements.
The extension of Avenida Encinas to the west will require the construction of a two lane bridge
,| over the A.T.& S.F. railroad tracks and the construction of a signalized intersection at Carlsbad
Boulevard.
The new intersection at Ponto Drive/Avenida Encinas is assumed to be signalized in Year 2000.
The intersection of Avenida Encinas/Windrose Circle is assumed to be stop sign controlled, with
stop signs facing traffic on Windrose Circle.
Year 2000 traffic volumes estimates were taken from the City of Carlsbads1 computer traffic
model for that year, prepared by the City through SANDAG in June, 1990. However, volume
0061 a5C 49 POINSHOR/180
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
adjustments at intersections have been made since the Poinsettia Shores project has
considerably less traffic generation than originally contained in the traffic model for F.M.Z. 9. The
adjustment consists of removing the project only volumes produced by the traffic model and
^ replacing them with the manually generated and assigned project only traffic developed in the
previous section of this report.
Figure 27 shows the Year 2000 projected daily traffic volumes on adjacent streets.
Figure 28 shows the assumed Year 2000 lane configurations.
Table 8 shows street segment levels of service for Year 2000. As shown, all segments impacted
9
by twenty percent or more of F.M.Z. 9 traffic are at acceptable levels of service, i.e., level "D"
or better during peak hours.
i
Figure 29 shows the Year 2000 A.M. peak hour traffic projections at impacted intersections.
Figure 30 shows the Year 2000 P.M. peak hour traffic projections at impacted intersections.
Appendix D includes Year 2000 peak hour levels of service worksheets.
Table 9 shows the intersection peak hour level of service at locations impacted by twenty percent
or more of F.M.Z. 9 traffic. As shown, all intersections meet the City Growth Management
standard of at least level of service "D" during the peak hours, without mitigation beyond the City
006185C 50 POINSHOFV18D
I
I
38
LEGEND^
XXXX ' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES IN THOUSANDS (ROUNDED)
SOURCE
CARLSBAD YEAR 2000 FORECAST. 6/90.
I
6/93
Q99APSHOR-22
FIGURE 27
YEAR 2000 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
UftBAM SYSTEMS
51 OO6J85C
11
11
tt
ttr
tt
tlr
II tt
T3O
O
NN^
NO SCALE
5/93
G99APSHOR-X1
FIGURE 28
YEAR 2000 LANE CONFIGURATIONS
PO/MSETr/A SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
52 ooewsc
TABLE 8
YEAR 2000 STREET SEGMENT
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
AVENK3A 6NC1NAS : : . - : 1 tT-JrlsP" £1
Poinsettia Lane - Poinsettia Village Dwy.
Poinsettia Village Dwy. - Windrose Circle
Windrose Circle - Ponto Dr.
Ponto Dr. - Carlsbad Boulevard
CARLSBAD BOULEVARD ^l^^^C "'"
Palomar Airport Road - Poinsettia Ln.
Poinsettia Ln. - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - La Costa Avenue
POfNSETTJALANE^: , .. ;- "
Carlsbad Boulevard - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - 1-5
1-5 - Paseo Del Norte
-_ WINDROSE CIRCLE ~:/ - _'"' '__ -.^JlH:
Avenida Encinas - Navigator Circle (S)
CLASSIFICATION
_ .. _ — , — _-- ..
4SA
4SA
2C
4SA
_ ;-_;_ - - ' -"=.'--
4 MA
4 MA
4 MA
4SA
4SA
4 MA
, - — . „„ -
2C
YEAR 2000
VOLUME
IN THOUSANDS
v.-.- .-
21.0
7.6
6.1
12.6
29.0
34.0
38.0
12.5
29.0
40.0
2.0
PEAK
VPHPL
-
550
180
150
345
" -- -
930
995
995
440
930
1010
160
PEAK
VPHPL
/CPL
- ;
0.31
0.10
0.08
0.19
0.52
0.55
0.55
0.24
0.52
0.56
0.09
LOS
--_-K;.--J-
A
A
A
A
:*;;f:
A
A
A
•£•"- -
A
A
A
--=•:
A
LEGEND:
4MA = 4 lane major arterial
4SA = 4 lane secondary arterial
2SA = 2 lane secondary arterial
2C = 2 lane collector
VPHPL = VEHICLES PER HOUR PER LANE
CPL = CAPACITY PER LANE
(1800 VEHICLES PER HOUR)
LOS:A
B
C
D
E
F
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.01-UP
5/93
PSHOR01.WQ1
PO/MS€rr/A SHORES
-UftBAM SYSTEMS
53 OOfffSSC
1530
1315 215
I V
1415 150
1625
1495
-130
•250
POINSETTIA LN.
t f
1365 570
MOBILE HOME
DRIVEWAY
25 25 210
40-
715-
65-
235 240J L•490 X X
<• 300
^—400
55 25 475
1075
325
t ^ 6°I I 100
1820 165 155
I t1985
SHOPPING
CENTER
DRIVEWAY
5/93
G99APSHOR-23
FIGURE 29
YEAR 2000
AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
UffBAM SYSTEMS
54
N
V
NO SCALE
OO6J85C
1295 3101 v
1640 220
1 ^
1985
V-315
f- 565
1 t
1000 420
o>»
Gtd>a
CD
C"<
w
V-155
^-345
t r1265 360
| t
1625
POINSETTIA LN. j
MOBILE HOME
DRIVEWAY \
\^
"0Q
0
o~a
X^15120515 ,, 165J I L ^-10
^^ w ^^ ^^
120-X N t /280 +- \ | f
180— y 215 5 15
4N
S~-
:>:H
;?p
:co:-q
:»:S)
75 25 420
600 290
270 X X
45-
535-
150-
200
100 230 575
•930
50 25 85
1185
555
I J 200
SHOPPING
CENTER
DRIVEWAY
5/93
G99APSHOR-24
FIGURE 30
YEAR 2000
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
55
N
V
NO SCALE
OOfffffSC
TABLE 9
YEAR 2000 INTERSECTION
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
1-5 / POINSETTIA LANE SB ON-OFF RAMPS (1)
I-5 / POINSETTIA LANE NB ON-OFF RAMPS (1)
POINSETTIA LANE / AVENIDA ENCINAS (1)
POINSETTIA LANE / CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
AVENIDA ENCINAS / PONTO DR. (2)
AVENIDA ENCINAS / WINDROSE CIRCLE
AVENIDA ENCINAS / POINSETTIA VILLAGE DWY.
TYPE OF CONTROL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
STOP SIGN (3)
SIGNAL
YEAR 2000
AM
B
C
B
C
A
A
A
PM
C
D
C
C
A
A
B
FOOTNOTES:
(1) I-5 / POINSETTIA INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ASSUMED COMPLETED IN MAY 1995.
(2) INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONCURRENT WITH BRIDGE OVER AT&SF TRACKS
(3) STOP SIGN FACING NB AND SB TRAFFIC.
6/93
PSHOR06.WQ1
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS
56 ooerssc
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
funded improvements previously described and the project construction of the Avenida Encinas
extension to the west.
*
006185C 57 POINSHOR/18D
Poinsettia Shores
May 17, 1993
YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
The Year 2010 traffic volumes were taken from the City of Carlsbad Year 2010 computer traffic
* forecast prepared in June, 1990. The forecast volumes were adjusted to account for the lowered
trip generation for the Poinsettia Shores project compared to the larger project previously
assumed in the traffic model for F.M.Z. 9.
Figure 31 shows the Year 2010 daily traffic volume projections on adjacent streets.
Figure 32 shows Year 2010 lane configuration assumptions, which are the same as assumed
for Year 2000.
*
Table 10 shows the Year 2010 street segment peak hour level of service. As shown, all street
^ segments impacted by twenty percent or more of F.M.Z. 9 traffic are within acceptable levels of
service "D" or better, without mitigation.
Figure 33 shows the Year 2010 A.M. peak hour traffic projections.
Figure 34 shows the Year 2010 P.M. peak hour traffic projections.
Table 11 shows the Year 2010 intersection peak hour levels of service. As shown in this table,
all intersections impacted by twenty percent of F.M.Z. 9 traffic are projected to be at acceptable
levels of service, at level "D" or better during peak hours, with additional mitigation beyond the
006185C 58 POINSHOFV180
18
47
LEGEND
XXXX ' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES IN THOUSANDS (ROUNDED)
SOURCE
SANDAQ - CARLSBAD YEAR 2010 BUILDOUT FORECAST, 6/90. (ADJUSTED)
6/93
G99APSHOR-26
FIGURE 31
YEAR 2010 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
UffBAN SYSTEMS
59 OO6185C
II
tt
ttr
tt
ttr
II tt
N
VNO SCALE
5/93
G99APSHOR-26
FIGURE 32
YEAR 2010 LANE CONFIGURATIONS
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
60 OO6185C
TABLE 10
YEAR 2010 STREET SEGMENT
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
- AV6.NIDA ENCINAS ;--"-" :- "^ "--'•• _--~- -- ^-^r-i
Poinsettia Lane - Poinsettia Village Dwy.
Poinsettia Village Dwy. - Windrose Circle
Windrose Circle - Ponto Dr.
Ponto Dr. - Carlsbad Boulevard
CARLSBAD BOULEVARD = ^
Palomar Airport Road - Poinsettia Ln.
Poinsettia Ln. - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - La Costa Avenue
POINSETTIA LANE -] . -;_^ :^~
Carlsbad Boulevard - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - 1-5
!-5-PaseoDelNorte(1)
WtNDROSE CIRCLE- '. -- __ _.".___ , "^
Avenida Encinas - Navigator Circle (S)
CLASSIFICATION
V Ijgv:^;-" -/\
4SA
4SA
2C
4SA
- ':sm ; --^,1-
4 MA
4 MA
4 MA
%AVf^:S-C
4SA
4SA
6 MA
--':."- " ""-_-
2C
YEAR 2010
VOLUME
IN THOUSANDS
-
21.0
7.6
6.1
12.6
-y : ~/""
36.0
38.0
47.0
JV^-- ~ __ .
13.2
34.0
50.0
2.0
PEAK
VPHPL
--
550
180
150
345
-
1110
1230
1205
475
905
640
160
PEAK
VPHPL
/CPL
- .--*
0.31
0.10
0.08
0.19
rv_; _.;/."
0.62
0.68
0.67
0.26
0.50
0.36
0.09
LOS
"-r5fS
A
A
A
A
l-V-7^.
B
B
B
-V.r^: ~
A
A
A
~~
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
LEGEND: LOS:
4MA = 4 lane major arterial
4SA = 4 lane secondary arterial
2SA = 2 lane secondary arterial
2C = 2 lane collector
VPHPL = VEHICLES PER HOUR PER LANE
CPL = CAPACITY PER LANE
(1800 VEHICLES PER HOUR)
FOOTNOTE: (1) WIDEN TO SIX LANES - FUNDED BY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM.
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.01-UP
6/93
PSHOROX.WQ1
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS*
61 ooetssc
1930 245
1
2180 150
1
V-140
^-215
POINSETTIA LN
t f
765 670
50515
t f 100-
2240 165 155.
