HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 95-03; Emerald Ridge West; Tentative Map (CT)NCT
RE: Proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Emerald Ridge
West Project - SCH #95101062
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Commission staff has reviewed the above cited document and would like to provide the
following comments. To begin with, it is our understanding that the project involves a 61-
lot residential subdivision along with open space and 10 second dwelling units. The
project also proposes a number of on- and off-site road and utility improvements including
two alternative sewer alignments. Relative to procedures, the project site is located within
the Coastal Zone and is therefore subject to coastal development permit review. The
project site is located within the area governed by the City of Carlsbad certified Mello n
LCP segment. As such, the standard of review for the coastal development permit is the
Commission-certified Mello n LCP segment.
Pertaining to potential concerns raised by the above cited draft document, the document
details two sewer/storm drain alternative alignments (A & B). Based on the information
provided, Alternative B would have significant impacts on environmentally sensitive
habitat areas, while Alternative A does not have any direct native or sensitive habitat
impacts. As such, Alternative A is clearly the least environmentally-damaging alternative.
However, the draft document does not specify which alignment is being proposed. As you
are aware, in March of this year, the Coastal Commission approved a permit for a
residential subdivision south of the subject site (ref. CDP #6-94-131/Toyohara). The
Commission's approval also included the extension/improvement of Hidden Valley Road
north from the project to Palomar Airport Road. In its approval, the Commission found
that while the road alignment would impact dual criteria slopes, such impacts could be
accepted because the road alignment would also provide necessary sewer, water and
access to other developable areas. In subsequent permit actions for other development in
this area, the Commission made additional findings that, because of potential impacts to
environmentally sensitive habitat areas, any proposed sewer lines to serve development in
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCT PETE WILSON, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 521-8036
November 30, 1995
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576
Attn: Jeff Gibson
Jeff Gibson
November 30, 1995
Page 2
this area should be within Hidden Valley Road. Due to topographic constraints that
would require the use of a pump facility, which can be costly to construct and maintain,
neither alternative is proposed within Hidden Valley Road. However, because Alternative
A does not involve any native habitat impacts, it should be the "preferred alternative".
The draft document also states that approximately 129,205 cubic yards of grading is
necessary to accommodate building pads, lots, utilities, etc., and that the grading conforms
to the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. However, the document does not indicate
whether a slope analysis has been completed and if there is any grading of dual-criteria
slopes. As such, this should be clarified. In addition, because portions of the site drain to
environmentally sensitive habitat areas, any grading that occurs during the winter rainy
season could lead to sedimentation impacts to such downstream resources. Therefore, the
document should make it clear that grading of the site would be prohibited during the
winter rainy season (October 1 to April 1), consistent with LCP requirements.
Finally, on Page 15 of the draft document, the statement is made that "no sensitive plant
species were identified onsite...". Although this statement is true, taken literally, it is
somewhat misleading. While it is true there are no plant species onsite that have been
listed by any state or federal agencies, the site does contain several environmentally
sensitive habitat areas (Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, Mixed Chaparral and Riparian) that do
support several listed/protected wildlife species. Therefore, this should be clarified in the
document.
The above comments have been prepared by Commission staff based on the information
available at this time. Additional issues may result from further public review and input.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this draft document. If you have any
questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely
Lee McEachern
Coastal Planner
(ERdgEnv.doc)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 521-8036
June 7, 1995
Jeff Gibson
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Mar Vista Project
Dear Jeff,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above. Staff has reviewed the
subject document and has the following comments.
General Comments
According to the above document, the proposed project would be confined to an
area currently in agricultural use, and no impacts to native vegetation on the
slopes or the on-site riparian drainage would occur from the development
itself. However, utility impacts from a sewer line in the northwest portion
of the site would occur to on-site riparian resources; additionally, a
proposed trail along Hidden Valley Road north to Palomar Airport Road would
impact off-site riparian resources associated with Encinas Creek. The LCP
provides that riparian resources located outside lagoon ecosystems shall be
protected and preserved. No direct impacts may be allowed unless it is found
that there is no feasible alternative, and the work will be performed in the
least environmentally-damaging manner.
