No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 94-04; Poinsettia Shores PA 1; Tentative Map (CT) (6)City of Carlsbad Planning Department May 27, 1994 Brian Murphy Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: CT 94-04/PUD 94-03 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA A-l Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map/Planned Unit Development, application no. CT 94-04/PUD 94-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is a list of initial project issues of concern to staff. More project design issues will likely be identified and require resolution after the application is deemed complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, April 29, 1994, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Eric Munoz, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4441, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director c: Gary Wayne Don Neu Bob Wojcik Jim Davis File Copy Data Entry Marjorie/Rich 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619)438-1161 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE APPLICATION: No. CT94-04/PUD 94-03 -PLANNING AREA A-l PLANNING: 1. A complete application for an affordable housing project Site Development Plan (SDP) is required for either on-site or off-site affordable units; unless off-site affordable housing units are existing in which case a draft affordable housing agreement must be submitted to make the individual tentative map applications complete. 2. As proposed, this map requires the final map approval of the master tentative map currently under review (CT 94-01). Otherwise, this map must be a "stand alone" map with all off site improvements shown, etc. On the cover sheet for this map, eliminate all lot and footprints shown for areas outside this specific planning area. Show the lots created by the master tentative map (CT 94-01) and label area outside this planning area as "not a part". List only the easements relevant to this planning area. The grading summary needs to reflect minor finished grading beyond the mass grading associated with CT 94-01. The amount of finished grading beyond the mass grading will be the basis for determining if additional environmental review specific to this planning area is required; or if the grading is minor enough so that it was covered with the master tentative's mass grading. 3. Show information such as easements, lot areas and street cross sections that are relevant to this planning area and not on a master tentative map level. Sheets cannot be missing from exhibits packages for application completeness. 4. Plotting of units/footprints on lots and pads; and full architectural exhibits for all proposed plan types, all elevations and all floor plans. These exhibits must reflect items a-e as shown under #17 on the application checklist. 5. Landscape plans at 40 scale including trail and any noise wall landscaping. Provide items a-f as shown under #16 on the application checklist. 6. Trail plans for the trail system required for this planning area consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. 7. Noise study with attenuation/mitigation measures to comply with City's noise policy. 8. List the Average Daily Traffic amount specific to this planning area. 9. Provide percent of landscaping for this planning area. 10. Provide number of parking spaces required/provided for this planning area. Distinguish between resident parking and guest parking. 11. Provide location, height and materials of all walls and fences. Indicate top, bottom and highest condition elevations at both ends and in the middle of walls/fences. 12. One copy of 8 1/2 x 11" reduced site plan and building elevations. 13. Provide an Environmental Impact Assessment form. The environmental assessment needs to, at a minimum, address the proposed project and the environmental issues specific to this planning area as outlined in the master plan. 14. Public Facility Fee Agreement: Two (2) copies: one (1) notarized original and one (1) reproduced copy. 15. Three copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months). 16. The SDP for Planning Areas E and M must be deemed complete for this application to be deemed complete. ENGINEERING: 1. It appears that two different directions of processing are being sought. a. Some items appear to indicate that the Master Tentative Map, CT 94-01 will become final before this map and this map will then become a subdivision upon Lot 1 of that final map. Examples are lack of offsite streets and sewers needed for this map to stand alone. b. Other items appear to indicate that this map is intended to not depend on CT 94-01 becoming final first. Examples are the legal description, the listing of all easements over the master tentative map without an explanation which easements apply to this map. The applicant must choose one direction of processing and make all items consistent with that choice. We believe that having each planning area capable of becoming a final map on it's own merits will require a lot of duplication of requirements for the offsite improvements for Avenida Encinas, the drainage west of the railroad, grading and sewer improvements. 2. Footprints of structures are not plotted. 3. Offsite sewer and water which is needed to serve the project is not shown. We suggest that the overall systems be shown on the "key map". 4. How this project will drain into the offsite drainage system is not shown. Same as above, the drainage system could be shown on the "key map". 5. State the traffic generation for this map alone. 6. Sight distances for cars exiting the site onto Avenida Encinas are not plotted. INITIAL ISSUES OF CONCERN PLANNING: 1. Please add the project application numbers (CT 94-04/PUD 94-03) to the upper right corners of plans for future resubmittals. 2. Follow all development standards and design criteria for this planning area as outlined in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. ENGINEERING: 1. Verify and identify on the map that the only existing easements on this map are Items 21 and 34 on the easement list. Call out the disposition of the easement, Item 34. 2. The grading analysis as presented is likely to be confusing to one not familiar with the processing of the overall project. Please clearly show the grading needed for this map alone. A reference to the sheet grading done on the Master Tentative Map CT 94-01 may be needed for a complete explanation. A statement such as "This map proposes minimum grading upon the sheet grading for Master Tentative Map sufficient only to establish streets, drainage and lot pads. Balanced grading onsite will be achieved". If balanced grading cannot be achieved on this map, please show how offsite areas will receive the export or furnish the import needed. 3. Clarify if two gates in series is proposed, one from Avenida Encinas to Street "A" to access the common recreational area and one from Street "A" to Street "H". Show location of all call boxes and gates. 4. In order to maintain the 300 foot stopping sight distance for a secondary arterial from the exit-only Street "I", it may be necessary to restrict Lots 176 through 179 to have no fencing, structures and have reduced landscaping. 5. Label the existing 60 inch storm drain along the westerly subdivision boundary. 6. Cross out or remove any information not appropriate to this map alone, such as the cross- sections for streets not in or adjacent to this subdivision. 7. A warrant analysis for signals at the access points is needed. 8. Check driveway grades and need for vertical curves. 9. A statement is made on sheet 2 under lots that private streets will be separate lots. Will this lot numbering be done and maintain consecutive numbers from map to map? 10. Over 1000 feet of overland flow requires an inlet at Avenida Encinas. If the inlets shown on Avenida Encinas improvement plans, sta. 39+54, is for meeting this requirement please show. 11. A letter from a soils engineer will be required for drainage less than five feet from structure to the drainage swale.