SHOPPING
CENTER
DRIVEWAY
MOBILE HOME |
DRIVEWAY
o
105 5 5
SOURCE
SANDAQ - CARLSBAD YEAR 2010 BUILDOUT FORECAST. 6/90. (ADJUSTED)N
^S
NO SCALE
FIGURE 33
YEAR 2010
AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
6/93
G99APSHOR-27
SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
62 OO6185C
1900 325
2240 220
2395
-295
• 560
POINSETTIA LN. f
\ f
1865 340
MOBILE HOME
DRIVEWAY
•oo
-3O
-155 120515
•345
t t 1
I I 2i
20-
280-
2050 360 180-
V.15
^ 165
Mr215 5 15
2410
SHOPPING
CENTER
DRIVEWAY
SOURCE
SANOAO - CARLSBAD YEAR 2010 BUILDOUT FORECAST. 6/90. (ADJUSTED)
N
VNO SCALE
6/93
G99APSHOR-28
FIGURE 34
YEAR 2010
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PO/NSETr/A SHORES
UftBAN SYSTEMS
63 006J85C
TABLE 11
YEAR 2010 INTERSECTION
LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
I-5 / POINSETTIA LANE SB ON-OFF RAMPS
I-5 / POINSETTIA LANE NB ON-OFF RAMPS
POINSETTIA LANE / AVENIDA ENCINAS
POINSETTIA LANE / CARLSBAD BOULEVARD (1)
AVENIDA ENCINAS / CARLSBAD BLVD.
AVENIDA ENCINAS / PONTO DR.
AVENIDA ENCINAS / WINDROSE CIRCLE (2)
AVENIDA ENCINAS / POINSETTIA VILLAGE DWY.
TYPE OF CONTROL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
SIGNAL
STOP SIGN
SIGNAL
YEAR 2010
AM
C
B
B
C
D
A
A
A
PM
D
C
C
D
D
A
A
B
FOOTNOTES:
(1) ADD SB LEFT TURN LANE IN YgAR POOS-FUNDED BY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM
(2) STOP SIGN FACING NB ANffSBTRAFFier>
6/93
PSHOR06.WQ1
po/Nserr/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
64 OO6J85C
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
street improvements assumed for Year 2000 recommended at only one intersection. The
9
Carlsbad Boulevard/Poinsettia Lane intersection is recommended to be modified in Year 2005
for an additional southbound left turn lane. However, this improvement should be funded by the
* City Traffic Impact Fee fund. Therefore, no additional project traffic mitigation is recommended.
Year 2010 intersection peak hour level of service worksheets are included in Appendix E.
*
006185C 65 POINSHOR/180
Poinsettia Shores
May 17, 1993
THE TENTATIVE MAP
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
Figure 35 shows the Poinsettia Shores tentative map, for reference only.
•
Figure 36 shows the recommended lane configurations for Avenida Encinas between Carlsbad
Boulevard and east of the A.T.& S.F. railroad tracks. As shown, the bridge over the railroad
•tracks is recommended to be two lanes in width.
• Figure 37 shows recommended lane configurations for the residential street intersections on
Avenida Encinas between the railroad bridge and Windrose Circle.
0061 asc 66 POINSHOR/18D
ii ..->-• tt)
o W"-.-'£> BS •<-i •& p 2
i E-f .Ev •'W
tii imill!
I let
5'J • :
iirl
-r
jflj!
3 i 11
JHI§3l
il
.
;!
2 FIF ; *
* IM .1 ? fiJ IN'I , i IHjfliS j||| II f
HlilM:!-""
H iE s a •;51 >! I n»»hhlihshhs -i
HH! Hil f!H iHHiHHiHHiinilHH!
filr i*
If «55| | * 'jli!;.t,i; «js>
J J ttiit t If || |! || ||| t 5j | !| j \ i i I 1 I f | i I ||« I I 11 |! f i jj
9 ft SiII ! • * ' ' • ' ' ' Ml S J H d * H i i i i i s I Si» i J I I « I : s ii11 in i i n n i n i u i ; s j j 1111 s j j s j 5 > & $ i in i s s ss *
H iinHilniililihllHlH!
i£l ii MM •i!;;;;;M;n!!l''li"liliillh:
Q_
<
LJU
Z oj
- 1co $
111 ^
DC ^
CD I
CO
<
h-
H
LLJ
COzo
Q_
I
III
I
UJo
CO
<
po
67
Ka
_Jm
Q
m
2_ i
5o
20'12'10'*12'20'
OE-Z
0Q-,
AVENIDA ENCINAS
SIGNAL
IS'
12'«
12' ^
\Z'
19' <
20'12'4
0
10'
t
12'
t
12'5:
f
IS'
4
^
18'
»•r1
}>^ta>
5Q
0Q
Z
O
SIGNAL
DESIGN TRANSITION
FDR 35
18'
«
12' ^__^x
12'
18' "
^
V
MPH .
/
^ 18'
18'
!>
\
\
\
\
\
\\
DESIGN TRANSITION
FOR 35 MPH
NOTE: 2 LANE BRIDGE IFTRANSITION GEOMETRIES ALLOW.o
NOTE
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT ONLY, NOT FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION, NO SCALE.
NvNO SCALE
FIGURE 36
CONCEPTUAL LANE CONFIGURATIONS
AVENIDA ENCINAS WEST SEGMENT
5/93
G99APSHOR-29
SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
68 OO6J85C
POINSETTIA LN.
M
razn
2>CO
t3
z
LEGEND
• STOP SIGN
NO SCALE
FIGURE 37
AVENIDA ENCINAS CENTRAL AND NORTH SEGMENTS
LANE CONFIGURATIONS
PO/MSErr/A SHOffES
L/ffBAM SYSTEMS
69
6/93
G99APSHOR-30 OOfffSSC
*Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP)
The Draft 1991 Congestion Management Program (CMP) prepared by the San Diego Association
of Governments in response to the passage of State Proposition 111 indicates that projects of
over 2,400 average daily traffic volumes need to show compliance with certain levels of service
performance standards for Congestion Management Program designated State freeways, State
highways, and principal arterials.
As stated in Figure 38, an excerpt from the Congestion Management Program, the traffic level
of service standard shall not be lower than level of service "E" or the current level for future traffic
if currently worse than "E".
Figure 39 shows the designated CMP System of State freeways, State highways, and local
principal arterials. For the purpose of this evaluation, the Poinsettia Shores project only traffic
will be shown distributed onto this CMP System and future Year 2010 levels of service will be
shown to remain at level of service "E" or better, or at current levels if currently worse than "E".
Figure 40 shows the CMP System with Poinsettia Shores only daily traffic distributed based on
previous directional distribution percentages extended onto the CMP System.
Figure 41 shows Year 2010 daily traffic projections on the CMP System and also shows project
only traffic as a percentage of total daily traffic projections. The project traffic is considered
insignificant if it is one percent or less of total daily traffic, and therefore segments of the CMP
006185C 70 POINSHOR/180
CMP HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC LOS STANDARDS
INTRODUCTION
Congestion Management Program (CMP) statutes require that the CMP include traffic
level-of-service (LOS) standards established for a designated CMP system [CGC
65089(b)(l)]. The CMP system shall include as a minimum all state highways and CMP
principal arterials. Once designated, no highway or roadway included on the CMP system
shall be removed from that system, and all new state highways and CMP principal arterials
shall be added to the system. SANDAG, as the Congestion Management Agency, shall
determine a uniform method for measuring traffic level-of-service and establish LOS
standards for the designated CMP system. The statute provides that in no case shall the
traffic LOS standard be established below a level of service LOS "E", or the current level
if worse than LOS "E".
SOURCE
SANDAG DRAFT 1991 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FIGURE 38
CMP HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC LOS STANDARDS
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS5/93
Orange County
Figure 2-2
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (CMP) SYSTEM
State Freeways
............ state Highways
CMP Principal Arterials
August 1991
S«n Diego
! i
SOURCE
I
SANDA8 DRAFT 1991 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FIGURE 39
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) SYSTEM
PO/A/SETT/A SHORES
URBAN SYSTEMS
72
5/93 ooerssc
Orange County
1236
10% 2225
18%
XXXX POINSETTIA SHORES PROJECT
ONLY ADT
XX% PERCENT OF PROJECT ONLY
ADT
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (CMP) SYSTEM
State Freeways
........... state Highways
IIIIIIIIIMIIIM CMP Principal Arterlals
August 1991
SOURCE
SANOAQ DRAFT 1991 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
5/93
FIGURE 40
PO/MSErr/A SHOftES
*Uf?BAN SYSTEMS
73 OO6J85C
34
1.0%
46
0.70%
44
1.3%35
202
1.2%
LEGEND
XXX " AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC. IN THOUSANDS
XX7o m PERCENT OF POINSETTIA SHORES PROJECT ONLY
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC TO TOTAL AVERAGE
DAILY TRAFFIC ON CMP SEGMENT.
SOURCE
SANDAG/CARLSBAD CALIBRATED RATES.
BUILDOUT NETWORK. 6/28/90 FIGURE 41
VOLUMES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS
YEAR 2010 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ON CMP SYSTEM
5/93
G99APSHOR-31
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
SYSTEMS'•
74
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
System with one percent or less of the projects' contribution to total traffic should not need to be§
evaluated.
For the purposes of evaluating Interstate 5 future levels of service, the CALTRANS I-5 Year 2010
Route Concept Report was used. This report projects Year 2010 levels of service for I-5 as
shown in Figure 42.
A comparison of existing I-5 freeway levels of service to Year 2010 levels as projected in the
CALTRANS I-5 Year 2010 Route Concept Report is shown in Table 12. As shown, all segments
evaluated are projected at LOS "E" or no worse than existing for Year 2010.
Since the CALTRANS I-5 Route Concept Report is based on Year 2010 traffic volume projections
from the SANDAG Series 7 traffic model, the F.M.Z. 9 buildout traffic volumes have been
considered in the Route Concept Report. Also, since the current project will produce less traffic
volume than previously considered, the project traffic impact of F.M.Z. 9 has been overstated.
Table 13 shows the CMP arterial levels of service for segments of Palomar Airport Road and El
Camino Real. As shown, all segments are projected to operate within the CMP performance
standard.
006185C 75 POINSHOR/180
STUDY-ARE A
Dlslrlcl 11 Roule Concept Report Map
InlerslaK 5
Sigmtnl'P.M. j Mijor Iniprovtmtnl*
, 8)
Add 2 HCV l»~5
Add 2 HOv !•"**
7 ! Add 2 HCV W-«
B007.P3J.7 ! Add 2 »OV '*r—» (,1m ! Vm>
i «»;«-ib'r-
§j (UJ 7-RM S | Add J W", «r( 2 HCV U^.^.
|R3>t-a<27 I Add 2 <wt ""d 2 HOv l»n«
j B42.7-B47 0 . Add 2 **n ^d 2 HOV Ivn
^H> I B47a-PSl2 I Add 2 l«-w rrl 2 HQVV.M
•
B5l J B5J9
Add 2 HOV W»«
SOURCE
CALTRANS ROUTE CONCEPT REPORT
INTERSTATE 5, JULY 1S90.
FIGURE 42
1-5 YEAR 2010 ROUTE CONCEPT IMPROVEMENTS
5/93
PO/MSETr/A SHORES
-VffBAM SYSTEMS*
76 OO6J85C
TABLE 12
EXISTING 1-5 LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARED
TO YEAR 2010 ROUTE CONCEPT REPORT
EXISTING 1990 FREEWAY SYSTEM LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
1991 CMP - San Diego Region 7
Route Location/Limits
1-5 Mexico Border to SR905
SR905 to SR75 (S)
SR75(S) to "L" St.