Regarding the sewer line impacts, an alignment is proposed northerly to
Palomar Airport Road through biologically sensitive lands associated with
Canyon de las Encinas. Apparently, this alignment is parallel to and near a
sewer alignment the Commission approved in CDP #6-94-131 (Toyohara), a 68 acre
site adjacent to the project site to the southeast. In that action, the
Commission approved a sewer alignment within Hidden Valley Road. The
Commission found that part of the resource impacts associated with the
construction of this road were justified under the LCP's provision that
utilities could be accepted in sensitive areas, subject to the Commission
finding the alignment represented the least environmentally-damaging
alternative. Based on that finding and information provided by the City
regarding the above alignment now being considered to sewer the Greystone
project, Poinsettia Park, and other properties north to Palomar Airport Road,
any other sewer alignment that is being considered in this area other than the
approved Hidden Valley location cannot be the least environmentally-damaging
alternative and would likely not be accepted by the Commission. Why can't
sewerage for the project site be directed to the proposed sewer line in Hidden
Valley Road? It must be shown that no less environmentally-damaging
alternatives exist for project impacts to be considered.
Jeff Gibson/Mar Vista Comments
June 7, 1995
Page 2
Similarly, an alternatives analysis regarding riparian impacts associated with
a proposed trail along Hidden Valley Road to Palomar Airport Road must be done
to find the project consistent with the LCP. The trail is not a LCP public
access requirement but a City requirement and it is not presently listed as a
permissable use of riparian areas. Therefore, how would such resource impacts
be acceptable under the Mello II LCP? Can the trail alignment be moved to a
location where no impacts would occur? If the trail alignment cannot be moved
to a location where no impacts would occur, isn't "no project" a feasible
alternative for the trail? Notwithstanding sewerage and trail impacts, does
the project incorporate a 50 foot buffer from riparian resources as required
in Policy 3-8 of the certified Mello II Local Coastal Program (LCP)?
Five sensitive wildlife species were observed on the site or within the sewer
easement, including the California gnatcatcher. The document states .that to
reduce the potential for indirect impacts to the gnatcatcher during sewer
construction, the sewer line should be installed during the non-breeding
season (August through December). Again, does the sewer line in this location
represent the least environmentally-damaging alternative considering its
indirect impacts on the gnatcatcher, its direct impacts on riparian resources
and the fact that a sewer line has been approved in the nearby Hidden Valley
Road that could possibly accommodate project sewage? Hhy can't sewerage be
handled through the sewer line proposed in Hidden Valley Road?
Specific Comments
The document notes that the least Bell's vireo is not likely found in Encinas
Creek, but directed searches for this species according to USFWS protocol
would be required. Has a recent check for this avian species been done?
The document notes that no coastal sage scrub would be directly impacted by
sewer construction. What would the indirect impacts to coastal sage scrub
be?
The document identifies erosion control and water quality measures which would
be used by the project to prevent sedimentation and water quality impacts to
Encinas Creek. However, an additional protective measure should be required
with this project to find it consistent with the LCP. Given its proximity to
Encinas Creek, grading should be prohibited during the rainy season pursuant
to Policy 3-4 of the Mello II LCP.
The document states an oversized culvert under Hidden Valley Road at Encinas
Creek is required to mitigate the effects of fragmentation of the open space
and wildlife corridor caused by the roadway, and to enhance wildlife mobility
in the area. It is our understanding that the culvert that was originally
proposed within the creek channel has been deleted. The crossing of Encinas
Creek is now proposed with a bridge structure (Murrieta crossing) that is more
accommodating to wildlife movements according to wildlife experts, and has
received the support of the California Department of Fish and Game in this
regard. What is the status of this project component?
Jeff Gibson/Mar Vista Comments
June 7, 1995
Page 3
With regard to long-range planning issues, the project must also be found
consistent with the City's draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). The goal of
the HMP is to preserve and protect contiguous stands of coastal sage scrub and
other habitats that are important as habitat to a number of plants and
animals. These habitats are protected within Preserve Planning Areas (PPA) of
the HMP. Is the proposed residential project and all off-site improvements
located outside of any PPA? What role does the site play relative to
connectivity or habitat preservation for the HMP?
The project will require review by DFG and USFWS to determine the project's
conformance with the NCCP guidelines, prior to filing the coastal development
permit application, and preferably prior to completion of the local
environmental review. We believe the project site's importance as a wildlife
corridor and role in providing connectivity between sensitive habitat areas
located between Batiquitos Lagoon and Encinas Creek should be thoroughly
analyzed in the environmental document to determine the project's consistency
with both the HMP and the NCCP guidelines.
