No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 97-16; Kelly Ranch; Tentative Map (CT) (2)June 29, 1999 TO: BOBBIE HODER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - GRAPHICS TRAFFIC ENGINEER RAENETTE ABBEY, BUILDING DEPARTMENT STEVE RUGGLES, STATION #3 FIRE DEPARTMENT GREG CLAVIER, COMMUNITY SERVICES LORI ALLEN, POLICE DEPARTMENT KARL VON SCHLIEDER - CIS FROM: Planning Director STREET NAMES FOR CT 97-16, KELLY RANCH The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 97-16, Kelly Ranch. A mapr delineating street locations is attached. Hemingway Drive Whitman Way Dickinson Drive Twain Avenue Steinbeck Court Clemens Court Coleridge Court Delaney Court Tolkien Way Attachment PG:eh H:\Admin\Streets4 i.r^I MEMORANDUM February 23, 1998 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer - Michael J. Shirey CT 97-16, CDP 97-43, HDP 97-17, LFMP 8(A): KELLY RANCH MTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed an initial issues review of the above-referenced project. The following issues of concern must be resolved or adequately addressed, prior to staff making a determination on the project: Engineering Issues of Concern Traffic and Transportation: 1. Please show access to Lot's 162, 165, 166-171, 173, 175 and 179. Show sight distance sight lines for these accesses in accordance with CalTrans corner sight distance criteria. 2. Show CalTrans corner sight distance sight lines for all intersections, including the lots mentioned above, on the preliminary landscape plans. 3. Please be advised, due to the 1" = 100' scale, the sight distance sight lines which are being shown on the tentative map were unable to be reviewed. At a minimum, and in accordance with above, all sight lines must meet CalTrans corner sight distance criteria. However, minimum design speeds should not always be used. If, using good engineering judgement, a street has the potential to facilitate a greater speed than the minimum design speed, then show sight distance sight lines at the greater speed. 4. Thank you for showing the gates at the proposed recreational vehicle (RV) lot. However, as previously requested, the following additional items must also be shown: • A queuing/turnaround area must be provided between the proposed gate and "AA" Street; • the cul-de-sac bulb should have tangent sections before the "curb return" radii to facilitate RV turning maneuvers; • the cul-de-sac bulb radius must be increased to a minimum of 42', per AASHTO motor home (MH) specifications; and, • also show the RV lot at a minimum 1" = 40' scale. CT 97-16: KELLY RANCUfflTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23, 1998 5. Please be advised, the street design/layout of this project is highly questionable. For example "AA" Street narrows from a 60' right of way (ROW)/40' curb to curb (CTC) to a 46' ROW/32' CTC; while "BB" Street is proposed as a continuous 60' ROW/40' CTC. The same happens for "HH" Street intersecting "C" Street. The street configuration should go from wider to narrower streets consistently, i.e. Collector Streets, to Local Streets and ultimately to Cul-de-sacs. Additionally, Area's "H, I & J" are huge cul-de-sacs that do not meet City Standards. The proposed private driveway as a means to meet the cul-de-sac standard is unacceptable. At a minimum, a full width publicly dedicated street, with sidewalks, must be used to meet the standard. Also, even if this private driveway is reconfigured into a public street, there is still a cul-de-sac standard deficiency with Area "I." Therefore, in accordance with the above, the entire street system must be reanalyzed to meet the City's Cul-de-sac standard and have a more natural street system which declines in width as the streets progres further into the project. 6. The following cul-de-sac bulbs do not look like they meet City Standards. Please verify and revise. • "BB" Street at Area "L"; • "C" Street at lot's 9-11. 7. The following intersections do not look like they meet City Standards. Please verify and revise. • "BB" Street/Faraday Avenue seems skewed; • "BB" Street/"HH" Street seems skewed; • Faraday Avenue/Cannon Road seems skewed; • "AA" Street/"BB" Street seems to need a tangent section; • "C" Street/"E" Street seems to need a tangent section; • "D" Street/'C" Street seems to need a tangent section; and, • "HH" Street west of "C" Street seems to have some reversing curves without any tangents between them. 8. "AA" Street must have sidewalk on both sides of the street for the entire length of the street. 9. Thank you for showing the potential off-site extension of proposed "C" Street. As previously requested, however, please also indicate the following: • Any development plans/potential in this area; • the topography in this area; and, • the full lot (or the developable portion of the lot with the rest of the lot shown with "cut" lines). RANcWffllCT 97-16: KELLY RANCTWlTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23,1998 10. A meandering walkway is being shown on the preliminary landscape plans, along Cannon Road. Is this what is being shown on the Cannon Road improvement plans? This type of walkway may be acceptable, but it must correspond with the Cannon Road plans. Sewer; 1. Please show a minimum 20' wide public sewer & drainage easement from the terminus of the "FF" Street right of way down the slope to the "BB" Street right of way. (This should be 20' wide because the storm drain at the terminus of "FF " Street should be placed within this easement.) (See Water & Drainage Issue Item 1.) 2. Please change the "private" sewer easement to "public" at lot's 165, 168, 169 & 170, and increase the width of the easement to a minimum width of 20' (20' is required between structures; so since no development has been proposed yet, it would be better to get the 20' width now to avoid deficiencies in the future). 3. Please indicate inlet elevations for the proposed sewer line within "C" Street, from the terminus of "C" Street to the intersection of "C" Street with "D" Street. 4. The Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) previously approved a temporary lift station and force main to provide sewer service to Kelly Ranch Village "E". Their approval, however, did not include the core area MTM. This MTM also proposes to utilize this force main to pump sewerage back to El Camino Real (ECR). This must be approved by the CMWD District Engineer and be reflected and approved in the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) amendment. Provide documentation from CMWD District Engineer, Bill Plummer (regarding CMWD requirements) and City Land Development Associate Engineer, Steve Jantz (regarding the LFMP amendment). Water & Drainage: 1. Please relocate the proposed storm drain at the terminus of "FF" Street so that it does not angle down the slope. Place this storm drain within the 20' sewer & drainage easement. (See Sewer Issue Item 1.) Additionally, since the terminus of this cul-de-sac is in a sump condition, emergency failsafe overflow measures must be indicated for the slope. 