"L" St. to SR54
SR54 to 1st Ave.
1st Ave. to SR274
SR274 to Mission Bay Dr.
Mission Bay Dr. to Oilman Dr.
Oilman Dr. to 1-805
1-805 to Manchester Ave.
Manchester Ave. to Santa Fe Dr.
Santa Fe Dr. to SR78
SR78 to Oceanside Blvd.
Oceanside Blvd. to Hill St.
Hill St. to Orange Co. Line
SOURCE
SANDAG DRAFT 1991 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
POtNSETTJA
77
Length
(miles')
3.00
1.54
2.17
2.62
7.18
6.91
0.45
2.86
3.89
7.77
2.14
10.59
1.14
1.61
18.17
SHORES
'STEMS
1990 Average
Weekday Traffic
43,700-77,600
89,600-99,900
132,500-144,200
141,000-155,900
154,000-221,600
133,800-220,400
120,800
161,700-180,600
108,100-128,300
188,500-221,200
166,000-170,000
152,900-165,300
150,900-155,800
130,200-138,700
105,300-109,800
CALTRANS
YEAR 2010
h5 ROUTE
LOS CCNCBT
A HEPCRTLQS
B
D
E
F
E
C
E
C ir
F E/F
E E
D E
E E
D E
B E
I
J
OO6f85C
TABLE 13
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ARTERIAL
LEVELS OF SERVICE
Congestion Management Program Arterials 2010
Class
2010
Volumes
(in thousands)
Peak
VPHPL
(in thousands)
V/C LOS
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
I-5 - Paseo Del Norte
Paseo Del Norte - Road "A"
Road "A" - Kelly Drive
Kelly Drive - College Boulevard
College Boulevard - El Camino Real
El Camino Real - Fuente Drive
6PA
6PA
6PA
6PA
6PA
6PA
45
46
41
40
28
44
0.90
0.92
0.82
0.80
0.56
0.88
0.50
0.51
0.46
0.44
0.31
0.49
A
A
A
A
A
A
EL CAMINO REAL
Camino Vida Roble - Palomar Airport Road
Palomar Airport Road - Faraday Avenue
Faraday Avenue - College Boulevard
College Boulevard - Cannon Road
Cannon Road - Tamarack Avenue
6PA
6PA
6PA
6PA
6PA
35
44
46
37
38
0.70
0.88
0.92
0.74
0.76
0.39
0.49
0.51
0.41
0.42
A
A
A
A
A
LEGEND:
6PA = 6 Lane Prime Arterial
V/C = Peak VPHPL/Capacity Per Lane (1,800 VPHPL)
PEAK VPHPL = Peak hourly volume per lane based on 10% of ADT, 60% in peak direction.
LOS:
A 0.00 - 0.60
B 0.61 - 0.70
C 0.71 - 0.80
D 0.81 - 0.90
E 0.91 - 1.00
5/93
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
•UftBAM SYSTEMS
78
POINSHOR.T13/180
OO6W5C
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This traffic impact evaluation was prepared to determine possible traffic impacts from the
Poinsettia Shores project within the City of Carlsbad Facilities Management Zone 9.
Existing Conditions
Street segments and intersections adjacent to the project area that will be impacted by twenty
percent or more of project traffic currently operate within the City of Carlsbad's Growth
Management Program Guidelines of at least level of service "D" during peak hours. Levels of
service at all locations evaluated are better than "D" so that some project traffic can be added
to the street system, based on Year 1993 traffic volumes without street improvements. The
amount of traffic that can be added is dependent on the start date of development and local and
regional growth.
First Phase with Single Entrance Street
The City of Carlsbad cul-de-sac policy would allow up to twenty five acres of development on
a four lane street within one-half mile of a single entrance point. If the single entrance point on
Avenida Encinas is considered to be at the Poinsettia Village shopping center signalized
driveway, then is recommended that an additional eleven acres of residential development be
allowed to go forward with the single entrance. This additional development will need to be
reviewed by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall for emergency access.
006185C 79 POINSHOR/180
Poinsettia Shores Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
May 17, 1993
Year 2QQQ
The l-5/Poinsettia Lane interchange improvements are scheduled to be completed in May, 1995,
and be funded by local TransNet means. The Poinsettia Shores project is estimated to be
adding residential traffic in late 1994. Therefore, the interchange improvements and Poinsettia
Lane improvements planned concurrently, are projected to accommodate initial project traffic and
project buildout traffic through Year 2000.
Year 2010
Local and regional growth through buildout of the City of Carlsbad (estimated at Year 2010) are
also projected to be accommodated by the l-5/Poinsettia Lane interchange improvements. A
traffic signal modification for an additional southbound left turn lane is recommended at Poinsettia
Lane/Carlsbad Boulevard in Year 2005.
Congestion Management Program
The Poinsettia Shores project as currently planned will generate fewer vehicle trips than the
previously planned project within F.M.Z. 9. Therefore, projected traffic impacts to the Congestion
Management Program State freeways, State highways, and local principal arterials will be fewer
than anticipated in the SANDAG Series 7 regional traffic model.
The CALTRANS I-5 Year 2010 Route Concept Report predicts level of service "E" or no worse
than existing levels of service on segments of I-5 that would be significantly impacted by project
traffic, which is within CMP requirements.
006185C 80 POINSHOR/18O
Poinsettia Shores
May 17, 1993
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
Principal arterials significantly impacted by project traffic also are predicted to be within CMP
level of service requirements.
Recommended Transportation Improvements Phasing
Table 14 lists recommended transportation improvements needed to attain the projected
intersection and street segment levels of service contained within this report.
TABLE 14
RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING
Project
11 Acres
11 + Acres
1 1 +• Acres
Buildout
Buildout
Improvement
None
Avenida Encinas/Carlsbad Boulevard Intersection Improvements
Railroad Bridge on Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas/Ponto Drive Signalization
Carlsbad Boulevard/Poinsettia Lane add S/B turn lane
Year
1994/1995
1995
1995
2000
2005
Responsibility
NA
Project
Project
Project
Traffic Impact Fee Program
Summary
With the recommended transportation improvements listed above, the street segment and
intersection levels of service are projected as shown in Tables 15 and 16, respectively.
0061 asc 81 POINSHOFV180
TABLE 15
STREET SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
AVENIDA ENCINAS/.-T- 'J^?M r~7v:"3sr V*-
Poinsettia Lane - Poinsettia Village Dwy.
Poinsettia Village Dwy. - Windrose Circle
Windrose Circle - Ponto Dr.
Ponto Dr. - Carlsbad Boulevard
.CARLSBAD BOJULEVARD^ ^ffc^- iS
Palomar Airport Road - Poinsettia Ln.
Poinsettia Ln. - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - La Costa Avenue
POINSETTIA LANE-;-- __-_ ~_ i-^'-^, _ -
Carlsbad Boulevard - Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas - 1-5
I-5 - Paseo Del Node
WINDROSE CIRCLE ."'-•- "
Avenida Encinas - Navigator Circle (S)
YEAR 1993
.:.... iS>. . .
A
A
NA
NA
=~>H... -v^"--.: :
A
A
A
.-Yr.--""--';;." ".
A
A
A
- _ - -_
A
YEAR 2000
-:- =--::
A
A
A
A
:-. -"^
A
A
A
-_'.;
A
A
A
-
A
YEAR 2010
- _— -~ -*•£ "
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
-k^-feW
A
A
A
A
5/93
PSHOR08.WQ1
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
82 OO6185C
TABLE 16
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
LOCATION
1-5 / POINSETTIA LANE SB ON-OFF RAMPS
1-5 / POINSETTIA LANE NB ON-OFF RAMPS
POINSETTIA LANE / AVENIDA ENC1NAS
POINSETTIA LANE / CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
AVENIDA ENCINAS / CARLSBAD BLVD.
AVENIDA ENCINAS / PONTO DR.
AVENIDA ENCINAS / WINDROSE CIRCLE
AVENIDA ENCINAS / POINSETTIA VILLAGE DWY.
1993 EXISTING
AM
A
B
A
A
NA
NA
A
A
PM
C
B
B
A
NA
NA
A
A
2000
AM
B
C
B
C
C
A
A
A
PM
C
D
C
C
C
A
A
B
2010
AM
C
B
B
C
D
A
A
A
PM
D
C
C
D
D
A
A
B
5/93
PSHOR09.WQ1
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
•URBANSYSTEMS'<
83 OO6J85C
PAGE 1 OF 19
APPENDIX A
EXISTING CONDITIONS
INTERSECTION AND STREET SEGMENT
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARIES
SOURCE
JHK AND ASSOCIATES CITY OF CARLSBAD 1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING REPORT
5/93
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-VftBAM SYSTEMS
84
OO6J85C
SITE CODE : 12
Locition : Cirlibid Blvd tttuctn Pi lour
: Airport Rd I Poinstttii Line
Operator : JHI t ASSOCIATES
TIKE
BEGIN
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
DAY TOTALS
SPLIT I
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
P.H.F.
V
5/93
SB -•
AX
11
8
6
a 33
6
2
4
3 15
0
3
2
1 6
0
1
2
0 3
1
1
2
1 5
3
10
11
21 45
25
47
59
60 191
69
62
83
101 315
83
79
75
87 324
85
76
90
100 351
90
102
112
106 410
130
129
153
140 552
2250
7370
49.1
11:00
552
0.90
PH
161
151
145
135
140
154
163
142
138
160
146
143
155
152
129
127
141
148
136
143
156
147
158
129
108
132
113
109
112
94
100
109
116
100
86
50
58
54
48
50
30
32
32
25
24
19
4
16
3120
31.6
2:15
604
0.94
592
599
587
363
568
590
462
415
352
210
119
63
APPENDIX A
All
13
9
0
11 33
6
4
2
2 14
2
2
1
2 7
1
2
1
2 6
0
2
1
4 7
4
7
8
21 40
27
28
45
68 168
58
77
80
128 343
112
100
76
111 399
87
99
88
102 376
98
88
110
118 414
133
126
135
129 523
2J30
7125
50.9
PH
148
131
138
165 582
150
162
141
132 585
146
122
146
139 553
125
123
149
141 338
129
145
138
137 549
138
158
129
127 552
126
130
127
101 484
104
106
80
83 373
70
63
33
47 235
40
41
47
40 168
23
34
27
20 104
29
27
7
9 72
4795
48.4
AH
24
17
6
19
12
6
6
5
2
5
3
J
1
3
3
2
1
3
3
5
7
17
19
42
52
75
104
128
127
139
163
229
195
179
151
198
172
175
178
202
188
190
222
224
263
255
288
269
4580
COHBINED
66
29
13
9
12
85
359
658
723
727
824
1075
14495
11:00 12:45 11:00
/>
523
0.97
PO/NSETTM
618
0.94
SHORES
'REAM SYSTEMS
85
1075
0.93
PR
309
282
283
300
290
316
304
274
284
282
292
282
280
275
278
268
270
293
274
280
294
305
287
256
234
262
240
210
216
200
180
192
186
165
139
97
98
95
95
90
53
66
59
45
53
46
11
25
9915
12:45
1210
0.96
">
PAGE 2 OF 19
PAGE: 1
FILE: C892U
DATE: 7/21/92
DAT: TUESDAY
1174
1184
1140
1101
1117
1142
946
788
587
378
223
135
^
OOfff85C
SITE CODE : 12
Location : Carlsbad Blvd Beturtn Paloiar
: Airoort Rd t Poinsettia Lane
Operator : m I ASSOCIATES
7 THEi int
BEGIN
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
TOTALS
DAY TOTALS
SPLIT I
PEflf HOUR
VOLUME
P.H.F.