I apologize for these late comments. We would like to coordinate with the
City in determining the most appropriate action on the project site. In
addition, as part of this coordination, we again mention that it would be
advantageous for the City to submit the Zone 20 Specific Plan as a local
coastal program amendment. This would allow the Commission the opportunity to
review the access and utility requirements, as well as the associated resource
impacts, for this large undeveloped area on a comprehensive basis, rather than
on a project-by-project review. Once again, we would be willing to try and
meet with City staff to conduct such a Zone 20 Specific Plan review informally
to identify issues early and determine what would be the next appropriate
step. If you have any questions, please contact me at the above number.
Sincerely
Bill Ponder
Coastal Planner
BP:bp(0232A)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY ^^ ^^ PETE WILSON, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA
3in CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
(619) 521-8036
APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
SECTION I. APPLICANT
1. Name, mailing address, and telephone number of all applicants.
MSP CALIFORNIA, LLC ; MSP CALIFORNIA. LLC
MARCUS PALKOWITSH DAVID BENTLEY
650 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 435 3573 EAST SUNRISE DRIVE //221
DENVER, CO 80222 (303) 399-9804 TUCSON. AZ (520) 299-2179
(Area code/daytime phone number)
Note: All applicants for the development must complete Appendix A, the declaration of campaign
contributions.
2. Name, mailing address and telephone number of applicant's representatives, if any. Please include all
representatives who will communicate on behalf of the applicant or the applicant's business partners, for
compensation, with the Commission or the staff. (It is the applicant's responsibility to update this list, as
appropriate, including after the application is accepted for filing. Failure to provide this information prior to
communication with the Commission or staff may result in denial of the permit or criminal penalties.)
ROBERT C. LADWIG
LADWIG DESIGN GROUP, INC.
703 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 300
CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (629) 438-3182
(Area code/daytime phone number)
SECTION II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Please answer all questions. Where questions do not apply to your project (for instance, project height for a
land division), indicate Not Applicable or N.A..
1. Project Location. Include street address; city, and/or county. If there is no street address, include
other description such as nearest cross streets.
SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD - EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE
number . street
city county
Assessor's Parcel Number(s) (obtainable from tax bill or County Assessor): 212-040-32 & 36
FOR OFFICE USE ONL Y RECEIVED
FILED
FEE
APPLICATION NUMBER DATE PAID
2. Describe the proposed development in detail. Include secondary improvements such as grading, septic
tanks, water wells, roads, driveways, outbuildings, fences, etc. (Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
Emerald Ridge West is a 62 lot standard single family R-l-7500 square-foot
lots minimum subdivision with '61 residential- lots on 28. Q acres with one
8.3 acre open-space lot and a remainder parcel of 27.4 acres. As one optior
to satisfy Carlsbad affordable housing requirements. 9 one bedroom second
dwelling units are proposed to be mixed within the 61 market rate units.
Also, 1 three bedroom affordable unit credit may be purchased offsite withir
Carlsbad. The project proposes 47,000*cubic yards of grading. Sewage will
flow offsite through Mar Vista (Coastal Application 6-96-46) to an existing
trunk line near Palomar Airport Road.
*NOTE: Grades on tentative map will be raised 3' to 5' and the dirt quantitj
will be reduced from 129,205 cubic yards to about 47,000 cubic yards
to eliminate export previously needed to grade Hidden Valley Road.
3.
4.
5.
a. If multi-family residential, state:
Number of units
Existing
units
N/A
Proposed new
units
N/A
Net number of units on
completion of project
N/A
Number of bedrooms perunft
(both existing and proposed)
N/A
Type of ownership
proposed
O rental
O condominium
O stock cooperative
O time share
n other
b. If land division or lot line adjustment, indicate:
Number of lots
Existing
lots
1
Proposed new
lots
62
Nei number of lots on
completion of project
62
Size o.f fots to be created (indicate net or gross acreage)
Existing
28.9 AC
Proposed
Open— space lot is
8.3 acres - R-l
lots range from
7505 sq.ft. to
19,201
Estimated cost of development (not including cost of land) $N/A
Project height: Maximum height of structure (ft.)
• above existing (natural) grade N/A - Site Development Plan to follow.
• above finished grade N/A - Site Development Plan to follow.
• as measured from centeriine of frontage road N/A - site Development Plan to follow.