2. Please place the proposed water line at the terminus of "CC" Street, between lot's 96 & 97, within a 15' public water easement. 3. Submit a Hydrology report for the core area MTM. 4. Address National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria within the proposed RV lot. This can be accomplished by one or more of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales, directing surface run-off to a de- pollutant basin, etc. 5. Please show all weather accesses to the various proposed detention basins. RANcMlCT 97-16: KELLY RANCHWlTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23,1998 SQ//S & Grading: 1. Show the Cannon Road borrow site which is located in Area "G". Also, indicate the proposed borrow quantity (60,000 to 160,000cy) under "General Note" 11. (Reference O'Day Consultants borrow plan 333-2G.) 2. City Standards require benches in manufactured slopes which are greater than 30' in height. Therefore, please indicate benches, with appropriate drainage facilities, for the slopes at Area's "G & H", and lot's 176 & 178. Land Title & Mapping: 1. All proposed lots must have frontage on a dedicated public street. This is not being proposed for Area's "K & L." This requirement will be satisfied for Area "K" when the private drive is revised to indicate a full width publicly dedicated street. To meet this requirement for Area "L", delete the proposed property line ("blocker strip") at the "BB" Street cul-de-sac bulb. 2. Please indicate the phasing on the MTM (with phasing lines and numbers). City Code requires that the proposed lots in phase number 1 begin with number 1 and be consecutively numbered for subsequent phases. 3. Please show the location of the potential land trade in the vicinity of Cannon Road and Faraday Avenue. Define the limits and indicate the acreage's of the two areas. 4. The Land Use table, on sheet 2 of 7, indicates that the land use for lot 161 is multi- family (MF). The MTM shows this lot as the RV lot. Please explain/revise. Miscellaneous: 1. Please add the following application numbers to the tentative map: CT 97-16, CDP 97-43, HDP 97-17. 2. Please provide staff with a copy of the signed land use application(s) for the Kelly Ranch MTM property. 3. Please provide the Preliminary Title Report (PR) for the Kelly Ranch MTM property (PR 1156759-15, dated July 25, 1997). The PR should address property ownership interest for proposed Area "L"; and include a boundary map for the entire project. 4. Attached is a red-lined check print of the project for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4388. MICHAEL J. SHIREY Associate Engineer - Land Development Attachment c: Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development MEMORANDUM February 10, 1999 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer - Land Development CT 97-16, SDP 98-04: KELLY RANCH CORE AREA MTM & "D, G & H" SDP THIRD ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed a third issues review of the above-referenced project(s). The following issues of concern still must be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the project(s): Engineering Issues of Concern- Core Area Master Tentative Map Traffic and Transportation 1. The ONA preliminary landscape plans still need to show the CalTrans 330' sight distance sight lines at the Village's "D & G" proposed driveways. Additionally, Gillespie recently submitted preliminary landscape plans for Village's "I & J"; as I informed staff at Gillespie, those plans also need to show the 330' CalTrans sight distance sight lines at the various intersections, in accordance with the tentative map. Again, any landscaping that encroaches into a sight line area must be deleted and only ground cover must be shown. 2. Staff still has concern with the vertical sight distance at the "BBTHH" Street intersection. Please reanalyze this sight distance using a design speed of SOmph, not 25mph. ("BB" Street will essentially function as a Collector roadway.) Additionally, plot this sight distance on the "BB" profile on sheet 7 of 9 of the tentative map. 3. This may be an over sight, but the "BB" Street/Faraday Avenue 50' tangent is still not being measured from the prolongation of the Faraday Avenue curb line, in accordance with City Standard 3A. It is short by approximately 10'. Please revise. 4. As discussed with PDC staff at the engineering counter on approximately 2/9/99, please show the proposed access to the future city park off of "BB"' Street. 5. As recently discussed with PDC staff, please show a standard knuckle to access Area "L" Sewer & Water 1. Please show the proposed 42" storm drain in the Recreational Vehicle (RV) driveway on sheet 3 of 9 of the tentative map. CT 97-16, SDP 98-04: KEELY RANCH MTM/"D, G & H" SDP THIRD ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; FEBRUARY 10,1999 Water & Drainage 1. Again, please investigate carrying the proposed bench, along lot's 120, 121 & 153, back to the terminus of "FF" Street to facilitate emergency fail-safe overflow measures for the sump condition at the terminus of this cul-de-sac. Look at putting the bench at elevation 170' so that there is positive flow. LanATitle & Mapping 1. The applicant has previously indicated that phasing of the project will not take place, and phasing lines are now not being shown; however, the language, "Phase Boundary" is still being shown in the Legend on sheet 1 of 9. Again, as previously indicated, please delete the word "phase" and any reference to it. 2. As previously requested, in General Note No. 6 on sheet 1 of 9, please delete the second half of the sentence that states, "...except that interior side yard slopes less than 5 feet high may be 1-1/2:1." Miscellaneous 1. Section V, Public Facilities and Phasing, of the existing Kelly Ranch Master Plan (MP 174) indicates that a number of public improvements are required as Kelly Ranch develops. These improvements must be constructed, or adequately secured, in accordance with the MP (Existing MP Pg. 44). How is this going to be accomplished? The following are some of the infrastructure improvements that are required: Circulation • "Bikeway" on Park Drive (Existing MP Pg. 39) • Completion of Cannon Road to serve Area's "D-J" (Existing MP Pg. 45 & 57) • Park Drive from Area "A" to Kelly Drive (Existing MP Pg.'s 46 & 56) • Street's "D & E" (comparative "Core Area" on-site street system) (Existing MP Pg. 46) • Portions of Faraday Avenue to serve the "Core Area" (Required to meet the Cul-de-sac Standard for the "Core Area") • Traffic Signal(s) (Existing MP Pg. 58) Water and Sewer • Water Facilities/Reservoir and CMWD Agreement (Existing MP Pg. 49 & 58) • Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer in Cannon Road (Existing MP Pg. 50) Flood Control • Reinforced Concrete Box at Kelly and Park Drives (Existing MP Pg. 53) The applicant's response to these issues was "done." Staff realizes that these issues were discussed at various meetings, and many have been resolved; but, "done" is still not an adequate response. Please provide a written response to how these issues are going to be resolved. CT 97-16, SDP 98-04: KELLY RANCH MTM/"D, G & H" SDP THIRD ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; FEBRUARY 10, 1999 Engineering Issues of Concern - Village's "D, G & H" SDP Sewer & Water 1. Thank you for adding the notes and clarifying the proposed and future sewer facilities. There is a mistake, however, in Note #3 on sheet 7 of 9. Please change the beginning of the sentence to, "Construct sewer line C...," not, "Construct sewer line D..." Mapping & Land Title 1. As previously requested, in General Note No. 8, please delete the second half of the sentence that states, "...except that interior side yard slopes less than 5 feet high may be 1-172:1." 