„ _„ eo
M
11
9
14
13 47
7
1
4
6 18
2
1
4
2 9
5
3
2
1 11
2
1
3
2 8
5
4
9
11 29
19
31
63
46 159
60
80
72
86 298
58
80
85 '
84 307
53
81
89
102 325
87
115
101
97 400
117
154
125
139 535
2146
7313
48.8
11:00
535
0.87
Pit
160
136
144
171
143
136
157
147
128
150
141
152
130
147
154
128
153
145
148
132
149
166
148
133
130
121
119
120
128
97
110
103
117
110
79
54
67
51
44
43
46
36
25
21
23
17
18
10
5187
50.4
17:00
611
0.89
AN
12
15
4
611 8
10
7
7
583 4
J
571
559 1
2
2
t
578 4
5
3
8
596 23
19
22
38
490 60
65
58
82
438 144
135
91
91
360 98
73
71
75
205 93
88
105
100
128 107
119
132
118
68 133
2251
51.2
11:00
502
0.94
APPENDIX A
yg .. ._„nu
pit
149
117
140
39 167 573
146
139
134
28 138 557
134
140
139
13 120 533
158
140
126
7 141 565
141
175
182
8 227 725
195
166
163
39 133 657
141
138
123
139 126 528
94
76
97
349 79 346
76
64
66
415 46 252
48
33
48
312 39 168
35
31
27
400 30 123
23
16
17
502 23 79
5106
7357
49.6
AH
23
24
18
21
17
8
11
10
5
5
8
4
6
7
3
2
4
3
3
6
10
7
17
34
38
53
101
106
125
138
154
230
193
171
176
182
126
152
164
195
175
220
201
204
236
286
243
272
4397
rniigtyenlunojntu
86
46
22
18
16
68
298
647
722
637
800
1037
14690
4:15 11:00
779
0.86
1037
0.9]
PAGE 3 OF 19
PAGE: 2
FILE: C89212
DATE: 7/22/92
W
309
253
284
338 1184
289
275
291
285 1140
262
290
280
272 1104
288
287
280
269 1124
294
320
330
359 1303
344
332
311
266 1253
271
259
242
246 1018
222
173
207
182 784
193
174
145
100 612
115
84
92
82 373
81
47
52
51 251
46
33
35
33 147
10293
4:30
1365
0.95
PO/A/SErr/A SHORES
\^
8/93 A/ SYSTEMS
86
•>J
00ef85C
f ^IK
APPENDIX A PAGE 4 OF 19
SITE CODE : 12 MKs '
Location : Carlsbad Blvil Bet«en Palotar . FILE: CB9212
: Aimort Rd ( Poiniettia Line
Operator : m t ASSOCIATES OflTE; 7/20/92
HUE HONOAY 20 TUESDAY 21 KEOHESOAY 22 THURSDAY 23 FRIDAY 24 SATURDAY 25 SUNDAY 26 KEEI AVERAGE
BEGIN SB NB SB KB SB NB SB KB SB KB SB KB SB KB SB NB
12:00 AH
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 PH
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
33 33 47 39
15 14 18 28
47 9 13
34 11 7
57 88
45 40 . 29 39
191 148 159 139
315 343 298 349
324 399 307 415
351 376 325 312
410 414 400 400
552 523 • 535 502
592 582 611 573
599 585 583 557
587 353 571 533
563 538 559 545
548 549 578 725
590 552 596 657
462 484 490 523
415 373 438 346
352 235 360 252
210 16S 205 168
119 104 128 123
43 72 68 79
'
40 34
16 21
7 10
7 4
4 7
37 39
175 153
304 346
315 407
338 344
405 407
543 512
601 577
591 571
579 543
541 551
573 437
593 604
476 506
426 359
356 243
207 168
123 113
65 75
TOTALS 1 1 7370 7125 7333 7357 » I » « • • « ' 7346 7235
COHBIHED TOTALS
12:00 AH
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 PH
1:00
2,'Ofl
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
9:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
66 86
29 46
13 22
9 18
12 16
85 68
359 298
658 647
723 722
727 637
824 800
1075 1037
1174 1184
1184 1140
1140 1104
UOt 1124
1117 1303
1142 1253
946 1018
788 784
587 412
378 373
223 251
135 147
76
37
17
13
13
76
328
652
722
682
812
1055
1178
1162
1122
1112
1210
1197
982
785
599
373
234
140
TOTALS 1 M495 14490 till M581
po/wsErr/A SHORES^ / /i-tn
5/93 UflE'SW SYSTEMS'j
oosrssc87
t APPENDIX A PAGE 5 OF 19
S.2U U»-. ft
(M r-l
.IJ
U -^40
ft ftft ftL L
4 i-«
•C fe§a <-> -
\ft
*9••*Ok_
c
• r4C
tn
,-\
1W
£U4OL.£C
n
*
T)A
N /I•*< <D
's w
O* £•~ Uin *
- Ii «§•V
i *U ft3U
«*•
4U
J—
j£
O 0tn tn
Z 4O ft £
0ui
»• X*
L.1 5•• ** L?! 1O 3
/\m
w
1
0i
*£Vitn
4
*J U4N -
°^ **» rwc o
0 U3U O L
T3
*O.
w
7J
»i>
n•o
•Cu
w
o>
<x
3
^1—
C
L!—
3
V
4_J
nT34
0.
^£GV
oc
32»-
£LU-1
3
W«*.
ft_1
nI0.
V^^
QC
it—
Cv
1a
V
»_i
-o»L
^tf
oc
3L
k—
C
^b—13
^/V .ftj
1 •+ TJ
i
I C
u t
oooooooooooo
fjo^T-Joj^ino^roo
oaoooooooooo
OJOO — -^OOOOOOO
*- * «* 2 12 2 S S ft S S °
o m - in (r, r a> a> r w - o
.
ooooooooocoo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooaaooooooo
oooooooooooo
<r**va}u>a>inv7i£f^-cr*r^-N -n « -r ^ *o a> vj a> « ui «
0"OOOOOOOOOO
.oooooooooooo
X K X X
Ez«xlii«««i«
tnomoinainoinoino
ooaooooooooa
\o 2
23
o o
n m
o o
M O
Sr
o o
o o
0 0
0 0
o o
o o
(M
cj in
N /n
tn <n
-« o
O O
• i
£ i
^r a.
^.p-
o*
LO•**
U
4
**•
•Jj
a.
u u
^ ^• *
OL. O^
C C
C L
9 nV. "Dt— QL
C Co o
u u
V •**c c
M »*
4 3ft Oo. s
ii
<n <n
P- a?
00
tnin(MO^^(M^<r-ftJoo
oaoooooooooo
^o<r^f^a>r — — ^mmT1 T in <vj T irt w »n n n in w
oooooooooooo
«-»OoQOO*-»O"«04QO
wSwMrJSlQrSwrT
Irtftl - 0 - 0 « - X. - 0 0
000000000000
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oaoooooooooo
oooooaoooooo
•^
\o&fli~*r^rmot*-v*tfy&t
* S ** "* S 2J H ** 2 " 2 m
OOOOOOOOOOO-*
oooooooooooo
X X K X
0.0.0.0.0,0.0.0.0.0.0.0.
oooooooooooo
o Jy
CD r-
T" tn
--
0) TU*) T"
ao
<M (VJ
u> inT" T
S **
O O
0 0
oo
o o
o o
o a
o tn
S ^
in -J>
<M r-
T T-
0 r
*4 O
O O
c -»
•*4 OC 2-
*!*
r ft.
CJ
*o
oVu
4U.
I
•^
a.
Jn N
ii M
X i
• •
a. a.
c c
•~ c*»- ut*. -*^4 n\- TJ»- a.
.2.2
U Uss
-<J **c c
Jt U
ft Oa. x
a. a.
in tnT T
T inn o
5/93
SHORES
•UffBAM SYSTEMS
88 OO6W5C
APPENDIX A PAGE 6 OF 19
Carlsbad Boulevard at Poinsettia Lane
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
Pk. Hr. Tiie Period: So. Approach IHB) No. Approach (SB) Vest Appr. (EB) East Appr. (MB)
07:30 AN to
08:30 AH Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Config- (left) 2 -
urations 3
4
Outside 5
1 1
Lane Settings 021120000101
Capacity 0 4000 1800 1800 4000 0000 1800 0 1BOO
Do you xant separate North/South phases (yes/no)? no
Do you nant separate East/Hest phases (yes/no)? no
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
0 383 63 45 245 0 0 0 0 142 0 63
0 383 63 65 245 0 0 0 0 142 0 63
Hourly Voluie
Adjusted Hourly Volute
Utilization Factor
Critical Factors
ICU Ratio - 0.31
0.00 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.04
0.10 0.04 0.08
LOS : A
Turning Hovetents at Intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane
North Approach Carlsbad Boulevard
Tiie: 07:30 AH to
08:30 AH
Date: 06/17/92
Day: HEDNESDAY
Nate: H.IC I C.K
Sub-
Total totals
0 ---•
0 -->
0
Subtotals ->
Total ->
387
310
245
I
V
761
65
North
A
383
446
833
South Approach
451
<- Total
<- Subtotals
63
Sub-
totals Total
•— 63
<--- 0
/— 142 ,
205
328
123
Poinsettia Lane
Note: Left-turn voluies include
U-turns.
5/93
SHOffES
-UffBAN SYSTEMS
89 OO6f85C
APPENDIX A PAGE 7 OF 19
boulevard at Poinsettia Lane
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Tiie Period: So. Approach (NB) No. Approach (SB) Vest Appr. IEB) East Appr. (HB)
Al 11^ DM * f« ................. ................. ............. . .................vn I^ j rn 10 ........ ..... ... ..... . .
05:45 PN Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Config- (left) 2
urations 3
4
Outside 5
1 1
Lane Settings 021120000101
Capacity 0 4000 1800 1800 4000 0 0 0 0 1800 0 1800
Do you Kant separate North/South phases (yes/no)? no
Do you Kant separate East/Nest phases (yes/no)? no
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
0 434 127 164 379 0 0 0 0 147 0 144
0 434 127 166 379 0 0 0 0 147 0 144
Hourly Volute
Adjusted Hourly Volute
Utilization Factor
Critical Factors
1CU Ratio 0.38
0.00 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08
0.11 0.09 0.08
LOS = A
Turning Doveients at Intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane
North Approach Carlsbad Boulevard
Tiie: 04:45 PN to
05:45 PH
Date: 06/17/92
Day: MEDNESOAY
Naie: N.K I C.I
Sub-
Total totals
0 —'
o -->o
Subtotals -> 524
Total ->
545
379
II
V
1129
166
North
A
434
541
1085
South Approach
584
<- Total
<- Subtotals
Sub-
totals Total
•— 144
<— 0
/--- 147
291
580
289
Poinsettia Lane
127
Note: Left-turn volutes include
U-turns.
5/93
SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
go OO6fS5C
APPENDIX A PAGE 8 OF 19
Mi1 ^
u u
i
»< V
2S
•o »il> occ a.