Total number of floors in structure, including
subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines N/A - site Development Plan to follow.
6. Gross floor area excluding parking (sq.ft.) N/A
Gross floor area including covered
parking and accessory buildings (sq.ft.)N/A
7. Lot area (within property lines) (sq.ft. or acre)See 2b above.
Lot coverage
Building
Paved area
Landscaped area
Unimoroved area
Existing {sq.ft. or acre)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A '
New proposed (sq.fL or acre}
Grand Total (should equal fat area as shown in #7 above)
Total (sq.ft or acre)
8. Is any grading proposed?.*See Note in Item 2 above.Yes O No
//yes, complete fte following.
a) Amount of cut
b) Amount of ri
c\ Amount of import or
' export (circle which)
47.000* cu. yds.
47.000* cu. yds.
0 cu. yds.
^ Maximum height of
' cut slope
-\ Maximum heiaht of .
' fill slope
« Location of borrow1 or disposal site
8* ft.
14*' ft.
N/A
Grading and drainage plans must be included with this application. In certain areas, an engineering
geology report must also be included. See Section IV, paragraph 11 for the specifics of these
requirements.
Please list any geologic or other technical reports
of which you are aware that apply to this property Geo-Soils, inc. 9/6/94 Report/ 7/6/95 Letter
9. Parking:
Number of parking spaces (Indicate whether standard or compact}
Existing spaces
0
Proposed new spaces
2 x 61 = 122 min.
1x9= 9 min.
13]
122 covered std. space
9 uncovered
Net number of spaces on complelion of project
122 min.
s
Is any existing parking being removed?
If yes, how many spaces?
O Yes 0[ No
size
Is tandem parking existing and/or proposed?...
If yes, how many tandem sets? 9_
Yes D No
Size 8 x 20 (Allowed for 2nd dwelling units
only. All may be in garages.)
10. Are utility extensions for the following needed to serve the project? (Please check yes or no)
a) water b)gas c) sewer d) electric e) telephone
g Yes fl Yes 23 Yes Q Yes JQJ Yes
O No D No O No a No O No
Will electric or telephone extensions be above-ground? O Yes xO No
11. Does project include removal of trees or other vegetation? O Yes x0 No
If yes, indicate number, type and size of trees —
or type and area of other vegetation —
SECTION III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The relationship of the development to the applicable items below must be explained fully. Attach additional
sheets if necessary.
1. Present use of property.
a. Are there existing structures on the property? Q Yes No
if yest describe
b. Will any existing structures be demolished? ........................................ O Yes
Will any existing structures be removed? ..................... . ...................... ' CJ Yes
No
No
If yes to either question,
site, if applicable.
describe the type of development to be demolished or removed, including the relocation
2. Is the proposed development to be governed by any Development Agreement? O Yes No
3.
4.
6.
7.
Has any application for development on this site including anysubdivision
been submitted previously to the California Coastal Zone Conservation
Commission or the Coastal Commission?D Yes No
If yes, state previous application number(s)
Is the development between the first public road and the sea (including
lagoons, bays, and other bodies of water connected to the sea) .................... CJ Yes NO
If yes, is public access to the shoreline and along the coast currently available
on the site or near the site? .....................................................................a Yes O No
. if yes» indicate tfie. location and nature of the access, including the- distance from the project site, if applicable.
Does the development involve diking, filling, draining, dredging or placing structures in open coastal
waters, wetlands, estuaries, or lakes? (Please check yes or no)
a) diking
O Yes
XZJ No
b) filling
O Yes
c) dredging
a Yes
No
d) placement of structures
• YeS (Off site sewer line nearby Encinas Creek
per Coastal Permit 6-95-141) (Carlsbad
Municipal Water District and Mar Vista
. , . _, , J ,.„ , , , Coastal Permit 6-96-46)Amount of matenal to be dredged or filled (indicate which) ___ _ _ cu. yds.
No
Location of dredged material disposal site
Has a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' permit been applied for?Yes gk No
&K No
Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tideiands, submerged
lands or public tmst lands? .off.s..ite .s.ew?r. d?.?.s...R9.t..cross, waters r-j Yes i
of U.S.
For projects on State-owned lands, additional information may be required as set forth in Section IV,
paragraph 10.