2. The applicant has previously indicated that phasing of the project will not take place, and phasing lines are now not being shown; however, the language, "Phase Boundary" is still being shown in the Legend on sheet 1 of 9. Again, as previously indicated, please delete the word "phase" and any reference to it. Miscellaneous 1. Red-lined check prints are not being returned with this review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4388. MICHAEL J. SHIREY Associate Engineer - Land Development c: Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development Berryman and Hennigar-J. Fulton MEMORANDUM December 2, 1998 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer - Michael J. Shirey CT 97-16, CDP 97-43, HDP 97-17, LFMP 8(A): KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed a second issues review of the above-referenced project. The following issues of concern still must be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the project: | Engineering Issues of Concern. > *"':' ', --.;" '',. % v /• .[••[ ^ .' *•.,'-"'*~~ Traffic and Transportation 1. Staff previously requested that the applicant show CalTrans corner sight distance sight lines for all intersections on the preliminary landscape plans. The applicant has only shown the 25' Sight Triangle City Standard criteria. CalTrans corner sight distance sight lines still must be shown. Additionally, due to the substantial curvature of the proposed streets, any landscaping that encroaches into a sight line area must be deleted and only ground cover must be shown. (See September 24, 1998, SDP 98-04, Kelly Ranch Villages "D, G & H" Second Issues Review italicized below.) 2. As previously requested, and in accordance with Item No. 2 above, please show CalTrans corner sight distance sight lines at all of the proposed intersections on the tentative map. (See September 24, 1998, SDP 98-04, Kelly Ranch Villages "D, G & H" Second Issues Review italicized below.) Thank you for showing the CalTrans Corner Sight Distance sight lines for the intersections of "CC" & "O" Streets with "86" Street, and "DO" & "T" Streets with "AA" Street. A minimum sight distance of 330' was utilized, and in some instances, this minimum was reduced to 275'. As we discussed at our Tuesday, September 1, 1998, meeting with staff from PDC Engineering, the developer and City planning and engineering staff, sight distance is a major concern with the City (especially at intersection which are located on the inside of curves). Therefore, at a minimum, 330' of clear sight distance must be obtained at the above-referenced intersections. Please be advised, due to safety concerns, this is the minimum requirement. These sight lines were shown on the Landscape Concept Plan (LCP), as requested. However, the sight lines are being shown as going through a number of trees/vegetation, and a note has been placed on the plan which states that the "plant materials...will comply with the Carlsbad Landscape Technical Manual." As we discussed in the meeting, this note is unacceptable. The Carlsbad Landscape Manual does not discuss sight distance requirements to the extent that is required for a project. CT 97-16: KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; DECEMBER 2,1998 This manual is for identifying plant species, plant layout, etc., for landscaping purposes. We had discussed that a note referencing maximum vegetation and minimum canopy heights would be placed on the plans. After reviewing the plans, however, this determination has been revised. Basically, due to the street design being proposed, no vegetation other than ground cover (i.e., grass) will be permitted within these sight distance sight zones. The sight lines must be clear...investigate "flattening" the horizontal curves in proposed "AA" Street. (This also should help with meeting the sight distance requirements.) 3. Thank you for showing the gates at the proposed recreational vehicle (RV) lot. Staff has made the determination that a full queuing/turnaround area does not have to be provided. However, 30' (AASHTO RV minimum) must be provided between the back of the sidewalk along "AA" Street and the proposed gate so that RV's do not encroach into the sidewalk or "AA" Street when accessing the lot while waiting for the gate to open. 4. As previously indicated, the street design/layout for this proposed project is highly questionable. The applicant has stated that the proposed street's narrow along various segments because of sensitive habitat located in these areas. Narrowing segments of the various streets is potentially acceptable, as long as, all of the proposed streets meet City Standards (i.e., 32' minimum width with sidewalks on one side for single loaded streets, and 36' minimum width with sidewalks on both sides for double loaded streets). Additionally, also as previously indicated, Area's "I & J" are huge cul-de-sacs; and, the proposed 30' private driveway as a means to meet the cul-de-sac standard is unacceptable. The applicant has stated that this 30' driveway meets Hillside Street Standards. This is incorrect. City Standard GS-1A indicates that the minimum widths for a single loaded hillside street is 32', with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Therefore, at a minimum, a publicly dedicated hillside street meeting the GS-1A Standard is what will be required. Also, even if this private driveway is reconfigured into a public street, there still may be a cul-de-sac standard deficiency with Area "I." Possibly connect "CC" Street to this hillside street at Area "L" to mitigate any deficiencies. 5. Thank you for deleting what appeared to be a "blocker strip" at the proposed cul-de- sac at Area "L." It seems, however, that the wrong line was deleted. The proposed cul-de-sac public right of way line was deleted and this still must be shown. It is still somewhat confusing how the Area "L" frontage property and phasing line is being treated. Revise as necessary to clearly delineate the property and phasing line. 6. As previously requested, please indicate the following for the potential off-site extension of proposed "C" Street: • Any development potential in this area; • the topography in this area; and, • the full lot (or the developable portion of the lot with the rest of the lot shown with "cut" lines). CT 97-16: KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; DECEMBER 2,1998 7. As previously indicated, the following intersections do not meet City Standards. Please verify and revise. • "BB" Street/Faraday Avenue incorrect tangents; • "AA" StreetTBB" Street incorrect tangents; • "HH" Street/'CC" Street incorrect tangents; • "C" Street/'E" Street incorrect tangents; • "D" StreetTC" Street incorrect tangents; and, • "HH" Street west of "C" Street needs tangents between the reversing curves. In accordance with City Standard 3A, tangent lengths are measured from the prolongation of the curb lines, not from the centerline of the intersections. 