::L L
u « 50 U •*
55 3*
7> »
** "tt
U ^
§?O u}U O
-« »•« (Si in ,rj <M ^i
i o o o **-«
£ IO* I•M t
4<MT>inrt-(V<\j-*rn<M(M.-«
U I3!ki«•!
ciooooacooocoo
-»-"OO<vjr.oi\-Mn->
-C ! £U 1 \~
II ** I„ i ?im i « i
w I 3 i
i!O. I
CIOOOO^QOOOOOO
i <n « a> a* to o a> ^ IA r
O I Vin i »
imotooiooinaiootno1 •"•COTO^/nTQ'-'OTO
££
§§
ooooooo-* — «o~
K X X *
3CCCCC££CC£Z:£
0.0.11.^0.0.0.0.0.0.4.0.
V) OT,M
is
U tt
— c»• L
• »W *»C C
£S
5/93
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
91 006J85C
APPENDIX A PAGE 9 OF 19
Arenida Encinas at Poinsettia Lane
Lane Configuration for Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 2 of 3
PI. Hr. Tiie Period: So. Approach INS) No. Approach (SB) Best Appr. |£B) East Appr. (KB)
08:00 All to
09:00 AH Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Lane Inside 1
Conf19- (left) 2
urations 3
4
Outside 5
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
Lane Settings 11101011
Capacity 1800 2000 1800 0 2000 0 1800 2000
Do you Kant separate North/South phases (yes/no)? no
So you want separate East/Vest phases (yes/no)? no
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Voluie 34 12 152 99 10 12
Adjusted Hourly Volute 36 12 152 0 121 0
Utilization factor
Critical Factors
20
20
0111
0 1800 2000 1800
47 193 93 157
0 193 93 157
0.02 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.05 0.09
0.08 0.00 0.05 0.11
1CU Ratio 0.34 LOS = A
Turning Hoveients at Intersection of Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Lane
Tiie: 08:00 AH to
09:00 AN
Date: 06/24/92
Day: HEONESDAY
Nate: K.S t D.H
Sub-
Total totals
259
141
118
North Approach Avenida Encinas
310
20 —'
51 --)
47
12
Subtotals -> 250
Total ->
121
10
V
99
34
North
A
I
12
200
450
South Approach
189
<- Total
<- Subtotals
152
Sub-
totals Total
•— 157
<— 93
/— 193
443
745
302
Poinsettia Lane
Note: Left-turn voluies include
U-turns.
5/83
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
92
APPENDIX A PAGE 10 OF 19
Avenida Encinas at Poinsettia Lane
Lane Configuration lor Intersection Capacity Utilization Page 3 of 3
Pk. Hr. Tiie Period: So. Approach (N8) No. Approach (SB) Vest Appr. IEB) East Appr. («)
04:15 PH to
05:15 PH Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right LeH Thru Right
Lane Inside 1 1
Config- (left) 2 1
orations 3 1
4
Outside 5
1 1 1.1 1
1 1
0111
0 1800 2000 1300
11 128 HO 377 142 143
41 268 0 377 142 143
0.08 0.01 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.21 0.07 0.08
0.21 0.00 0.13 0.21
Lane Settings 11101011
Capacity 1800 2000 1800 0 2000 0 1800 2000
Do you Hint separate North/South phases (yes/no)? no
Do you want separate East/Vest phases (yes/no)? no
Efficiency Lost Factor 0.10
Hourly Volute H3 2? 370 W 21 33
Adjusted Hourly Volute 143 29 370 0 200 0
Utilization Factor
Critical Factors
ICU Ratio = 0.65 LOS
Turning Hoveients at Intersection of Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Lane
Avenida Encinas
409
y
•e
s
t
A
P
P
r
Tiie:
Date:
Day:
Nate:
Total
631
04:15 PH to
05:15 PH North t
06/24/92
VEDNESDAY
K.S t D.H
Sub- 33
totals !
. .
322 <
*
;
41
309 128 -->
140 —•
J
V !
Ipproi
200
21
I
uV
Subtotals ->
Total -)
538
146
143
North
A
29
542
1080
South Approach
209
<- Total
<- Subtotals
1
<—
/ —
;
V
>
143
142
377
Sub-
totals Total
662
1306
644
Poinsettia Lane
£
a
s
t
A
P
P
r
370
Note: Left-turn voluies include
U-turns.
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
93
APPENDIX A PAGE 11 OF 19
fa.
X
o
s.
Ul ^H
i5 ~
.. I
in --i o•-« CL
ft ftft ftL L
8 il
oo-TO^N-rn-oo
5m«2S?SSS°^o
ooorBO~-Neoo
oooooooooooo
- -mmr T j>ir>j>uijm
oaoooooooooo
SISSSSSSISSS*
£"!Q2,r>N<\j»-Tri-rviJ
. _ 0 _ 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a
ooooooooaaoa
ooooooooooao
0 0 0 0 (M 0 0 - 0 <V, - 0
-*w-*(nw«(nwca^caN
ooooaooooooo
OOQOOOOOOOOO
oaoaoooooooo
X X X X
iiiliiiliiii
oooooooooaoo
T-O,
/n CD
T" **
o a
ca
o o
TT <o
in in
r **(M N-
w uj
O O
O O
O O
K CP0
M-
m o
o a
a o
O 0
II
in *
cSf
O)
a
o•+*u
u-
LX
4
a.
o
V_ i.
X X
a. L
C C
u n•- cv l-
L *Ot- 0-
c co o
u uft ftM nL \.
* ftW -•-*
N^ r4
^ La a
ii
in in
p- 01o a
o w m ui o in *^ w in ^- ii 7*
?5SrSSaISC!!jloS
O-NOO-O-MONO
oooooooooooo
sjssessssssse
oooaoooooooo
^$z%%z*%%m>
o-m«or^^^^-^r
-4 r r^ r^ in - ^ ^ (^ ^ w -
oooaoooooaoo
ooooooaaoooo
oaoooooooooo
oaoooooaoooo
ininTTTa>TininTinin
oooooooooooo
aooaoooooooo
oooooaooaooo
X » X M
inoinoinomomoinoTQr*mT'Qf*irive3**in
(T% T 7" 7" ST I*") U"V li"> U1 *£ u3 u3aooooooooooo
r- in
-g
OJ T
a o
CA intn
o o
(M «-•in CD
r-c«
r- m
-«T-
o c
a a
o o
in ff»
o o
ut -<
O 0
o o
O 0
||
w •
x •
c a.
*o
L
U
U-
i
fta.
o «
X. LX X
CL CL
C C
u vt•^ c
4 nL Ttk- a.
c co o••4 •««
u uss
ft ft
c c
ft Oa. x
c ca. a.
in inT T1
T U1O O
5/93
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-URBAN SYSTEMS
94
ooerssc
APPENDIX A PAGE 12 OF 19
INTERSECTION : 1-5 SB OFF RAMP/POINSETTIA LANE
ANALYST: B.L.T
PROJECT NO : 4685
PEAK HOUR: 4 (7:15 AM • 8:15 AM)
DATE : 6/17/92
CITY / STATE : CARLSBAD. CA
PK HR ENTERING VOL : 1018
f
Time Period
6:30-6:45
6:45-7:00
7:00-7:15
7:15-7:30
7:30 - 7:45
7:45-8:00
8:00-8:15
8:15-8:30
ISminStop Veh Vol
Corresponding App. Vol
Toial Pk Hr Vol
Stopped Vehicles
SB
13
21
14
21
33
32
24
18
32
WB
0
1
3
1
4
0
1
5
0
Approach Volume
SB
36
46
51
57
68
59
61
62
WB
80
74
83
93
94
46
80
61
59
245
46
313
APPROACH DELAY (DELAY/ APPROACH)" (PK HR APPROACH VOL )
PK HR ENTERING VOL
SB APPROACH (DELAY)
WB APPROACH (DELAY)
INTERSECTION (DELAY)
2.6 Seconds
0.0 Seconds
2.6 Seconds
INTERSECTION (LOS)
NOTE:
1. Delay data was collected at 20 second intervals.
2. Intersection LOS is based on information contained in the Highway Capacity Manual
and provided earlier in this report,
3. Delay/Approach = Pk 15 min Stop Veh Vol * 20 sec / Pk 15 min Approach Vol
4. Intersection Delay is the maximized value of the 15 min Approach Delays
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
-VffBAM SYSTEMS
95 OO6185C
f APPENDIX A PAGE 13 OF 19
INTERSECTION : I-5 SB OFF RAMP/POINSETTIA LANE
ANALYST: B.L.T
PROJECT NO : 4685
PEAK HOUR: 4 (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM)
DATE : 6/17/92
CITY / STATE : CARLSBAD, CA
PKHR ENTERING VOL: 1508
Time Period
4:00-4:15
4:15-4:30
4:30-4:45
4:45 - 5:00
5:00-5:15
5:15-5:30
5:30 - 5:45
5:45-6:00
15 minSlop Veh Vol
Corresponding App. Vol
Total Pk Hr Vol
Stopped Vehicles
SB
90
82
91
245
331
159
143
90
331
WB
3
4
4
2
6
2
12
2
6
Approach Volume
SB
104
97
96
107
102
110
98
90
WB
36
33
39
32
51
46
52
39
102
417
51
181
APPROACH DELAY (DELAY / APPROACH)' (PK HR APPROACH VOL )
PK HR ENTERING VOL
SB APPROACH (DELAY)
WB APPROACH (DELAY)
INTERSECTION (DELAY)
17.9 Seconds
0.3 Seconds
18.2 Seconds
INTERSECTION (LOS)
NOTE:
1. Delay data was collected at 20 second intervals.
2. Intersection LOS is based on information contained in the Highway Capacity Manual
and provided earlier in this report.
3. Delay/Approach = Pk 15 min Stop Veh Vol * 20 sec / Pk 15 min Approach Vol
4. Intersection Delay is the maximized value of the 15 min Approach Delays
5/93
SHORES
•UftBAN SYSTEMS
96 OO6J85C
r "N
APPENDIX A PAGE 14 OF 19
n
"4
O
.
,jjc
in
i
0u
1
<n4
Ul
m
0
i4 X N
4 U £ r\
*• c "5^ O 3 «
3 .0' — Q.* O Q.» TJ L Z<O 4 -V3 W C +Ju u o n
M 4 U 4
ff* -t Uoc o .*u <•->• v44 4•-* -W L
** « *""
o m
U L w
a 4 .cUJ *-« UVt 3 U 4« 23* a
C 4 JL£ **n « *• ^v a. 4 3* 4 oC C C 4 4 X3 4 4 O 3o a: _ju
** **- riC O WA W£ (D 44 Z W>. Co in -M
X 1 O ^11 Q- 0
s c
C +* ** .£L 4 4 U3 » 4 4t- U i. O•W *> u
</>W 0.
Vt 2 XX X
X IU .C
W 4 » ^5
^ fl-5 5•3 "5gO U •-« 4
n•o
4a.
n
u
|
4a.
v
Q£
3
C
t
3
"*.4
"*
n
4a.
"a*
QC
3
C
w
->_J
n
4a.
s
K_
L
l-
C
3
V
^
n
^a.
