HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-14; Mariano; Tentative Map (CT) (6)FEB-26-1999 09:34 HUNSflKER 8, flSSOCIflTES SD 6195581414 P.02/03
HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES
SAN 0 I E G O, INC.
BANNING
tNdNKRING
SURVIVING
IRVINE
LAS VEGAS
RIVERSIDE
SAN DIEGO
DAVE MAMMA*
December 15, 1998
Planning Technician
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Re: Street Name Approval for Mariano, CT 97-14
Dear Jordan:
The following are the proposed street names for the above captioned project:
Mariposa Road
Morea Road, at knuckle
Calmeria Place
Coneflower Drive
Torreyana Drive, at knuckle
Nandina Place
Goldenbush Drive
Willow Drive
Alternative Names:
Pyrus
Bassia
Gazania
Goidenfield
Enclosed you will find two (2) reduced copies of the tentative map index sheet
showing all subdivision streets (public and private).
Please advise if you have any questions, or anything further is needed.
Sincerely,
Hunsaker & Associates
San Diego, Inc.
l0179HuennekensSt,
suite 200 Diane Ingram
sar> oi«So, CA 92121 For Raymond L. Martin, Project Manager
(6191558.4500PM
(619) 558-1414 FX
lnfo8HunufccrSI7.com
FEB-26-1999 09=34 HUNSPKER & flSSOCIPTES SD 6195581414 P.03/03
TOTflL P.03
07/14/1999
07/14/99
12:42 7604380981
WED 10:07 KAX 760 BB7 OM4
HENTHORN PAGE 02
December?, 1998
Mr, Mike Shirey
Project Planner
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Subject:CT 97-14 Aviar
Dear Mr. Shirey:
North County Transit District (fTCTD) has reviewed above-referenced project and has the
following comments:
I, NCTDisnot
Plum Tree Road and Cobbl
plan provided by Robert M<
to be designed to a width 01
bike lane). This outside tra-
without impeding the flow c
per hour.
2. As a result, should transit
not be needed, such as bus I
PC Resolutions 4186, 4187
the applicant.
Thank you for providing us witi
questions, please contact me at
Sincerely,
Leslie Blanda
Manager of Planning
LB/kft
cc: Robert Morsch, Hunsak
M;TL>
N C T D
Parkway (Mariano Subdivision)
currently planing to provide transit service on Aviara Parkway between
stone Road. However, based on the Aviara Parkway striping
rsch of Hunsaker & Associates, the outside travel lane appears
twenty (20) feet including the bike lane (12' travel lane plus 8'
el lane would be sufficiently wide for buses to stop safely,
f traffic, provided that travel speeds do not exceed 45 miles
service be provided in the future, additional improvements would
jmouts. Therefore, in fulfilling Condition of Approval #14,
4189 and 4190, no bus stop facilities need to be provided by
the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any
760) 967-2852.
ir & Associates
ORTH COUNT* TBAN5IT OUTIICT
,,,„,) A,.PV,, Clc,on>ii)r. CA ° 2 D 3 4
76(1-'«/•2626
RONALD R. BALL
CITY ATTORNEY
D. RICHARD RUDOLF
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
JANE MOBALDI
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE ,
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
(760)434-2891
FAX: (760) 434-8367 \
October 20, 1998
William E. Tippets
Habitat Conservation Supervisor
California Department of Fish and Game
4949 Viewridge Avenue
San Diego, California 92123
Sheryl L. Barrett
Assistant Field Office Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2730 Loker Avenue, West
Carlsbad, California 92008
RE: HABITAT LOSS PERMIT FOR AVIARA PARKWAY
CITY OF CARLSBAD RESOLUTION NO. 98-219
Dear Mr. Tippets and Ms. Barrett:
This letter responds, on behalf of the City of Carlsbad ("City"), to your letter to Don
Rideout dated July 29, 1998, in which you state that your agencies do not concur with
issuance of a Habitat Loss Permit ("HLP") for construction of the last segment of Aviara
Parkway ("Parkway"). The City requests that you reconsider and withdraw your
objection to the HLP, so that this vital street improvement project can proceed.