8. Show that CalTrans vertical sight distance can be met for "AA, BB, CC, and HH" Streets, on TM profile sheet's 6 & 7 of 7. Additionally, revise the vertical curve information for "AA" Street so that it is legible. Sewer & Water 1. Please be advised, staff received a copy of a letter to Mr. Jim Kilgore of Project Design Consultants, dated August 27, 1998, from CMWD, Associate Engineer, Randy Klaahsen, regarding the capacity for the temporary sewer facilities for Kelly Ranch. Based on this information, only 16 more dwelling units will be able to be served by these temporary sewer facilities after Kelly Ranch Village "E" and the Area "D & G" apartments are served. Therefore, depending on the timing of the proposed remaining developments within Kelly Ranch, potential lack of sewer availability may become a major issue. 2. The following italicized issue is from the September 24, 1998, SDP 98-04, Kelly Ranch Villages "D, G & H" Second Issues Review and is regarding the proposed sewer lines below the slopes along the RV Lot. This is being provided for coordination purposes: We discussed that the sewer line is located under the slope, at our September 1, 1998, meeting, so that it can gravity drain to the temporary pump station. There are still two outstanding issues regarding this design, however. First, CMWD must approve the physical design. The letter that was submitted by CMWD, Associate Engineer, Randy Klaahsen only approves the capacity of the interim sewer facilities for this proposed project. It does not approve the design. Therefore, this design still must be approved by CMWD. Second the pump station has been labeled as temporary, but the sewer lines have not been addressed. And, the proposed sewer in "AA" Street does not connect with anything in Cannon Road. As previously requested, please address/label exactly what is happening with the sewer facilities for this proposed project, both interim and ultimate. CT 97-16: KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; DECEMBER 2,1998 Water & Drainage 1. Please investigate carrying the proposed bench, along lot's 120, 121 & 153, back to the terminus of "FF" Street to facilitate emergency fail-safe overflow measures, for the sump condition at the terminus of this cul-de-sac. 2. Thank you for submitting a Preliminary Drainage Report for the core area MTM. The applicant's response to issues indicates that the proposed detention basin located east of lot's 14 & 15 in Area "J" has been deleted. The Preliminary Drainage Report indicates that this detention basin will be installed. Additionally, when the basin was proposed within the report, the only facility discharging into it was a proposed 18" storm drain. Now a brow ditch is also proposed to out-fall in this area. Therefore, additional concentrated surface run-off is being proposed to be discharged into this natural drainage coarse, and the basin to reduce the velocities has been deleted. What effect does deleting the basin and increasing the surface discharge have on this drainage coarse? No velocity attenuation devices or access is being proposed at this discharge point. Please review and revise as necessary. 3. Thank you for addressing access concerns regarding the basins at Area "F" and north of the RV Lot. Access to the existing basin within Area F is acceptable, in accordance with the Agua Hedionda Nature Center Site Plan (SDP 98-15). However, a discrepancy exits regarding access to the proposed basin north of the RV Lot. The applicant has stated that access to this basin is from Cannon Road. Access is being shown, however, from the terminus of the RV Lot cul-de-sac. Access from the end of the cul-de-sac is acceptable; access from Cannon Road is not. Also, please widen the proposed access to a minimum of 14'; label it as A/C access, and provide a turn-around at the end of the access drive sufficient to accommodate work trucks. Land Title & Mapping 1. As previously indicated, all proposed lots must have frontage on a dedicated public street. This is still not being shown at Area "K" (Lot 176). This requirement will be satisfied for Area "K" when the private drive is revised to indicate a full width publicly dedicated street, in accordance with Traffic and Transportation Item No. 4 above. 2. The applicant has indicated that phasing of the project will not take place. However, phasing lines are still being shown on the MTM. Please remove the "phasing lines" or rename the phasing lines within the Legend as "area designation lines" (or something other than "Phase Boundary"). 3. In General Note No. 6, please delete the second half of the sentence, that states, "...except that interior side yard slopes less than 5 feet high may be 1-1/2:1." CT 97-16: KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; DECEMBER 2,1998 Miscellaneous 1. Thank you for providing an updated Preliminary Title Report (PR) for the Kelly Ranch MTM property. As previously requested, the PR should address property ownership interest for proposed Area "L," and include a boundary map for the entire project. 2. The owner/Subdivider must sign the latest version of the MTM. 3. Section V, Public Facilities and Phasing, of the existing Kelly Ranch Master Plan (MP 174) indicates that a number of public improvements are required as Kelly Ranch develops. These improvements must be constructed, or adequately secured, in accordance with the MP (Existing MP Pg. 44). How is this going to be accomplished? The following are some of the infrastructure improvements that are required: Circulation • "Bikeway" on Park Drive (Existing MP Pg. 39) • Completion of Cannon Road to serve Area's "D-J" (Existing MP Pg. 45 & 57) • Park Drive from Area "A" to Kelly Drive (Existing MP Pg.'s 46 & 56) • Street's "D & E" (comparative "Core Area" on-site street system) (Existing MP Pg. 46) • Portions of Faraday Avenue to serve the "Core Area" (Required to meet the Cul-de-sac Standard for the "Core Area") • Traffic Signal(s) (Existing MP Pg. 58) • Please be advised, that this entire project functions as one large cul-de-sac without Cannon Road being constructed to it's full width, or having a secondary access constructed (e.g., Cannon Road to Lego Drive or Faraday Avenue to match existing Faraday Avenue). Please be advised, it will be incumbent upon this project to complete these roadway connections, if they are not already completed by others within or out of Kelly Ranch. (Comment from September 24, 1998, SDP 98-04, Kelly Ranch Villages "D, G & H" Second Issues Review provided for informational purposes) Water and Sewer • Water Facilities/Reservoir and CMWD Agreement (Existing MP Pg. 