.2*QC
3
1-
C
k—I
3
<*.4
*i ** w in 'n u 4 M -* -o<c 4 a ^
«f » V. V fi O3> * C — t¥ v"* 2 > "9 c
X •*# C O bD £ "4n u •-• o a UJ c
00££<n*ojr-(nr<n
••••^(vrsjfMin^/niorjfntM
OWO-*no-MOOO<M
(n^ininTinmtnin^p-T
* 3 S $ 8 N ^ S N ° £ 8
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
OOO^QCl^OO^fMQ
OOOOQOOOOOOO
oooooooooooo
.
OOQOOOOOOOOO
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
ooooooooaooo
**
oooa~<MO-«~-'00
oooooooooooo
rj \a o JJ in T r- o ^ r»- r* en
m x x «
£55££,?£iii£ECCCOliCSCE<C&iEC
oooooooooooo
(O (W
o"T in
(n m
in o^s
5?
o o
o o
'
O Q
u>0
oo
T1 O
o o
o o
o o
o o
0 O
0 0
O OA/ O«•« T
CJ T
o o
o rw
.5*3c ^
-i
x a.
o
5
u4u.
uX
^4
4a.
n r-mm
M It
J J
C C-•* -*4
u n•n CV L
4 n
\. T3*- a.
c co o
V V
^n nL Lft «
C C
>-• !-•
JC U
a. z
ii
in in
00
„ ammo IM m j T 10 o T
0--00000000-
in(r>rTNO<Dior-«in<M
2 S S C R S £ S C K S S
oooooooooooo
oooaoooooooo
~m-*ooaooooooo
oooooooooooo
ff* P- O J* O i»1 iM O ** CJ \J 05
aooooooasooo
o d o o jj in jj m N « .0 ji
oaaooooooooo
ooaooooooooo
oooaoooooooo
oooooooooooo
oooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOOOOQ
^*
0(M->00-00000-«
oooooooooooo
ouTCDm<r — co^r-oajr-
« X X X
C£CCCHCCCC£C
«o,2o«o,2a,pou;o
oooooooooooc
1*^ O
M -*
-0
n in-2
in M3
00
a o
o o
00
in a>
o o
°<p
00
o o
oo
00
a o
o o
OJ OO PJ"* "
<M -«
O O
<P u5
aC 3-
"!*X •
4 ^c a.
•
o
k
U4U.
^X
4
*x gN.
H II
jj
c c-»* -»i
iSV i.V -W4 klU T3*- Q.
.!.!v *u u4 0
L L4 4
C 1
i-t —
J£ L.4 :
4 <a. x
g o(T
T tf
O O
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
^ //an A A/ .Q Y.STFMG '5/93
97
APPENDIX A PAGE 15 OF 19
INTERSECTION :
ANALYST:
PROJECT NO :
PEAK HOUR :
I-5 NB OFF RAMP/POINSETTIA LANE
B.L.T
4685
4 (7:15 AM-8:15 AM)
DATE: 6/17/92
CITY / STATE : CARLSBAD, CA
PK HR ENTERING VOL : 1533
Time Period
6:30 - 6:45
6:45 - 7:00
7:00-7:15
7:15-7:30
7:30 - 7:45
7:45 - 8:00
8:00-8:15
8:15-8:30
ISminStop Veh Vol
Corresponding App. Vol
Total Pk Hr Vol
Stopped Vehicles
NB
7
29
8
32
52
254
55
37
254
EB
2
1
1
5
8
3
4
2
3
Approach Volume
NB
60
83
72
108
123
164
126
86
EB
7
11
12
18
28
19
18
28
164
521
19
83
APPROACH DELAY (DELAY / APPROACH)* (PK HR APPROACH VOL )
PK HR ENTERING VOL
NB APPROACH (DELAY)
EB APPROACH (DELAY)
INTERSECTION (DELAY)
10.5 Seconds
0.2 Seconds
10.7 Seconds
INTERSECTION (LOS)B
NOTE:
1. Delay data was collected at 20 second intervals.
2. Intersection LOS is based on information contained in the Highway Capacity Manual
and provided earlier in this report.
3. Delay/Approach = Pk 15 min Stop Veh Vol * 20 sec/ Pk 15 min Approach Vol
4. Intersection Delay is the maximized value of the 15 min Approach Delays
6/93
PO/AfSETT/A SHORES
-VftBAN SYSTEMS
98
OO6JS5C
APPENDIX A PAGE 16 OF 19
INTERSECTION : I-5 NB OFF RAMP/POINSETTIA LANE
ANALYST: B.L.T
PROJECT NO : 4685
PEAK HOUR : 3 (4:30 PM - 5:30 PM)
DATE: 6/17/92
CITY / STATE : CARLSBAD, CA
PK HR ENTERING VOL : 1671
Time Period
4:00-4:15
4:15-4:30
4:30 - 4:45
4:45 - 5:00
5:00-5:15
5:15-5:30
5:30 - 5:45
5:45 - 6:00
15 min Slop Veh Vol
Corresponding App. Vol
Total Pk Hr Vol
Stopped Vehicles
NB
63
43
45
117
131
153
66
50
131
EB
3
8
2
4
8
3
0
4
8
Approach Volume
NB
100
106
102
142
120
161
111
126
EB
40
38
52
45
52
48
32
42
120
525
52
197
APPROACH DELAY (DELAY / APPROACH) * (PK HR APPROACH VOL )
PK HR ENTERING VOL
NB APPROACH (DELAY)
EB APPROACH (DELAY)
INTERSECTION (DELAY)
6.9
0.4
7.3
Seconds
Seconds
Seconds
INTERSECTION (LOS)B
NOTE:
1. Delay data was collected at 20 second intervals.
2. Intersection LOS is based on information contained in the Highway Capacity Manual
and provided earlier in this report.
3. Delay/Approach = Pk 15 min Stop Veh Vol * 20 sec / Pk 15 min Approach Vol
4. Intersection Delay is the maximized value of the 15 min Approach Delays
5/93
PO/NSETTM SHORES
-UffBAN SYSTEMS*
99 OO6f85C
APPENDIX A PAGE 17 OF 19
o> >-.Q •0. <->
ca 4
L) U.-t 4
a "ou
4 C1
4 CVI -^« OO. O_
4 44 4L L
•>. Cq ou •*
c rj3 Xo i^u o
4a.
tt
t«
_4
V)
o
Q_
Q£
3
£
C
1—
1
£
n
a.
QC
I
t—
t
1
<*.
4U
n
4
u.
JIa*
QC
3
.C
C
I—1
<*.
y>
a.
JZ
0*
QC
3
£
1—
Ci.
1r?
**.aj
,
^LO.
'E
j>- or-*m m -.urr mm
^ ~ w<CH(S££S!Q™i3
0 - - N 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0
v in n in <D r> CP j, r> „ o -
£tn££(CS SmSS com
oo-»ooooooooo
O«O-~OO-O-O«M-
— ooooomaoooo
— * (M T" lO (XJ !*"> T" 1*1 Cy T" i'i 1 T
oaooao-oo-w-
^H
OOOOOOOOO — 0 —
^^ooo--«^oo^rj
oooooooooooo
^*
OOO-^"^-HOOO-^OO
— omo-'inipm^'OTT
aooooooooooo
•" ^ -* -
* * '* M
CEXXZCCZZCXZICC
inoinoinoinoinomo
oooooooooooo
«-« r-
mw
(^J O
*ni^
S^«m
-0
in M
mm
<P uO
"2
(M -<
P- CD
-H (T)
ftl«
O O
** (M
^, ^*
tp m
^^
0 O
-S
' '
•* "oE :>
•^ uX
^si
a>
a
LO
U
(^
LX
0
Q-
P- T
(SJ
M M
L UX X
Q.OL
C C
•»4 *H
u w
• M CV i.V f*Q t*lL "O
C CO 0
'J U4 4
4 4
C C
JC LO 3
4 0a. 3=
E X
tn in
0 O
fno-rncjoJoj-.o^<MO
u>a)o<na^(n-Tmo-
SSfnSfn ? SmJnlnrJS
0 0 - 0 - 0 CM 0 0 - 0 0
woin-T-TOfMincnfn
£t§SG>a>m!n!C°}2in'u>
ooooooaooooo
^"~-in"-<NTmo-
— 00-^000^0000
coS(Pooi2S^2^o<n
pjaaoo'-'oooo*-*o
. .
•
-o«j30jrn^inmTrj^m
OOOOOOOO«-«OQO
aoaw-'-'Oooo-'O
-• W ^ (M ^ (P "-* OJ'-«T-^^
ooaooooooooo
MJUTOJO^CDOCJ^U-XP^uJ
x * m *
^^j;-^^^^^^^^]^
inoinainoinoinotno
(•H T T T T If) bT W UT u> ^ u>ooooooaooooo
<n in
T a>*-» (O
NW
<n^
5* mw
o o
<£ (M
^ -4
\M u>
tO 03
03 tn(VJ
(M *^
p- r»
tP CD
U> CD
^*-
CD en-" tn
(SI -<
T r-
o o
i2S
• •
*sS
X
0 Jiz: a.
03
O
LO
u
b.
LX
J£4
0.
CD in
T
11 II
^ ^"
Q. Q.
C C•IH -H
u «-- c**- i.<*• v
L. "C1— Q_
C Co a
•*•* -V
U '.'
4 4
C C
JC 1_fl 3
4 Oo. a:
x x:u. 0.
in tn
T b"»O O
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS
100 OO0J85C
APPENDIX A PAGE 18 OF 19
Jhk & Associates. San Dieao, CA.
Intersection: PASEO DEL NQRTE AND POINSETTIA LANE
Date:06/24/92 Analyst: BLT
Time Period Analyzed: 7:15 - 8:15 AM Project No:4685
City/State: CARLSBAD. CA Filename: G:CB9227AM.dbf
APPROACH VOLUMES
APPROACH LT TH RT TOTAL PHF
NUMBER
SB
WB
NB
EB
OF APPROACH
APPROACH
SB
WB
NB
EB
24
2
29
399
LANES
LT
1
0
0
1
3
351
19
162
TH
1
1
1
1
191
37
4
26
RT
0
1
0
0
218
390
52
587
TOTAL
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
.88
.93
.76
.75
SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS
'ROACH
SB
WB
NB
EB
DELAY
(SECONDS)
28.6
8.2
5.5
20. 1
CAPACITY
281
758
153
992
LOS
D
B
B
D
Average Delay (Intersection) : 17.5
Level of Service (Intersection): C
***************************** End of Print Job ***************************
5/93
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
•URBAN SYSTEMS
101
APPENDIX A PAGE 19 OF 19
Jhk & Associates. San Diego. CA.
