Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 96-04; Brookfield Meadows; Tentative Map (CT)J^ CITY OF CARLSBAD g^ • LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION fP FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOX! [~~| Master Plan f~[ Specific Plan [~] Precise Development Plan [XJ Tentative Tract Map [X| Planned Development Permit -7 . 1 # \ /I|EJ [ | Non-Residential Planned Development |~~[ Condominium Permit | | Special Use Permit f~| Redevelopment Permit 1 1 Tentative Parool Map Obtain from Eng. Dept | | Administrative Variance | [ Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit IS) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) CT?^ £>(m"7ki v<t/ /y\ [~^\ General Plan Amendment [ [ Local Coastal Plan Amendment | [ Site Development Plan [~"| Zone Change [ | Conditional Use Permit [T| Hillside Development Permit [*X| Environmental Impact Assessment [ | Variance [ | Planned Industrial Permit [ | Coastal Development Permit [ | Planning Commission Determination | [ List any other applications not specificed (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) 96- M 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE (NORTH, SOUTH EAST, BETWEEN CORINTIA ST (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(SL 5) LOCAL FACILITIES g MANAGEMENT ZONE 8) EXISTING ZONING RD- 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL N OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE SOUTH | SIDE OF XANA WAY WEST) (NAME OF STREET) j AND ALGA ROAD (NAME OF STREET) LOT 224 & FOR. OF LOT 223 CT # 84-24 MAP NO. 11241 - 223-021-18 & 223-353-27 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN RM 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Sta) PROPOSED ZONING 10) GROSS SITE 4 ACREAGE 12) PROPOSED NUMBER ~q 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION OF LOTS ^y 1 (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL .INDUSTRIAL) 0 /A 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE .39ic RES. NOTE: A. «IOK>SED KlOJE^T aEQVmiNfc THAT MOLIWUB A?«JCATIOKS BE SUED MBST BE SUBMITIED PRIOR TO fc» ?JW, A HtQPOSED PROJECT *EQUIR»«J THAT ONtY ONE APPLICATION m IttED MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:0ft P.iVt FRM000168/90 OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM!PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20) PROJECT NAME:BROOKFIELD MEADOWS 21) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:A 29 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT. ENTER THE PROPERTY PURPOSE 22) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING/ft IIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DEEM N REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS, OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS SIGNATURE 23) OWNER 24) APPLICANT NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) EDGECREST INVESTMENTS, LTD NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) OKON DEVELOPMENT CO. MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 577 MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 577 CITY AND STATE ZIP DEL MAR, CA 92014 TELEPHONE 755-7005 CITY AND STATE ZIP DEL MAR, CA 92014 TELEPHONE 755-7005 1 CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OP IE. DATE f> I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE CEGAL OWNER'I REPRESENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST Of MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGN,DATE //,'/"7/f.T FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED HDP 1\A TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID , £>0 O . 5. 2.2-0. OO e> . £> 2 6 1898 DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. ~L~~I H PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon^the da^e^o-f-^the completion letter. Applicant Signature: Staff Signature: Date:ilufa r ' I To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: KEYSTONE LA COSTA LLC Description PRE99065 •t fM*d-«i Amount 420.00 361309/03/99000101 02 C-PRMT 420-00 Receipt Number: R0006136 Transaction Date: 09/03/1999 Pay Type Method Payment Check Description Amount 1004 420.00 Transaction Amount: 420.00 &W « -filt (M City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: KEYSTONE LA COSTA LCC Description EIA99006 Amount 267° 08/06/9? OCOi 01 02 C-PRMT 1030-00 1,030.00 Receipt Number: R0005524 Transaction Date: 08/06/1999 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 3158 1,030.00 Transaction Amount: 1,030.00 City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: OKON DEVELOPMENT CO Description /AIIIOUIIL „..— nn ,,„,. Irm ^AH M ^ Receipt Number: R0005523 Transaction Date: 08/06/1999 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 3157 1,720.00 Transaction Amount: 1,720.00 * 1720-00 CT960004 1,720.00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: BROOKFIELD MEADOWS APPLICANT NAME: OKON DEVELOPMENT CO. Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION. J R»v. 4/91 ProjOetc.frm BROOKFIELD MEADOWS PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: BROOKFIELD MEADOWS APPLICANT NAME: OKON DEVELOPMENT CO. The site of the proposed project is currently credited with entitlements for a 100 unit apartment project per Site Development Plan SDP 84-8(A), approved on January 22, 1986. SDP8(A) replaced Site Development Plan SDP 84-8, which originally allowed a 104 unit apartment project on the same site. The Master Development Plan (CT 84- 23/PUD-71/SDP 84-8), The Meadows at La Costa, incorporated the development of a 43.6 acre subdivision with 220 single-family residences, and 104 apartments on the southwestern 4.39 acres of the subdivision. The overall project originally had a density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre which was approximately in the mid-range of the general plan designation of 4-10 dwelling units per acre. As a result of the delay in resolving the required Rancho Santa Fe Road improvements, SDP 84-8(A) continued to toll and its entitlement remained active. On November 30, 1995 an application for building permit was submitted for the apartment project. Currently, construction plans are in plan check. The proposed project, Brookfield Meadows, evolved from numerous deliberations with City staff, preliminary site plan review submittals and discussions with members of the adjacent Brookfield community which constitutes the balance of the original Master Development Plan. The revised project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land use and the adjacent Brookfield community. The project consists of 29 single-family homes ranging in size between approximately 1,750 square feet to 2,125 square feet on 3,755 square foot to 9,602 square foot lots. The City's inclusionary zoning ordinance for affordable housing is satisfied by the on-site construction of five attached second dwelling units of approximately 400 square feet in size. Streets are private with sidewalks located on both sides of the streets. Required parking is provided on-site. Grading is inside the limits of the subdivision except for an off-site area of 9,900 square feet. A letter of permission to grade will be provided by the owner of the affected property. The project proposes an amendment to PUD-71 to satisfy its recreational open space requirements and density calculations as described in the table herein. The project is Phase VI of PUD-71 and an extension of the existing Brookfield community. The project also proposes to annex into the existing Brookfield Owner's Association whose common recreational facilities would be available for the project's use. Active recreational facilities are composed of a swimming pool, spa, cabana, barbecue area, and a tot lot. The passive common recreation has a barbecue area and a tot lot. 03-265-1.170(2) BROOKFIELD MEADOWS SITE DATA Site Components Area (acres)% of Total Site Building Coverage Private Streets Private Driveways Private Backyards Front and Side Yards On-Site Slopes Total 0.96 0.71 0.36 0.56 1.25 0.55 4.39 21.90 16.20 8.20 12.70 28.50 12.50 100.00 DENSITY ANALYSIS WITH PUD-71 AMENDMENT Density Calculations Brookfield - Existing Brookfield Meadows Number of Dwelling Units 220 29 Dwelling Number of Units Acres Per Acre 39.21 4.39 5.61 6.60 Total 249 43.60 5.71 RECREATION ANALYSIS WITH PUD-71 AMENDMENT Recreation Calculations (sq.ft.) Existing Brookfield Private Areas - Backyards (a) 49,500 Common Areas (b) 27,630 Brookfield Meadows 22,452 0 Total PUD-71 61,952 27,630 Required PUD-71 56,025 24,900 Notes: (a) Minimum dimensions of 15 feet x 15 feet. Brookfield shown at the minimum 225 square feet/unit. (b) Lot 136 and portions of Lot 135 and Lot 86 of Map No. 11241 Common Areas calculated at 100 square feet/unit (50% of required 200 square feet/unit). 03-265-1.170(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: BROOKFIELD MEADOWS APPLICANT NAME: OKON DEVELOPMENT CO. Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope ar.c/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION. 3 0 R.v. 4/91 ProjO.iC.lrm BROOKFIELD MEADOWS PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: BROOKFIELD MEADOWS APPLICANT NAME: OKON DEVELOPMENT CO. The site of the proposed project is currently credited with entitlements for a 100 unit apartment project per Site Development Plan SDP 84-8(A), approved on January 22, 1986. SDP84(A) replaced Site Development Plan SDP 84-8 which originally allowed a 104 unit apartment project on the same site. The Master Development Plan (CT 84- 23/PUD-71/SDP 84-8), The Meadows at La Costa, incorporated the development of a 43.6 acre subdivision with 220 single-family residences, and 104 apartments on the southwestern 4.39 acres of the subdivision. The overall project originally had a density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre which was approximately in the mid-range of the general