49 & 58) • Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer in Cannon Road (Existing MP Pg. 50) Flood Control • Reinforced Concrete Box at Kelly and Park Drives (Existing MP Pg. 53) 4. Please be advised, Associate Engineer, Steve Jantz, is reviewing the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) amendment. Comments will be forwarded to you under separate cover. CT 97-16: KELLY RANCH MTM SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; DECEMBER 2,1998 5. The following is a list of the Standards modifications (variances) that are being proposed with the current design: • CalTrans sight distance reduction from 330' minimum to 275'. • Proposed 30' private driveway must meet public Hillside Street Standard of 32' minimum width with curb, gutter and sidewalk. • Incorrect tangents on a number of streets (see Traffic and Transportation Item No. 6 above). • Basin east of lot's 14 & 15 deleted and no velocity attenuation or access to storm drain out-fall being proposed. • Lot 176 (Area "K") does not front a public street. • Some interior slopes proposed at 1-1/2:1 gradient, instead of 2:1 Standard. Please be advised, staff cannot support these proposed Standard's modifications. 6. Since many of the issues were not resolved, I am returning the first issues review red-lined check print. The green check marks mean that the issue was resolved. The red X's mean that it wasn't. Additionally, I've attached the Landscape Concept Plan and MTM second check, sheet's 6 and 7 of 7. These check prints must be returned with the project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4388. MICHAEL J. SHIREY Associate Engineer - Land Development Attachment c: Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development Associate Engineer - S. Jantz x "]\ —*• ':« 11/19/98 13:35 O 431 1601 CARLSBAD MWD ' il002/002 Carlsbad Municipal Water District 5950 El Carnlno Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008-8893 Engineering: (760) 438-3367 Administration: (760) 438-2722 November 19, 1998 FM. 4Z].]6Q] Project Design Consultants Sandra Maule, Design Engineer 701 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego. CA 92101 Dear Sandra: SUBJECT: Kelly Ranch Temporary Sewer Lines The District reviewed your letter dated November 17, 1998 regarding the sewer service for Villages D, F, O.andH. We concur with the sewer design plan presented. There is an item \vewould like to mention. The maximum sewer rim elevation can not be below elevation 22.0. On the plan presented, it did not appear that there vert elevations lower than this, but keep ft in mind. THs elevation is the fail cafe deration to get sewer to flow to the North Agua Hedionda basin if there is a temporary sewer lift station problem. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at (760)438^367. Sincerely. J(CLy^L RaixfyKlaahsen Associate Cfvil Engineer "Serving Carlsbad for over 40 years" •: ••••;;&?' I > Project Design Consultants I' I. A N N I N c; I- N G I N I: K K I N G S II K V K Y I N C 22 Years of Excellence, 1976-1998 File: 1224.80 November 17,1998 Mr. Randy Klaahsen CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Temporary Sewer Lines on Kelly Ranch Dear Randy, During the second review of Kelly Ranch Villages "D, G and H" (SDP 98-04), Mike Shirey, of the City of Carlsbad, requested CMWD approval of the temporary sewer lines from *AA' Street to the temporary pump station. These temporary sewer lines will service the Kelly Ranch Core Area until the permanent pump station is built to the southwest of Kelly Ranch. To service Village T', we propose to use the sewer system shown on the Cannon Road Utility Plans (88-602 and 92-406) to Station 84+20. At this manhole we start a temporary sewer line connecting to the manhole at Station 2+55.55 on 'AA'Street From this manhole the temporary sewer line services all of the Kelly Ranch Core Area. The line follows the centerline of the RV parking and then cuts over to run along the east side of Cannon Road to the temporary pump station. See the attached plan for the details. We understand that there is a sewer capacity issue and that the entire Kelly Ranch Core Area might not be able to receive service from the temporary pump station. The approval we are requesting regarding the temporary sewer lines is for horizontal and vertical design only, not capacity. Please review the design of the temporary sewer system. If you have any questions or need to make any changes, please call me. If this system meets your approval, please respond with a letter. Sincerely, Sandra Maule, PE Design Engineer LET/1224JTSL.DOC 701 San Diego 619-235-6471 /tjX R«rded B Street California FAX 234-0349 '*' P>P" Suite 800 92101 Emailconsults@projcctdesign.com November 4, 1998 TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR VIA: ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: Associate Planner RE: PENDING KELLY RANCH APPLICATIONS Following are the currently pending applications for the KELLY RANCH and a summary of their status. LFMP 8(A) and Finance Plan Issues have been resolved. A letter has been submitted by the Kelly Land Company requesting Council authorization to go ahead with the amendment without the signature of Kirgis. Possibly Planning Commission in December and Council in January. Kelly Ranch Core Area GPA 9707 / ZC 9707 LCPA 9709 / LFMP 8(A) CT 9716 / HDP 9717 / CDP 97437 SDP 98-04/EIR 98-05 PUD 98-04/MP 174(B) The draft EIR was completed and has been circulated for public review. All of the associated applications have been initially reviewed. A more complete review of the applications will be conducted with reference to the findings of the EIR. Issues resolution and then on to Planning Commission and City Council. We have been targeting Batch #2 in May 1999 for the Coastal Program Amendment which means Council in April/May. Kelly Ranch Village A LCPA 9714/CT 9725 ZC 9709 An EIR is being prepared. Issues resolution to follow circulation of the EIR. November 2, 1998 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, CHRISTER WESTMAN From: Park Development Coordinator KELLY RANCH: COMMENTS FROM RECREATION DEPARTMENT Our comments on the latest submittal from Kelly Ranch (Project Design Consultants;8/31/98) remain the same as previous comments sent to you in the past (refer to attached correspondence). I have not heard anything from Kelly Ranch since my correspondance. Additionally, the "Landscape Concept Plan" (sht. 1 of 5) needs to be revised as follows: Any slopes (natural or man-made) within the City's future park site shall not be planted with "Coastal Sage Scrub or Chaparral" mix. Slopes shall be planted with non-native plant species to be approved by the Recreation Department. Mark Steyaert attachments c: Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey June 22, 1998 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER From: Park Development Coordinator KELLY RANCH / VETERAN'S MEMORIAL PARK The Community Services Department has several concerns on the Kelly Ranch Project (specifically "Areas D, G, and H"). 