X***********************************************************************Intersection: PASEO DEL NORTE AND POINSETTIA LANE
Date:06/24/92 Analyst: BLT
Time Period Analyzed: 4:45 - 5:45 PM Project No:46S5
City/State: CARLSBAD. CA Filename: G :CB9227PM.dbf
***********#*>l(!|c#**>|()t(****************************************************
APPROACH VOLUMES
APPROACH
SB
WB
NB
EB
LT
6O
12
26
267
NUMBER OF APPROACH LANES
APPROACH
SB
WB
NB
EB
APPROACH
SB
WB
NB
EB
LT
1
0
0
i
TH
18
281
7
467
TH
1
1
1
1
RT
187
47
6
60
RT
0
1
0
0
TOTAL
265
340
39
794
TOTAL
2
2
1
2
SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS
DELAY CAPACITY
(SECONDS)
23.9 327
7.2 772
4.4 142
25.9 956
PHF
0.97
O.85
0.70
0.97
LOS
D
B
A
D
Average Delay (Intersection) : 19.9
Level oi Service (Intersection): C
i**************************** End of Print Job ***************************
5/93
SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS*
102 OO6f85C
SOURCE
SANDAG
PAGE 1 OF 3
APPENDIX B
SANDAG TRIP GENERATION TABLE
MARCH 1993
6/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
•URBAN SYSTEMS
103 OOff185C
APPENDIX B PAGE 2 OF 3
BRIEF GUIDE OF VEHICULAR
TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES
FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION
San DiegoASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
_ Suite 800, First Interstate Plaza
MARCH 1993 ^S^ ' '^T^ 401 B Street
San Diego, California 92101
(619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305
NOTE: This list only represents a fluids of average, or estimated, traffic generation "driveway" rates for land uses (emphasis on acreage
and building square footage) in the San Diego region. These driveway rates (which do not categorize primary, linked, or pass-by trip types)
are subject to change as future documentation becomes available, or as local sources are updated. For more specific information regarding
traffic data and trip rates, please refer to the San Diego Traffic Generators manual. Always check with local jurisdictions for their preferred
or applicable rates.
LAND USE
Agriculture (Open Space)
Airports
Commercial
General Aviation
Heliports
Automobile
Car Wash
Gasoline
Sales (Dealer 6 Repair)
Auto Repair Canter
Banking
Bank (walk-in only)
Bank (w/drive-thcough)
Drive-through only
Savings ft Loan
Drive-through only
Cemeteries
Church (or Synagogue)
Commercial/Retail Centers
Super Regional Shopping Center
(More than 60 acres, more than
600,000 sq. ft., w/usually 3+
major stores)
Regional Shopping Center
(30-60 acres. 300.000-600.000
sq. ft., w/usually 2+ major stores)
Community Shopping Center
(10-30 acres. 100.000-300.000 sq. ft..
w/usually 1 major store and detached
restaurant)
Neighborhood Shopping Center
(Less than 10 acres, less than
100.000 sq. ft., w/usually grocery
store 8 drug store)
Commercial Shops
(also strip commercial)
Supermarket
Convenience Market
Discount Club
Discount Store
Furniture Store
Lumber Store
Hardware/Paint Store
Garden Nursery
Education
University (4 years)
junior College (2 years)
High School
Middle/Junior High
Elementary
Day Care
Hospitals
General
Convalescent/Nursing
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION BATE
2/acre"
12/acre. 100/flight. 70/1000 sq. ft."6/acre. 3 flight, 7/besed aircraft* "100/acre"
900/site. 600/acre"750/station. 130/pump"SO/1000 sq. ft. 300/acre. 60/lervice stair20/1000 sq. ft. 400/acre. 20/iervice stall*
150/1000 sq. ft.. 1000/acre1 "200/1000 sq. ft.. 1500/acte'300( 150 one-wayl/lane*
60/1000 sq. ft. 600/acre"
100 (50 one-way)/lana"
5/acre'
12/1000 sq. ft.. 40/acre" (triple ratesfor Sunday, or days of assembly)
40/1000 sq. ft.. 400/acre'
50/1000 sq. ft.. 500/acre'
70/1000 sq. ft.. 700/acre' "
120/1000 sq. ft.. 1200/acre' "
40/1000 sq. ft. 400/acre-
150/1000 sq. ft.. 2000/acre • "
500/1000 sq. ft"
80/1000 sq. ft. 800/acre"
70/1000sq. ft. 600/acre"6/1000 sq. ft. 100/acre"
30/1000 sq.ft., 150/acre"
60/1000 sq. ft. 600/acre"40/1000 sq. ft. 90/acre"
2.5/student. 100 acre*
1.6/sludent. 80/acre'
1.4/student. 11/1000 sq. ft. 50/acre''
1.0/student. 40/acre"
1.4/student. 14/1000 sq. ft. 60/acre"4/child. 80/1000 sq. It"
20/bed. 20/1000 sq. ft. 200/acre'
3/bed"
HIGHEST PEAK HOUR * (plus IN:OUT ratio)
B«tw*«n 7-9 A.M. B«tw««n 4-6 P.M.
6% (6:4)
10% (6:4)
4% (5:5)
6% (5:5)
5% (7:3)
8% (7:3)
4% (7:3)
5% (6.4)
3% (5:5)
2%
4%
4% (8:2)
2% (7:3)
2% (7:3)
3% (6:4)
4% (6:4)
3% (6:4)
4% (7:3)
8% (5:5)
1% (8:2)
2% (6:4)
4% (7:3)
7% (6:4)
2% (6:4)
3% (6:4)
10% (9:1)
12% (9:1)
20% (8:2)
24% (7:3)
26% (6.4)
19% (5:5)
9% (7:3)
7% (6:4)
7% (5:5)
15% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
12% (5:5)
8% (4:6)
11% (4:6)
8% (4:6)
10% (5:5)
13% (5:5)
9%
15%
8% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
10% (5:5)
11% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
10% (5:5)
8% (5:5)
9% (5.5)
10% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
9% (5:5)
10% (5:5)
9% (3:7)
8% (3:7)
14% (3:7)
7% (3:7)
5% (3:7)
18% (5:5)
10% (3:7)
7% (4:6)
(over)
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido. Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, National City. Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista and County of San Diego.
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense and Tijuana/Baja California.
5/93
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS
104
Industrial
Industrial/Business Park (commercial Included)Industrial Park (no commercial)
Industrial Plant (multiple shifts)
Manufacturing/ Assembly
Warehousing
Storage
Science Research & Development
Library
Lodging
Hotel (w/oonvention facilities/restaurant)Motel
Resort Hotel
Military
Offices
Standard Commercial Office
(less than 100.000 sq. ft)
Large (high-rise) Commercial Office
(more than 100.000 sq. ft.)Corporate Office (single user)
Government (Civic Center)
APPENDIX B
1671000sq.ft,200/aere*
8/1 000 sq.ft. 90/acre*
10/1 000 sq.ft.. 120/aere*
4/1 000 sq. ft, 50/acre"
5/1 000 sq.ft. 80/acre"
2/1000 sq. ft., 0.2/vault 30/aere*
8/1000 sq. ft. So/acre*
50/1000 sq. ft, 400/acre"
10/room. 300/acre
9/room, 200/acre*
8/room, 100/acre*
2.5 military & civilian personnel*
20/1000 eq. ft. 300/aere*
17/1000 sq. ft. 600/aere*
10/1000 sq. ft.. 1 40/acre*
30/1 000 tq. ft"
Post Office (central/walk-in only) 90/1 000 sq. ft"Community P.O. (not Including mail drop lane) 200/1000 sq. ft. 1 300/acre*
Community P.O. (w/mail drop lane)Mail Drop Lane only
Department of Motor Vehicles
Medical
Parks
City (developed)
Regional (developed)
Neighborhood/Regional (undeveloped)
Amusement (Theme)
San Diego ZooSea World
RecreationBeach. Ocean or Bay
Beach, Lake (fresh water)
Bowling Center
Campground
Golf Course
Marinas
Racquetball/Health Club
Tennis Courts
Sports Facilities
Outdoor Stadium
Indoor Arena
Racetrack
Theaters (multiplex)
Residential
Single Family Detached
(average 4 OU/acr e)
Condominium
(or any multi-family less than
20 DU/acre)
Apartments
(or any multi-family units more
than 20 Of/acre)
MobileHome
Family
Adults Only
Retirement Community
Rural Estate
Congregate Care Facility
Restaurants
Quality
Sit down, high turnover
Fast Food (w/drive-through)
Transportation Facilities
Bus Depot
Truck Terminal
Waterport
Transit Station (Rail)
Park & Ride Lots
• Primary source: San Diego Traffic Generators.
300/1000 sq. ft, 2000/acre*
1 500 (750 one-way)/lane*
180/1000 sq. ft., 900/acre"50/1 000 sq.ft. 500/aere*
50/acre*
20/acre*
5/aere*
80/acre. 1 30/acre (summer only)"
115/acre*80/acre*
600/1000 ft. shoreline, 60/acre*
50/1000 ft shoreline, 5/acre*
30/lane, 300/acre"
4/campsfte"
8/acre. 600/course"
4/berth, 20/aere* "
40/1000 sq. ft.. 300/acre, 40/court*
16/acre. 30/court"
50/acre, 0.2/seaf
30/acre, 0.1/seat*
40/acre, 0.6 seat*
80/1 000 sq.ft. 1.8/seaf
1 0/d welling unit'
a/dwelling unit*
6/dwelling unit*
5/dwelling unit 40/acre*
3/dwelling unit 20/acre*
4/dwelling unit"
12/dwellingunit"
2/dwelling unit**
100/1000 sq. ft.. 3/ifat. 500/aere* **
250/1000 sq. ft., 7/seat 1200/acre* "
700/1000 sq. ft., 22/seat 3000/aere* "
25/1 000 sq. ft"
10/1000 sq. ft. 7/bay, 80/acre"
170/berth. 12/aere"
300/acre"
400/acr* (600/paved acre)*
12% (8:2)
11% (9:1)
14% (8:2)20% (2:8)
15% (7:3)6% (5:5)
16% (9:1)
2% (8:2)
6% (6:4)
8% (4:6)
5% (6:4)
9% (9:1)
14% (9:1)
13% (9:1)
15% (9:1)
9% (9:1)
5%
6% (6:4)
7% (5:5)
7% (5:5)
6% (6:4)
6% (8:2)
4%
7% (7:3)
4%
6% (8:2)
3% (3:7)
4% (6:4)
5%
0.3%
8% (2:8)
8% (2:8)
8% (2:8)
9% (3:7)
9% (3:7)
3% (6:4)
1 % (6:4)
8% (5:5)
4% (6:4)
9% (4:6)
14% (7:3)
14% (7:3)
"*«
PAGE 3 OF 3
12% (2:8)
12% (2:8)
15% (3:7)
20% (2:8)
16% (4:6)
9% (5:5)
I** (1:9)
10% (5:5)
8% (6:4)
9% (6:4)
7% (4:6)
10% (2:8)
13% (2:8)
14% (2:8)
15% (1:9)
12% (3:7)
7%
9% (5:5)
10% (5:5)12% (5:5)
11% (4:6)
10% (3:7)
8%
6% (6:4)
11% (4:6)
11% (4:6)
8%
9% (3:7)
7% (6:4)
9% (6:4)
11% (5:5)
8% (7:3)
10% (7:3)
10% (7:3)
9% (7:3)
12% (6:4)
10% (6:4)
8% (5:5)
8% (7:3)
6% (6:4)
8% (5:5)
8% (5:5)
15% (3:7)
15% (3:7)
" Other sources:/T£ Trip Generation Report. Trip Generation Rates (other agencies), various SANDAG 4 CALTRANS studies, reports
and estimates.
^
PO/MSETr/A SHORES
'/&&4A/ QV.QTFM.Q ^4
5/93
105
PAGE 1 OF 6
APPENDIX C
TRANSPORTATION PHASING ANALYSIS FOR
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22
PREPARED FOR THE LUSK COMPANY
REVISED APRIL 4, 1988
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
SYSTEMS6/93 ~ 006f85C
APPENDIX C PAGE 2 OF 6
TOTAL F.M.Z. ZZ ADT« 35,738
LEGEND:
XXX
XXX * Subiru Dlitributien
4/88
APPENDIX G
ZONE 22 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
EXISTING PLAN - PHASE 6 (1993-1997)
CAFtlSBAD/r.H.Z. ??