plan designation of 4-10 dwelling units per acre. As a result of the delay in resolving the required Rancho Santa Fe Road improvements, SDP 84-8(A) continued to toll and its entitlement remained active. On November 30, 1995 an application for building permit was submitted for the apartment project. Currently, construction plans are in plan check. The proposed project, Brookfield Meadows, evolved from numerous deliberations with City staff, preliminary site plan review submittals and discussions with members of the adjacent Brookfield community which constitutes the balance of the original Master Development Plan. The revised project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding land use and the adjacent Brookfield community. The project consists of 29 single-family homes ranging in size between approximately 1,748 square feet to 2,281 square feet on 3,844 square foot to 9,602 square foot lots. The City's inclusionary zoning ordinance for affordable housing is satisfied by the on-site construction of four attached second dwelling units of approximately 393 square feet in size. Streets are private with sidewalks located on both sides of the streets. Required parking is provided on-site. Grading is inside the limits of the subdivision except for an off-site area of 9,900 square feet. A letter of permission to grade will be provided by the owner of the affected property. The project proposes an amendment to PUD-71 to satisfy its recreational open space requirements and density calculations as described in the table herein. The project is Phase VI of PUD-71 and an extension of the existing Brookfield community. The project also proposes to annex into the existing Brookfield Owner's Association whose common recreational facilities would be available for the project's use. Active recreational facilities are composed of a swimming pool, spa, cabana, barbecue area, and a tot lot. The passive common recreation has a barbecue area and a tot lot. 03-265-1.170(2) Revised 08/29/96 A06 3 0 €''T%7 f^Yr? fP*1/"'13 B I: v'ir' ti?/;-jj BROOKFIELD MEADOWS SITE DATA Site Components Area (acres)% of Total Site Building Coverage Private Streets Private Driveways Private Backyards Front and Side Yards On-Site Slopes 0.96 0.71 0.37 0.56 1.24 0.55 21.90 16.20 8.40 12.70 28.30 12.50 Total 4.39 100.00 DENSITY ANALYSIS WITH PUD-71 AMENDMENT Density Calculations Number of Dwelling Units Dwelling Number of Units Acres Per Acre Brookfield - Existing Brookfield Meadows 220 33 39.21 4.39 5.61 7.52 Total 253 43.60 5.80 RECREATION ANALYSIS WITH PUD-71 AMENDMENT Recreation Calculations (sq.ft.) Existing Brookfield Brookfield Meadows Total PUD-71 Required PUD-71 Private Areas - Backyards (a) 49,500 Common Areas (b) 27,630 22,452 0 71,952 27,630 49,800 24,900 Notes: (a) Minimum dimensions of 15 feet x 15 feet. Brookfield shown at the minimum 225 square feet/unit. (b) Lot 136 and portions of Lot 135 and Lot 86 of Map No. 11241 Common Areas calculated at 100 square feet/unit (50% of required 200 square feet/unit). 03-265-1.170 (3) Revised 08/29/96 3 0 U M V W V W H \J N*-* '—•' f ' ' * L, ,J j" J U C/ ACORD CERTIF1CME OF LIABH TM ^^PRODUCER (707)546-4810 FAX (707)544-2959 :eeney Durler West Ins. Services, LLC 2360 Professional Drive P. 0. Box 6165 i Santa Rosa, CA 95406-6165 i Attn: Ext: ; INSURED : Centerstone Development Co. ;•• 3500-B W Lake Center Drive j Santa Ana, CA 92704 : ITY 1 M Q 1 LB A NIP 1= DATE IMM/DUVY)••III IllfwUflfcni^l WL_^^•r w 12/02/1999 THIS CERTIFICATE J5 ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY Legion Indemnity Insurance A COMPANY Golden Eagle Insurance Corp B COMPANYc COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO \ TYPFnFiN«5iiRawrP ' pnnrvMiiMRcp ! POLICY EFFECTIVE i POLICY EXPIRATION ......LTRj TYPE OF INSURANCE | POLICY NUMBER | DATE (MM/DD/YY) \ DATE (MM/DD/YY) UMITS GENERAL LIABILITY j X :; COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY : i CLAIMS MADE 1 X : OCCUR : A •••< : GL1-1201957 12X OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT ; X XCU j 1 GENERAL AGGREGATE j S 1,000,000 j PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG i $ 1,000,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY j$ 1000 000 EACH OCCURRENCE :$ 1,000,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) •$ 50 000 ; MED EXP (Any one person) j $ EXCLUDED AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY j ANY AUTO i ALL OWNED AUTOS ! SCHEDULED AUTOS ! HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY i COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ; $ i i BODILY INJURY : , i i (Per person) ; *:: : : : BODILY INJURY 1 , ; (Per accident) j * i PROPERTY DAMAGE ! $ : AUTO ONLY -EA ACCIDENT $ : OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: i : EACH ACCIDENT: $ 1 ; AGGREGATE: $ 1 : EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4,000,000 A UMBRELLAFORM EL1-1201958 12/01/1999 i; 