Will the development protect existing lower-cost visitor and recreational
facilities? ?/£ O Yes O No
Will the development provide public or private recreational opportunities? ££ Yes D No
lfye$f explain*
A- portion
of Emerald
of a City wide trail
Ridge West along the
system is shown within the boundaries
west side of Hidden Valley Road.
8. Will the proposed development convert land currently or previously used for
agriculture to another use? pc Yes O No
If yes, how many acres will be converted? 17 Acres
9. Is the proposed development in or near:
a. Sensitive habitat areas (Biological survey may be required) EK Yes O No
b. Areas of state or federally listed rare, threatened, or endangered species... Sk Yes O No
C. 100-year floodplain (Hydrologic mapping may be required) O Yes ]Q No
d. Park or recreation area rjs Yes O No
10. Is the proposed development visible from:
a. State Highway 1 or other scenic route O Yes £3 No
b. Park, beach, or recreation area O Yes x3 No
c. Harbor area O Yes £J No
11. Does the Site contain any: (If yes to any of the following, please explain on an attached sheet)
a. Historic resources D Yes g No
No mitigation required - Site are not
••''b. Archaeological'resources ...iffE°£t ant..under...CEQA.&..Cari.s.b.a.d.... -•• }Q- Yes :;- O "NoGuidelines. . .
c. Paleontologicaf resources g Yes O No
12. Where a stream or spring is to be diverted, provide the following information:
Estimated streamfiow or spring yield (gpm) N/A
If well is to be used, existing yield (gpm)
If water source is on adjacent property, attach Division of Water Rights approval and property owner's
approval.
SECTION IV. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS
The following items must be submitted with this form as part of the application.
1. Proof of the applicant's legal interest in the property. A copy of any of the following will be acceptable:
current tax bill, recorded deed, lease, easement, or current policy of title insurance. Preliminary title
reports will not be accepted for this purpose. Documentation reflecting intent to purchase such as a
signed Offer to Purchase along, with a receipt of deposit or signed final escrow document is also
acceptable, but in such a case, issuance of the permit may be contingent on submission of evidence
satisfactory to the Executive Director that the sale has been completed.
The identity of all persons or entities which have an ownership interest in the property superior to that of
the applicant must be provided.
2. Assessor's parcel map(s) showing the page number, (he applicant's property, and ail other properties
within 100 feet (excluding roads) of the property lines of the project site. (Available from the County
Assessor.)
3. Copies of required local approvals for the proposed project, including zoning variances, use permits, etc.,
as noted on Local Agency Review Form, Appendix B. Appendix B must be completed and signed by the
local government in whose jurisdiction the project site is located.
4. Stamped envelopes addressed to each property owner and occupant of property situated within 100 feet
of the property lines of the project site (excluding roads), along with a list containing the names,
addresses and assessor's parcel numbers of same. The envelopes must be plain (i.e., no return
address), and regular business size (9 V2" x 41/8"). Include first class postage on each one. Metered
postage is not acceptable. Use Appendix C, attached, for the listing of names and addresses.
(Alternate notice provisions may be employed at the discretion of the District Director under extraordinary
circumstances.)
5. Stamped, addressed envelopes (no metered postage, please) and a list of names and addresses of all
other parties known to the applicant to be interested in the proposed development (such as persons
expressing interest at a local government hearing, etc.).
6. A vicinity or location map (copy of Thomas Bros, or other road map or USGS quad map) with the project
site clearly marked.
7. Copy(s) of project plans, drawn to scale, including site plans, floor plans, elevations, grading and drainage
plans, landscape plans, and septic system plans. Trees to be removed must be marked on the site plan.
- in-addition, a reduced site plan, 8 1/2" x 11" in size* must be'submitted. Reduced copies of complete
project plans will be required for large projects. NOTE See Instruction page for number of sets of plans
required.
8. Where septic systems are proposed, evidence of County approval or Regional Water Quality Control
Board approval. Where water wells are proposed, evidence of County review and approval.
9. A copy of any Draft or Rnal Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the project. If available, comments of all reviewing agencies and
responses to comments must be included.
10. Verification of all other permits, permissions or approvals applied for or granted by public agencies (e.g.,
Department of Fish and Game, State Lands Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast
Guard). For projects such as seawalls located on or near state tidelands or public trust lands, the Coastal
Commission must have a written determination from the State Lands Commission whether the project
would encroach onto such lands and, if so, whether the State Lands Commission has approved such
encroachment. See memo to "Applicants (or shorefront development"'dated December 13,1993.