Your objection is based on the premise that the City may not issue an HLP for the
Parkway segment separate from the residential subdivision known as "Mariano" or
Carlsbad Tract CT 97-14. We believe this premise is incorrect. Although construction
of this Parkway segment was a condition of City approval of CT 97-14, the right-of-way
for this street improvement was granted to the City in 1988. From the City's
perspective, the Parkway is a Circulation Element facility which is required to meet City-
wide traffic demands. Completion of the Parkway will enhance public safety and reduce
traffic congestion, especially existing and anticipated congestion on Palomar Airport
Road. The need for the road is not triggered by the subdivision, and the City intends to
pursue completion of the road as soon as possible, whether or not the subdivision is
developed.
Whether the nominal permittee under the HLP is the City or the developer of the
Mariano project (Ayres Land Company, Inc.), the City has the authority to issue the HLP
for construction of the Parkway segment under Section 4.2 of the NCCP Process
Guidelines ("Process Guidelines"), given that the appropriate findings have been made.
The City maintains that it properly made all of the findings required under the Process
Guidelines, based upon the available information and the record.
Even if the City were to consider and issue an HLP with respect to the Parkway
segment and the subdivision as one integrated project, there would be no legal basis
for your agencies to object, considering the prior environmental studies, documentation
and findings made by the City prior to approval of CT 97-14 and the fact that no other
coastal sage scrub ("CSS") habitat will be impacted by the subdivision.
As your July 29 letter acknowledges, CSS habitat will be disturbed only by construction
of the Parkway segment, not by construction of the residential subdivision. (The
subdivision includes a mere 0.6 acres of CSS habitat, and that land is being preserved
as open space.) The taking of the impacted 3.4 acres within the Parkway right-of-way
has already been fully mitigated in a 2 to 1 ratio by the purchase of 6.8 acres from the
Manchester Mitigation Bank in the City of Encinitas. The 3.4 acres within the right-of-
way has never been included in a Linkage Planning Area or otherwise suggested to be
part of a path between areas of high habitat value. Thus, the City's finding under
Section 4.2g(1)b of the Process Guidelines - that the habitat loss required to construct
the Parkway will not preclude connectivity between areas of high habitat value - is
supported and well-founded.
We wish to stress that construction of the Parkway segment is important to the City
because it completes a key connection within the City's street network and will result in
improved traffic safety and reduced congestion. The City intends to aggressively
pursue completion of the Parkway and the significant public benefits associated with it,
regardless of your agencies' position on the subdivision.
The City values its relationship with your agencies and we prefer to resolve this dispute
with a minimum of controversy, delay and expense. Therefore, we urge you to
reconsider and withdraw your objection to issuance of the HLP. We also request that
you provide your written response to us within 15 days so that we can determine
whether further action is required. We are also available to meet with you and
representatives of Ayres Land Company if that will facilitate a prompt resolution of this
matter.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
RONALD R. BALL
City Attorney
rrnh
c: City Manager
Public Works Director
Planning Director
Don Rideout
US FishWvVildlife Service
Carlsbad Field Office
2730 Loker Avenue, West
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760)431-9440
FAX (760) 431-9624
CA Dept. of Fish & Game
4949 Viewridge Avenue
San Diego, CA 92123
(619)467-4251
FAX (619) 467-423 5
July 29, 1998
Mr. Don Rideout, Senior Planner
Planning Department \
City of Carlsbad X"^L
Carlsbad, C A 92009-1576
Dear Mr. Rideout:
Response to the Habitat Loss Permit for Aviara Parkway (Ayres Land Company)
The California Department of Fish and Game (Department) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), collectively the wildlife agencies, have reviewed the draft Habitat Loss Permit
(HLP) and supporting documents for the referenced project. Aviara Parkway and CT 97-14 were
formerly one project (Mariano Project), with construction of this last segment of Aviara Parkway
a condition of approval for CT 97-14. Other aspects of the project include up to 153 single family
lots, 27 onsite apartment units, one multi-family lot, two recreation lots, one recreational vehicle
lot, and other infrastructure improvements. According to environmental information provided in
the documents, only the Aviara Parkway construction would impact coastal sage scrub
vegetation.