12/01/2000 ; AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM I ! $ : WORKERS COMPENSATION AND i EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY M THE PROPRIETOR/ i ; NWC42 5 G240 5' 03 i PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE ! i 1 OFFICERS ARE: ! ; EXCL : : VVL-ai/MU- . u 1 M-i X : TORY LIMITS ; ! ER i EL EACH ACCIDENT ;$ 1,000,000 /^/1999 l 03/22/2000 EL DISEASE . POLICY LIMIT ; $ 1>000,000 i EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE i $ 1,000,000 : OTHER ; DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS lertificate Holder is named as Additional Insured per attached endorsement ?E: All Operations of the named insured (Add'l Ins'd applies to GL Only) LO Day Notice of Non-Payment of Premium CERTIFICATE HOLDER < Ci ty of Carl sbad Attn: Ilene Blackburn 2071 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 ACCHtO 2S-S (1/95): CANCELLATfON SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILLRIJIQEKygftiflp MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTJEjfitfJg HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, Rmmxmmm*sW(X mTt^^m^^^m^^^vKmfm^^vfx x %RWMWP>U/^W!f^^ X X X X X X X AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIffi f/f ^^^^^ ' ^ <T^^\? ©ACQK0 CORPORATION 1988 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY PUD-71 (Amended) - Phase VI March 18, 1996 Item Guideline Minimum Standard Brookfield Meadows Results Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated less than fifteen (15) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than ten (10) feet in depth. 1 of 3 This meets the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet the minimum policy standard. Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated fifteen (15) to twenty (20) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than five (5) feet in depth. 1 of 3 n/a By meeting the design of the existing neighborhood, this design does not comply with policy guidelines 1 or 2. 3.Per project, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the total perimeter.33%0% None of the floor plans meet the forty percent (40%) single story edge. Therefore, this does not meet the minimum policy standard. 4.Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the front elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five (45) feet must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 100% 100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. * Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five feet (45) must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 0% 0% This project meets the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet this minimum policy standard. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units shall have one (1) side elevation with a seven (7) foot average side yard setback.50%100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Three-car garages are limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total units where the average lot size is five thousand (5,000) square feet or less. 75%n/a No three-car garages are proposed. 8.Fifty percent (50%) of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of two (2) inches.50%50% This meets the minimum policy standard. 03-268-1.170 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY PUD-71 (Amended) - Phase VI September 3, 1996 Item 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Guideline Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated less than fifteen (15) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than ten (10) feet in depth. Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated fifteen (15) to twenty (20) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than five (5) feet in depth. Per project, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the total perimeter. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the front elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five (45) feet must have four (4) separate building planes. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five feet (45) must have four (4) separate building planes. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units shall have one (1) side elevation with a seven (7) foot average side yard setback. Three-car garages are limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total units where the average lot size is five thousand (5,000) square feet or less. Fifty percent (50%) of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of two (2) inches. Minimum Standard 1 Of 3 1 of 3 33% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 75% 50% Brookfield Meadows 0 n/a 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 100% n/a 50% Results This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet the minimum policy standard. n/a While not meeting the minimum policy standard, the project does contain: # Units Floor Plan % Single Story 11 No. 1 30.4 % 4 No. 2 15.0% 14 No. 3 28.6 % Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet this minimum policy standard. Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. No three-car garages are proposed. This meets the minimum policy standard. Revised 9/3/96 03-268-1.170 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY PUD-71 (Amended) - Phase VI September 3, 1996 Revised January 31, 1997 Item Guideline Minimum Standard Brookfield Meadows Results Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated less than fifteen (15) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than ten (10) feet in depth. 1 of 3 This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet the minimum policy standard. Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated fifteen (15) to twenty (20) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than five (5) feet in depth. 1 Of 3 n/a n/a Per project, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the total perimeter.33%0% While not meeting the minimum policy standard, the project does contain: # Units 11 4 14 Floor Plan No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 % Single Story 30.4 % 15.0 % 28.6 % 4.Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the front elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five (45) feet must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 100% 100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five feet (45) must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 41% 71% This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood. There are 14 of 29 units or 48% that conform to this minimum policy standard. 6.Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units shall have one (1) side elevation with a seven (7) foot average side yard setback.50%100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. 7.Three-car garages are limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total units where the average lot size is five thousand (5,000) square feet or less. 75%n/a No three-car garages are proposed. 8.Fifty percent (50%) of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of two (2) inches.50% This meets the minimum policy standard. 50% Revised 1/31/96 03-268-1.170 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY PUD-71 (Amended) - Phase VI September 3, 1996 Revised January 31, 1997 Item Guideline Minimum Standard Brookfield Meadows Results Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated less than fifteen (15) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than ten (10) feet in depth. 1 of 3 This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood but does not meet the minimum policy standard. Where three (3) two-story units occur in a row and they are situated fifteen (15) to twenty (20) feet apart, at least one (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than five (5) feet in depth. 1 of 3 n/a n/a Per project, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the total perimeter.33%0% While not meeting the minimum policy standard, the project does contain: # Units 11 4 14 Floor Plan No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 % Single Story 30.4 % 15.0 % 28.6 % 4.Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the front elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five (45) feet must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 100% 100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units with a lot frontage less than forty-five (45) feet must have three (3) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Those with a lot frontage greater than forty-five feet (45) must have four (4) separate building planes. 50% 50% 41% 71% This project conforms to the design of the existing neighborhood. There are 14 of 29 units or 48% that conform to this minimum policy standard. Per project, fifty percent (50%) of all units shall have one (1) side elevation with a seven (7) foot average side yard setback.50%100% Exceeding minimum policy standard in all cases. 7.Three-car garages are limited to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total units where the average lot size is five thousand (5,000) square feet or less. 75%n/a No three-car garages are proposed. 8.Fifty percent (50%) of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of two (2) inches.50%50% This meets the minimum policy standard. Revised 1/31/96 03-268-1.170 PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME:•/ C/OMAILING ADDRESS: x«» 7.r.r PHONE NUMBER: PROJECT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) fAPNl;Z^J-- Z7 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): -f—*:•,**/1<_- ^/ WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ENGINEER? YES NO n PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT NUMBER: FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: . RECEIVED BY: 2 1 1995 'A 'ON qfi uunn nufi //39*43'//'S 2M7.74