1. "BB Street" encroaches within the park property, if this alignment is to be approved, the applicant must work out a land swap to the satisfaction of the Community Services Dept. or pay us for the land. 2. The applicant must provide us with a conceptual design for how access will be gained to the park off of "BB Street". I sent a letter to Pam Whitcomb of Kelly Ranch on 3/31/98 expressing these concerns (cc:s to you and Mike Shirey). I never received a response. These issues should be resolved prior to project approval. Mark Steyaert c: Recreation and Park Planning Manager Associate Civil Engineer, Mike Shirey of Carlsbad March 31, 1998 Pam Whitcomb KELLY RANCH 2011 Palomar Airport Rd., suite 206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 LAND DEED SWAP Kelly Ranch I Veteran's Memorial Park In your 2/25/98 letter to me, you requested a hearing before the Parks and Recreation Commission as soon as possible. Although we are interested in the land swap concept, there are some issues to work out and additional information needed prior to bringing this before the Commission. 1. Preliminary Site Design: We need to know the preliminary planning concepts for the project immediately adjacent to "BB Street". The reason is that we may need to access the future park site from BB Street. 2. Revised Exhibit: A portion of the land we would be receiving in the swap is undevelopable slopes with habitat on them. We will require the entire swap to be essentially flat, developable land. I will need this information by April 8, 1998 in order to meet the April 20th P&R Commission meeting (or 5/6 for the 5/18 meeting). I would be happy to meet with you to go over any questions you might have. Mark Steyaert Park Development Coordinator c Recreation and Park Planning Manager Principal Engineer, Bob Wojcik Associate Engineer, Mike Shirey Associate Planner, Christer Westman 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive • CarKbad, CA 92008-1989 • (619) 434-2825 • FAX (619) 434-7186 KELLY RANCH February 25, 1998 MarkSteyaert City of Carlsbad Parks & Recreation Department 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Kelly Ranch - Grant Deed Swap Dear Mark: Thank you for meeting with me and Dave Ragland on-site to discuss the proposed land swap proposal. As you requested, I have enclosed a 40' scale plan of the proposed swap. As the plan indicates, the swap is an even 1.08 acre swap. The benefit to the City is that it gains usable land, given that the R.O.W. and intersection spacing requirements would take up a good portion of the City's existing property. Kelly Land Company would benefit as it would provide us with the ability to dedicate the R.O.W. (Street "BB") and not have to approach the City for the R.O.W. dedication process. Kelly Land Company requests a hearing before the Parks Commission as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact me at 931-1190, ext. Ill, should you have any additional questions. I look forward to hearing from you on a date for the Parks Commission hearing. Sincerely, Community Services Manager cc: Bob Wojcik w/enclosures Dave Ragland Larry Clemens 201 I PAIOUAK AIKPIIRI ROAII. Sinn- 206. CARLSBAD. CA 92009 • TH : |619) 931-1 190 • FAX: |&19] 931-7950 October 21, 1998 To: City Manager City Attorney Public Works Director Administrative Services Director Community Development Director Finance Director From: Assistant City Engineer KELLY RANCH REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CANNON ROAD Attached is a copy of the draft Kelly Ranch reimbursement agreement for Reach 2 of Cannon Road West. Highlighted within the agreement are the latest revisions dealing with the issues of permitting delays and State and Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP) funding. The new wording proposed in Section 2(e) on page 5 of the agreement should resolve the matter of permitting delays. Chris Neils, the attorney for Kelly Land Company, has tentative agreed to the new language subject to Larry Clemens' approval. The matter of the SLTPP funding is a bit more problematic. Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the City guarantees that Kelly Land Company will be reimbursed within three years of project completion. Two million dollars of the Cannon Road West funding (including Reaches 1 & 2) derives from SLTPP funds. Eligibility for receipt of the SLTTP funds is contingent upon award of the contracts for all segments of Cannon Road West by June 30, 1999. Our initial proposal was to make 2 million dollars of Kelly's reimbursement contingent upon meeting the SLTPP deadlines. If Kelly missed the deadline, they would take the loss. Of course, Kelly took exception to that proposal. They countered with a proposal that linked contract award to City approval of the final map for the Kelly Ranch Master Tentative Map. Nothing within their proposal linked their performance in regard to SLTPP compliance, or lack thereof, to receipt of SLTPP funds. In response to their last proposal, I crafted a compromise provision which blends the two proposals. Under the new proposal, Kelly's award of the construction contract within SLTPP time limits is linked to our ability to get the map finaled by June 30, 1999. If we are successful and Kelly fails to award as promised, they accept the loss. If we fail the get the map finaled by June 30,1999, the City must find a new source of funds to cover Kelly's reimbursement costs. Both sides would agree to expeditiously process the tentative and final map and to not unreasonably withhold approvals or delay the processing. This issue needs consideration by the leadership team as it involves a significant financial risk to the City. Once this issue is resolved, I will be in a position to bring forward the reimbursement agreement for Council approval. David Hauser Assistant City Engineer c Chris Neils MEMORANDUM February 23, 1998 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer - Michael J. Shirey CT 97-16, CDP 97-43, HDP 97-17, LFMP 8(A): KELLY RANCH MTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed an initial issues review of the above-referenced project. The following issues of concern must be resolved or adequately addressed, prior to staff making a determination on the project: Engineering Issues of Concern Traffic and Transportation: 1. Please show access to Lot's 162, 165, 166-171, 173, 175 and 179. Show sight distance sight lines for these accesses in accordance with CalTrans corner sight distance criteria. 2. Show CalTrans corner sight distance sight lines for all intersections, including the lots mentioned above, on the preliminary landscape plans. 3. Please be advised, due to the 1" = 100' scale, the sight distance sight lines which are being shown on the tentative map were unable to be reviewed. At a minimum, and in accordance with above, all sight lines must meet CalTrans corner sight distance criteria. However, minimum design speeds should not always be used. If, using good engineering judgement, a street has the potential to facilitate a greater speed than the minimum design speed, then show sight distance sight lines at the greater speed. 