U.S.A. INC.004406
33
5/93
PO/MSETT/A SHORES
-UftBAN SYSTEMS'
107 OO6J85C
APPENDIX C PAGE 3 OF 8
APPENDIX B PAOE3 OF 8
°
°
CM
CM
HI
Z
O
N
*9 f^
HI N
uj HI uic CD N
•^ ^*r Qs ^ <u- Z to
UJ
H
_j
O
H.
O
/.
I
6/93
PO/NSETr/A SHORES
• URBAN SYSTEMS*
108
ooerssc
APPENDIX C PAGE 4 OF 6
APPENDIX B PAGE 4 OF 8
TABLE 1
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN TRIP GENERATION
PCX HOIK
TCMt
DUSTING
1967
fcUlAnlMt T5/C
PbbUt Horn FTJ+-1
fk*ll» tern RTN-2
1989
P/I
0-3
TS/C.
1990
P/I
0-2
Wl
B^5=l
WH-3
,— • » IS/RW-1
0-1
RT/fii
1931
PA
0/2m
RVD-1
FTH-3r is/wn-1
RV2
_ffi/0-2
1992
BVO-i
_ >r TS/2fcJ
FTK-4
RT-1
1993
Rr,/o-t
1993-1997
V » TS/PTH-.
nxKi
1S.2S
12.00
S6.O3
TRIP
R*Tt«
*00/«£
SAU
SAW
SIC TOTAL 1
10.40
50.10
3. 75
16 ASF
2DASF•OO/M:
SUB TOTAL 1
2S.70
1*3.30
6T.OO
5.60
ns.ro
5.00
3.*0
1.30
16ASF
20 ASF
tAu
300/HC
SAW
UXt/K
300/AC
3DO/AC
SUB TJTALl
31.70
152.90
B7.00
5.60
100.00
3.70
15.00
e.oo
16 AST
20 AST
8AXI
5X/HC
6AXJ
»x/»c
6AJU
B/DU
SUB TOTAL I
E.SO
100.00
• E.OO
16.00
300/»C
BAXJ
8AUe/ou
SOB TOTAL 1
5.60 J30/»C
i 7.80
'. 90.00
•OQ/W
BA«J
IP
JOS
8,100
560
780
7.4*0
186
1.002
1.SOO
2.S68
«7S
2,666
E36
1.680
£20
2,000
1,020
_»
9,867
S07
3,ae
536
1,680
800
1,«80
120
6*
e,?»5
1,680see
360
128
2,968
1,690
3 120
720
W IN/OUT
f 1 RATIO* III OUT
3 183 61* 110 73
9 SO 3.7 15 35
9 70 3iT 21 «5
1*C 1S8
12 20 8i2 18 «
14 140 til 12S 14
3 *5 6(4 27 18
16S 36
12 57 8i2 4£ 11
14 4C1 9l1 361 40
1 *3 2.8 9 34
14 235 9>1 212 2*
1 74 8.1 E6 7
3 60 El* 3E 2*
14 143 9t1 12S 14
14 55 9l1 49 5
907 160
12 E1 8t2 *9 12
14 428 Sil 3S5 43
8 43 2iB 9 3*
1* 235 9>1 212 2*
8 6* 2t8 1} 51
3 44 E.4 27 18
8 10 2.8 2
8 5 2iB 1
EH 194
14 235 9.1 212 2
t 64 2i8 13 S
8 29 2i8 t2
8 10 2i8 2
232 IDE
14 235 SM 212 2
3 94 6i4 Sfi )
8 5« 2iB 12 *
tm iH/nfi
• 1 HATIO* » OUT
1 549 SiS 27* 274
1 82 6t4 37 25
1 86 61* SI 34
363 333
12 20 2i8 4 18
13 130 2.8 25 104
8 135 SiS 87 B7
96 188
12 57 2i8 11 46
13 373 2i8 75 298
10 54 7i3 38 16
13 218 2.8 44 ITS
10 92 7.3 64 28
9 180 5.5 90 90
13 133 2.8 27 106
13 SI 2i8 10 41
358 799
12 61 2.8 12 49
13 398 2.8 80 318
10 5* 7.3 38 16
13 218 2:8 44 ITS
10 80 2iB 1E 64
9 133 SiS 67 67
10 12 7i3 8 4
10 8 7)3 42
2St 694
13 218 2t8 M 175
10 80 7i3 55 2*
10 36 7i3 25 11
-10 13 7i3 9 4
13* 213
13 218 2.8 44 ITS
9 281 SiS 1*0 140
10 77 7,3 SO 22
SUE TOlALl 3,8*0 66 84 191 162
OTUJlTIVt TCTALl 36,729 2,»3D 761 1455 256*
S«.-C»G C«r«riUor. RtUi,1967
«/6B
35
LUSK AREA 22/CARLSBAD
U.S.A. INC. <004481
5/93
SHORES
> URBANSYSTEMS*
109 OO6f85C
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX B
5/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
>Uf?BAN SYSTEMS*
110
PAGE 5 OF 6
PAGE 6 OF •
III
CO
ID
a
2
«Mz **
3 ><:^s
I<u. DC BJHI
Z fc
UJ ^O o
o
CO
X
UJ o
CO
/,
OO6J85C
APPENDIX C PAGE 6 OF 6
PAGE 6 OF 8
S/93
PO/NSETT/A SHORES
•UftBAM SYSTEMS
111 ooerssc
PAGE 1 OF 9
APPENDIX D
YEAR 2000 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
PO/MSErr/A SHORES
VffBAM SYSTEMS'•8/93
112
APPENDIX D PAGE 2 OF 9
o
o
o
O
11
a\A
§I
<0
<ii s
0
P
o
m
o CCA 00
4-
^\vo L.O.8.MitigaI
fe 006f35CIII
? <t>•» a.
113
t APPENDIX D PAGE 3 OF 9
i dfcW
W
4-
HTg
to
<*. a31
O
If
<0
• 1
*l!
ii1
•>31
u
s
1
3*3s OfffftffOO58
g 55
K;
5
^0i
52
114
APPENDIX D PAGB 4 OF 9
O
yk-i
--£>
\ -
51
« s31
u
i
0
1
3
Ess•3
— !— »
S"*
Q **U § .)8 olt
c< 1|S
U jjuS o^§ Siif^ J5^
rfS]
Lh
rC' H^^r !-•
•^ L"
*
'VYY/_>/Vi3
V<7//V^
r?
<iiwU\
2
4
/
^
>
oT^P
xz. —
.*•£ ^
/\7\
o
o
ffl
o
r
iris
VI
i
!
s1
9 o
1
i i
OSI
n oS55-* o.
115
APPENDIX D PAGE 5 OF 8
o
J
\A
4-
\U
3d
I
<0
^
Si
U
§=
!
u
CJ
: I
*
\
0
« 1
1
1a
<0I I
5
<0
5
116
APPENDIX D PAGE 6 OF 9
-*
J
^
a
ft
U
o
o
CAPACITYM>O
2
3
O
CAPACITYw
o
;=>u
CAPACITYw
o2
CD0
D|O•£
J
l^
•
45f
-
\\
vfl
0t
,Q
f
V*
\A
\^
\
2\*
\iis:
FiUo_J
^x-
*\
I
l
| £
» s
31
|
i
117
APPENDIX D PAGE 7 OF 9
a
J
r
<r-Q
^
1«: s51
si
h</> K;
1 5I <*1I
o o2 S•«• 0-
118
APPENDIX D PAGE 8 OF 8
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-9
1-1992
Figure 9-4
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
(Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note)
URBAN ^>5$.£#: RURAL
1. Minimum Vehicular
Satisfied Not Satisfied ^8%>
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
AV^A'IC'*- ^WClisfAS J-Vo"T&i-/V?&Soft-r piZlvJ&jJA
Major Street Minor Street ' '
1 1
fj)jr more j(Q
2 or more 2 or more
1 2 or more
2. Interuption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not Satisfied &ft %>
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
1 1
(JpDr more (Tj. '.
2 or more 2 or more
1 2 or more
3. Combination
Satisfied Y^*? Not Satisfied
No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more IB % 3^%
1 2
Minimum Requirements
EADT
Vehicles per day on
major street (total of
both approaches)
«=l,200
Urban Rural
8.000 5.600
[ 9,600 | 6,720
9,600 6,720
8,000 5,600
Vehicles per day on
major street (total of
both approaches)
^iZOO
Urban Rural
12000 8400
14.400J 10,080
14,400. 10,080
12,000 8,400
2 Warrants
Vehicles per day on
higher-volume minor
street approach (one
direction only)
-Z.4S-2.
Urban Rural
2,400 1 ,680
[ 2,400 I 1,680
3,200 2,240
3,200 2,240
Vehicles per day on
higher-volume minor
street approach (one
direction only)z,bsa
Urban Rural
1,200 850
{ _1.200{ 850
1,600 1,120
1,600 1,120
2 Warrants
NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted.
IS
6/93
SHORES
-UffBAM SYSTEMS
119
APPENDIX D PAGE 9 OF 9
IO
O
QD
o
CO
J K
Vr-
1
J?
1
1I
Hii
u
(S
J \
--?
§1
ia
e ^i i
•<;
s1
Ss
1
1I
120
PAGE 1 OF 8
APPENDIX E
YEAR 2010 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
PO/AfSETT/A SHORES
-UffBAN SYSTEMS5/93
121 ooerssc
APPENDIX E PAGE 2 OF 8
C^V2i-JaO 3/S\
\__ 1
it
IA ate
O
31
B
oil
%
\\
\\
§I5
<0i
$
I
I
s eOj rx
1 5
^
f$i« 0.
122
APPENDIX E PAGE 3 OF 8
\
s
11
SO -VI
4-
u
3
«i 1
31
«31
§§5<0
-iS| 1
SJ//V
EC]
O
11
U
-F
CO
31
SO
1 I£ fioj K!
I $§ S X.£ ^j f
H**
I
123
APPENDIX E PAGE 4 OF 8
124
APPENDIX E PAGE 5 OF 8
O
o
U\
U
u
U
U
V,
^
4
-F .O.S.itigat0
L.O.S.MillglO
^<0
I
'A
1
Uj1
a
S
^I
i
Si
X
<0I
^^
w O? 0)•» a.
125
APPENDIX E PAGE 6 OF 8
_f
DO
CAPACITYos
o
CAPACITY>o
u
CAPACITYCd
O
d
oSt$
J
t-
^^*
1
*i
^
1
V.
f-'L^S
S
*r
!PU.O.S. U.0.3.Mitigation MitigationU.0.3. rNo mitigation .,-OAT13
o
y
CAPACITYCd
o
ID
0
CAPACITYEd
O
O
CAPACITYca
o
(ft
|
-J
N(
^i
^
\
^
^V,
^
\
r
F
0N
•i
^
»: I
3 I
I
d
s
^<0I
i
58
^ S
I I
| ft
1 1 ft
^1
n o
SST Q-
126
APPENDIX E PAGE 7 OF 8
IN r
s *SI
<D I
Ix U3i
ls<0
$
b
127
128