11. For development on a bluff face, bluff top, or in any area of high geologic risk, a comprehensive, site-
specific geology and soils report (including maps) prepared in accordance with the Coastal Commission's
Interpretive Guidelines. Copies of the guidelines are available from the District Office.
SECTION V. NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
Under certain circumstances, additional material may be required prior to issuance of a coastal development
permit. For example, where offers of access or open space dedication are required, preliminary title reports,
7
land surveys, legal descriptions, subordination agreements, and other outside agreements will be required prior
to issuance of the permit.
In addition, the Commission may adopt or amend regulations affecting the issuance
of coastal development permits. If you would like notice of such proposals during
the pendency of this application, if such proposals are reasonably related to this -
application, indicate that desire 13 Yes O No
SECTION VI. COMMUNICATION WITH COMMISSIONERS
Decisions of the Coastal Commission must be made on the basis of information available to all commissioners
and the public. Therefore, permit applicants and interested parties and their representatives are advised not to
discuss with commissioners any matters relating to a permit outside the public hearing. Such contacts may
jeopardize the fairness of the hearing and result in invalidation of the Commission's decision by court. Any
written material sent to a commissioner should also be sent to the commission office for inclusion in the public
record and distribution to other Commissioners.
SECTION VII. CERTIFICATION
1 . I hereby certify that I, or my authorized representative, have completed and posted or will post the
Notice of Pending Permit card in a conspicuous place, on the property within three days of submitting
the application to the Commission office.
2. I hereby certify that I have read this completed application and that, to the best of my knowledge, the
information in this application and all attached appendices and exhibits is complete and correct. I
understand that the failure to provide any requested information or any misstatements submitted in
support of the application shall be grounds for either refusing to accept this application, for denying the
permit, for suspending or revoking a permit issued on the basis of such misrepresentations, or for
seeking of such further relief as may seem proper to the Commission.
3. I hereby authorize representatives of the California Coastal Commission to conduct site inspections on
my property. Unless arranged otherwise, these site inspections shall take place between the hours of
8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.
Signature of Authorized Agent(s) or if no agetti, signature of Applicant
NOTE: IF SIGNED ABOVE BY AGENT, APPLICANT MUST SIGN BELOW.
SECTION VIII. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
I hereby authorize Robert c. Ladwig/LADWic DESIGN GROUP, INC. to act as my representative
and to bind me in all matters concerning this application.
Signature of Applicant(s)
(Only the app/icantfs) may sign nere to authorize an agent)
8
APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPENDIX A
DECLARATION OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS
Government Code Section 84308 prohibits any Commissioner from voting on a project if he or she has received
campaign contributions in excess of $250 within the past year from project proponents or opponents, their
agents, employees or family, or any person with a financial interest in the project.
In the event of such contributions, a Commissioner must disqualify himself or herself from voting on the project.
Each applicant must declare below whether any such contributions have been made to any of the listed
Commissioners or Alternates (see last page).
CHECK ONE
The applicants, their agents, employees, family and/or any person with a financial interest
in the project have not contributed over $250 to any Commissioner(s) or Altemate(s)
within the past year.
The applicants, their agents, employees, family, and/or any person with a financial interest
in the project have contributed over $250 to the Commissioner(s) or Altemate(s) listed
below within the past year.
Commissioner or Alternate
Commissioner or Alternate
Commissioner or Alternate
( Signature of.Applicant or Authorized Agent Date
Please print your name Marcus s. Paikowitsh
APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPENDIX B
LOCAL AGENCY REVIEW FORM
SECTION A (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT)
Applicant MSP CALIFORNIA, LLC (Marcus _
Proiect DescriDtion f1^? FDGE WEST ~ A single family R-l-7500 sq.ft. minimum subdivisiorrrujeci uescnpuon I — 8.3 Ac. open-space lot - 61 SFD Int-.g w-ii-b pnt-pnt-Tal for Q onsite
af fordable^unif units and Purchase ®'f ' 1 of fsite credit for a 3 bedroom
Location South of Palomar Airport Road - East of Paspn HPT NnrfP - West of Hidden
Valley Road - Zone 20 City of Carlsbad. _
Assessor's Parcel Number 212-040-32 & 36
SECTION B (TO BE COMPLETED HY LOCAL PLANNING OR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT]
Zoning Designation R-l -l,Sbo - C?