4. Thank you for showing the gates at the proposed recreational vehicle (RV) lot. However, as previously requested, the following additional items must also be shown: • A queuing/turnaround area must be provided between the proposed gate and "AA" Street; , • the cul-de-sac bulb should have tangent sections before the "curb return" radii to facilitate RV turning maneuvers; • the cul-de-sac bulb radius must be increased to a minimum of 42', per AASHTO motor home (MH) specifications; and, • also show the RV lot at a minimum 1" = 40' scale. CT 97-16: KELLY INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23,1998 5. Please be advised, the street design/layout of this project is highly questionable. For example "AA" Street narrows from a 60' right of way (ROW)/40' curb to curb (CTC) to a 46' ROW/32' CTC; while "BB" Street is proposed as a continuous 60' ROW/40' CTC. The same happens for "HH" Street intersecting "C" Street. The street configuration should go from wider to narrower streets consistently, i.e. Collector Streets, to Local Streets and ultimately to Cul-de-sacs. Additionally, Area's "H, I & J" are huge cul-de-sacs that do not meet City Standards. The proposed private driveway as a means to meet the cul-de-sac standard is unacceptable. At a minimum, a full width publicly dedicated street, with sidewalks, must be used to meet the standard. Also, even if this private driveway is reconfigured into a public street, there is still a cul-de-sac standard deficiency with Area "I." Therefore, in accordance with the above, the entire street system must be reanalyzed to meet the City's Cul-de-sac standard and have a more natural street system which declines in width as the streets progres further into the project. 6. The following cul-de-sac bulbs do not look like they meet City Standards. Please verify and revise. • "BB" Street at Area "L"; • "C" Street at lot's 9-11. 7. The following intersections do not look like they meet City Standards. Please verify and revise. • "BB" Street/Faraday Avenue seems skewed; • "BB" Street/"HH" Street seems skewed; • Faraday Avenue/Cannon Road seems skewed; • "AA" Street/"BB" Street seems to need a tangent section; • "C" StreetTE" Street seems to need a tangent section; • "D" Street/"C" Street seems to need a tangent section; and, • "HH" Street west of "C" Street seems to have some reversing curves without any tangents between them. 8. "AA" Street must have sidewalk on both sides of the street for the entire length of the street. 9. Thank you for showing the potential off-site extension of proposed "C" Street. As previously requested, however, please also indicate the following: • Any development plans/potential in this area; • the topography in this area; and, • the full lot (or the developable portion of the lot with the rest of the lot shown with "cut" lines). CT 97-16: KELLY RANCmRTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23, 1998 10. A meandering walkway is being shown on the preliminary landscape plans, along Cannon Road. Is this what is being shown on the Cannon Road improvement plans? This type of walkway may be acceptable, but it must correspond with the Cannon Road plans. Sewer 1. Please show a minimum 20' wide public sewer & drainage easement from the terminus of the "FF" Street right of way down the slope to the "BB" Street right of way. (This should be 20' wide because the storm drain at the terminus of "FF " Street should be placed within this easement.) (See Water & Drainage Issue Item 1.) 2. Please change the "private" sewer easement to "public" at lot's 165, 168, 169 & 170, and increase the width of the easement to a minimum width of 20' (20' is required between structures; so since no development has been proposed yet, it would be better to get the 20' width now to avoid deficiencies in the future). 3. Please indicate inlet elevations for the proposed sewer line within "C" Street, from the terminus of "C" Street to the intersection of "C" Street with "D" Street. 4. The Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) previously approved a temporary lift station and force main to provide sewer service to Kelly Ranch Village "E". Their approval, however, did not include the core area MTM. This MTM also proposes to utilize this force main to pump sewerage back to El Camino Real (ECR). This must be approved by the CMWD District Engineer and be reflected and approved in the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) amendment. Provide documentation from CMWD District Engineer, Bill Plummer (regarding CMWD requirements) and City Land Development Associate Engineer, Steve Jantz (regarding the LFMP amendment). Water & Drainage: 1. Please relocate the proposed storm drain at the terminus of "FF" Street so that it does not angle down the slope. Place this storm drain within the 20' sewer & drainage easement. (See Sewer Issue Item 1.) Additionally, since the terminus of this cul-de-sac is in a sump condition, emergency failsafe overflow measures must be indicated for the slope. 2. Please place the proposed water line at the terminus of "CC" Street, between lot's 96 & 97, within a 15' public water easement. 3. Submit a Hydrology report for the core area MTM. 4. Address National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria within the proposed RV lot. This can be accomplished by one or more of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales, directing surface run-off to a de- pollutant basin, etc. 5. Please show all weather accesses to the various proposed detention basins. CT 97-16: KELLY RANCmiTM INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO, FEBRUARY 23,1998 Soils & Grading: 1. Show the Cannon Road borrow site which is located in Area "G". Also, indicate the proposed borrow quantity (60,000 to 160,000cy) under "General Note" 11. (Reference O'Day Consultants borrow plan 333-2G.) 2. City Standards require benches in manufactured slopes which are greater than 30' in height. Therefore, please indicate benches, with appropriate drainage facilities, for the slopes at Area's "G & H", and lot's 176 & 178. Land Title & Mapping: 1. All proposed lots must have frontage on a dedicated public street. This is not being proposed for Area's "K & L." This requirement will be satisfied for Area "K" when the private drive is revised to indicate a full width publicly dedicated street. To meet this requirement for Area "L", delete the proposed property line ("blocker strip") at the "BB" Street cul-de-sac bulb. 2. Please indicate the phasing on the MTM (with phasing lines and numbers). City Code requires that the proposed lots in phase number 1 begin with number 1 and be consecutively numbered for subsequent phases. 3. Please show the location of the potential land trade in the vicinity of Cannon Road and Faraday Avenue. Define the limits and indicate the acreage's of the two areas. 4. The Land Use table, on sheet 2 of 7, indicates that the land use for lot 161 is multi- family (MF). The MTM shows this lot as the RV lot. Please explain/revise. Miscellaneous: 1. Please add the following application numbers to the tentative map: CT 97-16, CDP 97-43, HDP 97-17. 