The Zone 20 Specific Plan that was approved by the City in 1993 analyzed each
property's development potential, without necessarily knowing the details of each property's
specific development. The Specific Plan's Environmental Impact Report was based on, at least
for CT 97-14, a general assessment of development potential. In 1997, the City issued a "Notice
of Prior Environmental Compliance" that addressed CT 97-14, including the specific elements
listed in the first paragraph. That process avoided a subsequent environmental review despite the
absence of a site-specific analysis in the Master EIR for the Zone 20 Specific Plan. The wildlife
agencies do not concur with the City's submittal of an HLP for Aviara Parkway separate from the
CT 97-14 project.
Subsequent to the City's issuance of the Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance in
1997, the project's representatives met with the wildlife agencies' biologists to finalize any
remaining issues to facilitate final project approval. Our staffs met in the fall of 1997 and on April
28, 1998. A critical issue of these discussions was how the project would provide adequate open
space connectivity to other open space areas. The April 28 meeting focused on resolving issues
tregarding the project's open space configuration, as this project's upen space will likely be
integral to a future habitat preserve that is being planned by the City in its Habitat Management
Plan (HMP), which is part of the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). During that
meeting, the participants identified a possible solution that would retain adequate open space
while providing for development that was similar to, but with somewhat fewer dwelling units,
than what the applicant had proposed. The potential solution allowed for the construction of
Aviara Parkway and was acceptable to the wildlife agencies. The consultant and applicant were
to work with the City to determine if this or a similar solution would be acceptable and then meet
again with the wildlife agencies to discuss the results. Since that meeting, there have been no
further meetings or written correspondence with the applicant or City on this project.
The completion of the final segment of Aviara Parkway is part of the CT 97-14 project. If
the City proposes to use the HLP process for the Aviara Parkway portion of CT 97-14, then its
HLP findings of conformance for the issuance of a HLP must evaluate all aspects of the project,
including how the project affects open space and habitat connectivity. As stated previously, the
currently proposed project does not propose adequate open space that is consistent with the
project site's value as part of the future habitat preserve, and we do not concur with issuances of
the HLP.
The wildlife agency staff are available to work with the applicant and City to resolve this
issue. Please contact Mr. David Lawhead (Department) at (619) 467-4211 or Ms. Julie
Vanderwier (Service) at (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
William E. Tippets Sheryl L. Barrett
Habitat Conservation Supervisor Assistant Field Office Supervisor
California Department of Fish and Game U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
cc: Ron Rempel
Gail Presley
David Lawhead
Nancy Gilbert
Julie Vanderwier
Mariano.bt
ditv of Carlsbad
July 13, 1998
Mr. Ken Burg, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Planning Department
??-/</
Mr. William Tippets
California Department of Fish & Game
4949 Viewridge Drive
San Diego, CA92123
Re: Habitat Loss Permit for Aviara Parkway (Ayres Land Company)
Dear Mr. Burg and Mr. Tippets:
On July 7, 1998, a Habitat Loss Permit was approved by the Carlsbad City Council for the
Aviara Parkway project. The subject property is located in the Southwest Quadrant of the City
of Carlsbad, as shown on the attached location map. The project will take 3.4 acres of coastal
sage scrub.
Pursuant to the 4(d) rule for the California gnatcatcher, this Habitat Loss Permit is being
transmitted to your offices for the required 30 day comment period. The comment period will
close on August 12, 1998. A copy of the staff report to the City Council and other supporting
documentation is enclosed. Supplemental materials may be provided by the property owner.
Attached for your reference is a tabulation of all coastal sage scrub losses authorized by the
City of Carlsbad since March 1993. If you have any questions regarding this project, please
feel free to contact me at 438-1161 extension 4212.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely;
Don Rideout
Applicant
Engineering Dept.
File
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 (760)438-1161