General or Community Plan Designation Rgg,
Local Discretionary Approvals
du/ac
du/ac
Proposed development meets all zoning requirements and needs no local permits other than building
permits.
Proposed development needs local discretionary approvals noted below.
Needed Received - ••'..-••
O
a
a
B
a
D
®
a
a
o
a
D
sr
a
D
s
a
o
Design/Architectural review
Variance for
Rezone from
errTentative Subdivision/Parcel Map No.
Grading/Land Development Permit No.
Planned Residential/Commercial Development Approval
Site Plan Review ST>f ?s- °-£
Condominium Conversion Permit
Conditional, Special, or Major Use Permit No.
Other \\\l\.
CEQA Status
O Categorically Exempt
o^-^*r.~.f
Class Item
INegative Declaration Granted (Date) QcToW-
Environmental Impact Report Required, Final Report Certified (Date).
Other
bounty of by
Date Title SSo c
10
Application No...
APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPENDIX C
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WITHIN 100 FEET AND THEIR ADDRESSES
(MAKE ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS SHEET AS NECESSARY)
211-040-14
CHRISTA MCREYNOLDS
2316 CALLS CHIQUITA
LA JOLLA CA 92037
211-040-33
CARLTAS ASSOCIATES
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
#100
212-040-35 AND 48
RICHARD & ROBERT KELLY
2770 SUNNY CREEK ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
212-040-39
JAMES UKEGAWA
6145 LAUREL TREE ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
212-040-47
SIM USA INC
1400 FLAME TREE LANE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
212-040-41
PACWEST LTD
550 WEST C STREET //1750
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
214-140-07
SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS LLC
8649 FIRESTONE BLVD
DOWNEY CA 90241
214-140-13
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
11
APPENDIX D
DECLARATION OF POSTING
Prior to or at the time the application is submitted for filing, the applicant must post, at a conspicuous place,
easily read by the public and as close as possible to the site of the proposed development, notice that an
application for the proposed development has been submitted to the Commission. Such notice shall contain a
general description of the nature of the proposed development. The Commission furnishes the applicant with a
standardized form to be used for such posting. If the applicant fails to post the completed notice form and sign
the Declaration of Posting, the Executive Director of the Commission shall refuse to file the application, or shall
withdraw the application from filing if it has already been filed when he or she leams of such failure. 14 Cal.
Admin. Code Section 13054(b).
Please sign and date this Declaration of Posting form when the site is posted; it serves as proof of posting. It
should be"retumed to our office with the application.
I
Pursuant to the requirements of California Administrative Code Section 13054(b), I hereby certify
that on 4~( *T I '<^ , | or my authorized representative posted the Notice
(date or posting)
of Pending Permit for application to obtain a coastal development permit for the development of
EMERALD RIDGE WEST - 1 open-space lot - 61 single family lots - With
alternative for 9 onsite second dwelling units and purchase of 1
offsite Credit for a 3 bedroom affordable unit.
(description 01 aeveiopment)
Located at Zone 2°-- South of Palomar Airport Road - East of Paseo del
Norte - West of Hidden Valley Road - City of Carlsbad, CA --212-040-
(aaaress or aeveiopment or assessors parcel numoer)
The public notJCS was posted at the south west corner of the property.
(a conspicuous piace, easily seen oy tne puouc ana as cicse as possioie to the sne or tne proposeo aeveiopment)
(signaiure)//
(date)
2 & 36
NOTE: Your application cannot be processed until this Declaration of Posting is signed and returned to this
office.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PERMIT NUMBER
RECBVED
DECLARATION COMPLETE
12
NOTICE OF
PENDING PERMIT
A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE IS PENDING
BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION,
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: M»ALO £rp£.£.
A
~ fe.'S Ag. g>PfeU •spjfrag UaT. fel s^i^ LeTS
b.a 4 \
LOCATION: ^Q^TtV <9^ p^co^AA AiC-PortJT
iM-LLE-Y
APPLICANT:
APPLICATION NUMBER:
DATE NOTICE POSTED: 4-/4
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE PHONE OR WRITE THE OFFICE LISTED
BELOW BETWEEN 8 AM AND 5 PM, WEEKDAYS,
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST AREA OFFICE
3111 CAMINO DEL RIONORTH, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725
C619D 521-8036