2. Please provide staff with a copy of the signed land use application(s) for the Kelly Ranch MTM property. 3. Please provide the Preliminary Title Report (PR) for the Kelly Ranch MTM property (PR 1156759-15, dated July 25, 1997). The PR should address property ownership interest for proposed Area "L"; and include a boundary map for the entire project. 4. Attached is a red-lined check print of the project for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4388. ^ MICHAEL JfSHIF Associate Engineer •£ Land Development Attachment c: Principal Civil Engineer- Land Development MEMORANDUM Novembers, 1997 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER - CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer - Michael J. Shirey CT 97-16/LFMP 8(A): KELLY RANCH MTM/LFMP 8(A) AMENDMENT COMPLETENESS REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness and have determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are incomplete and unsuitable for continued review, due to the following incomplete items: Engineering Completeness Items 1. As part of the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) amendment submittal package, the actual amended document should have been submitted for staff review. Therefore, please submit an amended document utilizing strike-out/shading format (or some other applicable designation) showing the proposed revisions to the original Zone 8 LFMP. All revisions must be based on applicable studies/reports. If any section of the current LFMP is not being revised, submit a valid explanation why the section does not need revision. 2. On the master tentative map (MTM), please show the distance between all intersections. 3. On the MTM, at the proposed recreational vehicle storage lot, please show any proposed gates and fencing. Additionally, a turnaround area must be provided between any proposed gate and "AA" Street. 4. Please show an off-site feasible extension of proposed "C" Street, and indicate any development plans/potential in this area. Show a minimum of 200' beyond the property line to demonstrate the feasibility of a future street extension. 5. Please clearly show and label the 100 year flood line for pre and post development along Cannon Road and at any village which is within or adjacent to a Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) flood plain. If you have any questions^piease call me at telephone 438-1161, extension 4388. MICHAEL J. SHIRE Associate Engineer - Land Development c: Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development arisbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008 (619) 729-9291 • FAX (619)729-9685 ...a world class district March 27, 1997 State of California Department of Real Estate 107 South Broadway, Room 7111 Los Angeles, Ca. 90012 Re: Project Name: Kelly Ranch Developer: Kelly Land Company Location: A.P.N. #207-010-12 Carlsbad Unified School District has reviewed the above project and its impact on school attendance areas in this District. At this time, the schools of attendance for this project are: Kelly Elementary School (K-6) 4885 Kelly Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 (619) 434-0627 Valley Junior High School (7-8) 1645 Magnolia Avenue Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 (619) 434-0602 Carlsbad High School (9-12) 3557 Monroe Street Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 (619) 434-1726 The Governing Board wishes to advise the Department of Real Estate and residents of Carlsbad that at present the Carlsbad Unified School District elementary schools are operating at full capacity. It is possible, therefore, that the students generated from this project may not attend the closest neighborhood school due to overcrowded conditions and, in fact, may attend school across town. You should also be aware that there are no school buses for regular student transportation from home to school. The Governing Board wishes to also inform you that conditions imposed upon new development within the City of Carlsbad requires mitigation of school impacts. Sincerely, H. Blair istant Superintendent, Business Services Developer MEMORANDUM DATE SENT: 19 May 2001 TO: Skip Hammann Sherri Howard Christer Westman Dale Greenhalgh Sandy Maule Greg Ponce MESSAGE FROM: Tom Delaney SUBJECT: Cannon Road construction meeting of 5.15.2001 I have the following notes from Tuesday's meeting: Kelly Land Company consultants presented a series of exhibits demonstrating the biological, geotechnical, and design constraints associated with the construction of Cannon Road. Biological: KLC consultants pointed out several slivers of habitat on the lagoon side and the Kelly core side of Cannon Road for which KLC is unaware of existing or pending biological permits. Sherri Howard stated that the City was aware of these areas and has already picked up the area on the Kelly core side (at the realigned portion of Cannon Road) in their 4D permit and was working with the resource agencies for additional take on the lagoon side. Sherri also mentioned that the 4D permit had expired and that the City was working on an extension. Geotechnical: KLC consultants displayed an exhibit showing the areas of required surcharge at the south end of Reach 2 Segment 2 to accommodate future loading associated with the planned Kelly core development. This surcharge area extends into the Cannon Road right-of-way. The exhibit also showed a required surcharge area that is required due to the City's realignment of Cannon Road. Design: KLC and the City discussed the need for the Cannon Road plans to be updated to reflect 1) revised sewer piping for the relocated pump station, 2) design changes dictated by SDG&E, 3) utility revisions and intersections consistent with the Kelly core amended tentative map and final engineering plans. It was agreed that updating O'Day's plans is a critical path activity, and the City agreed to authorize O'Day to proceed with the update based on KLC's second final engineering plancheck submittal (scheduled for 5.23.2001). There was some discussion of Kelly Land Company sharing in the fee risk of having O'Day update their plans before the Kelly plans were signed. Although no specific request was made by the City, KLC consultants indicated that KLC has historically accepted their share of such risk. The same plans (second final engineering plancheck submittal) will also be sent to SDG&E in order to initiate their processing of the Joint Use Agreement and Letter of Permission to Grade. Sherri Howard stressed the need to get this process moving. KLC consultants shared their point of view that the pump station issue was also critical; the City concurred and said that Bill Plummer has a meeting scheduled for 5.17.2001 with Coastal Commission staff to discuss the City's desired new location. The City also stated that the sewer plans for Cannon Road would be updated by City engineering staff rather than O'Day. If there are any questions, corrections, or clarifications regarding these notes, please contact me at 760.804.8455 or tomdelaney@springline.org. Thank you.